Muyni
← Back to Arlington Heights

Arts Commission

Regular Meeting

Arlington Heights, IL · February 4, 2026

AgendaPacketMinutes

Minutes

AC 2/4/26 MINUTES APPROVED MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ARTS COMMISSION MEETING HELD IN THE COMMISSIONS ROOM OF THE VILLAGE HALL FEBRUARY 4, 2026 AT 6:30 P.M. Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Mary Seitz-Pagano, Arts Chair Erika Cutlip Brian Wolf Leena Joshi Carla McAleer Kate Schwarz Sara Altieri Gretchen Grassl Members Absent: Kristen Walter Also Present: Michael Lysicatos, Assistant Director of Planning and Community Development Derek Mach, Staff Liaison Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano led the Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES COMMISSIONER WOLF MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CUTLIP, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE DECEMBER 3, 2025 ARTS COMMISSION MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED. Staff Liaison Derek Mach informed the Commission he would be retiring February 12th after 26 years. He thanked the members and proud of what the Arts Commission has been able to accomplish. The new Staff Liaison will be Michael Lysicatos for the time being until a permanent staff person is assigned the role. CULTURAL ARTS AWARD Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano mentioned that the award would be presented on February 17th at the Village Board meeting. The topic of the nomination for the 2027 Cultural Arts Award was discussed, including the call for artists, renominating past recipients and timing of the solicitation. The Arts Commission discussed the issue of nomination of past recipients. The intention of the submission guidelines was to encourage renominating individuals who may not have won, not past winners. Potential solutions discussed included restricting previous winners from being nominated for a certain time period (i.e., 10-year restriction), including previous winner names in the packet for the sub-committee, allowing for the same entity but not the same person, or preferred status for individuals who have not received the award. The submission guidelines could be updated stating the preference for individual how have not received the award and the updated list would be provided to the review sub-committee in a packet or maintained in a digital form. The timing of the 2027 solicitation was also discussed. The members discussed announcing the call for artists on April 15th (World Art Day) with a last call deadline on January 31st (National Art Day). The final deliberation would ideally be done at the February Arts Commission meeting to allow staff to make the final preparations for the next available Village Board Meeting. That would allow the Commission to recognize the winner on April 15th (World Art Day) along https://vah0.sharepoint.com/sites/PlanningTeam/Shared 1 of 2 Documents/General/BOARDS_COMMISSIONS/ARTS_COMMISSION/2026/March 4, 2026/February 4, 2026 MINUTES MSP.docx AC 2/4/26 MINUTES with opening the next solicitation. The members discussed finalizing the application at the next meeting in order to prepare for the April 15th announcement. DOWNTOWN PUBLIC ART PLAN Staff Liaison Derek Mach provided an update regarding the Downtown Public Art Plan. The Arts Commission discussed possibly including a conflict-of-interest form and a disclosure addressing products designed by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Assistant Director Lysicatos discussed the Strategic Priorities set by the Village Board, which includes promoting arts, and aligning the art plan with the Business Plan which addresses how priorities will be implemented. MURAL ORDINANCE Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano inquired about the status of the Mural Ordinance. Assistant Director informed the Commission that this was a priority with the Village Manager’s office and staff would work to refine the ordinance with the sub- committee. Commissioner Wolf and Altieri udpated the members on the working document produced by the sub- committee. Drawing a distinction on the type of text that could be included in a mural would help in promoting diverse work, while limiting art that would be connected to commercial activity. Staff requested an updated ordinance through the sub-committee who would review comments from the rest of the Commission. Follow-up discussion clarfied the intent of the ordinance to govern mural art projects on private property, where the Public Art Plan would be geared towards mural projects on public property. Commissioner Wolf added that the ordinance would also need to address a waiver of rights under the federal visual artist rights act. The process of approving the application on the building will require further discussion in terms of which boards and commissions would be involved, such as the Design Commission, and roles they would play in this process. SIDEWALK CHALK ART Commissioner Cutlip discussed how the project could be coordinated with businesses and events such as Arlington Alfresco, Taste of Arlington, or sidewalk sales to allow more interaction and involvement from the public. It was recommended that the Commission could coordinate with the downtown business association on events they are planning and businesses that would participate. Members discussed project ideas including multi-generational participation. ARTWORK AT METROPOLIS Staff recommended preparing a concept when coordinating with the Metropolis on the art project. Arts Chair Seitz- Pagano mentioned coordinating with the director of the Metropolis Theater and was provided clarification that meeting to work on the project would not be considered a public meeting. NEW BUSINESS PUBLIC MEETING RULES DISCUSSION/ADOPTION COMMISSIONER SCHWARZ MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ALTIERI TO APPROVE THE PUBLIC MEETING RULES AS PRESENTED BY STAFF. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONER WOLF MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOSHI TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:50 P.M. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED. https://vah0.sharepoint.com/sites/PlanningTeam/Shared 2 of 2 Documents/General/BOARDS_COMMISSIONS/ARTS_COMMISSION/2026/March 4, 2026/February 4, 2026 MINUTES MSP.docx

