Plan Commission
Regular MeetingLombard, IL · April 15, 2024
Minutes
Village of Lombard
Village Hall
255 East Wilson Ave.
Lombard, IL 60148
villageoflombard.org
Minutes
Monday, April 15, 2024
7:00 PM
Village Hall - Boardroom
Plan Commission
Leigh Giuliano, Chairperson
Commissioners:
Ruth Sweetser, Bill Johnston, Tony Invergo,
Alissa Verson and Robert Spreenberg
Staff Liaison: Anna Papke
Plan Commission Minutes April 15, 2024
Call to Order
Chairperson Giuliano called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m
Present 6 - Ruth Sweetser, Leigh Giuliano, Bill Johnston, Tony Invergo, Robert
Spreenberg, and Alissa Verson
Pledge of Allegiance
Chairperson Giuliano led the Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call of Members
Present 6 - Ruth Sweetser, Leigh Giuliano, Bill Johnston, Tony Invergo, Robert
Spreenberg, and Alissa Verson
Also present: William Heniff, AICP, Director Community Development.
Chairperson Giuliano called the order of the agenda.
Public Hearings
There were no Public Hearings
Business Meeting
Approval of Minutes
A motion was made by Commissioner Johnston, seconded by Commissioner
Invergo, that the minutes of the March 18, 2024, meeting be approved.
The motion carried by the following vote
Aye: 6- Ruth Sweetser, Leigh Giuliano, Bill Johnston, Tony Invergo, Robert
Spreenberg, and Alissa Verson
Public Participation
There was no Public Participation
DuPage County Hearings
There were no DuPage County Hearings
Village of Lombard Page 1
Plan Commission Minutes April 15, 2024
Chairperson's Report
Chairperson Giuliano advised Kevin Walker had resigned from the
Plan Commission.
Planner's Report
There was no Planner's Report.
Unfinished Business
There was no Unfinished Business.
New Business
There was no New Business
Subdivision Reports
There were no Subdivision Reports
Site Plan Approvals
There were no Site Plan Approvals
Workshops
240138 Workshop Discussion: Unincorporated Estate Residential Properties
- Comprehensive Plan and Development Considerations
Mr. Heniff presented the workshop session. He said the topic is
regarding two unincorporated areas adjacent to Village limits. He
noted this is not a public hearing. The workshop is an opportunity to
gather input from the Plan Commissioners regarding policy
considerations.
Staff had received several inquiries regarding two areas adjacent to
Village limits. Both of the areas are designated Estate Residential in
the Comp Plan. Estate Residential is defined as having a net density
of four or fewer units per acre. It is a low-density single-family
residential designation. Mr. Heniff said most of the Estate Residential
areas in the Village’s Comp Plan are single-family residential areas
developed in unincorporated DuPage County. These areas are on well
and septic, have larger lots, and streets are usually developed with
rural profiles (no curbs, sidewalks uncommon, streetlights uncommon,
etc.).
Village of Lombard Page 2
Plan Commission Minutes April 15, 2024
The first subject area is Pleasant Lane west of Route 53 and east of
I-355. The area is composed of six lots with single-family homes. One
lot is within Village limits and the remaining five are unincorporated.
Existing land uses around the subject area include townhomes and
single-family residential development. The Cimmaron and Buckingham
Court townhomes are immediately south of the subject area. A 20-unit
townhome project is under construction immediately east of the
subject area.
Mr. Heniff showed the Comp Plan map for the area. The Comp Plan
recommends redevelopment and annexation of the area coincide with
planning and comprehensive redevelopment. The existing Comp Plan
designation recommends Estate Residential on the subject area.
However, staff has received several inquiries from individuals
interested in developing the area with townhomes or smaller lot
single-family residential development. The Village has utilities near
this area and this is driving most inquiries. Townhome development in
this area would require a Comp Plan amendment from Estate
Residential to a higher density residential designation.
Mr. Heniff described the Comp Plan designations and existing
development surrounding the subject area. There are a number of
townhome developments, Route 53 to the east, and I-355 to the west.
He noted that the lots north of the subject area fronting Sunset
Avenue are designated for Estate or Low Density Residential, though
previously there was an inquiry from a developer interested in building
industrial/office uses on that property. Given existing development and
the potential for changes in other nearby properties, staff is seeking
feedback from the Plan Commission on whether the subject property
would be suitable for something other than Estate Residential.
Commissioner Spreenberg asked about the panhandle on the church
property immediately north of the subject area. Mr. Heniff said this was
a longstanding existing condition. The panhandle was an old
right-of-way that had been planned decades prior but was never
developed. The panhandle could function as a buffer between uses if
property to the north and south were developed for different purposes.
