Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority LBRA
Regular MeetingLansing, MI · July 11, 2025
Minutes
Page 1 of 3
Board of Directors Meeting
Friday, July 11, 2025 – 8:30 A.M.
Lansing EDC Office - 401 S. Washington Sq. Suite 101, Lansing, MI 48933
MINUTES
Members Present: Shelley Davis Boyd, Catherine Rathbun, Jonathan Smith, Bryan
Britten, Dr. Cristina Benton, Dr. Alane Laws-Barker (arrived at
8:36 A.M.)
Members Absent: Calvin Jones, Chaz Carrillo, Rawley Van Fossen
Staff Present: Kris Klein, Brian Swett, Chelsea Dowler
Guests: Craig Willian, Eric Helzer
Call to Order/Rollcall
Chair Davis Boyd called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M.
New Board Member Welcome
Christina Benton introduced herself and provided some background information on her experience
and desire to serve on the LBRA Board.
Approval of LBRA Board Meeting Minutes – Friday, June 20, 2025 (ACTION)
MOTION: Member Rathbun moved to approve the LBRA meeting minutes from the Friday, June 20,
2025, Board of Directors meeting, as presented. Motion seconded by Member Smith.
YEAS: Unanimous; motion carried.
Turner North Development Project Brownfield Plan #89 (ACTION)
Klein introduced the development team, Eric Helzer of Turner North Development and Craig Willian of
Develop Detroit provided a brief overview of the Project. The adequacy of parking facilities were
discussed, and Willian commented that parking for other Develop Detroit projects were as low as .3
spaces per unit, and have proved to be sufficient, but the proposed development has a parking ratio of
approximately .8 spaces per unit based on 60 spaces for 76 units. Member Benton inquired about the
project’s financing structure. Willian explained that the project is utilizing LIHTC, which stands for Low
Page 2 of 3
Income Housing Tax Credit, and that the project has a 15-year regulatory period where developer takes
rents and reinvests proceeds back into the project. Willian discussed the other financing sources to be
utilized by the project. Member Smith asked if the project would qualify for a variance under the
proposed Brownfield Plan Policy update and Klein indicated that he believes it would qualify. Member
Laws-Barker asked how the developer arrived at the number of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units. Willian
explained how the number of units at each size was arrived based on market studies and other factors
such as past experience of the development team. Member Dr. Benton asked about community support
for the project and Willian described public engagement efforts and the community’s support for the
project.
MOTION: Member Rathbun moved to approve the Turner North Development Project Brownfield Plan
#89, as presented. Member Britten supported the motion.
YEAS: SIX (6)
NAYS: NONE (0)
ABSTENTIONS: NONE (0
6 YEAS, 0 NAYS, 0 ABSTENSTIONS, Motion Carried.
Brownfield Plan Policy Update – Version 4 (ACTION)
Klein reviewed the process of updating the Brownfield Plan Policy and summarized changes included in
the proposed Version 4 of the policy. Member Britten inquired if the requirements of demonstrating a
financial gap incentivized developers to not try and get their own financing at the level that they could if
the brownfield money was not available. Member Dr. Benton asked about the process for reviewing
applications, including how long it takes and costs. Dowler contributed to explaining the review process.
Chair Boyd asked what ‘significant’ public improvements meant. Klein provided examples but mentioned
the intent was to be flexible. Dr. Benton inquired about how many projects would ask for a variance to
extend the 15-year reimbursement period. Klein said most projects would likely ask for and receive a
variance. Member Smith and Member Dr. Laws-Barker contributed to the discussion, including asking
about how the policy affects minority and new developers. Klein pointed to the variance criteria for
emerging developers. Member Dr. Benton asked if the policy changes would apply to current projects,
Klein said no.
MOTION: Member Smith moved to approve Brownfield Plan Policy Update Version 4, as presented.
Member Rathbun supported the motion.
YEAS: SIX (6)
NAYS: NONE (0)
ABSTENTIONS: NONE (0)
6 YEAS, 0 NAYS, 0 ABSTENSTIONS, Motion Carried.
Open Forum for LBRA Board Members
None.
Page 3 of 3
Other Business
None.
Public Comment
None.
Adjournment
Chair Shelley Davis Boyd adjourned the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority meeting at 9:25
A.M.
________________________________________________________
Kris Klein, President & CEO
Lansing Economic Development Corporation (LEDC)
Agenda
Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (LBRA)
Board of Directors Meeting
Friday, July 11, 2025 – 8:30 AM
Lansing EDC Office - 401 S. Washington Sq. Suite 101, Lansing, MI 48933
AGENDA
1. Call to Order/Rollcall
2. New Board Member Welcome
3. Approval of LBRA Board Meeting Minutes – Friday, June 20, 2025
4. Turner North Development Project Brownfield Plan #89 (ACTION)
5. Brownfield Plan Policy Update – Version 4 (ACTION)
6. Open Forum for LBRA Board Members
7. Other Business
8. Public Comment
9. Adjournment
Packet
Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (LBRA)
Board of Directors Meeting
Friday, July 11, 2025 – 8:30 AM
Lansing EDC Office - 401 S. Washington Sq. Suite 101, Lansing, MI 48933
AGENDA
1. Call to Order/Rollcall
2. New Board Member Welcome
3. Approval of LBRA Board Meeting Minutes – Friday, June 20, 2025
4. Turner North Development Project Brownfield Plan #89 (ACTION)
5. Brownfield Plan Policy Update – Version 4 (ACTION)
6. Open Forum for LBRA Board Members
7. Other Business
8. Public Comment
9. Adjournment
Page 1 of 2
Board of Directors Meeting
Friday, June 20, 2025 – 8:30 A.M.
Lansing EDC Office - 401 S. Washington Sq. Suite 101, Lansing, MI 48933
MINUTES
Members Present: Chair - Shelley Davis Boyd, Vice-Chair - Calvin Jones, Treasurer -
Catherine Rathbun (arrived 8:32am), Chaz Carrillo, Jonathan Smith,
Rawley Van Fossen, Bryan Britten
Members Absent: Secretary - Dr. Alane Laws-Barker
Staff Present: Karl Dorshimer, Kris Klein, Brian Swett
Guests: Brent Forsberg, John Knott, Connor Zook, Eric Helzer, Craig Willian
Call to Order/Rollcall
Chair Davis Boyd called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M.
Approval of LBRA Board Meeting Minutes – Friday, June 6, 2025 (ACTION)
MOTION: Vice Chair Jones moved to approve the LBRA meeting minutes from the Friday, June 6, 2025, Board of
Directors meeting, as presented. Motion seconded by Member Britten.
YEAS: Unanimous; motion carried. (8:31am)
Pleasant Grove & Holmes Development Project Brownfield Plan #80 Amendment No. 1 (ACTION)
Kris Klein provided an overview of the request and introduced developer Brent Forsberg who presented the
Pleasant & Holmes Development Project in more detail. Member Smith commented on the project gap and
sequencing of funding sources in regard to project completion. Member Van Fossen commented on the other
services proposed as part of the project. Member Carrillo inquired about the utilization of the property. Forsberg
indicated the area on Figure 2 of the presentation below the dotted line would be where proposed Phase 1 building
would be located, but that the entire lot would be prepared for future development. Chair Davis Boyd and Member
Britten commented on the financing structure and use of “Crowd Funding” on other projects. Vice Chair Jones
commented on the other projects Forsberg has led and the honoring of Malcolm X as part of the development.
MOTION: Vice Chair Jones moved to approve the Pleasant Grove & Holmes Development Project Brownfield Plan
#80 Amendment No. 1, as presented. Member Smith supported the motion.
Page 2 of 2
YEAS: SIX (6)
NAYS: NONE (0)
ABSTENTIONS: ONE (1), Chaz Carrillo
6 YEAS, 0 NAYS, 1 ABSTENSTION, Motion carried.
Presentation on Turner North Development Project Brownfield Plan #89 (DISCUSSION)
Klein introduced the development team, Eric Helzer of Turner North Development and Craig Willian of Develop
Detroit. Helzer provided an overview of the development team and details of the project. Member Smith provided
positive feedback on the presentation. Member Rathbun inquired about the location of this project in relation to
the New Vision Lansing Old Town development and Klein informed the group it was one block north of that site on
Turner Rd.
Brownfield Plan Policy Updates (DISCUSSION)
Klein presented the draft updates to the Brownfield Plan Brownfield Policy that will be brought before the Board at
a future meeting for their consideration. Member Smith initiated a discussion about what improvements would be
considered significant and at making the definition of “Public Benefit” clearer, as well as more clarity of what
would be considered for variances from the standard terms of the Brownfield agreements. Member Van Fossen
commented that there are many public improvements required by the city as part of developments. Treasurer
Rathbun initiated discussion on the 15-year vs. 30-year term of capture. Member Britten requested a copy of the
current Brownfield Plan Policy and Klein indicated that he would distribute a copy of the policy.
Open Forum for LBRA Board Members
None.
Other Business
None.
Public Comment
None.
Adjournment
Chair Davis Boyd adjourned the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority meeting at 9:51 A.M.
________________________________________________________
Kris Klein, President & CEO
Lansing Economic Development Corporation (LEDC)
THE LANSING BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (LBRA)
Resolution Recommending Approval of Plan #89
Turner North Redevelopment
At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority
(LBRA) City of Lansing, Michigan, held on Friday, July 11, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., pursuant
to notice duly given:
PRESENT: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
The following preamble and resolution was offered by;
Member: , and seconded by
Member:
WHEREAS, The LBRA (Authority) staff has worked closely with representatives of Turner
North Redevelopment, LLC (the “Developer”) to draft Brownfield Plan #89 – Turner North
Redevelopment (Plan); and
WHEREAS, The LBRA staff has duly reviewed such Plan and has found it to be in
compliance with the provisions of Act 381 of Michigan Public Acts of 1996, as amended
(Act), and meets the following determinations and findings:
1. The Plan constitutes a public purpose under the Act;
2. The Plan meets all of the requirements for a brownfield plan set forth in
Section 13 of the Act;
3. The proposed method of financing the cost of the eligible activities, as
described in the Plan, is feasible and the Authority has the ability to arrange
the financing;
4. The costs of the eligible activities proposed in the Plan are reasonable and
necessary to carry out the purposes of the Act; and
5. The amount of the captured taxable value estimated to result from the
adoption of the Plan is reasonable; and
WHEREAS, The LBRA staff recommends approval of Brownfield Plan #89 – Turner North
Redevelopment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
LANSING BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Brownfield Plan described as Brownfield Plan #89 – Turner North
Redevelopment in the form filed herewith is hereby approved by the Lansing
Brownfield Redevelopment Authority and recommended for consideration by the
City Council of the City of Lansing pursuant to Act 381 of Michigan Public Acts of
1996, as amended.
2. The LBRA Board hereby requests that the Lansing City Council, after required
notification as specified by the Act, hold a public hearing in consideration of this
matter, and subsequently approve the Plan.
YEAS:
NAYS:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
) SS.
COUNTY OF INGHAM )
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of a resolution adopted at
a meeting of the Brownfield Redevelopment Authority held on the 11th day of July, 2025,
and said resolution is on file in the office of the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment
Authority and is available to the public. Public notice of the said meeting was given
pursuant to and in compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of Michigan 1976, including
in the case of a special or re-scheduled meeting, notice by publication or posting of at
least eighteen (18) hours prior to the time set for the meeting. In addition, said meeting
was held in full compliance with the Board’s By-Laws.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my official signature.
________________________________
Shelly Davis-Boyd, Chair
CITY OF LANSING
BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (LBRA)
401 S. Washington Sq. Ste. 101, Lansing, MI 48933
LBRA BROWNFIELD PLAN SUBMITTAL COVER SHEET
For consideration of a Brownfield Plan by the City of Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment
Authority (LBRA), the Applicant must complete this form in full, provide all additional application
forms, and pay applicable administration fees with the submission of a Brownfield Plan. The
submitted Brownfield Plan must adhere to Michigan Public Act 381 of 1996, as amended.
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Project Name: Turner North Development
1413 Turner Street- 33-01-01-09-252-131
No Address- 33-01-01-09-252-152
1421 Turner Street- 33-01-01-09-252-161
Project Address:
No Address- 33-01-01-09-252-171
1429 Turner Street- 33-01-01-09-252-181
No Address- 33-01-01-09-252-191 (PART)
Applicant Name: Turner North Development, LLC
Contact Name: Craig Willian
Contact Phone: 313-960-7706
Contact Email: craig@developdetroit.org
Submittal Date: April 12, 2025
PLAN INFORMATION
Developer Reimbursement (Maximum) (Table 1a) However, deficiency/shortfall $13,163,588
to the Developer is estimated at $2,136,541
Public Reimbursement (Maximum) (BRA Admin, LBRF, and MBRF) (Table 1a) $1,215,636
Duration of Plan (Maximum) 33 years
Duration of Capture (Maximum) 30 years
Total Local Capture during Plan (includes Application Fee, BRA Admin, and $9,716,330
LBRF) (Table 1a)
Total State Capture during Plan (includes MBRF) (Table 1a) $4,662,894
Total New Taxes to Taxing Units during Plan (Table 3) $2,705,313
Version 2024.03.29 1
ADHERENCE TO LBRA BROWNFIELD PLAN POLICY
As part of the LBRA‘s review of the Applicant’s submission, adherence to Plan Requirements
and responses to the Plan Evaluation criteria will be considered. Applicant must complete each
section in full in order for the LBRA to review the submission.
Plan Requirements
Applicant’s submission must meet or exceed the following Brownfield Plan requirements of the
LBRA’s Brownfield Plan Policy.
Instructions: Applicant must initial each “Request” column of the table below attesting to the
Plan’s adherence to each criterion.
* Exemptions to any Criterion: If the Plan does not meet one or more of the following
criterion, an exemption must be requested by the Applicant. To request an exemption to
a criterion, applicant must explain their request in the “Request” column. A request for
exemption must be presented to the LBRA Board of Directors for their consideration at
least one month prior to the final approval of the Brownfield Plan by the LBRA Board.
LBRA Plan Policy Criteria Request
1) A minimum of 10% of yearly new incremental Plan adheres to criteria
taxes flowing through to all taxing units.
2) A minimum of 10% of captured yearly local Plan adheres to criteria
taxes going to LBRA Brownfield Administration
and/or the LBRA Local Brownfield Revolving
Fund.
3) A maximum of 5% simple interest on Developer Plan DOES NOT request interest
Eligible Activities.
4) The Developer is not asking the City of Lansing Plan adheres to criteria
or State of Michigan for the abatement or
exemption of personal or real property taxes for
the same project (ex: OPRA, Act 198, Act 328,
etc.).
5) A stated not to exceed amount (life of plan cap) Plan adheres to criteria with
for the reimbursement of Developer Eligible $8,889,702
Activities with local taxes.
6) A stated not to exceed amount (life of plan cap) Plan adheres to criteria with
for the reimbursement of Developer Eligible $4,273,886
Activities with state taxes (if state taxes are
captured).
7) A ratio of total state (if captured) to total local Plan adheres to criteria
captured taxes requested to reimburse the
Developer that is at least equal to the ratio of all
annual captured state to local taxes.
For example, if the annual brownfield capture is
20 mils state taxes and 30 mils local taxes, the
ratio is 20/30 = .66 Thus in the brownfield plan
for every dollar of local capture used to reimburse
the Developer there should be at least 66 cents of
Version 2024.03.29 2
state capture used to reimburse that Developer
for Eligible Activities.
8) Language in the plan stating that if the state EXEMPTION REQUEST – In the event
approves a 381 Workplan with less state tax that the state (MSHDA) denies any
capture than what was in the plan approved by eligible activity costs in a Work Plan
the City, the not to exceed amount of local request, those denied costs shall be
capture in the plan will automatically be adjusted adjusted to local-only reimbursement: If
by the LBRA to maintain the current state to local the state (MSHDA) does not approve
capture ratio. of certain state tax funded eligible
activity costs for the use of State tax
capture, those costs then become
eligible for reimbursement with the use
of Local-only tax increment revenues
not to exceed $767,871 (with 15%
contingency).
Plan Evaluation
Instructions: Please mark the section applicable to the Project under each criteria in the
“Response” column. The Applicant may provide additional information or answer under
“Applicant Comments”.
Criteria Response Applicant Comments
Amount of private >/= $100,000,000 Estimated as of March
investment pledged 27, 2025 Proforma
$50,000,000 to $99,999,999
$25,000,000 to $49,999,999 $25,454,144
< $25,000,000
Ratio of private >/= 10:1 Ratio out of
investment pledged $14,427,097 (Private
to requested public 5:1 to 9:1 investment) to
investment 1:1 to 4:1 X requested $11,027,047
(Public eligible activity
investment), not
including cost of
< 1:1 financing for this Project
or its eligible activities,
is 1.31:1.
Number of pledged >/= 500 4 full-time permanent
jobs created that are employees
new to the City 100 to 499
50 to 99
< 50 X
0
Version 2024.03.29 3
Average wage rate >/= $75,000/yr Based upon an average
of new pledged jobs hourly wage of $24.00,
$50,000 to $74,999
created that are new no overtime, resulting in
to the City $30,000 to $49,999 X $49,920/year
< $30,000
N/A (no new Jobs)
Percent of total >/= 20% $1,031,856 (inc. 15%
pledged private 10% to %19.9 contingency) out of
project investment $25,454,144 is 4.01%.
going to public 5% to 9.9%
improvements < 5% X
0%
Height of Building >/= 20 stories Downtown 4 stories Old Town
10 to 19 stories Downtown
5 to 9 stories Downtown
5 to 9 stories Not Downtown
3 to 4 stories Not Downtown X
Other (please explain)
Length of Brownfield </= 10 years Request 30 Year
Plan capture. Estimated
(Must be a stated 11 to 15 years maximum developer
cap in the 16 to 20 years reimbursement of
Brownfield Plan) eligible activities will
X
not be fully reimbursed
over 30 year capture
period resulting in a
Other (please explain) potential
deficiency/shortfall to
the developer estimated
at $2,136,541
Project reuses a Project Nat. Registered None apply
Historic Building Property
Project Meets Fed
Standards
Project in Local Historic
District
Project reuses Historic
Building
Project Provides a Downtown Housing Units X All the units will be
High Priority and restricted to households
Quality Product Downtown Hotel earning at or below 120
LEED Certified Building percent of the Area
Median Income (AMI).
Owner Occupied Housing
Version 2024.03.29 4
High Quality Exterior X The Project will income-
Materials/Exceptional average all 76 units at
Architecture 80 percent AMI, no less
than 59 of these units
will be provided at or
below 80 percent AMI
and their affordability
period will be 20 years.
Other (please explain) This is a high level of
commitment by the
developer. Therefore,
the entire Project is
dedicated to affordable
workforce housing.
Other Factors that demonstrate 1. Developer has been highly engaged with the
the need or impact of the Project community and has received strong public support
or the applicant would like to from the Old Town businesses and residents.
highlight (please list). 2. The Project will maximize the development
opportunity at the property to increase property tax
revenue for the city, county and state from its
current property taxable value of $74,000 to
approximately $4.2 million.
3. Project will create an estimated 75 average on-the-
job peak full-time equivalent construction jobs
(average salary approximately $54,449).
4. Project will create and estimated up to 36
prevailing wage jobs during the on-site and off-site
construction phases.
5. Project redevelops six vacant underutilized parcels
with three of the parcels being functionally
obsolete.
Other Project Assistance
Please list all other incentives or assistance the Applicant is seeking or has received for the
Project from the City of Lansing, Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority, Lansing
Economic Development Corporation, Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Michigan
Department of Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, or other Local, State, or Federal agencies:
Current requests under review for funding assistance: (a) Ingham County Housing Trust Fund;
(b) LBRA LBRF Loan; (c) MSHDA Gap 19
REQUIRED WITH APPLICATION
Applicant must submit the following items at the time the Brownfield Plan is submitted to the
LBRA:
• Complete Brownfield Plan per Michigan Public Act 381 of 1996, as amended
Version 2024.03.29 5
• Litigation Affidavit for each person that has a 20% or greater ownership interest in the
Applicant
• City of Lansing Treasury Information Form for each person that has a 20% or greater
ownership interest in the Applicant
• Review and Application Fee
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
By signing below, the undersigned represents and warrants their authority to submit the
Brownfield Plan on behalf of the Applicant and certifies all information provided by this
Brownfield Plan Cover Sheet is true and correct. Furthermore, by signing below, the
undersigned affirms that the Applicant’s submittal follows the LBRA’s Brownfield Plan Policy, as
amended, and adheres to Michigan Public Act 381 of 1996, as amended.
Applicant Name: Turner North Development, LLC
By:
Print Name: Craig P. Willian
Its: Co-Manager
Date: 06-30-2025
Version 2024.03.29 6
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT
OLD TOWN MULTIFAMILY
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
1413 THROUGH PORTION OF
1503 TURNER STREET, LANSING, MI
Property Addresses and Tax Parcel Numbers:
1413 Turner Street - 33-01-01-09-252-131
No Address - 33-01-01-09-252-152
1421 Turner Street - 33-01-01-09-252-161
No Address - 33-01-01-09-252-171
1429 Turner Street - 33-01-01-09-252-181
No Address - 33-01-01-09-252-191 (PART)
Brownfield Plan No. 89
Revised April 28, 2025
Prepared with assistance from:
ADVANCED REDEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS
PO Box 204
Eagle, Michigan 48822
Contact: Eric P. Helzer, EDFP
Phone: (517) 648-2434
Reviewed by:
LANSING BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (LBRA)
401 S. Washington Square, Suite 101
Lansing, Michigan 48910
Contact: Karl Dorshimer
Phone: (517) 243-3512
Approved by the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority
______ / ______ / 2025
Approved by the Lansing City Council
______ / ______ / 2025
Table of Contents
Project Summary Sheet: Brownfield Plan No. 89 -
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project ................................ 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 7
1. Description of the Eligible Property (Section 13(2)(h)) ......................................................... 8
2. Basis of Eligibility (Section 13(2)(h), Section 2(p)), Section 2(r)......................................15
3. Summary of Eligible Activities and Description of Costs (Section 13 (2)(a),(b))........18
4. Captured Taxable Value and Tax Increment Revenues (Section 13(2)(c),(f)) .............23
5. Method of Brownfield Plan Financing (Section 13(2)(d))....................................................26
6. Amount of Note or Bonded Indebtedness Incurred (Section 13(2)(e)) .........................26
7. Duration of the Brownfield Plan and Effective Date (Section 13(2)(f))..........................26
8. Estimated Impact on Taxing Jurisdictions (Section 13(2)(g)) ............................................26
9. Displacement of Persons (Section 13(2)(i-l)) ...........................................................................28
10. Local Brownfield Revolving Fund (Section 8)..........................................................................28
11. State Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (Section 8a) ............................................................29
12. Other Information (Section 13(2)(m)) ........................................................................................30
Tables
Table 1 – Eligible Activities................................................................................................ 22 and 23
Table 1a – Itemized Eligible Activities
Table 1b – Summary of Eligible Activities
Table 2 – Captured Incremental Taxable Values &
Tax Increment Revenues Captured............................................................................ 25
Table 3 – Impact to Taxing Jurisdictions: Tax Increment Paid, Captured, and Returned
to Taxing Jurisdictions .................................................................................................... 28
Table 4 – Tax Increment Financing Estimates ............................................................. Exhibit C
Table 4a1 – Base Year/Initial Taxable Value (ITV) Information
Table 4a2 – Total Estimated Taxes Paid to All Taxing Jurisdictions
on the Base Year Taxable Value/Initial Taxable Value (ITV)
Table 4b – Estimated Future Taxable Value (FTV) Information
Table 4c – Total Tax Increment Revenue Capture Estimate
Table 4d – Tax Increment Revenue Reimbursement Allocation Table
Table 4e – Total Taxes Paid to All Taxing Jurisdiction on the Total Captured Value
(excludes any Base Year/ITV) During Brownfield Plan Tax Capture
Period
Table 4f1 – Tax Capture Not Allowed by BRA
Table 4f2 – 10% of Tax Capture Passed-Through/Shared with Taxing Jurisdiction
Figures
Figure 1 – Scaled Property Location Map ..................................................................................... 9
Figure 2 – Eligible Property Boundary Map ............................................................................... 10
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 1
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Exhibits
A. ALTA / NSPS Land Title Surveys with Legal Descriptions
B. Basis of Eligibility –
Exhibit B-1: Affidavits (3) of Functional Obsolescence dated April 3, 2025
Exhibit B-2: MSHDAs Partnership I (South Central) - Data Document 2022
Exhibit B-3: August 1, 2023, Real Estate Analysis for the Old Town District
C. Table 4 – Tax Increment Financing Estimates
Attachments
A. Brownfield Plan Resolutions and Public Hearing Notice
B. Brownfield Development and Reimbursement Agreement
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 2
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET: Brownfield Plan No. 89-
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project
Project Name: Turner North Development
Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project
Applicant/Developer: Entity Name: Turner North Development, LLC and a Limited
Dividend Housing Authority (LDHA) to be named
and formed later (“Owner” or “Developer”)
Contact: Craig Willian
Mailing Address: 1452 Randolph St. STE 300
Detroit, MI 48226
Office Phone: 313-960-7706
Email: craig@developdetroit.org
Eligible Property Location: The Eligible Property (“Property”) consists of six (6) adjacent &
contiguous parcels located at the following addresses and tax parcel
numbers, Lansing, Michigan:
1413 Turner Street - 33-01-01-09-252-131
No Address - 33-01-01-09-252-152
1421 Turner Street - 33-01-01-09-252-161
No Address - 33-01-01-09-252-171
1429 Turner Street - 33-01-01-09-252-181
No Address - 33-01-01-09-252-191 (PART)
Property Size: Approximately 1.23-acres (53,578.80 square feet)
Type of Eligible Property: Housing Property and Functionally Obsolete Property with Adjoining
& Contiguous Properties
Project Description: Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment
Project (the “Project”) is a redevelopment project of six vacant parcels
(three of which are functionally obsolete) into a new construction
multifamily redevelopment project bringing new residents and
expanded living opportunity into the City of Lansing. The proposed
Project will consist of 76 affordable workforce housing units
(comprised of an estimated: 57, 1-bedroom units; 15, 2-bedroom units;
and 4, 3-bedroom units) contained within a four-story building with
self-contained surface parking. Upon completion of construction, all
the units will be restricted to households earning at or below 120
percent of the Area Median Income (AMI). The Project will income-
average all 76 units at 80 percent AMI, no less than 59 of these units
will be provided at or below 80 percent AMI and their affordability
period will be 20 years. The Project will expand the tax base, result in
significant capital investment into the community, and create new
needed housing opportunities in the City of Lansing. Construction is
anticipated to begin in Summer 2026 and be completed in early 2029.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 3
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Total Capital Investment: This Brownfield Plan (“Plan”) anticipates approximately $26 million in
Total Capital Investments (including acquisition and Developer eligible
activity costs).
