Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
Regular MeetingGreen Bay, WI · June 23, 2022
Minutes
MINUTES OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL
DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD
THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2022, 2:00 PM
Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom.
A. ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION.
1. This item contains Zoom information, instructions, and a link to the Virtual Comment Form.
B. ROLL CALL.
1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Josh Patchak,
Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College;
Brent Weycker, Citizen Member.
Present: Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, Bob Mathews,
Excused:
C. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA.
1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2022, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint
Review Committee.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Brent Weycker to approve the agenda. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
1. Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to approve the minutes. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
E. REGULAR BUSINESS.
1. Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance Districts
in the City of Green Bay.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Bob Mathews to receive and place on file. Motion
Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
2. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend
the Project Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown.
Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until the next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
3. Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street and
East Mason Street to add eligible projects.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to hold until the next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
4. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend
the Project Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park.
Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bob Mathews to hold until the next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
5. Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an
Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the North
Broadway corridor.
Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until the next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
6. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the
Project Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Bob Mathews to hold until the next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
7. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-four (24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in the area
north of E. Walnut Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and east of N.
Washington Street. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and
classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash
grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian,
bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water
infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land
acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and
administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-
half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID.
Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None,
Abstain- None.
8. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-five (25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in the area
east of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and north of Cherry
Street, plus a portion west of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and east of N. Madison
Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of
the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and
loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and
other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure;
environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition,
environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The
proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius
of the proposed boundary of the TID.
Bob Matthews left the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until the next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain-
None.
9. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-six (26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally located in
the area east of Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road, and north of Padi-
Wood Lane, plus a portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger Road, and west of S.
Northview Road. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and
classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash
grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian,
bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water
infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land
acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and
administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-
half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to hold until the next Joint Review Board
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain-
None.
F. INFORMATIONAL.
1. Set next meeting date, time and format.
The next meeting date will be confirmed, but is tentatively planned for August 18, 2022 or August
19, 2022.
G. ADJOURNMENT.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to adjourn. Motion Passed.
Yes- Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain-
None.
VERBATIM MINUTES
- Okay, agenda.
- Here we go.
- Call the Tax Incremental District joint review board for Thursday, June 23rd, 2022. We'll go
through roll call. We have a Bradley Klingsporn.
- Here.
- Josh Patrick.
- Patrick here.
- Thank you, Bob Matthews.
- He's there, I see him.
- Yep. Thumbs up. He's here. Yep.
- Matt Winker? Yep see him. Okay. And then Diana Ellenbecker. So all 5 are here. All right. Entertain
a motion to approve this.
- Motion to approve.
- Second.
- We have a motion by Bradley and second by Brent. All in favor?
- [All] Aye.
- Motion approved. I'll entertainment to take a motion to approve the minutes from June 23 2021.
- Motion to approve.
- Second.
- Alright we have a motion and a second?
- Second.
- Third.
- Aye.
- Aye.
- Thank you that passes.
- Aye.
- Thank you. Right. We'll move on regular business. The first one was consideration with annual
report on the TFI for the city of green bay. Is it gonna be okay if I, mute you? Or if you want to
mute, for some reason we have feedback from her. Thank you. Certainly can unmute as you have
questions. As you seeing in front of you, we have enough that we try to put our TIDs down and we
have enough of them. We try to put them on one spreadsheet to make it a little bit easier to look at
what I'm gonna go through is a very, very high level of our 2021 annual report. However, you can
stop, ask any questions or you can wait till the end, ask some questions. I don't wanna bore you with
all our TID's, but as you see the way we pull it together, we have a TID on the left number, the type
of TID we have the name, we have the creation date, the term date. We have the fund balance at the
beginning of the year of 2021, that we kinda recap of where our different revenue sources are
coming in. Most of them, the majority typically is tax increment. We have some interest, shared
revenue is really, the term has changed, but it's really property tax. Personal property and or exempt
computers that share a column. Then we have some developer agreements and then we have, if we
borrowed or some other revenue source. So that is in that revenue section. And then we have
expenditures. We have capital land purchases. We have debt in the interest that goes along with
that. And we have some, either development finance and or PayGos that goes through that column.
And then we have other payments that go out the door and that'll give you what, how we ended the
2021 year. Then you have the column of future project costs and the future revenues. Do you want
me to go through each one and kind of talk about the highlights in those items? In each one of the
TIDs, I'm really gonna talk about the financials. Neil's gonna talk a little about some of the things that
are on the development side. Do I have any feedback, do you want me to go through at a very high
level by TID? Or do, would you like to receive and place on file, or have questions?
- Is there anything at risk Diana?
- At risk?
- Yeah. You're showing surplus in all of them, I'm just saying, is there anything that- it looks like
you're pretty much working back to, to break even but is there anything that's that's of concern from
the, from green based perspective on any of the TIDs out there?
- No. What, what I would say is, as you're seeing our TID 13 is a negative fund balance, but what
we're seeing by 2023 or 2024, we believe that TID 13 is gonna turn positive. So that is some really
good news, that's a large TID. It's a large increment that is starting to come in for that TID. So again,
looking negative, but in a couple years, it's working its way out. TID 14 right now also has a large
negative fund balance. Hasn't really moved. That one, we need to get some more increment. TID 14
is your North Broadway, what we call Larson Green. Really it's the rail yard now. Projects are
started they just haven't completed. We just haven't seen enough increment to really get this one
moving in the right direction there. There has been a lot of development, but we just need more
projects completed. That one, I don't think there's a concern. The projects have to keep moving
forward. And then the other one is 22, which is our shipyard. And that is an area in which the city is
investing quite a bit of money in it. We have some large developments that are happening in that
area, not a concern. That's just gonna be a large investment from the city to really get that shipyard
up and running. Otherwise, we've heard that before, that a lot of the TIDs go down before they
come back up and we are really starting to see some of our TIDs coming back up. If they were in a
negative spot or vice, you know, in the last 2 development directors, we have worked really hard in
majority of our TIDs to just do PayGos and very few upfront grant. So it's really a, a switch in how
we are doing. The years have gotten better that our downtown and some of our other areas have
improved. So we have switched to a different kind of funding mechanism. Otherwise I think we really
don't have any large concerns for any of our TIDs.
- Thanks for me. It would help if you wanted to go and just talk about how many of these are kind of
locked in? Meaning like, if I look at TID 4, I imagine those future project costs are debt, service
payments, and maybe developer grants or something like that, that we've already agreed to. So
nothing's gonna change there. We have a pretty good idea what future project costs are gonna be.
And based on the increment, we have a pretty good idea what revenues are. So that's kind of locked
in, but then when you look down further at shipyard and basically the shipyard and the legends
maybe, those estimates are a whole lot more, "this is kind of how we're feeling about things" and not
quite as concrete. Maybe if you could just say, all right, TIDs 4,5, etc are locked in. And we're pretty
certain on those numbers. And then the ones where we're actively working on development and the
numbers are just kind of our best guess.
- Yep, I actually went through on to each one of them this morning. So I think we're gonna be fine.
TID 4 passes the expenditures period out of the 2.9 and the 2.95511 million is debt. And then there
is also about 1.9 million. What we are looking at is a proposed allocation to a TID 22 that is later in
this deck. So right now 1 million is locked in of that 2.9. That's assuming that we have what is left of
increment, the 2.2 million in increment that is assuming 4 years of increment, but again, 1 million is
locked in at debt. If we go to TID 5, of that 12.7 million, we have development agreements about just
under a million dollars, we have about 6 and a half million that's locked in at debt. We also have
some projects that were started before the expenditure period ended, and that is improvements to
our lake park. And that is about $5 million, but that's all the changes that you've seen to allow that
cruise ship that just came in this past week. And then there's some additional enhancements that are
already in the works for lake park. So in this case, that is really the 12, 7, 6, over 6 and a half is debt
development agreements, a million and there's improvements to the park that have already been
started. We'll continue on then. TID 7,8 and 9 were officially closed in 2021. So we have closed them
officially, shut them down and have zeroed out those balances if there were any outstanding debt
service, it will get moved to our debt service account. So those have officially been closed. When we
get into TID 10, 4.2 million. In that case, the majority of that is future infrastructure needs. That is a
corner of Main and Mason. We have a lot of flooding down there. So our director of public works is
working on some projects to try to help reduce, not eliminate, of course we can't, but try to reduce,
try to help curb some of the flooding down there. So at that point, those are future project costs.
Those are truly infrastructure, project costs, no other dollars are actually obligated at this point. And
that would be assuming still another 10 years, the increment side of 3.2, that is assuming 10 more
years worth of increment at roughly, 250- $300,000. If we continue onto to TID 12, that expenditure
period had ended in 2020. We still had some open projects for infrastructure near our nature's way.
Their facility. At that point of the 10.575, that is still outstanding, 1.7 is still obligated for debt. We
have an estimated 3.2 million for development agreements for really PayGo. And there is an
allocation request or we'd be looking to potentially to do an allocation of 5.5 million to other TIDs.
So really there's 5.5. That is probably unallocated for TID 12. That is assuming with 2022 and 2023
increment. We go onto TID 13 at 35 million. Large number, but 6.2 is estimated at the development
agreements or PayGos. Point 3 is standing and the remaining 13.5 was intended to put toward ramp
replacement downtown. So out of the 35.3 that you're seeing in TID 13, about 22 of it at is 0.5, we
are looking forward to using that money toward a ramp replacement. That is an all incremented
there that is assuming that this TID stays over the remaining 11 years. That makes up the 37.5 for
revenue. I go to TID 14, that 13.3 outstanding development agreements is estimated about 5 million
debt is about 6.3 million. And we assume that we have some additional project grants about 1.3
million in that, TID that makes up the 13 3 increment is assuming at 12 additional years makes up the
16.1. TID 16. $10 million is the future project cost development agreements. Just about 200,000. We
have outstanding one, 5.1 million in debt. And the 4.7 is looking to pay for additional infrastructure in
the military corridor. So that is unobligated the 4.5, but that's an additional project class that we're
looking to do in the military corridor. And that is assuming increment for the next 13 years to make
the 9.5 million. If we go into number 18, that one, I think we have a negative fund balance, we turn
positive. We expect to turn positive in 2024 cash flow on number 18. That one, 27 million is a large
number. Correct, outstanding. We have development agreements of about 9.8 million projected.
And those are obligated. And we are looking at future project costs of 17 million in that TID, as
Bradley did explain earlier. We are starting to get some of our newer TIDs. These are additional
projects that, we were possibly anticipating, but there's none of those in the 5th 17.3 are locked in at
this time. 19, another newer TID that started in 17. That is our east home mall area out of the 8.7
million, 1.5 is locked into development agreements for PayGos and future project costs of 7.5. That
is assuming about 23 more years worth of increment to get you to your 8.9.
- And future project costs on that. Are you looking at future development agreements or
infrastructure type projects for us?
- It would be a little bit of both, as you see, there's some things happening in the east town mall area.
I see Neil shaking his head, he is actually gonna touch on that when he gets to the east town mall
area. But I'll let Neil just speak to your question Bradley.
- Yeah, probably a little both Brad, the one thing that I think that's unique about this one is we're
kind of focusing on what we're calling in lot development. So you kinda see where the new bank
buildings going up, kind of on the inside ring there, we're kind of working with the developer there to
actually establish a kinda a new row of development on there. They're facing a lot of the current mall
projects right now. You guys remember probably the recently the developer actually kinda rezoned
the back half of that building to actually get a semi-industrial tenant in the back of that, to get that all
fully occupied. We're having preliminary conversations with the owner of the Shopco building in
terms of what may happen there. I think the really kind part of is to prove that this tool actually
works is when I think when 19 was created, they actually left off the frontage, the parcels that were
on the frontage of Mason street. And when we get to slides later, I'll show you that. So a couple of
those new buildings, like the Chipotle that just opened a couple of those buildings, those are not in
TIF 19. Those are actually fully on the tax roll. So obviously from a passerby, it just looks like it's
entirely all east town mall, but those new developments right on Mason street are not in the TID and
those are actually on the tax roll. But the investment that's happening on the inside, I think is
definitely positively affecting the investment that's happening on the roadway there. So probably a
little bit of both, we've got some, pedestrian improvements and some other things we wanna make
to kind of help make that more of that area done in there. There's always some storm water
improvements we can make to make that a little bit better, but we're anticipating, if those inline's
continue, we probably have some development incentives to do to help with those as well.
- Thank you.
- We're getting close to the end and then you can ask any more questions again, that certainly then
would be fine. TID number 20 on the Whitney park at about $6 million, about $2 million is locked in
for development agreements that are ready in place. And that is assuming about 8 million for
additional project costs. We do additional development agreements. Neil's gonna kind of explain
some of the newer TIDs we're putting together, and we're making them smaller. So in this case,
there still is some additional lots that are looking to be developed in our Whitney's park area. But at
this point that would be either 3.8 million in future project costs and or into additional development
agreements. And that 6.1 million is increment over 23 years Going to green made packaging. That
one is the large number there, but out the 52 million for future project costs, 38 million is locked
into a development agreement. We have a large PayGo with green bay packaging. So out of the 52,
38 million is locked in with the green bay packaging. That leaves about 14.3 million for future project
grants. At this point I'm not anticipating additional development agreements, but certainly as if you've
driven down those roads, there's certainly some infrastructure, railroads, streets; improvements that
could be done over by green bay packaging. So again, not locked in the 14.3, but some future project
cost. That's assuming additional 23 years worth of increment. 22 is our shipyard. That is the one. At
this point, it looks like positive fund balance, and we continue as a positive fund balance, but that is
because our borrowing is ahead of our expenditures at this point, that one is going to be, in cost, put
in from, by the city. Out of the 63 million that is right now projected as future cost project cost to
date that is locked in at just under $10 million for the development or PayGos development
agreements with PayGos. We are anticipating about $27 million in debt, and that would still free up
our future project costs. For additional enhancements in that area. And the reason 59.9 million is we
assume additional borrowing of up to about 11 million. We are anticipating grants of about 7 million
for the shipyard and the water feature. And then the balance is estimated increment for the next 25
years for this TID. And then we'll go onto the last one, which right now is our legends district. At
that point, the 11.7 is locked in at estimated development agreements or PayGos of 5 million. Those
are the items that are already locked in, and that would leave an allowance for about $6 million of
project costs. Within that, we also have a lighting project that's going on. That's also in those future
project costs. So far we haven't had a lot of development in that area. So I certainly can think that if
we have more development, we'd have more allocation to development agreements or PayGos, but
also we probably have increased increment, but that is not built in, but either way out of the 11.7, 5
million is locked in and then 6 million is for future project costs. That is assuming an increment of 24
over the next 24 years of projects that are already in the works or that we're aware of. Any
questions from any of the members on the results from 2021?
