Community and Sustainability Committee
Regular MeetingNorthbrook, IL · October 29, 2013
Minutes
Approved
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF
COMMUNITY AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE
VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
October 29, 2013
Call to Order
Chairman Israel called the meeting to order in the Terrace Room of the Village Hall at 6:31 p.m. On roll
call, Trustees Israel, Ciesla, & Scolaro were present. Also present: Trustee Karagianis, Deputy Fire Chief
T. Smeltzer, Village Manager R. Nahrstadt, Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly, Management Analyst A.
Letson, Village Clerk D. Ford, & Recorder G. Cerabona.
Hear from the Audience
There was no hear from the audience.
Discussion: Sustainability Plan
Chairman Israel introduced Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly & Management Analyst
A. Letson. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly stated that the process to develop a Joint Plan between the
Park District and Village of Northbrook began in early 2012. The purpose is to spread the costs, merge
the conversation, and provide a framework to move forward. The team has been working with the Delta
Institute, a firm that was hired following an RFP process conducted by the Village and Park District.
Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly stated that the Plan offers guidance, including goals and strategies
that can help guide both organizations’ next steps in their sustainability efforts. Trustee Scolaro
suggested that the Plan should offer guidance on simple ways for the community to participate in
recycling and other green efforts. Trustee Ciesla recommended school participation, including installing
recycling drop-offs at the schools.
Chairman Israel stated that if the Village leads this effort, others will follow. While the Plan was at one
time very specific in its scope, the parties have worked together to modify it so that it offers more
guidance than absolutes. The intent is to use the Plan to generate concepts and programs that may be
larger than specific program recommendations that might be included in the Plan. Ultimately, the goal is
to simplify efforts and to make the practice of sustainability economically sustainable
Categories, goals, and strategies of the plan were discussed:
1. Energy
a. Goal 1/Reduce energy consumption in Park District, Village facilities by 20% in 20 years
i. The Committee discussed the goals and strategies. Trustee Ciesla inquired if the
libraries, school district, etc. could be invited if a consultant comes in to conduct
energy audits. She noted that sharing resources is key. Assistant Village Manager
P. Kiraly suggested that success stories be built with the Village and the Park
District and then share those with the other taxing bodies in Northbrook.
b. Goal 2/Increase the potential for renewable energy generation & procurement within the
community
i. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly stated that the Village codes do not allow for
certain renewable features (i.e. wind turbines, etc.). Chairman Israel advised
there are a lot of code issues being reviewed with LEED due to concerns over
noise and vitration . Trustee Ciesla asked how the new regulations apply to the
Village of Northbrook. Chairman Israel responded that the Village would elect to
adopt the regulations as the technology addresses concerns and in appropriate
applications; some may be desired by our Village and some may not.
2. Materials Management
a. Goals 1&2/Reduce the environmental impact of materials in the operations, maintenance
and upgrades of facilities and parks; Reduce waste generated and improve recycling at
Village & Park District facilities
i. Trustee Ciesla asked what reducing waste and improving recycling means.
Trustees Scolaro & Ciesla agreed it is about education and encouraging the
community to adopt green initiatives. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly
reminded the Committee that some programs have a significant cost component
while others are either cost-neutral or can be profitable. . Chairman Israel
indicated that certain recycling programs have begun to make money for the
Village.
ii. Trustee Scolaro asked how “green purchasing” is defined. Assistant Village
Manager P. Kiraly responded that “green purchasing” includes the purchase of
things such as 100% recycled paper, low VOC cleaning products, etc., and
indicated that a Village “green purchasing” policy is not yet finalized. Trustee
Scolaro repeated that education to the public is key. It was stated that goals and
strategies lead to policy.
b. Goal 3/Increase community recycling rate to 50% while holding pounds-per-capita-
disposed constant
i. Discussion took place on the Village regulating and encouraging businesses to
recycle. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly shared that this could be an effort
but it’s multi-faceted. Village Manager R. Nahrstadt stated that currently haulers
must provide the service to businesses, but businesses have the option of using a
recycling service or not. Chairman Israel noted that most building management
firms require recycling because of cost-effectiveness
3. Natural Resource Management
a. Assistant Manager P. Kiraly indicated that this section relates generally to two natural
resources, water and trees and focuses on how both relate to storm water management.
Trustee Ciesla asked about rain gardens. Chairman Israel explained how a rain garden
functions and noted that many communities have had a great deal of success with the
development of rain gardens.
4. Community Development
a. Goal 1/Increase the sustainable development (“green”) methods throughout the
community
i. Trustee Ciesla asked how possible code amendments could affect Village
staffing. Discussion took place on accomplishing these efforts.
b. Goal 2/Amend Village codes (zoning, engineering standards & specifications, building
codes, etc.) to encourage green building
i. Trustee Scolaro stated there is a difference in encouraging green building and
discouraging construction without green elements. Village Manager R. Nahrstadt
identified incentives (LEED, etc.) but reminded that penalties/fines are not
administered. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly stated if programs are in place
for people to consider, this would be a guideline.
Trustee Ciesla asked about percentages of green cost savings on buildings to
those without LEED status. Chairman Israel cited examples. Assistant Village
Manager P. Kiraly shared there are points/requirements within LEED that may
not be desirable for a builder to seek certification. Chairman Israel summarized
that 6% represents the cost savings with a return on investment within 8-10 years.
Language was altered in Goals 1&2.
Trustee Ciesla referred to her role and the Communication & Legislation committee, asking how
this document can be communicated to the Village. Suggestions included ongoing articles in local
publications. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly concurred stating that a green page in the
newsletter is possible. It was determined that if possible, amendments to the Village’s
communication policy would incorporate green elements.
5. Transportation
a. Goal 1/Maintain a diverse, safe, & high quality transportation network
i. Chairman Israel stated we’re trying to encourage a more walkable community.
Shared goals with the Park District are possible.
Bike paths, including current grant applications were discussed.
b. Goal 2, Strategy 1/When considering new fleet vehicles, purchase best miles-per-gallon
vehicles. Where practical, seek hybrid or energy-efficient vehicles.
i. It was asked if a policy is in place to purchase hybrids. Assistant Village
Manager P. Kiraly responded that these vehicles are on State bid lists and added
that some vehicles which are purchased are not hybrids (as they may not be
worth it). Trustee Scolaro suggested that language be revised.
Trustee Ciesla requested that miles-per-gallon ratings on vehicles being replaced, be
shared with the Board when vehicle purchases are suggested by the CIP.
c. Goal 3, Strategy 3/As possible, provide preferred parking for fuel-efficient vehicles at
Partners’ facilities
i. Trustee Scolaro does not believe the Village should be included in this particular
strategy; Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly will alter the agency to the Park
District (P) only.
ii. Trustee Ciesla raised the issue of charging stations and incentives for businesses.
Trustee Scolaro believes this will work against the ultimate goal of improving the
viability of electric vehicles.
Chairman Israel asked if the Committee wishes to adopt this plan vs. confer its acceptance. Trustee
Scolaro stated he’d like to see the final product before the plan is adopted, if the committee chooses to go
that route. It was stated that acceptance doesn’t give as clear a direction as adoption. Village Manager R.
Nahrstadt stated that adopting this, between both entities, wouldn’t encourage a work plan where
acceptance would; adopting means putting this document in force within 2-3 years; code changes are also
factors. Trustee Ciesla asked how the Park District is moving forward. Assistant Village Manager Kiraly
stated they are adopting this and integrating it into their Standard Operating Procedures.
Trustee Ciesla motioned, seconded by Trustee Scolaro, to incorporate tonight’s alterations and to
recommend that the Village Board accept this document. On roll call, voting aye: Trustees Scolaro,
Ciesla, and Israel (3); voting nay: none (0); the motion was approved.
Discussion: Report on 4th of July Activities
Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly advised that the 2013 July 4th Activities went very well. A staff
committee, consisting of representatives from the Village and the Park District were responsible for
planning and executing the 4th of July events this year, as the 4th of July Association was disbanded. He
noted the costs involved, and stated that overtime is a factor whether the Village/Park District runs the
event or not.
Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly stated the Vehicle Sticker Program far exceeded expectations –
bringing in $28,000 to offset the costs of the events. Trustee Ciesla suggested conducting a contest with
the schools to design the next 4th of July vehicle sticker. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly advised that
the Park District does not have resources to commit to a program like this and therefore, it would have to
be a Village-led program. The consensus was that there would not be a logo contest next year (for
vehicle stickers).
Discussion took place on increasing the fireworks’ budget or not. Trustee Ciesla suggested partnering
with other municipalities and jointly bidding the displays. This could keep a display in each community,
but might allow for some cost savings. Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly stated an RFP will be
generated for next year’s fireworks.
Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly stated that better protocols and procedures are recommended for the
parade. Staff would be developing the protocols and procedures, but there were a few items that were
important to note:
Candy throwing in the parade –
unfortunately, a number of parade participants were throwing candy into the crowd which
encouraged spectators (especially children) to run into the road, and potentially put them at risk of
injury as the parade passed them.
Trustee Scolaro suggested that those who pass out candy must be walking. The Committee
agreed.
Water Spraying/Water Balloons -
It was noted by Assistant Village Manager P. Kiraly that a number of complaints were received
by parade participants that water balloons and hoses were being used. Some of the marching bands, and
those who were using antique cars in the parade were especially upset by this behavior. Trustee Ciesla
suggested banning water balloons and hoses. It was recommended to communicate this in the newsletter.
Adjourn
Trustee Ciesla motioned, seconded by Trustee Scolaro, to adjourn the meeting at 8:23 p.m. On a voice
vote, the motion was unanimously approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Gale Cerabona
Recorder
Agenda
COMMUNITY AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE
NORTHBROOK VILLAGE HALL, 1225 CEDAR LANE
OCTOBER 29, 2013, 6:30 P.M., TERRACE ROOM
The Community and Sustainability Committee of the Village of Northbrook Board of Trustees will
hold a meeting on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. in the Terrace Room of the Village Hall,
1225 Cedar Lane, Northbrook, Illinois. The following will be discussed.
MEETING AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. HEAR FROM AUDIENCE
3. DISCUSSION: Sustainability Plan
4. DISCUSSION: Report on 4th of July Activites
5. ADJOURN
Bob Israel, Chair
Community and Sustainability Committee
Members: Trustee Scolaro
Trustee Ciesla
Village of Northbrook
Cook County, Illinois
October 25, 2013
The Village of Northbrook is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require certain accommodations in
order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting, or who have questions regarding the
accessibility of this meeting or the facilities, are requested to contact Greg Van Dahm or Debbie Ford (272-
5050, extension 4225 or 4221, respectively) promptly to allow the Village of Northbrook to make reasonable
accommodations for those persons. Hearing impaired individuals may call the TDD number, 564-8645, for
more information.
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK
GENERAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: RICHARD A. NAHRSTADT, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PHILIP A. KIRALY, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 25, 2013
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
On Tuesday, October 29, the Community and Sustainability Committee is scheduled to review the final
draft of the Strategic Sustainability Plan jointly developed by the Village of Northbrook and the
Northbrook Park District (“Partners”). This plan is a collaborative effort between both units of
government and is intended to guide both organizations in their efforts to develop operational and
community-wide sustainability programs and services. Staff will be seeking committee feedback on the
final draft, and for a recommendation for acceptance of the plan by the full Village Board.
Background
The Village of Northbrook and the Northbrook Park District had each discussed development of a
sustainability plan for a number of years. In the course of discussions among staff in both organizations,
the potential of joining forces to develop a joint plan was explored. It was determined that a joint plan
would not only allow for the sharing of costs, but would also unify each organization’s sustainable
initiatives and allow for additional partnering opportunities. In that light, in early 2012, the Village and
Park District each approved an Intergovernmental Agreement that would pave the way for a cooperative
effort to jointly develop this community-wide sustainability plan. Working as partners in this effort, the
Village and Park District issued an RFP, and following the public process, entered into a contract with the
Delta Institute to begin plan development.
The purpose of the plan was to recognize the work that both the Village and Park District have already
done to promote sustainability and provide a framework for future actions. Both organizations have
long histories of very proactive sustainable practices and programs, and this plan is intended to enhance
existing efforts while identifying the essential elements of ongoing community sustainability practices as
well as to provide guidelines and recommendations for green initiatives that both organizations may
undertake in coming years.
Plan Development and Summary
The Plan was developed over a long period of time, starting in April 2012. The Partners and the Delta
Institute conducted a community engagement process that included an online survey and two public
meetings that were held last October. The online survey asked residents to prioritize sustainability
initiatives related to the areas including energy, materials management, natural resources, community
development, and transportation. The first public meeting provided residents with an opportunity to
discuss current conditions within the community and some possible goals for future efforts. The second
meeting focused on developing strategies to meet these goals. Staff and the Delta Institute used the
information gathered from the survey and at the meetings as a guide when developing the goals and
strategies included in the plan.
Plan development took place then with input from staff from both the Village and Park District. Staff
from the Delta Institute created an outline and several drafts that staff vetted with input from the
Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) chairman and other groups. The plan also incorporates
aspects from other Village planning documents such as the Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Plan, and
Bicycle Plan as well as the Park District’s Strategic Plan. The intent was to develop a document that
interweaves the goals of these various plans through the fabric of sustainability. As the objectives in
these documents are revised, the Partners will review the sustainability plan to ensure it continues to
complement the other plans.
The Village and Park District agreed to focus the plan on five distinct areas: energy, material
management, natural resources, community development, and transportation. The plan addresses
actions that each organization has already taken to promote sustainability in these areas as well as
establishes goals to address opportunities, strategies to meet these goals, and measures to determine
success. Strategies have been categorized as ongoing, short term (1-2 years), medium term (2-3 years),
and long term (3+ years) to identify when pursuit of the strategy is expected to take place. The intent
of these goals is not to bind either organization to taking specific actions, but rather, to provide a
framework that can help build sustainable practices into both organizations current and future programs
and practices. In other words, it serves as a guidebook rather than an exact map on how to move
forward with sustainable practices Village-wide.
Following review of the plan by the Village and Park District Boards, the plan will be put into place. It is
expected that the plan will be used by both the Village and Park Boards, staff, and other entities such as
the EQC. If the Village Board wishes to adopt the plan, staff will begin the process of implementing the
outlined strategies, focusing on those that have been identified as short term and ongoing first.
Staff will be present at the Community and Sustainability Committee meeting on October 29 to present
the plan and answer any questions the Committee may have.
2
NORTHBROOK
STRATEGIC SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
Northbrook residents have demonstrated
their commitment to environmental and social
responsibility in the ways they live, work and
play. In 2011, the Village of Northbrook and
the Northbrook Park District joined forces to
create this plan to ensure that they uphold
the sustainable values of the community.
The plan takes a detailed look at five distinct
areas that provide opportunity for improving
sustainability:
Energy: including consumption and
production
1
Material Management: including the
2 complete lifecycle of materials from
manufacturing to purchasing to disposal
Natural Resources: with a focus
on stormwater management and
preservation of the Urban Forest
4
Community Development: including
sustainable land use, urban design and
green building
7
Transportation: exploring opportunities
for improving alternative options,
including transit, biking and walking
10
The plan explores the importance of addressing
each issue and reflects on the sustainable
initiatives already underway in Northbrook.
13 Then, this plan suggests specific goals to
address opportunities in each category, as
well as strategies for attaining these goals
and measures that will be used to determine
16 success. Both the Village and the Park District
will use this document to guide their work
within the community and the operations of
their respective organizations.
19
1
NORTHBROOK: AN OVERVIEW
The Northbrook Strategic Sustainability Plan was COMMUNITY PROFILE
created to provide a roadmap for the community Northbrook, a dynamic community in northern Cook
to advance its current environmental programs and County, attracts families and businesses with its
identify new initiatives with the greatest opportunity excellent park amenities, schools and transportation
to enhance resource conservation, improve public infrastructure. The 33,170 residents enjoy such
health and strengthen the local economy. All aspects amenities as the walkable downtown, Village Green
of the plan are driven by a single guiding principle: Park and River Walk, a farmers market, summer
sustainability. In Northbrook, letting sustainability outdoor concert series, and the nationally-renowned
guide the decision-making processes means seeking Ed Rudolph Velodrome, where top cyclists compete
to balance today’s needs with those of tomorrow for major titles.
by considering environmental, economic and
social impacts. This plan is intended to be a living More than 50,000 people work in Northbrook,
document that will be revisited regularly by the which is home to the corporate headquarters of
Park District and Village of Northbrook to measure Underwriters Laboratories, Crate & Barrel and more
progress and reevaluate goals and strategies. than 700 manufacturing, light industrial and service-
related businesses. Northbrook also is home to a
strong retail community anchored by Northbrook
Court. In total, Northbrook has millions of square
feet of diverse shops, boutiques and restaurants -
truly something for everyone.
Both the Village of Northbrook and the Northbrook
Figure 1. Northbrook’s Techny Prairie Park Park District have been recognized for their
environmental leadership. Over the past several
years, both agencies have aggressively pursued
energy efficiency and conservation programs,
actively recycled waste products to safeguard the
natural and built environment, and subsequently
received sustainability-related acknowledgments.
