Muyni
← Back to Juneau

Economic Stabilization Task Force (Sunset January 2021)

Regular Meeting

Juneau, AK · July 9, 2020

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

Economic Stabilization Task Force Appointed by the City & Borough of Juneau’s Mayor Meeting Minutes from July 9, 2020 Call to Order The Economic Stabilization Task Force meeting was called to order at 3:02 p.m. by Mr. Mertz. Task Force Members Present: Max Mertz, Linda Thomas, Susan Bell, Theresa Belton, Bruce Botelho, Eric Forst, Ken Koelsch, Lauren MacVay, Laura Martinson, and Terra Peters Task Force Members Absent: None Staff Present: CDD Administrative Officer, Brenwynne Grigg; and CBJ Finance Director, Jeff Rogers CBJ Assembly Members Present: Mayor Beth Weldon, Alicia Hughes‐Skandijs, and Loren Jones Special Guest Speakers: Executive Director of Juneau Economic Development Council (JEDC), Brian Holst; Approval of Agenda No changes to the agenda. Approval of Minutes MOTION: by Ms. Thomas to adopt the Economic Stabilization Task Force minutes from the June 25 and June 26 meetings. Mr. Botelho seconded the motion. Hearing no objections, the motion was approved. Update on Adopted Programs Business Stabilization Grant Phase 1 Progress Report Mr. Holst reported that since the June 7 report, the Business Stabilization Grant program has received an additional 10 applications, and JEDC has processed an additional 11 or 12 approvals. The process is moving smoothly and quickly, but they are finding the Grant Program is consuming more staff time than administration of the CBJ Business Loan Program. Staff spends an average of 3 hours per grant application administrating the program. The relative size of awards is smaller than expected relative to the needs and resources available. Many businesses with a focus in tourism are applying. Under‐represented businesses include those from the fishing community, and very small operations, such as artisans. Mr. Holst has some ideas on potential remedies for this in Phases 2 and 3 of the Grant Program. He applauded the CBJ for its timeliness in providing data and sales tax information needed to process the grants. Mr. Mertz asked Mr. Holst to remark on areas for improvement in Phases 2 and 3 of the Business Stabilization Grants. 1. Mr. Holst remarked that many businesses were just shy of showing a financial hardship of a 20% decline in revenue. He suggested that if the benchmark were a 10% decline, the program would see more applicants. He explained some difficulties in demonstrating this metric due to a short window of months for pulling data. 2. Utility expense reporting is as streamlined as possible, but to come up with a value for reimbursement, businesses must share monthly payments and this takes effort to accurately list. JEDC is only asking for utility receipts if the amounts seem outside normal averages. This level of data analysis is time consuming; Mr. Holst suggested applying a modest utility stipend across the board to simplify the process, based on the data they are collecting. 3. The ordinance defines long‐term debt as 12 months or more. JEDC is seeing a lot of business debt related to COVID‐19 that is not being captured because it does not meet the 12‐month criteria. Often, the more recent debt is credit card debt or inventory loans. To meet the spirit of the program, Mr. Holst recommends correcting this to better address cash flow needs of businesses. Currently, if a loan payment has been deferred, JEDC does not consider that debt in the equation. However, the debt will come due eventually and perhaps it should be considered. 4. Mr. Holst also recommended an accommodation for very small businesses that is a more simple and streamlined process. Mr. Forst addressed community feedback stating the grant is difficult and cumbersome to navigate. He reported the Ketchikan Business Grant Program has a simple 2‐page application that only requests sales tax returns. Ms. Martinson asked about the number of businesses still awaiting funding and the average length of time for processing applications. She reported community feedback regarding hesitancy to share so much proprietary information in the application. Mr. Holst replied there are 90 grants approved as of today, and most people are receiving funds in about a week. Some applicants do not fit well in the parameters of the system, which makes for additional work that can lengthen timelines. He assured the Task Force that a very small group of people is reviewing the grant information and JEDC uses a software that is secure, but if anyone is concerned they are welcome to contact him directly. Mr. Mertz added there is strong language in Ordinance 2019‐06(AC)(b)(am) around confidentiality. Page 3 of 4 Ord. 2019‐06(AC)(b)(am)(d) Confidentiality. Except as provided in this ordinance, all application material submitted for a Business Sustainability Grant and all information contained therein (Grant Data) shall be kept confidential except for inspection by: (1)Employees and agents of the City and Borough, including the Grant Administrator, whose job responsibilities are directly related to such applications and information; (2)The business owner, managing member, or equivalent person and supplying such application and information; and (3)Court order. However, nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to provide confidentiality to the name of the applicant, address of the applicant, and the amount of grant award, if any. The Grant Administrator must hold this Grant Data in strict confidence and not disclose, publish, or otherwise reveal the Grant Data to any other person or entity unless expressly authorized by the CBJ in writing. The Grant Administrator must use all reasonable means to safeguard the Grant Data at its own expense. The Grant Administrator is prohibited from making copies or otherwise modifying the Grant Data without express written permission of the CBJ. Upon completion of Phase 1, the Grant Administrator shall transfer all Grant Data to the CBJ Finance Director. Upon confirmation that the CBJ received the Grant Data, the Grant Administrator shall destroy all copies of the Grant Data. If the Grant Administrator becomes aware of any possible unauthorized disclosure or use of the data, the Grant Administrator shall promptly advise the CBJ and take all necessary actions to enjoin the dissemination of the data. Ms. Thomas asked if there are larger businesses demonstrating a need greater than the maximum allowance of $33 thousand. Mr. Holst replied that 10% of grant applicants are at the maximum award amount and a few exceeded that maximum. The Task Force discussed the racial demographics of business owners in Juneau, and whether the racial demographics of program applicants align. They concluded that they were unsure whether the dataset for Juneau is available, but would look for it to draw accurate comparisons. Conservation Corps Program Mr. Botelho shared a photo of a crew from the Conservation Corps Program training and working in the community. He reported that work has begun on Emerson Spur Trail with improvements to the existing mountain bike trail, and expansion of a lower mountain bike trail, which began on July 2. The program was successful in hiring people displaced by the COVID‐19 situation: for example, a boat captain, hiking guide, kayak guide, helicopter pilot, deckhands, tour bus driver, and heavy machinery mechanics for motor coaches are among some of those employed. Rental Housing Assistance Ms. MacVay shared that Alaska Housing Development Corporation (AHDC) reported approximately $180 thousand left in the Rental Housing Assistance fund at the end of the quarter. At the July 6 Assembly meeting, the Assembly moved to reallocate the remaining funds to extend the program through the end of the year. AHDC expects the demand to increase at the end of July, when other benefits begin to expire. Update on Active Legislation Nonprofit Grant Ms. Thomas reported that Mayor Beth Weldon and City Attorney Rob Palmer worked on drafting an ordinance for the Nonprofit Grant program, and shared that draft with the Assembly Finance Committee at their July 8 meeting. The Nonprofit Grant program will have a defined period for application, and if the application requests exceed the allocated funding, awards will be distributed on a pro rata basis. The Assembly questioned language regarding the requirement that the nonprofit provide direct services in Juneau; there may be more discussion on this. The largest suggested change was to decrease the minimum grant award to $2,500, if a nonprofit wants to submit minimal documentation. Mr. Mertz reported that the Assembly schedule was created for this legislation this morning during a meeting with Mayor Weldon, Mr. Palmer, and Mr. Watt. The Nonprofit Grant will be introduced at the July 13 Assembly Meeting, and discussed further at the July 20 Committee of the Whole. The public hearing will be on August 3. Ms. Thomas and Mr. Mertz expressed appreciation for Ms. Amy Skilbred’s work invested in this effort. Juneau ArtWorks Grant Mr. Mertz shared the Assembly Finance Committee discussed the Juneau ArtWorks Grant program at their July 8 meeting, and Ms. Hale will work with Mr. Palmer to create an ordinance for Assembly introduction on July 13. This will follow a similar process as the Nonprofit Grant Program. Business Stabilization Grant Phases 2 and 3 Mr. Mertz directed the Task Force to page 19 of their packet to discuss changes to the Business Stabilization Grant Phases 2 and 3. Mr. Mertz and Ms. Bell are in agreement with the memo submitted by JEDC on changes to the program, and a memo by Mr. Mertz summarizes the major changes. Changes recommended by Mr. Mertz and Ms. Bell to the Task Force are: 1. Recommend a simplified grant option of a maximum of $5 thousand, based off of 10% of their calculated 2019 sales tax reports. For example, a small business with $25 thousand in gross sales tax might qualify for a $2.5 thousand grant. This recommendation is geared toward very small businesses, because the amount of required paperwork compared to the size of eligible funding is not always cost effective, and some may not have the resources or accounting records to provide the required information. Small businesses could self‐assert the need and JEDC could verify if needed. 