Zoning Board of Appeals
Regular MeetingHighland Park, IL · February 19, 2026
Minutes
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Thursday, February 19, 2026
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 7:31 p.m., Acting Chair Chase called the meeting to order. This Commission meeting takes place on-site.
12 Staff was asked to call the roll.
13
14 ROLL CALL
15 Commissioners Present: Acting Chair Chase; Commissioners Aronoff, Harmelech, Weisberg, & Zaransky
16
17 Commissioner Absent: Chairperson Yablon & Commissioner Treshansky
18
19 Councilmember Absent: Center
20
21 Student Council Present: Zoe Heller
22
23 Staff declared that a quorum was present.
24
25 Guests Present: Cal Bernstein, Attorney/Samuels & Bernstein
26 Ronald Nisson/Petitioner
27 Tommy Paliter/General Contractor
28
29 Staff Present: Hoffmann
30
31 Others Present: Gale Cerabona, Recorder
32
33 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
34 Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals – January 15, 2026
35
36 Commissioner Weisberg moved to approve the January 15, 2026, regular meeting minutes as drafted.
37 Commissioner Zaransky seconded the motion.
38
39 On a roll call vote
40 Voting Yea Commissioners Aronoff, Harmelech, Weisberg, & Zaransky
41 Voting Nay: None
42 Abstain: Acting Chair Chase
43
44 Acting Chair Chase declared that the motion passed 4-0.
45
46 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
47 There was no Business from the Public.
48
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
February 19, 2026 - Page 1
1 OLD BUSINESS
2 There was no Old Business.
3
4 NEW BUSINESS
5 1. #VAR-2026-00059
6 Property: 363 Woodland Road Appellant: Debra & Barry Kravitz
7 Zoning District: R5 Address: 363 Woodland Road, Highland Park, IL 60035
8
9 The petitioners and owners, Debra & Barry Kravitz, 363 Woodland Road, Highland Park, IL 60035 request by
10 authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1) of the Highland Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision Section
11 150.711, to encroach into the Established Building Setback/EBS.
12
13 Planner Hoffmann reviewed the proposal:
14 • Project Background
15 o new addition
16 o R5 zoning district
17 o built in 1937
18 • Site Location
19 • Aerial View was shown
20 • Plat of Survey
21 o 40’ building line; non-conforming
22 • Property Photos were displayed
23 • Proposed Work
24 • Elevations were illustrated
25 • Other Comments
26 o there were none
27 o 8 letters of support
28 • Review
29
30 Acting Chair Chase asked if there:
31 • were any variances. Planner Hoffmann said none that he saw.
32 • is a definition of the EBS. Planner Hoffmann explained same.
33
34 Acting Chair Chase swore in Cal Bernstein, Attorney with Samuels & Bernstein, who offered a history (35
35 year-old ordinance). He said City Staff wanted to preserve front yards. Examples were given on Sheridan
36 Road and Ravinia regarding the EBS. The applicant is looking to upgrade, make their home larger, and
37 modernize it. The second floor is already set back from the first floor. Rooflines line up with the existing
38 second floor. This is less than the floor-area-ratio/FAR.
39
40 Mr. Bernstein referenced the standards from his letter. He expressed the hardship is site context, and the
41 house is existing, non-conforming. There are 8 letters of support from neighbors.
42
43 Acting Chair Chase asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak on this matter. There was no one.
44
45 Some ZBA comments for Petitioner are…..
46 • Commissioner Zaransky said it’s a good plan. Standards are met; makes sense. He is in favor.
47 • Commissioner Aronoff said the request is reasonable. He will support it.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
February 19, 2026 - Page 2
1 • Commissioner Weisberg said there is no FAR issue. He will support it.
2 • Commissioner Harmelech concurred.
3 • Acting Chair Chase believes the standards have been met.
4
5 Commissioner Weisberg moved to approve the request as drafted. Commissioner Zaransky seconded the
6 motion.
7
8 On a roll call vote
9 Voting Yea Acting Chair Chase; Commissioners Aronoff, Harmelech, Weisberg, & Zaransky
10 Voting Nay: None
11
12 Acting Chair Chase declared that the motion passed unanimously.
13
14 2. #VAR-2026-00060
15 Property: 1550 Museum Drive Appellant: Ronald Nisson
16 Zoning District: R2 Address: 1550 Museum Drive, Highland Park, IL 60035
17
18 The petitioner and owner, Ronald Nisson, 1550 Museum Drive, Highland Park, IL 60035 request by authority
19 of Section 173.030, of the Highland Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision Section 173.010(C), to exceed
20 the maximum allowable 4’ fence-height requirement.
21
22 Planner Hoffmann reviewed the proposal:
23 • Project Background
24 o exceed fence height to 8’
25 o R2 zoning district
26 o built in 2018
27 • Site Location (3 frontages)
28 • Aerial View was shown
29 • Plat of Survey (additions/zoning relief was granted in 2025)
30 • Property Photos were displayed
31 o existing fence is 8’
32 • Proposed Work/Site Plan
33 • Other Comments
34 o there were none
35 • Review
36
37 Some ZBA comments for Staff are…..
38 • Acting Chair Chase asked if there are other fences in this development.
39 • Commissioner Weisberg asked if any neighborhoods have 8’ fences. Planner Hoffmann said they are
40 only allowed when properties abut busy roads or are next to train tracks. Other allowable fences are
41 6’.
42 • Acting Chair Chase asked if this can attach to the other fence. Planner Hoffmann said yes.
43 • Commissioner Zaransky asked if it will be the same material. Planner Hoffmann will defer to the
44 Applicant.
45
46 Acting Chair Chase asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak on this matter. There was no one.
47
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
February 19, 2026 - Page 3
1 Acting Chair Chase swore in Petitioner Ron Nisson, owner, who advised he never intended to have a fence.
2 It’s due to the person who bought Michael Jordan’s property, as photos are being taken of his family. There
3 are 300 cars going there daily. It is no longer a neighborhood. He wants to protect his family and has
4 contacted the police many times. The City has done nothing. Other homes have high fences. Mr. Nisson
5 installed 35 pine trees which is not stopping the problem. It is out of hand. It is not what he spent $2 million
6 for. The survey is questionable. Neighbors are not happy. Four Greyhound busses were parked in front of his
7 house all night long.
8
9 Some ZBA comments for Petitioner are…..
10 • Acting Chair Chase asked:
11 o about other fences. Mr. Nisson explained same. He shared Michael Jordan’s house has a 10’
12 fence. Mr. Nisson said he has no intention of placing a fence in front on Museum Drive.
13 o if an 8’ fence is unusual. Mr. Nisson said 350 cars and busses parked on the street are also
14 unusual.
15 o that the standards be addressed. Mr. Nisson said it is not detrimental and is not at the
16 corner. He shared everyone’s property values have dropped.
17 • Commissioner Weisberg asked how many properties are in the neighborhood. Planner Hoffmann
18 said 8. Mr. Nisson shared most people have gates that are approximately 8’. Michael Jordan’s
19 property has a 10’ fence. The only way to protect his family is to install a fence.
20 • Commissioner Zaransky asked:
21 o why not attach the fence?
22 o if the fence is L-shaped. Mr. Nisson said he doesn’t want to be contained inside. He wants to
23 fence the area as proposed because he doesn’t want any harm to his grandchildren. This is
24 sad for the neighborhood, as it’s a great place to live.