After 20 years of working separately on
environmental initiatives, the Village and the Park
District issued a joint Request for Proposals in
February 2012 to develop a Sustainable Community
Strategic Plan to guide sustainability enhancements
for the next 20 years.
PARTNERSHIP
This is the first community sustainability plan in
the Chicago area to be funded and driven by a
partnership of a municipality and its park district.
Partnering on the plan not only reduced each
organization’s cost, but it also maximized their
opportunities to leverage resources.
Figure 2. The Partners’ logos: Village of Northbrook
(left) and Northbrook Park District (right)
• COOK COUN
K TY
O IL
O
R
B LI
TH N
OR OI
S
GE OF N
LLA
VI
1 90
1
2
•
CIV 23
I TA S • 19
Partnership
Partnership and andcollaboration
collaborationareare not to
not new new to
either established
established Green TeamTeam
Green or environmental
or environmental
either the Village or the Park District (referred
the Village or the Park District (referred to as “the to as committee,
committee, comprised staff
comprised of members
of staff from from
members
“the Partners”).
Partners”). TheyTheyhavehavecollaborated
collaborated onon several multiple
multiple departments. Each group worksto
departments. Each group works toachieve
achieve
initiatives, including:
initiatives, including: specific goals and publishes its accomplishments
specific goals and publishes its accomplishments
The Annual Earth and Arbor Day event regularly.
regularly.
The Annual Earth and Arbor Day event
Tree maintenance and
Tree maintenance and pruning pruning
Light
Light bulb
bulb recycling
recycling
Electronics recycling
Electronics recycling COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
The Partners
The Partnersalso
alsohave
have experience
experience working
working withwith The
The community
communityengagement
engagementprocess
processwaswasused
used to
neighboring communities
neighboring communities andand will
willcontinue
continueto
toseek
seek to
identify which sustainability elements aremost
identify which sustainability elements are most
opportunities to
opportunities tocoordinate
coordinatewith
withother
othercommunity
community important
important totoresidents, educate
residents, staff and
educate staffthe
and the
partners.
partners. community
community on onthe
theallocation of of
allocation public resources,
public resources,
and
and identify opportunities for sustainabilitywithin
identify opportunities for sustainability within
Currently, the
Currently, the Village:
Village: municipal
municipal systems.
systems.
shares
shares a a health
health inspector
inspector with
with Wilmette
Wilmette
partners
partners withwith Northfield
Northfield Township
Township forfor
certain To
To ensure the success of the plan,
plan, ititwas
is important
important to
certain recycling
recycling programs programs to understand what sustainability
understand what sustainability means means to the
to the
uses
uses collaborative
collaborative purchasing
purchasing to to leverage
leverage residents of Northbrook and why it
residents of Northbrook and why it matters.matters.
greater
greater savings
savings forfor residents
residents Residents
Residents werewereasked
askedtotoparticipate
participatein an
in online
an online
survey that asked them to prioritize sustainability
survey that asked them to prioritize sustainability
And, the
And, the Park
Park District:
District: initiatives
initiatives related
related to
to key
key topic
topic areas,
areas, including:
including:
teamed
teamed upup with
with School
School District
District 2828
in in 2011
2011 to Energy
Energy
to fund
fund construction
construction of a of
newa new gymnasium
gymnasium at Materials
Materials Management
Management
at Greenbriar
Greenbriar School.School.
As partAs of
part
theofagreement,
agreement Natural
Natural Resource Management
thethe Park
Park District
District is is allowed
allowed to to
useuse
thethe
gymgym Community
Community Development
Development
after
after school
school and and during
during thethe summer
summer forfor Transportation
Transportation
indoor
indoor sports
sports programming.
programming.
partners
partners withethe
with United
United Methodist
Methodist Church
Church The
The survey
surveyresults guided
results the the
guided direction of twoof two
direction
forfor
thethe
useuse
of of
its their soccer
soccer fields in
fields in exchange
exchange for community
community engagement meetings that were held in
for regular
regular mowing
lawn mowing in October 2012. At the first meeting, community
October 2012. At the first meeting, community
hashas facility
facility andand grounds
grounds useuse agreements
agreements with members
members provided
providedinput
inputononcurrent
current conditions
conditions in
with School
School Districts
Districts 27, 27, 31
28, 30, 28,&30, 31 & 225
225 in Northbrook, which was used to develop
Northbrook, which was used to develop measurable
measurable goals. The
goals. The second second
public public
meeting meeting
then then
focused on
There is also a strong system of environmental focused on developing strategies to achieve
developing strategies to achieve those goals. The those
There is also among
leadership a strong system of environmental
the Partners. Each has an goals. The outcomes
outcomes of thisresulted
of this process process resulted in the
in the following
leadership among the Partners. Each has an following Strategic Sustainability
Strategic Sustainability Plan. Plan.
Figure 3. A Community Meeting held by the Village of Northbrook.
3
ENERGY
Most of the energy in the Chicago area comes programs and provided to residents and businesses
from nonrenewable sources, namely fossil to reduce their energy use.
fuels. Although all energy sources have some
environmental impact, the use of fossil fuels results Facility Improvements. The Partners have
in a particularly large amount of global warming collaborated with the Smart Energy Design Assistance
compounds, as seen below in Figure 4. Center (SEDAC) to receive free energy audits for
government-owned facilities. The resulting reports
Reducing the use of fossil fuel-based energy provided clear direction on upgrades that reduce
supports environmental stewardship by reducing energy consumption, including boiler replacements,
negative environmental impacts and improving HVAC upgrades, new windows, lighting and
environmental quality. The Partners have sought to roof systems. The SEDAC reports also provided
maximize energy conservation through investment information about grants and rebates that each
in renewable energy sources and for facility project may qualify for, thereby reducing upfront
improvements. costs to the Partners. Since 2010, the Partners have
initiated energy-saving projects in the following
facilities: Village Hall, Public Safety Building, Public
Works Maintenance Garage, Water Plant and Civic
Figure 4. Pounds of pollutant by energy source Building (Village facilities) and Leisure Center, Sports
Center, and the Joe Doud Administration Building
(Park District facilities). Both the Village and the
2250 Park District plan to continue to improve the energy
efficiency of their other buildings, starting with the
2000 Northbrook Sports Center.
1750
Proposed improvements scheduled for 2013
1500 12 through 2015 for the Sports Center include:
pounds
1250 10 Building Automation System Improvement
1000 8 (2013-2014) per suggestions of Energy
pounds
Evaluation: this project is expected to
750 6 receive $60,000 in grants and energy
500 4 savings are projected to be over $45,000
annually (at current rates).
250 2 Low –E Ceiling Installation (2014-2016) per
suggestions of the Energy Evaluation: this
Coal Coal Coal
Oil Oil Oil project is expected to receive $30,000 in
Gas Gas Gas
grants and energy savings are projected to
Carbon Nitrogen Sulfur be over $20,000 annually (at current rates).
Dioxide Oxides Dioxide
Kill-a-Watts. The Village has made Kill-a-Watt
devices available for complementary lending
CURRENT ENERGY INITIATIVES from the Northbrook Public Library. Using this
simple device, a homeowner can determine which
Although 2011 was the first year that Northbrook household appliances consume the most energy
had an energy audit, the Village most likely has and shift usage habits or replace devices with
achieved significant energy savings already, due energy-efficient models.
to energy efficient investments. The Partners and
residents have a high level of awareness of energy CUB Energy Saver. Northbrook is working with
efficiency issues. The following is a summary of the Citizens Utility Board (CUB) to offer residents
significant energy management improvements and innovative approaches to energy conservation.
tools the Partners have used in their facilities and Participants in the program can link a ComEd account
4
account to the CUB Energy Saver, and the program
to the CUB Energy Saver, and the program tracks Figure 5. Impacts of the
tracks progress and issues reward points for energy
progress and issues reward points for energy savings Green Power Program
savings that can be used for discounts at local and
that can be used for discounts at local and national
national retailers. To date, 250 households in
retailers. To date, 250 households in Northbrook
Northbrook have registered and saved an estimated
have registered and saved an estimated $35,800.
$35,800. The Village has also registered a few of their
The Village also registered a few of its facilities and
own facilities and has saved more than $7,400.
has saved more than $7,400.
