Historic Preservation
Regular MeetingHighland Park, IL · December 11, 2025
Minutes
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Monday, December 11, 2025
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 6:32 p.m., Chairperson Pines called the meeting to order. This Commission meeting takes place on-site.
12 Staff was asked to call the roll.
13
14 ROLL CALL
15 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Gonka, Hartinger, Portman, & Weeder
16
17 Commissioners Absent: Commissioners Ehrlich & Greenbaum
18
19 Councilmember Present: Blumberg
20
21 Student Council Absent: Koslow
22
23 Staff declared that a quorum was present.
24
25 Staff Present: Fontane, Coleman, & Markle
26
27 Guests Present: Donna Verechek/Petitioner
28 Tomaz Gniedziejko, Owner/TG Homes LLC
29
30 Others Present: Gale Cerabona, Recorder
31
32 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
33 Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission – November 13, 2025
34
35 Commissioner Weeder moved to approve the regular meeting minutes of November 13, 2025.
36 Commissioner Gonka seconded the motion.
37
38 On a voice vote
39 Voting Yea Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Gonka, Hartinger, Portman, & Weeder
40 Voting Nay: None
41
42 Staff declared that the motion passed unanimously.
43
44 SCHEDULED BUSINESS
45 1. Preliminary Consideration of Landmark Nomination – 3135 Priscilla Avenue
46 Planner Markle offered a presentation:
47 • Landmark Designation Process
48 o 3-step
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
December 11, 2025 - Page 1
1 • Summary
2 o H.W. Kadell House
3 o built in 1941
4 o architect is George Keck
5 o Contemporary style
6 • Existing Conditions were shown
7 • Architectural Features
8 • Contemporary Style Characteristics
9 o wood, brick, stucco
10 • Keck and Keck
11 o Famous for 1933 House of Tomorrow
12 o passive solar design
13 o designed 300 homes in Chicago area, 30 in Highland Park
14 • Original Owner & Chain of Title
15 • Historic Plans
16 • Floor Plans & Elevations were illustrated
17 • Radiant Heat Plan was noted (iron pipes, heated floors)
18 • Photos were displayed (from 1941, 1942, and 1968)
19 • Alteration History
20 o Material changes to windows and doors
21 o front porch extended in 2014
22 • Landmark Criteria were referenced (Staff highlighted Criteria #1, 4, 5, and 6)
23 • Recommendation
24
25 Some HPC comments are
26 • Chairperson Pines asked:
27 o and Ms. Donna Verechek, owner, stated they don’t know if the pipes work. There is no
28 control valve. She noted the floors are heated in the kitchen and bathrooms.
29 o how many Keck homes there are in Highland Park. Planner Markle will review same.
30 • Commissioner Portman referenced a possible Keck home.
31
32 Councilperson Blumberg said he grew up in a Keck house. He noted a house in Glencoe had radiant heat and
33 expounded on same.
34
35 • Commissioner Weeder believes this house meets Criteria #4, 5, and 6. She commends the
36 homeowners.
37 • Commissioner Gonka concurred and believes this may meet Criteria #1, 3, and 7. He shared it is
38 incredibly important to save. The integrity is still there.
39 • Chairperson Pines believes Criteria #1, 4, 5, and 6 are met.
40 • Commissioner Portman believes Criteria #4, 5, and 6 are met. He believes Criteria 1 and 7 blend
41 together. Commissioner Portman loves this home; beautiful example of an early Mid-Century
42 Modern home; represents an owner who had a vision built by a renowned architect. The
43 documentation is wonderful. This was called the Woodlands subdivision.
44
45 Commissioner Gonka moved that Criteria #1, 4, 5, and 6 apply and sufficient integrity is met – with adoption
46 of a Preliminary Landmark Designation. Commissioner Weeder seconded the motion.
47
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
December 11, 2025 - Page 2
1 Commissioner Portman noted the code said the home must have sufficient integrity. He expressed the front
2 entry is more habitable.
3
4 On a roll call vote
5 Voting Yea Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Gonka, Hartinger, Portman, & Weeder
6 Voting Nay: None
7
8 Staff declared that the motion passed unanimously.
9
10 Extended HPC comments are:
11 • Commissioner Portman said due to a narrow lot and trees make it is hard to see the beauty of this
12 home. He appreciates its modest design.
13 • Commissioner Gonka said the home has curb appeal.
14
15 Councilperson Blumberg referred to his modest home in Glencoe. He shared his parents contacted the
16 Keck’s and had their current home built in Highland Park.
17
18 • Chairperson Pines asked Petitioner why they decided to landmark the home. Ms. Verechek said she
19 read an article about Keck and learned a home he built in Glencoe got leveled following the closing.
20 She doesn’t ever want her house to be demolished.
21
22 2. Determination of Historic Significance – 1373 Oakwood Avenue
23 Planner Markle offered a presentation:
24 • Summary
25 o Contributing Structure in 2006 Bob O’Link survey
26 o Dutch Revival style
27 o built c.1912
28 • Property History
29 • Architecture
30 • Elevations were shown
31 • Landmark Criteria were illustrated
32 • Impact of Historic Findings
33 • Recommendation (Staff recommends Commission consider Criteria #1 and 4)
34
35 Some HPC comments are…..
36 • Commissioner Portman:
37 o referenced Page 2 of the memo in the packet and asked how it is known that the photo is
38 from 1974. Planner Markle said it is from a real estate listing that indicated 1974. They
39 noted a lot has changed with the current structure.
40 o asked what would be done if more information is needed. Planner Markle said this is a
41 standard option.
42 o asked how many homes in Highland Park have this style. Planner Markle referenced Page 2,
43 and said there are 9 at least.
44 • Chairperson Pines believes Criteria #4 and 6 are on the edge of being met.
45 • Commissioner Weeder said this is a solid Four Square; a good example of a modest home. She
46 believes Criteria #1 and 4 pertain. Porch additions are not detrimental.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
December 11, 2025 - Page 3
1 • Commissioner Hartinger believes Criteria #1 and 4 are met. The additions make it look piece meal.
2 The front porch blends and is all over the place.
3 • Commissioner Gonka identified the original steps, roofline. He asked, and Planner Markle said the
4 back porch was added later. The front porch was added c. 1924.
5
6 Petitioner, Tomaz Gniedziejko, Owner, with TG Homes LLC, noted this is a 2-bedroom house; like a barn in
7 Wisconsin. He advised the original owner was a construction worker in the 1920s; a cheap way to build a
8 house.
9
10 More HPC comments:
11 • Commissioner Portman said, based on other Dutch Revival homes, this style is a stretch. He noted, if
12 the house was altered with pride, he would vote against all criteria.
13 • Commissioner Gonka believes this house has integrity. The house is still a Dutch Colonial Revival that
14 could contribute to the neighborhood.
15 • Commissioner Weeder believes this house meets Criteria #1 and 4.
16
17 Commissioner Gonka moved that this house meets Criteria #1 and 4 and has integrity. Commissioner
18 Weeder seconded the motion.
19
20 On a roll call vote
21 Voting Yea Commissioners Gonka & Weeder
22 Voting Nay: Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Hartinger & Portman
23
24 Staff declared that the motion failed 2-3. Commissioner Portman read a portion of the Ordinance.
25
26 DISCUSSION ITEMS
27 1. Continued Discussion – Encouraging Historic Preservation
28 Planner Markle noted the HPC will offer recommendations to City Council, and Staff will provide same.
29
30 Further clarification was discussed on the following…..
31 • Historic Rehabilitation Grants
32 o Planner Markle provided Commissioner Ehrlich’s comments that he would like to offer a
33 $10,000 incentive amount like the City of Hinsdale does.
34 o Commissioner Hartinger wants to save homes. A significant amount/match should be
35 offered. He is not a fan of income eligibility.
36 o Commissioner Portman believes, as per Elgin, policing would be difficult.
37 o Commissioner Gonka said a cap on the grant takes care of various issues.
38 o Commissioner Weeder believes rich people should also receive benefits; try to come up with
39 a menu for more preservation. Councilperson Blumberg believes this is accurate. He
40 expounded. A protection should be put in place if the house gets sold, demolished, etc. (so
41 the City receives its money back).
42
43 A more general discussion took place.
44
45 Director Fontane asked what criteria would be a distinction to preserve; incentive to landmark a home.
46
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
December 11, 2025 - Page 4
1 Councilperson Blumberg said, based on City Council’s position, the goal is to benefit the community. He
2 noted there are 2 issues – incentivize landmarking and preventing teardowns.
3
4 Director Fontane said the focus is to encourage preservation – more landmarkings.
5
6 Commissioner Gonka doesn’t understand persistent encouragement rather than discouragement.
7
8 Director Fontane reminded this came from City Council. Feedback is still welcome, and Staff will convey
9 same. Recommendations can be made without all details.
10
11 • Local Property Tax Abatement
12 o Director Fontane said the property tax rate is based on assessed values.
13
14 Councilperson Blumberg said Staff doesn’t make policy. The tax levy is whatever it is for
15 Highland Park. He explained same.
16
17 o Commissioner Weeder:
18 stated there are empty lots. Director Fontane concurred, and said the assessed
19 value is less. Residential properties are desirable. He noted City Council will give
20 direction from the HPC’s recommendations.
21 would like to broaden this category to Contributing Structures.
22
23 It was stated Highland Park has the public benefit of private preservation. There is no
24 incentive for encouragement beyond education.
25
26 o Commissioner Gonka said maintenance could be at a reduced rate.
27
28 Councilperson Blumberg reminded the goal is historic preservation. The HPC should recommend a program
29 to incentivize the landmarking of a home – not set a dollar amount. The value to the community is vibrancy.
30 The main goal is to recommend as many programs as possible.
31
32 Commissioner Gonka stated paying someone to landmark their house is the goal.
33
34 • Land Use Incentives
35 o Commissioner Hartinger would like to see land use incentives expanded.
36
37 A general discussion continued.
38
39 Commissioner Portman would like to identify what homes would qualify for programs. Councilperson
40 Blumberg reminded one has to qualify for a landmark (2 or more criteria). He noted a Regulated Structure is
41 a landmark structure. During a teardown delay, programs could be told to the homeowner. He summarized
42 that programs should be given by the HPC that City Council would implement.
43
44 Director Fontane said Grants would be for exterior features, so the community can benefit.
45
46 Senior Planner Coleman discussed restoring integrity.
47
48 Chairperson Pines suggested heightening awareness by offering a plaque program for landmarked homes.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
December 11, 2025 - Page 5
1
2 Commissioner Gonka explained the process to landmark, go for a COA, then benefit from a grant.
3
4 Councilperson Blumberg recapped how to format the content; give City Council a lot to review.
5
6 Director Fontane discussed prioritizing:
7 • Grant Program link with Land Use
8 • Reduce Zoning Relief after a 365-Day Delay
9
10 Commissioner Weeder:
11 • asked, and Planner Markle said, when sending new resident letters, that resident could be informed
12 he/she purchased a Contributing Structure, is in a landmark district, etc.
13 • said a big menu shows this is being taken seriously.
14
15 Commissioner Gonka would like to add Commissioner Weeder’s suggestion – If something is demolished,
16 there should be a plan to rebuild.
17
18 Councilperson Blumberg departed the meeting at 8:58 p.m.
19
20 2. Introduction to 2026 Historic Preservation Awards
21 Planner Markle advised the ceremony is slated to take place at the Willits House.
22
23 Director Fontane departed the meeting at 8:59 p.m.
24
25 Senior Planner Coleman noted there is a running list of homeowners doing projects/preserving homes.
26
27 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
28 There was no Business from the Public.
29
30 OTHER BUSINESS
31 1. Next Regular Meeting is Scheduled for January 8, 2026
32 It was noted the next regular HPC Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2026.
33
34 STAFF REPORT
35 Planner Markle shared book recommendations. They noted multiple copies are available for viewing in
36 Community Development or at the library. They will distribute the list to the HPC.
37
38 Planner Markle advised if there is a material or dimension change on windows, a COA is required.
39
40 Senior Planner Coleman asked that the HPC give Chairperson Pines a round of applause as he ends his
41 appointment as Chair. Chairperson Pines said the HPC is devoted, and this has been a rewarding experience
42 for him. Commissioner Weeder will be the new Chair in 2026.
43
44 ADJOURNMENT
45 Commissioner Gonka moved to adjourn at 9:11 p.m. Commissioner Hartinger seconded the motion.
46
47 On a voice vote
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
December 11, 2025 - Page 6
1 Voting Yea Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Gonka, Hartinger, Portman, & Weeder
2 Voting Nay: None
3
4 Staff declared that the motion passed unanimously.
5
6 Respectfully Submitted,
7
8 Gale Cerabona
9 Recorder
10
11 MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 2025, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
December 11, 2025 - Page 7
Agenda
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
City Hall - Council Chambers
December 11, 2025
6:30 PM
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of
Highland Park, the next regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Highland Park is scheduled to be held at the hour of 6:30 pm on December 11, 2025 at City Hall
- Council Chambers, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois, during which meeting it is
anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The Historic Preservation Commission has elected to conduct the meeting entirely in-
person, and without opportunity for virtual viewing or participation. Please contact the
Department of Community Development – Planning Division at (847) 432-0867 for up-to-
date information on the conduct of the hearing.
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may email the Staff Liaison Maddy
Markle at mmarkle@cityhpil.com. Comments and emails received prior to the Thursday before
the scheduled meeting will be included in the meeting packet. Public comments received by 4:30
PM the day of the meeting will be read under Business from the Public. Any comments received
during the meeting will be held until the end of the meeting. Individuals who wish to have their
comments read into the public record are limited to 200 words or less. Public comments should
be emailed and contain the following information:
• In the subject line, identify, “HPC (Date of Meeting)”
• Name
• Address (optional)
• City
• Phone (optional)
• Organization, agency representing, if applicable
• Topic or agenda item number of interest
All emails received will be acknowledged. Individuals with no access to email may leave a voice
message with Maddy Markle at 847.926.1856.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in
this hearing, or who have questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, email the
City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub or call at 847.926.1005.
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
A. November 13, 2025, Regular Meeting
IV. Scheduled Business
A. 3135 Priscilla Avenue — Preliminary Consideration of Landmark Nomination
B. 1373 Oakwood Avenue—Determination of Historic Significance
V. Discussion Items
A. Continued Discussion — Encouraging Historic Preservation
B. Introduction to 2026 Historic Preservation Awards
VI. Business from the Public (Individuals wishing to be heard regarding items not listed
on this agenda)
VII. Other Business
A. Next Regular Meeting Scheduled for January 8, 2026
VIII. Staff Report
IX. Adjournment
Packet
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
City Hall - Council Chambers
December 11, 2025
6:30 PM
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of
Highland Park, the next regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Highland Park is scheduled to be held at the hour of 6:30 pm on December 11, 2025 at City Hall
- Council Chambers, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois, during which meeting it is
anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The Historic Preservation Commission has elected to conduct the meeting entirely in-
person, and without opportunity for virtual viewing or participation. Please contact the
Department of Community Development – Planning Division at (847) 432-0867 for up-to-
date information on the conduct of the hearing.
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may email the Staff Liaison Maddy
Markle at mmarkle@cityhpil.com. Comments and emails received prior to the Thursday before
the scheduled meeting will be included in the meeting packet. Public comments received by 4:30
PM the day of the meeting will be read under Business from the Public. Any comments received
during the meeting will be held until the end of the meeting. Individuals who wish to have their
comments read into the public record are limited to 200 words or less. Public comments should
be emailed and contain the following information:
• In the subject line, identify, “HPC (Date of Meeting)”
• Name
• Address (optional)
• City
• Phone (optional)
• Organization, agency representing, if applicable
• Topic or agenda item number of interest
All emails received will be acknowledged. Individuals with no access to email may leave a voice
message with Maddy Markle at 847.926.1856.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in
this hearing, or who have questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, email the
City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub or call at 847.926.1005.
Page 1 of 149
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
A. November 13, 2025, Regular Meeting
IV. Scheduled Business
A. 3135 Priscilla Avenue — Preliminary Consideration of Landmark Nomination
B. 1373 Oakwood Avenue—Determination of Historic Significance
V. Discussion Items
A. Continued Discussion — Encouraging Historic Preservation
B. Introduction to 2026 Historic Preservation Awards
VI. Business from the Public (Individuals wishing to be heard regarding items not listed
on this agenda)
VII. Other Business
A. Next Regular Meeting Scheduled for January 8, 2026
VIII. Staff Report
IX. Adjournment
Page 2 of 149
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Monday, November 13, 2025
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 6:31 p.m., Chairperson Pines called the meeting to order. This Commission meeting takes place on-site.
