Transportation Committee

113 W Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 Transportation Committee Agenda (Immediately Following City Council Agenda Session) City Hall Room 101 / Virtual Meeting Via Zoom Tuesday, January 27, 2026 5:30 PM Members Council Member Sarah Moore, Chair Council Member Robert "Bob" Stafford Council Member Sarah Bunch Council Member Min. Monique Jones City Staff Public Works Director Chris Brown Assistant Public Works / Transportation Services Director Terry Gulley City Engineer Justin Bland Transportation Committee January 27, 2026 Zoom Information Webinar ID: 816 8953 5124 Registration Link: Zoom Link A. Call to Order A.1. Election of a Chairperson Election of a chair person by the Committee as required by City Code. B. Roll Call C. New Business C.1. S. School Ave. - Conceptual Design Review Review of recomendations for S. School Ave. corridor C.2. Review of Transportation Division Workplans Review of proposed sidewalk and paving plans for 2026 and 2027. C.3. 5-year Trail Construction Plan Staff requests review of the 5-year trail construction plan. On December 10th, 2025 the Active Transportation Advisory Committee recommended approval of the 5-year trail construction plan after two months of review.5-year trail construction plan map C.4. Review of Revisions to City Code Chapter 33 Review of proposed ordinance revisions to change the review/approval process for Transportation Division Workplans C.5. Traffic Calming Policy Revisions City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 2 Transportation Committee January 27, 2026 Review updates to the City’s Traffic Calming policy for referral to full City Council approval D. Reports and Presentations E. Informational Items E.1. Transportation Bond Program F. Adjournment NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 3  Transportation Committee Memo 2026-192 Meeting of January 27, 2026 To: Transportation Committee Thru: Chris Brown, Public Works Director From: Justin Bland, City Engineer Subject: S. School Ave. - Conceptual Design Review Recommendation: Engineering Staff recommends full implementation of the proposed streetscape section for S. School Ave. This includes on-street parking, street trees, new buffered sidewalks, and other improvements. Background: The proposed improvements to this corridor result from several years of public feedback and master planning. This includes the 71B Corridor Study, completed in 2019, and the adoption of City Plan 2040, both of which included substantial public input. These efforts led ArDOT to officially remove the majority of the 71B Corridor from the state highway system in 2020. In 2024, the 71B Corridor was rezoned to the new Urban Corridor zoning district. In addition, a $25 million Safe Streets for All (SS4A) grant was awarded for five projects, including the S. School Ave. corridor between 15th St. and MLK Blvd. This grant includes funding for the design and construction of safety improvements for each corridor. The city selected ISG, Inc. as the civil engineering consultant for the work. Discussion: After performing a corridor survey, traffic study, and safety review, the consultant prepared a proposed streetscape section and scroll plot of the corridor for review. This design addresses many current safety concerns, including poor sidewalks, a lack of crosswalks, and excessive driveway density. The proposed design will greatly enhance pedestrian safety by providing proper buffered sidewalks and two new Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) protected crosswalks. It will also enhance vehicular safety by reducing the number of lanes drivers must cross during turning movements. On-street parking will provide a traffic-calming effect while serving future developments. A roundabout was considered at the MLK Blvd. intersection and received public feedback. However, due to mixed public sentiment, the significant encroachment required onto private property, and the substantial additional cost, staff is recommending installing an improved traffic signal instead of the roundabout. Budget/Staff Impact: None at this time. Attachments: S. School Ave. - Cross Section Options, S. School Ave. - Scroll Plot, S. School Ave. - Public Survey Information Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 STREETSCAPE SECTIONS TYPICAL 75’ RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING SECTION PROPOSED SECTION Parking + Intersection Bump-Outs to be Designed for Easy Removal to Accomodate a Future Travel Lane SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE SECTIONS TYPICAL 75’ RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING SECTION ALTERNATE SECTION SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN VIEW P Razorback Greenway Trail Potential Parklet Feature Potential Parklet Feature T T T T T T Potential Parklet Feature Potential Parklet Feature Potential Gateway Feature LEGEND: ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE ACQUIRED PARALLEL PARKING T TRANSIT STOP MAINTAIN EXISTING DRIVEWAY REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY FEET 0 10 20 40 NORTH SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025  TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY South School Avenue A traffic study along South School Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Avenue was conducted, finding that during peak hours the road currently sees up to 1,250 vehicles per hour. Five Lane Roadway Three Lane Roadway This data helps us understand existing traffic patterns and plan improvements that maintain safety and efficiency. The proposed designs consider reducing the roadway from five lanes to three lanes. While it may seem counterintuitive, the road will continue to handle the same traffic volumes safely and efficiently. Here’s why: • Each travel lane can handle up to 1,800 vehicles per hour in an urban environment • With South School Avenue carrying up to 750 vehicles per hour per direction, the roadway has plenty of capacity • Reduced right-angle crashes are anticipated because side street motorists cross three (3) lanes instead of five (5) Benefits • Improved street design balances traffic • There are fewer lanes for motorists and flow with comfort, safety, and accessibility pedestrians to cross for all users • Traffic calming and more consistent speeds • Enhanced walkability and convenient parking result in fewer crashes create a more welcoming corridor Even with fewer lanes, South School Avenue will move traffic efficiently and safely, helping everyone get where they need to go. 