Commissioner Spreenberg said that when the Plan Commission
discussed the possibility of industrial development on Sunset, there
were concerns about the impact of truck traffic on Route 53 and
surrounding residences. Mr. Heniff said that if the Sunset properties
are redeveloped as something other than residential, it could raise the
question of whether the subject area would be an ideal location for
something other than estate residential.
Village of Lombard Page 3
Plan Commission Minutes April 15, 2024
Commissioner Spreenberg said it is reasonable for the subject area to
be designated Low Medium Density, like the other nearby townhome
developments.
Commissioner Johnston asked how townhome development on the
subject area properties would impact traffic on Pleasant Lane and
Route 53. He asked if there would be a stop light or other
improvements on Route 53. He said he does not have an issue with
developing the area with townhomes but wants to make sure the
roadway network can handle it.
Mr. Heniff said that if a development proposal came forward, the
Village would review plans and engage a traffic consultant to conduct
a traffic study. He said the number of units would depend on site
design, ability to meet other development regulations such as
stormwater, etc. He estimated a reasonable design would be 20-30
units.
Commissioner Johnston asked if the noise from I-355 would be a
concern for residential development on the subject properties. Mr.
Heniff said the tollway authority had put up sound walls along the
area. He noted there are townhomes immediately to the south and the
noise of I-355 does not seem to have been a huge issue.
Commissioner Johnston asked about the occupancy levels of the
existing townhome developments on the south side of Pleasant Lane.
Mr. Heniff said the townhomes are owner-occupied units. The Village
has not heard of any issues related to occupancy concerns. Inquiries
from developers suggest there is a high demand for townhomes.
Commissioner Johnston said his main concern is the traffic impact of
additional townhomes.
Commissioner Invergo asked if it would be feasible to close access
from Route 53 to either Sunset Avenue or Pleasant Lane. Mr. Heniff
said Sunset is providing access to existing residences. If the area
were to be redeveloped, access may be part of a larger discussion.
Pleasant Lane needs to stay open because it provides access to
properties on Pleasant and crosses over I-355 to provide access to a
subdivision on the west side of I-355.
Commissioner Verson asked whether park space would be provided
as part of a redevelopment of the subject area, and how that would
work. Mr. Heniff said typically a developer would get the properties
under contract and come forward with a concept plan. The Village
Subdivision and Development Ordinance would require stormwater
detention, a street network, and other improvements. The developer
Village of Lombard Page 4
Plan Commission Minutes April 15, 2024
would possibly incorporate green space in the project as part of the
overall planning process.
Commissioner Sweetser asked if Pleasant would be the only access
to the subject area. Mr. Heniff said access would be from Route 53
along Pleasant, or from Route 53, along Meadow and up Cimmaron to
Pleasant Lane. He said redevelopment of the subject area would not
likely change existing traffic patterns in the area.
Commissioner Spreenberg asked if Commissioner Verson was asking
about how public park space might be dedicated as part of a
redevelopment. Commissioner Verson said she was. Mr. Heniff said
the subject area is within the Glen Ellyn Park District boundary. The
Park District could potentially attempt to acquire land in this area if
they determined there is a need for more park space. A developer
could potentially work with the Park District to donate land. Mr. Heniff
noted that the Village does not require developers to set aside land for
park space. However, he pointed out, the development regulations do
require stormwater detention and open space within individual lots.
Commissioner Spreenberg said it might be advantageous to establish
connectivity between the subject area and the properties along Sunset
Avenue by connecting through the panhandle of the church property.
Commissioner Invergo asked if it is possible to connect the subdivision
on Pleasant Lane on the west side of I-355 to Swift Road to alleviate
traffic on Pleasant Lane and Route 53. Mr. Heniff said there are a
ComEd substation and several other existing conditions preventing
connection from the west end of Pleasant Lane to Swift Road. A major
redevelopment would be required to establish such a connection.
Mr. Heniff presented the second area for consideration, located on the
west side of Meyers Road south of Roosevelt and north of 14th Street.
School Street borders the property on the west. The York Center
co-op (unincorporated) is located west of the subject property. There
is a gap strip located along School Street that has been incorporated
into one of the parcels on the block. The area is developed with
single-family residences developed in DuPage County. One property
is the former site of the York Center Fire District and is currently a
legal nonconforming vehicle repair and service business. A court
decree allows that use to continue. Mr. Heniff described existing
conditions in the neighborhood, including residential uses and
commercial uses along Roosevelt Road.
The Comp Plan identifies the subject area for Estate Residential. The
Comp Plan also notes that low to medium density residential
development can be recommended for transitional areas between
Village of Lombard Page 5
Plan Commission Minutes April 15, 2024
single-family neighborhoods and commercial areas, and that
transitional areas provide opportunities for new housing options, some
of them near transportation corridors.
Mr. Heniff said several properties in the subject area have been on
and off the market over the years and there does not seem to be
interest in redeveloping the area with single-family homes. One
challenge is that driveways from single-family homes would need to
back onto Meyers Road. Mr. Heniff said the Village has received
inquiries about townhome development in this area over the years.
Currently, there is a petition pending before DuPage County for a
30-unit duplex development on the three parcels addressed 1312 S.
Meyers Road. That petition was continued while the developer talked
to the Village of Lombard about the potential for annexing into the
Village. Mr. Heniff said no petition has yet been submitted to the
Village, though this may occur in the near future. If a petition is
submitted, the concept plan would be reviewed against all relevant
Village Codes, including the Zoning Ordinance and the Subdivisions
and Development Ordinance. The property would need to be annexed
with an annexation agreement and then rezoned. Annexations are at
the discretion of the Village Board.
Mr. Heniff said staff is looking for Plan Commission feedback on the
possibility of a Comp Plan amendment to allow for a designation that
would permit a medium density residential development in the area.
Commissioner Sweetser asked what factors were contributing to
interest in redevelopment in this area. Mr. Heniff said the petition
before DuPage County had brought some of these questions forward.
There had also been previous discussions of the area when a portion
of the property was considered for annexation in the early 2000s [the
annexation did not occur].
Chair Giuliano said she had always found the mixture of uses in the
subject area a little unusual. She is in favor of a higher density
residential designation for the properties. She asked if there were
some properties that would remain as-is, leading to a hodgepodge of
development in the area.
Mr. Heniff said it is possible that some of the properties on the block
will remain single-family homes. Regarding the southern portion of the
area in question, he said the Village would be seeking unified
redevelopment if a petition were to come forward.
Chair Giuliano asked the depth of the properties between Meyers and
School Street. Mr. Heniff estimated the lots are approximately 400 feet
deep.
Village of Lombard Page 6
Plan Commission Minutes April 15, 2024
Chair Giuliano said 30 duplexes in that space would be a lot. Mr.
Heniff said that was the proposal before DuPage County. In
discussions with the developer, staff had discussed the possibility of
lower density, or broadening the project area to include more real
estate in order to refine the proposed plan should it come before the
Village. Chair Giuliano said she would be in favor of a re-worked plan.
Commissioner Spreenberg asked about the boundary between
Lombard and Oakbrook Terrace. Mr. Heniff said Lombard and
Oakbrook Terrace have a boundary agreement that states property
west of Meyers would be annexed into Lombard, and property east of
Meyers and south of 13th Street would be annexed into Oakbrook
Terrace.
Commissioner Spreenberg said he favors fewer driveways along
Meyers in order to reduce potential for conflicts between vehicles
backing out of driveways and traffic on Meyers Road. He said any
plan should also be mindful of creating more traffic on School Street.
Mr. Heniff said staff had discussed curb cuts and traffic circulation
patterns with the interested developer.
Commissioner Spreenberg said he is in favor of a townhome concept,
pending review of a plan.
Adjournment
A motion was made by Commissioner Spreengberg, seconded by
Commissioner Johnson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:02 p.m. The motion
passed by an unanimous vote.
Village of Lombard Page 7
Agenda
Village of Lombard
Village Hall
255 East Wilson Ave.
Lombard, IL 60148
villageoflombard.org
Meeting Agenda
Monday, April 15, 2024
7:00 PM
Village Hall - Boardroom
Plan Commission
Leigh Giuliano, Chairperson
Commissioners:
Ruth Sweetser, Bill Johnston, Tony Invergo,
Alissa Verson and Robert Spreenberg
Staff Liaison: Anna Papke
Plan Commission Meeting Agenda April 15, 2024
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call of Members
Public Hearings
Business Meeting
Approval of Minutes
Request to approve the March 18, 2024 meeting minutes.
Public Participation
A 15-Minute period is allowed for public comments on any issue related to the Plan
Commission
DuPage County Hearings
There are no DuPage County Hearings
Chairperson's Report
1. Resignation of Commissioner Kevin Walker from the Plan Commission
Planner's Report
As presented by the Director of Community Development
Unfinished Business
There is no Unfinished Business
New Business
There is no New Business
Subdivision Reports
There are no Subdivision Reports
Site Plan Approvals
There are no Site Plan Approvals
Workshops
240138 Workshop Discussion: Unincorporated Estate Residential Properties -
Comprehensive Plan and Development Considerations
Village of Lombard Page 2 Printed on 4/10/2024
Plan Commission Meeting Agenda April 15, 2024
Adjournment
Village of Lombard Page 3 Printed on 4/10/2024