12 Staff was asked to call the roll.
13
14 ROLL CALL
15 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Ehrlich, Gonka, Greenbaum, Hartinger,
16 Portman, & Weeder
17
18 Councilmember Absent: Blumberg
19
20 Student Council Absent: Koslow
21
22 Staff declared that a quorum was present.
23
24 Staff Present: Mayor Rotering, City Manager Neukirch, Director Fontane, Senior Planner
25 Coleman, & Planner Markle
26
27 Others Present: Hart Passman, Corporation Counsel/Elrod Friedman LLP
28 Gale Cerabona, Recorder
29
30 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
31 Special Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission – September 29, 2025
32
33 Commissioner Gonka moved to approve the special meeting minutes of September 29, 2025. Commissioner
34 Weeder seconded the motion.
35
36 On a voice vote
37 Voting Yea Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Gonka, Greenbaum, Hartinger, Portman, &
38 Weeder
39 Voting Nay: None
40
41 Staff declared that the motion passed unanimously.
42
43 SCHEDULED BUSINESS
44 1. Certificate of Appropriateness/COA – 242 Linden Park Place
45 Planner Markle offered a presentation:
46 • Summary
47 o Non-Contributing Structure – NC rating in the local Historic District
48 o built in 1959 (formerly Ranch type in the Plain style)
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 1
Page 3 of 149
1 o no current home style
2 o architect is unknown
3 • Location of Proposed Changes
4 o rear of house; not visible
5 • Proposed Changes
6 o expand windows and door openings vertically by 10”
7 o install sliding-glass door
8 • Standards for COA were reviewed
9 • Recommendation
10
11 Some HPC comments are…..
12 • Commissioner Portman said replacements are consistent with existing structure and meets the
13 standards.
14 • Commissioner Weeder concurred, and said nothing is visible from the street. She has no issue.
15
16 Commissioner Gonka moved to approve the COA. Commissioner Weeder seconded the motion.
17
18 On a roll call vote
19 Voting Yea Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Gonka, Greenbaum, Hartinger, Portman, &
20 Weeder
21 Voting Nay: None
22
23 Staff declared that the motion passed unanimously.
24
25 Commissioner Ehrlich arrived at 6:43 p.m.
26
27 DISCUSSION ITEMS
28 1. Encouraging Historic Preservation
29 Planner Markle offered a presentation (including benefits and challenges):
30 • Historic Rehabilitation Grants
31 • Local Property Tax Abatement
32 • Land Use Incentives
33 • Permit Fee Waivers
34 • Reduce Historic District Property Minimums
35 • Recommendation
36 • Next Steps
37 o feedback from HPC and Staff will be presented to City Council
38
39 Some HPC comments are:
40 • Commissioner Greenbaum clarified, and Planner Markle verified a fee could be assessed to the
41 homeowner to apply to remove a historic landmark designation (if the home no longer meets
42 criteria, etc.).
43 • Chairperson Pines asked, and Planner Markle confirmed the Fee Resolution is noted in the code.
44 Senior Planner Coleman stated this fee (for landmark designation removal) is $500.
45
46 Mr. Hart Passman, Corporation Counsel, arrived at 7:03 p.m.
47
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 2
Page 4 of 149
1 Director Fontane suggested the HPC follow the discussion on encouraging/preserving historic presentation.
2 He explained fees, taxes, etc.
3
4 More HPC comments are:
5 • Commissioner Portman asked if all incentives are for existing homes and if this discussion is to
6 encourage others to landmark their homes. Planner Markle said the HPC could decide which homes
7 could/should be eligible for any potential preservation incentive.
8 • Commissioner Ehrlich thanked Staff as this information is very helpful. He would like to hear from
9 Mayor Rotering and City Manager Neukirch.
10
11 Mayor Rotering said she cannot speak on behalf of City Council. She shares the HPC’s concerns and looks
12 forward to incentivizing homeowners to preserve historic gems in Highland Park. Every idea is open and a
13 starting point.
14
15 Continued HPC comments are:
16 • Commissioner Gonka said he is interested in taxing people who are not interested in preserving
17 historic homes. Properties are hurt due to high property tax rates. Mayor Rotering said this could be
18 prioritized.
19 • Commissioner Weeder suggested taxing teardowns. Mayor Rotering said this happens with the
20 demolition tax. She recommended that these issues be presented to City Council.
21 • Commissioner Greenbaum asked, and Mayor Rotering shared that her home is not landmarked. She
22 explained the windows are not great, and it may be landmarked in the future.
23
24 City Manager Neukirch discussed the process, and said City Council is looking for the HPC’s feedback. She
25 suggested forming a list of supported recommendations – and complimented Planner Markle and Senior
26 Planner Coleman on the excellent presentation.
27
28 Commissioner Ehrlich asked, and Mayor Rotering advised if the code is being changed, a vote by City Council
29 is required. City Manager Neukirch stated corporate authorities can enact laws.
30
31 It was decided the HPC could review each category in the presentation and offer feedback.
32
33 Historic Rehabilitation Grants
34 • Commissioner Gonka believes it is not a good use of public funds. He would like to de-incentivize
35 people from tearing down houses.
36 • Commissioner Greenbaum stated the amount needs to be significant.
37 • Commissioner Gonka believes the demolition tax should be a six-figure fine or 20% of the sale
38 price.
39 • Commissioner Greenbaum identified that sometimes the HPC enacts a demolition delay, then City
40 Council removes it.
41 Mayor Rotering asked to differentiate between teardowns.
42
43 (continued)
44 • Commissioner Weeder said the whole City isn’t surveyed yet.
45 • Commissioner Portman reminded that City Council is looking for feedback on incentives.
46 • Commissioner Ehrlich identified that incentives are layered in other cities/villages. He noted a best
47 approach could be to mirror other cities/villages (Hinsdale, etc.).
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 3
Page 5 of 149
1 • Commissioner Portman would like to decide which incentives are appropriate or not.
2
3 Director Fontane asked the HPC to look at the scope of the program; prioritize; how to encourage people to
4 landmark their homes; public good of private preservation. He noted there are 77 landmarked
5 homes in Highland Park. Director Fontane stressed that the HPC not delve into the surveys, as they aren’t all
6 completed.
7
8 (continued)
9 • Commissioner Greenbaum asked Mayor Rotering what it would take for her to landmark her home.
10 Mayor Rotering said she doesn’t know, and wonders what’s to be gained. She stated education is
11 key. Her home has been in the family and is a Tudor Eclectic style.
12 • Commissioner Ehrlich said the HPC should learn what people are doing to their homes. Incentives
13 should be provided. There are a lot of Contributing Structures that haven’t been landmarked. Mayor
14 Rotering said preserving landscaping is another avenue.
15 • Commissioner Hartinger said the age of a home is a factor. People move here for the school system;
16 may not be able to afford a $2 million home. Homes built in the 1950s could be flagged to be
17 historic homes.
18 • Commissioner Gonka asked, and Planner Markle replied there is no age (of a house noted) in the
19 code to landmark a home. Senior Planner Coleman clarified that the 50 year cut-off is for Highland
20 Park architectural surveys.
21
22 Mayor Rotering mentioned the Boy Built homes should be landmarked.
23
24 (continued)
25 • Commissioner Ehrlich said there are homes built in the 1980s that should be landmarked. He noted
26 a landmarked home could be eligible for a grant.
27 • Commissioner Portman said educating people about a grant program is key. He referred to the
28 model Elgin has for income eligibility, and noted a test of this would be appropriate.
29 • Commissioner Gonka said the burden is on the homeowner to present a COA to the HPC when
30 someone wants to make a change to their house. He suggested a grant threshold could be a home
31 with 85 year-old windows, etc.
32 • Commissioner Weeder said rehabilitation is so costly.
33 • Commissioner Greenbaum suggested seniors with a limited budget who own a landmarked home
34 would be good candidates for a grant.
35
36 Local Property Tax Abatement
37 • Commissioner Gonka said this should be time-based for a property owner, not run with the land. He
38 would like to see the abatement be honored only if funds are put back in the property.
39 • Commissioner Portman asked, and Director Fontane said this is for the local level (what Highland
40 Park would enact) – not an assessment freeze. Property tax could be considered.
41 • Commissioner Hartinger asked, and Director Fontane said City Council would have to approve this.
42 • Commissioner Ehrlich said other taxpayers are paying the difference. He noted this is why a layered
43 approach would work. People’s income could change. Actual home examples (addresses) were
44 discussed on what could have been – other than a teardown.
45
46 Mayor Rotering advised that Highland Park’s portion is 7.7%. She shared her home was not maintained prior
47 to purchasing it.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 4
Page 6 of 149
1
2 (continued)
3 • Commissioner Gonka said abatements can be given to maintain the house. There could be a sliding
4 scale based on income.
5 • Commissioner Portman said this would be helpful for the preservation tool box.
6 • Commissioner Gonka said money should be given back through preservation.
7 • Commissioner Greenbaum said the HPC wishes to preserve, and homeowners should benefit. She
8 stated those who don’t preserve should be fined.
9
10 Planner Markle advised tax abatement is a way to encourage people to landmark homes.
11
12 • Commissioner Gonka asked why a homeowner wouldn’t go through the state program if they are
13 going through the local program. He shared that his house is not locally landmarked, but he uses the
14 state program. There was no benefit locally, as there was more red tape.
15
16 Director Fontane said the historic preservation program is a benefit. This is voluntary. There is a public good
17 in private preservation; public value. Education on local landmarks is a value for the community. Local
18 landmarks don’t expire.
19
20 Chairperson Pines asked if anyone from the audience wishes to speak. The following came forward:
21 • Tom Hiller advised he lives in a Tudor Revival house. He said they crossed the 25% mark (of the state
22 program) and shared that it was explained (by a representative from the state) that he should
23 obtain a local landmark first.
24
25 Commissioner Gonka said a state landmarking could be attained without local landmarking.
26
27 Mr. Hiller concurs with Director Fontane.
28
29 Back to…..
30
31 Local Property Tax Abatement
32 • Commissioner Hartinger believes all categories/an armory should be provided. The end result is to
33 retain the home; charge as much as is legally possible if someone wants to tear down the house.
34 This would help developers think about homes rather than dollar amounts. No matter the income,
35 most people would take free money. He wonders what the number would be to trigger people.
36
37 Land Use Incentive
38 • Commissioner Hartinger said people may not buy if they cannot add on. Offering options would be
39 amazing.
40 • Commissioner Ehrlich stated other cities/villages already have a footprint. Working off of these is a
41 start. These have worked for at least some villages. Highland Park could make this widely available.
42
43 Director Fontane said there’s been a lot of feedback.
44
45 Chairperson Pines suggested this be studied, absorbed, and this discussion can be continued. It was stated
46 the remaining categories would be discussed at a future meeting. He asked, and Director Fontane advised
47 feedback would be provided to City Council.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 5
Page 7 of 149
1
2 (continued)
3 • Commissioner Hartinger said if a demolition is granted, the code has to apply for new construction.
4
5 Director Fontane concluded these are incentives for historic properties; to encourage preservation – not to
6 discourage, penalize; a different approach policy-wise.
7
8 Chairperson Pines thanked Planner Markle for the information.
9
10 Mayor Rotering thanked the HPC.
11
12 Commissioner Greenbaum said she would like to discuss the negative approach; change people’s minds to
13 not tear down.
14
15 Commissioner Gonka said neighbors who protest encourage negative behavior. Having a big burden on the
16 homeowner, if demolishing, is an incentive; maintaining current properties benefits the community. He
17 noted City Staff/City Council do not want to discourage development.
18
19 City Manager Neukirch asked for all of the HPC’s ideas. She stated they will be compiled in a report. The
20 dialogue can be continued at the next meeting. Staff and Legal Counsel will present same to City Council.
21 City Manager Neukirch stressed that everything is on the table.
22
23 Everyone thanked the Mayor, City Manager Neukirch, etc. for attending tonight’s meeting.
24
25 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
26 There was no Business from the Public.
27
28 Senior Planner Coleman departed the meeting at 8:26 p.m.
29
30 OTHER BUSINESS
31 1. Commissioner/Open Meetings Act Training
32 Mr. Hart Passman, Corporation Counsel, offered a presentation:
33 • Agenda
34 • Statutory & Legal Authority
35 • City Code Provisions
36 • Specific HPC Duties & Responsibilities
37 • Landmark Criteria
38 • What is “Integrity”?
39 • Demolition of Dwellings
40 o New Code Provisions
41 o Common Questions
42 • Establishing a Landmark
43 • Establishing a Historic District
44 • Certificate of Appropriateness
45 • Certificate of Economic Hardship
46 • Burden for Satisfying Standards
47 • Common Questions & Problems
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 6
Page 8 of 149
1 • Procedure – Open Meetings Act
2 • Open Meetings Act: Email & Online Communication
3 • Public Forums & Social Media
4 • Open Meetings Act
5 o Openness
6 o Enforcement
7 • Commissioner Attendance Requirements
8 • Freedom Of Information Act/FOIA
9 o General Rule
10 o Private Email & Text Messages
11 • Robert’s Rules of Order
12 • Procedure – Robert’s Rules of Order
13 • Motions
14 • Procedure
15 o Public Hearings
16 o Public Comment
17
18 Commissioner Greenbaum departed the meeting at 10:01 p.m.
19
20 (continued)
21 • Ethics
22 o City Guidelines
23 o Guidelines
24 o Enforcement
25
26 2. Next Regular Meeting is Scheduled for December 11, 2025
27 It was noted the next regular HPC Meeting is scheduled for December 11, 2025.
28
29 STAFF REPORT
30 Planner Markle advised that an article was written in The Highlander and has generated interest in
31 landmarking homes.
32
33 Planner Markle asked if the date of May 7, 2026, is okay for the Preservation Awards event.
34
35 ADJOURNMENT
36 Commissioner Hartinger moved to adjourn at 10:16 p.m. Commissioner Weeder seconded the motion.
37
38 On a voice vote
39 Voting Yea Chairperson Pines; Commissioners Ehrlich, Gonka, Hartinger, Portman, & Weeder
40 Voting Nay: None
41
42 Staff declared that the motion passed unanimously.
43
44 Respectfully Submitted,
45
46 Gale Cerabona, Recorder
47
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 7
Page 9 of 149
1 MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 29, 2025, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
November 13, 2025 - Page 8
Page 10 of 149
Memorandum
Date: 12.11.25
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Maddy Markle, Planner I
Subject: Preliminary Landmark Designation – 3135 Priscilla Avenue
Location 3135 Priscilla Avenue
Historical Name H.W. KaDell House
Historical Status Not Surveyed
Structure Style: Contemporary
Architect: George Fred Keck
Builder: G. W. Lindstrom
Built: 1941
Petitioners Donna & Jordon Varichak
3135 Priscilla Avenue, Highland Park
Figure 1. West Elevation, 1941 Figure 2. South Elevation, 1941
Figure 3. West Elevation, 2025 Figure 4. South Elevation, 2025
1
Page 11 of 149
Memorandum
Summary of the Nomination
The owners of 3135 Priscilla Avenue, Donna and Jordon Varichak, have nominated their property for
a local landmark designation (see Attachment 1). They appreciate their home’s timeless floorplan
and innovative solar design. The Varichak’s have lived in the home since 2018. The applicants believe
their home is eligible for landmark nomination because it was designed by notable architect George
Fred Keck, exemplifies innovative sustainable design, and has a clean aesthetic that has stood the
test of time.
The residence at 3135 Priscilla Avenue, designed in 1941 by George Fred Keck, is a Contemporary
Style Linear Ranch. It has a front gabled roof and asymmetrical façade. It is characterized by its
integrated two-car garage, pitched roof with deep eaves, and large windows concentrated on the
south elevation. The home is among the earliest in Highland Park (and the world) to bring together
the modern principles of passive solar design. Existing Pictures have been compiled into Attachment
2.
George Fred Keck
George Fred Keck designed over a thousand homes, 30 of which were in Highland Park. Keck’s
homes in Highland Park were built between 1926 and 1968. He was the first American architect to
observe the effects of passive solar heating and to apply them to single family residences. He rose to
fame at the 1933 Century of Progress International Exposition with his dodecagon all-glass “House of
Tomorrow.” 1 In 1933 the Chicago Tribune wrote,
“In planning, in shape, in decoration and in furnishing this is a dwelling which presents a
radically different face to the house-minded world.”
Keck observed that the glass house retained massive amounts of heat, even in the Chicago winter.
This observation led him to start designing homes intentionally around the sun. According to some
sources Keck was the first American architect to draw shading diagrams based on solar geometry,
and the first to calculate a building’s solar heat gain. Keck’s shade plans and window placements
could save a client 20% on their winter heating bill. 2
Keck’s design style adapted modernist European aesthetics for an American consumer who would
have been more familiar with the Prairie Style. Robert Boyce, architectural historian, describes
Keck’s work as:
“high-quality solar residences, which combined the aesthetics and engineering of the
International Style and organic architecture, and in laying the ground work for their
acceptance that he most influenced American architectural design.” 3
Keck’s interpretation of the Contemporary Style is recognizable by its functionalism, horizontality,
simplicity, use of light, and open plan. All of these elements are present at 3135 Priscilla Avenue.