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, AR 72701 | fayetteville-ar.gov Page 1 ROUNDABOUTS A Safer, Smarter Way To Travel Why Roundabouts? Roundabouts are circular intersections where drivers yield to traffic already inside the circle. This simple design keeps vehicles moving while reducing conflict points found at traditional intersections. Safety First Keep Traffic Moving Roundabouts significantly reduce severe Roundabouts improve traffic flow by: crashes by: • Keeping traffic moving at low speeds • Lowering operating speeds, which reduces instead of stopping crash severity • Allowing drivers to enter as soon as there is • Eliminating high-speed right-angle and a safe gap head-on collisions • Decreasing backups and delays throughout • Creating shorter, safer crossings that let the day, which reduces idling, cuts emissions, pedestrians and bicyclists cross one and improves fuel efficiency direction at a time • Balancing heavier flows across entrances to improve overall intersection efficiency A Better Experience For Everyone Roundabouts support: • Drivers with slower, more predictable movements • Calming effects on surrounding streets • Bicyclists who can ride with traffic or use crosswalks • Large vehicles and emergency responders with designs that give them space to navigate safely • Aesthetic and urban-design opportunities in splitter and central islands 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, AR 72701 | fayetteville-ar.gov Page 2 STREETSCAPE LAYOUT CONCEPT A 6’ Sidewalk 5’ Amenity Zone 10’ Parallel Parking 11’ Thru Lane Driveway (TYP) Tree Grate (TYP) Light Pole (TYP) 11’ Double Turn Lane Median Planter Planted Median 11’ Thru Lane 50’ Tree Spacing (TYP) Decorative Pavement (TYP) 10’ Parallel Parking 5’ Amenity Zone 6’ Sidewalk Flexible Zone Art Opportunity (TYP) Parklet (TYP) (as space allows) Furnishing Suite (TYP) FEET PRECEDENT IMAGERY 0 5 10 20 Tree Grates w/ Suspended Pavement System Decorative Pavement - Sandblasted or Acid Etched Concrete Acid Etched Note: Suspended Pavement Systems Provide Adequate Soil Volume Porous Concrete for Health of Trees Custom Aggregate Mix Acid Etched Stencils SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE LAYOUT CONCEPT B 6’ Sidewalk 5’ Amenity Zone 10’ Parallel Parking 11’ Thru Lane Driveway (TYP) Tree Planter (TYP) Light Pole (TYP) 11’ Double Turn Lane Decorative Pavement (TYP) Median Planter Planted Median 11’ Thru Lane 70’ Tree Spacing (TYP) 10’ Parallel Parking 5’ Amenity Zone 6’ Sidewalk Flexible Zone Art Opportunity (TYP) Parklet (TYP) (as space allows) Furnishing Suite (TYP) FEET PRECEDENT IMAGERY 0 5 10 20 Built-In Planters Decorative Pavement - Integrally Colored Concrete Banding Acid Etched Concrete Banding Integral Colored Green Infrastructure Concrete Banding SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE LAYOUT CONCEPT C 6’ Sidewalk 5’ Amenity Zone 10’ Parallel Parking 11’ Thru Lane Driveway (TYP) Custom Tree Grate (TYP) Light Pole (TYP) 11’ Double Turn Lane Decorative Pavement (TYP) Median Planter Planted Median 11’ Thru Lane Art Opportunity (TYP) 80’ Tree Spacing (TYP) 10’ Parallel Parking 5’ Amenity Zone 6’ Sidewalk Flexible Zone Parklet (TYP) (as space allows) Furnishing Suite (TYP) FEET PRECEDENT IMAGERY 0 5 10 20 Custom Tree Grate w/ Suspended Pavement System Decorative Pavement - Stamped Integrally Colored Concrete Note: Suspended Pavement Systems Provide Adequate Soil Volume for Health of Trees SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE LAYOUT CONCEPT D 6’ Sidewalk 5’ Amenity Zone 11’ Thru Lane 10’ Thru Lane Driveway (TYP) Light Pole (TYP) 11’ Double Turn Lane Median Planter Planted Median 10’ Thru Lane Art Opportunity (TYP) 100’ Tree Spacing (TYP) 11’ Thru Lane 5’ Amenity Zone 6’ Sidewalk Flexible Zone (as space allows) Parklet (TYP) FEET PRECEDENT IMAGERY 0 5 10 20 Mowed Turf Grass Standard Concrete SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE LAYOUT ROUNDABOUT CONCEPT + PRECEDENT IMAGERY Public Sidewalk (TYP) Green Space (TYP) Decorative Sidewalk (TYP) Existing Roundabout at Northhills Blvd MLK Jr BLVD Incorporate Local Stone Public Art Opportunity Public Art Opportunity Decorative Pavement Planting Bed (TYP) Signage Opportunity School Avenue 0 15 30 60 FEET NORTH Native Plantings Pavement Chevrons Direct Traffic SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE LAYOUT INTERSECTION CONCEPT + PRECEDENT IMAGERY Public Sidewalk (TYP) Green Space (TYP) Decorative Sidewalk (TYP) MLK Jr BLVD School Avenue FEET 0 15 30 60 NORTH SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE AMENITIES FURNISHINGS SUITE Option 1: Existing City Standard Amenities Option 2: Metal Amenities By Anova Furnishings Option 3: Wood + Metal Amenities By Landscape Forms Option 4: Bright Colored Metal Amenities By Vestre SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE AMENITIES FURNISHINGS SUITE Parklets Razorback Greenway Gateway Feature Bus Shelters SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE AMENITIES PUBLIC ART OPTIONS Street Activation SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE SECTIONS TYPICAL 75’ RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING SECTION PROPOSED SECTION Parking + Intersection Bump-Outs to be Designed for Easy Removal to Accomodate a Future Travel Lane SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025 STREETSCAPE SECTIONS TYPICAL 75’ RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING SECTION ALTERNATE SECTION SCHOOL STREET - SAFE STREETS FOR ALL Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning Fayetteville, Arkansas | #32858 December 2025  Transportation Committee Memo 2026-180 Meeting of January 27, 2026 To: Transportation Committee Thru: From: Chris Brown, Public Works Director Subject: Transportation Division Sidewalk and Paving Workplans Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the 2026/2027 sidewalk and paving work plans. Background: The Transportation Division is tasked with maintaining and improving the city street and sidewalk network. A combination of in-house crews and equipment and contracted services is employed to complete yearly work plans within the framework of the division's budget. Discussion: Concrete Construction Program The proposed workplan includes design projects, new construction, and major maintenance activities on sidewalks along with miscellaneous curb replacements. Projects designed in 2025 are scheduled for construction in 2025 and 2026 design projects will be constructed in 2027. The plan also includes secondary projects that may be added if design, right of way, or other delays to the primary projects are experienced. A total of 190 working days are estimated to complete the work in 2026. Paving and Overlay Program The City’s paving plan is developed using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), a nationally recognized system that rates street conditions on a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better pavement condition. City streets were last evaluated in 2024 to identify pavement distress such as cracking, potholes, and surface wear. These observations are converted into PCI scores, providing an objective and consistent way to compare street conditions citywide. PCI scores are then used to determine the most appropriate treatment for each street—ranging from preventive maintenance on higher-condition streets to full reconstruction on streets in poor condition. This approach ensures the City applies the right fix at the right time. Projects are prioritized using PCI data along with other considerations such as traffic volumes, coordination with utility work, damage and premature wear on streets occurring after the 2024 inventory, and available funding. The attached plan is sorted by ward for ease of reference. Budget/Staff Impact: Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 The materials budget for the paving plan averages a little under $1.2 million per year for the 2026/2027 budget years. It should be noted that the overall network condition will deteriorate at this budget, and that an additional $1 million per year is needed to maintain the current condition. It is recommended that the upcoming bond, if approved by voters, allocate up to $1 million per year for 5 years to paving operations. Attachments: 2026-2027 Sidewalk Work Plan-Revised 11-19-2025, _2026 & 2027 combined _by ward Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701  2026-2027 CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION WORK PLAN (196 WORKING DAYS) 2026 Sidewalk Design Projects Construction Length Width Project Street From To Placement Type Ward Time Feet Feet (Days) Nettleship St. Eastern Ave. Graham Ave. South Side New 320 6 1 TBD Oakland Ave. Cleveland St. Douglas St. East Side Rep./ New 290 6 2 TBD 2026 Primary Sidewalk Construction