25
26 Acting Chair Chase swore in Tommy Paliter, General Contractor, who said this is not a wrought-iron fence.
27 Deer cannot pass through. People slow down and stare; awkward. Police site on Pointe Lane for hours.
28 There is a pool that is not on the rendering. That is the hardship.
29
30 More ZBA comments are…..
31 • Commissioner Aronoff commented an 8’ fence is tall. The standards are met.
32 • Commissioner Harmelech appreciates the passion. The standards are met. There are 8’ fences in this
33 subdivision.
34 • Commissioner Weisberg said the character of the neighborhood is unusual. He is in favor of this
35 simple ask. The standards are met.
36 • Commissioner Zaransky said it’s an unusual ask. The standards have been met. It makes sense and
37 doesn’t cause an issue to extend. He asked if the fence could be on the inside of the trees. Mr.
38 Nisson said he would like to view the trees. Mr. Paliter said it wouldn’t line up with the corner.
39 • Acting Chair Chase said it’s a residential neighborhood. The 8’ fence is an outlier. Mr. Paliter
40 explained the neighbor has an 8’ wrought-iron fence. A 6’ fence was considered. The fence would be
41 weaker, as it’s hollow inside.
42
43 Planner Hoffman said past variances would have to be researched.
44
45 Commissioner Aronoff moved to approve the variance as submitted. Commissioner Harmelech seconded
46 the motion.
47
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
February 19, 2026 - Page 4
1 On a roll call vote
2 Voting Yea Commissioners Aronoff, Harmelech, Weisberg, & Zaransky
3 Voting Nay: Acting Chair Chase
4
5 Acting Chair Chase declared that the motion passed 4-1.
6
7 STAFF REPORT
8 There is no Staff Report.
9
10 MISCELLANEOUS
11 There are no Miscellaneous items.
12
13 ADJOURNMENT
14 Commissioner Weisberg moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:22 p.m. Commissioner Aronoff seconded the
15 motion.
16
17 On a voice vote
18 Voting Yea Acting Chair Chase; Commissioners Aronoff, Harmelech, Weisberg, & Zaransky
19 Voting Nay: None
20
21 Acting Chair Chase declared that the motion passed unanimously.
22
23 Respectfully Submitted,
24
25
26 Gale Cerabona
27 Recorder
28
29 MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2026, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
February 19, 2026 - Page 5
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of Highland Park, the
next regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park is scheduled to be held at
the hour of 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, February 19, 2026, at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park,
Illinois, during which meeting it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who
require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this hearing, or who have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at
etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its eNews for important information from the City and its
government partners. The City updates its web site daily and also posts on social media daily. To sign-up for
the eNews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
At the meeting, it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Public Hearing
Thursday, 02/19/2026 - 7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois
AGENDA
1) Call to Order
2) Approval of Minutes
a) 01/15/2026 Zoning Board of Appeals Draft Minutes
3) Business from the Public
4) Old Business
5) New Business
a) #VAR-2026-00059 Appellant: Debra and Barry Kravitz
Property: 363 Woodland Rd Address: 363 Woodland Rd, Highland Park, IL 60035
Zoning District: R5
The petitioners and owners, Debra and Barry Kravitz, 363 Woodland Rd, Highland Park, IL 60035, request by
authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1) of the Highland Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision Section
150.711, to encroach into the Established Building Setback.
b) #VAR-2026-00060 Appellant: Ronald Nisson
Property: 1550 Musuem Dr Address: 1550 Museum Dr, Highland Park, IL 60035
Zoning District: R2
The petitioner and owner Ronald Nisson of 1550 Museum Dr, Highland Park, Illinois 60035, requests by
authority of Section 173.030, of the Highland Park Code, variations of provisions of Section 173.010(C), to
exceed the maximum allowable four feet fence height requirement.
6) Staff Report
7) Miscellaneous
8) Adjournment
Page 1 of 1
Packet
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of Highland Park, the
next regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park is scheduled to be held at
the hour of 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, February 19, 2026, at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park,
Illinois, during which meeting it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who
require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this hearing, or who have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at
etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its eNews for important information from the City and its
government partners. The City updates its web site daily and also posts on social media daily. To sign-up for
the eNews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
At the meeting, it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Public Hearing
Thursday, 02/19/2026 - 7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois
AGENDA
1) Call to Order
2) Approval of Minutes
a) 01/15/2026 Zoning Board of Appeals Draft Minutes
3) Business from the Public
4) Old Business
5) New Business
a) #VAR-2026-00059 Appellant: Debra and Barry Kravitz
Property: 363 Woodland Rd Address: 363 Woodland Rd, Highland Park, IL 60035
Zoning District: R5
The petitioners and owners, Debra and Barry Kravitz, 363 Woodland Rd, Highland Park, IL 60035, request by
authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1) of the Highland Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision Section
150.711, to encroach into the Established Building Setback.
b) #VAR-2026-00060 Appellant: Ronald Nisson
Property: 1550 Musuem Dr Address: 1550 Museum Dr, Highland Park, IL 60035
Zoning District: R2
The petitioner and owner Ronald Nisson of 1550 Museum Dr, Highland Park, Illinois 60035, requests by
authority of Section 173.030, of the Highland Park Code, variations of provisions of Section 173.010(C), to
exceed the maximum allowable four feet fence height requirement.
6) Staff Report
7) Miscellaneous
8) Adjournment
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 45
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Thursday, January 15, 2026
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 7:30 p.m., Chairperson Yablon called the meeting to order. This Commission meeting takes place on-site.
12 Staff was asked to call the roll.
13
14 ROLL CALL
15 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Yablon; Commissioners Aronoff, Harmelech, Treshansky, Weisberg, &
16 Zaransky
17
18 Commissioner Absent: Chase
19
20 Councilmember Absent: Center
21
22 Student Council Present: Zoe Heller
23
24 Staff declared that a quorum was present.
25
26 Guests Present: Mike Salazar, Sales Associate/Platinum Pool
27
28 Staff Present: Hoffmann
29
30 Others Present: Gale Cerabona, Recorder
31
32 Chairperson Yablon welcomed new Student Commissioner, Zoe Heller.
33
34 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
35 Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals – November 20, 2025
36
37 Commissioner Weisberg moved to approve the November 20, 2025, regular meeting minutes as drafted.
38 Commissioner Treshansky seconded the motion.
39
40 On a roll call vote
41 Voting Yea Chairperson Yablon; Commissioners Aronoff, Treshansky, Weisberg, & Zaransky
42 Voting Nay: None
43 Abstain: Harmelech
44
45 Chairperson Yablon declared that the motion passed 5-0.
46
47 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
48 There was no Business from the Public.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
January 15, 2026 - Page 1
Page 2 of 45
1
2 OLD BUSINESS
3 There was no Old Business.
4
5 NEW BUSINESS
6 1. #VAR-2025-00058
7 Property: 2021 Old Briar Road Appellant: Bogdan Opanasyuk
8 Zoning District: R4 Address: 2021 Old Briar Road, Highland Park, IL 60035
9
10 The petitioner and owner, Bogdan Opanasyuk, 2021 Old Briar Road, Highland Park, IL 60035 requests by
11 authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1) of the Highland Park Zoning Code, variations of provision Section
12 150.703, to encroach into the required side-yard setback for a pool and accessory structures.