1 White, Megan. (2017). He saw the future: George Fred Keck and the House of Tomorrow. National
Trust for Historic Preservation. https://savingplaces.org/stories/george-fred-keck-the-mastermind-
behind-the-house-of-tomorrow
2 Denzer, A. (2013). The Solar House: Pioneering Sustainable Design. Rizzoli Publications.
3 Boyce, R. (1993). Keck and Keck.
2
Page 12 of 149
Memorandum
Keck’s design philosophy still remains relevant today and continues to inform sustainable design
best practices.
Passive Solar Design
Henry KaDell, the original owner of 3135 Priscilla Avenue, told Keck “We like the solar type of
construction and prefer south exposure for all main rooms... We are very much interested in
automatic radiant floor type of heating...” (see Attachment 3). With these requests in mind, Keck
designed a long, linear ranch with all the main rooms oriented south.
Large windows line the southern elevation and are shaded by deep eave overhangs. The windows on
the home’s other elevations are significantly smaller. This was intended to keep the home shaded in
the summer and light-filled in the winter. During the summer, the sun sits at a high angle in the
southern sky and cannot reach the southern windows because of the deep overhangs. This reduces
cooling costs. Operable casement windows kept the house cool by providing cross ventilation (see
Attachment 4 and 5).
In the winter, the sun is positioned lower in the southern sky and is able to shine into the house. This
traps heat in the house and reduces heating costs. Heat is further retained by thick insulation and
double-glazed thermopane windows. Keck specified that the ceiling at 3135 Priscilla Avenue should
have 3 inches of rock wool insulation (see Attachment 6), as opposed to the one inch of ceiling
insulation that was typical during this time period. 4
Thicker roof insulation and south-oriented double-glazed windows may seem like common sense
energy saving measures, but the reason one can recognize these interventions as “common sense”
today is because Keck pioneered them in the 1940s. Keck essentially invented the modern framework
for sustainable design 30 years before it became popular. 5
Radiant Heat
Keck installed a radiant floor heating system at 3135 Priscilla Avenue. Iron heating pipes, through
which hot water flowed, were laid beneath the floor, and covered with sand and concrete and
reinforced by wire mesh (see Attachment 7). In 1941 radiant floor heat was a rarity in the United
States, as it was only used by Frank Lloyd Wright, who adapted the idea from Korean architecture. 6
Two decades after the completion of the KaDell House, radiant heat would become popular. 7 Again,
Keck proved to be decades ahead of his time.
Materials
Historic materials are included in Attachment 6.
• Slab concrete foundation,
• Fir wood balloon frame with brick veneer
4 Denzer, A. (2013). The Solar House: Pioneering Sustainable Design. Rizzoli Publications.
5 Drueding, Meghan. (2018). Edge of Tomorrow: The Unexpected Path of five “Homes of the Future”
from 1933-34 | National Trust for Historic Preservation. https://savingplaces.org/stories/edge-of-
tomorrow-the-unexpected-path-of-five-houses-of-the-future-from-the-1933-worlds-fair
6 Boyce, R. (1993). Keck and Keck.
7 Kim, H. (2023). Korean heat radiated: from Frank Lloyd Wright’s Usonian houses to postwar mass-
produced houses in America. Architectural Research Quarterly, 27(2), 109–128.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1359135523000167
3
Page 13 of 149
Memorandum
• Cement floors 4” thick (3” concrete/1” monolithic)
• Floors laid on gravel fill over iron floor heating pipes and reinforced with wire mesh.
• Double-glazed themopane windows
• Rock wool insulation
• Plywood wall coverings (interior)
• Weatherwood ceiling tile (interior)
Present materials (as stated by applicant in Landmark Nomination, see Attachment 1).
• Non-historic Hardy board and stucco exterior
• Non-historic rubber modified bitumen roof
• Non-historic gutters
• Non-historic windows, doors and trim
• Non-historic garage doors
Alterations
Roofing, siding, windows and doors are all replacement material. The roofline was extended over the
front porch and a post was added in 2014 (see Attachment 8).
The home has largely retained its original footprint, floorplan, massing and foundation. The home’s
massing, geometry (roof pitch, fenestration, solid-to-void ratio), and orientation clearly resemble
that which was originally designed by Keck in 1941.
Ownership
The house at 3135 Priscilla Avenue was originally constructed for Harold and Gladys KaDell, who
were highly involved in the design process. They asked Keck to build them a “six room house and two
car garage… (in the) solar type of construction” (see Attachment 3). Cross breeze ventilation, a
southern building orientation and radiant heat were all specific requests from the KaDells. It’s clear
the KaDells took an interest in sustainability and were familiar with Keck’s work.
Harold KaDell was a founder of the Deringer Metallurgical Corporation, a company that specialized
in creating metal components (see Attachment 9). The 1950 Census indicates that Gladys KaDell
was a homemaker (see Attachment 10).
Chain of Title
• 1941 - 1966 Harold and Gladys KaDell
• 1966-1968 Harry and Mary Hart
• 1968-1987 Jay and Anni Curtice
• 1987-~2014 Owen McCall and Harriet Smith
• 2018-Present Donna and Jordon Varichak
Landmark Criteria
The home at 3135 Priscilla Avenue may meet the following Landmark Criteria: 1, 4, 5 and 6.
4
Page 14 of 149
Memorandum
Sec. 24.015 Criteria for Landmark Designation.
The following is a list of the criteria to be considered in the designation of a Property, Structure,
Area, Object, or Landscape of Significance as a Landmark:
(1) It demonstrates character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage,
or cultural characteristics of the City, county, state, or country.
(2) It is the site of a significant local, county, state, or national event.
(3) It is associated with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of
the City, County, State, or Country.
(4) It embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural and/or landscape
style valuable for the study of a specific time period, type, method of
construction, or use of indigenous materials.
(5) It is identifiable as the work of a notable builder, designer, architect, artist, or
landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the
City, County, State, or Country.
(6) It embodies, overall, elements of design, details, materials, and/or
craftsmanship that renders it architecturally, visually, aesthetically, and/or
culturally significant and/or innovative.
(7) It has a unique location or it possesses or exhibits singular physical and/or aesthetic
characteristics that make it an established or familiar visual feature.
(8) It is a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure or group of such structures,
including, but not limited to farmhouses, gas stations or other commercial structures, with a
high level of integrity and/or architectural, cultural, historical, and/or community
significance.
(9) It possesses or exhibits significant historical and/or archaeological qualities.
Landmark Nomination Process Outline
The landmark process is initiated when a nomination form is submitted to the Historic Preservation
Commission. At this point, the property owner has already been sent a letter stating the time, place,
and intent of this meeting where the nomination will be considered. The owner has provided consent
to the landmark designation, so the next steps are as follows:
(1) The Commission should consider and discuss the landmark nomination. If the HPC finds that
the property (a) meets two or more Landmark Criteria set forth in Section 24.015 of the City
Code, and (b) has sufficient integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship to make
it worthy of preservation, then the Commission should direct Staff to draft a Resolution
making a preliminary Landmark Designation recommendation.
(2) The Commission should consider the resolution making the preliminary recommendation.
Should the HPC adopt the resolution making a preliminary Landmark Designation
recommendation, the house becomes a “Regulated Structure” with the associated protections
against demolition and alterations.
5
Page 15 of 149
Memorandum
(3) Staff will draft a Planning Report evaluating the relationship of the proposed designation to
the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the effect of the proposed designation on the surrounding
neighborhood. The Planning Report will be presented to the Commission following the
adoption of the Resolution making the preliminary recommendation.
(4) At a subsequent meeting, the Commission shall review the Planning Report, Findings of Fact,
and make a determination to recommend a landmark designation to City Council.
(5) The City Council will consider the findings, recommendations, and official record of the
Historical Preservation Commission and may, by an Ordinance duly adopted, designate the
subject property as a Local Landmark.
Recommended Action
The Historic Preservation Commission is asked to discuss and consider the preliminary landmark
designation for 3135 Priscilla Avenue. If the nomination is to be given a positive recommendation for
approval, the Commission must find that the structure meets two or more of the criteria set forth in
Section 24.015 and have sufficient integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship to make
it worthy of preservation or rehabilitation.
If the nomination is given a positive recommendation, the Commission is asked to consider A
Resolution Making a Preliminary Landmark Designation Recommendation for 3135 Priscilla
Avenue. Should the Commission adopt the resolution making a preliminary Landmark Designation
recommendation, the house becomes a “Regulated Structure” with the associated protections against
demolition and alteration.
6
Page 16 of 149
Memorandum
Attachments:
1. Landmark Nomination
2. Current Conditions
3. KaDell Requests for Keck, 1941
4. Elevations and Details, 1941
5. Floor Plan, 1941
6. Material Specifications, 1941
7. Radiant Heat Plan, 1941
8. Approved Porch Alterations, 2014
9. KaDell Business License, 1950
10. Census, 1950
11. 3135 Priscilla Under Construction, 1941
12. Building Permit for New Construction, 1941
13. Chain of Title Documentation
14. Keck’s Hand-Drawn Elevations, 1941
15. Real Estate Listing, 1968
16. Architectural Forum Article, 1942
7
Page 17 of 149
Keck and Keck – 3135 Priscilla Avenue, Highland Park, IL – Current Owners since 2018: Donna & Jordon Varichak
Originally built in 1941, the Keck and Keck “H.W. KaDell” home had an original address of 1953 Priscilla Avenue, which was
later changed to 3135 Priscilla Avenue.
George F. Keck was the first architect to pioneer passive solar house design. This architecturally significant residential mid-
century modern ranch home utilized passive solar heating and was built with radiant heated floors installed under the concrete
slab. The orientation of the home is to the south, incorporating large windows, angled roof lines and overhangs. With a modern
aesthetic, a simplicity in design and an open floor plan, it integrates a connection between the interior and the surrounding
natural landscape.
“Simplicity in design with,” as William Keck says, a “plain, clean, simple look about it” with sharp, clean edges and lack of ornamentation such as
scalloped edges.” Atomic Ranch – August 13, 2025
In 1980, the University of Illinois awarded both brothers its inaugural Illinois Medal in Architecture. Over the course of their career, the Keck & Keck
firm designed over 300 homes. While their names may not enjoy the same household recognition as their peers, their legacy continues in having
formed a major part of Modernism’s development in the Midwest. They remain an inspiring example of creative and efficient approaches to passive
solar design.
Although the home has gone through a few owners and interior changes made throughout the years, the overall footprint and
integrity of the house has remained the same modernism style, where modern meets timeless.
Legal Description: Lot 5 and Lot 6 (except the south ½ thereof) in block 2 in Highland Park Woodlands, a subdivision of the
East ½ of the Northwest ¼ of section 15, Township 43 North, Range 12, East of the third principal meridian (except the
Northeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of the Northwest ¼ of said Section 15) according to the Plat thereof recorded June 22, 1935,
as document 414033, in Lake County Illinois
The reason our home is eligible for landmark designation:
1) Designed by notable architects, George and William Keck (Keck and Keck).
2) A modern and innovative styled home built in1941, embodies a place-maker in history with distinguishing
characteristics including passive solar, large windows and a clean design.
3) The compact footprint is designed to stand the test of time.
Original 1941 materials: (see M73-026 client file)
Slab concrete foundation, building constructed of frame and brick with attached, 2 car garage. Cement floors 4” thick (3”
concrete/1” monolithic) cement finished with a trowel. Floors laid on sand or gravel fill over the floor heating pipes and
reinforced with 4” x 4” x12 ga electrically welded wire mesh.
All framing lumber #1 common Fir, free from loose or large knots, shakes, excess sap or other defects. Framing lumber shall
have no more than 12-15% moisture content.
2014 materials:
Retained original foundation, incorporated Hardie board and stucco exterior, rubber modified bitumen roof, gutters, new
windows, doors and trim.
Page 18 of 149
Page 19 of 149
1941:
Page 20 of 149
2025:
Page 21 of 149
West Elevation
South Elevation
Page 22 of 149
South Elevation
Page 23 of 149
South Elevation
North Elevation
Page 24 of 149
Page 25 of 149
Page 26 of 149
Page 27 of 149
Page 28 of 149
Page 29 of 149
0 UT 〔L E v A 1 0
N QAT ; LE AT 1 0 N
Page 30 of 149
ı ıııııııııılılııııııı ııııııııııııııııııııııııııııııııııııııııaııııııııııııı¯
Fil.'.
- ııııııııııııııııııııııııııııı ıııııııııııııııııııııIIılı IIıı ıııııııııI
Ilının
I ÇLFJ üüüüü
ILL
-612
Page 31 of 149
Cc
一
亻 40 Tu了ㄚ
: 0 00
F.
三A 一ㄒ一
E L E V Aㄒ 0 N
Page 32 of 149
ー
0 0 0第0 △ 0、
て気" し00、0 、 ~ 1、に (
当-- -0、 、に へ
「TE心
辷につ”「
つ p町 A 盾
れー.年フロ 円
%了
こ: ろ , 卩
づ( Aし
C 0 A Nー CE 0 Aー
し
S 0 A •E ー3 ・
町
マ
コ
一
0 コ
3 3
トっ
イ 1
←
ッ・ 2
0 ド
つ第。 、0 は て。
1駅当み、0ー 第 0
、
0 一
ツド
ー
′ 0
よい
=
3 -4 ! 、 、
を
製
な
、一0 ー0 第 A p を、 一
、、 ・
4
0
、を ャー
、朝ー 0 ・
」
0
編・
「 し気 f し・
を0 0 第を0 00、0 て を
一
1 Y 0ー
0 Aし
、を( 工
こ
0よ5 て袋0 CTー
0 0 E Aー
H0し5 E- 0 R
W A LL 5 E C丁ー
0 N5 〒
いu 人 トトこし
0 00 0. 1こ- 0.
SCA-LE 朝を
0 良0 をF 良0 当 こ
区、
AR0ー0 了
Page 33 of 149
WE T W 0 | EN WA L E AS T 50 0 T、 0 F Ll | G¯一0一
L:、G RM•
GA R E .JtJT | L | ㄒY , M A 0 '5
H
N ㄒ. 、M ST E R
0| NG M, 3 0 00 5E 0 0 M「
0 00 H 0凵
F 00 · A
F L 0 0 R P L A NV
&E ~ O C
Page 34 of 149
Page 35 of 149
Page 36 of 149
Page 37 of 149
Page 38 of 149
Page 39 of 149
Page 40 of 149
ΤςιΑο
2. ΑΙ-Ι- 41-"
ΑΙΟ
ΤΗΕ
ΙΑ . 4ey
•,TAT
. Ι-ΆΙΤ.
ΤΥΡΙΞΑΙ_
— —.STul
A".
442
_FOUNDATICN ?ΙΑΝ
ΙΙΙ.
Page 41 of 149
Piuscilla
DECEIVET 2009 IRG
72009 IRC Orainage
NOV 26 7014 poroved plans shall be Required. Footing drains, storm water drains.
kept on s drains paved arer
E de ava connected to
required by the Building
City of Highland Park storm sewer
GA
of Highland Park All work shal ble local, st
another approved point of discharge
rdinanc ordinances and all authorities hav
Prese The Ge or discrepar dinance Sec. 171.350 -Plambing Walls
For question
ARCHITECTS
or fisets, any one shall cestof not hess tha
Insulations
201 Flosamor EL 60422
and specifications. plumbing trom freezity shall be th
Section R402
r. Drilling and
Is with the 2009 1HK and 11
SINDLE PUY FOOF MEMBRANE 0162 Fax
TO MATCH EXIST'b. DRIP EDG3
d scope o
focations shallcomp s. Section 17
""JOINT WOOD CIDING
ode provides penalt
TO MATUH EXist4.
ON COX PUTWOOD.
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
comply with Highland Park
Smo
Shaoo
Shall prorude utterd and wit
cvel, per Section NEW 1X10 BALK
& Downmpoute pe TO BEAM IN BAR.
The Gener 2+10,5/19/ (NEAN) 2 FURF. Wi'N
2009 IRC SR-801.334
e heaters w
Pour allconer
NOINT SIDING
Boo Bremage tion wal Ex18tb.
CA
FNEEWALLS 2+05/10" W/EXT. bTP. BD.
GRADI
ll conform to the "NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFI 121x125
of1 modulus of elasticiry "E" = 1,400,000, Hem-Fir #2 or equal.
Use sts/rafters to flu
Prov
EXIST'O, BRIGK (4) 9x12 VENTS
EXIST
Roof Sheat
-NEw Post/919M
Wall sheathing shall be edx plywor -NEW
Highland Park, Illinois
o FURP19
MOISTURE CONTROL "V"NOINT SIDING.)
