Planning & Zoning Commission
Regular MeetingWestmont, IL · May 13, 2026
Minutes
Village of Westmont
Planning & Zoning Commission
May 13, 2026 - Approved Minutes
TheVillageofWestmontPlanningandZoningCommissionhelditsregularmeetingonWednesday,May
13,2026,at6:00p.m.,attheWestmontVillageHalllocatedat31W.QuincyStreet,Westmont,Illinois,
60559.
1. Call to Order
Chair Doug Carmichael called the meeting to orderat6:00 PM.
2. Roll Call
Present: 7 -Chair Doug Carmichael, Secretary Jill Peterson, Commissioners Dan Charleston,
Conor Donoghue, Michael Lynn, John F. Simpson IV, Craig Thomas
Absent: 0
A QUORUM WAS PRESENT TO TRANSACT BUSINESS
Staff:Scott Williams (Senior Planner), Adam Walsh(Planner), John Zemenak (Village Attorney)
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Swearing-in of testifying attendees
5. Reminder to silence all electronic devices
6. Reminder to sign-in for any public testimony
7. Approval of the Minutes of the March 11, 2026, regular meeting.
MOTIONbySimpsonto approve the regular meeting minutesfrom March 11, 2026.
Seconded byCharleston.
DISCUSSION:
CommissionerLynnexplainedhisrationaleforhisvotesonthefirestation’sapprovalsfromtheprevious
meeting,notingthathedidnotmeantovote“no”ontheComprehensivePlanamendmentrequest.John
Zemenak,VillageAttorney,explainedthatthevotescannotbechanged,butthismeeting’sminutescan
reflect his sentiments.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
8. Review of Public Hearing Procedures
1
9. Old Business
None.
10.New Business
PUBLIC HEARING PZC 009-2026
Request from Richard and Carol Barclay for the property at 326 South Washington Street, Westmont,
Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1) Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum lot coverage in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential
District for a deck and pool.
Presentation:
Richard Barclay, petitioner, presented the request. Barclay submitted to the Commission, through staff, a
list of signatures from neighbors supporting the requested variance. Scott Williams, Senior Planner,
explained that the list of signatures can be accepted, but it is not the same as sworn testimony provided
in-person at the meeting.
Staff Comment:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.
Public Comment:
Wayne David, neighboring property owner, spoke in support of the requested variance, and voiced
concerns about property maintenance conditions of other properties in the neighborhood.
Commissioner Comments:
Thomas:Commissioner Thomas had initial concerns aboutwater, but were resolved after reading the
staff report.
Lynn:Commissioner Lynn asked about the status offuture text amendments to lot coverage. Williams
explained that the staff presented potential changes to the Community Development Committee, and
received a positive recommendation to move forward with amendments in the future.
Lynn asked if the engineers required any stormwater improvements like a drywell. Williams replied no.
Lynn, Barclay, and Williams discussed the footprint of the deck. Lynn and Williams discussed the future
alley improvements
Donoghue:Commissioner Donoghue confirmed with Barclaythat the deck is above ground.
Simpson:Commissioner Simpson recommended that ifthe pool and or deck are removed, they cannot
be replaced with other improvements.
Charleston:Commissioner Charleston recognized thatlot coverage was calculated differently, and
asked what it may have been calculated when the home was reconstructed in 1998. Williams, and Adam
Walsh, Planner, explained the history of the lot coverage amendments.
2
Charleston supported Simpson’s recommended condition of approval.
Peterson:Secretary Peterson voiced concerns aboutsetting precedence if the variance is approved.
Barclay responded that each variance should be reviewed individually.
Peterson recommended the neighbor contact the Code Enforcement Division regarding potential
property violations.
Lynn agreed with Peterson about concerns of setting precedence. Lynn voiced concerns about
discounting permeable materials from lot coverage.
Carmichael:Chair Carmichael shared concerns aboutsetting precedence.
Carmichael allowed for a member of the public to approach the podium to provide comments.
John Savoia, neighboring property owner, spoke in favor of the variance.
MOTION 1
MotionbySimpsontorecommendtotheVillageBoardofTrusteestoapprovearequestfromRichard
andCarolBarclayforthepropertyat326SouthWashingtonStreet,Westmont,Illinois,60559,for
a Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum lot coverage in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential
District for a deck and pool.
Seconded byDonoghue.
DISCUSSION:
The Commission discussed amending the motion to approve a lotcoveragevariance,providedthatin
theeventthatthedeckandpoolarenotutilizedinthefuture,theallowedlotcoveragevariancereverts
back to the existing legal nonconforming lot coverage.
WilliamsandZemenakfurtherclarifiedthatstaffcanfinetunethewordingofconditionsintheordinance,
if approved by the Village Board.
