Committee of the Whole
Regular MeetingHighland Park, IL · October 20, 2025
Minutes
Minutes of a of a Regular Meeting of the
Committee of the Whole of the City of Highland Park
Meeting Date: October 20, 2025
Meeting Location: City Hall - 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL 60035
I. Call to Order
At 5:30 PM, Presiding Officer Blumberg called the meeting to order and asked for a roll
call:
II. Roll Call
Present: Presiding Officer Blumberg, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Ross,
Tapia (Remote), Lidawer (Remote)
Absent: Mayor Rotering
Staff Present: City Manager Neukirch, Director of Public Works Bannon, Community
Development Director Fontane, Assistant City Manager Jason, Police
Chief Jogmen, Finance Director McCaulou, Fire Chief Schrage,
Commander Curran, Sergeant Soldano, Assistant to the City Manager
Palbitska
Also Present: Corporation Counsel Elrod
All Councilmembers present at City Hall were in consensus to allow Councilmembers
Tapia and Lidawer to attend the meeting remotely.
III. Approval of Minutes
A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole on
October 6, 2025
Councilmember Center moved to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the
Committee of the Whole on October 6, 2025. Councilmember Bruckman seconded
the motion. Upon a voice vote, the Presiding Officer Blumberg declared the motion
Passed (6 - 0).
MOVER: Councilmember Center
SECONDER: Councilmember Bruckman
AYES: Presiding Officer Blumberg, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman,
Ross, Tapia, Lidawer
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Mayor Rotering
B. Approval of the Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of the
Committee of the Whole Held on October 6, 2025
Councilmember Bruckman moved to approve the Minutes of the Closed Session of
the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole Held on October 6, 2025.
Councilmember Center seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, Presiding Officer
Blumberg declared the motion Passed (6 - 0).
MOVER: Councilmember Bruckman
SECONDER: Councilmember Center
AYES: Presiding Officer Blumberg, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman,
Ross, Tapia, Lidawer
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Mayor Rotering
IV. Scheduled Business
A. E-bikes and E-Scooter Regulation Review
City Manager Neukirch provided an introduction to the conversation as it relates to
e-bikes and e-scooters regulation review.
Sergeant Soldano, Chief Jogmen, Corporation Counsel Elrod, and City Manager
Neukirch presented information on e-bikes and e-scooters. They presented
information regarding amendments to Section 71.360 of the City Code, including a
number of recommendations for policy consideration.
The Council, Corporation Counsel Elrod and staff discussed:
• If the operator of a pedal assist bike needs to pedal up to the maximum
speed or if they can simply turn on the pedal assist feature; the increase of
speed is gradual once engaged
• How these devices have precipitated the influx of accidents around
Highland Park, the State and the Country
• Perceived reactions to the regulations that were implemented by Highland
Park and how they may have been prohibitive in the beginning
• Benefits and complications of regulating the speed of these devices; hard
to enforce speed with larger groups
• Concerns with allowing devices on bike trails and paths due to the smaller
space and active pedestrians in the area
• Appreciate the work completed by the Police Department and collection
of data that was provided in the presentation
• Citations that were issued were to those individuals with devices that
would have exceeded 750 watts
• Prohibitions currently within the State statute
• Importance of updating and providing education as it relates to these types
of devices and allowing individuals to come into compliance
• Most interactions between individuals and Police Officers were with those
that were operating e-motos
• Enforcement challenges related to the difficulty with distinguishing
between Class 1, 2, or 3 e-bikes through simple observation
• Signage that has already been implemented and will be updated if there
are any changes requested to amend the Code, including increasing the
“Share the Road” signage
• Enforcement should be more punitive in regards to e-moto devices; fine
should be $1,000 instead of $100
• The juvenile age group presents a majority of the issues
• Ease or difficulties of modifying e-bikes
• Those operating these types of devices should know and understand the
rules of the road; should continue to require a driver’s license
• Highlighted prohibitions within neighboring communities
• Highland Park is a leader when it comes to being a walking and biking
community
• Interest in the breakdown of residents and non-residents in regards to
traffic stops
• Continued work with sister governments and community partners on
educating the community and amplifying regulations
• Staff does not recommend regulating each class separately
• While establishing a speed limit is possible, it may not be affective and it
will be difficult to enforce
• The City has used all communication modalities when the regulations
were enacted and will continue to share regulations requesting that
partners amplify the information, such as the park district, school districts,
library and others.
• The importance of work done by the School Resource Officer
• The impact of staff’s recommendations would allow for enforcement to
become easier, along with being able to adjudicate violations more clearly
• The importance of continuing to review this topic as actions continue to
change within other municipalities and at the State level
City Manager Neukirch reviewed direction provided by the Council. She noted that
a majority of the Council support regulating Class 1, 2, and 3 together; a majority of
the Council supports waiving the driver’s license requirement; and a majority of the
Council does not support speed limit restrictions. She voiced that there is a split
decision as it relates to allowing or not allowing these devices on a bike trail or
pathway. She explained that an ordinance will be drafted to reflect the amendments
and information for the next available meeting, and information will be shared with
the Mayor for her feedback.
At 7:02 PM, Presiding Officer Blumberg recessed the Committee of the Whole
meeting.
At 8:05 PM, Presiding Officer Blumberg reconvened the Committee of the Whole
meeting.
Present: Presiding Officer Blumberg, Councilmembers Center,
Bruckman, Ross, Tapia (Remote), Lidawer (Remote)
Absent: Mayor Rotering
Staff Present: City Manager Neukirch, Community Development Director
Fontane, Assistant City Manager Jason, Police Chief Jogmen,
Commander Curran, Assistant to the City Manager Palbitska
Also Present: Corporation Counsel Elrod
B. Discussion of Bicycle Parking and Connectivity Policy
Community Development Director Fontane presented information on bicycle
parking and connectivity policy considerations and feedback was requested.
The Council and staff discussed:
• The presentation provided information that represented the likeness of a
Plan and Design Commission (“PDC”) agenda and a clear recap of the
development that has taken place within the City
• How each development is different and the message from the Council,
staff and the community has been received by the development companies
• Need to review the list of public benefits and possibly update the list to
include the importance of bicycle parking and connectivity within the
community
A majority of the Council were in favor of keeping the current policies, highlighting
bike access and parking on the list of public benefits, and not making any further
changes at this time.
City Manager Neukirch noted that the public benefit list will be reviewed and updated
accordingly and then shared with the Council
V. Adjournment
Councilmember Bruckman moved to adjourn the Committee of the Whole meeting.
Councilmember Ross seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, Presiding Officer
Blumberg declared the motion passed unanimously.
The Committee of the Whole adjourned its meeting at 8:28 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ashley Palbitska
Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City Clerk
Agenda
Committee of the Whole Meeting
City Hall
1707 St Johns Avenue,
Highland Park, IL 60035
October 20, 2025
5:30 PM
Agenda
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item can address the City in the
following ways:
1. Emails with Unlimited Information. Individuals may email the City an unlimited number
of words at cityhp@cityhpil.com. Emails will be forwarded to the City Council if
requested. All emails received will be acknowledged.
