Committee of the Whole
Regular MeetingHighland Park, IL · February 23, 2026
Agenda
Committee of the Whole Meeting
City Hall
1707 St Johns Avenue,
Highland Park, IL 60035
February 23, 2026
5:30 PM
Agenda
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item can address the City in the
following ways:
1. Emails with Unlimited Information. Individuals may email the City an unlimited number
of words at cityhp@cityhpil.com. Emails will be forwarded to the City Council if
requested. All emails received will be acknowledged.
2. Telephone. Individuals with no access to email may leave a message with the City
Manager’s Office at 847.926.1000.
3. Live Comments. Individuals are able to address the Council during the City Council
meeting. Questions/comments should be limited to three minutes or less.
Committee of the Whole and City Council meetings are broadcast live on the City’s Facebook
page and on the City’s website. Meetings can be watched after the meeting from a video link on
the City’s website.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its enews for important information from the
City. To sign-up for the enews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole
Held on February 9, 2026
IV. Scheduled Business
A. Considerations Pertaining to the Permanent Place of Remembrance
B. Discussion Related to Short Term Rental Regulations
V. Other Matters
VI. Closed Session
VII. Adjournment
Packet
Committee of the Whole Meeting
City Hall
1707 St Johns Avenue,
Highland Park, IL 60035
February 23, 2026
5:30 PM
Agenda
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item can address the City in the
following ways:
1. Emails with Unlimited Information. Individuals may email the City an unlimited number
of words at cityhp@cityhpil.com. Emails will be forwarded to the City Council if
requested. All emails received will be acknowledged.
2. Telephone. Individuals with no access to email may leave a message with the City
Manager’s Office at 847.926.1000.
3. Live Comments. Individuals are able to address the Council during the City Council
meeting. Questions/comments should be limited to three minutes or less.
Committee of the Whole and City Council meetings are broadcast live on the City’s Facebook
page and on the City’s website. Meetings can be watched after the meeting from a video link on
the City’s website.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its enews for important information from the
City. To sign-up for the enews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole
Held on February 9, 2026
IV. Scheduled Business
A. Considerations Pertaining to the Permanent Place of Remembrance
B. Discussion Related to Short Term Rental Regulations
V. Other Matters
VI. Closed Session
VII. Adjournment
Page 1 of 12
Staff Report
Meeting Date: February 23, 2026
Staff Contact: Megan Cherry, Management Analyst
Department: City Manager's Office
Title: Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole Held on
February 9, 2026
Recommendation:
For the City Council’s approval are the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the
Whole held on February 9, 2026.
Attachments:
1. MIN COTW 2-9-2026
Page 2 of 12
MINUTES OF A OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OF THE CITY OF
HIGHLAND PARK
MEETING DATE: February 9, 2026
MEETING LOCATION: City Hall 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL 60035
I. Call to Order
At 5:30 PM, Mayor Rotering called the meeting to order and asked for a roll call:
II. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Rotering, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Tapia, Lidawer
Absent: Councilmembers Ross, Blumberg
Staff Present: City Manager Neukirch, Director of Public Works Bannon, Community
Development Director Fontane, Assistant City Manager Jason, Police
Chief Jogmen, Finance Director McCaulou, Fire Chief Schrage,
Assistant City Manager Taub, Communications Manager Bennett,
Commander Curran, Assistant to the City Manager Palbitska, Business
Development Manager Elder, Building Division Manager
Mohanchandra
Also Present: Corporation Counsel Elrod, Assistant Corporation Counsel Martinez
III. Approval of Minutes
A. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole
Held on January 12, 2026
B. Approval of the Minutes of the Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of the
Committee of the Whole held on January 12, 2026
Councilmember Lidawer moved to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
the Committee of the Whole Held on January 12, 2026 and the Minutes of the
Closed Session of the Regular Meeting of the Committee of the Whole Held on
January 12, 2026. Councilmember Center seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote,
the Mayor declared the motion Passed (5 - 0).
MOVER: Councilmember Lidawer
SECONDER: Councilmember Center
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmembers Center, Bruckman, Tapia,
Lidawer
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Ross, Blumberg
Page 3 of 12
IV. Scheduled Business
A. Pedestrian Bridge Design & Reconstruction Options
City Manager Neukirch provided introductory comments related to the presentation
for the Pedestrian Bridge Design and Reconstruction Options. She noted that staff is
seeking feedback from the Council but no final determinations will be made tonight.