VOTING ON AMENDING THE MOTION:
Ayes: 6 -Carmichael, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Abstain:1 -Peterson
Motion Passed
3
AMENDED MOTION 1
Motion by Thomas to recommend to the Village BoardofTrusteestoapprovearequestfromRichard
and Carol Barclay for the property at 326 South Washington Street, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for a
Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum lot coverage in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential
District for a deck and pool, as amended.
Seconded byDonoghue.
VOTING ON THE AMENDED MOTION:
Ayes: 4 -Charleston, Donoghue, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 2 -Carmichael, Lynn
Abstain:1 -Peterson
Motion Passed
Walsh explained the voting, stating that four positivevotesisapositiverecommendationtotheVillage
Board.
PUBLIC HEARING PZC 017-2026
Request from Hinsdale Mahjong Society, LLC, d/b/a HMS Mahjong Society (Petitioner), and Westmont
Downtown LLC (Owner) for the property at 10 West Burlington Avenue, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the
following:
1) Special Use Permit to operate an Indoor Other Participant Entertainment business in the B-1
Downtown Edge District.
Presentation:
Angel Leveston, petitioner, presented the request.
Staff Comment:
Adam Walsh, Planner, presented the staff report.
Public Comment:
Ashley Cirillo, Westmont resident, spoke in support of the request.
Commissioner Comments:
Lynn:Lynn and Leveston discussed how mahjong is played.Lynn asked if gambling is associated with
the business, to which Leveston replied no.
Donoghue:Donoghue asked how private events will operate.Leveston explained it would be for
mahjong-related events.
Carmichael:Carmichael expressed support for the request.
4
Peterson:Peterson voiced support for the request.Peterson and Leveston discussed how the studio will
be staffed.
Charleston:Charleston commented on the availabilityof parking.
Thomas:Thomas and Leveston discussed nearby parkingoptions.
MOTION 1
MotionbySimpsontorecommendtotheVillageBoardofTrusteestoapprovearequestfromHinsdale
MahjongSociety,LLC,d/b/aHMSMahjongSociety(Petitioner),andWestmontDowntownLLC(Owner)
for the property at 10 WestBurlingtonAvenue,Westmont,Illinois,60559,foraSpecialUsePermitto
operate an Indoor Other Participant Entertainment business in the B-1 Downtown Edge District.
Seconded byDonoghue.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
PUBLIC HEARING PZC 008-2026
Request from Tesla, Inc. (Petitioner), and Ogden Avenue LLC (Owner) for the property at 50 West Ogden
Avenue, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1) Special Use Permit amendment to allow modified operations and conditions for an existing
Vehicle Sales or Rentals business engaged in vehicle sales and minor vehicle repair and
maintenance in the B-2 General Business District.
Presentation:
Amina Taj and Zak Berta, on behalf of Tesla, Inc., presented the request. Taj explained the steps Tesla
Inc. has taken since receiving a special use permit violation notice.
Staff Comment:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Zemenak provided context on the Special Use
Permit request and the recommended conditions.
Public Comment:
Patsy Albrecht, neighboring property owner, raised concerns regarding the maintenance of the detention
area and asked if the parking lot will be extended. Williams replied that no structures are proposed to be
extended into the detention area. Berta responded that they will work on continuing maintenance of the
detention area.
5
Commissioner Comments:
Lynn:Lynn asked how many vehicles were sold at thedealership. Berta responded that he cannot
provide that information, as Tesla, Inc. is a publicly traded company. Williams and Carmichael added that
sales tax information is not a factor in their determination.
Simpson:Simpson asked for clarification on the conditionprohibiting body and paint work. Williams
explained the petitioner currently does not offer that service and will continue not to.
Carmichael:Carmichael asked how many vehicles couldbe serviced at a time. Berta replied eight to
ten. Taj explained that the service volume will remain the same as it currently is.
MOTION 1
MotionbySimpsontorecommendtotheVillageBoardofTrusteestoapprovearequestfromTesla,Inc.
(Petitioner), and Ogden Avenue LLC (Owner) for the property at 50 West Ogden Avenue, Westmont,
Illinois, 60559, for aSpecialUsePermitamendmenttoallowmodifiedoperationsandconditions
for an existing Vehicle Sales or Rentals business engaged in vehicle sales and minor vehicle
repair and maintenance in the B-2 General Business District.
Seconded byThomas.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
PUBLIC HEARING PZC 013-2026
Request from the Village of Westmont, for the following:
1) Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to Chapter 95 - Zoning, of the Westmont Code of
Ordinances, Section 6.01, regarding the addition of Video Gaming, Accessory as a permitted use
in the B-1(A) Downtown Core and B-1 Downtown Edge District.
2) Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to Chapter 95 - Zoning, of the Westmont Code of
Ordinances, Section 6.04, regarding the deletion of certain supplemental use regulations for
Video Gaming, Accessory.
Presentation:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the request and staff report. Williams clarified that the
proposed text amendments would allow accessory video gaming as a permitted use in the B-1(A) and
B-1 districts, and that new video gaming cafes would continue to be prohibited.
Carmichael asked if a business sells, may the new owner continue to operate accessory video gaming.
6
Zemenak explained that the liquor licenses are not transferable.
Public Comment:
None.
Commissioner Comments:
Lynn:Lynn confirmed that the proposed amendmentsdo not affect liquor license regulations. Williams
replied yes, explaining businesses must still request a liquor license from the Village Board.
Charleston:Charleston and Zemenak discussed how liquorlicenses are affected when a business sells
to a new owner.
Lynn and Zemenak discussed how liquor licenses are requested when the cap is reached.
MOTION 1
Motion by Charleston to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from the
Village of Westmont for Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to Chapter 95 - Zoning, of the
WestmontCodeofOrdinances,Section6.01,regardingtheadditionofVideoGaming,Accessory
as a permitted use in the B-1(A) Downtown Core and B-1 Downtown Edge District.
Seconded bySimpson.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
MOTION 2
Motion by Donoghue to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from the
Village of Westmont for Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to Chapter 95 - Zoning, of the
Westmont CodeofOrdinances,Section6.04,regardingthedeletionofcertainsupplementaluse
regulations for Video Gaming, Accessory.
Seconded bySimpson.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
7
PZC 021-2025
Request from 5628 SOUTH CASS LLC for the property at 5628 South Cass Avenue, Westmont, Illinois,
60559, for the following:
1) Major Site Plan approval for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4) dwellings in the R-4 General
Residential District.
Presentation:
Ashraf Darwish, petitioner, and Majdi Darwish, architect, presented the request.
Staff Comment:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Comments:
Lynn:Lynn asked for clarification about the interiorside yard setback. Williams replied it is 10 feet. Lynn
asked if floor plans were provided. Darwish displayed the floor plan and Williams explained that floor
plans are not adopted as a part of site plan approval. Lynn and the Darwishes discussed the building
materials and building orientation.
Peterson:Peterson expressed support for the development.
Carmichael:Carmichael voiced support for the development.
Charleston:Charleston asked if the building willbe on one parcel identification number (PIN) number.
Williams explained the development will likely utilize a condominium plat, which is handled at the time of
permitting.
Carmichael asked how the property will be addressed. Walsh answered that it will be addressed off Cass
Avenue, and will work the petitioner prior to submitting for permits.
Carmichael and the Darwishes discussed fire code requirements.
Donoghue:Donoghue asked if vehicles could park directlyin front of the garage. Darwish replied that it
will not be allowed.
MOTION 1
Motion by Thomas to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from 5628
SOUTH CASS LLC for the property at 5628 South Cass Avenue,Westmont,Illinois,60559,forMajor
Site Plan for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4) dwellings in the R-4 General Residential
District.
Seconded byDonoghue.
8
DISCUSSION:
Zemenak clarified that the item is not a public hearing, so an opportunity for public comment is not
required. Carmichael offered an opportunity for the public to comment.
Laurel Rugen, Westmont resident, raised concerns about the proposed development changing the
character of the Village.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
PZC 006-2026
Request from Sonja Smilga for the property at 1351 South Ridge Road, Willowbrook, Illinois, 60527 (PIN:
09-22-103-039) for the following:
1) Preliminary Plan of Subdivision for one (1) lot in the R-1(A) Single-Unit Residential District.
Presentation:
Ellen K. Raymond, representing the petitioner, presented the request.
Staff Comment:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Williams confirmed that though the property
has a Willowbrook zipcode, it is under the Village of Westmont’s jurisdiction.
Commissioner Comments:
Lynn:Lynn and Williams confirmed all minimum lotrequirements in the zoning district are met and that
utilities should be available near the subject property.
Charleston:Charleston confirmed the goal of the subdivisionis for a new home to be built. Williams
replied yes, after the preliminary plan and final plat of subdivision are approved by the Village Board.
MOTION 1
Motion bySimpsonto recommend to the Village Boardof Trustees to approve a request from.
Seconded byLynn.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
9
PZC 010-2026
Request from 814 CRE, LLC (Petitioner), and Encore CW, LLC (Owner) for the property at 6120 South
Cass Avenue, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1) Major Site Plan for a Daycare Center in the C-1 Commercial District.
Presentation:
Mark Kellenberger, petitioner, presented the request.
Kellenberger and Carmichael discussed the routes vehicles would access the site when coming from
different directions.
Staff Comment:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Williams discussed the two traffic flows
options, one that the petitioner prefers and one that staff prefers, as well as other conditions to allow staff
to work with the petitioner regarding the location of the freestanding sign and the reducing potential
conflicts with the fire truck turning radius to the south of the proposed building.
Commissioner Comments:
Charleston:Charleston asked for clarification onthe flow of the rear access points. Kellenberger
explained the west access point will allow two-way traffic, and the eastern point will be for in-bound traffic
only.
Charleston asked if the daycare will have directional signage. Williams explained that staff has
recommended it, but requires the northern neighbor’s approval.
Lynn:Lynn asked who owned the properties. Williamsanswered that both properties are owned by the
Encore Car Wash. Kellenberger explained the logistics of the access road easement, and that the
daycare is the contract purchaser of the subject property.
Lynn asked if installing parking along the access road was considered. Kellenberger replied yes, but did
not feel it would be the pest option.
Lynn expressed concerts about the clockwise traffic flow and maneuverability of the western parking lot.
Simpson:Simpson questioned if in the counterclockwiseflow, how parents would know if the eastern
spaces are available, which could also create conflicts.
Williams and Kellenberger discussed potential cross-access points, noting it is not a requirement.
Donoghue:Donoghue raised concerns about the visibilityat the northern access point to 61st Street.
Lynn provided a suggestion to amend the building orientation to potentially avoid conflicts with the
access road and parking lots. Kellenberger replied that the proposed site plan has been discussed with
the petitioner for two years on their preferred plan.
10
Lynn asked if multiple cross-access points could be provided to each parking lot. Kellenberger responded
that these access points cannot be guaranteed.
Lynn, Kellenberger, and Williams discussed potential alterations to the existing detention facility.
Williams and Carmichael discussed the orientation of the parking lots.
Simpson asked if the pork chop turn exists currently. Williams replied yes. Simpson presented a scenario
regarding vehicle stacking spilling onto Cass Avenue and alternative parking layouts.
The commission and Kellenberger discussed the possibility of re-orienting the building, and potentially
continuing the request.
MOTION 1
Motion bySimpsontocontinue the request to the regularmeeting on June 10, 2025 at 6:00 p.m.
Seconded byThomas.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
PZC 011-2026
Request from the Karen Bailey Meyer Trust and David P. Meyer Trust for the property at 300 West 60th
Street, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60516, for the following:
1) Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to subdivide one (1) lot into two (2) lots in the R-3 Single-Unit
Residential District.
Presentation:
Eric Bailey, representing the petitioners, presented the request.
Staff Comment:
Adam Walsh, Planner, presented the staff report. Walsh confirmed that though the property has a
Downers Grove zipcode, it is under the Village of Westmont’s jurisdiction.
Commissioner Comments:
Carmichael:Carmichael asked if any existing drivewaywill be retained. Bailey replied no.
11
MOTION 1
Motion byCharlestonto recommend to the Village Boardof Trustees to approve a request from.
Seconded bySimpson.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 -Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
11.Open Forum
Nobody spoke during the Open Forum.
12.Miscellaneous Items
Carmichael and Peterson commended staff on their preparation for the meeting.
a. Downtown Rezonings Update
Walsh notified the commission that rezonings in the downtown area are scheduled for the next
regular meeting. Walsh explained that there is an informational webpage on the Village’s website
that the commissioners and public are encouraged to review.
b. Next regular Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on June 10, 2026
Williams stated that in addition to the rezonings, there are potentially five cases scheduled.
c. Potential Special Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Williams explained that a special meeting may be scheduled in late June or early July, depending
on if cases are ready or not.
13.Adjourn
Motion byThomasto adjourn the meeting.
Second bySimpson.
The motion carried on a unanimous voice vote.
Meeting adjourned at 9:13 p.m.
12
Agenda
LEGAL NOTICE / PUBLIC NOTICE
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
The Village of Westmont Planning and Zoning Commission will hold its regular meeting
on Wednesday, May 13, 2026 at 6:00 PM, at the Village of Westmont, 31 W. Quincy St.,
Westmont, IL 60559.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Swearing-in of testifying attendees
5. Reminder to Silence All Electronic Devices
6. Reminder to Sign-In for Any Public Testimony
7. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of the Minutes of the March 11, 2026 Regular Meeting.
8. Review of Public Hearing Procedures
9. Old Business
10. New Business
a. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 009-2026
A request from Richard and Carol Barclay, for the property at 326 South
Washington Street, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the following:
1. Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum lot coverage in the R-3
Single-Unit Residential District for a deck and pool.
b. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 017-2026
A request from Hinsdale Mahjong Society, LLC, d/b/a HMS Mahjong Society
(Petitioner), and Westmont Downtown LLC (Owner) for the property at 10
West Burlington Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the following:
1. Special Use Permit to operate an Indoor Other Participant Entertainment
business (mahjong studio) in the B-1 Downtown Edge District.
c. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 008-2026
A request from Tesla, Inc. (Petitioner), and Ogden Avenue LLC (Owner) for
the property at 50 West Ogden Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the
following:
1. Special Use Permit amendment to allow modified operations and
conditions for an existing Vehicle Sales or Rentals business engaged in
vehicle sales and minor vehicle repair and maintenance in the B-2 General
Business District.
d. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 013-2026
Requests from Village of Westmont for the following:
1. Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the
Westmont Code of Ordinances, Section 6.01, regarding the addition of
Video Gaming, Accessory as a permitted use in the B-1(A) Downtown Core
and B-1 Downtown Edge Zoning Districts.
2. Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the
Westmont Code of Ordinance, Section 6.04, regarding the deletion of
certain supplemental use regulations for Video Gaming, Accessory.
e. PZC 021-2025
A request from 5628 SOUTH CASS LLC for the property at 5628 South Cass
Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the following:
1. Major Site Plan Approval for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4)
dwellings, in the R-4 General Residence Zoning District.
f. PZC 006-2026
A request from Sonja Smilga, for the property at 1351 South Ridge Road,
Willowbrook, Illinois 60527 (PIN: 09-22-103-039) for the following.
1. Preliminary Plan of Subdivision for one (1) lot in the R-1(A) Single-Unit
Residential District.
g. PZC 010-2026
A request from 814 CRE, LLC (Petitioner) and Encore CW, LLC (Owner) for the
property at 6120 South Cass Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the
following:
1. Major Site Plan approval for a Daycare Center in the C-1 Commercial
Zoning District.
h. PZC 011-2026
A request from the Karen Bailey Meyer Trust and the David P. Meyer Trust for
the property at 300 West 60th Street, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60516, for the
following:
1. Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to subdivide one (1) lot into two (2) lots
in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential District.
11. Open Forum
The public comment rules and procedures are set forth in Chapter 2, Section 2-66
of the Westmont Code of Ordinances. Public comment is allowed for matters of
public concern that are not on the agenda. Public comment is limited to 3 minutes
per speaker.
12. Miscellaneous
a. General Updates
1. Next Regular PZC Meeting on June 10, 2026.
13. Adjourn
Note: Any person who has a disability requiring a reasonable accommodation to
participate in the meeting should contact the ADA Compliance Officer, 9:00 A.M. to 4:00
P.M. Monday through Friday, Village of Westmont, Illinois, 60559; or telephone (630)
981-6210 voice, within a reasonable time before the meeting. Listen Everywhere, an
assistive listening, mobile app, is now available to visitors attending Board and
Commission Meetings held in the Village Hall Board Room.
https://westmont.illinois.gov/581/ADA-Listen-Everywhere
Packet
LEGAL NOTICE / PUBLIC NOTICE
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
The Village of Westmont Planning and Zoning Commission will hold its regular meeting
on Wednesday, May 13, 2026 at 6:00 PM, at the Village of Westmont, 31 W. Quincy St.,
Westmont, IL 60559.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Swearing-in of testifying attendees
5. Reminder to Silence All Electronic Devices
6. Reminder to Sign-In for Any Public Testimony
7. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of the Minutes of the March 11, 2026 Regular Meeting.
8. Review of Public Hearing Procedures
9. Old Business
10. New Business
a. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 009-2026
A request from Richard and Carol Barclay, for the property at 326 South
Washington Street, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the following:
1. Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum lot coverage in the R-3
Single-Unit Residential District for a deck and pool.
b. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 017-2026
A request from Hinsdale Mahjong Society, LLC, d/b/a HMS Mahjong Society
(Petitioner), and Westmont Downtown LLC (Owner) for the property at 10
West Burlington Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the following:
1. Special Use Permit to operate an Indoor Other Participant Entertainment
business (mahjong studio) in the B-1 Downtown Edge District.
c. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 008-2026
A request from Tesla, Inc. (Petitioner), and Ogden Avenue LLC (Owner) for
the property at 50 West Ogden Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the
Page 1 of 261
following:
1. Special Use Permit amendment to allow modified operations and
conditions for an existing Vehicle Sales or Rentals business engaged in
vehicle sales and minor vehicle repair and maintenance in the B-2 General
Business District.
d. PUBLIC HEARING PZC 013-2026
Requests from Village of Westmont for the following:
1. Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the
Westmont Code of Ordinances, Section 6.01, regarding the addition of
Video Gaming, Accessory as a permitted use in the B-1(A) Downtown Core
and B-1 Downtown Edge Zoning Districts.
2. Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the
Westmont Code of Ordinance, Section 6.04, regarding the deletion of
certain supplemental use regulations for Video Gaming, Accessory.
e. PZC 021-2025
A request from 5628 SOUTH CASS LLC for the property at 5628 South Cass
Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the following:
1. Major Site Plan Approval for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4)
dwellings, in the R-4 General Residence Zoning District.
f. PZC 006-2026
A request from Sonja Smilga, for the property at 1351 South Ridge Road,
Willowbrook, Illinois 60527 (PIN: 09-22-103-039) for the following.
1. Preliminary Plan of Subdivision for one (1) lot in the R-1(A) Single-Unit
Residential District.
g. PZC 010-2026
A request from 814 CRE, LLC (Petitioner) and Encore CW, LLC (Owner) for the
property at 6120 South Cass Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559 for the
following:
1. Major Site Plan approval for a Daycare Center in the C-1 Commercial
Zoning District.
h. PZC 011-2026
A request from the Karen Bailey Meyer Trust and the David P. Meyer Trust for
the property at 300 West 60th Street, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60516, for the
following:
1. Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to subdivide one (1) lot into two (2) lots
in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential District.
11. Open Forum
The public comment rules and procedures are set forth in Chapter 2, Section 2-66
of the Westmont Code of Ordinances. Public comment is allowed for matters of
public concern that are not on the agenda. Public comment is limited to 3 minutes
per speaker.
12. Miscellaneous
Page 2 of 261
a. General Updates
1. Next Regular PZC Meeting on June 10, 2026.
13. Adjourn
Note: Any person who has a disability requiring a reasonable accommodation to
participate in the meeting should contact the ADA Compliance Officer, 9:00 A.M. to 4:00
P.M. Monday through Friday, Village of Westmont, Illinois, 60559; or telephone (630)
981-6210 voice, within a reasonable time before the meeting. Listen Everywhere, an
assistive listening, mobile app, is now available to visitors attending Board and
Commission Meetings held in the Village Hall Board Room.
https://westmont.illinois.gov/581/ADA-Listen-Everywhere
Page 3 of 261
Village of Westmont
Planning & Zoning Commission
March 11, 2026 - Draft Minutes
The Village of Westmont Planning and Zoning Commission held its regular meeting on Wednesday,
March 11, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., at the Westmont Village Hall located at 31 W. Quincy Street, Westmont,
Illinois, 60559.
1. Call to Order
Chair Doug Carmichael called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
2. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Chair Doug Carmichael, Secretary Jill Peterson, Commissioners Conor Donoghue,
Michael Lynn, John F. Simpson IV, Craig Thomas
Absent: 0
Vacant: 1
A QUORUM WAS PRESENT TO TRANSACT BUSINESS
Staff: Scott Williams (Senior Planner), John Zemenak (Village Attorney)
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Swearing-in of testifying attendees
5. Swearing-in of Daniel Charleston as a new Commissioner
Chair Carmichael swore in Daniel Charleston as a Planning & Zoning Commissioner.
6. Roll Call of newly constituted Planning & Zoning Commission
Present: 7 - Chair Doug Carmichael, Secretary Jill Peterson, Commissioners Dan Charleston,
Conor Donoghue, Michael Lynn, John F. Simpson IV, Craig Thomas
Absent: 0
A QUORUM WAS PRESENT TO TRANSACT BUSINESS
Staff: Scott Williams (Senior Planner), John Zemenak (Village Attorney)
7. Reminder to silence all electronic devices
8. Reminder to sign-in for any public testimony
9. Approval of the Minutes
a. Approval of the Minutes of the February 4, 2026, special meeting and the February 11,
2026, regular meeting.
MOTION by Simpson to approve the special meeting minutes from February 4, 2026, and the regular
meeting minutes from February 11, 2026.
Seconded by Donoghue.
1
Page 4 of 261
VOTING:
Ayes: 6 - Carmichael, Peterson, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Abstain: 1 - Charleston
Motion Passed
10.Review of Public Hearing Procedures
11.Old Business
None.
12.New Business
PUBLIC HEARING PZC 005-2026
Request from Clovers Garden Center LLC, d/b/a Clovers Garden Center (Petitioner), and Suburbanite
Bowl, Inc., and Downers Grove National Trust 76-28 (Owners), for the properties at 201 and 209 West
Ogden Avenue, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1) Special Use Permit to operate an Outdoor Retail Sales business (seasonal outdoor garden
center) in the B-2 General Business District.
Presentation:
Jim Kuehnle, petitioner, presented the request, explaining the location and function of the second space.
Staff Comment:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Williams explained that the addition of the
second space triggered the requirement for a new special use permit. If approved, the special use permit
would address this new area and the existing operations.
Public Comment:
None.
Commissioner Comments:
Lynn: Commissioner Lynn asked if the greenhouse is reviewed by the Building Division. Williams
explained that the Fire Department reviews the structure at the time of permitting. Lynn, Kuehnle, and
Williams discussed how the greenhouse is constructed and permitting and inspection requirements.
Charleston: Commissioner Charleston asked how delivery vehicles access the site. Kuehnle responded
that they direct delivery vehicles to enter the parking lot from Washington Street.
Simpson: Commissioner Simpson did not have questions for the petitioner.
Donoghue: Commissioner Donoghue expressed support for the request.
2
Page 5 of 261
Thomas: Commissioner Thomas did not have objections with the new area.
Peterson: Secretary Peterson had no concerns with the request.
Carmichael: Chair Carmichael asked if the fencing around the sales area will be 5 feet or 6 feet tall.
Kuehnle answered that it would be 6 feet.
Lynn asked what would be stored in the second greenhouse. Kuenhle replied plants only.
