City Council
Regular MeetingDeKalb, IL · October 28, 2019
Minutes
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
OCTOBER 28, 2019
The City Council of DeKalb, Illinois held a Committee of the Whole meeting on October
28, 2019, in the City Council Chambers of the DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South
Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois.
A. Call to Order and Roll Call
Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 5 p.m.
City Clerk Lynn Fazekas called the roll, and the following members of City Council were
present: Alderman Carolyn Morris, Alderman Bill Finucane, Alderman Tracy Smith,
Alderman Scott McAdams, Alderman Mike Verbic, Alderman Tony Faivre, and Mayor
Jerry Smith.
Staff present included: City Manager Bill Nicklas, Assistant City Manager Ray Munch, and
City Attorney John Donahue.
B. Approval of the Agenda
Mayor Smith asked whether Council had additions or deletions. None were offered.
MOTION
Alderman Smith moved to approve the agenda. Alderman Faivre seconded.
VOTE
Motion carried 7-0 on roll call vote. Aye: Morris, Finucane, Smith, McAdams, Verbic,
Faivre, Mayor Smith. Nay: none.
C. Public Participation
Dewayne Brown commented on the Finance Advisory Committee’s recommendations for
property taxes and fuel taxes. Mr. Brown said he’s against raising the property taxes, fuel
taxes, and sales taxes, and says increases will prevent us from being competitive.
D. Considerations
1. Consideration of the Annual Property Tax Levy in the City of DeKalb.
Council was presented with 4 options for the levy on paper, specifically:
DeKalb Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2019
Page 2 of 2
• “Option 1” is to capture the full growth in equalized assessed value (EAV) and
recapture of EAV from Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 2.
• “Option 2” is to capture 2% of EAV growth, all new construction EAV, and to
recapture TIF 2 EAV.
• “Option 3” is to capture new construction EAV growth and to recapture TIF 2 EAV.
• “Option 4” is to levy to cover the full required contribution amounts of the pensions.
Informed that the Finance Advisory Committee (FAC) recommendation and staff
recommendation is “Option 2,” Council centered consideration on this option.
Comments included the observation that the City’s tax rate should fall with this option.
Mayor Smith declared a consensus that Council supports proceeding with the
recommended “Option 2” at this point, and no Council member expressed an objection.
2. Capital Funding Sources.
Council was asked to consider a recommendation to raise the local (home rule) gasoline
tax to assist in attacking a backlog in maintenance of streets.
There was discussion of new technologies to seal and extend the life of roads, and it was
confirmed that the gasoline tax could not be used for other capital needs.
Mayor Smith asked Council whether this tax is the best option for streets maintenance
and was met with no objection.
E. Adjournment
MOTION
Alderman Finucane moved to adjourn the Committee of the Whole at 5:35 p.m. Alderman
Faivre seconded.
VOTE
Motion carried on majority voice vote. Mayor Smith declared adjournment at 5:35 p.m.
_____________________________________
LYNN A. FAZEKAS, City Clerk
Passed by City Council: November 12, 2019.
Agenda
DEKALB CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 28, 2019
DeKalb Municipal Building
City Council Chambers
Second Floor
200 S. Fourth Street
DeKalb, Illinois 60115
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
5:00 P.M.
A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
D. CONSIDERATIONS
1. Consideration of the Annual Property Tax Levy in the City of DeKalb.
City Manager Summary: By the end of the calendar year, the City Council must
annually adopt a property tax levy. The combined property tax rate for taxes
collected in 2018 and paid in 2019 by residences and businesses located in
DeKalb Township was $11.86 per $100 EAV. The following table breaks down
that rate across the 10 local taxing bodies receiving operating revenue from
property taxes:
Taxing Body Tax Rate
City of DeKalb 1.188330
County of DeKalb 1.095070
DeKalb Library 0.208090
DeKalb Park District 0.736640
DeKalb Road & Bridge District 0.196090
DeKalb Township 0.168330
Forest Preserve District 0.076560
Kishwaukee College 0.668340
Kishwaukee Water Reclamation District 0.137540
DeKalb CUSD No. 428 7.385370
Total 11.860360
The City of DeKalb has historically used the monies raised through property
taxes to fund debt service, pension obligations, and general operations. In
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 2 of 9
recent years, all of the local property taxes received by the City of DeKalb have
been used to meet the City’s Police and Fire pension obligations. In fact, in
2019, the City’s Police and Fire pension obligations, as determined by an
independent actuary, exceeded the City’s property tax levy so other general
revenues (e.g. sales and use taxes) had to be dedicated to meeting these
obligations. The City did not levy for its other pension obligations (FICA and
IMRF) and abated its levy for bonded debt service, except the portion
associated with the Library debt.
