City Council Meeting

AGENDA LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL Friday, September 30, 2022 10:00 AM JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19 vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any Friday purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a - September printed document,30, 2022 email, or -text message displayed on a PAGE 1 from a test phone provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,  MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19 vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives, indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com. Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below. Telecommunication Relay Services Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user. What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs. Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability. For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com. Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 2 Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com. Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held. The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote. PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting. The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment. If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 3 information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 4 When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Friday, September 30, 2022 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (1) 21­1419 CD 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a Third Amendment to a Development Agreement for the property located in the Wilshire Community Plan at 8700 Beverly Boulevard (8575 West 3rd Street; 8723 West Alden Drive; 8660 – 8730 West Beverly Boulevard; 110 North George Burns Road; 103 – 139 South George Burns Road; 8705 – 8750 West Gracie Allen Drive; 111 North San Vicente Boulevard). Friday - September Recommendations 30, 2022 for Council - action, PAGE SUBJECT TO THE 5 APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:​ motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Friday, September 30, 2022 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (1) 21­1419 CD 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a Third Amendment to a Development Agreement for the property located in the Wilshire Community Plan at 8700 Beverly Boulevard (8575 West 3rd Street; 8723 West Alden Drive; 8660 – 8730 West Beverly Boulevard; 110 North George Burns Road; 103 – 139 South George Burns Road; 8705 – 8750 West Gracie Allen Drive; 111 North San Vicente Boulevard). Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:​ 1. FIND that based on the whole of the administrative record, the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15302, Class 2, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies. 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated April 20, 2022, authorizing the execution of a Third Amendment to Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 6 Development Agreement by and between the City of Los Angeles  pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15302, Class 2, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies. 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated April 20, 2022, authorizing the execution of a Third Amendment to Development Agreement by and between the City of Los Angeles and Cedars­Sinai Medical Center relating to real property in the Wilshire Community Plan area, to incorporate the addition of a new 405,000 square­foot hospital wing with 203 inpatient beds pursuant to California’s Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act, which requires that, by 2030, all acute care hospitals in California be able to withstand a major earthquake and remain functioning, the term of the development agreement will also be extended to August 11, 2038, to allow for this expansion, for the property located in the Wilshire Community Plan at 8700 Beverly Boulevard (8575 West 3rd Street; 8723 West Alden Drive; 8660 – 8730 West Beverly Boulevard; 110 North George Burns Road; 103 – 139 South George Burns Road; 8705 – 8750 West Gracie Allen Drive; 111 North San Vicente Boulevard). Applicant: Richard B. Jacobs, Cedars­Sinai Medical Center Representative: Jeffrey Haber and Michael Nytzen, Paul Hastings LLP Case No. CPC­2008­619­ZC­DA­M1 Environmental No. ENV­2021­3513­CE Related Case: CPC­2021­3512­VZC­VCU Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (2) 21­0890 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to various presentations from appropriate City departments regarding the Electric Vehicle (EV) Master Plan. Recommendations for Council action: 1. NOTE and FILE the September 13, 2022 Bureau of Street Services (BSS) and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) reports; and, the September 8, 2022 Department of General Friday - September Services (GSD) and30, 2022 - September PAGE 9, 2022 Department of 7 Recreation and Parks (RAP) reports, relative to the EV Master Plan.  ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to various presentations from appropriate City departments regarding the Electric Vehicle (EV) Master Plan. Recommendations for Council action: 1. NOTE and FILE the September 13, 2022 Bureau of Street Services (BSS) and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) reports; and, the September 8, 2022 Department of General Services (GSD) and September 9, 2022 Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) reports, relative to the EV Master Plan. 2. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Fire Department, Los Angeles Police Department, GSD, and the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with the assistance of the RAP, Bureau of Sanitation, BSS, and Department of Transportation, to review proposed Municipal Improvement Corporation of Los Angeles vehicle purchases scheduled within the Fiscal Year 2022­23 budget, and identify fossil fuel vehicles that should instead be electric and or carbon free. 3. INSTRUCT the Information Technology Agency to report in the next EV Master Plan update, in coordination with the GSD, on the communication technology needs for EV adoption. 4. INSTRUCT the GSD, with the assistance of the CAO and Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to include in the next EV Master Plan update background on all other client departments, including updates from the four largest fleets, and that the report should include details on vehicle leasing as well as purchases. 5. INSTRUCT the GSD, Bureau of Engineering, and LADWP to include in the next update, details on electrical load and infrastructure needs related to EV infrastructure adoption. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report Community Impact Statement: None submitted (3) 21­0352 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Strategic Long Term Resource Plan that achieves 100 percent carbon­free energy by 2035; and related matters. Recommendations for Council action: Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 8 1. NOTE and FILE the August 25, 2022 Los Angeles Department of (3) 21­0352 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Strategic Long Term Resource Plan that achieves 100 percent carbon­free energy by 2035; and related matters. Recommendations for Council action: 1. NOTE and FILE the August 25, 2022 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) report relative to the Strategic Long Term Resource Plan that achieves 100 percent carbon­free energy by 2035. 2. REQUEST the LADWP to: a. Report in six months from September 1, 2022, to the Energy Climate Change, Environmental Justice, and River Committee with an updated report card, including the following components: a visualization of a 365 days a year, each day of the calendar year, Renewable Portfolio Standard data, in order to clearly communicate to the public the City’s renewable energy mix in an online interactive manner, easily accessible via personal computer or cellular phone. b. Discuss and collaborate with environmental advocacy and environmental justice partners, such as but not limited to the Sierra Club, Physicians for Social Responsibility Los Angeles, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Locals 18 and 11; and, to include comment and suggestions on the next report card. c. Report and present their findings and recommendations at the conclusion of the LADWP’s Strategic Long Term Resource Plan. Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (4) 19­0775 CDs 1, 2, 5, 13, 14ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility of reinstituting the Illegal Dumping Reward Program and its inclusion in the Livability Services efforts to mitigate illegal dumping. Friday Recommendations for Council - September action, 30, 2022 - SUBJECT TO THE PAGEAPPROVAL 9 OF THE MAYOR:  Community Impact Statement: None submitted (4) 19­0775 CDs 1, 2, 5, 13, 14ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility of reinstituting the Illegal Dumping Reward Program and its inclusion in the Livability Services efforts to mitigate illegal dumping. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance to amend Section 1, Article 2.1 of Chapter 12 of Division 19 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, titled Illegal Dumping Reward Program, to implement the following changes to the program: a. Establish a tiered reward system based upon the following categories: i. If there is not enough evidence to proceed with an enforcement action or the enforcement action is unsuccessful, a person/witness is not eligible to receive a reward. ii. If the enforcement action is an uncontested conviction, but the City receives no monies before forwarding the matter to Collections, the person/witness may receive a nominal reward payment of $25. iii. If the infraction citation results in a conviction and the City collects any monies, the person/witness may receive a nominal reward payment of $50 or half of all monies collected capped at a maximum total amount of $500, whichever is greater. iv. If the misdemeanor or felony enforcement action results in a conviction and the City collects any monies, the person/witness may receive a nominal reward amount of $100 or half of all monies collected capped at a maximum total amount of $1,000, whichever is greater. v. Authorize the Board of Public Works to be designated to administer the nominal amounts for the illegal dumping reward program. All other reward amounts must continue to be authorized and approved by the City Council. b. Allow the collected funds to be utilized for community Friday - September beautification,30, 2022 - public improvements, rewardPAGE 10 public payments, outreach, and to support enforcement efforts, with 10 percent  $100 or half of all monies collected capped at a maximum total amount of $1,000, whichever is greater. v. Authorize the Board of Public Works to be designated to administer the nominal amounts for the illegal dumping reward program. All other reward amounts must continue to be authorized and approved by the City Council. b. Allow the collected funds to be utilized for community beautification, public improvements, reward payments, public outreach, and to support enforcement efforts, with 10 percent of the collected funds to be apportioned by Council District. c. Allow the applicant to provide contact information on the reward application form that does not include a home address. 