2. Telephone. Individuals with no access to email may leave a message with the City
Manager’s Office at 847.926.1000.
3. Live Comments. Individuals are able to address the Council during the City Council
meeting. Questions/comments should be limited to three minutes or less.
Committee of the Whole and City Council meetings are broadcast live on the City’s Facebook
page and on the City’s website. Meetings can be watched after the meeting from a video link on
the City’s website.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its enews for important information from the
City. To sign-up for the enews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes
A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole on
October 6, 2025
B. Approval of the Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of the
Committee of the Whole Held on October 6, 2025
III. Scheduled Business
A. E-bikes and E-Scooter Regulation Review
B. Discussion of Bicycle Parking and Connectivity Policy
IV. Other Matters
V. Closed Session
VI. Adjournment
Packet
Committee of the Whole Meeting
City Hall
1707 St Johns Avenue,
Highland Park, IL 60035
October 20, 2025
5:30 PM
Agenda
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item can address the City in the
following ways:
1. Emails with Unlimited Information. Individuals may email the City an unlimited number
of words at cityhp@cityhpil.com. Emails will be forwarded to the City Council if
requested. All emails received will be acknowledged.
2. Telephone. Individuals with no access to email may leave a message with the City
Manager’s Office at 847.926.1000.
3. Live Comments. Individuals are able to address the Council during the City Council
meeting. Questions/comments should be limited to three minutes or less.
Committee of the Whole and City Council meetings are broadcast live on the City’s Facebook
page and on the City’s website. Meetings can be watched after the meeting from a video link on
the City’s website.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its enews for important information from the
City. To sign-up for the enews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes
A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole on
October 6, 2025
B. Approval of the Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of the
Committee of the Whole Held on October 6, 2025
III. Scheduled Business
A. E-bikes and E-Scooter Regulation Review
B. Discussion of Bicycle Parking and Connectivity Policy
IV. Other Matters
V. Closed Session
VI. Adjournment
Page 1 of 40
Page 2 of 40
Staff Report
Meeting Date: October 20, 2025
Staff Contact: Ashley Palbitska, Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City Clerk
Department: City Manager's Office
Title: Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole on
October 6, 2025
Recommendation:
For the City Council’s approval are the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the
Whole held on September 25, 2025.
Attachments:
1. MIN COTW 10-6-2025
Page 3 of 40
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of
The Committee of the Whole of the City of Highland Park
MEETING DATE: October 6, 2025
MEETING LOCATION: City Hall - 1707 St Johns Avenue
I. Call to Order
At 5:30 PM, Mayor Rotering called the meeting to order and asked for a roll call:
Present: Mayor Rotering, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Ross, Tapia,
Lidawer, Blumberg
Absent: None
Staff Present: City Manager Neukirch, Director of Public Works Bannon, Community
Development Director Fontane, Assistant City Manager Jason, Finance
Director McCaulou, Fire Chief Schrage, Assistant City Manager Taub,
Communications Manager Bennett, Commander Curran, Assistant to
the City Manager Palbitska
Also Present: Deputy Corporation Counsel Passman
II. Approval of Minutes
A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole on
September 25, 2025
B. Approval of the Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of the
Committee of the Whole Held on September 25, 2025
Councilmember Lidawer moved to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
the Committee of the Whole and the Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular
Meeting of the Committee of the Whole. Councilmember Center seconded the
motion. Upon a voice vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
MOVER: Councilmember Lidawer
SECONDER: Councilmember Center
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Ross, Tapia,
Lidawer
NAYS: None
PRESENT: Councilmember Blumberg
III. Scheduled Business
A. 445 Central Ave. Discussion Regarding Uses
City Manager Neukirch presented background information and the proposal
provided by Mr. Scott Canel, owner of the property at 445 Central Avenue.
Page 4 of 40
Mr. Canel provided historical information for the property and discussed his
proposal.
The Council, Mr. Canel and staff discussed:
▪ Appreciation for the work that has taken place
▪ Concerns about the length of time the space has been vacant and lack
of communication with the City on Mr. Canel’s part
▪ Concerns with the request for an additional two years on top of the multiple
years the space has been vacant
▪ Negative community perception
▪ The proposed use of the property and courtyard space
▪ Opportunities that have been reviewed to fill the space, including the
current dermatologist
▪ More attention could have been given as to how the space was designed
▪ Request that the $250K be provided to the City instead of at the end of two
years
▪ The matter of trust based on past experience
▪ Lack of action by Mr. Canel
▪ Un-fulfillment of promises is a major issue
▪ More money can be spent that will not be recouped in order to fill the
vacancies
▪ Impacts of COVID
▪ Ensure no precedent is set for future businesses in the same situation
▪ Mr. Canel’s characterization of the $250K funding as a gift
▪ Concerns if the spaces are not filled in the requested timeframe
▪ Negative impacts on surrounding business community
▪ Appreciation for the apology by Mr. Canel
▪ Property is an important part of Central Avenue, and it needs to be filled
▪ Process moving forward needs to be conducted in a way that protects
everyone, especially the community
▪ Businesses will be created by Mr. Canel if the spaces are not leased within
the proposed timeframe
▪ Continued concerns regarding issues presented by Mr. Canel
The Council was in consensus to move forward with what has been proposed with
a condition that the $250K is paid to the City upfront. They agreed that the
dermatologist may open in the space and the remaining vacancies need to be filled
by the end of 2027.
B. Place of Remembrance Design Firm Consultant Recommendation
City Manager Neukirch provided opening comments for the presentation. She
explained that staff is looking for feedback as it relates to the designer for the
project.
Assistant to the City Manager Taub presented information regarding the Place of
Remembrance Design.
Mayor Rotering requested Councilmember Ross provide her insight regarding the
recommendation based on her experience as an architect.
Page 5 of 40
Councilmember Ross provided information on the research she conducted, the
review of the interviews, and her excitement with the recommendation of SWA as it
was a firm she would be in agreement with moving forward with.
The Council voiced their appreciation for the work that was completed on the staff
report and the direct involvement of the community. They discussed the interviews
that are available, the number of individuals from the proposed firm that would be
working on the project, how the proposed firm understood what the community is
asking for, and the connection between the two site locations. They noted the
importance of providing information related to the budget for the project and the
significance of timing in relation to the completion of the project. They agreed that
the memorial pieces need to be in place and completed before July 4, 2027.
The Council was in consensus to move forward with staff's recommendation of
SWA.
City Manager Neukirch noted that everyone who has been participating in the
process will be notified of the next steps, including the drafting of an agreement with
SWA.
At 6:59 PM, Mayor Rotering recessed the Committee of the Whole meeting.
At 10:04 PM, Mayor Rotering reconvened the Committee of the Whole meeting.
Present: Mayor Rotering, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Ross, Tapia,
Lidawer, Blumberg
Absent: None
Staff Present: City Manager Neukirch, Community Development Director
Fontane, Assistant City Manager Jason, Commander Curran,
Communications Manager Bennett, Assistant to the City Manager
Palbitska
Also Present: Deputy Corporation Counsel Passman
C. Update Regarding Relocation of "Miss Nitro"
Communications Manager Bennett presented information on the relocation of "Miss
Nitro".
