Muyni
← Back to DeKalb

Landmark Commission

Regular Meeting

DeKalb, IL · May 18, 2017

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

DeKalb Municipal Building Glidden Conference Room 200 S. Fourth St., 2nd Floor DeKalb, IL 60115 MINUTES LANDMARK COMMISSION May 18, 2017 7:00 PM Chairman Gable called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. A. ROLL CALL The following members of the Landmark Commission were present: Donna Gable, Amanda Durik, Robert Glover, and Donna Schultz Xidis. Elizabeth Wirsing joined the meeting at 7:05 PM. Members absent were Don Whitmore and Pam Collins. City staff present was Community Development Director Jo Ellen Charlton. Also present were Lakota Group representatives Nick Kalogeresis and Cade Sterling. B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA – ADDITIONS / DELETIONS Chair Gable requested an amendment to add under New Business “Discussion of Landmark Commission Chair position.” A. Durik moved to approve the agenda as amended, R. Glover seconded the motion, and all approved by voice vote. C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION None. D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – ADDITIONS / DELETIONS 1. October 12, 2016 R. Glover motioned to approve the minutes as presented, A. Durik seconded the motion, and all approved by voice vote. E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation – Draft Report regarding the Central Business District property survey, possible historic district designation, historic preservation project recommendations, and design guideline recommendations. Nick Kalogeresis and Cade Sterling presented on behalf of the Lakota Group. Mr. Kalogeresis noted that Doug Gilbert helped prepare the draft but was not available to attend this meeting. Landmark Commission May 18, 2017 Page 2 of 6 He reported upon the onsite survey, conducted last fall and completed before Christmas. He stated that since December, Lakota staff has been conducting background research on the properties using a variety of resources. He noted they are working on adding missing data to the property survey forms and anticipated the final report would be ready to present in one month. Mr. Kalogeresis reported that the survey forms, photos, map can be view online at http://downtowndekalbsurvey.com/. He stated that the website includes a color- coded map that categorizes contributing and non-contributing properties, based upon architectural elements that qualify them for possible neighborhood nomination to the National Historic Register. He noted that the majority of contributing properties are west of the railroad tracks, except for the old Fargo theater building, and to the north and south of the railroad tracks a few residential properties might qualify as well. He reported that the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency (IHPA) has received copies of the survey forms for feedback, but a response has not yet been received. He said the IHPA can help decide whether applying for a smaller, more concentrated historic district is more likely to succeed or if a larger district with breaks due to the presence of non-contributing properties would be more likely to succeed. He noted a variety of architectural styles exist in in the area west of the railroad tracks, which would should help that area qualify. He demonstrated how to use the website’s interactive map and property survey forms and distributed copies of the draft report. He said that staff at the Sycamore Library Local History Room and NIU Regional History Center were very helpful. He summarized the sections of the draft report, which he noted includes discussions of the multiple architectural forms and styles in the downtown area. Director Charlton asked if the survey was performed from the sidewalk level. Mr. Kalogeresis confirmed that was the method. J. Charlton reported that property owners have recently submitted building permits for roofing work and discovered upper level façade damage that would not be noticeable from below. She asked how to address these issues when they arise at that point. Mr. Kalogeresis responded that it is difficult. He added that most of the Queen Anne style buildings appear to be well maintained from the exterior. Mr. Kalogeresis stated that the Egyptian Theatre and Haish Memorial Library are already listed on the National Register of Historic Places. He reported that four additional buildings could be eligible for individual listing on the National Register, including the Drs. Smith building (263 East Lincoln Highway, currently The House) and the McCabe’s building (323 East Lincoln Highway). In addition, they identified 16 other buildings that may be appropriate for local landmark designation if property owners are interested. Landmark Commission May 18, 2017 Page 3 of 6 He reported that a total of 136 properties were inventoried. He stated that he would furnish an electronic copy of the draft report. He invited the Commission to comment upon the draft report and the property forms, ask questions, and provide any additional information they may have. He said additional historical data still must be added, including former businesses and property owners. He added that a context statement will also be crafted. Mr. Kalogeresis reported he was unable to locate a downtown building inventory he believed occurred in the late ‘80s/early ‘90s. Chair Donna Gable stated that the survey was performed by Commission members. She recalled that the inventory forms had black-and-white photographs attached, which were placed in black binders and stored in City Hall. She