Estimated Job Creation:
Construction Jobs During the eligible activities and construction phases of the project, the
Developer estimates that 75 average on-the-job peak full-time
equivalent (FTE) construction jobs will be created. Additional indirect
jobs will be created by spending earnings from both direct and indirect
jobs (for example a construction worker’s purchase of lunch, gasoline,
groceries, etc.). Actual pay rates are unknown, but the average
construction worker salary in Michigan is approximately $ 54,449, or
an equivalent hourly rate of $26, according to ERI Economic Research
Institute.
Permanent Jobs The redeveloped property will provide a variety of permanent jobs,
ranging from support staff, administrative, managerial, and
professional jobs. The Developer estimates that four (4) full-time
equivalent jobs will be created with an average hourly wage of
approximately $24.00.
Estimated Gain in Taxable Value:
(after Project completion)
Base Year Future Taxable
Increased/
Taxable Value Value
Taxable Value
(estimate) (Estimate)
Starting in 2029 Starting in 2029
2025 (when 100% (when 100%
completed) completed)
$ 84,260 $ 4,138,100 $ 4,053,840
Annual Taxes Paid $ 6,745 $ 324,518 $ 317,772
Estimated Duration of Plan: 33 years (2025-2057) to reimburse the amounts specified in this Plan.
Estimated Duration of Plan
Capture: 30 years (2028-2057). Total estimated Plan capture duration for
reimbursement of Department-Specific Activities; MSHDA Housing
Development Activities; Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Preparation and
Consulting & Support, Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation;
Contingency; Local Application Fees; Brownfield Redevelopment
Authority (BRA) Administration and/or Local Brownfield Revolving
Fund (LBRF); and State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund
(MBRF).
Base Year of Plan: 2025
First Year of Plan Capture: 2028
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 4
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Total Taxes Captured Estimate:
(Total Plan Duration)
Total/
Total Taxes Captured During Brownfield Plan Tax Capture Period
Cumulative
Estimated Tax Capture Period in Number of Years = 30
Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (BRA) Administration and/or
$ 826,628
Local Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF) (10%)
BRA Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation (to BRA) $ -
State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF) (Maximum
$ 389,008
of 25-Year period for tax capture)
Local Taxes to Developer * (to Reimburse Eligible Activities) $ 8,889,702
State School Taxes To Developer * (to Reimburse Eligible Activities) $ 4,273,886
Total New Tax Capture (See Table 1a) $ 14,379,225
* Developer Reimbursement Obligations may not be fully reimbursed based upon
current estimates of projected Taxable Value and resultant tax capture from Local and
State School Taxes. The identified Developer eligible costs in the Plan totaling
$13,163,588 (not including captures for BRA Administration and/or LBRF, or MBRF)
may not be fully reimbursed if Taxable Value and/or tax capture assumptions do not
increase over the balance of the 30-year capture period, because Plan estimates a
deficiency/shortfall in potential capture.
Distribution of Total New Taxes Paid Estimate:
(Total Plan Duration)
Total New Taxes Received by Taxing Units $ 1,481,045
Total New Taxes Captured by BRA * $ 12,242,684
Total New Taxes $ 13,723,729
* The impact to each individual taxing jurisdiction may be as much as their
proportionate share of $14,379,225 so long as there are available revenues.
Developer Brownfield costs in this Plan are extraordinary and as a result,
even with the maximum number of years of tax capture allowed, the
Developer may not be fully reimbursed. Currently, as identified in Table 4d,
the resultant deficiency/shortfall to the Developer is estimated at
$2,136,541.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 5
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Eligible Activities and Eligible Costs:
Eligible activities are estimated at approximately $14,379,225
(inclusive of captures for Department-Specific Activities; MSHDA
Housing Development Activities; Brownfield Plan & Work Plan
Preparation and Consulting & Support, Brownfield Plan & Work Plan
Implementation; Contingency; Local Application Fees; BRA
Administration and/or LBRF; and MBRF) of which the projected costs
of Developer eligible activities are $13,163,588. Developer eligible
activities as defined in this Plan are the eligible activities necessary for
the Developer to complete its proposed Project. Developer Brownfield
costs in this Plan are extraordinary and as a result, even with the
maximum number of years of tax capture allowed, the Project may not
be fully reimbursed. The resultant deficiency/shortfall to the
Developer is estimated at $2,136,541 if Taxable Value and/or tax
capture assumptions do not increase over the balance of the 30-year
capture period.
Eligible Activities Eligible Costs
EGLE Eligible Activities
Department-Specific Activities
Work Plan Approval Exempt Activities - Assessments $ 19,987
Work Plan Approval Exempt Activities - Due Care Planning $ 27,855
Due Care Activities $ -
MSHDA Housing Development Eligible Activities
Demolition Activities $ 569,261
Lead, Asbestos and Mold Abatement Activities $ 45,669
Infrastructure Improvements Activities, necessary for a Housing Project $ 1,371,178
Safety Improvements Activities $ 667,714
Site Preparation Activities $ 696,752
Housing Financing Gap $ 9,002,586
EGLE & MSHDA Contingency and Interest
Contingency: EGLE Environmental (0%) $ -
Contingency: MSHDA Eligible Activites (15%) (Not on Housing Financing Gap) $ 502,586
Interest: EGLE Environmental (Simple Interest: 0%) $ -
Interest MSHDA Housing Development (Simple Interest: 0%) $ -
Subtotal $ 12,903,588
Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Preparation and Consulting & Support (to Developer) $ 80,000
Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation (including Tracking, Recording and
Compliance (inclusive of annual income and price monitoring associated with
housing development activities) $ 175,000
Local Application Fees (to Developer) $ 5,000
Subtotal: To Developer * $ 13,163,588
Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (BRA) Administration and/or Local
Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF) (10%) $ 826,628
State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF) $ 389,008
Subtotal: To BRA & State $ 1,215,637
GRAND TOTAL $ 14,379,225
* Developer Reimbursement Obligations may not be fully reimbursed based upon current estimates of projected
Taxable Value and resultant tax capture from Local and State School Taxes. The identified Developer eligible costs in
the Plan totaling $13,163,588 (not including captures for BRA Administration and/or LBRF, or MBRF) may not be
fully reimbursed if Taxable Value and/or tax capture assumptions do not increase over the balance of the 35-year
capture period, because Plan estimates a deficiency/shortfall in potential capture.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 6
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
INTRODUCTION
A. General
The City of Lansing, Michigan (the “City”), established the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment
Authority (the “Authority” or “LBRA”) on October 1, 1997, pursuant to Michigan Public Act 381 of
1996, as amended (“Act 381”). The primary purpose of Act 381 is to promote the revitalization,
redevelopment, and reuse of properties that are blighted, functionally obsolete, tax reverted, an
historic resource, contaminated (also known as a “facility”), or housing property by providing
economic incentives through tax increment financing to pay for certain approved eligible activities.
The Authority is authorized by Act 381 to undertake all activities allowed by the statute.
The purpose of this Brownfield Plan (the “Plan”), as amended is to promote the redevelopment of and
investment in certain “Brownfield” properties within the City. Inclusion of Property within this Plan
will facilitate financing of eligible activities at eligible properties, and will also provide tax incentives
to eligible taxpayers willing to invest in revitalization of eligible sites, commonly referred to as
“Brownfields” that are either environmentally contaminated (a “facility”), blighted property, historic
resource, deemed functionally obsolete property, or housing property. By facilitating redevelopment
of Brownfield properties, this Plan is intended to promote economic growth for the benefit of the City
and all taxing units located within and benefited by the Authority. The City of Lansing has determined
that this Plan is necessary to reduce unemployment, promote economic growth, provide new
affordable workforce housing in the City, and increase capital investment thus creating new taxable
value for the City and the State of Michigan.
The identification or designation of a developer(s) or proposed use for the Eligible Property that is
the subject of this Plan, shall not be integral to the effectiveness or validity of this Plan. This Plan is
intended to apply to the Eligible Property identified in this Plan and, if tax increment revenues are
proposed to be captured from that Eligible Property, to identify and authorize the eligible activities to
be funded by such tax increment revenues. Any change in the proposed developer(s) or proposed use
of the Eligible Property shall not necessitate an amendment to the Plan, affect the application of the
Plan to the Eligible Property, or impair the rights available to the Authority under this Plan.
The Plan is intended to be a living document, which may be modified or amended in accordance with
the requirements of Act 381, as necessary to achieve the purposes of Act 381. The applicable sections
of Act 381 are noted throughout the Plan for reference purposes.
This Plan contains information required by Section 13(2) of Act 381.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 7
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE ELIGIBLE PROPERTY (SECTION 13(2)(H))
The Eligible Property (“Property”) consists of six (6) adjacent & contiguous parcels and is located in
the City of Lansing (“City”), Michigan. The Property is situated west of Turner Street and north of
Dodge River Drive, as depicted on the below Figure 1 – Scaled Property Location Map. The Property
contains approximately 1.20-acres (53,578.80 square feet) as described and depicted in Exhibit A -
ALTA / NSPS Land Title Survey with Legal Descriptions and Figure 2 – Eligible Property Boundary
Map.
Eligible Property*
Address (if known) Tax ID Basis of Eligibility
Housing Property and Functionally
1413 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-131
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address 33-01-01-09-252-152 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
Property
Housing Property and Functionally
1421 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-161
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address 33-01-01-09-252-171 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
Property
Housing Property and Functionally
1429 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-181
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address (PART) {portion
33-01-01-09-252-191 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
of 1503 Turner Street}
Property
*See Exhibit A - ALTA / NSPS Land Title Survey with Legal Descriptions for each individual Eligible
Property and Overall Parcel after redevelopment
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 8
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 9
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 10
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
This Project is seeking tax increment financing (TIF) reimbursement for Brownfield eligible activities.
The use of tax increment revenues (TIRs) are a necessary component of redevelopment financing for
the Property.
The Property is zoned and falls under the City Form-Based Zoning Code (FBC). The intent and purpose
of the MX-3 Mixed-Use District Center district is to provide primarily a vertical mix of uses with higher
density residential. Ground floor uses should be active and pedestrian focused. Development in this
district is characterized by tall buildings lining urban streets near the City core. This district is
intended to be one of the City’s most walkable and higher density areas because of its proximity to
downtown.
The Property is bound by multifamily residential use to the south, single family residential to the west,
and commercial uses to the east and north. The Property is abutted by surface roadways, municipal
water, sanitary and storm sewer services, and electrical and gas utilities.
The Property consists of a vacant land and vacant buildings.
The Property is in an area close to amenities which are both walkable and bikeable. The Property’s
Walkscore scores well for both walkability and bikability, earning a score of 84 (very walkable) and
86 (very bikeable) out of 100 respectively. A Walkscore shows how walkable any given location is,
similarly, a bike score indicates the ease of bike commuting in a particular area. Necessities and
amenities such as markets, transit stops, and entertainment venues are all considered when
calculating these scores. These scores are good indicators of how desirable the Property will be to the
target market demographic. The Property is also situated on the Capital Area Transit Authority
(CATA) Bus Line with a stop immediately in front of the Property on Turner Street.
The Project proposes to redevelop the Property that will create significant economic opportunity for
the local area. The redevelopment integrates design elements, Department-Specific Activities,
Housing Development Activities, and economic development to further goals of the City and the
Michigan State Housing Development Authority (“MSHDA”). It will result in: (1) the community and
municipal benefits of increased property taxes on the Property; (2) housing development activities
that will address specific housing needs on the Property; (3) elimination of vacant buildings; and (4)
a substantial improvement to the appearance and aesthetics of the Property which will assist in
increasing the property values of the neighboring community. The applicant has a strong desire to
put this Property back to productive use and drastically improve the aesthetics of the area. The
applicant will bring a significant investment and major improvement to the City. The Project will add
to the economic vitality of the City.
The parcel and all tangible real and personal property located thereon will comprise the Eligible
Property and is referred to herein as the “Property.” Incremental tax revenues resulting from new
personal property will be captured. Any such funds will be used to reimburse the Authority and
Developer for eligible activities, to the extent authorized by this Plan, and an executed Brownfield
Development and Reimbursement Agreement (“Agreement”), after adoption of this Plan, between the
Developer, the Authority, and the City.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 11
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
PROPERTY CONDITIONS - 2025
PROPOSED PROJECT PARCEL SITE PLAN AFTER COMPLETION
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 12
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
PROPOSED PROJECT SITE SKETCH AFTER COMPLETION
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 13
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
PROJECT RENDERINGS
View Looking Northwest along Turner Street
View Looking Southwest along Turner Street
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 14
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
2. BASIS OF ELIGIBILITY (SECTION 13(2)(H), SECTION 2(P)), SECTION 2(R)
The Property is considered “Eligible Property” as defined by Act 381, Section 2, because (a) the
Property was previously utilized or is currently utilized for residential or commercial purposes; (b)
the vacant residential and commercial structures are “Functionally Obsolete” property; (c) the
Property meets the definition of a “Housing Property”; (d) each of the remaining two (2) parcels are
“adjacent or contiguous” to “Functionally Obsolete” property and “Housing Property”; and (d) the
Property is located within the City of Lansing, a qualified local governmental unit, or “Core
Community,” under Act 381.
The applicant has a strong desire to put this Property back to productive use and drastically improve
the aesthetics of the area.
Eligible Property*
Address (if known) Tax ID Basis of Eligibility
Housing Property and Functionally
1413 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-131
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address 33-01-01-09-252-152 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
Property
Housing Property and Functionally
1421 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-161
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address 33-01-01-09-252-171 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
Property
Housing Property and Functionally
1429 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-181
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address (PART) {portion
33-01-01-09-252-191 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
of 1503 Turner Street}
Property
*See Exhibit A - ALTA / NSPS Land Title Survey with Legal Descriptions for each individual Eligible
Property and Overall Parcel after redevelopment
“Functionally Obsolete” – The property qualifies as “Eligible Property” under Act 381 based on
meeting the definition of a “Functionally Obsolete” property. According to Section 2(u), Functionally
Obsolete means that the property is unable to be used to adequately perform the function for which
it was intended due to a substantial loss in value resulting from factors such as overcapacity, changes
in technology, deficiencies or superadequacies in design, or other similar factors that affect the
property itself or the property’s relationship with other surrounding property. Exhibit B-1: Functional
Obsolescence Determination dated April 3, 2025 (1413 Turner St., 1421 Turner St., 1429 Turner St.)
includes the formal determination of functional obsolescence as made by the City Assessor for these
three (3) parcels as it is related to its basis of eligibility and inclusion in the Plan as an “Eligible
Property”.
“Housing Property” – The property quali ies as “Eligible Property” under Act 381 based on meeting
the de inition of a “Housing Property.” Act 381 de ines Housing Property, in part, as property on which
one or more units of residential housing are proposed to be constructed at or below 120% Area
Median Income (AMI). All of the Project’s rental units will provide affordable housing for individuals
and families earning at or below 120% of Ingham County’s AMI and serves an important public
purpose in Ingham County and the City of Lansing. According to Section 2(o)(ii), the Housing Property
must be “located in a community that has identi ied a speci ic housing need and has absorption data
or job growth data included in the brown ield plan.” Supportive information referenced below and
additional information regarding the Property’s basis of eligibility and inclusion in the Plan as an
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 15
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
“Eligible Property” is in Exhibit B-2: MSHDAs Partnership I (South Central) - Data Document 2022 and
Exhibit B-3: August 1, 2023, Real Estate Analysis for the Old Town District.
a) Located in a community with a speci ic housing need:
The Project is located in Old Town which is the north end of Lansing, Michigan near Grand
River and the Lansing River Trail. Old Town is listed on the National Register of Historic Places
as the North Lansing Commercial District, established in the mid-19th Century. The North
Lansing Historic Commercial District, which included 44 buildings centered in a one-block
radius around the intersection of Cesar E. Chavez (Grand River) Avenue and Turner Street. Old
Town has sought to revitalize itself through programs like Michigan Main Street which was a
program established in 1996. Between then and 2020, vacancy rates in the area dropped from
90% to 10% as Old Town has been re-invented as a location for art, festivals, boutique stores
and creative businesses.
At the time of this writing, there are only four multifamily communities in the trade area
(Motor Wheel Lofts, Amber Square Apartments, Crestwood Apartments and Temple Lofts);
two are considered “affordable” which are dated and two are “market rate” built in the last few
years. Therefore, the proposed Project of workforce housing will be the irst in the community
in decades.
Workforce and affordable housing are particularly needed in Lansing according to the
Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) Regional Housing Partnership
(RHP) Regional Data document for South Central Housing Partnership – I. The MSHDA
published Michigan’s irst Statewide Housing Plan in 2022 and established the Michigan
Statewide Housing Partnership, which called for the creation of Regional Housing Partnerships
(RHPs). The Tri-County Regional Planning Commission (Tri-County/TCRPC), in partnership
with the Capital Area Housing Partnership (CAHP), lead a RHP effort for the tri-county region,
serving Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham counties (Region I). This RHP, known as the state's South
Central Regional Housing Partnership, brought public, private, and nonpro it stakeholders
from across the region together to develop a ive-year housing action plan that addresses local
and regional housing needs, builds on the region’s existing networks and housing ecosystem,
and aligns with the priorities, goals, and strategies identi ied in both the Statewide Housing
Plan and Tri-County's recent HousingDrives study. Their feedback, input from residents, and
results from HousingDrives were used to develop a plan, which was submitted to MSHDA at
the end of September 2023.
The South Central Michigan Housing Partnership includes three counties (Clinton, Eaton and
Ingham) as well as 17 Statewide Housing Needs Assessment markets. The Project location
falls within the Lansing-Central-North market. Currently for the Project location, 82.50% of
Lansing-Central-North households are at or below 120% Area Median Income (AMI) Group.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 16
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
One housing demand indicator, vacancy rates, for the Lansing-Central-North market are
extremely low at 0.1% with renter housing households making up 61% of the housing stock in
this speci ic market. Renter household income tends to be signi icantly lower than the
statewide average, and unemployment is strongly higher. Housing supply indicators imply
markets where single-family detached structures are very common, with some presence of
denser housing types such as duplexes and small-scale multifamily structures. The stock tends
to be quite old, with few units built after 2010 (4.3%), 47.2% dating back to 1939 or earlier,
and 80.3% built before 1970. As such demand for new housing stock for-rent units is high.
Overcrowded conditions are more common in these places than in other markets around the
state. Home values and shelter costs are much lower in these areas; this is likely due to the age
of the stock among other factors. Despite this, overburden is a large issue for many households
here.
A September 2023 Downtown Lansing, Inc Potential Site Development Plans report prepared
by SmithGroup identi ies Lansing’s opportunities. One of those development opportunities is
through the redevelopment of: (a) the many city-owned lots and surface parking lots, and; (b)
vacant buildings and lots like the speci ic Project Eligible Property Turner North Development
are working on redeveloping. Additionally, the August 1, 2023, Real Estate Analysis for the Old
Town District prepared by LandUseUSA in collaboration with SmithGroup and CIB identi ies
the demand for rental housing in the Old Town District at about 200 units annually after
adjusting for new renters that have exceptionally high movership rates (375 units annually
without adjusting).
The Project has rental housing that meets this need.
b) Absorption data or job growth data:
Major employers in the trade area include the State of Michigan, Michigan State University,
Sparrow Health (now University of Michigan- Sparrow), McLaren Health, GM’s Lansing
Assembly Plant, Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Jackson National Life Insurance, and Lansing
Community College.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 17
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Absorption – Ingham County has a slightly higher housing absorption rate than the State of
Michigan. According to the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) economic data released for
March 2025 (Housing Inventory: Median Days on Market, by month not seasonally adjusted),
the median number of days property listings are on the market in Michigan for housing are 50
days. Ingham County, for the same period, housing median number of days property listings
are on the market are 43 days.
According to one private housing site for April 2025, Red in.com, there are approximately 60
available rental units in apartments in the Lansing-Central-North market.
Job Growth – Using the most recent data, November 22, 2024, from the Research Seminar in
Quantitative Economics (RSQE), RSQE predicts the number of payroll jobs in Michigan will
grow by 19,000 next year (2025) and an additional 26,700 in 2026. RSQE is an economic
forecasting and modeling group that has been a part of the University's Economics Department
since 1952. They are the world's longest-running continuously operating economic forecasting
group. They produce four forecasts per year of the U.S. and Michigan economies and annual
forecasts of some Michigan economies. According to the Federal Reserve Economic Data
(FRED) the unemployment rate, not seasonally adjusted, in Ingham County as of February
2025 was at 5.3 percent while for the same period Michigan was at 6 percent.
The Project has rental housing that meets this need.
As Eligible Property, the Property is eligible for Brownfield redevelopment incentives from the
Authority.
3. SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES AND DESCRIPTION OF COSTS (SECTION 13 (2)(A),(B))
The “eligible activities” that are intended to be carried out at the Property are considered “eligible
activities” as defined by Section 2 of Act 381, because they include: Department-Specific Activities;
Housing Development Activities; Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Preparation and Consulting & Support;
Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation; Contingency; Local Application Fees; BRA
Administration and/or LBRF; and MBRF.
The estimated cost of each eligible activity intended to be paid for with tax increment revenues
captures from the Property are shown in the following tables (Tables 1a and 1b). Contingency is
included in this Plan as identified on the tables throughout this Plan. A summary of the eligible
activities that are proposed include:
Department-Specific Activities. Work Plan Approval Exempt Activities included are Assessments and
Due Care Planning. Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Phase II ESA and Baseline
Environmental Assessment(s) report preparation as part of All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI} standards
for a land transfer, purchase, acquisition, occupancy, renovation, or redevelopment. Preparation of
these reports and all costs associated with their preparation are included. Work Plan Approval Exempt
Activities - Due Care Planning included are Due Care Planning, Due Care Planning Subsurface
Investigations, Planning for Compliance with Due Care Plans, and Bid Coordination. Health and Safety
Plan, Project Management, and Eligible Activity Compliance are included.
Housing Development Activities.
Lead and Asbestos Abatement - Due to the age of the buildings, it is expected that lead and asbestos
materials will be encountered during the building demolition process. Therefore, the proposed
abatement costs will include proper assessment, removal and disposal of any materials encountered
during the demolition process. The cost includes the cost of the initial survey to determine the
presence of materials required for abatement and required 3rd-party oversight and reporting of
abatement work. Bid Specification Compliance, Construction Management, Project Management,
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 18
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Eligible Activity Compliance, and Engineering & Other Professional Fees for Abatement Activities are
included.
Demolition - Demolition activities will include building demolitions, including proper removal and
disposal of regulated materials, and select demolition of existing site improvements from the
predeveloped site in preparation for the proposed redevelopment. Bid Specification Compliance,
Construction Management, Project Management, Eligible Activity Compliance, and Engineering &
Other Professional Fees for Demolition Activities are included.
Site Preparation - Site preparation activities include clearing & grubbing, mass grading and land
balancing, , staking, temporary erosion control, temporary traffic control, temporary site control,
excavation for unstable material, fill material, compaction & sub-base, special foundations, soft costs,
professional fees, including but not limited to geotechnical engineering, and active utility relocation.
Bid Specification Compliance, Construction Management, Project Management, Eligible Activity
Compliance, and Engineering & Other Professional Fees for Site Preparation Activities are included.
Infrastructure Improvements Activities, necessary for a Housing Project – Infrastructure improvements
that directly benefit the Project onsite and offsite include road repair, sidewalks, curb/gutter,
approaches, storm water management, electric, sanitary sewer, gas, parking (inc. green space
amenity), lighting, and landscaping & irrigation. Bid Specification Compliance, Construction
Management, Project Management, Eligible Activity Compliance, and Engineering & Other
Professional Fees for Infrastructure Improvements Activities are included.
Safety Improvements – Safety improvements that directly benefit the Project include electrical
hazards, elevator, emergency fire exits and alarm system, fire suppression system including water
connection. Construction Management, Project Management, Eligible Activity Compliance, and
Engineering & Other Professional Fees for Demolition Activities are included.
Housing Financing Gap - Reimbursement provided to the Developer to fill a financing gap associated
with the development of 76 housing units priced for income qualified households (affordable
workforce apartments for households at or below the 120% Area Median Income (AMI)). In
accordance with MSHDA’s Housing Subsidy Calculation memorandum dated September 1, 2023, using
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development FY 2025 Fair Market Rent Documentation
System for Lansing-East Lansing County, the total potential rent loss (PRL) gap cap is calculated as
$23,052,960 for the Plan’s reimbursement period to the Developer (30 years). The amount of Costs to
Fill an Identified Housing Gap reimbursed through this Plan is $9,002,586.
Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Preparation and Consulting & Support, Brownfield Plan & Work Plan
Implementation. Costs incurred to prepare, develop this Plan, proposed Act 381 Work Plan, and the
Agreement, as well as their implementation (including Tracking, Recording and Compliance {inclusive
of annual income and price monitoring associated with housing development activities}), as required
per Act 381 of 1996, as amended. The reasonable costs associated with consultation, representation,
and support at public meetings associated with this Plan, proposed Act 381 Work Plan, and the
Agreement have been included as an eligible activity.
Local Application Fee. The Authority will be charging the Developer an application fee for the
processing of this Plan. The Developer will seek reimbursement of this fee from local tax increment
revenues.
Authority Administration. Plan includes, as allowed by the statute, the capture of tax increment
revenues for the costs of the Authority for the administration of this Plan over the Plan's duration.
Authority Local Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF). Plan includes, as allowed by the statute, the
capture tax increment revenues for deposit into Authority’s LBRF over the Plans duration.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 19
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF). As required in Act 381, the Authority shall
pay to the Department of Treasury at least once annually an amount equal to 50% of the taxes levied
under the state education tax act, including 50% of that portion of specific taxes attributable to, but
not levied under, the state education tax act, that are captured under this Plan. Payments to the MBRF
are estimated at up to twenty-five (25) years starting in Year 1 through Year 25 of this Plan.
The Eligible Activities projected in this Plan may switch categories if onsite, offsite or Property
conditions change. If conditions change, an eligible activity may fall under a different category so long
as the Plan adjustments stay within the Department-Specific Activities category and the Housing
Development Activities category because this Plan contemplates capture of state revenues.
For Department-Specific Activities, the line item costs for any eligible activity may be adjusted with
the approval of the Authority after the date the Plan is approved by the Authority and/or Governing
Body, so long as the costs do not exceed the total combined costs of said activities plus a pro-rata
contingency amount, to the extent that the adjustments do not violate the terms of any approved
documents, such as an Agreement or Work Plan (if applicable), or Public Act 381 of 1996, as amended.
For Housing Development Activities, the line item costs for any eligible activity may be adjusted with
the approval of the Authority after the date the Plan is approved by the Authority and/or Governing
Body, so long as the costs do not exceed the total Housing Development Activities costs plus a pro-rata
contingency amount, to the extent that the adjustments do not violate the terms of any approved
documents, such as an Agreement or Work Plan (if applicable), or Public Act 381 of 1996, as amended.
The Developer desires to be reimbursed for the costs of eligible activities. Tax increment revenue
generated by the Property will be captured by the Authority and used to reimburse the cost of the
eligible activities completed. Amendments to Act 381 that were signed into law on December 28, 2012
to allow local units of government to approve reimbursement of eligible activities with tax increment
revenues attributable to local taxes on any eligible activities conducted on Eligible Property or
prospective eligible properties prior to approval of the Plan (including Plan Amendments), if those
costs and the Eligible Property are subsequently included in an approved Plan or Plan Amendment. If
eligible activities are performed prior to Plan approval, approved eligible activity costs will be
reimbursable in accordance with Act 381. Furthermore, costs in this Plan are subject to approval by
the MSHDA for the use of state tax increment revenues. The MSHDA may adjust specific eligible
activities amongst Department-Specific Activities and Housing Development Activities in accordance
with state policy and guidance. Changes made between Department-Specific Activities and Housing
Development Activities will be reflected in the Act 381 Work Plan. These adjustments made by the
state are allowed and do not change the validity of this Plan, so long as the Grand Total of eligible
activity costs identified are not exceeded. If the state (MSHDA) does not approve of certain state tax
funded eligible activity costs for the use of State tax capture, those costs then become eligible for
reimbursement with the use of Local-only tax increment revenues not to exceed $767,871 (with 15%
contingency).
In accordance with this Plan and the associated Agreement with the Authority, the amount advanced
by the Developer will be repaid by the Authority, solely from the tax increment revenues realized from
the Eligible Property.
Tax increment revenues generated by this Project will be governed by the Agreement. Local and state
school tax capture were assumed to reimburse eligible activity costs in this Plan. Further use of tax
increment revenues generated by this Project will be governed by the Agreement.
Tax increment revenues will be used to pay or reimburse the following obligations based upon the
proposed Waterfall Structure for use of tax increment revenues. This Waterfall Structure may be
amended in the Agreement between the Authority, City, and the Developer:
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 20
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
1. 10% Pass-through/Tax Sharing with all Taxing Jurisdictions. An estimate of this tax sharing
with all taxing jurisdictions in which the Eligible Property is located is provided in Table 3 and
Table 4f2 of this Plan;
2. City/Local Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (LBRA): Reimbursement of Administration
Expenses and/or Local Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF): Funded from Local Tax Capture is
provided at 10% of tax increment revenues in this Plan;
3. State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF): Funded from the capture of the
State Education Tax (SET) millages, 50% of the Captured SET for 25 years, is provided in this
Plan; and
4. Developer Reimbursement for Eligible Activity costs and other eligible costs identified in this
Plan.
The costs listed in the tables are estimated costs and may increase or decrease depending on the
nature and extent of the actual conditions encountered on the Property. The actual cost of those
eligible activities encompassed by this Plan that will qualify for reimbursement from tax increment
revenues of the Authority from the Property shall be governed by the terms of the Agreement. No
costs of eligible activities will be qualified for reimbursement except to the extent permitted in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
Total Plan eligible activity costs identified shall not exceed $14,379,225, so long as there are available
revenues. However, based upon current estimates of Projected Taxable Value and resultant tax
capture, the identified Eligible Activities in Table 1a may not be fully reimbursed if Taxable Value
assumptions don't increase over the 35-year capture period, because the Plan only estimates
$12,242,684 in potential tax capture. If the actual costs of eligible activities are lower than the
estimates identified in this Plan, capture may be lower or if the Taxable Value is higher than estimated
eligible costs may be fully reimbursed.
To summarize, if the Plan is adopted as proposed, Developer reimbursement shall be capped at
an amount not to exceed $13,163,588 on the actual costs of the following Eligible Activities
incurred by the Developer: Department-Specific Activities; MSHDA Housing Development
Activities; Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Preparation and Consulting & Support, Brownfield Plan
& Work Plan Implementation; Contingency; and Local Application Fees. The maximum capture
for BRA Administration Fees and/or LBRF shall be $826,628 of Local Tax Capture. The maximum
capture for MBRF shall be $389,008 of State Tax Capture. However, if the actual costs of eligible
activities are lower than estimated, the amount reimbursed to the Developer, or paid for BRA
Administration Fees and/or LBRF, and MBRF may be lower.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 21
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Eligible Activity Local Tax State School Local Tax State Tax
Amount Capture Tax Capture Capture Only Capture Only
Table 1a - Itemized Eligible Activities
Supported in
Brownfield Plan 67.52% 32.48% 100.00% 100.00%
EGLE Eligible Activities
Department-Specific Activities
Work Plan Approval Exempt Activities - Assessments $ 19,987 $ 13,495 $ 6,492 $ - $ -
Work Plan Approval Exempt Activities - Due Care Planning $ 27,855 $ 18,808 $ 9,047 $ - $ -
Due Care Activities $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
EGLE Environmental Eligible Activities Total $ 47,842 $ 32,303 $ 15,539 $ - $ -
MICHIGAN STATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MSHDA) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
Demolition Activities $ 569,261 $ 384,366 $ 184,895 $ - $ -
Renovation of Existing Buildings Activities $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Lead, Asbestos and Mold Abatement Activities $ 45,669 $ 30,836 $ 14,833 $ - $ -
Infrastructure Improvements Activities, necessary for a Housing Project $ 1,371,178 $ 925,822 $ 445,356 $ - $ -
Safety Improvements Activities $ 667,714 $ 450,842 $ 216,872 $ - $ -
Site Preparation Activities $ 696,752 $ 470,448 $ 226,304 $ - $ -
Housing Financing Gap $ 9,002,586 $ 6,078,562 $ 2,924,024 $ - $ -
MSHDA Housing Development Eligible Activities Total $ 12,353,160 $ 8,340,876 $ 4,012,284 $ - $ -
EGLE & MSHDA Contingency and Interest
Contingency: EGLE Environmental (0%) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Contingency: MSHDA Eligible Activites (15%) (Not on Housing Financing Gap) $ 502,586 $ 339,347 $ 163,239 $ - $ -
Sub Total: Contingencies $ 502,586 $ 339,347 $ 163,239 $ - $ -
Interest: EGLE Environmental (Simple Interest: 0%) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Interest MSHDA Housing Development (Simple Interest: 0%) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Sub Total: Interest $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Sub Total: EAs + Contingencies + Interest $ 12,903,588 $ 8,712,526 $ 4,191,062 $ - $ -
Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Preparation and Consulting & Support (to Developer) $ 80,000 $ 54,016 $ 25,984 $ - $ -
Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation (including Tracking, Recording and
Compliance (inclusive of annual income and price monitoring associated with $ 175,000 $ 118,160 $ 56,840 $ - $ -
housing development activities)
Local Application Fees (to Developer) $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ -
Total Developer Administration: Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Preparation +
$ 260,000 $ 172,176 $ 82,824 $ 5,000 $ -
Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation + Application Fees
Sub Total: EAs + Contingencies + Interest + Developer Administration $ 13,163,588 $ 8,884,702 $ 4,273,886 $ 5,000 $ -
Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (BRA) Administration and/or Local
$ 826,628 $ - $ - $ 826,628 $ -
Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF) (10%)
BRA Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation (to BRA) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total BRA : BRA Administration + LBRF + BRA Brownfield Plan & Work Plan
$ 826,628 $ - $ - $ 826,628 $ -
Implementation
Sub Total: EAs + Contingencies + Interest + Developer Administration + Total
$ 13,990,216 $ 8,884,702 $ 4,273,886 $ 831,628 $ -
BRA
State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF) $ 389,008 $ - $ - $ - $ 389,008
GRAND TOTAL: EAs + Contingencies + Interest + Developer Administration +
$ 14,379,225 $ 8,884,702 $ 4,273,886 $ 831,628 $ 389,008
Total BRA + MBRF *
* Reimbursement Obligations may not be fully reimbursed based upon current estimates of projected Taxable Value and resultant tax capture. The identified eligible costs
in this Brownfield Plan totaling $14,379,225 may not be fully reimbursed if Taxable Value and/or tax capture assumptions do not increase over the balance of the 30-year
capture period, because the tax increment revenue projections estimate a deficiency/shortfall in potential tax capture of up to $2,136,541.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 22
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Eligible Activity
Amount
Table 1b - Summary of Eligible Activities
Supported in
Brownfield Plan
Total Local Taxes to Developer for Eligible Activities, Contingency and Interest $ 8,889,702
Total Local Tax Capture for Eligible Activities, Contingency and Interest $ 8,889,702
Total Local Taxes to BRA Administration and/or Local Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF) $ 826,628
Total Local Tax Capture to BRA $ 826,628
Total School Taxes to Developer for Eligible Activities, Contingency and Interest $ 4,273,886
Total School Tax Capture for Eligible Activities, Contingency and Interest $ 4,273,886
Total School Taxes to BRA Administration $ -
Total School Taxes to BRA Local Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF) $ -
Total School Tax Capture to BRA $ -
Total School Taxes to State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF) $ 389,008
Total School Tax Capture to BRA & MBRF $ 389,008
Total Capture by Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (BRA) $ 826,628
Total Capture by State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF) $ 389,008
Total Capture for Developer** $ 13,163,588
GRAND TOTAL* $ 14,379,225
* Reimbursement Obligations may not be fully reimbursed based upon current estimates of projected Taxable Value and
resultant tax capture. The identified eligible costs in this Brownfield Plan totaling $14,379,225 may not be fully reimbursed
if Taxable Value and/or tax capture assumptions do not increase over the balance of the 30-year capture period, because
the tax increment revenue projections estimate a deficiency/shortfall in potential tax capture of up to $2,136,541.
**To meet Developer obligations.
4. CAPTURED TAXABLE VALUE AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUES (SECTION 13(2)(C),(F))
This Plan anticipates the capture of tax increment revenues to reimburse the Developer for the costs
of eligible activities under this Plan in accordance with the Agreement. The initial taxable value of the
Property shall be determined by the use of tax year 2025 tax values. Tax increment revenue is
expected to be available for capture by the redevelopment on the Property in 2028. Estimates project
that the Authority is expected to capture the tax increment revenues through 2057, which will be
generated by the increase in taxable value. The following table provides a summary of the captured
incremental taxable values and tax increment revenues captured which it will provide after
completion of the redevelopment project. In addition, detailed tables of estimated tax increment
revenues to be captured are attached to this Plan as Exhibit C, Table 4 - Tax Increment Financing
Estimates.
The captured incremental taxable value and associated tax increment revenue will be based on the
actual increased taxable value from all taxable improvements on the Property set through the
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 23
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
property assessment process by the local unit of government and equalized by the County. The actual
increased taxable value of the land and all future taxable improvements on the Property may vary.
Furthermore, the amount of tax increment revenue available under this Plan will be based on the
actual millage levied annually by each taxing jurisdiction on the increase in taxable value resulting
from the redevelopment project that is eligible and approved for capture. Eligible activities are
estimated at approximately $14,379,225 so long as there are available revenues. However, based upon
current estimates of Projected Taxable Value and resultant tax capture, the identified eligible activities
to the Project in Table 1a may not be fully reimbursed if Taxable Value assumptions don't increase
over the 35-year capture period, because the Plan only estimates $12,242,684 in potential tax capture.
After tax capture payments to other obligations identified in this Plan (BRA Administration and/or
LBRF, and MBRF), the resultant shortfall to Developer is estimated at $2,136,541. If the actual costs
of eligible activities are lower than the estimates identified in this Plan, capture to the Project may be
lower or if the Taxable Value is higher than estimated Project reimbursement may be satisfied.
Additional Revenues Captured
if Taxable Values Increase
Estimated Eligible Activity Costs $14,379,225
Estimated Potential Tax Capture $12,242,684
Estimated Deficiency/Shortfall (this
deficiency/shortfall may be captured if $2,136,541
Taxable Values increases)
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 24
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Table 2 - Captured Incremental Taxable Values & Tax Increment Revenues Captured
Captured Tax Increment
Tax Year Incremental Revenues
Taxable Values Captured
2028 - Start of Tax Capture $ 3,640,040 $ 236,503
2029 $ 4,053,840 $ 263,389
2030 $ 4,177,940 $ 271,452
2031 $ 4,305,840 $ 279,762
2032 $ 4,437,540 $ 288,319
2033 $ 4,573,240 $ 297,136
2034 $ 4,712,940 $ 306,212
2035 $ 4,856,840 $ 315,562
2036 $ 5,005,040 $ 325,191
2037 $ 5,157,740 $ 335,112
2038 $ 5,315,040 $ 345,333
2039 $ 5,477,040 $ 355,858
2040 $ 5,643,840 $ 366,696
2041 $ 5,815,640 $ 377,858
2042 $ 5,992,640 $ 389,358
2043 $ 6,174,940 $ 401,203
2044 $ 6,362,740 $ 413,404
2045 $ 6,556,140 $ 425,970
2046 $ 6,755,340 $ 438,913
2047 $ 6,960,540 $ 452,245
2048 $ 7,171,840 $ 465,974
2049 $ 7,389,540 $ 480,118
2050 $ 7,613,740 $ 494,685
2051 $ 7,844,640 $ 509,688
2052 $ 8,082,540 $ 525,145
2053 $ 8,327,540 $ 541,063
2054 $ 8,579,940 $ 557,462
2055 $ 8,877,407 $ 576,789
2056 $ 9,145,107 $ 594,182
2057 $ 9,420,907 $ 612,102
Total Estimated Tax Increment Revenues Captured $ 12,242,684
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 25
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
5. METHOD OF BROWNFIELD PLAN FINANCING (SECTION 13(2)(D))
Eligible activities are planned to be financed by the Developer, City, and Ingham County’s Housing
Trust Fund (HTF). Total capital investment is approximately $26 million, which will be financed by
the Developer with the following sources of funds being pursued by the Developer: LBRF loan funding
from the LBRA; HTF grant funding from Ingham County, and; Gap 19 funding from MSHDA. Any
eligible activities identified within this Plan funded by an HTF grant cannot and will not be reimbursed
with tax increment financing revenues under Act 381. If an HTF grant is not approved or utilized for
any of the eligible activities listed within this Plan, those eligible activities may be reimbursed with
tax increment financing revenues under Act 381.
The Developer will be reimbursed for eligible costs as listed in Tables 1a and 1b above. The current
estimated amount of capture used to reimburse the:
$13,163,588 capped amount for Developer costs in this Plan, so long as there are available tax
increment revenue captures;
$389,008 for State Brownfield Revolving Fund (State of Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment
Fund {MBRF}); and
$826,628 (10% from local-only tax revenues, see Table 1a) for BRA Administration Fees
and/or LBRF in accordance with Act 381.
MBRF, Authority Administration and LBRF capture are reflective of the redevelopment Project being
completed.
All reimbursements authorized under this Plan shall be governed by the Agreement. The Authority
shall not incur any note or bonded indebtedness to finance the purposes of this Plan. The inclusion of
eligible activities and estimates of costs to be reimbursed in this Plan is intended to authorize the
Authority to fund such reimbursements. The amount and source of any tax increment revenues that
will be used for purposes authorized by this Plan, and the terms and conditions for such use and upon
any reimbursement of the expenses permitted by the Plan, will be provided solely under the
Agreement contemplated by this Plan.
6. AMOUNT OF NOTE OR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS INCURRED (SECTION 13(2)(E))
The Authority will not incur a note or bonded indebtedness for the Brownfield project under this Plan.
7. DURATION OF THE BROWNFIELD PLAN AND EFFECTIVE DATE (SECTION 13(2)(F))
Subject to Section 13b(16) of Act 381, the date of tax capture shall commence no earlier than 2028 or
the immediate following year—as increment revenue becomes available, but the beginning date of tax
increment revenues capture shall not exceed five years beyond the date of the governing body
resolution approving the Plan. In no event shall this Plan extend beyond the maximum term allowed
by Section 13(2)(f) of Act 381 for the duration of this Plan. Total estimated Plan capture duration for
reimbursement of Department-Specific Activities; Housing Development Activities; Brownfield Plan
& Work Plan Preparation and Consulting & Support, Brownfield Plan & Work Plan Implementation;
Local Application Fees; BRA Administration and/or LBRF; and MBRF capture is estimated at 30 years
(2028-2057). This Plan’s capture of tax increment revenues shall not exceed 35 years, unless
amended.
Furthermore, this Plan, or any subsequent amendment thereto, may be abolished or terminated in
accordance with Section 14(8) of Act 381 in the event of any of the following:
a. The governing body may abolish this Plan (or any subsequent amendment thereto) when it
finds that the purposes for which this Plan was established have been accomplished.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 26
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
b. The governing body may terminate this Plan (or any subsequent amendment thereto) if the
project for which eligible activities were identified in this Plan (or any subsequent amendment
thereto) fails to occur with respect to the Eligible Property for at least two (2) years following
the date of the governing body resolution approving this Plan (or any subsequent amendment
thereto), provided that the governing body first does both of the following: (i) gives 30 days'
written notice to the Developer at its last known address by certified mail or other method
that documents proof of delivery attempted; and (ii) provides the Developer with an
opportunity to be heard at a public meeting.
Notwithstanding anything in this subsection to the contrary, this Plan (or any subsequent amendment
thereto) shall not be abolished or terminated until the principal and interest on bonds, if any, issued
under Section 17 of Act 381 and all other obligations to which the tax increment revenues are pledged
have been paid or funds sufficient to make the payment have been identified or segregated.
8. ESTIMATED IMPACT ON TAXING JURISDICTIONS (SECTION 13(2)(G))
The following table presents a summary of the impact to taxing jurisdictions (if the redevelopment
Project is completed) over a 30-year capture period. The impact to each individual taxing jurisdiction
may be as much as their proportionate share of $12,242.684. Table 1a identifies the total amount
required for the Project's eligible activities and if sufficient tax increment revenue captures become
available for capture the impact to each individual taxing jurisdiction could become as much as their
proportionate share of $14,379,225. Additional information related to the impact of tax increment
financing on the various taxing jurisdictions is presented in Exhibit C.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 27
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
Table 3: Impact to Taxing Jurisdictions: Tax Increment Paid, Captured, and Returned to Taxing Jurisdictions
Taxes Taxes
Returned to Returned to
Taxing Taxing
Incremental Tax Impact/
Taxing Unit/ Entity 1 2 Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction:
Taxes Paid Capture Tax Capture 10% Pass-
Not Allowed Through/
3 4
Tax Sharing
CITY OF LANSING
City Operating - Lansing $ 3,663,042 $ 3,296,738 $ - $ 366,304
Storm/ Montgomery Drain $ 48,991 $ - $ 48,991 $ -
Public Safety $ 659,498 $ - $ 659,498 $ -
Subtotal of Local Government Unit (LGU): Annual $ 4,371,532 $ 3,296,738 $ 708,490 $ 366,304
INGHAM COUNTY
Ingham County $ 2,335,020 $ 2,101,518 $ - $ 233,502
Capital Region Airport Authority - CRAA $ 131,711 $ 118,540 $ - $ 13,171
Capital Area Transportation Authority - CATA $ 563,306 $ 506,975 $ - $ 56,331
LIBRARY
Capital Area District Libraries - CADL $ 293,759 $ 264,383 $ - $ 29,376
INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS (ISD)
ISD Operating & Special Education $ 930,420 $ 837,378 $ - $ 93,042
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Lansing Community College - LCC $ 710,223 $ 639,201 $ - $ 71,022
LOCAL SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes State School millages
Lansing School District Debt (District #33020) $ 772,555 $ - $ 772,555 $ -
Lansing School District Sinking Fund $ 557,276 $ 501,548 $ - $ 55,728
Subtotal of Non-LGU Local: Annual $ 6,294,271 $ 4,969,544 $ 772,555 $ 552,172
STATE SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes Local School millages
State Education Tax - SET $ 1,130,569 $ 1,017,512 $ - $ 113,057
Local School Operating - LSO $ 3,287,656 $ 2,958,890 $ - $ 328,766
Total State & Local School: Annual $ 4,418,224 $ 3,976,402 $ - $ 441,822
Total $15,084,027 $12,242,684 $1,481,045 $1,360,298
Notes:
1. Tax amount paid on incremental taxable value during Plan tax capture period (excludes tax amount paid on Base Year Taxable Value, if any).