Energy supply alternatives. In March 2012,
Through the Green Power
Energy Supply Alternatives. In March 2012,
Northbrook voters approved a referendum
Northbrook voters approved a referendum
Program the Village of
authorizing the Village to engage in electricity
authorizing the Village to engage in electricity
aggregation services to secure a lower electric rate
Northbrook has avoided
428
aggregation services to secure a lower electric rate
for its residents and small businesses. Working with
for its residents and small businesses. Working with
nearby communities, the Village was a founding
nearby communities, the Village was a founding
partner of the North Shore Electricity Aggregation
partner of the North Shore Electricity Aggregation
Consortium. By bringing eight communities
Consortium. By bringing eight communities together,
together, the consortium leveraged bulk purchasing
the consortium leveraged bulk purchasing power to metric tons of CO2
power to secure 26% to 45% savings on the supply
secure 26% to 45% savings on the supply portion of
portion of electricity bills. While lower energy costs
electricity bills. While lower energy costs through which is the same as
through aggregation may not promote energy
aggregation may not promote energy conservation,
conservation, the increasing reliance on renewable
the increasing reliance on renewable energy sources
energy sources is a significant improvement for the
removing 64 household’s
is a significant improvement for the Village. Currently,
Village. Currently, Northbrook residents are
Northbrook residents are purchasing 8% renewable
purchasing 8% renewable energy through the households’
energy through the aggregation, and the amount of
aggregation, and the amount of renewable energy
renewable energy will increase by 1% each year until electricity use for a year
will increase by 1% each year until 2025 as
2025 as mandated by State statute. This aligns with
mandated by State statute. This aligns with the
the Illinois State Renewable Standard, and there is
Illinois State Renewable Standard, and there is an
an additional option for residents who seek 100%
additional option for residents who seek 100%
renewable energy.
renewable energy.
Park District Energy Use Benchmark. As a result
Park District Energy Use Benchmark. As a result of
of its facility improvements, the Park District
their facility improvements, the Park District
experienced significant reductions in electricity use
experienced significant reductions in electricity use
between 2011 and 2012 and modest reductions in
between 2011 and 2012 and modest reductions in
natural gas use in 2010 and 2012.
natural gas use in 2010 and 2012.
Joe Doud Administration: Between 2010
Joe
and Doud
2012, Administration:
the Park DistrictBetweenimplemented 2010
and 2012 the Park District
lighting improvements and building implemented
or taking 89 cars off
lighting
automation improvements
system upgrades and withbuilding
the
automation system upgrades
assistance of $33,000 in grants, achieving with the
assistance
an averageofreduction
up
$33,000 inofgrants32% inand
consumption and 16% reduction in 32%
achieving an average reduction
ended
electrical
of gas
the road for a year
in electrical consumption and 16%
consumption.
reduction in gasIn
Leisure Center: consumption.
2012 the Leisure Center
Leisure Center:
received a new 2012In roof theandLeisure
HVACCenter
system.
underwent
The new roof is white, which hasbuilding
an extensive a high
renovation
albedo factor, including the roof
decreasing the and HVAC
building’s
systems. The new roof is white which
heat island effect and reducing the amount has a
high albedo factor decreasing the
of energy required to cool the facility. Thebuildings
heat island effectwere
improvements and reducing
funded inthe amount
part with
of
$58,000 in grants and have reduced The
energy required to cool the facility. the
improvements were funded
electrical consumption by 12%insopart
far. with
$58,000 in grants and have reduced the
electrical consumption by 12% so far.
5
FUTUREENERGY
FUTURE ENERGYSTRATEGIES
STRATEGIES
Sports Center: In 2010 the Park District
Northbrook Sportswith
Center:
energy In 2010 the
updated the lighting efficient InInaddition
additiontotothe
theprogress
progressthat
thathas
hasbeen
beenmademadeto to
Park District updated the lighting
flourescent lighting and light sensors with improve energy efficiency, the Partners will continue
improve energy efficiency, the Partners will continue
throughout the Sports Center. The Projectand
energy-efficient flourescent lighting
totopromote
promotesustainable
sustainableenergy
energyuse
use inin Northbrook.
Northbrook.
waslight sensors
funded throughout
in part with overthe SportsinCenter.
$18,000 Table 1 below outlines the two broad
Table 1 below outlines the two broad goals goals for
for
grants and has reduced the electricalwith
The project was funded in part usageover energy production and consumption,
energy production and consumption, as well as as well as
$18,000 in grants
on average by 850,000 kWh.and has reduced the specific strategies for attaining these goals and
specific strategies for attaining these goals and
electrical usage on average by 850,000 kWh. measuresthat
thatwill
willbe
beused
usedtotodetermine
determinesuccess.
success.
measures
Goals, metrics, and strategies have been defined for each of the five distinct areas of sustainability (see the table
below for Energy Goals, Metrics and Strategies). Each is categorized as “short term” meaning 1-2 years, “medium
term” meaning 2-3 years, “long term” meaning 3 or more years, or “ongoing” for current strategies that are expected
to continue.
Table 1. Goals, Metrics and Strategies for improving energy production and consumption
Timeframe
Agency Energy Goal 1 (Short, medium, long
term or ongoing)
B: Both
P: Park District
Reduce energy consumption in Park District and
V: Village Village facilities by 20% in 20 years.
Reduction in total kilowatt hour (kWh) and therm usage in Village and
Metric
Park District facilities
Continue to explore grants and alternative funding to support energy
B Strategy ongoing
efficiency improvements
B Strategy Perform energy audits at facilities; make improvements as appropriate ongoing
Strategically place vegetation around buildings to reduce heating and
B Strategy short term
cooling costs and decrease energy consumption
Conduct assessments of Partner owned exterior lighting for energy
B Strategy medium term
efficiency and possible light pollution controls
For new construction or upgrades to existing buildings, integrate LEED
B Strategy best practices and/or achieve LEED certification or similar alternative long term
assessment or rating, such as Energy Star and Green Globes
Energy Goal 2
B: Both
P: Park District
Increase the potential for renewable energy generation
V: Village and procurement within the community.
Number of installations of solar panels, geothermal heat pumps, wind
Metric
turbine, and other green, energy-saving technologies
V Strategy Promote enrollment in the residential renewable energy credit short term
Work to revise zoning standards to consider allowing green roofs, wind
V Strategy medium term
turbines, and solar panels as appropriate
Assess the environmental and financial benefits of solar-powered
P Strategy medium term
electric golf carts
Where possible and financially viable, assess installing Village and Park
B Strategy long term
District-owned renewable energy generation technology at facilities
6
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
The Partners view material management as a life recent waste audit found that the Park District has a
cycle. They consider the social and environmental 99% recycling rate at its main office.
impact of the materials at every stage of the lifecycle
from extracting raw materials to manufacturing Using Recycled Products. The Partners are exploring
the usable product to transportation and disposal the use of recycled products for everything from
after use. note pads to public pathways. Early in 2012, the Park
District rolled out a two-part initiative to streamline
the office supply ordering process and encourage
CURRENT MATERIAL INITIATIVES the use of environmentally-preferred products. The
initiative led to a centralized purchasing program,
Due to successful materials management initiatives, which netted a $5,000 savings as well as a significant
the waste generated per capita in Northbrook is reduction in the overall carbon footprint of the
five pounds less than the Cook County average and District. By choosing recycled paper and other
the 31% recycling rate exceeds the Cook County environmentally friendly supplies, the District saved
average by 6%. The Partners provide a variety of approximately 21 tons of wood (the equivalent of
opportunities for recycling and other responsible 137 trees), 20,000 pounds of carbon dioxide and
material management for residents. nearly 83,000 gallons of water.
Village Operations. Village operations have moved Holiday Lights Recycling Program. Residents can
toward electronic document storage, which will recycle holiday string lights and extension cords at
reduce its contribution to the waste stream. Also, Village Hall and at other locations on select days.
Village Board agenda packets are now transmitted The Village works with an outside vendor to provide
electronically, saving thousands of sheets of paper this service, which in turn generates revenue for
as well as transportation-related costs. And, paper the Village and funds other Northbrook recycling
that is used is recycled since recycling is readily initiatives.
available in each Village building.
E-Waste. Residents can drop off any electronic item
Park District Operations. The Park District takes a for recycling at the Public Works Fleet Maintenance
holistic approach to waste diversion and materials Garage behind the Village Hall on the first Tuesday
management by considering not only what is of each month. This service complies with the ban
disposed but also the materials used in facilities to on curbside collection of e-waste imposed by the
reduce future waste. Recycling is widely available State of Illinois in January 2012. In 2012, the Village
to all District staff and throughout all public parks. A collected 52,144 pounds of e-waste.
Figure 6. Material management from raw material extraction to waste management.
STORE
raw
material manufacturing purchase & use waste
extraction management
reuse
recycle
7
photo of waste management initiatives
Household Hazardous Waste. Residents can safely must be recycled. Cook County recently adopted a
dispose of hazardous household waste on the first similar ordinance, which the Village is reviewing (to
Tuesday of each month. The Village has collected determine if the Village’s ordinance is redundant).
the following hazardous wastes:
Prescription Drug Disposal. The Police
18,000 pounds of batteries annually Department collaborates with Save-a-Star to
5,500 light bulbs in 2011 dispose of prescription and over-the-counter
3.5 semi-trailers full of paint in 2012 medications properly to protect the environment
more than 1,000 gallons of waste oil from and public safety. The Police Department collects
fleet vehicles in 2012 the medications at a drop box located in their lobby.
