Muyni
← Back to Portland

Sustainability and Transportation Committee

Regular Meeting

Portland, ME · November 12, 2025

AgendaPacket

Agenda

Sustainability& Transportation MEMBERS Committee Agenda Councilor Regina Phillips, Chair Councilor Pious Ali, At-Large November 12, 2025 at 5:00 PM Councilor Anna Bullett, District 4 The Sustainability and Transportation Committee will conduct this meeting remotely via Zoom. Allow your computer to install the free Zoom app to get the best meeting experience. If you are not able to attend live either in person or via Zoom, a recording will be available in the Agenda Center following the meeting. For public comment via Zoom, you will need to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise your hand via the telephone, please hit *9. You will be unmuted by the host when it is time for public comment. https://portlandmaine- gov.zoom.us/j/89952567500?pwd=zLf7HunT yswwcokWAwAlXBHcv0WNXl.1 1. Review and approve minutes from October 8, 2025 a. Minutes from October 8, 2025 2. Sustainability Program Updates a. Sustainability Updates 3. Presentation and Discussion a. Presentation regarding the Capisic Brook Watershed Management Plan Presenter: Ben Pearson No public comment will be taken. b. Annual report regarding Energy Benchmarking Presenters: Katie Tims No public comment will be taken. c. Review and discussion of updated greenhouse gas inventory Presenter: Troy Moon No public comment will be taken. d. In accordance with 1 M.R.S. section 405(6)(E), the Sustainability and Transportation Committee is expected to hold an executive session to consult with its attorneys regarding matters related to the regulation of discharges from cruise ships. 4. Other Business

Packet

Sustainability& Transportation MEMBERS Committee Agenda Councilor Regina Phillips, Chair Councilor Pious Ali, At-Large November 12, 2025 at 5:00 PM Councilor Anna Bullett, District 4 The Sustainability and Transportation Committee will conduct this meeting remotely via Zoom. Allow your computer to install the free Zoom app to get the best meeting experience. If you are not able to attend live either in person or via Zoom, a recording will be available in the Agenda Center following the meeting. For public comment via Zoom, you will need to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise your hand via the telephone, please hit *9. You will be unmuted by the host when it is time for public comment. https://portlandmaine- gov.zoom.us/j/89952567500?pwd=zLf7HunT yswwcokWAwAlXBHcv0WNXl.1 1. Review and approve minutes from October 8, 2025 a. Minutes from October 8, 2025 2. Sustainability Program Updates a. Sustainability Updates 3. Presentation and Discussion a. Presentation regarding the Capisic Brook Watershed Management Plan Presenter: Ben Pearson No public comment will be taken. b. Annual report regarding Energy Benchmarking Presenters: Katie Tims No public comment will be taken. Page 1 c. Review and discussion of updated greenhouse gas inventory Presenter: Troy Moon No public comment will be taken. d. In accordance with 1 M.R.S. section 405(6)(E), the Sustainability and Transportation Committee is expected to hold an executive session to consult with its attorneys regarding matters related to the regulation of discharges from cruise ships. 4. Other Business Page 2 CITY OF PORTLAND, MAINE Committee on Sustainability and Transportation Councilor Regina Phillips (D3), Chair Councilor Pious Ali (At-Large) Councilor Anna Bullett (D4) Minutes October 8, 2025 Members Present: Councilor Ali, Councilor Bullet, Councilor Michniewicz, Councilor Pelletier, Councilor Phillips, Mayor Dion Staff Present: Helen Donaldson, Greg Jordan, Kevin Kraft, Karly Meyer, Troy Moon, Mike Murray, Greg Watson, Tony Wirkus Meeting was called to order. September 10, 2025, Meeting Minutes The September 10, 2025, meeting minutes were approved unanimously. Announcement Councilor Phillips thanked Director Murray, Department of Public Works, and the Maine Department of Transportation for their work repaving streets. Sustainability Updates Presented by Troy Moon and Karly Meyer, Sustainability Office Visited Little Diamond Island and viewed their living shoreline and joined Kristina Egan at the Greater Portland Council of Governments for their Regional Councils national conference. The Neighborhood Mini Grants program launched to bring neighbors together. The Sustainability Office is partnering with the Harvard Kennedy School of Government to better understand residents’ concerns related to sea level rise and vulnerabilities. Katie Tims, Sustainability Associate, recently gave a talk at the Senator George J. Mitchell Center at the University of Maine on One Climate Future. The Sustainability Office hosted Park(ing) Day at the end of September. Mayor Dion recommended that Councilor Phillips follow up with Director Moon to watch the video produced about the Little Diamond Island living shoreline project. Page 3 Resolution Supporting the Collaboration Between the Gulf of Maine Research Institute and the City of Portland Councilor Phillips brought forth the resolution supporting the collaboration between the Gulf of Maine Research Institute and the City of Portland to build coastal resilience and support the marine economy. Councilor Phillips asked Mayor Dion if this is something that should be read at a full council meeting and if it is something that could be put on the agenda. Mayor Dion stated that it would be on the agenda. Director Moon read the resolution. Public Comment on Resolution Supporting the Collaboration Between the Gulf of Maine Research Institute and the City of Portland Seeing no one wishing to make public comments, the comment period was closed. Councilor Bullet motioned to bring the resolution before the full council. Councilor Ali seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Amendment to Chapter 28 Presented by Tony Wirkus and Mike Murray Proposing to change the ticketing for leaving a car on the street during a city parking ban for snow removal efforts from $40 to $175. Historically, the City has operated the Ocean Gateway parking lot as an impound lot. However, this lot is slated to become a city park, and will no longer be available for vehicles. Currently, the fee structure is such that if you are towed, you pay $135 and a $40 citation. If you are not towed, but you leave your car in an area where you are not permitted to park it, you only pay a $40 citation. The proposed change would be such that if you are towed, you would pay $40. If you are not towed, but you leave your car in an area where you are not allowed to park it, you would pay a $175 citation. Director Wirkus stated that this looks at a fee structure that ensures it is worth the time and effort to move your vehicle, so that our public works team can adequately plow the roads and emergency vehicles can access roads. In addition to revising the fee structure, the proposal increases the amount of parking space available during snow bans to include the following areas: parking along Marginal Way until Maj. Charles J. Loring Memorial Park, Rainbow Mall Road next to the woods, Saint James and Douglas Streets next to the park, Valley Street south of C Street next to the park. None of these parking locations are in front of someone’s residence. Page 4 Councilor Bullet asked if Director Wirkus could attend her district meeting on December 7 to discuss parking along Rainbow Mall Road and if communication efforts could be increased by encouraging residents to sign up for text messages. Councilor Ali asked how we landed on this fee. Director Wirkus stated that this is below $200, which is the current fee for parking in an ADA-designated parking spot. That fee is similar, since it is also blocking accessibility. The tow fee, impound fee, and citation were adding up to over $200, and so the rate for leaving a car on the street during a snow ban was set to be below $200. Public Comment on Amendment to Chapter 28 ❖​ One resident commented that they are a property manager and higher fines don’t necessarily create the reactions one is looking for, but rather consistency in enforcement. A drastic change is pretty concerning. Appreciates options for more parking. Wants to create a solution before penalizing people. Noted that other areas don’t have parking ban fees above $100. Fines are often considered a tax. ❖​ Comments were made that this will penalize people; people don’t even know that there will be a parking ban or that the city tows. The City is fining people who are not aware of what is happening. ❖​ A comment was made that the parking ban ends at seven o’clock and you have to move your car by seven, which is hard to do. The ban should end at six and cars should be moved by seven. ❖​ A comment was made that once in a while, parking bans get extended and called much too early. Does not approve of the increase and encourages the committee to send this back to staff. ❖​ A commenter stated that they were very supportive of changes to the policy, both the fee structure and adding new snow ban lots. A new development came to Libbytown, and the concern was that they would not add much surface parking. The neighborhood was supportive of not adding more surface parking. By creating more snow ban lots, we are able to have fewer off-street parking lots. Raising the fines is regrettably necessary. It is comparable to a cigarette tax, and it may be regressive, but some regressive taxes are necessary. ❖​ A commenter stated that they were inclined to support the city staff’s proposal. Suggested that the impact on lower-income households is something we could mitigate. If residents can show their eligibility for food stamps or Section 8 housing, could receive a discount of 50%. ❖​ A comment was made in support of the increase in availability of options. It is stressful to come home from working out of town and find that all of the snow ban parking is taken. Around 2,700 snow ban parking spots exist on peninsula; suggested City encourage or mandate other garage owners to allow use of garages for parking. Mayor Dion commented that on the criminal side, increasing fines rarely changes behaviour. He would like an analysis of enforcement, including how many tow trucks are deployed and how Page 5 many officers are available to help remove vehicles. He stated that he is more concerned about capacity to remove vehicle rather than fining someone. The likelihood of getting towed is more of a deterrent than a fine. Councilor Michniewicz commented that there have been fluctuations in the number of people available. Sees the life-safety issue of such narrow streets. Asks if there is an option to have a fee between $40 and $175. Asks if there is a gradual fee structure option, like with sidewalk shoveling. Assistant City Manager Jordan stated that they could certainly provide data on the strain this places on the police department. This is a forced-overtime situation for police. The City could try to quantify the lack of coordination from tow drivers. Thirdly, the loss of the tow lot will impact things. Can do more work looking at how fines are raised and how populations respond. Recognized that communication is a big part of this. Mayor Dion would like to know how we target our limited resources, and if we target certain areas. Councilor Pelletier recognized the difficult position. It is expensive to use tow trucks. Would like to see data on effectiveness of fines. Would also like to see discount on fines for low-income residents. Would love to see community partners lend their parking spaces. Councilor Michniewicz asks if impound lot needs to be enclosed or if it can be an open surface lot. Director Wirkus responded that it needs to be able to be secured. Councilor Michniewicz stated that during recent conversations about music venues, they looked at night parking availability, and that there was lots of parking. Suggested that some of those lots could be pressed into service for this. Councilor Phillips reiterated that education is key, additional spaces within garages, WEX or Roux building parking, and asked what happens when a car does get towed. Are you not just paying the tow truck company? Director Wirkus stated that yes, you just would pay $40 as a citation, and the $135 would be to the tow truck company for use of their equipment. Councilor Phillips asked if the committee was under the gun for this proposal. Assistant City Manager Jordan confirmed that if this went to the council and then back to the committee, it would likely not be put in place until snow season, which would be too late. Motion to raise the fee to $175 with some of the changes suggested by the committee. Councilor Bullett motioned and Councilor Phillips seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Amtrak Downeaster Location Presented by Assistant City Manager Greg Jordan Assistant City Manager Jordan provided an overview. Proposed move of location from its current location to the Main Line, which is the track directly parallel to Saint John Street. A site Page 6 study in 2021 conducted by Maine Department of Transportation (DOT) concluded that a location parallel to Congress Street would be most advantageous. A follow-up study in 2024 by the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) looked at three locations and concluded that a location on the Maine Line along Saint John Street adjacent to the Mercy Hospital, referred to as Site Three. NNEPRA adopted the recommendations in the plan. From the beginning of the discussions, City staff have communicated concerns to NNEPRA. City staff appreciate NNEPRA meeting, however, staff have not been convinced that Site Three is in the best interests of Portland. NNEPRA has been invited here to present why Site Three is the best location, as well as City staff to present their assessment and recommendation, and the Greater Portland Council of Governments, which administers the regional transportation program, to share their perspective. Presented by Patricia Quinn, Executive Director of NNEPRA Provided a brief overview of the history and structure of NNEPRA, NNEPRA’s role as operating partners for Amtrak Downeaster partners. Provided statistics on the Downeaster trips, ridership, and passenger destinations. Goal of NNEPRA is to provide more trains with shorter travel times to connect more trains to more destinations. Have received federal funds to open a station in Falmouth. Provided overview of Wells Area Improvement Project. This will enable an additional trip to be added between Wells and Brunswick running every day. The northbound train would arrive in Portland around 7:55AM. The biggest barrier is that the Portland station is not very accessible to the downtown currently. The other issue with the Portland station is that it is currently located down a one-way street, taking 15 minutes for the train to stop and turn around. This adds cost and makes the train less competitive. Ms. Quinn presented a vision for a new mainline station where there are two tracks, making the stop two minutes. A map and schematic of where the new station location was presented. Increased connectivity to a variety of locations were discussed. Ms. Quinn noted past studies supporting moving train stations, as well as stakeholder and public outreach and engagement in the 2024 plan. Noted support from Maine DOT, Maine Legislature Transportation Committee, Towns of Brunswick and Wells, Amtrak, and others. Noted request from City of Portland to conduct an analysis that includes a no-build option and a cost-benefit analysis of all reasonable alternatives. Ms. Quinn noted plans and challenges for each of the three options evaluated by NNEPRA. Mr. Dale Doughty, Acting Commissioner of NNEPRA, added additional reasons which inform and motivate NNEPRA’s plan to change station locations. Amtrak Downeaster Station Relocation Presented by Kevin Kraft, Development Director Discussed site selection of process, role of City in the site selection process. Summarized historic and current regional transportation plans, as well as implementation process of plans. Discussed outcomes of 2021 study conducted by City, NNEPRA, Concord Coach Lines, Metro, PACTS, and other key partners, led by Maine Department of Transportation (DOT). Explained benefits and drawbacks of each station, from the perspective of the City and the 2021 study. Page 7 Presented national examples of integrating rail into downtowns, rail lines located near grade crossings. Reviewed history of statements made by city on NNEPRA proposal of station move. Portland Station Relocation - Regional Context Kristina Egan, Executive Director, Greater Portland Council of Governments (GPCOG) Discussed goals and role of GPCOG. Goal of GPCOG is cohesion of all regional transportation. Discussed 2021 study, the goal of which was to analyze whether or not to decouple Concord Coach Lines from Amtrak Downeaster site. Discussed opportunity costs and benefits of investing in rail. Reviewed regional transportation goals: make transit easier, create frequent connections, invest in rapid transit, create transit-friendly places. Preferred Site 2 over Site 3. Kevin Kraft concluded staff recommendation for Site 2 over Site 3, emphasized investments and benefits of current station location, identified pathways forward for Council. Public Comment on Amtrak Downeaster Station Location ❖​ Support for Site 2 includes transit, bike/ped, and development potential; is most effective to meet accessibility goals, land use and planning goals, and holistic community needs; proximity to Congress Street and METRO stop is important; revitalizes historic location of original use and serves regional and local goals; advances TOD and multimodal access; recognition that City staff, regional planners at GPCOG, and the neighborhood organizations in/around this site all prefer Site 2. ❖​ Opposition for Site 2 includes the concern around land ownership, safety considerations related to a 3rd rail crossing Congress St and downtime signals with multiple track crossings and vehicle delays, and platform landing on County jail property. ❖​ Support for Site 3 includes concern that the City is ignoring the operational difficulties of Site 2 and MaineHealth’s preference for Site 3; quick access to MaineHealth and Mercy shuttle. ❖​ Opposition on Site 3 includes inconsistency with City’s Comprehensive Plan; requires significant industrial restructuring. ❖​ Concern that the study done to determine size of proposed parking lot is insufficient; concern for the impact to surrounding area; concern that carbon emissions were not a consideration in the study; concern that MaineHealth is landbanking area with no plan for improvement/development to Union Plaza; concern for the cost benefit of this potential project. Councilor Comment on Amtrak Downeaster Station Location Jim Cohen recognizes NNEPRA’s lengthy process to analyze the feasibility of and public input surrounding this topic. The information presented by City staff has not been seen until today. Reiterates the following conclusions around reduction of carbon emissions, land ownership and control on those outcomes. Greg Jordan recognizes the property ownership concerns, but those issues are downstream from this conversation at this time. Page 8 Dale Doughty notes that Maine DOT and City agree on reassessing Libbytown traffic patterns, after their federal grant funding was rescinded, and we don’t see a funding path forward anytime in the near future. MEDOT wants to continue partnering with all parties to determine the best site, even if the alternatives are not in Portland. Patricia Quinn reaffirms that Site 3 would support Transit Oriented Development. She goes on to review some of the regional and service-related changes since the study was conducted during COVID. Councilor Bullett notes that Portland’s train station should be urban and future planning means planning for a future without cars. Councilor Bullett asks if there was in-state ridership modeling done between Site 3 vs Site 2. Patricia Quinn says they did not, since the sites are so close to each other. Councilor Bullett asks Dale Doughty, MaineDOT, to expand on the federal grant clawbacks mentioned. There are still federal grants being announced, we can get you more details on those. We didn’t get public comment from Mercy or MaineHealth, and just wanted to make sure they are aware of this public comment. Greg Jordan mentioned that representatives of MaineHealth on the attendee side, we have corresponded with property owners, but confirming that we did not receive public comment from either organizations. Councilor Bullett shares her support for the alternatives analysis and re-emphasizes the key to walkability to the train station. Councilor Pelletier asks if Site 3 is up for sale? Patricia Quinn states that we have had conversations with all property owners impacted by Site 3 and all have expressed their willingness to work with us. Is the only feasible layover facility the one mentioned on the Mountain Branch? The primary layover facility is in Brunswick and would still be able to be accessed by any new station, some of them just require the backup movement and multiple movements. Is there an implication that Amtrak would no longer service Portland if there isn’t a favorable outcome here? I think we were talking about ‘what’s next’ such that if we go back and conduct an alternatives analysis and we determine that Falmouth is the most viable alternative, because of the limited viable spaces available in Portland, then that may be the outcome. If we moved to conduct an alternative analysis and work with MaineHealth to find a compromise. Councilor Ali asks Mayor Dion if there was other sources of funding that could be accessed to help fund this study? Mayor Dion submit this project for analysis in the U.S. Mayor’s Conference design guidance for land use issues. There is an opportunity for us to work together and hard bargain for what something could look like, but perhaps a third party can help us determine what is in the best interest of all. Councilor Michniewicz shares her support for the Mayor’s advice on collaborating with a third-party and for all members not backing away from this conversation. Mayor Dion suggests Legal should provide clarity on land acquisitions and other relevant issues. Page 9 Councilor Phillips notes her appreciation for the public comment concerning parking lot size. Councilor Phillips goes on to remind us of all of our City planning documents that outline our goals and aspirations that direct this work. So many of these documents outline our concern for public safety. Site 3 does not have sufficient connection with METRO lines. There are five businesses co-located with Site 3, all of which would have to move if Site 3 was selected. That is certainly a concern that has not been noted tonight. Councilor Phillips shares her surprise that a facilitated conversation has not happened already. Greg Jordan suggests that a facilitated discussion would be couched within the greater alternatives analysis and further technical and financial studies. Councilor Phillips suggests we need to change the recommendation before us, being step 1 being a facilitated discussion with a third party and step 2 conducting an alternative study. Councilor Bullett adds that those steps could happen simultaneously. Financial cost breakdowns, land ownership, and legal analysis of the options at hand. Motion to Recommend an Alternative Study for the Amtrak Downeaster Station Location and an Additional Directive for Staff to Engage NNEPRA in the Solicitation of a Mediator to Provide the Objective Data to Inform the Committee Councilor Bullett motioned and Councilor Ali seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0. Motion to Adjourn The motion was moved by Councilor Bullett and seconded by Councilor Ali. The motion was approved 3-0. Meeting Adjourned Page 10 City of Portland | Sustainability Office Troy Moon, Director To: Sustainability and Transportation Committee Regina Phillips, Chair MEETING DATE November 12, 2025 AGENDA ITEM Agenda Item #2A– Sustainability Updates PURPOSE To update the committee regarding recent activities of the Sustainability Office to advance Council goals and objectives related to One Climate Future COMMITTEE WORK PLAN/CITY COUNCIL GOAL ALIGNMENT These projects implement elements of the One Climate Future Plan or other Council goals. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Project: Sustainable Neighborhoods On November 8, our office hosted the first Neighborhood Leaders Summit. The program convened groups who received a Sustainable Neighborhoods Mini Grant as well as other community members nominated by their neighbors. Participants also included several individuals who work with the Office of Economic Opportunity as Natural Helpers. Participants shared information about their projects as well as ideas for building community across the City. The program built a lot of excitement and participants would like to maintain connections, which will be a key focus of our Sustainable Neighborhoods program during the upcoming year. Project: Waste Reduction We hosted our third annual Pumpkin Cycle, where we ask residents to bring their jack-o-lanterns, pumpkins, and gourds to Payson Park, where we can collect them to be 1 Page 11 composted. While the event is fun and promotes composting, the real goal of this event is to help us avoid overwhelming our community compost sites with pumpkins. The City Council accepted a grant from the Maine DEP that will allow us to add a compost drop off site on Irving Street at Heseltine Park. It will also allow us to build attractive kiosks at most of the drop off sites that will provide some shelter for the carts and will also provide space for community notices. As part of this program expansion we will be conducting additional education and outreach activities about composting including community events at some of the sites. Work will begin in the spring. Project: Energy We are launching a new campaign to encourage residents to make their homes more energy efficient. We distributed energy efficiency kits to people who attended Pumpkincycle and have also produced a short promotional video, which we translated into several languages with the help of the Natural Helpers program participants. The City has filed as an intervenor in the PUC’s docket regarding CMP’s request for a Finding of Public Convenience and Necessity for their Greater Portland Transmission Upgrade project. This will allow us to be a full participant in the proceedings to ensure that the City’s interests are fully considered. The process will take at least a year. Project: Community Education and Engagement During the last committee meeting, Councilors requested to see the video created by Little Diamond Island residents which offers an inspiring look at the completion of the Cogawesco Park Artificial Sand Dune Project on Little Diamond Island. Over the course of 5 weeks in September and October of 2024, several island cottage owners, their families and friends (under the leadership of the Waterfront and Buildings & Grounds Committees), put in over 800 hours of volunteer labor to build and stabilize a new protective sand dune and reimagine the cherished LDI casino beach. The Sustainability Office is partnering with the Harvard Kennedy School of Government to survey Portland residents, with a focus on Bayside, about their knowledge of climate vulnerabilities and to hear what their concerns are about climate change. A group of five graduate students are engaged on the project and are currently connecting with neighborhood leaders. They are working on a survey to be conducted in collaboration with a professional polling firm and are organizing in person opportunities to connect 2 Page 12 with Bayside residents. They will provide us with a report in December that will inform our resilience planning efforts.. On October 21, Troy attended the 2025 Extension Disaster Education Network Annual Conference which convened in Portland this year. He participated on a panel with representatives from GPCOG and Maine Sea Grant to discuss the impacts of the January 2024 storms on Maine’s coastal and island communities. On November 6, our Resilience Fellow, Brenda Kirlin, hosted an Apartment-Friendly Wildflower Workshop at the East End Community Center to teach residents planting techniques and how to overwinter native wildflowers from seed. We hosted a Coffee & Climate event: “Climate Action in Maine” with Congresswoman Chellie Pingree on October 10. Our last two Coffee & Climate webinars for 2025 are “From Donation to Difference” with Goodwill Northern New England on November 14 and “Climate Resilience Zoning” with Portland and South Portland planning staff on December 12. Visit www.oneclimatefuture.org to sign up for our once-a-month newsletter where we share the upcoming Coffee & Climate topic, information on upcoming events, new programs launching, and climate action progress in Portland and South Portland. 3 Page 13 Capisic Brook Watershed Management Plan Update November 12, 2025 Page 14 Capisic Brook Location: Small, 2.5-mile-long urban stream primarily in the City of Portland, with a small portion in Westbrook. Watershed Size: 1,478 acres. Path: Begins near Warren Avenue, flows through dense commercial/residential areas, enters Capisic Pond, and ultimately joins the Fore River near Casco Bay. Tributaries: East (near Evergreen Cemetery), North (north of Warren Ave), and West (near I-95/Portland-Westbrook line) The original Watershed Management Plan from 2012 was updated in 2025 Page 15 Page 16 Capisic Brook is listed as a Class C waterbody under the State’s Water Quality Standards, the lowest classification Urbanization has greatly changed Capisic Brook and now roughly a third of the watershed is a paved or built surface Capisic Brook does not meet the Class C standard and has been listed as “Impaired” and subject to the Urban Impaired Stream requirements under the Stormwater regulations Page 17 Page 18 Stressors and Pollutant Sources Primary Habitat Stressors (from 2023 Field Assessments): ● Fill encroachment, artificial stream channel modifications (straightening, artificial stabilization/hardening). ● In-stream obstructions, lack of woody substrate, undersized culverts. ● Lack of vegetated buffer, large impervious areas without stormwater controls. Nonpoint Sources and Point Sources (NPS): Diffuse sources across the watershed. ● Stormwater runoff from developed areas, future IC increases, chlorides (road salt), pet waste, fertilizer. ● Stream incision and streambank destabilization and erosion ● Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), Illicit sewer discharges Page 19 •Wood additions (chop & drop, anchored logs) •Nature-based bank stabilization •Culvert upgrades/removals •Outfall Page 20 repairs •Riparian buffer establishment •Infiltration Tree Trenches •Bioretention swales/bumpouts •Rain Gardens •Underground storage chambers Page 21 Improving Capisic Brook will require CIP and Operating Budget Funds Page 22 https://www.portlandmaine.gov/561/Capisic-Brook-Watershed Questions & Answers Contact bnp@portlandmaine.gov Page 23 City of Portland | Sustainability Office Troy Moon, Director To: Sustainability and Transportation Committee Regina Phillips, Chair MEETING DATE November 12, 2025 AGENDA ITEM Agenda Item #3B PURPOSE To update the committee on progress made in the 2024 cycle of implementing the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN/CITY COUNCIL GOAL ALIGNMENT The success of the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance is a key element of the One Climate Future Plan and will aid the City in reaching its climate goals. BACKGROUND Energy benchmarking is the process of measuring a building's energy and water consumption over time. Jurisdictions nationwide have adopted energy benchmarking and transparency policies as foundational tools for building decarbonization. These ordinances promote the efficient use of energy and water, contributing to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. By annually inventorying energy usage and comparing buildings of similar size and function, property owners can make data-driven decisions and effectively pinpoint areas of underperformance for improvement. The City of Portland adopted its energy benchmarking ordinance on November 7, 2016, requiring the annual reporting of water and energy usage for all covered public (municipal) and private (non-municipal) properties. Subsequently, on July 15, 2019, the City Council voted to begin mandatory reporting for all single-occupant buildings, defined as any building where a single tenant utilizes 90% or more of the building space. All other covered properties will be required to comply one year after the Sustainability Office certifies that whole-building aggregated energy use data is available from the utility in a convenient electronic format. 1 Page 24 2024 REPORTING CYCLE There are over 600 covered properties in Portland. Excluding properties that are vacant, under significant renovation, are under new ownership, or new development (and do not have 12 months of utility data), there were approximately 595 covered properties in Portland this reporting cycle. Property Type Status this Reporting Season Number of Properties in Portland Multi-tenant Exempt 292 properties ≥ 20,000 sq. ft. Unconditioned spaces Exempt 4 (e.g. parking garages) ≥ 20,000 sq. ft. Single-tenant Not exempt 259 properties ≥ 20,000 sq. ft. Municipal properties Not exempt 40 ≥ 5,000 sq. ft. The Sustainability Office received 213 Energy and Water Use Benchmarking Reports for calendar year 2024. There were 40 municipal buildings and 173 non-municipal buildings reported. Of the non-municipal buildings, 167 were found to have sufficient energy and water use data to calculate a Building EUI. This represents a significant improvement in data quality compared to the prior year (137 EUI-eligible reports in the 2023 cycle). Only 6 reports were missing crucial data requested. 110 single-tenant properties failed to report this reporting cycle. COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT Since 2019, Sustainability staff have collaborated with covered properties to establish processes for achieving compliance with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance. Acknowledging the interruption in municipal services due to COVID-19 in 2020, Sustainability staff have conducted robust and repeated outreach through multiple channels to multiple property representatives to help with participation and compliance since 2021. The City has deliberately delayed the issuance of violations to ensure property owners had a fair opportunity to comply. Following this fourth consecutive year of dedicated outreach, the Sustainability Office has decided to issue the first notice of violation 2 Page 25 letters to covered properties currently mandated to report (single-occupant buildings 20,000 sq ft or more). Properties who fail to comply with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance a second time and are issued a second notice of violation will be subject to a fine of $20.00 per day. LOOKING TO THE FUTURE ● Onboarding multi-tenant buildings: As the ordinance states, multi-tenant buildings 20,000 square feet or more are required to report energy and water use metrics once the utility is able to provide whole-building energy usage data in a convenient online format. Central Maine Power is currently working on this platform, with hopes to launch in 2026. The Sustainability Office anticipates multi-tenant buildings will be required to report starting in 2027. We will strongly encourage and support multi-tenant buildings in voluntarily reporting as soon as the platform becomes available. ● Contact with building owners: There are around 600 buildings covered under the ordinance in the City of Portland. Sustainability staff has had difficulty reaching the building owners of these buildings as Assessor’s Office information is the basis for benchmarking contact. Additionally, staff struggle to continue to reach the correct contact at each building due to staff turnover and new reporters unable to access their existing accounts. Staff is working to better communicate with reporters to create continuity over time in case of turnover. The Sustainability Office currently has contact information for 413 covered buildings (68%). This is an improvement from 391 buildings (64%) last year. ● Education: Without support and free educational resources, the energy benchmarking ordinance remains a compliance hurdle for building owners, failing to become the motivating force for energy performance improvements it should be. This ordinance requires staff support to drive building owners towards proactive investment in long-term energy efficiency and building decarbonization. City staff will focus on providing more programming in relation to the landscape of funding and technologies and building owners’ needs arise. PREPARED BY Katie Tims, Sustainability Associate ATTACHMENTS 2024 Energy Benchmarking Report 2024 City of Portland Building Disclosure Report 2024 Energy Benchmarking Disclosure Report 3 Page 26 2024 Energy Benchmarking Report November 12, 2025 Page 27 Overview Energy benchmarking is the process of measuring a building's energy and water consumption over time. Jurisdictions nationwide have adopted energy benchmarking and transparency policies as foundational tools for building decarbonization. These ordinances promote the efficient use of energy and water, contributing to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. By annually inventorying energy usage and comparing buildings of similar size and function, property owners can make data-driven decisions and effectively pinpoint areas of underperformance for improvement. The City of Portland adopted its energy benchmarking ordinance on November 7, 2016, requiring the annual reporting of water and energy usage for all covered public (municipal) and private (non-municipal) properties. Subsequently, on July 15, 2019, the City Council voted to begin mandatory reporting for all single-occupant buildings, defined as any building where a single tenant utilizes 90% or more of the building space. All other covered properties will be required to comply one year after the Sustainability Office certifies that whole-building aggregated energy use data is available from utilities in a convenient electronic format. The Sustainability Office will notify affected property owners upon this certification. Property Type Initial Reporting Deadline Covered Municipal Properties ≥ 5,000 sq. ft. May 1, 2019 Covered Single-Tenant Non-Municipal Properties ≥ 20,000 sq. ft. May 1, 2019 Covered Multi-Tenant Non-Municipal Properties ≥ 20,000 sq. ft. Anticipated May 1, 2027 Benchmarking Methodology and Key Metrics Data Collection and Building Identification The Sustainability Office obtains a list of buildings 20,000 sq ft or more from the Assessor’s Office. Each building is assigned a Unique Building Identifier (also known as UBID) that is geolocated and is unique for that building, even if the building envelope is modified. Data Reporting The ordinance relies on self-reported data input into Energy Star Portfolio Manager by building owners or individuals designated by the building owner. The information required includes property address; primary use type; gross floor area; monthly energy usage for all energy types; and monthly water usage. Portfolio Manager applies a complex analytic model to compare and rank similar types of buildings across the country and over time by adjusting for differences in weather, climate, and use characteristics. Key Metrics Analyzed in Report ● ENERGY STAR Score: The ENERGY STAR score is a 1 to 100 score that demonstrates the energy efficiency of a building relative to similar buildings across the country. It offers a simple way to communicate relative performance across a portfolio of Page 28 buildings. ENERGY STAR scores are based on data from national building energy consumption surveys, allowing ESPM to control for key variables affecting a property’s energy performance, including climate, hours of operation, and building size. Not all building types are eligible for an ENERGY STAR score, and an ENERGY STAR score is not required for compliance with this program. ● Weather Normalization: Energy use changes due to colder winters or hotter summers; weather-normalized energy is the energy use a property would have consumed during 30-year average weather conditions. Using weather normalized values helps better understand changes in energy across years regardless of differences in weather. ● Energy Use Intensity (EUI): EUI is expressed as energy per square foot per year. It is calculated by dividing the total energy consumed by the building in one year by the total gross floor area of the building. Site EUI measures the amount of energy actually consumed at the building site, the same number one would see on their utility bills. Source EUI measures the total amount of raw fuel that is needed to generate and transmit the energy used at the building site providing a comprehensive picture of a building's total energy footprint. ● Total (Location-Based) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Total (Location-Based) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions refers to the sum of all greenhouse gas emissions that occur at a specific property, calculated using location-specific emission factors. This includes calculating emissions from direct sources (also known as Scope 1) and indirect sources like the electricity used at the site (also known as Scope 2), based on regional grid data. It provides a clearer picture of emissions directly tied to the physical location of operations. Total (Location Based) GHG Emission Intensity is the total GHG emissions, direct and indirect, produced by the property divided by the property’s gross floor area. 2024 Reporting Cycle Compliance Notification and Outreach The Sustainability Office initiated the 2024 reporting cycle in January 2025 by distributing official notice letters to all property owners with buildings of 20,000 square feet or more in the City of Portland. These letters clarified the mandatory reporting requirement for single-tenant buildings and the delayed requirement for multi-tenant properties. Trainings and Support Sustainability staff conducts outreach to covered properties, provides direct support with the ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool, and step-by-step guidance for first time reporters. Sustainability staff also review submitted benchmarking reports to identify and communicate issues that must be corrected for compliance. Sustainability staff have created many short tutorials for frequently asked questions and explaining how to fix common errors in benchmarking reports. All trainings, step-by-step guidance documents, and presentations can be found at portlandmaine.gov/energybenchmarking. Compliance Enforcement Since 2019, Sustainability staff have collaborated with covered properties to establish processes for achieving compliance with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance. Acknowledging Page 29 the interruption in municipal services due to COVID-19 in 2020, Sustainability staff have conducted robust and repeated outreach through multiple channels to property representatives to increase participation and compliance since 2021. The City has deliberately delayed the issuance of violations to ensure property owners had a fair opportunity to comply. Following this fourth consecutive year of dedicated outreach, the Sustainability Office has decided to issue the first notice of violation letters to covered properties currently mandated to report (single-occupant buildings 20,000 sq ft or more). Properties who fail to comply with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance a second time and are issued a second notice of violation will be subject to a fine of $20.00 per day. 2024 Data Analysis There are over 600 covered properties in Portland. Excluding properties that are vacant, under significant renovation, are under new ownership, or new development (and do not have 12 months of utility data), there were approximately 595 covered properties in Portland this reporting cycle. Property Type Status this Reporting Season Number of Properties in Portland Multi-tenant properties Exempt 292 Unconditioned spaces Exempt 4 (e.g. parking garages) Single-tenant properties Not exempt 259 Municipal properties Not exempt 40 The Sustainability Office received 213 Energy and Water Use Benchmarking Reports for calendar year 2024. There were 40 municipal buildings and 173 non-municipal buildings reported. Of the non-municipal buildings, 167 were found to have sufficient energy and water use data to calculate a Building EUI. This represents a significant improvement in data quality compared to the prior year (137 EUI-eligible reports in the 2023 cycle). No EUI can result from missing data, having gaps in the dates data is entered, or if the building is part of a larger campus that shares meters between buildings. Only 6 reports were missing crucial data requested. Of the buildings with EUIs, there are 41 unique property types. 