2. The Plan may only capture millages allowed for tax capture.
3. Tax amount returned on incremental taxable value (excludes tax amount paid on Base Year Taxable Value, if any) during Plan tax capture
period because millages are not allowed for tax capture by the BRA.
4. Tax amount returned on incremental taxable value (excludes tax amount paid on Base Year Taxable Value, if any) during Plan tax capture
period because of 10% Pass-through/Tax Sharing with Taxing Jurisdiction.
9. DISPLACEMENT OF PERSONS (SECTION 13(2)(I-L))
There are no persons or businesses residing on the Property, and no occupied residences are
designated for acquisition and clearance by the Authority; therefore, there will be no displacement or
relocation of persons or businesses under this Plan. Therefore, no relocation assistance strategy for
compliance with Michigan’s Relocation Assistance Law is needed in this Plan.
10. LOCAL BROWNFIELD REVOLVING FUND (SECTION 8)
The Authority has established a Local Brownfield Revolving Fund (LBRF). The Authority will capture
incremental tax revenues during the tax capture period of this Plan Amendment and deposit those
revenues into the LBRF to fund other projects within the City of Lansing. All funds deposited in the
LBRF shall be in accordance with Section 8 of Act 381.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 28
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
11. STATE BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT FUND (SECTION 8A)
The Authority shall pay to the Department of Treasury at least once annually an amount equal to 3
mills of the taxes levied under the state education tax, 1993 PA 331, MCL 211.901 to 211.906, that
are captured under this Plan for up to the first twenty-five (25) years of the duration of capture of
tax increment revenues for each Eligible Property included in this Plan. If the Authority pays an
amount equal to 3 mills of the taxes levied under the state education tax, 1993 PA 331, MCL 211.901
to 211.906, on a parcel of Eligible Property to the Department of Treasury under Section 13B(14) of
Act 381, the percentage of local taxes levied on that parcel and used to reimburse eligible activities
for the Project under this Plan shall not exceed the percentage of local taxes levied on that parcel
that would have been used to reimburse eligible activities for the Project under this Plan if the 3
mills of the taxes levied under the state education tax, 1993 PA 331, MCL 211.901 to 211.906, on
that parcel were not paid to the Department of Treasury under Section 13b(14) of Act 381. State of
Michigan Brownfield Redevelopment Fund (MBRF) capture is estimated at $389,008.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 29
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
12. OTHER INFORMATION (SECTION 13(2)(M))
Brownfield Plan Amendments
The Authority and the City, in accordance with the Act, may amend this Plan in the future in order to
fund additional eligible activities associated with the Project described herein in the event an
amendment is deemed necessary for the completion of the Project and to meet the objectives of the
Plan under Act 381.
Explanation of Millages Captured
A. All millages allowed will be captured by the BRA as allowed pursuant to Act 381 of the Public Acts
of 1996, as amended, for use in this Plan after a 10% Pass-through/Tax Sharing with all Taxing
Jurisdictions. Based on the above, and as required under Act 381, an estimate of the impact of tax
increment financing on the revenues and tax sharing of all taxing jurisdictions in which the Eligible
Property is located is provided in Table 3 and Table 4f2 of this Plan.
B. Capture of School Millages, the Local School Operating (LSO) millage and the State Education Tax
(SET) millage, by the Authority are allowed for EGLE-Environmental Eligible Activities of Exempt
Activities – Assessments and Exempt Activities – Due Care Planning (“EGLE Exempt Activities”).
EGLE Exempt Activities are not subject to approval of an Act 381 Environmental Work Plan by
EGLE.
C. Debt millages in this Plan – Act 381 does not allow capture of certain Ad Valorem millages and in
the case of this Project’s Plan, Ad Valorem debt millages are not allowed for capture, see Table 4f1.
Explanation on Proportionality of Eligible Activity Costs
Based upon the assumptions made in this Plan, the state and local breakdown of tax capture millage
percentages anticipated to be used for reimbursement of eligible costs through this Plan are
summarized below.
Local Capture State Capture
EGLE and MSHDA Eligible Activities
Proportionality Proportionality
Local to State Tax Capture Revenue
67.52% 32.48%
Percentages on EGLE and MSHDA amounts
This Project to the City establishes a large residential development tax base partially on a City-owned
Property that currently generates zero tax revenue with the remaining parcels generating only a
combined total tax revenue of $6,745 per year. The Project provides a means for job creation and a
new injection of capital into our economy. Additionally, the Developer has committed to a leasing
schedule, leasing all 76 of its units to affordable workforce housing (units at or below 120% of the
AMI) within current MSHDA affordability guidelines. These affordable workforce housing units will
be an added benefit to the City’s residents and Project.
Brownfield Plan No. 89 Page 30
Turner North Development Old Town Multifamily Redevelopment Project, Lansing, MI Revised April 28, 2025
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A
ALTA / NSPS Land Title Surveys with Legal Descriptions
Eligible Property*
Address (if known) Tax ID Basis of Eligibility
1413 Turner Street Housing Property and Functionally
33-01-01-09-252-131
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address 33-01-01-09-252-152 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
Property
Housing Property and Functionally
1421 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-161
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address 33-01-01-09-252-171 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
Property
Housing Property and Functionally
1429 Turner Street 33-01-01-09-252-181
Obsolete Property
Housing Property and Adjacent &
No Address (PART) {portion
33-01-01-09-252-191 Contiguous to Functionally Obsolete
of 1503 Turner Street}
Property
*See ALTA / NSPS Land Title Survey with Legal Descriptions for each individual Eligible
Property and Overall Parcel after redevelopment on next page
EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LEGEND:
WFG Nation Title Insurance Company
Issuing office file No.: ELA-24-04791
Commitment No.: ELA-24-04791-1
Property Address: 1413 Turner St, Lansing, MI 48906
Commitment Date: October 4, 2024
Parcel A
Commencing in the West line of Turner Street at a 84/100 of a rod North of the Southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 10, Original
Plat of the City of Lansing, Ingham County, Michigan, according to the recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 2 of Plats,
Page 36, Ingham County Records; thence West 10 rods; thence South 4 rods; thence East 10 rods; thence North 4 rods to
the Place of Beginning.
Also described as: Commencing on the West side of Turner Street 2 rods North of the Southeast corner of Lot 9, Block 10,
Original Plat of the City of Lansing, Ingham County, Michigan, according to the recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 2
of Plats, Page 36, Ingham County Records; thence North 4 rods; thence West 10 rods; thence South 4 rods; thence East 10
rods to the Point of Beginning.
Parcel B
Beginning 69 1/2 feet South of Lot 4, Block 9, Original Plat of the City of Lansing, Ingham County, Michigan, according to
the recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 2 of Plats, Page 36, Ingham County Records; thence South 46 feet; thence
West 165 feet; thence North 46 feet; thence East 165 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Parcel C
Commencing 28 1/2 feet South of the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 9, Original Plat of the City of Lansing, Ingham
County, Michigan, according to the recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 2 of Plats, Page 36, Ingham County Records;
thence West 165 feet; thence South 41 feet; thence East 165 feet; thence North 41 feet to the Point of Beginning. NORTH
Parcel D
The South 12 1/2 feet of Lot 4, Block 9, Original Plat of the City of Lansing, Ingham County, Michigan, according to the 0 10 20 40
recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 2 of Plats, Page 36, Ingham County Records.
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Also, Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 9, Original Plat of the City of Lansing, Ingham County, Michigan,
according to the recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 2 of Plats, Page 36, Ingham County Records; and running
thence South 28 1/2 feet; thence West 165 feet; thence North 28 1/2 feet; thence East 165 feet to the Point of Beginning.
NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B ##
WFG Nation Title Insurance Company
X
Issuing office file No.: ELA-24-04791 CAUTION!!
Commitment No.: ELA-24-04791-1 THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITI ES AS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE ONLY
Property Address: 1413 Turner St, Lansing, MI 48906
APPROXIMATE. NO GUARANTEE IS EITHER EXPRESSED OR
IMPLIED AS T O THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY THEREOF.
THE CONTRA CTOR SHALL BE EXCLUSIVELY RESPONSIBLE FOR
Commitment Date: October 4, 2024 DET ERMINING THE EXACT UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
PRIOR TO THE ST ART OF CONSTRUCTI ON.
There were no plottable land survey matters listed in the Schedule B Exceptions
ADDITIONAL PARCELS
PARCEL E:
(PER CITY OF LANSING TAX DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL ID NO. 33-01-01-09-252-152)
North 6.16 Rods of the South 7 rods of Lots 6, 7, & 8, Block 10, Original Plat of the City of Lansing.
PARCEL F:
Part of Lot 4, Block 9, ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE CITY OF LANSING, INGHAM COUNTY, MICHIGAN, as recorded in Liber 2
of Plats, Page 36, Ingham County Records, being more particularly described as: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of the
South 12-1/2 feet of said Lot 4; thence South 89 degrees 35 minutes 40 seconds West, along the Northline of the South 12-1/2
feet of said Lot 4, 165.86 feet; thence North 00 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds East, along the West line of said Lot 4 and the
East line of WYLLIS O. DODGE SUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 10 AND VACATED STREETS OF ORIGINAL PLAT CLIENT
OF THE CITY OF LANSING, as recorded in Liber 6 of Plats, Page 40, Ingham County Records, 22.27 feet to the Southeast CREATIVE
corner of Lot 12 of said WYLLIS O. DODGE SUBDIVISION; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 40 seconds East, 165.71 feet
to the East line of said Lot 4; thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes 14 seconds West, along the East line of said Lot 4, 22.26 feet
OPTIONS, LLC
to the POINT-OF-BEGINNING. and
TURNER NORTH
DEVELOPMENT,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
LLC
1452 RANDOLPH STREET, #300
LANSING, MICHIGAN
TABLE A NOTES: OTHER NOTES:
A. Bearings were established per GNSS Observations and linked to Continuously
2. The surveyed property is identified as: Operating Reference Stations (CORS) within the Michigan Spatial Reference PROJECT TITLE
Parcel A - 1413 Turner Street Network (MSRN).
OLD TOWN
Parcel ID: 33-01-01-09-252-131
B. Per Section 5, Paragraph F of the Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for MULTIFAMILY
Parcel B - 1421 Turner Street TURNER STREET
Parcel ID: 33-01-01-09-252-161 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, Effective February 23 2021, there was no LANSING, MICHIGAN
observable evidence of cemeteries, burial grounds, or individual grave sites on
Parcel C - Vacant Turner Street
the surveyed property.
Parcel ID: 33-01-01-09-252-171
Parcel D - 1429 Turner Street
C. No information was provided in regards to the abandonment or vacation of
Parcel ID: 33-01-01-09-252-181 Beaver Street as is was platted in the Original Plat of the City of Lansing as
Parcel E - Vacant Turner Street recorded in Liber 2 of Plats, Page 36, Ingham County Records.
Parcel ID: 33-01-01-09-252-152 REVISIONS
PER CLIENT COMMENTS 4/10/2025
Parcel F - Vacant Turner Street D. The location of surface improvements on this site, such as drives, walks and
Parcel ID: 33-01-01-09-252-191 (PART) utilities, may be approximate or incomplete due to snow and ice conditions.
3. By graphic platting, the surveyed property is in "Zone X"
per FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Number
26065C0018D, Effective Date of 08/16/2011
4. The area of the surveyed properties are as follows:
Parcel A - 0.25± acres
Parcel B - 0.18± acres
Parcel C - 0.16± acres
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE:
Parcel D - 0.16± acres APRIL 4, 2025
Parcel E - 0.39± acres ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY CERTIFICATE
To: Creative Options LLC; DRAWING TITLE
Parcel F - 0.09± acres
Turner North Development LLC ALTA / NSPS
WFG National Title Insurance Company;
8. Substantial features observed in the process of LAND TITLE
conducting the fieldwork are shown on the survey map
and are depicted as observed. SURVEY
This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with
the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established
13. Names of adjoining owners according to current tax and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 2, 3,4,8 and 13 of Table A thereof.
records are noted and shown on the survey map. The field work was completed on January 7, 2025.
PEA JOB NO. 2023-1080
P.M. CB
SUR. WSF
Wendy S. Fuller Date
DN. JML
Michigan Professional Surveyor No. 4001047969
Agent for PEA Group DRAWING NUMBER:
NOTE: This survey is for the exclusive use and benefit of the parties indicated
and is not intended for future transactions.
1 of 2
LEGEND:
OVERALL PARCEL
Part of Lot 4, Block 9, Lots 7, 8, and part of Lots 6 and 9, Block 10 and that part of Beaver Street
not constructed and lying West of the West line of Turner Street, ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE CITY
OF LANSING, INGHAM COUNTY, MICHIGAN, as recorded in Liber 2 of Plats, Page 36, Ingham
County Records, being more particularly described as: COMMENCING at the Southeast Corner
of said Lot 9; thence North 00 degrees 26 minutes 14 seconds East, 33.09 feet to the Northwest
corner of the intersection of Dodge River Drive and Turner Street and the POINT-IF-BEGINNING
of the following described Parcel; thence South 89 degrees 50 minutes 49 seconds West, along
the North line of Dodge River Drive, 165.69 feet to the Southeast Corner of Lot 17 of WYLLIS O.
DODGE SUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 10 AND VACATED STREETS OF ORIGINAL
PLAT OF THE CITY OF LANSING, as recorded in Liber 6 of Plats, Page 40, Ingham County
Records; thence along the East line of said WYLLIS O. DODGE SUBDIVISION, the following
four (4) courses: NORTH
1) North 00 degrees 06 minutes 41 seconds East, 65.61 feet;
2) North 00 degrees 16 minutes 09 seconds East, 55.91 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 16
of said WYLLIS O. DODGE SUBDIVISION; 0 10 20 40
3) North 00 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds West, 53.53 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot
15 of said WYLLIS O. DODGE SUBDIVISION; SCALE: 1" = 20'
4) North 00 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds East, 142.17 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot
12 of said WYLLIS O. DODGE SUBDIVISION;
thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 40 seconds East, 165.71 feet to the East line of said Lot 4,
Block 9 of said ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE CITY OF LANSING an the West line of Turner Street ;
thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes 14 seconds West, along the East Line of said Blocks 9 and ##
10 of said ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE CITY OF LANSING and the West line of Turner Street,
X
317.95 feet to the Point of Beginning. CAUTION!!
THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITI ES AS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE ONLY
APPROXIMATE. NO GUARANTEE IS EITHER EXPRESSED OR
IMPLIED AS T O THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY THEREOF.
THE CONTRA CTOR SHALL BE EXCLUSIVELY RESPONSIBLE FOR
DET ERMINING THE EXACT UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
PRIOR TO THE ST ART OF CONSTRUCTI ON.
CLIENT
CREATIVE
OPTIONS, LLC
and
TURNER NORTH
DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
1452 RANDOLPH STREET, #300
LANSING, MICHIGAN
PROJECT TITLE
OLD TOWN
MULTIFAMILY
TURNER STREET
LANSING, MICHIGAN
REVISIONS
PER CLIENT COMMENTS 4/10/2025
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE:
APRIL 4, 2025
DRAWING TITLE
ALTA / NSPS
LAND TITLE
SURVEY
PEA JOB NO. 2023-1080
P.M. CB
SUR. WSF
DN. JML
DRAWING NUMBER:
2 of 2
EXHIBIT B
Basis of Eligibility
Exhibit B-1: Affidavits (3) of Functional Obsolescence dated April 3, 2025
Exhibit B-2: MSHDAs Partnership I (South Central) –
Data Document 2022
(A table with market names is on the next page)
Market Name Market Name
55 Charlotte 212 Lansing-Southeast
100 Dewitt 214 Leslie
106 East Lansing 255 Okemos-Haslett
107 East Lansing-South, MSU 256 Olivet
177 Holt 328 St. Johns
208 Lansing-Central-North 351 Wacousta
209 Lansing-Central-Southwest 358 Waverly
210 Lansing-East 371 Williamston
211 Lansing-Outer-West
Project Location
The South Central Michigan Housing Partnership includes three counties (Clinton, Eaton and Ingham) as
well as 17 Statewide Housing Needs Assessment markets. An analysis of the latest-available Census
data, as well as changes in housing prices and availability since 2016, shows that these markets fall into
eight broad categories.
• The first group is comprised of markets in northern Clinton, central Clinton, and northwestern
Ingham counties. Housing demand indicators in these areas are near statewide averages. The
housing supply in these areas is predominately made up of single-family detached homes, with a
slightly elevated proportion of mobile homes as well. Units here tend to be slightly larger than
in other markets, and the percentage of new-build units is relatively low. Seasonal housing
vacancies are low here, as are market vacancies. “Other” vacancies are higher than average,
however. Both housing values and housing costs tend to be low; that coupled with moderate
income tends to keep the incidence of shelter overburden relatively low. This pattern is likely to
continue into the short term, at least, since housing costs and home values have decreased or
remained steady since 2016.
• The second market type incorporates territory in western and southwestern Eaton County and
southeastern Ingham County. Housing demand indicators in these markets is positive, as
incomes are slightly higher than statewide averages, and unemployment rates tend to be lower.
Workers tend to have longer commutes in these markets. On the supply side, older, single-
family homes tend to dominate the landscape. Homes tend to be larger among members of this
group, and homeownership rates are significantly higher than statewide. Markets in this group
tend to have a more stable household base, since they have relatively fewer new in-movers, and
a significant proportion of households residing in their neighborhoods since before 1990. Rents
and homeowner costs are lower than statewide, as is the percentage of households
experiencing shelter overburden. Vacancy tends to be very low in this market group. Despite a
sharp drop in market vacancies over the last five years, housing costs for residents have
remained mostly stable.
• The third market group includes neighborhoods in central and southwestern Lansing. Housing
demand indicators in these markets are relatively low; household income tends to be
significantly lower than the statewide average, and unemployment is strongly higher. Housing
supply indicators imply markets where single-family detached structures are very common, with
some presence of denser housing types such as duplexes and small-scale multifamily structures.
The stock tends to be quite old, with few units built after 2010 and nearly a quarter dating back
to 1939 or earlier. Overcrowded conditions are more common in these places than in other
markets around the state. Home values and shelter costs are much lower in these areas; this is
likely due to the age of the stock among other factors. Despite this, overburden is a large issue
for many households here. Five-year trends in housing costs (both owner and renter) show
decreases, even in the face of a decrease in the stock available for sale or rent.
• Another group of markets with similar market dynamics is the eastern part of the City of Lansing
and its near southern and western suburbs. The residents in this group tend to be younger on
average, with moderately high incomes and low levels of unemployment. They also tend to be
well-educated, with a higher-than-average proportion of persons with bachelors degrees.
Housing here tends to have more diversity in terms of both tenure and construction type; a
majority is still single-family detached, but with higher levels of more-dense housing
alternatives. Similarly, renters are more common in these markets, but most households own
their homes. More of its stock tends to date back to the 1970s and 1980s, but some recent
development has occurred as well. Housing quality is relatively high, since the percentage of
units built before 1940 is low, as is the percentage of households that experience overcrowding.
Housing values and cost tend to be moderately high in these markets, as is the overburdened
percentage. Housing vacancy is not a large issue in these markets, as both the renter and owner
vacancy rates are low, and there is not a large amount of seasonal or “other” vacancy either.
Changes between 2016 and 2021 may indicate higher housing costs in the future, since the
number of market vacancies has decreased significantly during that time. This seems to have
increased housing costs and home values for current residents, especially renters.
• The next market type takes in the southeastern corner of Clinton County as well as the
northwestern portion of Ingham County. Housing demand indicators for this group are very
strong, led by incomes that are significantly higher, and unemployment rates significantly lower,
than statewide averages. Median age tends to be higher in these areas, as does educational
attainment. The housing supply in this group is dominated by owner-occupied, larger, single-
family detached structures, with little diversity in offerings outside of a slightly elevated
presence of mobile homes. Housing values and costs for both owners and renters are high in
these markets as well; however, higher incomes keep the overburden rate relatively low.
Vacancies are a smaller portion of the total housing stock than in other places as well. The five-
year trends show that market vacancies have increased in these areas, along with housing costs
for both tenure types.
• Southeastern Clinton County is included in the next housing market type. Housing demand
indicators are strong here, performing better than the Michigan average. The housing supply in
these markets, while not new, is of relatively recent vintage and corresponds to the push
towards the exurban fringe, distant from more-established population centers. Units here tend
to be larger and more expensive than average. Housing costs for owners and renters are higher
than statewide, but due to higher income levels, shelter overburdened households are less
common here than in other market types. Housing vacancies are low as well, which likely
maintains higher housing values and rents. The five-year trend indicates that these patterns
could extend into the future, since market vacancies declined strongly and costs for non-
mortgaged homeowners and renters increased significantly as well.
• Housing demand in the Okemos-Haslett area is high, as incomes are significantly above the state
average, and employment levels are strong. Educational attainment is also much higher than in
other market groups. The group’s housing supply displays some diversity, as single-family
detached dwellings are only a bare majority in most areas in this group. Duplexes, triplexes and
other denser small-scale multifamily structures are more common here as well, as is new
construction. Homeownership rates are just under the state average, but homeowners still
make up most households in most markets here. These markets also tend to have a higher
degree of recent movers than statewide. Housing costs and home values are significantly higher
here than in the rest of the state, but the higher incomes common to households in this group
tends to keep the overburden rate slightly lower than the Michigan average. Vacancies in the
homeownership market are quite low, and rental vacancies are lower than statewide as well.
Five-year trends in vacancy and costs show that even with a hefty increase in stock available for
sale or rent in these markets, housing costs rose dramatically, especially for renters. Home
values also rose strongly during this period.
• Neighborhoods in East Lansing and southeastern Lansing are included in the last market group.
Housing demand indicators in these markets is relatively soft, with low household incomes;
however, the unemployment rate is closer to the state average. Residents of these markets
tend to be younger, with higher levels of educational attainment. The housing supply displays
great diversity; on average, single-family detached units account for less than a third of all
homes here. Smaller units are common, and newer construction is more common here than the
state in general. These markets tend to have a greater amount of resident turnover, as about a
quarter of their households moved to their current residences within the last three years.
Housing costs for mortgaged homeowners and renters are higher than state averages, and
median home values are higher as well. This market type tends to have more homes available
overall, and a low percentage of “other” vacancies. The five-year trend in vacancies shows that
the number of homes for sale or lease has increased significantly in these areas. Costs for
owners tended to decrease, while renters saw their shelter costs increase significantly. Home
values were also up strongly, but less than the statewide average.
• Given local market conditions, certain tools or practices can be more effective than others. This
data review uses two sources to generate possible policies to investigate for use regionally. The
first is a product of researchers at Brookings and the Aspen Institute, who used local trends in
housing data to determine logical tools and practices that could be used to help solve housing
issues. They derived a set of market types, and policy responses tailored to conditions within
these groups. Their work is at https://www.brookings.edu/essay/introducing-the-housing-
policy-matchmaker-a-diagnostic-tool-for-local-officials/. The other is derived from the National
Community of Practice on Local Housing Policy, which is a joint project of the Furman Center at
New York University and Abt Associates. Their work was funded by the Ford Foundation, the
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Kresge Foundation and the JPMorgan
Chase Foundation. They have assembled a large list of tools that are keyed to what they term
strong and soft markets, which are detailed at https://localhousingsolutions.org/housing-policy-
framework/. Each tool entry is hyperlinked to its description on the Local Housing Solutions
website. These policies are not presented as prescriptions to meet local goals, since conditions
outside the scope of this analysis could impact their appropriateness. Instead, they are a way to
start thinking about what might work given a general sense of local market context.
