Planning & Zoning Commission
Regular MeetingDeKalb, IL · April 19, 2021
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 19, 2021
Page 1 of 3
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
April 19, 2021
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on April 19, 2021, at the DeKalb
Public Library in the Yusunas Meeting Room located at 309 Oak Street, DeKalb, Illinois.
Chair Maxwell called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
Chair Maxwell stated he wanted to thank everyone for being here tonight. He
mentioned for those attending, the meeting room has been set up to meet the CDC
recommended distancing guidelines and the Executive Order from the Governor.
A. ROLL CALL
Principal Planner Dan Olson called the roll. Planning and Zoning Commission
members present were: Trixy O’Flaherty, Maria Pena-Graham, Vice Chair Bill
McMahon, and Chair Max Maxwell. Steve Becker attended the meeting remotely
by video conference. Jerry Wright was absent. Principal Planner Dan Olson was
present representing the City of DeKalb.
B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)
Chair Maxwell requested a motion to approve the April 19, 2021 agenda as
presented. Mr. Becker motioned to approve the agenda as presented. Ms.
O’Flaherty seconded the motion, and the motion was approved by unanimous
voice vote.
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. April 5, 2021 – Chair Maxwell requested a motion to approve the April 5, 2021
minutes as presented. Mr. McMahon motioned to approve the minutes as
presented. Ms. Pena-Graham seconded the motion, and the motion was
approved by unanimous voice vote.
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
None
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public Hearing – A petition by the City of DeKalb on text amendments to Article
7.06.08 of the Unified Development Ordinance to remove the requirement that
barbed wire fencing be angled towards the interior of a property, to allow
barbed wire fencing in the General Commercial and Planned Development –
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 19, 2021
Page 2 of 3
Commercial Districts, and to allow barbed wire fencing in the front yard of
commercial and industrial districts in conjunction with certain uses.
Principal Planner Dan Olson went through the staff report dated April 15, 2021.
He noted the proposed amendments are only related to barbed wire on top of
a six ft. high fence, not barbed wire in general. He stated the UDO currently
requires barbed wire to be directed towards the interior of the property. He
believes this requirement was added in order to maintain setbacks from
property lines. He advised the proposed amendment would allow barbed wire
fencing to be positioned inwards or outwards from the property.
Mr. Olson stated a quick survey through the City shows an approximately 50-
50 split between barbed wire fencing facing inwards or outwards. He advised
the outward facing fences possibly outdated the UDO or were constructed
without proper permitting. He mentioned the proposed amended language
would require outward facing barbed wire fencing to be setback two feet from
property lines. He added this amendment would not require current non-
conforming fences to be removed and reinstalled.
Mr. Olson advised the proposal would also allow barbed wire fencing in the
front yard in commercial or industrial districts in conjunction with certain uses.
He stated the UDO only allows barbed wire fencing in the side or rear yard in
industrial districts. He noted barbed wire is currently allowed in the side or rear
yards in the General Commercial District with City Council approval after a
report from the Community Development Director. He said he was unable to
find any previous cases heard by the City Council regarding barbed-wire
fences.
Mr. Olson stated certain uses have a need for barbed wire fencing not only in
the side and rear yard, but also in the front yard for security purposes. He noted
the proposal would accommodate these uses. He said electrical power
substations, transformer stations, communications facilities, publicly owned
properties, and uses requiring a secured entrance are some of the uses that
would be allowed to have barbed wire in the front yard. Mr. Olson mentioned
the proposal was initiated when Facebook required one of their sub-contractors
along Dietz Ave. to have a secured vehicle entrance with barbed wire fencing
around the perimeter.
Mr. Olson state the changes would also allow barbed wire fencing in the
General Commercial and Planned Development Commercial Districts without
Council approval. He expects the main user of barbed wire fences in the
General Commercial District would be for cell tower sites that typically need a
secured entrance.
Chair Maxwell gave the public an opportunity to speak. There was none.
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 19, 2021
Page 3 of 3
Chair Maxwell gave Commission members an opportunity to speak.
Mr. McMahon questioned why the setback for outward facing barbed wire
fencing is two feet. Mr. Olson advised with the barbed wire being angled
outwards at 45 degrees, two feet will cover the overhang and avoid having the
barbed wire from encroaching over a property line. He noted he spoke with the
Chief Building Official who also recommended the two foot setback as well.