MOTION 1
Motion by Simpson to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from Clovers
Garden Center LLC, d/b/a Clovers Garden Center (Petitioner), and Suburbanite Bowl, Inc., and Downers
Grove National Trust 76-28 (Owners), for the properties at 201 and 209 West Ogden Avenue, Westmont,
Illinois, 60559, for a Special Use Permit to operate an Outdoor Retail Sales business (seasonal
outdoor garden center) in the B-2 General Business District, subject to the conditions listed in
the staff report.
Seconded by Donoghue.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 - Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
PUBLIC HEARING PZC 004-2026
Requests from the Village of Westmont for the properties at 6015 South Cass Avenue, 6101 South Cass
Avenue, and 1000 Beninford Lane, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1) Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from General Commercial and Parks/Open Space to
Public/Semi Public;
2) Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment to rezone the properties from the R-3 Single-Unit Residential
District, the R-4 General Residential District, and the C-1 Commercial District to the P/I Public
and Institutional District;
3) Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to consolidate four (4) lots into one (1) lot;
4) Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum size, fuel type, and location of an Emergency
Generator;
5) Major Site Plan.
Presentation:
Tom Frank, Deputy Fire Chief, presented the requests. Frank explained how the project was developed,
3
Page 6 of 261
how the consultants were selected, and engagement opportunities for the neighbors, public, and Village
Board to provide feedback. Virgil Viscuso, Fleet & Facilities Supervisor, explained the variances
requested for the emergency standby generator.
Staff Comment:
Scott Williams, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Williams recommended including a condition
on the major site plan approval to allow staff to administratively make changes to the plan based on
recent Village Board direction.
Public Comment:
Wes Buege, Westmont resident, raised concerns about changes to the stormwater detention area. Frank
answered that the pond east of the station will be filled in, but will increase the volume of the other
detention areas to accommodate the change. Buege asked how the station would be financed.
Carmichael and Williams explained that the financing is outside of the scope of the Commission’s
purview. Frank briefly explained that sales tax would see a small increase, which was already approved
by the Village Board.
Ruben Romero, Westmont resident, asked about the proposed changes to the detention. Frank
explained the scope of the detention improvements.
Carmichael asked for clarification whether the detention improvements will affect the existing fencing.
Viscuso answered that the detention being filled will create a more usable yard for the neighbors.
Laurel Rugen, Westmont resident, asked if the south detention facility would be filled in. Frank and
Viscuso answered that the south facility would be deepened, and not be filled in, only the facility to the
east will be filled in.
Commissioner Comments:
Lynn: Lynn asked why diesel would be used for the generator. Viscuso explained that diesel is much
cheaper and would be available much quicker than a natural gas generator. Lynn and Viscuso discussed
the emissions, sound levels, frequency of generator testing, and setbacks from property lines.
Lynn asked if the Beninford subdivision has any covenants related to generators. Williams replied that he
is not aware of any.
Lynn questioned the ownership of the Fire Department. Williams and John Zemenak, Village Attorney,
confirmed that the Fire Department is part of the Village of Westmont. Lynn asked why the stormwater is
being consolidated with the Fire Department. Frank answered that the consolidation is per staff’s
direction and that the Fire Department uses these areas for training.
Lynn asked if the detention lots could be sold for development. Williams replied no, the detention will
remain.
Charleston: Charleston questioned including the Beninford lot in the consolidation. Williams explained
the purposes of the detention areas, noting that the detention facing Beninford is connected to the
4
Page 7 of 261
detention facing Cass Avenue.
Charleston asked how the existing generator serves the Fire Department. Viscuso explained that the
existing generator is fueled by natural gas, and could run in perpetuity, so long as natural gas is
available. Carmichael confirmed that the generator does not support the whole building.
Charleston raised concerns about the visual impacts of the generator. Jamie Zaura, 845 Design Group
(the Village’s consultant), explained that a variance for a taller fence would be required to fully screen the
generator. Frank added that landscaping will also help screen the generator.
Zemenak asked about the landscaping surrounding the generator, to which Williams clarified the
language. Williams added that the Public Works Department anticipates installing taller landscaping,
Zemenak added that can be placed as a condition of approval.
Simpson: Simpson asked about the decibel level of the existing natural gas generator. Viscuso
explained that it is much louder than the proposed diesel generator.
Simpson asked how the fencing near the fueling station would be affected. Zaura explained that the
Village will install a new 7 foot fence that would be placed on the east and north sides of the station.
Carmichael asked if the fueling station would remain. Frank replied yes.
Lynn asked about the emissions of a natural gas versus a diesel generator. Carmichael did not have a
concern with the emissions of the generator for testing and emergency purposes. Viscuso explained that
the police station at 500 North Cass Avenue has a diesel generator and they have not received
complaints about it. Frank explained why a diesel generator was chosen.
Donoghue: Donoghue asked if additional diesel fuel will be stored on-site. Viscuso explained that the
fueling station regularly gets diesel delivered to it, and it can be easily transferred to the generator.
Thomas Thomas asked what the target date for completion is. Frank replied by September 2027 if
everything goes according to plan.
