City Council Meeting
Regular MeetingLos Angeles, CA · September 16, 2022
Minutes
Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Friday, September 16, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 10:00 AM
(For further details see Official Council Files)
(For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)
Roll Call
Members Present: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price (11); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman, Rodriguez (4)
Approval of the Minutes
Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations
Multiple Agenda Item Comment
Public Testimony of Nonagenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council
Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held
(1) 220800
CD 10 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE
REPORT relative to initiating consideration of a Community Plan
Implementation Overlay (CPIO) Amendment and accompanying Height
District Change for the property located at 5741 West Jefferson Boulevard
and 3336 3348 South La Cienega Place.
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Wesson
HarrisDawson):
1. INITIATE consideration of a CPIO Amendment and accompanying
Height District Change for the property located at 5741 West
Jefferson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90016, and 3336 3348
South La Cienega Place, Los Angeles, CA 90016.
2. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to expeditiously
process the CPIO Amendment and Height District Change for the
property to permit the continuation and modernization of this
community resource and to address the evolving needs of this
transitoriented area.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 1
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
Height District Change for the property located at 5741 West
Jefferson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90016, and 3336 3348
South La Cienega Place, Los Angeles, CA 90016.
2. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to expeditiously
process the CPIO Amendment and Height District Change for the
property to permit the continuation and modernization of this
community resource and to address the evolving needs of this
transitoriented area.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr. (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman,
Rodriguez (4)
(2) 220023
CD 13 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND), MITIGATION
MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMP) and
RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
FINDINGS; and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an appeal filed for Conditional Use
Permits, a Specific Plan Exception, and a Project Permit Compliance, for
the property located at 1530 North Western Avenue (15241530 North
Western Avenue and 5446 West Harold Way).
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
OF THE MAYOR:
1. FIND, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b), after
consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the
MND, No. ENV20194339MND, as circulated on August 19, 2021,
and all comments received, with the imposition of mitigation
measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have
a significant effect on the environment; FIND, the MND reflects the
independent judgment and analysis of the City; FIND, the Mitigation
Measures have been made enforceable conditions on the project;
and, ADOPT the MND and the MMP prepared for the MND.
2. ADOPT the REVISED FINDINGS of the Central Los Angeles Area
Planning Commission (CLAAPC), dated March 4, 2022, as the
Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Doug Haines, joint with
Friday La - September
Mirada Avenue16, 2022 -
Neighborhood PAGE 2
Association, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the CLAAPC in approving: 1) a
independent judgment and analysis of the City; FIND, the Mitigation
Measures have been made enforceable conditions on the project;
and, ADOPT the MND and the MMP prepared for the MND.
2. ADOPT the REVISED FINDINGS of the Central Los Angeles Area
Planning Commission (CLAAPC), dated March 4, 2022, as the
Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Doug Haines, joint with
La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the CLAAPC in approving: 1) a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a hotel within 500 feet from a
Residential Zone; 2) a Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale and
dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for onsite
consumption within 36 hotel rooms (minibars) and a rooftop
bar/lounge; 3) a Specific Plan Exception from Section 9.A.1 of the
Vermont/Western Station Neighborhood Area Plan to allow
commercial uses above the groundfloor and from Section 9.C of
the Vermont/Western to allow the proposed building to exceed the
Transitional Height limits for a project abutting a Subarea A lot; and,
4) a Project Permit Compliance to allow for the demolition of an
existing twostory duplex and surface parking lot, and the
construction, use, and maintenance of a new fourstory (60foot),
mixeduse boutique hotel with 36 guest rooms, 10 residential
apartment units, and an atgrade parking level with one
subterranean level, the project will reserve two units as affordable
including one Very Low Income Household unit and one Low Income
Household unit, it will include 47 overall parking spaces with a
maximum of 12 residential parking spaces (including two guest
spaces) designated for the proposed apartments, 24 bicycle
parking spaces, and 1,343 square feet of open space, the site is
located on a 14,478 squarefoot lot that would include 26,080
square feet of total floor area with a Floor Area Ratio of 1.8:1, there
are four existing trees on the site, which are all unprotected fruit
trees that would be removed as part of the project scope; for the
property located at 1530 North Western Avenue (15241530 North
Western Avenue and 5446 West Harold Way), subject to Conditions
of Approval.