She introduced Duane O'Laughlin, Chief Operation Officer for Ciorba Group, and
Public Works Director Ron Bannon as subject matter experts for this project.
O’Laughlin presented an overview of the Pedestrian Bridge project, including
updates on engineering design options, new construction timelines, and options for
rehabilitation or reconstruction.
The Council, Mr. O’Laughlin and staff discussed options and costs related to either
reconstruction or rehabilitation of the bridge. They discussed the impact the ITEP
funds would have on the cost of a new bridge, the outcome of a review of all grant
opportunities, allowance for both bike and pedestrian traffic with the new bridge
design, how rehabilitation would not be ADA compliant and therefore would not
qualify for the ITEP funds, maintenance cost and life expectancy timelines that
could affect rehabilitation versus new build, and the riding and/or walking surface of
the bridge. They discussed the bridge being a gateway into the community and how
a new bridge could add to the vibrancy of Highland Park as well as keep branding
cohesive across the City. They discussed potential conversations with Lake County.
City Manager Neukirch noted that the total cost for a rehab or new bridge
construction will be added to the discussion regarding the Capital Improvement Plan
(“CIP”) that is slated for the March 30, 2026, Committee of the Whole meeting. She
noted that it is important to review the 10-year CIP to understand the impact of the
bridge on other projects and impact to the City’s budget and long-term financial
outlook.
B. Building Code Update
Community Development Director Fontane presented information on a
comprehensive amendment package related to building and property maintenance
codes. He noted that formal policy consideration of the amendments will be placed
on the next Council agenda for formal consideration.
The Council voiced their appreciation for the comprehensive presentation.
The Council, Corporation Counsel Elrod, and staff discussed a “grandfathered”
provision and how that would apply going forward, quality of the codes that are
updated and created through the process, assessment of ensuring green sustainability
codes are maintained within the updated information, processes for choosing the
codes for recommendation, and code versus regulation and enforcement procedures.
They discussed whether it could be possible to offer an incentive to homeowners to
update their homes based on the updated codes and that the better option would be to
educate homeowners before offering an incentive to make changes. They discussed
the frequency of review of the codes in order to make recommendations for updates
Page 4 of 12
and how all municipalities work to keep their codes updated. Director Fontane
clarified that Highland Park does not rely specifically on timelines of other
municipalities adoptions but more on staying in line with ISO and allowing time for
staff and design professionals to understand the updates that are made.
V. Adjournment
Councilmember Lidawer moved to adjourn the Committee of the Whole meeting.
Councilmember Bruckman seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, Mayor Rotering
declared the motion passed unanimously.
The Committee of the Whole adjourned its meeting at 7:01 PM
Respectfully Submitted,
Ashley Palbitska
Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City Clerk
Page 5 of 12
Staff Report
Meeting Date: February 23, 2026
Staff Contact: Emily Taub, Assistant City Manager
Jazmin Alejandro, Social Services Specialist
Amanda Bennett, Communications Manager
Department: City Manager's Office
Title: Considerations Pertaining to the Permanent Place of Remembrance
Recommendation:
City staff, SWA and All Together will provide information about the public engagement and
other next steps that will be undertaken pertaining to the permanent Place of Remembrance. The
consultants will also facilitate a listening session to obtain feedback from the Mayor and City
Council regarding the permanent Place of Remembrance focusing on reflecting on safety, the
meaning of the place of remembrance, and design ideas.
Policy Consideration:
Background
In 2023, the City Council established a Working Group to guide the planning process for the
permanent place of remembrance for the Highland Park shooting. The place of remembrance will
have three primary objectives:
• Create an accessible public place for reflection, remembrance, and solace;
• Pay tribute to the memories of Katie Goldstein, Irina McCarthy, Kevin Michael
McCarthy, Jacki Lovi Sundheim, Stephen Straus, Nicolas Toledo, and Eduardo Uvaldo;
• Honor the community’s resiliency, especially those who were injured.
