Joint City-County Planning Task Force
Regular MeetingSpringfield, MO · May 14, 2014
Minutes
Joint City-Greene County Planning Task Force
Meeting Notes
May 14, 2014 – 10:00 a.m.
Greene County Archives & Election Center
1126 Boonville Avenue
Meeting #17
Task Force Members Present:
Greg Burris, Springfield City Manager
Tim Smith, Greene County Administrator
Cindy Stein, Greene County Auditor
Mary Mannix Decker, Springfield Finance Director
Kevin Spaulding, Greene County Sherriff’s Office
Dan Patterson, Greene County Prosecutor
Jerry Moyer, Greene County Court Administrator
Martha Mundt, Greene County Budget Director
Collin Quigley, Springfield Assistant City Manager
The meeting began at approximately 10:02 a.m. with a welcome from Tim Smith, Greene County
Administrator, and Greg Burris, City Manager, followed by a review of today’s agenda.
Collin Quigley, Springfield Assistant City Manager, arrived at approximately 10:04 a.m.
Martha Mundt, Greene County Budget Director, arrived at approximately 10:05 a.m.
City Manager Burris introduced Sheila Maerz, Springfield Human Resources Director, who reviewed the
topics of the City’s employee recruitment, retention, and compensation.
During the discussion, the following handouts were reviewed by Springfield Human Resources Director
Maerz: City of Springfield – Average # of Years of Service; Benchmark Cities Task Force’s Final
Recommendation to City Manager dated December 4, 2008; and City of Springfield’s Summary of Salary
Survey Results for All Employee Groups. (Please refer to Exhibits A, B, & C located within the City Clerk’s
Office for additional information.)
The average number for years of Service for City employees is as follows: Police 10.12; LAGERS 10.54;
and Fire 11.89.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz explained that since Springfield is governed by a Charter, the
City follows the terms outlined within the Charter, which includes Human Resources.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz discussed that the City has been involved in upgrading the
City’s financial and human resources system the past couple of years, such as the recent iRecruitment
system, where employees and applicants can electronically create an individual profile for applying to
vacancies within the various City departments, such as Parks and Public Works.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz addressed that the City has been focusing on using electronic
and social media, such as the City’s website, Twitter, and Facebook, to publicize various vacancies as
opposed to only using print media, such as newspapers, to post job vacancies and applicant recruitment.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz noted that the City is dedicated in focusing on diversity during
the recruitment, orientation, and retention process. She discussed that last year the City implemented a paid
diversity internship program for local college students, who are interested in gaining experience in
government.
The Task Force and Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz discussed the City’s employee
recruitment, retention, and compensation.
In response to a question posed by Cindy Stein, County Auditor, Springfield Human Resources Director
Maerz explained that when the economy rebounded from the recession she feels the private sector rebounded
faster than the public sector regarding the issue of employment. She explained that people are looking for
employment or a job change, and the private sector has been more successful in recruiting, retention, and
compensation for applicants than the public sector has.
City Manager Burris noted that with “baby boomers” entering the age of retirement, it may become more
difficult to recruit and retain new hires that will have the experience as those who are retiring.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz explained that approximately a year ago the City revamped
the “Welcome to the City” orientation program, which introduces and engages new employees to the various
components within the City (i.e. City Manager, Human Resources, Finance, Fire, Health, Police, and Public
Works) via a two-day seminar.
In response to a question posed by Camille Knowles, Greene County Human Resources Director, City
Manager Burris and Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz discussed that the City’s Leadership
Team is an important component regarding the “Welcome to the City” orientation program. They reported
that the Leadership Team helps socially engage the new employees at a morning meet and greet on the first
day of the program, and he/she gains valuable experience within the two-day period about the various
departments within the City. Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz addressed that although an
employee works within a specific department (i.e. Fire or Public Works) the employee is still a part of the
overall organization within the City.
Mary Mannix Decker, Springfield Finance Director, noted that she enjoys the “Welcome to the City”
orientation program, because she meets and interacts with new employees that otherwise she probably would
never meet. She added that this program does not take a lot of time to participate in, and feels it is well
worth her time.