2. Extend the eligible cost period through October 31. Increase the eligibility period from 5 months to 7 months. This will increase award amounts. 3. Allow businesses to include short‐term debt as well as long‐term debt when listing. This would include credit cards debt, lines of credit, and inventory financing. Debt listed is not to exceed $10 thousand or 20% of balances. 4. Allow businesses to include inventory as eligible cost, along with utilities, in preparation for the summer season. 5. Combine phases 2 and 3 to form only a phase 2. 6. Grant the City Manager the option of prorating available grant funds in phase 2 based on the demand, similar to the approach of the Nonprofit Grant Program. 7. Change the definition of long‐term debt. 8. Establish a minimum grant amount of $500, to create a floor and minimum award amount for utilities. Businesses would be able to opt‐in to this if they do not want to provide the data to the exact penny. Ms. Martinson asked if this is similar to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), where if someone receives an award at the phase 1 level and applies for phase 2, they would resubmit everything and be awarded the difference. Mr. Mertz replied that those details have not yet been worked out. The maximum funding amount continues to be $99 thousand. Mr. Forst asked that messaging be considered when releasing this program. There is already confusion between various programs, and this needs clear messaging to avoid additional confusion. Ms. MacVay asked Mr. Mertz to expound upon the pro rata recommendation. Mr. Mertz explained that they are recommending the ordinance reserve the right for CBJ to prorate the awards, to protect businesses who may be late to the application period. The intent is to ensure everyone has an opportunity to receive funding. A possible scenario is as follows: they could set the application period for one month, JEDC would work though the applications and establish eligibility, then the Assembly could determine if award amounts are prorated or not. Ms. Thomas asked if businesses could apply at the phase 2 level and qualify for the $99 thousand maximum amount of funding if they did not apply at the phase 1 level. Mr. Mertz replied that they could. Ms. Thomas suggested that a business should not need to submit additional paperwork if it already applied at the phase 1 level to reduce difficulty of the application process. Ms. Thomas asked that they consider including a question regarding whether a business intends to still be in business in 2021. Mr. Mertz replied that he will discuss that with Mr. Palmer. Ms. Bell stated that, even if a business is unable to guarantee they will be in business in 2021, the grant funding is provided to pay utilities and rent, so there is a domino effect with this grant money flowing through to other Juneau businesses as well. Ms. Bell expressed support for a simplified process for small businesses, and the expansion of including short‐ term debt as an eligible expense. Ms. Martinson thought the idea of the grant awards naturally flowing through the Juneau community was interesting, but asked if there was a way to require any business that dissolves to show the City they spent the funds in the appropriate manner. Mr. Mertz replied that this was a good thought, but the time and energy needed to collect this information would be quite extensive. He will present this idea to Mr. Palmer to see if there are ways to address this. MOTION: by Ms. Bell to recommend changes to phase 2 and 3 as presented by Mr. Mertz. The motion was seconded by Mr. Botelho. Hearing no objections, the motion passed. PPE Grant Ms. MacVay reported that she and Ms. Belton met with Assembly Member Carole Triem about the PPE Grant. Their meeting resulted in forwarding the parameters of the grant to Mr. Palmer for the creation of an ordinance. Ms. Triem will be working with Mr. Palmer on any modifications to the ordinance. The details of the program are: 1. Maximum grant amount of $5 thousand. 2. Maximum reimbursement amount of 75% of PPE purchases. Receipts are required for anything over $200. 3. Applicants must have a physical presence in Juneau. 4. This is a public oriented program, not just limited to one type of business. 5. Examples of eligible PPE expenses may include physical improvements to the space to promote safety, cleaning products, and software equipment or upgrades needed. Mr. Mertz shared that the Assembly Finance Committee discussed the PPE Grant Program at their July 8 meeting and moved it towards introduction. Ms. MacVay stated she would like to release a list of reliable PPE providers or places people can go for assistance with placing orders. ACTION ITEM: Ms. MacVay and Ms. Belton will reach out to local stores and learn what has worked well for them in order to develop some informational material for when the program is executed. Infrastructure Bond Proposal Mr. Botelho shared that there was robust discussion at the Assembly Finance Committee meeting regarding using bond indebtedness to stimulate the economy. Mr. Rogers unveiled a useful tool for calculating bond debt capacity at any given mill rate. This resulted in the Assembly adopting a motion from Mayor Weldon, which incorporated Manager Watt’s recommendation, to draft a bond ordinance for the fall voter’s ballot in the amount of $15 million, targeting school repairs, park improvements, and extension of the West Douglas Pioneer Road to water. Generally, there was enthusiasm for undertaking a bond package. Mr. Edwardson expressed some skepticism about whether infrastructure projects truly stimulate the economy. Mr. Botelho also reported an interesting Assembly byproduct discussion regarding refinancing its current school bond debt to lower the impact of the State’s failure to reimburse its share of that debt. This topic will be discussed again in more detail at the July 20 Assembly Committee of the Whole. Mr. Koelsch stated that he was under the impression there was not time for this to be on the fall voters ballot. He said that, though school improvements are needed, he understood the West Juneau Pioneer Road is still in the negotiation phase, and parks are not needed if they take money away from the local economy through increased taxes. He stated there are already large expenses associated with living in Juneau and property taxes have not been lowered. Mr. Forst asked if the Assembly had discussed separating the three proposals to allow voting on individual projects. Mr. Botelho replied that the motion passed at the Assembly level had suggested a bundled effort. There were concerns expressed about the package, and the Assembly is expected to discuss it further at the July 20 Assembly Committee of the Whole. Mr. Mertz asked Mr. Koelsch if he would be support a $5 million bond package for school improvements. Mr. Koelsch replied that he would like to know where the $5 million amount came from, and why the City is not using the $3 million set aside from sales tax for school repairs and maintenance. He would like additional information regarding the details of the projects. Ms. Bell stated that she also felt the conversation about infrastructure projects has very quickly become larger than the Task Force’s recommendation. Strategic Initiatives Action Items Homelessness Ms. Thomas reported that the Assembly is still discussing the Task Force’s recommendation to reserve $3 million in CARES Act money for direct services by nonprofits of a social service nature. This is intended to help with some of the homelessness issues. At the July 8 Assembly Finance Committee, they asked the City Manager to solicit the community for a building the City could buy to serve as a warming shelter. The Homelessness Fact Finding Group will continue to research how the Task Force can support what the City and others are already doing. Education and Childcare Ms. Martinson met with Mr. Koelsch, Mr. Botelho, Mayor Weldon, Superintendent Weiss, Assembly Member Jones, Ms. Lyons, and Mr. Holst to discuss the childcare need that has been created by the new school district schedule. They have another meeting scheduled for July 14. Currently, they are awaiting survey results to see what parents’ needs are in order to return to work while maintaining some type of structure for their children. There are many big questions regarding space, staff, and funding, with not a lot of time before school starts. Mr. Koelsch shared that he has spoken with several families, and he wants to ensure any assistance programs are based on the needs of children and not finances. Ms. Martinson added there is currently no State mandate for school districts in Alaska. The current schedule that has been released was the decision of the Juneau School District. Mr. Forst stated the school district’s schedule is confusing. He expressed concern that a 14‐year‐old student will only be in school 2 days a week, and that in some views, despite the low rate of spread and minimal risk to children, the damage to education is outweighed by the risk of them being in school full time. He said that this is a large roadblock to stabilizing the economy. He also expressed concern for the unsupervised tweens and teens during the school day while parents are working. Ms. Martinson stated that the American Pediatric Association has released a statement that the risks associated with children not being in school is greater than the risks associated with them being in school. She added that the school district is receiving feedback from some teachers that they do not feel safe in the classroom. She said we have to consider the teachers’ needs also, what they are willing to do, and where the Task Force can help make it safer. Ms. Peters asked if the school district has discussed hiring extra full‐time