13
14 Planner Hoffmann reviewed the proposal:
15 • Project Background
16 o R4 zoning district
17 o relief for a pool, pool equipment (buried underground), and gazebo
18 • Site Location
19 • Aerial View was shown
20 • Plat of Survey
21 • Property Photos were displayed
22 • Proposed Work
23 • Elevations were illustrated
24 o 6 ft. fence is proposed; not for discussion tonight
25 • Other Comments
26 o one public comment
27 • Review
28
29 Some ZBA comments for Staff are…..
30 • Commissioner Treshansky asked if the current owner built this house. Planner Hoffmann said no, a
31 company built the house prior to current ownership.
32 • Commissioner Zaransky asked if equipment would be in the gazebo footprint. Planner Hoffmann
33 said it would be underneath the gazebo, underground.
34
35 Chairperson Yablon swore in Petitioner Mike Salazar, Sales Associate with Platinum Pool who noted there
36 are two frontages which reduces buildable space. The concern is having the pool near the foundation.
37
38 Some ZBA comments for Petitioner are…..
39 • Commissioner Zaransky asked/stated:
40 o how deep the pool is. Mr. Salazar said 6’ deep.
41 o how far the pool is from the current house. Mr. Salazar replied 17’.
42 o other engineers stated pools can be 5.5’ from a foundation. He wonders what the hardship
43 is, and asked if the pool could be moved in the buildable footprint. Mr. Salazar informed
44 that his company typically goes 15-20’ away from the house.
45 o for an explanation on the pit and hardship for the gazebo. Mr. Salazar explained the pool
46 equipment vault is a buried concrete structure with drainage and lighting. He said there
47 could be a different location.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
January 15, 2026 - Page 2
Page 3 of 45
1 o if there is a sump pump. Mr. Salazar said yes, there is drainage. He could provide more
2 information.
3 o if there is an exhaust. Mr. Salazar responded yes, further detail could be provided.
4 • Commissioner Treshansky asked if moving the pool or shrinking it was considered. Mr. Salazar
5 shared the pool initially was designed at 20x40. He noted the result ended up being 14x40.
6 • Chairperson Yablon asked if the foundation begins at the end of the porch or house. Mr. Salazar said
7 he is unsure.
8 • Commissioner Aronoff asked if the pit could be moved. Mr. Salazar advised he could inquire, and
9 noted equipment would be buried.
10 • Student Commissioner Heller asked if the gazebo and pit could be moved closer to the house. Mr.
11 Salazar stated he is unsure about the gazebo. Planner Hoffmann said in 2023-2024, the holding
12 company owned the house. He shared the owner built the house in 2025.
13 • Commissioner Weisberg asked/said:
14 o how close the pool is to the objecting neighbor. Planner Hoffmann said 12.5’ to the property
15 line.
16 o the other neighbor had no comments. That neighbor raised his hand from the audience.
17 • Commissioner Harmelech asked if the rest of the neighbors are 12’ away. Planner Hoffmann said
18 they are generally more than 12’ away, and noted it depends on their lot size.
19
20 Chairperson Yablon asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak on this matter. The following came
21 forward:
22 • Marc Siegel stated he has lived on Red Oak for 15 years and in the area for 36 years. He shared he
23 spoke with the owner who wasn’t the original developer. Mr. Siegel raised standard #5 in the code
24 regarding affecting neighboring properties. He said he would be impacted as the pool would be in
25 view from their kitchen. Neighbors share common property lines. They are concerned with grading
26 and flooding; would be helpful to know this information in advance. Mr. Siegel understands this
27 may come later with engineering review. The shared neighbor has significant flooding as do others.
28 With more impervious area, there could be more flooding. The view is also a concern as well as the
29 vault with exhaust and noise from the pump, as it is near their kitchen. He noted there was a lot of
30 buckthorn, so landscaping is more desirable than the proposed wall (wrought-iron fence, etc.). The
31 gazebo would be a concern, as they would be viewing it. Other pools have landscaping. Mr. Siegel
32 would like further detail before an informed decision is made; creative options.
33
34 Chairperson Yablon asked if Mr. Siegel is concerned about light supply. Mr. Siegel replied no, he did
35 not perform a light analysis. He shared there originally was a pitched roof, and now there is a flat
36 roof, so that may omit any light concern. Though he then said he feels these items may block light.
37
38 Mr. Salazar stated it is part of the process to have an engineering review and landscape plan which
39 wasn’t required.
40
41 Final ZBA comments are…..
42 • Commissioner Harmelech asked how bad the exhaust is. Mr. Salazar advised he could obtain that
43 information.
44 • Commissioner Treshansky said, at this juncture, he would vote no due to the encroachment; a big
45 ask. He would like to see the pool be closer to the house to limit the ask. He shares neighbor
46 concerns.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
January 15, 2026 - Page 3
Page 4 of 45
1 • Commissioner Zaransky concurred. He said he would decouple the pool and gazebo; move closer to
2 the house. The hardship didn’t really address the standards; doesn’t see a hardship for the gazebo.
3 Equipment should be placed by-right. Commissioner Zaransky is not in favor.
4 • Commissioner Weisberg concurred. The hardship is building a pool too close to the house. There is
5 nothing unique; perfect location for a pool doesn’t exist. He would like to see this continued with
6 alterations presented. Commissioner Weisberg is not in favor.
7 • Commissioner Aronoff concurred and would like engineering input.
8 • Commissioner Harmelech concurred and would like to see the owner speak with neighbors and pool
9 contractor to devise a better plan.
10 • Chairperson Yablon concurred, and stated the standards have not been met. She thanked the owner
11 for speaking with neighbors.
12 • Student Commissioner Heller said this plan could decrease neighbors’ property values.
13 • Commissioner Zaransky asked, and Planner Hoffmann said if more information is provided,
14 Engineering Staff could provide comments.
15
16 Planner Hoffman wonders if the pool and gazebo could be separated. Chairperson Yablon said the
17 pool equipment would still be buried. Planner Hoffmann said the pool would still require a variance.
18
19 Commissioner Zaransky stated a conceptual landscape plan could be provided. Planner Hoffmann
20 advised he would express that to the Petitioner.
21
22 • Commissioner Weisberg said it would help if the gazebo was gone.
23 • Commissioner Aronoff concurred that would be less of an ask.
24 • Chairperson Yablon asked, and Planner Hoffmann said fence information could be added to the
25 proposal.
26 • Commissioner Zaransky said he is not expecting the Petitioner to spend money on plans. Mr. Salazar
27 said the owner is working on landscape plans.
28
29 Commissioner Treshansky moved to continue this matter to a date uncertain. Commissioner Harmelech
30 seconded the motion.
31
32 On a roll call vote
33 Voting Yea Chairperson Yablon; Commissioners Aronoff, Harmelech, Treshansky, Weisberg, &
34 Zaransky
35 Voting Nay: None
36
37 Chairperson Yablon declared that the motion passed unanimously. Planner Hoffmann stated the
38 Applicant will re-notice the meeting for neighbors.
39
40 STAFF REPORT
41 There is no Staff Report.
42
43 MISCELLANEOUS
44 Chairperson Yablon reminded everyone that the ZBA should follow Roberts Rules of Order.
45
46 ADJOURNMENT
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
January 15, 2026 - Page 4
Page 5 of 45
1 Commissioner Treshansky moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Commissioner Weisberg seconded
2 the motion.