In response to another question posed by County Auditor Stein, Springfield Human Resources Director
Maerz reported that she would compile some information for the County regarding the City’s “Welcome to
the City” orientation program structure.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz discussed the issue of compensation at the City and referred to
Exhibits B and C. She explained that the Benchmark Cities Task Force was convened in October 2008, and
their charge was to recommend a list of 12-15 cities for the City to use during the next 5-10 years for the
purpose of City-wide benchmarking, such as for salary comparison. She added that the City conducts a
salary survey from the list of the various benchmark cities.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz reported that due to collective bargaining, things could change
in terms of salary compensation for employees in the future. She noted that the City is struggling in some
areas for employee compensation, which is one of the reasons the City also struggles with employee
retention.
In response to questions posed by County Administrator Smith and County Human Resources Director
Knowles, Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz explained that the City’s goal regarding
compensation is the middle third of the salary schedule. She noted that the middle third indexing
measurement was made several years ago by City officials when employee tenure was the norm.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz noted that the City has five different pay schedules and
Human Resources conducts job study analysis internally. She added that the issues of affordable health care
and collective bargaining are time extensive topics for City staff.
The Task Force and Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz continued to discuss the City’s employee
recruitment, retention, and compensation.
Following further discussion, County Administrator Smith gave a PowerPoint presentation entitled “Greene
County, Employee Recruitment, Retention, & Compensation.” (Please refer to Exhibit D located within the
City Clerk’s Office for additional information.)
The following is a brief outline of the presentation:
A. Employee Compensation (couple slides)
B. Employee Compensation – Summary of Benefits
C. Employee Retention
D. Employee Recruitment Practices & Strategies
E. Compensation & Payment Study 2011
F. Employee Compensation
G. 2011 Salary Study: A 15-Factor Job Rating System Utilized
H. Greene County DB Squared Compensation Study Exhibit 2: Scatter Graph of Actual Pay – June
2011
I. Employee Compensation (couple slides)
J. Greene County – June 2011 DB Squared Compensation Study Exhibit 4: Salary Survey
Paylines June 2011
K. Greene County – June 2011 DB Squared Compensation Study Exhibit 4A: Statistical Details for
Salary Survey Paylines June 2011
L. Employee Compensation
M. Questions??
County Administrator Smith and County Human Resources Director Knowles made comments about the
County’s employee recruitment, retention, and compensation, particularly for the Sheriff’s Department.
County Administrator Smith, County Human Resources Director Knowles, City Manager Burris, and
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz discussed the differences in benefits (i.e. sick time accrual,
holidays, and retirement) for County and City employees.
In response to a question posed by City Manager Burris, County Administrator Smith and County Human
Resources Director Knowles reported that employees hired at the County since approximately 2008 begin at
the 1st step whether he/she has any experience at this time. County Administrator Smith noted that the
County use to hire employees beginning at a higher step, such as 2 or 3, to stay competitive until economic
budget issues emerged. He added that no employees have been hired using general fund revenues in quite
some time due to the County’s budget circumstances.
County Administrator Smith noted that County employees can only accrue approximately three months of
sick leave. He discussed that there is a cap for County employees regarding a “payout” for sick leave, and
for vacation time accumulated.
Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz reported that City employees can accrue a significantly higher
amount for sick leave; however, many City employees cannot “sell back” their sick leave time for “payouts”
unless he/she has been grandfathered in before changes to the sick leave policy were made. She added that
she would provide additional information to the Task Force. Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz
noted that there is a cap for City employees to accrue vacation time that he/she can receive for “payout.”
She added that the City does not provide life insurance for employees, but it is optional for employees to
purchase.
In response to a question posed by Assistant City Manager Quigley, County Administrator Smith explained
that some County employees have two retirements, LAGERS (Missouri Local Government Employees
Retirement System) and CERF (Missouri County Employees’ Retirement Fund), as well as an optional
savings plan. He added that LAGERS and CERF are not optional for contribution for County employees.