Agenda

AGENDA ARTS COMMISSION Commissions Room, 2nd Floor Arlington Heights Village Hall, 33 S. Arlington Heights Rd. Arlington Heights IL 60005 February 4, 2026 6:30 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. December 3, 2025 IV. REPORTS V. OLD BUSINESS A. Cultural Arts Award B. Downtown Public Art Plan C. Mural Ordinance D. Sidewalk Chalk Art E. Artwork at Metropolis VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Public Meeting Rules Discussion/Adoption VII. OTHER BUSINESS VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT Anyone wishing to speak on a subject not on the Agenda may speak at this time. Please limit your comments to three minutes. IX. ADJOURNMENT Persons with disabilities requiring auxiliary aids or services, such as an American Sign Language interpreter or written materials in accessible formats, should contact the Health & Human Services Department, at 33 S. Arlington Heights Road, Arlington Heights, IL 60005, healthmail@vah.com or 847/368-5760.

Packet

AGENDA ARTS COMMISSION Commissions Room, 2nd Floor Arlington Heights Village Hall, 33 S. Arlington Heights Rd. Arlington Heights IL 60005 February 4, 2026 6:30 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. December 3, 2025 IV. REPORTS V. OLD BUSINESS A. Cultural Arts Award B. Downtown Public Art Plan C. Mural Ordinance D. Sidewalk Chalk Art E. Artwork at Metropolis VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Public Meeting Rules Discussion/Adoption VII. OTHER BUSINESS VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT Anyone wishing to speak on a subject not on the Agenda may speak at this time. Please limit your comments to three minutes. IX. ADJOURNMENT Persons with disabilities requiring auxiliary aids or services, such as an American Sign Language interpreter or written materials in accessible formats, should contact the Health & Human Services Department, at 33 S. Arlington Heights Road, Arlington Heights, IL 60005, healthmail@vah.com or 847/368-5760. Page 1 of 11 AC 12/3/25 MINUTES DRAFT MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ARTS COMMISSION MEETING HELD IN THE COMMISSIONS ROOM OF THE VILLAGE HALL DECEMBER 3, 2025 AT 6:30 P.M. Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Members Present: Mary Seitz-Pagano, Arts Chair Kristen Walter Erika Cutlip Brian Wolf Leena Joshi Carla McAleer Kate Schwarz Sara Altieri Members Absent: Gretchen Grassl Also Present: Derek Mach, Staff Liaison Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano led the Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES COMMISSIONER WALTER MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WOLF, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 15, 2025 ARTS COMMISSION MEETING. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED. CULTURAL ARTS AWARD Commissioner Cutlip commented that the Arts Commission received six submittals for the 2025 Cultural Arts Award. Commissioner Cutlip explained that the subcommittee graded each submittal to compare how each candidate met the criteria. Commissioner Joshi explained that the subcommittee reviewed the submittals and that they are recommending Tamaron Conseur as the winner. The Commission discussed that one of the nominations was a previous winner. Commissioner Cutlip and Joshi explained that there is nothing in the application that would prohibit someone from winning a second time. The Commission is going to evaluate the application prior to releasing again for the next award. COMMISSIONER WOLF MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MCALEER TO NOMINATE TAMARON CONSEUR FOR THE 2025 CULTURAL ARTS AWARD. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED. Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano and the Arts Commission thanked the subcommittee for their work on the 2025 Cultural Arts Award. Staff Liaison Derek Mach commented that staff will coordinate with the winner and the Village Manager’s office regarding a Village Board date for presenting the award. 1 of 2 Page 2 of 11 AC 12/3/25 MINUTES DOWNTOWN PUBLIC ART PLAN Staff Liaison Derek Mach provided an update regarding the Downtown Public Art Plan. Staff Liaison Derek Mach explained that the subcommittee provided criteria for evaluating art which has been incorporated into the draft plan. The Commission reviewed the criteria. The Commission discussed the potential locations for art and asked that Harmony Park be removed from the list. Staff Liaison Derek Mach commented that the concept that a consultant developed as part of the Vail Promenade project includes artwork along the east property line which has generated excitement. Staff Liaison Derek Mach commented that per the Commission’s request, Harmony Park will be removed from the list of potential locations for artwork. The Commission discussed that there is too much artwork in Harmony Park. The Commission discussed the south elevation of the Vail parking garage as a potential location for artwork. Staff Liaison Derek Mach recommended that the Commission form a subcommittee for the mural ordinance component. Commissioner Altieri and Commissioner Wolf volunteered for a subcommittee for the draft of the mural ordinance. SIDEWALK CHALK ART Commissioner Cutlip shared an idea for a chalk art competition. Commissioner Cutlip commented that businesses could have food and possibly a live music performance. Commissioner Walter commented that the event could be a festival and families, organizations or individuals could be assigned a square and there could be categories and themes. The Commission discussed that the festival could possibly be at the end of the summer. The Commission discussed that there could be prizes as part of the event. Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano suggested that the Commission continue to discuss a sidewalk chalk art festival at the next Arts Commission meeting. Commissioner Cutlip and Commissioner Joshi volunteered for a subcommittee. The subcommittee is going to focus on a tentative date, location and guidelines. ARTWORK AT METROPOLIS Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano explained that previously there were murals on the walls on the second floor of Metropolis. The Commission discussed creating new murals on the walls. Staff Liaison Derek Mach commented that the walls are owned by the Village and staff would need to discuss. NEW BUSINESS Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano asked if there is any new business? PUBLIC COMMENTS Arts Chair Seitz-Pagano asked if there are any public comments? ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONER WALTER MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOSHI TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:40 P.M. ALL WERE IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED. 2 of 2 Page 3 of 11 2/4/2026 Item: Public Meeting Rules Discussion/Adoption Department: Planning & Community Development Item Description: In an effort to create consistency across all the Village’s Boards and Commissions, Planning and Community Development Staff, in conjunction with the Village Attorney, have provided an informational memo regarding how to conduct the public comment portion of Board/Commission meetings (along with public hearings) in compliance with the Open Meetings Act. Staff has also included “Rules Concerning Public Comment and Participation”, which are being recommended for adoption by the Village Manager’s Office and Village Attorney. Please review both documents in preparation for discussion and adoption at this meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. AH Memo Public Comment and Public Hearings 2. AH Public Comment Rules Arts 2026 Page 4 of 11 350 North Clark Street Second Floor Chicago, Illinois 60654 312-528-5200 www.elrodfriedman.com Hart M. Passman 312.528.5193 hart.passman@elrodfriedman.com Memorandum Date: December 11, 2025 To: Village Department of Community Development From: Village Attorney Cc: Village Manager Re: Best Practices for Public Comment and Public Hearings At your request, our office has prepared this best practice guide regarding public comment and public hearings during board and commission meetings. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the legal framework governing public comment, outline recommended best practices for managing public comment time, and clarify key differences between public comment periods and public hearings. I. Public Comment and Public Meetings Section 2.06(g) of the Illinois Open Meetings Act, 5 ILCS 120/2.06(g), requires that every single public body – including all Village boards and commissions – provide time at public meetings for public comment. Further, the Illinois Public Access Counselor has interpreted Section 2.06(g) to require all public bodies to establish and record written rules for public comment at public meetings. Public comment time is intended to allow members of the public to address a public body. Accordingly, Village boards and commissions may not cancel or truncate public comment time at their public meetings. II. Establishing Rules and Best Practices Municipalities may establish time place and manner restrictions for public comment, just as they can under the First Amendment for any other public forum. A few examples of rules for public comment time are as follows: • Individual Speaker Limit: o Limit each speaker to a fixed time (e.g., three minutes), unless the Chair decides otherwise before the comment period begins. o The same time limit must apply uniformly to all speakers during public comment at that meeting. • Group Representation: 4900-1112-5109, v. 3 1 Page 5 of 11 o A speaker that is representing, or speaking on behalf of, an individual, group, or association will not be allocated additional time regardless of whether they are speaking for or on behalf of multiple people. o A speaker may not yield time to another speaker. • Overall Time Limit: Some local governments have established a total maximum time for public comment (e.g., 30 minutes), unless extended by the Chair prior to the start of the comment period. If adopted, such a rule should include clear parameters for selection of the commenters at each meeting (and those parameters must be agnostic as to the substance of the comments). While the