Projects Construction Length Width Project Street From To Placement Type Ward Time Feet Feet (Days) Cleveland St. Leverett Ave. Willis Ave. North Side New 806 6 2 88 15th St. College Ave. Kelly Lynn Driveway South Side New 501 5 1 24 SUBTOTAL 112 2026 Sidewalk Maintenance from Service Requests Address Ward Description Construction Time (Days) 4380 W. Pecan St. 1 Replace sidewalk 25 ft. 2 2133 S. Clover Dr. 1 Replace sidewalk 25 ft. 2 520 N. Washington Ave. 2 Replace sidewalk 75 ft. 4 311 W. Ila St. 2 Replace sidewalk 45 ft. 4 413 W. Center St. 2 Replace sidewalk 12 ft. 2 303 E. Sutton St. 2 Replace sidewalk 60 ft. & Replace curb 15 ft. 3 526 E. Lafayette St. 2 Replace sidewalk 40 ft. 3 251 E. Sycamore St. 2 Replace sidewalk 15 ft. 2 327 N. Willow Ave. 2 Install 4 ADA ramps 4 127 W. Mountain St. 2 Replace sidewalk 50 ft. 3 1018 N. Canterbury Rd. 3 Replace sidewalk 32 ft. 2 461 E. Fairway Ln. 3 Replace sidewalk 50 ft. 3 2507 N. Jimmie Ave. 3 Replace sidewalk 150 ft. 3 2531 N. Jimmie Ave. 3 Replace sidewalk 149 ft. 3 2515 E. Lancer St. 3 Replace sidewalk 25 ft. 2 E. Arapaho Dr. 3 Replace sidewalk 50 ft. 3 4677 W. Franciscan Trl. 4 Replace sidewalk 40 ft. 4 3103 N. Verona Ln. 4 Replace sidewalk 24 ft. 3 W. Ika Ln. 4 Replace sidewalk 40 ft. 3 2979 W. Ika Ln. 4 Replace sidewalk 42 ft. 3 3103 Verona Ln. 4 Replace sidewalk 25 ft. 3 E. Albright Rd. 4 Replace sidewalk 15 ft. 3 SUBTOTAL 64 2026 Misc. Maintenance from Service Requests Address Ward Description Construction Time (Days) 841 W. Lorena Ln. 1 Replace curb 45 ft. 3 1815 W. Arrowhead St. 1 Replace curb 40 ft. 3 275 S. Duncan Ave. 2 Replace curb 6 ft. 2 1039 E. Bonnie Ln. 3 Replace curb 250 ft. 5 2838 W. Vanike Dr. 4 Replace curb 2 ft. 1 SUBTOTAL 14 TOTAL (Days) 190 2027 Sidewalk Design Projects Construction Length Width Project Street From To Placement Type Ward Time Feet Feet (Days) Lindell Ave. Hughs St. Eagle St. East Side New 185 5 2 TBD Leverett Ave. Sycamore St. Poplar St. West Side Rep. 1,325 6 2 TBD 2027 Primary Sidewalk Construction Projects Construction Length Width Project Street From To Placement Type Ward Time Feet Feet (Days) Nettleship St. Eastern Ave. Graham Ave. South Side New 320 6 1 TBD Oakland Ave. Cleveland St. Douglas St. East Side Rep./ New 290 6 2 TBD 2026-2027 Secondary Sidewalk Construction Projects Construction Length Width Project Street From To Placement Type Ward Time Feet Feet (Days) Center St. West Ave. Razorback Greenway South Side New 288 8 2 24 Stearns St. Joyce Ave. Vantage Dr. North Side New 276 6 3 TBD Hackberry Dr. Amber Dr. Overcrest St. North Side New 202 6 3 TBD  2026 PAVING PLAN p. 1/2 WARD 1 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 15441 S COBALT AVE NORTH END E PEACEFUL DR 20 109 254 80.8 852 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $4,636.00 $47,360.00 15441 S COBALT AVE E PEACEFUL DR E ROYAL DR 27 298 939 71.9 852 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $17,137.00 $47,360.00 15441 S COBALT AVE E ROYAL DR ALLEY 2443 27 119 376 72.8 852 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $6,862.00 $47,360.00 15441 S COBALT AVE ALLEY 2443 E HISTORY ST 27 157 495 75.9 852 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $9,034.00 $47,360.00 15441 S COBALT AVE E HISTORY ST ALLEY 2547 27 168 531 74.5 852 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $9,691.00 $47,360.00 15631 S CHURCH AVE W ROCK ST W SOUTH ST 25 618 1,801 59.7 618 60 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $32,868.00 $32,868.00 3620 E HISTORY ST S SUGARBUSH AVE S DEAD HORSE MOUNTAIN RD 20 207 482 78 207 78 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $8,797.00 $8,797.00 3630 E HISTORY ST S COBALT AVE S SUGARBUSH AVE 27 555 1,747 74 756 75 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $31,883.00 $40,442.00 3630 E HISTORY ST S DEAD HORSE MOUNTAIN RD S SUGARBUSH AVE 20 201 469 78 756 75 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $8,559.00 $40,442.00 4900 E PEACEFUL DR WEST END S COBALT AVE 19 126 280 73 989 70 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $5,110.00 $48,563.00 4900 E PEACEFUL DR S COBALT AVE S SUGARBUSH AVE 25 668 1,948 70 989 70 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $35,551.00 $48,563.00 4900 E PEACEFUL DR S SUGARBUSH AVE S DEAD HORSE MOUNTAIN RD WC 55 19 195 433 71 989 70 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $7,902.00 $48,563.00 5300 E ROYAL DR WEST END S COBALT AVE 20 131 306 81 744 76 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $5,585.00 $39,512.00 5300 E ROYAL DR S COBALT AVE S SUGARBUSH AVE 26 613 1,859 75 744 76 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $33,927.00 $39,512.00 17660 S SUGARBUSH AVE E PEACEFUL DR E ROYAL DR 20 252 587 75.7 548 75 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $10,713.00 $22,704.00 17660 S SUGARBUSH AVE E ROYAL DR ALLEY 2443 19 144 319 78.2 548 75 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $5,822.00 $22,704.00 17660 S SUGARBUSH AVE ALLEY 2443 E HISTORY ST 19 153 338 70 548 75 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $6,169.00 $22,704.00 TOTAL $240,246.00 0.89 MILES WARD 2 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 9310 N GREGG AVE W PROSPECT ST W CLEBURN ST 26 310 939 79.1 617 86 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $17,137.00 $30,222.00 9310 N GREGG AVE W CLEBURN ST W HAWTHORN ST 20 307 717 94.5 617 86 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $13,085.00 $30,222.00 9320 N GREGG AVE W HAWTHORN ST W ADAMS ST 25 341 993 55.8 710 43 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $18,122.00 $44,895.00 9320 N GREGG AVE W ADAMS ST W NORTH ST 34 370 1,467 33.9 710 43 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $26,773.00 $44,895.00 3820 E JOHNSON ST N OLIVE AVE ALLEY 534 21 190 466 58 537 56 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $8,505.00 $21,809.00 3820 E JOHNSON ST ALLEY 534 N MISSION BLVD 18 347 729 55 537 56 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $13,304.00 $21,809.00 11750 N PORTER RD W WEDINGTON DR W VALLEY DR 21 418 1,025 68.9 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $18,706.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W VALLEY DR W HATFIELD ST 20 55 127 70.6 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $2,318.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W HATFIELD ST W HOLLY ST 25 358 1,044 80.1 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $19,053.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W HOLLY ST W LAWSON ST 24 182 509 80 3,081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $9,289.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W LAWSON ST W CORNERSTONE PL 26 169 512 80.6 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $9,344.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W CORNERSTONE PL W MEGAN DR 24 342 959 60 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $17,502.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W MEGAN DR W SKYLER DR 25 276 804 66 3,081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $14,673.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W SKYLER DR W HOUSTON ST 25 508 1,482 82 3,081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $27,047.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W HOUSTON ST W SYCAMORE ST 25 334 975 88 3,081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $17,794.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD W SYCAMORE ST DS@306N W SYCAMORE ST 24 306 856 82.7 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $15,622.