Intergovernmental Committee
Regular MeetingOak Park, IL · February 21, 2015
Minutes
123 Madison Street
Village of Oak Park Oak Park, Illinois 60302
www.oak-park.us
Meeting Minutes
Intergovernmental Committee
Saturday, February 21, 2015 9:00 AM Oak Park Township, 105 S. Oak Park Ave.
1. Call To Order
President Lueck called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m.
Attendees:
Paul Aeschleman - Parks
Peter Barber - Village
Matt Baron - Library
Graham Brisben - D97
Jim Gates - D97
Steve Gevinson - D200
Clarmarie Keenan - Township
Ade Onayemi - Township
Andrea Ott - Village (late arrival)
Colette Lueck - Village
Absent:
Victor Guarino - Parks
Bruce Samuels - Library
Jeff Weissglass - D200
Others Attending:
Teresa Powell - Village
2. Approval of Agenda
It was moved by Ms. Ott and seconded by Mr. Barber to approve the
agenda. The agenda was approved.
3. Approval of Minutes
It was moved by Ms.Ott and seconded by Mr. Barber to approve the
minutes of January 17, 2015. The minutes were approved.
4. Public Comment
There was no public comment.
5. Eisenhower Issues
Ms. Lueck reported that the first meeting study group with IDOT and the
Village of Oak Park Page 1 Printed on 3/26/2015
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting Minutes February 21, 2015
CTA was cordial; IDOT representatives had mapped public comments
and addressed each of these. Once these are addressed, the meetings
can focus the Village’s goal of more in-depth exploration of a single issue
each time and reporting out on that issue. There was much agreement
between the group and IDOT regarding improvements. They were much
better at explaining trade-offs such as how much the Ike can be lowered
under bridges, options for moving roads to north or south, improvements to
embankments, Ms. Lueck requested that they prepare a 3D model to
better visualize these options.
There was discussion of working on the Home Street overpass early due to
the dangerous condition (per the Village Engineer) of the pedestrian
walkway, but IDOT wants to address all overpasses together. There was
discussion of height, which is driven by the CSX daily train deliveries to
Ferrara.
There is now a structure now to address concerns rather than just sending
comments. The completion of recommendations is scheduled for
December, but construction is probably 10 years away.
The next meeting will include review of the 3D designs, scheduled for April.
Mr. Gates asked what two things that IDOT wants and two things that the
Village wants. Ms. Lueck noted that infrastructure needs to be replaced,
and that an extra lane will reduce traffic. The Village sees the opportunity to
improve connectivity between two parts of the Village. The meeting
explored the cost of expansion of decks where there is a crossover to
visually decrease the impact of the Ike and increase the connectivity of the
Village. They understand this and appear committed to making this
happen. She mentioned soundscaping, pollution mitigation, improved
landscaping, sidewalks, decking that is functional. What does the Village
give up? The ramps, if kept where they are, would not be an issue, but
moving the ramps and raising them create an interchange at Austin and at
Harlem. The biggest impact is on business. The CTA will do
improvements at the same time. Ms. Ott noted that current entrances to the
CTA are not ADA-compliant; changes could increase ridership.
There were questions about safety of the current ramps, remove six lane
“bottleneck” and replace old infrastructure, and improve pedestrian and
bicycle transit. Ms. Lueck noted that one proposal includes a tunnel for
bikes. The CTA will completely rebuild and improve access to the Des
Plaines exit as a CTA hub, encouraging more “kiss and ride” at that
location.
Mr. Aeschleman reported a good meeting of the Park District Board with
Village of Oak Park Page 2 Printed on 3/26/2015
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting Minutes February 21, 2015
IDOT, discussing vibration for the Conservatory impact, mostly tied to
whether the retaining wall will need to be replaced or just repaired.
Mr. Gates asked if there was an executive summary of the meeting. There
is not one yet, but Ms. Lueck expects that there will be, with bi-monthly
study sessions. Both Parks and D97 offered to participate in the process,
but were told that these meetings will be Village-driven. There was
discussion of this decision, with a desire to keep it small and simple. The
agreement is between the Village and IDOT. There was desire to have
other taxing bodies available as resources at these meetings due to the
significance of this infrastructure improvements. Ms. Lueck noted that it is
important to have other stakeholders involved in this and will send a
request to the Village President and Village Manager. Mr. Onayemi noted
the impact on the whole community.
The Village convened an advisory group to conduct a discussion with
experts on various topics to identify major issues and concerns to be
addressed with IDOT. Mr. Barber suggested that the next step in this
process would be a Board vote regarding how this process will go forward.
