Plan and Design Commission
Regular MeetingHighland Park, IL · February 17, 2026
Minutes
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 PLAN AND DESIGN COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Tuesday, February 17, 2026
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 7 p.m., Chairperson Kerch called the meeting to order. Staff was asked to call the roll.
12
13 ROLL CALL
14 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, &
15 Nanus
16
17 Councilmember Present: Ross
18
19 Student Council Present: Pielet
20
21 Staff declared that a quorum was present.
22
23 Guests Present: Corey Glasson, Owner/Twinkle Twinkle Little One
24
25 Staff Present: Fontane, Burhop, & Mistretta
26
27 Others Present: Marcus Martinez, Corporation Counsel/Elrod Friedman LLP
28 Gale Cerabona/Recorder
29
30 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
31 Regular Meeting of the Plan and Design Commission – February 3, 2026
32
33 Commissioner Ihnchak moved to approve the February 3, 2026, PDC regular meeting minutes.
34 Commissioner Henry seconded the motion.
35
36 On a voice vote
37 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, & Nanus
38 Voting Nay: None
39
40 Chairperson Kerch declared that the motion passed unanimously.
41
42 SCHEDULED BUSINESS
43 Chairperson Kerch rearranged the order of tonight’s two cases.
44
45 1. PUD-2025-00081 for a Special Use Permit in the Nature of a Planned Development with Modifications
46 from City Code; and a Plat of Re-Subdivision, with Variances from City Code (147 Central Avenue)
47
48 Chairperson Kerch advised that this Petitioner asked to continue this case to the April 7, 2026, PDC meeting.
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 17, 2026 - Page 1
1
2 Commissioner Fettner moved to continue this matter to the next PDC meeting on April 7, 2026.
3 Commissioner Nanus seconded the motion.
4
5 On a voice vote
6 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, & Nanus
7 Voting Nay: None
8
9 Director Fontane declared that the motion passed unanimously, there would be no new notice, and the
10 next meeting would take place at City Hall in Highland Park, at 7 p.m.
11
12 2. DES-2026-00086 for Design Review & Sign Package with Variations (1849 Green Bay Road)
13 Planner Mistretta reviewed the proposal:
14 • Existing Property
15 o sign package in Renaissance Place
16 o occupying 2 tenant spaces
17 • Aerial View was shown
18 • Existing Sign Package
19 o Unit 112 (two frontages)
20 • Proposed Amendments
21 o 4 signs (2 wall, 2 awning)
22
23 Commissioner Moore arrived at 7:07 p.m.
24
25 • Proposed Awnings
26 o extension from northern facade
27 • Light Fixture Removal
28 o 1 existing light fixture will be removed
29 • Proposed Renderings (west & north)
30 • Existing Photos
31 • Staff Photos (surrounding area)
32 • Standards for Sign Packages
33 • Approval Process & Recommendation
34
35 Petitioner, Corey Glasson, owner of Twinkle Twinkle Little One, said this store represents the growth of their
36 19-year business. He explained the revisions.
37
38 Chairperson Kerch asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak. There was no one.
39
40 Commissioner Moore moved to adopt the Certificate of Approval. Commissioner Mantis seconded the
41 motion.
42
43 On a roll call vote
44 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, &
45 Nanus
46 Voting Nay: None
47
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 17, 2026 - Page 2
1 Director Fontane declared that the motion passed unanimously.
2
3 OTHER BUSINESS
4 1. Information Item: Administrative Design Review Update
5 There were no updates.
6
7 2. Next Regular Meeting – March 3, 2026
8 Senior Planner Burhop advised this meeting may be cancelled.
9
10 3. Case Briefing
11 Director Fontane advised that City Council approved the Habitat development at 1700 Old Deerfield Road.
12
13 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
14 There was no Business from the Public.
15
16 ADJOURNMENT
17 Commissioner Henry moved to adjourn at 7:16 p.m. Commissioner Fettner seconded the motion.
18
19 On a voice vote
20 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus
21 Voting Nay: None
22
23 Chairperson Kerch declared that the motion passed unanimously.
24
25 Respectfully Submitted,
26
27
28 Gale Cerabona
29 Recorder
30
31 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING ON FEBRUARY 3, 2026, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 17, 2026 - Page 3
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the statutes of the State of Illinois and the ordinances of the City of Highland Park, the next
regular meeting of the Plan & Design Commission of the City of Highland Park is scheduled to be held at the hour
of 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois.
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may email Karl Burhop, Senior Planner, with the
Community Development Department, at kburhop@cityhpil.com. All emails and comments submitted for the
Commission will be made public.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who
require certain accommodations to allow them to observe or participate in this hearing, or who have questions
about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at
etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its eNews for important information from the City and its
government partners. The City updates its web site daily and also posts on social media daily. To sign-up for the
eNews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
At the meeting, it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items:
City of Highland Park
Regular Meeting of the Plan and Design Commission
Highland Park City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue
February 17, 2026
7:00 P.M.
MEETING AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
a. Consideration of Plan and Design Commission Minutes
i. Regular Meeting on Feb. 3, 2026
IV. Scheduled Business
a. DES-2026-00086 for Design Review and Sign Package with Variations (1849 Green Bay Rd.)
b. Public Hearing #PUD-2025-00081 for a Special Use Permit in the Nature of a Planned
Development with Modifications from City Code; and a Plat of Re-Subdivision, with Variances
from City Code (147 Central Ave.)
V. Other Business
a. Information Item: Administrative Design Review Update
b. Next Meeting – March 3, 2026, A Regular Meeting at City Hall
c. Case Briefing
VI. Business from the Public
VII. Adjournment
Page 1 of 1
Packet
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the statutes of the State of Illinois and the ordinances of the City of Highland Park, the next
regular meeting of the Plan & Design Commission of the City of Highland Park is scheduled to be held at the hour
of 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois.
