Zoning Board of Appeals

Public participation is invited. When called upon, please approach the microphone and state your name. Kindly limit your remarks to 3 minutes. VILLAGE OF VILLA PARK Village Hall, Board Chambers 20 South Ardmore Avenue Villa Park, IL 60181 Zoning Board Of Appeals (ZBA) June 10, 2026 6:00 PM Chair Person: Rodney Pate Commissioners: Wanda Ackermann, Vicki Flaskamp, Troy Clampit, Richard Gonzales, Jason Jarrett, Deborah Cain Board Liaison: President Kevin Patrick Staff Liaison: Brandon Nolin, AICP 1. Call to Order - Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes a. Approval of Minutes- May 13, 2026 3. Public Hearing - Old Business a. ZBA-26-01 - Text Amendment - 7.7.7 - Parking - Continue to July 8, 2026 4. Public Hearing - New Business a. ZBA-26-07 - 405 S Villa Ave. - Variation b. ZBA-26-08 - 19 W. Jackson St.- Variation c. ZBA-26-13 - 1031 S. Summit Ave. - Variation d. ZBA-26-11 - 5 W. Park Blvd. - Planned Unit Development 5. Public Comments on Non-Agenda Items 6. Adjournment The Villa Park Village Hall is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. An elevator is operational at the north side entrance to the Village Hall during normal work hours and also during evenings. lndividuals with special needs are requested to contact the Village's Compliance Officer at (630) 834-8500 so that reasonable accommodations can be made for those persons. Page 1 of 128  Village of Villa Park Zoning Board of Appeals May 13, 2026 CALL TO ORDER BY THE CHAIRMAN Chairperson Pate called the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals to order at 6:00 p.m. I. ROLL CALL AND DECLARATION OF A QUORUM Commissioners Present Ackermann, Cain, Clampit, Jarrett, Chairperson Pate (5) Commissioners Absent: Flaskamp, Gonzales Staff/Liaison Present: Planner Rachel Leedom A Quorum was present. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Clampit moved to approve the minutes from April 8, 2026 The Motion was seconded by Commissioner Jarrett Voice Vote: AYES: (5) NAYS: None (0) The motion carried. III. Public Hearing – Old Business a. ZBA – 26 - 01 - Text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance (Appendix C) – Article 7 “Parking”, Section 7.7- “Parking in R Districts” Motion to continue ZBA-26-01- Text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance (Appendix C) – Article 7 “Parking”, Section 7.7- “Parking in R Districts” to June 10, 2026. Motion was made by Commissioner Jarrett The motion was seconded by Commissioner Clampit On roll call: AYES: Ackermann, Cain, Clampit, Jarrett, Chairperson Pate (5) NAYS: None (0) Motion carried. Page 2 of 128 IV. Public Hearing - New Business a. ZBA-26-09 – 31 W. Saint Charles Rd-Special Use Petitioner: Cat Guardians Rachel Leedom presented • Special Use permit would allow the space to function as an animal shelter. • This property is roughly 2,000 sq ft and would allow for space to house rescued cats, host outreach events, and educational events. • The building would be primarily used to house cats in care, but would also have space for organization administration, a public space to welcome people coming in to look at adoptable cats, storage, laundry, and an exam room. • The goal is to make the public spaces flexible so that they can be converted to spaces that can hold events and raise money for the organization. • The business currently operates by appointment only and would retain that initially. • They will also have regular events, once every month or two, which will allow drop-in access if people want to see the cats without an appointment. • Cat Guardians is run entirely by volunteers. There are two volunteer cat care shifts a day, which consist of approximately 2-4 volunteers on each shift, who feed the cats, clean litter boxes, sweep, etc. • Minimal interior remodeling is planned and would be reviewed in the building permit process. • Nine Parking stalls will be on site. Two parking stalls are all that is needed. Beth Gowski explained the mission of Cat Guardians. Judy Pappendorf Vice President of Cat Guardians Fire department submitted that they would either need to have 24-hour on-site staff or Automated fire system that notifies responders. Beth Gowski responded that the building already is wired for the fire system and they will pay for the service. Jason Jarrett wanted to know how pet waste will be handled. Beth Gowski stated that they take it out after each shift to the dumpster. V. Public Comments Non-Agenda Items Ron Riley- spoke in favor of Cat Guardians Joan Spania - spoke in favor of Cat Guardians Elizabeth Reichert – spoke on favor of Cat Guardians Christine Murphy-spoke in support of Cat Guardians VI. Commissioner Comments Jason Jarrett had a concern about the dumpster at the rear of the property and how it goes into the Public Right-of Way. Rachel Leedom stated that it could be taken care of by code enforcement but can be looked at when they apply for a permit. Page 3 of 128  Greg Ludwig addressed the trash from the former tenant. He said it has not been an issue. He is more than happy to do whatever needs to be done to comply. Brian Igawski spoke, he said the most cost-effective way to deal with this would be to paint an area and staff could make sure the dumpster goes in that area. Jason Jarrett would like the applicant and staff to work together for a solution before the Village Board votes on it. Motion was made to recommend approval of ZBA-26-09 for a Special Use to permit a boarding or animal shelter use within the existing building was made by Commissioner Clampit. Seconded by Commissioner Ackermann. AYES: Ackermann, Clampit, Jarrett, Chairperson Pate (4) NAYS: None (0) ABSTAIN: Cain (1) Motion carried Non-Agenda Items Rachel Leedom stated that if anyone was at the meeting for the Islamic Foundation, we spoke with our attorney, and it does not need to go in front of this board. It is just going straight to the Village Board. VII. Adjournment Motion to Adjourn was made by Commissioner Clampit Seconded by Commissioner Ackermann AYES: Ackermann, Cain, Clampit, , Jarrett, Chairperson Pate (5) NAYS: None (0) The motion carried. Meeting ended at 7:02 Page 4 of 128  MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) FROM: DATE: June 10, 2026 SUBJECT: ZBA-26-01 - Text Amendment - 7.7.7 - Parking - Continue to July 8, 2026 RECOMMENDED ACTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: Page 5 of 128  Village of Villa Park Community & Economic Development 11 W Home Avenue, Villa Park, IL 60181 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Community & Economic Development Department DATE: June 10, 2026 RE: Petition ZBA-26-07 | 450 S. Villa Ave. | Variation PETITIONER OWNER Lynette Ball Lynette Ball 405 S. Villa Ave. 405 S. Villa Ave. Villa Park, IL, 60181 Villa Park, IL, 60181 Request Summary The Petitioner is seeking a Variation from Section 9.2.2- Allowed Fence Heights and Locations to permit a solid fence with a height of 6 feet in the front yard, where a 4-foot-tall open style fence would be permitted. The subject property is located on a corner lot. Background The petitioner is seeking a variation to replace the existing 6-foot-tall wooden fence with a 6-foot-tall vinyl privacy fence that is also 100% opaque. The variation request would permit a 6-foot-tall, solid fence in the front yard where a 4-foot tall, open style fence would be permitted by right. This house is located on a corner lot. The house faces Villa Ave., but the property line adjacent to Highland Ave. is considered the front yard because it is the smallest street facing property line. The area that the petitioner wants to fence in functions as her rear/side yard. This fence height does not conflict with any visibility requirements. Site Information Present Zoning: Residential Single-Dwelling District - RS-7.5 Present Land Use: Residential Property Size: 15,050 sq. ft. / 0.34 acres PIN: 06-10-400-001 Surrounding Zoning Surrounding Land Use North: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential West: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential East: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential South: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential Comprehensive Plan Designation - Residential Single-dwelling residential areas are neighborhoods where each lot contains one dwelling unit, which can be a standalone house or attached units like townhomes and duplexes. These areas should encompass carefully planned subdivisions and older, established