110 single-tenant properties failed to report this reporting cycle. A complete list of 2024 covered properties (municipal and non-municipal), their compliance status, and publicly available benchmarking information is available at www.portlandmaine.gov/energybenchmarking. Page 30 2024 Compliant Properties by Largest Property Use Category Property Use Number of Gross Floor Area Reports (GFA) in Sq Ft City Buildings City Hall, Fire Stations, K- 40 3,374,433 12 Schools, Jetport, etc. College/University University Buildings, 32 2,354,350 College Buildings Hospital General, Medical, Surgical, 5 2,041,806 and Specialty Hospital; Surgical Centers Storage/Distribution Non-Refrigerated 19 1,755,756 Warehouse; Self-Storage Facility; Distribution Center Hotel Hotel 17 1,619,022 Office Medical Office; Financial 17 1,337,735 Office; Bank; Courthouse Retail Strip Mall; Auto Dealership; 15 813,668 Supermarket; Retail Store Residential Senior Living; Multifamily 12 787,689 Housing; Residential Care Facility Industrial Manufacturing/ Industrial 8 642,360 Plant Parking Parking Garages 2 505,441 K-12 Schools Private K-12 Schools 7 140,747 All Other Buildings Bank Branch, Bowling 33 974,316 Alley, Fitness Center, Library, Mixed Use Property, Not Available, Performing Arts, Repair Services, Worship Facility TOTAL 207 16,347,323 Page 31 ENERGY STAR Score The ENERGY STAR Score is a measure of how well a property performs relative to similar properties across the country, when normalized for climate and operational characteristics. ENERGY STAR Scores range from 1-100 where one represents the worst performing properties and 100 represents the best performing properties. A score of 50 indicates that a property is performing at the national median, taking into account its size, location, and operating parameters. A score of 75 indicates that a property is performing in the 75th percentile and may be eligible to earn ENERGY STAR Certification. Not all properties can generate an ENERGY STAR score because a property must meet criteria for property type, use details, and have 12 months of energy data for all fuel types. Both charts below reflect compliant property types in 2024 that were able to generate an ENERGY STAR score. The average Energy Star Score for all compliant property types in 2024 is 63.6. 2024 Compliant Properties' ENERGY STAR Score (1-100) by Gross Floor Area (ft²) Note: A single data point (Property GFA of 1,483,216 sqft, ENERGY STAR Score 27) was excluded from the graph above for improved scale visualization. Page 32 2024 Compliant Properties' ENERGY STAR Score by Year Built Source Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EPA has determined that source energy is the most equitable unit of evaluation for comparing different buildings to each other. Source EUI measures the total amount of raw fuel that is needed to generate and transmit the energy used at the building site providing a comprehensive picture of a building's total energy footprint. ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager calculates source EUI by dividing the total annual source energy consumption by the building's gross floor area. Source energy is calculated by converting all energy types (like electricity and natural gas) to a common unit (kBtu), adding them together, and then applying multipliers to account for energy loss during generation and transmission. 2024 Compliant Properties' Weather Normalized Normalized Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) by Gross Floor Area (ft²) Page 33 Note: A single data point (Property GFA of 1,483,216 sqft, Weather Normalized Normalized Source EUI 490.7 kBtu/ft²) was excluded from the graph above for improved scale visualization. 2024 Compliant Properties' Weather Normalized Normalized Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) by Year Built Page 34 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Total location-based (or site-level) total GHG emissions refers to the sum of direct and indirect Commented [1]: if we include intensity, GHG emissions that occur at a specific property. The average number of total (location-based) mention it above here GHG emissions for all compliant property types in 2024 is 498.3 metric tons CO2e. 2024 Compliant Properties' Average Total (Location-Based) GHG Emissions (Metric Tons CO2e) by Largest Property Use *College/University: The calculated total GHG emissions for properties within the College/University sector may not be fully representative of individual building performance or the true sector average, as many institutions share central utility systems (e.g., for heating/cooling) and report energy consumption and emissions data at a 'campus' level, which requires the use of allocation methods. Page 35 Data Quality Staff implemented the use of an implementation platform called BEAM by Clearly Energy during the 2022 reporting season. Previously, data quality checks for each report were done manually making it difficult to correct errors in reports after the initial report was submitted. Data quality has improved each year since using BEAM. Properties using default, estimated, and temporary values are considered low levels of data quality. Site EUI and Source EUI may be noted as “Not Available” if energy data was input incorrectly, there was not a full year of data to analyze, or if the building is part of a parent property. ENERGY STAR scores of 1 or 100 indicate energy data or property gross floor area (GFA) were input incorrectly. Only 6 reports (of ENERGY STAR Score of 100) fall into this category. Looking to the Future ● Enforcement: The City has deliberately delayed the issuance of violations to ensure property owners had a fair opportunity to comply. Following this fourth consecutive year of dedicated outreach, the Sustainability Office has decided to issue the first notice of violation letters to covered properties currently mandated to report (single-occupant buildings 20,000 sq ft or more). Properties who fail to comply with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance a second time and are issued a second notice of violation will be subject to a fine of $20.00 per day. We anticipate that enforcement of these penalties for non-compliance will result in greater compliance in all years moving forward. ● Onboarding multi-tenant buildings: As the ordinance states, multi-tenant buildings 20,000 square feet or more are required to report energy and water use metrics once the Page 36 utility is able to provide whole-building energy usage data in a convenient online format. Central Maine Power is currently working on this platform, with hopes to launch in 2026. The Sustainability Office anticipates multi-tenant buildings will be required to report starting in 2027. We will strongly encourage and support multi-tenant buildings in voluntarily reporting as soon as the platform becomes available. ● Contact with building owners: There are around 600 buildings covered under the ordinance in the City of Portland. Sustainability staff has had difficulty reaching the building owners of these buildings as Assessor’s Office information is the basis for benchmarking contact. Additionally, staff struggle to continue to reach the correct contact at each building due to staff turnover and new reporters unable to access their existing accounts. Staff is working to better communicate with reporters to create continuity over time in case of turnover. The Sustainability Office currently has contact information for 413 covered buildings (68%). This is an improvement from 391 buildings (64%) last year. ● Education: Without support and free educational resources, the energy benchmarking ordinance remains a compliance hurdle for building owners, failing to become the motivating force for energy performance improvements it should be. This ordinance requires staff support to drive building owners towards proactive investment in long-term energy efficiency and building decarbonization. City staff will focus on providing more programming in relation to the landscape of funding and technologies and building owners’ needs arise. Page 37 Water Use Primary % Total (Location- Intensity Property Difference % Difference Based) GHG Total (Location- Weather Weather (All Type - Property GFA - from from Property Emissions Based) GHG Normalized Normalized Water ENERGY Portfolio Calculated National National is Part of a Intensity Emissions (Metric Site EUI Site EUI Source EUI Source EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) Tons CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Passed Not Exempt 87MFPP27+93-2-1-1-2 Allen Ave Fire Station 386 Allen Ave 4.88 27.34 78.6 84.2 148.6 157.4 32.74 Fire Station 5600.0 19.0 19.0 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP3H+84-2-2-2-2 Bramhall Fire Station 784 Congress St 5.20 76.28 89.3 93.6 136.3 140.9 19.25 Fire Station 14675.0 9.1 9.1 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5V+MP-2-2-1-2 Central Fire Station 380 Congress St 4.47 72.04 79.6 90.0 106.4 117.6 10.92 Fire Station 16110.0 -14.8 -14.8 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPH3+8G-0-1-1-2 Stevens Avenue Fire Barn 212 Stevens Avenue 7.13 35.92 96.8 101.3 138.2 143.6 5.71 Fire Station 5040.0 10.7 10.7 Fitness Center/Health Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4F3-4-2-3 Exposition Building 239 Park Av 9.62 596.68 156.8 162.5 285.2 291.2 9.80 Club/Gym 62038.0 154.6 154.6 Ice/Curling Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4F+HF-3-3-3-2 Portland Ice Arena 225 Park Av 19.21 642.18 321.3 324.1 537.3 539.6 40.88 Rink 33437.0 379.7 379.7 Passed Not Exempt x Lyseth Elementary School 175 Auburn St 1.18 58.57 16.5 16.5 46.2 46.2 19.83 97 K-12 School 49444.0 -55.4 -55.4 Amanda C. Rowe Elementary Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMHJ4-6-4-5 School 23 Orono Road 3.79 288.11 64.1 66.6 103.3 106.0 4.32 52 K-12 School 76053.0 -2.6 -2.6 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP2V3-3-1-4 Deering High School 370 Stevens Av 4.03 771.81 71.9 79.3 95.3 103.3 6.43 48 K-12 School 191438.0 1.3 1.3 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPCW4-5-4-5 East End Community School 195 North St 5.41 392.96 92.2 98.6 144.7 151.4 10.15 17 K-12 School 72620.0 42.7 42.7 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4G+X5-4-4-6-5 King Middle School 92 Deering Av 4.31 385.00 76.1 80.2 105.4 109.9 3.79 50 K-12 School 89263.0 -0.7 -0.7 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPG33-3-2-3 Lincoln Middle School 522 Stevens Av 4.53 425.56 79.6 87.7 111.7 120.4 2.76 42 K-12 School 93936.0 8.0 8.0 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPF33-2-4-3 Longfellow Elementary School 432 Stevens Av 0.80 37.48 11.1 11.1 31.1 31.1 5.18 100 K-12 School 46924.0 -69.3 -69.3 Passed Not Exempt 87MFPP465-8-5-2 Lyman Moore Middle School 171 AUBURN ST K-12 School Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPG84-5-3-5 Ocean Av Elementary School 150 Ocean Av 3.64 250.34 63.3 67.9 92.1 96.9 4.97 48 K-12 School 68847.0 1.5 1.5 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPW44-6-5-8 PATHS 196 Allen Av 4.20 723.13 71.0 77.2 106.3 112.7 5.08 45 K-12 School 172173.0 4.6 4.6 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMR63+86-2-2-1-2 Peaks Island School 4 Church St 12.32 83.15 166.5 166.9 196.9 197.9 10.50 3 K-12 School 6750.0 102.9 102.9 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R4-6-5-6 Portland High School 284 Cumberland Av 2.83 752.51 48.8 53.8 73.1 78.5 3.20 76 K-12 School 266228.0 -26.3 -26.3 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPMR3-2-3-2 Presumpscot Elementary School 69 Presumpscot Street 7.03 178.79 124.6 137.2 169.4 183.2 10.68 10 K-12 School 25430.0 62.0 62.0 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP2J2-4-3-3 Reiche Community School 166 Brackett Street 4.00 449.52 69.5 74.3 102.0 107.0 11.42 45 K-12 School 112346.0 4.7 4.7 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMWR1-2-2-1 Riverton School 1600 Forest Avenue 3.55 379.22 59.2 62.8 100.2 104.0 4.56 51 K-12 School 106754.0 -1.2 -1.2 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP2P+QC-1-2-1-1 Fire Museum 157 Spring St 4.13 24.76 55.6 64.8 58.5 67.8 0.26 K-12 School 6000.0 -47.8 -47.8 Public Works Administration - Non- Parks, Recreation and Facilities Refrigerated Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPP83-6-4-6 Department 212 Canco 2.31 158.80 38.2 41.5 66.5 70.4 3.32 43 Warehouse 68730.0 11.5 11.5 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q2-3-2-2 School Administration Building 353 CUMBERLAND AVE 20.20 226.97 348.1 384.1 525.5 562.6 14.95 15 Office 11236.0 61.9 61.9 Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4P2-3-3-4 39 Forest Ave 39 Forest Ave 3.63 135.13 59.9 64.3 104.6 109.2 8.95 Services 37250.0 17.1 17.1 Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5V4-5-5-4 City Hall and Merrill Auditorium 389 Congress St 4.65 771.47 79.1 82.2 125.2 128.4 4.69 Services 165876.0 40.2 40.2 Cummings Community Center & Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMQ82+6R-2-2-2-2 Munjoy Hill Fire Station 134 Congress St 5.40 85.55 91.1 96.9 148.4 154.5 12.19 Services 15840.0 66.2 66.2 Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPJ3+PC-0-0-1-1 Evergreen Cemetery Building 672 Stevens Av 10.37 58.04 140.1 157.7 170.0 189.0 14.31 Services 5597.0 90.5 90.5 Page 38 Water Use Primary % Total (Location- Intensity Property Difference % Difference Based) GHG Total (Location- Weather Weather (All Type - Property GFA - from from Property Emissions Based) GHG Normalized Normalized Water ENERGY Portfolio Calculated National National is Part of a Intensity Emissions (Metric Site EUI Site EUI Source EUI Source EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) Tons CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Peaks Island Community Center Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMR52+8M-2-1-1-2 and Public Safety Building 129 Island Av 3.86 30.69 52.6 56.0 88.3 93.8 8.11 Services 7956.0 -1.1 -1.1 Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMWJ1-3-2-4 Portland Central Kitchen 92 Waldron Way 7.92 167.70 131.0 139.3 227.4 236.1 7.18 Services 21180.0 154.7 154.7 Portland Ocean Gateway and Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP6R1-1-1-1 Information Center 6 Commercial St 56.40 1041.52 1030.4 1030.1 1238.2 1237.2 142.95 Services 18466.0 1286.9 1286.9 Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPP93-7-4-7 Portland Public Works 250 Canco Road 3.02 243.40 51.2 56.1 81.4 86.9 3.48 Services 80713.0 -8.9 -8.9 Other - Public Passed Not Exempt 87MFPM4J2-2-1-1 Riverside Golf Course Clubhouse 1158 Riverside Street 4.60 46.69 69.8 72.3 156.3 158.9 31.19 Services 10154.0 75.1 75.1 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R3-4-3-4 Elm St Parking Garage 21 Elm St 0.18 23.47 2.5 2.5 6.9 7.1 0.47 Parking 172291.0 Approved for permanent exemption Exempt 87MFMP3Q4-4-3-4 PARKING GARAGE 0 FREE ST Parking Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP3Q+XW-4-4-3-4 Spring Street Parking Garage 45 Spring Street 0.40 88.66 5.6 6.0 15.3 16.3 0.22 Parking 222270.0 Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5W1-4-4-5 Portland Police Station 109 Middle St 7.05 444.46 114.6 121.3 210.2 217.1 7.28 Police Station 63038.0 68.4 68.4 Residential Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMXF+99-4-4-5-3 HOMELESS SERVICES CENTER 654 RIVERSIDE ST Care Facility Senior Living Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMGF+QM-4-2-3-2 Barron Center 1145 Brighton Av 6.56 767.47 112.9 115.5 169.0 171.7 35.02 84 Community 117032.0 -25.5 -25.5 Transportatio n Terminal/Stati Passed Not Exempt 87MFJMWQ+XM-5-20-4-14 Portland International Jetport 1001 Westbrook Street 18.71 2619.68 280.9 287.8 649.6 658.5 55.56 on 140000.0 479.9 479.9 Transportatio n Terminal/Stati Passed Not Exempt 87MFMQ52+79-0-1-1-0 Portland Ocean Terminal 40 Commercial St 4.79 674.38 76.0 81.4 150.2 155.8 9.92 on 140798.0 34.1 34.1 Page 39 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Refrigerated Exempt Not Exempt 87MFMP2W+CQ-1-1-1-2 Fish Exchange 1 Portland Fish Pier Warehouse 38824.0 Distribution Exempt Exempt 87MFMPJ7+86-4-9-1-3 CONGDON-52 Canco 52 Canco Road 1.79 87.12 32.5 38.9 39.8 46.7 1.08 71 Center 48782.0 -33.7 -33.7 31301101 - Fore River Medical Medical Exempt Exempt 87MFJPX82-3-2-4 Building 195 Fore River Parkway 13.50 1022.96 188.9 189.1 522.2 522.4 4 Office 75784.0 70.0 70.0 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP94-5-4-5 10590 Woods At Canco 257 Canco Road 4.00 450.72 64.8 68.6 120.3 127.2 31 Housing 112647.0 12.9 12.9 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMPC81-2-0-1 409 CUMBERLAND 409 CUMBERLAND AVE 4.07 123.24 69.1 73.0 109.6 114.1 39.62 60 Housing 30310.0 -7.2 -7.2 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P2-3-3-5 Back Bay Tower 401 Cumberland Ave 1.89 432.8 28.2 30.5 66.0 70.8 14.83 100 Housing 229083.0 -48.3 -48.3 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7W1-2-0-1 BAYSIDE EAST 47 SMITH ST 2.32 48.04 40.3 42.8 58.8 61.6 23.74 99 Housing 20740.0 -47.4 -47.4 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9W+WQ-3-4-3-5 Bayview Heights 158 North Street 2.76 184.8 51.9 53.5 54.5 56.2 18.02 98 Housing 67084.0 -43.6 -43.6 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2J1-2-2-2 BUTLER PAYSON 77 PINE ST 5.20 199.09 91.4 93.6 128.2 130.3 18.55 64 Housing 38299.0 -9.5 -9.5 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXM1-3-2-2 Danforth Heights - Building A 240 Danforth Street 5.14 126.5 89.2 92.1 131.1 134.2 40.58 45 Housing 24612.0 3.1 3.1 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXP2-3-1-3 Danforth Heights - Building B 213 Danforth Heights 5.80 176.5 103.0 106.1 138.9 142.4 43.07 37 Housing 30436.0 8.7 8.7 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWP2-4-2-3 Danforth Heights - Building C 48 Salem Street 5.85 325.5 102.7 106.3 145.1 149.5 40.75 51 Housing 55604.0 -1.3 -1.3 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH6+63-2-2-1-2 deering pavilion 880 forest ave 2.89 392.50 47.3 49.2 84.8 86.7 28.06 81 Housing 135968.0 -21.4 -21.4 Multifamily Exempt Exempt 87MFMMFJ1-1-2-2 WESSEX WOODS APTS 7 WESSEX ST 3.79 72.37 56.2 56.2 134.4 134.4 32.97 Housing 19080.0 13.8 13.8 Supermarke t/Grocery Exempt Exempt 87MFPP369-6-7-5 2541AS - Portland, ME 91 Auburn St Ste A 12.49 788.33 195.4 202.5 402.9 410.5 19.18 70 Store 63100.0 -20.2 -20.2 Supermarke t/Grocery Exempt Exempt 87MFMP534-10-5-9 4543AS - Portland, ME 1364 Congress St 12.91 502.85 197.0 200.7 435.6 439.5 9.17 70 Store 38949.0 -19.8 -19.8 Worship Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M+3R-2-3-2-2 State Street Church UCC 159 State Street 2.92 94.45 52.6 56.1 66.7 70.4 5.57 45 Facility 32385.0 7.1 7.1 Failed Non- (Incomplete NEPW Logistics, Inc. (70 Refrigerated report) Not Exempt 87MFMPP63-6-4-6 Quarry) 70 Quarry Road 1.25 112.65 21.1 24.4 34.0 37.5 84 Warehouse 90400.0 -53.9 -53.9 Failed Non- (Incomplete NEPW Logistics, Inc. (90/118 Refrigerated report) Not Exempt 87MFMPP73-8-3-7 Q) 90/118 Quarry Road 1.48 258.54 24.1 26.0 36.5 39.0 81 Warehouse 175000.0 -49.4 -49.4 Failed Non- (Incomplete Refrigerated report) Not Exempt 87MFJPWP+FV-3-5-3-5 POME 29 West Commercial St 4.91 112.99 86.6 95.7 120.3 129.9 37 Warehouse 23000.0 24.7 24.7 Failed (Incomplete report) Not Exempt 87MFMM3H2-3-3-4 Fancy Sauce 1945 Congress St. Building A 3.29 82.50 54.1 56.2 95.4 97.6 75 Office 25100.0 -31.2 -31.2 Failed Supermarke (Incomplete t/Grocery report) Not Exempt 87MFPM2J+P6-3-3-3-4 8387-Maine Mall-S Portland 415 Philbrook Avenue 11.32 560.19 174.4 179.4 375.3 380.2 12.82 69 Store 49499.0 -18.7 -18.7 87MFMPM3+HV-10-10-10- College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt 11 x Central Loop 716 Stevens Avenue ersity 254806.0 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP463-1-2-2 Norway Savings Bank 1200 Congress Street 7.57 218.64 122.3 124.2 228.6 230.2 5.68 40 Bank Branch 28886.0 12.5 12.5 Bowling In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5P2-3-2-2 Bayside Bowl 58 Alder St 3.02 99.64 54.8 61.6 57.3 64.4 29.47 Alley 33000.0 -48.9 -48.9 Abromson Community College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Education Center 88 Bedford Street 0.00 0.0 ersity 44124.0 Page 40 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Alexander Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 3.02 66.73 42.0 42.0 117.7 117.5 12.57 ersity 22098.0 -34.8 -34.8 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Alumni Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 1.01 ersity 12612.