Mr. McMahon inquired what prompted these changes. Mr. Olson advised a
Facebook sub-contractor initiated the review and proposed amendments, but
there have been other requests for barbed wire fencing as well.
Ms. O’Flaherty moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
to the City Council approval of Text Amendments to the Unified Development
Ordinance regarding barbed wire fencing as indicated in Exhibit A of the staff
report.
Ms. Pena-Graham seconded the motion.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. O’Flaherty – Yes, Mr. Becker – Yes, Ms. Pena-
Graham – Yes, Vice Chair McMahon – Yes, Chair Maxwell - Yes. Mr. Wright
was absent. Motion Passed 5-0-1.
F. REPORTS
Mr. Olson noted the next scheduled meeting, May 3rd, has no scheduled public
hearings and will most likely be cancelled. He mentioned at their last meeting,
the City Council approved the time extension for NuMed Partners to obtain their
state-issued cannabis dispensary license for 818 W. Lincoln Highway.
Mr. Olson stated Old Navy is looking to open this coming Wednesday (April 21)
and Harbor Freight Tools is planning a soft opening at the end of May, with an
official opening in June. He added that Isaac Executive Suites, a project by
Pappas Development, should be completed within 3-4 weeks.
G. ADJOURNMENT
Mr. McMahon motioned to adjourn, Mr. Becker seconded the motion, and the
motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. The Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting adjourned at 6:14 PM.
Agenda
DEKALB PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA
April 19, 2021
6:00 P.M.
DeKalb Public Library
Yusunas Meeting Room
309 Oak Street
DeKalb, Illinois 60115
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
COVID-19 Notice: This meeting will be conducted in-person with a physically present quorum and open to the public.
The corporate authorities of the City of DeKalb intend to conduct this meeting in compliance with all applicable social
distancing and public health requirements. All persons attending this meeting in-person shall be required to wear
protective face masks/coverings. Furthermore, the corporate authorities of the City of DeKalb intend to conduct this
meeting pursuant to Illinois Governor JB Pritzker’s Executive Order 2021-4 dated February 5, 2021 (the “Executive
Order”), which prohibits meetings of more than 50 people for Phase 4 mitigations, unless the City of DeKalb
determines that it is necessary to invoke the Governmental Functions exemption “to ensure the operation of
government agencies or to provide for or support the health, safety and welfare of the public.”
As a convenience to the public, the City of DeKalb may also provide video, audio, telephonic or internet access for the
public to monitor this meeting. The provision of any such remote means of access is not intended to provide for
attendance by a means other than physical presence due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, nor is it intended
to provide an opportunity for the public to address public officials, make public comment or otherwise participate in the
meeting.
Persons wishing to provide public comment or otherwise address public officials in person during this meeting must
comply with all applicable rules governing the conduct of this meeting including, but not limited to, the aforementioned
social distancing and face covering requirements.
The City of DeKalb is providing the following conveniences for the public to monitor and participate in this meeting:
Persons wishing to view the meeting from home or elsewhere can tune in to Channel 14 or by following the link provided here.
Persons wishing to provide public comment but are unable to attend the meeting in person or remotely may forward their
comments by clicking on the link provided here. Note that all submissions must be received no later than 12:00 p.m. on the
day of the meeting in order to ensure dissemination to the Planning and Zoning Commission before the meeting convenes.
Zoom Meeting Information
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86753041327?pwd=Y2NXT3NicGtTUkNQTWVTUTlWQUlSZz09
Meeting ID: 867 5304 1327
Passcode: 297768
One tap mobile
+13126266799,,86753041327#,,,,*297768# US (Chicago)
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
Meeting ID: 867 5304 1327
Passcode: 297768
Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
April 19, 2021
Page 2 of 2
For those participating via Zoom and wishing to comment during the public hearing portion of the meeting, please click on the
link provided here and add in the Comment Section that you wish to address the Commission verbally. Note that all
submissions must be received no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting in order to ensure your name is added to the
list of remote speakers.
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Additions or Deletions)
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. April 5, 2021
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public Hearing – A petition by the City of DeKalb on text amendments to Article 7.06.08 of the Unified
Development Ordinance to remove the requirement that barbed wire fencing be angled towards the interior of a
property, to allow barbed wire fencing in the General Commercial and Planned Development - Commercial
Districts, and to allow barbed wire fencing in the front yard of commercial and industrial districts in conjunction
with certain uses.