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD DS@306N W SYCAMORE ST ROUNDABOUT 1010 19 66 147 92.5 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $2,683.00 $156,166.00 11750 N PORTER RD ROUNDABOUT 1010 N PORTER RD 15 67 117 95.1 3081 77 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $2,135.00 $156,166.00 14550 N WILSON AVE W MAPLE ST W ILA ST 24 379 1,062 22.8 379 23 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $19,382.00 $19,382.00 ALLEY 444 E JOHNSON ST E GUNTER ST 20 320 712 320 Pave Gravel Alley $18.25 $12,994.00 $12,994.00 ALLEY 456 E JOHNSON ST E GUNTER ST 20 320 712 320 Pave Gravel Alley $18.25 $12,994.00 $12,994.00 TOTAL $298,462.00 1.13 MILES  2026 PAVING PLAN p. 2/2 WARD 3 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 1970 E APPLEBURY DR E HOPE ST WEST END 27 294 935 33 294 33 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $17,064.00 $17,064.00 8100 N CRESTWOOD DR W RIDGEWAY DR W RIDGEWAY DR 26 1,856 5,631 89.2 1856 89 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $102,766.00 $102,766.00 5180 E RIDGEWAY DR W RIDGEWAY DR E SHADOWRIDGE DR 18 518 1,087 83.9 3052 89 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $19,838.00 $125,232.00 5180 E RIDGEWAY DR E SHADOWRIDGE DR PUBLIC 1350 20 1,332 3,108 89 3,052 89 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $56,721.00 $125,232.00 5180 E RIDGEWAY DR PUBLIC 1350 W RIDGEWAY DR 19 1,203 2,667 92 3,052 89 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $48,673.00 $125,232.00 22560 W RIDGEWAY DR N SHREWSBURY LN E RIDGEWAY DR 24 136 380 80 863 84 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $6,935.00 $42,140.00 22560 W RIDGEWAY DR E RIDGEWAY DR N CRESTWOOD DR 21 473 1,159 88 863 84 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $21,152.00 $42,140.00 22560 W RIDGEWAY DR N CRESTWOOD DR N VIEWPOINT DR 26 254 770 81.7 863 84 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $14,053.00 $42,140.00 22570 W RIDGEWAY DR N VIEWPOINT DR E HAMMOND ST 19 1,289 2,856 89 1,808 88 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $52,122.00 $72,015.00 22570 W RIDGEWAY DR E HAMMOND ST E RIDGEWAY DR 18 519 1,090 85 1,808 88 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 50-60) $18.25 $19,893.00 $72,015.00 12290 N ROSEWOOD DR SOUTH END N SHERYL AVE 38 269 1,199 87.3 269 87 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $21,882.00 $21,882.00 12821 N SHERYL AVE N ROSEWOOD DR WEST END 33 594 2,285 75.9 1033 79 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $41,701.00 $68,821.00 12821 N SHERYL AVE N ROSEWOOD DR E OAKS MANOR DR 29 439 1,486 82.7 1033 79 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $27,120.00 $68,821.00 N OLD WIRE RD & N OLD MISSOURI RD INTERSECTION 2,500 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $45,625.00 $45,625.00 TOTAL $495,545.00 1.74 MILES WARD 4 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 12540 N SALEM RD W WEDINGTON DR PRIVATE 3400 45 377 1,978 68.7 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $36,099.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD PRIVATE 3400 W MICA ST 30 403 1,411 79 3,526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $25,751.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W MICA ST N TIMBERLINE DR 28 654 2,135 76 3,526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $38,964.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD N TIMBERLINE DR W VASSAR ST 29 95 320 74 3,526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $5,840.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W VASSAR ST W CORNELL ST 30 269 940 81.1 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $17,155.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W CORNELL ST W PRINCETON ST 29 272 920 80.6 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $16,790.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W PRINCETON ST W YALE ST 29 270 912 79.6 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $16,644.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W YALE ST W HARVARD ST 29 268 908 79.1 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $16,571.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W HARVARD ST W BUCKEYE ST 28 273 892 83.4 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $16,279.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W BUCKEYE ST W ESSEX DR 27 267 841 62.6 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $15,348.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W ESSEX DR W FAIRFAX ST 29 274 926 51 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $16,900.00 $228,382.00 12540 N SALEM RD W FAIRFAX ST NORTH END 27 105 331 81.5 3526 74 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) $18.25 $6,041.00 $228,382.00 TOTAL $228,382.00 0.67 MILES Length (mi) % Length Cost % Cost Ward 1 0.89 20.16% $240,246.00 19.03% Ward 2 1.13 25.51% $298,462.00 23.64% Ward 3 1.74 39.25% $495,545.00 39.25% Ward 4 0.67 15.08% $228,382.00 18.09% Total 4.43 100% $1,262,635.00 100%  2027 PAVING PLAN p. 1/2 WARD 1 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 18630 W BEST WAY ST DS@131W S LAGUNA LOOP S FUTRALL DR 30 489 1,710 27 489 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $31,208.00 $31,208.00 19060 W CHERRY ST EAST END S HADDON AVE 17 402 797 30.1 1161 29 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $14,545.00 $38,799.00 19060 W CHERRY ST S HADDON AVE S SCHOOL AVE 15 759 1,329 28 1,161 29 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $24,254.00 $38,799.00 15430 S COACH RD NORTH END S COCKRILL RD 20 1,151 2,686 30.1 1151 30 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $49,020.00 $49,020.00 19640 W DOWELL DR S RAZORBACK RD S FUTRALL DR 26 761 2,307 30.1 761 30 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $42,103.00 $42,103.00 16380 S HUNT LN E TALON TRL E STEEPLE CHASE DR 26 55 167 46 55 46 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $3,048.00 $3,048.00 17330 S SAND TRAP LN W 29TH CT SOUTH END 10 454 529 27.4 454 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $9,654.00 $9,654.00 17480 S SHILOH DR S RAMP 60 FULBRIGHT EAST END 24 1,211 3,391 28.9 1211 29 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $61,886.00 $61,886.00 23170 W SUNRISE MOUNTAIN RD S SCHOOL AVE DS@1257W S SCHOOL AVE 21 1,257 3,079 30.4 1257 30 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $56,192.00 $56,192.00 23700 W VELDA CT EAST END S ONE MILE RD 24 350 980 29.5 350 30 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $17,885.00 $17,885.00 14070 N WALNUT AVE E CENTER ST E MEADOW ST 15 240 419 29.2 240 29 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $7,647.00 $7,647.00 23860 W WHILLOCK ST EAST END S SCHOOL AVE 19 1,328 2,943 30 1,328 30 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $53,710.00 $53,710.00 TOTAL $371,152.00 1.60 MILES WARD 2 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 19140 W CLEVELAND ST DS@79W N BELL AVE N LEVERETT AVE 26 266 808 43 266 43 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $14,746.00 $14,746.00 20740 W LAWSON ST N LEWIS AVE N SANG AVE 22 1,325 3,401 43.4 1325 43 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) $18.25 $62,068.00 $62,068.00 16650 S LOCUST AVE W SOUTH ST S NELSON HACKETT BLVD 26 314 952 29.8 314 30 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $17,374.00 $17,374.00 10830 N MCCONNELL AVE W DRAKE ST NORTH END 22 244 626 31 244 31 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $11,425.00 $11,425.00 22940 W SOUTH ST S CHURCH AVE S LOCUST AVE 33 366 1,408 32 366 32 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $25,696.00 $25,696.00 23340 W TAYLOR ST N WHITHAM AVE N LEVERETT AVE 18 643 1,350 28.6 643 29 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $24,638.00 $24,638.00 TOTAL $155,947.00 0.60 MILES WARD 3 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 6830 N BALL AVE E KANTZ LN S E KANTZ LN N 30 858 3,005 43.8 858 44 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $54,841.00 $54,841.00 6870 N BEGONIA LN ALLEY 4360 E FRONTIER ELM DR 19 123 272 25.6 242 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $4,964.00 $9,545.00 6870 N BEGONIA LN E FRONTIER ELM DR ALLEY 4399 18 119 251 29 242 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $4,581.00 $9,545.00 7480 N CANTERBURY RD DS@107S N CANTERBURY RD DS@255N N CANTERBURY RD 30 149 520 29.2 149 29 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $9,490.00 $9,490.00 2590 E CINNAMON WAY NW END N WYNDHAM CT 29 747 2,505 40 1,031 42 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $45,716.00 $62,013.00 2590 E CINNAMON WAY N WYNDHAM CT N OLD MISSOURI RD 27 284 893 49 1,031 42 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $16,297.00 $62,013.00 8910 N FRONTAGE RD E JOYCE BLVD E SHEPHERD LN 30 1,012 3,541 48 2,604 44 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) $18.25 $64,623.00 $166,312.00 8910 N FRONTAGE RD E SHEPHERD LN E ZION RD 30 1,592 5,572 42 2,604 44 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) $18.25 $101,689.00 $166,312.00 4130 E LAKEVIEW RD N COLLEGE AVE E LAKE FAYETTEVILLE RD 28 1,122 3,666 27 1,122 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $66,905.00 $66,905.00 10200 N LEE AVE E HAROLD ST E BERTHA ST 26 325 987 35.2 556 31 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $18,013.00 $30,788.00 10200 N LEE AVE E BERTHA ST NORTH END 26 231 700 25.6 556 31 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $12,775.00 $30,788.00 10670 N MALL AVE E JOYCE BLVD E GEORGETOWNE SQUARE DR 58 443 2,995 42.8 443 43 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) $18.25 $54,659.00 $54,659.00 11030 N NEW SCHOOL PL SOUTH END E SUNBRIDGE DR 30 308 1,077 42.4 308 42 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $19,655.00 $19,655.00 11100 N NOTTING HL N WARWICK DR N WARWICK DR 33 202 778 30 202 30 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $14,199.00 $14,199.00 4800 E OVERCREST ST WEST END N AUSTIN DR 29 157 538 13.6 377 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $9,819.00 $21,554.00 4800 E OVERCREST ST N AUSTIN DR N JUNEWAY TER 25 220 643 38 377 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $11,735.00 $21,554.00 5080 E RANCH DR N OLD WIRE RD N RANCH DR 26 359 1,090 27 359 27 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $19,893.00 $19,893.00 TOTAL $529,854.00 1.56 MILES  2027 PAVING PLAN p. 2/2 WARD 4 Current Pavement Pavement Pavement Project Project Average Unit Segment Total Whole Project Project ID On Street From Street To Street Segment PCI Rehab Activity Width (ft) Length (ft) Area (yd2) Length (ft) Current PCI Rate ($/yd2) Cost ($) Cost ($) (CPCI) 13820 N VALLEY VIEW DR DS@286E SW END W WEDINGTON DR 20 381 888 43.4 381 43 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + SP (PCI 40-50) + Strctrl Ptch $18.25 $16,206.00 $16,206.00 TOTAL $16,206.00 0.07 MILES Length (mi) % Length Cost % Cost Ward 1 1.60 41.76% $371,152.00 34.58% Ward 2 0.60 15.60% $155,947.00 14.53% Ward 3 1.56 40.76% $529,854.00 49.37% Ward 4 0.07 1.88% $16,206.00 1.51% Total 3.83 100% $1,073,159.00 100%  Transportation Committee Memo 2026-158 Meeting of January 27, 2026 To: Transportation Committee Thru: Chris Brown, Public Works Director From: Matt Mihalevich, Active Transportation Manager Subject: Recommendation: Background: Discussion: Budget/Staff Impact: Attachments: 2026-2031 Construction Schedule List (ATAC Approved 12-10-25) Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701  12/12/2025 2026 - 2031 Proposed Shared-Use Paved Trail Construction Projects Prioritization 2026 Score* Funding Rank Ward Feet Miles Hamestring Creek Trail Salem Rd. to Rupple Rd. (1 Bridge) 45.5 Trail CIP 13 4 2,386 0.45 Wedington Trail Futrall Dr. to West End N/A Trail CIP N/A 2 593 0.11 Alberta Trail Connection to Farmington Trails 36.3 Trail CIP 22 1 1,816 0.34 Drake Trail Extension to Gordon Long Gordon Long Park to College Ave. (Includes a 49.5 TAP Grant 11 3 4,535 0.86 (Contractor) bridge over Scull Creek) Safe Streets For All / Maple Street Cycle Track (Contractor) Razorback Greenway to Garland Ave. 53.8 3 2 2,699 0.51 U of A Trans. Bond & Garland Avenue (Contractor) Poplar to Drake St. N/A N/A 2 4,554 0.86 ARDOT Highway 112 (Garland Ave./Howard Truckers Drive to Howard Nickell N/A ARDOT & Grants N/A 4 6,373 1.21 Nickell) (ARDOT Project) Includes Clabber Creek Tunnel Tsa La Gi Trail (Hwy 62 MLK & I-49) Best Way to Lefler Ln. & Shiloh Trail from MLK 56.7 ARDOT & Grants 1 1 9,102 1.72 ARDOT Project to 15th St. overpass to Town Branch White River Greenway (River Commons) St. Paul Trail to Dead Horse Mtn. N/A CPRG Grant Funded N/A 1 12,856 2.43 In-house Constructed: 0.91 Year Total 9.35 2027 Persimmon Trail (Owl Creek Trail) Betty Jo to Rupple Road 46.2 Trail CIP 12 4 1,959 0.37 Hwy 62 (MLK Jr. Blvd.) (Schedule 2026 Trail Bond & Lefler Ln. to Rupple Road and Ozark Trail 56.7 1 1 3,574 0.68 dependent on ARDOT) Developer Build Trail Reconstruction Scull Creek Trail (Frisco to Meadow Valley) N/A TAP Grant N/A 2 6,200 1.17 In-house Constructed: 2.22 Year Total 2.22 2028 Skillern Rd. (Sidepath South Side) Crossover Rd. to Charleston Crossing 44.2 Trail CIP 23 3 2,320 0.44 2026 Trail Bond & Midtown Trail (Ash Side Path) Woodland to College & Rayview Dr. to Old Wire 52.6 12 4 2,785 0.53 Ramay School Teal to Fairlane & Swift to Jaybird Floodway South of Huntsville Connection 50.6 Trail CIP 7 1 884 0.17 issues Clabber Creek Trail Truckers Drive to Highway 112 47.8 Developer Build 11 4 1,753 0.33 Future Grant Mission Blvd. Trail (Phase 3) South of Rush Dr.to Maple St. 49.3 10 2 2,092 0.40 Funding Gulley Park to Rolling Hills (Includes Hilldale Old Wire/Old Missouri Trail 50.9 Undetermined 6 3 3,916 0.74 Connection & Crosswalk) Trail Reconstruction Various Locations N/A Trail CIP/Bond N/A N/A 2,500 0.47 In-house Constructed: 1.61 Year Total 3.08 2029 Shiloh Trail (Wedington to MLK) & Old ARDOT Permit - Watching for Development to 52.5 Trail CIP 5 4 7,359 1.39 Farmington to Centennial Park occur Mt. Comfort Side Path Salem Rd. to I-49 45.5 Undetermined 13 4 4,845 0.92 Trail Reconstruction Various Locations N/A Trail CIP/Bond N/A N/A 2,500 0.47 In-house Constructed: 1.87 Year Total 2.78 2030 Markham Hill Trail Connector Razorback Road to Cross Ave. 41.3 Trail CIP 17 4 1,500 0.28 ARDOT Permit & Bridge over Hamestring Shiloh Trail (Moore Ln. to Wedington) 52.2 Trail CIP 3 4 5,955 1.13 Watching for Development to occur Trail Reconstruction Various Locations N/A Trail CIP N/A N/A 2,500 0.47 In-house Constructed: 1.89 Year Total 1.89 2031 Existing trail end west of Rupple Rd. to Broyles Owl Creek Trail 46.2 Trail CIP 12 4 2,767 0.52 Road Razorback Gwy. to St. Paul Trail (includes St. Paul Trail 44.8 Undetermined 14 1 9,574 1.81 replacement of existing trail) St. Paul Trail (Paddle Park Connection) Armstrong to Dead House Mtn. 42.9 Undetermined 15 1 4,702 0.89 Trail Reconstruction Various Locations N/A Trail CIP N/A N/A 2,500 0.47 In-house Constructed: 2.81 Year Total 3.70 5 Year Total 117,099 22.18 Notes: In-House Trail Crew Build Future Trail Bond Funded Project Other Funding Ward 1 Total 42,508 8.05 *Trail development of approximately 2 miles per year is based on continued CIP, Future Bond and Grant funding Ward 2 Total 16,138 3.06 *Prioritization Score reflects weighting established by ATAC - Maximum score if 56.7 Ward 3 Total 10,771 2.04 Ward 4 Total 37,682 7.14 117,099 22.18  Transportation Committee Memo 2026-182 Meeting of January 27, 2026 To: Transportation Committee Thru: From: Chris Brown, Public Works Director Subject: Recommendation: Staff requests a recommendation from the Committee to the City Council for revisions to City Code of Ordinance sections 33.302 and 33.291 to transfer the approval authority of paving programs from the City Council to the Transportation Committee Background: The current version of the code requiring approval of the paving workplan was approved approximately 20 years ago. The development of the paving plan during that era was subjective. Since 2019, the City’s paving plan been developed using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), a nationally recognized system that rates street conditions on a scale from 0 to 100. (Higher scores indicate better pavement condition.) City streets are regularly evaluated to identify pavement distress such as cracking, potholes, and surface wear. These observations are converted into PCI scores, providing an objective and consistent way to compare street conditions citywide. PCI scores are then used to determine the most appropriate treatment for each street—ranging from preventive maintenance on higher-condition streets to full reconstruction on streets in poor condition. Projects are prioritized using PCI data along with other considerations such as traffic volumes, safety, street classification, coordination with utility work, and available funding. Using this data-driven approach allows the City to: • Stretch limited paving dollars further • Reduce long-term maintenance costs • Prevent streets from deteriorating into costly reconstruction • Maintain a more consistent level of street quality across the community The result is a paving plan that is transparent, defensible, and focused on preserving the City’s infrastructure investment. Discussion: Using this data-driven approach allows the City to: Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701  • Stretch limited paving dollars further • Reduce long-term maintenance costs • Prevent streets from deteriorating into costly reconstruction • Maintain a more consistent level of street quality across the street network The result is a paving plan that is transparent, defensible, and focused on preserving the City’s infrastructure investment. With this system in place, staff recommends that the ordinance be changed to remove the unnecessary step of City Council approval, and instead invest that authority in the Transportation Committee. Staff will develop plans yearly and update the committee periodically to report progress and changes to the plan that may be necessary. These changes include damage due to utility breaks, street cut repairs due to developments, etc. Budget/Staff Impact: No Impact. The City Council will continue to approve yearly budgets for paving and other Transporation operations. Attachments: transportation division and committee ordinance changes Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701  ARTICLE XVI CITY COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ARTICLE XVI CITY COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE 33.290 Composition There is hereby established and continued a City Council Transportation Committee which shall be composed of four (4) City Council members aldermen, one (1) from each ward who shall be appointed annually by the Mayor, subject to City Council approval. The members shall elect a chair at its first annual meeting. (Ord. No. 5540, 10-16-12; Ord. No. 5586, 05-21-13) 33.291 Purpose, Duties and Powers (A) The Transportation Committee shall may make recommendations to the City Council on transportation projects and issues that may arise, including, but not limited to: (1) Changes, additions, or deletions to the Master Street Plan. (2) Bids, contracts, contract amendments, change orders, cost share proposals, and other contractual items that require City Council approval. (3) Requests for authority to begin eminent domain actions, and offers of settlement for eminent domain cases related to transportation projects, except when timing of settlement offers are such that Transportation Committee review is not feasible. (4) Yearly Transportation Division paving, overlay, sidewalk, and trail/bikeway construction programs. (5) Funding priorities for proposed major transportation improvement projects and programs. (6) Street and alley closures and/or right of way vacations. (7) Funding requests made by transit providers during the yearly budget process. (8) Changes, additions, or deletions to the bikeway map and trail/street intersections. (B) The Transportation Committee shall serve as an advisory board to the City Administration, and as a public forum for transportation projects and issues that may arise, including, but not limited to: (1) Proposed street, sidewalk, bikeway, and transit related improvement plans for major projects to be partially or fully funded by the city. Said review will be at the preliminary stage, and will include typical cross sections and preliminary horizontal and vertical alignments. Said projects will be at the discretion of the City Administration, but generally will include major widening or new location projects, or projects where major changes to existing street cross sections are planned. (2) Traffic Calming Policies of the city, including review of requests for traffic calming by citizens. (3) Paving, overlay, sidewalk, trail, and related work plans for work to be completed by the Transportation Division. (3C) Any City Council member Alderman may appeal any recommendation of the Transportation Committee to Formatted: Indent: Left: 0" the full City Council. (CD) The Transportation Committee may adopt rules to govern the conduct of its business. Said rules shall be consistent with the provisions of the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. (Ord. No. 5540, 10-16-12; Ord. No. 5586, 05-21-13) Fayetteville, Arkansas, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-12-04 14:21:49 [EST] (Supp. No. 39) Page 1 of 3 33.292—33.300 Reserved (Code 1965, §§17B-11.2(a), (b), (d); Ord. No. 2109, 6-3-75; Ord. No. 2585, 12-4-79; Ord. No. 3153, 11-19-85; Ord. No. 3340, 3-15-88; Ord. No. 3587, §1, 1-7-92; Ord. No. 4099, 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4652, 12-07-04; Ord. No. 5041, 7- 17-07; Ord. No. 5586, 5-21-13) ARTICLE XVII TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 33.301 Establishment The Transportation Division (formerly known as the Street Department) has long been established in Fayetteville to maintain and improve city streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks and to perform related services for our citizens. The Transportation Division works under the supervision of the Mayor and the budgetary authorization of the City Council. 33.302 City Overlay Program (A) In the early 1990s, the city began its in-house overlay program with a stated goal to pave every city street for which public right-of-way existed. Later, the overlay program also began milling and overlaying various important, but deteriorating city streets. (B) In the early 2000s, the Mayor and City Council enlarged the overlay program to maintain and overlay city streets on a regular and rotating basis so that city streets would not deteriorate to such an extent that a full reconstruction would be necessary. (C) The procedure to determine which city streets will be funded to be overlaid and/or have curb and gutterpriorities for work shall be as follows: (1) The Transportation Division shall report to the City Council Street Committee during its first meeting of the year the results of the previous year's overlay program and propose a recommended list of sections of streets to be overlaid (and any planned curb or gutter work) during the new year.develop plans for paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk and trails, and other street and trail related work from the City’s pavement management system, sidewalk and trail prioritization metrics, and service requests. (2) The Street Committee can propose additions or deletions to this list and will recommend it to the City Council.The plan will be updated on at least a yearly basis and presented to the Transportation Committee for review. (3) The City Council after consideration and any amendments shall approve by resolution the approved overlay, curb and gutter program. (4) If the administration wishes to amend the overlay, curb and gutter program during the construction year to add an additional project, it shall request the Street Committee to approve such additional project and the City Council to amend the resolution with possible necessary budget adjustment to allow any such addition to the programreport this change to the Transportation Committee. 