County Administrator Smith stated that the Greene County Sheriff’s Office is struggling for recruitment due
to being unable to stay competitive with local community law enforcements.
Kevin Spaulding, Major-Greene County Sheriff’s Office, distributed two brochures regarding the County’s
Sheriff’s Office, one of which specifically notes the essential duties and minimum experience, training
qualifications and available opportunities for job seekers. (Please refer to Exhibits E & F located within the
City Clerk’s Office for additional information.) He noted that the Sheriff’s Office has experienced the
following:
Within the correction division, approximately 50 employees have left within the past 16 months;
approximately 5 employees have left since the beginning of the year from the Detective division;
and approximately 15 employees have left the Patrol division.
Major Spaulding reported that the average year of employee service for the Sheriff’s Office is approximately
2 years due to the high turnover rate. He explained that many employees who are leaving note he/she will
make better pay elsewhere.
In response to a question posed by Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz, County Human Resources
Director Knowles explained she feels that due to the County’s current budget situation, many individuals
choose not to pursue a job with the County, such s the Sheriff’s Office, due to uncertainty, and he/she can
find other employment opportunities with better compensation elsewhere.
Dan Patterson, Greene County Prosecutor, addressed that he has also been experiencing approximately a
72% employee turnover within his office due to employees going elsewhere for other employment
opportunities.
In response to a question posed by Springfield Finance Director Mannix Decker, County Prosecutor
Patterson discussed that the average year of employee service within his office is approximately 3-5 years.
County Human Resources Director Knowles noted that the information regarding the County’s Salary Study
was conducted by DB Squared in 2011, which is the last salary study conducted for the County.
City Manager Burris noted that City staff would be taking a “fresh look” at the City, which would include
budgeting, services, and compensation, next year due to the City’s tight budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-
2015. He added that the City’s current general fund budget is not “sustainable,” because the City’s expenses
are going up faster than revenue.
The Task Force and County Human Resources Director Knowles discussed the County’s employee
recruitment, retention, and compensation.
County Administrator Smith explained that the County has very little services that could be “cut” due to
mandates.
Springfield Finance Director Mannix Decker suggested that the issue of defined benefit retirement plans
could be reviewed for savings, such as possibly utilizing “hybrid plans,” or possibly decreasing the amount
of employer retirement contributions. She noted that some communities outside Missouri are utilizing
“hybrid plans” as opposed to defined benefit retirement plans.
County Administrator Smith expressed he feels the Community needs to become more aware of the topics of
employee recruitment, retention, and compensation for public employees, such as the County and City.
Following further discussion, the Task Force thanked County Administrator Smith, County Human
Resources Director Knowles, and Springfield Human Resources Director Maerz for today’s discussion.
County Administrator Smith asked for a motion to approve the notes from the April 30, 2014 meeting.
Jerry Moyer, Greene County Court Administrator, moved to approve the notes as presented. Assistant City
Manager Quigley seconded the motion and the notes were approved.
City Manager Burris introduced Kirk Juranas, Springfield Co-Interim Public Works Director, who
distributed and discussed a handout regarding the City’s Unfunded and Funded Transportation Capital
Improvement Projects. (Please refer to Exhibit G located within the City Clerk’s Office for additional
information.)
Co-Interim Public Works Director Juranas noted that he feels the County and City have a good working
relationship regarding transportation needs within the Community.
Co-Interim Public Works Director Juranas reported that there is approximately $14.6 million regarding
unfunded projects and approximately $70.83 million in funded projects. Thus, there is a total cost of
approximately $216.68 million for Unfunded and Funded Transportation Capital Improvement Projects at
this time.
City Manager Burris and Co-Interim Public Works Director Juranas explained that they feel the outlook is
uncertain regarding federal and state funding for local transportation projects within the Community in the
future. Co-Interim Public Works Director Juranas noted that the Missouri Department of Transportation
(MoDOT) has cancelled their cost share program at this time.