F. REPORTS
G. ADJOURNMENT
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 5, 2021
Page 1 of 4
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
April 5, 2021
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on April 5, 2021, at the DeKalb
Public Library in the Yusunas Meeting Room located at 309 Oak Street, DeKalb, Illinois.
Vice Chair Bill McMahon called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
A. ROLL CALL
Principal Planner Dan Olson called the roll. Planning and Zoning Commission
members present were: Trixy O’Flaherty, Jerry Wright, Steve Becker, Maria Pena-
Graham, and Vice Chair Bill McMahon. Chair Max Maxwell was absent. Principal
Planner Dan Olson was present representing the City of DeKalb.
B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)
Vice Chair McMahon requested a motion to approve the April 5, 2021 agenda as
presented. Ms. O’Flaherty motioned to approve the agenda as presented. Mr.
Wright seconded the motion, and the motion was approved by unanimous voice
vote.
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. March 1, 2021 – Vice Chair McMahon requested a motion to approve the March
1, 2021 minutes as presented. Mr. Becker motioned to approve the minutes as
presented. Mr. Wright seconded the motion, and the motion was approved by
unanimous voice vote.
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
None
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public Hearing – A petition by NuMed Partners LLC for approval of an
amendment to Ordinance 2020-029 to extend the time limit to July 1, 2022 to
obtain a State issued cannabis dispensary license for the property located at
818 W. Lincoln Highway.
Jim Hughes, representing NuMed Partners LLC, advised they are looking for
an extension to their special use permit. He stated they are still waiting on the
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 5, 2021
Page 2 of 4
State of Illinois to issue their cannabis dispensary license. He added they are
working with the landlord and are very excited in the DeKalb location.
Principal Planner Dan Olson went through the staff report dated April 1, 2021.
He advised on April 27, 2020, the City approved an ordinance which granted a
special use permit for an adult use and medical cannabis dispensary at 818 W.
Lincoln Highway. He stated one of the conditions to the ordinance was for the
applicant to obtain a state issued license within 1-year after approval, which
they were unable to do. He added this petition, if approved, would extend the
time to obtain state approval to July 1, 2022.
Mr. Olson noted NuMed Partners LLC operates other dispensaries including
locations in Chicago, East Peoria, and Urbana. He mentioned the applicant has
been paying rent for the subject site since their initial interest in the location.
He said it will be located in the old Book World location, which is approximately
6,600 sq. ft. Mr. Olson added the proposed operation will meet all State
requirements for security and safety.
Mr. Olson clarified this petition is solely for the extension to obtain a state issued
cannabis dispensary license. He stated the conditions required for the initial
approval have not changed, and include completing the build-out and tenant
improvements within 6 months of issuance of the state license, complying with
Article 7.18 of the Unified Development Ordinance for “Cannabis Business
Establishments, and having an approved security plan with the Police
Department prior to a final certificate of occupancy.
Vice Chair McMahon gave the public an opportunity to speak. There was none.
Vice Chair McMahon gave Commission members an opportunity to speak.
Mr. Wright questioned when the State might issue their license. Mr. Robert
Fitzsimmons (participating via Zoom), representing NuMed Partners LLC,
advised a bill is currently being reviewed by the State Legislature, which will
release up to 150 cannabis dispensary licenses. He believes it will be approved
by Memorial Day.
Mr. McMahon questioned if they are unable to get a license for DeKalb, where
would they relocate? Mr. Hughes advised they have prospective locations in
Aurora, but DeKalb is where they want to be.
Mr. Becker inquired if the State license is issued based on location. Mr. Hughes
advised they must propose a location to the State, in which case they will
conduct an inspection to ensure the location is compliance with their
regulations. Mr. Becker stated he was very impressed with NuMed’s
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 5, 2021
Page 3 of 4
presentation last year. He said he was unsure whether he was going to support
the proposal at that time, but their presentation was very thorough and
convinced him otherwise.
Ms. O’Flaherty clarified NuMed Partners has been unable to open, due to no
fault of their own. She stated it appears they have completed and satisfied
everything on their end and are only waiting on the State to issue their license.