Applicant: Phil Patel
Representative: Eric Lieberman, QES, Inc.
Case No. APCC20194338SPECUCUBSPP1A
Environmental No. ENV20194339MND
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CLAAPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 3
Adopted Item
Case No. APCC20194338SPECUCUBSPP1A
Environmental No. ENV20194339MND
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CLAAPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr. (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman,
Rodriguez (4)
(3) 220750
CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal filed for the property located at
603, 603 ½, and 605 South Mariposa Avenue.
Recommendations for Council action:
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
Section 15332, Article 19, Class 32, and there is no substantial
evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Central Los Angeles Area Planning
Commission (CLAAPC) as the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the CLAAPC, in approving a
Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for a
proposed Tier 4 Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing
project involving the construction, use, and maintenance of a new
eightstory multifamily development, containing a total of 92
dwelling units, with 11 proposed dwelling units reserved for
Extremely Low Income Households, the proposed development will
contain approximately 43,818 square feet of floor area, provides a
total of 6,900 square feet of open space; for the property located at
603, 603 ½, and 605 South Mariposa Avenue.
Applicant: Kayte Edson, 603 South Mariposa QOZB, LLC
Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
Case: DIR20219072TOCSPRHCA1A
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 4
Environmental No.: ENV20219073CE1A
dwelling units, with 11 proposed dwelling units reserved for
Extremely Low Income Households, the proposed development will
contain approximately 43,818 square feet of floor area, provides a
total of 6,900 square feet of open space; for the property located at
603, 603 ½, and 605 South Mariposa Avenue.
Applicant: Kayte Edson, 603 South Mariposa QOZB, LLC
Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
Case: DIR20219072TOCSPRHCA1A
Environmental No.: ENV20219073CE1A
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CLAAPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr. (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman,
Rodriguez (4)
(4) 220875
CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the property located at
1037 South Dewey Avenue (10311043 South Dewey Avenue).
Recommendations for Council action:
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
Article 19, Section 15332, Class 32, and there is no substantial
evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning (DCP) as
the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the Director of Planning, in approving
a Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for the
construction, use and maintenance of a 56,112 square foot, 60unit
residential development including six dwelling units set aside for
affordable housing (or 10 percent of the proposed density) reserved
for Extremely Low Income Households TransitOriented
Communities project, for the property located at 1037 South Dewey
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 5
Avenue (1031 – 1043 South Dewey Avenue).
the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the Director of Planning, in approving
a Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for the
construction, use and maintenance of a 56,112 square foot, 60unit
residential development including six dwelling units set aside for
affordable housing (or 10 percent of the proposed density) reserved
for Extremely Low Income Households TransitOriented
Communities project, for the property located at 1037 South Dewey
Avenue (1031 – 1043 South Dewey Avenue).
Applicant: Henry Fan, URSA 1037 Dewey Ave., LLC
Representative: Patrick Jen
Case: DIR2022756TOCHCA
Environmental No. ENV2022757CE1A
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr. (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman,
Rodriguez (4)
(5) 220468
CD 13 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Appeals filed for
Conditional Use Permits and a Site Plan Review for the property located at
3209 3227 West Sunset Boulevard.
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
OF THE MAYOR:
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, Article 19,
Class 32, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that
an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
Friday Commission (LACPC)
- September as the- Findings of Council. PAGE 6
16, 2022
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, Article 19,
Class 32, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that
an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEALS filed by Nicole Antoine and
David Richardson, and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of
the LACPC in approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow a
Density Bonus for a housing development project in which the
density increase is greater than otherwise permitted by Los Angeles
Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.22 A.25; approving a
Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 W.1 for
the sales and dispensing of a fullline of alcoholic beverages for on
and offsite consumption for two establishments; and, approving a
Site Plan Review for a project that results in an increase of 50 or
more dwelling units; for the demolition of an existing one and two
story auto shop with an adjoining surface level parking lot and the
construction, use, and maintenance of a new 84,662 squarefoot,
sevenstory mixeduse residential development consisting of 86
residential units (with 10 units reserved for Very LowIncome
Households), the project proposes to include a total 69 parking
spaces within an at grade parking garage; for the property located
at 3209 3227 West Sunset Boulevard, subject to Conditions of
Approval.