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may email Karl Burhop, Senior Planner, with the
Community Development Department, at kburhop@cityhpil.com. All emails and comments submitted for the
Commission will be made public.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who
require certain accommodations to allow them to observe or participate in this hearing, or who have questions
about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at
etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its eNews for important information from the City and its
government partners. The City updates its web site daily and also posts on social media daily. To sign-up for the
eNews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
At the meeting, it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items:
City of Highland Park
Regular Meeting of the Plan and Design Commission
Highland Park City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue
February 17, 2026
7:00 P.M.
MEETING AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
a. Consideration of Plan and Design Commission Minutes
i. Regular Meeting on Feb. 3, 2026
IV. Scheduled Business
a. DES-2026-00086 for Design Review and Sign Package with Variations (1849 Green Bay Rd.)
b. Public Hearing #PUD-2025-00081 for a Special Use Permit in the Nature of a Planned
Development with Modifications from City Code; and a Plat of Re-Subdivision, with Variances
from City Code (147 Central Ave.)
V. Other Business
a. Information Item: Administrative Design Review Update
b. Next Meeting – March 3, 2026, A Regular Meeting at City Hall
c. Case Briefing
VI. Business from the Public
VII. Adjournment
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 39
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 PLAN AND DESIGN COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Tuesday, February 3, 2026
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 7:01 p.m., Chairperson Kerch called the meeting to order. Staff was asked to call the roll.
12
13 ROLL CALL
14 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, &
15 Nanus
16
17 Councilmember Present: Lidawer
18
19 Student Council Present: Pielet
20
21 Staff declared that a quorum was present. Director Fontane recognized new Student Council member, Chloe
22 Pilot.
23
24 Guests Present: Mitch Goltz, Managing Principal/GTZ Properties
25 Corey Glasson, Owner/Twinkle Twinkle Little One
26
27 Staff Present: Fontane, Burhop, & Mistretta
28
29 Others Present: Marcus Martinez, Corporation Counsel/Elrod Friedman LLP
30 Gale Cerabona/Recorder
31
32 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
33 Regular Meeting of the Plan and Design Commission – January 20, 2026
34
35 Commissioner Moore moved to approve the January 20, 2026, PDC regular meeting minutes. Commissioner
36 Ihnchak seconded the motion.
37
38 On a voice vote
39 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus
40 Voting Nay: None
41 Abstain: Commissioner Henry
42
43 Chairperson Kerch declared that the motion passed 6-0.
44
45 SCHEDULED BUSINESS
46 1. DES-2026-00085 for Design Review & Sign Package with Variations (172-178 Skokie Valley Road)
47 Senior Planner Burhop distributed a material sample.
48
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 3, 2026 - Page 1
Page 2 of 39
1 Planner Mistretta reviewed the proposal:
2 • Existing Property
3 o has no sign package; 3 tenants
4 • Aerial View was shown
5 • Proposed Sign Package
6 o existing gooseneck lights
7 • Renderings were illustrated
8 o Applicant owns property to the north; will mirror those façade improvements
9 • Façade Improvements
10 o material was distributed
11 • Existing Signage & Facade
12 o current internally-illuminated signs
13 • Sign Standards were displayed
14 • Approval Process & Recommendation
15 o with Condition per Staff
16
17 Chairperson Kerch asked about variations. Senior Planner Burhop said there are no variations – but rather a
18 sign package. Each window sign would be up to 6 sq. ft.; total of 120 sq. ft.; height complies. He did note
19 there is 1 variance – identifications signs (hours of operation).
20
21 Mr. Mitch Goltz, Managing Principal with GTZ Properties, stated they renovated the neighboring property
22 and are excited to receive new tenants. He noted demolition is underway.
23
24 Commissioner Nanus asked, and Mr. Goltz said there are 3 tenants in 4 spaces.
25
26 Chairperson Kerch asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak. There was no one.
27
28 Commissioner Moore moved to adopt the Certificate of Approval as listed. Commissioner Mantis seconded
29 the motion.
30
31 On a roll call vote
32 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, &
33 Nanus
34 Voting Nay: None
35
36 Director Fontane declared that the motion passed unanimously.
37
38 2. DES-2026-00086 for Design Review & Sign Package with Variations (1849 Green Bay Road)
39 Planner Mistretta reviewed the proposal:
40 • Existing Property
41 o tenant space in Renaissance Place
42 o sign package in place
43 o triggers Design Review
44 • Aerial View was shown
45 • Existing 1998 Sign Package
46 • Proposed Amendments (first-time signage on wall and awnings)
47 o wall-sign total area is 63.2 sq. ft.
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 3, 2026 - Page 2
Page 3 of 39
1 o awning-sign total area is 178.4 sq. ft.
2 o total sign area is 241.6 sq. ft.
3 • Proposed Awnings (will match what’s currently there)
4 • Proposed Renderings
5 o signage on all awnings (separate signs)
6 o wall signs comply
7 • Existing Photos
8 • Staff Photos (surrounding area)
9 • Approval Process & Recommendation
10 o Petitioner could amend dimensions
11 o 11 signs
12
13 Some PDC comments are…..
14 • Commissioner Ihnchak asked what identification signage is. Planner Mistretta responded it would
15 have the store name, logo, etc.
16 • Commissioner Henry is troubled by letter “a” in the standards for sign packages. This is a
17 hodgepodge; lack of consistency. Director Fontane said flexibility of content is necessary to express
18 one’s business. He explained the focus should be on the containers and how many there are (not
19 the content).