Vice Chair McMahon advised he has seen an empty store front for the last year
that has not produced jobs or revenue and is unsure if DeKalb is the right place
for their proposal. Mr. Hughes advised they are adamant about opening their
business at this location and have been working with the property owner, as
well as paying rent for the space. He advised their intentions is to get this
location opened as soon as possible and they are doing everything in their
power to do so.
Ms. O’Flaherty moved the Planning and Zoning Commission forward its
findings of fact and recommend to the City Council approval of an amendment
to Ordinance 2020-029 to extend the time limit to July 1, 2022 to obtain a State
issued cannabis dispensary license for the property located at 818 W. Lincoln
Highway in the tenant space as shown on Exhibit A and subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit B.
Mr. Becker seconded the motion.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. O’Flaherty – Yes, Mr. Becker – Yes, Mr. Wright
- Yes, Ms. Pena-Graham – Yes, Vice Chair McMahon – No. Chair Maxwell was
absent. Motion Passed 4-1-1.
F. REPORTS
Mr. Olson advised the Commission meeting on April 19 has one scheduled
hearing, with the City of DeKalb as the petitioner. He stated the petition is an
amendment to the UDO regarding barbed fire fencing. He added the City is
proposing to allow certain uses to have barbed wire fencing in the front yard.
He stated there is also an amendment allowing barbed wire fencing to be
angled inwards or outwards from the property.
Mr. Olson stated he anticipates a new Commission member will be appointed
within the next few meetings. He advised Mayor Smith has a candidate in mind
but due to the upcoming election, he wanted to the new Mayor to review the
person and provide input.
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 5, 2021
Page 4 of 4
G. ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Wright motioned to adjourn, Ms. Pena-Graham seconded the motion, and
the motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. The Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting adjourned at 6:15 PM.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
April 15, 2021
TO: DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Dan Olson, Principal Planner
RE: Text Amendments to Chapter 23 of the Municipal Code - Unified
Development Ordinance – Barbed Wire Fences
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The City is proposing text amendments to Article 7.06(8), Chapter 23 of the Municipal
Code (Unified Development Ordinance) regarding barbed wire fencing. The amendments
will remove the requirement that barbed wire fencing be angled towards the interior of a
property, allow barbed wire fencing in the General Commercial and Planned Development
- Commercial Districts, and to allow barbed wire fencing in the front yard of commercial
and industrial districts in conjunction with certain uses. Please note the current regulations
only allow barbed wire on top of a six (6) foot high fence.
The specific amendments to Article 7.06(8) are as follows:
Removing the requirement that barbed wire fencing be angled towards the interior
of a property.
The current language only allows barbed wire fencing to be angled toward the interior of
the property. Typically, barbed wire is angled outward, so it has the most effectiveness.
There is barbed wire fencing around the City that is angled both to the interior and exterior
of the property and is split about 50/50. It’s assumed that barbed wire that is angled
outward either pre-dates the UDO or was put up without a permit.
It is not clear on the reasoning for the interior angled requirement. It may have to do with
barbed wire fencing that is angled toward the exterior of the property encroaching over a
right-of-way or property line. That assumes the fence itself was placed on the property
line. To address this concern, language is included in the amendment that would require
fences using barbed wire that is angled towards the exterior of the property be setback a
minimum of two (2) feet from a property line.
Allowing barbed wire fencing in the front yard in conjunction with certain uses.
Currently, the UDO only allows barbed wire fencing on top of a six (6) foot high chain link
fence in the side or rear yard in the “ORI” Office, Research, Light Industrial District, “LI”
Light Industrial District, “HI” Heavy Industrial District or “PD-I” Planned Development –
Industrial District. In the “GC” General Commercial District it is allowed in the side or rear
yard with City Council approval after a report from the Community Development Director.
Certain uses tend to have a need for barbed wire fencing not only in the side and rear
yard but also in the front yard for security purposes and to make sure the perimeter is
enclosed. Such uses may include electrical power substations, transformer stations,
communications facilities, publicly owned property or a use requiring a secured entrance.
There is a contractor for Facebook that is located along Dietz Ave. that requires a secured
vehicle entrance to the site with barbed wire fencing around the perimeter. Language is
proposed that would allow barbed wire fences in the front yard in the “GC”, “ORI”, “LI”,
“HI”, “PD-C” or “PD-I” Districts when associated with an electrical power substation,
transformer station, communications facility, publicly owned property or a use requiring a
secured entrance as determined by the City Manager. Around the City, there are
properties where barbed wire fencing exists in the front yard and its assumed they either
pre-date the UDO or were constructed without a permit. Language was also added that
prohibits razor wire fencing.