Lansing‐Central‐North
Population Households Median HH Income Owner HH Income Renter HH Income
23,606 9,512 $40,672 $54,013 $31,905
Housing Costs
Owner Units Renter Units
Home Value $68,950 2016 Value $64,684 2016 Rent $824
Gross Rent $934
Cost M/NM $925/$454 Value ▲ 6.6% Rent ▲ 13.4%
$22,983 To afford median home $37,360 To afford median gross rent
Affordability Gap
Monthly Costs: Owners and Renters Cost‐Burdened Households
$6,000 100%
76% 83% 54%
90%
$5,000
80%
70%
$4,000
60%
$3,000 50%
40%
$2,000
30%
$1,237
$925 $934 20%
$1,000 $798
$454 $503
10%
24% 17% 46%
$0 0%
Mortgaged Not Mortgaged Renter
Mortgaged Not Mortgaged
Renter 30% of Mo. Private Sector Wage
30% of Monthly Renter Income 30% of App. Miminum Wage
Overburdened Not Burdened
Housing and Development Conditions
Housing Stock Number of Households by AMI Group
Units 11,230 Owner HH 39% Renter HH 61%
3000
Median Year Built 1949 % Built Pre‐1970 80.3%
Median Move Year 2015 % Built After 2010 4.3% 2,476
2500
Median Rooms 4.9 SF% 60.4% MM% 22.7% MF% 16%
Vacancy Rates 2000
1,665
Total 15.3% Owner 0% Renter 0.1% 1,412
1500 1,369
Seasonal 0.6% Other 9.5% # V Rent 326 #V Owner 125
983
Homeownership Rate by Race/Ethnicity 1000 788 819
Black 23.7% White 45.2%
500
Asian 31.4% Other or Multiracial 32.9%
Am. Indian 20.7% Hispanic 43.4%
0
Pacific Islnd 0.0% <30% 30% to 40% to 50% to 60% to 80% to >120%
40% 50% 60% 80% 120%
Lansing‐Central‐North
Housing Policy Indicators
Household Count and Growth Market Partnership
Household Change, 2016 to 2021 1.8% 3.5%
Household Count, 2021 9,512 190,462
Market Partnership
Housing Affordability Number % % Change Number % % Change
Home value / partnership income 1.07 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Median Income, 2021 $40,672 ‐‐ 32.5% $64,417 ‐‐ 13.0%
Median owner income, 2021 $54,013 ‐‐ 25.5% $83,145 ‐‐ 11.8%
Median renter income, 2021 $31,905 ‐‐ 29.8% $35,865 ‐‐ 13.3%
Median home value $68,950 ‐‐ 6.6% $166,411 ‐‐ 14.3%
Median gross rent $934 ‐‐ 13.4% $941 ‐‐ 6.1%
Income needed for median rent $37,360 ‐‐ ‐‐ $37,633 ‐‐ ‐‐
Income needed for median value $22,983 ‐‐ ‐‐ $55,470 ‐‐ ‐‐
Overburdened households 3,461 36% ‐21.5% 50,213 26.4% ‐11.5%
Market Partnership
Housing Quality and Vacancy Number % % Change Number % % Change
"Other" vacancy 1,071 9.5% ‐19.0% 6,898 3.4% 0.6%
Seasonal vacancy 68 0.6% 518.2% 683 0.3% ‐43.1%
For‐Sale vacancy 125 1.1% ‐1.6% 1,376 0.7% ‐30.3%
For‐Rent vacancy 326 2.9% ‐28.2% 3,822 1.9% ‐12.6%
Homes built pre‐1940 5,296 47.2% ‐‐ 33,490 16.7% ‐‐
Homes built post‐1990 1,091 9.7% ‐‐ 56,930 28.5% ‐‐
Other Market Indicators
Housing Policy Matchmaker Type* Low Cost and Growing
Strength and Need Type** Low Strength and High Need (Type II)
Gap Analysis 2021
Owner Units Renter Units Total Units
Market demand (estimated annual moves) 70 463 533
Market supply (vacant on market, adjusted for age) 111 234 346
5 year Market production goals (based on 75K units) 0 220 220
1 year Market production goals (based on 15K units) 0 44 44
5 year Partnership goals (based on 75K units) 1,760 3,500 5,260
1 year Partnership goals (based on 15K units) 352 700 1,052
Lansing‐Central‐North
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Patterns, 2021
Total Apps 302 Total Amt/App $94,106 % Approved 75.5%
Total Conventional Apps 202 Conventional Amt/App $95,396 % Conv Apprved 78.2%
Total Assisted Apps 100 Assisted Amt/App $91,500 % Asst Apprvd 70.0%
Applications by Race: White
Total Apps 212 Total Amt/App $94,009 % Positive 77.4%
Total Conventional Apps 147 Conventional Amt/App $94,592 % Conv Positive 80.3%
Total Assisted Apps 65 Assisted Amt/App $92,692 % Asst Positive 70.8%
Applications by Race: Black
Total Apps 33 Total Amt/App $103,485 % Positive 64%
Total Conventional Apps 22 Conventional Amt/App $113,182 % Conv Positive 63.6%
Total Assisted Apps 11 Assisted Amt/App $84,091 % Asst Positive 63.6%
Applications by Race: Asian
Total Apps 8 Total Amt/App $95,000 % Positive 50.0%
Total Conventional Apps 7 Conventional Amt/App $87,857 % Conv Positive 57.1%
Total Assisted Apps 1 Assisted Amt/App $145,000 % Asst Positive 0.0%
Applications by Race: Native American
Total Apps 3 Total Amt/App $138,333 % Positive 100.0%
Total Conventional Apps 2 Conventional Amt/App $110,000 % Conv Positive 100.0%
Total Assisted Apps 1 Assisted Amt/App $195,000 % Asst Positive 100.0%
Applications by Race: Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
Total Apps 0 Total Amt/App $0 % Positive NA
Total Conventional Apps 0 Conventional Amt/App $0 % Conv Positive NA
Total Assisted Apps 0 Assisted Amt/App $0 % Asst Positive NA
Applications by Race: Race Not Available
Total Apps 39 Total Amt/App $85,000 % Positive 82.1%
Total Conventional Apps 22 Conventional Amt/App $81,364 % Conv Positive 81.8%
Total Assisted Apps 17 Assisted Amt/App $89,706 % Asst Positive 82.4%
Applications by Ethnicity: Hispanic
Total Apps 22 Total Amt/App $85,909 % Positive 72.7%
Total Conventional Apps 14 Conventional Amt/App $82,143 % Conv Positive 85.7%
Total Assisted Apps 8 Assisted Amt/App $92,500 % Asst Positive 50.0%
Market Conditions According to Household Growth and Housing Cost/Value
Strong Markets:
DeWitt
East Lansing
Holt
Lansing-Central-North
Lansing-Central-Southwest
Lansing-East
Lansing-Outer-West
Leslie
Okemos-Haslett
Wacousta
Waverly
Williamston
Soft Markets:
Charlotte
East Lansing-South, MSU
Lansing-Southeast
Olivet
St. Johns
Housing Policy Toolbox
I. Create and preserve dedicated affordable housing units Suggested
Market Type
Establishing incentives or requirements for affordable housing
Expedited permitting for qualifying projects Soft, Strong
Reduced or waived fees for qualifying projects Soft, Strong
Reduced parking requirements for qualifying developments Soft, Strong
Tax abatements or exemptions Soft, Strong
Density bonuses Strong
Inclusionary zoning Strong
Generating revenue for affordable housing
Dedicated revenue sources Soft, Strong
Employer-assisted housing programs Soft, Strong
State tax credits for affordable housing Soft, Strong
Tax increment financing Soft, Strong
General obligation bonds for affordable housing Soft, Strong
Housing trust funds Soft, Strong
Increased use of multifamily private activity bonds to draw down 4 percent Low Income Housing Tax Credits Soft, Strong
Activation of housing finance agency reserves Soft, Strong
Demolition taxes and condominium conversion fees Strong
Linkage fees/affordable housing impact fees Strong
Transfers of development rights Strong
Supporting affordable housing through subsidies
Below-market financing of affordable housing development Soft, Strong
Low income housing tax credit Soft, Strong
Project-basing of housing choice vouchers Soft, Strong
Acquisition and operation of moderate-cost rental units Strong
Capital subsidies for building affordable housing developments Strong
Operating subsidies for affordable housing developments Strong
Preserving existing affordable housing
The Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Soft, Strong
Preservation inventories Strong
Rights of first refusal Strong
Exhibit B-3: August 1, 2023, Real Estate Analysis
for the Old Town District
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Old Town
...
Old Town District
...
Lansing, Michigan
August 1, 2023
Prepared by:
In Collaboration with:
Acknowledgements
Downtown Lansing, Inc | Advisory Team
Cathleen Edgerly, Executive Director, Downtown Lansing, Inc
Project Manager, Comprehensive Market Analysis, Downtown Lansing, Inc
Jen Estill, President, Board of Directors, Downtown Lansing, Inc
Principal and Creative Director, Redhead Creative Consultancy
James Tischler, Treasurer, Board of Directors, Downtown Lansing, Inc
Development Director, State Land Bank Authority
Julie Reinhardt, Director, Community Development, Downtown Lansing, Inc
Trevor Benoit, Director, Design & Planning, Downtown Lansing, Inc
Ashlee Willis, Advisor and Past President, Board of Directors, Downtown Lansing, Inc
Founder & CEO, Michigan Premier Events (Corp, Assoc, Gov’t Event Management)
Old Town, Lansing, Michigan Executive Summary
Old Town District Retail Summary
Retail Potential – There is an opportunity to lease up to 60,000 square feet (sf) of existing and
new commercial space in the Old Town District within the next five years. New retail tenants
should be concentrated in and near the retail core, east and west along Cesar E Chavez
Avenue (including west of the Grand River), and north along Turner Road. The aggregate
space could be allocated among 30 establishments with considerable flexibility in aggregate
square feet (sf). Depending on the location, new buildings could include up to six levels of
for-lease lofts.
The recommendations have been carefully customized to leverage Old Town District’s
existing strengths while also filling clear gaps and opportunities. Traditional merchants and
discovery types of retailers, restaurants, and entertainment venues should be concentrated
together in the district’s core, whereas services, home improvement stores, and overnight
accommodations should be located at the periphery.
9,500 sf | A small pharmacy and specialty food stores like a healthy food co-op,
international market, and bakery should be located anywhere along Cesar E Chavez
Avenue.
4,500 sf | Apparel, accessories, and beauty supplies should be clustered together and
proximate to established apparel boutiques within the retail core. They should not be
fragmented from other traditional merchants.
6,000 sf | A variety of unique and discovery types of merchants offering sporting goods
(skateboards, mopeds, resale), stationary, books, and artisan craft supplies, should be
clustered in the heart of the retail core.
10,000 sf | Four unique restaurants, eateries, drinking establishments, and/or
entertainment venues, could be located anywhere within the retail core, and they do not
necessarily need to be clustered together.
14,500 sf | Hardline categories like an appliance store, mattress store, and home
improvement stores and services (contractors, locksmith, flooring, lighting) should strive to
cluster together near North Street.
12,500 sf | Non-retail services like a laundromat, printing and shipping services (with
computer rental), recording studio, fitness center, and caterer should occupy space at
the periphery or edges of the retail core.
3,000 sf | A boutique style hotel and retreat center could leverage the unique shopping
environment (square footage is not included in the retail space). Flexible meeting space
(3,000 sq. ft.) could be linked to the hotel.
Retail Gaps and Opportunities
Old Town District - Core and Periphery
Count General Retail Category General Retail Category Sq. Ft.
1 Apparel - Screen Shop Sports apparel and iconic T-shirts 1,000
2 Apparel - Men's Urban fashions, casual wear 1,500
3 Accessories - Shoes Urban fashions for entire family 1,000
4 Beauty Supplies Organic, cottage industry products 1,000
5 Sporting Goods Skateboards, mopeds, resale goods 2,000
6 Greeting Cards, Other Collectibles Stationary, invitations, special orders 1,000
7 Book Stores Teaching, educational supplies 1,500
8 Art Supply Stores Full range of artisan craft supplies 1,500
9 Specialty Grocery - Neighborhood Healthy choices locally grown, co-op 3,000
10 Specialty Grocery - Neighborhood International market, imports, novelty 2,000
11 Pharmacy - Neighborhood Central Pharmacy or similar brand 2,500
12 Restaurant - African Cuisine Unique eateries, African cuisine 1,500
13 Restaurant - Middle Eastern Unique eateries, Middle Eastern bistro 1,500
14 Restaurant - Fish by Name Unique eateries, seafood restaurant 2,000
15 Entertain - Comedy, Piano, Dance Pride comedy, piano duel, dance club 5,000
16 Specialty Foods - Bakery, Sweets Daily bakery, breads, cupcakes, orders 2,000
Subtotal Old Town Core 30,000
17 Appliances, Electronics New and used appliance showroom 3,000
18 Furniture - Mattresses Mattresses, ready-to-assemble furniture 3,000
19 Home Improve - Contractors Plumbing, roof, siding, window svcs 1,500
20 Home Improve - Locksmith, Safes Locksmith shop with safe showroom 2,500
21 Home Improve - Floors Carpet, tile, and flooring showroom 3,000
22 Home Improve - Electric, Light Fixtures Light fixtures and installation svcs 1,500
23 Laundry and Dry Cleaning Modern laundromat, not dry cleaning 2,000
24 Convenience w/out Gas Wine + cheese cellar, beer cave, deli 2,000
25 Office Supplies Hourly computer rental, print & ship 2,500
26 Marketing - Recording Studio Recording studio, karaoke bar, DJ svc 2,000
27 Fitness Centers, Health Clubs, Gyms Fitness center, martial arts, yoga studio 3,000
30 Non-Restaurant Catering Services Specialty catering, special order svcs 1,000
28 Overnight Accommodations Boutique style hotel with retreat center .
29 Event Halls, Meeting Venues Meeting space linked to boutique hotel 3,000
Subtotal Old Town Periphery 30,000
Total Estimated Square Feet 60,000
Source: Based on a Comprehensive Market Analysis and retail study prepared
by LandUseUSA | Urban Strategies; 2023.
Old Town, Lansing, Michigan Executive Summary
Old Town District Residential Summary
Owner Potential – Avoid over-building new
detached houses for owners and explore
alternative formats like side-by-side
duplexes and townhouses. Build no more
than thirteen (13) detached houses for
owners each year. Also strive to build nine
(9) townhouses with private entrances and porches, or a few condo style apartments
with shared entrances. Attached units should have vista views of the Grand River
and/or retail core; and townhouses should have private porches.
Renter Potential – For renters, focus on the
development of up to 375 new units
throughout the district each year,
including 212 lofts, walkups, and courtyard
apartments. Diversify the choices with 66
new for-lease townhouses with private
entrances and stoops; and 97 accessory
dwellings, small cottages, and units in small
apartment houses.
Additional Notes – About half of the new renters will be “Colleges and Cafes” and
“Striving Singles” target markets with exceptionally high movership rates. They tend to
turn-over the housing stock quickly and removing them from the analysis reduces the
renter market potential to about 200 units annually. For every new residential unit that
is constructed, at least one existing unit should be rehabilitated, renovated,
remodeled. Some optimal Step Building © formats are shown below and would be
ideal for sites located adjacent to Old Town’s retail core.
The Housing Mismatch | Lansing Old Town
Capture with New Builds v. Existing Units | 2025
Project
100%
Housing Type
Proposed
90%
75% 69%
Share of Total
56%
50%
37% 35%
30% 28%
Demand Demand
26%
Supply Supply
25%
15% 17%
6% 4%
0%
OWNERS OWNERS OWNERS RENTERS RENTERS RENTERS
Houses Town Condo Downtown Town Accessory
Large Houses Style Lofts Houses Small
Cottages Side-Side Apartments Walkups Private Cottages
Private Lg Porch Shared Courtyard Entrances Subdivided
Yard Vista View Entrances Apartments & Stoops Houses
Supply represents all existing housing units as reported by the American Community Survey with
one-year and five-year estimates through 2021. Demand is based on the number of new
households migrating into the Old Town Lansing study area each year. All figures are unadjusted for
out-migration; internal movership among existing households; vacancies; and new projects that
might be in pipeline for future development.
Based on the results of a comprehensive Residential Target Market Analysis and analysis prepared
by LandUseUSA | Urban Strategies; 2022-2023.
Annual Market Potential | Lansing Old Town
Capture with New Builds | Year 2025
Note: Includes about 204 in-migrating
500
Owners v. Renters singles (i.e., the Colleges & Cafes and
Total = 397 Striving Singles lifestyle clusters) who
tend to seek student housing formats.
Number of Housing Units
400 375
300
200
100
22
0
Owners Renters
All charts represent the minimum and conservative market potential based on in-
migration only, and excluding internal movership. There is a need to CAPTURE these new
households that are moving into Old Town Lansing by building new units every year. All
figures are unadjusted for out-migration, current vacancies, and competing
developments that might be in the construction pipeline.
500
Tenure Allocated to Formats
Total = 397
Number of Housing Units
400
Project
Housing Type
300
Proposed
212
200
97
100 66
13 6 3
0
OWNERS OWNERS OWNERS RENTERS RENTERS RENTERS
Houses Town Condo Downtown Town Accessory
Large Houses Style Lofts Houses Small
Cottages Side-Side Apartments Walkups Private Cottages
Private Lg Porch Shared Courtyard Entrances Subdivided
Yard Vista View Entrances Apartments & Stoops Houses
Source: Target market analysis and exhibit prepared by LandUseUSA | Urban
Strategies on behalf of Old Town Lansing; 2022.
Annual Market Potential | Old Town
Capture of New Owners | Year 2025
all other lifestyle clusters 4
Family Funtastic | B09
Suburban Attainment | D18 1 Total = 22
Status Seeking Singles | G24 1 Annual Capture
Bohemian Groove | K40 1 Owner Households
(excludes Rehabs
Rooted Flower Power | L42 1
and Interception)
Infants Debit Cards | M45 3
Full Steam Ahead | O50
Digital Dependents | O51 3
Urban Ambition | O52 1
Colleges Cafes | O53 1
Striving Singles | O54 1
Family Troopers | O55
Mid-Scale Medley | P56 2
Humble Beginnings | P61
Senior Discount Towers | Q65
Daring to Dream | R66 1
Hope for Tomorrow | R67
Small Town Pockets | S68 1
Urban Survivors | S69 1
Tough Times | S71
Underlying Mosaic Lifestyle Clusters provided by Experian Decision Analytics through
2021, and with forecasts through 2025. Analysis & exhibit prepared by LandUseUSA
on behalf of Old Town Lansing; 2022 - 2023.
Annual Market Potential | Old Town
Capture of New Renters | Year 2025
all other lifestyle clusters
Family Funtastic | B09
Suburban Attainment | D18
Total = 375
Status Seeking Singles | G24 1 Annual Capture
Bohemian Groove | K40 9 Renter Households
Rooted Flower Power | L42
(excludes Rehabs
and Interception)
Infants Debit Cards | M45 3
Full Steam Ahead | O50 15
Digital Dependents | O51 5
Urban Ambition | O52 32
Colleges Cafes | O53 3
Striving Singles | O54 196
Family Troopers | O55 14
Mid-Scale Medley | P56 2
Humble Beginnings | P61 3
Senior Discount Towers | Q65 1
Daring to Dream | R66 70
Hope for Tomorrow | R67 14
Small Town Pockets | S68 3
Urban Survivors | S69 1
Tough Times | S71 3
Underlying Mosaic Lifestyle Clusters provided by Experian Decision Analytics through
2021, and with forecasts through 2025. Analysis & exhibit prepared by LandUseUSA
on behalf of Downtown Lansing, Inc.; 2022 - 2023.
Preferred Home Values | Old Town
Capture with New-Builds | Year 2025
$500,000 or more
$475 - 500,000
Minimum Number of
$450 - 475,000 1 Annual New-Builds
by Total Home Value
$425 - 450,000 (Preferred by the Target Markets)
...
$400 - 425,000
Total Owner Units = 22
New-Build Home Value Brackets
$375 - 400,000
$350 - 375,000
$325 - 350,000
$300 - 325,000 1
$275 - 300,000 4
$250 - 275,000 2
$225 - 250,000 5
$200 - 225,000 4
$175 - 200,000 2
$150 - 175,000 3
$150,000 or less
Based on the results of a Target Market Analysis and study of households moving
into the local market. Analysis & exhibit prepared by LandUseUSA | Urban Strategies
on behalf of Downtown Lansing, Inc.; 2022 - 2023.
Preferred Contract Rents | Old Town
Capture with New Builds | Year 2025
$2,000 or more 1
$1,900 - 2,000
Minimum Number of
$1,800 - 1,900 Annual New-Builds
by Monthly Contract Rent
$1,700 - 1,800
(Preferred by the Target Markets)
...
$1,600 - 1,700
Total Rental Units = 375
$1,500 - 1,600
Monthly Contract Rent Brackets
$1,400 - 1,500 22
$1,300 - 1,400
$1,200 - 1,300 256
$1,100 - 1,200
$1,000 - 1,100
$900 - 1,000 78
$800 - 900
$700 - 800 18
$600 - 700
$500 - 600
$500 or less
Based on the results of a Target Market Analysis and study of households moving
into the local market. Analysis & exhibit prepared by LandUseUSA | Urban Strategies
on behalf of Housing Lenawee; 2022 - 2023.
Annual Market Potential | Lansing Old Town
Intercept with New Builds | Year 2025
Note: Includes about 200 singles (i.e., the
500
Owners v. Renters Colleges & Cafes and Striving Singles lifestyle
Total = 261 clusters) who are on the move but currently
bypassing Lansing's Old Town District each year.
Number of Housing Units
400
300 258
200
100
3
0
Owners Renters
Both charts are based on the history of in-migration for Lansing's Old Town District over
the past five years, and excluding internal movership. There is an upside opportunity to
INTERCEPT these households that are on the move but currently bypassing the district.
All figures are unadjusted for out-migration, current vacancies, and competing
developments that might be in the construction pipeline.
500
Tenure Allocated to Formats
Total = 261
Number of Housing Units
400
Project
300
Housing Type
Proposed
198
200
100
31 29
2 1 0
0
OWNERS OWNERS OWNERS RENTERS RENTERS RENTERS
Houses Town Condo Downtown Town Accessory
Large Houses Style Lofts Houses Small
Cottages Side-Side Apartments Walkups Private Cottages
Private Lg Porch Shared Courtyard Entrances Subdivided
Yard Vista View Entrances Apartments & Stoops Houses
Source: Target market analysis and exhibit prepared by LandUseUSA | Urban
Strategies on behalf of Old Town Lansing; 2022.
Annual Market Potential | Lansing Old Town
Retain with Rehabs | Year 2025
Note: Includes about 110 existing singles (i.e.,
500
Owners v. Renters the Colleges & Cafes and Striving Singles
Total = 372 lifestyle clusters) who are swapping addresses
within Lansing's Old Town District each year.
Number of Housing Units
400
346
300
200
100
26
0
Owners Renters
Both charts represent a conservative market potential based on internal movership
only, and excluding in-migration. There is a need to RETAIN these existing households
that are moving within Lansing's Old Town District by rehabbing outdated units every
year. All figures are unadjusted for out-migration, current vacancies, and competing
developments that might be in the construction pipeline.
500
Tenure Allocated to Formats
Total = 372
Number of Housing Units
400
300
200
129 137
100 80
16 7 3
0
OWNERS OWNERS OWNERS RENTERS RENTERS RENTERS
Houses Town Condo Downtown Town Accessory
Large Houses Style Lofts Houses Small
Cottages Side-Side Apartments Walkups Private Cottages
Private Lg Porch Shared Courtyard Entrances Subdivided
Yard Vista View Entrances Apartments & Stoops Houses
Source: Target market analysis and exhibit prepared by LandUseUSA | Urban
Strategies on behalf of Old Town Lansing; 2022.
Block Groups | Residential CMA
Old Town Study Area | 2020 Census Rd
i ng
ns
La
N E a s t St
k e
La
W o o d St
H ei g h t s A v e
Whyte St
Indiana Ave
New Yo rk Av e N F a irv i e w A v e
ve
rd A
N H i gh St
E N o rth S t
O h i o Ave
Turner St N Larch St
yfo
N Ha
8.04
Cen te r St
Groesbeck Golf
Course
Ho p ki n s Av
E C esar E C h a vez Ave
W Mapl e St
66.02
7.01 Porter St
Ma r yland Av e
W Kilborn St
Center St Cleveland St C l a rk S t
Mah l o n St
N C hestnut St
E Oak l and Ave
W Oak l and A v e 8.03
Ma y S t
N Penn s y l van i a Av e
S eym o u r Ave
N P i ne S t
N C a p i to l Av e N F a ir v i e w Ave
N C e dar St N L a r ch S t
69 69
882 ft
N Ma gn o li a Av e N H a yfo r d Ave
N Wa l n u t S t
N Grand Ave
M ar s ha ll St
W Ge n ese e S t
N C l em e ns Ave
Sh i aw a ss e e S t E S hiaw ass ee S t
W Ion i a St 96 Vine St
4/7/2023 1:20,000
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 mi
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 km
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA, Province of Ontario, Esri, HERE, Garmin,
SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US
EXHIBIT C
Table 4 – Tax Increment Financing Estimates
Table 4a1 - Base Year/Initial Taxable Value (ITV) Information
Table 4a2 - Total Estimated Taxes Paid to All Taxing Jurisdictions
on the Base Year Taxable Value/Initial Taxable Value (ITV)
Table 4b - Estimated Future Taxable Value (FTV) Information
Table 4c - Total Tax Increment Revenue Capture Estimate
Table 4d - Tax Increment Revenue Reimbursement Allocation Table
Table 4e – Total Taxes Paid to All Taxing Jurisdiction on the Total
Captured Value (excludes any Base Year/ITV) During Brownfield Plan
Tax Capture Period
Table 4f1 – Tax Capture Not Allowed by BRA
Table 4f2 – 10% of Tax Capture Passed-Through/Shared with Taxing
Jurisdiction
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT ‐ OLD TOWN ‐ NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel IDs)
Table 4a1 ‐ Base Year/ Initial Taxable Value (ITV) Information
Base Year/ Initial Taxable Value (ITV) of All Eligible Property in the Brownfield Plan by
Property Identification Notes
Property Classification
Land Improve‐ Real Property Personal BASE YEAR =
Address Tax Parcel Number Land Building Total
ments Subtotal Property 2025
0 TURNER 33‐01‐01‐09‐252‐171 $ 3,568 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 3,568 $ ‐ $ 3,568
Tax Exempt/ City‐owned
0 TURNER 33‐01‐01‐09‐252‐152 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Property for 2025
1413 TURNER 33‐01‐01‐09‐252‐131 $ 11,334 $ ‐ $ 14,765 $ 26,099 $ ‐ $ 26,099
1421 TURNER 33‐01‐01‐09‐252‐161 $ 12,270 $ ‐ $ 28,350 $ 40,620 $ ‐ $ 40,620
1429 TURNER 33‐01‐01‐09‐252‐181 $ 5,743 $ ‐ $ 3,577 $ 9,320 $ ‐ $ 9,320
1503 TURNER (portion of) 33‐01‐01‐09‐252‐191 $ 4,653 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 4,653 $ ‐ $ 4,653
Totals $ 37,568 $ ‐ $ 46,693 $ 84,260 $ ‐ $ 84,260 ‐
Last revised: 4/2/2025
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions Base Year/ ITV Page 1 of 1
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT ‐ OLD TOWN ‐ NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel IDs)
Table 4a2 ‐ Total Estimated Taxes Paid to All Taxing Jurisdictions on the Base Year
Taxable Value/ Initial Taxable Value (ITV)
Real Property
Buildings,
Improvements to
Land & Land
Calendar/
AD VALOREM TAXING AUTHORITIES/ TAXING 2025
Tax Year
1 Millage Rate Paid
JURISDICTIONS
‐ CITY OF LANSING ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ City Operating ‐ Lansing 19.4400 $ 1,638
‐ Storm/ Montgomery Drain 0.2600 $ 22
‐ Public Safety 3.5000 $ 295
Subtotal of Local Government Unit (LGU):
‐
Annual 23.2000 $ 1,955
‐ INGHAM COUNTY ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Ingham County 12.3921 $ 1,044
‐ Capital Region Airport Authority ‐ CRAA 0.6990 $ 59
‐ Capital Area Transportation Authority ‐ CATA 2.9895 $ 252
‐ LIBRARY ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Capital Area District Libraries ‐ CADL 1.5590 $ 131
‐ INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS (ISD) ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ISD Operating & Special Education 4.9378 $ 416
‐ COMMUNITY COLLEGE ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Lansing Community College ‐ LCC 3.7692 $ 318
LOCAL SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes State
‐
School millages ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Lansing School District Debt (District #33020) 4.1000 $ 345
‐ Lansing School District Sinking Fund 2.9575 $ 249
‐ Subtotal of Non‐LGU Local: Annual 33.4041 $ 2,815
‐ Total Local Tax Capture: Annual 56.6041 $ 4,769
STATE SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes Local
Millage Rate Paid ‐ ‐
‐ School millages
‐ State Education Tax ‐ SET 6.0000 $ 506
‐ Local School Operating ‐ LSO 17.4478 $ 1,470
‐ Total State & Local School: Annual 23.4478 $ 1,976
TOTAL LOCAL and STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL
‐ 80.0519 $ 6,745
TAX CAPTURE: ANNUAL
Notes:
1 The most current available millage rates are utilized (Summer 2024 and Winter 2024).
Last revised: 4/2/2025
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions Base Year Taxes Paid Page 1 of 1
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT ‐ OLD TOWN ‐ NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel IDs) FIRST YEAR
OF TAX
Table 4b ‐ Estimated Future Taxable Value (FTV) Information 1, 2 CAPTURE
Calendar/
Tax Year = 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057
Tax Year
FYE 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058
BP Capture
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Year
Estimated Percentage (%) Change In Future Taxable Values (TV) of Building(s), Land Improvements & Land (excludes
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
any Personal Property)
Tax Year = 2026 2027 2028 2029
% % %
Estimated Future Taxable Value (FTV) and %
Completed Completed Completed
True Cash Value (TCV) of Building(s), Land Completed ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
by by by
Improvements & Land Upon Completion by 12/31/28
FTV TCV Notes 12/31/25 12/31/26 12/31/27
Includes AV/FTV of Land
Multi‐Family Residential Apartment Units $ 4,138,100 $ 8,276,103 0% 30% 90% 100% 1,241,400 3,724,300 4,138,100 4,262,200 4,390,100 4,521,800 4,657,500 4,797,200 4,941,100 5,089,300 5,242,000 5,399,300 5,561,300 5,728,100 5,899,900 6,076,900 6,259,200 6,447,000 6,640,400 6,839,600 7,044,800 7,256,100 7,473,800 7,698,000 7,928,900 8,166,800 8,411,800 8,664,200 8,924,100 9,191,800 9,467,600
upon 100% completion.
Total $ 4,138,100 $ 8,276,103 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,241,400 3,724,300 4,138,100 4,262,200 4,390,100 4,521,800 4,657,500 4,797,200 4,941,100 5,089,300 5,242,000 5,399,300 5,561,300 5,728,100 5,899,900 6,076,900 6,259,200 6,447,000 6,640,400 6,839,600 7,044,800 7,256,100 7,473,800 7,698,000 7,928,900 8,166,800 8,411,800 8,664,200 8,924,100 9,191,800 9,467,600
Total Future Taxable Value (FTV) of Building(s) and Land Improvements, Land & Personal Property (if any) 1,241,400 3,724,300 4,138,100 4,262,200 4,390,100 4,521,800 4,657,500 4,797,200 4,941,100 5,089,300 5,242,000 5,399,300 5,561,300 5,728,100 5,899,900 6,076,900 6,259,200 6,447,000 6,640,400 6,839,600 7,044,800 7,256,100 7,473,800 7,698,000 7,928,900 8,166,800 8,411,800 8,664,200 8,924,100 9,191,800 9,467,600
Base Year/ Initial Taxable Value (ITV) of Building(s) and Land Improvements 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693 46,693
Base Year/ Initial Taxable Value (ITV) of Land 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568 37,568
Total Base Year/ Initial Taxable Value (ITV) 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260 84,260
Total Captured Taxable Value ( = to Total FTV of Building(s) and Land Improvements, Land & Personal Property (if any) minus Base Year/ ITV) $ ‐ $ 3,640,040 $ 4,053,840 $ 4,177,940 $ 4,305,840 $ 4,437,540 $ 4,573,240 $ 4,712,940 $ 4,856,840 $ 5,005,040 $ 5,157,740 $ 5,315,040 $ 5,477,040 $ 5,643,840 $ 5,815,640 $ 5,992,640 $ 6,174,940 $ 6,362,740 $ 6,556,140 $ 6,755,340 $ 6,960,540 $ 7,171,840 $ 7,389,540 $ 7,613,740 $ 7,844,640 $ 8,082,540 $ 8,327,540 $ 8,579,940 $ 8,877,407 $ 9,145,107 $ 9,420,907
Notes:
All Future Taxable Values (FTV)/Future Assessed Values (FAV) are estimates only; the actual FTV/FAV may be higher or lower than estimated, and
must be determined upon project completion by the governing body's Assessing personnel. FTV/FAV per square foot and/or per room/unit for both
new construction and renovations may vary widely depending on the quality, quantity, type of improvements, and the property's location.
1
Additionally, for any renovations (if applicable), the FTV/FAV depends on whether improvements are assessed as “new improvements” or just
“replacement/repair,” as determined by Assessing personnel. Until improvements are completed and assessed, it is only possible to estimate the
FTV/FAV based on various assumptions.
The Brownfield Plan will also capture all Personal Property taxes allowed for tax capture. The estimates of the Future Assessed Value (FAV) of
Personal Property, if any are provided, and any associated Tax Increment Revenues, are estimates only, and the actual values of Personal Property
and any associated property taxes generated are difficult to estimate due to the following: (a) uncertainty regarding the amount, value and type of
Personal Property to be included in the project; (b) different depreciation rates applying to the various categories of Personal Property, such as
2
Furniture and Fixtures, Office and Electronic Equipment, Machinery and Equipment, and Computer Equipment; and (c) Personal Property being
exempt from taxes if its True Cash Value (after depreciation) is less than $180,000 and the proper forms are submitted to the local unit of
government (pursuant to Michigan Public Act 153 of 2013, as amended). The estimated Assessed/Taxable Value of any existing Personal Property is
included in the Plan's Base Year/Initial Taxable Value.
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions Estimated Future Taxable Value (FTV) Page 1 of 1
Table 4c - Total Tax Increment Revenue Capture Estimate
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT - OLD TOWN - NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel IDs)
4/3/2025
Estimated Percentage (%) Change In Taxable Values (TV) 0.00% 0.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
Brownfield Plan Year 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Brownfield Plan Capture Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 TOTAL
Calendar Year 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057
Base Year Taxable Value $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 $ 84,260 ‐
Estimated New TV: Residential Apartments $ 3,724,300 $ 4,138,100 $ 4,262,200 $ 4,390,100 $ 4,521,800 $ 4,657,500 $ 4,797,200 $ 4,941,100 $ 5,089,300 $ 5,242,000 $ 5,399,300 $ 5,561,300 $ 5,728,100 $ 5,899,900 $ 6,076,900 $ 6,259,200 $ 6,447,000 $ 6,640,400 $ 6,839,600 $ 7,044,800 $ 7,256,100 $ 7,473,800 $ 7,698,000 $ 7,928,900 $ 8,166,800 $ 8,411,800 $ 8,664,200 $ 8,924,100 $ 9,191,800 $ 9,467,600 ‐
Incremental Difference (New TV ‐ Base TV) $ 3,640,040 $ 4,053,840 $ 4,177,940 $ 4,305,840 $ 4,437,540 $ 4,573,240 $ 4,712,940 $ 4,856,840 $ 5,005,040 $ 5,157,740 $ 5,315,040 $ 5,477,040 $ 5,643,840 $ 5,815,640 $ 5,992,640 $ 6,174,940 $ 6,362,740 $ 6,556,140 $ 6,755,340 $ 6,960,540 $ 7,171,840 $ 7,389,540 $ 7,613,740 $ 7,844,640 $ 8,082,540 $ 8,327,540 $ 8,579,940 $ 8,839,840 $ 9,107,540 $ 9,383,340 ‐
Multi‐Family
Residential
Apartment
Units
Millage Rate
School Capture Captured
State Education Tax ‐ SET 6.0000 $ 19,656 $ 21,891 $ 22,561 $ 23,252 $ 23,963 $ 24,695 $ 25,450 $ 26,227 $ 27,027 $ 27,852 $ 28,701 $ 29,576 $ 30,477 $ 31,404 $ 32,360 $ 33,345 $ 34,359 $ 35,403 $ 36,479 $ 37,587 $ 38,728 $ 39,904 $ 41,114 $ 42,361 $ 43,646 $ 44,969 $ 46,332 $ 47,938 $ 49,384 $ 50,873 $ 1,017,512
Local School Operating ‐ LSO 17.4478 $ 57,160 $ 63,658 $ 65,606 $ 67,615 $ 69,683 $ 71,814 $ 74,007 $ 76,267 $ 78,594 $ 80,992 $ 83,462 $ 86,006 $ 88,625 $ 91,323 $ 94,103 $ 96,965 $ 99,914 $ 102,951 $ 106,079 $ 109,301 $ 112,620 $ 116,038 $ 119,559 $ 123,185 $ 126,920 $ 130,768 $ 134,731 $ 139,402 $ 143,606 $ 147,937 $ 2,958,890
School Total 23.4478 $ 76,816 $ 85,548 $ 88,167 $ 90,866 $ 93,645 $ 96,509 $ 99,457 $ 102,494 $ 105,621 $ 108,844 $ 112,163 $ 115,582 $ 119,102 $ 122,728 $ 126,463 $ 130,310 $ 134,273 $ 138,354 $ 142,558 $ 146,888 $ 151,347 $ 155,942 $ 160,673 $ 165,546 $ 170,566 $ 175,736 $ 181,063 $ 187,340 $ 192,989 $ 198,810 $ 3,976,402
Millage Rate
Local Capture Captured
City Operating ‐ Lansing 19.4400 $ 63,686 $ 70,926 $ 73,097 $ 75,335 $ 77,639 $ 80,013 $ 82,458 $ 84,975 $ 87,568 $ 90,240 $ 92,992 $ 95,826 $ 98,745 $ 101,750 $ 104,847 $ 108,037 $ 111,322 $ 114,706 $ 118,191 $ 121,782 $ 125,479 $ 129,287 $ 133,210 $ 137,250 $ 141,412 $ 145,699 $ 150,115 $ 155,319 $ 160,003 $ 164,828 $ 3,296,738
Ingham County 12.3921 $ 40,597 $ 45,212 $ 46,596 $ 48,023 $ 49,491 $ 51,005 $ 52,563 $ 54,168 $ 55,821 $ 57,524 $ 59,278 $ 61,085 $ 62,945 $ 64,861 $ 66,835 $ 68,868 $ 70,963 $ 73,120 $ 75,342 $ 77,630 $ 79,987 $ 82,415 $ 84,915 $ 87,490 $ 90,144 $ 92,876 $ 95,691 $ 99,009 $ 101,994 $ 105,070 $ 2,101,518
Capital Region Airport Authority ‐ CRAA 0.6990 $ 2,290 $ 2,550 $ 2,628 $ 2,709 $ 2,792 $ 2,877 $ 2,965 $ 3,055 $ 3,149 $ 3,245 $ 3,344 $ 3,446 $ 3,551 $ 3,659 $ 3,770 $ 3,885 $ 4,003 $ 4,124 $ 4,250 $ 4,379 $ 4,512 $ 4,649 $ 4,790 $ 4,935 $ 5,085 $ 5,239 $ 5,398 $ 5,585 $ 5,753 $ 5,927 $ 118,540
Capital Area Transportation Authority ‐ CATA 2.9895 $ 9,794 $ 10,907 $ 11,241 $ 11,585 $ 11,939 $ 12,305 $ 12,680 $ 13,068 $ 13,466 $ 13,877 $ 14,300 $ 14,736 $ 15,185 $ 15,647 $ 16,123 $ 16,614 $ 17,119 $ 17,640 $ 18,176 $ 18,728 $ 19,296 $ 19,882 $ 20,485 $ 21,106 $ 21,746 $ 22,406 $ 23,085 $ 23,885 $ 24,605 $ 25,347 $ 506,975
Capital Area District Libraries ‐ CADL 1.5590 $ 5,107 $ 5,688 $ 5,862 $ 6,042 $ 6,226 $ 6,417 $ 6,613 $ 6,815 $ 7,023 $ 7,237 $ 7,458 $ 7,685 $ 7,919 $ 8,160 $ 8,408 $ 8,664 $ 8,928 $ 9,199 $ 9,478 $ 9,766 $ 10,063 $ 10,368 $ 10,683 $ 11,007 $ 11,341 $ 11,684 $ 12,039 $ 12,456 $ 12,832 $ 13,218 $ 264,383
ISD Operating & Special Education 4.9378 $ 16,176 $ 18,015 $ 18,567 $ 19,135 $ 19,721 $ 20,324 $ 20,944 $ 21,584 $ 22,242 $ 22,921 $ 23,620 $ 24,340 $ 25,081 $ 25,845 $ 26,631 $ 27,442 $ 28,276 $ 29,136 $ 30,021 $ 30,933 $ 31,872 $ 32,839 $ 33,836 $ 34,862 $ 35,919 $ 37,008 $ 38,129 $ 39,451 $ 40,641 $ 41,867 $ 837,378
Lansing Community College ‐ LCC 3.7692 $ 12,348 $ 13,752 $ 14,173 $ 14,607 $ 15,053 $ 15,514 $ 15,988 $ 16,476 $ 16,978 $ 17,496 $ 18,030 $ 18,580 $ 19,145 $ 19,728 $ 20,329 $ 20,947 $ 21,584 $ 22,240 $ 22,916 $ 23,612 $ 24,329 $ 25,067 $ 25,828 $ 26,611 $ 27,418 $ 28,249 $ 29,106 $ 30,115 $ 31,023 $ 31,958 $ 639,201
Lansing School District Sinking Fund 2.9575 $ 9,689 $ 10,790 $ 11,121 $ 11,461 $ 11,812 $ 12,173 $ 12,545 $ 12,928 $ 13,322 $ 13,729 $ 14,147 $ 14,579 $ 15,022 $ 15,480 $ 15,951 $ 16,436 $ 16,936 $ 17,451 $ 17,981 $ 18,527 $ 19,090 $ 19,669 $ 20,266 $ 20,880 $ 21,514 $ 22,166 $ 22,838 $ 23,629 $ 24,342 $ 25,076 $ 501,548
Local Total 48.7441 $ 159,687 $ 177,841 $ 183,285 $ 188,896 $ 194,673 $ 200,627 $ 206,755 $ 213,068 $ 219,570 $ 226,268 $ 233,169 $ 240,276 $ 247,593 $ 255,130 $ 262,895 $ 270,893 $ 279,131 $ 287,616 $ 296,355 $ 305,357 $ 314,626 $ 324,177 $ 334,012 $ 344,142 $ 354,579 $ 365,327 $ 376,399 $ 389,449 $ 401,193 $ 413,292 $ 8,266,282
Millage Rate
Non‐Capturable Millages Paid
Public Safety 3.5000 $ 12,740 $ 14,188 $ 14,623 $ 15,070 $ 15,531 $ 16,006 $ 16,495 $ 16,999 $ 17,518 $ 18,052 $ 18,603 $ 19,170 $ 19,753 $ 20,355 $ 20,974 $ 21,612 $ 22,270 $ 22,946 $ 23,644 $ 24,362 $ 25,101 $ 25,863 $ 26,648 $ 27,456 $ 28,289 $ 29,146 $ 30,030 $ 30,939 $ 31,876 $ 32,842 $ 659,104
Storm/ Montgomery Drain 0.2600 $ 946 $ 1,054 $ 1,086 $ 1,120 $ 1,154 $ 1,189 $ 1,225 $ 1,263 $ 1,301 $ 1,341 $ 1,382 $ 1,424 $ 1,467 $ 1,512 $ 1,558 $ 1,605 $ 1,654 $ 1,705 $ 1,756 $ 1,810 $ 1,865 $ 1,921 $ 1,980 $ 2,040 $ 2,101 $ 2,165 $ 2,231 $ 2,298 $ 2,368 $ 2,440 $ 48,962
Lansing School District Debt (District #33020) 4.1000 $ 14,924 $ 16,621 $ 17,130 $ 17,654 $ 18,194 $ 18,750 $ 19,323 $ 19,913 $ 20,521 $ 21,147 $ 21,792 $ 22,456 $ 23,140 $ 23,844 $ 24,570 $ 25,317 $ 26,087 $ 26,880 $ 27,697 $ 28,538 $ 29,405 $ 30,297 $ 31,216 $ 32,163 $ 33,138 $ 34,143 $ 35,178 $ 36,243 $ 37,341 $ 38,472 $ 772,093
Total Non‐Capturable Taxes 7.8600 $ 28,611 $ 31,863 $ 32,839 $ 33,844 $ 34,879 $ 35,946 $ 37,044 $ 38,175 $ 39,340 $ 40,540 $ 41,776 $ 43,050 $ 44,361 $ 45,711 $ 47,102 $ 48,535 $ 50,011 $ 51,531 $ 53,097 $ 54,710 $ 56,371 $ 58,082 $ 59,844 $ 61,659 $ 63,529 $ 65,454 $ 67,438 $ 69,481 $ 71,585 $ 73,753 $ 1,480,159
Total Annual Tax Increment Revenue (TIR) Available for Capture $ 236,503 $ 263,389 $ 271,452 $ 279,762 $ 288,319 $ 297,136 $ 306,212 $ 315,562 $ 325,191 $ 335,112 $ 345,333 $ 355,858 $ 366,696 $ 377,858 $ 389,358 $ 401,203 $ 413,404 $ 425,970 $ 438,913 $ 452,245 $ 465,974 $ 480,118 $ 494,685 $ 509,688 $ 525,145 $ 541,063 $ 557,462 $ 576,789 $ 594,182 $ 612,102 $ 12,242,684
Cumulative Tax Increment Revenue (TIR) Available for Capture $ 236,503 $ 499,892 $ 771,344 $ 1,051,106 $ 1,339,425 $ 1,636,561 $ 1,942,774 $ 2,258,336 $ 2,583,527 $ 2,918,639 $ 3,263,971 $ 3,619,830 $ 3,986,525 $ 4,364,383 $ 4,753,741 $ 5,154,944 $ 5,568,348 $ 5,994,318 $ 6,433,231 $ 6,885,476 $ 7,351,450 $ 7,831,568 $ 8,326,254 $ 8,835,941 $ 9,361,086 $ 9,902,148 $ 10,459,610 $ 11,036,400 $ 11,630,582 $ 12,242,684 ‐
Footnotes:
The most current available millage rates are utilized (Summer 2024 &
Winter 2024) and are assumed to be in effect for the duration of the Plan.
Actual rates are subject to change and may be higher or lower, and may
include the elimination of existing millages and/or the addition of new
millages.