substitute teachers so the children can stay in one group all day long without mixing. Ms. Martinson replied that the fact‐finding group has discussed this idea, so that children are not just in a daycare setting but also receive a level of supervision conducive to completing their independent classwork. Mr. Botelho stated that the Task Force is not a substitute for the School District and should not second‐guess how they intend to manage. However, the question with which the Task Force can assist is how to help provide school‐age children supervision during the day when they are not in school, in order to free the parents to re‐ engage in the economy. The role of the Task Force is to compliment the strategy the school board puts into place. Ms. Martinson said that from an economic standpoint, employers would be faced with a large dilemma if there were no good solutions for parents. Increased requests for Emergency Family Medical Leave Act (EFMLA) and increased unemployment is the solutions many parents will turn to, which will negatively affect our economy. Mr. Mertz agreed that there is a role for the Task Force to come up with solutions to mitigate the impact on families. Workforce Development Ms. Bell stated that their fact‐finding group is tracking the status of the University of Alaska Southeast. They are also looking at current training and resources in Juneau, along with recent work and planning efforts on the topic by JEDC and Southeast Conference. Their action strategy is to gather information that will allow them to prioritize funding and effort. Public Comment Comment Matrix Ms. MacVay supplied an update in the Task Force packet on public comments received. LifeMed Funding Request Mr. Mertz shared that LifeMed, a provider of flight medivac services in Southeast Alaska, has approached the City with a funding request. City Manager Watt asked the Task Force to conduct some research on their request. He stated that after a conversation with the CEO of LifeMed earlier that morning, they discovered that because they are a limited liability company and owned by Yukon‐Kuskokwim Health Corporation, they qualified for a PPP loan between $2 and $5 million. Mr. Mertz recommended to the Task Force that, based on their eligibility for substantial funding elsewhere, the City should not move forward with a funding request to the Assembly for LifeMed. Mr. Botelho asked about the business structure of the third medivac company serving Southeast Alaska, Guardian. Mr. Mertz replied that Guardian is a for‐profit entity, which is eligible for other funding, similar to LifeMed. Ms. Thomas asked if they have a base in Juneau and may qualify for the Business Stabilization Grant program. Mr. Mertz replied that they are aware of that program. Good of the Order Mr. Mertz directed the attention of the Task Force to a fact‐finding item presented by Ms. Grigg displaying data acquired through the Chief Behavioral Health Officer at Bartlett Regional Hospital, Bradley Grigg. The data displays indicators of the stressors that children are suffering due to the COVID‐19 environment that are being evidenced in Psychiatric Emergency Services. The second bullet on the memo is particularly telling, where Mr. Grigg states that “stressors communicated by youth included isolation from their social support networks, lack of sports, and struggles with school during the last quarter of the 2019 – 2020 academic year.” Ms. Grigg stated that she had an interest in whether Bartlett Behavioral Health was seeing a change in dynamics amongst the children they serve. The data reflected in the packet only captures a portion of the picture in Juneau. The data is not reflective of what SEARHC, Juneau Youth Services, or other providers in Juneau may be seeing. Ms. Grigg drew their attention to the second data set, which indicated the children experiencing the most negative impacts of the COVID‐19 environment are 13 and under. The number of children visiting the emergency room for mental health reasons in that age category has sharply increased, and could be seen as the beginning as a disturbing trend. Ms. Grigg stated that these numbers do not take into account the children that were doing well in February and may be experiencing situational depression today, but only the ones with severe enough symptoms to be present in the Emergency Department’s data. She stated that her intent with bringing this information before the Task Force was to inform the fact‐finding group as they continue to work on childcare and education, and to encourage them to keep the mental health and emotional well‐being of Juneau’s children in mind as well. Mr. Botelho asked if a representative from Bartlett Regional Hospital could speak to this issue for a few minutes at the next Task Force meeting. Ms. Thomas recommended keeping testing as a critical topic of the Task Force with further discussion at their next meeting, as it is important for the rebound of the economy. She will invite Mr. Barr to give an update. Ms. Thomas also asked the Task Force to keep in mind independent contractors and longshoremen, as this may be a gap area in terms of assistance. Further, Ms. Thomas asked for a communications update at the next meeting that examines messaging by different sources of media. Ms. Martinson suggested the Task Force revisit the recommendations made by Ms. Peters in her report when assessing the business climate in Juneau, to see where the Task Force may help. Mr. Koelsch stated that, if the Task Force is to continue meeting on a weekly basis, it would be helpful to receive the agenda and reading materials a day prior to the meeting, giving them more time for reading and research. Ms. MacVay suggested going back through the public comments received to review the ones that were narrower in focus and to look for opportunities for positive impact. Mr. Force stated a gap area for contract musicians. They do not qualify for unemployment and it is very difficult to get assistance for this group of people. Ms. Thomas stated the current pace of weekly meetings has been necessary and will continue to be for a little while longer, but perhaps not for much longer. Adjournment At 5:13 p.m., the meeting was adjourned.

Agenda

Page 1 of 28 Economic Stabilization Task Force Appointed by the City & Borough of Juneau’s Mayor Meeting Agenda Thursday, July 9, 2020 3:00 p.m. Members of the public may listen in or watch by following one these options Please click the link to join the meeting: https://juneau.zoom.us/j/95278702804, or call 1‐346‐248‐7799 or 1‐669‐900‐6833 or 1‐253‐215‐8782 or Assembly Charge 1‐312‐626‐6799 or 1‐929‐436‐2866 or 1‐301‐715‐8592, and enter The purpose of the task force is Webinar ID: 952 7870 2804 to review the economic Send comments to Economic‐Stabilization@juneau.org landscape and make recommendations to the Time Agenda Item Presenter assembly. In particular, the task force should: 3:00 p.m. Call to Order Mr. Mertz 1. Examine federal and state 3:01 p.m. Approval of Agenda Mr. Mertz government financial 3:02 p.m. Approval of Minutes Open assistance programs and identify and prioritize any 3:05 p.m. Update on Adopted Programs “gaps” that exist. • Business Stabilization Grant Mr. Holst Phase 1 Progress Report 2. Identify and promote  Jobs / Trails Program Mr. Botelho strategies that enable  Rental Housing Assistance Ms. McVay businesses to continue operations safely such as 3:25 p.m. Update on Active Legislation curbside pick‐up, take‐away,  Nonprofit Grant Ms. Thomas delivery, and other innovative  Juneau ArtWorks Grant Mr. Mertz services. Additionally, explore  Business Grant Phase 2 / 3 Mr. Mertz strategies that enable  PPE Grant Ms. MacVay businesses and Juneau’s  Infrastructure Bond Proposal Mr. Botelho economy to recover in the long term. 3:45 p.m. Strategic Initiatives Action Items  Homelessness Ms. Thomas 3. Act as Liaison with the  Education and Childcare Ms. Martinson Governor’s Alaska Economic Stabilization Team  Workforce Development Ms. Bell 4:15 p.m. Public Comment  Comment Matrix Ms. MacVay  LifeMed Funding Request Mr. Mertz 4:30 p.m. Good of the Order Open Max Mertz, Co‐Chair • Linda Thomas, Co‐Chair • Susan Bell • Theresa Belton • Bruce Botelho Eric Forst • Ken Koelsch • Lauren MacVay • Laura Martinson • Terra Peters Page 2 of 28 Economic Stabilization Task Force Appointed by the City & Borough of Juneau’s Mayor DRAFT Meeting Minutes from June 25, 2020 Call to Order The Economic Stabilization Task Force meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mr. Mertz. Task Force Members Present: Max Mertz, Linda Thomas, Susan Bell, Theresa Belton, Bruce Botelho, Eric Forst, Ken Koelsch, Lauren MacVay, Laura Martinson, and Terra Peters Task Force Members Absent: None Staff Present: EOC Planning Chief, Robert Barr; CDD Administrative Officer, Brenwynne Grigg; and CBJ Finance Director, Jeff Rogers CBJ Assembly Members Present: Alicia Hughes‐Skandijs, Loren Jones, and Greg Smith Special Guest Speakers: Executive Director of Juneau Economic Development Council (JEDC), Brian Holst; Executive Director of Juneau Community Foundation (JCF), Amy Skilbred; and Executive Director of Juneau Arts and Humanities Council (JAHC), Nancy DeCherney Approval of Minutes MOTION: by Ms. Thomas to adopt the Economic Stabilization Task Force minutes from the June 18 meeting. Ms. Bell seconded the motion. Hearing no objections, the motion was approved. Agenda Changes Mr. Mertz added PPE Grant to the agenda under Updates on Active Programs, presented by Ms. MacVay and Ms. Belton. Update on Active Programs Business Stabilization Grants Phase 1 Progress Report Mr. Holst reported that the Juneau Economic Development Council (JEDC) have received 103 applications to date. Preliminary numbers show: Page 3 of 28  103 applications received  79 businesses have been quoted an award amount  18 business have funds in hand  85 businesses are still moving through the vetting process The average amount requested is $12 thousand and the average award is just under $10 thousand. Award amounts range from the smallest awards of $250 to the maximum award amount allowed at $33 thousand. Mr. Holst considered an idea for phase 2 of the grant program could include setting a minimum award amount. There are currently 11 grants with award amounts less than $2 thousand. Thousands of self‐ employed individuals in Juneau have not applied for this grant. If they did apply, they will not qualify for much assistance due to calculation methodology. However, if the minimum award were set at $2 thousand, there may be an increase in self‐employed businesses applying, which could overwhelm the program at current funding levels. He encouraged the Task Force to consider the intent of the program and its targeted business structure. Ms. MacVay asked Mr. Holst if they were experiencing delays due to incomplete applications. Mr. Holst replied that many applications received are missing information. JEDC is working with businesses to complete their application packages and assisting when able. Ms. Bell stated the definition of long‐term debt may need evaluation. Many businesses have incurred large credit card and inventory debt to stay afloat, and that does not quite meet the current definition in the grant program. Ms. Martinson asked if any gaps in businesses’ awareness of the program, either by sector or in general, have appeared. Mr. Holst replied that the City and Juneau Chamber of Commerce have marketed the program well and there seems to be an awareness. Some people misunderstand the program to be another loan instead of a grant or confuse it with the AK CARES Grant and think they are disqualified due to participation in the Federal Paycheck Protection Program. Ms. Thomas asked if JEDC is able to track how many applicants give up during the application process, and if they are being flexible with the data requested from the business. Mr. Holst replied there are a few that give up, but it is not many, and JEDC is being flexible with the data needed as much as they are able. Mr. Holst shared that many applicants enter the application process believing they will qualify for more grant money than they do. He’s not exactly sure why this is the case, but it is something they are studying as they learn more. ACTION ITEM: It was determined that additional marketing distinguishing the Juneau Business Sustainability Grant from AK CARES and Federal CARES programs is needed. Page 4 of 28 Conservation Corps Program Mr. Botelho reported that Trail Mix deployed its first team into the field the week of the meeting and are currently interviewing applicants for crew leader positions. They are developing a process for documenting work to assess the effectiveness of the program. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Grant Ms. MacVay reported that she and Ms. Belton provided a report in the Task Force packet that is a concept summary of initiatives for a future PPE Grant proposal. They recommend dealing with facemasks separately from other PPE. They suggested that CBJ purchase facemasks in bulk, with a mechanism for distribution within the community. This could be a full grant or cost share program. Cost sharing could ensure usage but could also become complicated. Eligibility criteria needs to be established, along with a recommended purchase volume and distribution center. Ms. MacVay reported that other PPE items, such as sneeze guards, cleaning supplies, and other items, receive a reimbursement of 75% of the purchase price for both retroactive and future purchases. She suggested providing a list of PPE sources that have proven to have adequate supplies of product with timely shipping to Juneau. Ms. Bell stated that masks are a priority for the workforce and larger community; she supports expansion of the program to include nonprofits, state and city employees, and the public. Mr. Koelsch expressed support for offering this to the community at large. Mr. Botelho said it could be simple to create an ordering mechanism for a business or nonprofit to indicate their anticipated need for masks over a specified period so the City could measure the degree of need in the community and purchase in bulk. Mr. Mertz asked if it makes sense to interact with the EOC on this idea for input on logistics and demand. Mr. Rogers replied the EOC has been assessing this need. They are under the impression that the community is making and gifting masks at a rate that is appropriately meeting the need. Ms. Thomas stated that, while mask availability could be a non‐issue currently, the introduction of legislative work, tourism, and potential mandatory masking might create an issue down the road. Future COVID‐19 Testing Mr. Barr reported that the Assembly will be hearing an ordinance related to local testing on June 29. The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is exploring a variety of options for testing and processing tests locally. Three testing systems are under consideration, but Bartlett Regional Hospital (BRH) feels there is only one testing system, the Cepheid system, they can reliably staff. The Cepheid system is a rapid test that is in use in Juneau. BRH CEO Chuck Bill is negotiating a potential contract with Cepheid, but Cepheid can only commit to supplying 300 tests per week starting in September. This is not enough to meet the demands in Juneau. Page 5 of 28 Mr. Mertz asked what issues exist with the other testing systems. Mr. Barr replied that space and staffing seem to be the major roadblocks. Machines for other testing systems will not fit in the current BRH laboratory, measuring approximately 11’ x 6’ and 9’ x 5’. Mr. Barr was unclear on the specifics of the staffing barriers, and Mr. Mertz recommended that Mr. Bill might speak on this issue at a future meeting. Mr. Koelsch and Ms. Bell asked if the EOC has considered approaching SEARHC, the Tongass Testing Center, or another local provider for processing test results. Mr. Barr replied that due to licensing and waiver requirements, along with the need for the supervision of the medical director, it is more advantageous to utilize BRH since they already have those systems in place. He added that SEARHC is also doing Cepheid testing. Non‐Profit Grants / Projects Recommendation to Assembly Ms. Thomas introduced Executive Director of JCF, Amy Skilbred, as instrumental in developing the nonprofit grant proposal. Ms. Thomas gave an overview of the proposal and asked the Task Force to consider a recommendation to the Assembly for this program. The recommendation consists of two primary grant programs, run sequentially. One program focuses on distributing grant assistance as quickly as possible for $3.2 million, with $200 thousand designated specifically to a food program. The estimated nonprofit need of $3 million was calculated through consultation with Mr. Larry Persily, consultant to Kenai’s nonprofit assistance program, Mr. Max Mertz’s financial expertise, and Mr. Jeff Roger’s access to 990 forms filed in Juneau. The second recommendation is to set aside an additional $3 million to focus on future social service needs leading into the fall. This will enable nonprofits to work on a plan for use of these funds. Ms. Skilbred thanked the Foraker Group and Alaska Municipal League for their assistance and the information they provided that helped with the creation of the nonprofit grant proposal. During development, they were careful that the application process does not ask the applicant for more than is needed to assess an award amount, in order to keep the program simple. Mr. Botelho asked if the funding level is adequate for all 501(c) organizations, and if they had considered limiting the program to specific types of 501(c) organizations. He stated he appreciated that the program addressed a variety of different types of nonprofits but wondered if the program should be more narrowly targeted to nonprofits experiencing the most harm due to COVID‐19. Mr. Mertz shared that according to GuideStar, there were 157 revenue producing nonprofits in Juneau in 2019. Nonprofits listed include fraternal orders, sports teams, veteran organizations, labor organizations, and more. Childcare businesses can be a 501(k) but can also be a 501(c)(3). He observed the grant proposal is structured in a way that takes other CARES funding into consideration when calculating the maximum award amount. Page 6 of 28 Mr. Mertz recommended limiting the nonprofit grant to the following 501(c) types: Type Description 501(c)(3) Religious, Educational, Charitable, Scientific, Literary, Testing for Public Safety, to Foster National or International Amateur Sports Competition, or Prevention of Cruelty to Children or Animals Organizations 501(c)(4) Civic Leagues, Social Welfare Organizations, and Local Association of Employees 501(c)(6) Business Leagues, Chambers of Commerce, Real Estate Boards, etc. 501(c)(19) Post or Organization of Past or Present Members of the Armed Forces 501(c)(23) Veterans’ Organization Mr. Koelsch agreed the program should be narrower, targeting the nonprofits that are most in need. Ms. Skilbred stated that the program could be narrowed, but suggested exercising caution because narrowing only to social service organizations would exclude many nonprofits that are in dire need of assistance. Examples of this include the Juneau Arts and Humanities Council, Perseverance Theatre, and cultural organizations. Mr. Koelsch asked for clarification on faith‐based nonprofits and whether that meant something like St. Vincent de Paul’s retail store or a faith‐based church. Mr. Mertz replied that it would include 501(c)(3) organizations such as Family Promise, and other religious organizations that carry out a charitable purpose. Mr. Botelho added that Salvation Army would be another example of a faith‐based religious organization that provides charitable services regardless of a person’s religious affiliation. Ms. Thomas stated that, in order for a nonprofit to be eligible for a grant, it must be able to demonstrate a loss due to COVID‐19 related impacts. Therefore, while a sports organization, for example, is an important part of