Allow barbed wire fencing in the “GC” General Commercial District and “PD-C”
Planned Development – Commercial District
The UDO currently allows barbed wire fencing in the GC District (rear yard and side yard)
if approved by the City Council with a report from the Community Development Director.
Records showing City Council review of a barbed wire fence in the “GC” District could not
be located so an amendment is proposed that would allow these fences in the “GC”
District if all the requirements are met. Some uses such as cell tower sites may be in the
“GC” District and they typically need a secured entrance with barbed wire. It is anticipated,
however, that many of the uses in the “GC” District would not have the need for barbed
wire fencing. The “PD-C” District was added for the barbed wire allowance since it covers
many of the commercial areas of the City.
RECOMMENDATION
Sample Variation Motion:
Based on the submitted petition and testimony presented, I move the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of Text Amendments to the
Unified Development Ordinance regarding barbed wire fencing as indicated in Exhibit A
of this report.
Page |2
EXHIBIT A
2. Residential developments, when approved as part of a Planned Development, subdivision,
rezoning, special use permit, or any other zoning or subdivision action, shall provide the same
landscaping and screening as in Paragraph 1, above, when located adjacent to an existing
commercial or industrial zoned property, whether developed or vacant. This provision shall not
apply to lots platted prior to this Amendatory Act of 2004, when a building permit is all that is
necessary to construct a development on that lot.
3. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be enclosed by an opaque architectural screen or louver that
substantially conforms to the color and building materials of the principal structure, and of a height
not less than the height of such equipment.
4. Outdoor storage areas must be screened with an opaque architectural screen or fence that
substantially conforms to the color and building materials of the principal structure, and of a height
not less than the height of the materials stored.
5. Outdoor storage areas shall be paved or hard surfaced in accordance with the Construction
Requirements set forth in Article 12.03, Paragraph 1.
7.06 Fences
1. For the purposes of this section, there shall be the following types of fences:
a. Open Fence: A fence in which the openings in the materials of which the fence is constructed
represent more than fifty (50) percent of the area of the fence and which do not interfere with
visibility, or the free passage of air, through the fence;
b. Privacy Fence: All fences other than Open Fences.
2. In residential districts, open fences six (6) feet or less in height are permitted in the rear yard, and
in the side yard behind the front of the principal structure. Except as provided for elsewhere in this
Ordinance, open fences in non-residential districts shall not exceed four feet in height in the front
yard, but may be erected to any height anywhere else on a lot.
3. In residential districts, privacy fences six (6) feet or less in height are permitted in the rear yard and
in the side yard behind the nearest front of the principal building on the lot, provided that said fence
is located at least five (5) feet from any principal building on adjacent property. In commercial or
industrial districts, privacy fences are also allowed in the front yard, but not closer to the street than
the required building setback line, when providing screening required elsewhere in this Ordinance.
4. Through lots and corner lots with frontage on more than one street (2009-050):
a. Through lots: On residential lots that are through lots (lots with frontage on one street and the
rear yard having frontage on another street) the front and side fence placement shall comply
with Article 7.06.2 or Article 7.06.3. The location of the rear yard fence may abut the property
line unless the Plat of Subdivision specifically identifies a greater set-back from the property
line. Prior to issuance of a Fence Permit, a Certified Plat of Survey must be submitted to the
Building and Code Enforcement Division for review and approval.
b. Corner lots with frontage on more than one street: On residential corner lots that have frontage
on two or more streets, no privacy fences greater than thirty-six (36) inches in height or open
fence greater than forty-eight (48) inches in height shall be permitted in the frontage yards
(yards that front on the streets). The location of the side and rear yard fence shall comply with
Article 7.06.02 or Article 7.06.3 unless the Plat of Subdivision specifically identifies a greater
set-back from the property line. Prior to issuance of a Fence Permit, a Certified Plat of Survey
must be submitted to the Building and Code Enforcement Division for review and approval.”
7-7
5. The maximum height of an open fence in front of the front building line established by the principal
structure shall be forty-eight (48) inches.
6. The maximum height of a privacy fence in front of the front building line established by the principal
structure shall be thirty-six (36) inches, unless allowed elsewhere in this Article.