20 • Commissioner Fettner asked if current tenants have signage on awnings. Planner Mistretta said no.
21 Senior Planner Burhop said the restriction is 1 pedestrian sign per frontage.
22 • Commissioner Moore asked if Local Leaf has awnings; not super consistent.
23 • Chairperson Kerch said the 1998 sign package didn’t set good guidelines. Senior Planner Burhop said
24 some parts of that sign package have been amended.
25 • Commissioner Mantis asked if other tenants, who have more facades, have different signage. Senior
26 Planner Burhop said some signs have above-window signs or signage on the door.
27
28 Mr. Corey Glasson, owner of Twinkle Twinkle Little One, advised he and his wife have been in business for
29 19 years in Chicago. He noted there is a need to educate first-time parents, and explained they needed room
30 for furniture, usage of car seats/strollers. They fell in love with Renaissance Place to lease 2 spaces. The
31 challenge is 2 separate spaces with 2 entrances. Mr. Glasson shared, if signage was different, it may not
32 identify this is all 1 store; don’t wish to have confused customers. An alternate/revised sign option was
33 shown (connecting 2 stores into 1).
34
35 More PDC comments are…..
36 • Chairperson Kerch asked if an entrance on both frontages is desired. Mr. Glasson said yes.
37 • Commissioner Mantis said there may be more depth/protrusion. Mr. Glasson stated they will use
38 the awnings that are there.
39
40 Chairperson Kerch asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak. There was no one.
41
42 Councilperson Lidawer asked/said…..
43 • and Staff said each face can have an identification sign.
44 • if an awning is a separate sign. Director Fontane said yes. Senior Planner Burhop said, in the 1998
45 sign package, 1 pedestrian sign per frontage is allowed (without the subsequent amendments).
46 • 11 signs are a lot.
47
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 3, 2026 - Page 3
Page 4 of 39
1 Mr. Glasson said he wishes to comply. He is not adamant about the valance signage. The concern is to be
2 classy and combine 2 spaces; wants uniformity with the facades; matching look. No one else has taken 2
3 spaces and combined them into 1.
4
5 Final PDC comments are…..
6 • Commissioner Moore likes:
7 o the 1 awning along the north side. A concern is the valance. Mr. Glasson noted the middle
8 door doesn’t exist.
9 o the revised option better; looks cleaner.
10 • Commissioner Fettner concurred and likes the revised sign better; looks cleaner; wants the business
11 to be successful.
12 • Commissioner Mantis struggles with the signage on the valance. There are no other areas with 2
13 entrances; a big ask.
14 • Commissioner Ihnchak concurs with Commissioner Mantis; the valance looks busy. The first version
15 looks repetitive. She appreciates identifying this is a family-owned business.
16 • Commissioner Nanus applauds and admires the Petitioner. He shared this may set a precedent for
17 the future.
18 • Chairperson Kerch:
19 o likes the 3 awnings. He hates to cover stone. There are too many logos; repetitive.
20 o doesn’t think people will be confused; likely want more signage on the Green Bay side.
21 • Commissioner Ihnchak asked Corporation Counsel for valance feedback. Corporation Counsel
22 Martinez said the content of the sign cannot be dictated, as it’s a constitutional issue. Content strays
23 away from design. He suggested concentrating on the number of signs.
24 • Commissioner Mantis asked, and Corporation Counsel Martinez said the tenant can switch content.
25 Director Fontane said the number of signs and the size of the containers should be the focus.
26 • Commissioner Henry likes the revised sign; lends uniformity to the area. He would remove Twinkle
27 Twinkle Little One and indicate family-owned instead. Mr. Glasson informed they wish to open the
28 business in the next 6 weeks.
29 • Chairperson Kerch said there could be 1 less sign on the Green Bay side. He agreed everyone wants
30 to see businesses succeed. Director Fontaine summarized that the valance would only have 1
31 centered sign, a logo, and a wall sign.
32
33 Commissioner Henry moved to continue this matter to the next PDC meeting on February 17, 2026.
34 Commissioner Fettner seconded the motion.
35
36 On a voice vote
37 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, &
38 Nanus
39 Voting Nay: None
40
41 Director Fontane declared that the motion passed unanimously.
42
43 OTHER BUSINESS
44 1. Information Item: Administrative Design Review Update
45 There were no updates.
46
47 2. Next Regular Meeting – February 17, 2026
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 3, 2026 - Page 4
Page 5 of 39
1 The next regular meeting will be February 17, 2026, in City Hall at 7 p.m.
2
3 3. Case Briefing
4 There were no Case Briefings.
5
6 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
7 There was no Business from the Public.
8
9 ADJOURNMENT
10 Commissioner Henry moved to adjourn at 8:03 p.m. Commissioner Mantis seconded the motion.
11
12 On a voice vote
13 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus
14 Voting Nay: None
15
16 Chairperson Kerch declared that the motion passed unanimously.
17
18 Respectfully Submitted,
19
20
21 Gale Cerabona
22 Recorder
23
24 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING ON JANUARY 20, 2026, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes
February 3, 2026 - Page 5
Page 6 of 39
REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION
DATE REFERRED: for the February 17th Plan and Design Commission (“Commission”)
ORIGINATED BY: Department of Community Development
SUBJECT: Design Review with a Sign Package Amendment for 1849 Green Bay
Road
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Site Location: 1849 Green Bay Road, STE 112
Current Zoning: B5 – Downtown Commercial District
Applicant: Corey Glasson
Property Owner: T RENAISSANCE IL LLC
DESCRIPTION
The applicant Corey Glasson, who
will be occupying the tenant space
(Suite 112) at Renaissance Place, is
seeking to amend the existing sign
package for Renaissance Place (the
“Property”). Currently the tenant
space is not occupied, however the
applicant owns a business named
Twinkle Twinkle Little One. The
applicant plans to move into the
tenant space and be fully operational
this year. The tenant is proposing
adding awnings and additional
signage. Currently, there are no
tenants at Renaissance Place with
awning signage. Staff have provided
photographs in Attachment 5.