The Working Group has been meeting regularly since November of 2023. The Working Group,
with input from the public and notably victims, brainstormed a list of possible locations and
issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a consultant to assist in gathering community feedback
in keeping with the commitment to public engagement in the process. In conjunction with the
working group’s feedback, the City entered into an agreement to work with Do Tank. Following
extensive community engagement, Do Tank's Location Feedback Report recommended a
prominent, primary location in the Rose Garden adjacent to City Hall and a subtle, secondary
Page 6 of 12
location in Port Clinton Plaza. The location feedback report is available at hpremembrance.org.
Following the location recommendation, the City issued a Request For Qualifications (RFQ)
from experienced architects, artists, designers, and design teams to create these meaningful and
lasting places of remembrance. The Working Group and City Council evaluated the RFQ
responses, interview responses, concept designs, incorporation of trauma-informed community
engagement, and feedback from the public, including victims. After careful review and
consideration of all submittals and interviews with the top candidates, the City Council supported
the working group recommendation to enter into an agreement with SWA Group (SWA) as the
design firm on this project. The City entered into an agreement with SWA in January of 2026.
The project kicked off in January 2026 and is expected to run through December of 2026.
The project will be divided into two phases as follows:
Phase 1
• Project Administration
• Listening, Discovery, and Community Engagement
• Schematic Design
Phase 2
• Design Development
• Construction Documentation
• Construction Administration
The construction timeline will be developed after the final design is determined.
Project Update
SWA and engagement partner All Together will provide an update to City Council on the project
and engagement timeline.
Discussion
SWA and All Together will facilitate a discussion between Council members regarding the
permanent Place of Remembrance focusing on reflecting on safety, the meaning of the place of
remembrance, and design ideas.
Next Steps
An update will be provided on the next steps related to the use of the Rose Garden for the
permanent Place of Remembrance.
Core Priorities:
Fiscal Stability
The engagement with Do Tank was $45,000. The cost of the Phase 1 Professional Services
Page 7 of 12
Agreement with SWA is $262,500 plus up to $21,000 in reimbursable expenses (8% of the cost).
The estimate provided by SWA is $700,000 – $1,250,000 for Phase 2 costs. The final
determination on Phase 2 costs will be made after a design is approved.
The City Council supported a preliminary budget of $2 million dollars for construction of the
place of remembrance.
Infrastructure Investment
The permanent place of remembrance will incorporate a primary installation at the Rose Garden,
and a subtle secondary installation at Port Clinton Plaza, each a significant infrastructure
undertaking given the presence of existing structures at or adjacent to the site. The Working
Group and staff will work with the project managers from SWA Group to define the scope of
each installation. SWA Group will take the City's commitment to environmentally sustainable
practices into consideration as the project is undertaken.
Attachments:
None
Page 8 of 12
Staff Report
Meeting Date: February 23, 2026
Staff Contact: Joel Fontane, Director of Community Development
Department: Community Development Department
Title: Discussion Related to Short Term Rental Regulations
Recommendation:
Staff request feedback on the City's Short Term Rental policy.
Policy Consideration:
Recommendation.
Staff seek feedback related to the City’s Short-Term Rental policy, specifically related to the
number of short term rentals within a geographic area, enforcement mechanisms, and the
possible purchase of industry data to aid enforcement efforts.
Background.
Regulation of Short Term Rentals (STRs) is an important issue for municipalities throughout the
country. STRs are typically associated with services or property owners that rent one or more
room(s) in their homes, or an entire home, for short periods of time and typically less than 30
days. STRs have become popular on various on-line services with 12 such rentals currently
registered in Highland Park. This use of a home may present a nuisance[1] to abutters,
particularly in single-family residential neighborhoods and therefore present regulatory
challenges for municipalities. However, the City’s Code is intended to allow reasonable use of
residential properties as STRs provided it is the property owner’s primary residence. The STR
Ordinance addressed a need by some in the community to be able to rent their homes on a short-
term basis while they were away for vacation, the winter, or some other period, due to other
circumstances including a pending sale of property, etc. The City has not received a large
number of complaints; however, there are a number of concerns that the City has received
throughout the community. Council feedback is requested if short term rentals should continue
to be available, and if so, it is recommended that a number of policy considerations be discussed.