The Council and staff discussed how Brown Park and Lincoln Place Park are both
owned by the Park District and while the Park District is open to the relocation, no
final considerations have been provided. They discussed how the property east of
Library is owned by the City but there is a restrictive covenant on the property
indicating that use would be for Park District purposes. They opined on The
Preserve and the Park District’s concerns with that natural preserve. They discussed
site plans demonstrating where the sculpture would be located on the proposed
properties.
Page 6 of 40
A majority of the Council stated there was interest in relocating the sculpture to
Brown Park followed by Lincoln Place Park.
IV. Closed Session
Councilmember Blumberg moved the Council to close its meeting to the public, pursuant
to the following cited section of the Illinois Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/2(c)), for the
purposes of (i) pending litigation (5 ILCS 120/2(c)(11)); (ii) purchase or lease of property
(5 ILCS 120/2(c)(5)); and (iii) security (5 ILCS 120/2(c)(8)). Councilmember Lidawer
seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed
unanimously.
At 10:18 PM, the Council recessed the public portion of the meeting to meet in Closed
Session.
At 10:19 PM, Mayor Rotering reconvened the open session of the Committee of the
Whole meeting.
Present: Mayor Rotering, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Ross, Tapia,
Lidawer, Blumberg
Absent: None
Staff Present: City Manager Neukirch, Community Development Director Fontane,
Assistant to the City Manager Palbitska
Also Present: Deputy Corporation Counsel Passman
Councilmember Blumberg moved the Council to close its meeting to the public, pursuant
to the following cited section of the Illinois Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/2(c)), for the
purposes of (i) potential litigation (5 ILCS 120/2(c)(11)); (ii) purchase or lease of
property (5 ILCS 120/2(c)(5)); and (iii) security (5 ILCS 120/2(c)(8)). Councilmember
Center seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed
unanimously.
At 10:19 PM, the Council recessed the public portion of the meeting to meet in Closed
Session.
At 10:52 PM, Mayor Rotering reconvened the open session of the Committee of the
Whole meeting.
Present: Mayor Rotering, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Ross, Tapia,
Lidawer, Blumberg
Absent: None
Staff Present: City Manager Neukirch, Assistant to the City Manager Palbitska
Also Present: Deputy Corporation Counsel Passman
Page 7 of 40
V. Adjournment
Councilmember Tapia moved to adjourn the Committee of the Whole meeting.
Councilmember Center seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, the Mayor declared the
motion passed unanimously.
The Committee of the Whole adjourned its meeting at 10:52 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ashley Palbitska
Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City Clerk
Page 8 of 40
Staff Report
Meeting Date: October 20, 2025
Staff Contact: Ashley Palbitska, Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City Clerk
Department: City Manager's Office
Title: Approval of the Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of the Committee
of the Whole Held on October 6, 2025
Recommendation:
For the City Council’s approval are the minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of
the Committee of the Whole held on October 6, 2025.
Attachments:
1. MIN CWCS 10-6-2025_A
2. MIN CWCS 10-6-2025_Bv2
Page 9 of 40
Staff Report
Meeting Date: October 20, 2025
Staff Contact: Brian Soldano, Police Sergeant
Department: Police Department
Title: E-bikes and E-Scooter Regulation Review
Recommendation:
Earlier this summer, the City recognized the increasing presence of electric scooters, bicycles,
and similar vehicles throughout the City and regulations were adopted based on concerns for
public safety. This policy matter is being introduced again following a review of enforcement
and education efforts, and based on public and staff feedback. Based on updated data, state
classifications, and regional practices, staff recommends amending Code 71.360 as follows:
1. Amend the ordinance to prohibit “E-Motos". E-Motos are motor-driven cycles subject to
federal motor vehicle safety standards. E-Motos are only permitted on roadways when they meet
the following Illinois Vehicle Code requirements:
• Must have rearview mirror
• Headlamp required
• Brake light required
Examples of E-Motos are mopeds, electric motorcycles, electric dirt bikes and high-powered
electric scooters. E-Motos may have motors with thousands of watts of power that far exceed
the 750 watts allowed for legal low-speed electric bicycles. They are usually equipped with
throttles and typically can go in excess of 30 mph. E-Motos are only permitted on the roadway
when the following requirements are met: valid registration, insurance, and a valid M or L class
driver’s license.
“Golf Carts” or “non-highway vehicles" a.k.a. "Low speed vehicles” as defined in the Illinois
Vehicle Code have their own Illinois Vehicle Code definition as “a motor vehicle not specifically
designed to be used on a public highway.” (625 ILCS 5/11-1426.1) and (625 ILCS 5/11-1427).
They are permitted on roadways where posted speed limits are 35 mph or less with a valid DL,
insurance and registration. The City does not currently have a policy that would prohibit their
use as long as the Illinois Vehicle Code guidelines are followed.
Page 10 of 40
2. Amend the ordinance to permit Class 1, 2, and 3 low-speed electric bicycles and electric
tricycles in all areas where bicycles are permitted, such as bike paths, parks and public parking
lots, unless otherwise posted by the property owner (defined by Illinois law as having operable
pedals, motors less than 750 watts, and maximum assisted speeds of 20–28 mph
https://www.ilga.gov/documents/legislation/ilcs/documents/062500050K11-1517.htm)
Why? Although “E-Motos” would remain prohibited on paths, class 1, 2 and 3 low-speed
electric bicycles are used by those who may have limitations due to disability, age, or need
assistance to continue a “rider’s quality of life” that is now more difficult to maintain solely
under human power.
3. Maintain the minimum age requirement of 16 years of age to operate a low-speed electric
bicycle, but amend the ordinance to remove the driver’s license requirement to operate a low-
speed electric bicycle.
Why? This allows those who may not need a driver’s license for a motor vehicle, who still
comprehend the basic rules of the road to operate a low-speed electric bicycle or scooter to ride
with family, friends or commute without a penalty.
4. Continue to uphold state law requirements, which include:
• No person under the age of 18 years old may operate an electric scooter per Illinois State
statute: (625 ILCS 5/11-1518)
https://www.ilga.gov/Documents/legislation/ilcs/documents/062500050K11-1518.htm
• A person may not operate a low-speed electric scooter on a highway with a posted speed
limit in excess of 35 mph. (625 ILCS 5/11-1518)
https://www.ilga.gov/Documents/legislation/ilcs/documents/062500050K11-1518.htm
5. Continue to uphold the following Highland Park ordinance requirements:
o Hold parents and legal guardians accountable
o Continue to recommend the use of ebikecourse.com for voluntary online training
on safe electric bicycle operation
o Continue to require helmets, lights and reflectors
6. Continue our education and enforcement efforts: include signage along trails and in the
downtown district, communicate through public communication channels code
regulations, continue to participate in and educate through community events, such as the
“Bike Rodeo.”
This approach balances consistency with regional practices, recognizes state definitions, and
Page 11 of 40
maintains strong safety standards by distinguishing between regulated low-speed electric
bicycles, low-speed electric scooters and higher-powered motor-driven vehicles, “E-Motos.”