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM3+2P-1-2-1-2 Blewett Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 2.94 92.91 49.0 52.0 82.4 85.6 8.15 ersity 31650.0 -54.4 -54.4 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Coleman Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 3.32 35.60 62.5 69.0 65.7 72.5 6.13 ersity 10718.0 -63.6 -63.6 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM4+26-1-2-1-2 College of Pharmacy 706 Stevens Avenue 11.86 550.04 200.9 209.6 322.2 331.4 5.63 ersity 46380.0 78.4 78.4 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x East Campus Bedford Street 2.99 687.53 41.6 41.6 116.4 116.4 ersity 230260.0 -35.6 -35.6 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Ginn Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 45.67 857.90 828.7 876.8 1025.1 1077.9 42.45 ersity 18783.0 467.6 467.6 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Glickman Family Library 314 Forest Avenue 2.49 314.92 46.9 48.2 49.2 50.6 1.31 ersity 126432.0 -72.7 -72.7 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Goddard Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 1.34 17.03 25.3 27.6 26.5 28.9 111.48 ersity 12696.0 -85.3 -85.3 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Hersey Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 4.53 ersity 22170.0 College/Univ In compliance Exempt 87MFMPM4+X4-2-5-3-5 x Innovation Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 2.83 180.24 43.5 45.4 94.2 96.3 5.73 ersity 63700.0 -47.8 -47.8 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Linnell Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 3.07 ersity 12411.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Luther Bonney Hall 85 Bedford Street 0.00 0.0 ersity 76685.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x MacDougal Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.0 ersity 15308.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6C+CC-2-2-3-2 x Maine Law Building 246 Deering Avenue 0.00 0.00 0.17 ersity 92983.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Masterton Hall 71 Bedford Street 0.00 0.00 1.10 ersity 36636.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x McGoldrick Center 35 Bedford Street 3.03 127.07 57.0 60.3 59.8 63.3 16.03 ersity 42000.0 -66.9 -66.9 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM4+J3-2-3-3-2 Oral Health Center 1 College Street 8.04 323.86 117.9 120.5 289.7 292.0 29.99 ersity 40300.0 60.4 60.4 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Parker Pavilion 716 Stevens Avenue 31.08 205.10 432.6 434.5 1211.2 1216.7 ersity 6600.0 570.6 570.6 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6C+VX-2-2-2-3 x Payson Smith Hall 96 Falmouth Street 0.14 7.41 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 6.40 ersity 52516.0 -98.5 -98.5 Placeholder Property (Bills College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x from Unknown Source) Unknown 0.00 0.00 65.20 ersity 10000.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Portland Commons Bedford Street 0.93 202.82 17.5 18.8 18.4 19.8 ersity 218000.0 -89.8 -89.8 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Proctor Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 3.31 102.90 46.1 46.1 129.1 129.1 30.69 ersity 31074.0 -28.5 -28.5 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Science Building 70 Falmouth Street 0.23 35.70 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.6 7.35 ersity 152806.0 -97.4 -97.4 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Sullivan Gym Complex 66 Foulmouth Street 0.24 14.19 4.6 4.7 4.8 5.0 6.90 ersity 58062.0 -97.3 -97.3 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x West Campus Bedford Street 3.15 1567.70 43.8 43.8 122.7 122.7 ersity 497944.0 -32.1 -32.1 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6G+H6-4-7-4-8 x Wishcamper Center 34 Bedford Street 0.00 0.26 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.17 ersity 59704.0 -100.0 -100.0 College/Univ In compliance Not Exempt x Woodbury Campus Center 35 Bedford Street 0.00 0.00 ersity 28256.0 CUMBERLAND COUNTY In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5W+QG-2-2-2-3 COURTHOUSE 142 FEDERAL STREET 2.91 227.25 49.8 57.0 77.4 84.9 7.74 94 Courthouse 78000.0 -60.0 -60.0 Page 41 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM7+26-5-8-5-7 150 Read St 150 Read St 1.97 114.22 33.9 37.7 51.3 55.3 1.12 58 Center 58000.0 -14.0 -14.0 Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM77-8-7-7 187-209 Read St, LLC 203 Read St 2.22 365.70 39.5 44.4 52.4 57.9 0.52 70 Center 165000.0 -31.6 -31.6 Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP583-2-3-3 85 St. James Street 85 St. James Street 2.67 53.9 36.5 38.3 63.0 65.0 4.89 48 Center 20160.0 3.2 3.2 Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMCG+85-8-10-11 BROSCO Portland 7 Rand Road 2.62 793.23 44.7 47.7 68.1 71.3 0.63 Center 303156.0 28.8 28.8 Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPXC+67-4-3-4-3 Ferguson 33500 - Portland 172 Saint John St 2.38 135.87 40.4 43.2 64.8 67.8 0.58 67 Center 56988.0 -28.6 -28.6 Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM5P2-3-3-3 Partners for World Health 40 Walch Drive 2.30 57.39 35.6 35.6 52.4 52.4 1.67 57 Center 25000.0 -12.0 -12.0 Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPRC+P2-2-3-2-2 Sprague Operating Resources 92 Cassidy Pt Dr 0.64 144.81 8.7 9.2 18.6 19.4 1.92 Center 227594.0 -64.8 -64.8 The Salvation Army ARC Distribution In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPQ33-4-3-5 Warehouse and Store 30 Warren Ave. 4.19 179.07 74.6 83.0 99.8 108.7 2.46 Center 42708.0 88.8 88.8 Fitness Center/Heal In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7P+7W-1-2-2-2 Planet Fitness Portland 145 Marginal Way 6.38 127.69 98.4 102.5 211.5 215.9 38.28 th Club/Gym 20000.0 88.9 88.9 Hospital (General Medical & In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP85+F7-3-6-3-6 MMC - Brighton Campus 335 Brighton Ave 10.93 2287.01 178.9 178.9 321.7 321.7 24.84 92 Surgical) 209149.0 -25.6 -25.6 Hospital (General Medical & In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3F+7J-8-10-8-11 MMC - Portland 22 Bramhall Street 17.19 25499.71 284.8 284.3 492.1 490.7 9.87 27 Surgical) 1483216.0 12.6 12.6 Hospital (General Medical & In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPX93-4-3-3 Northern Light Mercy Hospital 175 Fore River Parkway 20.39 4297.72 344.7 343.5 554.9 613.2 62.44 8 Surgical) 210803.0 30.8 30.8 Hospital (General Medical & In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM353-5-2-4 Spring Harbor Hospital 123 Andover Road 14.86 1038.89 244.7 244.2 430.8 429.4 46.34 77 Surgical) 69928.0 -14.7 -14.7 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP49+46-2-1-2-1 2049-Portland 340 Park Ave. 4.27 217.04 68.9 70.0 129.2 132.3 49.45 85 Hotel 50864.0 -30.0 -30.0 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMQ62+JJ-2-4-3-4 86 Newbury Street Condo 5 25 Hancock Street 5.00 394.34 81.1 81.1 150.2 150.2 26.88 74 Hotel 78845.0 -19.5 -19.5 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3V2-3-3-3 Canopy Portland Waterfront 9 Center Street 1.58 164.79 29.3 29.3 33.2 33.2 32.05 100 Hotel 104000.0 -82.5 -82.5 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP45+CW-4-3-4-4 Clarion Hotel 1230 Congress st 4.20 416.29 68.2 69.3 126.2 127.4 46.78 94 Hotel 99000.0 -38.8 -38.8 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM2Q3-2-4-4 Embassy Suites by Hilton 1050 Westbrook St 6.13 631.58 99.8 100.8 182.0 183.1 74 Hotel 103048.0 -17.7 -17.7 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5X+6V-2-3-3-2 HGI Portland 65 Commercial st. 5.60 428.48 90.9 92.0 167.9 168.8 51.39 79 Hotel 76472.0 -23.2 -23.2 Hilton Garden Inn Portland In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJMXM+QP-3-4-3-3 Airport 145 Jetport Blvd. 19.21 384.11 318.3 324.3 549.2 557.6 120.59 5 Hotel 20000.0 56.2 56.2 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3Q+CQ-3-5-3-5 Holiday Inn By The Bay 88 Spring Street 5.78 1034.25 93.2 97.7 175.6 183.9 50.54 60 Hotel 178842.0 -7.9 -7.9 Maple Hotel Enterprises LLC In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMGC+VQ-2-3-1-4 dba Motel 6 1 Riverside Street 1.76 78.91 32.7 32.8 36.0 36.2 113.38 100 Hotel 44944.0 -76.2 -76.2 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMQ62+CJ-4-6-3-2 Portland Downtown ME RI 145 Fore St 4.36 599.54 69.0 71.3 137.2 140.0 39.89 80 Hotel 137640.0 -25.0 -25.0 Portland DT Waterfront ME In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMQ62+3V-3-3-2-4 ACH 158 Fore St 4.20 436.13 67.1 68.2 129.7 130.6 38.34 86 Hotel 103898.0 -31.6 -31.6 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4V+4X-2-2-3-4 Portland Harbor Hotel 468 Fore Street 9.17 498.40 149.8 155.0 270.2 279.8 67.01 2 Hotel 54376.0 91.2 91.2 Page 42 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4W0-1-1-1 Portland ME AH 379 Commercial St 4.57 375.15 70.3 71.8 151.9 156.1 35.80 71 Hotel 82113.0 -17.0 -17.0 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5X2-3-2-3 Portland ME HAMP 209 Fore St 4.67 332.49 74.0 75.6 146.7 148.4 70.56 74 Hotel 71206.0 -20.1 -20.1 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4W+RW-2-3-2-4 Portland Regency Inc 20 Milk Street 6.96 528.66 113.6 117.1 205.5 213.0 98.84 59 Hotel 76000.0 -6.6 -6.6 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5V+HF-1-3-2-2 The Press Hotel 119 Exchange St 6.21 518.50 100.9 103.9 185.3 188.9 49.71 55 Hotel 83506.0 -4.3 -4.3 Westin Portland Harborview In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4P+47-5-8-7-7 Hotel 157 High Street 5.84 1485.31 95.8 98.0 171.1 173.4 31.44 66 Hotel 254268.0 -12.9 -12.9 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPWH+CQ-1-2-2-2 16 Storer Street 16 Storer Street 1.28 94.31 21.8 22.8 34.0 35.0 1.86 100 K-12 School 73799.0 -68.0 -68.0 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPWJ+PH-2-2-1-3 64 Emery Street 64 Emery Street 3.07 131.32 52.4 54.8 81.9 84.7 4.72 81 K-12 School 42779.0 -31.5 -31.5 In compliance Not Exempt x Breakwater Learning 856 Brighton Ave. 0.00 0.0 K-12 School 35986.0 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMFP+29-2-2-1-2 x Brick 858 Brighton Ave. 3.25 69.11 57.0 59.3 80.3 82.7 12.57 68 K-12 School 21288.0 -17.8 -17.8 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPHF+W3-2-2-9-6 Cheverus High School 267 Ocean Ave 3.88 406.46 66.7 73.9 101.5 109.7 32.12 54 K-12 School 104761.0 -3.9 -3.9 In compliance Not Exempt 884 x Gym 856 Brighton Ave. 5.55 50.78 75.4 77.6 108.1 110.7 5.39 62 K-12 School 9145.0 -12.6 -12.6 In compliance Not Exempt 856 x Jessie 856 Brighton Ave. 4.27 23.72 57.9 59.6 66.8 68.4 5.90 93 K-12 School 5553.0 -48.5 -48.5 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPP47+R8-11-14-10-12 Lyman Moore Middle School 171 Auburn St 4.33 704.62 77.1 84.7 103.2 111.4 6.03 48 K-12 School 162669.0 1.8 1.8 In compliance Not Exempt x Abplanalp Library 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 9.30 Library 26636.0 Manufacturi 500 Riverside Industrial ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM7V3-3-3-4 500 Riverside - 500 Building Parkway 7.83 269.51 118.9 122.9 266.8 271.1 5.83 Plant 34400.0 Manufacturi 525 Riverside - 520/540 524 Riverside Industrial ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM8W3-3-3-3 Building Parkway 6.66 345.96 104.0 106.1 215.3 217.0 9.28 Plant 51952.0 Manufacturi ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPWC+5J-5-4-6-4 Barber Foods, LLC 70 St. John Street 32.98 4823.06 518.0 522.0 1055.0 1059.2 220.76 Plant 146233.0 Manufacturi ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM3J2-4-2-4 Designtex Portland 14 Industrial Way 3.63 145.13 57.1 59.6 115.5 118.0 0.58 Plant 40000.0 Manufacturi ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM5P+4G-2-3-2-2 Immucell 56 Evergreen Drive 22.31 800.85 335.3 341.7 772.6 787.5 130.68 Plant 35896.0 Manufacturi ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJMX5+VM-6-8-5-10 Nichols Portland LLC 2400 Congress Street 29.75 5949.82 454.9 456.1 999.7 1001.0 22.63 Plant 200000.0 Manufacturi ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7G+H7-5-8-4-7 Oakhurst Dairy 364 Forest Avenue 33.75 2860.02 467.7 471.0 964.0 966.0 395.26 Plant 84730.0 Manufacturi ng/Industrial In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM6V+VG-2-5-3-4 unifirst corp 430 riverside ind. prkwy 20.02 984.20 362.7 377.8 451.9 468.9 208.38 Plant 49149.0 Medical In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP2G+JH-1-2-1-2 216 Vaughan Street 216 Vaughan Street 6.94 195.84 119.6 122.6 180.7 183.7 10.24 47 Office 28220.0 1.6 1.6 Medical In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6X+P2-1-2-2-2 272 Congress Street 272 Congress Street 5.32 111.64 86.0 90.0 160.1 166.3 6.46 57 Office 21000.0 -6.1 -6.1 Medical In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP452-3-2-4 Eye Venture Associates 53 Sewall St 12.89 335.62 206.3 205.6 397.5 395.5 23.92 37 Office 26030.0 10.6 10.6 Medical In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP382-2-1-3 Maine Eye Center 15 Lowell Street 3.82 129.88 60.8 62.9 119.1 121.2 8.00 Office 34000.0 -48.8 -48.8 Page 43 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Medical In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7H2-3-2-2 Northern Light Health 43 Baxter Blvd 2.29 56.19 35.1 36.6 76.9 78.5 6.89 100 Office 24524.0 -73.6 -73.6 Mixed Use Exempt Not Exempt Parking Garage 88 Bedford Street 0.00 0.00 0.31 Property 386681.0 Children's Museum and In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP252-2-2-1 Theatre of Maine 250 Thompson's Point Road 4.10 122.87 62.4 63.3 138.5 139.9 18.95 Museum 40000.0 23.7 23.7 Non- Refrigerated In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPQR1-1-1-1 165 Presumpscot 165 Presumpscot St 0.28 12.16 3.8 4.0 10.7 11.1 2.84 Warehouse 44100.0 -79.7 -79.7 Non- Refrigerated In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQC+4G-3-3-2-4 Building 2 344 Riverside St 1.50 19.19 26.0 28.3 38.4 40.9 70.13 72 Warehouse 12800.0 -35.5 -35.5 Non- Refrigerated In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM73-7-3-7 NEPW Logistics, Inc. (Read) 182-184 Read Street 2.20 169.05 39.4 43.7 50.8 55.3 0.41 82 Warehouse 77000.0 -50.0 -50.0 Non- 376 Riverside Industrial Pa Refrigerated In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM6V+F9-3-6-3-6 NU Portland Facility rkway 2.97 192.24 47.1 50.2 92.9 96.1 1.21 60 Warehouse 64759.0 -15.0 -15.0 Non- Refrigerated In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMPF+RR-2-2-3-1 Pine Tree Paper Co 633 Warren Ave 0.41 8.26 5.7 6.0 16.1 16.8 0.00 97 Warehouse 20000.0 -80.2 -80.2 #1208 - Thompson's Point - In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP25+F9-2-5-2-5 Brick South 8 Thompsons Point Road 6.70 187.68 118.6 125.1 162.2 168.9 3.75 7 Office 28000.0 99.3 99.3 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q+JW-1-2-1-2 307-9 CUMBERLAND AVE 307 CUMBERLAND AVE 2.97 76.07 50.4 53.5 80.0 83.5 2.81 82 Office 25650.0 -39.6 -39.6 Cianbro (Ricker's Wharf In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPF+W8-1-3-2-3 Facility) 60 Cassidy Point Drive 3.13 68.64 47.8 50.4 105.9 110.2 4.11 62 Office 21901.0 -15.1 -15.1 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM272-4-3-4 Congress Street LLC 2331 Congress Street 5.85 128.80 101.2 105.2 151.2 155.5 18.56 49 Office 22000.0 0.6 0.6 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3P2-2-1-1 Julia Welsh 619 Congress St 1.48 35.77 27.4 31.1 30.9 34.7 3.73 100 Office 24187.0 -78.8 -78.8 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4V2-1-2-2 ME EMPLOYERS MUTUAL 19 Cross St. 4.25 249.50 59.1 61.6 165.6 172.5 2.97 57 Office 58737.0 -9.5 -9.5 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP67+WM-6-3-6-3 PWD Admin Facility 225 Douglass St. 6.63 430.82 111.8 116.6 181.7 186.7 6.14 49 Office 65000.0 0.7 0.7 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM2C4-7-3-7 Unum Portland, ME Campus 2211 Congress Street 4.35 3128.96 70.3 73.0 131.5 134.4 8.79 Office 719458.0 13.0 13.0 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM274-4-1-4 Woodard & Curran 41 Hutchins Drive 4.44 255.60 75.8 78.6 118.3 121.2 0.69 Office 60144.0 1.6 1.6 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMR92-3-1-2 101 McAlister Farm Road 101 McAlister Farm Road 3.89 81.23 63.0 67.0 117.4 121.8 7.55 Other 20860.0 31.5 31.5 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMM92-3-2-4 238 Riverside 238 Riverside Street 1.28 46.65 20.3 22.3 40.6 42.8 1.24 Other 36340.0 -54.5 -54.5 In compliance Not Exempt Building G 100 West Commercial Street 2.86 57.25 45.6 47.7 53.1 55.2 4.26 Other 20000.0 -40.5 -40.5 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMPC+M8-2-2-2-2 Hammond Lumber Company 300 Riverside Street 1.60 35.20 29.7 35.3 33.1 39.0 4.22 Other 22000.0 -62.9 -62.9 In compliance Not Exempt x Wayneflete Rowing 100 West Commercial Street 0.28 0.57 3.9 4.0 11.0 11.1 4.26 Other 2000.0 -87.6 -87.6 Other - In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPPM+M4-1-2-2-2 Glickman Academy 587 Ocean Ave 4.29 92.70 74.5 81.6 109.2 116.8 5.72 Education 21624.0 -1.0 -1.0 Other - In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+56-3-4-4-5 Monument Square 5 Monument Square 2.04 166.47 38.3 41.2 40.2 43.3 4.25 Education 81770.0 -63.5 -63.5 Other - In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPC4+G3-1-1-1-0 PPL Burbank 337 Stevens Avenue 2.13 14.60 36.3 38.1 56.6 59.3 10.78 Education 6870.0 -48.7 -48.7 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6P3-4-3-2 127 MW 127 marginal way 0.06 1.60 0.9 0.9 2.1 2.3 1.44 Other - Mall 27554.0 -99.1 -99.1 Other - In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4M+JR-3-4-3-3 YMCA of Southern Maine 70 Forest Avenue 6.73 660.63 120.0 125.6 159.2 165.1 24.88 Recreation 98180.0 42.1 42.1 Page 44 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Other - In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPVM+PW-4-15-3-15 Portland Yacht Services 100 West Commercial Street 4.45 384.91 68.5 71.1 120.0 123.5 12.50 Services 86400.0 23.9 23.9 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5W1-2-2-3 PARKING GARAGE 142 FEDERAL STREET 0.30 34.56 4.1 4.1 11.6 11.6 0.00 94 Parking 118760.0 -60.0 -60.0 Performing In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4R+JC-2-2-2-2 121 Center Street 121 Center Street 6.88 198.81 114.4 120.6 195.3 202.1 10.22 Arts 28885.0 74.4 74.4 Refrigerated In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQJ+F5-4-7-5-8 029 513 Warren Ave 0.00 0.00 124.9 131.0 275.6 283.2 4.04 17 Warehouse 104710.0 82.2 82.2 Refrigerated In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM8+72-4-7-4-9 10573002 - Portland 165 Read Street 3.33 653.77 49.1 49.0 118.7 118.6 37.38 77 Warehouse 196599.0 -42.7 -42.7 Salvation Army Adult Residential In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5P1-2-0-1 Rehabilitation Center 98 Preble Street 6.36 151.51 105.6 112.9 181.1 188.8 26.71 Care Facility 23826.0 68.4 68.4 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPPR2-2-2-2 145 Presumpscot Store 145 Presumpscot St 1.68 36.21 23.3 23.4 65.3 65.5 3.46 95 Retail Store 21600.0 -52.7 -52.7 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMPG+75-5-5-7-6 2401 - PORTLAND 245 RIVERSIDE STREET 4.52 483.50 75.6 81.3 126.2 132.3 6.22 79 Retail Store 107085.0 -29.4 -29.4 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQJ+2W-3-3-2-3 Branch 616 - Portland, ME 425 Warren Ave 2.77 73.12 49.1 54.5 67.1 73.0 0.00 61 Retail Store 26357.0 -11.2 -11.2 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5X+7C-1-2-2-3 Hub Furniture Co 291 Fore St 1.05 36.65 18.0 20.1 27.5 29.7 0.68 98 Retail Store 35000.0 -60.1 -60.1 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM29+R2-3-3-1-3 Ruth's Reusable Resources 39 Blueberry Rd 1.82 49.07 28.5 28.7 37.9 38.4 0.55 95 Retail Store 27000.0 -48.6 -48.6 Self-Storage In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMJC3-4-2-4 3697-Portland - Riverside St 150 Riverside St 0.91 69.54 15.1 16.3 25.8 27.1 0.09 Facility 76527.0 -46.0 -46.0 Social/Meeti In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3P+7W-2-2-1-3 Cumberland Club 116 High St 8.65 172.97 150.8 158.9 218.2 227.3 15.53 ng Hall 20000.0 99.1 99.1 Supermarke t/Grocery In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7R+9H-4-6-3-4 10291-PTL Portland Bayside 2 Somerset Street 18.85 1056.84 299.3 308.5 590.6 600.4 39.40 Store 56059.0 33.0 33.0 Supermarke JPQX+4V South Portland, t/Grocery In compliance Not Exempt Maine 8279-Portland, ME 50 Cottage Road 12.48 540.05 191.1 198.8 418.5 426.6 16.40 62 Store 43268.0 -12.6 -12.6 Supermarke t/Grocery In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7J+CJ-4-9-3-7 8351-Portland Forest Ave. 295 Forest Avenue 13.21 938.21 195.9 203.5 468.1 476.3 6.41 51 Store 71011.0 -1.9 -1.9 Urgent Care/Clinic/ Other In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPVJ2-4-3-4 Portland VA CBO 141 West Commercial Street 11.24 772.03 186.3 190.7 321.1 325.9 8.57 Outpatient 68710.0 120.3 120.3 Vehicle In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQF+G9-2-4-3-3 Moose LLC 375 Riverside Street 3.02 79.25 48.9 53.0 90.2 94.7 5.35 72 Dealership 26285.0 -20.7 -20.7 Vehicle In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMFH+9R-4-3-3-4 Quirk Chevrolet 1000 Brighton Ave 1.97 110.52 30.1 30.6 66.5 67.1 2.57 95 Dealership 56000.0 -48.3 -48.3 Vehicle Repair In compliance Not Exempt x Building A 100 West Commercial Street 0.22 4.31 3.1 3.2 8.8 8.9 2.22 Services 19200.0 -91.0 -91.0 Vehicle Repair In compliance Not Exempt x Building