7. Fences may exceed the above stated maximum heights in a Planned Development, Commercial
(PD-C) or any Industrial zoning district when approved as part of a landscaping plan, or as part of
a buffering or screening requirement as may be provided for elsewhere in this Ordinance. Also,
fences (or walls), used as a decorative feature and/or as a backdrop to an identification sign at
subdivision, apartment, condominium or planned development entrances, may exceed the above
stated maximum heights, if approved by the Community Development Director.
7.8. Barbed wire may be used as part of a fence in the “GC” General Commercial District , “ORI” Office,
Research, Light Industrial District, “LI” Light Industrial District, “HI” Heavy Industrial District, “PD-C”
Planned Development-Commercial District or the “PD-I” Planned Development – Industrial District
when located in the side or rear yard, and is attached to the fence above six (6) feet and is at a 45
degree angle. Barbed wire may be used as part of a fence in the “GC”, “ORI”, “LI”, “HI”, “PD-C” or
“PD-I” Districts in the front yard when used in association with an electric power substation,
transformer station, communications facility, publicly owned property or a use requiring a secured
entrance as determined by the City Manager. Fences using barbed wire that is angled towards the
exterior of the property shall be setback a minimum of two (2) feet from the property line. Razor
wire fencing is prohibited.
8. Barbed wire shall not be used to constitute any part of a fence in any zoning district except that
part of a fence in a side or rear yard, which is at least six (6) feet above the grade, with the barbed
wire attached to the fence above six (6) feet and at a 45 degree angle towards the interior of the
property, and either:
a. is used to protect an electric power substation or transformer station;
b. is located in an “ORI” Office Research and Light Industrial, “LI” Light Industrial District, “HI”
Heavy Industrial District, or in a “PD-I” Planned Development – Industrial District;
c. is located in a “GC” General Commercial District: except that the use of barbed wire in a “GC”
General Commercial District, must be approved by the City Council after a report from the
Community Development Director.
9. Fences may be placed at the property line, except no fence shall be erected along, parallel to or
substantially parallel to and within five (5) feet of an adjoining property line unless the finished side
of the fence faces the adjoining property. If a fence is erected with posts and supports, the side on
which the posts and supports are most visible shall be considered the unfinished side. No fence
shall be constructed in such a manner or location as to block any natural or planned stormwater
conveyance system, nor shall any fence be constructed over or within a stormwater drainage
easement.
10. All fences shall conform to the requirements of Section 7.10, “Sight Distance Triangle,” of this
Article.
11. Prohibited Fences: Electrically charged, chicken wire, permanent snow or any other fence
constructed of materials from used or discarded materials including but not limited to corrugated
metal, plywood or other type of sheet metal. An underground electrical pet fence is exempt from
this prohibition. (2019-025)
7-8
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the DeKalb Planning and Zoning
Commission at its regular meeting on Monday, April 19, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. in the Yusunas Meeting
Room at the DeKalb Public Library, 309 Oak St., DeKalb, IL, on the petition by the City of DeKalb
for text amendments to Chapter 23 “Unified Development Ordinance (UDO)” of the Municipal
Code, Article 7.06.08 as follows: 1) removing the requirement that barbed wire fencing be angled
towards the interior of a property; 2) allowing barbed wire fencing on top of a six (6) foot high
chain link fence in the front yard in the “GC” General Commercial District , “ORI” Office,
Research, Light Industrial District, “LI” Light Industrial District, “HI” Heavy Industrial District,
“PD-C” Planned Development-Commercial District or the “PD-I” Planned Development –
Industrial District if associated with an electric power substation, transformer station,
communications facility, publicly owned property or a use requiring a secured entrance as
determined by the City Manager; and 3) allowing barbed wire fencing in the “GC” General
Commercial District and “PD-C” Planned Development – Commercial District.
All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard at the time and place listed above.
Interested persons are also encouraged to submit written comments on the proposal to the City of
DeKalb, Community Development Department, 164 E. Lincoln Highway, DeKalb, Illinois, 60115
by 12:00 p.m. on Monday, April 19, 2021, by e-mail to dan.olson@cityofdekalb.com or the Online
Public Comment Submission Form at https://www.cityofdekalb.com/FormCenter. Further
information regarding the petition is available from the Community Development Department at
(815) 748-2070 or on the City of DeKalb’s web page at
https://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings.
Max Maxwell, Chair
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission