City Council Meeting

AGENDA LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, June 22, 2022 10:00 AM JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District VACANT HERB J. WESSON, JR., Tenth District MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 1 Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621-CITY (Metro), (818) 904-9450 (Valley), (310) 471-CITY (Westside), and (310) 547-CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in-person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in-person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid-19 vaccination or of a negative Covid-19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid-19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives, indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com. Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below. Telecommunication Relay Services Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user. What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non- English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay- service-trs. Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability. For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 2  BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com. Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held. The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote. PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting. The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment. If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 3 votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 4 Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 5 Los Angeles City Council Agenda Wednesday, June 22, 2022 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items Noticed for Public Hearing (1) 22-0679 CD 2 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the quitclaim of a portion of the 10-foot wide easement for sanitary sewer purposes lying on 5240 Lankershim Boulevard - Right of Way No. 36000-2362 (Quitclaim). Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that the Quitclaim is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the petitioner’s request for the Quitclaim, as shown on the Exhibit Map on the May 24, 2022 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Group of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated June 1, 2022 authorizing the quitclaim of an easement for sanitary sewer purposes, lying on 5240 Lankershim Boulevard. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 6  4. INSTRUCT the Real Estate Division of the BOE record and deliver the necessary quitclaim deed or deeds to the persons legally entitled thereto. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. Community Impact Statement: None submitted Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (2) 12-0071-S1 CD 3 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Historic Old Town Canoga Park (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning report. Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that: a. The Annual Planning Report for the Historic Old Town Canoga Park BID's 2022 FY, attached to the Council File, complies with the requirements of the State Law. b. The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Historic Old Town Canoga Park BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners. 2. ADOPT the Annual Planning Report for the Historic Old Town Canoga Park Business Improvement District's 2022 FY, attached to the Council File, pursuant to State Law. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 7 (3) 18-0526-S2 CD 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Greater Lincoln Heights (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report. Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that: a. The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Greater Lincoln Heights (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 16, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law. b. The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Greater Lincoln Heights BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners. 2. ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Greater Lincoln Heights BID, pursuant to the State Law. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (4) 13-0770-S2 CD 9 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to including City-owned parcels in the Central Avenue Business Improvement District. Recommendation for Council action: NOTE and FILE the Motion (Price – O’Farrell) relative to including City- owned parcels in the Central Avenue Business Improvement District. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 8  Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (5) 22-0615 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to enabling more employee ownership in the City’s local business sector. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman – Price – Wesson): INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD), with assistance from the City Administrative Officer (CAO), Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), Office of Finance, Chief Procurement Officer, and other relevant City Departments to report back within 90 days on the following: a. Key insights and findings from pilot programs currently underway to promote employee ownership in Council District Nine, County Supervisorial District 1, and the City of Long Beach. b. Specific recommendations for how these programs should inform the development of a Citywide approach to promoting employee ownership in Los Angeles. c. Strategies for leveraging existing City programs and policies to promote and incentivize the creation of more employee-owned enterprises in Los Angeles, including through: i. Inclusion of specific training modules on employee ownership in technical assistance provided to businesses through Business Source Centers, Jobs and Economic Development Incentive Zones, business incubators, and other City programs aimed at small businesses. ii. Establishment of a bid preference for employee-owned businesses in City contracting. iii. Creation of a registry of consumer-facing employee-owned businesses for use in City tourism and marketing materials. iv. Subsidizing of legal, technical and financial assistance to businesses seeking a transition to employee ownership. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 9  v. Creation of a revolving loan fund for the creation of employee- owned enterprises, modeled after a similar fund in Madison, Wisconsin. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (6) 22-0612 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to implementing a Community Development Tax Incentive in the City of Los Angeles. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman - Price - Krekorian): INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD), with support from the Office of Finance, City Administrative Officer (CAO), and the City Attorney, as needed, to report within 90 days with a framework for implementing a Community Development Tax Incentive in Los Angeles with said framework to include: a. Eligibility for any business registered in the City of Los Angeles to establish a ten-year funding partnership with a Community Development Organization (CDO), in which the business would provide $100,000 per year in unrestricted grant funds to the CDO, granting the business, in turn, a rebate against its tax liability under the Los Angeles City Business Tax (but not against any other tax levied by the City). b. A maximum of $5 million per year in tax incentives, equating to up to 50 active partnerships between businesses and CDOs in any given year. c. The following definition of a CDO: i. A nonprofit corporation or other such entity or organization, including a limited equity cooperative housing corporation. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 10  ii. Serving low-income residents within the City of Los Angeles, for example, those whose incomes are at or below 80 percent of the Area Median Income. iii. Engaged primarily in one or both of the following activities: A. Improving the economic well-being of a target area or areas by increasing or retaining primary employment and capital, where primary employment is defined as employment with wages at least 1.5x the minimum wage and with fringe benefits including health insurance, or by other means. B. Preserving existing or creating new affordable housing. d. As an accountability mechanism, a requirement that any CDO seeking to participate in the program be certified by EWDD based on both the above criteria and additional required or preferred criteria the EWDD establishes to ensure the CDO’s activities are transparent and accountable to the community, such as: i. Demonstrated history of successful, broad-based economic development initiatives that have not led to displacement of residents and businesses. ii. Financial transparency and annual reporting mechanisms. iii. Demonstration that the organization’s constituency, including low-income people, is meaningfully represented on the board of directors of the organization. e. A requirement that CDOs seeking to participate in the program must develop and submit a Community Development Plan (CDP) outlining their strategic vision for supporting low-income Angelenos in the communities where they work, against which they will be required to track progress in the form of an annual report submitted to the EWDD. f. A programmatic structure wherein CDOs will be responsible for establishing their own relationships with private businesses, but EWDD can facilitate these relationships by creating a registry of businesses who would like to partner with a CDO. g. Recommendations from the EWDD on: i. Additional accountability and oversight mechanisms. ii. Geographic or other forms of equity-based targeting for the program. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 11  iii. A possible cap on the size of the budgets of the CDOs eligible for the program. iv. Required roles and responsibilities of other City Departments. v. Administrative costs associated with running the program. vi. An implementation timeline, with the possibility of a phased approach in which the City gradually builds up to 50 approved partnerships over 2-3 years. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (7) 13-0934-S2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to changes to Jobs and Economic Development Incentive (JEDI) Zone Establishment Policy. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the proposed programmatic changes to the JEDI Zones Establishment Policy as requested and detailed in the May 4, 2022 Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD) report, attached to the Council File: a. Adjust the qualifying criteria to allow businesses on both sides of a boundary street to qualify for the benefits of the JEDI Zone program, so long as one side of the street qualifies under the primary eligibility criteria. b. Adjust the qualification of an economic assessment from meeting five of eight secondary needs criteria to needing to meet four of six secondary needs criteria. Fiscal Impact Statement: The EWDD reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. During the establishment of the JEDI Zone Program, City Council and Mayor authorized the use of $1,000,000 of former Urban Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 12  Development Action Grant funds to provide permit fee reductions for businesses located in designated JEDI Zones. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (8) 20-0066-S1 CDs 1-4, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative 6-10,13-15 to the Excess Bond Proceeds (EBP) Quarterly Project Status Report as of May 15, 2022. Recommendation for Council Action: NOTE and FILE the June 1, 2022 Community Redevelopment Agency Los Angeles (CRA/LA) Bond Oversight Committee report, inasmuch as this report is for information only and no Council action is required. Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (9) 14-1174-S95 CDs 1-4, GENERAL EXEMPTION and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS 6-10, COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the allocation of up to $601,935 in 12-15 Community Redevelopment Agenda of Los Angeles (CRA/LA) Excess Non- Housing Bond Proceeds from all CRA/LA Redevelopment Project Areas to cover budgeted Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 staffing costs for the City Administrative Officer (CAO), City Attorney, Personnel Department, and Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD) to administer and manage the CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Program. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. DETERMINE that the allocation of CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds (EBP) for staffing costs does not constitute a project as defined by Section 15378(b)(4) (Creation of Government Funding Mechanisms or Other Government Fiscal Activities) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 13  2. APPROVE the proposed FY 2021-2022 Bond Oversight Committee (BOC) staffing budget of $601,935 for the Office of the City Administrative Officer (CAO), City Attorney, Personnel, and EWDD to manage the EBP program as detailed in Attachments A, B, and C of the April 13, 2022 BOC report, attached to the Council File, 3. APPROVE the administrative amounts identified below in Recommendation No. 6, inasmuch as only one year's administrative funding is requested at this time. 4. ALLOCATE up to $504,222 for direct and related staffing costs to administer the EBP Program using taxable EBP from each Project Area into the account(s) for staffing and reporting as described in Section 4.7(ii) of the Bond Expenditure Agreement (BEA), attached to the Council File, for the following departments: a. EWDD b. City Attorney c. Personnel Department 5. ALLOCATE up to $97,713 for CAO's direct staffing costs for the tasks described in Section 4.3 of the BEA, attached to the Council File, using taxable EBP from each Project Area into the account(s) as described in Section 4.7 (ii) of the BEA. 6. AUTHORIZE the Controller to: a. Decrease appropriations within the CRA/LA EBP Fund No. 57D as follows: Amount Amount from Account Title From 1% 15% Total Reporting Staff/Admin From: 22M122 EWDD 0 ($173,970.31) ($173,970.31) 22N122 EWDD 0 (134,696.69) (134,696.69) Reimbursement of General 22M299 0 (483.27) (483.27) Fund Costs- EWDD Reimbursement 22N299 0 (168,668.73) (168,668.73) of General Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 14  Fund Costs- EWDD 22P112 City Attorney 0 (9,753.38) (9,753.38) 22R112 City Attorney 0 (246.62) (246.62) Related Costs- 22P292 0 (5,350) (5,350) City Attorney 22P166 Personnel 0 (3,208.53) (3,208.53) 22R166 Personnel 0 (3,105.47) (3,105.47) Related Costs- 22P297 0 (4,719.84) (4,719.84) Personnel Reimbursement of General 22R299 0 (19.16) (19.16) Fund Costs- Personnel 22N110 CAO 0 (97,713) (97,713) Total: (601,935) (601,935) b. Decrease appropriations within the CRA/LA EBP Fund No. 57D as follows: Account Title Amount Economic and Workforce 22V122 ($235,019) Development Reimbursement of General Fund 22V299 (17,930) Costs Total: ($252,949) c. Increase (Decrease) appropriations within Fund No. 100/22 as follows: Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 15  Account Title Amount 1010 Salaries General ($294,002) 1070 Salaries, As-Needed 1,574 1090 Overtime General 57 2120 Printing and Binding 37 2130 Travel 77 3040 Contractual Services 5,907 3310 Transportation 7 6010 Office and Administration 5,336 6020 Operating Supplies 8 6030 Leasing 49,980 Total: ($235,019) d. Establish new account and increase appropriations within the CRA/LA EBP Fund No. 57D as follows: Account Title Amount 22V112 City Attorney $10,000 22V299 Reimbursement of General Fund Costs 5,350 Total: $15,350 e. Increase appropriations within Fund No. 100/12 as follows: Account Title Amount 1010 Salaries General $10,000 f. Establish new account and increase appropriations within the CRA/LA EBP Fund No. 57D as follows: Account Title Amount 22V166 Personnel $6,314 22V299 Reimbursement of General Fund Costs 4,739 Total: $11,053 g. Increase appropriations within Fund No. 100/66 as follows: Account Title Amount 1010 Salaries General $6,314 h. Increase (Decrease) appropriations within the CRA/LA EBP Fund No. 57D as follows: Account Title Amount Reimbursement of General Fund 22V299 ($106,567) Costs Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 16  7. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, or designee, to: a. Make any corrections or clarifications to the April 14, 2022 BOC report, attached to the Council File, as necessary to effectuate the intent of this action. b. Prepare Controller instructions and/or make technical adjustments that may be required and are consistent with this action, subject to the approval of the CAO; and, authorize the Controller to implement these instructions. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CRA/LA Bond Oversight Committee reports that there is no anticipated impact to the General Fund as funding for the CRA- LA Excess Non-Housing Bonds Proceeds Fund No. 57D is funded solely from transfers totaling approximately $95 million in pre-2011 tax allocation bond proceeds from CRA/LA to the City (Council File No. 14-1174). Said transfers have been deposited with the Office of the Controller. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (10) 22-0438 CD 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the acquisition of real property located at 1554 West 11th Place in Council District One. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Cedillo – De Leon): 1. AUTHORIZE the Department of General Services (GSD) to negotiate, execute, and accept transfer documents and perform other actions necessary with the CRA/LA, a Designated Local Authority, to receive and convey real property located at 1554 West 11th Place in Council District One with such transfer conditioned upon the City's receipt of an "Approval of Removal Action Completion Report" from the California Department of Toxic and Substance Control affirming the environmental condition of the Property is safe for public use. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 17  2. INSTRUCT the GSD to effectuate a non-financial transfer of jurisdiction of the Property described above in Recommendation No. 1 to the Department of Recreation and Parks. 3. REQUEST the Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners to consider and accept the transfer of jurisdiction of the property described above in Recommendation No. 1, and dedicate said property as park property in perpetuity if there is no environmental impediment in doing so. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (11) 21-0270-S1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to selection of contractors as Los Angeles Business Source Center (LABSC) operators for the South Los Angeles and West Valley Service Areas. Recommendations for Council action: 1. APPROVE the list of recommended operators selected through the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the 2022 LABSC Operators in the South Los Angeles and West Valley Service Areas process as detailed in Attachment A of the May 19, 2022 Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD) report, attached to the Council File. 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, or designee, to: a. Negotiate and execute contracts with the agencies selected to become LABSC Operators, effective July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, compliance with City contracting requirements and federal guidelines, and contingent on available grant funding. b. Establish a LABSC Operator Replacement List to be in effect for two years commencing July 1,2 022, to include any LABSC Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 18  proposer that attained a score of 70 points or greater, during the 2021 and 2022 LABSC RFP process as detailed in Attachment of the May 19, 2022 EWDD report, attached to the Council File. 3. INSTRUCT the EWDD to report to City Council before the selection of a new LABSC operator from said list as detailed above in Recommendation No. 2b. 4. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, or designee, to prepare Controller instructions and/or make any technical adjustments needed and consistent with this action, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer, and request the Controller to implement these instructions. Fiscal Impact Statement: The EWDD reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. The LABSC System is funded entirely through the City's Community Development Block Grant Program with funds allocated on an annual basis through the Consolidated Plan process. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (12) 22-0666 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL, AND TOURISM REPORT relative to approving the 30-month Lease with Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc., covering the property located at 5761 West Imperial Highway, Los Angeles, CA, 90045 within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Airport Commissioners (Board) that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article lll, Class 1 (18)(c) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the 30-month Lease with Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc., an Alaska Corporation, covering the property located at 5761 West Imperial Highway, Los Angeles, CA, 90045 within LAX. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 19  3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on April 14, 2022, by Resolution No. 27476, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles World Airports, to execute said Lease with Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc., an Alaska Corporation. Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 4, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022) (13) 22-0576 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the exemption of one Project Assistant (Class Code 1542) for the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) from the Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(d)(4) in connection with the Housing Opportunity for Persons with AIDS Program. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE and CONCUR with the Board of Civil Service Commissioner’s April 14, 2022 action to exempt one position (CSC No. 3584) of Project Assistant, Class Code 1542, in the LAHD pursuant to Charter Section 1001(d)(4) based on the position being grant-funded for a term not to exceed two years. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer not the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (14) 19-1135-S1 Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 20  PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Salary Reopener Tentative Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to the 2019-23 MOU for the Managing Attorneys Bargaining Unit (MOU 32). Recommendations for Council action: 1. APPROVE the Tentative Agreement, attached to the Council File, with the Los Angeles City Attorney Management Association on behalf of MOU 32 regarding the salary reopener provisions contained in the 2019-23 MOU. 2. APPROVE Amendment No. 1 to the 2019-23 MOU for MOU 32. 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller and City Administrative Officer (CAO) to correct any clerical errors in the MOU, or make necessary technical corrections subsequent to City Council approval. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the General Fund impact of the Salary Reopener Tentative Agreement will be a total of approximately $161,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 and $219,000 in FY 2023-24. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (15) 19-1136-S1 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Salary Reopener Tentative Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the 2019-23 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Confidential Attorneys Bargaining Unit (MOU 31). Recommendations for Council action: 1. APPROVE the Tentative Agreement, attached to the Council File, with the International Union of Operating Engineers on behalf of MOU 31 regarding the salary reopener provisions contained in the 2019-23 MOU. 2. APPROVE Amendment No. 2 to the 2019-23 MOU for MOU 31. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 21  3. AUTHORIZE the Controller and City Administrative Officer (CAO) to correct any clerical errors in the MOU, or make necessary technical corrections subsequent to City Council approval. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the General Fund impact of the Salary Reopener Tentative Agreement will be a total of approximately $194,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 and $264,000 in FY2023-24. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (16) 20-0331-S1 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Salary Reopener Tentative Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to the 2019-23 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City Attorneys Bargaining Unit (MOU 29). Recommendations for Council action: 1. APPROVE the Tentative Agreement, attached to the Council File, with the Los Angeles City Attorney Association representing MOU 29 regarding the salary reopener provisions contained in the 2019-23 MOU. 2. APPROVE Amendment No. 1 to the 2019-23 MOU for MOU 29. 