reported that a set was also submitted to the IHPA. Mr. Kalogeresis stated he spoke with Darius Bryjka at the IHPA, and he told him the IHPA did not have the documents. Chair Gable recalled visiting the IHPA in the early 2000s and viewing the documents there. Mr. Kalogeresis stated he contact the IHPA again to request further searching. Director Charlton stated she would also search City Hall. Mr. Kalogeresis stated that the survey documents are important because they help fill in the gap between the present and the era just after World War II, which is the most recent period found in their research. Director Charlton added that Fire Station 1, located at Seventh and Pine Streets, has some interesting old photographs on display that could be useful. Mr. Kalogeresis reported that his team has not yet begun developing Design Guidelines. He requested clarification and guidance for this portion of the project. He recommended removing the current Design Guidelines document in its entirety from the Municipal Code and inserting a reference instead, the arrangement many other communities use, so that minor edits to the Design Guidelines would not prompt an amendment to the Municipal Code. Director Charlton stated she would provide the current Design Guidelines to Lakota Group as a starting point for developing the new guidelines. Mr. Kalogeresis reported little progress has been made to identify historic downtown properties for potential rehab projects. He asked for assistance for identifying properties and contacting owners. He noted he met with the owners of Gordon Hardware early in the project to discuss their plans to rehab the interior and reopen the storefront. Ms. Xidis mentioned the owner of Cracker Jax expressed interest in rehabbing her building’s façade. The Commission and Mr. Kalogeresis discussed recommendations for the following: • Selecting properties for rehabilitation projects to increase the likelihood other property owners would be encourage to follow suit; • Prioritizing properties located west of the railroad tracks along Lincoln Highway; Landmark Commission May 18, 2017 Page 4 of 6 • Focusing on store-front rehabilitations and signage; • Deciding different levels of rehabilitation from minor to major; • Ensuring rehabilitation efforts last long term; and • Designating properties in significant need of repair and maintenance. Director Charlton stated that downtown property owners’ renewed interest in investing in their buildings has led to building permits for improvements. She voiced concern that staff does not have the necessary tool, Historic Property Design Guidelines, to evaluate the proposed improvements to ensure they are using historically appropriate methods and materials. Mr. Kalogeresis stated his team would provide a memo listing of properties with the most significant maintenance needs. He recommended property owners seek to improve their properties by opening previously closed storefronts to improve sidewalk appeal. He asked the Commission to review the beginning sections of the draft report and each survey form and provide comments and questions. The Commission discussed deadlines for submitting comments, revisions, and future meeting dates: • June 9th – Deadline to send comments to Director Charlton • Prior to June 23rd – Lakota’s final draft due to City • June 23rd – Agenda distributed with Commission comments on draft report • June 28th – Meeting Chair Gable recommended contacting the owners of the old Drs. Smith building for possible rehab projects, as they recently sought Landmark Commission advice on repairing or replacing the windows. Director Charlton inquired about cleaning methods to remove the mottling on the building’s façade. Mr. Kalogeresis recommended against damaging pressure washing and chemicals. He said soap and water on a brush can be both gentle and effective and were used on Chicago buildings during recent rehabs. 2. Discussion – Donna Schultz Xidis to report upon attendance at recent workshop. Prior to Ms. Xidis’ presentation, Chair Gable recalled an annual IHPA report, likely due in June, and one of the requirements for the report is training for at least one of the members. Director Charlton stated she would look into the IHPA annual report deadline and requirements. Ms. Xidis reported she attended the Illinois Association of Historic Preservation Commission (IAHPC) in Princeton on Saturday, May 6th. She distributed copies of the materials she received and her notes. Ms. Xidis summarized the topics covered in the workshop. She noted that a Facebook page called “Remembering Princeton” Landmark Commission May 18, 2017 Page 5 of 6 for Princeton residents to share personal historic photographs. A discussion followed on possible social media venues for historic photographs of DeKalb. Ms. Xidis reported upon preservation legislation updates. She stated that federal preservation tax credits are available in 40 states, but Illinois is not one of them. However, a bill has recently been proposed to provide smaller tax credits for smaller communities. She also learned that the IHPA may become part of the Department of Natural Resources, which may help with maintaining funding. She said she also learned about other communities’ design guidelines, which could be helpful in developing them for DeKalb. She noted that she included a list of resources in the notes she distributed. Chair Gable reported that she received only a week’s notice of that workshop, and a conflict in her schedule prevented her from attending. She stated she would contact the IHPA to request communications for events further in advance and with more regularity. She encouraged other Commission members to participate in similar events to learn about historic preservation in other communities. Ms. Xidis added that she learned that other communities do often separate their design guidelines from their municipal codes and provide references therein instead, as Mr. Kalogeresis recommended earlier. 