- I'm just gonna quickly zip through these, then. Diana covered a lot of the information. Oh, go ahead.
- Hang on. We have these all separate items. So we really would have to entertain a motion to
receive in place and file this report.
- I guess, Diana, before we do that, I did have one financial related question for 13. There was a
payment to Foxcon and I was just wondering what it was that they had done in TID 13 that justified
the, the 54,952 paid to them.
- That's an interesting one. The city of green bay is on the hook for the property tax bill for the
parking ramp. That is the river ramp. It was an agreement prior to Foxcon that we thought we were
going to be getting the parking ramp. So I'm not sure exactly how that all happened, but we have a
development agreement slash parking agreement that we, the city maintains the building. There's
some payments that go back and forth on the, on that parking ramp. But the 54,000 is actually really
not a developer. It's really paying for the property tax bill on the river ramp.
- OK. So that really didn't, it didn't go to them for doing anything. It just wiped out the property tax
bill for the parking ramp? Yeah.
- Essentially. Yes.
- Unfortunately they haven't. Yes. They haven't done anything. So yes. We're not paying them for any
services or any development that they have done.
- But they do own that. Or they have some sort of.
- They do still own the property, yes.
- Okay. All right. Thank you. I'll have a motion to approve.
- I'll second.
- Alright we have a motion by Bradley, a second by Bob. Any other questions otherwise all in favor?
- [All] Aye.
- That passes.
- Okay.
- Then item number 2 consideration with possible action to adopt, or did you just wanna run down
through the TIDs?
- Yeah, yeah, absolutely. So just as again, I think Diana covered most of this, but this is in the annual
port, but again, this is just kind of the general location of where all our districts are at. Here's TID 4.
It's downtown, no significant development looking at possible allocation closes in 2025. TID 5 is kind
a weird one, more Frankenstein shaped one. It kind of crosses the river goes both sides here, this is
where certainly the light wall dock improvements that you mentioned was a big hit with the cruise
ship. Second one I think is coming in on June 30th already. So that's a, a good sign. The company had
a good experience with that. I did want make a note on the one Astra project that's in this area
south of Mason has been delayed. So the developer's kind of working on getting some new financing
and doing some things there. So we're hopeful that that comes back next year, but we're not positive
exactly where that's gonna come from. And obviously the public market project and the private
development project associated with that. That's within this district. However, if we were gonna do a
deal that would certainly probably require a separate TID going in the future, probably in overlay in a
separate development agreement, which is not in place, but have we have had preliminary discussions
on that one, but certainly nothing, nothing in, in force at this point. So again, the expenditure period
is done and it closes in 26. TID 10. Several smaller retail infield projects are being looked at in this
area. the big expenditure again is Dianne is probably more storm water improvements, hopefully for
this area, just because of the flooding that does happen in this area. Looking to close that in 31. TID
12. This is the I 43 business park. You know, the nature's way project infrastructure was the main
thing that's driving that one right now. Latest closure on that one is 25. 10 district 13. This is
important, certainly because not only it's existing area, but also because of the WPS site here in this
area here. Part of this area is in for that we had just very preliminary discussions on that site. Really
kinda just looking at preliminary land use concepts with, with the developer, as well as just kinda
coming up with the plan for environmental mediation on the site. Definitely looking at this area for
how to accommodate some parking in the future that has to do with certainly obligations with the
main street ramp going away possibly, and then identifying another location for new parking. So the
main street, specifically that actually goes to Schriber at their request within the next 10 to 12 years
if they ask for it. Essentially we'd have to knock that building down and give them that site for future
expansion. Last conversation we've had with them is they have no intention of exercising that right
now, I think their office building is set up for 800 people. They've got about 500 on staff right now,
about a hundred people actually on site. So they don't have a whole lot of need for the extra space
right now, but that's certainly impacting our downtown. And we'd love to get a few more folks back
in the offices to come out and have lunch during the day. Then that one closes in 32, here's TID 14,
the rail yard working with them to do project financing for that project. We are in the middle of
kinda renegotiating that development agreement. Project has received its WHEDA tax credits. So
that's a great sign moving that one forward. Also working with them on active discussions on maybe
a new corporate tenant for one of their buildings. So we are still seeing some good positive activity
there. We haven't got the increment, we're working on getting that, moving forward, working very
positively with the developer at this point, TID 16, Military avenue. I think the notable projects on
this one is we got some outlaw development possibly at the former shop go site. HJ Martins also got
a lot of development about lots kind of in these same areas where we're working on these. So we
think we're very positive on the future of this district as well. Again, that closes in 34. TID 18. This is
University avenue. This is the project, tuning properties. The folks remember it used to be TMD
properties had a project here that kind of stalled and didn't go forward. We got a new development
agreement in place with Tune-in properties to construct their side. They're going to be hopefully
moving ground, hopefully this fall and then actually be under construction with their first phase in the
spring. There's also a new vet clinic that's being evaluated for it, so a little bit more extra increment
here in that area. We mentioned east town mall again here. I mentioned these white areas here, right
on the frontage area. That's where some of the newer restaurants have built and located and are not
within the tip district are coming fully on the tax roll, but I think are benefiting from the investment
activity that's happening within the district, right on the other side of it. Some of those in lots, the
façade improvements mentioned the adjusted retail development. We expect that to continue. We
hope the developers continue to attract other investors hopefully for that area. The TID should
close in 2044. Here's Wendy park. I think Diana mentioned there's a couple of more opportunities
for a few town homes to be built in this area. But right now there's nothing in the docket. We're
hopefully gonna be continuing discussions with that developer to keep those moving at some point.
They have met their minimum requirement I believe for their agreement, but they still have an
opportunity to continue that development. So we hope to talk them into doing that. Green bay
packaging- whoop, go ahead.
- Neil has the response to those properties been strong? I mean, do they have high occupancy?
- I think there's half of them have done very, very well. And half of them have been a little slow and
we think primarily it's just due to price point difference between the 2 developers who worked in
this area, but we certainly are still seeing plenty of demand. So we're confident that maybe if we can
get this one developer who's been very successful, but maybe acquire the rest of the space that's
available. He might be the one then to pull it off and try to get some additional projects going on
there. So mixed results. We think primarily based on price point for the housing units.
- OK. Thank you.
- I mentioned green bay packaging here and in the shipyard, obviously lots of news going on here,
phase 1 improvements or contract has just been awarded. So we'll be actually doing the public
improvements here in the next couple of weeks, we'll get those started. That includes all the
waterfront amenities, the marina, the kayak launch, the bike trail, some of the other seating area,
right on the waterfront, that will be underway really here in the next 30 to 60 days. Phase 2 is
already being planned. We have been essentially notified of potential award from the national park
service from a 5 million grant for phase 2. So we're excited to see that and hopefully get that fully
implemented to moving forward. Our private development, some updates on those: the merge urban
development project are currently kind of reworking some of their soils costs on site. They had
made some assumptions in terms of what the soil compaction level was on the site and found that it
was not what they thought it was. So we're kind of working through with them on how to get that
taken care of. We're hopeful that they're just gonna change their phasing around a little bit and
hopefully should be getting moving here in the spring. Impact 7 is actually on the Badger sheet metal
site across the street on Broadway. They are actually looking at doing an affordable housing project
as well. They have, received their tax credits as well. We are looking at trying to figure out exactly
how that project moves forward. We're readily under a planning option, a preliminary term sheet
with that developer, hopefully having a development agreement with them in the next 30, 60 days. So
a lot going on in this particular district. So we're excited to see some things finally get moving here
on this one. Then obviously the legends district, the last one. The good news was the hotel
groundbreaking was just this past what couple weeks ago. So they're under construction and they're
moving forward. We are looking at some, several pedestrian trail and lighting improvements, as
Diana mentioned for that corridor, getting going in the summer, early fall, that one closes in 46. So
does anybody have any questions on any of those? I know we just raced through a lot of territory in
not a lot of time. So if anybody has any questions I may answer, certainly let me know if you have
anything, even after this meeting, I'd be happy to follow up on any status of any projects in these
areas.
- On the shipyard, those 2 developments that you mentioned. You said that we were working
through some changes. Do we have any commitments? Is there a chance that they both fall through?
- The merge urban development is actually under development agreement. So we have an agreement
with them in place. We're looking at just modifying, primarily modifying the timeframe for them,
certainly with costs being what they are, construction costs. There's always a little concern with that,
but right now they have not given us any indication that they plan on not moving forward with the
project. They're simply working through maybe a little bit of a schedule, change. Impact 7 we're been
kinda working through them with their numbers and their financial model of what they're trying to
bring forward, but they have been very persistent in trying to accelerate their project. So right now
we're still confident. We don't have any reason to believe that they're going to delay and hopefully
we'll be in and have something moving forward with them either this fall again, or early spring. I
celebrate when I actually see the bull moving dirt and we know they've got their financing and
everything's moving forward. So certainly in this economy with interest rates and everything else,
until they're actually moving, and even the project's actually done, there's always some degree of risk
I think in this day and age.
- I think that's it then. We're going to the next section Diana.
- Business item, number 2: consideration with possible action to adopt an allocation amendment
resolution and to amend the project plan for TID 4 downtown.
- We don't have a whole lot of of details on these at this point, because these are primarily tax
amendments and most cases on these, they're not substantial documents. So for TID 4, as we
mentioned before, would simply be an allocation amendment of revenues from 4 into TID 22. At this
point for these and really all the subsequent reports on shown on the screen. Right now, we're just
gonna be asking for a hold till the next joint review board meeting. Obviously the TID 4 balance, we
feel could be a safety net for what we're looking to get completed in TID 22 with the shipyard. That's
the short version of that one. Anybody have any questions on that one?
- Well, I do have a question. In your projections that you have built in, are those allocations assumed
in your projections?
- Yes, they are. In the future project costs, that was kind of what Bradley had asked earlier. When we
went through TID 4, we have 2.9 million future project costs. We have 1 million outstanding for
debt. And then that is about 1.9 million as a proposed allocation to TID 22. So that is already built in
over the course of the next 4 years.
- Any other questions?
- How much is the allocation from TID 12 to TID 22, please.
- For TID 12 have we pulled the number for that one yet Diana? I can't remember if we did or not. I
think we're actually looking through our TID 22. We have L as our financial consultant reviewing the
overall TID 22 financial picture. So by the time we get to the RDA version of this, there will be a
much more sound projection on what that's going to be. But I think we may have had a preliminary
number at this point. I don't know if we had one. Do you remember if we put one in for that or not?
- Yes. Out of the 10.5 million. That's outstanding on that. We're looking at for future project costs
for TID 12, 1.7 is locked in for debt, 3.2 is estimated for PayGo. And that leaves about 5.5 million
that we were looking to do an allocation amendment to TID 22. Yes, that is what we had discussed.
There are some options with that one. You know, affordable housing but that right now there's out
of that 10.5, 5.5 is not obligated as in, as an allocation amendment.
- Okay. Thank you.
- I guess, to follow up on that. So a bit with both TID 4 and TID 12 It looks like, if we didn't do an
allocation to TID 22, some of those could be terminated.
- Yes. Early.
- This year. like they'll have enough to cover future costs based on the increments and what the
balance was at 12, 31, 21, that they could cover all their future costs by the end of 2022.
- Yeah, I think, go ahead, Diana.
- That, that would be correct. Based on the fund balance of 740, we get another 500, in and the 22
would go into, by the end of 20. Yes. Based on future probability yes. TID 4 could be terminated by
the end of 22 and still have a a slight positive fund balance without allocation amendment.
- I'm not proposing that, I'm just trying to show what the decision is is. Do we keep these open to
the end of their term in 2025? And then we can allocate 1.7 from TID 4 and 5.5 from TID 12 to give
7.2 million to TID 22, reducing the borrowing, especially with borrowing costs, being higher on this
new TID and improve the financial viability of it, or do we terminate those right away and get our
TID increments? That's the decision that the taxing authorities need to make. Is that accurate?
- Absolutely Brad. Exactly. I said we're still cautiously optimistic that the increment that will come in
from the projects we're working on will sail, look great. And we're coming back to you guys in 2
years saying, "you know what, guys, we're good." We can move this and everything worked the way
we thought it was going to, just the uncertainty around the things you exactly mentioned, Brad, is
kinda why we're looking at at least having these I guess as a safety net, if you will, to kind of make
sure that those projects are paid for.
- You're just pushing dollars out that would be received in another 20 years. So I'd like to understand
if TID 22 is truly at risk that you, to the tune of, you know, $7.4 million, because it's fairly early for
you to be calling that risk out. So what changed in your assumptions?
- Yeah, I think the main thing that we're looking at right now is obviously, we've just had all of our
borrowing approved for phase 1. So that borrowing is in place and we're proceeding with that, for
phase 2, even with the $5 million grant coming in for the federal, there's a dollar for dollar match for
that requirement. So we're certainly looking at having those while we're bringing in 5 billion, we still
need to show the investment, to match of what the rest of that could be there. So that's certainly a
driving factor. And then obviously we're looking at still some of the uncertainty around some of the
environmental in that particular area, is well in terms of getting that resolved and until we actually
have buildings in the ground, that increment is actually coming in. Certainly we're a little hesitant to
say it's all gonna be all smooth sailing at this point, but an absolute fair question. Ellers is actually
performing kind of an updated analysis for us on TID 22. So we'll, we will have a full, detailed financial
for that by the time the RDA takes a look at this. And we'll certainly be sharing that with the
members here as well.
- Okay. Thank you.
- I guess that kind of brings up the question of the timing of the transfer. Do you need this funds for
activities that you'll be paying out in 2023? And so the transfer needs to happen now in 22 for you to
have the cash into 22 or is this something- oh, go ahead, Diane.
- Oh, I apologize. What I would be projecting out of the 1.9, I would say in 2022, we would have $1
million balance that would be transferred. The resolution that I would work with Neil to bring
forward would be a million dollars at this point in 2022, that could go to TID 22, which would
reduce our borrowing in 22 to pay for the shipyard. Again, as Neil just said, we just awarded a
construction contract that we will have enough to pay probably out this year, but by spring we would
have to pay out the balance. So we would be looking at potentially a million now, and then I, I would
the remaining balance, which would be roughly 900,000 projected cash flow would be really 2025. So
we would really be looking to split it half now and half in 3 years. This is what we've projected out
for the over the next couple years.
- Okay.
- Other questions on TID 4. At this point, there's certainly, there's no approvals at this point. It
would simply be asking this to hold this item to the next joint review board meeting for when we
have a full draft project plan available with including the full financial analysis. That's the one that Bob
is referring to.
- Yes so I'm going to make a motion to hold until the next RDA or really the next JRB meeting.