The Task Force thanked Co-Interim Public Works Director Juranas for today’s discussion.
The next Task Force meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 28, 2014 from 9:30 to 11:00 a.m. in the L-45
Conference Room at the Busch Municipal Building, and the topics will be animal control and economic
development.
With no additional discussion, the meeting was dismissed at approximately 11:23 a.m.
City of Springfield - Transportation Capital Improvement Projects
(Based on safety, congestion, and infrastructure condition)
City of Springfield - Unfunded Project Needs For 2014-2024
Estimated
Project Location: Project Description:
Project Cost ($):
E Battlefield Road from National Avenue to Kansas Expy Access Control, median and driveway closures $11,450,000.00
S Campbell Ave from Battlefield Road to Walnut Lawn St Six Laning and Access Control as needed $1,750,000.00
S Campbell Ave from Walnutlawn Street to Powell St Walnut Lawn addition lanes, Six Laning Campbell and Access Control as needed $3,500,000.00
S Campbell Ave from Powell St to Primrose St Six Laning and Access Control as needed $1,000,000.00
S Campbell Ave and Broadmoor Intersection Upgrade signal and improve geometrics $750,000.00
S Campbell Ave from Sunset St to Woodland St Six Laning and Access Control as needed $1,000,000.00
S Campbell Ave from Woodland St to Battlefield Rd Six Laning and Access Control as needed $1,600,000.00
E Catalpa St and Oak Grove Ave Intersection Improve sight distance and add left turn lanes $1,250,000.00
Central St from Sherman to Campbell Convert Central to a complete street $2,350,000.00
Central St from Campbell Ave to Grant Convert Central to a complete street $2,250,000.00
E Cherry St and Kimbrough Intersection Signal Upgrade $1,500,000.00
W Cox Ave from Battlefield Rd to Walnut Lawn Reconstruct Cox as a collector street with curb and gutter, sidewalks and storm sewers $2,000,000.00
E Division St from Glenstone Ave to National Ave Reconstruct Division as a two lane road with center turn lane $2,750,000.00
W Division St and Grant Ave Intersection Upgrade signal and improve geometrics $1,250,000.00
E/W Arterial from Campbell Ave to National Ave Connect Campbell to National and widen National to PT north $5,500,000.00
E/W Arterial from Southwood to Kissick Ave Extend arterial street $10,310,000.00
S Fremont Ave from County Line Rd to E/W Arterial Extend arterial street to new arterial $8,300,000.00
S Fremont Ave from Lark St to Briar St Widen Fremont to five lanes with curb and gutters and sidewalks $1,750,000.00
S Fremont Ave from Sunset St to Montclair St Widen Fremont to five lanes and improve the Fremont Battlefield intersection $6,500,000.00
Galloway from Luster to Lone Pine Ave Widen Galloway to three lanes with curb and gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalks $3,500,000.00
N Lecompte Rd from Division St to Rail Road Widen LeCompte to three lanes $1,000,000.00
E Lone Pine Ave from Sunshine St to Seminole St Widen Lone Pine to three lanes with curb and gutter, sidewalks bike lanes and storm sewers $4,250,000.00
S National Ave from Walnutlawn St to Primrose St Add an additional south bound lane and improve the Walnut Lawn intersection $1,200,000.00
S National Ave from Montclair St to Walnut Lawn Six lane National to provide additional capacity $2,750,000.00
S National Ave and Bennett Intersection Upgrade Signals and improve geometrics $750,000.00
Packer Rd from RR to Kearney St Reconstruct Packer as a industrial collector street with curb and gutters and sidewalks $3,500,000.00
E Primrose St from South Ave to Kimbrough Widen Primrose to five lanes and provide dual lefts at Jefferson along with bike lanes and sidewalks $2,750,000.00
E Pythian St from Central St to National Ave Connect Pythian to Central at Sherman $2,000,000.00