3
4 On a voice vote
5 Voting Yea Chairperson Yablon; Commissioners Aronoff, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
6 Zaransky
7 Voting Nay: None
8
9 Chairperson Yablon declared that the motion passed unanimously.
10
11 Respectfully Submitted,
12
13
14 Gale Cerabona
15 Recorder
16
17 MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20, 2025, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
January 15, 2026 - Page 5
Page 6 of 45
Memorandum
Date: February 19, 2026
To: Chair Alexis Yablon & Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”)
From: Patrick Hoffmann, Planner II & Staff Liaison
Subject: 363 Woodland Rd Application Summary
________________________________________________________________________________________
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
The petitioners and owners, Debra and Barry Kravitz, (the “Applicant”) of 363 Woodland Rd,
Highland Park, IL 60035, (the “Property”) request by authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1) of
the Highland Park Zoning Code, variation of provision Section 150.711 to encroach into the
Established Building Setback (EBS) for a new addition. The subject property is located within the
R5 zoning district and according to Lake County Assessor’s Office the home was built in 1935.
The Applicant seeks relief from Section 150.711 by authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1):
(i) To encroach into the Established Building Setback of 50.93 feet by 8.63 feet for a
new addition;
The applicant is proposing a new 554 SF second floor
addition to the existing home. This addition will encroach
into the EBS of 50.93’, but will sit outside of the required
minimum front yard of 40’. The first floor of the existing
home currently encroaches into the 40’ minimum front yard
requirement and the applicant is not matching this
encroachment. Only a variation to the EBS is required.
In the event the variations are approved, the Applicant is
required to get a building permit before construction. This
is a request for Chapter 150 zoning variation and requires
the ZBA to use the Article 12 Zoning Standards of Approval.
NEIGHBOR & CITY COMMENTS:
• There are no additional comments from other city staff.
• 8 public comments in support have been submitted which you can find attached below.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map & Copy of Legal Notice
• Applicant’s Packet
• Draft Approval Order 1
1 All Approval Orders are to be considered drafts and are not a recommendation by City Staff. The Board may approve, approve with
conditions, deny, or continue an application.
1
Page 7 of 45
Page 8 of 45
Page 9 of 45
LEGAL NOTICE - Lake County News-Sun – 02/04/2026
PUBLIC NOTICE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, in the City of
Highland Park, Lake County, Illinois, on Thursday, February 19, 2026, at 7:30 P.M. Said Public Hearing will
be conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for variation of provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of 1997,
being Chapter 150 of the Highland Park Code, as amended.
VAR-2026-00059
Petitioner: Debra and Barry Kravitz
Zoning District: R5
Subject Property: 363 Woodland Rd
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
The petitioners and owners, Debra and Barry Kravitz, 363 Woodland Rd, Highland Park, IL 60035, request
by authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1) of the Highland Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision Section
150.711, to encroach into the Established Building Setback.
The Subject Property, commonly known as 363 Woodland Rd, is legally described as follows:
Lot 1 (except that part described as follows: commencing at the point of the common intersection of lots 1,2,
and 3 of the wood lands subdivision of lot 4; thence northwesterly on the line between lots 1 and 2 as shown
by the record plat thereof, 21.46 feet for a point of beginning; thence in a northwesterly direction on the line
between lots 1 and 2 as shown by the record plat thereof; 63.43 feet to a point in the northwesterly boundary
of lots 1 and 2, 93 feet northeast of the northwest corner of lot 1, according to the plat thereof, thence in a
southwesterly direction along the northwest boundary of lot , 10 feet; thence in a southeasterly direction to
the point of beginning) in woodlands subdivision of lot 4 in Ravinia woods a subdivision of the southwest
quarter of the northeast quarter of section 36, township 43 north, range 12 east of the third principal
meridian (except railroad rights of way) and of lot 4 in nelson’s addition to Ravinia woods in the north half of
the northeast quarter of section 36, township 43 north, range 12 east of the third principal meridian,
according to the plat thereof, recorded January 13, 1928, as document 311,523, in book “S” of plats, page 49,
in lake county, Illinois. .
PIN: 16-36-205-096-0000
If you have questions about the application, public hearing, or any other questions, you may contact Patrick
Hoffmann, Planner II, with the Community Development Department, by email at phoffmann@cityhpil.com or by
phone at 847.926.1612.
At the public hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeals will accept and consider all testimony and evidence pertaining
to the application, and will consider any zoning actions or relief that may be necessary or convenient to allow
development of the type described in this notice, or development that is less dense than the type described in this
notice, including, without limitation, special use permits, variations, map or text amendments, or other special
approvals.
Any person who also desires to appear as an "interested party" with the right to cross-examine others at the hearing
must complete and file an appearance form with the Highland Park City Clerk at the Highland Park City Hall, 1707
St Johns, Highland Park, Illinois, no later than three business days before the date of the hearing. Appearance forms
are available at the Finance Department on the first floor of the Highland Park City Hall, 1707 St Johns, Highland
Park, Illinois, during regular business hours.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who require
certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this hearing, or who have questions about
the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at etaub@cityhpil.com or
847.926.1005.
Zoning Board of Appeals | Alexis Yablon, Chairman
Page 1 of 1
Page 10 of 45
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
ZBA Application
Letter of Situation and Hardship
RE: 363 Woodland Road in Highland Park
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
363 Woodland Road is the home of Debra and Barry S. Kravitz. The existing home is
considered non-conforming as the one-story garage encroaches into the 40’ minimum front yard
setback by approximately 2’ and into the established front yard setback by almost 13’.
Furthermore, significant front year landscaping exists screening the home’s front from the street
The home’s existing primary bedroom and bathroom located on the second floor are undersized
with limited closet space. The owners desire to update their primary bedroom and bathroom to
provide more usable rooms consistent with modern living so as to ensure that the house remains
relevant for future generations. The only logical place to increase the space for the primary
bedroom and bathroom is over the existing non-conforming one-story garage. To minimize the
appearance of additional bulk and to line up the new second story addition roof line with the
existing second floor roof line, the proposed new addition is designed to allow for a step back on
the second story over the first floor by approximately 4 feet. Thus, the new second floor addition
will not encroach into the 40’ minimum front yard setback and will be less of an encroachment
into the established front yard setback. As proposed, this improvement, among many others that
do not require a variance, will update the existing home to allow the family to achieve their goal
of more usable indoor family living space to accommodate a modern lifestyle while preserving
the existing streetscape.
Applying the standards set forth in the Code, the Zoning Board of Appeals should be able
to make the following findings of fact based upon the evidence submitted herein and at the
hearing:
1. The purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more
money from the property. Instead, the owners simply desire to improve their home for
their personal use. They have no intention of selling their home, thus, they seek to
improve the home for their use and enjoyment and not to further a desire to make
more money from the property. Without the variance and the corresponding
renovation, the property cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only
under the condition set forth in the zoning code. Without periodic updating, the
existing home could lose its value. There are many tear downs on the street and
failing to update the current non-conforming home to allow for a larger primary
bedroom and bathroom could lead to it not yielding a reasonable return if permitted to
be used only under the conditions set forth in the code. Thus, the renovations,
including a new primary bedroom and bathroom, would allow the owners to create
value to preserve the existing home, thereby allowing them to receive a reasonable
return on their investment.
2. The owners’ plight is due to unique circumstances, and the proposed variations will
1
Page 11 of 45
not merely serve as a convenience but instead will alleviate some demonstrable and
unusual hardship which would result if the strict letter of the Code was carried out.
Furthermore, this hardship is not generally applicable to other property within the
same zoning district. The existing non-conforming home already encroaches in the
encroaches into the 40’ minimum front yard and into the established front yard
setback by almost 13’. The variance request is less of an encroachment than the
existing condition. This situation contains unique challenges and makes it impossible
to update the home without requesting the established front yard setback relief. The
unique physical surrounding of how the house is sited on this lot and the home’s
layout drive this request, wherein the house is existing non-conforming. Therefore,
due to the unique site context of the lot, an unusual hardship exists which requires a
variance from the code. This hardship is unique to the lot in question and is not
generally applicable to other homes in the zoning district. But for the site context, the
owners would be able to construct their additions without seeking a variance.
3. The unique physical surrounding of their home generates a particular hardship. As set
forth above, the lot’s site context and the desire to upgrade an existing non-
conforming home create the hardship. Thus, the hardship claimed herein was not
originated by the owners.
4. The variations sought herein will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to other property in the neighborhood.
5. The home will not impair adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, nor
will it increase congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire, nor will
it endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values on
the neighborhood.
6. Since the addition is less than the existing non-conformity and the front yard is
heavily landscaped, there will be little appearance of additional bulk. Thus, granting
the variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood as it will not
alter the existing streetscape. Further, granting the variances will preserve the
essential character by updating an existing non-conforming home allowing it to stay
relevant for many more decades. Finally, the proposed variation is in harmony with
the spirit and intent of the code.
Thank you for considering our request.
2
Page 12 of 45
Page 13 of 45
Page 14 of 45
Page 15 of 45
Page 16 of 45
Page 17 of 45
Page 18 of 45
Page 19 of 45
Page 20 of 45
Page 21 of 45
Page 22 of 45
Page 23 of 45
Page 24 of 45
Page 25 of 45
Page 26 of 45
VAR-2026-00059
363 Woodland Rd
After recording, please return to:
City of Highland Park
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
1150 Half Day Road
Highland Park, IL 60035
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) SS.
COUNTY OF LAKE )
BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF
DEBRA & BARRY KRAVITZ APPEAL NO. ZBA VAR-2026-00059
FOR VARIATION
VARIANCE APPROVAL ORDER
This order (“Order”) concerns the petitioners and owners Debra and Barry Kravitz of 363
Woodland Rd Road, Highland Park, IL 60035, for the variation described herein for the property described
herein. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park (“Board”), being duly advised in the
premises, DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Property that is the subject of this Order is commonly known as 363 Woodland Rd,
Highland Park, IL 60035 and legally described on Exhibit A attached to this Order
(“Property”).
2. The Property is currently improved with a single family house.
3. The Property is located within the R5 Zoning District, as established by “The City of Highland
Park Zoning Ordinance of 1997,” as amended (“Zoning Ordinance”).
4. The Applicant sought the following variations from of Section 150.711 of the City Code (the
“Variation”), to construct a new addition as depicted on the Plans within Exhibit B.
a. To encroach into the Established Building Setback of 50.93 feet by 8.63 feet for a new
addition;
5. Notice of the time and place of the hearing was duly published in Lake County News-Sun, a
newspaper of general circulation in the City, not more than 30 days nor less than 15 days
previous to the hearing, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and all applicable law.
Page 27 of 45
VAR-2026-00059
363 Woodland Rd
6. Notice of the hearing was served upon the adjacent and adjoining property owners or
occupants, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Section 150.1203, and applicable law.
7. The application was heard by the Board at a public hearing of the Board on February 19, 2026.
8. The Board has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 150.1204.(A)(1) of the City Code, to hear and
determine the Applicant’s request for the Variation.
9. The Applicant entered into the record sufficient evidence of their ownership of the Property.
10. After the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board found that the requested Variation satisfy
the standards set forth in Section 150.1205, to the extent required.
11. After the conclusion of the public hearing the Board granted the application for the Variation,
by a vote of the majority of the members of the Board.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
A. Subject to and contingent upon the conditions, restrictions, and provisions set forth in
Section B of this Order, the Applicant’s request for the Variation for the Property shall be, and is hereby,
approved for the reasons set forth in this Order. The Applicant will be allowed:
(i) To encroach into the Established Building Setback of 50.93 feet by 8.63 feet for a new
addition;
B. Notwithstanding any use or development right that may be applicable or available pursuant
to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, or any other rights the Applicant may have, the variation granted
in Section A of this Order shall be, and are hereby, expressly subject to and contingent upon the
construction, use, and maintenance of the Property in compliance with each and all of the following
conditions:
i. The construction, development, use, operation, and maintenance of the Property
shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances, as the same have been or
may be amended from time to time, except to the extent specifically provided otherwise in this Order.
ii. Except for minor changes and site work approved by the Director of Community
Development or the City Engineer (for matters within their respective permitting authorities) in accordance
with all applicable City standards, the construction, development, use, operation, and maintenance of the
Property shall substantially comply with the following plans:
a. Proposed Site Plan for 363 Woodland Rd by Downey Szafarz Architects,
dated 1/15/2026,
b. Proposed Elevations for 363 Woodland Rd by Downey Szafarz Architects,
dated 1/15/2026;
C. The Applicant shall permit a copy of this Order to be recorded against the Property in the
office of the Lake County Recorder of Deeds. This Order and the privileges, obligations, and provisions
contained herein shall inure solely to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Applicant and their heirs,
personal representatives, successors and assigns.
Page 28 of 45
VAR-2026-00059
363 Woodland Rd
D. This Order shall be valid for a period not to exceed 12 months from the date hereof, unless,
within such period and in accordance with this Order, the Applicant commences either (i) erection or
alteration of a building or structure, pursuant to a valid building permit for construction on the Property, or
(ii) the use contemplated by this Order. In the event that the Applicant obtain a building permit in
furtherance of the Variation granted pursuant to this Order, the Applicant shall prosecute all work
authorized by the building permit to completion without unnecessary delay.
E. Upon the failure or refusal of the Applicant to comply with any or all of the conditions,
restrictions, or provisions of this Order, in addition to all other remedies available to the City, the Variation
granted pursuant to this Order shall, at the sole discretion of the Board, by order duly adopted, be revoked
and become null and void; provided, however, that the Board may not so revoke such Variation unless it
shall first provide the Applicant with two months advance written notice of the reasons for revocation and
an opportunity to be heard at a regular meeting of the Board. In the event of revocation, the development
and use of the Property shall be governed solely by the applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance.
Order approved February 19, 2026 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
By:
Alexis Yablon, Chairman
# 5146803_v2
Page 29 of 45
VAR-2026-00059
363 Woodland Rd
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The Subject Property, commonly known as 363 Woodland Rd, is legally described as follows:
Lot 1 (except that part described as follows: commencing at the point of the common intersection of lots 1,2,
and 3 of the wood lands subdivision of lot 4; thence northwesterly on the line between lots 1 and 2 as shown
by the record plat thereof, 21.46 feet for a point of beginning; thence in a northwesterly direction on the line
between lots 1 and 2 as shown by the record plat thereof; 63.43 feet to a point in the northwesterly boundary
of lots 1 and 2, 93 feet northeast of the northwest corner of lot 1, according to the plat thereof, thence in a
southwesterly direction along the northwest boundary of lot , 10 feet; thence in a southeasterly direction to
the point of beginning) in woodlands subdivision of lot 4 in Ravinia woods a subdivision of the southwest
quarter of the northeast quarter of section 36, township 43 north, range 12 east of the third principal
meridian (except railroad rights of way) and of lot 4 in nelson’s addition to Ravinia woods in the north half of
the northeast quarter of section 36, township 43 north, range 12 east of the third principal meridian,
according to the plat thereof, recorded January 13, 1928, as document 311,523, in book “S” of plats, page 49,
in lake county, Illinois. .
PIN: 16-36-205-096-0000
Page 30 of 45
VAR-2026-00059
363 Woodland Rd
EXHIBIT B
[PLANS]
Page 31 of 45
Page 32 of 45
Page 33 of 45
Memorandum
Date: February 19, 2026
To: Chair Alexis Yablon & Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”)
From: Patrick Hoffmann, Planner II
Subject: 1550 Museum Dr Application Summary
________________________________________________________________________________________
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
The petitioner and owner, Ronald Nisson, (the “Applicant”) of 1550 Museum Drive, Highland
Park, IL 60035, (the “Property”) is seeking approval of a Fence Code variation from Chapter
173 in order to allow a new fence of 8 feet along Point Ln. The subject property is located within
the R2 Zoning District and is a peninsula lot that has 3 required front yards. According to
Highland Park building records, the construction was complete in 2018.
The Applicant seeks relief from Section 173.010(C):
(i) To exceed the maximum allowable fence height of 4
feet by 4 feet to allow a fence 8 feet in height along Point
Ln;
The applicant is proposing an 8’ fence along Point Ln
that will be 25’ away from both intersection to stay out
of the visibility clearance area. This fence will exceed the
fence height requirement by 4’.
In the event the variation is approved, the Applicant is
required to get a building permit before construction.
This is a request for Chapter 173 fence code variation
and requires the ZBA to use the Chapter 173 Standards
of Approval.
NEIGHBOR & CITY COMMENTS:
No neighbor comments have been submitted prior to packet posting and there are no additional
comments from other city divisions.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map & Copy of Legal Notice
• Applicants’ Packet
• Draft Approval Order 1
1 All Approval Orders are to be considered draft and are not a recommendation by City Staff. The Board may approve,
approve with conditions, deny, or continue an application.
Page 34 of 45
PUBLIC NOTICE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, in the City of
Highland Park, Lake County, Illinois, on Thursday, February 19 at 7:30 P.M. Said Public Hearing will be
conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for variation of provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of 1997, being
Chapter 173 of the Highland Park Code, as amended.
VAR-2026-00060
Petitioner: Ronald Nisson
Zoning District: R2
Subject Property: 1550 Museum Dr
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
The petitioner and owner Ronald Nisson of 1550 Museum Dr, Highland Park, Illinois 60035, requests by
authority of Section 173.030, of the Highland Park Code, variations of provisions of Section 173.010(C), to
exceed the maximum allowable four feet fence height requirement.
The subject property commonly known as 1550 Museum Dr, Highland Park, Illinois, is legally described as
follows:
LOT 8 IN ARCHITECTURE POINT, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOTS 12 AND 13 IN
SCHOOL TRUSTEES' SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTH ½ OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,
RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1990 AS DOCUMENT 2973947 AND RE-RECORDED
APRIL 11, 1991 AS DOCUMENT 3007168, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
PIN: 16-16-312-001-0000
If you have questions about the application, public hearing, or any other questions, you may contact Patrick
Hoffmann, Planner II, with the Community Development Department, by email at phoffmann@cityhpil.com
or by phone at 847.926.1612.
At the public hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeals will accept and consider all testimony and evidence
pertaining to the application, and will consider any zoning actions or relief that may be necessary or convenient
to allow development of the type described in this notice, or development that is less dense than the type
described in this notice, including, without limitation, special use permits, variations, map or text amendments,
or other special approvals.
Any person who also desires to appear as an "interested party" with the right to cross-examine others at the
hearing must complete and file an appearance form with the Highland Park City Clerk at the Highland Park
City Hall, 1707 St Johns, Highland Park, Illinois, no later than three business days before the date of the hearing.
Appearance forms are available at the Finance Department on the first floor of the Highland Park City Hall,
1707 St Johns, Highland Park, Illinois, during regular business hours.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who
require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this hearing, or who have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at
etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005.
Zoning Board of Appeals
Alexis Yablon, Chairman
Page 1 of 1
Page 35 of 45
Regarding variance for 1550 Museum Dr. Highland Park, IL.
To whom it may concern,
The fence along the west side of the property (Point Dr) will be at least 25 feet from the
intersection of Point Dr and Museum Dr. The existing fence along the south side of the property
already stops 25 feet away from the intersection of Point Dr. and Half Day Rd.
The new fence is requested to be 8 feet tall as opposed to the 4 foot tall approved height which
would help eliminate the view of vehicle traffic coming in and out to see the old Jordan
residence.
For any questions or concerns,
Please reach out to Tommy Palider who will be installing the fence, once permitted, at
773-339-7584
Page 36 of 45
IL2405.2185
BOUNDARY SURVEY
LAKE COUNTY
33.0' MUS
EUM
DRI
L2 5/8" FIR
C-3 VE (
3/4" 66' R
FIP 10' U.E.
/W )
41.5'
C-2
CL MUSEUM DR
CONC. CURB & GUTTER (RAD. 60')
' 1
51.5' .5 .0
'
' 4
.3 1 15 5/8" FIP 5/8" FIP
14
2. 5' 0'
50
' S. C-4 0.33' W 0.38' W
' 4. B.L
. 0.68' S L3 0.23' S
.8
POINT
17 5' CONC. D/W 42 10' U.E
2. .7' .
50' S
'
0.3' ON
' .7
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 14
.9
5' 38
.B.L.
LN (66
2. CS/W 10 C-5
1550 MUSEUM DRIVE, HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS 60035 ' 'U
.5 4.1'
15.6 .E
17 8.3' ' .4
'
.8
' .
4.1'
' R/W)
5.6' 7.8' 15.7 19 17 0.3' OFF
SURVEY NUMBER: IL2405.2185 5.5'
'
4.
2'
4. 0' 1'
50'
S.B. 5/8" FIP
1 STORY 8.4' 1 2. L.
86.5 CS/W 8.
2' 6.
5'
4' 184.1'
10' U
'
DATE SIGNED: 05/14/24 FIELD WORK DATE: 5/13/2024 8.4' BRICK & STONE 7.
.E. 8.4' '1 5.8' RES. #1550 21.5
8.6' 8.0 5.8' 50
' '
CLF
1.1' 5.8' S.
REVISION DATE(S): 6.0' 15.9
' 8.8' 15.0
'
B.
L.
15.0 6.1
(REV.4 1/8/2025) (REV.3 7/22/2024) (REV.2 7/19/2024) (REV.1 5/14/2024) ' ' 8.2' '
195.1'
CONC 8.4' 8.5
5/8" .
POINTS OF INTEREST FIR
25' S.B.L.
1. RESIDENCE OVER 50' SETBACK LINE
LOT 8 LOT 7
10' U.E.
C-1
97.1'
114.4'
CONC. CURB & GUTTER
5/8"
FIR
50' S.B.L.
10' U.E.