- JRB meeting. We'll be sharing full information by the time the RDA meeting rolls around with the
joint review board. But the actual action would not be until the next JRB meeting.
- Including at actual resolution then.
- Yes. And that will include an RDA resolution and council resolution, assuming that those are both
supported.
- Move to hold.
- Second.
- Okay. So we had a motion to hold by Joshua. And was that Bradley that second it?
- Yes.
- Thank you all in favor.
- [All] Aye.
- That motion passes.
- Thank you.
- I will go to the next item. Number 3 for consideration with possible action to amend the project
plan for TID 10 main street and East Mason projects.
- Yeah, right now, as we said, our director, Steve Greneer and public works department is essentially
kind of developing an updated storm water management plan for this area. And that's where the
primary investment is going to be for this in particular. We are not anticipating any other really new
projects at this time that we believe that they are primarily storm. There may be a street project or
something else associated with a storm water project, but the storm water addition spin will
probably likely be the main addition for this area. And again, we'll have a detailed map of, of what
those might be in a list. Certainly coming up here shortly. We have a very preliminary estimate from
director Greneer but he's looking to kind of finalize a map location as well as some more detailed
cost estimates.
- Motion to hold to the next joint review meeting.
- Second.
- All right. We have a motion by Bradley and second by Joshua. Any other discussion all in favor?
- [All] Aye.
- That passes, next item. Number 4 consideration with possible action to adopt an allocation
amendment resolution to amend the project plan for TID 12, I 43 industrial park.
- Essentially, this is the same report we did for TID 4 and for the same purpose we called through
and we kind of finalized the financial projections on this; we'll determine final need and hopefully,
maybe confirm the amount needed, at least for being considered for this allocation event.
- So in the, in the packet, it looks like there's a possibility. This could go to TID 14 or TID 22. Is that
still on the table?
- I think right now we're looking at primarily 22. Initially, we looked at it as possibly be being 14 of
them. But because of the next item we're looking at here on this item, we're looking at this point just
allocating to 22, depending on what happens with the action on TID 14.
- Move to hold to the next JRD.
- Second.
- We have a, a motion by Joshua, I believe second by Bob.
- Yes.
- And any other discussion? All in favor?
- [All] Aye.
- Motion passes. Number 5 consideration with possible action to extend TID 14 by 3 years and
adopt an allocation amendment resolution and amend the project plan for TID 14, the north
Broadway corridor.
- And again, I think similar to what we said previously, Josh, you mentioned on this one, I think right
now we're really just looking at a project plan amendment for the extension of 3 years on this one.
Obviously I think this is something that this board has looked at previously, but we were looking at
essentially now this time in terms of the pandemic and delays and the change in project financing and
the loss of essentially 2 years of increment. Since I think this was discussed previously, we're back in
front of this. The developer has provided the city with a cash flow analysis, documenting why they
think they need this extension. We preliminary look on it. The staff is preliminary agreement that we
agree with their analysis, but we are going to ask Ellers to take a look at that full cash flow analysis
and provide that essentially at the time of when this comes back before this body. Actually at the
time of the RDA public hearing to have that analysis completed and available.
- I apologize for being new if this is obvious to other people, but in the, the annual report is the
future revenue estimated? Does that assume the 3 year extension?
- It does not. The 16.1 million that is out that we chose is for future revenue is increment for 12
years. And I made myself a note that does not include an extension. So it would have the extension.
Good question.
- Yeah.
- Yeah. It does not anticipate an extension, it's not built in at this point.
- Would this change any of the development terms? If we had the extra 3 years of increment of one
and a half million dollars going into that, would you want to then propose infrastructure or is this just
to have a buffer in case anything goes wrong? Because right now you're projecting a $13 surplus.
- But essentially this is looking at what would be owed to the developer under there in terms of the
incentive directly to the developer. That does include some infrastructure responsibilities on their
end, Brad. So we're assuming as part of that, there are also other agreements in the rail yard that
certainly could potentially benefit from this. But at this point we're looking at primarily the Ford at
the rail yard being the primary beneficiary of that extension. If and when that gets passed, we've told
the developer that BDL would sit down with them and actually reevaluate the existing agreements on
a one by one basis. But we not giving automatic 3 year extension on all their projects automatically.
- Okay. I'll move to hold to the next JRB.
- Second.
- We have a motion by Joshua second by Bradley. Any other discussion? All in favor?
- [All] Aye. Any neighs? Motion passes. Number 6 consideration with possible action to adopt an
allocation amendment resolution and amend the project plan for TID 22, the shipyard.
- And our understanding is actually discussing legal counsel. If we put this in there, I don't believe an
allocation amendment action is actually required for a recipient for a donor TIF to be a recipient.
However, to be on the safe side, we've gone ahead and added this on here just to cover our bases.
So assuming the other actions would move forward, we would also proceed with just make sure that
we're, we're legally covered with any action we might need to do for TED 22s project and accept any
funds. Subjects to direction by the city attorney.
- It's a little odd to have those as separate items.
- Yeah I agree, and Brad, tell me if I'm wrong. In our experience with the department of revenue,
they like things being very specific. We're being a little bit overly specific in terms of saying, "Hey,
we're acknowledging these guys are donating and we're acknowledging this one is a recipient." So
we're just trying to make sure we cover our legal bases that we've adequately noticed. That's the
intent of what we wanna do, but I fully agree.
- It's just possible for the donor to pass and then the recipient to fail, which would be awkward.
- Absolutely. Yeah. So if we determine the legal counsels is not needed, we'll report that as such at,
at the next meeting.
- I was wondering if we could, with these allocations, when we have these for consideration at the
next meeting, if we could have the amount that would be an immediate transfer this year as separate
consideration for an intention of future transfers. And I just think that the idea of transferring to
avoid some borrowing costs in the shipyard makes a lot of sense financially, but we don't want to get
into what Bob was getting at before. We don't want it to look like we're bailing out this brand new
TID, they need our financial help. And so to say that we're gonna transfer things in 2025 kind of
presupposes the financial condition of the shipyard at that point. Is that something that we would
need, you know, a separate action on or what do the other members think of that proposal?
- Yeah, I agree. I think the thing is, once the dollars get transferred, they're hard to get out because it
closes at the end. So if we treat it as a financing mechanism, I'm much more supportive. Just taking
cash and moving it in for rainy day, Not as interested.
- Yes, I would agree. Actually on my cash flow, I have let's say TID 4, I show an estimated 1 million
coming in or sorry, 1 million going out in 2022. And then I didn't show them another transfer until 3
years later. So when we were gonna bring that resolution through, it would probably would've been
an ask for $1 million and not for the full 1 9. But we certainly can have the resolution stating what
we're asking for now. And then if there's an anticipated and a future date for a future resolution, we
would let you know what that is. But we wouldn't be looking for action on that at the next JRB.
- Great. Thank you.
- Any motion on this one? Number 6.
- I have a motion to hold until the next meeting.
- Second.
- All right. We have a motion by Bradley second by Bob. Any other's discussion if all in favor?
- [All] Aye.
- Motion passes.
- Super.
- Number 7 consideration with possible action to adopt a creation resolution to establish TID
number 24 cherry street and adopt the project plan. You need me to continue the whole item?
- Nope, I can go ahead and list that one here. Just start off on some notes on this one. Staff has been,
I think Diana mentioned before, we're trying to kind of identify smaller districts at this point rather
than go out and grab everything just to kind of mitigate any risks of valuation going down. Just in
terms of trying to be a little bit more conservative in terms of how we know it is, this process to
amend a boundary is fairly straightforward. It's similar to what we're doing right now. And if we
decide there's a good project and need to do that, you know, again, we feel very confident that we
could bring that forward and present that to you guys at that time. So we think this is a good call
again, in addition, we're looking at mixed use districts because they are shorter duration, usually 20
years versus other ones, I'll address that later on, possibly being a more of a rehabilitation district to
get that a little bit extra time, depending on the cash flow, but obviously mentioned construction
pricing is slowing projects. It has not canceled them yet, but it's certainly slowing them down and
causing delays. The good news is with the districts. We'll be talking about here shortly. There is an
anchor project that's kind of set up to help create increment right off the bat. So we're excited about
that. They are not overly speculative. They have projects ready to go. The downtown TID will
certainly be PayGo to the extent we can on anything related to the developer incentive and the
industrial TID we're gonna be reviewing may have some minimal upfront costs. If there's some
infrastructure things we need to do to accommodate that. But the very first item in this agenda item
is the cherry street project. So folks know this is the here's the cherry street parking ramp. This is
this here's this Adam street parking lot, 221 Cherry street here, Shower and Schumacher buildings
are right here. The confetti's building, the old Vic theater is right here. So this is in a relatively small
district, but again, very specific in its purpose of what we wanna do. So we talk about these areas
projects, essentially looking at initially. Also when the draft plan was attached, looking at about 11.8
million of costs. Right now, we've got about $8-11.5 million of revenue coming in. We haven't done
any other projections unlimited. We don't have full projects or evaluations listed in there. So we
believe that will come up enough to cover the cost anticipated by the incentives on that. But that has
not been quite finalized. We are also working with elders essentially to come up with a cashflow
analysis for this particular district. So it is very small. There is a project that is proposed right here at
222 Cherry street. This is the boss's building we call it in terms of the single story building that
normally, if you walk by here, you would see a single story retail structure right here. It's being
proposed to add 5 stories to the top of that at this point, subject to final architectural was that we
have a development agreement in place to provide incentives to assist with the cost of actually
redoing this building. Apparently, historically, I think it did have a 4 to 5 story building. There was
apparently a fire sometime in the past that took all the top floors off it and they never added them
back on. So we're hopeful that the, the foundations are still good enough to be able to support a new
project. I understand that they're still going back and kinda confirming and verifying that. Best case
scenario, they would be able to do that. Worst case scenario, They would probably have to actually
do full demolition on the current site and put a new foundation in for that particular structure.
- You know what the projected price points are on those apartments?
- I think they are supposed to be market rates, depending on the bedroom unit account, I do actually
have it in their development agreement. Bob, I can forward those over to you, but I think they're
kind of looking at the 80 to 120% of the area median income was kind what they were talking. So
more moderate range. They're not gonna be super luxury ones. Just out past the affordable range.
Which is kind of what we're seeing is more of a gap. We're doing a lot of investment in the lower
end, not as much in the higher end, but in terms of pricing and so forth, we are seeing some projects
that are going that direction. What's missing is this kind of area in the middle in terms of folks who
are just, they're not qualified for the lower income programs, but they're not, certainly can't afford
the top of the line. So there's kinda this middle gap and we feel this project would actually fit that
perfectly. I think it's mostly just one and 2 bedroom units if I recall correctly. So probably in more of
that 800 to 1200 bucks a month rent. I'm assuming at this point.
- So just real quickly, you said Whitney way, some were some were selling quickly and others
weren't. Is it a price point issue or is it a price for the quality issue?
- Well, I certainly don't know about that second part, Bob, but there's certainly a price point. I
thought what we have heard at this point from other folks is just a general price condition. Although
certainly I know the quality of the one developer is certainly the one who's doing pretty well. It does
build a nice unit and I think has been pretty successful with that. I am not familiar with the other
developer quite as much.
- OK. Only I'm asking is if Whitney's not that far away and you're putting in similar price point, it's
either I've got poor quality for the price or, you know, or that price point isn't as, as in demand.
- Absolutely. Fair question. From all of our market data and research we're seeing is that there's still
pretty high demand for housing units. So it's surprising to see unless something's really out of whack
price wise. It is surprising to not see those moving a little bit faster because it is a good location. It's a
great project spot right next to the park. It's close to downtown. It's a good spot. So, absolutely a
fair question. I wish I had a, a better answer for you.
- That's fine. We'll have a chance to talk about it again. I apologize. I have to leave at 3. I have another
appointment.
- Okay. Just if I jump off, that's the reason why I'm not upset.
- Okay. Fair enough. Thanks Bob. So any, any questions on the proposed hit 24 here. otherwise,
similar to the other ones, we'd ask for just a motion to hold this to the next JRB meeting.
- The concept we saw there, is that 222 and 221.
- No, this is just 222, 221 is just a parking lot across the street from this project that does not have
an active project being proposed at this point. The city's owns that lot. So we're actually likely to go
out for an RFP to try to attract a developer to do something on that site.
- And same thing you're looking for mixed use multifamily.
- Ideally, I think this is a good opportunity to get some density downtown and maybe support some
of the, the downtown businesses by getting a few more heads down there, living downtown here.
Absolutely.
- And that would be on the side of the existing Adam street parking lot.
- Yes. Correct.
- Okay.
- To, to hold to the next meeting.
- Second.
- All right. We have a motion by Joshua and we have a second by Bradley. Any other question? Any
other discussion, If not, all approve.
- [All] Aye.
- Okay. Number 8, consideration with possible action to adopt a creation resolution to establish TID
number 25 Monroe street and adopted project plan.
- Okay. Solona here's this is an also one. We have a specific project, lots right here owned by our
redevelopment authority right now the 200 north Monroe project folks have seen that pop up in the
news here within the last year or so. So a relatively smaller district kind of in between some of our
other districts in this immediate area. We, trying with the area, we're looking at in until such time as
other projects may come about. So again, that's the area. So we are looking at about 25 parcels, kind
of looking at it as a mixed use district. However, we look at our cash flow life. We were assuming
kind of a 27 year life. So if that's the case, this will end up being a conservation or rehabilitation TID
at end of the day. This project has been the specific project on that location has been really
experiencing some difficulties with their construction estimates. We have assigned development
agreements subjects to a, a TID being created for this one, working with them on about a $2 and a
half million gap. They are not asking for more TIF assistance. This is the good news. However, we are
trying to find other financing options for them to essentially close the gap and complete their project.
So we do have some opportunity if we really wanted to. And Diane cover your ears, because I think
we kind of are comfortable with really where it's at. And fortunately the developer has felt that he
really wasn't comfortable asking for any additional, knowing what we, the city's other projects have
been requested for the area. So most of them have been in the 70% increment range. This one's
actually at 75, so it's a hair higher, but in terms of just overall cash flow, we do feel that there's other
projects kind of north up. And this, this is where this project is. There's nothing pending on these
projects, but we do think there have been some discussions where additional increment is very likely
to occur. So we are confident that there there'll be substantial revenue to cover any expenditures at
this point. And again, we'll also be kind of taking care of having elders run a formal cash flow analysis
for us on this part as well. There's just a rendering what that project would look like. So again, kind
of a nice up on the Monroe, the tower scale, the 5 stories here, first floor retail, including kind of a
grocery market space, possibly UWGB leasing some space here and then scaling it down to kind of
this 3 story building again, where there's more residential kind of on the side. So very unique design,
underground parking for a lot of the project, this is because outdoor patio area. And then there
some onsite parking for the retail customers. So a really very exciting project. We're excited. Got a
little bit more work to do with them to show UPEN the pencil, to get across the finish line. But we
believe TIF contribution is pretty much locked in at this point.