Calculating the Property Tax Levy and Rate
The starting point for each levy discussion is our estimate of the City’s
“equalized assessed valuation” (EAV) for the coming year – in this case, 2020.
In Illinois, the EAV is one-third of the full assessed valuation of real property
(versus personal property).
The City’s final rate setting EAV in 2019 was $547,947,687. The 2018 City
levy collected in 2019 ($6,510,857), divided by the rate setting EAV, set
the tax rate (1.188330). From the taxpayers’ point of view, the rate is the
key. Presuming their property’s EAV remains constant, the rate will
determine whether they pay more, less, or the same taxes in the new year.
At this time every year, the County Supervisor of Assessments completes a
preliminary estimate of the EAV for properties in DeKalb Township and portions
of other townships that overlap DeKalb’s corporate limits (e.g. Sycamore, Afton,
Cortland). This estimate takes into account such variables as the value of
homestead and senior exemptions, and any equalizing multiplier established
to maintain uniform assessments across all township districts. The preliminary
EAV estimate also has to account for TIF district status, and Board of Review
actions following appeals arising from re-assessment notices mailed each fall.
The final rate-setting EAV is not set until the late winter of the following year,
so it is prudent for taxing bodies aiming for a certain rate to set their levies
cautiously.
After consultation with the office of the County Supervisor of Assessments, our
estimate of DeKalb’s rate-setting EAV for 2020 is $592,785,395. This
estimate takes into account the recapture of “frozen” EAV totals in TIF #2 and
the recovery of EAV from TIF #1 parcels that become TIF #3 parcels in 2020.
Levy Options
The principal goal of the City’s Five-Year Financial Plan (2018-2022) was the
“stabilization” of the General Fund. This involved the following principal
assumptions:
holding the Municipal tax rate under 1.5%; and
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 3 of 9
raising the General Fund Balance to a threshold at or above 25% of annual
GF expenditures and sustaining that level of reserve funds.
The City staff’s recommended levy option proposes a targeted, level City
tax rate of 1.1403% based on an estimated 2019 rate-setting EAV of
$592,785,395 and a City levy of $6,759,723. The 2019 City levy option
proposed was recommended by the Finance Advisory Committee by a
vote of 5-1 on October 21 and is detailed below:
Option #2 Capture 2.0% of EAV Growth (CPI), All New Construction, and Recapture TIF #2 EAV
2017 2018 2019 $ %
Extended Levy Extended Levy Proposed Levy Difference Difference
#001 - Corporate - - - -
#003 - Bonds & Interest 493,032 494,117 490,075 (4,042) -0.820%
#005 - IMRF - - - -
#013 - Firefighter Pension 3,225,814 3,220,117 3,322,914 102,797 3.187%
#015 - Police Pension 2,778,807 2,796,623 2,946,735 150,112 5.402%
Total Corporate Levy 6,497,653 6,510,857 6,759,724 248,867 3.830%
Library 2,050,725 2,132,754 2,265,717 132,963 6.484%
#060 - SSA #3 1,000 1,000 1,000 -
#061 - SSA #4 5,501 5,501 5,501 -
#201 - SSA #6 15,765 16,400 16,400 - 0.000%
#209 - SSA #14 2,500 2,500 2,500 - 0.000%
SSA #28 - - 8,704 8,704
Total with Bond Debt 8,573,145 8,669,012 9,050,841 381,829 4.454%
Total w/o Bond Debt 8,080,113 8,174,895 8,560,766 385,871 4.776%
Abatements 4,211,725 4,194,333 4,998,314 803,981 19.089%
Total with Abatements 12,784,870 12,863,345 14,049,155 1,185,810 9.275%
2019 % New Growth – 2019 %
2018 Actual EAV Estimated EAV Change TIF Recovery Estimated EAV Change
547,947,687 572,865,507 4.55% 19,919,888 592,785,395 8.18%
2.0% of EAV Growth 498,356.40
New Construction EAV 526,098
2018 Actual Rate 1.1882%
2019 Actual Levy - Opt #2 6,759,723
2019 Actual Rate - Opt #2 1.1403%
The recommended Levy Option has the following features:
it captures new construction and 2% of new EAV growth;
it reflects the recapture of TIF #2 EAV, plus the recapture associated with the
ascendance of TIF #3 on TIF #1 parcels; and
it provides a cushion to ensure that last year’s tax rate of 1.1882% is not
exceeded when appeals are registered against the rate-setting EAV this fall
and winter.