Policy Consideration:
On June 16, 2025, the City Council approved amendments to Section 71.360 of the Municipal
Code (“Other Vehicles on Streets and Highways”) in response to public concerns about the
increased use of electric bicycles (e-bikes) and electric scooters (e-scooters) in the community.
During both the Committee of the Whole and Council meetings, discussion focused on safety
risks associated with these vehicles—particularly their potential high speeds (some reaching 40–
50 mph) and their near-silent operation, which can create dangerous encounters with pedestrians
and other users of public spaces.
As a result, the following recommendations were made:
• Establish clear definitions for low-speed electric bicycles, low-speed electric scooters, motor-
driven vehicles, motorized wheelchairs, and toy vehicles.
• Restrict use of motor-driven vehicles on public property by individuals under 16 or without a
valid driver’s license, unless accompanied by a parent/guardian.
• Prohibit operation of low-speed electric scooters on public property by anyone under 18 or
without a valid driver’s license.
• Prohibit use of motor-driven vehicles and e-scooters on sidewalks, bike paths, parks, and
City-owned parking lots due to frequent complaints of reckless operation, particularly in Sunset
Woods Park, residential areas, and the downtown district.
• Hold parents/guardians accountable when minors under 16 are knowingly permitted to violate
the ordinance.
• https://www.cityhpil.com/government/city_departments/police/resources/e-
bike_regulations.php
On August 11, 2025, City Council revisited the issue to specifically address e-bike and e-scooter
use on bike trails. Staff learned that the Skokie Valley Trail (Lake County Forest Preserve
jurisdiction) allows low speed electric bicycles and low speed electric scooters, creating a
jurisdictional inconsistency with the Green Bay Trail. Therefore, Council requested additional
data from the Police Department on complaints and enforcement related to e-bikes and e-
scooters.
Police Data – June 1 to September 29, 2025
• Calls for service: 63 (complaints included reckless driving, unsafe operation, damage to park
property, sidewalk use, and traffic crashes).
• Enforcement stops: 43 Some stops involved multiple subjects
o 6 citations issued
o 37 warnings issued
o Of note, 43 contacts were with juveniles ages 12-17 years of age. The most contacted ages
were 12-13 years of age.
o 10 contacts were made with adults 18-74 years of age.
Page 12 of 40
o 3 contacts with 18-25 year olds
o 0 contacts with 26-40 year olds
o 3 contacts with 41-51 year olds
o 3 contacts with 52-74 year olds
Regional Comparisons
Staff reviewed regulations in neighboring communities. While approaches vary, only Northbrook
and Glenview currently prohibit electric bicycles on public trails entirely. Highlights include:
• Winnetka (adopted 9/16/25): Riders must be 18+, DL required, one rider per scooter, no
modifications to speed/propulsion.
• Lake Forest: Adopts state definitions of Class 1, 2, 3 e-bikes; higher-powered vehicles (e.g., E-
Motos) require DL, registration, and insurance. Prohibited use in the business district.
• Lake Bluff: E-bikes/scooters must be walked on CBD sidewalks; high-powered e-motorcycles
banned.
• Northbrook: Riders must be 16+ with a DL; e-bikes prohibited on sidewalks, public paths, and
multi-use trails.
• Glenview (6/23/25): E-bikes/scooters banned on all public property (streets, sidewalks, parking
lots, paths).
• Evanston: General prohibition on e-bikes/scooters in public rights-of-way, except Class 1 and 2
low-speed e-bikes.
• Libertyville: Class 1–3 e-bikes prohibited in parks and downtown; otherwise permitted where
bikes are allowed. Riders must be 16+ to operate Class 3.
Use of golf carts, utility task vehicles, and moke cars on public property continue to be
prohibited unless expressly permitted by the State or City.
Core Priorities:
Public Safety - regulations have been enacted in consideration of public safety measures given
the increased use of e-bikes and e-scooters.
Attachments:
1. Ebike Easy Sheet Third Draft edits
Page 13 of 40
Overview Low-Speed E- E-Scooter E-Bike Class 1 and 2 E-Bike Class 3 Personal Vehicles
Scooter (Over 10 MPH) ( up to 20 mph ) ( up to 28 mph ) ( ATVs, Dirt bikes, “ E-
(under 10mph) Motos “ etc. )
Where Can I On the roadway, when
Ride? Bike paths, parks and public parking lots unless posted Illinois vehicle code
All bicycles, electric bicycles and electric scooters are prohibited on sidewalks, and enforced requirements are met.
in the business districts.
Class 1 E-Bike Motor assisted, only while pedaling; assistance stops at 20 mph
Class 2 E-Bike Throttle exclusive operation possible to 20 mph; motor assisted beyond 20 mph
Class 3 E-Bike Motor assisted, only while pedaling; assistance stops at 28 mph
“E-Moto” Includes mopeds, electric motorcycles, and high-powered scooters. Requires registration,
insurance, and a valid M or L class driver’s license. Speeds typically exceed 30 mph.
Motor Restrictions Safety Enforcement
Motors must be under 750 watts; max assisted Helmets, reflectors, and lights Follow road rules; fines start at $100.
speed is 20-28 mph. (sunset to sunrise are required. Parents/guardians accountable for minors.
Visit www.cityhpil.com and search e-bike for
SCAN ME
ordinance details and Q&A
Page 14 of 40
Staff Report
Meeting Date: October 20, 2025
Staff Contact: Patrick Hoffmann, Planner II
Department: Community Development Department
Title: Discussion of Bicycle Parking and Connectivity Policy
Recommendation:
Council feedback is requested related to the City’s bike parking and connectivity policies.
Policy Consideration:
At the May 27, 2025 meeting, City Council considered an Ordinance amending the code
regarding bicycle paths and parking. The Ordinance included four main objectives as set forth in
Move HP, adopted by Council in Oct. 2020[1]:
• Objective 2.1: Amend the Zoning Code to require bike parking as part of new
commercial and multi-family developments (including for changes in use for existing
structures).
• Objective 2.2: Amend the Zoning Code to simplify the requirements to receive parking
reductions by providing bicycle parking.
• Objective 2.3: Amend the Zoning Code to require pedestrian pathways within internal
parking lots.
• Objective 2.4: Amend the Zoning Code to require commercial and multifamily planned
developments to provide connections to adjacent existing and/or planned trails.
Council amended the Ordinance approving Code provisions related to Objectives 2.2 and 2.3
above by a vote of 6-0, while motions failed related to Objectives 2.1 (vote 2-3-1) and 2.4 (vote
2-4). Please see Attachment 1 for the adopted Ordinance. Ultimately, Council requested staff
to provide additional information related to Objectives 2.1 and 2.4 for discussion at a future
Committee of the Whole meeting. The purpose of the October 20th meeting is to represent the
information that was previously shared, provide the additional information requested, and open
the policy discussion for Council input.
Page 15 of 40
This report provides the results of a bike parking survey and an update on the status of the
Move HP plan (Attachment 4) for reference. The policy matter involves whether or not to
require by Code or attempt to achieve adequate bike parking through the Planned Development
process as conditions of approval and public benefit. Attachment 2 provides an example of a
Planned Development with a bike path connectivity requirement.
Summary of Bike Parking & Connectivity Survey.
The City conducted a survey of 13 municipalities through the Northwest Municipal Conference[2]
that inquired as to bike parking requirements within developments. Staff found that about half of
the municipalities surveyed required bike parking for commercial and for multi-family residential
developments. On average, they require that bicycle parking be provided at about 10% to 15%
the number of parking spaces – with exceptions, similar to what staff initially proposed for
Highland Park. As to whether the development community provides bike parking when not
required to do so, most answered “occasionally” or “infrequently”, with one municipality
indicating “frequently”. As for requiring a connection to an existing or planned bike path or trail –
two of 13 municipalities indicated they did. Please see Attachment 3 for more details regarding
the results.
[1] See Pages 22-23 of MoveHP, An Update to Bike-Walk HP 2030, dated October 2020.
[2] Barrington,
Des Plaines, Elk Grove, Morton Grove, Mount Prospect, Niles, Rolling Meadows,
Schaumburg, Skokie, Streamwood, Wheeling, Wilmette, Winnetka, and Highland Park.
Core Priorities:
Infrastructure Investment - Bike facilities are an important part of the City's infrastructure both
public and private.
Environmental Sustainability - Providing for alternative modes of transportation helps
improve sustainability.
Attachments:
1. Attachment 1 - HP Amendatory Ordinance Bicycle Paths and Parking Amended on the
floor
2. Attachment 2 - Hidden Oak PUD Bike Path Connectivity Requirement
3. Attachment 3 - Northwest Munic. Conf. Survey Summary
4. Attachment 4 - MoveHP Implementation Update
Page 16 of 40
City of Highland Park
Ordinance No. _________
An Ordinance Amending “The City of Highland Park Zoning Ordinance of 1997,”
as Amended, Regarding Bicycle Paths and Parking
WHEREAS, Article II of the “City of Highland Park Zoning Ordinance of 1997,” as
amended (“Zoning Code”), sets forth definitions for the Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 150.520 of the Zoning Code sets forth the site planning
constraints and design standards for planned developments in the City; and
WHEREAS, Article VIII of the Zoning Code sets forth the off-street parking and
loading requirements of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend Section 150.520 and Article VIII of
the Zoning Code to: (i) require buffering along property lines that abut existing or proposed
trails and paths; (ii) allow long-term bicycle spaces to satisfy minimum off-street parking
space requirements; and (iii) require sidewalks of at least five feet in width to separate
driveways and parking areas from a building (collectively, the “Proposed Amendments”);
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing by the City Plan and Design Commission to consider
the Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Code was duly advertised in the Lake County News-
Sun on October 21, 2024, and held on November 5 and December 17, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2024, the Plan and Design Commission adopted
Findings of Fact, Public Hearing No. 2024-ZTA-009, recommending to the City Council
approval of the Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Code, in accordance with and pursuant
to Section 150.1506 of the Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Proposed Amendments and the
recommendation of the Plan and Design Commission and has determined that adoption of
the Proposed Amendments, as set forth in this Ordinance, will serve and be in the best
interest of the City and its residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
HIGHLAND PARK, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:
SECTION ONE: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and
made a part of, this Ordinance as findings of the City Council.
SECTION TWO: DEFINITIONS. Section 150.202, titled “Definitions,” of Article
II, titled “Interpretation and Definitions,” of the Zoning Code is hereby amended further to
read as follows:
“Whenever in this Chapter the following words and phrases are used,
they shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, have the meanings respectively
Additions are bold and double underlined; deletions are struck through.
4928-3400-5517, v. 12
Page 17 of 40
ascribed to them in this Section, except when the context otherwise clearly
indicates. Whenever in this Chapter other words are used, those other words
shall have the meanings normally ascribed to them.
* * *
Long-term bicycle spaces: bicycle parking spaces that:
1. Are protected from weather and from access by
unauthorized persons;
2. Have minimum dimensions of two feet in width by
six feet in length, with a minimum overhead
vertical clearance of seven feet, excluding bicycle
lockers from the calculation of vertical clearance;
3. Are of solid construction, resistant to rust,
corrosion, hammers, and saws;
4. Allow both the bicycle frame and the wheels to be
locked with the bicycle in an upright position using
a standard U-lock;
5. Are designed so as not to cause damage to the
bicycle;
6. Facilitate easy locking without interference from
or to adjacent bicycles;
7. Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored so that
they cannot be easily removed, unless the long-term
bicycle parking spaces are located within a secure
room designated for the storage of bicycles; and
8. Are located within 100 feet of the principal
entrance of the building it serves, unless the long-
term bicycle parking spaces are located within a
secure room designated for the storage of bicycles.”
SECTION THREE: COMPUTATION OF PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT. Section 150.803, titled “Computation of
Parking and Loading Requirements for New Development,” of Article VIII, titled “Off-Street
Parking and Loading,” of the Zoning Code is hereby amended further to read as follows:
“Sec. 150.803. – Computation of Parking and Loading Requirements for New
Development.
(A) Computational Rules.
Additions are bold and double underlined; deletions are struck through.
4928-3400-5517, v. 12
Page 18 of 40
(1) The capacity of the building expressed in number of
persons shall be determined by the Fire Prevention Code
of the City of Highland Park.
(2) When the calculation of the number of required off-street
parking and loading spaces results in a requirement of a
fractional space, any fraction up to and including one-half
(½) shall be disregarded, and fractions of over one-half
(½) shall be interpreted as one (1) whole parking space,
with a minimum of one space for any use which requires
parking.
(3) Electric vehicle charging stations may be located in
required off-street parking spaces and may be counted
toward satisfying minimum off-street parking space
requirements.
(4) Long-term bicycle spaces located within a
dedicated area may be counted toward satisfying
minimum off-street parking space requirements,
with eight long-term bicycle spaces satisfying the
requirement of one off-street parking space.
(5) Eight non-long-term bicycle parking spaces may be
located in an off-street parking space.
* * *
(B) Requirements by Use. The computation of the minimum off-
street parking and loading requirements for each permitted use
shall be based upon the following Table of Parking and Loading
Requirements subject to the adjustments allowed and the
absolute minimums required by this Article.
(See Table of Parking and Loading Requirements at end of Article)
(C) Uses Not Listed. Whenever the City Council, upon
recommendation of the Plan Commission, permits any use not
listed in the Table of Allowable Uses without formal amendment
in accord with Article IV of this Chapter, the City Council shall
also determine the required off-street parking and loading
facilities for such use.
(D) Minimum Parking Requirements.
(1) User Parking. Every use for which any requirement for
user parking is listed in the Table of Parking and Loading
Requirements must provide an absolute minimum of one
(1) user off-street parking space.
Additions are bold and double underlined; deletions are struck through.
4928-3400-5517, v. 12
Page 19 of 40
(2) Commercial Vehicles. In addition to the requirements in
the Table of Parking and Loading Requirements, one (1)
off-street parking space shall be required for each
commercial vehicle directly associated with a permitted
use, whether the vehicle is stored over-night on the
premises or not.
(E) Internal Parking Lot Requirements. Off-street parking
and loading areas for which at least 150 off-street parking
spaces must be provided must include internal
pedestrian paths at least five feet in width connecting all
buildings, off-street parking facilities, and bicycle
parking on the property.”