- Is there anything to include the Monroe apartments?
- Oh, right. This one right here. Just because we've heard the conditions that we're dealing with over
there right now, they're pretty rough in terms of, we think there's likely to be some sort of project
happening there sometime in the future. There's nothing pending that we're aware of, but there has
been a lot of action in terms of our inspection departments and things kind of having to come over
there and do work there. So we're familiar. We're very familiar with its prime for redevelopment,
especially if there's some activity. We do know that there's a builder actively looking at this corner of
Maine in Monroe that if something could happen here, that there might be some incentive to
grabbing something here on this particular site. Plus the value of this building is low enough. It's not
likely to go any lower it's. I hope not.
- It's zero.
- Yeah. Is it still zero at this point? We're just kinda looking at this as we do think that it is a
redevelopment opportunity and obviously if it's zero, there was no risk in including it in terms of
evaluation. Nothing specifically pending that we're aware of at this point. Just, just being a bit
speculative that something, could happen there. Any questions on 25?
- A motion.
- To hold to the next meeting.
- Second.
- Alright we had a motion by Joshua 2nd by Bradley to hold any other discussion, hearing none all in
favor.
- [All] Aye.
- That passes.
- Okay. Thank you.
- Let me read. The last one consideration with possible action to adopt a creation resolution, to
establish TID number 26 grand new industrial park and adopt the project plan.
- Great. Thank you, Diana. This is essentially here. If folks are familiar, we've had had recent
discussions and development agreement approved with carnivore meat company here at green green
bank located here, primarily on these parcels right here. These are essentially city owned parcels that
we have acquired for purposes of industrial development. So this is the location of where that
project would go. The other areas you've identified here, staff has actually been in communication
with, with these owners and that they have expressed an interest in possibly moving forward on
development. So at this point, this is reviewing this as our phase 1 area essentially, of the growth
park of this particular industrial area. So the I 43 park is simply kind of just off the screen over here,
off to the left. So these particular owners, we feel that's a strong potential for add additional
industrial development going forward. We do have essentially a development agreement with the the
initial landowner. We're conservatively, assuming that there would be kind of a mirrored project
occurring on some of those properties, obviously with the amount of land here, there should be
multiple projects, occurring infrastructure is largely to this area. There's some things we'll need to
extend to the south and maybe a little bit out to the west to ensure that it's available for the next
phase of expansion for this area. But for the most part that most of the infrastructure needed in this
area will kind of be to the south and possibly a, a bit of it to the east and west to provide some sort
of spur connection for future industrial development here. So again, right now we anticipate just on
the first project, the industrial project that has been approved at this point was again, Phil was a very
competitive project but a very, very, I think beneficial cash flow for the city in terms of what its
projection in projected increment would be. So we do suspect there should be sufficient, even just
on a very conservative approach. We feel there's gonna be some substantial valuation and increment
made to help cover the costs that we're projecting at this point. We'll be doing a full formal financial
cash flow analysis as part of the final project. And this is the car project a little bit tough to see it's a
great big long building. So here's kinda the building footprint on that particular site. Here's the actual
building structure that is as proposed. They would like to be under construction like in the next
couple weeks. So they're not messing around.
- It says here, the description of the district. This is 26, right?
- Yep. It looks like I got the wrong.
- That's for the last one.
- Right. Mainstream road that should not be in there anymore. That's the wrong descriptions. North
and south of Mason street and Finger road. And then with Grandview here in the middle. Thank you
for pointing that out.
- Yeah.
- This would be a standard industrial TID I think 20 years, for this one.
- I would entertain a motion.
- Motion to hold to the next meeting.
- Second.
- All right. We have a motion by Bradley second by Joshua. Any other discussion? If not all in favor.
- [All] Aye. The motion passes.
- Thank you. And I think just as from a wrap up here, Diana, this is akin. We're kind of looking at
RDA meeting and public hearing on August 1st and public city council meeting the next day on
August 2nd, looking at probably tentatively in our to checking availability for members here on the
18th or 19th of August. So we are planning on having a full kind of working draft of all the project
plans, ready to go and resolutions by the August 1st meeting. So those packets should include that.
We'll be including that and sharing that with joint review board members as well in case there's any
questions.
- Any other discussion, or that would be our last item, motion to adjourn.
- So moved.
- Second.
- Motion by Bradley second by Joshua. All in favor.
- [All] Aye.
- Thank you everybody.
Agenda
AGENDA OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL
DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD
THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2022, 2:00 PM
Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom.
A. Zoom Meeting Information.
1. This item contains Zoom information, instructions, and a link to the Virtual Comment Form.
B. Roll Call.
1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Josh
Patchak, Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin
Technical College; Brent Weycker, Citizen Member.
C. Approval of the Agenda.
1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2022, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint
Review Committee.
D. Approval of Minutes.
1. Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting.
E. Regular Business.
1. Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance
Districts in the City of Green Bay.
2. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to
amend the Project Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown.
3. Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street
and East Mason Street to add eligible projects.
4. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to
amend the Project Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park.
Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
June 23, 2022
Page 1
5. Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an
Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the
North Broadway corridor.
6. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and
amend the Project Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard.
7. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-four (24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in
the area north of E. Walnut Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and
east of N. Washington Street. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the
identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID.
Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of
property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements;
potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable
infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation,
structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs
include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the
proposed boundary of the TID.
8. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-five (25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in
the area east of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and
north of Cherry Street, plus a portion west of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and
east of N. Madison Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the
identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID.
Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of
property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements;
potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable
infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation,
structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs
include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the
proposed boundary of the TID.
9. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-six (26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally
located in the area east of Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road,
and north of Padi-Wood Lane, plus a portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger
Road, and west of S. Northview Road. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based
on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the
TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of
property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements;
potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable
infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation,
structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs
include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the
proposed boundary of the TID.
F. Informational.
Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
June 23, 2022
Page 2
1. Set next meeting date, time and format.
G. Adjournment.
1) THIS MEETING IS RECORDED: THE VIDEO OF THIS MEETING AND MINUTES ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE
AT www.greenbaywi.gov
2) ACCESSIBILITY: Any person wishing to attend who requires special accommodation because of a disability,
should contact the City Safety Manager at 920-448-3125 at least 48 hours before the scheduled meeting time so
that arrangements can be made.
3) QUORUM: Please take notice that a majority or quorum of the Common Council will attend this Tax
Incremental Districts Joint Review Board meeting and will constitute a meeting of the Common Council for
purposes of discussion and information gathering relative to this agenda.
4) REPRESENTATION: The party requesting the communication, or their representative, should be present at this
meeting.
Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
June 23, 2022
Page 1
Packet
AGENDA OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL
DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD
THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2022, 2:00 PM
Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom.
A. Zoom Meeting Information.
1. This item contains Zoom information, instructions, and a link to the Virtual Comment Form.
B. Roll Call.
1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Josh
Patchak, Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin
Technical College; Brent Weycker, Citizen Member.
C. Approval of the Agenda.
1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2022, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint
Review Committee.
D. Approval of Minutes.
1. Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting.
E. Regular Business.
1. Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance
Districts in the City of Green Bay.
2. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to
amend the Project Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown.
3. Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street
and East Mason Street to add eligible projects.
4. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to
amend the Project Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park.
Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
June 23, 2022
Page 1
5. Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an
Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the
North Broadway corridor.
6. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and
amend the Project Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard.
7. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-four (24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in
the area north of E. Walnut Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and
east of N. Washington Street. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the
identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID.
Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of
property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements;
potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable
infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation,
structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs
include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the
proposed boundary of the TID.
8. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-five (25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in
the area east of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and
north of Cherry Street, plus a portion west of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and
east of N. Madison Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the
identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID.
Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of
property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements;
potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable
infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation,
structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs
include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the
proposed boundary of the TID.
9. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number
Twenty-six (26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally
located in the area east of Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road,
and north of Padi-Wood Lane, plus a portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger
Road, and west of S. Northview Road. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based
on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the
TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of
property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements;
potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable
infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation,
structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs
include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the
proposed boundary of the TID.
F. Informational.
Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
June 23, 2022
Page 2
1. Set next meeting date, time and format.
G. Adjournment.
1) THIS MEETING IS RECORDED: THE VIDEO OF THIS MEETING AND MINUTES ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE
AT www.greenbaywi.gov
2) ACCESSIBILITY: Any person wishing to attend who requires special accommodation because of a disability,
should contact the City Safety Manager at 920-448-3125 at least 48 hours before the scheduled meeting time so
that arrangements can be made.
3) QUORUM: Please take notice that a majority or quorum of the Common Council will attend this Tax
Incremental Districts Joint Review Board meeting and will constitute a meeting of the Common Council for
purposes of discussion and information gathering relative to this agenda.
4) REPRESENTATION: The party requesting the communication, or their representative, should be present at this
meeting.
Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
June 23, 2022
Page 1
Virtual Meeting Instructions
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
Zoom Meeting Information
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84702439013?pwd=Wk53U21LYnlMWjBoK2Yrekw1ZHk3Zz09
Meeting ID: 847 0243 9013
Passcode: 261684
One tap mobile
+13126266799,,84702439013# US (Chicago)
+16468769923,,84702439013# US (New York)
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 876 9923 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 408 638 0968 US (San Jose)
Meeting ID: 847 0243 9013
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kctdzfcqhB
Public Comments
If you wish to speak at this public meeting or leave a comment, please fill out the online
Comment Form prior to the meeting.
Additional Information
1. Wisconsin Open Meetings Law still applies
a. Persons interested in speaking to an item must state their name and address for
the minutes.
b. Committee/Commission/Board members will still follow Roberts Rules of Order
Newly Revised 12th edition.
2. Please log into the Zoom meeting at least 10 minutes before the meeting begins to
ensure a proper connection and that your technology is working.
a. If you are a Board Member, please log into CivicClerk with a computer, laptop, or
tablet device.
3. Once you are in the meeting please mute yourself.
a. You may unmute yourself when you are called upon to speak.
4. Waiting room
a. When you call in or connect via web or Zoom app, you will be placed in a
“waiting room.”
b. The meeting host will then admit you to the meeting, and mute you upon
entrance (you will still be able to hear and or otherwise observe the meeting).
5. Registering
a. The host may ask you to register for the meeting. A registration link will be sent to
you along with the invite. You’ll receive another email confirming that you’re
registered for the meeting.
b. If you’re using a phone, your registration will be tied to an email.
6. Raising your hand
a. Committee/Commission/Board members—you can either use CivicClerk and
request to speak or you can also utilize the “raise your hand” tool in the Zoom
platform (you’d need to use a computer or tablet) to let the host know you would
like to speak. You can also un-mute yourself and start speaking.
b. Persons with items on the agenda or other interested parties —you can also utilize
the “raise your hand” tool on the Zoom platform via computer or mobile device.
You will be allowed to speak once the committee, commission, or board has
moved to “open the floor for interested parties to speak.” Once discussion on
your agenda item has concluded, the host will mute you, unless the committee
opens the floor again.
7. What devices should I use?
a. Smart phone (please see more detailed instructions on page 3)
b. Land line
c. Tablet— in advance of the meeting, please download the Zoom Meeting app by
using either the Apple Store or the Play Store. You will be asked to input your
name, to identify you for the meeting.
d. Computer— you can access the meeting through a web browser by clicking on
the meeting link, or through the Zoom Meeting app. If using the app, please
download it in advance of the meeting. You will be asked to input your name, to
identify yourself for the meeting.
e. For tablet and computer users--if you download the app you may be asked to
verify your email.
8. Zoom etiquette
a. Muting yourself when you’re not speaking will prevent your background noise from
interfering with others’ ability to listen to and participate in the meeting.
b. If you’re using a telephone, please identify yourself with your phone number and
state your name and address before you speak. Zoom meeting hosts can see
only your telephone number and will ask you to identify yourself.
9. Closed session
a. Persons in the Zoom meeting will be put into a waiting room while the
committee/commission/board meets in Closed Session. Participants will be
admitted back into the Zoom meeting once the committee reconvenes in Open
Session.
b. Persons watching a Common Council meeting live on YouTube will see a gray
screen with the City logo during closed session.
10. Persons interested in attending anonymously or listening to the meeting may call in by
dialing *67 followed by the phone number in the Zoom Meeting Information box.
Calling into the Zoom meeting using a smartphone
1. Dial the phone number listed at the beginning of this document.
2. When prompted, enter the Meeting ID number followed by #
3. Once you are in the meeting, notify the meeting host that you are in and state your
name.
4. If you do not wish to speak, please make sure your phone is on Mute
a. If you’re using a smartphone, look at your screen and click the Mute button
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022
AGENDA ITEM # D.1
Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting.
BACKGROUND
RECOMMENDATION
FISCAL IMPACT
ATTACHMENTS
1. JRB Minutes 06.23.2021 with Verbatim
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
MINUTES OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL
DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 2021, 11:00 AM
Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom.
A. ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION.
1. This item contains documents which provide call in information and instructions for the Zoom
Meeting.
B. ROLL CALL.
1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Peter Ross,
Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College;
Brent Weycker, Citizen Member.
Present: Peter Ross, Gina Van Egeren on behalf of Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker,
Bradley Klingsporn, Excused: None
C. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA.
1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2021, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint
Review Board.
Moved by Brent Weycker, seconded by Peter Ross to approve the agenda for the June 23, 2021,
meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No-
None, Abstain- None.
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
1. Approval of the minutes from the April 8, 2021, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint
Review Board.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Gina Van Egeren to approve the minutes from the April
8, 2021, meeting. Motion Passed.
Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No-
None, Abstain- None.
E. REGULAR BUSINESS.
1. Review the Tax Incremental Districts annual reports.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Gina Van Egeren to receive and place on file the Tax
Incremental Districts annual reports. Motion Passed.
Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No-
None, Abstain- None.
2. Staff report on the performance and status of each district governed by the Board.
Neil Stechschulte presented the staff report. No action needed.
F. INFORMATIONAL.
1. Set next meeting date, time and format.
No action needed.
G. ADJOURNMENT.
Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Peter Ross to adjourn. Motion Passed.
Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No-
None, Abstain- None.
VERBATIM MINUTES
- That is, I think we're ready to go. Let's say, I guess, digitally are we all? Well, we have Lisa, we all
good to go in terms of everything else for a minutes and recording, okay perfect. And Dave gives us
the thumbs up too. I think we are good to go, Diana.
- All right, sounds good. Well, call the meeting together for the tax increment district. The joint
review board for June 23rd at 11:00 AM. We will take a roll call. Bradley Klingsporn?