Scrap Metal. The Village continues to provide
Composting. The Park District’s main office features
scrap metal recycling services. In 2012, the Village
a worm bin for lunch scraps (lettuce, orange peels,
collected 2,150 pounds of brass and 35,840 pounds
apple cores, etc.). The worms produce a nutrient-
of steel.
rich tea that staff uses to fertilize office plants.
Construction Debris. In 2008, the Village enacted
Light Bulb Recycling. The Park District operates a
a Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
so-called light bulb eater, a machine that crushes
Ordinance to ensure that construction materials such
tube fluorescent bulbs in a 55-gallon drum that
as metal, brick, concrete, wood and glass are recycled
contains filters designed to collect over 99% of
rather than landfilled. The ordinance requires that at
the mercury from the bulbs. The District recycles
least 75% of debris generated at a construction site
Figure 8. Household hazardous waste collected: batteries (annual average), light bulbs (2011),
paint (2012), waste oil (2012)
5,500 1,000+
light
18,000 bulbs 3.5 semi- gallons of
pounds
of batteries
trailers waste oil
of paint
8
contains
fluorescentsfilters designed
from the to collect
Village over 99%
which collectsof the
the FUTURE
FUTURE MATERIAL
MATERIAL STRATEGIES
STRATEGIES
mercury HID
District’s from the bulbs.
(High Intensity The District
Discharge) recycles
bulbs, such
fluorescents
as metal halidefrom
and the
high Village
pressurewhich
sodiumcollects
bulbs. the Although the Partners have demonstrated great
District’s HID (High Intensity Discharge) bulbs, such success in material management, there are three
as metal halide and high pressure sodium bulbs. broad goals for further improving materials
management, detailed
detailed in
inTable
Table 2.
2.
Table 2. Goals, Metrics, and Strategies for improving materials management
Timeframe
Agency Materials Management Goal 1 (Short, medium, long
term or ongoing)
B: Both Reduce the environmental impact of materials in
P: Park District the operations, maintenance and upgrades of
V: Village
facilities and parks.
Metric Number of third-party certified green products purchased
B Strategy Prioritize biodegradable, low emission and low-toxicity products ongoing
B Strategy Create and adopt “Green Cleaning” policies in facilities short term
B Strategy As possible, encourage green and consolidated purchasing ongoing
B Strategy Where possible, purchase Energy Star appliances and electronics ongoing
Materials Management Goal 2
B: Both
P: Park District
Reduce waste generated and improve recycling at
V: Village Village and Park District Facilities.
Metric Increased recycling rated and decreased amount of waste
B Strategy Consider additional Partner recycling-related collaborations short term
B Strategy Improve signage/information displays for recycling at facilities short term
Reduce paper and toner consumption by encouraging double-
B Strategy ongoing
sided, black and white printing; “Think before you print”
Park District will amend record management policies to allow
B Strategy electronic document management; Village will improve and medium term
broaden its electronic file management
Encourage waste haulers to provide regular reports indicating the
B Strategy medium term
volume of waste disposed and recycled by Partners’ facilities
Materials Management Goal 3
B: Both
P: Park District
Increase community recycling rate to 50% while
V: Village holding pounds per capita disposed constant.
Metric Increased recycling rate as documented in waste hauler reports
Create a community guide to increase awareness of recycling
B Strategy short term
opportunities; clarify which materials can be recycled/composted
Explore the viability of a residential food-scrap collection program;
B Strategy long term
increase awareness about composting
Provide model bid documents to multi-unit property managers to
V Strategy medium term
help them secure recycling at their facilities
B Strategy Make recycling available and improve signage at Partners’ facilities ongoing
9
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Natural resources include fresh water, forests, air projects requiring coordination with groups such
and other elements critical for human life and well- as FEMA or the Army Corps of Engineers to smaller
being. The preservation of these resources for future projects that are intended to minimize localized
generations is a critical piece of the sustainability flooding issues. These projects provide protection to
challenge. In Northbrook, both the Village and numerous properties in areas throughout the Village
the Park District have focused on strong water during smaller rain events reducing the total number
management practices, which in turn will help of flooding occurrences over the course of a year.
maintain the health and quality of natural resources
including open space, tree canopy and clean air. Tree Planting. Over the past 5 years, the Village
planted on average 417 trees each year to keep
Figure 9. Northbrook’s approach to natural resource up with removals precipitated by the Emerald Ash
management
Borer (EAB) infestation. This included 510 trees in
2013 alone. Participants in a cost-share program
improved water
management can pay $150 to receive their chosen species of tree
planted in the parkway. Figure 10 (below) indicates
the number of trees planted in response to the trees
removed due to EAB infestation.
Figure 10. Trees planted and removed since 2010
# parkway trees planted
# parkway trees removed
improves 600 1800
improved other
tree natural 500 1500
canopy resources
400 1200
CURRENT RESOURCE INITIATIVES
Although Northbrook is in close proximity to Lake # trees
300 900
Michigan, water is a limited resource. The Partners 200 600
have been successful in conserving water and
managing its demand, as well as managing water 300
100
as a resource with various natural and human end-
uses throughout its cycle. This approach encourages
00
management practices that prevent runoff while 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
ensuring a steady supply of water for other beneficial Year
purposes, including aesthetics and recreation. The Park District also has been replacing EAB-infested
trees throughout Northbrook’s parks. Between 2011
Village Master Stormwater Management Plan and 2012, the Park District removed 143 Ash trees
(MSMP). The original Plan, written in 1992, identified and planted 262 new trees. The new trees were
that development and an associated increase in carefully selected to improve tree canopy diversity.
impervious (paved) surfaces caused rainwater to
flow to the sewer system at a greater volume, with Rain Gardens and Rain Barrels. Residents who
greater speed and with increased flooding and have experienced flooding can help alleviate
damage to basements during storms. In response, standing water in their yards and protect their
the Plan established the Stormwater Management homes by installing bioswales, berms, or rain
Commission, a 10-member advisory group that gardens. Residents with flooding conditions that
works with residents, staff, consultants and the qualify for this program are reimbursed 50% of the
Board of Trustees to improve the Village’s MSMP. The improvement cost, up to $3,500. The Park District
Commission prioritizes stormwater management also has installed rain gardens to improve water
construction projects and programs when funding is management on public sites including: Floral Park,
available and benefits are justified. In 2011, an update Indian Ridge Park, Joe Doud Administration Building,
to the MSMP shifted focus from large-scale stormwater and Meadow Road Tot Lot.
10
Figure 11 (right). A selection of parks
throughout Northbrook
The Village also encourages homeowners to
disconnect their downspouts from the sewer system
and redirect them to rain barrels or to the landscape
directly to conserve water, reduce runoff and prevent
contamination of waterways. The Village has sold
nearly 500 rain barrels to residents.
Park District Natural Area Improvements. In
addition to the installation of rain gardens, the Park
District has implemented several other natural area
improvement strategies. When the Park District
created Floral Park in 2011, with the help of a grant
from OSLAD, one of the goals was the promotion
of conservation education opportunities. The park
design includes a native prairie with educational photo of Floral Park
signs, low-maintenance materials and recycled glass
pavement.
About half of the 107-acre Techy Prairie Park and
Fields is open prairie and woodlands. The park
contains the award-winning Trail Through Time, a
unique natural history walk that meanders along 14
acres with a restored wetland. The educational trail
shows how early settlers developed a relationship
with the land, celebrating the first pioneer settlers.
Sportsman’s Country Club, managed by the Park
District, is working with the Audubon Cooperative
Sanctuary Program for Golf Courses (ACSP),
an international certification program to help
golf courses develop conservation and wildlife
enhancement programs. Sportsman’s already
has received certification in two of six categories:
Environmental Planning and Wildlife and Habitat
Management. Sportsman’s is also in the middle
of a shoreline stabilization project. This multi-year
project began in 2010 and will replace all rip/rap photo of Trail Thru Time
edging along golf course water features with 3.75
acres of native plantings to improve water quality,
enhance aesthetics and create wildlife habitat.
Linking Human Uses with Ecosystems. The Park
District connects water conservation to stormwater
management activities that link human uses with
ecosystems and habitat. For example, some irrigation
at the golf course is supplied by stormwater held on-
site in detention ponds, which provide an essential
public service but also a resource for birds and other
wildlife.
FUTURE RESOURCE STRATEGIES
Table 3 on the following page outlines the four goals
that will guide future natural resource management
strategies in Northbrook.