SECTION FOUR: JOINT PARKING FACILITIES. Section 150.804, titled
“Joint Parking Facilities,” of the Zoning Code is hereby amended further to read as follows:
“Sec. 150.804. – Joint Parking Facilities.
(C) Adjustments to Parking Requirements.
* * *
(4) Alternative Transportation Reductions.
* * *
(f) The reduction of up to one nonresidential parking
space may be granted for every 10 long-term
bicycle parking spaces provided on-site. In order
to qualify for this reduction, the long-term bicycle
parking must:
(i) Be protected from weather and from access
by unauthorized persons;
(ii) Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored
so that they cannot be easily removed;
(iii) Be of solid construction, resistant to rust,
corrosion, hammers, and saws;
(iv) Allow both the bicycle frame and the
wheels to be locked with the bicycle in an
upright position using a standard U-lock;
(v) Be designed so as not to cause damage to
the bicycle;
Additions are bold and double underlined; deletions are struck through.
4928-3400-5517, v. 12
Page 20 of 40
(vi) Facilitate easy locking without
interference from or to adjacent bicycles;
and
(vii) Have minimum dimensions of two feet in
width by six feet in length, with a
minimum overhead vertical clearance of
seven feet. Bicycle lockers are exempt from
overhead clearance requirements
referenced herein.”
SECTION FIVE: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKING
FACILITIES. Section 150.808, titled “Design and Maintenance of Parking Facilities,” of
Article VIII, titled “Off-Street Parking and Loading,” of the Zoning Code is hereby amended
further to read as follows:
“Sec. 150.808. – Design and Maintenance of Parking Facilities.
* * *
(D) Minimum Area and Spacing Requirements. The following are
minimum requirements, and it shall be the responsibility of the
property owner to maintain the facilities in such a condition as
to be able to continue to meet these requirements.
* * *
(4) Sidewalks. In order to insure ensure pedestrian safety,
sidewalks of not less than three (3) five feet in width,
exclusive of vehicle overhang, are required to separate
any driveway or parking area from a building.”
* * *
SECTION SIX: PUBLICATION. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish
this Ordinance in pamphlet form pursuant to the Statutes of the State of Illinois.
SECTION SEVEN: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance will be in full force and
effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED:
Additions are bold and double underlined; deletions are struck through.
4928-3400-5517, v. 12
Page 21 of 40
APPROVED:
PUBLISHED IN PAMPHLET FORM:
ORDINANCE NO.:
Nancy R. Rotering, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ghida S. Neukirch, City Clerk
Additions are bold and double underlined; deletions are struck through.
4928-3400-5517, v. 12
Page 22 of 40
Half Day Road
2
4
1 3
New Sign
Park Connection Entry
Called “The Preserve”
Existing Sign
Add to Existing
Page 23 of 40
Half Day Road
1 Add new way point above Metra
Arrow: Forward
Text: The Preserve
Distance: 1/4
2 Add new way point above Highwood
Arrow: Left
Text: The Preserve
Distance: 1/4
Page 24 of 40
Half Day Road
3 Add whole new sign with two way points
Arrow: Right; Text: The Preserve; Distance: 1/8
Arrow: Forward; Text: Highwood; Distance: 1/4
4 Add whole new sign with two way points
Arrow: Left; Text: The Preserve; Distance: 1/8
Arrow: Forward; Text: Skokie Valley Path; Distance: 1/2
Page 25 of 40
Park Ave W
6
5
New Sign
Existing Sign
Add to Existing
Page 26 of 40
Park Ave W
5 Add whole new sign with three way points
Arrow: Left; Text: The Preserve; Distance: 1/8
Arrow: Forward; Text: Hospital; Distance: 1/2
Arrow: Forward; Text: Downtown; Distance: 3/4
6 Add whole new sign with two way points
Arrow: Right; Text: The Preserve; Distance: 1/8
Arrow: Forward; Text: Skokie Valley Path; Distance: 1/2
Page 27 of 40
Preserve Pathway Connection
Page 28 of 40
Preserve Signage Installed by Park District
Page 29 of 40
Installed Bike Route Signs
Page 30 of 40
Attachment 3
The City conducted a survey, through the Northwest Municipal Conference, of 13 municipalities
including Highland Park that inquired as to bike parking requirements with developments. The
following is a summary of the results:
Does your municipality require by code that bike parking be provided for new commercial
development? If so, what are the requirements?
o Seven yes / six no.
Elk Grove: 4-2-M. Bicycle Parking - 2. Minimum Required Spaces. Bicycle
parking facilities should be provided at a rate of one bicycle space per
twenty-five (25) vehicle parking spaces with a minimum of space for four
(4) bicycles and a maximum of ten (10) spaces. Additional requirements in
the linked Zoning code.
Mount Prospect: Required in downtown districts for the construction of
new buildings, additions to existing buildings, or facade improvements to
existing buildings. Bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum amount
of ten percent (10%) of the vehicle parking provided on site.
Niles: Retail/personal service establishments larger than 10,000 sf in GFA
must provide 1 bike parking space for every 30 car parking spaces.
Rolling Meadows: 1 bicycle space per 10 automobile spaces, minimum 3,
maximum ten. We have specific requirements for the type of rack installed.
See Sec. 122-160 of Municipal Code.
Schaumburg: Parking spaces are based on use and area and range from 5
to 20 spaces. Reference: § 154.125 - BICYCLE PARKING
REQUIREMENTS.
Skokie: Sec. 118-222. - Required number of bicycle parking spaces. (a)
Bicycle parking shall be required for all new construction or when a change
in use results in the requirement for additional off-street motor vehicle
parking.
Wheeling: Bicycle Parking. All new uses and off-street parking lots shall
provide bicycle parking facilities, such as bike racks, in accordance with the
provisions of this Title. See Sec. 19.11.010. The number of required bike
parking is based on the required number of car parking at a site with a
minimum of 2 bike spaces and a max of 10 bike spaces + 5% of amount over
100 car spaces.
Does your municipality require by code that bike parking be provided for new multiple-
family development? If so, what are the requirements?
o Seven yes / six no.
Elk Grove: same as above.
Mount Prospect: Bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum amount
of ten percent (10%) of the vehicle parking provided on site.
Niles: 1 per 10 dwelling units.
Page 31 of 40
Rolling Meadows: 1 space per three dwelling units for residents, plus one
space per 20 automobile spaces for visitors. Minimum 3 spaces, maximum
10. See Sec. 122-160 of Municipal Code.
Schaumburg: § 154.125 - BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. Multi-
Family Residential without private garages are required to install the
following minimum bicycle parking spaces: - Long-term Bicycle Parking: 1
per 3 units (minimum 5 spaces) - Short-term bicycle 1 per 40 vehicle
parking spaces for parking (minimum of 5 spaces).