neighborhoods exhibiting classic neighborhood layouts. Single- dwelling homes are the most common form of residential property in the Village and most likely will remain so. Zoning Request The Petitioner is seeking a Variation from Section 9.2.2 - Allowed Fence Heights and Locations to permit a solid fence with a height of 6 feet in the front yard, where a 4-foot-tall open style fence would be permitted. Page 6 of 128 Internal Staff Review Variation The Zoning Ordinance specifically allows for Variation petitions to grant relief to a property owner from strict compliance with the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Variations are intended to help alleviate a practical difficulty or particular hardship that would be caused by the literal enforcement of the subject ordinance requirements and are site specific. The petitioner is looking to replace their existing 6-foot-tall wooden fence with a 6-foot-tall vinyl privacy fence. The variation request would permit a 6-foot-tall, solid fence in the front yard where a 4-foot-tall, open style fence would be permitted by right. This variation request came about when the applicant applied for a fence permit and the need for a variation was noticed during the zoning review for permits. The subject property is a corner lot. The single-family home faces Villa Ave., but the property line adjacent to Highland Ave. is considered the front lot line as it is the smallest street facing property line. Upon visiting the site, staff observed that the area along Highland Ave. where the fence would be located has many trees and plantings and does not function as a front yard. The area that the petitioner wants to fence in functions as their rear and side yard. The proposed fence height does not conflict with any visibility requirements as it is 44 feet from the intersection of Villa Ave. and Highland Ave. and is approximately 50 feet from the driveway serving the adjoining property. Site Plan – Proposed Fence as Permitted (CYAN) Proposed Fence requiring height and transparency waiver (ORANGE) 2 Page 7 of 128 Site Plan Review The following comments summarize aspects of the proposed development plans in relation to various Zoning Ordinance requirements: 1. Building and Structure Location: a. This home is located on a corner lot, facing Villa Ave. The frontage on Highland Ave is considered the front because it is the smallest street facing frontage. The area that is considered the petitioner’s front yard functions as her rear/side yard. b. The fence is in compliance with all other bulk regulations. 2. Building Scale: a. Section 9.2.2 permits a 4-foot-tall open style fence in the front yard. The petitioner is requesting a 6-foot-tall solid fence. b. The petitioner has an existing 6-foot-tall solid fence. 3. Lot Coverage: a. No new lot coverage would be added as a result of this project. 4. Completeness: If the Zoning Board of Appeals requires additional information to determine whether the applicant’s development requests comply with the applicable standards of the Code, they may direct the Petitioner to furnish additional information and evidence that may provide clarity regarding their concerns. Findings Per Sec. 11.5.6.8, the Zoning Board of Appeals’ recommendation must be accompanied by specific findings of fact regarding whether practical difficulties or particular hardships would result if a Variation is not granted. The Petitioner has submitted the following justification for a Variation from Article 2, Section 2.3, Table 2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance: A. State the particular hardship and/or practical difficulty created for you in carrying out the strict letter of the zoning regulations to wit: Petitioner: We live on a corner lot and have a small/no backyard. This area is considered our back yard. B. A reasonable return or use of your property is not possible under the existing regulations because: Petitioner: No privacy, live on corner. There is a bus stop with people in our front yard all the time. Sound is loud with cars. C. Your situation is unique (not applicable in other properties in the area or zoning classification) in the following respect: Petitioner: We already have a 6 foot fence, just want to replace what is there. Backyard is small and the side yard is where we use it. The corner is not block frontage. There is a bus stop, so it is a busy corner with no privacy. D. The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality, impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property; not increase hazard from fire; not impair property values in the neighborhood; not unduly increase congestion in the streets, or otherwise impair public safety; health and convenience because: Petitioner: No, it will not harm anyone. 3 Page 8 of 128 Notification Legal Notice was published in the Daily Herald on May 28, 2026, a sign placed on the subject property, and notifications sent to property owners within a 250.0-foot radius of the subject property in advance of the Public Hearing. Sample Motion Should the Board approve Case ZBA 26-07, staff recommends the following motion and conditions: Motion to approve Case ZBA 26-07, a request for variations from Section 9.2.2 to allow a six-foot high fence within a front yard located 46.40 feet in front of the principal structure, with 0% transparency, subject to the following conditions: 1) The proposed fence shall be installed in accordance with the plans submitted by the applicant in the Variation Application received 3/27/2026. 2) The applicant shall file all necessary plans and applications, for review and approval, and secure all necessary building permits prior to the commencement of installation. Exhibit List • Exhibit A – Site Plan 4 Page 9 of 128  E HIGHLAND AV 405 405 R S - 7 . 5 S VILLA AV Zoning Districts 409 Zoning Districts RS-10 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 10,000 Sq. Ft. RS-7.5 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 7,500 Sq. Ft. RD-7.5 - Residential Duplex District - 7,500 Sq. Ft.. RM-9 - Residential Multi-Unit District - 9,000 Sq. Ft. O-R - Office Research District C-1 - Convenience Business District C-2 - Neighborhood Business District C-3 - Service Business District MX-1 - Mixed-Use TOD District ¯ MX-2 - Mixed-Use Main Street District MX-3 - Mixed-Use Corridor District MX-T - Mixed Transitional (Office-Residential) District 415 MX-R1 - Mixed Residential District 1 MX-R2 - Mixed Residential District 2 M-1 - Light Industrial District M-2 - General Industrial District PI-1 - Neighborhood-scale Institutional and Public District PI-2 - Campus-scale Institutional and Public District P.U.D.-R - Planned Unit Development Residential 012.525 50 75 100 Feet P.U.D.-C - Planned Unit Development Commercial P.U.D.-I - Planned Unit Development Industrial Page 10 of 128  ,F--:?:.r.'! firrrctr&Irc) _ coutcDU-rll!trd. tEl IS t0 ctfiIE 1rrr tE iuttME EI' g rcltt'E]tE llF !fr ripnvlora r8r rs nlllof wr \D) s,^ '< U'r. X6grr ddEtd bt Sttdttt 8ln&r l\ 9- ( () ala,.1,bA r....s .{ t 6' tall privacy fence s { Y t \ \ ,t t. lle E Ea' I I .1. h /Slar,t 8.,'rl, y' 'j ^.: 9rlopa lnl $ N ,,# /.ol /39 \ o.v I I \ll l; ,l I''q /oo. o' {\ .-l) [xcc7/ lta 'f. /9' /bcret' tl STATE OF I!LI}IOIS : RICHARD C, FIELD COUIITY OT OU PAEE s.5. REOISTERTD LAIIO SURVEYOR I5U 729 TEXII{GTON STNEET ...I, RICHARO C, FIELOI A REGISTERED LAIID SURVEYOR. O.