Juneau’s community, it still has to demonstrate a loss, whether through canceled fundraising efforts due to social distancing requirements or lower enrollment. Mr. Mertz confirmed that sports organizations are all classified as 501(c)(3), so they will be covered if they have experienced a loss. Mr. Botelho asked to include 501(c)(7) organizations in the list of eligible nonprofits, in order to encompass social and recreational clubs that have clearly experienced loss, such as the Juneau Yacht Club and the Gastineau Channel Little League. There was no opposition expressed to adding 501(c)(7) to the list. Page 7 of 28 MOTION: by Mr. Mertz to limit the Nonprofit Grant Program to the following 501(c) organizations: Type Description 501(c)(3) Religious, Educational, Charitable, Scientific, Literary, Testing for Public Safety, to Foster National or International Amateur Sports Competition, or Prevention of Cruelty to Children or Animals Organizations 501(c)(4) Civic Leagues, Social Welfare Organizations, and Local Association of Employees 501(c)(6) Business Leagues, Chambers of Commerce, Real Estate Boards, etc. 501(c)(7) Social and Recreational Clubs 501(c)(19) Post or Organization of Past or Present Members of the Armed Forces 501(c)(23) Veterans’ Organization ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS: Ms. Peters asked what organizations are being excluded from this motion. Mr. Botelho replied insurance companies, credit unions, and condo associations to name a few. Hearing no objections, the motion was approved. Mr. Mertz asked Ms. Skilbred to explain the $25 thousand threshold mentioned in the grant. Ms. Skilbred replied that if a nonprofit is receiving $25 thousand or less in grant funding, they attest to the fact that they have experienced revenue loss, and no further documentation is needed. Grant administrators still reserve the right to request additional information if needed, but this is a good way to simplify and streamline the program by not requiring more paperwork than is actually needed. Any nonprofit receiving funding in excess of $25 thousand is required to list specific COVID‐19 related costs or revenue losses they have experienced and/or foresee through the end of December 2020. This will be used as a guide to determine the impact on the organization. MOTION: by Mr. Botelho to move this Nonprofit Grant Program proposal forward to the Assembly for the creation of an ordinance with the modifications adopted prior for specific 501(c) organizations. Ms. Bell seconded the motion. Hearing no objections, the motion was approved. Page 8 of 28 Juneau Arts Proposal Mr. Mertz introduced the Executive Director of JAHC, Nancy DeCherney and the work she has contributed to the Juneau ArtWorks Grant Proposal. Recommended ranges of funding for the program are $250 thousand to $500 thousand. It would follow the same process the JAHC has had in place for many years when issuing CBJ grants to artists. This idea was brought to the Task Force by a public comment provided by Ms. Anjuli Grantham, who also serves on the Juneau Commission on Sustainability. From there, the idea has grown into a vision to support artists of all types who have lost gigs, sales, and employment, while at the same time memorializing what the community is going through and lifting people’s spirits to help pull us through. Ms. DeCherney stated that Ms. Grantham’s suggestion helped them realize that many artists fall into a gap where they do not have access to other funds. A national statistic shows that 62% of creative workers and artists are out of work or unemployed. Ms. DeCherney shared that at the 2020 Americans for the Arts convention, keynote speaker David Brooks from the New York Times expressed that the arts can be used to weave communities back together. Ms. DeCherney added that the arts can help to rebuild trust, work with social issues, and move us forward while providing meaningful work to people who have suffered harm and loss of income due to COVID‐19. Mr. Mertz asked Ms. DeCherney to outline the process that would be used to manage the program. Ms. DeCherney explained that a call would be released to the artist community; there are currently around 300 on their list alone. Artists would respond by submitting an application. Then, a panel of community members who represent the arts, the business community, and other segments of the population would review the projects and determine which artists would be funded. The JAHC is responsible for issuing the funding and tracking the work progress of the artists and collecting evaluations. Mr. Botelho expressed enthusiasm for this idea as it impacts a segment of the community that would otherwise fall through the cracks. Mr. Mertz advised that as the application is developed, there should be a mechanism for ensuring that the artist has experienced harm due to COVID‐19. He feels there is a case due to the lack of tourism. He suggested that, if an artist who has received funding through the Business Stabilization Grant applies, the funding received be taken into consideration when processing applications. MOTION: by Ms. Bell to forward the Juneau ArtWorks Grant Proposal to the Assembly at the $500 thousand level of funding. Ms. Martinson seconded the motion. Page 9 of 28 DISCUSSION Ms. Martinson stated that her own small business, which is driven by tourism, has displaced many artists. Additionally, the cancelation of Celebration was a large blow to many artists. Mr. Koelsch expressed a desire for the art involved in the program to be of a positive and uplifting nature, because there is already so much negativity in our society due to dealing with the health and social issues. OBJECTION Ms. Thomas expressed support of the concept, but stated there has not been time to fully absorb this. She asked for additional time to consider the program rather than voting on the motion tonight. Mr. Mertz replied that for the good of the Task Force, he suggested taking the week of June 29 off. Therefore, it would be two weeks before this proposal could move forward. Mr. Botelho suggested taking this up tomorrow at the conclusion of the Strategic Initiatives Work Session. The group was in favor of this to allow the Task Force additional time to consider the program. The motion was postponed. The Task Force will hear the motion again at the conclusion of the June 26 Strategic Initiatives Work Session. Strategic Initiatives Work Session Ms. Bell shared the intent of the Strategic Initiatives Work Session on June 26 is to discuss the foundations of community and the future. She suggested that not all topics might be related to CARES funding but could be budget items and bond initiatives that would further the mission the Task Force has been given. Agenda items include broad topics such as education, communication, energy, workforce, housing, and public infrastructure. Good of the Order Mr. Koelsch expressed disappointment at the status of COVID‐19 testing and stated he would like to see a decreased turnaround time for tests to enable safe travel. Mr. Mertz suggested inviting BRH CEO, Mr. Bill, to the next meeting to hear some of the challenges the hospital is experiencing and to gather more information. Ms. Grigg announced the location of the Economic Stabilization Strategic Initiatives Work Session on Friday, June 26 at 12 p.m. at the Elizabeth Peratrovich Hall. Members of the public may join or call in to the number listed on the website at www.juneau.org/assembly/economic‐stabilization. Page 10 of 28 Ms. Grigg added that Airlift NorthWest will be meeting with the Mayors and City Managers of Southeast Alaskan towns, and the President of Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska to discuss the funding request presented to the Task Force on June 6, 2020. There are a limited number of slots for Task Force members at that meeting if they are interested. Adjournment The Economic Stabilization Task Force meeting is canceled for July 2. The next meeting will be held on July 9. At 5:04 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Page 11 of 28 Economic Stabilization Task Force Strategic Initiatives Work Session Appointed by the City & Borough of Juneau’s Mayor DRAFT Action Notes from June 26, 2020 Call to Order The Economic Stabilization Task Force Strategic Initiatives Work Session was convened at the Elizabeth Peratrovich Hall at 12:05 p.m. by Co‐Chair Linda Thomas. The Task Force expressed appreciation to Ms. Belton and Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska for providing the meeting room, technical support, and lunch. Task Force Members Present: Linda Thomas, Max Mertz, Susan Bell, Theresa Belton, Bruce Botelho, Eric Forst, Ken Koelsch, Lauren MacVay, Laura Martinson, and Terra Peters. Task Force Members Absent: None Staff Present: CDD Administrative Officer, Brenwynne Grigg; and CBJ Finance Director, Jeff Rogers Assembly Members Present: Mayor Beth Weldon and Loren Jones Special Guest Speakers: None Opening Comments Task Force Role  Identify funding gaps  Provide recommendations to the Assembly to stimulate the economy, keep the community safe, and initiate strategies that facilitate long‐term recovery  Serve as a liaison with the State of Alaska’s economic stabilization team Potential discussion topics should be expanded to include:  The City itself and processes  Address homelessness  Impact of school schedule on the workforce  Broader issue of childcare  Focus on 2021 and beyond Additional comments:  Workforce development issues are acute, began before COVID, and tie into national issues  We should identify strategies to attract remote workers, recognizing this is a competitive issue and a unique moment in time  Broadband is important Page 12 of 28  To attract young families we need housing, education, and childcare plus arts and activities  What are growth industries that would attract young people and opportunities  Seniors are now the largest sector of our population, what encourages them to remain in the community, stay safe  We need accessible and timely COVID testing Financial Capacity of CBJ and Infrastructure Mr. Botelho introduced the Infrastructure Report and presented arguments for why the CBJ Assembly should develop a project list for an infrastructure package to be voted on in an upcoming election in order to stimulate the economy.  