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 4 of 9
The recommended option and three other options (see attached) are presented
to the City Council for review and a recommendation, to assist staff in the final
preparation of the proposed FY2020 City Budget for Council review in several
weeks.
General Fund Balance
The 2019 Levy has to be considered in connection with the other key
objective in the Council’s Financial Plan: raising the General Fund
Balance to a threshold at or above 25% of annual General Fund
expenditures, and sustaining that level of reserve funds.
Here is where we stand:
With the adoption of the FY2019 Budget on December 18, 2018, a fund balance
shortfall of $931,158 versus the 25% threshold of $9,238,043 was projected by
FY2019 year-end (or a threshold of 22.28%). Management staffing reductions
in February 2019 promised about a $1.1 million in annualized savings.
However, in terms of closing the gap in the reserve balance for the General
Fund, almost $213,000 of the salaries of the seven positions came from other
City funds, and the seven non-bargaining positions all carried substantial
accrued leave balances that were fully paid at the time of separation. The net
savings in 2019 was therefore closer to $580,000.
As a result of the management layoffs, constrained departmental spending, and
other savings, the year-end FY2019 General Fund balance should be
$9,111,850 or $1,708,993 higher than the actual year-end balance
($7,402,857) in December 2018. As a result, on December 31, 2019 the
estimated reserve balance will be 25.17% of annual expenditures. In order
to put a floor under this progress, City staff strongly recommend a 2019 levy
(Option #2) that does not raise the City tax rate, but does raise as much new
property tax revenue as possible to meet a substantial portion of our fiduciary
obligations. Even a combined Fire and Police pension levy of $6,269,649 will
not entirely cover our statutory Police and Fire pension obligations ($7,397,938)
and the balance will need to be covered by other General Fund revenues, as
shown in the table below:
2019 Actuarial 2019 Levy Option #2 Difference * % Difference
Fire Pension $3,920,907 $3,322,914 $597,993 15.25%
Police Pension $3,477,031 $2,946,735 $530,296 15.25%
Total $7,397,938 $6,269,649 $1,128,289 15.25%
*To be paid from other General Fund revenues
Additionally, the recommended levy option will not cover our projected
FICA ($539,353) and IMRF ($647,050) obligations. It goes without saying
that no property tax revenues will be available for general operations with
this option.
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 5 of 9
Pending Changes in the Pension Funding Landscape
Several key factors impact the annual pension calculations:
the actuarial cost method which determines the actuarial accrued liabilities.
The Illinois Pension Code uses a closed amortization period that relies on an
arbitrary date – 2040 – as the point in time when all funds must be 100%
funded. This builds in increasing levels of contribution and volatility as the end
of the amortization period approaches.
The fact that there are more than 650 Police and Fire investment funds that
are individually managed with varying success, with an estimated shortfall of
as much as 200 basis points (2%) per year in investment returns.
A breakthrough occurred on October 10 when the Governor’s Pension
Consolidation Feasibility Task Force, in conjunction with the Illinois Municipal
League, presented its report. The Legislature meets later this month in veto
session and may act on the Task Force recommendations, which include the
mandatory consolidation of the 650 Fire and Police Funds into two separate
statewide funds operating much like the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
(IMRF), which currently has a funding level of 90%. The two statewide funds
would handle the resulting investment pools through equal labor/management
governing boards. The 650 pension groups would retain decision-making over
the award of pensions. This will greatly reduce the annual costs of financial
management with the consolidation of the investing, auditing and actuary
services into the two statewide funds.
Reform of the actuarial cost method will be a next step and will not likely be
considered by the Legislature until the regular session in the spring of 2020.
This means the City will need to absorb significant pension funding increases
for another fiscal year. Nevertheless, encouraging collaboration involving the
Associated Firefighters of Illinois, the Illinois Municipal League, and leaders on
both sides of the state legislative aisles is evolving on the pension question.