- Here.
- Peter Ross?
- Present.
- Bob Matthews?
- Actually, yeah. Gina is here on Bob's behalf today.
- Okay, thank you.
- Gina is here. And then we have Brent Wecker.
- Yes.
- And then Diana Ellenbecker from the city is here.
- Excellent.
- All right, so we'll move on to the approval of the agenda.
- All right, we have a move by Brent, second by Peter all in favor. That's approved. We're down to
the approval of the minutes from the meeting on April 8th, 2021.
- I'll second.
- All right, we had a motion by Bradley and second by Gina all in favor, that is approved. We'll move
on to regular business. The item is review of the tax increment district annual reports. Obviously,
there's a lot of information here. It's a large packet, as we've done in the past. We tried to take all
that information, the DOR reports and we summarize it on one spreadsheet. I think that's a little bit
easier as a snapshot. Do you have questions right from the beginning? Do you want me to go
through a lot of detailed? How do you want to meet me to handle this? I can give you as much detail
as little detail as you want, any suggestions?
- I'm good with a 20,000 foot view.
- Okay, well then we'll go over and very quickly very high level and please stop me. I will touch on
every one real quick, but just, I don't even know if I have to catch them all, you know. Tip four is our
oldest and still it has a term date of 2025. I'm good, that one is just running just smoothly. That's tid
four, tid five there was a lot that happened in tid five in this past year that had a, that district got
amended and we moved out the ship yard out of the tid five. So, we created tid 22 instead in the
shipyard. So, there was a lot of movement of revenues and expenses and then projections. And, that
also had there was money that was allocated to tid 9. So there was a lot of moving. So, you know,
we started at 1.9 million at the beginning of the year, right? We went down to about $900,000. We
still expect some large expenditures in this tid, tid five. But, we will need those years, last couple of
years to finish out paying for those projects. But, again, lot happened in tid five. But, now that has
been carved. All the shipyard has been carved out. Move on to seven, eight and nine. All three of
them were closed in 2020. So if you looked at last year's projections of future costs and future
revenues numbers have changed a lot because we have now closed out those TID's. We've had some
allocations out of those TID's. So, shows very little movement or activity future activity for those
TID's TID 10 is our next next one, main and mason. And that one is, not a lot of expenditures. At
this point, we have just started working with our development team to work on some future
projects for this TID, as we have income coming in, and not as many expenditures. So, we are
working on projects to try to, this is mainly Mason. There's plenty of stormwater projects that we
can use down and Maine and Mason. We move on to TID 12. This is a tid, also, there was quite a bit
of activity that went on last year. And this year, the increment is over $2 million, but we also had a
lot of projects going on mostly for one of our large development in the I-43 development. It was the
nature's way. So, getting infrastructure into that TID. We continue to, it also had a allocation to TIF
9, that was approved last year. So, still some future costs that are being still worked on. And, were
already obligated, with some future revenues coming through. We'll go onto TID 13. That one is our
downtown TID. Have a lot of expenditures here, as you can tell. See, it's a negative fund balance. We
do have more increment coming in then we do have show of future expenses. And we just show that
this TID will turn positive in the about the next two years. So at this point, there's no new projects. I
mean, no new infrastructure projects planned in here. We do have potential some new development
going on downtown which will help our increment. But, the goal is still is within two to three years,
that this one will turn positive. Go onto TID 14 which is our rail yard area that we're starting to see
some nice improvement in the tax increment. We also had some large infrastructure projects in
there. We also did some borrowing in this TID. So, it went from a negative fund balance of 3 million
down, to about two five. And this one also based on projections, in about two years, we are looking
to have this one as a positive fund balance. Again, we have a lot of activity going on in TID 14. And
the Director will talk to you after we go through the annual reports of some of these additional new
projects coming through. TID 16, which is our military avenue very little activity there at this point,
starting to show off positive fund balance. Finally, in 2020 we rolled to a positive fund balance. And so
we are looking at some future storm water projects in this TIF before closure. TIF 18 university
avenue the festival foods now out on that side our JBS out on that side. Negative fund balance and
that is partially because of a project that was started at JBS. We just haven't seen the increment to go
with that project. We did have an upfront project grant of 1.5 million and that's why you're seeing a
nick. But, the director also had some positive information on that TID, but we are seeing some
positive movement on this TID. Then we get into East Towne Mall, as you know, we had high
expectations of changes in East Towne Mall. But, we were lucky to get some change in the Cub
foods. We have some changes going on there now, but so this one still remains very little activity.
We haven't done any payouts other than some now pay goes for increment that's been created. So,
it's still small positive fund balance looking for some bigger changes coming down the pipe. Whitney
park, very new development. We haven't seen much increment yet. That will all be coming online for
the one of 21 which will affect will be we'll see the increment really at the beginning of next year.
Again, that one just has a negative fund balance but for a few administrative costs a few minor costs,
same thing. Green bay packaging, green bay packaging has a by the time we ended the year we've had
a negative fund balance of 31,000. But, one of 21, we do have incremental $1.6 million that came in
from green bay packaging. This is our large pay-go. We do have a 90% pay-go that goes on to pre-
med packaging. As we have very little infrastructure costs that we have so far put into this TID. So,
right now it's looking negative 31, by next year we'll have a nice positive fund balance. And again,
we'll start paying out a large 90% pay-go on this in this TID. We go onto the shipyard again, there
was a lot of changes with a new TID that was created. We moved out all expenditures and all
revenues that were brought in for the ship yard and that district that was removed out of TID 5. We
had some new bonding in 2020 of $2 million. We transferred in about 1.5, 7 million from TID 5. So,
started off very small because it was just a brand new TID. And at the end of the year we are sitting
at about a $2.6 million fund balance. But again, the majority of that is because of borrowing, and for
future projects at the shipyard. Phase one will be happening this fall. And then the director will talk
to that. So, right now it looks positive. We just haven't spent down some of the money that we
borrowed yet for that project. The legend district, a very new TID at this point, very little activity,
but it will be receiving $850,000 in 2021 from our TIDs. That was a project that was started in TID
7. It was a pedestrian walkways that was not able to complete prior to us closing, so we got approval
to allocate $850,000 from TID 7 to TID 23, which will be then able to be spent in this TID and
improve that. Use that for infrastructure in this district. I know I flew right through it. Please let me
know what questions you have. I got thumbs up from Peter.
- I just want to clarify it was seven and it closed in 2020?
- 7, 8, and 9 all closed in 2020, correct.
- Okay. Thank you.
- And I think, director had asked the question and should I steal his thunder? Between the three of
them that we closed, they had increment value of $58,970,000. So overall our equalized value, our
TID stats we're currently at 7.3% of the 12% that we can have open for TID's. These three that we
closed are about a 0.8%. So, we go from about a 7.3% to about a 6.5%. So we drop our allowable
TID's by closing these three TID's. Any other questions? Otherwise we would take a motion I guess
this is just to receive and place on file. If there are no changes or questions, or recommendation, we
had some spelling mistakes on our DOR reports. So, thank you to Bradley. We are going to be fixing
those before we submit them to DOR. But, also changes we would be submitting them as presented
in the packet. And again, this would be a receive and place on file then.
- Before you do that, I have a question. So a couple, the next mandatory term dates there's a couple
of 2025, 26's, and when you're going through, you were talking about if you had infrastructure
projects that could be done. Is there any discussion on what's going to happen next? And whether,
instead of doing the infrastructure project there now rather, A to terminate a couple of years early
and create a new TID service there, I guess. Cause they're all ongoing effort to develop. You know
what, I'm thinking what TID 5, TID 10. I'd imagine that in 2027, there's going to be a TID there. It
just isn't going to be the same one that we created here.
- We've believe I had some discussions. We, on a weekly basis, we meet with our development team.
And TID five, as you know, as you were just mentioning TID five actually has an expenditure period
that ends in December of 21 here. So we have been looking at some projects that still could be
completed this year to make sure that we could use projects that are needed into TID five. So at this
point we have not had any discussion of closing TID five early, as some of these expenditures will
really take our fund balance down, and that will need a little bit of more future revenues to kind of
bring it back up. But, at this point there was no discussion of closing that one early, and then that
really the next one that has the next termination date would be yes, TID 10. And at this point our
expenditure period doesn't end till 2026. So, again, the discussion and the plan at this point was to
move forward and continue to have some projects up until 2026. We did not discuss closing this one
down and then creating a new one, certainly up for discussion, certainly something, those are, you
know, those are the two options, spend them up to your expenditure period or closing, create new.
- And I would add Brad, certainly if we get a if we get a new project, certainly that needs that is going
to be, we're going to need to probably, it's probably going to be in our interest to do that anyway
because we're going to need the life of a new district to help out if, especially if it's a significant
project. So that certainly remains a possibility. But I think something we haven't really made a
determination on yet at this point.
- Yeah, and just kind of, if you extend two period with the need to have the increment allow you to
pay that off, then you can't really do anything in that, not expenditure period. Whereas, if you don't
expand it, and you're able to close. Then, you have the flexibility to do more things in the future, so.
- Absolutely.
- Perfect, the other question I had was the agreement packaging legal agreement is that go through
2045 then I need a .
- Give me a moment, I have to look up the I'm going to look at the spreadsheet real quick make sure
I have right answer for you.
- Not that any of us will care too much in 2044, but whether it was gonna be active is what I am
curious. You know, cause it goes payload goes until 2045 then that's just locked in until 2045, and it
just coasts.
- A tax year of 2045, payable in 2046. Correct.
- All right, well that one is gonna coast in there for the next 24 years.
- Money in, money out, exactly, yeah exactly. But, they did just have their, their actual ribbon cutting
for the plant here just about a month ago. So it was nice to see that they actually followed through
on it, so.
- Yeah, that sounds great. I will make a motion to receive.
- We have a motion. Do we have a second?
- Second by Gina? All in favor.
- That passes. We'll move on to the second regular business items staff report on the performance
and status of each district governed by the board and the director will take this one.
- Yep, I'm going to kind of grace through some specific project updates some of the key ones, some
of the districts. And we'll see if it just, again, want to see if you folks have any questions on that. So,
hopefully projects update hopefully is coming up on the screen.
- Yes.
- All right, perfect. Great. Excellent. So we'll hop right in obviously here's our map of all of our
districts. Certainly the 2021 map we'll remove seven, eight, and nine from this map, but they will no
longer be on here again. I just kind of remind folks where the districts are at here throughout the
city. Here at TID 14 in Washington apartments. I know our TID 4. I don't believe we had a whole lot
of activity on this one. This is just a reminder of where this one is at again. So between Mason street
and just past a little bit past Walnut street on the right on the river there. Similarly here's our TID 5
downtown. Again, this is one we have seen significant activity in. A recall there was a small property
amendment. I believe some of this property was removed from TID five here and this right in this
area here where the cursor is on the screen. That was our boundary minute that was done. So again,
the area was taken out of that district. I think particular area that a focus going forward on the is
certainly here for the, for this coming year two aspects of it, really the parking lot here in the close
the near part of this, the photo here. Cities actively considering getting an RFP reissued for that
particular lot for redevelopment on that site. However, we were also working with kind of some of
the owners of the Bay Lake city center building there in terms of what the possible future use of that
building may end up being. We're evaluating several concepts right now the original concept actually
called for that building to be removed and some open space to be added here. The authenticity
planted, folks remembered that. There's enough users in that building right now that are kind of
proposing some new uses. So, we're still kind of evaluating and working with those property owners
as to whether or not some sort of new mixed use may actually end up occurring in that Bay Lake
building. And obviously that certainly impacts our ability. We think to RFP, the Adams street lot and
get a development project on that side as well. But, again so what could be seeing some significant
changes on this either one or both sites here. Certainly in the coming future here, so. A lot of work
that we needed to make that happen, one way or the other, but again, certainly probably one of the
most highest potential locations. I think for redevelopment, certainly in the city right now whether
that's for use of the existing building or just, you know, a new project on the city's lot parking lot
that they have right there, so. Stay tuned on this one. Hopefully we have some, some more
information one way or the other on that one going forward. This is again, here's TID 10. The Maine
and Mason TIF district and kind of reminding folks where that exactly. No real activity in that one at
this point. TID 12, we mentioned certainly this is the I-43 business park. We've got a lot of interest
in activities. Certainly staff is taking a very hard look at this in terms of expanding this, expanding the
park here, certainly with the life of TID 12, being where it's at. Certainly that presents challenges in
terms of being able to utilize the existing district to move that forward. So we'll talk a little bit about
perhaps a future project. A future district need on what that might look like going forward here at
some point. One project that is happening in that area by the bakery is a major daycare expansion
project happening for the facility that's there in this particular area. I think we estimated this. You
may bring up my notes here about a $12 million new clinics, about 130,000 square feet. So, a very
nice project occurring. There is no direct assistance being added for that particular project. So, there
is no TIF assistance. So, that's just new increment going into that particular site. So, we're certainly
excited about that one. And that's, I believe they just broke ground on that one here. I believe here
actually within the last month or so, I believe. TID 13, obviously this is one we see some significant
activity possibly coming up here in the future. But, right now, no specific project. We mentioned the
rail yard, certainly the one project that's here on this part. So here's the rail line, that's the river. You
know, certainly the fort is probably the one project that's out there. Folks going to notice the
elevator shafts that are up right now with not much other construction activity going on. The
developers kinda lost part of their investment stack essentially. We're trying to re-establish really
what their overall financing plans going to be at this point. They're certainly trying to work in adjust
probably advancing and maybe going for some WEDA tax credits in terms of some affordable
housing project in this area. Also, working with staff right now in terms of evaluating the mixed use
status on the bottom floor of the building. I think the city's position has been, we've kind of want to
see that commercial component really to kind of remain on that bottom part there, but that may be
presenting some challenges for the developer. Specifically, with regard to financing the project. So we
are currently kind of in negotiations for them. Ideally, if we get something worked out and we see
some additional construction work happening here see at sometime this fall, if everything went
perfectly, so. I mentioned the TID 16 military avenue district. This is here's the area here no specific
real projects happening in that district to report on. The university avenue, project TID 18. This is a
major one I think director did mention the project. These are the two buildings were constructed on
the site, but then the developer after about a hundred, I think it was 1.5 million, Diana. did put in
there for, for essentially for cleanup on the JBS site, I believe was the number. Got a couple of
buildings started here, but the developers kind of had, again, unable to proceed with the project for
financial aid at this point. We are in negotiations with a new developer to kind of present a similar, a
different residential concept of kind of going from I think it was essentially there's 322 units at a value
of about $21.9 million. So, we have a new developer proposing 209 units, but at the same valuation.