Ettin Residence
shield a
All exte caulkin
Section at Garage/New Porch
polysulphide, acrylic, silicone, or butyl. EXIST'. 1x10 Shall meet all applicable Scale: 1"= 1'-0"
Roofing shallbe as shown on the plans and details and shallmatch extst FAPTERS19
inances and
6.0 DOORS AND WINDOWS
it shall
NEW 2X6 LOOkouts cifications
ARC
be a fixed wood window of the same si door sha TO CREATE OVERRANG.
locks,wood silland weatherstrippir TEXTEND INTO HOOSE extent y are in
SISTER TO EXIST. RAFTERs)
7.0 FINISHES
3135 Priscilla
Illinois Registrat
IMATLH EXIST)
DARAGE Dae 11.18.4
EXISt. Ext.
WALL
Eave Detail at Damaged Overhang PROVIDE NEW " Fc.
(At Great Room) Scale: 1"= 1'-0" BD ON OLE
- NEW 2X1OP THROUBADUT AA
Ette
EXIST. BEAM
TO NEW POFCH -14
12-19
li
gam
NEW EXTENDED
PORCH POS
EXIST. HINEENA11 -NEW FIXBD
woDNIM 89au BREAT FM.
(VIP.)
EXIST6. 210 FAPTERS/16"
Glazing in haz
DONSTrUCT'N. 2009 IRC Section R308 W/FULL CAVITY INSULATION
NEW ROOF TO PEMAIN,
ExIst PPL. 2x12 HDR.
(MEN
NEW
EXIST, BRI EXTENSIONS/9'v.
NEM DOOR 12.4 (V1P.)
-Bxistouc
Cbecked By:
-NEN POST
EXISTB.
REW FIXED
MOONIN TAPER EXPOSED POFTION
EXISt
TUH
11/18/2014
Issued Fo
r Const.:
For
NEWPost.
FOUND. Partial First Floor Plan =1'-0"
(At Great Room and Garage)
Shall meer al pica
ppicate
Shall meet all applicable DEW THICKENED SLAB Shall meet all applicab
codes, ordinances and CEXPANDED STOOP codes, ordinances and codes, ordinances and Sheet No.:
c
1
specifications
specifications (x12'4") specifications
Partial Front Elevation Partial Right Side Elevation
Scale: 4"1'-0"
cale: /4" = 1'-0”
Page 42 of 149
Page 43 of 149
Page 44 of 149
Page 45 of 149
Page 46 of 149
Page 47 of 149
Page 48 of 149
Page 49 of 149
Page 50 of 149
Page 51 of 149
Page 52 of 149
Page 53 of 149
Page 54 of 149
Page 55 of 149
Page 56 of 149
Page 57 of 149
Page 58 of 149
Page 59 of 149
Page 60 of 149
Page 61 of 149
Page 62 of 149
TALMO K
KUNSUL
KYESIEL
KIMSUL
RIMSUL YIMSUL
KIMSUL
KIMSUL KIMESUL KIMSL
KIMSUL
KIMSUL
VIMSUL
KIMSUL
KIMSUL KIMSUL
KIMSUL
KIMSUL
VIMSUL
KIMSUL KIMSUL
KIMSUL
Page 63 of 149
Page 64 of 149
Page 65 of 149
Page 66 of 149
Page 67 of 149
Date 0r 14 1930 2228 447
3
0.19530Street RISCI A AVE.
W. KADELL
garage?. Palhed arepA
TWOOD
Remodeling..
-EVANSTON, e
l
FLORENCE
aschatict
to ContractorFW LINDSTRO Address114 AVE
DAVIS
to OWNEe INGLE FAMILY DNELRNG
4 Wall going ii
Handale
2 HP.
Sub'n. MOOPLA
12,000, .Permit
2Raftars
2x10 Ra
J.0 3186 5020
Page 68 of 149
KORDICA FLECT.C Address 658GREENBAY. WINN
3456 Issued 2/5/41
$8 #14 PE
wlaes
Size of b
. System..
62 No.FIXTUEE
Socket 15 4 Motors No. Ran
ΔΟ
Addres8 514€.RAILROAD AVE. WILMETTE
03277 Issued 11/0/41
/77
S Toilets... 4
Certificate of Inspection Issued.
Downspouts connected to fh demnte cch
Heat HoW. G95. - uA ntl goo-N
Inspectiot Liphi tack of somwhat diep 00 fut la
Manfol 7H H Paprs approbed7a
Page 69 of 149
Date. 5 Ο. 4
P Ave
Name of Owner. H.W. A DE
He
FRm To
Architect. OWNEN Address.
NEN
Permit issued to. OWNE to construct a TOOL SHER
building on Lot 5 Blk 2 Sub'n H.P WooDLANDS
Lot yerified. 9by
Gsted Card.
Page 70 of 149
Page 71 of 149
Page 72 of 149
Page 73 of 149
NO.810
LEGAL FORMS
WARRANTY DEED
April, 1980
Joint Tenancy
Statutory (ILLINOIS) 2578152
(Individual to Individual)
10882
CAUTION Consult a lam
er belore using or acting under thes form. RECORDER
y and htness, are excluded LAKE COUNTY
. ILLINCIS
THE GRANTORS, JAY S. CURTICE and ANNI B. 1987 JUN 12
CURTICE, his wife, in joint tenancy, PH 1: 24
Franknu
Bit hueta
of the City offtighland Park County of Lake STATE OF ILLINOIS =
091536
U. 049
State of Illinois
TEN AND NO/100 (s10.00)---for
and in consideration of
- DOLLARS.
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX E
「ャ
and other good and valuable consideration
CONVEY _ and WARRANT _ to
in hand paid, GO.
co.
PB.10591
JUN 12'87
OF71
DEPT.
REVENUE 00E
SANCELTED
J. OWEN MC CALL and HARRIET T. SMITH, his wife
660 ORIOLE COURT
GRAYSLAKE, ILLINOIS 60030
(The Above Space For Recorder's Use Only)
(NAMES AND ADDRESS OF GRANTEES)
not in Tenancy in Common, but in JOINT TENANCY, the following described Real Estate situated in the
County of Lake in the State of Illinois, to wit:
QEALESTAL
COUNTY OF LAKETAX
LOT 5 AND THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 2 IN HIGHLAND PARK WOODLANDS, A
SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, (EXCEPT
THE NORTH EAST QUATER OF THE NORTH EAST QUARTER OF THE NORTH WEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 15) ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED JUNE 22, 1935,
REFSNAR
AS DOCUMENT 414033, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
PERMANENT INDEX NUMBER: 16-15-105-003 (LOT 5)
16-15-105-004 (NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 6)
STAMPS HER
COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 3135 PRISCILLA, HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS 60035
R 1REVENUE ST
AFFIX "RIDERS" OR
SUBJECT тO: General taxes for 1986 and subsequent years; building lines and building ad
liquor restrictions of record; zoning and bildire laws and ondinances; public ad
utility easements; covenants and restrictions of recond as to use and occupencу:
and acts done or suffered by or thorugh Purchaser.
hereby releasing and waiving all rights under and by virtue of the Homestead Exemption Laws of the State of
Illinois. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said premises not in tenancy in common, but in joint tenancy forever.
西
DATED this 10 _ day of JUNE 19 87
PLEASE
ue SEAL B Chetice (SEAL)
PRINT OR JAY S. CURTICE ANNI B. CURTICE
TYPE NAME(S)
BELOW (SEAL) _(SEAL)
SIGNATURE(S)
State of Illinois, County of Lake ss. I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said County, in the State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
JAY S. CURTICE and ANNI B. CURTICE, his wife, in joint C
tenancy
personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are_ subscribed P
to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person, and acknowl-
edged that they signed, sealed and delivered the said instrument as their
RE
free and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes therein set forth, including the
release and waiver of the right ofhomestead.
HIGHWAY.
PALATINE, ILLINOIS 60007,
WCE CO
U S-NORTHWEST
Given under my hand and official seal, this 10 江 day of JUNE 19 87
(a12) 991.5401
Commission expires September 27
NOTARY PUBLIC ONU
This instrument was prepared by David bkotoff 899 Skokie Seulevard, Northbrook, linois 60062
(NAME AND ADDRESS)
LIBERTY 3'
FRED RAWLES
ADORESS OF PROPERTY:
3135 Priscilla Avenue
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
MAIL TO SJITE 461 325 WASHINGTO THE AROVE ADDRESS IS FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES
ONLY AND IS NOT A PART OF THIS DEE
WAUKELAN 60085 SEND SUBSEQLENT TAX BILLS TO:
J. Oven MbCall/Harriet T. Smith
OR
(Cry. Stace andZc)
RECORDER'S OFFICE BOX NO.
3135 Priscilla Avene, Highland Park
Pue
(Adoress)
Page 74 of 149
Page 75 of 149
Page 76 of 149
Page 77 of 149
Page 78 of 149
Page 79 of 149
Page 80 of 149
5 H O U S E IIS H I G H L A N D P A R K , H X I N O I S
Designed to intercept and utilize a maxi-
mum quantity of winter sun-heaL, this house
has most of its rooms facing due south and
equipped with generous windows. A por-
tion of the living room ceiling slopes up
under a shed roof, providing extra height
for the windows in this part of the facade.
The Hour slab, laid directly on the ground,
is heated by hot water circulating through
...,.,;rj ^ LIV-RM- n KLJK'.;
wrought-iron pipe coils. The plan, which is
extremely orderly and compact, provides a
living-dining room, three master bedrooms, CALEINIFFT
one with private bath, and an additional 0 5 10 15 20
bedroom which may be used either as a
maid > i i x M i i . ^ i i i - s l room or another master
bedroom. Since the house is basementless, a
generous utility room has been provided be-
tween the kitchen and the garage.
LIVING ROOM Photos. Hedrtcll-Blesslng
80 T E C T U U M
Page 81 of 149
GEORGE FRED K E C K , ARCHITECT
I
SIDE VIEW
Exterior finish is vertical fir boarding, except for
the brick sidewall of the garage, alongside the
ENTRANCE
entrance porch. Interiors are plywood. The greater
part of the glass area is fixed in large panes, with
the operable sash in wood casements. Lpper pic-
ture shows south side of house, picture at right
shows entrance side. Below is a plan showing the
arrangement of the pipe coils for floor hcatinu.
PANEL COILS-J/-I
PANEL HEATING PLAN
A U G U S T 1 9 4 2 81
Page 82 of 149
K E C K PORTFOLIO — TECHNICAL DATA
I
Construction photographs show the arrangement of the
pipe coils for floor heating in the Highland Park house,
and are typical of the method employed in several of
the Keck designs. Coils are placed in a gravel fill on top
of the floor slab, and covered with concrete reenforced
with light wire mesh.
CONSTRUCTION OUTLINE
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT: Range and re- S H E E T METAL WORK: Flashing—copper.
HOUSE LAGRANGE
frigerator—General Electric Co. Sink — Revere Copper & B r a s s Co. D r a i n s — J o s a m
Crane Co. Mfg. C o .
STRUCTURE: Balloon construction, fir;
i n s i d e — S l i e e t r o c k a n d p l a s t e r , U. S . G y p s u m L A U N D R Y E Q U I P M E N T : Washing machine WINDOWS: Glass — Libbey-Owens-Ford
Co. —Bendix Home Appliance Co., Inc. Glass Co. Sash and screens—aluminum,
BATHROOM EQUIPMENT: Crane Co. A d a m s Westlake Co. Glass blocks—Owens-
I N S U L A T I O N : R o c k w o o l , U. S . G y p s u m C o .
P L U M B I N G : Soil pipes (all h o u s e s ) — c a s t Illinois G l a s s C o .
SHEET METAL WORK: Flashing—galv.
iron. C r a n e C o . W a t e r p i p e s — c o p p e r b e a r - WALL COVERINGS: Main rooms—wall-
copper bearing steel. Republic Steel C o r p .
ing s t e e l , C r a n e C o . paper, K i m b e r l y - C l a r k Corp.
W I N D O W S : Glass—Pittsburgh Plate Glass
Co. H E A T I N G : Floor panel heating. Boiler — P A I N T S : P r a t t & L a m b e r t , Inc.
Triad Mfg. Co., Inc. Panel pipes—A. M. D O O R S : Rezo, Paine L u m b e r Co.
P A I N T S : Pittsburgh Plate G l a s s Co. and
Byers Co., Circulating pump—Bell & Gos- H A R D W A R E : Sargent & Co.
Pratt & Lambert, Inc.
sett. Regulator — Minneapolis-Honeywell BATHROOM E Q U I P M E N T : Kohler Co.
D O O R S : U. S. Plywood Co.
Regulator Co. W a t e r heater—Crane Co. PLUMBING: W a t e r pipes—copper. Revere
H A R D W A R E : Sargent & Co.
Copper & B r a s s , Inc.
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT: S i n k — C r a n e Co.
BATHROOM E Q U I P M E N T : Crane Co. HOUSE IN COLUMBIA H E A T I N G : Combination panel and radiator
PLUMBING: W a t e r pipes—copper bearing system; air conditioning. Carrier Corp.
S T R U C T U R E : I n s u l a t e d c e m e n t block, H a y - Radiators — American Radiator-Standard
steel. C r a n e Co.
dite C o . , s t u c c o o u t s i d e , p l a s t e r i n s i d e . Sanitary Corp. Regulator—Johnson Service
H E A T I N G : Forced w a r m air system, win- I N S U L A T I O N : Haydite Co. and U. S . Gyp- Co.
ter conditioning. Water heater—Westing- sum Co.
h o u s e E l e c t r i c & Mfg. C o .
SHEET METAL WORK: Flashing—galv. HOUSE IN HIGHLAND PARK
copper bearing steel. Republic Steel C o .
HOUSE IN FLOSSMOOR WINDOWS: Glass — Libbey-Owens-Ford S T R U C T U R E : Balloon construction, T . & G .
Glass Co. fir, shiplap sheathing; inside—studs and
STRUCTURE: Cavity brick and balloon
P A I N T S : Pyroxylin Coated F a b r i c s Material plywood. C e i l i n g s — W e a t h e r w o o d t i l e , U. S .
construction; inside—fir and brick.
Div. and Medusa Products Div., Medusa Gypsum Co.
ROOF (all h o u s e s ) : B u i l t - u p or t a r and
Portland Cement Co. INSULATION: R e d T o p R o c k w o o l , U. S .
gravel, Johns-Manville.
D O O R S : Rezo. Paine L u m b e r Co. Gypsum Co.
INSULATION: Kimsul, Kimberly-Clark
H A R D W A R E : P. & F . C o r b i n . S H E E T M E T A L W O R K : Flashing—Toncan
Corp.
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT: Sink—American iron. Republic Steel C o r p .
SHEET METAL WORK: Flashing—galv.
Radiator-Standard Sanitary Corp.
copper bearing steel. Republic Steel C o r p . WINDOWS: Glass — Libbey-Owens-Ford
L A U N D R Y E Q U I P M E N T : Washington ma-
D r a i n s — J o s a m Mfg. C o . Glass Co.
chine—Bendix Home Appliance Co., Inc.
WINDOWS: Glass — Libbey-Owens-Ford W A L L C O V E R I N G S : Main rooms—plywood.
B A T H R O O M E Q U I P M E N T : American Radi-
Glass Co. Wcatherstripping (all h o u s e s ) — K i t c h e n a n d b a t h r o o m s — p l a s t e r on S h e e t -
ator-Standard Sanitary Corp.
Monarch Metal W e a t h e r S t r i p C o . r o c k . U. S . G y p s u m C o .
PLUMBING: W a t e r pipes—copper, Revere
F L O O R C O V E R I N G S (all h o u s e s ) : K i t c h e n P A I N T S : Pratt & L a m b e r t , Inc., Johnson
Copper & B r a s s , Inc.
and bathrooms—linoleum, Congoleum-Nairn, W a x Co. and A . C . Horn C o .
H E A T I N G : Forced w a r m air s y s t e m . Boiler
Inc. D O O R S : Rezo, Paine L u m b e r Co.
—Mueller Co. Regulator — Minneapolis-
PAINTS: Pratt & Lambert, Inc. Floor col- H A R D W A R E : Sargent & Co.
Honeywell Regulator Co. W a t e r heater—
oring—A. C. Horn Co. K I T C H E N E Q U I P M E N T : Range and refrig-
American Radiator-Standard Sanitary Corp.
D O O R S : U. S . P l y w o o d C o . G a r a g e d o o r s — erator—General Electric Co. S i n k — C r a n e Co.
O v e r h e a d Door C o . B A T H R O O M E Q U I P M E N T : Crane Co.
HOUSE IN MENASHA
H A R D W A R E : P. & F . C o r b i n . Door c l o s e r s PLUMBING: W a t e r pipes—copper. Revere
(all h o u s e s ) — L . C . N . , L a s i e r - N o r t o n Co. STRUCTURE: Balloon construction, fir; Copper & Brass, Inc.
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (all houses): rough s h e a t h i n g , building paper; inside— H E A T I N G : Floor panel heating. Boiler —
Wiring system—conduit, General Electric lath and plaster. Triad Products Corp. Panel pipes—A. M.