Applicant: Sunset TwinsHH, LLC c/o Daniel Neman
Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
Case No. CPC20212035DBCUCUBSPRHCA1A
Environmental No. ENV20212036CE
Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr. (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman,
Rodriguez (4)
(6) 220453
Friday
CD 5 - September
SUSTAINABLE 16, 2022 - ENVIRONMENTALPAGE
COMMUNITIES 7
ASSESSMENT
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr. (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman,
Rodriguez (4)
(6) 220453
CD 5 SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
(SCEA), ERRATA, MITIGATION MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING
*REPORTING P R O G R A M (MMP) *(MMRP), a n d R E L A T E D
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS; and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a SCEA request for the
future development of the proposed 5001 Wilshire Project (Project), for the
properties located at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard, 671677 South Highland
Avenue, and 668 South Citrus Avenue.
Recommendations for Council action:
1. FIND, pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC), Section 21155.2,
after consideration of the whole of the administrative record,
including the SB 375 SCEA, ENV20213327SCEA, and all
comments received, after imposition of all mitigation measures, that:
a. There is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
b. The City Council held a hearing on September 6, 2022 for
adoption of the SCEA pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b)(6).
c. The Project is a transit priority project pursuant to PRC
Section 21155, and the Project has incorporated all
feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or
criteria set forth in prior Environmental Impact Report(s) (EIR),
including the 20202045 Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Program
EIR, SCH No. 2019011061.
d. All potentially significant effects required to be identified in the
initial study have been identified and analyzed in the SCEA.
e. With respect to each significant effect on the environment
required to be identified in the initial study for the SCEA,
changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated
into the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to
a level of insignificance or those changes or alterations are
within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
Friday -public
September
agency16, 2022
and - been, or can and should
have PAGEbe,8 adopted
by that other agency.
d. All potentially significant effects required to be identified in the
initial study have been identified and analyzed in the SCEA.
e. With respect to each significant effect on the environment
required to be identified in the initial study for the SCEA,
changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated
into the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to
a level of insignificance or those changes or alterations are
within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted
by that other agency.
f. The SCEA reflects the independent judgment and analysis of
the City.
g. The mitigation measures have been made enforceable
conditions on the Project.
2. FIND that the Project complies with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act for using the SCEA as
authorized pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b).
3. ADOPT, pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2, the SCEA and the
MMP *MMRP prepared for the SCEA, for a proposed demolition of
the existing twostory commercial building and surface parking lots
to develop an eightstory mixeduse building with 242 residential
dwelling units and 10,900 square feet of commercial space fronting
Wilshire Boulevard; the Project would set aside 25 dwelling units for
Extremely Low Income Households; the Project would encompass a
total floor area of 260,000 square feet resulting in a Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) of 3.54:1 and would have a maximum building height of
105 feet; the northern lots and Carling Way (which would be merged
into the Project Site through Case No. VTT83358CN) would be
redeveloped into a 16,822 squarefoot green belt that would be
utilized as a publiclyaccessible common open space; the Project
would provide 26,350 square feet of open space which includes the
green belt, a courtyard, roof deck, private balconies, and amenity
rooms; the Project would comprise of 293 residential parking
spaces located within two subterranean levels and one abovegrade
level, and 30 commercial parking spaces located on the ground
level; designated driveways would provide ingress and egress for
residential and commercial parking and would be located along
South Citrus Avenue; the Project would also provide 164 bicycle
spaces (143 longterm and 21 shortterm); for the properties located
at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard, 671677 South Highland Avenue, and
668 South Citrus Avenue.
Applicant: Wilshire Springs, LLC
Friday Representative: Jamie Poster
- September and -Jon Meyer, Craig Lawson
16, 2022 PAGE& Co.,
9 LLC
level, and 30 commercial parking spaces located on the ground
level; designated driveways would provide ingress and egress for
residential and commercial parking and would be located along
South Citrus Avenue; the Project would also provide 164 bicycle
spaces (143 longterm and 21 shortterm); for the properties located
at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard, 671677 South Highland Avenue, and
668 South Citrus Avenue.
Applicant: Wilshire Springs, LLC
Representative: Jamie Poster and Jon Meyer, Craig Lawson & Co., LLC
Case Nos. DIR20213324CLQ, DIR20213326TOCSPRVHCA, and
VTT83358CN
Environmental No. ENV20213327SCEA
*JOURNAL CORRECTION
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr. (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Raman,
Rodriguez (4)
Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held (10 Votes Required for Consideration)
(7) 191134S1
CD 4 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to the case
entitled Sunshine Hill Residents Association v. City of Los Angeles, Los
Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 20STCP03910 (Writ Action)
regarding the City’s approval of a Notice of Exemption (NOE) for a single
family residential project’s compliance of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) for property located at at 11472 West Laurelcrest
Drive, Los Angeles, CA 91605 (Project).