3. Discussion – Landmark Commission Chair election Chair Gable reported the chair is appointed annually for a one-year term. She said she has been chair since December 2015 and was willing to remain chair, step down, or work with a co-chair. Director Charlton stated she would report at the next meeting the City’s procedure for chair appointment. Continued Discussion of Downtown Property History Director Charlton reported renewed interest in investing in downtown properties, so having design guidelines for historic properties right now is important. She reported upon Cohen Barnes’ plans for renovating the building that was formerly Moxie’s, including dividing the spaces, installing an elevator, and adding windows to the second floor façade. She stated he will be using some of the space for his own tech business and rent out the rest until his business requires more space. Chair Gable recalled that Malone’s department store occupied the building even earlier, and it had second floor windows. She recommended examining the interior to determine the locations of the old window and placing new windows similarly. Director Charlton reported that building permits have already been obtained and the windows have been cut in. Director Charlton reported upon recent discussions with downtown property owners and business owners. She noted that part of the Eduardo’s restaurant Landmark Commission May 18, 2017 Page 6 of 6 building has recently been sold. She stated that Jim Hovis, owner of old Elk’s Lodge, discussed options for his property and potential new uses of the spaces. She stated that Omar, owner of Mediterraneo, is still seeking a place to relocate his restaurant to a permanent downtown location that already has kitchen facilities. She also stated that The Forge is relocating its operation to the building next to the laundromat on North Sixth Street. F. OLD BUSINESS None. G. ANNOUNCEMENTS Chair Gable recommended scheduling more regular meetings again. The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 28, 2017, at 7:00 PM. Chair Gable provided an update upon Commissioner Pam Collins, who was not reappointed to the Commission when other members were. She said she is in contact with Ms. Collins regularly, and she enjoys receiving Commission communications but cannot attend meetings currently. Director Charlton said she would confirm when Ms. Collins’ term ended and how she could continue participating. Chair Gable proposed discussing the meeting schedule at the next meeting, so Don Whitmore may participate. The other Commissioners agreed. Chair Gable announced the Local Lore series of talks, which take place monthly, mostly at Ellwood House. She commended Commission Rob Glover who spoke on the ongoing Glidden Homestead barn archeological dig. The schedule of dates, locations, and topics can be found on the Ellwood House website. H. ADJOURNMENT A. Durik motioned to adjourn the meeting, R. Glover seconded, and all approved by voice vote. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 PM. Respectfully Submitted, Natalie Nelson, Administrative Assistant Minutes approved by the Landmark Commission on August 29, 2017.

Agenda

Glidden Conference Room 200 S. Fourth St., 2nd Floor DeKalb, IL 60115 AGENDA LANDMARK COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING May 18, 2017 A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 12, 2016 E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation by Nick Kalogeresis of the Lakota Group: Draft Report regarding the Central Business District property survey, possible historic district designation, historic preservation project recommendations, and design guideline recommendations. 2. Discussion – Donna Schultz Xidis to report upon attendance at recent workshop. F. OLD BUSINESS G. ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Future meeting dates H. ADJOURNMENT If you are unable to attend or have questions regarding this meeting, please contact Community Development Director Jo Ellen Charlton at 815-748-2371. DeKalb City Hall 200 S. Fourth St., 2nd Floor Glidden Conference Room MINUTES LANDMARK COMMISSION October 12, 2016 7:00 PM The Landmark Commission held a Meeting on October 12, 2016 in the Glidden Conference Room at the Municipal Building, located at 200 South Fourth Street in DeKalb, Illinois. Chairman Gable called the meeting to order at 7:05 PM. A. ROLL CALL The following members of the Landmark Commission were present: Donna Gable, Amanda Durik, Robert Glover, Donna Schultz Xidis, and Don Whitmore. Members absent were Elizabeth Wirsing and Pam Collins. Also present were City of DeKalb Economic Development Planner Jason Michnick and Lakota Group representatives Nick Kalogeresis and Doug Gilbert. B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA – ADDITIONS / DELETIONS A. Durik move to approve the agenda, seconded by R. Glover, and all approved by voice vote. C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION None. D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – ADDITIONS / DELETIONS September 22, 2016 – Typographical errors in the minutes were corrected: • Page 1, item B. Approval of Agenda: Revise “Schulz” to read “Schultz.” • Page 1, item E. New Business: Revise “Elwood” to read “Ellwood” in each instance. • Page 2, item 3: Revise “D. Xidis commented on it being a very interested day” to read, “D. Xidis commented on it being a very interesting day.” A. Durik motioned to approve the minutes as amended, D. Whitmore seconded, and all approved by voice vote. Landmark Commission October 12, 2016 Page 2 of 5 E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Introductions – The Lakota Group D. Gable welcomed the Lakota Group representatives: Nick Kalogeresis and Doug Gilbert. Mr. Kalogeresis, Vice President of Lakota Group, a planning and design firm based in Chicago, provided and overview of his firm’s experience and expertise. He said his firm found this project interesting because, in addition to the historic survey, there is an architectural component that involves working with property owners. Lakota Group does not have architects on staff, but they have worked closely with architect Doug Gilbert on historic preservation projects for the past several years. Mr. Gilbert provided an overview of his experience and expertise as a preservation- focused architect with his own firm based out of Oak Park. Mr. Gilbert said he was the designer for the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency’s Illinois Main Street and he has a strong history of promoting commercial revitalization. He and Mr. Kalogeresis met while working on the Illinois Main Street project. They are both Oak Park residents. 2. Define Project Work Plan and Schedule Mr. Kalogeresis expressed that the goal of the project is to establish a downtown historic district. The project timeline was distributed, starting today and completing date in April. The first activities include going out in the field as soon as possible due to the weather. They will be using iPads to document the survey, and the cold weather causes technical problems. A discussion of the next meeting between the Landmark Commission and Lakota Group took place. The evening of November 17th, which is the third Thursday of November, was proposed and agreed upon as the next meeting date. The consultants plan to begin survey work as soon as possible, and it will likely take about two weeks. Most, if not all of the survey, should be complete in time for the next Commission meeting, weather permitting. Mr. Kalogeresis stated he was unsure of how much time they would take reviewing building permit records for building changes. It was stated that City building permit record-keeping starts in the 1960s, and locating historic building permits could be a challenge due to off-site storage and records organization throughout the years. The consultants outlined in detail a tentative project timeline, including dates for drafts and revisions of the survey report and survey forms, as well as building reports. To fulfill the contract requirement to meet with up to eight property owners to plan potential projects, the consultants asked City staff to identify, or develop a process to identify, those properties and coordinate meetings with property possibly in December. The consultants have already met with one property owner. The development of design guidelines is also part of the timeline. The consultants asked Landmark Commission October 12, 2016 Page 3 of 5 for guidance from the City and the Commission regarding the depth of the design guidelines to be developed. The consultant presentation to the downtown property owners was not an event on the presented timeline, but it can be added as an event during mid-March or early April or it could be made part of a Landmark Commission meeting. J. Michnick confirmed that the business owners in downtown meet monthly, but the property owners might be more challenging to track down and contact. The City will work to invite them directly, in addition to sending out information to the general public about the presentation, in hopes they will find preserving their property’s unique characteristics an attractive investment. The consultant stated they revise the schedule to include the public information meeting. 3. Define project duties for Lakota, City staff, and Landmark Commission members The consultants referred to the handouts, including the inventory form. The consultants will perform the survey electronically, using SiteVista software, which includes a project website for public view. The consultants provided a sample project they completed in Berwyn, which included an online map with each property’s inventory form viewable as a pdf. If volunteers would like to perform background research, they can be allowed to input permit information into the website. The SiteVista licensed is included in the contract. The City must decide if they want to renew the license after the one-year period. If not renewed, the data can be exported into spreadsheets that can imported into GIS. The consultant stated that the SiteVista license start date is the date of their contract’s start. Ten hard copies of the survey report and a digital pdf file will be provided to the City, as well as the inventory forms. The City’s website will also have a link to the electronic files. The consultants will use iPads to record their findings, and those findings will be uploaded to the project website. The consultants provided overviews of sample survey forms, including an in-depth four-page survey form and a condensed two-page survey form they have used in the past in other communities. The longer form includes space for building permit information and an extensive architectural description. The shorter form is suitable for IHPD historic district nomination and appears more