() ELI*IURsT, TLLINOIS 60}25 I-Elqgl_cERrrry THAT r HAvE sunvivid-ixi"risoii"oiilli ism PHoilE eJ9-e245 B0$BIY ANo T|{AT THls pLfr is n ionaicr'iipcrftfiiiiii,H 9f sAro sunvEs. ALL orxflistflrrs me in-iiei /i[o'ili[il1Ar PASI,S rilmt0f -- tt0OntSSi . conRECT Ar oP r. ffii.;ta{rra,. Tltlc Polt,:y. Ird Locd ffilllirruar foi &rlldiiq Resinlctltrs. Page 11 of 128  Village of Villa Park Community & Economic Development 11 W Home Avenue, Villa Park, IL 60181 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Community & Economic Development Department DATE: June 10, 2026 RE: Petition ZBA-26-08 | 19 W. Jackson St. | Variation PETITIONER OWNER Rob and Aurora Scahill Rob and Aurora Scahill 19 W. Jackson St. 19 W. Jackson St. Villa Park, IL, 60181 Villa Park, IL, 60181 Request Summary The Petitioner is seeking a Variation from Section 6.10.2 - Residential Accessory Structures, Table 6-2 Accessory Structure Regulations, to permit a pergola with a maximum size of 250 square feet where 200 square feet is permitted by right. Background This case came about as the result of a Work Without a Permit Violation issued March 5, 2026. The petitioner applied for a building permit on March 14, 2026. It was noted during permit review that the pergola exceeds the maximum of 200 sq. ft. permitted. The petitioner would like to keep the full size of the pergola, because it currently covers the entire rear of the residence, including two sliding doors. The pergola is 13 feet by 19 feet for a total area of 247 square feet. The pergola is approximately 8.0 feet tall, which is in compliance with bulk regulations. The pergola complies with setback requirements. Site Information Present Zoning: Residential Single-Dwelling District - RS-7.5 Present Land Use: Residential Property Size: 7,250 sq. ft. / 0.16 acres PIN: 06-16-215-006 Surrounding Zoning Surrounding Land Use North: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential West: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential East: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential South: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Park Comprehensive Plan Designation - Residential Single-dwelling residential areas are neighborhoods where each lot contains one dwelling unit, which can be a standalone house or attached units like townhomes and duplexes. These areas should encompass carefully planned subdivisions and older, established neighborhoods exhibiting classic neighborhood layouts. Single- dwelling homes are the most common form of residential property in the Village and most likely will remain so. Zoning Request The Petitioner is seeking a Variation from Section 6.10.2 - Residential Accessory Structures, Table 6-2 Accessory Structure Regulations, to permit a pergola with a maximum size of 250 square feet where 200 square feet is permitted by right. Page 12 of 128 Internal Staff Review Variation The Zoning Ordinance specifically allows for Variation petitions to grant relief to a property owner from strict compliance with the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Variations are intended to help alleviate a practical difficulty or particular hardship that would be caused by the literal enforcement of the subject ordinance requirements and are site specific. The petitioner is seeking to install a pergola across the rear of the residence on top of an existing patio. The petitioner received a violation notice for work without a permit on March 5, 2026. The petitioner came to apply for a permit a week later. The pergola is 13 feet by 19 feet for a total area of 247 square feet. The reason for this size is to cover the entire rear of the house on top of an existing patio and provide a covered entrance and exit from two sliding patio doors on the rear of the house. Section 6.10.2 - Residential Accessory structures permits a pergola with a maximum area of 200 square feet. No variations to height or setbacks are needed as part of this application. Site Plan Review The following comments summarize aspects of the proposed development plans in relation to various Zoning Ordinance requirements: 1. Building and Structure Location: a. The pergola has a length of 19 feet and a depth of 13 feet. The pergola has a total area of 247 sq. ft. and exceeds the maximum area permitted by 47 sq. ft. b. The pergola is in compliance with all other bulk regulations. 2. Building scale: a. Section 6.10.2 - Residential Accessory structures permits a pergola with a maximum area of 200 sq. ft. The petitioner is requesting a 247-square-foot pergola. 3. Lot Coverage: a. No new lot coverage would be added as a result of this project. The pergola is placed on an existing patio. 4. Completeness - If the Zoning Board of Appeals requires additional information to determine whether the applicant’s development requests comply with the applicable standards of the Code, they may direct the Petitioner to furnish additional information and evidence that may provide clarity regarding their concerns. Findings Per Section 11.5.6.8, the Zoning Board of Appeals’ recommendation must be accompanied by specific findings of fact regarding whether practical difficulties or particular hardships would result if a Variation is not granted. The Petitioner has submitted the following justification for a Variation from Article 2, Section 2.3, Table 2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance: A. State the particular hardship and/or practical difficulty created for you in carrying out the strict letter of the zoning regulations to wit: Petitioner: The practical difficulty is created by the layout of the home, which includes two rear sliding doors that require continuous covered access across the full width of the patio. A pergola limited to 200 square feet would not adequately span both door openings, resulting in incomplete coverage and limiting safe and functional use of the space. The requested size of 13 feet by 19 feet represents the minimum necessary to provide consistent coverage across both entry points and allow the structure to function as intended. 2 Page 13 of 128  B. A reasonable return or use of your property is not possible under the existing regulations because: Petitioner: Under the current 200 square foot limitation, the pergola cannot reasonably fulfill its intended purpose of providing continuous covered access across both rear sliding doors. A smaller structure would only partially cover the patio, reducing usability and creating an impractical layout. The requested variation allows for a functional outdoor space consistent with normal residential use, including family use, shade, and safe entry and exit from the home. C. Your situation is unique (not applicable in other properties in the area or zoning classification) in the following respect: Petitioner: The unique condition of this property is the configuration of the rear elevation of the home, which includes two separate sliding door access points that require a wider structure to provide adequate coverage. This condition is specific to the layout of the home and is not a general condition applicable to all properties in the area. The pergola must span a greater width than a standard single-entry layout, making the 200 square foot limitation insufficient in this case. D. The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality, impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property; not increase hazard from fire; not impair property values in the neighborhood; not unduly increase congestion in the streets, or otherwise impair public safety; health and convenience because: Petitioner: The requested variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or negatively impact surrounding properties. The pergola is an open-air structure with an adjustable slatted roof and does not create enclosed space or increase density. It is approximately 7 feet in height and is located with appropriate setbacks, including approximately 7 feet from one side property line, over 20 feet from the opposite side, and more than 15 feet from the rear property line. The structure does not obstruct views, light, or air to adjacent properties and does not create any additional traffic, noise, or safety concerns. Similar outdoor structures, including decks, exist on neighboring properties, and the pergola is consistent with the residential character of the area. The design complements the home’s exterior and contributes positively to the overall appearance and value of the property. Notification Legal Notice was published in the Daily Herald on May 28, 2026, a sign placed on the subject property, and notifications sent to property owners within a 250.0-foot radius of the subject property in advance of the Public Hearing. Sample Motion Should the Board approve Case ZBA 26-08, staff recommends the following motion and conditions: Motion to approve Case ZBA 26-08, a request for variations from Section 6.10.2- Residential Accessory Structures, Table 6-2 Accessory Structure Regulations to permit a pergola with a maximum size of 250 square feet, subject to the following conditions: 1) The proposed pergola shall be installed in accordance with the plans submitted by the applicant in the Variation Application received 3/31/2026. 2) The applicant shall file all necessary plans and applications, for review and approval, and secure all necessary building permits prior to the commencement of installation. Exhibit List • Exhibit A – Plat of Survey • Exhibit B – Site Plan 3 Page 14 of 128 • Exhibit C – Pergola Manufacture Specifications 4 Page 15 of 128  26 18 14 944 W JACKSON ST 31 27 23 19 15 11 R S - 7 . 5 Zoning Districts Zoning Districts 1000 RS-10 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 10,000 Sq. Ft. RS-7.5 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 7,500 Sq. Ft. RD-7.5 - Residential Duplex District - 7,500 Sq. Ft.. RM-9 - Residential Multi-Unit District - 9,000 Sq. Ft. O-R - Office Research District C-1 - Convenience Business District C-2 - Neighborhood Business District C-3 - Service Business District MX-1 - Mixed-Use TOD District ¯ MX-2 - Mixed-Use Main Street District MX-3 - Mixed-Use Corridor District MX-T - Mixed Transitional (Office-Residential) District MX-R1 - Mixed Residential District 1 MX-R2 - Mixed Residential District 2 M-1 - Light Industrial District M-2 - General Industrial District PI-1 - Neighborhood-scale Institutional and Public District PI-2 - Campus-scale Institutional and Public District P.U.D.-R - Planned Unit Development Residential 012.525 50 75 100 Feet P.U.D.-C - Planned Unit Development Commercial P.U.D.-I - Planned Unit Development Industrial Page 16 of 128 Page 17 of 128 13' 19' 13'x19' Pergola Page 18 of 128 1 Page 19 of 128  Installation Inst† „tionsƒ Installationsanl”it n–ƒ Ensure all parts are present and undamaged Stellen Sie sicher, dass alle Teile vorhanden und before starting the assembly. unbeschädigt sind, bevor Sie mit der Montage beginnen. Secure to a solid foundation with the correct Befestigen Sie sie mit den richtigen fasteners for your foundation. Befestigungselementen für Ihr Tundament auf einem soliden Tundament. (If applicable) Install motors and wiring as shown. Ensure the electric parts are off during (Talls zutreffend) Installieren Sie Motoren und installation. Verkabelung wie gezeigt. Stellen Sie sicher, dass die elektrischen Teile während der Installation Use the correct lifting and installation equipment. ausgeschaltet sind. Safety Warnings: Verwenden Sie die richtige Hebez und Keep children and pets away during installation. Installationsausrüstung.s Do not operate the structure if parts are loose or Sicherheitshinweise: improperly installed. Halten Sie Kinder und Haustiere während der Installation fern. Ensure the structure is securely anchored to prevent accidents. Betreiben Sie die Struktur nicht, wenn Teile lose oder nicht richtig installiert sind. Do not stick fingers or anything between the louvre. Stellen Sie sicher, dass die Struktur sicher verankert ist, um Unfälle zu vermeiden. Maintenance: Regularly clean the aluminum structure to Stecken Sie keine Tinger oder andere Gegenstände maintain its appearance and prevent the zwischen die Lamellen. accumulation of dirt. Wartung: Also, make sure to clean the gutters regularly. Reinigen Sie die Aluminiumstruktur regelmäßig, um ihr Inspect moving parts for wear and lubricate as Aussehen zu erhalten und die Ansammlung von Schmutz necessary. zu verhindern. Check anchor points periodically to ensure Reinigen Sie auch die Dachrinnen regelmäßig. stability. Überprüfen Sie bewegliche Teile auf Verschleiß und schmieren Sie sie bei Bedarf. Überprüfen Sie die Ankerpunkte regelmäßig, um die Stabilität sicherzustellen. 2 Page 20 of 128 Congratulations and thank you for choosing a PERGOLUX Product! To enjoy this product for a long time as well as for your own and others’ safety, please follow the installation instructions. Before you start assembling and using the pergola, ensure that all the parts listed in the manual are delivered and intact. If you need help with the installation, you can contact us by chat, phone, e-mail or at our website. We wish you good luck with the assembling process! Contact: Germany United Kingdom United States Denmark Sweden Norway Australia France Switzerland Italy Netherlands Austria Chile Brazil contacto@pergolux.cl contato@pergolux.com.br 3 Page 21 of 128 Having some issues or submit a claim? If you are faced to an issue with your PERGOLUX products and needs to submit a claim pleace read this article: Complaints and Technical Issues Reklamation einreichen. Schritt für Schritt Anleitung Submit the claim here: Submit a request Anfrage einreichen Een aanvraag indienen Enviar una solicitud Envoyer une demande Send oss en henvendelse Skicka oss en förfrågan Send os en forespørgsel 4 Page 22 of 128 5 Page 23 of 128 6 Page 24 of 128 PN-200000752 PN-200000560 PN-200000692 PN-200000667 PN-200000734 PN-200000737 PN-200000733 PN-200000668 PN-200000559 PN-200000510 PN-200000738 PN-200000669 PN-200000535 PN-200000655 PN-200000739 PN-200000565 7 Page 25 of 128 PN-200000568 PN-200000740 PN-200000658 PN-200000958 PN-200000653 PN-200000731 PN-200000648 PN-200000732 PN-200000743 PN-200000415 PN-200000695 PN-200000650 PN-200000746 PN-200000660 PN-200000662 8 Page 26 of 128 PN-200000647 PN-200000699 PN-200000649 PN-200000677 PN-200000652 PN-200000529 PN-200000663 PN-200000532 PN-200000693 PN-200000666 PN-200000744 PN-200000742 PN-200000573 PN-200000546 PN-200000698 PN-200000518 9 Page 27 of 128 PN-200000840 PN-200000745 PN-200000538 PN-200000512 PN-200000608 PN-200001861 PN-200000878 10 Page 28 of 128 PN-200001334 PN-200001563 PN-200000969 PN-200001623 PN-200001625 PN-200001624 11 Page 29 of 128 12 Page 30 of 128 13 Page 31 of 128 14 Page 32 of 128 15 Page 33 of 128 16 Page 34 of 128 17 Page 35 of 128 18 Page 36 of 128 19 Page 37 of 128 20 Page 38 of 128 21 Page 39 of 128 22 Page 40 of 128 23 Page 41 of 128 24 Page 42 of 128 25 Page 43 of 128 26 Page 44 of 128 27 Page 45 of 128 28 Page 46 of 128 29 Page 47 of 128 30 Page 48 of 128 31 Page 49 of 128 32 Page 50 of 128 33 Page 51 of 128 34 Page 52 of 128 35 Page 53 of 128 36 Page 54 of 128 37 Page 55 of 128 38 Page 56 of 128 39 Page 57 of 128 40 Page 58 of 128 41 Page 59 of 128 42 Page 60 of 128 43 Page 61 of 128 44 Page 62 of 128 45 Page 63 of 128 46 Page 64 of 128 47 Page 65 of 128 48 Page 66 of 128 49 Page 67 of 128 50 Page 68 of 128 51 Page 69 of 128 52 Page 70 of 128 53 Page 71 of 128 54 Page 72 of 128 55 Page 73 of 128 56 Page 74 of 128 57 Page 75 of 128 58 Page 76 of 128 59 Page 77 of 128 60 Page 78 of 128 61 Page 79 of 128 62 Page 80 of 128 63 Page 81 of 128 64 Page 82 of 128 65 Page 83 of 128 66 Page 84 of 128 67 Page 85 of 128 68 Page 86 of 128 69 Page 87 of 128 70 Page 88 of 128 71 Page 89 of 128 72 Page 90 of 128 73 Page 91 of 128 Case ZBA-26-08 19 W Jackson- Variation for 247 sq. ft. Pergola Page 92 of 128 Page 93 of 128  Village of Villa Park Community & Economic Development 11 W Home Avenue, Villa Park, IL 60181 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Community & Economic Development Department DATE: June 10, 2026 RE: Petition ZBA-26-13 | 1031 S Summit Ave | Variation PETITIONER OWNER Kurt Berry and Jacqui Francis Kurt Berry and Jacqui Francis 1031 S. Summit Ave. 1031 S. Summit Ave. Villa Park, IL, 60181 Villa Park, IL, 60181 Request Summary The Petitioner is seeking a Variation from Section 14.1.9 - Setbacks to permit a patio in the front yard. This double frontage lot has two front yards and the patio would be placed behind the rear of the residence. Background The petitioners are seeking a variation to build a concrete patio in the space that functions as their rear yard. Because the property abuts Terry Lane, the area that functions as their rear yard, is considered a front yard per zoning code. If this patio were located in a rear yard on a typical lot, no variation would be required. This area is surrounded by a privacy fence. A wooden deck was previously in this location but was removed due to disrepair. The proposed patio is 16 feet by 26 feet for a total area of 416 square feet. The patio is setback 41 feet from the secondary frontage, Terry Lane. The patio is setback 8.75 feet from the north property line and 25.3 feet from the south property line. Site Information Present Zoning: Residential Single-Dwelling District - RS-7.5 Present Land Use: Residential Property Size: 8,354.44 sq. ft. / 0.19 acres PIN: 06-15-114-012 Surrounding Zoning Surrounding Land Use North: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential West: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential East: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential South: Residential Single-Dwelling District- RS-7.5 Residential Comprehensive Plan Designation - Residential Single-dwelling residential areas are neighborhoods where each lot contains one dwelling unit, which can be a standalone house or attached units like townhomes and duplexes. These areas should encompass carefully planned subdivisions and older, established neighborhoods exhibiting classic neighborhood layouts. Single- dwelling homes are the most common form of residential property in the Village and most likely will remain so. Zoning Request The Petitioner is seeking a Variation from Section 14.1.9 - Setbacks to permit a patio in the front yard. This double frontage lot has two front yards and the patio would be placed behind the rear of the residence. Page 94 of 128 Site Plan – Proposed Patio (CYAN) Terry Ln. Front Yard (GREEN) 2 Page 95 of 128 Internal Staff Review Variation The Zoning Ordinance specifically allows for Variation petitions to grant relief to a property owner from strict compliance with the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Variations are intended to help alleviate a practical difficulty or particular hardship that would be caused by the literal enforcement of the subject ordinance requirements and are site specific. The petitioners are seeking a variation to build a concrete patio in the space that functions as their rear yard. The proposed patio is 16 feet by 26 feet for a total area of 416 square feet. The proposed patio is setback 41 feet from the secondary frontage, Terry Lane. The proposed patio is setback 8.75 feet from the north property line and 25.3 feet from the south property line. If this patio were located in a rear yard on a typical lot, no variation would be required. This area functions as the rear yard for the residence and is surrounded by a privacy fence. A wooden deck used to be in this location, but was removed because it was in disrepair. Site Plan Review 1. Building and Structure Location: a. The proposed patio is 16 feet by 26 feet for a total area of 416 square feet. b. Setbacks are in compliance with section 14.1.9- Setbacks i. North setback: 8.75 feet ii. East setback: 41 feet iii. South setback: 25.3 feet 2. Building scale: a. The proposed patio is 16 feet by 26 feet for a total area of 416 square feet. b. Per Section 6.10.2- Residential Accessory Structures, there is no maximum size for a patio. 3. Lot Coverage: a. The current lot coverage is 38%. After the patio installation, the lot coverage would be 43%. b. Per section 2.3- Lot and Building Regulations, maximum lot coverage for RS-7.5 is 60%. 4. Completeness - If the Zoning Board of Appeals requires additional information to determine whether the applicant’s development requests comply with the applicable standards of the Code, they may direct the Petitioner to furnish additional information and evidence that may provide clarity regarding their concerns. Findings Per Sec. 11.5.6.8. The Zoning Board of Appeals’ recommendation must be accompanied by specific findings of fact regarding whether practical difficulties or particular hardships would result if a Variation is not granted. The Petitioner has submitted the following justification for a Variation from Article 2, Section 2.3, Table 2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance: A. State the particular hardship and/or practical difficulty created for you in carrying out the strict letter of the zoning regulations to wit: Petitioner: Our lot is located on a pre-shaped parcel between Summit and Terry at the narrowing end. There is no neighboring house behind ours (Terry) and thus it is considered we have 2 front yards. B. A reasonable return or use of your property is not possible under the existing regulations because: Petitioner: A concrete patio is not allowed by zoning in front yard, which is our back yard and already surrounded by privacy fencing. 3 Page 96 of 128  C. Your situation is unique (not applicable in other properties in the area or zoning classification) in the following respect: Petitioner: We’d like to use our yard for BBQ and entertaining that a concrete patio would allow. D. The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality, impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property; not increase hazard from fire; not impair property values in the neighborhood; not unduly increase congestion in the streets, or otherwise impair public safety; health and convenience because: Petitioner: It is ground level so no light or air disruption. Less fire hazard than the old wood deck. Updates to the home will improve values, cause no traffic issues or safety issues. Neighboring home already has a similar concrete patio without incident. Notification Legal Notice was published in the Daily Herald on May 28, 2026, a sign placed on the subject property, and notifications sent to property owners within a 250.0-foot radius of the subject property in advance of the Public Hearing. Sample Motion Should the Board approve Case ZBA 26-13, staff recommends the following motion and conditions: Motion to approve Case ZBA 26-13, a request for variations from Section 14.1.9- Setbacks to permit a patio in the front yard, subject to the following conditions: 1) The proposed patio shall be installed in accordance with the plans submitted by the applicant in the Variation Application received 3/31/2026. 2) The applicant shall file all necessary plans and applications, for review and approval, and secure all necessary building permits prior to the commencement of installation. Exhibit List • Exhibit A – Plat of Survey • Exhibit B- Site Plan 4 Page 97 of 128  1019 226 1023 E VAN BUREN ST 1027 1031 RY LN ET 221 ER S SUMMIT AV R S - 7 . 5 1035 217 Zoning Districts Zoning Districts RS-10 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 10,000 Sq. Ft. 213 RS-7.5 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 7,500 Sq. Ft. RD-7.5 - Residential Duplex District - 7,500 Sq. Ft.. RM-9 - Residential Multi-Unit District - 9,000 Sq. Ft. 48 O-R - Office Research District C-1 - Convenience Business District C-2 - Neighborhood Business District 209 C-3 - Service Business District MX-1 - Mixed-Use TOD District MX-2 - Mixed-Use Main Street District 100 MX-3 - Mixed-Use Corridor District ¯ MX-T - Mixed Transitional (Office-Residential) District 205 MX-R1 - Mixed Residential District 1 MX-R2 - Mixed Residential District 2 M-1 - Light Industrial District 1106 M-2 - General Industrial District PI-1 - Neighborhood-scale Institutional and Public District PI-2 - Campus-scale Institutional and Public District 201 P.U.D.-R - Planned Unit Development Residential P.U.D.-C - Planned Unit Development Commercial 0 1530 60 90 120 206 P.U.D.-I - Planned Unit Development Industrial Feet Page 98 of 128 144 Page 99 of 128 Page 100 of 128  i; l l-l l: l.r\\'V ()l:l:l(-l: ()l:--- Q.r KELLEY V. FTINN - o1 : ( ,rll il. rrl .:!l -lrl,' .lLll!i SURVEY NUMBEfit 25O4 6306 vil-u\ I'ARK, ll.t-lNol5 60181 PRoPEnTY ADrlBEss: iO-11 S 5UN'1MIT 'VENUE ,l5tl4'iJ!r':. PLAT OF SURVE\' DUPAGE COUNTY i LOT I2 LOT 9 BLK 6 BI-K 6 ilz I 'l i FI: I I LOT 1'l ^t F 1 STORY BLK 6 t Er BRICK & 0109 SO.FT'a |: c, FRAME gr r I G RES. #1031 i l!' ,l 5r FIR 0ll ft I ft =l Lul 0.26 w \t 0.51'S /s- ,1 {i h*- I 79 i8 /t{o' EI JI (Dl /,s I ./n-1 I 121.13' /.lS LOT 10 I BLK 6 /,,Y tINE TABLE: :i L1 s2"22'35'E 40,78 {C) 40.3t (R) L2 S26'01'43'W 24.23'(C) 24,40' (R) L3 N87"26',35' E 132.66'(M) 132,50'(R) A N JO GRAPHIC SCALE (ln Feet) 1 inch = 30'ft, POINTS OF INTEREST: ') I, RESIDENCE OVER BUILDING LINE 5llilF Ot il I ll':cls 5S .:OI till./ i,1!: L!5At.tl, f rr llj i! it {:Hr ilt:t -f l rAi 1 'Jr5 Irf{(ll:l:55lOf.!Al- 5il?Vl(l[ (:()Nt:f)nM5 If) Ii l[ {-{.}t?Ral'li ll i.il\j,)t! l,4ll']llllJt.4 'i f/tl'lllAnD:; ffill f\ IIOIJNDARY :ilil?!11:".,;l'./tiI:'JlitirL'tl,4Yl{/('!1.,Al'lL}l;Ia'l. II]lllL],/rlLIlEll[(ll'l' D, l Ct <EXACTA a\.1th land SuIveYolt'LlC pN , r900{i019 Il l0t.'l0l I ) t [,iDtt,9la)ltni I V Bnd suN6yo6L!C o: i I ld tntt Jnckioil Strtcl I trlot!'!. Il 60't50 sitD!UltvLY(iI ,l rl I rl t/Jl(; '.,tllrtt '/irfi 1.i., )tll 1 F SurrveySTARS -l'.