So, a little bit at nicer, a little bit larger, a little bit bigger units, but the same value. So, we're excited,
we're getting negotiations kind of getting that transferred over right now. We'd like to see that
hopefully move forward here to both the RDA and city council. Hopefully within the next 30 to 60
days. So, there are some challenges in terms of getting the infrastructure lined up. If it was one
developer they could kind of use a private drive. Since now there's going to be more than one
owner. There, there probably needs to be some public street infrastructure that's going to be
needed there as part of the project. So, we're kind of evaluating that, working with both developers
to try to figure out exactly what that's going to end up looking like. But, excited to finally kind of see
some progress on this one. I know our RDA has been kind of following up on this one and noting the
lack of progress. Hopefully again, with the new developer we think we can get this jump started and
get probably even a little bit nicer set of units on the site, even though the number's not quite as
many units, but I think the quality of the unit and size of the unit will actually be a little bit better on
this site. So, fingers crossed that proceeds here, this coming year. We mentioned the East Towne
Mall project or East Towne Mall TIFF here. This is again the current reminder of where this is at. The
structure here, that's going on here. We're kind of, this is a rather unique project that is happening
here right now. American tent is actually being located in kind of the back half of these, these kind of
giant buildings. So, it's gonna be kind of an industrial user, but in all of the commercial retail tenants
are kind of being moved and relocated to the front of the building, so. For the outside perspective of
folks, just driving by it's going to kind of look like a usual mall, but it's going to have a rather large
industrial tenant in the back. A very fast growing company. American Tenant company is going to put
one of their production space kind of back here in the back half of this building, so. A very unique
combination of uses. And we're also seeing some interest in kind of generating some additional work
on some of the out lots. Related to kind of the inner ring road. I guess we should call for lack of a
better term and actually kind of making that inner road instead of just kind of a drive around the aisle
of the mall actually being more of a functional public street access with actual businesses on both
sides. So, we could be looking at adding some infill to these areas and obviously those parking lots
are what they are there. There a large paved areas that don't generate a lot of increment. So,
hopefully we can actually figure out a way to kind of update theirs. I think Dave Buck is on the line,
and he said, there's more than a dozen planned unit developments I think on this particular site. So
we're kind of, we're trying to work and try to get a kind of a master zoning re-established for the
area that would kind of allow us to take a look at some of those things, including adding some of
those additional infill developments possibly on some of these areas. Particularly like this main
entrance here. We could see certainly billings occurring on both sides of that in kind of continuing
this drive back to the main part of the mall. We similarly think there's some good opportunities
there to kind of add some infill development to this particular area. I mentioned Whitney park. I
think a lot of the updates a lot of the projects were completed. I think in this area last year were
reported as a joint review board. And I think those were illustrated last year. Kind of working with
them right now to kind of see exactly when they're going to receive their first payment. It was based
on largely based on occupancy permit which I don't think they got until January 1. They just kinda
missed the deadline. So, it kind of is delaying their, increment by it here. They were a little surprised
by that. So we may be bringing an amendment back to the RDA to try to at least get something back
to them this year for a subset based on the assessment based on the substantial completion of the
project. So, that's probably coming forward to RDA here in July, we suspect. I mentioned Green Bay
Packaging. Again, this was the largest. This is probably I think so looking back in the files this was
apparently the first new paper mill constructed in Wisconsin in the last 30 years. So, pretty
impressive project. Obviously they needed an enormous investment on the company's part, as well
as from the TIFF standpoint. This is probably the largest project I'm anticipating. Seeing certainly for
our foreseeable future, but again a great project in . The employer kind of retaining those jobs here,
here in Green Bay, so. And plus that hopefully adding a few more when things normalize a little, so.
It's shipyard is probably where we've seen the most excitement on here the last couple months.
Again, this here's a map of the district. That's kind of the close-up of the area here. The reason that
just remind folks, cause I certainly had to ask the reason this bizarre strip goes out here that is
exactly what the parcel is, along the rail line. So, that we didn't have to in order to just keep, just
take that parcel in. We actually had to go, this is actually one whole parcel this whole stretch out
here. So, there's no projects or no increment obviously going to happen on that. It's just simply in
the logistics of the map we had to have the, that was part of the parcel that was included down in
this area. So, we simply had to include that strange stretch outbound the side there. So, I think the
main project, obviously the shipyard here in general, here's the concept plan. The main project that
was announced here earlier this year it was that we have a signed development agreement with
Merge Urban Development. Their project is about 225 units of market rate housing. It's about $21
million project. I think it's going to be let's see how many buildings do we see. I think it's going to be
two, four story buildings I believe is kind of what they're proposing on the site. A very unique design
and that it keeps, maintains a visual access for most of the units to the river. So, they've actually done
some kind of unique design aspects there to make that happen. Shortly after this was announced, we
have a planning option has been pulled on the Badger sheet metal site kind of immediately adjacent to
the site here. Impact seven is actually proposing and kind of currently evaluating a 238 unit project.
That's actually at a more targeted rental rate for the 80 to 110% of the county median income. So,
again, a little bit lower than market rate kind of in that middle median income number. Which is a
unique aspect. This is our first project that's actually targeting kind of that center, that center
income. So, you know, there's affordable and market rate. These are kind of are right in the middle
it's we're kind of excited that they're filling a targeted need. We don't have a projected valuation on
that. This is just a working on that, but really preliminary estimates are saying it's a 45 to $50 million
construction costs. So, that'd be three, four story buildings. Is it going to be the massing on that site.
So, a nice sized project there. So, we're excited to see some momentum kind of finally building here
in the shipyard area. And then TID 23, this is the legends district. Again, the primary front check.
This was, I think you guys have seen this one before. This is the legacy hotel project that's being
proposed. We're currently working through with them. They actually did a relocation on their site
from one side of the site to the other that affected some code questions and raise some issues to
make that work. We're also thinking the valuation is probably largely going to remain the same. This
is a $12 million five story building about 90,000 square feet would like to see hopefully get something
worked out and updated development agreement completed with them here yet this summer and
see some progress on the site here maybe even as early as this fall. So again, it could be a nice
project over there by the, in the legends district close to Lambeau Field. I think Dr. Allen Becker
already mentioned these. These were the actions that we took at the the joint review board meeting
and the RDA here this earlier this year, just to remind everybody this is kind of what we went
through the allocation amendments and the housing resolutions at least were all completed earlier
this year. Just a quick reminder on that. We are looking at some possible new districts in terms of
staff reviewing, you know when we might need to do these here we're looking at there's one for the
one Astro project which I think everybody has probably seen before, but has been delayed for
multiple reasons, coal piles being one of them, pandemic being another add, add to the list. As far as
you go, if folks have driven by there they've actually seen the Fox River Trail actually being installed
and actually going in on this site. So, some of the improvements have begun on the site. We're
excited to see those, hasn't been officially dedicated on there. And I think we're already seeing
several hundred people a day already going down the section of trail much to the private owners
dismayed despite his efforts to block it off. So, folks are excited about it. They want to use the trail.
The Monroe project that we're going to have it. It's a nice project. We'll kind of highlight that here
shortly. And I mentioned previously, you know, kind of maybe an update for the pending business
park expansion. And there is a blind elimination tip in Northeast neighborhood. We are taking a look
at possibly as a staff to considering that as a possibility. So, we do know that we knew the one Astro
project and the Monroe street project are going to require a new TIF district, for sure. We know
eventually I-43 one will, as well. But, again, exactly what the timing of those are going to be is still a
little bit up, up in the air. One of these could, you know, certainly they could move forward this year.
We think probably one astor will probably need to move forward this year. So, we'll probably be
reaching out to you guys, again, for a meeting on that particular district. Monroe, I think is it could be
this year. It could be next year. I think we're evaluating with the developer exactly what their
schedule is going to be. I-43, there's some other zoning, it's using several landowners out there that
we're still doing some coordination on with that. And I think the planning staff is kind of evaluating
this Northeast neighborhood areas still in terms of its potential to create a district. But, those are
the ones that are at least on the radar screen right now, in terms of creating new ones. And this was
the one Astro her project again. It's a four stories, a hundred units. I think it was estimated at about
$13 million in value. So, again, that was the project that's kind of going on right there by the Mason
street bridge. This would be what would be going on. I think ideally we get the agreement updated.
They could be doing some site work and then actually had the trail exit trailed stations going in and
actually see the project under construction as early as next spring. The one that's centering a lot of
the excitement I think at least amongst staff, this is the former is the 200 north Monroe project being
proposed. That is about, $22 million project. It's a three to five story building. You kind of see the
difference in the height depending as the next architect actually lowered the height. As it goes to the
residential neighborhood next to it. 172 units, a mixed use project. Not only are we excited about
the, certainly the adding the residential units, it also includes expanding the main street Oriental
market here and actually relocating across the street into the site, kind of expanding the grocery
options downtown, which has been a major objective. The other one is we believe, I think there's
negotiations going on possibly with UWGB to be at least tenant in this building and actually have get
them to have a presence downtown, which is again, the city has been working on for quite some
time. It would be pretty excited to have that. So, those projects all together, just to kind of give folks
some perspective, we did kind of add that it looks like it's actually going to be a it could be about
200, if everything happens as currently anticipated, it's about $200 million in project valuation and
about 1100, and almost just under 1200 residential units added. So pretty, pretty impressive
numbers. We hope the pandemic stays away and takes care of things. And we're able to keep all
these on track. And if so, should be seeing some significant investment private sector investment
coming forward here in the next several years. So with that, I am certainly available to answer any
questions folks may have.
- What would be the procedure for the . You know, if they say, Hey, we really like to break ground.
We have things ready.
- Yeah, yeah, yup. Well, we have to have it depending on the timing. If we want this playing in place,
we certainly have to have the agreement place. And I think we have to have the district. If we want
to count the valuation as in one-one of this year, I think we have to have it done. Everything
procedurally done before October 1st, I believe is the date. So, certainly that, if we need to know
that, we need to know that pretty quick, because it sounds like, oh it's no problem. It's mid June, as
well as that, that 90 days that kind of plus or minus it requires to actually create a district, that fills up
pretty fast. So, we're kind of getting on the crunch. So, I'm assuming we're gonna know, probably
make a determination on that Brad, probably within the next 30 days, I would think. We're going to
have to have some discussions with, and as soon as we can come up with a new and really I think the
key domino it falls that is getting an updated agreement with the developer. So, if we can agree on
schedule and get everything ready to go. Now again, if he's not going to start construction until next
spring, if he's definitely not doing anything, we'd probably have some options in terms of making it as
available as of one, one next year. But again, it's just kind of figuring out, you know. What exactly is
that going to be? So, hopefully we'll get that resolved here in the next 30 to 60 days, so.
- All right, we're good.
- Any other questions?
- I have a question. This is Steve. I know I'm not part of the, at all. But, Diana had mentioned how
much increment was going back into the tactical from our three closed earlier. And I just kinda
missed it, update me. Was it like 58 million or something?
- Let's see, hold on. What was that number?
- That was the increment that is part of the three closed TIDS, remember. Two of them don't have
affordable housing. And so there's one year of delay before those will go back to the texts and
jurisdictions . It was a total of $58,970,700 worth of increment from those three TID's that we'll be
going back to the taxing jurisdictions either this year or the following year.
- Yeah, I just, I guess I just want it to kind of make, say these TID's are definitely performing. They're
doing what they're supposed to and it's pretty exciting. That life is going against the rules within the
next couple of years.
- So he's showing off, that's what, that's what David was trying to do there. That's in case you guys
missed that. That's what he was doing. So, we're excited about, and I guess to build on that
obviously, you know, adding the prospect of an additional 200 million coming online with these
additional districts obviously that's, we want to keep that trend going. That's, we're like seeing the
private investment that is being generated by these districts. We are very happy with at this point,
so. Any other questions?
- If there are no other questions you know what we'll set the next meeting date as needed and there
might be one coming this fall. If we're going to issue, set up a new TID. Otherwise I would take a
motion for adjournment.
- Motion adjourned.
- Do we have a second? And was that you, Brad?
- Pete.
- Peter, okay. We have a motion by Bradley, second by Peter. All in favor. Alright, we're adjourned
thanks guys.
- Enjoy your vacations.
- Thank.
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.1
Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance Districts in the
City of Green Bay.
BACKGROUND
Staff will provide an overview of each district at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and place on file.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact from the annual report.