(Click here for further information)
2. Capital Funding Sources.
City Manager Summary: As the Finance Advisory Committee (FAC) discussed
on October 21, the 2018 Five-Year Financial Plan also provides a detailed
“Streets and Fleet” analysis, which is to be reviewed each year by the City
Council. Expected service levels and asset inventories have changed little
since 2018 because new or alternative capital and infrastructure funding
sources have not been approved.
The following analysis was offered to the FAC and Council at the joint session
on August 16, and to the FAC on October 21. The detailed assessment and
revenue options outlined in that joint meeting remain valid.
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 6 of 9
In order to proceed with reliable Budget assumptions for capital spending
in 2020, a Council recommendation is requested regarding several
options for a new, dedicated capital revenue stream in 2020. The
following analysis is divided into “Streets” and “Fleet.”
Streets
The winter of 2018-2019 had a particularly harsh impact on our local roads
because the average daytime temperature often hovered in the “freeze-thaw”
range. The resulting explosion of potholes exacerbated the failing condition of
streets around the City and accelerated the cracking at pavement joints and
along gutter lines of streets in fair or good condition. The street inventory and
pavement condition assessment in the 2018-2022 Financial Plan will be
updated, but it is a safe assumption that many asphalt streets slipped in their
pavement condition index (PCI) rating. The total funds allocated for road
repair and re-surfacing in FY2019 was $1,707,421. The sources and uses
are portrayed in the table below:
MFT Funds CDBG Funds
N. First St. $715,341 $0
Tilton Park, Wineberry & Manning $552,080 $0
Harvey/Tyler $0 $440,000
Patching $0 $0
Total $1,267,421 $440,000
The budgeted City MFT revenue in FY2019 was $1,161,757, which also funded
salt purchases ($100,000) and annual electrical charges for streetlights
($450,000), so the MFT reserve had to be tapped to take advantage of
aggressive pricing by the prime paving contractor on N. First Street.
The City owns and maintains about 130 centerline miles of roads, of which
74.8% (97.3 miles) are residential streets. As of January 2019, approximately
25 miles of DeKalb roads (mostly residential) needed immediate maintenance
to prevent rapid degradation. In 2019, a total of only 2.75 centerline miles
received such maintenance. At this pace, the road mileage needing urgent
maintenance is growing much faster than the funds available to maintain good
or very good pavement ratings (i.e. a PCI rating above 70). The average street
maintenance expenditures required to keep pace total about $3.7 million
per year.
It is expected that the recent 19 cent increase in the State motor fuel tax will
generate about $500,000 in additional MFT revenue for the City in FY2020, for
a total budget of about $1.6 million.
The following MFT projects are tentatively planned for 2020, pending Council
approval:
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 7 of 9
a) State MFT (Fund 210):
Twombly Road from Edens Garden to Annie Glidden. DeKalb share:
$750,000; DeKalb Township share: about $300,000. DeKalb County will
do the design engineering at no cost to the City.
Salt. $100,000.
Electricity for Street Lights. $450,000.
b) Local MFT (Fund 400):
N. Seventh Street from Lincoln Highway to Sycamore Road, $350,000.
N. Thirteenth Street, estimated $200,000.
N. Fourteenth Street, estimated $200,000.
Macom Drive, estimated $100,000 for aggressive crack-filling and some
Class D patching.
Total: $2,150,000
Fleet
The City’s fleet of Fire, Police, Public Works and other vehicles totals about 170
units of widely varying description and function. The average age of the overall
fleet increased from 5.7 years to 11 years between 2006 and 2017. This trend is
a consequence of allowing vehicles to age beyond their useful life before
replacing them, due to a lack of replacement funding. In 2018, it was estimated
that more than one-half of the overall fleet was beyond its useful life. The total
fleet’s replacement value is now over $12 million and the annual maintenance
cost on that fleet is now over $300,000. Replacing the vehicles rated in
declining or critical condition would cost approximately $4.3 million.
The preliminary vehicle replacement list for FY2020 includes the following on the
“retirement” list:
Police: Replace three squad cars with three Ford Explorer Utility Squad Cars
at $55,000 each or $165,000.
Fire: Replace International Navistar ambulance at $150,000 and replace Pierce
Saber Engine (#4) at $550,000.
Public Works (non-Water Fund): Replace 2011 Sterling Dump Truck at
$150,000; replace 2001 Ford 4x4 one-ton truck at $70,000; replace 2009 Toro
52” riding mower at $11,000; replace 1998 Chevy 4x4 pickup at $40,000; Misc.