B 100 West Commercial Street 4.08 117.37 60.8 62.7 117.4 120.0 11.83 Services 28800.0 21.2 21.2 Vehicle Repair In compliance Not Exempt x Building C 100 West Commercial Street 2.00 43.22 32.6 34.2 59.3 61.4 6.50 Services 21600.0 -38.8 -38.8 Vehicle Repair In compliance Not Exempt x Building D 100 West Commercial Street 4.87 23.38 81.2 85.0 137.4 141.3 18.26 Services 4800.0 41.8 41.8 Vehicle Repair In compliance Not Exempt x Building E 100 West Commercial Street 6.87 82.48 108.9 112.9 133.4 137.7 17.05 Services 12000.0 37.7 37.7 Page 45 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Vehicle Repair In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPHW+WR-3-3-4-4 Maine Yacht Center 100 Kensington Street 2.70 133.11 40.5 43.4 75.7 78.6 12.80 Services 49300.0 -21.8 -21.8 Vehicle Moody's Collision Centers Repair In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPXR2-2-2-3 Portland 495 Presumpscot St 19.85 223.35 268.9 287.0 344.6 362.7 12.67 Services 11250.0 255.7 255.7 Vehicle Portland Commerce Center - Repair In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQM+5V-3-2-4-1 Safelite 421 Warren Ave 3.06 82.20 51.5 55.0 84.8 88.6 43.78 Services 26840.0 -12.5 -12.5 Wholesale Club/Superc In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMFG+4M-4-9-5-9 LOWES 37 RAND RD 4.05 469.5 65.8 68.5 120.8 123.7 3.94 83 enter 115928.0 -31.6 -31.6 First Baptist Church in Worship In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPRC+36-3-3 Portland 360 Canco rd 2.14 60.7 37.9 42.1 52.3 57.1 1.35 93 Facility 28327.0 -46.2 -46.2 First Lutheran Church & Worship In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPP35+XR-2-3-2-2 Children's Programs 132 Auburn St 3.50 87.62 47.7 52.2 61.2 66.0 6.47 69 Facility 25011.0 -23.9 -23.9 Worship In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+CM-2-2-1-2 First Parish Church 425 Congress Street 2.33 41.06 40.8 45.5 57.7 63.6 8.08 41 Facility 17637.0 13.6 13.6 Worship In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPP83+WQ-2-3-1-2 Grace Baptist Church 476 Summit Street 9.73 46.10 132.2 141.1 176.3 188.9 5.84 Facility 4737.0 201.8 201.8 Worship In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP88+8F-2-4-2-4 Temple Beth El 400 Deering Avenue 3.89 84.36 67.8 72.8 98.5 103.6 11.34 41 Facility 21674.0 12.4 12.4 Woodfords Congregational Worship In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPC6+6W-2-1-2-1 Church 202 Woodford Street 1.95 85.66 26.6 26.6 36.3 36.3 664.03 79 Facility 44000.0 -43.6 -43.6 In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM3+4J-3-8-3-3 x HERSEY 714 STEVENS AVE The Cathedral Church of St. In compliance Not Exempt Luke 143 State Street 3.31 107.04 59.7 65.6 75.3 81.9 32386.0 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMHC+RR-5-10-2-3 Fireside Portland 81 Riverside St 4.72 536.05 75.8 144.9 214.26 83 Hotel 113493.0 -26.4 -26.4 Financial Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3Q2-3-3-3 Baxter 562 Congress st 2.37 251.30 41.4 44.3 59.7 62.6 4.53 Office 105872.0 -48.7 -48.7 Manufacturi Douglas Bros. Division-Robert 423 Riverside Industrial ng/Industrial Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM7W+26-2-3-4-3 Mitchell Co., Inc. Parkway 2.38 67.17 40.4 64.6 1.99 Plant 28200.0 APEX Fitness & Racket Center Other - Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM25+JR-3-4-4-4 LLC 2445 Congress St 1.43 117.41 20.4 53.9 0.01 Recreation 82000.0 -51.9 -51.9 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP7Q2-3-2-3 161 MW 161 marginal way 8.26 453.62 153.7 158.3 170.4 175.3 43.70 Other - Mall 54922.0 -24.4 -24.4 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPR53-2-1-2 7TH DAY ADVENTISTS 97 ALLEN AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPP3-3-4-2 APPLICATOR SALES 400 WARREN AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPM3-3-3-2 APPLICATORS SALE 420 WARREN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-4-3-3 ARCADIA 504 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMMF+6Q-3-3-2-2 BERLIN CITY LEXUS/TOYOTA 191 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFPP287-7-11-8 CALL CENTER BLDG 75 NORTHPORT DR Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4R+67-4-7-5-7 CIVIC CENTER 82 FREE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPWC+9X-3-3-2-3 COZY HARBOR 75 ST JOHN ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6R+XX-4-6-4-5 E W NOYES & SONS 127 OXFORD ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRC+36-3-3-2-4 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 326 CANCO RD Page 46 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPXC2-3-2-4 GOULET SUPPLY 151 ST JOHN ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP49+F3-3-3-2-2 H.P. HOOD & SONS 349 PARK AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMQF4-5-3-6 HARVEY IND. 405 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2V0-1-1-1 HOBSON'S PIER 390 COMMERCIAL ST HOLMES DISTRIBUTOR / Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM4Q3-4-3-3 HORIZON 230 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R1-2-2-1 KINKO'S 50 MONUMENT SQ Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQ8+3X-8-9-8-7 L L BEAN 765 WARREN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQM2-5-3-4 LEX CONNECTION 429 WARREN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V1-2-1-3 MACHIAS BANK/O BAG 193 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFJMXG+JP-3-4-3-4 MAINE LOBSTER NOW 52 CITY LINE DR Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ93-4-3-5 ME DMV & DEP 298 CANCO RD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q+FG-2-2-1-1 MECHANICS HALL 519 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMM283-4-4-4 MPX/SFX 2301 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMRF3-4-2-4 MSN / ME TPK SVC CTR 400 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9F2-4-3-4 NEXCYCLE / ROOF SPECIALIST/ 80 PINE TREE IND PKWY Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM7V+4J-2-5-3-4 PAUL WHITE TILE CO 446 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY Ambulatory Surgical Exempt Exempt 87MFMP453-3-3-4 ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOC 33 SEWALL ST Center 54000.0 Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+93-2-3-1-3 Cow Plaza Hotel LLC 433 Fore Street 46.16 Hotel 80189.0 Non- Refrigerated Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3M+FX-6-5-5-4 006881-Portland ME 125 Industrial Way Warehouse 100000.0 Exempt Exempt 87MFPM9W+6Q-2-4-3-4 FAIRPOINT COMUNICATION 5 DAVIS FARM RD Office 80683.0 Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-2-3-4 PARKING DECK 468 FORE ST Parking 61650.0 Residential Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4J+4C-1-1-1-2 899 Riverside St Campus 899 Riverside St 0.00 0.0 Care Facility 25688.0 Residential Exempt Exempt Bigelow 899 Riverside St Care Facility 12460.0 Residential Exempt Exempt Kineo 899 Riverside St Care Facility 9180.0 Residential Exempt Exempt 87MFMPV9+QX-6-7-6-7 ST JOSEPHS MANOR 136 RAY ST Care Facility 88000.0 Residential Exempt Exempt Sue Wright House 899 Riverside St Care Facility 4576.0 Vehicle Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQR+53-2-1-1-1 O'CONNORS MOTOR CO 279 WARREN AVE Dealership 33710.0 Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R+FJ-1-2-2-2 #1 FREE ST CONDO 10 FREE ST Page 47 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V2-5-2-5 1 CITY CENTER 1 CITY CTR Exempt Exempt 87MFMMVC1-2-2-3 1 OF 3 470 RIVERSIDE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P4-5-2-4 10 CONGRESS ST PLAZA 10 CONGRESS SQ Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ633-6-4-5 100 FORE ST 100 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P3-2-3-6 100 STATE STREET 100 STATE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPJ61-2-2-1 1025 FOREST AVE 1025 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMMGH3-1-4-5 1041 SHOPPING PLAZA 1041 BRIGHTON AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6P2-3-1-2 117 LOFTS 117 PREBLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFJPVF1-2-1-1 121 CASSIDY POINT 121 CASSIDY PT RD 17 CARLETON STREET Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2H1-1-2-1 APARTMENTS 17 CARLETON ST 178 KENNEBEC CONDO UNIT Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5M1-2-1-2 #2 178 KENNEBEC ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMMC1-3-2-4 190 RIVERSIDE PLAZA 190 RIVERSIDE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V+PP-2-2-1-2 2 CANAL PLAZA 2 CANAL PLAZA Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V1-1-1-1 2 CITY CENTER 2 CITY CTR Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R2-3-2-3 2 MONUMENT SQUARE 2 MONUMENT SQ Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-3-3-3 2 PORTLAND SQUARE 2 PORTLAND SQ Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W2-2-1-1 217 COMMERCIAL ST 217 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R+MW-1-2-2-2 22 FREE ST 22 FREE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3H1-1-2-2 27 UNIT 553 CUMBERLAND AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-2-2-2 3 CANAL PLAZA 3 CANAL PLAZA Exempt Exempt 87MFMPF71-3-1-2 3 PLEASANT AVE 3 PLEASANT AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP51-2-1-1 4 APARTMENTS 78 BELL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R1-2-2-3 40 FREE ST 28 FREE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P+9F-2-2-1-2 45 FOREST AVE APARTMENTS 45 FOREST AVE 482 CONGRESS HAZY HILL Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R2-3-2-2 FARMS 482 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ521-2-1-2 5 INDIA STREET 5 INDIA ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q3-4-3-3 511 PLAZA 511 CONGRESS ST 53 DANFORTH STREET Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3R2-2-2-1 APARTMENTS 53 DANFORTH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7V1-2-2-2 58 BOYD STREET 58 BOYD ST Page 48 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2Q2-2-1-2 66 STATE ST 66 STATE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+77-1-2-1-2 75 MARKET STREET 75 MARKET ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V1-3-2-3 89 ANDERSON ST 89 ANDERSON ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+R8-1-1-1-2 ABACUS / KENNEDY STUDIO 44 EXCHANGE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMVG+X9-1-2-1-1 ADT 563 RIVERSIDE ST ALLAGASH BREWING Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3M+F9-2-2-2-3 COMPANY INDUSTRIAL WAY 1265.95 Exempt Exempt 87MFPM5Q3-4-2-5 ALLSIDE 78 WALCH DR Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+8R-1-2-1-2 ANDROSCOGGIN BANK 130 MIDDLE ST ARTEMISIA CAFE/ ART Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3R3-3-2-2 STUDIOS 59 PLEASANT ST ASIAN BISTRO/YOGURT Exempt Exempt 87MFMMFF7-5-9-4 VALLEY 1140 BRIGHTON AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6M+GP-1-2-1-2 AT & T MOBILITY 49 MARGINAL WAY Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ422-3-2-3 ATLANTIC TRAWLER 68 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQJ+GQ-3-3-4-6 ATRIUM 640 OCEAN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP31-2-2-2 AVESTA BISHOP STREET 72 BISHOP ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8X2-2-1-2 AVESTA HOUSING 58 NORTH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X2-3-3-2 BANGOR SAVINGS OFFICE 280 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6Q5-7-4-6 BAXTER ACADEMY 185 LANCASTER ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3V2-2-2-3 BAXTER PLACE 305 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R2-2-2-3 BAYSIDE MAINE 645 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7M3-5-3-4 BAYSIDE MEDICAL BLDG 84 MARGINAL WAY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7H+G2-2-3-2-2 BAYVIEW COURT APTS 331 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt currently unavailable BIRCH MEADOW APTS 237 WOODFORD ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPPC+36-1-5-5-5 BIRCHWOOD 217 CANCO RD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2G0-2-1-2 BOWDOIN DEVELOPMENT 135 CHADWICK ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP25+JQ-3-4-2-4 BRICK NORTH 4 THOMPSONS POINT Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W+M3-1-2-2-2 BROWNE TRADING MARKET 260 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPM7W+PH-3-3-3-4 BUILDERS INSULATION 511 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M1-4-3-4 BURNHAM APARTMENTS 633 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4M1-1-1-2 BURNHAM TOWERS APTS 419 CUMBERLAND AVE Page 49 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH6+JR-2-3-2-4 CARAVAN BEADS 915 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3H1-1-1-1 CARLETON APTS 84 CARLETON ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P1-2-2-2 CARLETON COURT 145 SPRING ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRV2-2-2-2 CASCO BAY REFINISHING 273 PRESUMPSCOT ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X1-2-2-2 CASCO VARIETY 94 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+GP-1-2-1-3 CELLARDOOR WINERY 131 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-3-3-4 CENTER CITY PLAZA 510 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P+P7-2-3-1-2 CHURCH 156 HIGH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R1-1-2-2 CLAPP MEMORIAL BLDG 443 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P2-2-2-2 COFFEE BY DESIGN/ LAZZARI 616 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V3-4-3-5 COFFEE BY DESIGN/ YOUNGS 11 DIAMOND ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+FX-1-1-1-1 COMMUNIQUES 5 MOULTON ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P3-4-2-3 CONGRESS BLDG 142 HIGH ST COURT SQUARE, Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W2-3-1-3 ANTHOPOLOGIE 66 PEARL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3V3-2-3-2 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 311 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXR2-2-1-2 CUMBERLAND PARK PLACE 447 CUMBERLAND AVE CYCLE MANIA/ANGELA Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9V3-3-3-4 ADAMS 170 ANDERSON ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2R1-2-1-2 DANFORTH ON HIGH 81 DANFORTH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+48-1-1-1-2 DAVID WOOD CLOTHING 225 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R0-1-1-1 DAVIDS / COFFEE BY DESIGN 22 MONUMENT SQ Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3J2-3-1-3 DEERING PLACE 609 OCEAN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6V2-3-2-2 DEERING PLACE BLDG A 61 DEERING ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP461-2-2-3 DERMATOLOGY ASSO. 50 SEWALL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQQ2-3-2-2 DRAKE EQUIPMENT 160 PRESUMPSCOT ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMPP3-6-3-2 DSI-GARAGE DOORS 380 WARREN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP61-2-1-1 EEC 57 BELL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2Q2-1-1-2 ELM TERRACE 68 HIGH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ931-2-1-2 EMERSON 13 EMERSON ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-1-1-2 EQUALITY MAINE 15 CASCO ST Page 50 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X1-2-2-3 EVIE CIANCHETTE BLOCK 145 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPP29+98-6-4-1-4 FALLBROOK WOODS 60 MERRYMEETING DR Exempt Not Exempt 87MFMM36+JW-2-4-2-4 FEDERAL EXPRESS 95 HUTCHINS DR Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2C4-3-4-2 FIRST ATLANTIC BLDG 222 ST JOHN ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W2-2-1-1 FITZ & BENNETT HOME 5 MILK ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W1-2-1-2 FL PUTMAN 5 WIDGERY WHARF Exempt Exempt 87MFMP272-2-1-2 FORE RIVER APARTMENTS 57 FREDERIC ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4M1-2-1-2 FOREST AVE PLAZA 449 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4Q+4G-2-3-2-3 FORM SYSTEMS 200 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P1-1-1-0 FRANKLIN TOWERS 61 WILMOT ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMM5V2-3-2-4 FRESENIUS MEDICAL CENTER 1600 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ623-4-3-3 GATEWAY GARAGE 167 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q2-3-2-4 GOVERNMENT CENTER 81 PREBLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-1-1-2 GROSS CONFECTION BAR 57 EXCHANGE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMRP32-3-1-2 GYM 78 MCKINLEY CT Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3W+WC-5-3-5-4 HALCYON ORGANICS 65 MILLIKEN ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ2+2F-2-4-2-3 HAPPY TAILS/ BRACKETT WEST 115 BISHOP ST Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWM3-4-2-3 HARBOR TERRACE 284 DANFORTH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXQ2-2-1-2 HARBORSIDE APARTMENTS 41 STATE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQJ+7V-3-3-3-4 HOFFMAN CENTER 630 OCEAN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3G2-2-2-2 HOLT HALL 794 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+CR-2-2-1-2 HOLY DONUTS 4 MOULTON ST HUGOS/EVENTIDE/HONEY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X1-2-1-2 POT 80 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPP650-1-1-2 HUNTINGTON NORTH 326 AUBURN ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4P+65-1-3-2-2 IMMUCELL 201 INDUSTRIAL WAY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4F2-3-1-2 IRIS PARK APARTMENTS 191 PARK AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9V2-3-1-3 JJ RITTER/INDIGO ART 50 COVE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M3-2-3-2 JOES VARIETY 667 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+GF-1-2-1-1 JOHN D CARROLL BLOCK 136 COMMERCIAL ST Page 51 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M1-3-2-2 LAFAYETTE SQUARE APT 638 CONGRESS ST LEAVITT & PARRIS/ OTTOS Exempt Exempt 87MFMPM65-3-6-4 PIZZA 250 READ ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9C+78-2-3-2-3 LEEWARD 516 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+G2-1-2-1-1 LEROUX KITCHEN 161 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7P4-5-2-6 LINDEN 132 MARGINAL WAY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-1-1-2 LIO REST./ STYLE ME 6 CITY CTR Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W2-2-2-2 LIQUID RIOT 250 COMMERCIAL ST LOCAL 188/NORTHEAST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3J1-1-2-2 PATIENT 685 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M4-2-2-2 LONGFELLOW COMMONS 681 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMGG+Q3-4-4-3-4 LORING HOUSE 1125 BRIGHTON AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMM6V2-2-2-2 MAINE ORTHOPEDICS 1599 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQR3-5-4-4 MAINE YACHT CENTER 197 PRESUMPSCOT ST MARION BLDG / JOHNS Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X+54-1-2-2-2 MANVILLE 31 PEARL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQH3-4-2-4 MARTIN POINT 32 RAINBOW MALL RD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R2-2-1-2 MASONIC BLDG 415 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P5-8-7-7 ME MED PARKING GARAG 173 HIGH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P2-3-2-3 MECA 380 CUMBERLAND AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMM3J+CJ-2-3-1-2 MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 1945 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-1-1-1 MIDDLE ST TOWER 100 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X2-3-2-2 MIDDLE STREET APARTMENTS 83 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMP92-3-2-4 MILTON RENTALS 750 WARREN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMPPM1-1-2-2 MOTHERHOUSE 605 STEVENS AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W1-1-2-2 MSRC 30 UNION WHARF Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8R4-5-4-6 MULTI TENANT 34 DIAMOND ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V1-2-1-1 MULTI TENANT 97 EXCHANGE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ41-2-1-2 MULTI TENANT RETAIL 1190 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMMRF3-3-2-2 MULTI TENANTED 460 RIVERSIDE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWP2-5-2-6 MULTI TENANTED 65 W COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6P2-3-2-3 MULTI TENANTED 101 HANOVER ST Page 52 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3H2-4-2-3 MULTI TENANTED 1 INDUSTRIAL WAY Exempt Exempt 87MFMPF41-1-1-2 MULTIPLE TENANTS 197 PLEASANT AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3V2-2-2-2 NETWORK SYSTEMS 14 YORK ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPPR5-7-5-3 NEW ENGLAND ORGANIC 125 PRESUMPSCOT ST NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P+FC-3-4-2-3 BUILDING 55 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q3-5-3-5 NEW GREEN LIGHT STUDIO 45 DARTMOUTH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4W+P9-6-8-6-9 NEW WAREHOUSE 56 MILLIKEN ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6X2-3-2-3 NORTH SCHOOL 248 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M1-1-1-1 NORTHGATE 231 STATE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPP362-2-1-1 NORTHGATE OFFICE MLL 94 AUBURN ST NOVA SEAFOODS / DAVES Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWQ3-3-2-4 AUTO 555 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R+RQ-1-3-2-2 NURA 1 MONUMENT WAY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q1-3-2-2 OAK STREET LOFTS 72 OAK ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPC81-1-2-2 ODD FELLOWS BLDG 651 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+85-1-2-1-2 OLD PORT SANDWICH SHOP 77 MARKET ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+XP-2-2-1-3 OLD PORT SEAGRILL 7 CUSTOM HOUSE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+HW-1-1-1-2 OLD PORT TAVERN BILLIARDS 366 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V1-1-0-0 ONE CANAL PLAZA 1 CANAL