Recommendation for Council action:
VACATE the Council’s November 24, 2020, action approving the
Project’s CEQA NOE.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
completed a financial analysis of this report.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 10
Recommendation for Council action:
VACATE the Council’s November 24, 2020, action approving the
Project’s CEQA NOE.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
completed a financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(Public Works Committee waived consideration of the above
matter)
Adopted Item
Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee,
Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz,
Rodriguez (3)
Items Called Special
Motions for Posting and Referral
Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings
Adjourning Motions
Council Adjournment
ENDING ROLL CALL
Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, HarrisDawson, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr.,
Raman (12); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Rodriguez (3)
Whereupon the Council did adjourn.
ATTEST: Holly L. Wolcott, CITY CLERK
By
Council Clerk PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 11
COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS
MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Cedillo De Leon Fernando Valenzuela Day
Buscaino Bonin Amy Gebert
Martinez Lee Sergeant 1 Timothy Jones
Martinez Lee Detective II Martinez
Harris-Dawson Bonin Ana M. Figueroa
De Leon O’Farrell National Recovery Month
2022
ADJOURNING MOTIONS
MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Buscaino All Councilmembers Katy Carlson
Agenda
AGENDA
LOS ANGELES CITY
COUNCIL
Friday, September 16, 2022
10:00 AM
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER
ROOM 340, CITY HALL
200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012
Submit written comment at
LACouncilComment.com
President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
MARQUEECE HARRISDAWSON, Eighth District
Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District
MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings
The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621
CITY (Metro), (818) 9049450 (Valley), (310) 471CITY (Westside), and (310) 547CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.
Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings inperson. Live, oral public comment will be taken inperson,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid19
vaccination or of a negative Covid19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
Friday
purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a - September
printed document,16, 2022
email, or -text message displayed on a
PAGE 1 from a test
phone
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings
The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621
CITY (Metro), (818) 9049450 (Valley), (310) 471CITY (Westside), and (310) 547CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.
Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings inperson. Live, oral public comment will be taken inperson,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid19
vaccination or of a negative Covid19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be
submitted at LACouncilComment.com.
Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 9781133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.
Telecommunication Relay Services
Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in
technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing,
and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peertopeer and thirdparty telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications.
Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place
and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories
for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers generally telephone companies are compensated for the costs of
providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.
What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIYBased TRS; SpeechtoSpeech Relay Service; Shared NonEnglish
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunicationsrelayservicetrs.
Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is
the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a
person who is deaf, hardofhearing, or has a speech disability.
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.
SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES
AGENDAS The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 2
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.
SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES
AGENDAS The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a twothirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an
Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special"
by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda
have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak
on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.
The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The
Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If
anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by
Council with one roll call vote.
PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for
which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda
Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute
per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a
reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.
The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to
one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not
discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.
If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the SergeantAtArms with
35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.
NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 3
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.
NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 4
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
RULE 16 MOTIONS Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Friday, September 16, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 10:00 AM
Roll Call
Approval of the Minutes
Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations
Multiple Agenda Item Comment
Public Testimony of Nonagenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council
Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held
(1) 220800
CD 10 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE
REPORT relative to initiating consideration of a Community Plan
Implementation Overlay (CPIO) Amendment and accompanying Height
District Change for the property located at 5741 West Jefferson Boulevard
and 3336 3348 South La Cienega Place.
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Wesson
HarrisDawson):
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 5
1. INITIATE consideration of a CPIO Amendment and accompanying
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
RULE 16 MOTIONS Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Friday, September 16, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 10:00 AM
Roll Call
Approval of the Minutes
Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations
Multiple Agenda Item Comment
Public Testimony of Nonagenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council
Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held
(1) 220800
CD 10 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE
REPORT relative to initiating consideration of a Community Plan
Implementation Overlay (CPIO) Amendment and accompanying Height
District Change for the property located at 5741 West Jefferson Boulevard
and 3336 3348 South La Cienega Place.