Proposed Amendment.
The City’s current regulations specifically require registration of certain rental units and
regulates STRs through the provisions of the Zoning Code Sec. 150.430. Since adopting these
regulations in Nov. 2020, the City has identified the need for additional information to aid its
Page 9 of 12
enforcement efforts. Staff recommend:
1. Amending Chapter 154 regarding Rental Registration to require additional information
from applicants to demonstrate that the property used for STRs is, in fact, their primary
residence as required by Sec. 150.430; and amend Chapter 150 Definitions to specify
what Primary Residence means (see Attachment A).
2. Purchasing STR rental data from date brokers to aid the City’s enforcement efforts by
providing the number of days rented, etc. by address for several of the leading STR
services.
Amending the Code, and purchasing STR data will greatly improve the City’s ability to enforce
the City’s Code for STRs.[2]
Other Policy Approaches.
• When the City adopted its STR regulations in 2020 there were few communities that
allowed STRs. The City could choose to prohibit STRs in certain Zoning Districts or
completely throughout the City. As part of our suggested next steps, the City will survey
other communities about their regulation of STRs. It is important to note that regardless
of whether STRs are continued to be allowed, additional information recommended
above are needed to enable efficient and effective enforcement of STR regulations.
• Another policy that may be of interest to the Council is limiting the number of STRs
within a certain distance of each other. This would require a Zoning text amendment.
• Council may want to consider licensing STRs rather than merely registering STRs to
improve enforcement tools.
Next Steps.
• Formal consideration of amendments to Chapter 150 and Chapter 154 to require
applicants to demonstrate that an STR is their Primary Residence as defined.
• Conduct a survey of communities related to whether they allow STRs, or limit the
number by proximity to other STRs. Present to Council for discussion and feedback.
• Research and purchase of data broker services to gain access to STR data by address
within Highland Park; and begin using this data for STR enforcement purposes.
[1] These include parking, noise and increased garbage, etc. Note Regulations in Chapter 95
related to Nuisances also apply.
[2] Note that should the Council prohibit STRs the City’s enforcement efforts would still benefit
from better information about which properties are rented as STRs, therefore staff’s
recommendation would not change regarding the purchase of data.
Core Priorities:
Vibrancy - Regulation of short term rentals balances quality of life concerns with property rights
to allow for the reasonable use of property while protecting neighbors from nuisance.
Page 10 of 12
Attachments:
1. Attachment A - Proposed Amendments to Chapter 154 & Chapter 150 related to Short
Term Rental Regulation
Page 11 of 12
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 154 and Chapter 150 related to Short Term Rental
Regulation.
Staff propose amending the Zoning Code to include a definition for Principal / Primary Residence
based on the definitional standard used by the Internal Revenue Service. That one can only have
a single principal / primary residence. For those who maintain more than one residence (“snow
birds” for example) and divide their time between those residents, the dwelling in which they spend
more time would be considered their primary / principal residence.
1. Amend Sec. 150.202 of the Zoning Code to include the following definition (see
further below) and capitalize the term “Primary Residence” in 150.430(C)(2) and
amend as follows:
“(2) The short-term rental property must be occupied by the property owner, or a tenant with a written
lease for the property, as their pPrimary rResidence. for at least 30 consecutive days in each
calendar year in which the property is used as a short-term rental.”
2. Amend Sec. 154.001 – Definitions to include:
“Primary / Principal Residence: A single Dwelling Unit that is used, owned, or leased as a place
to live for most of the previous calendar year as demonstrated by a least two of the following
documents issued to the name of the person who claims said Dwelling Unit as their Primary /
Principal Residence, and that includes the complete street address of said Dwelling Unit:
1) A valid State of Illinois issued driver’s license, or identification card;
2) A valid Voter Registration card;
3) A valid State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Registration; or
4) A valid State of Illinois tax return(s) for the most recent tax year.”
3. Amend Sec. 154.005: insert a new 154.005(4) and renumber existing provisions (4)
to (5) and (5) to (6) accordingly.
154.005(4) – “For Regulated Rental Dwellings used as a Short Term Rental, the documents
required to demonstrate that the Regulated Rental Dwelling is a Primary / Principal Residence.”
Page 12 of 12