PLAZA Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R+3M-1-2-2-2 ONE MONUMENT SQUARE 1 MONUMENT SQ Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQJ+FX-1-3-2-3 OSHER INN 620 OCEAN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2R0-1-1-0 PARKING GARAGE 27 HIGH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X3-3-2-4 PARKING GARAGE/REGISTRY 25 PEARL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R1-2-2-2 PEARL PLACE II APARTMENTS 184 PEARL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-3-2-3 PEOPLES HERITAGE BANK 1 PORTLAND SQ Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P+6P-1-2-2-3 PERFORMING ARTS CNTR 25 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMMR9+8G-2-3-1-3 PHARMERICA EAST 97 MCALISTER FARM RD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+HV-1-2-1-3 PHENIX TITLE / HARRIMAN 121 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W4-4-3-3 PIERCE ATWOOD 252 COMMERCIAL ST PLAY IT AGAIN/MAINE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9R2-2-3-3 RUNNING 315 MARGINAL WAY Page 53 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q+4F-1-2-1-1 PORTLAND DATA CENTER 338 CUMBERLAND AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6X2-2-2-3 PORTLAND FOOD CO-OP 290 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+6F-1-1-1-2 PORTLAND GREEN GROCR 211 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2V1-1-1-2 PORTLAND YACHT SERVICES 400 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6M+6P-3-5-3-4 POST OFFICE MNTNANCE 171 KENNEBEC ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V2-5-3-6 POST OFFICE SQUARE 396 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q4-4-3-3 POWER PAY/PUBLIC MARKET 320 CUMBERLAND AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP77+39-1-1-1-1 PRINCETON VILLAGE 7 ELIZABETH RD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R2-2-1-1 PRIOR TD BANK SPACE 477 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W1-0-0-1 PROCTOR BLDG 9 EXCHANGE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ22-2-3-4 RAIA BUSINESS CMPLX 54 WARREN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMPM6+HW-2-5-2-5 READ ST SELF STORAGE 217 READ ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ31-1-1-1 REICHHOLD PLASMINE 33 BISHOP ST RESIDENCES AT MERCY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P3-4-3-4 HOSPITAL 120 STATE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W3-4-3-4 REST/PARKING GARAGE 425 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M2-2-2-1 RICE TRELAWN BLDG 655 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V+52-3-4-4-4 RISING TIDE/AUSTIN STREET 109 FOX ST ROCKINGHAM/THREE OF Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V+Q4-4-5-4-3 STRONG 35 DIAMOND ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPHQ+X2-4-6-5-7 SEASIDE PARTNERSHIP 850 BAXTER BLVD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4C+2C-2-2-2-3 SHALOM HOUSE 106 GILMAN ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-2-2-2 SILVER STREET DEVELOPMENT 4 MILK ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X2-1-0-2 SIMON PIERCE 111 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8X6-5-6-5 SMRT 59 WASHINGTON AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V1-2-2-2 SONNY'S 85 EXCHANGE ST STARBUCKS COFFEE / Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-2-1-1 STONEWALL 178 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W1-2-1-2 STORAGE BLDG. 450 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q+32-3-3-2-3 STRAND BLDG. 565 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMM5Q2-2-2-2 STROUDWATER CROSSING 1685 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMFF7-7-7-6 SULLIVAN TIRE 1110 BRIGHTON AVE Page 54 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRR3-2-3-3 TALUS/GRIME STUDIO 299 PRESUMPSCOT ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-2-1-2 THE AMBASSADOR 37 CASCO ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q1-2-1-1 THE EARL 341 CUMBERLAND AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R1-2-2-2 THE METROPOLITAN 439 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP991-2-2-2 THE SANBORN BUILDING 550 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q1-1-2-2 THE SHEPLEY 18 CASCO ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+HJ-2-2-1-3 THOMAS BLOCK 100 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+24-1-1-1-1 THREE DOLLAR DEWEYS 241 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6P+P5-3-4-2-3 TRADER JOES 87 MARGINAL WAY Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8C1-1-1-2 TREE HOUSE TOYS / MAPS 45 EXCHANGE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH44-3-3-4 U.S. POST OFFICE A 622 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP298-3-9-3 UNION STATION PLAZA 966 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R1-1-1-2 UNITED BANK & TRUST BLDG 465 CONGRESS ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q1-2-2-3 UNITY VILLAGE 6 STONE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPX72-2-2-2 UPHAM BLDG 56 NORTHPORT DR Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W2-2-2-2 URBAN OUTFITTERS 188 MIDDLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3C1-2-1-2 VALLEY STREET APARTMENTS 88 GILMAN ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3R2-3-2-3 VARIOUS SM BUSINESS 20 DANFORTH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ634-9-3-6 VETERANS AFFAIRS 144 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMHF+83-2-2-3-2 VIP 35 RIVERSIDE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q2-2-1-2 WADSWORTH BLDG, DUTCHS 28 PREBLE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3J1-2-2-3 WALKER TERRACE 730 CONGRESS ST WALTON STREET BUSINESS Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH75-4-4-3 PARK 135 WALTON ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X+HV-1-2-2-2 WAREHOUSE 15 FRANKLIN ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V4-5-4-3 WAREHOUSE IN REAR 31 DIAMOND ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQH4-5-3-4 WASHINGTON PARK 31 PHEASANT HILL DR Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQH4-6-4-5 WASHINGTON PARK 65 PHEASANT HILL DR Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2J2-4-2-3 WEST END PLACE 183 BRACKETT ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ633-4-2-6 WEX 1 HANCOCK ST Page 55 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI WHISKEY BARREL/PORT Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5P2-5-3-4 PROPERTIES 82 HANOVER ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQC3-4-3-4 WISE PRINTING 33 MCALISTER FARM RD Exempt Exempt 87MFMPHR2-1-2-2 970 BAXTER BLVD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P+W5-2-4-2-4 134 PARK ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X+3J-2-2-2-2 300 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRP0-2-1-1 733 OCEAN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4G0-4-2-1 157 GRANT ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRQ1-1-2-1 733 OCEAN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMMXJ1-1-0-0 1838 FOREST AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4J2-2-0-2 286 STATE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPM5P5-6-5-6 26 WALCH DR Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2H1-2-1-1 30 WEST ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMPC36-6-4-6 37 FORE ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4J1-0-0-1 65 GRANT ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R2-2-1-2 180 PEARL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X2-2-2-2 86 COMMERCIAL ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P1-1-1-2 11 SHEPLEY ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ62+JM-3-6-3-5 86 Newbury Street Condo 4 25 Hancock Street Parking 120850.0 Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R2-3-3-3 PARKING GARAGE 23 FREE ST Parking 175134.0 Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQR+8H-2-1-2-2 CAPOZZA TILE CO 267 WARREN AVE Distribution Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM363-5-4-5 102 Hutchins Drive 102 Hutchins Drive 5.06 Center 82522.0 Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM4M2-4-3-4 Micucci Wholesale Foods 961 Riverside Street 1.43 Food Sales 40000.0 Hospital (General Medical & Failed Not Exempt Bramhall Campus 22 Bramhall Street Surgical) 1158254.0 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2M+QM-2-1-1-2 PORTLAND CLUB 152 STATE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3P+HX-1-7-4-2 PORTLAND MUSEUM OF ART 148 FREE ST PORTLAND RETIREMENT Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPVM4-5-5-4 RESIDENCE 802 OCEAN AVE U-Haul Moving & Storage At Self-Storage Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPCV4-2-3-2 Rte 295 (731066) 411 Marginal Way Facility 55662.0 Page 56 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Manufacturi ng/Industrial Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM3J+7W-2-2-1-2 ALLAGASH BREWING 50 INDUSTRIAL WAY Plant 75000.0 Medical Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3F+V5-3-4-3-4 887 Congress Street 887 Congress Street 3.20 Office 48058.0 Non- Refrigerated Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRQ3-4-2-3 00616-Portland 290 Presumpscot Street 0.00 0.0 Warehouse 39900.0 Failed Not Exempt 110 Free Street 110 Free Street 4.93 Office 83052.0 301 NE 2nd Ave, Portland, OR - Failed Not Exempt BLDG10028 301 NE 2nd Ave Office 25150.0 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPX8+P4-2-4-3-3 CHESHIRE BLDG 43 NORTHPORT DR Office 26784.0 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C1-3-2-2 USM OFFICES 501 FOREST AVE Office 26400.0 Worship Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPJ4+RQ-1-2-2-1 ST JOSEPH CHURCH 671 STEVENS AVE Facility 20000.0 Worship Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPPH+28-1-2-1-2 ST PIUS X CHURCH 492 OCEAN AVE Facility 20000.0 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3V1-2-2-2 . 54 YORK ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C2-3-3-3 509 FOREST AVE 509 FOREST AVE AAA NORTHERN NEW Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6M+QJ-1-2-2-1 ENGLAND 54 MARGINAL WAY Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM6W+63-4-4-2-4 ABC SUPPLY CO. 1 RICE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9F+VF-3-5-3-5 ALLEN & COLES 75 PINE TREE IND PKWY Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4W1-1-0-1 ANDIAMO SALON & SPA 52 EXCHANGE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP8F1-1-1-2 ANNEX BUILDING 45 BROWN ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMQ521-2-2-2 AUTO EUROPE 29 COMMERCIAL ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3R3-3-2-4 BAMICO PARKING 40 SPRING ST ARTERIAL Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2W+V3-2-3-2-4 BRISTOL 5 PORTLAND FISH PIER Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPM8+J9-6-5-4-4 CENTRAL ME POWER 138 CANCO RD Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPPH+2V-2-3-2-2 CHANCERY BUILDING 506 OCEAN AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q3-4-3-4 CUMBERLAND AVE PRKG 315 CUMBERLAND AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5W+H4-1-2-3-6 FEDERAL COURT BLD 168 FEDERAL ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPJ3-6-3-5 GEORGIA PACIFIC 508 WARREN AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9G+32-2-3-2-3 HALE TRAILER INC 20 PINE TREE IND PKWY Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMGC+8G-2-3-2-2 HAMPTON INN 1210 BRIGHTON AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMRP4+43-4-4-1-3 INN AT DIAMOND COVE 18 MCKINLEY CT Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMFF+V8-7-5-9-4 INN AT PORTLAND 1150 BRIGHTON AVE Page 57 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMCC4-4-4-3 LEEN CO / HOMAN'S ASSOC / 111 PINE TREE IND PKWY LIBERTY BAY RECOVERY Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP7G3-2-1-3 CENTER 343 FOREST AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+VR-1-2-1-1 LONGFELLOW HOUSE 483 CONGRESS ST Maine College of Art and Failed Not Exempt Design 522 Congress Street 664.98 Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3P2-1-3-2 MAINE GIRLS ACADEMY 631 STEVENS AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+PV-2-1-1-2 MAINE HISTORICAL SOC 489 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFJMX7+Q3-2-3-2-3 MAINE TURNPIKE 2352 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2W+HF-2-3-2-3 MARINE TRADE CENTER 2 PORTLAND FISH PIER Failed Not Exempt 87MFMQQ3+7J-3-6-3-5 MARTIN'S POINT 331 VERANDA ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+HR-1-2-2-3 MASONIC TEMPLE 8 CHESTNUT ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPWC+PW-2-3-3-4 METRO 91 ST JOHN ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPQR2-3-2-3 NAPA AUTO PARTS 235 PRESUMPSCOT ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM4J+GQ-2-3-3-3 NORTH SPORE 921 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP883-3-4-2 NURSING CARE CENTER 68 DEVONSHIRE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPVR+J8-2-1-2-2 PACK EDGE 340 PRESUMPSCOT ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+7M-2-4-3-3 Porteous Bldg. 522 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C2-2-2-2 PORTLAND BALLET 517 FOREST AVE PORTLAND MOTOR CLUB Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRR3-3-2-3 STORAGE 293 PRESUMPSCOT ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+W8-1-3-2-3 PORTLANDS BOYS CLUB 277 CUMBERLAND AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMJC+MV-4-3-3-5 RAMADA PLAZA / EGG & I 155 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6W2-2-1-2 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHP 313 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2H0-1-1-1 RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE 59 CARLETON ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+P2-2-3-2-2 SALVATION ARMY 2 CEDAR ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPWR+FP-2-3-1-3 SEA BREEZE 419 PRESUMPSCOT ST SOUTHERN MAINE ORAL Failed Not Exempt 87MFJMXC1-2-1-2 SUGERY 131 JOHNSON RD Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q+JF-1-2-2-3 SPURWINK 61 PREBLE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C2-3-2-3 STARBIRD MUSIC 525 FOREST AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+4J-2-2-2-3 STORAGE MCA 540 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM39+H5-3-2-3-3 SURBRIDGE YANKEE 2 BLUEBERRY RD Page 58 Water Use Primary % % Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI SURFACE CREATIONS OF Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM5W+P5-2-3-2-4 MAINE 25 RICE ST TECH PACK / MEDQUIST / Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMRC3-4-2-4 VORTECH 410 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4X+VG-2-3-1-2 U S CUSTOMS HOUSE 99 COMMERCIAL ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM3F7-8-9-9 UNUM 2145 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPVM+X5-3-5-2-5 VA CLINIC 101 W COMMERCIAL ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM6Q3-4-3-4 VACANT 1119 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFPMCX+F7-3-6-2-5 VERIZON 13 DAVIS FARM RD Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMJF+G7-2-3-1-5 VERRILLO'S REST/LNG 155 RIVERSIDE ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9C+2X-4-2-6-2 WB MASON 106 PINE TREE IND PKWY Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3P1-2-2-2 WCSH TV 6 ALIVE 128 HIGH ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP7V2-2-2-2 WGME BLDG 81 NORTHPORT DR Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5V+W7-3-3-3-4 385 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRR2-3-2-3 275 PRESUMPSCOT ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6W+M7-2-3-2-4 307 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6Q+G4-5-7-4-7 71 KENNEBEC ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPH6-5-5-6 PORTLAND SPORTS COMPLEX 550 WARREN AVE Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-4-2-3 RENY'S 540 CONGRESS ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMQ88-9-8-7 SELF STORAGE UNITS 76 WARREN AVE Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2Q+9G-3-2-1-3 SOUTH COMMONS 115 DANFORTH ST Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ643-4-3-4 SUN LIFE 110 THAMES ST Failed Not Exempt 87MFJMXF+7X-3-4-1-3 TIME WARNER CABLE 118 JOHNSON RD Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R3-4-4-5 U-1 OXFORD CONDO 134 LANCASTER ST Exempt Exempt 87MFPM8W3-3-2-4 VERIZON 1 DAVIS FARM RD Exempt Exempt 87MFJMXG+J6-1-4-1-3 WHSE/OFFICE FOR TW CABLE 90 JOHNSON RD Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM3J3-4-3-3 YANKEE LANES 867 RIVERSIDE ST Page 59 City of Portland | Sustainability Office Troy Moon, Director To: Sustainability and Transportation Committee Regina Phillips, Chair MEETING DATE November 12, 2025 AGENDA ITEM Agenda Item C PURPOSE To inform the committee about the updated greenhouse gas inventory. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN/CITY COUNCIL GOAL ALIGNMENT Provides information related to progress on One Climate Future Goals BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As part of the development of the One Climate Future climate action plan, Integral Group, now Introba, conducted a community wide greenhouse gas inventory using data from 2017. The purpose of the inventory was to develop baseline information regarding emissions generated within the city limits of Portland. The City chose to follow the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory (GPC) which is compliant with the Global Covenant of Mayors’ Common Reporting Framework. The inventory was compiled and submitted using the City Inventory and Information System (CIRIS) tool from C40 Cities, the tool adopted by most cities around the world. The City of Portland inventory used the GPC BASIC approach, which requires reporting for stationary energy, transportation, and waste. This means we collected data for Scope 1 emissions, which largely correlate with the burning of fossil fuels in building and vehicles, Scope 2 emissions, which are largely emissions related to our use of electricity, and a small portion of Scope 3 emissions related waste. 1 Page 60 Scope 3 emissions are not generally tracked as part of municipal GHG inventories. This includes things such as emissions related to employee commuting and emissions generated in the supply chain of goods and services purchased by the City. Last year, the Sustainability Office again commissioned Introba to update our inventory using 2023 data, which was the most recent year for which we had complete data available. Our goal was to conduct an inventory that would be as close to an “apples to apples” comparison as possible. The categories we inventoried and source of the data used are shown on this table: Some of the data is from utilities that meter service, such as the electric utility and the gas utility and can be deemed to be very reliable. Usage of other fuels must be estimated 2 Page 61 using information from a variety of sources and proxies. This includes examining assessor’s data to determine how many buildings use fuel oil and approximating how much an average facility uses. It also includes estimates of diesel fuel and gasoline burned in Portland using regional transportation data collected by GPCOG. This provides a reasonable approximation but is not as fine grained as we would like. Overall, we feel our consultant was able to complete an inventory that was very similar to the one conducted during the development of OCF. Buildings Buildings continue to be the largest emitters of greenhouse gases in Portland, contributing 60% of the total. As you can see in the chart below, emissions from the building sector (shown in blue) fell noticeably between 2017 and 2023, with the largest reduction coming from commercial buildings. Combined, emissions from buildings fell by 14%. (481,951 MTCO2e down from 560,666 MTCO2e). We attribute this to: ●​ A reduction in fuel oil use (down nearly 42%) ●​ Fewer emissions generated from electricity use due to greening of the grid ●​ Overall energy efficiency improvements in buildings It is notable that this reduction occurred despite significant new construction of commercial buildings in Portland. 3 Page 62 Transportation Emissions from transportation make up nearly 40% of the greenhouse gases emitted in Portland and result from the driving of commercial vehicles, passenger vehicles, offroad vehicles (mostly at the Portland Jetport), ferries operated by Casco Bay Lines, and cruise ships while they are in port. Unfortunately, we found that emissions from the transportation sector rose almost 20% between 2017 - 2023. (305,277 MTCO2e up from 255,252 MTCO2e) This is due to several factors including: ●​ A greater number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) due in part to population growth, commercial activity, and a greater number of visits to the region ●​ The inclusion of airport service vehicles as off-road transportation, which was not accounted for in the 2017 baseline inventory ●​ Increased waterborne navigation in the form of ferries and cruise ship visits The increase in emissions from on road transportation is far and away the largest contributor to transportation emissions, rising more than 42,600 tons since 2017. The chart below shows the percentage of emissions by vehicle type and demonstrates that passenger trucks (SUVs and light duty pick up trucks for personal use) contribute 38% of the emissions on the transportation sector. Unfortunately, these large, heavy vehicles have poor fuel economy. 