E Pythian St from National Ave to Glenstone Convert Pythian to a complete street $3,400,000.00
Sunshine and Fire Station # 7 Signal Upgrade Upgrade signal at Fire Station for safer access $250,000.00
N Weller Ave from Dale St to Kearney St Widen existing street to collector standards $750,000.00
Additional sidewalks and Multi Modal connections Fill in gaps of missing sidewalks and make connections to Multi Modal facilities $15,000,000.00
Economic Development Partnerships Partner with economic developments as needed to encourage development $15,000,000.00
TOTAL Unfunded= $122,860,000.00
City of Springfield - Unfunded Parternship Projects
Estimated
Project Location: Project Description:
Project Cost ($):
E Chestnut Expy from Barnes Ave to RT 65 Improve left Turn Lanes $750,000.00
E Division St from US 65 to LeCompte Rd Add a center turn lane for left turn movements $1,750,000.00
S Glenstone and Bennett St Intersection Add additional turn lanes $2,500,000.00
S Kansas Expy and Sunset Ave Intersection Upgrade signal and improve geometrics $1,750,000.00
W Walnut Lawn St from Kansas Expy to Cox Rd Add turn lanes at Kansas Expressway and improve the Walnut Lawn and Cox intersection $2,250,000.00
N West Bypass and Kearney Intersection Upgrade signal and improve geometrics $3,500,000.00
S Kansas Expy from Republic Rd to Weaver Construct new Road to Arterial Standards $13,500,000.00
TOTAL Unfunded = $10,250,000.00
* Amount included in Greene County list
Projects Currently Funded
Estimated
Project Location: Project Description:
Project Cost ($):
E Battlefield Rd and US 65 Interchange Widen Battlefield bridge over 65 and add ramp additional ramp lanes $14,825,000.00
E Battlefield Rd and Glenstone Ave Intersection Add right turn lanes $750,000.00
S Campbell Ave from Primrose St to South Ave Additional intersection capacity and complete sixing Campbell to South and Primrose to the east $3,000,000.00
S Campbell Ave and Republic Intersection Improve Intersection Capacity by Adding Dual left turn lanes $4,500,000.00
E Chestnut Expy and US 65 - Bridge over RR Railroad Grade Separation on Chestnut Expressway at US 65 $12,000,000.00
Galloway Creek 2900 E Barton St - Bridge rated 10 tons Replace existing bridge over Galloway Creek $300,000.00
S Glenstone from RT60 to Battlefield Rd Six Laning and Access Control as needed $5,200,000.00
S Kansas Expy and Rt 60 JRF Interchage Convert interchange to a DDI and extend the ramps $4,500,000.00
E Kearney St and Packer Rd Intersection Reconstruct the intersection with turn lanes and signals $3,250,000.00
W Mount Vernon St and Orchard Crest Ave Intersection Improve the sight distance and intersection capacity $750,000.00
W Mount Vernon St from Suburban to Orchard Crest Ave Widen street to three lanes with curb & Gutters, bike lanes and sidewalks. $4,500,000.00
W Republic St from Campbell Ave to Kansas Ave Reconstruct Republic as a five lane curb and gutter street with sidewalks $4,000,000.00
W Republic St from Scenic Ave to FR 141 (Golden) Reconstruct Republic as a five lane curb and gutter street with sidewalks $2,500,000.00
W Republic St and Kansas Ave - Bridge over JRF Widen existing bridge to five lanes to provide capacity and turn lane for Kansas Ave $1,000,000.00
E Republic St and Monastery St - Bridge over JRF Widen existing bridge to five lanes to provide capacity and turn lane for Monastery Drive $1,000,000.00
E Republic St from Campbell Ave to Monastery St Widen to five lane with curb and gutter and sidewalks and access control as needed $2,500,000.00
Weaver Rd from City Limit to PT West Reconstruct Weaver Road from City Limits to Campbell $2,000,000.00
TOTAL Funded = $66,575,000.00
City of Springfield - Project Deficit
Total Project Needs (Unfunded, including Partnerships) = $133,110,000.00
Total Funded = $66,575,000.00