2. REQUEST the Controller, and INSTRUCT the City Clerk and applicable City departments to allow the Illegal Dumping Enforcement Program fund to accept funds from the Los Angeles Superior Court from adjudicated cases to support the reward program. 3. DIRECT the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) to evaluate and implement a public outreach campaign and include information about the Illegal Dumping Reward Program in all appropriate community outreach, social media, and other notices to the community to provide awareness of the program and encourage participation, subject to available funding. 4. PROVIDE $20,000 in funding to the Illegal Dumping Reward Program and Trust Fund to provide initial funding for payment of rewards and public outreach. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the BOS. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (5) 22­0650 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to instructing City departments who engage with trees to report on the best practices for long­term tree maintenance and cost impact analysis due to water scarcity. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Blumenfield ­ Friday Koretz ­ - September Krekorian 30, 2022 - ­ O’Farrell): PAGE 11  Community Impact Statement: None submitted (5) 22­0650 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to instructing City departments who engage with trees to report on the best practices for long­term tree maintenance and cost impact analysis due to water scarcity. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Blumenfield ­ Koretz ­ Krekorian ­ O’Farrell): 1. INSTRUCT the City’s Chief Forest Officer to partner with Bureau of Street Services, Urban Forestry Division, the Department of Recreation and Parks, Bureau of Sanitation and its Biodiversity Expert panel, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), and other City departments who engage with trees, to report on: a. Best practices for the long­term maintenance of the City’s street trees and trees in City parks in light of persistent and worsening water scarcity conditions. b. A cost impact analysis of City trees that are lost due to water scarcity conditions. c. A proactive strategy to mitigate heat impacts on the City’s trees, including but not limited to an updated planting schedule, prioritizing the receipt of tree planting in­lieu fees during sub­optimal planting seasons, mulching, holistic organics­first integrated pest management and disease prevention strategies, and prohibiting the trimming of live growth, except to address public safety issues. d. A concerted plan to address tree maintenance at public facilities (i.e. public housing facilities and parks) that are relied upon for cooling, recreation and enjoyment, and where trees in our region have the opportunity to grow the largest and provide the most benefits. e. On the feasibility of developing a robust outreach and education campaign to encourage City residents to responsibly and appropriately maintain trees on private property. 2. REQUEST the LADWP to report on a public messaging strategy emphasizing that the City is in a new era of long­term “water scarcity” and should plan accordingly for future scarcity exacerbated by an unpredictable heating climate. Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 12  e. On the feasibility of developing a robust outreach and education campaign to encourage City residents to responsibly and appropriately maintain trees on private property. 2. REQUEST the LADWP to report on a public messaging strategy emphasizing that the City is in a new era of long­term “water scarcity” and should plan accordingly for future scarcity exacerbated by an unpredictable heating climate. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Chatsworth Neighborhood Council Westside Neighborhood Council Reseda Neighborhood Council (6) 22­0947 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Inflation Reduction Act and funding opportunities for Climate Policy goals, and analysis of impacts to current policies and initiatives towards LA100 and all related carbon free initiatives. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (O'Farrell ­ Martinez ­ Krekorian ­ Price): 1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) to report on the Inflation Reduction Act, with recommendations for City departments to maximize funding opportunities that further Climate Policy goals aimed at eliminating greenhouse gasses, adopting renewable technology, and creating a carbon free city. 2. REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power to report with an analysis on the impacts to current policies and initiatives towards LA100 and all related carbon free initiatives, including incentives, including recommendations to greatly enhance residential and commercial incentives. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 13 For: Westside Neighborhood Council  initiatives towards LA100 and all related carbon free initiatives, including incentives, including recommendations to greatly enhance residential and commercial incentives. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Westside Neighborhood Council (7) 22­0574 CD 11 SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SCEA), MITIGATION MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMP), RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS, and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a SCEA request for the future development of the proposed 6521 South Sepulveda Boulevard Project (Project), for the properties located at 6501­6521 South Sepulveda Boulevard and 6502­6520 South Arizona Avenue. Recommendations for Council action:​ 1. FIND, pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC), Section 21155.2, after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the SB 375 SCEA, ENV­2021­4938­SCEA, and all comments received, after imposition of all mitigation measures, that: a. There is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment. b. The City Council held a hearing on September 20, 2022 for adoption of the SCEA pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b)(6). c. The Project is a transit priority project pursuant to PRC Section 21155, and the Project has incorporated all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in prior Environmental Impact Report(s) (EIR), including the 2020­2045 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Program EIR, SCH No. 2019011061. d. All potentially significant effects required to be identified in the initial study have been identified and analyzed in the SCEA. e. With respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the initial study for the SCEA, Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 14 changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated  criteria set forth in prior Environmental Impact Report(s) (EIR), including the 2020­2045 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Program EIR, SCH No. 2019011061. d. All potentially significant effects required to be identified in the initial study have been identified and analyzed in the SCEA. e. With respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the initial study for the SCEA, changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance or those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. f. The SCEA reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City. g. The mitigation measures have been made enforceable conditions on the Project. 2. FIND that the Project complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for using the SCEA as authorized pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b). 3. ADOPT, pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2, the SCEA and the MMP prepared for the SCEA, for the proposed demolition and removal of all existing structures from the project site, with the exception of the existing Dinah’s Family Restaurant building on the project site (that would be preserved and renovated in place) and some existing signage, and development of the site with an eight­ story, 362­unit multi­family residential building, with approximately 3,700 square feet of ground­floor restaurant space fronting Sepulveda Boulevard, of the 362 proposed units, 41 would be restricted to Very Low Income households, the proposed new building would total approximately 365,623 square feet, which along with the existing Dinah’s Family Restaurant, would result in a floor area ratio of 3.85:1, would reach 96 feet and 4 inches in height as measured to the top of the elevator structure, and, would require the export of approximately 30,000 cubic yards of soil; for the properties located at 6501­6521 South Sepulveda Boulevard and 6502 ­ 6520 South Arizona Avenue. ​​​​​​​Applicant: Ed McCoy, FRH Realty, LLC Representative: Jonathan Lonner, Burns & Bouchard, Inc. Case No. CPC­2021­4937­CU­DB­SPR­WDI­HCA Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 15 ​​​​​​​Environmental No. ENV­2021­4938­SCEA  measured to the top of the elevator structure, and, would require the export of approximately 30,000 cubic yards of soil; for the properties located at 6501­6521 South Sepulveda Boulevard and 6502 ­ 6520 South Arizona Avenue. ​​​​​​​Applicant: Ed McCoy, FRH Realty, LLC Representative: Jonathan Lonner, Burns & Bouchard, Inc. Case No. CPC­2021­4937­CU­DB­SPR­WDI­HCA ​​​​​​​Environmental No. ENV­2021­4938­SCEA Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For if Amended: Neighborhood Council of Westchester Playa (8) 18­1101 CD 5 NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to amendments to the Westwood Village Specific Plan and the Westwood Design Review Board Specific Plan. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:​ 1. FIND, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the Negative Declaration, No. ENV­ 2021­815­ND and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; FIND that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; and, ADOPT the Negative Declaration. 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC), as set forth in the LACPC report dated March 1, 2022 in the Council file, as the Findings of Council. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated September 14, 2022, amending the Westwood Village Specific Plan, established by Ordinance No. 164,305 and amended by Ordinance Nos. 167,407 and 176,177, and amending the Westwood Design Review Board Specific Plan established by Ordinance No. 163,204. Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 16  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC), as set forth in the LACPC report dated March 1, 2022 in the Council file, as the Findings of Council. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated September 14, 2022, amending the Westwood Village Specific Plan, established by Ordinance No. 164,305 and amended by Ordinance Nos. 167,407 and 176,177, and amending the Westwood Design Review Board Specific Plan established by Ordinance No. 163,204. Applicant: City of Los Angeles Case No. CPC­2021­795­SP Environmental No. ENV­2021­815­ND Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney nor the LACPC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes Against unless Amended: Westwood Neighborhood Council For: North Westwood Neighborhood Council Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration) (9) 22­1030 CD 13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR, ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to setting the operating hours for Silver Lake Meadows Park, located at 2543 Armstrong Avenue, to open at Sunrise and close at Sunset. Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (O'Farrell ­ Lee): 1. ESTABLISH the hours of operation at Silver Lake Meadows Park, located at 2543 Armstrong Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90039 in Council District 13, as opening at Sunrise and closing at Sunset. 2. INSTRUCT the Department of Recreation and Parks to prominently post the aforementioned hours at Silver Lake Meadows Park. 3. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance to add Silver Lake Meadows to the list of parks closed at various times, as specified in the Los Angeles Municipal Code Section Friday 63.44.- September 30, 2022 - PAGE 17  located at 2543 Armstrong Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90039 in Council District 13, as opening at Sunrise and closing at Sunset. 2. INSTRUCT the Department of Recreation and Parks to prominently post the aforementioned hours at Silver Lake Meadows Park. 3. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance to add Silver Lake Meadows to the list of parks closed at various times, as specified in the Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 63.44. 4. REQUEST the Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners to concur with the above recommendations. 5. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Park Rangers to enforce the new park hours at Silver Lake Meadows park. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (10) 22­0497 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR, ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE relative to the Older Adults Recovery and Resilience (OARR) grant funds from the California Department of Aging (CDA), and Standard Agreement IF­2223­25. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Aging (Aging), or designee, to: a. Accept the CDA OARR funds; to execute Standard Agreement IF­2223­25 and any unilateral amendments to the subgrant agreement, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, and in compliance with Los Angeles Administrative Code Section14.8 et seq. (City grant regulations); and, to authorize the proposed OARR IF­2223­25 Budget upon approval by the CDA. b. Negotiate and execute agreements and amendments to agreements with public, private, nonprofit, and/or governmental entities with funds awarded as identified in Attachment I of the Service Provider Funding Allocation detailed in the September 6, 2022 Report from Aging, attached to the Council file. c. Prepare Controller's instructions and any necessary technical Friday -adjustments September 30, that2022 - are consistent PAGEand with the Mayor 18 Council  Budget upon approval by the CDA. b. Negotiate and execute agreements and amendments to agreements with public, private, nonprofit, and/or governmental entities with funds awarded as identified in Attachment I of the Service Provider Funding Allocation detailed in the September 6, 2022 Report from Aging, attached to the Council file. c. Prepare Controller's instructions and any necessary technical adjustments that are consistent with the Mayor and Council actions on this matter, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer, and, authorize the Controller to implement those instructions. 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to: a. Establish new accounts and appropriate funds for the OARR Plan within the Area Plan for the Aging Title III Fund Number 395 as follows: Account Title Amount 02W102 Aging $401,354 02WAF1 Sr. Legal Services – OARR $1,571,591 02WAF2 C1­OARR $310,683 02WAF4 C2­OARR $1,040,112 02WAF12 Home Fall Prevention $531,900 02WAF9 Family Caregiver – OARR $157,940 Total: $4,013,580 b. Increase appropriation within Fund No. 100/02, and transfer funds on an as­needed basis as follows: Fund Account Title Amount From: 395 02W102 Aging $401,354 To: 100/02 001010 Salaries General $401,354 c. Expend funds upon proper demand of the General Manager, Aging, or designee. Fiscal Impact Statement: Aging reports that the proposed action involves the allocation of OARR Grant funding from the CDA. There is no additional impact to the City General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 19  c. Expend funds upon proper demand of the General Manager, Aging, or designee. Fiscal Impact Statement: Aging reports that the proposed action involves the allocation of OARR Grant funding from the CDA. There is no additional impact to the City General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (11) 22­1025 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR, ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE relative to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP­Ed) Grant funds from the California Department of Aging (CDA) for Fiscal Year 2022­ 23. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Aging (Aging), or designee, to: a. Accept the CDA SNAP­Ed funds; to execute Standard Agreement SP­2223­25 and any unilateral amendments to the subgrant agreement, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, and in compliance with Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 14.8 et seq. (City grant regulations); and, to authorize the proposed SNAP­Ed SP­ 2223­25 Budget upon approval by the CDA. b. Negotiate and execute agreements and amendments to agreements with public, private, nonprofit, and/or governmental entities with funds awarded to Consulting Nutritional Services (CNS) for Fiscal Year 2022­23. c. Prepare Controller’s instructions for any technical adjustments, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, authorize the Controller to implement the instructions. 