First Amendment protects a wide range of speech, a local government may restrict speech and conduct in certain circumstances. Specifically: • Speakers may not engage in conduct or speech that is threatening, incites violence, or is obscene. • Speakers may not engage in disorderly conduct that disrupts the meeting (and speakers and attendees alike should be discouraged from clapping, cheering, or booing). • The public body may prohibit public comment that is not related to the public body’s jurisdiction or purpose. • The Chair may interrupt or limit a speaker’s comments to enforce the adopted rules. • The Chair may require a speaker who violates the rules to end their remarks or leave the meeting. Public comment time is not intended to be a forum for open dialogue or engagement. Neither the Chair, nor any member of the commission or of Village Staff, is under any obligation to respond to any public comment, or engage with any speaker, during the public meeting. Indeed, as a general rule, we discourage debate or back-and-forth exchanges with speakers during a public meeting. To debate in public allows the commenter to hijack the meeting, and also denies the Village the opportunity for more careful, planned dialogue of sensitive issues. However, the Chair may direct Village Staff to respond to questions or issues raised in a public comment at an appropriate time after the meeting. It is generally advisable for public bodies to adopt rules for public comment. At your direction, we can prepare form rules for consideration. III. Public Hearings In contrast to general public comment time, public hearings are formal proceedings, often required by statute or ordinance, focused on a specific matter, such as a zoning application or development proposal. Key distinctions that differentiate public hearings from public comment are as follows • Testimony during a public hearing is given under oath. • Participants may be examined or questioned by the Plan Commission, staff, or others present. • A public hearing record is legally significant and forms part of the evidentiary basis for the Plan Commission’s decision. • Whereas public comment time can be used for discussion of any topic germane to the public body, testimony during a public hearing must be restricted to the subject of that hearing. 4900-1112-5109, v. 3 2 Page 6 of 11 • Whereas a public body can decide when, during a meeting, it will entertain public comment – and can refuse to entertain public comment at all other times – the body must allow public testimony during the hearing itself, as part of the hearing. • Whereas public bodies should get a uniform time limit for speakers during public comment, and should extend the same uniformity requirement to the general public that offers testimony during a formal hearing, public bodies should not limit the applicant to that time limit. This is because the applicant for relief bears the burden of persuasion, and therefore should be afforded the full time needed to present its case. The rules and best practices set forth above for public comment time should also be applied during a public hearing. Most importantly, the public body should provide the same amount of time to each speaker during a public hearing. IV. Summary of Recommendations • Provide public comment at all board and commission meetings. • Set a time limit for each public commenter, and apply it uniformly. • As a general rule, refrain from responding to or debating public commenters. • Adopt rules to govern public comment. 4900-1112-5109, v. 3 3 Page 7 of 11 Rules Concerning Public Comment and Participation Arts Commission ___________________________________________________________ Overview 1. Authority These rules concerning public comment and participation (“Rules”) are adopted pursuant to Section 2.06 (g) of the Illinois Open Meetings Act (“OMA”), and are intended to provide an opportunity for members of the public to address public officials during a public meeting (“Public Comment Time”). 2. Applicability These Rules apply to meetings of the Arts Commission (“Public Body”). These Rules supersede any rules governing public comment at public meetings previously adopted by the applicable Public Body. These Rules are not intended to govern “public hearings” of the Public Body. 3. Intent a. Public Comment Time is intended to allow members of the public to address the Public Body on a topic that is germane to matters within the specific purview and jurisdiction of the Public Body. b. Unlike a “public hearing,” at which testimony is presented under oath and may be subject to examination by, and dialogue with, public officials and others in attendance, Public Comment Time is strictly limited to comments made by a speaker to the Public Body. Public Comment Time is not intended to be a forum for open dialogue or engagement. The Public Body is under no obligation to respond to any public comment, or engage with any speaker, during the public meeting. The Chair may direct Village staff to respond to questions or issues raised in a public comment at an appropriate time after the public meeting. 