Infrastructure is a classic development tool to stimulate the economy  Report drafted by Mr. Botelho illustrates municipal bonding capacity is available  Can be augmented with reserves and other funds, including philanthropic organizations  Projects are not identified at this stage  Need to be mindful of the overall tax burden and debt  CBJ should be ready for any state and federal stimulus programs  City processes can move faster than a state bond package, which would be 2022 at the earliest  Current mill rate is 1.2, which is a drop of .03 since 2010.  Mr. Rogers comments: o As debt is added or retired, the mil rate goes up or down o Fund balance is available, however the CBJ has lost revenue from economic loss and state actions including changes on school debt o CARES funding continues to evolve; if the municipality can use CARES funding to replace lost revenue it will likely do that MOTION: by Mr. Mertz to advance the Public Infrastructure memorandum to the Assembly with encouragement of early action and the addition of language supporting importance of job training to align with implementation. Mr. Botelho seconded the motion. Hearing no objections, the motion was approved. Homelessness  The issue is very apparent downtown  Support CBJ funding for Glory Hall; we need a purpose‐built facility and other programs to help people at risk  Ties with prior recommendation for non‐profit grants to address needs  Need to take advantage of lack of traffic; use strike teams to identify and assist people  Who is aggregating information and actions  Need to improve coordination between CBJ, Homelessness Coalition, other organizations  Need to address immediate issues and develop a 5‐year plan  A campus approach or systems approach for long‐term solutions  Warming center and campground are not enough  Anchorage is looking at converting four sites to housing  CARES Act funding can be used to acquire real property Page 13 of 28 ACTION ITEM: Ms. Thomas, Ms. Peters, and Mr. Forst will pursue additional fact‐finding on the homelessness issue to bring before the Task Force. Education and Childcare  Really want to see schools open, with kids in schools  School district plan is expected to have three scenarios for different COVID‐19 levels in the community  Broad COVID‐19 testing is critical to allowing the economy to function  Need to weight safety factors; infection rate is low both in community and for kids  We should anticipate changes to the schedule while we are waiting to get a vaccine  Childcare is the single most important issue  We need to develop programs for the 50% who will not be in school  Facilitate a safety net that allows both parents to resume working  School guidance and education delivery is evolving  Need to join the initiative and understand gaps‐‐including teens  Invite school district to address the Task Force  Examine actions in other communities ACTION ITEM: Mr. Botelho, Ms. Martinson, and Mr. Koelsch will pursue additional fact‐finding on the education and childcare issue to bring before the Task Force. Workforce Development and Training  How can we attract remote workers  What are training needs for recovery and for the future  Retaining UAS is a major aspect of workforce development o Regents are forming a committee to examine options  Employment is a priority of Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska o Vocational Training Resource Center is expanding distance delivery o Considering a construction academy  FOLLOW‐UP: Theresa, Laura, and Susan ACTION ITEM: Ms. Belton, Ms. Martinson, and Ms. Bell will pursue additional fact‐finding on the workforce development and training issue to bring before the Task Force. Other Discussion  Has a gap analysis been done to identify business opportunities  UAS was positioned to address training needs in medical services  There was an effort to increase value added/light manufacturing  Communications/broadband support other initiatives  What are the industry‐specific needs o JEDC, SE Conf, McDowell Group tracking data and business surveys  Expanding our federal research capacity was a JEDC initiative o Ted Stevens marine Research Institute, USFS Lab, NOAA examples Page 14 of 28  US Coast Guard is a huge aspect of our community in terms of service delivery, payroll, and volunteers o UAS training program was developed for USCG needs  Unemployment is profound and growing Resume Action Items from June 25 Task Force Meeting The Juneau ArtWorks Program proposal was reconsidered for recommendation to the Assembly. Ms. Thomas would like to see strong language in an ordinance tying this program to the COVID‐19 business interruption clause.  Artists have seen a year‐over‐year loss of income due to COVID‐19  Program could mirror the panel process for art review currently in place for other CBJ grants  CCTHITA is implementing a similar program for their Certified Tribal Artist program  Art program could be expanded to teach children who are at home during the school year MOTION: by Ms. Bell to move the 2020 Juneau ArtWorks Program to the Assembly for consideration at the $500 thousand funding level. Ms. Martinson seconded the motion. Hearing no objections, the motion passed. Adjournment The July 2 Economic Stabilization Task Force meeting is canceled, and meetings will resume on July 9. At 1:55 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Page 15 of 28 To: Rorie Watt, CBJ Manager CC: Jeff Rogers, CBJ Finance Director Mila Cosgrove, CBJ Deputy Manager From: Brian Holst, JEDC Executive Director Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 Re: Update on COVID19 CBJ Sustainable Business Grant Program per CBJ Ordinance 2019- 06 (AC)(b)(am) Reporting Period: Monday, June 6 to Tuesday, July 7 1. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES CBJ Assembly adopted Ordinance 2019-06 (AC)(b)(am) which provides for $3.5 million in grants to Juneau businesses experience financial hardship due to COVID19. Per the Ordinance, businesses must demonstrate Financial Hardship by showing a decline in business of 20% or more from 2019 to 2020. Once the qualify, they can then submit actual and estimated expenses for the period of April through August 2020 in three categories of “fixed” expenses: 1) utilities, 2) long-term debt, and 3) rent/leases. Thirty-three percent of those expenses, up to $33,000, can be granted to businesses, including non-profits. This program is Phase One of a three phase program. Phases Two and Three may be adjusted to better meet the needs of the business community. An additional $8.5 million is currently earmarked for these future phases. This report covers the initial period of the program through the first week of July. 2. PROGRAM SECTION a. Summary of Main Activities CBJ Assembly adopted Ordinance 2019-06 (AC)(b)(am) on Monday, June 8. On Wednesday, June 17, JEDC received and signed an agreement with CBJ to operate the program. Upon mutual agreement with CBJ Manager’s Office, JEDC opened up the application process on Monday, June 15. On Friday, June 19, JEDC received the first batch of twenty applications back from CBJ after the verification of CBJ reported revenues and tax compliance—a pre-requisite for the program. JEDC received funds for the program from CBJ on Monday, June 22. JEDC began issuing grants to qualified businesses that week. b. Significant Events and Accomplishments • JEDC has received 156 applications. • Of that number, no application has been declined or set aside because of tax compliance issues, duplicate, incomplete, or withdrawn application. • CBJ has reviewed tax compliance for 150 applications. Page 16 of 28 Covid-19 Business Sustainability Full-Time Part-Time Applications Dollars Grant Weekly Report: 7/07/20 Jobs Jobs Total 156 633 472 Post-Approval 79 $ 811,946 226 314 Money Sent 40 $ 440,828 108 201 Documents Sent 13 $ 108,614 28 41 Eligibility Report Sent 21 $ 213,992 75 67 Approved 5 $ 48,512 15 5 Pre-Approval 77 407 158 Final Review 34 $ 416,721 216 73 Initial Review 43 191 85 • The 79 businesses with approved grants have 226 part-time and 314 full-time positions during the period of April through August 2020, as reported/estimated by each applicant. This data is voluntary and 133 applicants provided employment information. Applicant's Line of Business 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 • For the grant program, we collected the abbreviated NAICS code (North American Industry Classification System) to determine business sector. See chart below for types of businesses in the application pool to date. Page 17 of 28 • Grant applicants were asked to voluntarily report their race. One-hundred and twenty applicants replied. The above pie chart shows the self-reported race of the first person listed in each application. Below is the distribution of race in Juneau. Based on these first applicants, it appears that American Indian/Alaska Native are the most under-represented race at this point in the program. c. Anticipated Challenges/Problems/Opportunities/Recommendations • Of the 79 approved applications, 35 have been approved for an amount less than $6,000 and 12 have been approved for less than $2,000. Page 18 of 28 • Grant size is averaging close to $10,000 per award in Phase 1, which will require 300+ grants to fully allocate the resources. • Business that pay high rents and/or have high long-term debt get the highest awards, many of which are located in the downtown area. • JEDC is recommending changes to the Business Sustainabilty Grant Program, Phase 2 & 3 in a separate memo. For example, adding an Simplified Business Grant option would both increase the approved amount for many of the smaller grants and decrease the staff time required to process smaller grants. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION JEDC has not calculated its administrative costs in detail. Some costs include: • JEDC personnel has invested 425 hours of effort. • JEDC acquired HelloWorks software to manage paperless processes for the emergency loan program. We are now using this software also for the grant program, at a relatively small marginal cost. Page 19 of 28 Brenwynne Grigg From: Max Mertz Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 12:09 PM To: Brenwynne Grigg Cc: Linda Thomas Subject: Recommendations for changes to the Phase 2/3 business grant program EXTERNAL E-MAIL: BE CAUTIOUS WHEN OPENING FILES OR FOLLOWING LINKS ESTF members, Susan Bell and I have met with members of the JEDC board and staff over the last two weeks regarding possible changes to the existing Phase 2 and 3 Business Sustainability Grant Ordinance. Please also see the memo from Brian Holst of JEDC. I have also met with the Mayor and Rob Palmer about feasibility and best way to implement the proposed changes. I recommend the following changes to better implement the intent of the program and to best assist the businesses harmed by the grants: 1. Implement a simplified grant process for small businesses – Under this program businesses would be eligible for a grant not to exceed $5,000 based on their 2019 gross sales as reported to the CBJ on their sales tax returns. The grant would be calculated based on 10% of the gross sales reported on the sales tax returns. As examples, if a business had $25,000 in sales, they would qualify for a $25,000 grant. A business with $50,000 in gross sales would receive a $5,000 grant, the maximum. A business with, say, $60,000 in sales would only get the capped maximum of $5,000, but could choose to opt into the program. Under this program, the documentation related to assertion of need would be changed to a self‐assertion subject to verification by JEDC if they believed such verification was necessary. 2. Extend the eligibility period for expenses which currently starts on April 1 and ends on August 31, to instead end on October 31, increasing the number of months of eligible expenses to seven months from five months. JEDC recommended extending to September 30 as a means of increasing the average award size. I recommend including October as well, to further achieve larger grant sizes. 3. Allow businesses to include not only long‐term debt, but also short‐term debt (credit cards, lines of credit, inventory financing). The amount to allow would equal 20% of their balances, not to exceed $10,000. 4. Allow businesses to include as an eligible cost amounts spent on inventory along with utilities in preparation for the summer season. 5. Combining phases 2 and 3. In order to simplify the ordinance, Rob Palmer recommended combining phases 2 and 3. I agreed with him on that and recommend that change. 6. Adding a provision that gives the City Manager the option of prorating available grant funds to eligible businesses based on demand on phase 2 and 3. Max E. Mertz, CPA 1 Page 20 of 28 To: Rorie Watt, CBJ Manager CC: Jeff Rogers, CBJ Finance Director Mila Cosgrove, CBJ Deputy Manager From: Brian Holst, JEDC Executive Director Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 Re: COVID-19 CBJ Sustainable Business Grant Program, Phase 2 & 3 Recommendations Introduction The CBJ Assembly adopted Ordinance 2019-06 (AC)(b)(am), which provides for $3.5 million in grants to Juneau businesses experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19. Per the Ordinance, businesses must demonstrate financial hardship by showing a decline in business revenue of 20% or more from 2019 to 2020. A qualifying business may then submit actual and estimated expenses for the period of April 1 through August 31, 2020, in three categories of “fixed” expenses: 1) utilities, 2) long-term debt, and 3) rent/leases. Thirty-three percent (33%) of those expenses, up to $33,000, can be granted to businesses, including non-profits. This program is Phase One of a three-phase program. Phases Two and Three may be adjusted to better meet the needs of the business community. An additional $8.5 million is currently earmarked for these future phases. This memorandum outlines suggested changes to the CBJ Business Sustainability Grant Program Phases Two and Three, based on experience gained through the implementation of Phase One. Phase One Observations Phase One of the CBJ Business Sustainability Grant Program is assisting many businesses adversely impacted by COVID-19. Here are some observations about the program: • Grant size is relatively small. • Applications can require 50 or more data points (various utilities for five months each, for example) and are considered burdensome by many applicants because of the amount of paperwork. • Very small businesses are not applying. • Award amounts are heavily influenced by high rent and high debt payments. Businesses located in downtown generally receive higher awards because of the relatively high rents. • Maximum grant amount seems reasonable. The average size of an award in Phase One is approximately one-third of the maximum award. • There is no minimum grant amount, which occasionally results in both a business and the grant administrator spending considerable time to process and award a very small grant. Phase Two and Three Proposed Changes 1) Financial Hardship Page 21 of 28 • No change. 2) Award Eligibility Calculations • Make all award calculations based on six months, April through September. This will increase average award size. • No expenses will be used for eligible expenses that would result in duplicate awards, which will require a verification from each recipient in each phase. Utilities: • Minimum utility deduction of $200 per month per business, or $1,200 (or $1,000, if five months). If a business would like to document and be considered for a higher utility amount, they can present documentation establishing actual expense. Debt Service: • Long-term Debt should be redefined as Business Debt, as defined in the operating procedures by the Grant Administrator, which would allow other debts that meet the intent of the grant program to considered in award calculations. This addresses the needs of the smallest businesses that want to apply. • Debt payments on business-related credit card balances (or similar business lending products) can be considered. Eligible expenses will be calculated by using the average revolving debt (balance of capital not paid within the period) from the three dates of April 30, May 31 and June 30. Twenty percent of the balance of this business-related credit card (or similar) debt will be eligible for grant support. • Business lines of credit can be included in the eligibility calculation. Twenty percent of balances as of June 30, 2020, on active business lines of credit can be included, up to an aggregate of $10,000 in Phase Two and Three. • Inventory loans can be included in the eligibility calculation. Twenty percent of the short- term debt (not less than 90 days) as of June 30, 2020, of inventory purchase debt is eligible for grant relief, up to an aggregate of $10,000 in Phase Two and Three. • Monthly payments on federal deferred emergency loans for the period of July through December 2020 can be included. • JEDC Emergency Loan obligation should be considered eligible debt included in the grant reimbursement calculation. Up to six months (July through December 2020) of payments can be included in the grant at 66% for Phase Two and 33% for Phase Three as long as payments are made directly against the loan (not disbursed to the recipient but paid against the awardee’s obligation). The JEDC Emergency Loan Program, funded by CBJ, was specifically defined by Ordinance as a bridge to other resources. Including reduction of six months of this COVID-19 incurred debt is consistent with the intent of both the loan and grant programs. Lease/Rents: • No change. Page 22 of 28 3) Simplified Business Grant: Introduce an alternative, streamlined award methodology for very small businesses. If businesses opt-in to this program, they are eligible for one award. Applicants in Phase Two that received an award in Phase One can receive a second a simplified grant for the difference between a Phase One award and the total eligible through a Simplified Business Grant. • Grants up to $5,000 for any business operating in Juneau. Award is the lesser of $5,000 or 10% of the of the sum of gross revenues in one twelve-month period, calculated based on the sum of twelve consecutive months of gross sales starting no earlier than January 2019 as reported to CBJ for gross sales on sales tax reporting. For businesses with fewer than 12 months of consecutive operations in Juneau, awards will be based on the months available through June 2020. For non-profits (or those not reporting Gross Sales to CBJ for a legitimate reason), the award is based on the annual revenue (excluding gaming- related operations) for a twelve-month fiscal year ending no earlier than June 2019. Minimum grant size is $500. Any business with gross sales or revenues of less than $5,000 a year should not apply. Sole Proprietorships and single-member LLCs (or similar) can apply, but the sum of awards cannot exceed $5,000 to any individual. • Applicants must meet all criteria of the Phase One grant program with one exception: Instead of the financial hardship criteria (demonstrating a 20% decline in gross sales from 2019 to 2020), applicants will certify that they are adversely impacted by COVID-19 and will include a brief explanation of adverse impact. • This award is an alternate method to provide minimum relief to businesses in Juneau and cannot be added to other CBJ Business Sustainability Grant Program awards. An award of the dollar difference between a previous grant and a minimum award under this Simplified Business Grant can be made. 4) Future considerations: Should sufficient funds remain available as we head into Phase Three of this program, we recommend the following: • Financial Hardship is calculated based on a decline in revenue of 20% or more between 2019 and 2020. Reducing the financial hardship threshold to 10% will result in more businesses being eligible for an award. • Other business expenses that were not financed by debt, and are therefore covered in the Debt Service section, or addressed by other grant programs, be considered for addition. 