L1
5/8" FIP
33.0' VF 0.7' OFF
CS/W ASPHALT S/W
0.5' ON ON LINE 0.3' ON
50.0'
CL
CONC. CURB & GUTTER
CL
HALF DAY RD (100' R/W)
C-1 C-2 C-3
R= 167.00' (R&M) R= 233.00' (R&C) R= 169.51' (R&C)
LINE TABLE: L= 37.23' (M), 37.25' (R) L= 60.39' (R&C) L= 72.49' (R&C)
= = =
CH= CH= CH=
C-4 C-5
R= 230.49' (R&C) R= 60.00' (R&C)
L= 91.98' (R&C) L= 68.50' (R&C)
= =
CH= CH=
GRAPHIC SCALE (In Feet)
1 inch = 50' ft.
SEE PAGE 2 OF 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 2 - NOT VALID WITHOUT ALL PAGES
Page 37 of 45
PROPERTY ADDRESS: GENERAL SURVEYORS NOTES: SURVEYORS LEGEND:
1550 MUSEUM DRIVE, HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS 60035
1. The Legal Description used to perform this survey was supplied by others. This survey does not determine LINETYPES
ABBREVIATIONS FIP - Found Iron Pipe Surveyor
SURVEY NUMBER: IL2405.2185 nor imply ownership of the lands or any fences shown hereon. Unless the Title Commitment Number and (C) - Calculated FIPC - Found Iron Pipe & Cap PLT - Planter
Date is referenced on this survey, an examination of the abstract of title was NOT performed by the signing Boundary Line (D) - Deed FIR - Found Iron Rod POB - Point of Beginning
CERTIFIED TO:
KRUNAL PATEL; CT; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY surveyor to determine which instruments, if any, are affecting this property. Center Line (F) - Field FIRC - Found Iron Rod & Cap POC - Point of
Chain Link or Wire (M) - Measured FN - Found Nail Commencement
2. The purpose of this survey is to establish the boundary of the lands described by the legal description
Fence (P) - Plat FN&D - Found Nail & Disc PRC - Point of Reverse
provided and to depict the visible improvements thereon for a pending financial transaction. Underground Curvature
footings, utilities, or other service lines, including roof eave overhangs were not located as part of this survey. Easement (R) - Record FRRSPK - Found Rail Road
Spike PRM - Permanent Reference
Unless specifically stated otherwise the purpose and intent of this survey is not for any construction activities Edge of Water (S) - Survey
Monument
or future planning. A/C - Air Conditioning GAR - Garage
Iron Fence PSM - Professional Surveyor &
AE - Access Easement GM - Gas Meter
DATE OF SURVEY: 05/14/24 3. If there is a septic tank or drain field shown on this survey, the location depicted hereon was either shown to Mapper
Overhead Lines ANE - Anchor Easement ID - Identification
the surveyor by a third party or it was estimated by visual above ground inspection. No excavation was PT - Point of Tangency
BUYER: KRUNAL PATEL Structure ASBL - Accessory Setback Line IE/EE - Ingress/Egress
performed to determine its location. PUE - Public Utility Easement
Easement
B/W - Bay/Box Window R - Radius or Radial
LENDER: 4. This survey is exclusively for a pending financial transaction and only to be used by the parties to whom it is Survey Tie Line ILL - Illegible
BC - Block Corner R/W - Right of Way
certified. Vinyl Fence BFP - Backflow Preventer
INST - Instrument
TITLE COMPANY: CT RES - Residential
INT - Intersection
5. Alterations to this survey map and report by other than the signing surveyor are prohibited. Wall or Party Wall BLDG - Building RGE - Range
IRRE - Irrigation Easement
COMMITMENT DATE: CLIENT FILE NO: 24GST125622SK 6. Dimensions are in feet and decimals thereof. Wood Fence BLK - Block ROE - Roof Overhang
L - Length
BM - Benchmark Easement
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 7. Any FEMA flood zone data contained on this survey is for informational purposes only. Research to obtain SURFACE TYPES LAE - Limited Access Easement
BR - Bearing Reference RP - Radius Point
LOT 8 IN ARCHITECTURE POINT, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF said data was performed at www.fema.gov and may not reflect the most recent information. Asphalt BRL - Building Restriction Line
LB# - License No. (Business)
S/W - Sidewalk
LOTS 12 AND 13 IN SCHOOL TRUSTEES' SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTH 1/2
LBE - Limited Buffer Easement
OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD 8. Unless otherwise noted “SIR” indicates a set iron rebar, 5/8 inch in diameter and twenty-four inches long. Brick or Tile BSMT - Basement SBL - Setback Line
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED LE - Landscape Easement
9. The symbols reflected in the legend and on this survey may have been enlarged or reduced for clarity. The Concrete C - Curve SCL - Survey Closure Line
DECEMBER 17, 1990 AS DOCUMENT 2973947 AND RE-RECORDED APRIL LME - Lake/Landscape
11, 1991 AS DOCUMENT 3007168, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. symbols have been plotted at the approximate center of the field location and may not represent the actual C/L - Center Line SCR - Screen
Covered Area Maintenance Easement
shape or size of the feature. C/P - Covered Porch SEC - Section
LS# - License No. (Surveyor)
Water C/S - Concrete Slab SEP - Septic Tank
10. Points of Interest (POI’s) are select above-ground improvements, which may appear in conflict with MB - Map Book
Wood CATV - Cable TV Riser SEW - Sewer
boundary, building setback or easement lines, as defined by the parameters of this survey. These POI’s may ME - Maintenance Easement
CB - Concrete Block SIRC - Set Iron Rod & Cap
not represent all items of interest to the viewer. There may be additional POI’s which are not shown or called- SYMBOLS MES - Mitered End Section
CH - Chord Bearing SMWE - Storm Water
out as POI’s, or which are otherwise unknown to the surveyor. Benchmark MF - Metal Fence
Management Easement
CHIM - Chimney
MH - Manhole
11. Utilities shown on the subject property may or may not indicate the existence of recorded or unrecorded Center Line CLF - Chain Link Fence SN&D - Set Nail and Disc
utility easements. MHWL - Mean High Water Line
Central Angle or CME - Canal Maintenance SQFT - Square Feet
NR - Non-Radial
12. The information contained on this survey has been performed exclusively by and is the sole responsibility of Delta Easement STL - Survey Tie Line
NTS - Not to Scale
Exacta Land Surveyors, LLC. Additional logos or references to third party firms are for informational purposes Common Ownership CO - Clean Out STY - Story
NAVD88 - North American
only. CONC - Concrete SV - Sewer Valve
Control Point Vertical Datum 1988
COR - Corner SWE - Sidewalk Easement
13. Due to varying construction standards, building dimensions are approximate and are not intended to be NGVD29 - National Geodetic
Catch Basin CS/W - Concrete Sidewalk TBM - Temporary Bench Mark
used for new construction or planning. Vertical Datum 1929
Elevation CUE - Control Utility Easement OG - On Ground TEL - Telephone Facilities
14. Surveyor bearings are used for angular reference and are used to show angular relationships of lines only and CVG - Concrete Valley Gutter ORB - Official Records Book TOB - Top of Bank
Fire Hydrant
are not related or orientated to true or magnetic north. Bearings are shown as surveyor bearings, D/W - Driveway ORV - Official Record Volume TUE - Technological Utility
and when shown as matching those on the subdivision plats on which this survey is based, they are to Find or Set Easement
Monument DE - Drainage Easement O/A - Overall
be deemed no more accurate as the determination of a north orientation made on and for those original DF - Drain Field TWP - Township
Guywire or Anchor O/S - Offset
subdivision plats. North 00 degrees East is assumed and upon preparation of this plat, the resulting bearing DH - Drill Hole TX - Transformer
OFF - Outside Subject
between found points as shown on this survey is the basis of said surveyor bearings as defined and required Manhole DUE - Drainage & Utility Property TYP - Typical
to be noted by Illinois Administrative Code Title 68, Chapter VII, Sub-Chapter B, Part 1270, Section 1270.56, Easement UE - Utility Easement
Tree OH - Overhang
Paragraph B, Sub-Paragraph 6, Item k. ELEV - Elevation UG - Underground
Utility or Light Pole OHL - Overhead Utility Lines