Co. Switches—Bakelite Corp. and Hart INSULATION: Kimsul, Kimberly-Clark Byers Co. Thermostat—Minneapolis-Honey-
Mfg. C o . F i x t u r e s — V i c t o r P e a r l m a n C o . Corp. well R e g u l a t o r C o . W a t e r h e a t e r — C r a n e C o .
82 A R C H I T E C T U R A F O R U M
Page 83 of 149
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. R001 - 2025
A RESOLUTION MAKING A PRELIMINARY LANDMARK DESIGNATION
RECOMMENDATION FOR 3135 PRISCILLA AVENUE
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2025, pursuant to Section 24.025(A) of "The Highland
Park Code of 1968," as amended ("City Code"), Donna Varichak and Jordon Varichak
(collectively, the “Owner”), the record title owners of that certain real property located at
the address commonly known as 3135 Priscilla Avenue in Highland Park, Illinois
("Property"), submitted a written nomination to designate the Property as a landmark; and
D WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24.025(B)(1) of the City Code, a public meeting of
the Commission to consider preliminary landmark designation of the Structure was held on
December 11, 2025 notice of which meeting was delivered on November 12, 2025 to the
Owner; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24.025(B)(2) of the City Code, to make a preliminary
landmark designation recommendation for the Structure, the Commission must, by
R
resolution duly adopted: (i) find that the proposed landmark designation satisfies at least two
of the criteria set forth in Section 24.015 of the City Code; and (ii) determine that the Property
has sufficient integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship to make it worthy of
preservation; and
WHEREAS, the Property demonstrates value as part of the development and cultural
character of the City; and
AF
WHEREAS, the single-family residential structure on the Property was built in the
Contemporary style, and includes many of the architectural features of that style; and
WHEREAS, the single-family residential structure on the Property and site setting
were designed by notable architect, George Fred Keck whose individual work had a strong
influence on the development of the country; and
WHEREAS, the single-family residential structure on the Property embodies
culturally significant and innovative passive solar design; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that the proposed landmark
designation of the Property satisfies the criteria for landmark designation set forth in the
City Code;
T
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as
follows:
SECTION ONE: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and
made a part of, this Resolution as the findings of the Historic Preservation Commission.
SECTION TWO: PRELIMINARY LANDMARK DESIGNATION. In accordance
with, and pursuant to, Section 24.025(B)(2) of the City Code, the Commission hereby: (a)
{00116884.1}
Page 84 of 149
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. R001 - 2025
finds that the Structure satisfies the criteria for landmark designation set forth in Sections
24.015(1), 24.015(4), 24.015(5), and 24.015(6) of the City Code; and (b) determines that the
Structure has sufficient integrity of location, design, materials and workmanship to make it
worthy of preservation. Pursuant to such finding and determination and Section 24.025(B)(2)
of the City Code, the Commission hereby makes a preliminary recommendation to designate
the Structure as a landmark.
SECTION THREE: EFFECT OF DESIGNATION. In accordance with and
D
pursuant to Section 24.025(B)(3) of the City Code, upon the effective date of this Resolution,
the Structure will be considered a "Regulated Structure," as that term is defined pursuant to
Section 24.005 of the City Code.
SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution will be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
R
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED:
AF
APPROVED: December 11, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. R001-2025
____________________________________
Seth Pines, Chairman
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Maddy Markle, Commission Secretary
T
{00116884.1}
Page 85 of 149
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Maddy Markle, Planner I
Date: December 11, 2025
Subject: Determination of Historic Significance:
1373 Oakwood Avenue
Location: 1373 Oakwood Avenue (Formerly 533 Oakwood)
Tomaz Gniedziejko
Petitioner: TG Homes
Historical Name: None
Historical Status: C – Contributing (2006 Bob-O-Link Survey)
Year Built: Circ. 1912
Style: Dutch Colonial Revival
Architect: Unknown
Builder: Unknown
Original Owners: Unknown
· Historic garage (demolished 2014) - 1918-1924
· Front porch enclosed (historic in its own right) - 1924-1933
· Enclosed back porch - 1947-1974
Alterations: · New garage - 2014
· Shingle siding painted over - 1974-2003
· New shutters on front façade – 1974-1994
Summary of the Petition
Tomasz Gneidziejko of TG Homes submitted
a demolition application on October 17th,
2025, to the Department of Community
Development. Lake County Assessor’s tax
data lists the homeowner as Jennifer E.
Swofford. This home has a Contributing
rating, as identified in the 2006 Bob-O-Link
architectural resource survey (Attachment
1). Additionally, the failed 2004 Oakwood
Local Historic District nomination included
1373 Oakwood in its boundaries as a
contributing structure (Attachment 2).
Architectural Analysis
1373 Oakwood Avenue is a two-story, two-
bedroom, single-family home with a
symmetrical façade and front-facing gambrel
roof. A full-width screened in porch with 9-
over-1 windows obscures the lower portion of
Page 1 of 4
Page 86 of 149
the front façade. The second story is clad in wood shingle siding and has two 4-over-4 double-hung-
sash wood windows. A collection of Sanborn maps between 1918 and 1947 show the 1373 Oakwood lot
and main house (formerly, 533 Oakwood before 1950 street renumbering) (Attachment 3).
Alterations
Sanborn maps show the front porch was enclosed between 1924 and 1933. A two car garage was
constructed on the back of the property between 1918 and 1924 (Attachment 3). Between 1947 and
1974 a back porch was constructed and enclosed (Attachment 4 & 5). Between 1974 and 1994
shutters were added to the front façade. The 1920s garage was demolished and replaced in 2014.
(Attachments 6). The shingle siding, originally raw wood, was painted over between 1974 and 2003
(Attachment 7).
1373 Oakwood retains its significant design features such as its gambrel roof, shingle siding, dormers,
4-over-four wood windows, and 1920s enclosed front porch. Existing pictures have been compiled into
Attachment 8.
Architectural Style and Type
The Bob-O-Link survey identifies the home as a Dutch Colonial Revival Style (a Colonial Revival Style
subtype popular between 1910 and 1920 1) and Rectangular Type (Attachment 1). The Dutch Colonial
Revival Style is easily recognized by its distinctive gambrel roof. The Style was loosely derived from
early Dutch houses in the northeastern United States. The Style takes elements of the Victorian Shingle
style and combines them with the gambrel form found in Dutch Colonial homes. In total, there are 9
other Dutch Colonial Revival Style homes in the Bob-O-Link survey area and 75 in the broader Colonial
Revival Style, according to the 2006 Survey Report.
1373 Oakwood is representative of turn-of-the century middle-class housing. Modest housing types
situated on narrow, linear lots are characteristic of the development along Oakwood Avenue from 1901
to 1925. This pattern of development is distinct from the picturesque development that was taking
place concurrently east of Saint John’s Avenue.
1 McAlester, V., & McAlester, A. L. (1984). A Field Guide to American houses.
http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA0139195X
Page 2 of 4
Page 87 of 149
Figure 1. 1373 Oakwood as it was in 1974. 1920s garage (demolished) visible to the right of the main house.
Biographical Information
Irish immigrants John and Mary Faulkner (married in 1911) 2 are known to have owned the property
at 1373 Oakwood between 1912 and 1950 according to the failed Oakwood Historic District
nomination, local historic newspapers, census data, tax records, and deed titles (Attachments 9-11).
John arrived in the U.S. in 1906 and Mary in 1907. According to 1930 census data, John worked as a
construction laborer. The couple had 6 children. Anne Cholewa (daughter of John and Mary) and her
husband Theodore Cholewa, took over the title of the house in 1950 after her father’s death
(Attachments 9-11).
Chain of Title
1. Circ. 1912-1950 John and Mary Faulker
2. Circ. 1950-1974 Anne and Theodore Cholewa
3. 1974-1983 Wilbur and Margret Beaton
4. 1983-1983 Robert Levis
5. 1983-1986 Paul and Wendy Thornycroft
6. 1986-1995 Joel Herm and Bonnie Rose
7. 1995-1999 Beverly and Scott Moss
8. 1999-2010 Stephen and Paulette Swofford
9. 2010-2025 Jennifer Swofford
Recommended Action
Based on the available information, Staff recommends the Commission review the property at 1373
Oakwood Avenue with regard to any of the landmark criteria that they see fit. Staff recommends that
the Commission consider Criteria 1 and 4. If the Commission feels that more historic research may
help in a determination of architectural or historical significance for this house, Staff recommends a
continuation to the next HPC agenda.
Alternatively, if the Commission feels the information provided above is sufficient, a determination
can be made on what, if any, landmark criteria in Chapter 24 are satisfied by the subject property.
In accordance with Section 170.122 Demolition of Dwellings (E)(1) Historic Preservation Commission
Review, the Commission is asked to review the structure per Section 24.015 of the Historic
Preservation Regulations. If the Historic Preservation Commission determines that the Structure that
is the subject of the Demolition Application satisfies:
(1) Four or more of the landmark standards, and has sufficient integrity of location, design,
materials, and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or rehabilitation, then the
commission shall impose a 365-day demolition delay period on such structure, commencing
on the Application Completion date;
(2) two or three of the landmark standards, and has sufficient integrity of location, design,
materials, and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or rehabilitation, then the
commission shall impose a 180-day demolition delay period on such structure, commencing
on the Application Completion date;
(3) one or none of the landmark standards, or does not have sufficient integrity of location, design,
materials, or workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or rehabilitation, then the City
shall proceed immediately to process the application pursuant to all other applicable
provisions of this Code.
2 Record number 086M2287 listed on Lake County Genealogical Research Index.
Page 3 of 4
Page 88 of 149
Landmark Criteria
Below are the landmark criteria and definition of “integrity” from the City Code (Section 24.015):
(1) It demonstrates character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage, or
cultural characteristics of the City, county, state, or country.
(2) It is the site of a significant local, county, state, or national event.
(3) It is associated with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the City,
County, State, or Country.
(4) It embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural and/or landscape style
valuable for the study of a specific time period, type, method of construction, or use of
indigenous materials.
(5) It is identifiable as the work of a notable builder, designer, architect, artist, or landscape architect
whose individual work has influenced the development of the City, County, State, or Country.
(6) It embodies, overall, elements of design, details, materials, and/or craftsmanship that renders it
architecturally, visually, aesthetically, and/or culturally significant and/or innovative.
(7) It has a unique location or it possesses or exhibits singular physical and/or aesthetic characteristics
that make it an established or familiar visual feature.
(8) It is a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure or group of such structures,
including, but not limited to farmhouses, gas stations or other commercial structures, with a high level
of integrity and/or architectural, cultural, historical, and/or community significance.
(9) It possesses or exhibits significant historical and/or archaeological qualities.
Integrity: The degree of original design and historic material remaining in place on a property,
structure, area, object, or landscape of significance. 3
Attachments
1. Attachment 1 – Bob-O-Link Survey Form
2. Attachment 2 –Failed Oakwood Historic District Nomination
3. Attachment 3 – Sanborn Maps, 1918-1947
4. Attachment 4- 1974 Listing - Enclosed Back Porch
5. Attachment 5 – 1988 Plat of Survey
6. Attachment 6 – 2014 Demolition and Construction of New Garage
7. Attachment 7 – 2003 Exterior
8. Attachment 8 – Current Conditions
9. Attachment 9 – Compiled Newspaper Clippings
10. Attachment 10 – Census Data
11. Attachment 11- Evidence of Ownership 1912-1986
3 Integrity refers to original location, materials, workmanship and design. It does not refer to structural
integrity. Matters of structural integrity are outside the purview of the Historic Preservation Commission.
If a building’s structural integrity is a threat to public safety, the Building Code Official will issue an
emergency demolition permit (see Sec. 170.040(F)).
Page 4 of 4
Page 89 of 149
Page 90 of 149
Page 91 of 149
Highland Park Historic Preservation Commission
1707 St. Johns Avenue
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
Landmark District Nomination Form
Date: December 9, 2003
1) Name of District Oakwood Avenue Historic District
2) Street Address: Please see Map of Proposed District
3) Legal description or P.I.N. See List
(Permanent Index Number):
4) Name and Address of See List
Property Owner(s):
5) Present Use: Residential 6) Past Use: Residential
7) Architect: Various 8) Date of Construction: Various
9) Written statement describing property and setting forth reasons it is eligible for landmark
designation:
Oakwood Avenue was originally a part of G.L. Wrenn’s Addition, recorded in 1901 from a survey
drawn by Emil Rudolph. However, Oakwood was an unrecorded subdivision of the City as early as
1872, appearing on a map created by Frank Hawkins, founding member of the Highland Park Building
Company and first mayor of Highland Park.
Early residents of Oakwood Avenue included Rev. George Wrenn, the original subdivider of the area.
Reverend Wrenn organized the first Protestant church in Highland Park in 1872. His home was located
at the northwest corner of Oakwood and Mulberry, although it was demolished and replaced by a
multifamily building in 1960. Mayor Warren M. Sweetland also had his residence on Oakwood (since
demolished) where he originally owned four lots. The Schauffler family lived at what is now 1508
Oakwood. Mr. Schauffler served on the District 108 Board and on the High School Board. Brothers
George and Fred Tucker lived next door to each other in homes which are still standing at 1401 and
1413. Both Tuckers were prominent Highland Park businessmen, and were active in civic
organizations. George Tucker’s daughter, Lillian Tucker, later lived in the home at 1401 and served 43
years as the Secretary of the Board of Education of the Township High School District and was active
in the Highland Park Historical Society.
In 1909 Lincoln School was dedicated on the 100th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln. The
school replaced an earlier shingle-style structure which was no longer adequate to the demands of the
area. It has seen a number of renovations and expansions over the years by various local architects.
The playground to the south of the school is an integral part of the campus, and both properties had
planting plans created by landscape architect Marshall Johnson, son-in-law of Jens Jensen.
Oakwood Avenue developed differently from the winding, picturesque streets east of St. Johns Avenue,
which were intended to attract seasonal residents to lots with lake and ravine views. Judging from U.S.
Census records, the residents of Oakwood were mostly middle class, year-round residents. These
include schoolteachers, gardeners, and small business owners. Because of their year-round proximity to
the life and development of the City, the area contained many civically active residents.
There are a few early homes on Oakwood Avenue but the period of significance for most of those that
remain is from 1910 to 1925. There are many modest examples of the Craftsman style, which
emphasized natural materials and an informal organization of space. Often Craftsman-style homes
expressed their structure through exposed beams and masonry. There are 46 structures included in the
proposed historic district, 32 (69%) which can be considered contributing. There are 14 (31%) non-
contributing structures, which do not add to the district because of their recent date or lack of
architectural integrity. There is one landscape which may be considered significant, depending on
additional research.
K:\Historic Preservation\Historic Districts\OAKWOOD AVENUE\Oakwood NOMINATION FORM 10_02_03.DOC
Page 92 of 149
SOURCES
A Field Guide to American Houses, McAlester & McAlester, 1995.
Central East Comprehensive Architectural Survey, 1999- on file at the Dept. of Com. Dev.
Highland Park Building Division Permit Files
Highland Park News and Highland Park Press Obituaries, on microfilm at the Highland Park Library
Highland Park: The First Hundred Years, Highland Park Historical Society, 1967.
Illinois Historic Structures Survey- accessed through the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency website:
http://gis.hpa.state.il.us/hargis/
Lake County Assessor’s Office- accessed through their website at:
http://www.co.lake.il.us/assessor/assessments/default.asp
Marshall Johnson Landscape Plans- on file at the Dept. of Com. Dev.
Pioneer to Commuter: The Story of Highland Park, Marvyn Wittelle, 1958.
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1912, 1918, 1924, 1933, 1947- on microfilm at HP Library
U.S. Census records accessed through Ancestry.com- 1880, 1920, 1930.
10) These structures are eligible for designation on the basis of 1, 3, 4, 5, 9
the following criteria (see below):
11) Name(s) of Applicant(s):
Christine Benuzzi Muessig
Address:
1508 Oakwood Avenue
Signature(s):
Highland Park, IL 60035
Address(es):
12) Affiliation (Commission Member, Highland Park Environmental Commissioner; 2nd Vice
Owner, City Council, Preservation President, Highland Park Historical Society; Member-
Organization): Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois; Member-
National Trust for Historic Preservation
Significance Determinations:
Contributing Structures
Criteria for Contributing Rating
Must possess distinction in one of the following areas:
(1) It demonstrates character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural
characteristics of the community, county, state or country;
(2) It is the site of a significant local, county, state or national event;
(3) It is identified with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the
community, county, state or country;
(4) It embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural and/or landscape style valuable for the
study of a period, type, method of construction or use of indigenous materials;
(5) It is identifiable as the work of a master builder, designer, architect, artist, or landscape architect
whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state or country;
(6) It embodies, overall, elements of design, detailing, materials, and/or craftsmanship which renders it
architecturally, visually, aesthetically, and/or culturally significant;
(7) It embodies, overall, design elements that make it structurally, visually, aesthetically, and/or
architecturally innovative;
K:\Historic Preservation\Historic Districts\OAKWOOD AVENUE\Oakwood NOMINATION FORM 10_02_03.DOC
Page 93 of 149
(8) It has a unique location or it possesses or exhibits singular physical and/or aesthetic characteristics
that make it an established or familiar visual feature;
(9) It is a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure or group of such structures,
including, but not limited to farmhouses, gas stations or other commercial structures, with a high
level of integrity and/or architectural, cultural, historical and/or community significance; and/or
(10) It possesses or exhibits significant aesthetic, cultural and/or archaeological qualities.
Integrity
Must have a high degree of integrity:
• most architectural detailing in place
• no historic materials or details covered up, no modern siding materials
• no unsympathetic and/or overpowering additions
• only minor porch alterations permitted.
or
• While not of sufficient historic and/or architectural significance to be designated as an individual landmark, it has
the characteristic stylistic design and detail of its period.
• It contributes to the overall visual characteristics of the landmarks located within a historic district.
• It may possess architectural distinction of a contributing structure, but has been altered.
Non-Contributing Structures
Criteria for Non-Contributing Rating
• Most buildings less than 50 years old
• Any building at least 50 years old whose integrity is so poor that most historic materials and details are
missing or completely covered up.
• A building that has unsympathetic alterations that greatly compromise its historic character.
• A structure that does not meet the standards applicable to a landmark or to a contributing structure.
An area nominated for designation as a Historic District shall be identifiable by clear and
distinct boundaries, and it shall possess a significant concentration of regulated structures
united historically, visually, aesthetically, culturally, archaeologically, and/or architecturally
by plan or physical development. (Sec.24.025[D])
K:\Historic Preservation\Historic Districts\OAKWOOD AVENUE\Oakwood NOMINATION FORM 10_02_03.DOC
Page 94 of 149
Properties Included in the Proposed Historic District
PLA_NUMBERPLA_NAME PLA_TYPEBUILT STYLE ARCHITECT RATING OWNER_LAST OWNER_FIRSTOWNER_MI
0 GLENCOE AVE PARK DISTRICT OF HIGHLAND PARK
0 GREEN BAY RD PARK DISTRICT OF HIGHLAND PARK
1357 GREEN BAY RD 1979 Modern James March Goldberg Non-Contributing PATAKY ROBERT R & DONNA M
1371 GREEN BAY RD 1979 Modern James March Goldberg Non-Contributing KAPLAN RICHARD A & SHARON R
1385 GREEN BAY RD 1924 Tudor Revival Unknown Contributing DANIEL RUBIN & RORY DICK
1399 GREEN BAY RD 1963 Modern Morton S. Balaban Non-Contributing ZANE CHAIT, TRUSTEE
1417 GREEN BAY RD 1912 Colonial Revival Unknown Contributing NORMAN SCHUCART, TRUSTEE UTD 08-23-01
711 LINCOLN PL 1909 Classical Revival Unknown Contributing NORTH SHORE SCHOOL DIST #112
622 MULBERRY PL 1927 Colonial Revival Unknown Contributing WILLIAM J CASEY III, TRUSTEE
1365 OAKWOOD AVE 1912 Craftsman Unknown Contributing HEROUX JOHN J & NADINE S
1373 OAKWOOD AVE 1917 Dutch Colonial Revival Unknown Contributing SWOFFORD STEPHEN R & PAULETTE J
1379 OAKWOOD AVE 1925 Craftsman Unknown Contributing BLACK ROBERT M & ELLEN H
1385 OAKWOOD AVE 1925 Dutch Colonial Revival Unknown Contributing NEWLUN WAYNE T
1401 OAKWOOD AVE 1895 Vernacular Unknown Contributing SCOPELLITI ROCCO & GIOVANNA
1413 OAKWOOD AVE c.1890 Italianate Unknown Contributing L GERTZFELD N THORPE
1425 OAKWOOD AVE 1940 Bungalow Unknown Contributing DALE & KRISTINE KELLEY
1426 OAKWOOD AVE 1951 Ranch Unknown Non-Contributing LAMBERTI LIDO & LILIANA
1430 OAKWOOD AVE 1950 Minimal Traditional Ray Houlihan Non-Contributing KRAFT RICHARD E
1435 OAKWOOD AVE 1910 Vernacular Unknown Contributing SERRADIMIGNI BRUNO
1440 OAKWOOD AVE 1953 Minimal Traditional J. Brown Non-Contributing MORDINI RAIMONDO
1443 OAKWOOD AVE 1914 Craftsman Unknown Contributing DUENOW LYNN
1448 OAKWOOD AVE 1962 Minimal Traditional Unknown Non-Contributing 1448 OAKWOOD LLC
1449 OAKWOOD AVE 2002 Neo-Traditional Non-Contributing FARRELL, IV WILLIAM J & LISA A
1456 OAKWOOD AVE 1926 Mission Style Unknown Contributing A ARENAS & L TOLAN
1457 OAKWOOD AVE 1906 Craftsman Unknown Contributing CRAWFORD GARY R
1464 OAKWOOD AVE 1926 Bungalow Unknown Contributing FREED JANET B
1465 OAKWOOD AVE 1914 Craftsman Unknown Contributing MAKKAI ERNEST G & IRINA
1471 OAKWOOD AVE 1921 Craftsman Unknown Contributing FISH JOHN E & MARGARET A
1474 OAKWOOD AVE 1993 Neo-Traditional Non-Contributing SABOL LAURA
1477 OAKWOOD AVE 1914 Craftsman Unknown Contributing NEWCOMB PATRICIA
1478 OAKWOOD AVE 1915 Vernacular Unknown Contributing R SMITH D SMITH A SABOL
1485 OAKWOOD AVE 1920 Craftsman Unknown Contributing PASQUESI CARLO
1486 OAKWOOD AVE c.1915 Craftsman Unknown Contributing W SLOANE S FIELD
1494 OAKWOOD AVE 1920 Craftsman Unknown Contributing COHEN HARVEY J
1495 OAKWOOD AVE 1920 Craftsman Unknown Contributing MARTIN JAMES P
1501 OAKWOOD AVE 1894 Craftsman Unknown Contributing STRAUSS BENTON C & SANDRA K
1508 OAKWOOD AVE 1894 Craftsman Unknown Contributing MUESSIG PAUL & CHRISTINE
1509 OAKWOOD AVE 2001 Neo-Traditional Tom Lindsay Non-Contributing STEIMETZ CHET & DIANE
1519 OAKWOOD AVE 1915 Craftsman Unknown Contributing GIUNTOLI GARY P & SHEREE T
1520 OAKWOOD AVE 2002 Neo-Traditional Tom Lindsay Non-Contributing D.M.C. REALTY, INC.
1529 OAKWOOD AVE 1922 Craftsman Unknown Contributing JOYCE KAMEN TRUST
1530 OAKWOOD AVE 1920 Colonial Revival Unknown Contributing SHANNON GREG J & MARY G
1538 OAKWOOD AVE 1913 American Foursquare Unknown Contributing KLIGERMAN JOEL M & PATRICIA D
1544 OAKWOOD AVE 1986 Modern Non-Contributing BOMMARITO DOMENIC & MARY GRACE
1546 OAKWOOD AVE c.1920 No style Unknown Non-Contributing BOMMARITO DOMENIC & MARY GRACE
1554 OAKWOOD AVE 1912 Craftsman Unknown Contributing KNOX ALAN D & JUDY A
1564 OAKWOOD AVE 1915 American Foursquare Unknown Contributing PAUL & AMALIA GIANNETTI, TRUSTEES
1574-1576 OAKWOOD AVE 1915 American Foursquare Unknown Contributing GRAY STEPHEN J
K:\Historic Preservation\Historic Districts\OAKWOOD AVENUE\Oakwood NOMINATION FORM 10_02_03.DOC
Page 95 of 149
Page 96 of 149
Proposed Oakwood Historic District
1357 GREEN BAY RD
Built: 1979
Architect: James March Goldberg
Style: Modern
Rating: Non-Contributing
History: Built by Wrenn’s Point Limited
Partnership.
1371 GREEN BAY RD
Built: 1979
Architect: James March Goldberg
Style: Modern
Rating: Non-Contributing
History: Built by Wrenn’s Point Limited
Partnership.
1385 GREEN BAY RD
Built: 1924
Architect: Unknown
Style: Tudor Revival
Rating: Contributing
Description: Stucco veneer; arched wood front door;
English windows with shutters; “eye-
brow” entry;
History: Formerly 529 S. Green Bay Road. The
first owner of this property was S. T.
Rebling.
Page 97 of 149
1399 GREEN BAY RD
Built: 1963
Architect: Morton S. Balaban
Style: Modern
Rating: Non-Contributing
History: This home was built by Joseph Ariano
Construction Company.
1417 GREEN BAY RD
Built: 1912
Architect: Unknown
Style: Classical Revival
Rating: Contributing
Description: white stucco veneer; pedimented entry
with supporting columns; fanlight over
door; elaborate masonry chimney
History: Formerly 511 S. Green Bay Road
622 MULBERRY PL
Built: 1927
Architect: Unknown
Style: Colonial Revival
Rating: Contributing
Description: Red brick veneer; double-hung paired
wood windows with 6 over 1 panes; entry
porch with supporting wood columns,
dentils, and arched canopy; front door with
sidelights
History: Formerly 504 Sheridan Place. Original
owner was Melvin D. Sweetland
Page 98 of 149
1365 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1912
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: full length dormer with shed roof; deep,
full-length porch; wood shingle siding;
History: The old address for this property was 535-
537 Oakwood Ave. According to the 1920
and 1930 census, the owners were Stephen
and Anne Sienerth. Mr. Sienerth was a
gardener for private homes.
1373 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1917
Architect: Unknown
Style: Dutch Colonial Revival
Rating: Contributing
Description: front gable, double-pitched roof; enclosed
porch; wood shingle siding; shuttered
second story windows;
History: Formerly 533 Oakwood. In 1920 and 1930
the residents of this home were John and
Mary Faulker, and their family. Mr.
Faulkner worked as a laborer.
1379 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1925
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: second story dormer with gable roof and
triple windows; screened porch; wood knee
brackets under gables;
History: The original owners of this home were
Virgin and Blanche Musser. Mr. Musser
worked as a municipal city clerk.
Page 99 of 149
1385 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1925
Architect: Unknown
Style: Dutch Colonial
Rating: Contributing
Description: double-pitched roof with cross gable;
stucco veneer; 1 story front sun porch with
hipped roof; six over 1 double-hung
windows; entry with metal awning; second
story triple window with metal awning
History: Original owner was Albert H. Rubly. In
the 1930 census Mr. Rubly was listed as a
paper salesman. There was a room
addition in 1955 and a new garage added in
1960. Fomerly 525 Oakwood.
1401 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1895
Architect: Unknown
Style: Vernacular
Rating: Contributing
Description: L-form house with front facing gable;
enclosed wrap-around porch with double
hung windows; wood shingle siding;
History: The original owner, George Tucker, came to
Chicago in 1891 as a carpenter for the 1893 World’s Fair. In 1895
he came to Highland Park and became active in local business. He
ran the Lake Shore Creamery, and later the Ravinia Grocery and
Meat Market. His future wife, Caroline Tucker, came to Highland
Park in 1886 with Frederick W. Cushing, private secretary to
Elisha Gray and builder of the Moraine Hotel. They were married
in 1901. George initially worked in partnership with his brother,
Fred, who lived in the house immediately to the north. George
Tucker died in 1930, and Caroline Tucker died in 1941. They had
two children- George Lloyd and Lillian. Lillian Tucker remained
in the family home at 1401 Oakwood. Ms. Tucker was the
Secretary of the Board of Education of District 113 for 43 years.
She was also one of the original founders of the Highland Park
Historical Society. Original address, 519 Oakwood.
Page 100 of 149
1413 OAKWOOD AV
F.A. Tucker Residence
Built: c.1890
Architect: Unknown
Style: Italianate
Rating: Contributing
Description: one story bay window; paired second story
windows; enclosed porch; entry with
gable-front canopy; artificial siding
History: Fred Tucker moved to this home in 1902.
At that time Mr. Tucker expanded his
business, the Lake Shore Creamery, to
serve the entire North Shore. In 1917 he
went into the real estate business. He was
very active in Highland Park civic
organizations, including the Highland Park
Business Men’s Association, and the
Highland Park Presbyterian Church. He
died in 1952. They had 4 children- Gladys,
Bernice, Earle and Edith. Original address
515 Oakwood.
1425 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1940
Architect: Unknown
Style: Bungalow
Rating: Contributing
Description: stucco veneer; front-facing second story
dormer with shed roof; north facing
through-the-cornice dormer with shed roof;
full-length front porch
History: Formerly 509 Oakwood.
1426 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1951
Architect: Jones and Duncan
Style: Ranch
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: low-pitched roof; gridded picture window
with decorative shutters; exposed roof
beams
History: Don Ronzani was the original owner of
this home. There were additions made in
1977.
Page 101 of 149
1430 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1950
Architect: Ray Houlihan
Style: Minimal Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: gable-front with sheltered entry; common
brick veneer;
History: The first owner was Fortunato B.
Amendola.
1435 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1910
Architect: Unknown
Style: Vernacular
Rating: Contributing
Description: gable-front; enclosed porch with hipped
roof; shed roof dormers; rear additions;
History: In 1920 Mary Garrity and her family lived
here with her 2 sisters and 2 brothers.
Mrs. Garrity was employed as a domestic
servant. Electrical engineer John B.
Jackson lived at this address in 1930.
Formerly 501 Oakwood.
1440 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1953
Architect: J. Brown
Style: Minimal Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: low-pitched roof;wide eaves; gable vent;
History: Darwin E. Inman was the original owner of
this home. This house suffered fire
damage in 1964.
Page 102 of 149
1443 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1914
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: wood shingle siding; gable front; full-
length porch; gabled dormers;
History: Louise Weiskoff was the owner of this
home in 1927, when the porch was added.
She was listed in the 1930 census as a
lampshade designer. Original address, 497
Oakwood.
1448 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1962
Architect: Uknown
Style: Minimal Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: gabled front; sheltered entry; integral
garage; brick and siding veneer
1449 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1924
Architect: Unknown
Style: Neo-Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: wood shingle siding; portal and half-round
windows; white wood trim; masonry
foundation; entry porch with column
History: This home has seen extensive alterations.
Page 103 of 149
1456 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1926
Architect: Unknown
Style: Mission
Rating: Contributing
Description: side gable; front sun-room; arched french
windows with keystones and iron
balconies; cast stone parapet with
decorative cast stone urns; buttressed
walls;
History: Formerly 448 Oakwood. Fred Bremmer, a
cabinetmaker, lived here with his family in
1930.
1457 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1906
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: White stucco veneer; second story dormers
with shed roof; entry porch; side addition
with divided light windows;
History: Formerly 489 Oakwood. Grace Coale
lived here with her family and several
roomers in 1930. This apparently served
as a boarding house for some time.
Additions constructed in 1988.
1464 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1926
Architect: Unknown
Style: Bungalow
Rating: Contributing
Description: brick veneer; gabled side dormers; bay
window; arched porch entry with
decorative cast stone elements; double
hung 3/1 windows;
History: Charles Werhane was the original owner of
this home. Original address 444 Oakwood.
Page 104 of 149
1465 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1914
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: wood shingle siding; triangular pediment
entry porch with supporting columns; 3/1
double-hung windows; triple and double
grouped windows;
History: In 1920 August and Anna Larson lived
here. Mr. Larson was a gardener for a
private estate. By 1930 they had two
roomers- Benjamin and Jadelle Landsman,
who were orchestra musicians. Former
address 445 Oakwood.
1471 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1921
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: wood siding; full-length porch; 3/1 double-
hung windows; gable front dormer with
decorative knee braches; exposed rafters;
oriel window with shed roof;
History: Clinton and Perl Fritsch were the owners in
1927, when the garqage was added. An
attic room was constructed in 1932. Mr.
Frisch was a plumbing clerk. Former
address 443 Oakwood.
1474 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1993
Architect: 0
Style: Neo-Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: divided light windows; front facing garage;
complex roof-line; palladian window
configurations
Page 105 of 149
1477 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1914
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: green stucco veneer; full length porch with
supportin rectangular columns; wood trim;
domer with triangular pediment and
decorative oblong window;
History: In 1930 this was the home of Hugo and
Marie Schneider. Mr. Schneider was the
Highland Park Postmaster. Former address
439 Oakwood.
1478 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1915
Architect: Unknown
Style: Gable Front
Rating: Contributing
Description: front gable; side additions; artificial siding;
History: Original Address 436 Oakwood. Charles
Dreyer and his wife Lillian Lived her in
1930. Mr. Dryer is listed as an insurance
bondsman.