Equipment = $20,000.
Total: $1,156,000
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 8 of 9
Funding Needs. The table below projects the sources and uses for urgent
capital spending in FY2020:
Needed Annual FY20 Funding
Capital Spending+ Available Gap
MFT (210)*
Roads/Eng 1,420,000 1,420,000
Electricity 425,000 425,000
Salt 125,000 125,000
Total $ 1,970,000 $ 1,970,000 $ (0.00)
CDBG (280)**
Infrastructure -
Total $ - $ - $ -
Capital Projects (400)***
Roads/Alleys 2,280,000 1,325,000 (955,000)
Facilities 500,000 310,000 (190,000)
Total $ 2,780,000 $ 1,635,000 $ (1,145,000)
Capital Equipment (420)****
Vehicles/Equip. 1,075,000 1,156,000 +81,000
Total 1,075,000 1,156,000 +81,000)
Total All Funds $ 5,825,000 $ 3,372,245 $ (2,452,755)
+Street maintenance: $3.7 million per year.
+Vehicles in critical condition: $4.3 million. Because it is unrealistic to hope to replace all of these declining vehicles at
once, a 4-year accelerated replacement initiative is proposed. This does not keep pace with annual depreciation but
does aggressively reduce the backlog.
* Motor Fuel Tax: Funded by State MFT funds. Annual amount increased by about $500,000 due to state MFT increase.
Includes $670,000 in engineering fees for all City projects in FY2020.
** Community Development Block Grant: $440,000 was spent on infrastructure in low-to-moderate income
neighborhoods in FY2019. This was a one-time shift in accumulated CDBG funds from other annual eligible uses such
as housing rehabilitation in neighborhoods with a high percentage of low-to-moderate income families.
*** Capital Project Fund: Funded by Local Motor Fuel Tax of $0.04/gallon ($695,000 in FY19). Another $0.015 per gallon
goes to Airport Fund ($260,000 in FY19).
**** Capital Equipment Replacement Fund: Funded by various small revenues, such as cell tower leases, a
reimbursement tied to a sales tax IGA, and a portion of Police fine revenues.
The budgeted expenditures in the table, above, attack the longer list of degraded
streets and alleys that would fill out the $3.7 million in annual street maintenance
spending needed to hold our own. It also reduces the list of aging vehicles and
equipment in critical condition, presently valued at about $4.3 million.
Funding Options. Some capital funding options to partially close the funding
“gap” in road repairs and fleet replacements are offered below:
Property tax rate increase. The City Council and City Manager share a very
strong consensus behind a level City tax rate.
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.
Committee of the Whole Meeting
October 28, 2019
Page 9 of 9
Home Rule Sales Tax Increase. The current rate – 1.75% – ranks second
highest among the comparable cities established by the Sikich accounting firm
in the City’s Five-Year Financial Plan (2018). Carpentersville has a home rule
tax rate of 2.00%. A .25% rate hike would produce about $963,411 in new
revenue that could be dedicated exclusively to street improvements. With
a .25% hike, the total tax on a meal from a local restaurant would be 10.25
cents on the dollar.
Local Fuel Tax Increase. The current rate of 5.5 cents per gallon is split
between roads (4 cents) and airport expenses (1.5 cents). In 2019 they are
expected to raise $695,000 and $260,000, respectively. The dollars can be
spent on any capital item. The table above shows a part of the FY2020 local
fuel tax revenue dedicated to the fulfillment of the Barb City Manor agreement
in 2020, which calls for an annual allocation of $50,000 plus whatever spending
is associated with the “carryover” the Council approved on June 24. Most of
that carryover will not be spent in 2019 and cannot be spent from TIF funds in
2020. For every two-cent increase, the local fuel tax produces an
estimated $345,000 in revenue.
The proposed FY2020 Budget that the Council will review in mid-November will
include a four-cent local fuel tax increase of approximately $690,000. This
proposed increase would cut the FY2020 funding gap ($2,452,755) by 28%.
At their meeting on October 21, the FAC failed to recommend a Capital
funding option. City Council direction is requested so the FY2020 Budget
provisions for Streets and Fleet allocations can be better defined prior to
public review.
E. ADJOURNMENT
FULL AGENDA PACKET
Assistive services available upon request.
Hearing assistance devices are available in the Information & Technology
Office, which is located to the right, just before entering Council Chambers.