11
Table 3. Goals, Metrics and Strategies for improving natural resource management
Timeframe
Agency Natural Resource Management Goal 1 (Short, medium, long
term or ongoing)
B: Both Conserve existing natural areas and restore available turf
P: Park District areas to provide habitat, promote biodiversity, decrease
V: Village
flooding and control erosion.
Metric Increase the total square footage of naturalized areas
B Strategy Increase diversity of tree species to reduce the impact of infestations ongoing
As applicable, transition unused turf grass areas to native and non-invasive
B Strategy medium term
adapted plantings on Partners’ property
Where possible and if prudent, incorporate native and adapted plants in
V Strategy medium term
medians and rights-of-way
Offer educational programs and materials on proper landscape
P Strategy short term
management
B Strategy Protect and restore riparian, wetland, and shoreline buffers medium term
B Strategy Control, manage, and prohibit invasive plants at Partners’ facilities ongoing
Consider certifications such as Sustainable SITES or National Audubon
P Strategy medium term
Society for key parks and open spaces
Natural Resource Management Goal 2
B: Both
P: Park District Implement Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs).
V: Village
Metric Stormwater management projects completed with “green” elements
Continue to utilize capital budget funds to implement Stormwater
V Strategy ongoing
Management Plan
Where possible, include stormwater BMPs in all roadway, park and facility
B Strategy medium term
improvements
B Strategy Encourage the development of bioswales and rain gardens ongoing
B Strategy Educate the community about the value of downspout disconnection short term
V Strategy Where possible, build capacity to measure stormwater flow rate long term
Natural Resource Management Goal 3
B: Both
P: Park District Increase potable water BMPs village-wide.
V: Village
Metric Number of potable water BMPs implemented throughout Northbrook
B Strategy Continue to promote rain barrels, rain gardens and gray water harvesting ongoing
Where functional, install low-flow fixtures in Partners’ facilities; encourage
B Strategy medium term
their use in commercial and residential construction
B Strategy Install moisture sensors on existing irrigation systems long term
Natural Resource Management Goal 4
B: Both
P: Park District
Encourage community-wide use of responsible pest control
V: Village and fertilizer methods.
Metric Number of outreach efforts
B Strategy Offer educational programs on proper pest control and fertilizer use short term
Develop and implement an active pest management plan for the control of
B Strategy medium term
known invasive plants at Partners’ facilities
P Strategy Provide interpretive signage at park sites to explain plans and benefits short term
Encourage the planting of “Low Mow Fescues,” native and adaptive plants,
B Strategy and increase plant bio-diversity to reduce the need for mowing and short term
chemical pest control
12
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community development refers to strategies that provides incentives, including permit fee rebates,
achieve sustainable development through land use, Environmental
expedited Design (LEED)and
permitting rating system
review, andandVillage
Community development
urban design and green refers to strategies
building. that with
In alignment provides incentives, including permit fee rebates,
recognition. To date, six projects have applied for
achieve
the sustainable
Plan’s development
guiding through
principle, land
sustainable expedited
rebatespermitting and review,
under this program, and commercial,
including Village
use, urban design and
development green
meets thebuilding.
needs ofIn alignment
today without recognition.
residential and mixed-use developments. for
To date, six projects have applied
with compromising
the Plan’s guiding principle,
the ability of futuresustainable
generations to rebates under this program, including commercial,
development
meet their needs. Sustainableofdevelopment
meets the needs today without not only residential and mixed-use
Community Gardening.developments.
There is a community
compromising
preserves the ability of future
environmental healthgenerations to the
by alleviating garden behind the Village Hall and at Crestwood
meetimpacts
their needs. Sustainable development
of development but also promotes not Community Gardening.
Place. Both There isplots
feature individual a community
and Food Pantry
only economic
preserves growth
environmental health
and builds humanby alleviating
capital through garden behind the Village Hall and
lots that donate produce to the at Northfield
CrestwoodFood
the impacts
increased community engagement. promotes
of development but also Place.Pantry
Both feature individual plots and Food
and other charitable organizations.Pantry The
economic growth and builds human capital through lots that
Partners worked together on this initiative.Food
donate produce to the Northfield
increased community engagement. Pantry and other charitable organizations. The
Partners worked
Village together
Green on this
Overlay initiative.
District. As an established
community, Northbrook has limited opportunities
CURRENT DEVELOPMENT
This Sustainability INITIATIVES
Plan provides an opportunity for Village
for Green Overlay
progressive District. As an
development andestablished
infrastructure.
Northbrook to add value to the community while community, Northbrook has limited
However, the Village created a new opportunities
zoning overlay
This Sustainability
preserving itsPlan providesintegrity
historical an opportunity for
and character. for progressive development
district in 2004, called heand infrastructure.
Village Green Overlay
Northbrook to add value to the community while
Several existing initiatives showcase sustainable However,
(VGO), to encourage development thatoverlay
the Village created a new zoning leads to a
preserving its historical
development integrity and character.
principles. district
morein 2004, calleddowntown
mixed-use the Village to Green Overlay
facilitate a vibrant,
Several existing initiatives showcase sustainable (VGO), to encourage
walkable development
community. The VGOthat leadscontinuity
requires to a
development principles.
Sustainable Development Incentive Program. In moreofmixed-use downtown to facilitate a
pedestrian activity and pedestrian linkages tovibrant,
2008, the Village created a voluntary program to walkable community.
promote The VGO
walkability, brick requires
paving continuity
for crosswalks
Sustainable Development
incentivize Incentive
property owners andProgram.
builders to of pedestrian activity and pedestrian
over pavement to promote downtown linkages to
aesthetics
In 2008, the Village created a voluntary program
construct buildings in an environmentally-friendly promote walkability, brick paving for crosswalks
and controlled lighting to reduce light pollution and
to incentivize
manner. Theproperty
program owners andonbuilders
is based the U.S.toGreen over glare
pavement
while to promote illuminating
attractively downtown aesthetics
the downtown
construct buildings in an environmentally-friendly
Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and and controlled
area. lighting to reduce light pollution and
manner. The program
Environmental is based
Design on the
(LEED) U.S.system
rating Green and glare while attractively illuminating the downtown
Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and area.
Figure 12. Elements of sustainable development
Community amenities Sustainable
& environmental Residential rain Development
programs gardens and Incentive Program
bioswales
13
Community
CommunityAmenities. The Park
Amenities. The District promotes
Park District promotes
sustainable community development by providing
sustainable community development by providing
amenities that support
amenities the well-being
that support of residents.
the well-being of residents.
The The
Park Park
District
District estimates thatmajority
estimates that a a majorityof of
Northbrook
Northbrook residents live within ½ mile of In
residents live within ½ mile of a park. a park.
addition, the District
In addition, the builds
Districtcommunity capacitycapacity
builds community to
live healthier, more sustainable
to live healthier, lives through
more sustainable its its
lives through
programming and events.
programming and events.
Park Park
District Lands.
District The Park
Lands. District
The Park ownsowns
District 513 513
acres acres
andand anmanages
additional
an additional 30 acres to
30 acres due due to
intergovernmental agreements
intergovernmental agreements for a for
total total
of 543
of 543
acres.acres.
SinceSince
20052005
the the
ParkPark
District hashas
District acquired
acquireda 8.65
total of 8.65 acres including the
acres at the following sites: following sites:
GreenGreenview
View Park,1.88 acresacres
Park,1.88
September 2005
September 2005
FloralFloral
Park, Park,
0.77 acres
0.77 acres
November 2009
November 2009
180 Anets Drive,Drive,
180 Anets 6.0 acres
6.0 acres
December 2011
December 2011
Environmental
EnvironmentalProgramming.
Programming. The Park District
The Park District
offersoffers
CampCampExploration, a kids’ summer camp
Exploration, a kids’ summer camp with with
an environmental theme.
an environmental The curriculum
theme. includes
The curriculum includes
canoeing in the Skokie Lagoon, geocaching,
canoeing in the Skokie Lagoon, geocaching, animal-
animal-predator gamesthat
predator games that teach
teach children
children about
about the
the food web and relationships in
food web and relationships in ature, nature,
andand
science
science experiments
experiments with soil
involving soillayers
layers and thewater
and the watercycle.
cycle.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Table 4 on the following page outlines the three
Tablegoals
4 onthat
thewill
following pagecommunity
guide future outlines the three
development
goalsstrategies
that as willwellguide future community
as specific strategies for attaining
development strategies
these goals and the as measures
well as specific strategies
that will be used to
for attaining these goals and
determine their success. the measures that will
be used to determine their success.
Figure 13 (left). Northbrook residents enjoying
parks and programs in the community
14
Table 4. Goals, Metrics and Strategies for improving community development
Timeframe
Agency Community Development Goal 1 (Short, medium, long
term or ongoing)
B: Both
P: Park District
Increase the sustainable development (‘green’)
V: Village methods throughout the community.