1485 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1920
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: white stucco veneer; attached garage
addition; front porch; second story dormer;
History: The residents of this home in 1930 were
Laurence and Eugenie Briggs. This home
saw major alteration in 1964, when the
current garage was added. Former address
433 Oakwood.
Page 106 of 149
1486 OAKWOOD AV
Built: c.1915
Architect: Unknown
Style: Colonial Revival
Rating: Contributing
Description: white stucco veneer; 3/1 double hung
windows; third floor dormer with shed
roof; front sun porch with half timber
details; hipped roof entry porch;
History: Former address 430 Oakwood. In 1930
banker Edward Hintz and his wife Ella
lived here. This structure was included in
the Illinois Historic Structures Survey of
the 1970s. Since then the roof dormer has
been added.
1494 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1920
Architect: Unknown
Style: Dutch Colonial Revival
Rating: Contributing
Description: stucco veneer; gabled entry porch; second
story dormers with shed roofs;
History: In 1920 Albert Goodman, a mechanical
engineer, lived here. Knute Sedig and his
family lived her in 1930. Mr. Sedig was
listed as a photo engraving salesman.
Former address 426 Oakwood.
1495 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1920
Architect: Uknown
Style: Craftsman w/Tudor detailing
Rating: Contributing
Description: red brick veneer; double hung wood
windows with brick sills and lintels; 1
story enclosed porch with half timber
details;
History: In 1930 Arthur and Alice Bell lived in this
home. Mr. Bell was a brick mason.
Former address 429 Oakwood.
Page 107 of 149
1501 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1999
Architect: Tom Lindsay
Style: Neo-Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: cast stone foundation veneer; brick and
ashlar side-loading garage; double-hung
windows; paver driveway
1508 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1894
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: wood shingle siding; 6/1 double hung
wood windows; wrap-around porch;
pyramidal roof; garage addition; paver
driveway;
History: Former address 420 Oakwood. Charles
Schauffler built this home for his family,
including his parents and six sons. Mr.
Schauffler served on the District 108 Board
in 1909 and on the High School Board.
This home was included in the Illinois
Historic Structures survey of the 1970s. It
has recently undergone extensive
rehabilitation.
1509 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 2001
Architect: Tom Lindsay
Style: Neo-Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: brick, cast-stone and siding veneer; side
loading garage; double gable roof;
dormers;
History: This structure replaced a home designed by
local architect Robert Seyfarth.
Page 108 of 149
1519 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1915
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: low-pitched gabled roof; artial width porch
with supporting columns; exposed rafters;
decorative beams;
History: F. Bre mmer was the owner of this home in
1927, and Walter C. Flinn in 1931.
Howard H. Flinn was the owner in 1954,
when the garage was added. The former
address was 417 Oakwood.
1520 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 2002
Architect: Tom Lindsay
Style: Neo-Traditional
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: brick and stone façade; oriel window;
attached garage; 6/6 double hung windows;
brick paver driveway;
1529 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1922
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: decorative beams; side-gabled roof;
encosed porch; second story front-gabled
dormer; entry with sidelights;
History: Andrew and Rose Yowell were the owners
of this home in 1930. Mr Yowell was a
paint store proprietor. Former address 409
Oakwood.
Page 109 of 149
1530 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1920
Architect: Unknown
Style: Colonial Revival
Rating: Contributing
Description: full-width porch with supporting columns;
double-hung windows with decorative
shutters;
History: The owner of this home in 1920 was
Elwood.J. Pratt, who owned a cigar store
with his father, who also lived at this
address. Former address 408 Oakwood.
1538 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1913
Architect: Unknown
Style: American Foursquare
Rating: Contributing
Description: red brick veneer; full-width porch with
supporting columns; double-hung
windows; hipped roof; attic dormer with
hipped roof;
History: Former address 404 Oakwood. In 1920
Jesse Johnson, a bank teller, lived here
with his family. Joseph Mooney, a golf
club laborer, lived here with his family in
1930, along with two roomers. Boarders
William Schultz was a dentist, and Harold
Schultz (possibly his son) was a public
school art teacher.
1544 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1986
Architect:
Style: Modern
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: red brick veneer; slid ing windows; 1 and 2
story sections
Page 110 of 149
1546 OAKWOOD AV
Built: c.1920
Architect: Unknown
Style: No style
Rating: Non-Contributing
Description: red brick veneer; sliding windows; 1 and 2
story sections; significant updating and
alterations
History: Formerly 320 Oakwood.
1554 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1912
Architect: Unknown
Style: Craftsman
Rating: Contributing
Description: side-gabled roof with exposed rafters and
decorative wood braces; paired double
hung windows; front sun porch with brick
and wood siding; entry porch with
pedimented awning and supporting wood
brackets; attic dormer with gabled roof;
History: Former address 318 Oakwood. Arther
Hagemen, a building construction
engineer, lived here as a renter with his
wife Helga in 1930.
1564 OAKWOOD AV
Built: 1915
Architect: Unknown
Style: American Foursquare
Rating: Contributing
Description: red brick veneer; paired windows; hipped
roof; hipped roof attic dormers; first and
second story additions;
History: According to the 1930 Census the owner of
this home was Ray Sherwin, a hardware
foundry manager. The former address was
314 Oakwood.
Page 111 of 149
1574-1576 OAKWOOD AV
Built: c.1915
Architect: Unknown
Style: American Foursquare
Rating: Contributing
Description: red brick and stucco veneer; pyramidal
roof with attic dormer; partially enclosed
front porch with decorative windows;
History: In 1930 the Dreger and Lindblom families
lived in this double house. Arthur Dreger
was a manager for a radiator manufacturer
and Harry Lindblom was involved in
shipping clothing. The former address
was 308-310 Oakwood.
Page 112 of 149
Not Included in Original Proposed District
711 LINCOLN AV
Lincoln School
Built: 1909 (additions 1928, 1937, 1949,and
1956)
Architect: Unknown (John Van Bergen, 1928 and
1937; Bertram Weber, 1949; Childs &
Smith, 1956)
Style: Classical Revival (Gothic Revival
additions)
Rating: Contributing
Description: Pressed metal cornice with brackets;
massive cast-stone column s flanking entry,
which is framed by smaller columns; cast
stone lintels; decorative brick corners;
replacement windows
History: This school replaced the Fairview School,
an 1886 shingle style building. The new school was
dedicated on the 100th birthday of Abraham Lincoln. In 1928
local architect John S. Van Bergen designed a 6 room
addition and in 1937 a 7 room addition. In 1949 Bertram
Weber was hired for interior renovations. In 1949 landscape
architect Marshall Johnson developed a planting and paving
plan for the courtyard of the school In 1956 the firm Childs
& Smith completed a school-wide renovation and
modernization. .
Lincoln Place Park
Lincoln School Park encompasses 5 acres of recreational
grounds for the students of Lincoln School. In 1931
Marshall Johnson, the son-in-law of Jens Jensen, developed a
planting plan for both the park and Lincoln School. It is not
clear if this plan was ever implemented.
Page 113 of 149
1918
1924
Page 114 of 149
1933
1947
Page 115 of 149
Page 116 of 149
Page 117 of 149
SAAAW, INC
34.1 1114 ILL 60076
1212 4
6 311
THE NORTH HALF Or LOT ZOo BLOCK 3 IN. G. L WRE' S Abb I -T- tOW 70 C 1 1.Y- OF HIGHLAND
AND - PARK
BEIIQ A SLIODIVIS1.04, IN THE "
IR EAST Q'UkAfE0 tf SECT1, 04 26, 7 OWNSHJP. 43 NORTH, RANGE
t2, EAST. - OF THE TMtRb. PAIWCfPAL KRIDIAbr' ACCOWING JO THE ' PLAT THERE Ofo RECORDED
MARCH I I i 1901., AS DOCUMENT &* 5tp IN 800 ' C OP, PLATS, FAdEs. 44 AND 45 IN' LAKE
COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
tr
is
KAU: I rock
STATE OF ILUMM
cotamopcooK I IS,
1. NXHAAL J. MATTS, 0 rugisfoomd 8111" is Uad Swvfyor. do bda* "
ORDER NO, 32.2-63 pmw" devdb" ae" and drat dw plot drown h
0* *
0 1 haw sw,# F" dw
DAM :. d5
A.D. N60--
o* Dmm syl
410141s togWw* d land Swevavw No. 2104
Vftm& ft an sltawnllm I* et and dedmSk and So& carnet of N dayraaa Fahrmthelt.
RESURVEY:
SEPTEMBER
DATED THIS 51 1_ DAY OF
or /
A, D. j.
2. ok" , - Z lw__.
4wr
a WW6Wthm". wfbe # vb dk4w" 00.
4. Caaailt low M* Wdtw few komakop Kae 00ANA04 by ucw mmaw
v p Na. 210A
Page 118 of 149
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
GHL4
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
7
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
U
BUILDING DMSION
1150 HALF DAY ROAD, HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS 60035
tir ,
0RNt ( 847) 432- 0808 • FAX ( 847) 926-8885
Web: www. cityhpil. com
Construction
Site Address
Master Permit Number BPX_ C- tLi^ 60 SS`%
13" 13 0A1C_w00p
Owners Building Permit Number` Q A CC' l 4^ 00SS9
Name J E N S W 0 K F OR -0
Owners
Estimated Construction
Address
Cost ( exclusive of Land) $ 14, 1100
Owners
Telephone
Obstruction
Architect' s 1
iC
Business Name N
IA Building - New, Alter, or Remodel
Contact
Name Interior Demolition
Business
Address Exterior Demolition
Telephone
X Structure Demolition
Office Cell
Email_
Address Fence
General Contractor
Business Name Dan s G2124R, WOY Temporary Construction Trailer
Contact `'
Name Ahd red, vf, 0Lynort_ Curb Crossing
Business
l
O Z & C.. N byn K Driveway New or Repair
C11
Address Q
4
Ij
one
Offices- n 0 it- 4531
Cell 2_1\- Waiver Required
Email _.
1-
Xy\CA,nnOyC• f)XX Guarantee Deposit Required
Address 1U•/
OV-drC® \
General Contractors
License Number (
A 319 1a S Q_ Number of Driveway
Approaches
Bond - 7 e olQJ Total Guaranteed Deposit
II -OL
Insurance 1 3 Qp 1 & I
Owners Name (
Please Print JEtV W O F F )V_)D
Total Permit Fees Due
Owners j_
Signature I Date / AA-,—
AI
Ci l
Applicant' s
Comments:
v
Signature Signature I Date 1 j t Y)j 4
flekc, tieh
By signing this document you acknowledge and agree that all the informa-
tion provided is true and accurate on your behalf. You further acknowledge
ve read and accept all responsibilities listed in the conditions and
WaIV Ftf back of this sheet referred to as page 2.
10 2014 - j0ll
f/_
l,3 / y
J-
Page 119 of 149
Page 120 of 149
Front Elevation
Page 121 of 149
2014 Garage
Page 122 of 149
Back Elevation (1994 Addition)
Page 123 of 149
1928
1942
1945
Page 124 of 149
1946
1950
Page 125 of 149
Page 126 of 149
- ------ ::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::-::--:-:---:-::-:-:--..:.. --�- -,..--- ------- - - -- ---- -- ---- -- - - - --- - - -------- --
r -� HOl�-;,R�::-:::::'.::::-7;'.
11 O'l'Y,J,, J,A:-;;:;::-;
--•--,:,.,:-;;-:::;;;;--;:- - - -
llml;�t Uu,r•t1 Nu. •tl--lll44,-A11rl'<l>'•l ".111 ilt1 l).,....,.n1b,,r SI, 1950.
•
-·-r.-:-:-"'·"'·i<- ---------'.;..---'-.----- _ --
l "_l_'A_l_l'-r"'---;.,...
l E_ _'_'_
• .-- .;.
OO,\IJNO UOU8F., 1N8Tl'l'tJTH)N, MlJ,rrA.RY INS'1'Al,LA'l'ION, R'l'O. S H E E.T Jl 10
--- Nnuio ------.. Nawa ---
------ ---·-- - - --____....
-- - --
CONFIDENTIAL Thlslnqnity I.ti a.uthorl1ed by Act orcon;rffl (MJ f:Hat. 21: 13 U. !J. 0. 201�218) which requJ.re11 thnt a report be matle.
'l'ho lnfonnallc.u furul:iltO\l ls tlC\lorJtid l"Onl1de:rnh,l lrootwc1H, 'l'ho Oeul!US rtiport cauuoi bo usod ror purJIOstU ol
N
_ •_
" Al' :o,
__ _ L
\'l'Ul
'f!J.t-
,_.
-------·--__;_
' ltMO NUMBER
_, _,._._i._._"'_'"'_"_"_""_•_' _''_�-�-•t-;-:··-·D_E_P_A_ _T_M_E _
l-:-:,---- ----·--------1---- f 0 RM R _N T_O_F_C_O_M_M_E_R_C_E_______,-.-,-, �.
;
� �""� '-' �1J
" %<£)
l
uij. ' 'ypo 'J'yp,i •
�U�<G::l-... BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
p1 71
" --------
• OIIE 'KKU nY
-
,--N----------- --1-- --- _______ ___
""�� ,
/J
�o�.
-1- � ��-·----·--'-Ll:_ ::... ,_·-:._-:._---
. .
• • .-
� " :_- - -
-
• "'
1 1
"'
_ ._ _ _ .� _ _
v'_._Liu· - _
•-N •
•·_-=.-=:_-=:_--=-.-_' " 1
�==---==-· 1950 (ENS US Of POPULATION AND HOUSING
-----Jl�-1---,J.- u.._ cc..���•�:!::
<!!....,)-==··--·-::.f!.._;0-<l_-_, _.,._1...__---1
::
-,-Tru=..;-;
FOR HEAD=-;-;:;:- -;.. ---:= === =-::-:: ::-r- -- -· -- -- ·----·--------· - --- · - --------------·-- ..
t---'-·r---OF- HO
--USE
-r- --IIOLD -1------------
-,- � FOR ALL PERSONS --- ·�------·�--..;_�------·---
NAME Jtl-11,A'I'lONSUIP SEX l. lf<uuployed (\Vk lu It-Om 16, or ,•c11 In ltmn Hi or ltea1 18), d;,scrlbo Joi, or bwtlncss bol,l lQ..'l, Vh'(!li:
2. I flooklni; for wtn k ( Y&.� ln I !em 17), dcaulbe IMtjob or bwln�II
lfNo Whal i• the nan10 of the ho•d or this 3. For oil othor perso113, Jo11,vo blank
In lttiu
,.
•- housoboldf
Whal a1·e the ••mes or all other persona Class of worker
lhla "·J10 liYe )1erer
houae
lo on a
houae
llou�e Ihle place For PHIVATPJ en1plo7cr ( Pl
Sodal Por OOVF:HNMHN'r (0)
(and 11umbe1 ol
apart• ona In O\VN bu.,tne&1 (0)
three
mtnO
nuu1oot
ofJ\fell
lng uult farm
(or
., \\"ITUOU'I' PAY on fomlly
farrn or bu•Jnt.sit { NI�)
more
RUlch)? acrea?
(Ye:,or
No)
2
C, I I
I
3
6
I I
•
'
1...........1
I I I
(V IELOW
•••
QIEI.
. I
I
8
l t./ � �f-
�
••••••••• ............
I r,...:,. ��-� lV__ s
• ,1+ •r;,
-- tJ.. - '.l{��?�,a,,,' cf)_;Jfi.
0
.
1 I 0
I
I , f•
10
j_p !�
.j .......
-N)
tJ _\ ..... .it... f· �·-· r �.,�... I Iu
I
.. I J- r •
y
.
11
W ifl.A./!J
II I I
...... .. II
......... ..t
I �
.... ®
Pll
I 1
'
®.,. QUC
1
&iNE IELOW
13
tJ r!f I ...; ,1.v J · ,
j
fi 13
j- �-,i;l �i:i:�
J ·I
·---• 4- &2,,1 . L 4/ (1 ,JL/2 ,,_f:tclk�-, • -·
14
-
�- .. ,no. ... l ... ,.8� ....... . �l '·----·
.. .. .. ...... 1·· . . /f.f:-.. .......�..................;.... ��.�.................... ✓-? ·--'� .:r::.L.�'---� ::
,-.--- - - -'S"'·-
Zk<.
I
1
1f�!.!··j'··I
I
............ � •.... --· tJ.. �. 3-s:. c& . ........... .: .... .
15 ✓ -::i:_
16
1 L.f 6'- 1 I 8�
r·••· ®
,,-n{) I o-,.<Jjni,/)
I I
I ··-·----�-------------------•--l--"----"---l-....1.--
-' I
�
ll
crd,:_, -4>
1
1 ®��
_________1 __�-------'-----------·----·-------------'--.i...------'-i--..;:•a:•::;•':.;;.i•
...................: . . .. i
INI
1
· -··· ........M. I .fr.:�!r:_:!!:'. . .��.