Figure 1: 172-178 Skokie Valley Road
There is a sign package for the
Property and the proposed signage will go beyond the maximum allowed signage for this tenant space. The
applicant has provided a narrative in Attachment 1.
EXISTING SIGN PACKAGE
The existing sign package for the Property was originally approved with the original PUD in 1998. The
sign package lays out a signage standard for the entire property (which includes 1850 Second Street as
well). The sign package has been previously amended before on a tenant by tenant basis, as all of the
amendments to the sign package have only been for individual tenant spaces. The 1998 sign package is
included in Attachment 3.
The tenant space is a corner tenant space, and has two pedestrian frontages. Because of this, the sign
package allows for two wall signs by right for the tenant space, one along each pedestrian frontage. The
sign package does not allow for internal illumination of signage; instead opting for external illumination of
signage via mounted gooseneck lighting. For awning signage, the sign package allows awning signage in
lieu of wall signage but not both.
Page 1 of 6 Page 7 of 39
REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION
For wall signage, the following design standards must be followed:
1. Pin set letters.
2. Must only show the company/tenant name.
3. Non-internally illuminated.
4. Letters must be between 10”-20” in height.
In addition to the regulations above, the sign package states that wall signage “shall be limited to the store
name...shall not include the product or service provided except as part of Tenant’s trade name”. The sign
package also provides a rendering showing external illumination via mounted light fixtures. For awning
signage, the sign package states that the lettering for signs shall be “silk screened or painted letters on the
face of the awning shall be six to eight inches high”. The material specified for the awning is states as
“fabric material”.
As stated above, all identification signs shall be illuminated by “stem mounted low voltage accent lights,
and must be per Landlords specifications. All tenants are required to use the same lighting fixtures for their
illumination”. The standard light fixture for Renaissance Place currently is a “gooseneck” stem light fixture.
The sign package does not specify a specific amount for the maximum sign area, the limit on the letter
height is the only size limit it provides. However this is an example provided that does show a total sign
area of 12.8 Sq. Ft.
PREVIOUS COMMISSION CONSIDERATION
The Commission previously reviewed this proposal at the February 3rd, 2026 meeting. The Commission
decided to continue this item to the following agenda; providing the following general comments to the
applicant to prepare for the next meeting (refer to the draft minutes in the packet).
Concerns with the number of signs proposed and repetitiveness.
The Commission did not have any comments on the proposed wall signage.
The applicant also gave a brief presentation which provided an alternative design to the sign package
amendment. The applicant agreed to move forward with a redesign of the proposed signage and the
proposed redesign in included in Attachment 2.
UPDATED - PROPOSED SIGN PACKAGE AMENDMENT
The proposed sign package amendment will only apply to the tenant’s unit, and not to any other tenant
spaces in Renaissance Place. The applicant has received approval from the landlord for this amendment.
In addition, the applicant intends on installing additional awnings to the façade. The signs and awnings
are shown on the rendering in Attachment 2. All awnings are depicted as being 10’ in height from the
bottom of the awning to the ground.
The Applicant proposes the following:
1. Two 1.25’ x 25.3’ (31.6 Sq. Ft. in total area) externally illuminated wall signs. There will be one
sign for each pedestrian frontage
a. These signs would be allowed by right, and conform to the sign package.
b. The external illumination is gooseneck lighting.
c. NO CHANGES. There are no changes to the two proposed wall signs. The wall signs are
in the same location and are the same area as presented on Feb. 3 to the Commission.
2. Two 13.75’ x 0.5’ (6.9 Sq. Ft. in total area) awning signs.
Page 2 of 6 Page 8 of 39
REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION
a. These will be situated along the northern & western tenant façade facing the pedestrian
walkways.
b. One of these graphics will be installed on a proposed new awning.
c. The signs will be situated on the dropped valence of the awnings.
d. The awning will be 179.2 sq. ft. There is 13.6 sq. ft. of signage proposed, as defined in
code with each sign dimensioned
3. Total Changes:
a. Total number signs allowed:
i. PROPOSED AMENDMENT: In total, the sign package will allow 4 total signs,
(2 wall signs and 2 awning signs).
ii. NOTE –The two wall signs will be externally illuminated via gooseneck light
fixtures
b. Total sign area allowed for the tenant space:
i. WALL SIGN TOTAL AREA: 63.2 sq. ft. (2 Signs)
The total allowed wall sign area by code per Sec. 150.2025(B)(2)(g)would
be 100 Sq. Ft. as that is the lesser amount than 15% of the horizontal area
of the façade (approx. 160 Sq. Ft.). The same standard would apply for
awning signage as well.
ii. AWNING SIGN TOTAL AREA: 13.8 Sq. Ft (2 Signs)
iii. TOTAL SIGN AREA: 77 Sq. Ft. (6 total signs)
4. Changes from Feb. 3, 2026:
a. Signs:
i. The Applicant presented 11 signs on Feb. 3 – two walls signs and nine awning
signs.
ii. This has been reduced to four total signs – the same two wall signs and two awning
signs.
b. Awnings.
i. The Applicant was keeping two awnings while proposing two new awnings.
ii. The Applicant is still keeping the west-facing awning and is doing one, larger
awning facing north.
Note on Exterior Lighting: The Applicant should clarify what is changing, if anything, regarding the
existing lights on the building. At certain locations there are lantern-like lights hanging from the masonry
columns. The proposed awning extension along the north appears to cover those lights.