Number of building permits issued for projects incorporating
Metric
sustainable design elements
Where possible, continue to provide incentives for sustainable
V Strategy ongoing
development
Assess the possibility of adopting a lower cost Northbrook-specific
V Strategy medium term
certification program to encourage sustainable development
V Strategy Assess opportunities for transit-oriented development medium term
Where possible and fiscally prudent, encourage adaptive reuse of
V Strategy ongoing
buildings throughout the community
Work to pair future Comprehensive Plan development with key
B Strategy medium term
strategies, policies and criteria of this plan
Community Development Goal 2
B: Both Amend Village codes (zoning, engineering
P: Park District standards and specifications, building codes, etc.) to
V: Village
encourage green building.
Metric Annual number of green buildings built
If prudent, update Village codes to allow for and encourage green
V Strategy medium term
building
Provide regular reviews of Village codes to remain current with
V Strategy ongoing
green building technology
If practical, review potential zoning code amendments to allow
V Strategy medium term
multi-generational housing
Review Zoning Code for possible amendments necessary for
V Strategy short term
Transit Oriented Development to occur in the VGO
Community Development Goal 3
B: Both
P: Park District
Increase opportunities for outreach and education
V: Village on sustainable practices.
Number of communications, website hits, attendance at Earth Day/
Metric
Arbor Day Events, and number of other events with green booths
B Strategy Improve existing websites and link the Partners’ “green” pages short term
B Strategy Provide interpretive signage of green amenities short term
Increase nature appreciation and environmentally-oriented
P Strategy short term
educational programs offered by the Park District
Encourage collaboration and resource sharing between
B Strategy short term
organizations, businesses, schools and other local agencies
Create a Sustainable Development Resource Booklet to
V Strategy disseminate to community development stakeholders through medium term
educational forums
Provide educational forums for developers and contractors on
B Strategy medium term
white roofs, geothermal, building orientation, solar access, etc.
15
TRANSPORTATION
Transportation is the second largest contributor of
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions after building-
related energy consumption. Transportation is also
6 Pace bus routes
a major source of nitrogen oxide, which continues to
keep the Chicago Metropolitan Area from meeting
National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
Transportation, however, also represents an
opportunity for residents and commuters to be
1 Metra train stop
more active and healthy. Reducing or replacing
the use of fossil-fuel-based transportation supports
environmental stewardship, alleviates environmental
impacts, and improves environmental quality. High 11 bike trails
quality transportation systems support high quality
of life through feasible alternatives such as public 12 bike routes
transit, biking and walking. With convenient public
transit options such as Metra and Pace, and lower
impact options (biking and walking), Northbrook
has dedicated time and funds to provide convenient
alternative transportation options.
27 bike rack
locations
Figure 14. Alternative transportation options
CURRENT TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES
Top Transit Suburbs. The Village of Northbrook Greening the Village Fleet. The Village received
was named one of the 20 “Top Transit Suburbs” a grant for $16,561 through the Clean Air Counts
(toptransitsuburbs.com) in the Chicago Metropolitan Program for Public Works staff to install diesel
Region, based on a 2012 report from the Chaddick oxidation catalysts on 13 vehicles to reduce harmful
Institute for Metropolitan Development at DePaul emissions from diesel fuels, including particulate
University. This report considered community matter, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and
infrastructure, such as commuter rail stations and nitrogen oxides. Northbrook was among the first
walkable downtown areas. communities to retrofit its equipment. The Village
also has nine hybrid vehicles in its fleet.
Bicycle Task Force. The Village’s Bicycle Task Force
coordinates all bicycle-related initiatives in the Greening the Park District Fleet. The Park District
community, reviews the need for access to bicycle fleet contains cars, trucks, landscape equipment and
transportation, identifies existing needs and offers miscellaneous small engines. Most of the fleet relies
recommendations to make the Village more “bike- on gasoline; although there are some diesel, electric
friendly.” The Bicycle Task Force also has developed and hybrid pieces of equipment.
a Bike Plan to guide the further development of bike
infrastructure throughout the village. Active Transportation. The Partners support active
transportation, such as walking and bicycling,
Anti-Idling Efforts. Beginning in March 2007, the to access their facilities and services by making
Village partnered with parks, schools, and other bicycle parking available. Throughout the Village,
organizations to install anti-idling signage. It also there are 15 parks with walking, biking, or multiuse
published articles in newsletters urging drivers to trails, totaling over 8.5 miles. Northbrook is also
cut idling engines to reduce harmful pollutants at participating in a multijurisdictional effort to convert
school pick-up locations, Park District facilities and former railways into a bike path, the Skokie Valley
train stations. Bike Trail, to connect Chicago and Wisconsin.
16
Parking Management. The Park District shares its
parking facilities with neighboring groups to reduce
the number of spaces needed. This reduces the
need for paved surfaces that interfere with effective
stormwater management. The Park District has the
following parking agreements:
St. Norberts School and Church uses the
parking lot at Village Green Center for
parent drop-off, special occasions and
Sunday overflow.
Village Green and the Northbrook
Historical Society share a parking lot
Leisure Center and Beth Shalom allow
shared parking during special events.
The parking areas near Meadowhill Park
and Northbrook Jr. High are used for
overflow parking since the high volume Figure 15. Bike lane outside Village Hall
times for each are opposite times of day
and times of year.
The Islamic Cultural Center uses the far
southwest parking lot at the Sports Center FUTURE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES
as overflow parking.
Wood Oaks Green Park visitors can use the Although Northbrook has easy access to alternative
Wood Oaks Junior High parking lot when transportation options, residents and staff
school is not in session. seek additional improvements to the network
of commuter rail and bus stations, a walkable
downtown, bicycle and pedestrian paths and
wayfinding signs. See Table 5 on the following page
for goals and strategies for improving transportation.
Figure 16. One of Northbrook’s many multiuse trails
17
Table 5. Goals, Metrics and Strategies for improving transportation
Timeframe
Agency Transportation Goal 1 (Short, medium, long
term or ongoing)
B: Both
P: Park District
Maintain a diverse, safe, and high quality transportation
V: Village network.
Reduction in accidents, increased number or bicycle and pedestrian
Metric
amenities, number of transportation alternatives
Identify potential links between open space and other activity centers
B Strategy (schools, Park District facilities, downtown) and provide signage for short term
pedestrian and bike routes
B Strategy Encourage multi-agency initiatives to link regional bike/pedestrian paths medium term
Where practical, provide adequate bike storage at facilities, parks, and
B Strategy short term
downtown
Continue to work with other agencies to enhance public transportation
V Strategy ongoing
options
V Strategy Identify relevant bus and train routes on the green website short term
B Strategy Incorporate IDOT’s Complete Streets Initiatives into projects ongoing
B Strategy Seek additional grant funding to improve the transit network ongoing
Transportation Goal 2
B: Both
P: Park District
Reduce fuel consumption and emissions by Village and
V: Village Park District fleet vehicles.
Metric Decrease in the amount of fuel purchased
When considering new fleet vehicles, purchase best miles-per-gallon
B Strategy ongoing
vehicles. Where practical, seek hybrid or energy efficient vehicles.
Institute anti-idling policies and increase use of anti-idling technology in
B Strategy short term
fleet vehicles
Assess the environmental and financial benefits of energy-efficient fuel
B Strategy medium term
sources for golf carts
Transportation Goal 3
B: Both
P: Park District
Reduce pollution and land development impacts from
V: Village single occupancy vehicle use.
Increased number of carpool parking spots, increased number of - fuel
Metric efficient vehicles, increased Pace/Metra ridership, reduction in year-over-
year growth in average daily vehicle traffic in key spots
P Strategy Provide preferred parking for carpools at Park District facilities short term
Where possible, promote shared parking between businesses
V Strategy ongoing
(night/day use)
As possible, provide preferred parking for fuel-efficient vehicles at
B Strategy short term
Partners’ facilities
Use newsletters to recognize businesses that provide shuttles,
V Strategy ongoing
guaranteed ride home programs, and other transportation options
B Strategy Participate in and support Commuter Challenges short term
18
CONCLUSION
The Northbrook Strategic Sustainability Plan
builds upon the demonstrated commitment
of local government, business and residents to
environmental and social responsibility, and it marks
a significant step forward in the process of building a
more sustainable Northbrook for current and future
residents. Over the next several years, this plan will
provide direction for Northbrook to continue to
become more healthy, livable and environmentally
resilient. The Village of Northbrook and the
Northbrook Park District will maintain oversight of
this plan, measuring progress made towards the
goals that have been set and updating the plan as
appropriate. This plan was prepared by the Delta Institute.