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Wesson
HarrisDawson):
1. INITIATE consideration of a CPIO Amendment and accompanying
Height District Change for the property located at 5741 West
Jefferson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90016, and 3336 3348
South La Cienega Place, Los Angeles, CA 90016.
2. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to expeditiously
process the CPIO Amendment and Height District Change for the
property to permit the continuation and modernization of this
community resource and to address the evolving needs of this
transitoriented area.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 6
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
2. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to expeditiously
process the CPIO Amendment and Height District Change for the
property to permit the continuation and modernization of this
community resource and to address the evolving needs of this
transitoriented area.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(2) 220023
CD 13 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND), MITIGATION
MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMP) and
RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
FINDINGS; and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an appeal filed for Conditional Use
Permits, a Specific Plan Exception, and a Project Permit Compliance, for
the property located at 1530 North Western Avenue (15241530 North
Western Avenue and 5446 West Harold Way).
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
OF THE MAYOR:
1. FIND, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b), after
consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the
MND, No. ENV20194339MND, as circulated on August 19, 2021,
and all comments received, with the imposition of mitigation
measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have
a significant effect on the environment; FIND, the MND reflects the
independent judgment and analysis of the City; FIND, the Mitigation
Measures have been made enforceable conditions on the project;
and, ADOPT the MND and the MMP prepared for the MND.
2. ADOPT the REVISED FINDINGS of the Central Los Angeles Area
Planning Commission (CLAAPC), dated March 4, 2022, as the
Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Doug Haines, joint with
La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the CLAAPC in approving: 1) a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a hotel within 500 feet from a
Residential Zone; 2) a Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale and
dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for onsite
consumption within 36 hotel rooms (minibars) and a rooftop
bar/lounge; 3) a Specific Plan Exception from Section 9.A.1 of the
Vermont/Western Station Neighborhood Area Plan to allow
commercial uses above the groundfloor and from Section 9.C of
the Vermont/Western to allow the proposed building to exceed the
Friday - September
Transitional Height16, 2022
limits - project abutting a Subarea
for a PAGE 7A lot; and,
La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the CLAAPC in approving: 1) a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a hotel within 500 feet from a
Residential Zone; 2) a Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale and
dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for onsite
consumption within 36 hotel rooms (minibars) and a rooftop
bar/lounge; 3) a Specific Plan Exception from Section 9.A.1 of the
Vermont/Western Station Neighborhood Area Plan to allow
commercial uses above the groundfloor and from Section 9.C of
the Vermont/Western to allow the proposed building to exceed the
Transitional Height limits for a project abutting a Subarea A lot; and,
4) a Project Permit Compliance to allow for the demolition of an
existing twostory duplex and surface parking lot, and the
construction, use, and maintenance of a new fourstory (60foot),
mixeduse boutique hotel with 36 guest rooms, 10 residential
apartment units, and an atgrade parking level with one
subterranean level, the project will reserve two units as affordable
including one Very Low Income Household unit and one Low Income
Household unit, it will include 47 overall parking spaces with a
maximum of 12 residential parking spaces (including two guest
spaces) designated for the proposed apartments, 24 bicycle
parking spaces, and 1,343 square feet of open space, the site is
located on a 14,478 squarefoot lot that would include 26,080
square feet of total floor area with a Floor Area Ratio of 1.8:1, there
are four existing trees on the site, which are all unprotected fruit
trees that would be removed as part of the project scope; for the
property located at 1530 North Western Avenue (15241530 North
Western Avenue and 5446 West Harold Way), subject to Conditions
of Approval.
Applicant: Phil Patel
Representative: Eric Lieberman, QES, Inc.
Case No. APCC20194338SPECUCUBSPP1A
Environmental No. ENV20194339MND
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CLAAPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(3) 220750
CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal filed for the property located at
603, 603 ½, and 605 South Mariposa Avenue.
Recommendations for Council action:
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 8
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
(3) 220750
CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal filed for the property located at
603, 603 ½, and 605 South Mariposa Avenue.