SIGN PACKAGES & STANDARDS
Sign packages are powerful tools because Section 150.2030 allows applicants to flexible design as part of
a sign package proposal. Section 150.2030 of the Zoning Code establishes regulations for Sign Packages.
They are a tool meant to “ensure that properties with multiple buildings, and buildings with multiple
occupants or tenants, provide signage that is well designed and consistent throughout that building or
Page 3 of 6 Page 9 of 39
REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION
property, while providing some flexibility in the design of the Signs that are approved through a Sign
package.”
Standards for Sign Packages
The Code provides the following standards by which to evaluate Sign Package proposals:
Section 150.2030(D): “No Sign package shall be approved by the Plan and Design Commission unless
the Plan and Design Commission shall find that the Sign package incorporates Signage that is:
1. Unified and consistent throughout the building or property; and
2. Of a higher quality than would be otherwise required under the applicable Sign regulations; and
3. Compatible with the design and materials of the building or buildings, and consistent with the
area surrounding the building or property.
UPDATED - PROPOSED AWNING
The applicant is proposing one new awning
along the northern pedestrian walkway.
1. An extension of the existing awning,
the applicant proposes an extension
50’ x 3.6’ awning with black fabric to
match surrounding store awnings
The proposed awning is shown in Figure 2.
The tenant space currently has two existing
awnings with one at the principal entry way
along the northern pedestrian walkway, and
one along the façade of the western pedestrian
walkway. The proposed awning will be
installed with black fabric that will match the
existing awnings. Additionally, the new awning
are proposed to have signage installed on
Figure 2: Proposed Awnings for tenant space
them on the valences (as discussed in the
Sign Package section of this report). Each
awning will project out 3.5’ into the pedestrian walkway and a mounted height of 10’.
STAFF NOTE: From here, the report contents do not change from that of the previous report
provided to the Commission for the February 3rd PDC Meeting.
DESIGN REVIEW – CHAPTER 176 STANDARDS OF REVIEW:
This project is subject to the provisions in Chapter 176 of the City Code, “Design Review.” These include
the following:
(A) Site Plan.
(1) The site shall be planned to (a) provide a desirable transition from the streetscape, (b) meet the parking
design requirements of Article VIII of Chapter 150 of this Code, and (c) meet the landscape planting and
screening requirements of Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code.
(2) Buildings shall be oriented so that the principal entry is visible and accessible from the primary street
frontage.
Page 4 of 6 Page 10 of 39
REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION
(3) Building configurations that tend to catch and accumulate debris, leaves, dirt, trash and rubbish shall
be avoided.
(4) Service yards, storage yards, exterior work areas, and utility meters shall either be (i) screened from
view from public rights-of-way with dense planting or other materials harmonious with the building, or
(ii) otherwise be located so as not to be visible from any public rights-of-way.
Staff Comment & Review: The principal entry way will remain visible from the right of way. Applicant is not
proposing any changes to the entry way or pedestrian walkways
(B) Site Treatment.
(1) Where natural or existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they
shall be preserved and enhanced, subject to the requirements set forth in Article XVIII of Chapter 150 of
this Code.
(2) Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas shall provide a safe and stable surface
for walking.
(3) Sidewalks, plazas, and pedestrian pathways shall be distinguished from Vehicular Use Areas through
the use of materials, such as curbs, pavers, and brick or brushed or scored concrete, in order to ensure
pedestrian safety and comfort.
(4) Newly installed utility services and service revisions necessitated by a modification to an Exterior Design
Feature shall be place underground.
Staff Comment & Review: Applicant is not proposing any changes to parking spaces, pedestrian walkways, or
plazas.
(C) Building Design.
(1) Building mass, scale, and lines, including roof forms, shall be designed to be harmonious with the design
of adjacent buildings.
(2) Buildings shall be designed to avoid monotony with respect to roof line, windows, location and size of
principal entry, location and orientation of garage entries, and cladding material and color.
(3) Building materials shall be durable and conducive to easy maintenance and upkeep.
(4) Mechanical or other utility equipment.
(a) Mechanical and utility equipment located on the roof or exterior of a building shall either be: (i)
screened from view from public rights-of-way with materials harmonious to the building; or (ii)
located as to not be visible from public rights-of-way or residential zoning districts.
(b) Ground-mounted mechanical or utility equipment shall comply with the screening requirements
set forth in Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code.
(5) Building additions and modifications shall maintain safe access and pathways, and allow for the
functional use of spaces between buildings.
Staff Comment & Review: Applicant is not proposing any new mechanical or utility equipment
(D) Lighting.
(1) Lighting fixtures shall be of a scale and finish, and shall be mounted at a height, that are appropriate to
the building design and lighting function.
(2) Light sources shall be shielded from view from public rights-of-way and residential districts.
(3) Light poles located within a Vehicular Use Area shall be located between parking spaces.
(4) Lighting levels and light fixture design shall meet the standards of Article VI of Chapter 150 of this Code.
Page 5 of 6 Page 11 of 39
REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION
Staff Comment& Review: Applicant has indicated no changes, and all existing lighting shall remain as is.
(D) Awnings.
(1) Awnings are encouraged to be mounted with respect to the design of the building bays and windows,
and so as to not detract from the window trim or other architectural features of the building.
(2) Awning design and construction shall meet the standards set forth in Article XX of Chapter 150 of this
Code and in Chapter 170 of this Code.
Staff Comment & Review: The proposed awning will be designed to match the projection and aesthetic of the
existing awnings on the façade, as well as awnings that are installed throughout Renaissance Place.
(F) Fences. Fences shall be constructed to meet the requirements of Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code and
of Chapter 173 of this Code.