6. Next Steps Assembly
Ms. Powell explained that a conflict has arisen for the original date of the
Assembly on May 2, as the annual Ethnic Fest Parade is the same
morning. There was agreement that the meeting should be moved to the
morning of May 16 at the Township Senior Center. Ms. Lueck asked that
this date be communicated to all of the local Governing Boards.
There was agreement that Gil Herman should be asked to facilitate the
meeting, to be paid at the meeting, as he is familiar with the process. Mr.
Brisben will ask Mr. Herman.
Ms. Lueck asked about the content of the meeting. Mr. Barber reviewed
notes, that it was important to demonstrate a collective commitment and
the following topics:
1. Use of metrics and measurements: How do we establish a baseline
for performance change for Oak Park?
2. Are there any other low-hanging fruit? (table discussions with
mid-level staff)
3. Successes and failures (likely table discussions too),
4. Realtor or business community component.
Mr. Gates added that he would like part of the presentation to be some
kind of viual representation of the impact for the business community and
Realtors, who may have different views of what is beneficial. Mr.
Aeschleman suggested presentations using a similar format to the first
Assembly representing the business and Realtor community, as well as
Village of Oak Park Page 3 Printed on 3/26/2015
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting Minutes February 21, 2015
property developers and managers, the retail and restaurant group, and the
Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Gates suggested that the two of them work
together with one other person to prepare a list of possible participants for
review by this group.
Mr. Aeschleman suggested five minute presentations and what constitutes
a baseline metric. He mentioned an email from a resident proposing better
measures for government than the CPI and possible use of three or four
metrics from his suggestions for taxing bodies as a place to start.
Mr. Gates suggested use of a standard format for five minute
presentations. Ms. Lueck noted that standard visuals were very helpful at
the first Assembly. The planning group will come up with a draft template.
Ms. Ott volunteered to join the planning group.
Mr. Baron recommended a digest of the first Assembly as part of the
presentation. Mr. Aeschleman recommended that Tax Assessor Ali
ElSaffar be invited. Mr. Gevinson suggested a business / commercial
focus to drive the meeting with reference to how this relates to the prior
Assembly. Mr. Barber suggested that Mr. Herman, the proposed
moderator, provide a recap of key points from the first Assembly, the big
issues, to set the tone for the meeting. Mr. Gates suggested that for this
expanded role the moderator’s fee be increased to $500.
Mr. Gates will assemble the slides for the meeting. Mr. Baron requested
that these be distributed early with key drivers and goals identified. Mr.
Barber suggested Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Cathy Yen
as a presenter; Ms. Ott suggested that she might compile an overall
business presentation and will contact her to get a proposed list to choose
from for presenters. Mr. Gates will prepare a skeleton format for
presentations and share with the planning committee, Mr. Aeschleman and
Ms. Ott There was discussion of how many residents are renters, and Ms.
Lueck said that the Housing Department will have details. Ms. Lueck
added that after the presentation there will be table discussions. Mr. Gates
and Ms. Ott will propose topics for discussion.
7. Report from Participating Taxing Bodies
Ms. Lueck noted that while the original structure of the I-Gov included three
members of the Village Board, that it was not the intent that the Village
have overall responsibility for these meetings and that Ms. Powell could
retire from this position following the next Assembly to have this
record-keeping and administrative position handled another way.
Following discussion of the options of hiring someone or rotating this
position among the six boards, it was decided that the position will rotate
for a year at a time. Ms. Powell will prepare a summary sheet of the
administrative role.
Village of Oak Park Page 4 Printed on 3/26/2015
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting Minutes February 21, 2015
The group discussed whether a change in the number of representatives
from the Village would impact recognition of the I-Gov’s role. The option of
sending an alternate representative from boards when a primary
representative was discussed; this is the method used by the Village on
their Economic Development Committee.
Mr. Baron reported that he and Park Board President Lane Hart met with
Village President Anan Abu-Taleb and Trustee Bob Tucker to discuss
changes to insurance coverage and reached an agreement to avoid
litigation. This provides a good example of cooperation among taxing
bodies. Ms. Lueck noted that future boards may look back at decisions
currently being made with questions, as current boards have reviewed past
decisions.
Mr. Aeschleman reported that he met with D97 representatives to discuss
use of fields; Parks is ahead of schedule on registrations for summer camp
programs. Over 800 part-time workers are being hired to staff these
summer programs and provide support.
Ms. Keenan reported that the Township is in its budget cycle. Mr. Onayemi
noted that the Governor’s proposed budget cuts are “scary” with mental
health and youth programs a target.