Recommendations for Council action:
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
Section 15332, Article 19, Class 32, and there is no substantial
evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Central Los Angeles Area Planning
Commission (CLAAPC) as the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the CLAAPC, in approving a
Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for a
proposed Tier 4 Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing
project involving the construction, use, and maintenance of a new
eightstory multifamily development, containing a total of 92
dwelling units, with 11 proposed dwelling units reserved for
Extremely Low Income Households, the proposed development will
contain approximately 43,818 square feet of floor area, provides a
total of 6,900 square feet of open space; for the property located at
603, 603 ½, and 605 South Mariposa Avenue.
Applicant: Kayte Edson, 603 South Mariposa QOZB, LLC
Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
Case: DIR20219072TOCSPRHCA1A
Environmental No.: ENV20219073CE1A
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CLAAPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(4) 220875
CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the property located at
Friday 1037 South -Dewey
September
Avenue16,(10311043
2022 - PAGE 9
South Dewey Avenue).
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CLAAPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(4) 220875
CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the property located at
1037 South Dewey Avenue (10311043 South Dewey Avenue).
Recommendations for Council action:
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
Article 19, Section 15332, Class 32, and there is no substantial
evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning (DCP) as
the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and THEREBY
SUSTAIN the determination of the Director of Planning, in approving
a Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for the
construction, use and maintenance of a 56,112 square foot, 60unit
residential development including six dwelling units set aside for
affordable housing (or 10 percent of the proposed density) reserved
for Extremely Low Income Households TransitOriented
Communities project, for the property located at 1037 South Dewey
Avenue (1031 – 1043 South Dewey Avenue).
Applicant: Henry Fan, URSA 1037 Dewey Ave., LLC
Representative: Patrick Jen
Case: DIR2022756TOCHCA
Environmental No. ENV2022757CE1A
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(5) 220468
Friday
CD 13 - September
CATEGORICAL 16, 2022 -and PLANNING AND
EXEMPTION PAGELAND
10 USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Appeals filed for
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(5) 220468
CD 13 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Appeals filed for
Conditional Use Permits and a Site Plan Review for the property located at
3209 3227 West Sunset Boulevard.
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
OF THE MAYOR:
1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, Article 19,
Class 32, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that
an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.
3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEALS filed by Nicole Antoine and
David Richardson, and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of
the LACPC in approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow a
Density Bonus for a housing development project in which the
density increase is greater than otherwise permitted by Los Angeles
Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.22 A.25; approving a
Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 W.1 for
the sales and dispensing of a fullline of alcoholic beverages for on
and offsite consumption for two establishments; and, approving a
Site Plan Review for a project that results in an increase of 50 or
more dwelling units; for the demolition of an existing one and two
story auto shop with an adjoining surface level parking lot and the
construction, use, and maintenance of a new 84,662 squarefoot,
sevenstory mixeduse residential development consisting of 86
residential units (with 10 units reserved for Very LowIncome
Households), the project proposes to include a total 69 parking
spaces within an at grade parking garage; for the property located
at 3209 3227 West Sunset Boulevard, subject to Conditions of
Approval.
Applicant: Sunset TwinsHH, LLC c/o Daniel Neman
Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 11
Case No. CPC20212035DBCUCUBSPRHCA1A
sevenstory mixeduse residential development consisting of 86
residential units (with 10 units reserved for Very LowIncome
Households), the project proposes to include a total 69 parking
spaces within an at grade parking garage; for the property located
at 3209 3227 West Sunset Boulevard, subject to Conditions of
Approval.
Applicant: Sunset TwinsHH, LLC c/o Daniel Neman
Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
Case No. CPC20212035DBCUCUBSPRHCA1A
Environmental No. ENV20212036CE
Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(6) 220453
CD 5 SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
(SCEA), ERRATA, MITIGATION MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM (MMP), and RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS; and
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
relative to a SCEA request for the future development of the proposed
5001 Wilshire Project (Project), for the properties located at 5001 Wilshire
Boulevard, 671677 South Highland Avenue, and 668 South Citrus Avenue.