ATTACHMENTS
1. JRB final packet 2021 YE
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
TID ANNUAL REPORT (PE-300) SUMMARIZED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021
Revenues Expenditures
Debt Fund
TIF Creation Mandatory Fund balance Tax Shared Developers Other/ Capital & Service & Developers balance as Future Future Surplus or
Dist TYPE NAME date term date as of 1/1/21 Increment Interest Revenue guarantees Borrowing Land Interest grants Other of 12/31/21 project costs revenue deficit
Washington
4 Blight 1/20/1998 1/20/2025 414,209 541,571 620 1,071 - - - 200,000 - 13,400 744,071 2,955,050 2,216,521 5,542
Apartments
5 Blight Downtown 12/21/1999 12/21/2026 854,415 1,903,817 1,961 177,077 53,114 - 84,184 1,307,264 48,211 92,698 1,458,027 12,777,641 11,321,092 1,478
7 Blight Lombardi/Ashland 1/15/2002 1/15/2029 1,115,425 780,291 1,225 (3,459) - 6,082 - 229,462 13,891 1,656,211 - - - -
8 Blight Berger/Morrow 8/20/2002 8/20/2029 581,793 380,989 697 30,406 - 5,514 - 603,905 - 395,494 - - - -
9 Industrial University Heights 10/7/2003 10/7/2026 1,317,175 185,011 (11) 249 3,662 - - 1,167,070 - 339,016 - - - -
10 Blight Main/Mason 8/17/2004 8/17/2031 899,314 251,991 882 9,499 - - - - 21,507 23,088 1,117,091 4,273,012 3,226,960 71,039
12 Industrial I43 Industrial Park 9/6/2005 9/6/2025 1,985,227 2,454,267 3,333 442,140 - - 450,089 290,802 200,000 81,201 3,862,875 10,575,418 6,854,691 142,148
13 Reh/Cons Downtown 9/6/2005 9/6/2032 (3,024,709) 2,539,445 - 607,374 16,486 9,859 - 1,417,455 591,028 82,935 (1,942,963) 35,319,975 37,551,587 288,649
N Broadway/Larsen
14 Blight 9/16/2006 9/16/2033 (2,474,833) 523,604 3,311 4,623 208,376 168,234 1,095 724,469 490,447 53,420 (2,836,116) 13,270,454 16,106,583 13
Green
16 Blight Military Avenue 5/6/2007 5/6/2034 275,344 447,031 483 82,474 - - - 181,155 1,479 15,441 607,257 10,003,935 9,457,807 61,129
18 Reh/Cons University Avenue 10/6/2015 10/6/2043 (1,199,783) 463,192 - 15,678 - - - 1,131 184,948 20,520 (927,512) 27,502,855 28,497,801 67,434
19 Reh/Cons East Town Mall 9/19/2017 9/19/2044 174,473 211,258 271 - 75,900 - - - 105,816 18,704 337,382 8,681,090 8,967,153 623,445
20 Reh/Cons Whitney Park 9/25/2018 9/25/2045 (36,248) 116,140 52 - - - - - 34,664 16,917 28,363 6,018,876 6,132,934 142,421
21 Blight Green Bay Packaging 9/25/2018 9/25/2045 (31,009) 1,556,802 1,092 - - - - - - 23,988 1,502,897 52,424,742 51,172,340 250,495
22 Blight The Shipyard 9/25/2018 9/25/2045 2,597,454 - 2,145 - 500 2,007,200 349,166 77,048 - 48,595 4,132,490 63,687,304 59,952,712 397,898
23 Blight Legends District 9/17/2019 9/17/2046 (25,554) 13,664 106 - - 850,000 6,788 28 - 282,963 548,437 11,723,645 11,196,178 20,970
Totals 3,422,693 12,369,073 16,167 1,367,132 358,038 3,046,889 891,322 6,199,789 1,691,991 3,164,591 8,632,299 259,213,997 252,654,359 2,072,661
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
004 2 Washington Appartments 01/20/1998 01/20/2025 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $414,209
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $541,571
Investment income $620
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $1,071
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $543,262
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $7,687
Professional services $1,650
Interest and fiscal charges
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt $200,000
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name N/A $0
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Name Personal Property Aid refund $3,913
Total Expenditures $213,400
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $744,071
Future costs $2,955,050
Future revenue $2,216,521
Surplus or deficit $5,542
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
005 2 Downtown 12/21/1999 12/21/2026 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $854,415
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $1,903,817
Investment income $1,961
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $177,077
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Developer name TOHO Platten Building $13,331
Developer name Washington St Inn $39,783
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $2,135,969
Page 1 of 3
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures $84,184
Administration $70,076
Professional services $16,650
Interest and fiscal charges $276,539
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt $1,030,725
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name Smet rebate historical train station $5,000
Developer name Bellin buidling parking PAYGO $14,429
Developer name TMJ Initiative One $10,000
Developer name Lorenzen Holdings $9,977
Developer name Historic Hibernia $8,805
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Name Utilities $5,822
Total Expenditures $1,532,357
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $1,458,027
Future costs $12,777,641
Future revenue $11,321,092
Surplus or deficit $1,478
Page 2 of 3
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 3 of 3
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
010 2 MAIN MASON 08/17/2004 08/17/2031 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $899,314
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $251,991
Investment income $882
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $9,499
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $262,372
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $20,288
Professional services $2,650
Interest and fiscal charges
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name GB Real Estate - 1901 M Street $21,507
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $44,595
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $1,117,091
Future costs $4,273,012
Future revenue $3,226,960
Surplus or deficit $71,039
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
012 5 I43 Industrial Park 09/06/2005 09/06/2025 12/31/2023
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $1,985,227
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $2,454,267
Investment income $3,333
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $442,140
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $2,899,740
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures $450,089
Administration $67,585
Professional services $12,430
Interest and fiscal charges $56,447
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt $234,355
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name Willow Creek Strategic Behavioral Health $200,000
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Name Utilities $1,036
Total Expenditures $1,022,092
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $3,862,875
Future costs $10,575,418
Future revenue $6,854,691
Surplus or deficit $142,148
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
013 3 Downtown 09/06/2005 09/06/2032 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $-3,024,709
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $2,539,445
Investment income
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $607,374
Sale of property $16,486
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Source Lot Rent $9,859
Total Revenue (deposits) $3,173,164
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $75,237
Professional services $650
Interest and fiscal charges $426,236
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt $991,219
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name Schreiber Foods $236,041
Developer name Associated Bank $154,978
Developer name Foxconn $54,952
Developer name Northland $145,057
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Name Utilities $6,898
Total Expenditures $2,091,418
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $-1,942,963
Future costs $35,319,975
Future revenue $37,551,587
Surplus or deficit $288,649
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
014 2 N Broadway Larsen Green 09/16/2006 09/16/2033 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $-2,474,833
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $523,604
Investment income $3,311
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $4,623
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Developer name SMET $208,376
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Source WEDC Grant $168,234
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $908,148
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures $1,095
Administration $48,120
Professional services $5,150
Interest and fiscal charges $174,469
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt $550,000
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name DDL Project Grant $490,447
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $1,269,431
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $-2,836,116
Future costs $13,270,454
Future revenue $16,106,583
Surplus or deficit $13
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
016 2 Military Avenue 05/06/2007 05/06/2034 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $275,344
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $447,031
Investment income $483
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $82,474
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $529,988
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $13,641
Professional services $1,650
Interest and fiscal charges $110,841
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt $70,314
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name Burlington and Broadway Automotive $1,479
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $198,075
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $607,257
Future costs $10,003,935
Future revenue $9,457,807
Surplus or deficit $61,129
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
018 3 University Avenue 10/06/2015 10/06/2043 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $-1,199,783
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $463,192
Investment income
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue $15,678
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $478,870
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $17,720
Professional services $2,650
Interest and fiscal charges $1,131
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name JBS project grant $0
Developer name Festival Foods paygo $184,948
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $206,599
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $-927,512
Future costs $27,502,855
Future revenue $28,497,801
Surplus or deficit $67,434
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
019 3 East Town Mall 09/19/2017 09/19/2044 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $174,473
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $211,258
Investment income $271
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Developer name Green Bay East LLC $75,900
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $287,429
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $15,904
Professional services $2,650
Interest and fiscal charges
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name Green Bay East LLC $105,816
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $124,520
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $337,382
Future costs $8,681,090
Future revenue $8,967,153
Surplus or deficit $623,445
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
020 3 WHITNEY PARK 09/25/2018 09/25/2045 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $-36,248
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $116,140
Investment income $52
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $116,192
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $16,117
Professional services $650
Interest and fiscal charges $0
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name Whitney School Development LLC $34,664
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $51,581
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $28,363
Future costs $6,018,876
Future revenue $6,132,934
Surplus or deficit $142,421
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
021 2 GREEN BAY PACKAGING 09/25/2018 09/25/2045 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $-31,009
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $1,556,802
Investment income $1,092
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Total Revenue (deposits) $1,557,894
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures
Administration $23,188
Professional services $650
Interest and fiscal charges
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name N/A $0
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $23,988
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $1,502,897
Future costs $52,424,742
Future revenue $51,172,340
Surplus or deficit $250,495
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
022 2 SHIPYARD 09/17/2019 09/17/2046 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $2,597,454
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $0
Investment income $2,145
Debt proceeds $2,000,000
Special assessments
Shared revenue
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Developer name Impact Seven INC $500
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Source Rental income $7,200
Total Revenue (deposits) $2,009,845
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures $346,745
Administration $21,605
Professional services $650
Interest and fiscal charges $77,048
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name NONE $0
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Name Purchase of Land $2,421
Name Utilities $26,190
Total Expenditures $474,809
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $4,132,490
Future costs $63,687,304
Future revenue $59,952,712
Surplus or deficit $397,898
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 1 - Municipality and TID
Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type
05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL
TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date
023 2 LEGENDS DISTRICT 09/17/2019 09/17/2046 N/A
Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount
TID fund balance at beginning of year $-25,554
Section 3 - Revenue Amount
Tax increment $13,664
Investment income $106
Debt proceeds
Special assessments
Shared revenue
Sale of property
Allocation from another TID
Developer guarantees
Transfer from other funds
Grants
Other revenue
Source Transfer in from closed TID 7 $850,000
Total Revenue (deposits) $863,770
Page 1 of 2
Form
PE-300
TID Annual Report 2021
WI Dept of Revenue
Section 4 - Expenditures Amount
Capital expenditures $6,788
Administration $13,866
Professional services $268,947
Interest and fiscal charges $28
DOR fees $150
Discount on long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Principal on long-term debt
Environmental costs
Real property assembly costs
Allocation to another TID
Developer grants
Developer name NONE $0
Transfer to other funds
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures $289,779
Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount
TID fund balance at end of year $548,437
Future costs $11,723,645
Future revenue $11,196,178
Surplus or deficit $20,970
Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information
Preparer name Preparer title
Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant
Preparer email Preparer phone
stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409
Contact name Contact title
DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR
Contact email Contact phone
DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025
Page 2 of 2
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.2
Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project
Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown.
BACKGROUND
Staff is proposing that some funds from TID 4 be transferred to either 1) TID 14 to assist with infrastructure
costs and the delay in new increment, and/or 2) TID 22 to aid in the lost revenue due to project delays
related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost for projects in the Shipyard. Additional
information will be provided at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A detailed fiscal impact will be provided along with the proposed amendment to the project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
None
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.3
Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street and East Mason
Street to add eligible projects.
BACKGROUND
Staff is proposing that some additional projects be added to the eligible projects list identified within TID
10. These projects were delayed or have increased in cost due to the pandemic. Additional information will
be provided at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided with the formal amendment to the project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
None
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.4
Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project
Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park.
BACKGROUND
Staff is proposing that some funds from TID 12 be transferred to either 1) TID 14 to assist with
infrastructure costs and the delay in new increment, and/or 2) TID 22 to aid in the lost revenue due to
project delays related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost for projects in the
Shipyard. Additional information will be provided at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided with the amended project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
None
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.5
Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an Allocation
Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the North Broadway corridor.
BACKGROUND
Staff is proposing that TID 14 be extended three years to help recover lost revenue due to project delays
related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost. Staff is also proposing that TID 14 be able to
receive funds from other TIDs with a positive cash flow to recover these costs. Additional information will
be provided at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided in the amended project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
None
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.6
Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project
Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard.
BACKGROUND
Staff is proposing that TID 22 be designated as a recipient of potential transfers from several other TID's to
aid in the lost revenue due to project delays related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost for
projects in the Shipyard. Additional information will be provided at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A formal fiscal analysis will be provided as a part of the amended project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
None
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.7
Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-four
(24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in the area north of E. Walnut
Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and east of N. Washington Street. TID 24 will be
classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be
included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers
of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water,
sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and
amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and
administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half
(1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID.
BACKGROUND
Staff will provide an overview of the proposed TID 24 at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A formal fiscal impact will be included as part of the final project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
1. TID 24 Project Plan Draft
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
City of Green Bay
Department of Community and Economic Development
Tax
Increment
District
Twenty-Four (24)
Cherry Street
PROJECT PLAN
City of Green Bay, Wisconsin
June 17, 2022
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
100 North Jefferson Street, Room 608, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
(p) 920.448.3400 (f) 920.448.3426 greenbaywi.gov
Key Dates:
Organizational Joint Review Board Meeting: June 23, 2022
Public Hearing Held: August 1, 2022
Approval by Redevelopment Authority: August 1, 2022
Adoption by Common Council: August 2, 2022
Approval by the Joint Review Board: August 18 or 19, 2022 (TBD)
Executive Summary
• Description of District:
o Tax Incremental District (“TID”) No. 24 (“District”) is a proposed mixed-use
district consisting of 13 parcels on approximately 4.5 acres bounded by N.
Adams St., E. Walnut St., N. Washington St. and the northern boundary of the
Adams Street parking lot owned by the Green Bay Redevelopment Authority.
• Authority
o The City is creating the District under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 66.1105.
• Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($11.8 million)
o Approximately $4.5 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at
222.Cherry Street. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF
creation.)
o Estimated $5 million in development incentives for a projected mixed-use or
multi-family redevelopment project at 221 Cherry Street.
o Estimated $500,000 in development incentives for potential mixed-use
redevelopment projects at 217 E. Walnut, 227 E. Walnut, and 101 N. Adams.
o Estimated $250,000 for Public Improvements to the Cherry Street Parking
Ramp
o Estimated $250,000 for Streetscape Improvements
o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District
o Estimated $1.2 million for Administrative costs (10%)
• Preliminary Projected/Estimated Incremental Valuation ($29 million)
o Approximately $13 million in improvements for a mixed-use project at 222
Cherry Street.
o Approximately $15 million in improvements for a projected mixed-use or multi-
family redevelopment project at 221 Cherry Street.
o Approximately $1 million in improvements for potential mixed-use
redevelopment projects at 217 E. Walnut, 227 E. Walnut, and 101 N. Adams.
• Expected Termination of District
o Based on the Economic Feasibility Study located within Section 9 of this Plan,
the City anticipates that the District will need to remain open for its entire 20
year life to generate sufficient tax increment to pay all Project Costs.
page 2 of 12 City of Green Bay
• Summary of Findings
o As required by Wis. Stat. § 66.1105, and as documented in this Plan
and the exhibits contained and referenced herein, the following findings are
made: [TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 3 of 12
Preliminary Map of Proposed District Boundary
page 4 of 12 City of Green Bay
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions - Zoning
100% Downtown Two (D2)
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 5 of 12
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Existing Land Use
[TO BE COMPLETED]
page 6 of 12 City of Green Bay
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Future Land Use
Downtown (Purple), Park or Public Use (Green)
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 7 of 12
Improvement Map Area
Parcel ID Location Owner Total Value Land Value Value (sq ft)
12-114 216 CHERRY ST TAJ ENTERPRISES LLC $ 775,600 $ 133,800 $ 641,800 15,892
12-118 109 N ADAMS ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 3,389
page 8 of 12
12-122 101 N ADAMS ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 1,472
12-121 217 E WALNUT ST AMERICAN HOLDINGS INC $ 281,900 $ 91,600 $ 190,300 10,868
12-120 225 E WALNUT ST LIZA RAE LLC $ 219,200 $ 19,600 $ 199,600 2,340
12-119 227 E WALNUT ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 6,652
12-353 211 E WALNUT ST WALNUT WASHINGTON LLC $ 347,400 $ 53,800 $ 293,600 50,486
12-354 102 N WASHINGTON ST 7878 BIG SKY LLC $ 791,900 $ 87,700 $ 704,200 50,486
12-355 126 N WASHINGTON ST NICOLET NATIONAL BANK $ 139,800 $ 44,100 $ 95,700 50,486
12-351 202 CHERRY ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 50,486
12-352 CHERRY ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 50,486
12-356 N WASHINGTON ST NICOLET NATIONAL BANK $ 5,700 $ 5,700 $ - 50,486
12-112 221 CHERRY ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 67,036
$ 2,561,500 $ 436,300 $ 2,125,200 410,567 Preliminary Parcel List and Analysis (as of 6/17/2022)
City of Green Bay
Equalized Value Test [TO BE COMPLETED]
Statement Listing the Kind, Number and Location of All Proposed Public Works or
Improvements Within the District [TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 9 of 12
Map Showing Proposed Improvements and Uses [TO BE COMPLETED]
page 10 of 12 City of Green Bay
Detailed List of Estimated Project Costs [TO BE COMPLETED]
o Approximately $4.5 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at
222.Cherry Street. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF
creation.)
o Estimated $5 million in development incentives for a projected mixed-use or
multi-family redevelopment project at 221 Cherry Street.
o Estimated $500,000 in development incentives for potential mixed-use
redevelopment projects at 217 E. Walnut, 227 E. Walnut, and 101 N. Adams.
o Estimated $250,000 for Public Improvements to the Cherry Street Parking
Ramp
o Estimated $250,000 for Streetscape Improvements
o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District
o Estimated $1.2 million for Administrative costs (10%)
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 11 of 12
Economic Feasibility Study, Description of the Methods of Financing Estimated
Project Costs and the Time When Related Costs or Monetary Obligations are to be
Incurred [TO BE COMPLETED]
Annexed Property
No parcels or other property or territory will be annexed. All parcels exist within the City of
Green Bay.