4 Page 63 It should be noted that there are far fewer heavy and medium duty commercial trucks in Portland but they generate a large portion of the emissions from the transportation sector because of the dirty fuel they use (diesel). Waste Emissions from solid waste management and wastewater management are only about 2% of Portland’s overall calculated emissions. They include emissions from incineration of waste at ecomaine, operations of the wastewater treatment plant, and emissions related to composting food scraps. It is important to recognize that our inventory only captures emissions from local management of waste streams. It does not factor in emissions related to manufacturing, packaging, transporting, and marketing consumer goods outside our city limits. Efforts to reduce waste and to recycle remain essential in order to reduce global GHG emissions. Findings When we combine the inventory results from the three sectors, we find that the significant emissions reduction in the building sector is largely offset by the increase in emissions from the transportation sector. 5 Page 64 This is demonstrated by the columns on the right hand side of the graph above, where we see that total emissions from Portland fell from 840,419 MTCO2e in 2017 to 801,825 MTCO2e in 2023 - a reduction of 4.6%. CONCLUSION(S) The 14% reduction in emissions from the building sector, despite an increased economic activity and increase in the number buildings indicates that state and local policies intended to reduce emissions are working. These include: The State of Maine’s Renewable Portfolio Standard, the statutory requirement that electricity on Maine’s electricity grid be 100% clean/renewable by 2040. This policy is bringing more green electricity onto the grid in support of beneficial electrification. Electrifying buildings and transportation remains an essential way to reduce GHG emissions. The 42% drop in the use of heating oil in Portland demonstrates a significant shift away from this dirty fuel. This coincides with State and local efforts to promote heat pumps and energy efficiency. Updated energy codes are having a positive impact on emissions. In 2017 the State was still enforcing the inefficient 2009 energy code. In 2020, the State passed new legislation that requires the energy code to be updated regularly and established a voluntary “stretch” code that is more efficient than the current base energy code. The 6 Page 65 City of Portland has a local ordinance that requires us to enforce the stretch code. Chapter 6 of City Code requires the City to lead by example by mandating that City funded building projects be even more efficient that the stretch code. New building policies are working to reduce emissions from new construction and major renovations but emissions from existing buildings will continue to be a challenge. Nearly all emissions from the building sector are privately owned. Upgrading energy systems and improving building envelopes will require significant private investment and generally happen during building maintenance cycles. The Energy Benchmarking and Disclosure ordinance is an important tool to connect with the owners of buildings over 20,000 square feet and to help them understand the financial benefits of improving the energy efficiency of their buildings. Once Central Maine Power is able to provide the owners of multi-tenant buildings with whole building data we will recommend adoption of building performance standards that require commercial buildings to show continuous improvement in energy performance. Such policies are in effect in several cities including Boston, Cambridge, New York, Washington DC, Ann Arbor, Denver, and Seattle. We will also need to consider policies that encourage residential properties to decarbonize, potentially examining a policy that requires disclosure of Home Energy Scores at the time of sale as is currently done in jurisdictions like Portland, OR. Disclosure of a HES allows new home buyers to better understand the cost of heating and cooling a home. This helps them make a better buying decision because they will understand the full cost of maintaining the home. It also encourages home sellers to improve the energy efficiency of their home to make it more attractive on the market. The City’s efforts to reduce GHG emissions in the buildings sector have been supported by important policies at the State level, particularly the RPS. It will be important to monitor the State’s progress in implementing it to ensure that the grid is 100% clean by 2040 as required by Statute. This will ensure that our Electrify Everything (beneficial electrification) strategy will succeed in decarbonizing the building sector in conjunction with other zero carbon energy systems, such as geothermal. It is encouraging that the newly created Department of Energy Resources has the responsibility and authority to issue RFPs for large-scale renewable energy procurement in order to meet the 2040 target. The increase in GHG emissions in the transportation sector is discouraging but must be seen in a regional context as our inventory measures all vehicle traffic in Portland, not just from Portland residents. This includes commuters, tourists, commercial vehicles, and heavy trucking. It includes traffic on local streets and roads as well as on the Maine Turnpike and I-295. As noted in The final report for the Greater Portland Rapid Transit Study, VMT in Greater Portland has increased by 10% during the past decade, that traffic 7 Page 66 congestion is worsening, and this trend will be exacerbated by the nearly four million square feet of real-estate development planned or proposed in the study area. The study points out that transit development has not kept pace with the population and economic growth. The City has been a strong advocate for the development of a rapid transit system and an active participant in the ongoing studies for a system to connect Portland and Gorham. Councilors and staff continue to work with GPCOG/PACTS to emphasize the need for greater regional support of transit. Earlier this year the Sustainability and Transportation Committee held a forum with regional transit agencies to discuss policy actions that might improve transit operations in Portland and regionally. The Sustainability and Transportation Committee has also led efforts this year to gain City Council adoption of a Vision Zero policy and quick implementation plan that is now underway. The Committee also led the effort to update the City’s complete streets policy as well as supported the funding of a comprehensive transportation plan. The Planning Department has just issued an RFP for this work. We anticipate that implementation of these policy actions will improve road safety for all road users and encourage more residents to walk, ride bicycles, and to use public transportation. The adoption of ReCode in 2024 brought several important policy changes recommended in One Climate Future to encourage travel without the use of a car. This includes eliminating parking minimums and adopting parking maximums for new development. It also includes Transit Oriented Development zones along main travel corridors where people can access transit most easily. Portland continues to be a statewide leader in the adoption and promotion of electric vehicles. According to GPCOG, the number of EVs registered in Portland rose from 184 in 2018 to 1602 in 2024. The City has played a key role in the expansion of EV charging capacity by hosting publicly available DC fast chargers and L2 chargers on City property, including a new bank of DC fast chargers slated for installation next to the Miss Portland Diner this fall. We have also adopted a policy that requires 20% of new parking spaces come with L2 charging installed. Reducing GHG emissions from transportation will require continued leadership by the City on transportation issues as well as robust and ongoing collaboration with state and regional partners. The Maine Climate Council’s Transportation Working Group has identified the trend of increasing VMT as a significant challenge to meeting Statewide goals and the City should continue to engage with them and State policy makers to address this. 8 Page 67 PRIOR COMMITTEE REVIEW n/a PREPARED BY Troy Moon, Sustainability Director ATTACHMENTS 2023 GHG Emissions Memo from Introba 9 Page 68 City of Portland Community Inventory of 2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum June 2025 Page 69 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Community Inventory Results ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Summary................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Buildings ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Transportation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Waste ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Uncertainty ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Citywide Protocol ................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.3 Differences from 2017 Inventory .................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4 Greenhouse Gases Included ........................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.5 Summary of Data Sources ............................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.6 Stationary Sources .............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.7 Mobile Sources .................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.8 Waste and Wastewater ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Page 2 of 24 Page 70 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS 1 Introduction The cities of Portland and South Portland published their joint climate action and adaptation plan One Climate Future in 2020. As part of that effort, Introba (then Integral Group) was tasked with developing a baseline greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory for the City of Portland. The inventory was compiled and submitted using the City Inventory and Information System (CIRIS) tool from C40 Cities, which follows the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC)1 and is compliant with the Global Covenant of Mayors’ Common Reporting Framework. At the time, the City of Portland selected 2017 as the baseline year for tracking GHG emissions reductions moving forward. The City of Portland contracted Introba again in 2024 to complete an update to their GHG emissions inventory. The update took place four years after the One Climate Future plan was released, and by using 2023 data, represents a six-year span since the baseline inventory year (2017 to 2023). The purpose of the update is to demonstrate progress made toward the City’s GHG emissions reductions goals and inform future planning efforts. The 2023 update draws on the methodology and outcomes from the 2017 baseline inventory to maintain a consistent and replicable approach with future updates in mind. The updated inventory follows the same Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories and was compiled and submitted using the City Inventory Reporting and Information System (CIRIS) tool from C40 Cities.2 It is a community-scale inventory accounting for all emissions generated within city boundaries, as opposed to a corporate or municipal inventory which would only account for emissions generated by city-owned assets. The City of Portland’s inventory is divided into scopes 1, 2, and 3 as shown in Figure 1: • Scope 1: all emissions generated within city boundaries • Scope 2: emissions occurring as a result of grid-supplied electricity consumed within city boundaries • Scope 3: other emissions occurring outside the boundaries of the city as a result of activities taking place within the city Figure 1. Emissions scopes included in the 2023 GHG inventory 1 GHG Protocol, Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC) Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. https://ghgprotocol.org/greenhouse-gas-protocol-accounting-reporting-standard-cities 2 C40 Cities. Reporting GHG emissions inventories. https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/City-Inventory-Reporting-and- Information-System-CIRIS?language=en_US Page 3 of 24 Page 71 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS The City of Portland’s inventory uses the GPC’s “BASIC” approach, which requires reporting for stationary energy, transportation and waste. The “BASIC” approach is consistent with most GPC-compliant inventories across the glove. Further details on the approach are found in the Methodology section of this memo. 2 Community Inventory Results 2.1 Summary Figure 2. Portland GHG Emissions Summary The overall output of data from the CIRIS tool for the City of Portland is shown in Figure 2 above and Table 1 below. Note the totals shown in these and future tables in the memo may differ slightly from the sum of the rows due to rounding. Overall, the region was responsible for 801,825 tons of GHG emissions, measured in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e). Table 1. GHG Emissions by Sector and Scope It is important to note that this not a comprehensive picture of all emissions generated in the city. There are various Page 4 of 24 Page 72 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS sectors and sources, particularly scope 3 emissions sources (e.g., air travel, purchased goods and services), that are not reflected in this inventory, but do in fact have a significant impact on emissions generated in the city. It is also important to note that data presented in this memo are a reflection of the inventory results with all digits provided by the CIRIS tool for consistency; these numbers may be estimated through various means and should not be taken as exact. These and other details are discussed in the Methodology section of this memo. On a per capita basis, Portland generated 11.7 tons of GHG emissions per resident. This compares favorably to the US national average of 17.6 tons per resident, due in large part to the low emissions intensity of the regional electricity grid (ISO-NE). However, Portland is more energy intensive than some larger Northeast cities (e.g., Boston), based in part on the greater demand for heating fuels, particularly fuel oil, and a greater reliance on personal cars rather than public transit. Figure 3 shows a comparison of the per capita GHG emissions in the City of Portland among peers and within the national and global context. Note the inventory years below vary and may not reflect the most up-to-date and accurate emissions for these jurisdictions. Each of the inventories reflected below may also include slightly different sectors and emissions sources, so this figure should be used for rough comparison only. Figure 3. Comparison of Per Capita GHG Emissions (variable inventory years) Portland’s total GHG emissions for 2023 are down 4.6% since 2017 (down from 840,419 MTCO2e). This difference is largely driven by a reduction in stationary (i.e., buildings) energy use and emissions, to be discussed in greater detail later in the memo. Figure 4 provides a comparison of GHG emissions between 2017 and 2023 by sector and scope. Page 5 of 24 Page 73 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Figure 4. Comparison of GHG Emissions by Sector and Scope (2017 & 2023) Again, it is important to note in the figure above that while scope 3 emissions (generated from waste disposal occurring outside of city boundaries) appear minimal, this is not a true reflection of the significant impact that other scope 3 sources that are not included in the inventory (e.g., air travel, purchased goods and services) have. Figure 5. GHG Emissions by Subsector (2023) Overall, the use of electricity, natural gas, and fuel oil in buildings is the main driver of Portland’s GHG footprint, with residential, commercial, and industrial buildings being responsible for a combined 60% of GHG emissions. Mobile sources within city boundaries, including on-road transportation (e.g., cars) and waterborne transportation (e.g., ferries) are responsible for a combined 38%. Lastly the incineration of solid waste is responsible for the remaining 2%. Figure 5 (above) shows the breakdown of GHG emissions by these subsectors and Table 2 (below) Page 6 of 24 Page 74 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS shows the energy use by subsector contributing to these total emissions Table 2. Energy Use and GHG Emissions by Subsector (2023) When comparing GHG emissions by subsector between 2017 and 2023, the most significant differences come from a) reductions in stationary emissions across all building types, and b) an increase in emissions from on-road transportation (Figure 6), to be discussed in more detail in the subsequent sections. Figure 6. Comparison of GHG Emissions by Subsector (2017 & 2023) When looking at GHG emissions by fuel source, the majority of emissions are generated from the use of electricity (20%), natural gas (31%), and fuel oil (18%) in buildings. Gasoline (33%) and diesel (12%) used in transportation makes up most of the remainder. Figure 7 (below) shows the breakdown of GHG emissions by fuel source. Table 3 Page 7 of 24 Page 75 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS shows the actual energy use by fuel source contributing to these total emissions. Portland ss ons o r Solid aste, 1 Propane, 3 astewater, 0 iesel, 10 lectricity, 17 atural Gas, 2 Gasoline, 2 Fuel il, 1 Figure 7. GHG Emissions by Fuel Source (2023) Table 3. Energy Use and GHG Emissions by Fuel Source (2023) When comparing GHG emissions by fuel source between 2017 and 2023, the most significant differences come from a lower percentage of emissions generated from burning fuel oil in buildings and a larger percentage of emissions generated from burning natural gas in buildings, as well as gasoline and diesel in vehicles, cruise ships, and ferries (Figure 8). Page 8 of 24 Page 76 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Figure 8. Comparison of GHG Emissions by Fuel Source (2017 & 2023) 2.2 Buildings 6 % of Portland’s footpr nt s attr ta l to n rg s n buildings, which produced a total of 481,951 MTCO2e of GHG emissions in 2023. Building GHG data was computed from a combination of community-wide electricity and natural gas consumption information, and estimated use of other fuels including fuel oil and propane. The process for calculating building emissions is described in the Stationary Sources section of the Methodology. Figure 9. Building Sector GHG Emissions (2023) Figure 9 (above) shows the breakdown of building emissions across the residential, commercial, and industrial building sectors. Table 4 (below) shows the breakdown of energy use by fuel source contributing to the total emissions across each building sector. Page 9 of 24 Page 77 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Table 4. Site and Source Energy Use by Building Sector When comparing GHG emissions across building sectors between 2017 and 2023, there is an overall decrease in emissions across all building sectors despite increased development in Portland during recent years (Figure 10). Overall building sector emissions are down about 14% since 2017 (481,951 MTCO2e down from 560,666 MTCO2e). This is most likely due to several factors, including: • A reduction in fuel oil use (down nearly 42%), often due to the conversion of fuel oil heating systems to electric heat pumps or natural gas-based systems (lower GHG intensity) • Less emissions generated from electricity use due to greening of the grid (i.e., greater mix of renewables making up grid-supplied electricity) • Overall energy efficiency improvements in buildings, due in part to programs and services offered through Efficiency Maine and other state incentive programs Figure 10. Comparison of Building Sector GHG Emissions (2017 & 2023) Page 10 of 24 Page 78 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS 2.3 Transportation Transportation is responsible for a o t 8% of Portland’s footpr nt, or 305,277 MTCO2e of GHG emissions. Transportation emissions were estimated for all on-road and off-road transportation occurring within city boundaries. The process for calculating these emissions is described in the Mobile Sources section of the Methodology. Figure 11 shows the breakdown of transportation emissions across on-road (e.g., passenger cars), off-road (e.g., airport vehicles), and waterborne (e.g., ferries) transportation types. Figure 11. Transportation Sector GHG Emissions (2023) The following figures provide more context to the on-road transportation emissions, which make up over 95% of the emissions in the transportation sector. Figure 12 shows the makeup of vehicle types registered in Portland, with passenger cars and trucks (inclusive of SUVs) making up 81% of vehicles in the city. Figure 12. Makeup of Vehicle Types Registered in City (2023) Figure 13 shows the breakdown of GHG emissions by vehicle type, demonstrating that medium and heavy-duty trucks have a greater impact on emissions than the proportion of these vehicles among the total vehicle stock would imply. This is due to the disproportionately larger quantity of fuel – particularly emissions-intensive diesel – that these vehicles consume. Page 11 of 24 Page 79 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Figure 13. GHG Emissions by Vehicle Type (2023) When comparing GHG emissions across transportation sectors between 2017 and 2023, there is an overall increase in emissions across all transportation sectors (Figure 14). Overall transportation sector emissions are up 19.6% since 2017 (305,277 MTCO2e up from 255,252 MTCO2e). This is most likely due to several factors, including: • A greater number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in some on-road vehicle types (e.g., diesel vehicles) registered in the city, due in part to population growth, commercial activity, and a greater number of visits to the region • The inclusion of airport service vehicles as off-road transportation, which was not accounted for in the 2017 baseline inventory • Increased waterborne navigation in the form of ferries and cruise ship visits Figure 14. Comparison of Transportation Sector GHG Emissions (2017 & 2023) Page 12 of 24 Page 80 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS 2.4 Waste The waste sector is responsible a o t % of Portland’s footpr nt, or 14,596 MTCO2e of GHG emissions. Waste emissions were estimated for all waste produced and treated within city boundaries. The process for calculating these emissions is described in the Waste and Wastewater section of the Methodology. Figure 15 shows the breakdown of waste emissions across biological waste (i.e., compost), incinerated waste (i.e., municipal solid waste incinerated at the Ecomaine plant), and wastewater (i.e., process emissions from the chemical breakdown of sewage) types. Figure 15. Waste Sector GHG Emissions (2023) When comparing GHG emissions across waste sectors between 2017 and 2023, there is an overall decrease in emissions, largely due to the decrease in emissions generated by solid waste incineration (Figure 16). Overall waste emissions are down 40.4% (14,596 MTCO2e down from 24,502 MTCO2e). Despite conversations with the City and Ecomaine staff, it is unclear what has driven this reduction in GHG emissions from incinerated waste. It is possible that there was a discrepancy in how the emissions were calculated and/or reported for the 2017 baseline inventory. However, it is worth noting that a) the waste sector emissions represent a very small portion of the Portland’s total emissions (2%), so the change does not impact the overall emissions landscape significantly, and b) that the City and data provider (Ecomaine) are confident in the 2023 data moving forward. Page 13 of 24 Page 81 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Figure 16. Comparison of Waste Sector GHG Emissions (2017 & 2023) Page 14 of 24 Page 82 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS 3 Methodology 3.1 Uncertainty The 2023 inventory was compiled using measured data, projections, models, and, where data was unavailable, best estimates. The inventory can be regularly revised as new and better data become available, as models are improved, and as international standards and guidance evolve. For these reasons, longer-term trends are likely to prove more reliable than absolute numbers or year-to-year changes. The greatest area of uncertainty in the inventory is the estimate for fuel oil consumption. 