Recommendations for Council action:
1. FIND, pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC), Section 21155.2,
after consideration of the whole of the administrative record,
including the SB 375 SCEA, ENV20213327SCEA, and all
comments received, after imposition of all mitigation measures, that:
a. There is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
b. The City Council held a hearing on September 6, 2022 for
adoption of the SCEA pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b)(6).
c. The Project is a transit priority project pursuant to PRC
Section 21155, and the Project has incorporated all
feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or
criteria set forth in prior Environmental Impact Report(s) (EIR),
including the 20202045 Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Program
EIR, SCH No. 2019011061.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 12
b. The City Council held a hearing on September 6, 2022 for
adoption of the SCEA pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b)(6).
c. The Project is a transit priority project pursuant to PRC
Section 21155, and the Project has incorporated all
feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or
criteria set forth in prior Environmental Impact Report(s) (EIR),
including the 20202045 Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Program
EIR, SCH No. 2019011061.
d. All potentially significant effects required to be identified in the
initial study have been identified and analyzed in the SCEA.
e. With respect to each significant effect on the environment
required to be identified in the initial study for the SCEA,
changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated
into the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to
a level of insignificance or those changes or alterations are
within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted
by that other agency.
f. The SCEA reflects the independent judgment and analysis of
the City.
g. The mitigation measures have been made enforceable
conditions on the Project.
2. FIND that the Project complies with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act for using the SCEA as
authorized pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b).
3. ADOPT, pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2, the SCEA and the
MMP prepared for the SCEA, for a proposed demolition of the
existing twostory commercial building and surface parking lots to
develop an eightstory mixeduse building with 242 residential
dwelling units and 10,900 square feet of commercial space fronting
Wilshire Boulevard; the Project would set aside 25 dwelling units for
Extremely Low Income Households; the Project would encompass a
total floor area of 260,000 square feet resulting in a Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) of 3.54:1 and would have a maximum building height of
105 feet; the northern lots and Carling Way (which would be merged
into the Project Site through Case No. VTT83358CN) would be
redeveloped into a 16,822 squarefoot green belt that would be
utilized as a publiclyaccessible common open space; the Project
would provide 26,350 square feet of open space which includes the
green belt, a courtyard, roof deck, private balconies, and amenity
rooms; the Project would comprise of 293 residential parking
Friday spaces located within
- September 16,two
2022subterranean
- levels andPAGE
one abovegrade
13
level, and 30 commercial parking spaces located on the ground
Extremely Low Income Households; the Project would encompass a
total floor area of 260,000 square feet resulting in a Floor Area
Ratio (FAR) of 3.54:1 and would have a maximum building height of
105 feet; the northern lots and Carling Way (which would be merged
into the Project Site through Case No. VTT83358CN) would be
redeveloped into a 16,822 squarefoot green belt that would be
utilized as a publiclyaccessible common open space; the Project
would provide 26,350 square feet of open space which includes the
green belt, a courtyard, roof deck, private balconies, and amenity
rooms; the Project would comprise of 293 residential parking
spaces located within two subterranean levels and one abovegrade
level, and 30 commercial parking spaces located on the ground
level; designated driveways would provide ingress and egress for
residential and commercial parking and would be located along
South Citrus Avenue; the Project would also provide 164 bicycle
spaces (143 longterm and 21 shortterm); for the properties located
at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard, 671677 South Highland Avenue, and
668 South Citrus Avenue.
Applicant: Wilshire Springs, LLC
Representative: Jamie Poster and Jon Meyer, Craig Lawson & Co., LLC
Case Nos. DIR20213324CLQ, DIR20213326TOCSPRVHCA, and
VTT83358CN
Environmental No. ENV20213327SCEA
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held (10 Votes Required for Consideration)
(7) 191134S1
CD 4 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to the case
entitled Sunshine Hill Residents Association v. City of Los Angeles, Los
Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 20STCP03910 (Writ Action)
regarding the City’s approval of a Notice of Exemption (NOE) for a single
family residential project’s compliance of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) for property located at at 11472 West Laurelcrest
Drive, Los Angeles, CA 91605 (Project).
Recommendation for Council action:
VACATE the Council’s November 24, 2020, action approving the
Project’s CEQA NOE.
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 14
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
regarding the City’s approval of a Notice of Exemption (NOE) for a single
family residential project’s compliance of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) for property located at at 11472 West Laurelcrest
Drive, Los Angeles, CA 91605 (Project).
Recommendation for Council action:
VACATE the Council’s November 24, 2020, action approving the
Project’s CEQA NOE.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
completed a financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
(Public Works Committee waived consideration of the above
matter)
Items Called Special
Motions for Posting and Referral
Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings
Adjourning Motions
Council Adjournment
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.
Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 000000).
Friday - September 16, 2022 - PAGE 15