{:i l:;t lrlt{ :f h \ t, \t)ft.li'i( )ti,, | | t v l,litt:ti:;:l{lt'll ^l { L!,;tatrJ ! rliil llnli{)ilr}lit r){lIil DAT€oF SURVEY: O4l29l25 SEE PACE 2 OF 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION FIELD WoRK DAT€I 4l2lJl2O25 PA6€ ! OF 2 . NOT VALID IVI'I'IIOUT ALL PAGE5 RIVlSloN DATE(slt IREV.O 4 /29/29251 Page 101 of 128  Village of Villa Park Community & Economic Development 11 W Home Avenue, Villa Park, IL 60181 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Community & Economic Development Department DATE: June 10th, 2026 RE: Petition ZBA-26-11 | 5 W Park Blvd. | Special Use for Planned Unit Development PETITIONER OWNER Ethan Coleman Ethan Coleman 5 W. Park Blvd. 5 W. Park Blvd. Villa Park, IL, 60181 Villa Park, IL, 60181 Request Summary The Petitioner is seeking a Special Use permit for a Planned Unit Development and other relief from the Village of Villa Park Village Code as may be required for this project. The project is an addition to the existing building to accommodate new restaurant space. Background The petitioner requests a Special Use permit for a Planned Unit Development to construct an addition to the existing building at 5 W. Park Blvd. The petitioner intends to use the space for restaurant and bar use. The project includes a commercial kitchen, restaurant space, lounge space, and a walk-up window for pedestrians picking up food. The existing hair salon and residential space would remain. The site would include a trash enclosure, three (3) on-site parking stalls, and 11 on-street parking stalls (including approximately eight (8) newly constructed parking stalls). Site Information Present Zoning: MX-2- Mixed-Use Main Street District Present Land Use: Commercial Property Size: 6,892 sq. ft. or 0.1582 acres PIN: 06-09-220-006 Surrounding Zoning Surrounding Land Use North: Mixed-Use Main Street District – MX-2 Commercial West: Mixed-Use Main Street District – MX-2 Commercial East: Mixed-Use Main Street District – MX-2 Commercial South: Mixed-Use Main Street District – MX-2 Commercial Comprehensive Plan Designation – Local Commercial Local commercial areas are designed to provide small-scale retail and services catering to nearby residents’ day- to-day needs. These areas typically include a grocery store or restaurant and other smaller retailers, such as gas stations, dry cleaners, convenience stores, and banks. The Village should look to provide these daily necessities and services close to home as an amenity for nearby residents and to reduces the need to drive. Page 102 of 128 Zoning Request The petitioner is requesting approval of a planned unit development (PUD) designated as a “special use” administered under Section 11.3 Planned Unit Development. The project is an addition to an existing building to accommodate new restaurant space. Several variations from the underlying zoning requirements are being sought by the petitioner as part of the PUD. Internal Staff Review Planned Unit Development The petitioner requests a special use permit for a Planned Unit Development to renovate the ground floor of the existing building at 5 W. Park Blvd and construct a single-story addition in the current parking lot at the subject property. The petitioner intends to use the renovated and expanded space for a restaurant and bar. The project includes a commercial kitchen, restaurant space, lounge space, and a walk-up window for pedestrians picking up food. The existing hair salon on the ground floor and two residential dwellings on the upper floor of the existing building would remain. The petitioner also proposes improvements to the Village right-of-way to add additional on-street parking. The proposal would maintain the existing 100% impervious cover on the site with no landscaping proposed. Staff has concerns regarding landscaping and building materials that should be addressed by the applicant. Site Plan Review The following comments summarize aspects of the proposed development plans in relation to various Zoning Ordinance requirements: 1. Building Location and Scale: The proposal includes a one-story addition of 2,595 square feet and remodeling of the first floor of the existing building. The proposed building addition would be roughly 73 feet by 43 feet with a building height of 24 feet. A commercial business (a salon) located in the rear of the ground floor of the existing building at the subject property, as well as two (2) residential units located on the upper floor, would remain. Per Section 4.6.2, parapet walls may be a maximum of six feet (6 ft.) in height. The proposed single -story addition features a 12.3 ft. Ground floor with a parapet wall measuring 11.7 ft. in height. A waiver of 5.7 ft. is required to permit the proposed parapet wall height. Proposed North Elevation – Parapet wall outlines in ORANGE 2. Building Materials: The petitioner is proposing the use of engineered architectural panels as the primary facade material. Per discussion with the architect, cast stone would also be used at the base of the building. The architectural panels come in a wide variety of colors. 2 Page 103 of 128 Per section 4.7.1, 80% of each façade shall be constructed of primary materials. Permitted primary building materials include high quality, durable, natural materials, such as stone, brick; wood lap siding; fiber cement board lapped, shingled, or panel siding; glass. Other high quality synthetic materials may be approved during the site plan process with an approved sample and examples of successful, high quality local installations. While architectural panels are commonly used as accent materials, Staff has concerns regarding the use such panels as a primary material. Details regarding proposed building materials were received the week prior to the June 10, 2026 public hearing. As the only significant outstanding item, Staff agreed to process the application and keep the case on the June 10, 2026 agenda. Staff requested material samples and examples of where the proposed engineered architectural panels have been used for smaller-scale projects within the Chicago region. The project architect provided several examples and those have been included with the application materials . Staff continue have concerns regarding the use of the architectural panels as a primary façade material given that all but one of the examples shared appear to have been institutional buildings. The petitioner should speak to the proposed primary materials choice and examples from elsewhere in the region. Per section 4.7.1, main building colors shall utilize any historic palettes from any major paint manufacturer. Other colors may be utilized for details and accents, not to exceed a total area larger than ten (10) percent of the facade surface area. The petitioner did not provide an indication as to which colors are proposed and Staff was unable to determine with compliance as a result. Staff recommends that compliance with building color requirements be included as a condition of approval. Proposed Primary Façade Material – Engineered Architectural Panels(Examples provided by Architect) Proposed Accent Material – Cast Stone 3 Page 104 of 128 3. Façade Transparency The proposed project is meets minimum façade transparency requirements along the Ardmore Avenue (primary street) frontage, however additional transparency is required along Park Blvd. While the front of the proposed restaurant and bar are highly transparent, the applicant has indicated that additional windows along the back of the building are not desired due to the location of the kitchen and storage in this area. The applicant should be prepared to speak to the need for less transparency due to the existing site constraints and kitchen needs. Staff feels these requests are reasonable given the circumstances. a. North: 70% transparency is required. The petitioner proposes 64% transparency on the North façade (Ardmore Ave.). A waiver of 6% is requested. b. East: 70% transparency is required. The petitioner proposes 80% transparency on the East façade (Park Blvd.). c. West: 15% transparency is required for the open space frontage. The petitioner proposes 0% transparency on the West façade (abutting parking) due to kitchen restraints. A waiver of 15% is requested. d. Per section 4.5.5.B - Blank Wall Segments, no more than 30% of any story shall be without transparency. The petitioner proposes 67% without transparency due to kitchen restraints. A waiver of 37% is requested. 4. Lot Coverage The site currently is 100% impervious surface. Although the requirement for Zoning District MX -2 is a maximum of 75% impervious coverage, the petitioner requests to maintain the 100% cover. Staff has identified areas for possible landscaping but applicant has declined. Staff feels while adding an additional 25% of landscaping to the site may not be reasonable given the site constraints, there are opportunities to include some type of landscaping and 100% impervious surface is not necessary. a. Per section 4.4.2- Storefront Building, the maximum impervious cover for the MX-2 District is 75% b. The lot is currently 100% impervious surface and is proposed to remain at 100% lot coverage. Petitioner request a waiver of 25%. 