Skokie: Sec. 118-222. - Required number of bicycle parking spaces.(b)The
minimum number of required off-street bicycle parking spaces is as
follows: (1)Residential and lodging uses. (a)Detached, 2-unit multifamily,
and townhouse residences: none. (b)Residences within transit oriented
developments (TODs) and in mixed-use districts: 15% of motor vehicle
parking requirements with a minimum of 1 space. (c)Multifamily
residences neither in TODs nor in mixed-use districts and all other uses:
10% of motor vehicle parking requirements with a minimum of 1 space.
Wheeling: same as above.
Do / would new developments in your community incorporate adequate bike parking, on
their own, without it being required (please select one: rarely, infrequently, occasionally
frequently, don’t know)?
o Barrington: infrequently. Developers are asked to provide bike parking as part of
planned developments.
o Des Plaines: Occasionally. Large multi-family residential developments have
included bicycle parking without prompting. Staff suggests bicycle racks for
commercial parking when it is not included on preliminary plans.
o Elk Grove: Occasionally.
o Morton Grove: Review for adequate bike parking is contextual and incorporated
into special use and planned unit development review based on required traffic
impact study.
o Mount Prospect: Occasionally.
o Niles: Occasionally.
o Rolling Meadows: Infrequently. Typically do not receive plans that propose these.
o Schaumburg: Infrequently. New developments rarely include bicycle parking
unless required by code. Provisions are typically discussed with applicants during
preliminary review, with staff taking a business-friendly approach to ensure
needed accommodations are addressed.
o Skokie: Occasionally. Most developers include bike parking as part of their
proposals, but unclear if they would provide sufficient bicycle parking if there was
not a code requirement.
o Streamwood: rarely.
o Wheeling: rarely.
Page 32 of 40
o Wilmette: Occasionally.
o Winnetka: Frequently.
Does your City code require developments to connect to abutting bike paths or pedestrian
trails?
o Barrington: The comprehensive plan does where improvements are shown in the
bike and ped plan.
o Des Plaines: Yes.
o Elk Grove: not applicable.
o Morton Grove: Bike parking and trail connections have often incorporated into
special use and planned unit development ordinances.
o Mount Prospect: No.
o Niles: It requires a connection to sidewalks but not specifically to bike paths or
trails.
o Rolling Meadows: Certain large sites (5+ acres) must provide bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. See Sec. 122-77 of Municipal Code.
o Schaumburg: Pedestrian connection is required from the development to the
right-of-way, but a bicycle path connection is not required.§ 151.08 - PAVEMENT
DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
o Skokie: Not via Village of Skokie Zoning Code, but more than likely suggested
during the internal plan review process.
o Streamwood: Not a requirement, but we strongly encourage it where applicable.
o Wheeling: no.
o Wilmette: no but it’s a good idea.
o Winnetka: no.
Does your community require pedestrian pathways be provided in parking lots? If so, what
are the requirements?
o Six yes / seven no.
Elk Grove: 11-5 - LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS d. Pedestrian Access
i. All parking lots with two (2) or more double- loaded rows must provide
internal pedestrian walkways within the Parking Area and outside of the
parking row. Additional requirements in the linked Zoning code.
Morton Grove: All parking areas more than two thousand (2,000) square
feet shall have internal landscaping to channelize and define logical areas
for pedestrians and vehicular circulation.
Niles: All required off-street parking facilities must have an internal
pedestrian circulation system that allows for safe passage between parking
areas and any public sidewalk in the adjacent right-of-way and the use it
serves. This includes, but is not limited to, interconnected sidewalks,
striped walkways, and separated walkways.
Page 33 of 40
Rolling Meadows: Our site plan review process requires meet various
standards, including that "The proposed site plan or design is internally
logical and safe and facilitates clear understanding of travel and circulation
within the property, as well as to and from the site by vehicles, pedestrians,
and bicyclists." See Section 122-398 of Municipal Code.
Schaumburg: New developments are required to have pedestrian access to
all roadways, including through parking lots.§ 154.122 - OFF-STREET
PARKING. In addition, staff also requests a pedestrian access route citing
PROWAG section § R201.2.
Wilmette: Only required for parking lots in Village Center (downtown) by
design guidelines.
Page 34 of 40
Planning Division
Department of Community Development
1150 Half Day Rd.
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
847.432.0808
cityhpil.com
Date: October 14, 2025
To: City Council
From: Patrick Hoffmann, Planner II
Subject: MoveHP Implementation Follow-up
MoveHP, an update to Bike-Walk HP 2030, was adopted by City Council on October 13,
2020 in order to re-evaluate proposed projects and policy for non-motorized networks
of transportation and to reflect on the progress of Bike-Walk HP 2030. In a continued
effort to evaluate MoveHP, staff has collected a summary of the plan’s goals to provide
City Council a prospective on MoveHp’s accomplishments. Please reference the
Implementation Matrix at the end of this report for a list of all the goals and objectives
of MoveHP.
Plan Summary:
Goal 1: Develop and adopt policies, plans and guidelines to assure that cycling and
walking are a safe and integral part of City life.
Complete Streets: As a part of MoveHP, a Complete Streets Policy Draft was
attached to the appendix. City Council, on December 11, 2023, adopted an
amended policy to help guide decision making relative to transportation network
improvements. Please find the adopted policy here: Complete Streets Policy.
Amend Code: Earlier this year on May 27, 2025, City Council reviewed Zoning
Text Amendments in relation to goals set by the MoveHP Plan. Council adopted
code amendments to bike parking incentives and pedestrian pathways, while
continuing the rest of the amendments to a date uncertain.
Goal 2: Partner with government, non-profit, and local organizations/agencies to
incorporate bicycle and pedestrian policies in projects and facilities in the community.
Lake Cook Rd path: Public Works is working directly with Lake County DOT to
connect the North Branch Trail to Skokie Valley bike path across Rt. 41.
Northbrook is not involved in this effort.
Transportation Advisory Group:
o Provide advisory recommendations related to the planning and
implementation of transportation plans, including but not limited to the
MoveHP Plan, Complete Streets Policy and recommendations from Bike
Walk Highland Park.
Page 35 of 40
o As requested by the City Council or City Staff, provide advisory
recommendations related to multi-modal, vehicular, and pedestrian
transportation and parking conditions, projects, education, and
communications through the City.
o Public Works is the staff liaison to this advisory group
Goal 3: Develop and maintain a continuous, interconnected cycling and pedestrian
system that accommodates short- and long-distance trips and provides connections
and access to major community destinations.
Public Benefit: Through the Planned Development process, projects are required
to provide a public benefit as defined in Section 150.515 – “means an amenity
provided in the form of an improvement, donation or dedication that is not
otherwise required as part of the development process and that serves the
residents of the Planned Development and the community at large” when
requesting certain modification from code or being located in the B4-4, B4-5, B4-
6, B4-BG, or B5 Zoning Districts. With this requirement, several transportation
public amenities have been completed. Please reference the information item,
Attachment 1, outlining the adopted Public Benefit with PUDs Since 2016. Below
are some improvements that have been recently completed:
o The Preserve park connection: Hidden Oak public benefit at Compton-
Livingston just south of Half Day Rd added a concrete entrance walk to
allow for a northern connection to the Preserve. Additionally, bike way
finding signs were added to the existing bike sign network.
o Bike shelter and fix-it station: Recently constructed near the Ravinia
Metra Station north parking long the Robert McClory Bike path was
partially funded with public benefit from 555 Roger Williams Ave.