1 4909-7531-2519, v. 1 Page 8 of 11 Governing Rules 1. Public Comment Required a. Except as expressly provided in these Rules, the agenda of every regular and special meeting of the Public Body must include a reservation of time during the meeting for Public Comment Time. b. Subject to these Rules, the Chair will recognize any person desiring to speak during Public Comment Time. c. Public Comment Time is reserved for comments on matters that are not the subject of a specific agenda item at the same meeting. If a person desires to speak during Public Comment Time about a matter that is the subject of a specific agenda item at the same meeting, public comment will be allowed at the discretion of the Chair during that agenda item. If no public comment will be allowed during the specific agenda item, then the person must be allowed to speak about the matter during Public Comment Time, subject to these Rules. d. Unless the meeting is a remote meeting in accordance with the provisions of the OMA, any person desiring to make a public comment must do so in person at the location at which the public meeting is taking place. As provided in Section B.6 of these Rules, written comments may be submitted to the Public Body, but written comments will not be read aloud during Public Comment Time. 2. Time Allotted a. No speaker may speak during the Public Comment Time for more than three minutes, unless the Chair designates a longer time period for that meeting, which designation must occur prior to the commencement of Public Comment Time on the agenda and must be applicable to all persons making comments during Public Comment Time at that public meeting. b. A speaker that is representing, or speaking on behalf of, an individual, group, or association will not be allocated additional time regardless of whether they are speaking for or on behalf of multiple people. c. A speaker may not yield time to another speaker. 3. Speaker Guidelines and Requirements a. Each speaker must state and spell their name in a clear manner so that it can be recorded in the minutes of the meeting. 2 4909-7531-2519, v. 1 Page 9 of 11 b. Speakers will not be required to state their home address; however, the Chair may ask the speaker to state whether or not they are a resident of the Village. c. If a speaker is representing, or speaking on behalf of, an individual, group, or association, the speaker must disclose that representation. d. In the interest of promoting the efficient conduct of public business, speakers should refrain from repeating their own comments and comments that have previously been provided to the Public Body by other speakers. e. All public comments must be directed to the Chair and the members of the Public Body, and not to any member of the audience or Village staff. f. All speakers should be respectful of the Public Body and the audience members, and should be courteous, polite, and civil. g. No speaker may engage in conduct or speech that is imminently threatening to any person, that incites violence, or that is obscene. h. No speaker may engage in conduct that is disorderly and that disrupts or interferes with the ability of the Public Body to conduct the public meeting. 4. Public Comment Procedure a. All persons intending to speak during Public Comment Time must sign up on the Village’s written sign-up form supplied in the meeting room, and deliver that form to the Chair prior to the commencement of Public Comment Time on the agenda. b. The speaker must speak only from the specific location in the public meeting room designated by the Chair. 5. Enforcement by the Chair a. The Chair has the authority and the direction to strictly enforce these Rules, and to do so in a fair and consistent manner. b. The Chair may interrupt a speaker in order to enforce these Rules, and may limit the comments or take the floor from any speaker who the Chair determines is violating these Rules. c. Any person that the Chair determines is violating any of these Rules may be required to terminate their comments and vacate the podium or be subject to other action as deemed necessary by the Chair. Additionally, the Chair or a majority of the members of the Public Body may require that person to leave the premises of the meeting. 3 4909-7531-2519, v. 1 Page 10 of 11 6. Written Submissions a. Any person has the right to provide written comments to the Public Body by addressing those comments to: Arts Commission 33 S Arlington Heights Rd. Village of Arlington Heights, IL 60005 -or- Arts Commission Planningmail@vah.com and delivering the comments via any of the following methods: i. by personal delivery at the front desk of Planning and Community Development between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; ii. by mail, courier, or any similar delivery service; or iii. by email to planningmail@vah.com. b. All written submissions received for the Public Body will be provided to the members of the Public Body. The Chair may, in the Chair’s sole discretion, elect to read aloud any written comment received by the Public Body during a Public Comment Time of a public meeting, but has no obligation to do so. 4 4909-7531-2519, v. 1 Page 11 of 11