33.303—33.310 Reserved (Ord. No. 3875, 2-21-95; Ord. No. 4304, 3-20-00; Ord. No. 4438, 11-19-02; Ord. No. 5047, 8-07-07; Ord. No. 5173, 9-2-08) Created: 2025-12-04 14:21:49 [EST] (Supp. No. 39) Page 2 of 3  Created: 2025-12-04 14:21:49 [EST] (Supp. No. 39) Page 3 of 3  Transportation Committee Memo 2026-159 Meeting of January 27, 2026 To: Transportation Committee Thru: Chris Brown, Public Works Director From: Dane Eifling, Mobility Coordinator Subject: Traffic Calming Policy Update Recommendation: Review updates to the City’s Traffic Calming policy for referral to full City Council approval Background: In 2003, in response to multiple complaints about speeding in residential neighborhoods, a traffic calming policy was recommended as part of a citywide traffic study. Although the policy was never formally adopted, its framework was used for several years to prioritize requests through a points-based scoring system. The primary factors considered were traffic speed and traffic volume. This system remained in use until approximately 2008, when funding constraints resulted in traffic calming being removed from the City’s budget. In 2019, staff resumed evaluating traffic calming requests using the informal policy framework that had been in place since 2008. At that time, it became clear that the existing policy did not align with neighborhood expectations, as nearly all requests failed to meet the established thresholds. In response, staff drafted a revised traffic calming policy, which was adopted by City Council in March 2021 and remains in effect today. Shortly after the 2021 policy was adopted, City Council approved a new default speed limit of 20 mph for residential streets, and speed limits were adjusted on most streets throughout Fayetteville. Discussion: Since 2021, city staff has responded to approximal 200 formal requests for traffic calming on various streets in Fayetteville. Under the existing policy the City has installed speed cushions traffic calming on the following streets: 1. Ash St 2. Assembly Dr 3. Stubblefield Rd 4. Sequoyah Dr 5. Roberts Rd 6. Alberta St 7. Harold St 8. Morning Mist Dr 9. Elm St 10. Duncan Ave Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701  11. New Bridge Rd 12. Bulldog Blvd 13. East Oaks Dr 14. S College Ave 15. Happy Hollow Rd The current policy is a point-based system that requires 35 points or an 85th percentile speed of 35 MPH on residential link or urban center classified streets to qualify. Points are mostly based on traffic speed and volume with additional points added for lack of sidewalks and proximity to schools. A neighborhood consensus of 60% approval from residents is also required with residents voting to approve exact location and type of treatment. The proposed updates to the policy keep the framework of the existing policy intact but make some key changes to the scoring system and eligibility requirements to better align the policy to the expectations of the public and the original intent to provide traffic calming focused on safety in mitigating higher speed “cut through” traffic on residential and minor urban streets. Key changes include: • Basing the speed score on the posted or statutory speed limit of the street rather than a default 25 mph o This increases overall points scored for most streets with 20 mph speed limits • Adding 2.5 points for streets designated as on-street bicycle routes • Subtracting 5 points for streets with fully separated sidewalks or side paths • Allowing low-volume neighborhood link streets with less than 1,500 ADT to qualify • Increasing the minimum qualifying score from 35 to 50 points • Simplifying the process for requesting a traffic study by requiring five signatures rather than signatures from 70% of residents • Lowering the maximum allowable ADT from 4,000 to 3,000 • Requiring a minimum of 20 resident signatures to approve any installation Budget/Staff Impact: None Attachments: Traffic Calming Policy 2026 Draft Revision 1-22-26 Mailing address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701  TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY Update EFFECTIVE MARCH 17, 2021Draft January 2026 INTRODUCTION Excessive traffic speeds in neighborhood areas is an issue of concern to citizens in Fayetteville. This policy addresses a procedure through which neighborhoods can be considered for traffic calming measures. Traffic calming is the management of traffic through the use of roadway design features. Traffic management through traffic calming is most effective if the features are both warranted and properly designed. Traffic calming solutions may be warranted where there is a demonstrated need for traffic calming, and where solutions can be identified that may address the need. Not only must the needs be perceived by the neighborhood, but they must also be documented to be substantive. In order for traffic calming strategies to be effective, traffic data collection and analysis must validate that calming needs are legitimate. These traffic studies may include: 1. Speed studies 2. Vehicle and pedestrian counts 3. Through-traffic surveys 4. Accident records Effective solutions for valid needs also require that the selected traffic calming strategy be appropriate for the need. Once an effective strategy for traffic calming has been selected, it should be properly designed in accordance with the relevant design parameters. These should include consideration of: 1. Traffic volume 2. Design speed 3. Design vehicle characteristics 4. Emergency services Although warranted and properly designed traffic calming strategies can have the desired benefits of managing traffic, they also can create disadvantages to adjacent streets and neighborhoods and to the traveling public at large. Traffic calming can have the potential of shifting an existing traffic problem to another street or neighborhood. Traffic calming may also increase delay for emergency response vehicles and can increase long term maintenance costs for the City. Because of the controversy and potential disadvantages, traffic calming should be implemented only with the majority consent of those directly impacted. 