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller and City Administrative Officer (CAO) to correct any clerical errors in the MOU, or make necessary technical corrections subsequent to City Council approval. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the General Fund impact of the Salary Reopener Tentative Agreement will be a total of approximately $2.9 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 and $3.9 million in FY 2023-24. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (17) 14-0407-S1 Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 22  PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORTS relative to Salary Reopener Tentative Agreements and Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) for the Administrative (MOU 01), Supervisory Technical (MOU 19), Supervisory Administrative (MOU 20), and Technical (MOU 21) bargaining units. Recommendations for Council action: 1. APPROVE the attached Tentative Agreements with the Engineers and Architects Association (EAA) on behalf of MOUs 01, 19, 20, and MOU 21 regarding the salary reopener provisions contained in the 2019-23 MOUs. 2. APPROVE the attached amendments to MOUs 01, 19, 20, and 21 that would codify the provisions of the attached Tentative Agreements; pursuant to Council file No. 12-1148, approve the terms of the Tentative Agreement with EAA to be applied to non-represented classifications. 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller and the CAO to correct any clerical errors in the MOU, or make necessary technical corrections subsequent to City Council approval. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the General Fund impact of the Salary Reopener Tentative Agreements and amendments to EAA- represented MOUs will be a total of approximately $19 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 and $26.5 million in FY 2023-24. This General Fund impact combines the cost of administering the terms of the Salary Reopener Agreement for EAA unit members, as well as non-represented classifications. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (18) 22-0680 ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the permanent appointment of Mr. Jaime Pacheco-Orozco as the General Manager, Department of Aging. Recommendation for Council action: Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 23  RESOLVE that the Mayor’s appointment of Mr. Jaime Pacheco-Orozco as the permanent General Manager, Department of Aging, is APPROVED and CONFIRMED. Financial Disclosure Statement: Pending Background Check: Pending Community Impact Statement: None submitted. TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 22, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022) (19) 22-0681 ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the reappointment of Ms. Mariella Freire-Reyes as Interim General Manager, Department of Aging. Recommendation for Council action: RESOLVE that the Mayor’s reappointment of Ms. Mariella Freire-Reyes as Interim General Manager, Department of Aging, to be effective until the appointment of a Permanent General Manager, is APPROVED and CONFIRMED. Financial Disclosure Statement: Pending Community Impact Statement: None submitted (20) 22-0231 CD 15 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (BUSCAINO – HARRIS- DAWSON) relative to an Interim Control Ordinance to prohibit the issuance of permits or certificates of occupancy associated with any demolition, building, use of land, grading for open storage, truck parking, and container storage on all industrially zoned properties within the Wilmington-Harbor City Community Plan Area. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 24  (Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Click on http://www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Community Impact Statement: None submitted (21) 21-0042-S3 AD HOC COMMITTEE ON COVID-19 RECOVERY AND NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT REPORT relative to a request for a report on recommendations and possible amendments to the eviction moratorium, and data relative to the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP). Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Martinez – Cedillo – De Leon – Lee): 1. DIRECT the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), with assistance from the City Attorney, to report back in 30 days on recommendations and possible amendments to the eviction moratorium. 2. DIRECT the LAHD to report back in 30 days with data on the number of Angelenos still on the ERAP waitlist, as well as residents who may qualify for rental assistance, but were unable to be captured or helped by the State and City programs. 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD to report back on existing protections for tenants, gaps in those protections, and options to address those gaps. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (Housing Committee waived consideration of the above matter) Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 25 Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for Consideration) (22) 20-0291 RESOLUTION relative to the Declaration of Local Emergency by the Mayor, dated March 4, 2020, wherein he declared that conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen both internationally and within the United States as a result of the introduction of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), pursuant to the provisions of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) Section 8.27. Recommendation for Council action: ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to: a. Resolve that a local emergency continues to persist within the City of Los Angeles, within the meaning of Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 8.21, et seq., and the continuance of the Mayor’s March 4, 2020, Declaration of Local Emergency through 30 days from the adoption of this Resolution is therefore necessary. b. Direct, in accordance with the LAAC, Section 8.21 et seq., all appropriate City departments, agencies and personnel shall continue to perform all duties and responsibilities to represent the City of Los Angeles in this matter for the purpose of abating the emergency and for the receipt, processing and coordination of all inquiries and requirements necessary to obtain whatever State and Federal assistance that may become available to the citizens of Los Angeles who may be affected by the emergency. c. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management Department, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need for extension of this Declaration of Local Emergency as may be required. d. Instruct the City Clerk to forward copies of this Resolution to the Governor of the State of California, the Director of the California Office of Emergency Services, and the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 26 (23) 21-1189 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to finding in accordance with AB 361 Section 3(e)(1)(B) whether meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees because of the continuing state of emergency related the Covid-19 pandemic, as originally proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020; and related actions. Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND in accordance with AB 361 Section 3(e)(3) that, while the state of emergency due to the Covid-19 pandemic, as originally proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, remains active and/or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and finds for City Council, including its advisory Committees, that the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person and/or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. 2. FIND in accordance with AB 361 Section 3(e)(3) that, while the state of emergency due to the Covid-19 pandemic, as originally proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, remains active and/or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and finds for all City Brown Act bodies that the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person and/or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. 3. INSTRUCT the Clerk to place on the agenda for a Council meeting not more than 30 calendar-days after Council adopts these findings and recommendations an item entitled “Findings to Continue Teleconference Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 and Related Actions” and include these same recommendations for adoption by Council; and instruct the Clerk to continue to do so on the agenda for a Council meeting not more than 30 calendar-days after each time Council adopts these findings and recommendations, until Council instructs the Clerk to cease doing so. Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 27 (24) 22-0007-S13 CD 13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the installation of the name of Jenifer Lewis on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the installation of the name of Jenifer Lewis at 6284 Hollywood Boulevard. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that there is no General Fund impact. All costs are paid by the permittee. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (25) 22-0007-S14 CD 13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the installation of the name of Holly Robinson Peete on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the installation of the name of Holly Robinson Peete at 6623 Hollywood Boulevard. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that there is no General Fund impact. All costs are paid by the permittee. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (26) 22-0667 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to initiating vacation proceedings for Community Street west of Aqueduct Avenue to its westerly terminus (VAC-E1401421). Recommendations for Council action: Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 28  1. ADOPT the City Engineer report dated May 24, 2022, attached to the Council file, to initiate the vacation proceedings to vacate Community Street west of Aqueduct Avenue to its westerly terminus, as shown on Exhibit A of said City Engineer report, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code, Division 9, Part 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements Vacation Law. 2. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to investigate and report regarding the feasibility of this vacation request. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $47,080 was paid by the petitioner for the investigation of this request pursuant to Section 7.42 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC). Any deficit fee to recover the cost pursuant to LAAC Section 7.44 will be required of the petitioner. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (27) 22-4118-S4 CD 15 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (BUSCAINO - LEE) relative to designating locations in Council District 15 for enforcement against sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right-of-way, as further detailed in Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 41.18. Recommendations for Council action: 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Section 41.18 of the LAMC, to designate the following locations for enforcement against sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right-of-way, up to the maximum distance and effective for the maximum period of time prescribed, and further detailed in the LAMC: South Pacific Avenue and West 19th Street - Public Safety 2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City Department(s) with jurisdiction over the identified locations to post appropriate notices of Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 29  the above prohibitions at these locations, and to begin enforcement upon the expiration of any required posting period. (Continued from Council meeting of June 14, 2022) (28) 13-1320-S3 CD 12 MOTION (LEE - KREKORIAN) relative to financing for the construction of a new Granada Hills replacement community swimming pool. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. TRANSFER $1,650,000 in the Sunshine Canyon Community Amenities Trust Fund No. 699 to the Recreation and Parks Fund No. 302/89, Account No. 89270k as an interest - free loan to address the funding shortfall for the Granada Hills replacement community swimming pool project. 2. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer in coordination with the Department of Recreation and Parks and the Bureau of Engineering to identify a funding source to repay the funding shortfall loan provided from the Sunshine Community Amenities Trust Fund to complete funding for the Granada Hills replacement community swimming pool project. 