Last revised: 4/3/2025
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions Total TIR Capture Page 1 of 1
Table 4d ‐ Tax Increment Revenue Reimbursement Allocation Table
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT ‐ OLD TOWN ‐ NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel IDs)
4/3/2025
Developer
Maximum School & Local Local‐Only School‐Only
Reimbursement Proportionality Taxes Taxes Taxes Total Estimated Reimbursement
State 32.48% $ 4,273,886 ‐ $ ‐ $ 4,273,886 BRA Administrative Fees and/or
Estimated Total
Local Brownfield Revolving Fund $ 826,628 30
Years of Plan
Local 67.52% $ 8,884,702 $ 5,000 ‐ $ 8,889,702 (LBRF)
TOTAL $ 13,158,588 $ 5,000 $ ‐ $ 13,163,588 State Brownfield Redevelopment
Fund ‐ MBRF (50% of the $ 389,008
EGLE Activities 0.36% $ 47,842 captured SET millage)
MSHDA Subtotal: Non‐Developer
99.64% $ 13,110,746 $ 1,215,637
Activities Reimbursement
TOTAL 100.00% $ 13,158,588 Developer Reimbursement $ 13,163,588
Total $ 14,379,225
Brownfield Plan Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Brownfield Plan Capture Year 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
TOTAL
Calendar Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057
Total State Tax Incremental Revenue (TIR) $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 76,816 $ 85,548 $ 88,167 $ 90,866 $ 93,645 $ 96,509 $ 99,457 $ 102,494 $ 105,621 $ 108,844 $ 112,163 $ 115,582 $ 119,102 $ 122,728 $ 126,463 $ 130,310 $ 134,273 $ 138,354 $ 142,558 $ 146,888 $ 151,347 $ 155,942 $ 160,673 $ 165,546 $ 170,566 $ 175,736 $ 181,063 $ 187,340 $ 192,989 $ 198,810 $ 3,976,402
State Brownfield Redevelopment Fund ‐ MBRF: 50% of the
Captured SET $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 9,828 $ 10,945 $ 11,280 $ 11,626 $ 11,981 $ 12,348 $ 12,725 $ 13,113 $ 13,514 $ 13,926 $ 14,351 $ 14,788 $ 15,238 $ 15,702 $ 16,180 $ 16,672 $ 17,179 $ 17,702 $ 18,239 $ 18,793 $ 19,364 $ 19,952 $ 20,557 $ 21,181 $ 21,823 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 389,008
State TIR Available for Reimbursement $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 66,988 $ 74,603 $ 76,887 $ 79,240 $ 81,664 $ 84,161 $ 86,732 $ 89,381 $ 92,108 $ 94,918 $ 97,813 $ 100,794 $ 103,864 $ 107,025 $ 110,283 $ 113,638 $ 117,094 $ 120,653 $ 124,319 $ 128,095 $ 131,984 $ 135,990 $ 140,116 $ 144,365 $ 148,743 $ 175,736 $ 181,063 $ 187,340 $ 192,989 $ 198,810 $ 3,587,393
Total Local Tax Incremental Revenue (TIR) $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 159,687 $ 177,841 $ 183,285 $ 188,896 $ 194,673 $ 200,627 $ 206,755 $ 213,068 $ 219,570 $ 226,268 $ 233,169 $ 240,276 $ 247,593 $ 255,130 $ 262,895 $ 270,893 $ 279,131 $ 287,616 $ 296,355 $ 305,357 $ 314,626 $ 324,177 $ 334,012 $ 344,142 $ 354,579 $ 365,327 $ 376,399 $ 389,449 $ 401,193 $ 413,292 $ 8,266,282
BRA Administrative Fee and/or BRA Local Brownfield Revolving
Fund (LBRF): 10% of Available Local TIR $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 15,969 $ 17,784 $ 18,328 $ 18,890 $ 19,467 $ 20,063 $ 20,676 $ 21,307 $ 21,957 $ 22,627 $ 23,317 $ 24,028 $ 24,759 $ 25,513 $ 26,290 $ 27,089 $ 27,913 $ 28,762 $ 29,635 $ 30,536 $ 31,463 $ 32,418 $ 33,401 $ 34,414 $ 35,458 $ 36,533 $ 37,640 $ 38,945 $ 40,119 $ 41,329 $ 826,628
Local TIR Available for Reimbursement $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 143,719 $ 160,057 $ 164,956 $ 170,006 $ 175,206 $ 180,564 $ 186,080 $ 191,761 $ 197,613 $ 203,642 $ 209,852 $ 216,248 $ 222,834 $ 229,617 $ 236,606 $ 243,803 $ 251,218 $ 258,854 $ 266,719 $ 274,821 $ 283,164 $ 291,759 $ 300,611 $ 309,728 $ 319,121 $ 328,794 $ 338,759 $ 350,504 $ 361,074 $ 371,963 $ 7,439,654
Total State & Local TIR Available $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 210,706 $ 234,660 $ 241,843 $ 249,247 $ 256,870 $ 264,725 $ 272,812 $ 281,142 $ 289,720 $ 298,560 $ 307,665 $ 317,043 $ 326,698 $ 336,643 $ 346,888 $ 357,441 $ 368,312 $ 379,507 $ 391,038 $ 402,916 $ 415,147 $ 427,749 $ 440,727 $ 454,093 $ 467,864 $ 504,530 $ 519,822 $ 537,844 $ 554,063 $ 570,773 $ 11,027,047
Beginning
DEVELOPER Balance
DEVELOPER Reimbursement Balance $ 13,163,588 $ 13,163,588 $ 13,163,588 $ 13,163,588 $ 12,952,882 $ 12,718,222 $ 12,476,379 $ 12,227,132 $ 11,970,262 $ 11,705,537 $ 11,432,725 $ 11,151,583 $ 10,861,862 $ 10,563,303 $ 10,255,638 $ 9,938,595 $ 9,611,898 $ 9,275,255 $ 8,928,367 $ 8,570,926 $ 8,202,614 $ 7,823,107 $ 7,432,069 $ 7,029,153 $ 6,614,006 $ 6,186,257 $ 5,745,530 $ 5,291,437 $ 4,823,573 $ 4,319,043 $ 3,799,221 $ 3,261,377 $ 2,707,313 $ 2,136,541 $ 2,136,541
MSHDA Housing Development Costs $ 13,110,746 $ 13,110,746 $ 13,110,746 $ 13,110,746 $ 13,110,746 $ 12,900,040 $ 12,665,380 $ 12,423,537 $ 12,174,290 $ 11,917,420 $ 11,652,695 $ 11,379,883 $ 11,098,741 $ 10,809,020 $ 10,510,461 $ 10,202,796 $ 9,885,753 $ 9,559,056 $ 9,222,413 $ 8,875,525 $ 8,518,084 $ 8,149,772 $ 7,770,265 $ 7,379,227 $ 6,976,311 $ 6,561,164 $ 6,133,415 $ 5,692,688 $ 5,238,595 $ 4,770,731 $ 4,266,201 $ 3,746,379 $ 3,208,535 $ 2,654,471
State Tax Reimbursement $ 4,258,347 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 66,988 $ 74,603 $ 76,887 $ 79,240 $ 81,664 $ 84,161 $ 86,732 $ 89,381 $ 92,108 $ 94,918 $ 97,813 $ 100,794 $ 103,864 $ 107,025 $ 110,283 $ 113,638 $ 117,094 $ 120,653 $ 124,319 $ 128,095 $ 131,984 $ 135,990 $ 140,116 $ 144,365 $ 148,743 $ 175,736 $ 181,063 $ 187,340 $ 192,989 $ 198,810
Reimbursement Balance $ 4,258,347 $ 4,258,347 $ 4,258,347 $ 4,191,359 $ 4,116,756 $ 4,039,870 $ 3,960,629 $ 3,878,965 $ 3,794,804 $ 3,708,071 $ 3,618,691 $ 3,526,583 $ 3,431,665 $ 3,333,852 $ 3,233,058 $ 3,129,194 $ 3,022,169 $ 2,911,886 $ 2,798,249 $ 2,681,155 $ 2,560,502 $ 2,436,184 $ 2,308,089 $ 2,176,105 $ 2,040,115 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,755,635 $ 1,606,891 $ 1,431,155 $ 1,250,093 $ 1,062,752 $ 869,763 $ 670,953
Local Tax Reimbursement $ 8,852,399 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 143,719 $ 160,057 $ 164,956 $ 170,006 $ 175,206 $ 180,564 $ 186,080 $ 191,761 $ 197,613 $ 203,642 $ 209,852 $ 216,248 $ 222,834 $ 229,617 $ 236,606 $ 243,803 $ 251,218 $ 258,854 $ 266,719 $ 274,821 $ 283,164 $ 291,759 $ 300,611 $ 309,728 $ 319,121 $ 328,794 $ 338,759 $ 350,504 $ 361,074 $ 371,963
Reimbursement Balance $ 8,852,399 $ 8,852,399 $ 8,852,399 $ 8,708,681 $ 8,548,624 $ 8,383,667 $ 8,213,661 $ 8,038,455 $ 7,857,891 $ 7,671,811 $ 7,480,050 $ 7,282,438 $ 7,078,796 $ 6,868,944 $ 6,652,695 $ 6,429,861 $ 6,200,244 $ 5,963,638 $ 5,719,835 $ 5,468,617 $ 5,209,762 $ 4,943,043 $ 4,668,222 $ 4,385,058 $ 4,093,299 $ 3,792,688 $ 3,482,960 $ 3,163,840 $ 2,835,046 $ 2,496,286 $ 2,145,782 $ 1,784,708 $ 1,412,745
Total MSHDA Reimbursement Balance $ 13,110,746 $ 13,110,746 $ 13,110,746 $ 12,900,040 $ 12,665,380 $ 12,423,537 $ 12,174,290 $ 11,917,420 $ 11,652,695 $ 11,379,883 $ 11,098,741 $ 10,809,020 $ 10,510,461 $ 10,202,796 $ 9,885,753 $ 9,559,056 $ 9,222,413 $ 8,875,525 $ 8,518,084 $ 8,149,772 $ 7,770,265 $ 7,379,227 $ 6,976,311 $ 6,561,164 $ 6,133,415 $ 5,692,688 $ 5,238,595 $ 4,770,731 $ 4,266,201 $ 3,746,379 $ 3,208,535 $ 2,654,471 $ 2,083,699 $ 2,083,699
EGLE Environmental Costs $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842
State Tax Reimbursement $ 15,539 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Reimbursement Balance $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539 $ 15,539
Local Tax Reimbursement $ 32,303 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Reimbursement Balance $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303 $ 32,303
Total EGLE Reimbursement Balance $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842 $ 47,842
Local Only Costs $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Local Only Tax Reimbursement $ 5,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Total Local Only Reimbursement Balance $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
State Only Costs $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
State Only Tax Reimbursement $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Total State Only Reimbursement Balance $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
Total Annual Developer Reimbursement $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 210,706 $ 234,660 $ 241,843 $ 249,247 $ 256,870 $ 264,725 $ 272,812 $ 281,142 $ 289,720 $ 298,560 $ 307,665 $ 317,043 $ 326,698 $ 336,643 $ 346,888 $ 357,441 $ 368,312 $ 379,507 $ 391,038 $ 402,916 $ 415,147 $ 427,749 $ 440,727 $ 454,093 $ 467,864 $ 504,530 $ 519,822 $ 537,844 $ 554,063 $ 570,773 $ 11,027,047
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions TIR Reimbursement Page 1 of 1
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT ‐ OLD TOWN ‐ NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel IDs)
Table 4e ‐ Total Taxes Paid to All Taxing Jurisdictions on the Total Captured Value (excludes
any Base Year/ ITV) During Brownfield Plan Tax Capture Period
Commercial
Real Property Personal
Property
Multi‐Family
Residential
Furniture &
Apartment
Fixtures,
Units
Machinery &
Buildings, Equipment;
Improvements Other
to Land & Land
Calendar/
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057
Millage Rate Millage Rate Tax Year
Paid Paid BP Capture
AD VALOREM TAXING AUTHORITIES/ TAXING Total Taxes
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
JURISDICTIONS 1 Year Paid
BP Years BP Years
1‐End 1‐End
‐ CITY OF LANSING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ City Operating ‐ Lansing 19.4400 19.4400 ‐ 70,762 78,807 81,219 83,706 86,266 88,904 91,620 94,417 97,298 100,266 103,324 106,474 109,716 113,056 116,497 120,041 123,692 127,451 131,324 135,313 139,421 143,653 148,011 152,500 157,125 161,887 166,794 172,577 177,781 183,142 $ 3,663,042
‐ Storm/ Montgomery Drain 0.2600 0.2600 ‐ 946 1,054 1,086 1,120 1,154 1,189 1,225 1,263 1,301 1,341 1,382 1,424 1,467 1,512 1,558 1,605 1,654 1,705 1,756 1,810 1,865 1,921 1,980 2,040 2,101 2,165 2,231 2,308 2,378 2,449 $ 48,991
‐ Public Safety 3.5000 3.5000 ‐ 12,740 14,188 14,623 15,070 15,531 16,006 16,495 16,999 17,518 18,052 18,603 19,170 19,753 20,355 20,974 21,612 22,270 22,946 23,644 24,362 25,101 25,863 26,648 27,456 28,289 29,146 30,030 31,071 32,008 32,973 $ 659,498
‐ Subtotal of Local Government Unit (LGU): Annual 23.2000 23.2000 $ ‐ $ 84,449 $ 94,049 $ 96,928 $ 99,895 $ 102,951 $ 106,099 $ 109,340 112,679 116,117 119,660 123,309 127,067 130,937 134,923 139,029 143,259 147,616 152,102 156,724 161,485 166,387 171,437 176,639 181,996 187,515 193,199 199,055 205,956 212,166 218,565 $ 4,371,532
‐ Local Government Unit (LGU): Cumulative $ ‐ $ 84,449 $ 178,498 $ 275,426 $ 375,322 $ 478,273 $ 584,372 $ 693,712 806,391 922,508 1,042,167 1,165,476 1,292,543 1,423,480 1,558,403 1,697,433 1,840,691 1,988,307 2,140,409 2,297,133 2,458,618 2,625,004 2,796,442 2,973,080 3,155,076 3,342,591 3,535,790 3,734,844 3,940,800 4,152,967 4,371,532 ‐
‐ INGHAM COUNTY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Ingham County 12.3921 12.3921 ‐ 45,108 50,236 51,773 53,358 54,990 56,672 58,403 60,186 62,023 63,915 65,865 67,872 69,939 72,068 74,261 76,520 78,848 81,244 83,713 86,256 88,874 91,572 94,350 97,212 100,160 103,196 106,323 110,010 113,327 116,745 $ 2,335,020
‐ Capital Region Airport Authority ‐ CRAA 0.6990 0.6990 ‐ 2,544 2,834 2,920 3,010 3,102 3,197 3,294 3,395 3,499 3,605 3,715 3,828 3,945 4,065 4,189 4,316 4,448 4,583 4,722 4,865 5,013 5,165 5,322 5,483 5,650 5,821 5,997 6,205 6,392 6,585 $ 131,711
‐ Capital Area Transportation Authority ‐ CATA 2.9895 2.9895 ‐ 10,882 12,119 12,490 12,872 13,266 13,672 14,089 14,520 14,963 15,419 15,889 16,374 16,872 17,386 17,915 18,460 19,021 19,600 20,195 20,809 21,440 22,091 22,761 23,452 24,163 24,895 25,650 26,539 27,339 28,164 $ 563,306
‐
LOCAL SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes State School millages ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Lansing School District Debt (District #33020) 4.1000 4.1000 ‐ 14,924 16,621 17,130 17,654 18,194 18,750 19,323 19,913 20,521 21,147 21,792 22,456 23,140 23,844 24,570 25,317 26,087 26,880 27,697 28,538 29,405 30,297 31,216 32,163 33,138 34,143 35,178 36,397 37,495 38,626 $ 772,555
‐ Lansing School District Sinking Fund 2.9575 2.9575 ‐ 10,765 11,989 12,356 12,735 13,124 13,525 13,939 14,364 14,802 15,254 15,719 16,198 16,692 17,200 17,723 18,262 18,818 19,390 19,979 20,586 21,211 21,855 22,518 23,201 23,904 24,629 25,375 26,255 27,047 27,862 $ 557,276
‐ Subtotal of Non‐LGU Local: Annual 33.4041 33.4041 $ ‐ $ 121,592 $ 135,415 $ 139,560 $ 143,833 $ 148,232 $ 152,765 $ 157,432 162,238 167,189 172,290 177,544 182,956 188,527 194,266 200,179 206,268 212,542 219,002 225,656 232,511 239,569 246,841 254,330 262,043 269,990 278,174 286,605 296,542 305,484 314,697 $ 6,294,271
‐ Non‐LGU Local: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 121,592 $ 257,007 $ 396,567 $ 540,400 $ 688,632 $ 841,397 $ 998,829 1,161,067 1,328,256 1,500,545 1,678,090 1,861,045 2,049,573 2,243,839 2,444,018 2,650,286 2,862,827 3,081,829 3,307,485 3,539,996 3,779,565 4,026,406 4,280,736 4,542,779 4,812,769 5,090,943 5,377,548 5,674,090 5,979,574 6,294,271 ‐
‐ Total Local Tax: Annual 56.6041 56.6041 $ ‐ $ 206,041 $ 229,464 $ 236,489 $ 243,728 $ 251,183 $ 258,864 $ 266,772 274,917 283,306 291,949 300,853 310,023 319,464 329,189 339,208 349,527 360,157 371,104 382,380 393,995 405,956 418,278 430,969 444,039 457,505 471,373 485,660 502,498 517,651 533,262 $ 10,665,803
‐ Total Local Tax: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 206,041 $ 435,505 $ 671,994 $ 915,722 $ 1,166,905 $ 1,425,769 $ 1,692,541 1,967,458 2,250,763 2,542,713 2,843,566 3,153,589 3,473,053 3,802,242 4,141,450 4,490,977 4,851,134 5,222,239 5,604,618 5,998,614 6,404,569 6,822,847 7,253,816 7,697,855 8,155,360 8,626,733 9,112,392 9,614,890 10,132,541 10,665,803 ‐
Millage Rate Millage Rate
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Paid Paid
‐ STATE SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes Local School millages
‐ State Education Tax ‐ SET 6.0000 6.0000 ‐ 21,840 24,323 25,068 25,835 26,625 27,439 28,278 29,141 30,030 30,946 31,890 32,862 33,863 34,894 35,956 37,050 38,176 39,337 40,532 41,763 43,031 44,337 45,682 47,068 48,495 49,965 51,480 53,264 54,871 56,525 $ 1,130,569
‐ Local School Operating ‐ LSO 17.4478 5.4478 ‐ 63,511 70,731 72,896 75,127 77,425 79,793 82,230 84,741 87,327 89,991 92,736 95,562 98,473 101,470 104,558 107,739 111,016 114,390 117,866 121,446 125,133 128,931 132,843 136,872 141,023 145,297 149,701 154,891 159,562 164,374 $ 3,287,656
‐ Total State & Local School: Annual 23.4478 11.4478 $ ‐ $ 85,351 $ 95,054 $ 97,963 $ 100,962 $ 104,051 $ 107,232 $ 110,508 113,882 117,357 120,938 124,626 128,425 132,336 136,364 140,514 144,789 149,192 153,727 158,398 163,209 168,164 173,268 178,525 183,940 189,518 195,262 201,181 208,156 214,433 220,900 $ 4,418,224
‐ Total State & Local School: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 85,351 $ 180,405 $ 278,368 $ 379,331 $ 483,381 $ 590,613 $ 701,122 815,004 932,361 1,053,299 1,177,925 1,306,349 1,438,685 1,575,049 1,715,563 1,860,352 2,009,544 2,163,271 2,321,669 2,484,878 2,653,042 2,826,310 3,004,836 3,188,775 3,378,293 3,573,556 3,774,736 3,982,892 4,197,325 4,418,224 ‐
‐ TOTAL LOCAL and STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL TAX: ANNUAL 80.0519 68.0519 $ ‐ $ 291,392 $ 324,518 $ 334,452 $ 344,691 $ 355,233 $ 366,097 $ 377,280 $ 388,799 $ 400,663 $ 412,887 $ 425,479 $ 438,447 $ 451,800 $ 465,553 $ 479,722 $ 494,316 $ 509,349 $ 524,831 $ 540,778 $ 557,204 $ 574,119 $ 591,547 $ 609,494 $ 627,978 $ 647,023 $ 666,635 $ 686,840 $ 710,653 $ 732,083 $ 754,162 $ 15,084,027
TOTAL LOCAL and STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL TAX:
‐ $ ‐ $ 291,392 $ 615,910 $ 950,362 $ 1,295,052 $ 1,650,286 $ 2,016,382 $ 2,393,662 $ 2,782,461 $ 3,183,124 $ 3,596,011 $ 4,021,490 $ 4,459,938 $ 4,911,738 $ 5,377,291 $ 5,857,013 $ 6,351,329 $ 6,860,678 $ 7,385,509 $ 7,926,287 $ 8,483,492 $ 9,057,611 $ 9,649,158 $ 10,258,652 $ 10,886,630 $ 11,533,653 $ 12,200,288 $ 12,887,129 $ 13,597,782 $ 14,329,865 $ 15,084,027 ‐
CUMULATIVE
Percentage of Local Millages Paid 70.71% 83.18% 0.00% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71% 70.71%
Percentage of State & Local School Millages Paid 29.29% 16.82% 0.00% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29% 29.29%
Notes:
The most current available millage rates are utilized (Summer 2024 & Winter 2024) and are assumed to be in effect for the duration of the Plan. Actual
1
rates are subject to change and may be higher or lower, and may include the elimination of existing millages and/or the addition of new millages.
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions Total Taxes Paid Page 1 of 1
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT ‐ OLD TOWN ‐ NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel
IDs)
Table 4f1 ‐ Tax Capture Not Allowed by BRA
Calendar/
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057
Tax Year
AD VALOREM TAXING AUTHORITIES/ TAXING
BP Capture Total
JURISDICTIONS 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Year
‐ CITY OF LANSING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ City Operating ‐ Lansing ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Storm/ Montgomery Drain ‐ 946 1,054 1,086 1,120 1,154 1,189 1,225 1,263 1,301 1,341 1,382 1,424 1,467 1,512 1,558 1,605 1,654 1,705 1,756 1,810 1,865 1,921 1,980 2,040 2,101 2,165 2,231 2,308 2,378 2,449 $ 48,991
‐ Public Safety ‐ 12,740 14,188 14,623 15,070 15,531 16,006 16,495 16,999 17,518 18,052 18,603 19,170 19,753 20,355 20,974 21,612 22,270 22,946 23,644 24,362 25,101 25,863 26,648 27,456 28,289 29,146 30,030 31,071 32,008 32,973 $ 659,498
‐
Subtotal of Local Government Unit (LGU): Annual $ ‐ $ 13,687 $ 15,242 $ 15,709 $ 16,190 $ 16,685 $ 17,195 $ 17,721 $ 18,262 $ 18,819 $ 19,393 $ 19,985 $ 20,594 $ 21,221 $ 21,867 $ 22,532 $ 23,218 $ 23,924 $ 24,651 $ 25,400 $ 26,172 $ 26,966 $ 27,785 $ 28,628 $ 29,496 $ 30,390 $ 31,312 $ 32,261 $ 33,379 $ 34,386 $ 35,423 $ 708,490
‐ Local Government Unit (LGU): Cumulative $ ‐ $ 13,687 $ 28,929 $ 44,638 $ 60,828 $ 77,513 $ 94,709 $ 112,429 $ 130,691 $ 149,510 $ 168,903 $ 188,887 $ 209,481 $ 230,702 $ 252,569 $ 275,101 $ 298,319 $ 322,243 $ 346,894 $ 372,294 $ 398,466 $ 425,432 $ 453,216 $ 481,844 $ 511,340 $ 541,730 $ 573,042 $ 605,302 $ 638,681 $ 673,067 $ 708,490 ‐
‐ INGHAM COUNTY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Ingham County ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Capital Region Airport Authority ‐ CRAA ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Capital Area Transportation Authority ‐ CATA ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ LIBRARY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Capital Area District Libraries ‐ CADL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS (ISD) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ISD Operating & Special Education ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ COMMUNITY COLLEGE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Lansing Community College ‐ LCC ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
LOCAL SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes State School
‐
millages ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Lansing School District Debt (District #33020) ‐ 14,924 16,621 17,130 17,654 18,194 18,750 19,323 19,913 20,521 21,147 21,792 22,456 23,140 23,844 24,570 25,317 26,087 26,880 27,697 28,538 29,405 30,297 31,216 32,163 33,138 34,143 35,178 36,397 37,495 38,626 $ 772,555
‐ Lansing School District Sinking Fund ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Subtotal of Non‐LGU Local: Annual $ ‐ $ 14,924 $ 16,621 $ 17,130 $ 17,654 $ 18,194 $ 18,750 $ 19,323 $ 19,913 $ 20,521 $ 21,147 $ 21,792 $ 22,456 $ 23,140 $ 23,844 $ 24,570 $ 25,317 $ 26,087 $ 26,880 $ 27,697 $ 28,538 $ 29,405 $ 30,297 $ 31,216 $ 32,163 $ 33,138 $ 34,143 $ 35,178 $ 36,397 $ 37,495 $ 38,626 $ 772,555
‐ Non‐LGU Local: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 14,924 $ 31,545 $ 48,674 $ 66,328 $ 84,522 $ 103,273 $ 122,596 $ 142,509 $ 163,029 $ 184,176 $ 205,968 $ 228,424 $ 251,563 $ 275,407 $ 299,977 $ 325,295 $ 351,382 $ 378,262 $ 405,959 $ 434,497 $ 463,902 $ 494,199 $ 525,415 $ 557,578 $ 590,716 $ 624,859 $ 660,037 $ 696,435 $ 733,929 $ 772,555 ‐
‐ Total Local Tax: Annual $ ‐ $ 28,611 $ 31,863 $ 32,839 $ 33,844 $ 34,879 $ 35,946 $ 37,044 $ 38,175 $ 39,340 $ 40,540 $ 41,776 $ 43,050 $ 44,361 $ 45,711 $ 47,102 $ 48,535 $ 50,011 $ 51,531 $ 53,097 $ 54,710 $ 56,371 $ 58,082 $ 59,844 $ 61,659 $ 63,529 $ 65,454 $ 67,438 $ 69,776 $ 71,881 $ 74,048 $ 1,481,045
‐ Total Local Tax: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 28,611 $ 60,474 $ 93,312 $ 127,156 $ 162,035 $ 197,981 $ 235,025 $ 273,200 $ 312,539 $ 353,079 $ 394,855 $ 437,905 $ 482,265 $ 527,976 $ 575,078 $ 623,613 $ 673,625 $ 725,156 $ 778,253 $ 832,963 $ 889,333 $ 947,415 $ 1,007,259 $ 1,068,918 $ 1,132,447 $ 1,197,901 $ 1,265,340 $ 1,335,116 $ 1,406,996 $ 1,481,045 ‐
STATE SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes Local School ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ millages
‐ State Education Tax ‐ SET ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Local School Operating ‐ LSO ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Total State & Local School: Annual $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Total State & Local School: Cumulative $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ ‐
TOTAL LOCAL and STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL TAX:
‐ $ ‐ $ 28,611 $ 31,863 $ 32,839 $ 33,844 $ 34,879 $ 35,946 $ 37,044 $ 38,175 $ 39,340 $ 40,540 $ 41,776 $ 43,050 $ 44,361 $ 45,711 $ 47,102 $ 48,535 $ 50,011 $ 51,531 $ 53,097 $ 54,710 $ 56,371 $ 58,082 $ 59,844 $ 61,659 $ 63,529 $ 65,454 $ 67,438 $ 69,776 $ 71,881 $ 74,048 $ 1,481,045
ANNUAL
TOTAL LOCAL and STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL TAX:
‐ $ ‐ $ 28,611 $ 60,474 $ 93,312 $ 127,156 $ 162,035 $ 197,981 $ 235,025 $ 273,200 $ 312,539 $ 353,079 $ 394,855 $ 437,905 $ 482,265 $ 527,976 $ 575,078 $ 623,613 $ 673,625 $ 725,156 $ 778,253 $ 832,963 $ 889,333 $ 947,415 $ 1,007,259 $ 1,068,918 $ 1,132,447 $ 1,197,901 $ 1,265,340 $ 1,335,116 $ 1,406,996 $ 1,481,045 ‐
CUMULATIVE
Notes:
The most current available millage rates are utilized (Summer 2024 & Winter 2024) and are assumed to be in effect for the duration of the Plan.