Estimate of Property to Be Devoted to Retail Business [TO BE COMPLETED]
Proposed Changes of Zoning Ordinances, Master Plan, Map, Building Codes and
City Ordinances
No changes to zoning or the comprehensive plan are anticipated at this time.
Statement of the Proposed Method for the Relocation of any Persons to be
Displaced [TO BE COMPLETED]
How Creation of the Tax Incremental District Promotes the Orderly Development
of the City [TO BE COMPLETED]
List of Estimated Non-Project Costs
General reporting costs, audit, and review by the City’s financial consultant on an annual
basis.
Legal Opinion Advising Whether the Plan is Complete and Complies with Wis. Stat.
§ 66.1105(4)(f) [TO BE COMPLETED]
page 12 of 12 City of Green Bay
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.8
Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-five
(25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in the area east of N. Monroe
Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and north of Cherry Street, plus a portion west of
N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and east of N. Madison Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed-
use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the
TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within
the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer,
and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land
acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration.
The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of
the proposed boundary of the TID.
BACKGROUND
Staff will provide an overview of the proposed TID 25 at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided with the final project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
1. TID 25 Project Plan Draft
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
City of Green Bay
Department of Community and Economic Development
Tax
Increment
District
Twenty-Five (25)
Monroe Street
PROJECT PLAN
City of Green Bay, Wisconsin
June 17, 2022
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
100 North Jefferson Street, Room 608, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
(p) 920.448.3400 (f) 920.448.3426 greenbaywi.gov
Key Dates:
Organizational Joint Review Board Meeting: June 23, 2022
Public Hearing Held: August 1, 2022
Approval by Redevelopment Authority: August 1, 2022
Adoption by Common Council: August 2, 2022
Approval by the Joint Review Board: August 18 or 19, 2022 (TBD)
Executive Summary
• Description of District:
o Tax Incremental District (“TID”) No. 25 (“District”) is a proposed mixed-use
district consisting of 25 parcels on approximately 10.4 acres generally bounded
by Main Street, N. Monroe Ave., Cherry Street, and Quincy St.
• Authority
o The City is creating the District under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 66.1105.
• Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($13.6 million)
o Approximately $10 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at
200 N. Monroe St. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF
creation.)
o Estimated $1 million in development incentives for future mixed-use
redevelopment projects throughout the District.
o Estimated $500,000 for Streetscape Improvements
o Estimated $1 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary Sewer,
Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.)
o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District
o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs (17%)
• Preliminary Projected/Estimated Incremental Valuation ($22 million)
o Approximately $17 million in improvements for a mixed-use project at 200 N.
Monroe.
o Approximately $5 million in improvements for potential mixed-use
redevelopment projects throughout the rest of the District.
• Expected Termination of District
o Based on the Economic Feasibility Study located within this Plan, the City
anticipates that the District will need to remain open for its entire 20 year life to
generate sufficient tax increment to pay all Project Costs.
page 2 of 12 City of Green Bay
• Summary of Findings
o As required by Wis. Stat. § 66.1105, and as documented in this Plan
and the exhibits contained and referenced herein, the following findings are
made: [TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 3 of 12
Preliminary Map of Proposed District Boundary
page 4 of 12 City of Green Bay
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions - Zoning
Downtown one (D1) - Solid Brown, Downtown Two (D2) – Hatched Brown, Commercial One
(C1) – Solid Red, Varied Density Residential (R3) – Solid Orange
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 5 of 12
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Existing Land Use
[TO BE COMPLETED]
page 6 of 12 City of Green Bay
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Future Land Use
Downtown (Purple), Medium Intensity Retail, Office or Housing (Pink)
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 7 of 12
Improvement Map Area
Parcel ID Location Owner Total Value Land Value Value (sq ft)
11-160 616 PINE ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 35,014
11-91 420 N MONROE AVE GB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC $ 500 $ 500 $ - 1,524
11-53 607 BODART ST MAY MARIE INC $ 235,300 $ 104,100 $ 131,200 17,518
page 8 of 12
11-55 406 N MONROE AVE RICOS PARKING LOT LLC $ 215,100 $ 78,300 $ 136,800 13,157
11-99 620 MAIN ST KUEHN LLC $ 150,000 $ 106,100 $ 43,900 12,510
11-156 227 N QUINCY ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 5,324
11-191 605 CHERRY ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 17,566
11-50 619 BODART ST KEVIN C KUEHN $ - $ - $ - 26,279
11-92 416 N MONROE AVE GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 11,235
11-95-A MAIN ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 2,045
11-100 417 N QUINCY ST KEVIN C KUEHN $ - $ - $ - 6,760
11-158 624 PINE ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 8,784
11-159 618 PINE ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 8,784
11-157 221 N QUINCY ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 29,810
11-152 621-623 PINE ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 233,700 $ 74,700 $ 159,000 8,787
11-45 314 N MONROE AVE EDWARD M & RENEE J WINECK $ 144,200 $ 60,800 $ 83,400 7,978
11-47 618 BODART ST K B PROPERTIES LLP $ 102,200 $ 31,800 $ 70,400 4,185
11-46 610 BODART ST WAGNER ROBERT E & MELIDA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST $ 239,000 $ 112,400 $ 126,600 16,603
11-155 313 N QUINCY ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 56,300 $ 19,100 $ 37,200 5,325
11-48 622 BODART ST NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD $ - $ - $ - 22,177
11-153 625-627 PINE ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 184,800 $ 50,100 $ 134,700 5,893
11-149 310 N MONROE AVE MAIN ORIENTAL MARKET LLC $ 206,600 $ 145,700 $ 60,900 21,436
11-154 303 N QUINCY ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 138,100 $ 38,000 $ 100,100 6,356
Preliminary Parcel List and Analysis (as of 6/17/2022)
11-44 BODART ST RENEE J & EDWARD M WINECK $ 54,400 $ 51,200 $ 3,200 6,691
11-66 411 N MONROE AVE MONROE PLAZA APARTMENTS LLC $ - $ - $ - 70,338
$ 1,960,200 $ 872,800 $ 1,087,400 372,080
City of Green Bay
Equalized Value Test [TO BE COMPLETED]
Statement Listing the Kind, Number and Location of All Proposed Public Works or
Improvements Within the District [TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 9 of 12
Map Showing Proposed Improvements and Uses [TO BE COMPLETED]
page 10 of 12 City of Green Bay
Detailed List of Estimated Project Costs [TO BE COMPLETED]
o Approximately $10 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at
200 N. Monroe St. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF
creation.)
o Estimated $1 million in development incentives for future mixed-use
redevelopment projects throughout the District.
o Estimated $500,000 for Streetscape Improvements
o Estimated $1 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary Sewer,
Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.)
o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District
o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs (17%)
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 11 of 12
Economic Feasibility Study, Description of the Methods of Financing Estimated
Project Costs and the Time When Related Costs or Monetary Obligations are to be
Incurred [TO BE COMPLETED]
Annexed Property
No parcels or other property or territory will be annexed. All parcels exist within the City of
Green Bay.
Estimate of Property to Be Devoted to Retail Business [TO BE COMPLETED]
Proposed Changes of Zoning Ordinances, Master Plan, Map, Building Codes and
City Ordinances
No changes to zoning or the comprehensive plan are anticipated at this time.
Statement of the Proposed Method for the Relocation of any Persons to be
Displaced [TO BE COMPLETED]
How Creation of the Tax Incremental District Promotes the Orderly Development
of the City [TO BE COMPLETED]
List of Estimated Non-Project Costs
General reporting costs, audit, and review by the City’s financial consultant on an annual
basis.
Legal Opinion Advising Whether the Plan is Complete and Complies with Wis. Stat.
§ 66.1105(4)(f) [TO BE COMPLETED]
page 12 of 12 City of Green Bay
Report to the
Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board
of the City of Green Bay
MEETING DATE PREPARED BY
June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director
AGENDA ITEM # E.9
Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-six
(26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally located in the area east of
Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road, and north of Padi-Wood Lane, plus a
portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger Road, and west of S. Northview Road. TID 24 will be
classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be
included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers
of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water,
sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and
amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and
administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half
(1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID.
BACKGROUND
Staff will provide a detailed overview of the project plan at the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided as part ot the final project plan.
ATTACHMENTS
1. TID 26 Project Plan Draft
100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
greenbaywi.gov
City of Green Bay
Department of Community and Economic Development
Tax
Increment
District
Twenty-Six (26)
Grandview Industrial Park
PROJECT PLAN
City of Green Bay, Wisconsin
June 17, 2022
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
100 North Jefferson Street, Room 608, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026
(p) 920.448.3400 (f) 920.448.3426 greenbaywi.gov
Key Dates:
Organizational Joint Review Board Meeting: June 23, 2022
Public Hearing Held: August 1, 2022
Approval by Redevelopment Authority: August 1, 2022
Adoption by Common Council: August 2, 2022
Approval by the Joint Review Board: August 18 or 19, 2022 (TBD)
Executive Summary
• Description of District:
o Tax Incremental District (“TID”) No. 26 (“District”) is a proposed industrial district
consisting of 14 parcels on approximately 208.7 acres generally bounded by
Main Street, N. Monroe Ave., Cherry Street, and Quincy St.
• Authority
o The City is creating the District under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 66.1105.
• Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($17.1 million)
o Approximately $3 million in development incentives for an industrial project at
3731 Finger Road (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF
creation.)
o Estimated $3 million in future development incentives for future industrial
development projects throughout the District.
o Estimated $10 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary
Sewer, Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.)
o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District
o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs
• Preliminary Projected/Estimated Incremental Valuation ($22 million)
o Approximately $35 million in improvements for an industrial project at 3731
Finger Road (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF
creation.)
o Approximately $30 million in improvements for potential industrial development
projects throughout the rest of the District.
• Expected Termination of District
o Based on the Economic Feasibility Study located within this Plan, the City
anticipates that the District will need to remain open for its entire 20 year life to
generate sufficient tax increment to pay all Project Costs.
page 2 of 12 City of Green Bay
• Summary of Findings
o As required by Wis. Stat. § 66.1105, and as documented in this Plan
and the exhibits contained and referenced herein, the following findings are
made: [TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 3 of 12
Preliminary Map of Proposed District Boundary
page 4 of 12 City of Green Bay
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions - Zoning
[TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 5 of 12
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Existing Land Use
[TO BE COMPLETED]
page 6 of 12 City of Green Bay
Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Future Land Use
[TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 7 of 12
Improvement Map Area
Location Owner Total Value Land Value Value (sq ft)
3714 E MASON ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 179,363
page 8 of 12 3760 E MASON ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 134,728
3731 FINGER RD GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 1,002,454
3731 FINGER RD GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 768,727
S NORTHVIEW RD RRL LAND LLC $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ - 435,590
909 S GRANDVIEW RD RENTMEESTER ANTOINETTE L REVOCABLE TRUST $ 125,900 $ 55,000 $ 70,900 1,284,761
1020 S GRANDVIEW RD STUART E & CYNTHIA G FRANKOW $ 169,100 $ 47,400 $ 121,700 370,625
911 ERIE RD JOHN J BUNKER, ETAL $ 79,000 $ 79,000 $ - 111,540
ARLINE LN & & & & & PIERQUET FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP $ 6,400 $ 6,400 $ - 1,562,724
720 S GRANDVIEW RD PIERQUET ROSELLA REVOCABLE TRUST $ 300 $ 300 $ - 64,445
PADI WOOD LN PIERQUET FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP ETAL $ 5,100 $ 5,100 $ - 1,235,124
641 S GRANDVIEW RD GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 102,400
S GRANDVIEW RD RENTMEESTER ANTOINETTE L REVOCABLE TRUST $ 4,700 $ 4,700 $ - 1,143,335
E MASON ST PIERQUET FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP ETAL $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - 697,864
$ 394,300 $ 201,700 $ 192,600 9,093,678 Preliminary Parcel List and Analysis (as of 6/17/2022)
City of Green Bay
Equalized Value Test [TO BE COMPLETED]
Statement Listing the Kind, Number and Location of All Proposed Public Works or
Improvements Within the District [TO BE COMPLETED]
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 9 of 12
Map Showing Proposed Improvements and Uses [TO BE COMPLETED]
page 10 of 12 City of Green Bay
Detailed List of Estimated Project Costs
• Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($17.1 million)
o Approximately $3 million in development incentives for an industrial project at
3731 Finger Road (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF
creation.)
o Estimated $3 million in future development incentives for future industrial
development projects throughout the District.
o Estimated $10 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary
Sewer, Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.)
o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District
o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs
TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 11 of 12
Economic Feasibility Study, Description of the Methods of Financing Estimated
Project Costs and the Time When Related Costs or Monetary Obligations are to be
Incurred [TO BE COMPLETED]
Annexed Property
No parcels or other property or territory will be annexed. All parcels exist within the City of
Green Bay.
Estimate of Property to Be Devoted to Retail Business [TO BE COMPLETED]
Proposed Changes of Zoning Ordinances, Master Plan, Map, Building Codes and
City Ordinances
No changes to zoning or the comprehensive plan are anticipated at this time.
Statement of the Proposed Method for the Relocation of any Persons to be
Displaced [TO BE COMPLETED]
How Creation of the Tax Incremental District Promotes the Orderly Development
of the City [TO BE COMPLETED]
List of Estimated Non-Project Costs
General reporting costs, audit, and review by the City’s financial consultant on an annual
basis.
Legal Opinion Advising Whether the Plan is Complete and Complies with Wis. Stat.
§ 66.1105(4)(f) [TO BE COMPLETED]
page 12 of 12 City of Green Bay