5) Recommended Changes to Ordinance: • Change Long-Term Debt to Business Debt. • Extend award calculation period end date from August 31 to September 30. Page 23 of 28 Impacts of COVID‐19 and the Related Shutdown on Children’s Mental and Behavioral Health Children's Psychiatric Emergency Department Non‐Unique Visits 8% Post Shutdown 7% Post Shutdown 6% 5% 4% Pre‐ Shutdown 3% 2% Pre‐ Shutdown 1% 0% Age 14 ‐ 17 Age 13 Under July 2019 ‐ March 2020 April 2020 ‐ June 2020 July 2019 – March 2020 Number Percentages Monthly Average 18 and Above 911 96% 101 14 – 17 33 3% 4 13 and Under 6 1% 1 April 2020 – June 2020 Number Percentages Monthly Average 18 and Above 315 87% 105 14 – 17 27 7% 9 13 and Under 22 6% 7  Nearly 50% of the children and adult patients assessed during the April 2020 – June 2020 period expressed this was their first time experiencing a Behavioral Health Crisis. Patients communicated a sharp increase in depression and anxiety due to stressors around their employment, housing, and family stress, due to impacts of COVID‐19 on their lives.  Stressors communicated by youth included isolation from their social support networks, lack of sports, and struggles with school during the last quarter of the 2019 – 2020 academic year. Data represents patients seen in the Bartlett Regional Hospital’s Emergency Department, and is not inclusive of other mental and behavioral health providers in Juneau. Data sourced from Bartlett Behavioral Health. Page 24 of 28 Brenwynne Grigg From: Brenwynne Grigg Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:55 PM To: Max Mertz; Linda Thomas Cc: 'Bradley Grigg (bgrigg@bartletthospital.org)' Subject: FW: COVID-19 impact on Psych Emergency Services (“PES”) at BRH Attachments: Impacts of COVID-19 and the Related Shutdown on Children's Mental and Behavioral Health.pdf Hi Linda and Max, I thought this might be useful information for the you or the Task Force when discussing education, childcare, and school services this fall. Mental and Behavioral Health Data from Bartlett Hospital shows the impact of COVID‐19 and the related shutdown on children. The data shows that children ages 13 and under are experiencing the most heightened negative impacts. Below is a statement from the Chief Behavioral Health Officer at Bartlett. Attached are the numbers and some visuals of the data that I put together based on information from Bradley Grigg. I've copied him on this email in case you have further questions of what the therapists at Bartlett are seeing. To one person, they may view the numbers of children presenting as low. To another person, the rate of increase in children presenting to the hospital for mental health reasons is the beginning of a disturbing trend. These number represent the more advanced cases in children. These numbers do not reflect children who were doing great in February and are now experiencing situational depression but are not yet at the point of presenting at the hospital. ______________________________________ Brenwynne Grigg | Administrative Officer Community Development Department │ City & Borough of Juneau, AK Location: 230 S. Franklin Street │ 4th Floor Marine View Building Office: 907.586.0766 │ Cell: 907.723.8072 Fostering excellence in development for this generation and the next. ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Bradley F. Grigg <bgrigg@bartletthospital.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 7:45 AM To: Brenwynne Grigg <Brenwynne.Grigg@juneau.org> Subject: COVID‐19 impact on Psych Emergency Services (“PES”) at BRH EXTERNAL E‐MAIL: BE CAUTIOUS WHEN OPENING FILES OR FOLLOWING LINKS ________________________________ Since July 1, 2019 BRH staff have provided on site 24/7 Masters Level Therapists stationed on campus, available to assess (pediatric and adult) patients who are experiencing a Behavioral Health Crisis to determine if inpatient treatment is needed to effectively treat the patient through said crisis. The following numbers reflect those who present in the Emergency Department with symptoms of depression, anxiety, thoughts of self‐harm, thoughts of harm to others, and / or exhibiting signs of being gravely disabled. 1 Page 25 of 28 General Stats: ‐ July 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020, BRH Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) Staff conducted over 950 Crisis Assessments on patients. Of those 950, 39(4%) were under the age of 18. ‐ April 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020, BRH PES Staff assessed an average of 364 total patients during this 3‐ month timeframe; however, there were some significant changes in dynamics of the patients assessed. 1. Nearly 50% of the patients assessed during this time expressed this was their first time experiencing a Behavioral Health Crisis, communicating a sharp increase in depression and anxiety due to stressors around their employment, housing and family stress due to impacts of COVID on their lives. 2. Of the 364 patients assessed, 49 were under the age of 18. Of those 49, 22 were under the age of 14. Stressors for youth included isolation from their social support networks, lack of sports, struggles with school during the last quarter of the 2019‐2020 academic year. In essence, PES has seen a sharpe rise in COVID related psychiatric crises in the last 3 months. BRH has added staffing to where there is 24/7 coverage of Masters Level Therapists and a Behavioral Health Technician to initiate Crisis Intervention Services as quickly as possible when needed. Bradley F. Grigg, MA Chief Behavioral Health Officer Bartlett Regional Hospital 3260 Hospital Drive Juneau, Alaska 99801 Office: 907.796.8583 Cell: 907.723.0548 2 Page 26 of 28 ESTF Public Comment Summary June 25th, 2020 Letters Received since June 25th Food Production letter proposes a $238,000 grant idea. All Comments: Page 27 of 28 To the Finance Committee and the Assembly, It has recently come to our attention that you will be discussing potential financial aid for medical transportation companies supporting southeast Alaska. As an Alaska owned and operated medevac company also working out of Juneau it is encouraging to hear of he Boro gh commi men o the communities of southeast Alaska and to ensuring the viability of the companies that supply such a vital service to them. Despite also seeing a significant reduction in our flight volume and operating revenue due to COVID-19 we are dedicated to ensuring we can continue to provide medevac service in Juneau, the surrounding communities and throughout Alaska. Any funding that could be provided through this Task Force would be crucial to our ongoing commitment to providing this service. For those on the Committee who are unfamiliar with us, LifeMed Alaska is a non- profit medical transportation company headquartered in Anchorage and has bases in Anchorage, Juneau, Fairbanks, Soldotna, Bethel, Palmer, Dutch Harbor and Kodiak. We provide 24/7 critical care air ambulance services throughout Alaska with full-scope transports for adult, pediatric, neonate (utilizing Neonatal Nurse Practitioners) and high- risk obstetric patients. We also are CLIA certified to carry blood products to meet the critical needs of patients during transport. In the event of the need to transport Covid-19 cases we have an ISO-POD in Juneau to be used if needed to protect both our patients and our crews. In our efforts to provide lifesaving service to all of Alaska we utilize jets, turboprops and helicopters to meet the various needs of our communities on and off the road system. In Juneau we use the Learjet 31 to provide timely transport throughout Southeast Alaska and to Washington state or other lower 48 hospitals for patients needing a higher level of care. We are accredited at the highest level for patient care quality and transportation safety by the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems (CAMTS). Our clinical staff regularly sponsors training opportunities for many clinicians around the state. Recently our staff provided training in Juneau for the Capital City Fire/Rescue personnel in regard to Difficult Airway situations. In October we will also be offering training for the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) course taking place in Juneau. Just like many small businesses in Alaska we have been significantly affected by recent developments. For the last few months we have seen a decrease in our flight volume of over 30% from 2019 levels and our June volume was down by 62.5 % compared to 2019. Clearly both the Alaska-specific COVID-19 impact and the significant reduction in tourism this year are taking a toll. Based on previous years we have seen a concurrent increase in funding requirements, mostly due to the need to provide significantly more personal protective equipment for our clinicians and pilots to avoid the spread of the virus. We have taken urgent steps to keep our costs down by suspending capital expenditures that can be put on hold and cancelling or reducing discretionary spending as much as possible Page 28 of 28 while maintaining patient care and safety standards. Even though we have no plans to reduce our operations, any funds would be vital to maintaining the viability of our organization as we continue to see such significant losses. I and my staff in Juneau can be available for comment at any time and would be grateful for the opportunity to address this issue with you all in person at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration regarding LifeMed Ala ka current situation and ongoing contributions to meeting the medical transportation needs of those communities in Southeast Alaska. I am hopeful that we can be a part of future discussions about this matter. Respectfully, Russ Edwards CEO, LifeMed Alaska