Staff Comment & Review: Applicant is not proposing fencing.
APPROVAL PROCESS
The Plan & Design Commission has approval authority over the sign package proposal. If appropriate a
Certificate of Approval for the Proposed Sign Package has been drafted adopting the changes as proposed,
in Attachment 61.
A Certificate of Approval is attached, approving the sign package as presented, if appropriate. This is not a
recommendation by Staff.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development recommends that the Plan and Design Commission discuss
the proposal per the standards above. The Commission can approve the plans, deny them, or recommend
changes and continue the discussion to a future meeting.
1
The Cert. of Approval is not a recommendation by staff. The Commission may approve, modify, deny, or continue
the request, and the Cert. of Approval is provided if the Commission finds it appropriate.
Page 6 of 6 Page 12 of 39
Project Narrative – Signage & Awning Exception Request
Twinkle Twinkle Little One is requesting a signage and awning exception due to the unique nature of
our new Highland Park location, which consists of two combined commercial spaces operating as
one unified retail store.
Under the current signage ordinance, a corner store like ours is permitted two name signs and a
total of two logos. While this standard works well for a typical single-storefront configuration, it
assumes one primary entrance and a more compact frontage. Our new location di ers in that it
spans two adjacent storefronts, each with its own entrance, within a very large continuous retail
footprint.
Because of the width of the combined space, a single name sign does not clearly communicate to
customers that both entrances belong to the same business. Without additional visual continuity,
customers may reasonably assume the entrances serve separate tenants, which can create
confusion and negatively impact wayfinding, accessibility, and the overall customer experience.
To address this, we are requesting approval to include our logo on the awnings. The intent is not to
increase visual clutter or advertising impact, but rather to clearly identify the space as one cohesive
store, ensuring customers approaching from either direction immediately understand that both
entrances serve Twinkle Twinkle Little One.
While it is not common for a tenant to occupy two storefronts, this configuration is necessary for
our next phase of growth. Twinkle Twinkle Little One has operated successfully at 461 Central
Avenue for the past six years, building a strong customer base and deep ties to the Highland Park
community. This expansion represents a thoughtful, long-term investment in the city and reflects
the natural progression of our business.
For the Highland Park location to be successful, it is essential that customers can easily recognize
the store, understand the full extent of the space, and feel confident entering from either side. The
requested exception supports clarity, consistency, and a positive streetscape experience, while
maintaining the overall intent and spirit of the signage regulations.
We appreciate the City’s consideration of this request and believe this solution balances regulatory
intent with the practical realities of a unique storefront configuration.
Page 13 of 39
AWNING & CUTOUT LETTERS SIGN MOCKUP
COREY CHILDREN STORE
Page 14 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
Product Information Product Information
Product Type Cutout letters Black Product Type New and Recovery Awning
Color Color Black 4608-0000
Twinkle Twinkle Little One
Material Sunbrella Canvas
Overall Size (304”W x 15”H)
Overall Size Left side awning 600”W x 43”H x
42”P) Right side awning (231”W
x 43”H x 42”P)
600" 231”
168"
304"
15"
165"
43"
8" Family Owned · Est. 2007 · A Place Where Dreams Begin 6"
New Awning Recovery Awning
42”Projection 42”Projection
10' 10'
Corey Children Store 1849
Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00
Suite 115 Highland Park, IL NASH
60035Mansur
United States
Quadri
Page 15 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
Product Information Product Information
Product Type Cutout letters Black Product Type Recovery Awning
Color Twinkle Twinkle Little One Color Black 4608-0000
Overall Size (304”W x 15”H) Material Sunbrella Canvas
Overall Size (304”W x 43”H x 42”P)
304"
15"
43" 165"
8" Family Owned · Est. 2007 · A Place Where Dreams Begin 6"
Recovery Awning
42”Projection
10'
Corey Children Store 1849
Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00
Suite 115 Highland Park, IL NASH
60035Mansur
United States
Quadri
Page 16 of 39
A. SIGN CRITERIA
'1w
The following outlines the basic sign criteria for all in-line retail tenants (not
t includL·ig d;~partment stores or theaters).
1. Slgnage Requirements
Cl a. Number of Signs
Tenant shall identify the premises by instalfing one (1) non-
t illuminated sign or other graphic treatment on the storefront
elevation facing the arcade. VI/hen the premises is a comer store,
an additional identification sign shall be required for frontages in
ii excess of 15 feet In length and shall be subject to the criteria tor
each elevation respectively.
t b.
•
A uniform store identification sign shall be installed by tenant per
landlord's specifications. Tenant shall not post additional signs in
service areas. Letters are to be 3-inch high white vinyl applied
directly to the outside face of the tenant's door. Wording shall be
'I
limited to the tenanfs name and space number only.
c. Postal Service Sign
Street address identification (street number only) for postal delivery
is required and must be placed in the lowest left hand comer of the
I storefront glazing. Numbers to be 3 inch black vinyl mounted to the
inside face of the glass.
I d. Prohibited Signage
i. No sign, advertisement, notice, or other lettering shall be
exhibited, inscribed, painted, or affixed on any part of the
I storefront(s) except store identification signs.
ii. All signage shall be approved at the sole discretion of the
I Landlofd and are subject to City of Highland Park DRC
approval and local code autholity approvals.
I
I
Page 17 of 39
~··
I
iii. The following types of signs and sign components shall not
I be permitted.
a. Internally illuminated.
I b.
c.
Boxed or cabinet type.
Clo1h, paper, cardboard and similar stickers, or
deCals around or on surfaces exterior to the
I d.
premises.
Freestanding.
e. Moving or flashing.
Noise or odor producing.