5. Site Circulation The three (3) on-site parking stalls would be accessible from Park Blvd. All other parking and vehicular traffic would remain on Ardmore Ave and Park Blvd. a. With the new building addition and reconfiguration of the parking lot, the existing garage space serving the existing salon business can no longer be served directly by a delivery vehicle. As a condition of approval, Staff recommends that vehicles be prohibited from driving across the designated pedestrian way along the north façade of the existing building and that deliveries to the space must be made from the parking lot. 4 Page 105 of 128  Existing Garage and man door serving Existing Salon Business to Remain 6. Parking The proposed project includes a total of fourteen (14) parking stalls. Three (3) parking stalls are on the subject property, including one ADA accessible parking stall. Eleven (11) parking stalls are provided on Ardmore Ave. and Park Blvd. For the new restaurant, two residential apartments, and a commercial space, twenty (20) parking stalls would be required. a. The site proposes 14 parking stalls, 3 on-site parking stalls and 11 on-street parking stalls. Per section 7.2 Minimum Parking Ratios, 20 stalls are required. The petitioner is requesting a waiver of six parking stalls (a 30% reduction). i. Residential: 2 one-bedroom apartments, 2 parking stalls required ii. Commercial: 3 stalls per 1,000 square feet, 1 stall required iii. Restaurant: 0.33 per seat, 17 stalls required b. Section 7.4.1- On-Street Parking, allows for non-residential uses to count on-street parking towards the number of required parking stalls at a rate of 1 stall per 20 feet of abutting right of way. 7. Landscaping No landscaping is proposed as part of the Special Use application. a. Staff has noted areas where landscaping or planters could be added, but petitioner has declined these suggestions. Per Section 9.1.5.C, when a new development abuts non-residential properties, a landscaped buffer is required. While staff believe the landscape buffer is not practicable given site constraints and the scale and character of adjacent development. No landscaping is proposed as part of the Special Use application. b. Section 4.3.4 states that open space that is not used for sidewalk or patio space, shall contain landscaping. Staff has suggested two areas where landscaping could be installed. Staff has also suggested planter boxes be installed to include some type of vegetation. The petitioner has declined these suggestions and should speak to their decision to omit landscaping. 5 Page 106 of 128 8. Lighting The petitioner is proposing recessed lighting at the entrances to the building. Per comments from the petitioner, the lighting fixtures will include shielding to direct light away from adjacent right-of-way and minimize glare. Parking lot lighting is not required because the proposed parking lot has fewer than six (6) stalls. As there is no required site lighting, Staff waived the requirement for a photometric analysis. Staff has concerns regarding the potential for low light levels in the parking lot in the evening when the restaurant and bar will be active (compared to the salon at the subject property). In response to these comments, the petitioner indicated a willingness to install lighting in the parking area and that has been included as a condition of approval. The petitioner has agreed to provide a photometric plan as part of the permitting process if requested by Staff. Proposed Soffit Lighting 9. Signage The petitioner proposes two new wall signs and one projecting sign as part of this project. Proposed signage complies with Article 8 regulations. One existing wall sign for the commercial space shall remain. The petitioner is proposing 180 square feet of signage within six (6) wall signs. Per Section 8.6.3 - Wall Signs, 180 square feet of wall signage is permitted. 180 square feet of signage is proposed. 10. Completeness If the Zoning Board of Appeals requires additional information to determine whether the applicant’s development requests comply with the applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance, they may direct the applicant to furnish additional information and evidence that may provide clarity regarding their concerns. The case may also be continued if the board determines that it lacks complete information needed to make an informed recommendation. 11. Findings Per Section 11.4.8. – Review and Approval Criteria: No Special Use may be recommended for approval or approved unless the respective review or decision-making body determines that the proposed Special Use is consistent with and in substantial compliance with all village board policies and plans and that the applicant has presented evidence to support each of the following conclusions for both Special Uses that they are requesting: a. That the proposed use or activity is expressly authorized as a Special Use; Petitioner’s Response: The activity is expressly authorized as special use. b. That the proposed use at the proposed location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or a facility that is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community; Petitioner’s Response: This activity is in the interest of public use and convenience. 6 Page 107 of 128  c. That the proposed use will not, in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be injurious to property values or improvements in the vicinity. Petitioner’s Response: The use will not be detrimental to health. d. That approval of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; Petitioner’s Response: The special use will not impede development of surrounding properties. e. That the proposed Special Use will be served by adequate utilities, access roads, parking, drainage and other important and necessary facilities, infrastructure, and community services; and Petitioner’s Response: Usage will be supported by adequate utilities and infrastructure. f. That the proposed Special Use complies with all applicable regulations of this zoning ordinance except as expressly approved in accordance with the procedures of this zoning ordinance. Petitioner’s Response: The special use complies w regulations, except for those requested in this application. Notification Legal Notice was published in the Daily Herald on May 28th, 2026, a sign placed on the subject property, and notifications sent to property owners within a 250.0-foot-radius of the subject property in advance of the Public Hearing. Sample Motion Should the Board recommend approval of Case ZBA 26-11, staff suggests the following motion and conditions: Motion to recommend approval of a Special Use permit for a Planned Unit Development to construct an addition to and renovate an existing building to establish a restaurant, with waivers to Section 4.4.2 for impervious coverage and façade transparency, Section 4.5.5 for blank walls, Section 4.6.2 for parapet wall height, and Section 7.2 for minimum parking ratios, for the property commonly known as 5 W. Park Blvd., subject to the following conditions: 1) The proposed site developments shall be in accordance with the plans submitted by the petitioner in the Variation Application received 4/1/2026. 2) The petitioner shall file all necessary plans and applications, for review and approval, and secure all necessary building permits prior to the commencement of installation. 3) The petitioner shall submit all required permit materials and meet all applicable code requirements and standards for dwelling units such as natural light and ventilation requirements for the existing residential dwellings at the Subject Property. 4) Prior to filing any Building Permit Application, the petitioner shall provide the Village with a Landscape Plan identifying areas for open lot landscaping and plantings consistent with discussion with the Zoning Board of Appeals, as determined by the Director of Community and Economic Development and Chairperson of the Zoning Board of Appeals. If such designs are deemed to be inconsistent with the direction provided by the Zoning Board of Appeals, then the petitioner will be required to file an application for an amendment to the Special Use Permit. 