Figure 17. Northbrook’s Wood Oaks Green Park
19
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK
GENERAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: RICHARD A. NAHRSTADT, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PHILIP A. KIRALY, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: October 25, 2013
SUBJECT: REPORT: 2013 4TH OF JULY EVENTS
This is a joint staff report developed by the Village of Northbrook and the Northbrook Park District staff
regarding the 2013 4th of July events. The report will provide an overview of the events this year, as well
as information that should be considered by the Village Board of Trustees and Park District Board of
Commissioners in determining how both organizations should continue to plan and execute the events
moving forward.
2013 4th of JULY OVERVIEW
The Northbrook 4th of July Association dissolved in January 2013. At that time, the Village and Park
District determined that for 2013, the two organizations would jointly plan the annual celebration, and
an intergovernmental agreement was developed and approved by both Boards. It was also determined
that staff would evaluate the events and make a recommendation to our respective Boards in order to
plan for future years. The events that were planned jointly focused on the parade and fireworks. In
addition, the Rotary Club of Northbrook agreed to run the Pancake Breakfast in 2013.
Planning meetings began in February. The Committee included representatives from the Village’s Fire,
Police, Public Works, and General Government departments and from the Park District’s Parks and
Properties, Leisure Services and Marketing & Communications departments. In total, the committee
consisted of 14 Village and Park District staff. The Committee developed the theme and Park District
marketing staff created the event logo. Work responsibilities were divided; the Park District handled the
administrative support for the parade, while the Village handled the administrative tasks related to the
fireworks display. However, staff from both organizations assisted with both events.
The pancake breakfast was hosted and operated by the Northbrook Rotary Club. Park District staff
assisted with event set up and hosted family games. Rotary has indicated that they are planning to host
this event in the future, pairing it with their Rubber Ducky race.
The committee met in late July with volunteers and staff from both the Village and Park District to recap
the events and determine successes and areas of improvement. The following were observations
highlighted in that meeting:
Parade
Staff developed protocols for handling administrative tasks related to parade planning that
had not been formalized in the past including safety and emergency protocols in the event
of inclement weather or other unplanned situation.
Page 1
Staff improved protocols for communicating with event participants. For example, with the
parade, mailings were sent on a number of occasions that communicated event staging,
provided maps for participants and offered parade guidelines in written format.
Both the Village and Park District had ancillary roles in planning the parade in the past. In
2013, we relied heavily on the support of a few former 4th of July Association volunteers
who provided insight and historical context on how the events were planned in the past.
The support of these key individuals will be important in the future. The parade required a
great deal of staff to operate, involving not only much of the committee in leadership roles,
but also the assistance of Fire, Police and Public Works staff in directing traffic, closing
streets and maintenance of the parade route.
There were a few problems with the large transport busses and their support vehicles,
causing some last minute modifications and some confusion in the staging area.
Many parade participants tossed candy and in some cases used water guns, causing
complaints from spectators. There was also concern for safety of children running into the
streets to retrieve candy.
In a similar way, staff received complaints regarding the use of hoses, water balloons and
water guns by parade spectators. Some parade participants indicated that they may not
participate in the future because of this problem.
Crowd control was an issue in the first few blocks of the parade route as spectators (mostly
children) began to crowd into the street, narrowing the clearance necessary by some parade
floats and, particularly, the marching bands.
Overall, the Parade proved to be a success, serving as one of the largest on the North Shore
and with one of the most diverse parade lineups with over 60 participants. Compliments
were received that of the parades in the area, Northbrook’s was the best organized.
Fireworks
In the past, the fireworks have been heavily administered by staff, specifically the Fire
Department (firing logistics) and the Park District. This made the event fairly easy to
transition.
Event conditions were ideal – very little breeze, cool temperatures and modestly dry ground
conditions all contributed to a safe event.
The additional costs approved by the Village Board for the fireworks display were well
received. Many commented that the fireworks were the best they had seen in a number of
years. The Village Board approved an additional $10,000 for a total of $30,000 for this
year’s display.
The crowd seemed somewhat smaller than in years past, despite very good weather. Some
surrounding communities (Wheeling in particular) reinstated their own fireworks shows
which may have impacted our attendance.
Due to the timing of a mailing for Northbrook Days, some in the crowd believed there would
be entertainment at the fireworks; however, entertainment has not been provided for a
number of years.
Food options to patrons were limited – the Village was able to secure two ice cream vendors
however there were requests for additional food options in the future.
An RFP for fireworks services was not done this year, as the timing did not allow. The same
vendor, Melrose Pyrotechnics, who has been providing fireworks services for many years,
was utilized.
Page 2
Event Costs
Costs for both the Parade and Fireworks were borne by the Village and Park District, with an
initial infusion of funds from the defunct 4th of July Association. In total, the events cost
approximately $85,000 between the Village and Park District. This included staff overtime for
the events, purchase of peripheral materials (handouts, giveaways, event shirts, etc.) and event
costs (including contracts with vendors and fees for parade participants). The revenues and
costs are outlined in the following chart:
Revenues: Village Park District
4th of July Association (1 time) $12,927.00 $6,000.00
Parade Entry Fees $5,170.00
Vehicle Sticker Program $28,000.00
Misc. $100.00
TOTAL $40,927.00 $11,270.00
Expenses:
Staff Overtime
Police $13,546.00
Fire $2,990.00
Public Works $13,278.00
Park District $168.75
Contracts
Fireworks Vendor $30,000.00
Security/Portable Restrooms $1,575.00
Parade Participants $15,270.00
Event Items
Giveaways $2,187.00
Other Supplies $4,432.00 $1,137.00
TOTAL $64,246.00 $20,337.75
-$23,319.00 -$9,067.75
New this year was a fundraising opportunity that proved to be very successful. For a minimum
donation of $20, residents had the option to purchase a special vehicle sticker with the 4th of
July logo. This provided $28,000 to help offset event costs this year.
It is important to note that costs for staff overtime are essentially the same as they would have
been were the Village and Park District only serving in the roles that they had in the past, and
relate primarily to staffing the events themselves. We did not break out planning time, as that
work was primarily handled by salaried employees. The Village has historically budgeted
$20,000 annually for the Fireworks, and has also accounted for overtime costs in budget
projections as well.
Other recurring costs include the costs for the fireworks display itself as well as for the parking
vendor that directed traffic at Meadowhill Park.
Page 3
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff from both the Village and Park District strongly believe that the events of 2013 were successful due
to our positive collaboration. Certainly, taking on this new role added to the workload of both
organizations, but as was discussed with both Boards in February, there were no other entities that had
the resources to plan and execute these events. Staff was able to allocate the necessary time, and
developed a stronger understanding of the requirements of the events, which should ease the planning
process in the future. It is our joint recommendation that both the Village and Park District continue to
work together on planning and executing the Northbrook 4th of July events in 2014 and beyond.
There are some areas that staff believes can be improved in order to ease problems that arose in 2013
and to further streamline the overall event planning process. These include:
Generally, the planning committee structure worked very well. Distribution of work was
accomplished without either the Village or the Park District being adversely impacted.
Moving forward, we will need to either continue the current structure of funding these events
(each organization pays its staff and overtime costs; the Village pays for the fireworks, the Park
District pays for the parade) or develop an alternative cost sharing model. Certainly, the Village
has the majority of the costs allocated to it, between overtime costs and the costs for the
fireworks. However, the Village also has a very successful fundraising tool (vehicle sticker
program) that can help to offset those costs. Park District costs are focused on covering all
necessary expenses for the parade. Staff recommends utilizing the process that was used this
year.
Staff believes that we must develop better protocols, along with policies and procedures, for the
parade. This would include making changes to the staging process, improving crowd control and
reviewing rules for parade participants and spectators. It is our intention that the community
view this part of the 4th of July celebration as a fun and enjoyable event, but there are safety
issues that should be addressed.
While Northbrook has had a long and positive relationship with the current fireworks vendor,
Melrose Pyrotechnics, staff believes that it is prudent to solicit bids for the 2014 fireworks.
Staff would like to improve the food options and explore additional entertainment options for
the fireworks. Without the necessary planning time for this year’s event, staff was unable to
provide as many options for patrons.
Development of a theme and logo for the events was handled by the planning committee. Staff
recommends continuing that process. It was discussed that perhaps a community contest of
some sort might be possible, but the logistics and planning for a contest could be prohibitive.
However, if a contest was created, forms should be sent out much earlier (January or February).
Staff will be presenting this report to both the Village Board and Park District Board of Commissioners
and welcomes any feedback or suggestions. If both Boards concur with staff that our organizations
should continue to partner for this purpose, the Intergovernmental Agreement will be updated as
necessary and presented to both Boards for their approval.
Page 4