15. THIS SURVEY IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE STATE EM - Electric Meter OHWL - Ordinary High Water UP - Utility Pole
OF ILLINOIS. NO IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF THIS PLAT ALONE. PLEASE REFER ALSO Well ENCL - Enclosure Line UR - Utility Riser
TO YOUR DEED, TITLE POLICY AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED BY THE ENT - Entrance ON - Inside Subject Property VF - Vinyl Fence
PARTIES TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. EOP - Edge of Pavement P/E - Pool Equipment W/C - Witness Corner
EOW - Edge of Water PB - Plat Book W/F - Water Filter
FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: ESMT - Easement PC - Point of Curvature WF - Wood Fence
EUB - Electric Utility Box PCC - Point of Compound WM - Water Meter/Valve Box
F/DH - Found Drill Hole Curvature WV - Water valve
FCM - Found Concrete PCP - Permanent Control Point
Monument PI - Point of Intersection
FF - Finished Floor PLS - Professional Land
JOB SPECIFIC SURVEYOR NOTES:
07-19-24 REMOVED BUILDING LINES
01-08-25 ADDED BUILDING SETBACK LINES AS DIRECTED BY THE VILLAGE ZONING DEPARTMENT. SETBACK LINES DO NOT MATCH THE PLAT OF SUBDIVISION OR TITLE POLICY
SEE PAGE 1 OF 2 FOR MAP OF PROPERTY
PAGE 2 OF 2 - NOT VALID WITHOUT ALL PAGES
Page 38 of 45
Page 39 of 45
VAR-2026-00060 – 1550 Musuem Dr
Variance Approval Order
After recording, please return to:
City of Highland Park
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
1150 Half Day Road
Highland Park, IL 60035
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) SS.
COUNTY OF LAKE )
BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF
RONALD NISSON APPEAL NO. ZBA VAR-2026-00060
FOR VARIATION
VARIANCE APPROVAL ORDER
This order (“Order”) concerns the application of Ronald Nisson of 1550 Museum Dr, Highland
Park, Illinois 60035 (the “Applicant”) for the variation described herein for the property described herein.
The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park (“Board”), being duly advised in the premises,
DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Property that is the subject of this Order is commonly known as 1550 Museum Drive,
Highland Park, IL 60035 and legally described on Exhibit A attached to this Order
(“Property”).
2. The Property is currently improved as a single-family home.
3. The Property is located within the R2 Zoning District of the City, as established by “The City
of Highland Park Zoning Ordinance of 1997,” as amended (“Zoning Ordinance”).
4. The Applicants sought the following variation from Section 173.010(C) of the City Code
(“Variation”), in order to construct an eight feet high fence within a required front yard.
a. To exceed the maximum allowable fence height of 4 feet by 4 feet to allow a fence 8 feet
height along Point Ln;
5. Notice of the meeting was served upon the adjacent and adjoining property owners or
occupants, in accordance with Section 173.030(B)(2) of the City Code, and applicable law.
-1-
Page 40 of 45
VAR-2026-00060 – 1550 Musuem Dr
Variance Approval Order
6. The application was heard by the Board at a public meeting of the Board on February 19, 2026.
7. The Board has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 173.030 of the City Code, to hear and determine
the Applicants’ request for the Variation.
8. The Applicants entered into the record sufficient evidence of their ownership of the Property.
9. After the conclusion of the public meeting, the Board found that the requested Variation satisfy
the standards set forth Section 173.030(C), to the extent required.
10. After the conclusion of the public meeting the Board granted the application for the Variation,
by a vote of the majority of the members of the Board.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
A. Subject to and contingent upon the conditions, restrictions, and provisions set forth in
Section B of this Order, the Applicants’ request for the Variation for the Property shall be, and is hereby,
approved for the reasons set forth in this Order. The Applicants will be allowed:
i. To exceed the maximum allowable fence height of 4 feet by 4 feet to allow a fence
8 feet height along Point Ln;
B. Notwithstanding any use or development right that may be applicable or available pursuant
to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, or any other rights the Applicants may have, the variation granted
in Section A of this Order shall be, and are hereby, expressly subject to and contingent upon the
construction, use, and maintenance of the Property in compliance with each and all of the following
conditions:
i. The construction, development, use, operation, and maintenance of the Property
shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances, as the same have been or
may be amended from time to time, except to the extent specifically provided otherwise in this Order.
ii. Except for minor changes and site work approved by the Director of Community
Development or the City Engineer (for matters within their respective permitting authorities) in accordance
with all applicable City standards, the construction, development, use, operation, and maintenance of the
Property shall substantially comply with the following plans:
a. Fence Plan on a plat of survey for the property 1550 Museum Dr;
C. The Applicants shall permit a copy of this Order to be recorded against the Property in the
office of the Lake County Recorder of Deeds. This Order and the privileges, obligations, and provisions
contained herein shall inure solely to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Applicants and their heirs,
personal representatives, successors and assigns.
D. This Order shall be valid for a period not to exceed 12 months from the date hereof, unless,
within such period and in accordance with this Order, the Applicant commences either (i) erection or
alteration of a building or structure, pursuant to a valid building permit for construction on the Property, or
(ii) the use contemplated by this Order. In the event that the Applicants obtain a building permit in
furtherance of the Variation granted pursuant to this Order, the Applicants shall prosecute all work
authorized by the building permit to completion without unnecessary delay.
-2-
Page 41 of 45
VAR-2026-00060 – 1550 Musuem Dr
Variance Approval Order
E. Upon the failure or refusal of the Applicants to comply with any or all of the conditions,
restrictions, or provisions of this Order, in addition to all other remedies available to the City, the Variation
granted pursuant to this Order shall, at the sole discretion of the Board, by order duly adopted, be revoked
and become null and void; provided, however, that the Board may not so revoke such Variation unless it
shall first provide the Applicants with two months advance written notice of the reasons for revocation and
an opportunity to be heard at a regular meeting of the Board. In the event of revocation, the development
and use of the Property shall be governed solely by the applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance.
Order approved February 19, 2026 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
By:
Alexis Yablon, Chairman
# 5146803_v2
-3-
Page 42 of 45
VAR-2026-00060 – 1550 Musuem Dr
Variance Approval Order
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The subject property commonly known as 1550 Museum Dr, Highland Park, Illinois, is legally described as
follows:
LOT 8 IN ARCHITECTURE POINT, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOTS 12 AND 13 IN
SCHOOL TRUSTEES' SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTH ½ OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH,
RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1990 AS DOCUMENT 2973947 AND RE-RECORDED
APRIL 11, 1991 AS DOCUMENT 3007168, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
PIN: 16-16-312-001-0000
Page 43 of 45
VAR-2026-00060 – 1550 Musuem Dr
Variance Approval Order
EXHIBIT B
[PLANS]
Page 44 of 45
Page 45 of 45