1 f.
g. Exposed lamps.
h. Exposed fastenings.
i. Neon.
j. Channel or reverse internally illuminated channel
letter.
k. No 1ele"llisicn or prcjedioo screens are permilted
wilhin 10 feet from the lease Hne.
I. Chaige card decals shall not be affixed to any part
of the storefront, nor shall any charge card
identification be immediately visible from the public
space.
iv. Sign company names or stamps shall be concealed and not
be visible to public view.
v. All signs and their installation shall comply with all local
building and electrical codes.
e. Time Clock .
A seven calendar-day, 24-hour time clock shall be provided ~
Tenant to control illumination of Tenanfs storefronts, show
windows, and signs during required hours designated by Landlord.
2. Mall Store Identification Sign Specifications
a. Sign Type
All tenants are required to provide metal non-illuminated letters.
Letters are to be pin-set to the stone sign band or the tenant's
storefront. Metal letters are to be of a dark color. Awning signage
is to be silk screened or painted letters on the face of the awning.
I
!
I
I
Page 18 of 39
11
I
b. Store Name
' Store identification signs shall be limited to the store name (d.b.a.).
Wording of signs shall not indude the product sold except as part of
Tenanfs trade name. The use of a crest, shield, logo, or other
'I c.
established corporate insignia which has been customarily
displayed or associated with the store name may be approved on
an indiVidual basis by the Landlord at Landlord's sole discretion.
Illumination
' Illumination of the signs is required. Tenant installed lighting to
illuminate the tenant signage will be by stem mounted low voltage
accent lights and must be per Landlord's specifications. All tenants
'I d.
will be required to use the same lighting fixtures for their
illumination.
i. Storefront letters located 7'-0" or more above the mall
I o·
finished floor shall not be less than 1 nor more that 20"
maximum letter size.
I ii. Letters located less than 7'-0" above the finished floor shall
not exceed six inches (6") high.
I iii. A non-illuminated non-dimensional sign composed of letters
having a maximum height of three to six (3" to 6") inches,
applied directly to the inside face of the storefront glass of
I gold or silver leaf, silk screened, painted or etched glass or
other material may be permitted at the disaetion of the • ·
Landlord .
• e. Sign Position
No part of lettering or insignia shall be less than 1'-0" above the
floor of the center, nor less than 6" from the top of the Tenant's
storefront. No part of any sign shall extend beyond five inches (5")
of the mall lease line (exceptforAwning signage).
f. Awning Signage
Slk screened or painted letters on the fai:e of the awning shall be
between six to eight (6" to 8") inches high. Awnings are to be fabric
material (i.e .. canvass).
Page 19 of 39
Page 20 of 39
-_n
--
...< .a1
"'
v..:J -J_j
,< ... <;!
~>. ""'
."";:..
LJ'°'!
.
/
i ~[
~8 !
=~
r::iB
==~
:;:
Page 21 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
N E
S
W
Signage & Awning Location
Green Bay Rd
Corey Children Store
1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00
Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH
Mansur Quadri
Page 22 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
N E
S
W
Signage & Awning Location
Green Bay Rd
Corey Children Store
1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00
Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH
Mansur Quadri
Page 23 of 39
Page 24 of 39
Page 25 of 39
Page 26 of 39
Page 27 of 39
Page 28 of 39
Page 29 of 39
Page 30 of 39
Page 31 of 39
CERTIFICATE OF DESIGN REVIEW
APPROVAL
Date Approved: February 17th, 2026
Project Address: 1849 Green Bay Road (the “Property”)
Applicant: Corey Glasson (Twinkle Twinkle Little One)
Project Name / Description: Design Review & Sign Package Amendment
Application Summary
The Plan & Design Commission approved the Design Review & Sign Package as specifically
proposed in Attachment 2 of the packet.
Conditions of Approval:
• Must comply with size and method of illumination as stipulated in proposed Sign
Package and Attachment 2 in the packet. No internal illumination is allowed.
• The changes for signage are only the tenant space identified in Attachments 2 and the
staff report.
• The proposed awnings shall be installed to code, and should not stray away from the
proposed alterations shown in the elevations in Attachment 2.
• Applicant must obtain necessary building permits to proceed with installation of the
signage shown in the attached sign plans.
• Must also be in substantial conformance with Attachment 7 of this packet.
Approved Plans:
• Approved Sign Plans & Elevations – per Attachment 2 in the posted packet for February 17, 2026
Approved Plans Attached.
See next page for notes and signature. Page 1 of 2
Page 32 of 39
This is to verify that on this date, an approval was given by the Plan & Design Commission of the City of
Highland Park, Illinois for this project. It is the responsibility of the Petitioner to ensure that all
necessary permits are filed with the City. Plan & Design Commission approval does not imply that the
project has met all code requirements of the City as subsequent approvals by the Building Division,
Public Safety or Public Works may be required.
Anthony Mistretta
Planner I
Community Development
Page 33 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
600" 231”
168"
304"
15"
165"
43"
8" 6" Family Owned · Est. 2007 · A Place Where Dreams Begin
New Awning Recovery Awning
42”Projection 42”Projection
10' 10'
Corey Children Store
1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00
Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH
Mansur Quadri
Page 34 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
600" 231”
Recovery Awning
165"
43"
8" 6" Family Owned · Est. 2007 · A Place Where Dreams Begin
New Awning
42”Projection 42”Projection
Product Information
Product Type New and Recovery Awning
Color Black 4608-0000
Material Sunbrella Canvas
Overall Size Left side awning 600”W x 43”H x 42”P)
Right side awning (231”W x 43”H x 42”P)
Sunbrella Canvas
Aluminum Awning Frame
Installation Detail
PVC Vinyl Banner
Banner fabricated from heavy-duty PVC vinyl suitable for
outdoor display. Material is UV and weather-resistant,
with reinforced edges and metal grommets for secure
mounting. Digitally printed using fade-resistant inks to
provide long-lasting color and visibility. Designed for
temporary signage applications such as promotions,
wayfinding, and events, and intended to be removed at
project completion.