3.2 Citywide Protocol Portland’s community GHG inventory follows the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC)3 developed by the World Resources Institute. The inventory was compiled and submitted using the City Inventory Reporting and Information System (CIRIS) tool from C40 Cities 4, version 2.5, which is compliant with the Global Covenant of Mayors Common Reporting Framework (CRF) 5, a framework followed by many cities globally. GPC-compliant inventories usually follow the “BASIC” or “BASIC+” approach, which largely differ in the extent of Scope 3 emissions included. Table 5 shows the major emissions sources included in GPC inventories. BASIC inventories typically include all sources highlighted in green. It was decided by the City of Portland and Introba to use the BASIC approach based on data availability and to keep the methodology consistent with the 2017 baseline inventory. The BASIC approach includes all scope 1 and 2 emissions generated within city boundaries, as well as the scope 3 in-boundary waste and wastewater emissions. 3 GHG Protocol, Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC) Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. https://ghgprotocol.org/greenhouse-gas-protocol-accounting-reporting-standard-cities 4 C40 Cities. Reporting GHG emissions inventories. https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/City-Inventory-Reporting-and- Information-System-CIRIS?language=en_US 5 Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy. Global Common Reporting Framework. https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/our-initiatives/data4cities/common-global-reporting-framework/ Page 15 of 24 Page 83 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Table 5. GPC GHG Emissions Sources (BASIC sources are highlighted in green) 3.3 Differences from 2017 Inventory Emissions Sources: Nearly all emissions sources across stationary, transportation, and waste sectors are identical to the 2017 inventory. The lone exception is the 2023 addition of off-road vehicles, which included service vehicles at the Portland International Jetport, representing less than 1 of Portland’s total emissions. Off-road vehicle data was not collected for the 2017 inventory. Page 16 of 24 Page 84 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Electricity Emissions Factor: The 2023 inventory uses the 2022 GHG intensity for the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) New England sub-region factor from PA’s eGRI 6 database of regional GHG intensities. This region is aligned with ISO New England. This is an update from the 2017 inventory, which used the 2016 GHG intensity. Due to increasing renewable energy generation, the 2022 emissions factor (2.45E-04 MTCO2e/kWh) is lower than the 2016 emissions factor (2.66E-04 MTCO2e/kWh) by about 8%, largely contributing to a reduction in GHG emissions resulting from electricity consumption. 3.4 Greenhouse Gases Included The inventory quantified three of the six internationally recognized GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Data for fugitive N2O emissions from healthcare facilities were not readily available at the time of the inventory, so these emissions, which are assumed to be minimal, were excluded. Data on emissions of the other three internationally recognized groups of GHGs – hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) – was not available. HFC emissions were also considered negligible under the assumption that all refrigerators, heat pumps, and air conditioners were installed and disposed of properly under State regulations. Industrial emissions of SF 6 were not researched. Emissions of the three measured GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O) were converted to Metric Tons Carbon Dioxide equivalent (MTCO 2e) emissions using the 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP) coefficients of each gas developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 5 th Assessment Report (AR5), as shown in Table 6 below. Table 7 shows the main GHG emissions factors used for the calculations in the inventory. Table 6. Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases 100-year Global Warming Greenhouse Gas Chemical Formula Potential (GWP), AR5 Carbon Dioxide CO2 1 Methane CH4 28 Nitrous Oxide N2O 265 6 Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID). United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/egrid Page 17 of 24 Page 85 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Table 7. Emissions Factors Used CO2/unit CH4/unit N2O/unit Total Source Unit (MTCO2e) (MTCO2e) (MTCO2e) MTCO2e/unit Electricity kWh 2.43E-04 8.00E-07 9.62E-07 2.45E-04 Natural Gas Therm 5.31E-03 2.80E-06 2.65E-06 5.31E-03 Fuel Oil No. 2 MMBtu 7.40E-02 8.40E-05 1.59E-04 7.42E-02 Diesel Oil Gal 1.02E-02 1.15E-05 2.12E-05 1.02E-02 Propane Gal 5.72E-03 7.56E-06 1.33E-05 5.74E-03 Gasoline MMBtu 7.02E-02 8.40E-05 1.59E-04 7.05E-02 Cruise kWh 6.86E-04 2.24E-07 7.69E-06 6.94E-04 Cruise Boiler kWh 9.22E-04 2.10E-06 5.30E-07 9.25E-04 Diesel Ship Gal 1.02E-02 1.68E-06 1.19E-04 1.03E-02 3.5 Summary of Data Sources Table 8. Summary of Data Sources Sector Data Name of Source Provider Year Electricity Emission Factor eGRID v2022 U.S. EPA 2022 Emissions Factors (applied to all sectors) Fossil Fuel Combussion EPA Emission Factor List U.S. EPA 2023 Emission Factors Central Maine Power (CMP) Electricity Use CMP 2023 Electricity Use Natural Gas Use Unitil Natural Gas Use Unitil 2023 Residential Energy Consumption Fuel Oil Use Residential U.S. EIA 2020 Survey (RECS) Stationary Energy Fuel Oil Use Commercial Building Energy U.S. EIA 2018 Commercial/Industrial Consumption Survey (CBECS) Wastewater Treatment Energy Portland Water District (East End Portland Water District (PWD) 2023 Use Plant) Building Floor Area Tax Assessor Parcel Database City of Portland 2023 Fuel Consumption from Vehicle Greater Portland Council of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 2023 Miles Traveled Governments Jetport Fleet Fuel Jetport Fleet Fuel Consumption Portland International Jetport 2023 Transportation Ferry Fuel Consumption Casco Bay Lines Fuel Consumption Casco Bay Lines 2023 Cruise Ship Port Schedule Portland Docking Schedule City of Portland 2023 Cruise Ship Energy Use While Cruise Ship Study Port of Los Angeles 2022 Docked Solid Waste Collected Municipal Solid Waste Tonnage Ecomaine 2023 Waste Garbage to Garden Compost Food Waste Composted Garbage to Garden 2023 Tonnage Data for the inventory was collected from a variety of sources spanning government, local utility providers, and Page 18 of 24 Page 86 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS national datasets, among others. Wherever possible, data was collected for the 2023 calendar year. In several cases where 2023 data was unavailable due to irregular or less frequent updates, data from the closest year possible (e.g., 2022) was used. Table 8 (above) provides a summary of data sources used, many of which are described in the following sections. 3.6 Stationary Sources Stationary emissions (i.e., generated by buildings) were calculated from the consumption of several fuel sources: electricity, natural gas, fuel oil (i.e., heating oil), and to a lesser extent propane. Electricy consumption data for the area in 2023 was provided by Central Maine Power (CMP), broken out between residential, commercial, and industrial sectors, including total consumption and number of accounts. Natural gas consumption data for 2023 was provided by Until, broken out between total residential consumption and combined commercial and industrial consumption (combined for the privacy of large accounts). Propane consumption data was provided by Portland Water District for wastewater treatment facilities only. Fuel oil consumption was estimated using the methodology outlined below. Wood heat was excluded from the inventory due to a lack of available data and because the GPC considers wood a “biogenic” source and is treated as carbon neutral. ther potential stationary fuel sources (e.g., kerosene) were left out due to a lack available data and their emissions were assumed to be negligible. Energy Use Estimation and Assumptions for Fuel Oil Although it is a common source of fuel for heating in Maine, no direct data was available for the consumption of fuel oil. Fuel oil is delivered by many companies that are exceptionally challenging to track and largely unwilling to share data on their sales, which is common across the country. To calculate fuel oil consumption for Portland, total floor areas and heating fuel sources for different building types were estimated and various Energy Use Intensities (EUIs) were applied as described below. This approach followed the same methodology used in the 2017 baseline inventory with updated data sources where available. Emissions from fuel oil consumption represent about 15% of Portland’s total emissions, so there is an inherent layer of uncertainty to the total emissions reported for the city. Building floor areas were compiled from the City of Portland’s Tax Assessor’s database for residential, commercial, and industrial building types (Table 9). The incidence of fuel oil use across these building types was then estimated as a percentage of gross floor area (GFA) heated with fuel oil. For residential buildings, this was estimated using Residential Prototype Building Models from the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the state of Maine 7. The incidence of fuel oil use in commercial and industrial buildings was estimated using the 2018 Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) for New England8 (most recent available). 7 Prototype Building Models. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. https://www.energycodes.gov/prototype- building-models 8 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2018/index.php?view=characteristics Page 19 of 24 Page 87 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Table 9. Floor Area and Gross Floor Area Heated by Fuel Oil by Building Sector GFA Heated by GFA Heated by Building Type Floor Area (ft2) Fuel Oil (%) Fuel Oil (ft2) Residential 43,104,632 35.03% 15,101,282 Commercial 43,229,218 34.83% 15,056,149 Industrial 7,165,908 34.77% 2,491,784 Preliminary EUIs measured in kBtu/ft2 for each building and fuel type (Table 10) were then developed based on the U.S Energy Information Administration (EIA) nationwide building energy surveys: the CBECS for 2018 and the Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) for 20209 (most recent available). These values were compared against actual total consumption data (for electricity and natural gas) across the estimated floor area (ft2) of each building type to ensure the EUIs for these fuel types made practical sense. However, only the fuel oil EUI was used to estimate fuel oil consumption (there was no need to estimate consumption for electricity and natural gas). Table 10. EUI by Building and Fuel Type Note that the EUIs for natural gas and fuel oil in commercial and industrial buildings were assumed to be the same. This decision was made for several reasons. First, no distinction was made between commercial and industrial natural gas accounts in the data provided by Unitil so there was no way to know roughly how much natural gas use could be allocated to each of these building types. Second, commercial and industrial buildings come in many forms and have vastly different energy needs based on typology and, in the case of industrial buildings, process loads. Assuming an average EUI across both building categories provides an accurate estimate of city-wide energy use without needing to collect building- or even typology-specific energy use data (which would not have been available). Lastly, this assumption is consistent with the methodology applied in the 2017 baseline inventory and other GHG inventories across Maine (e.g., Penobscot Climate Action). Finally, the fuel oil EUI for each building type (kBtu/ft2) was applied to the gross floor area estimated to be heated by fuel oil for each building type (ft2) to calculate the total fuel oil consumed across each building type, converted to MMBtu (Table 11). Table 11. Estimated Fuel Oil Consumption by Building Type Fuel Oil Fuel Oil EUI GFA Heated by Building Type Consumption (kBtu/ft2) Fuel Oil (ft2) (MMBtu) Residential 82.7 15,101,282 1,248,876 Commercial 19.11 15,056,149 287,723 Industrial 19.11 2,491,784 47,618 9 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2020/ Page 20 of 24 Page 88 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS 3.7 Mobile Sources On-Road Transportation The GHG emissions for vehicles were based on the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and the GHG intensities of fuel sources, including gasoline and diesel. As is standard for calculating VMT and tracking transportation sector emissions, VMT numbers were based on the miles traveled within the boundaries of the City of Portland, regardless of whether the vehicle owners reside in the city or not, or if the vehicles are purchased at dealers within the city or not. Because pickup trucks are a common mode of transit in Maine, passenger vehicle VMT was broken out between passenger vehicles and passenger trucks. SUVs are considered to be passenger trucks. Data provided by the Greater Portland Council of Governments (GPCOG) was used to estimate the total VMT on roads within the City of Portland, and from this, it was assumed that the total vehicle miles traveled in the city during the calendar year of 2023 was 508,933,187 miles. To estimate energy use and emissions, vehicle registration data was used to understand the registered vehicle stock with the City of Portland. U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Energy Information Administration data for the fuel economy of vehicles sold in each class and model year was matched to the registered vehicle stock, and from this, weighted average fuel economy calculations were created for each vehicle class. Any emissions resulting from the charging of electric vehicles was included under stationary sources and accounted for in the electricity consumption data. The resulting table is shown below (Table 12). Table 12. On-Road VMT and Fuels Off-Road Transportation Offroad transportation emissions were calculated for Portland International Jetport fleet vehicles, Casco Bay Lines ferries, and visiting cruise ships (Table 13). Jetport fleet fuel consumption data for gasoline and diesel was Page 21 of 24 Page 89 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS provided directly by Jetport staff. Similarly, Casco Bay Lines ferry fuel consumption for diesel and biodiesel was provided directly by Casco Bay Lines staff. It is interesting to note that Casco Bay Lines will begin operating a new hybrid electric-diesel ship in the near future. Table 13. Off-Road Vehicles and Waterborne Transportation Fuel Use and GHG Emissions Fuel Use Fuel Use GHG Vehicle/Ship Location & Fuel Type (Variable Units) (MMBTU) (MTCO2e) Cruise Ships - Electric (provided by diesel engines) 11,917,005 kWh 40,663 8,749 Casco Bay Lines - Diesel 261,307 Gal 36,199 2,700 Casco Bay Lines - BioDiesel 33,274 Gal 4,275 344 Jetport Fleet Vehicle - Gasoline 24,367 Gal 3,058 1,717 Jetport Fleet Vehicle - Diesel 10,315 Gal 1,429 765 While airport fleet and ferry consumption data were readily available, the energy consumption from visiting cruise ships had to be estimated. Cruise ships maintain power while docked and, since they are within the city at the time, are considered scope 1 emissions sources. Data on the number of cruise ship visits and total time docked was provided by the City of Portland (Table 14). Table 14. Cruise Ship Visits To estimate emissions from docked cruise ships, a 2022 study of docked cruise ships was referenced from the Port of Los Angeles Inventory of Air Emissions10. Energy consumed during harbor transit, maneuvering, and hoteling at dock was considered. Cruise ships typically run two engines: an auxiliary diesel engine and an auxiliary boiler. For each ship, the energy consumption (kW) of these auxiliary engines is estimated based on the passenger size class and applied to the estimated time of visit. The total energy (kW) consumed by visiting cruise ships is summarized in Table 15. 10 Inventory of Air Emissions for Calendar Year 2022. Port of Los Angeles. https://kentico.portoflosangeles.org/getmedia/409590b5-0e6a-4c15-8d9b-fcdb02624933/2022_Air_Emissions_Inventory Page 22 of 24 Page 90 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Table 15. Ship Hotelling Energy Use Assumptions Note that this is certainly not a complete picture of all off-road emissions in Portland. Additional off-road gasoline and diesel use that is not included in the inventory due to a lack of available data may include, for example, vehicles used in agriculture and maintenance vehicles for public spaces or private use. Emissions from passenger and freight rail and from intracity aircraft, such as helicopters that depart and land within city limits, were also not included due to limited data availability. These emissions are assumed to be negligible, and their omission is consistent with the 2017 baseline inventory. 3.8 Waste and Wastewater Waste emissions sources included municipal solid waste (MSW), biological waste (i.e., compost), and wastewater process emissions. All MSW that is not recycled in Portland is collected and processed at the Ecomaine Waste-to- Energy incineration plant in Portland. Only waste produced and disposed of within Portland is considered a source of scope 1 emissions. Emissions from waste generated outside of Portland but incinerated at the Ecomaine plant were not considered part of Portland’s inventory following the BASIC approach. The total volume of MSW collected in Portland for the 2023 calendar year was provided directly by Ecomaine. Emissions were calculated using the Incineration and Open Burning Emissions Calculator built into the CIRIS inventory tool, which assumes the North American characterization and average distribution of waste types (e.g., paper, plastics) across the total volume of MSW and applies emissions factors to each. The total volume of MSW collected and incinerated was 41,976 tons and the total emissions were 11,689 MTCO2e (Table 16). Page 23 of 24 Page 91 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS Table 16. Waste Disposal Volume and GHG Emissions Food waste (i.e., compost) is collected from participating residents and businesses in Portland by Garbage to Garden, which operates an anaerobic digester in a nearby town. Since this waste is generated in Portland, but treated outside of Portland, it is considered a source of scope 3 emissions. Composted tonnage was provided directly by Garbage to Garden, and total emissions were calculated using the PA’s Greenhouse Gas quivalencies Calculator.11 The total volume of food waste composted was 1,024 tons and the total emissions were 163 MTCO2e (Table 16). Wastewater emissions are calculated for treatment process emissions only (i.e., GHG emissions produced from the chemical breakdown of sewage). Wastewater energy use is included in the industrial energy use sector of the inventory. Wastewater process emissions were modeled using the Wastewater Emissions Calculator in the CIRIS tool based on the total population of the City of Portland and estimated to be 2,744 MTCO2e. 11 Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse- gas-equivalencies-calculator Page 24 of 24 Page 92