5) Vehicles shall be prohibited from driving across the designated pedestrian way along the north façade of the existing building and deliveries to the existing garage serving the existing salon business (and any future users of the space) must be made from the parking lot. 7 Page 108 of 128  6) Prior to filing any Building Permit Application, the petitioner shall provide the Village with final elevations and material specifications for review and approval. Final elevations and materials must be deemed consistent with the approved elevations and materials, as determined by the Director of Community and Economic Development and Chairperson of the Zoning Board of Appeals. If such designs are deemed to be inconsistent with the approved plans or if materials are deemed to be of a lower quality than the approved materials, then the petitioner will be required to file an application for an amendment to the Special Use Permit. 7) Prior to filing any Building Permit Application, the petitioner shall provide the Village a Lighting Plan that includes lighting for the parking lot for review and approval by the Director of Community and Economic Development and Chairperson of the Zoning Board of Appeals. If such designs are deemed to be inconsistent with the direction provided by the Zoning Board of Appeals, then the petitioner will be required to file an application for an amendment to the Special Use Permit. Final Plans and Supporting Documents for ZBA-26-11, 5 W. Park Blvd. PUD A. Zoning Board of Appeals Application, submitted by Ethan Coleman, received 4-1-26 B. 5 W Park- Tax Bill, submitted by Ethan Coleman, received 4-1-26 C. Legal Description, submitted by Ethan Coleman, received 4-1-26 D. A1 Site Plan, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 3-27-26 E. A2 Floor Plan, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 3-27-26 F. A3 Elevations, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 3-27-26 G. Model Views, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 3-27-26 H. Plat of Survey, prepared by Edward J. Molloy & Associates, 8-15-2025 I. Affidavit of Ownership, submitted by Ethan Coleman, dated 4-6-26 J. A1 Site Plan, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 5-11-26 K. A2 Floor Plan, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 5-11-26 L. A3 Elevations, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 5-11-26 M. Model Views, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 5-11-26 N. ZBA Comments Response 1, prepared by SSL Architects, dated 5-11-26 O. Abet MEG Panels, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 P. Exterior Soffit Lights, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 Q. MEG Panels EF System, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 R. A1 Site Plan, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 S. A2 Floor Plan, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 T. A3 Elevations, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 U. Aerial Map, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 V. Model Views, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 W. PUD Application, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 X. ZBA Comments Response 2, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 Y. Cast Stone Samples, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-3-26 Z. Response to Staff Report Questions, submitted by Ethan Coleman, received 6-4-26 AA. Exterior Cladding Sample Projects, submitted by SSL Architects, received 6-5-26 8 Page 109 of 128  4 20 6 L C E NTRA E M X - T BL BL TR AL W CEN 326 TH IR IE PA PRA 10 RK BL E PA BL AR K 3 WP 1 9 327 M X - 2 7 5 S ARDMORE AV 329 5-1 331-A 5-2 5-3 331-B 11 332 15 17 333 334 1/2 335 M X - T Zoning Districts Zoning Districts 334 RS-10 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 10,000 Sq. Ft. 336 337 RS-7.5 - Residential Single-Dwelling District - 7,500 Sq. Ft. RD-7.5 - Residential Duplex District - 7,500 Sq. Ft.. 338 RM-9 - Residential Multi-Unit District - 9,000 Sq. Ft. O-R - Office Research District 340 C-1 - Convenience Business District C-2 - Neighborhood Business District C-3 - Service Business District 341 MX-1 - Mixed-Use TOD District ¯ 353 MX-2 - Mixed-Use Main Street District MX-3 - Mixed-Use Corridor District MX-2 355 MX-T - Mixed Transitional (Office-Residential) District 350 24 20 357 6 MX-R1 - Mixed Residential District 1 M MX-R2 X - Mixed- Residential R 2District 2 M-1 - Light Industrial District M-2 - General Industrial District E HIGHLAND AV W HIGHLAND AV PI-1 - Neighborhood-scale Institutional and Public District PI-2 - Campus-scale Institutional and Public District P.U.D.-R - Planned Unit Development Residential 0 1530 60 90 120 Feet P.U.D.-C - Planned Unit Development Commercial P.U.D.-I - Planned Unit Development Industrial R S - 7 . 5 Page 110 of 128 N Page 111 of 128  Job Name : Sheet Number : 4 West Adams Street Villa Park . IL 60181 Phone : 630.247.5088 Job No. : Job Date : of sheets www.sslarchs.com Page 112 of 128  Job Name : Sheet Number : 4 West Adams Street Villa Park . IL 60181 Phone : 630.247.5088 Job No. : Job Date : of sheets www.sslarchs.com Page 113 of 128  Job Name : Sheet Number : 4 West Adams Street Villa Park . IL 60181 Phone : 630.247.5088 Job No. : Job Date : of sheets www.sslarchs.com Page 114 of 128 Page 115 of 128 Page 116 of 128 Page 117 of 128 Page 118 of 128 Page 119 of 128 Page 120 of 128 Page 121 of 128 Page 122 of 128 Page 123 of 128 Page 124 of 128 Page 125 of 128  Project name: Fixture type: Date: 5" or 6" Round LED Adjustable Gimbal Insert ELCO Lighting's inserts are engineered with energy-efficient LED technology that produces even illumination with an incredible 93+ CRI. Designed to be used for New Construction, Remodel, and Retrofit applications, these inserts are rated for a life of 50,000 hours, and meet the Title 24 and Energy Star requirements. Suitable for IC and Non-IC housings manufactured by ELCO or others. Features Specifications Options Fits ELCO 5" and 6′′ Dedicated LED Recessed Housings, Wattage 13W Regular and Shallow. Lumens 1000 lm Die-Cast construction provides lasting durability. 25° Tilt, 358° rotation. Voltage 120V Energy Star Certified. Color Temp. 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, Title 24 JA8-2019 Compliant. 4000K, 5000K Life Span of 50,000 hours L70. Black Bronze Dimmable Triac/ELV Lamp Type LED Beam Angle 60º EL616CT3 CRI 90+ Power Factor >0.9 Damp Location Listed Technical Details Optics: Frosted polycarbonate lens diffuses light evenly throughout while reducing glare with LED Array technology. Construction: For use in IC and non-IC housings. Spun Aluminum for greater heat dissipation. High quality powder coat finish preventing rust and paint cracking. Installation: : Includes PSA30 medium base adapter for retrofitting existing housings. Quick connect for use with ELCO housings EL570ICA, EL570RICA, EL56FICA, EL560ICA, EL560RICA, EL770ICA, EL770RICA, EL760ICA, EL616CT5 EL760RICA, EL76FICA. Can be used in IC and non-IC housings. Electrical: Driver connects to 120V power supply. High Efficiency driver with a power factor > 0.9. Start time of less than .75 seconds. LED Technology: Extremely accurate color rendering with 93+ CRI. Lumen Maintaince of 50,000 hours L70 Life based on LM80 standardized test results. Superior Thermal Management by utilizing integral heat sink. Instant On to Full Brightness. No LED pixelation. Dimmability: Works with 120V Triac and ELV type dimmers. Dims down to 10%. For full list of dimmers refer to the Dimmer Compatibility List. Listings: UL Listed for Damp Location. RoHS Compliant. ENERGY STAR® Certified. Title 24 JA8-2019 Compliant. Product Number Warranty: ELCO Products are built to last with a 5-year Limited Warranty. Lamp Beam Item Lumens CCT Watts Voltage Dimming Finish type Angle 2700K, 3000K, EL616CT5B LED 1000 lm 3500K, 13W 120V Triac/ELV 60º Black 4000K, 5000K 2042 E. Vernon Ave., Vernon, CA 90058 • Tel (323) 231-2600 Fax (323) 231-3200 • elcolighting.com © ELCO Lighting 2022. All rights reserved • Rev. 26 May 2022 • ELCO Lighting reserves the right to make specification and design changes without notice. Page 1 of 3 Page 126 of 128 Product Number Builder Example: EL616CT3W 6" LED Gimbal Insert Color Temp. Finish EL616 CT3 2700K, 3000K, 3500K W White CT5 2700K - 5000K B Black BZ Bronze 2042 E. Vernon Ave., Vernon, CA 90058 • Tel (323) 231-2600 Fax (323) 231-3200 • elcolighting.com © ELCO Lighting 2022. All rights reserved • Rev. 26 May 2022 • ELCO Lighting reserves the right to make specification and design changes without notice. Page 2 of 3 Page 127 of 128 2042 E. Vernon Ave., Vernon, CA 90058 • Tel (323) 231-2600 Fax (323) 231-3200 • elcolighting.com © ELCO Lighting 2022. All rights reserved • Rev. 26 May 2022 • ELCO Lighting reserves the right to make specification and design changes without notice. Page 3 of 3 Page 128 of 128