3. AUTHORIZE the above referenced departments to make any corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion. (29) 21-0702-S2 MOTION (PRICE - KREKORIAN) relative to funding to pursue and conduct a Racial Equity Audit of existing City programs, policies, and practices to develop a Strategic Action Plan. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 30  1. AUTHORIZE the Controller to TRANSFER $432,358 within and between Fund No. 100 sources, as follows: From: 100/15 001010, Salaries General $432,358 To: 100/15 003040, Contractual Services $350,000 100/40 001101, Hiring Hall Construction $24,432 100/40 001121, Benefits Hiring Hall Construction $11,064 100/40 003180, Construction Materials $46,862 2. AUTHORIZE the Civil, Human, Rights, and Equity Department to prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments, subject to approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, authorize the Controller to implement the instructions. (30) 22-0713 CD 11 MOTION (BONIN - KORETZ) relative to funding for Priority Legislative Budget Projects, including the Potrero Canyon Pacific Coast Highway Pedestrian Bridge and the Colorado Bridge Undercrossing East Bank Riverway Project. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Engineering, with the assistance from the City Attorney, to negotiate and execute a transfer agreement with Caltrans for the Colorado Bridge Undercrossing East Bank Riverway Project ($5 million) and the Potrero Canyon Pacific Coast Highway Pedestrian Bridge ($11 million) Priority Legislative Budget Projects. 2. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Engineering to: a. ACCEPT $5,000,000 from Caltrans for the Colorado Bridge Undercrossing East Bank Riverway Project, deposit said funds, including any additional earned interest, into the Engineering Special Services Fund No. 682/50, and appropriate therein to a new account entitled “Colorado Bridge Undercrossing East Bank Riverway” for expenditures associated with the design and construction of the project. b. ACCEPT $11,000,000 from Caltrans for the Potrero Canyon Pacific Coast Highway Pedestrian Bridge Project, deposit said funds, including any additional earned interest, into the Engineering Special Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 31  Services Fund No. 682/50, and appropriate therein to a new account entitled “Potrero Canyon Pacific Coast Highway Pedestrian Bridge” for expenditures associated with the design and construction of the project. 3. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Engineering to make any technical corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion, including any corrections and changes to fund or account numbers. (31) 22-0022-S1 CD 8 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - BONIN) relative to a revocable permit for the NHS Neighborhood Redevelopment Corporation to close, fence, occupy, demolish, excavate, and construct in the public right-of-way of the alley west of Broadway Avenue between 87th Street and 88th Street, adjacent to 8727 Broadway Avenue, prior to finalizing and recording the street vacation of a portion of this alley. Recommendation for Council action: AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Engineering to issue a revocable permit to the NHS Neighborhood Redevelopment Corporation, subject to satisfaction of the conditions for issuing such permit, to close, fence, occupy, demolish, excavate, and construct in the public right-of-way of the alley west of Broadway Avenue between 87th Street and 88th Street, adjacent to 8727 Broadway Avenue, prior to finalizing and recording the street vacation (VAC-E1401411) of a portion of this alley. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (Public Works Committee waived consideration of the above matter) Items Called Special Motions for Posting and Referral Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 32 Closed Session (32) 22-0472 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Galit Eisenberger v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV00868. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that occurred on June 4, 2019, on Daniels Drive near its intersection with West Pico Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of this matter) (33) 22-0469 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Jose Martinez v. Charles L. Beck, et al., United States District Court Case No. CV19-02101-ODW-GJS. (This matter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on May 26, 2017, in Los Angeles, California.) (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the matter) (34) 22-0557 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Reuben David Chudy, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC697503. (This matter arises from a trip and fall that occurred on March 19, 2016, at 10733 Esther Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90064) (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the matter) Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 33 (35) 22-0553 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Margaret Beal Sandorf v. Glen Centre GP LLC., A Delaware Limited Liability Company, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV25360. (This matter arises from a trip and fall accident that occurred on January 6, 2020, at 2926 Beverly Glen Circle, Los Angeles, CA 90077.) (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the matter) (36) 22-0640 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Rita Aron v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV14954. (This matter arises from a trip and fall incident that occurred on Barrington Avenue near Wilshire Boulevard on August 18, 2018.) (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the matter) (37) 22-0638 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Tracy Bradford v. James Douglas, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV12871. (This matter arises from a traffic collision which occurred on April 1, 2018, at the intersection of Crenshaw and Jefferson in the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the matter) Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 34 Adjourning Motions Council Adjournment EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final. Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000). Wednesday - June 22, 2022 - PAGE 35