304"
15"
Product Information
Product Type Cutout letters
1/4" Thick Aluminum Flat Cut Letters Color Black
Overall Size Twinkle Twinkle Little One (304”W x 15”H)
Existing wall 1/4" Thick Aluminum
Flat cut dimensional letters fabricated from 1/4" (6mm)
solid aluminum sheet, precision cut to shape for clean
and accurate profiles. Letters are lightweight, durable,
and corrosion-resistant, suitable for exterior signage
applications. Finished with painted, powder-coated, or
Stud brushed surface options as specified. Letters are
mounted using studs or adhesive per installation
requirements and provide a long-lasting, architectural-
grade identity.
Corey Children Store
1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00
Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH
Mansur Quadri
Page 35 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
304"
15"
43" 165"
8" Family Owned · Est. 2007 · A Place Where Dreams Begin 6"
Recovery Awning
42”Projection
10'
Corey Children Store
1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00
Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH
Mansur Quadri
Page 36 of 39
Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States
304"
43" 165"
8" Family Owned · Est. 2007 · A Place Where Dreams Begin 6"
Recovery Awning
42”Projection
Product Information
Product Type Recovery Awning
Color Black 4608-0000
Material Sunbrella Canvas
Overall Size (304”W x 43”H x 42”P)
Sunbrella Canvas
Aluminum Awning Frame
Installation Detail
PVC Vinyl Banner
Banner fabricated from heavy-duty PVC vinyl suitable for
outdoor display. Material is UV and weather-resistant,
with reinforced edges and metal grommets for secure
mounting. Digitally printed using fade-resistant inks to
provide long-lasting color and visibility. Designed for
temporary signage applications such as promotions,
wayfinding, and events, and intended to be removed at
project completion.
304"
15"
Product Information
Product Type Cutout letters
1/4" Thick Aluminum Flat Cut Letters Color Black
Overall Size Twinkle Twinkle Little One (304”W x 15”H)
Existing wall 1/4" Thick Aluminum
Flat cut dimensional letters fabricated from 1/4" (6mm)
solid aluminum sheet, precision cut to shape for clean
and accurate profiles. Letters are lightweight, durable,
and corrosion-resistant, suitable for exterior signage
applications. Finished with painted, powder-coated, or
Stud brushed surface options as specified. Letters are
mounted using studs or adhesive per installation
requirements and provide a long-lasting, architectural-
grade identity.
Corey Children Store
1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 02-12-2026 02-12-2026_rev.00
Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH
Mansur Quadri
Page 37 of 39
REQUEST FOR PLAN AND DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION
DATE REFERRED: For the February 17, 2026 Plan and Design Commission
(“Commission ”)
ORIGINATED BY: Community Development
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Planned Development and Plat of Subdivision with
Variations for 147 Central Ave.
RECOMMENDATION:
Applicant has requested a continuation to the April 7, 2026 PDC Meeting. Please note,
the applicant requested and received a continuation at the February 12, 2026 Historic
Preservation Commission meeting to the March 12, 2026 HPC meeting.
The Historic Preservation Commission’s recommendation will be attached to the April
7, 2026 meeting packet along with any public comments received for both the PDC and
HPC. This item, 147 Central Ave Planned Development and Plat of Subdivision
consideration, has been previously considered at the January 6, 2026 PDC meeting.
Page 1 of 1
Page 38 of 39
From: Cal Bernstein
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2026 5:49 PM
To: Fontane, Joel <jfontane@cityhpil.com>; Markle, Maddy <mmarkle@cityhpil.com>; Hoffmann,
Patrick <phoffmann@cityhpil.com>; Coleman, Zubin <zcoleman@cityhpil.com>; Burhop, Karl
<kburhop@cityhpil.com>; Hart Passman;
Subject: 147 Central Avenue, Highland Park, IL
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Joel, with regard to 147 Central Avenue, please continue the two matters before the HPC on
February 12, 2026 (the Partial Landmark Designation Removal and the Written Report to the
Plan and Design Commission) to the March 12, 2026, HPC meeting. Also, please continue the
two matters before the PDC on February 17, 2026 (the PUD application and the Subdivision
Application) to the first available PDC meeting thereafter (April 7, 2026).
I will not appear at either the HPC on February 12, 2026, or the February 17, 2026, PDC
meeting. Please, confirm receipt of this email.
Thanks,
Cal
Calvin A. Bernstein
Samuels & Bernstein
484 Central Avenue, Suite 202
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE! - ONLINE BANKING FRAUD IS REAL AND YOU NEED TO TAKE
PRECAUTIONS! IF YOU RECEIVE AN EMAIL CONTAINING WIRE TRANSFER
INSTRUCTIONS, IT IS YOUR JOB TO CONTACT THE TITLE COMPANY TO VERIFY THE
WIRING INFORMATION PROVIDED IS 100% CORRECT - THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO
WIRING FUNDS. BY USING ANY WIRING INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY THIS OFFICE,
YOU AGREE THAT THIS OFFICE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING!!!
Confidentiality Note. This message originated from the Law Firm Samuels & Bernstein and is
confidential and legally privileged. It is intended only for the person(s) or organization(s) named
above. Any other use or disclosure is strictly forbidden. If this message is received by anyone other than
the person(s) or organization(s) intended, please notify the sender at once by telephone (847) 433-1980 or
by email to the sender. Thank you
Page 39 of 39