1 Actual rates are subject to change and may be higher or lower, and may include the elimination of existing millages and/or the addition of new
millages.
Last revised: 4/2/2025
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions Taxes Not Captured/ Returned Page 1 of 1
TURNER NORTH DEVELOPMENT ‐ OLD TOWN ‐ NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1413 through portion of 1503 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan (6 Tax Parcel IDs)
Table 4f2 ‐ 10% of Tax Capture Passed‐Through/ Shared with Taxing Jurisdiction
Percent (%) of Calendar/
Millage Rate Millage Rate 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057
Tax Year
Allowed for Passed‐Thru to
AD VALOREM TAXING AUTHORITIES/ TAXING Capture Taxing BP Capture
1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total
JURISDICTIONS Jurisdiction Year
BP Years BP Years
1‐End 1‐30
‐ CITY OF LANSING ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ City Operating ‐ Lansing 19.4400 10% ‐ 7,076 7,881 8,122 8,371 8,627 8,890 9,162 9,442 9,730 10,027 10,332 10,647 10,972 11,306 11,650 12,004 12,369 12,745 13,132 13,531 13,942 14,365 14,801 15,250 15,712 16,189 16,679 17,258 17,778 18,314 $ 366,304
‐ Storm/ Montgomery Drain 0.0000 0% ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Public Safety 0.0000 0% ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐
Subtotal of Local Government Unit (LGU): Annual 19.4400 $ ‐ $ 7,076 $ 7,881 $ 8,122 $ 8,371 $ 8,627 $ 8,890 $ 9,162 $ 9,442 $ 9,730 $ 10,027 $ 10,332 $ 10,647 $ 10,972 $ 11,306 $ 11,650 $ 12,004 $ 12,369 $ 12,745 $ 13,132 $ 13,531 $ 13,942 $ 14,365 $ 14,801 $ 15,250 $ 15,712 $ 16,189 $ 16,679 $ 17,258 $ 17,778 $ 18,314 $ 366,304
‐ Local Government Unit (LGU): Cumulative $ ‐ $ 7,076 $ 14,957 $ 23,079 $ 31,449 $ 40,076 $ 48,966 $ 58,128 $ 67,570 $ 77,300 $ 87,326 $ 97,659 $ 108,306 $ 119,278 $ 130,583 $ 142,233 $ 154,237 $ 166,606 $ 179,352 $ 192,484 $ 206,015 $ 219,957 $ 234,323 $ 249,124 $ 264,374 $ 280,086 $ 296,275 $ 312,954 $ 330,212 $ 347,990 $ 366,304 ‐
‐ INGHAM COUNTY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Ingham County 12.3921 10% ‐ 4,511 5,024 5,177 5,336 5,499 5,667 5,840 6,019 6,202 6,392 6,586 6,787 6,994 7,207 7,426 7,652 7,885 8,124 8,371 8,626 8,887 9,157 9,435 9,721 10,016 10,320 10,632 11,001 11,333 11,674 $ 233,502
‐ Capital Region Airport Authority ‐ CRAA 0.6990 10% ‐ 254 283 292 301 310 320 329 339 350 361 372 383 395 407 419 432 445 458 472 487 501 517 532 548 565 582 600 621 639 659 $ 13,171
‐ Capital Area Transportation Authority ‐ CATA 2.9895 10% ‐ 1,088 1,212 1,249 1,287 1,327 1,367 1,409 1,452 1,496 1,542 1,589 1,637 1,687 1,739 1,791 1,846 1,902 1,960 2,020 2,081 2,144 2,209 2,276 2,345 2,416 2,490 2,565 2,654 2,734 2,816 $ 56,331
‐ LIBRARY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Capital Area District Libraries ‐ CADL 1.5590 10% ‐ 567 632 651 671 692 713 735 757 780 804 829 854 880 907 934 963 992 1,022 1,053 1,085 1,118 1,152 1,187 1,223 1,260 1,298 1,338 1,384 1,426 1,469 $ 29,376
‐ INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS (ISD) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ISD Operating & Special Education 4.9378 10% ‐ 1,797 2,002 2,063 2,126 2,191 2,258 2,327 2,398 2,471 2,547 2,624 2,704 2,787 2,872 2,959 3,049 3,142 3,237 3,336 3,437 3,541 3,649 3,760 3,874 3,991 4,112 4,237 4,383 4,516 4,652 $ 93,042
‐ COMMUNITY COLLEGE ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Lansing Community College ‐ LCC 3.7692 10% ‐ 1,372 1,528 1,575 1,623 1,673 1,724 1,776 1,831 1,886 1,944 2,003 2,064 2,127 2,192 2,259 2,327 2,398 2,471 2,546 2,624 2,703 2,785 2,870 2,957 3,046 3,139 3,234 3,346 3,447 3,551 $ 71,022
LOCAL SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes State School
‐
millages ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ Lansing School District Debt (District #33020) 0.0000 0% ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ ‐
‐ Lansing School District Sinking Fund 2.9575 10% ‐ 1,077 1,199 1,236 1,273 1,312 1,353 1,394 1,436 1,480 1,525 1,572 1,620 1,669 1,720 1,772 1,826 1,882 1,939 1,998 2,059 2,121 2,185 2,252 2,320 2,390 2,463 2,538 2,625 2,705 2,786 $ 55,728
‐ Subtotal of Non‐LGU Local: Annual 29.3041 $ ‐ $ 10,667 $ 11,879 $ 12,243 $ 12,618 $ 13,004 $ 13,401 $ 13,811 $ 14,233 $ 14,667 $ 15,114 $ 15,575 $ 16,050 $ 16,539 $ 17,042 $ 17,561 $ 18,095 $ 18,645 $ 19,212 $ 19,796 $ 20,397 $ 21,016 $ 21,654 $ 22,311 $ 22,988 $ 23,685 $ 24,403 $ 25,143 $ 26,014 $ 26,799 $ 27,607 $ 552,172
‐ Non‐LGU Local: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 10,667 $ 22,546 $ 34,789 $ 47,407 $ 60,411 $ 73,812 $ 87,623 $ 101,856 $ 116,523 $ 131,637 $ 147,212 $ 163,262 $ 179,801 $ 196,843 $ 214,404 $ 232,499 $ 251,145 $ 270,357 $ 290,153 $ 310,550 $ 331,566 $ 353,221 $ 375,532 $ 398,520 $ 422,205 $ 446,608 $ 471,751 $ 497,766 $ 524,564 $ 552,172 ‐
‐ Total Local Tax: Annual $ ‐ $ 17,743 $ 19,760 $ 20,365 $ 20,988 $ 21,630 $ 22,292 $ 22,973 $ 23,674 $ 24,397 $ 25,141 $ 25,908 $ 26,697 $ 27,510 $ 28,348 $ 29,211 $ 30,099 $ 31,015 $ 31,957 $ 32,928 $ 33,929 $ 34,958 $ 36,020 $ 37,112 $ 38,238 $ 39,398 $ 40,592 $ 41,822 $ 43,272 $ 44,577 $ 45,921 $ 918,476
‐ Total Local Tax: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 17,743 $ 37,503 $ 57,868 $ 78,857 $ 100,487 $ 122,779 $ 145,752 $ 169,426 $ 193,822 $ 218,963 $ 244,871 $ 271,568 $ 299,079 $ 327,427 $ 356,637 $ 386,736 $ 417,751 $ 449,708 $ 482,637 $ 516,565 $ 551,524 $ 587,543 $ 624,656 $ 662,894 $ 702,291 $ 742,883 $ 784,705 $ 827,977 $ 872,554 $ 918,476 ‐
STATE SCHOOL MILLAGES: excludes Local School ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ millages
‐ State Education Tax ‐ SET 6.0000 10% ‐ 2,184 2,432 2,507 2,584 2,663 2,744 2,828 2,914 3,003 3,095 3,189 3,286 3,386 3,489 3,596 3,705 3,818 3,934 4,053 4,176 4,303 4,434 4,568 4,707 4,850 4,997 5,148 5,326 5,487 5,653 $ 113,057
‐ Local School Operating ‐ LSO 17.4478 10% ‐ 6,351 7,073 7,290 7,513 7,743 7,979 8,223 8,474 8,733 8,999 9,274 9,556 9,847 10,147 10,456 10,774 11,102 11,439 11,787 12,145 12,513 12,893 13,284 13,687 14,102 14,530 14,970 15,489 15,956 16,437 $ 328,766
‐ Total State & Local School: Annual 23.4478 $ ‐ $ 8,535 $ 9,505 $ 9,796 $ 10,096 $ 10,405 $ 10,723 $ 11,051 $ 11,388 $ 11,736 $ 12,094 $ 12,463 $ 12,842 $ 13,234 $ 13,636 $ 14,051 $ 14,479 $ 14,919 $ 15,373 $ 15,840 $ 16,321 $ 16,816 $ 17,327 $ 17,853 $ 18,394 $ 18,952 $ 19,526 $ 20,118 $ 20,816 $ 21,443 $ 22,090 $ 441,822
‐ Total State & Local School: Cumulative $ ‐ $ 8,535 $ 18,040 $ 27,837 $ 37,933 $ 48,338 $ 59,061 $ 70,112 $ 81,500 $ 93,236 $ 105,330 $ 117,792 $ 130,635 $ 143,868 $ 157,505 $ 171,556 $ 186,035 $ 200,954 $ 216,327 $ 232,167 $ 248,488 $ 265,304 $ 282,631 $ 300,484 $ 318,878 $ 337,829 $ 357,356 $ 377,474 $ 398,289 $ 419,732 $ 441,822 ‐
TOTAL LOCAL and STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL TAX:
‐ $ ‐ $ 26,278 $ 29,265 $ 30,161 $ 31,085 $ 32,035 $ 33,015 $ 34,024 $ 35,062 $ 36,132 $ 37,235 $ 38,370 $ 39,540 $ 40,744 $ 41,984 $ 43,262 $ 44,578 $ 45,934 $ 47,330 $ 48,768 $ 50,249 $ 51,775 $ 53,346 $ 54,965 $ 56,632 $ 58,349 $ 60,118 $ 61,940 $ 64,088 $ 66,020 $ 68,011 $ 1,360,298
ANNUAL
TOTAL LOCAL and STATE & LOCAL SCHOOL TAX:
‐ $ ‐ $ 26,278 $ 55,544 $ 85,705 $ 116,790 $ 148,825 $ 181,840 $ 215,864 $ 250,926 $ 287,059 $ 324,293 $ 362,663 $ 402,203 $ 442,947 $ 484,931 $ 528,193 $ 572,772 $ 618,705 $ 666,035 $ 714,803 $ 765,053 $ 816,828 $ 870,174 $ 925,139 $ 981,771 $ 1,040,121 $ 1,100,239 $ 1,162,179 $ 1,226,267 $ 1,292,287 $ 1,360,298 ‐
CUMULATIVE
Notes:
The most current available millage rates are utilized (Summer 2024 & Winter 2024) and are assumed to be in effect for the duration of the Plan. Actual rates are subject to
1
change and may be higher or lower, and may include the elimination of existing millages and/or the addition of new millages.
Advanced Redevelopment Solutions Tax Captured Pass‐Through Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A
Brownfield Plan Resolutions and Public Hearing Notice
ATTACHMENT B
Brownfield Development and Reimbursement Agreement
LANSING BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Resolution Approving the LBRA Policy Guidelines for Brownfield Plans
At a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment
Authority (LBRA) held on Friday, July 11, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., pursuant to notice duly given:
PRESENT: MEMBERS:
ABSENT: MEMBERS:
The following preamble and resolutions were offered by:
MEMBER: , seconded by:
MEMBER:
WHEREAS, The LBRA’s priority in approving the use of tax increment financing for
redevelopment projects is to protect the health and welfare of the community through
environmental remediation and to incentivize real estate development that furthers the
economic development goals of the City of Lansing.
WHEREAS, The LBRA staff evaluated the use of tax increment financing for projects in the City
of Lansing and determined the need to revise and replace the LBRA Brownfield Plan Policy,
originally adopted on August 2, 2019, and last updated on December 12, 2023, to better
achieve the economic development goals of the City of Lansing.
WHEREAS, On February 7, 2025, the LBRA staff met with members of the LBRA Site
Committee to propose policy changes. LBRA staff and the LBRA Site Committee met two
additional times for this purpose.
WHEREAS, A draft of the revised LBRA Brownfield Policy was discussed at the Special
Meeting of the LBRA Board of Directors on June 20, 2025.
WHEREAS, The LBRA Staff has incorporated feedback from the LBRA Site Committee and the
LBRA Board of Directors into the revised LBRA Brownfield Plan Policy and believes these
revisions will better achieve the economic development goals of the LBRA and the City of
Lansing.
WHEREAS, The LBRA Staff recommends adoption of the LBRA Brownfield Plan Policy Version
4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LANSING
BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (LBRA), AS FOLLOWS:
1. The LBRA Board approves the Brownfield Plan Policy, effective immediately.
2. The LBRA Board directs staff to produce, publish, and process all forms and other
documentation necessary for the effective implementation of the Brownfield Plan Policy.
3. Additionally, the LBRA Board agrees that if any section, clause or phrase of this
Resolution is declared as invalid by a court of law, that ruling shall not affect the intent and
purpose of this Resolution and validity of the remaining provisions of the Resolution.
4. Finally, the LBRA Board declares that all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict
with any of the provisions of this Resolution are repealed.
YEAS: ()
NAYS: ()
ABSTENTIONS: ()
ABSENT: ()
PREAMBLE AND RESOLUTIONS DECLARED ADOPTED.
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
) ss.
COUNTY OF INGHAM )
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and a complete copy of a preamble and resolutions
adopted at a regular meeting of the Economic Development Corporation of the City of Lansing
held on the 11th day of July 2025, and said preamble and resolutions are on file in the office of
the Economic Development Corporation of the City of Lansing and are available to the public.
Public notice of the meeting was given pursuant to and in compliance with Act No. 267, Public
Acts of Michigan 1976, including in the case of a special or re-scheduled meeting, notice by
publication or posting of at least eighteen (18) hours prior to the time set for the meeting. In
addition, the meeting was held in full compliance with the Board’s Bylaws.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my official signature.
Shelley Davis-Boyd, Chair
LBRA Board of Directors
CITY OF LANSING
BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
401 S. Washington Sq. Ste. 101, Lansing, MI 48933
Policy Guidelines for Brownfield Plans
Effective: July 11, 2025
Purpose
To establish guidelines for the administration of the Brownfield Redevelopment Program and
project agreements in the City of Lansing.
Background
Public Act 381 of 1996, MCL 125.265 et seq., (the “Act”), as amended, authorizes
municipalities to create brownfield redevelopment authorities to facilitate the
implementation of Brownfield Plans to promote the reuse and revitalization of urban
properties. The City of Lansing (the “City”) created the Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment
Authority (the “LBRA”) in 1997. This policy guides the administration of the LBRA’s Program
under the Act.
The use of tax Increment financing (TIF) to reimburse a developer for eligible brownfield
activities is a discretionary development incentive. The City’s priority in using TIF is to protect
the health and welfare of the community through environmental remediation and to
incentivize development that achieves the City’s development goals. The LBRA is under no
obligation to reimburse an applicant for all eligible activities. As described in this policy, TIF
developer-reimbursable revenues are limited, unless a project is eligible for a variance AND
includes significant public benefits. The intention of this policy is to encourage development
outcomes that meets the goals of the City.
Policy
1. Objective
Brownfield Plans are recommended for approval to the LBRA Board of Directors based
on the extent that the Brownfield Plan complies with this policy and the proposed project
complies with the City’s planning documents, including, but not limited to:
a. City of Lansing Comprehensive Plan (2012)
b. City of Lansing Sustainability Plan
c. City of Lansing Non-motorized Transportation Plan
d. Downtown Lansing Comprehensive Market Analysis
e. Regional Housing Needs Assessment
f. Lansing Parking Study
Version 4 – approved July 11, 2025 Page 1 of 5
g. Other plans as deemed necessary by LBRA staff during pre-application meetings.
2. Project Eligibility
Projects are eligible for brownfield assistance if the project meets the following minimum
criteria:
a. Projects meet the requirements under the Act.
b. Projects demonstrate a financial gap.
3. Invitation to Apply and Application Submission
An applicant will receive an invitation to apply that includes a checklist of required
application materials. At a minimum, the application must include:
a. Brownfield application coversheet.
b. Brownfield Plan that complies with the requirements of the Act.
c. Cost estimates dated within the 3 months prior to application submission.
d. Project financials (in the proforma format provided by the Lansing EDC).
e. Completed City of Lansing Treasury Form.
f. Completed City of Lansing Litigation Affidavit.
g. Universal Development Agreement, signed by the applicant.
h. Proof of community outreach and engagement.
i. Other materials deemed relevant by LBRA staff during pre-application meetings.
and included in the invitation checklist.
4. Application Review
Upon receipt of the application and all required documents, and prior to any public
consideration of the application, LBRA staff reviews the application for compliance with
the Act and this policy. LRBA staff consults with city departments to confirm the
applicant, and affiliated entities, is eligible to do business with the City and the project is
permissible as proposed. Review must confirm the following:
a. The applicant, and all individuals and entities that will have an ownership interest
in the project, is not delinquent on any financial obligation to the City.
b. The project is compatible with the City’s zoning ordinance, Comprehensive Plan,
and other planning goals.
c. The applicant, and its affiliated entities, does not have outstanding written orders
or code compliance violations.
d. The applicant, and its affiliated entities, is not in active litigation with the City, the
LBRA, or the Lansing EDC.
e. The applicant, and its affiliated entities, have not defaulted on the terms of
previously executed agreements with the City, the LBRA, or the Lansing EDC.
Version 4 – approved July 11, 2025 Page 2 of 5
5. Application and Other Fees
All fees are levied according to an annually approved fee schedule posted on the Lansing
EDC’s website.
LBRA staff invoices the applicant for an application review fee upon receipt of the
application and all required materials. The invoice must be paid prior to public
consideration of the application.
6. Guidelines for Brownfield Plans
Except for projects with a variance granted under Section 10, a Brownfield Plan
submitted to the LBRA must adhere to the following guidelines:
a. 20% of yearly new incremental taxes pass-through to all taxing units.
b. 15% of yearly captured taxes go to the LBRA for brownfield administration and/or
the Local Brownfield Revolving Fund.
c. The duration of the Brownfield Plan does not exceed 15 years or the length of
financing, whichever is less.
d. The Brownfield Plan includes significant public infrastructure improvements,
above and beyond what is required, scaled with the incentive amount, to activate
a public space, improve safety, and/or increase mobility and connectivity. The
applicant and LBRA staff will work collaboratively to determine the type and value
of public infrastructure improvements.
7. Guidelines for Brownfield Plans with Housing Tax Increment Financing
In addition to the guidelines in Section 6, a Brownfield Plan that includes Housing Tax
Increment Financing must adhere to the following:
a. 20% of units must be leased to households whose income is at or below the
applicable AMI level based on household size, not to exceed 120% AMI. Unless
otherwise required by law or MSHDA, income verification is only required at initial
tenant lease-up.
b. Rents for restricted units will be provided annually by the LBRA and will be based
on the “rent by bedroom” less applicable utility allowances(s), set by MSHDA.
c. Rent restrictions must remain in place for a minimum of 5 years, or the period of
reimbursement, whichever is longer.
Version 4 – approved July 11, 2025 Page 3 of 5
d. All EGLE- and MSF-eligible activities must be accounted for.
8. Variance Eligibility
Projects that meet one or more of the eligibility criteria below AND include significant
public benefits may be eligible for a variance from one or more of the Brownfield Plan
guidelines in Section 6. However, capture for LBRA administration may not be reduced to
zero. Only projects that meet one or more of the following criteria are eligible for a
variance:
a. Projects located within the Principal Shopping District, the boundaries of the Tax
Increment Financing Authority, a Corridor Improvement Authority, or Targeted
Redevelopment Area (see attached map).
b. Projects proposed by first-time developers participating in an emerging developer
initiative at the local, regional, or state level.
c. Projects requesting reimbursement for EGLE-eligible activities only.
9. Variance Request
An applicant must request a variance in writing prior to receiving an invitation to apply. A
variance request must include:
a. Project eligibility for a variance.
b. The guideline(s) the applicant is requesting a variance from.
c. The value of the variance.
d. Why a variance is requested.
e. Narrative explaining the public benefits and why those benefits were selected.
10. Variance Request Review and Approval
Variance requests are reviewed by the LBRA Site Committee. Requests may be approved
in-whole, approved in-part, or denied. The LBRA has created a list of potential public
benefits which, if included in the design of the project, may improve the likelihood of
variance approval. Public benefits may include, but are not limited to:
a. Projects that support the mobility and connectivity goals of the City.
b. Projects that provide a facility, service, social good, or a cultural amenity that is
lacking and is prioritized by the community.
c. Projects that include designs, materials, or other elements that make the project
more resilient to climate change and/or reduces climate risk.
d. Projects that create new high-quality jobs, especially projects in partnership with
an educational institution or job training program.
Version 4 – approved July 11, 2025 Page 4 of 5
e. Projects that address the needs of an underserved or vulnerable population, such
as housing for those at risk of homelessness or experiencing homelessness.
f. Projects that diversify the housing stock by providing a housing type or unit
configuration that is in limited supply in the census tract.
g. Projects that build community wealth, such as projects that include below market
rents for commercial and office space for small, local businesses or nonprofits.
h. Projects that include partnership with an organization or service provider to
address a need for the community.
LBRA staff provides a written explanation for the decision to grant or deny a variance
within five business days of the LBRA Site Committee determination.
11. Misc. Brownfield Plan Provisions
A Brownfield Plan submitted to the LBRA for approval must include the following
statements and provisions:
a. A “not to exceed amount” for the reimbursement of Developer Eligible Activities
with local taxes.
b. A “not to exceed amount” for the reimbursement of Developer Eligible Activities
with state taxes.
c. Language that if the state approves a workplan with less state capture than
approved by the City, the “not to exceed” amount will automatically be adjusted
by the LBRA to maintain the current state to local capture ratio. If a workplan is
not approved by the state, local capture will be reduced to zero. The LBRA Board
of Directors must explicitly provide approval for the project to be reimbursed only
from local tax increment revenues.
12. Compliance
a. Projects must be operated and maintained in compliance with City codes and
ordinances.
b. Projects must meet the agreed to commitments and comply with the reporting
requirements outlined in the City of Lansing Universal Development Agreement.
c. Additional reporting and compliance requirements will be detailed in the
Reimbursement Agreement.
13. Policy Exemptions
The LBRA Board of Directors reserves the right to waive this policy or any portion of it if
the LBRA Board of Directors deems that it is in the best interest of the City or the LBRA.
Version 4 – approved July 11, 2025 Page 5 of 5