1 This policy therefore provides guidelines for the following traffic calming activities: 1. Requests for traffic calming consideration 2. Prioritization of requests 3. Identification and approval of traffic calming strategies 4. Programming of traffic calming improvements 5. Design of traffic calming projects 6. Evaluation of traffic calming projects REQUESTS FOR TRAFFIC CALMING CONSIDERATION Requests for traffic calming received will be catalogued, and will be assigned to one of three tiers: Tier 1: Proximity to Schools (1/2-mile walkshed) or other significant points of interest Tier 2: Obvious cut-through opportunities (based on engineering best judgement, could be supplemented with traffic count study) Tier 3: Dead-end or disconnected areas of the transportation network If a residentcitizen requests police patrol enforcement, the request will be forwarded to the Police Department for possible enforcement action. Requests from multiple streets may be grouped together and/or staff may add streets that may be impacted by traffic calming to requests. If such grouping occurs, the requirements of the next section will apply to the grouped streets. PRIORITIZATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING REQUESTS Locations assigned to Tier 1 or Tier 2 will be scheduled for further study upon receipt by the City Engineer of a petition or other affirmative response by at least five signatures one member of seventy percent (70%) of thefrom property ownersersh or residents of ips facing the street(s) on which the traffic calming study is requested or written request from a Property Owners Association or other similar group. A block shall consist of every developed property having frontage on the street to be studied between successive intersecting streets. A typical traffic calming petition shall include, at a minimum, a description of the street or streets which are to be included in the calming study and the signature or other written evidence of approval70% of the . Where more than one person is listed as owner for each property, only one person shall be entitled to vote or sign a petition. Likewise, if multiple properties are owned by the same person or persons, the owner(s) will only be entitled to one vote or signature on the petition. This definition of property owner shall apply throughout this policy document. Active Property Owners Associations (POA’s) may also provide approve or disapprove a traffic calming project. Written communication from association leadership may be used to meet the consensus requirements instead of a petition signed by residents. The City staff assigned to administer traffic calming studies will review the request for validity and will assess whether other streets may be impacted by implementation of traffic calming strategies. City staff will define the area of potential impact resulting from the traffic calming implementation on a case by case basis. Relevant data to be collected for the study includes: 1. Speed and volume counts 2. Accident experience 3. Distance to schools and other pedestrian generators 4. Pedestrian facilities This data will be used to assign a point value to each Tier 1 and Tier 2 location, as follows: 5pts for each MPH over five MPH over 25 MPH the posted Speed Per Calc. or statutory speed limit -using the 85th percentile Volume Per Calc. ADT/100 5 pts if no continuous accessible sidewalks, 2.5pts if one Sidewalks and side, 2.5 points street is part of designated shared on-street -5 to0- 5 pts Bikeways bike route. Subtract 5 points for streets with continuous adequate/comfortable sidewalks or side paths. 1 point for each auto accident/year at one location, 3 points Crashes 0 to -5 pts for any fatal or serious injury crash or crash involving a pedestrians or bicyclists. 10 pts within quarter-mile radius, 7.5pts if between quarter- School zones and and half-mile radius, 5pts within half-mile radius, 2.5pts if Pedestrian 0 to -10 pts partially in half-mile radius or within half mile of a major ActivityWalkshed pedestrian activity generator such as large city park, employment cent, university or community center. Locations receiving a minimum of 50 points, or that have 85th percentile speeds 35above 35 mph or higher will receive further consideration for traffic calming under this program. Locations with 85th percentile speeds not exceeding 5 mph over the speed limit will not receive further consideration regardless of score. Streets that do not meet these minimum criteria, and dead-end or disconnected streets that are placed in Tier 3 generally will not be considered for structural traffic calming, but may be considered for enforcement and are eligible for consideration of tactical urbanism permits. IDENTIFICATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES City staff shall present to the residents living within the area of potential impact the results of the traffic calming study and rating. Where traffic calming may be appropriate, staff will present options for traffic calming in the affected area. Sixty percent (60%) or more of the property owners in the area of potential impact must support the proposed strategy option(s) before the City will consider traffic calming implementation. In certain circumstances, the 60% requirement may be waived. These circumstances may include locations that have disinterested owners (e.g. locations with a large percentage of rental properties or locations adjacent to a single multifamily apartment complex) or other situations that are deemed necessary for public safety by the City. PROGRAMMING OF TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS Periodically, but not less than once each year, City staff will prioritize those traffic calming strategies within the City that have been approved within their area of impact. Prioritization will be based on the rating system. The City Council Transportation Committee will approve projects to be implemented, up to the yearly budget as determined by City Council. Those traffic calming improvement locations not selected will remain in consideration for up to three years. City ward boundaries should be considered so that projects affecting each ward can be implemented. DESIGN OF TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECTS The design of traffic calming devices must meet the following criteria: 1. Only rOnly residential links, or urban center streets with less than 3,000 ADT and neighborhood link streets with less than 1,500 ADT are eligible.. 2. The street shall have an ADT of less than 4,000. 23. Limited to streets having only one lane of through traffic in each direction. 34. Streets must not be primary emergency routes, as determinedetermined by the Police and Fire Departments. 45. At the discretion of the City Engineer, certain traffic calming measures may not be used if they would create an unsafe condition for motorists driving at normal speeds under average driving conditions. 56. Streets must not be through truck routes unless an acceptable alternative route is identified and approved. Design of traffic calming features shall accommodate a single unit truck. EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECTS Six months following the completion of the traffic calming improvements, City staff may undertake a follow-up study to determine if the traffic calming features have achieved the initial purpose of the project. If unacceptable impacts are identified, corrective measures may be taken. Traffic calming measures may be removed after the evaluation period for any of the following reasons: 1. Emergency response is significantly impacted. 2. The problem for which the traffic calming was implemented has been transferred to another street. 3. At least sixty percent (60%) of the property owners in the defined area of impact sign a petition to remove the traffic calming measures. This option will result in complete  removal of all measures. Where traffic calming measures are removed by petition, a period of at least 3 years must pass before future petitions for traffic calming measures will be considered on the same street(s). 4. If traffic volumes have increased beyond established limits for traffic calming, or sidewalk or trail infrastructure has been added, traffic calming measures may be reduced or removed.