---------- ·•---
j,/
J6 -- ------- ···-- '.k..
18
-----·- ·----···
-- ....,.... e, 1P '�•J: ll �
-·-··· ··-··-···r;,.... �i:;:;�l, .�.�
-·-!--- �........,._#$_I J'�a�d.-,___:_���
,
- _ l:d__ i _:z�
19 �.{
-7 �:;o2)7:-�--n:r20
. ....
20 •
.f!f.
l
---·
7-J l- :. -. : �.....2_,....__
______ _! _______ ... �.--':::. 1 -�------ .. ---
.'.{,,.. i- ........ ......
21
,4/k :
j,/ Q.., . ��r>n.a,,,��
I J4 ! • ®�t�..
��t.J ::.......i..
•
,.._,______+----:------....,.--·--------------------==- +- -:i,-,-'-f-r:;.;;.;;.&
IELOW
23
.7 ?.J.... Ir .� ......
•
24
2&
,I ._ !!.L.,_ ·- .21_ -! · 1· �� . -
//.. ;!/ If.
26 2U
/j���'}YUW�
·••·@
PlE
l�J:J1 � � -·--+--
.t,M�tt1w____\_,__ : · __.:i.��: 1.ffe� "�.P...���::: ::::�d.�
0���0���-· L,M,,,..!:::':.. !:!' ::...::
�,a,,.v� -
� ��u�,'./::..
� )+'
_: .1 '.�.Sa: 0 :::.. ; : .:.. ' .::� ® g�}�,!!J•;,
C.1_1-: :::.!
I= I
LUil
� .� l--71 1:"LJ . J.: -�
I I
-· 1·--· -·t&<.�
·
�=-....'
.., l
28 •
I 28
-- ·--- ··-··--······-·-···---····-.1--...•. --·------,----·-·-···-· ---
cf,;-,._-� . . i:f..U_f� ! /a! -1-'--·�,. I •I
���
. I
20 20
---l-----ll---•, ------------ I
'
tJ r7 g ' I
•
•
30 30
HOUSEHOLD CONTINUED ON NEXT SHEET [j!IJ,-
------------------·-·--------- _ -·--------- ---------------------------------------------------·----·---·--------------------·--·-----------------
..__
-�. ------------··----·-·------ ·------·•'l'!{J;_ QUES'l'IONS BELOW ARE FOil PERSONS LISTED_QN SA!\'Il�F; l,!_N!�_f:l ___________. __, __________ ________
Jo'OR Al,L AGES
------· ·----·------ Jo'OR l'EllSONS 14 YEARS OF AGJ,J AND OVEil
---, ---·,--------- - - I( 1\tllle-
J(No In
1t�n121-
J@
• -
Uuin 25: 00"1).F..Jl ror ,:RAJH� .A'l''tt!NO.EO I( wnrk,•d l,\;1( )Car (J nr JTihtO
a,t. 'l'o ! IHlll\()'lltor!;�JJ: \\'hut l.dtHI c,f \\'Ork di<l thb, \\'hat kind of hu!iis1C�ij ur I1 (�l:1,�.1.1
of \\'Drknr
wrpl;� i11 i !em lH tlu:nJ nny '-'lltry l11 Hem" JH:1'8011 du in hl::1 lal"Jl job'! indu:,try did bu work i11? 1 (P 1 ll, 0, or �p
Nnn<•---- ....... ... _ •..• ,.,. ______ ....... ,, ;.,.�----.:. O 201:1. ZHb, 1111d 2uc?
. I
D
@·1
'Kl!'J"llttifll.rtih..,--.4�.;, , •• ,• .,..�--�--····••··•� •• K n.s iu ih:Ul �Oo)
•
l�itht>r l�) lu\hl ot':bvuaebl)Jrl 1' ith rrh,t..,,i rwt;wll:;. r,r�ent In hnLtseholrl Yct:1--Rk{p t.o il1JH1 30
DK
F:f�j,�,tt,. 'tAl-l �rJllOU :
.lJ,
t":lcmCinh,rr (If p:r. J ttl�} ...... ,,. ....... . ___ -·. .. • •., � • � t tt1 $8 r,r (b} pm:si.rJ1 11n.rt1M-t11 to lttill..1'.•llold .iuwd-J;ut wttb 11tt!llitt'( t'�li.it!,l. 1t, t1\l)J_ 1l--- !al� �-� b�, i Q lt�fl't �;.,, 3��. �lld n5r - .. - \, ;
u111n(,�ye.ara>�-,.�. �- �....,•� ..,. � ..:.., .•. -�-.�· .ss.�no. 11.s12 .1brt1;d ho.low Jtim ..,n t-hv �h�luh........ r.ir �lflffiJllt: l,o,l;i:er wl!h wHr __ ., -� I -·--�·---' ...--- ! -
Ji:JiE":JV.�1J\>Ut_)'.,-JUNTtHt•.�EN:Ioll UlOJl: JG. J( O\ rr 1nnrric•J (;\l:,r, \\'d, t.•rS1:11 �17. lf '.\Jar lfuwn1•nyy(' ll.t�fincethis pr-r,1ir1v.. :a${1td)1n.irrierl 7 J8, lftennl<'iln•l•tc ·r 1n.1rri�,1 (1oh1t, \\-'d,
,Di: nt,_fl1 11,,ntw.hQkl "' !CONT. 1 l>, '1r l"••pn\1�••111 l:!J-
Kh1mu1uar � tel �r&dl;.fL.u�.. - � .... '. ....�..Je� ••1....._,._-� Rl tu.Sf< _, 1n J\1•:n l'.!1- 1{ \YI! -!tow n11111y y1·11rs iinr.c this \H'.non wa, whlo"'t•d?
J111Jlt1r hllh (3.}'ffirJ)__ ,,.:-.., . ., "··•--•➔·-··•-'-'+ • 87, RR, 81t J fl, 111)"11 many y1•1n1 :-iun: thii f1tr,.. n wa1 divorced? llr,w 111any 1.hildren l,11, ,hu ever
8t11)ior h1g11 (3 Yl?alS)•• ·····-- �:·:�. ·-· -�"-.-�·-__ _. SIO, Hit, !=!JZ l Jns thi1,1 tJCl.'1011 been ru::.rtiec.J n1orc
00 Ll,Y.0 E f) \i UN IV BRMJ'r,•· " _• (hnn onrc? fr :'\cp Jlov, 111111y ye11rs 1nncc thh J)erion w.1s .eepar,tcd1 l1>l111e, f\lll c.ounting tilillhirtlu?
l1r..,h!tgh�<1lll\lti (-t f6!1r1).. ��", . � . �..-- -� .".�,,.. ...-:.. •-' Ct,oi_ (:.3. P.l -- P -- childrct1, or O Nono
•
m,.rJUf\lgt,r, Jlttif""5io.nal y.atlool (I l''flr.i;lf rnure)"' _. Ct ___.. r1•;tr,:4, or � f,es.--. th.nu l 1r.nr
• ...__
•
• • •
•
Page 127 of 149
Page 128 of 149
Page 129 of 149
Page 130 of 149
Page 131 of 149
Page 132 of 149
Page 133 of 149
Page 134 of 149
Page 135 of 149
Page 136 of 149
Page 137 of 149
Page 138 of 149
Page 139 of 149
Page 140 of 149
Page 141 of 149
Page 142 of 149
Page 143 of 149
Memorandum
Date: December 11, 2025
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Maddy Markle, Planner I
Subject: Discussion – Encouraging Historic Preservation
Request for Feedback.
Staff requests further Commission feedback regarding how to encourage historic
preservation.
Background
At its Sep. 8, 2025 meeting, the City Council considered a Code amendment related to
Historic Preservation and directed staff to work with the Historic Preservation Commission
to develop a recommendation on how the City could encourage historic preservation. At its
September 11, 2025 meeting, the Historic Preservation Commission (“HPC”) directed staff
to research preservation incentives for discussion at its Nov. 13, 2025 meeting.
At the Nov. 13, 2025 meeting, the HPC discussed three monetary incentives: matching grants,
tax abatements, and permit fee waivers; and two regulatory-based considerations –the
number of properties required for a Local Historic District nomination and land-use
regulations related to setbacks for historic properties. Staff’s approach focused on
preservation tools aimed at spurring voluntary landmark nominations and the
restoration/rehabilitation of Regulated Historic Structures. The Commission also raised and
discussed two penalty-based approaches to yield the preservation of historic homes.
The following is an overview of the topics discussed at the Nov. 13, 2025 HPC meeting and
the feedback provided by the Commission.
Historic Rehabilitation Matching Grants
There was consensus among Commissioners that a Historic Rehabilitation Matching Grant
program could be layered with other incentives. Commissioners noted that restoration and
rehabilitation are costly and that any such program should be limited to exterior work on
Regulated Historic Structures with prior approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness. There
was interest in further restricting grants to income eligible households.
Questions Requiring Further Research:
The dollar amount needed to incentivize historic preservation.
Income eligibility requirements.
Policy Question for Commission:
1
Page 144 of 149
Memorandum
Allow for any property that is deemed significant by the Commission to be eligible, or
limit matching grants to already Regulated Historic Structures only (all designated
landmarks, and those within local historic districts, or both)?
o If not already a Regulated Historic Structure, require that the property (home)
become a Regulated Historic Structure to qualify?
Local Property Tax Abatements
There was consensus among Commissioners that a local property tax abatement could be
useful. One Commissioner suggested that a property tax abatement should be modeled after
the State Property Tax Assessment Freeze 1. Staff notes that local sentiment towards the State
program is negative due to its significant requirements. Staff have found that it does not
encourage local landmark designation. 2 Residents complain that the Secretary of the Interior
Standards are too strict, that the period of abatement is too short, and that the State makes
it difficult to review work retroactively.
Additionally, the State model holds no value for homeowners who do not plan to, or cannot,
undertake a major rehabilitation. The State requires that homeowners expend at least 25%
of the assessed property value on a rehabilitation. This creates a large financial barrier for
homeowners who cannot afford up-front rehabilitation costs.
Policy Question for Commission:
Staff seek feedback from the Commission regarding a local abatement structure that
would require that a property be voluntarily landmarked to be eligible, but have
significantly fewer other requirements. Essentially, how might the City improve upon
the State model through a local property tax abatement?
Land-Use Incentives
A consensus was not achieved regarding the use of land-use incentives as a preservation tool.
However several Commissioners were supportive of Bonus FAR, building height exemptions,
and/or setback relief (front, side, or rear), etc. Several Commissioners stated land-use
incentives should be considered subject to dual approvals from the Zoning Board of Appeals
and HPC through a COA process. Moreover, a Commissioner highlighted the fact that many
people want to add on to their homes. Staff believe this can help historic homes avoid
becoming functionally obsolete. The Commission spoke again of a layered approach.
Policy Question for Commission:
1 Historic owner-occupied principle residences are eligible for an eight-year freeze on assessed property
values when a substantial rehabilitation that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic
Rehabilitation takes place.
2 The Planning Division routinely receives calls from residents who have questions and/or complaints
about the State Property Tax Assessment Freeze.
2
Page 145 of 149
Memorandum
Staff seek additional feedback regarding land-use incentives as a tool to encourage
preservation. Staff suggests that any proposed land-use incentive be by-right from a
Zoning Code perspective, but be limited to Regulated Historic Structures, thereby
encouraging voluntary landmark nominations.
Permit Fee Waivers for Eligible Improvements
This incentive was not discussed in detail by the Commission due to a lack of time at last
meeting. Staff note that permit fees may not be significant enough to prompt improvements
to historic structures or to spur voluntary landmark nominations. Moreover, the dollar value
of the portion of permits associated with only exterior features will be difficult to calculate
and administer. However, permit fee waivers could be layered with other incentives, but staff
suggest that eligibility be limited to Regulated Historic Structures, and require substantial
exterior improvements.
Staff seek additional feedback from the Commission.
Reduce Number of Properties Required for Local Historic District Nominations
The majority of Commissioners did not express explicit support for a reduction in the number
of properties required for a local Historic District nomination. One Commissioner expressed
a concern that the Commission is not qualified to recommend a Code change. However, staff
respectfully disagrees, and advises that the Commission is qualified to recommend policy
changes that impact historic preservation, including changes to the Preservation Ordinance
and Demolition of Dwellings Ordinance (Chapter 24 and Sec. 170.122).
Policy Question for Commission:
Staff seek additional feedback regarding changing the minimum numbers of
properties needed for a nomination for local Historic Districts.
Other Commission Comments
The following two ideas were not included in staff’s report to the Commission as staff’s
approach was to provide tools for encouraging voluntary landmark designations and the
voluntary rehabilitation/restoration of historic homes.
Establish a Demolition Tax for Historic Structures
Several Commissioners expressed support for a revision of the Demolition Ordinance to
discourage the demolition of historic homes. Ideas included longer demolition delays and the
establishment of a tax for the demolition of properties found by the Commission to meet the
criteria for landmark designation. Suggestions ranged from $40,000 to $200,000 for a
historic home demolition tax. 3
3 By way of comparison, the affordable housing demolition tax as of 2025 is $10,000 and will be $15,000
in 2026.
3
Page 146 of 149
Memorandum
Staff notes that a high demolition tax for homes found to meet landmark criteria will
essentially prevent the demolition of homes otherwise eligible for demolition. This
could have a similar effect as involuntary landmarking. However, this approach will
not make a home a Regulated Historic Structure. Therefore, changes that are
incompatible with the home’s historic features could still occur without Commission
approval.
Staff suggest that a historic demolition tax set at a lower amount could help fund the
preservation initiatives discussed above, or other projects such as the Historic
Resource Survey program.
Prohibiting Variances for New Construction on Properties where Demolition
Delay was Imposed.
A Commissioner expressed a desire to disallow all variances for new construction on
properties subjected to demolition delays. Other Commissioners seemed to agree.
Staff seek further feedback to determine if there is a consensus to support this
recommendation.
Next Steps
Incorporate feedback and present to the Commission for formal recommendation at
a future meeting.
Present to City Council – Committee of the Whole.
4
Page 147 of 149
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Maddy Markle, Planner I, at mmarkle@cityhpil.com or (847) 926-1856
2026
Annual Historic
Preservation
Sponsored by
Awards
THE HIGHLAND PARK HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION
CALL FOR NOMINATIONS
Nominations are now being accepted for the Highland Park
Preservation Awards. Public and privately owned buildings are
eligible for both exterior and interior improvements. A jury of
experts in the field of architecture, architectural history, and
preservation will select winners in each category.
Restoration
Rehabilitation
New Construction/Addition
Adaptive Reuse
Landscape Restoration
Awards will be presented at the Preservation Awards Ceremony,
May 7, 2026, at 1445 Sheridan Road, Highland Park, Illinois. To
nominate a structure, complete the nomination form available here
or on the HPC’s website: www.cityhpil.com/HPC
--- Deadline for Submission : April 1, 2026 ---
Page 148 of 149
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Maddy Markle, Planner I, at mmarkle@cityhpil.com or (847) 926-1856
2026 Highland Park Historic Preservation Awards
NOMINATION FORM
Award Categories (check those that best represent your project):
RESTORATION – Returning a structure or a significant part of it to the original design and condition through repair or
by matching the original architectural detailing with replacement materials.
REHABILITATION – Renovating and/or “greening” a structure through alterations or additions that are compatible in
materials, scale, and character with the original design.
ADAPTIVE RE-USE – Changing the use of a structure to meet contemporary needs in a manner that retains or restores
its viability while respecting the original design character.
ADDITION/NEW – Can include a contemporary addition to a historic building or new construction that is sympathetic
in character, scale, and materials to the existing neighborhood.
LANDSCAPE RESTORATION – Preserving or recreating a historic landscape plan through the use of appropriate
plantings and design elements.
Address of Property: ____________________________ Built: _______ Purchased: ________
Owner(s):_________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________ Telephone: ___________________
Nominated By: ________________________________ Telephone: ___________________
Architect (name and address):
Contractor (name and address): __________________________________________________
Start Date: ________________________________ Completion Date: ______________
(Projects must have been completed within the last three years)
Brief Project Description: _____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Nomination Material to include:
Narrative. A written narrative describing the project, the design intent, architectural cues, material choices, etc. This is
your chance to present your project to the panel of jurors in your own words. Input from the project architect is recommended.
Before and After Photos. Photographs of the project, preferably before and after the work has been completed.
Elevations. Exterior architectural elevations, if appropriate. Our jurors are typically experienced architectural historians
from around the Chicago metro area and will appreciate the detail.
Contact information not listed above. Contact information for all those involved with the project, unless any are being
excluded from the awards nomination.
Other. Include any additional material for the jury to consider.
SEND OR EMAIL ENTRIES TO
Maddy Markle, Planner I, Department of Community Development,
1150 Half Day Road, Highland Park, IL 60035
Phone: 847.926.1856 - Email: mmarkle@cityhpil.com
Page 149 of 149