Mr. Gates reported on the success of the VEX Robotics competition at
Brooks and Julian Middle Schools on February 7, attracting 36 robotics
teams. Of the ten top awards, seven went to D97 teams. Six of these
teams qualified for the state competition. He also reported that schools will
use pencil and paper tests for the Common Core, rather than computers.
The current partial year vacancy on the D97 board will be filled while the
search for a new superintendent is under way. D97 will partner with Parks
to use “outdoor learning spaces”.
Mr. Brisben added that this 50 day appointment will be contributing to the
search for a new superintendent, which D97 plans to announce by May 5.
He thanked other stakeholders for their input to this process.
Mr. Gates reported that the Facilities Advisory Committee is consulting
with heads of architectural firms and structural engineers on the design of
the new administration building. The last public forum will be held on
Wednesday, February 25.
Mr. Barber reported that a new development at South Boulevard and
Harlem Avenue will include rental units and will replace a portion of Maple
Avenue in the development with a public walkway.
Village of Oak Park Page 5 Printed on 3/26/2015
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting Minutes February 21, 2015
Mr. Aeschleman asked about the impact of new developments on provision
of children’s activities by the Park District and on the number of classrooms
needed by the schools. Ms. Lueck explained that the target density and
smaller size of units will tend to attract residents without children in the
schools. The density will provide community savings in impact on utilities
as housing is more compact in a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD).
She noted that downtown Oak Park will be very different when these
projects are completed. Mr. Baron commented that there would be 2300
new residents; Mr. Barber said that the total number of units will be 1,200 to
1,400. He added that parking for these units is included in each
development and that current parking spaces in the development areas are
being replaced. Ms. Lueck added that the desire is not to incent too much
parking as these developments are meant to encourage use of public
transit.
Mr. Barber reported that the Economic Development Corporation (EDC)
has hired John Lynch as its new Development Director and added that he
has extensive experience in attracting corporate development. Mr. Lynch,
an Evanston resident, started work on Tuesday, February 17 and will be
contacting other local governing bodies.
Ms. Lueck also noted the potential impact of the Governor’s budget
proposals on the Village, with a loss of $2 million projected, and was also
concerned about the Governor’s approach to pension reform. Mr. Gates
noted the Speaker Madigan’s pension position might assure “mutual
destruction”.
There was discussion of a possible memorial for former School Board
member and president Peter Traczyk. Mr. Gates noted that the Board is
taking time to consider options rather than rushing to make a quick
decision. He added that the Board “needs time to breathe”. Ms. Lueck
noted that it was best that D97 respond to citizen recommendations that
have come to the Village and others regarding this decision.
Ms. Ott reported that Forest Park and Oak Park are moving forward on a
joint approach to environmental sustainability and expressed a desire to
work with more governments on this initiative. The Village Board will hold a
special meeting on this topic on March 9 to discuss the proposed
organization and structure. The proposal is like that of the EDC or the
Collaboration for Early Childhood governing boards to consider policy and
best decisions working with local sustainability organizations on
opportunities for collaboration. Ms. Ott said that the working name of this
group is the Intergovernmental Sustainability Organization.
Mr. Aeschleman asked when this group would reach out to other
Village of Oak Park Page 6 Printed on 3/26/2015
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting Minutes February 21, 2015
governments. He noted that Parks personnel are currently providing
preschool outdoor education in Austin Gardens. Ms. Ott noted that the
organization is still in development and that outreach will follow.
Mr. Gevinson reported that the High School Board is working on
implementation of the D200 strategic plan. The pool issue is partially
resolved and mentioned another new proposal presented at a recent public
meeting. The group discussed the pool issue and sports facility options.
Mr. Gevinson noted that the pool is used for physical education and a new
pool would provide a resource available to the community as well. Ms.
Lueck noted that the proposed debt issue to build should be coordinated
with other governments. Mr. Brisben recommended that this be part of the
Assembly discussion.
8. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m.
Village of Oak Park Page 7 Printed on 3/26/2015
Agenda
123 Madison Street
Village of Oak Park Oak Park, Illinois 60302
www.oak-park.us
Meeting Agenda
Intergovernmental Committee
Saturday, February 21, 2015 9:00 AM Oak Park Township, 105 S. Oak Park Ave.
1. Call To Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes
4. Public Comment
5. Eisenhower Issues
6. Next Steps Assembly
a. Finalize preferred date
b. Topics and assignments
7. Report from Participating Taxing Bodies
8. Adjournment
Village of Oak Park Page 1 Printed on 2/27/2015