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to: a. Establish new account and appropriate $239,614 within the Fund 57E, Titled Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Prog­ Education as follows: Fund Account Title Amount 57E 02W99M SNAP­Ed $239,614 Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 20  authorize the Controller to implement the instructions. 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to: a. Establish new account and appropriate $239,614 within the Fund 57E, Titled Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Prog­ Education as follows: Fund Account Title Amount 57E 02W99M SNAP­Ed $239,614 b. Expend funds upon proper demand of the General Manager, Aging, or designee. Fiscal Impact Statement: Aging reports that the proposed action involves the allocation of the SNAP­Ed Grant Program funded by the CDA. There is no additional impact to the City General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (12) 22­1040 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR, ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE relative to the Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Senior Infrastructure Grant from the California Department of Aging (CDA). Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Aging (Aging), or designee, to: a. Accept the CDA HCBS funds; to execute Standard Agreement NI­ 2223­25 and any unilateral amendments to the subgrant agreement, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, and in compliance with Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 14.8 et seq. (City grant regulations); and, to authorize the proposed HCBS NI­2223­25 Budget upon approval by the CDA. b. Negotiate and execute agreements and amendments to agreements with public, private, nonprofit, and/or governmental entities with funds awarded as identified in Table I of the Service Provider Funding Allocation detailed in the September 12, 2022 Report from Aging, attached to the Council file. c. Prepare Controller's instructions for any necessary technical adjustments that are consistent with the Mayor and Council actions on Friday - September this matter, subject to30, the2022 - approval of the City PAGE 21 Officer Administrative (CAO), and authorize the City Controller to implement those  b. Negotiate and execute agreements and amendments to agreements with public, private, nonprofit, and/or governmental entities with funds awarded as identified in Table I of the Service Provider Funding Allocation detailed in the September 12, 2022 Report from Aging, attached to the Council file. c. Prepare Controller's instructions for any necessary technical adjustments that are consistent with the Mayor and Council actions on this matter, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO), and authorize the City Controller to implement those instructions. 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to: a. Establish new accounts and appropriate funds for the OARR Plan within the Area Plan for the Aging Title III Fund Number 395 as follows: Account Title Amount 02W102 Aging $58,300 C1 Nutrition Infrastructure­ 02WA19 $746,504 HCBS C2 Nutrition Infrastructure­ 02WA20 $1,881,601 HCBS b. Increase appropriation within Fund No. 100/02, and transfer funds on an as­needed basis as follows: Fund Account Title Amount From: 395/02 02W102 Aging $58,300 To: 100/02 007300 Furn., Office and Tech Equip. $58,300 c. Expend funds upon proper demand by the General Manager, Aging, or designee. Fiscal Impact Statement: Aging reports that the proposed action involves the allocation of HCBS Nutrition Infrastructure Grant Program under the Mello­Granlund Older California Act. There is no additional impact to the City General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (13) 22­1100­S4 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY CLERK and CITY ATTORNEY, CERTIFICATION OF SUFFICIENCY OF REFERENDUM PETITION, and Friday RESOLUTION relative to30, - September holding 2022 -a Referendary VotePAGE on Ordinance 22 No. 187566 regarding a Minimum Wage for Employees Working at Certain  Mello­Granlund Older California Act. There is no additional impact to the City General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (13) 22­1100­S4 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY CLERK and CITY ATTORNEY, CERTIFICATION OF SUFFICIENCY OF REFERENDUM PETITION, and RESOLUTION relative to holding a Referendary Vote on Ordinance No. 187566 regarding a Minimum Wage for Employees Working at Certain Healthcare Facilities. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that if the City Council chooses to place this measure before the voters at a Special Election, the cost of that Election is estimated to be approximately $19 million (includes both City and County election costs). Placing the referendum on the March 5, 2024 ballot will have zero to minimal costs as there will be funding for measures included in the Fiscal Year 2023­24 Budget. Please note that the County Registrar­Recorder/County Clerk will not have cost estimates or calculators available until approximately three months before an election. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 6, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 4, 2022) MOTION REQUIRED (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter) (14) 22­0002­S120 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (KREKORIAN – O’FARRELL – MARTINEZ – LEE – DE LEON) relative to calling on President Biden and all members of Congress to take meaningful punitive action against the Azeri regime to reign in its violent expansionism, and on the United States and all other democracies to stand with Armenia and suspend all military and economic aid to Azerbaijan. Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR: RESOLVE to: Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 23 a. Call on President Biden and all members of Congress to take  all members of Congress to take meaningful punitive action against the Azeri regime to reign in its violent expansionism, and on the United States and all other democracies to stand with Armenia and suspend all military and economic aid to Azerbaijan. Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR: RESOLVE to: a. Call on President Biden and all members of Congress to take meaningful punitive action against the Azeri regime to reign in its violent expansionism once and for all, including but not limited to discontinuing all sale of arms and other financial and economic assistance to Azerbaijan under Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act. b. Call on the United States and all other democracies to stand with Armenia in its present danger and immediately suspend all military and economic aid to Azerbaijan. c. Call for the United States and all nations who respect democracy and self­determination to extend, at long last, full diplomatic recognition to the Republic of Artsakh as a free, independent and sovereign state, and to demand unequivocally that Azerbaijan must respect the sovereignty of Armenia and discontinue its pattern of aggression, violence and war crimes in the region. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter) (15) 21­0252­S1 CD 6 MOTION (O’FARRELL for MARTINEZ ­ LEE) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $32,997,000 to finance the acquisition, rehabilitation, and development of a 73­unit multifamily housing project known as Luna Vista located at 8767 North Parthenia Place. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. CONSIDER the results of the Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) public hearing held on April 21, 2022 for Luna Vista, attached to the Motion. 2. ADOPT the accompanying TEFRA RESOLUTION approving the Friday - September issuance of bonds 30, in an2022 - amount PAGE 24 for the not to exceed $32,997,000 acquisition, rehabilitation, and development of a 73­unit multifamily  North Parthenia Place. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. CONSIDER the results of the Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) public hearing held on April 21, 2022 for Luna Vista, attached to the Motion. 2. ADOPT the accompanying TEFRA RESOLUTION approving the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $32,997,000 for the acquisition, rehabilitation, and development of a 73­unit multifamily housing project located 8767 North Parthenia Place in Council District 6. (16) 22­1114 CD 6 MOTION (O’FARRELL for MARTINEZ ­ LEE) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $48,000,000 to finance the acquisition and rehabilitation of the 102­unit multifamily housing project known as Vista Terrace located at 8134 and 8146 Van Nuys Boulevard. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. CONSIDER the results of the Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) public hearing held on April 21, 2022, for Vista Terrace, attached to the Motion. 2. ADOPT the accompanying TEFRA RESOLUTION approving the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $48,000,000 for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a 102­unit multifamily housing project located at 38134 and 8146 Van Nuys Blvd in Council District 6. (17) 22­1115 CD 12 MOTION (LEE ­ O’FARRELL) relative to funding for new workstation furniture needed at Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Devonshire Division. Recommendations for Council action: 1. RESOLVE to allocate and appropriate $15,856 in the Sunshine Canyon Community Amenities Trust Fund No. 699/14 to the Supporters Law Enforcement in Devonshire (SOLID) organization in order to help to improve the working conditions of our LAPD officers and to fund new workstation furniture. Friday - September 2. AUTHORIZE 30, 2022 the City Clerk- to make any technical PAGE 25 corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to  Division. Recommendations for Council action: 1. RESOLVE to allocate and appropriate $15,856 in the Sunshine Canyon Community Amenities Trust Fund No. 699/14 to the Supporters Law Enforcement in Devonshire (SOLID) organization in order to help to improve the working conditions of our LAPD officers and to fund new workstation furniture. 2. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any technical corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion. (18) 22­0011­S9 CD 3 MOTION (BLUMENFIELD ­ HARRIS­DAWSON) relative to funding for center median island landscape improvements on Greenbriar Drive in Council District 3. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $15,000 in the Council District 3 portion of the Street Furniture Revenue Fund No. 43D/50 to the following accounts, and in the amounts specified, in the Street Services Fund No. 100/86: $10,000 to Account No. 001090 (Salaries, Overtime) and $5,000 to Account No. 006020 (Operating Supplies) for center median island landscape improvements on Greenbriar Drive in Council District 3. 2. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Street Services to make any technical corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion Items Called Special Motions for Posting and Referral Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings Adjourning Motions Council Adjournment EXHAUSTION OFFriday ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES -­ If youSeptember challenge30, 2022 a City - in court, you may be limited action PAGE to 26 raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Motions for Posting and Referral Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings Adjourning Motions Council Adjournment EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final. Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000). Friday - September 30, 2022 - PAGE 27