user-friendly to a novice. The consultants asked for guidance from the Commission for which form to use. The shorter form allows for narrative and comments areas for historic building use and other miscellaneous information. The Commission member consensus was that the shorter form will be adequate. The consultants explained that the final product’s interactive map allows users to click on an address and receive both general information and specific survey information. Other users may be given access to enter information as well, if the City desires. The consultants provided drive-through observations of the proposed survey boundaries, which will likely be larger than the National Register nomination Landmark Commission October 12, 2016 Page 4 of 5 boundaries. They recommended that the churches north of Lincoln Highway not be included in the survey because they are situated nearer residential buildings, not downtown. They noted that 1966, and soon 1967, are the latest building dates that can be considered historic. They also recommended that the industrial areas around the railroad tracks not be included in the survey. The Commission recommended that the public library be included in the survey, even though it is north of the downtown area. The consultants’ recommended area includes approximately 100 buildings. 4. Identify resources and resource people • Joiner History Room – DeKalb County records and a postcard collection are housed in the Sycamore Public Library. The hours are Tuesdays and Thursdays 10 am to 3 pm. Contact person is Sue Breese. • NIU Regional History Library – contains a large collection of photographs, including downtown photos, electronic Sanborn maps, and NIU yearbooks are available online on the niu.edu website. • DeKalb Public Library – Local history materials may be found at the DeKalb Public Library’s local history room, which has limited staff and limited hours. Historic directories are part of the library’s collection. Contact people are Teresa Iverson and Steve Bigolin. • Ellwood History – Resources related to the Ellwood House and family and the barbed wire business and factories. Some of the same materials are also available at the NIU Regional History Library. Contact person is Donna Gable. • Haish – The DeKalb Public Library, including Steve Bigolin, may have some limited resources, but much has been lost. Jeff Marshall is a Haish relative who may have some resources. • Glidden – Glidden Homestead has property abstracts for DeKalb, about 70% of them have been processed with addresses and entered into a database. Contact person is Rob Glover. • Other resources – It was believed that the City has Sanborn maps, which are very valuable resources in place of the lack of historic permit data, provided the pages have not been pasted over with updates, as was customary in the past. The consultants requested access to the Otto’s building at First Street and Lincoln Highway. Planner Michnick reported that the building is the subject of a lawsuit brought by the City which is requesting remediation due to extensive disrepair and water issue. Planner Michnick stated he would look into getting the consultants access to the building prior to the January 6th court date. Access to the interior requires protective gear due to suspected presence of mold and asbestos. Planner Michnick reported that building is still leaking due to damage in the internal drainage system. The consultants expressed interest in preserving the façade of the building if possible. A discussion took place regarding the building’s structural integrity, necessary repairs to the drainage system, and the cost for repairs. The consultants asked to review the reports the City regarding the building, and Planner Michnick Landmark Commission October 12, 2016 Page 5 of 5 stated he would provide them. Chair Gable and Commissioner Durik stated that the corner location is important to downtown, and it would be unfortunate if the building were removed. It was noted that a few residential buildings near downtown DeKalb may be included in the survey. The consultants invited the Commissioners to contact them and provide information to them. The old walking tour booklet was made available to them. The consultants stated there is no architectural style manual “bible” for commercial buildings, but the Virginia Savage McAlester’s manual is acceptable, although it addresses mostly residential buildings. The consultants also mentioned “The Buildings of Main Street,” by Richard Longstreth, which addresses building forms but not style. Determining building styles can be debatable, but the IHPA makes the final determination. Planner Michnick stated that he will be the City contact person until he tells the Commission and consultants otherwise. Chair Gable invited the consultants to contact her if she can be of assistance. The consultants also invited the Commissioners to contact them if they would like to have access and contribute to the survey database. 5. Review Draft Survey Form and Evaluation Criteria This item was covered in discussion above. 6. Discuss Historic Context Information This item was not addressed at this meeting. F. OLD BUSINESS None. G. ANNOUNCEMENTS Next meeting date: November 17, 2016 at 7:00pm. City staff was asked to look into (a) how are permits organized, (b) how far back do permit records go, and (c) what if any Sanborn maps does the City own. H. ADJOURNMENT A. Durik motioned to adjourn the meeting, D. Whitmore seconded, and all approved by voice vote. The meeting adjourned at 8:25 PM. Respectfully Submitted Jason Michnick, Economic Development Planner