Goal 4: Provide funding for bicycle and pedestrian-related improvements through the
capital improvement program, grants, and other funding sources.
Sidewalk Improvement Sheridan Road/Cedar Dean -Roger Williams (ITEP and
DCEO grants)
Investigating use of ITEP grant for replacement or improvements to Central
Pedestrian Bridge.
Green Bay Rd Project: eliminated proposed bike lanes from scope of work.
University Ave sidewalk: project not moving forward.
Goal 5: Implement bicycle and pedestrian education, encouragement, and evaluation
programs.
Historic Bike Tour: On May 25th and 31st, Senior Planner, Zubin Coleman, former
staff liaison to the Historic Preservation Commission and Jean Sogin, former
HPC chair, led community members on a tour of historic and landmarked
properties around sunset woods.
Page 36 of 40
Bicycle Rodeo: The Highland Park Police Department hosted a bicycle rodeo on
Sunday, August 24 at The Preserve where community members learned more
about bike safety, sharing the road, and included free safety checks.
Special Events: Every year the City issues several special event permits runs,
walks and bike rides though Highland Park and the surrounding communities.
This year the events included:
o The Empire Bikes Back – community bike ride organized by the Park
District
o North Shore Classic Half Marathon, 5K and 1-Mile Walk – organized by
Ventures Endurance
o Walk to Cure Scleroderma – annual family walk to benefit the scleroderma
community organized by the Scleroderma Foundation of Greater Chicago
o Highwood 5K Family Run, Walk & Stroll – family centered walk organized
by Celebrate Highwood
o Rock the Ride – walk/ride to raise awareness and support for gun violence
prevention organized by Green Bay Cycles of Winnetka
o North Shore Century Bike Ride – recreational bike ride organized by the
Evanston Bicycle Club
o NSSD 112 FUNd Run – 5K run/walk in support of the District 112
Education Foundation organized by the Foundation and Race Day Events
o North Shore Turkey Trot – permit has not yet been issued – 10K/5K run
and walk organized by Ventures Endurance
Bike Friendly Community: Staff renewed Highland Park’s Bike Friendly
designation and the League of American Bicyclist awarded the City with a
Bronze-Level Bicycle Friendly Community award.
Page 37 of 40
Implementation Matrix:
Goal 1: Develop and adopt policies, plans and guidelines to assure that cycling
and walking are a safe and integral part of City life.
Objective
Objective 1: Consider adopting the Complete Streets Policy as a distinct, separate resolution
and general policy guide.
Objective 2: Amend the Highland Park Municipal Code to promote and enhance biking and
walking and align with best practices.
Objective 2.1: Amend the Zoning Code to require bike parking as part of new commercial and
multi-family developments.
Objective 2.2: Amend the Zoning Code to simplify the requirements to receive parking
reductions by providing bicycle parking.
Objective 2.3: Amend the Zoning Code to require internal parking lot pedestrian paths.
Objective 2.4: Amend the Zoning Code to require new commercial, multi-family, and planned
developments to provide connections to adjacent existing and/or planned trails.
Objective 2.5: Amend the Municipal Code to align with Illinois State statutes.
Objective 3: Evaluate opportunities to increase safety using traffic-calming measures and
additional non-motorized transportation infrastructure.
Objective 4: Regularly review the City’s Local Streets New Sidewalk Installation Guideline and
revise as appropriate to increase the number of sidewalks in residential neighborhoods.
Goal 2: Partner with government, non-profit, and local organizations/agencies to
incorporate bicycle and pedestrian policies in projects and facilities in the
community.
Objective
Objective 1: Continue to work with the Park District of Highland Park to improve pedestrian
and bike connections to local parks and recreational facilities.
Objective 2: Work with the Village of Northbrook to extend the Lake Cook Road trail to the
Skokie Valley Trail & other neighboring municipalities.
Objective 3: Work with the City of Highwood, the Village of Lake Forest, and the Town of Fort
Sheridan HOA to increase connectivity and access to trails in northern Highland Park.
Objective 4: Work with the Village of Northbrook, the Illinois Department of Transportation,
Cook County, and Lake County to improve bicycle and pedestrian access along and across Lake
Cook Road.
Objective 5: Work with the Illinois Department of Transportation to provide safe and efficient
non-motorized access across US 41.
Objective 6: Continue to utilize BWAG and TAG as valuable stakeholder groups for feedback on
non-motorized transportation infrastructure improvements.
Objective 7: Work with adjacent municipalities and regional transit agencies to promote and
implement improved local and regional transit mobility and connections.
Objective 8: Engage stakeholder groups such as the local school districts and places of worship
to find opportunities to improve non-motorized transportation connections.
Page 38 of 40
Goal 3: Develop and maintain a continuous, interconnected cycling and
pedestrian system that accommodates short- and long-distance trips and
provides connections and access to major community destinations.
Objective
Objective 1: Establish pedestrian priority routes to ensure all parks and schools have
pedestrian infrastructure connections within a 10-minute walk/0.5 miles.
Objective 2: Continue to clear sidewalks and paved multi-use trails as part of the City snow and
ice control plan.
Objective 3: Plan and implement safe, off-street east-west bicycle routes through the City.
Objective 4: Promote transit use and local access through station area improvements and
micromobility.
Objective 4.1. Focus pedestrian improvements within a half-mile radius of Metra stations and
bus routes.
Objective 4.2. Consider micromobility as an opportunity to increase non-motorized
transportation options throughout the City.
Objective 5: Implement bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements throughout the
City as part of the Capital Improvement Program and Community Development project public
benefits.
Goal 4: Provide funding for bicycle and pedestrian-related improvements
through the capital improvement program, grants, and other funding sources.
Objective
Objective 1: Identify and apply for grant funding for bicycle and pedestrian related
improvement projects.
Objective 2: Establish a Sponsor-a-Rack Program that allows local businesses and
organizations to fund a bike rack that includes opportunities for advertisements.
Objective 3: Ensure adequate funding is allocated for the ongoing maintenance of new bicycle
and pedestrian infrastructure.
Goal 5: Implement bicycle and pedestrian education, encouragement, and
evaluation programs.
Objective
Objective 1: Launch a public safety campaign for people of all ages and all users of the road.
Objective 1.1: Consider using alternative signs where appropriate.
Objective 2: Work with Northshore School District 112 to develop School Travel Plans and
Bike/Walk safety curricula for each of the schools.
Objective 3: Host annual and special events aimed at increasing the number of families and
individuals who bike and walk in Highland Park.
Objective 4: Continue semi-annual bicycle and pedestrian counts to evaluate bicycle and
pedestrian use in Highland Park.
Page 39 of 40
Objective 5: Create and distribute an annual update that tracks the implementation progress of
MoveHP.
Objective 6: Pursue recognition as a bicycle- and pedestrian friendly community.
Objective 6.1: Continue to pursue certification as a Bicycle and Pedestrian Friendly
Community through the League of American Bicyclists.
Objective 6.2: Pursue designation as a Walk Friendly Community.
Page 40 of 40