Peterson: Secretary Peterson expressed support for the design of the station, asking if the existing
pergola would be retained. Frank answered that a new pergola will be constructed, but they are
evaluating the possibility of reusing the existing one elsewhere.
Peterson asked why Cass Avenue is not already striped in front of the garage bays. Frank explained that
the right-of-way is under DuPage County’s jurisdiction, and they have not been supportive of striping the
road since it is far from a signalized intersection.
Peterson asked if a line would connect the diesel at the fueling station to the generator. Viscuso replied
no, but there is a large container attached to the generator.
Carmichael: Carmichael asked about the operations of the emergency shelter. Zaura explained that
there will be one in the basement separate from the ground floor training room.
5
Page 8 of 261
Carmichael asked if anything can be added to the fence to screen the generator. Megan Harte, 845
Design Group, explained that the landscaping around the generator could grow to 15 feet in height.
Zemenak and Williams discussed adding conditions to the site plan approval to allow for revisions prior
to Village Board approval for fencing to be consistent throughout the plans.
MOTION 1
Motion by Charleston to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from the
Village of Westmont, for the properties at 6015 South Cass Avenue, 6101 South Cass Avenue, and 1000
Beninford Lane, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from General
Commercial and Park/Open Space to Public/Semi Public.
Seconded by Simpson.
VOTING:
Ayes: 6 - Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 1 - Lynn
Motion Passed
MOTION 2
Motion by Peterson to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from the Village
of Westmont, for the properties at 6015 South Cass Avenue, 6101 South Cass Avenue, and 1000
Beninford Lane, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the properties
from the R-3 Single-Unit Residential District, the R-4 General Residential District, and the C-1
Commercial District to the P/I Public and Institutional District.
Seconded by Thomas.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 - Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
MOTION 3
Motion by Simpson to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from the Village
of Westmont, for the properties at 6015 South Cass Avenue, 6101 South Cass Avenue, and 1000
Beninford Lane, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for a Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to consolidate four
(4) lots into one (1) lot.
Seconded by Donoghue.
6
Page 9 of 261
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 - Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
MOTION 4
Motion by Thomas to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from the Village
of Westmont, for the properties at 6015 South Cass Avenue, 6101 South Cass Avenue, and 1000
Beninford Lane, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for a Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum size,
fuel type, and location of an Emergency Generator.
Seconded by Peterson.
VOTING:
Ayes: 6 - Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 1 - Lynn
Motion Passed
MOTION 5
Motion by Simpson to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees to approve a request from the Village
of Westmont, for the properties at 6015 South Cass Avenue, 6101 South Cass Avenue, and 1000
Beninford Lane, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for a Major Site Plan, with the condition that staff may
modify and approve adjustments to the major site plan.
Seconded by Donoghue.
VOTING:
Ayes: 7 - Carmichael, Peterson, Charleston, Donoghue, Lynn, Simpson, Thomas
Nays: 0
Motion Passed
13.Open Forum
Nobody spoke during the Open Forum.
14.Miscellaneous Items
a. Next regular Planning & Zoning Commission on April 8th
Williams noted that there may be a light agenda or the meeting may be canceled. Williams added
that there could be an opportunity to attend a virtual Plan Commissioner training if the meeting is
canceled.
7
Page 10 of 261
b. IT Security Training
Williams notified the commissioners that there is a required IT Security Training they must
complete by March 21st.
15.Adjourn
Motion by Simpson to adjourn the meeting.
Second by Charleston.
The motion carried on a unanimous voice vote.
Meeting adjourned at 7:56 p.m.
8
Page 11 of 261
Page 12 of 261
Page 13 of 261
Page 14 of 261
Page 15 of 261
Page 16 of 261
Page 17 of 261
Page 18 of 261
Page 19 of 261
Page 20 of 261
Page 21 of 261
Page 22 of 261
Page 23 of 261
Page 24 of 261
Page 25 of 261
Page 26 of 261
Page 27 of 261
Page 28 of 261
Page 29 of 261
Page 30 of 261
Page 31 of 261
Page 32 of 261
Page 33 of 261
Page 34 of 261
Page 35 of 261
Page 36 of 261
Page 37 of 261
Page 38 of 261
Page 39 of 261
Page 40 of 261
Page 41 of 261
Page 42 of 261
Page 43 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 009-2026
TITLE: A request from Richard and Carol Barclay, for the property at 326 South Washington Street,
Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1. Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum lot coverage in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential
District for a deck and pool.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Location: 326 South Washington Street is located midblock between West Des Moines Street and
West 55th Street. The property is improved with a single-unit detached home and detached garage.
The lot is approximately 60’ by 150’, with a total area of approximately 9,000 square feet.
Aerial Map - 326 South Washington Street (source: DuPage County Parcel Viewer)
Page 44 of 261
Zoning Map - 326 South Washington Street
B. Zoning Designations:
SUBJECT PROPERTY: R-3 Single-Unit Residential District
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
North, South, East, and West: R-3 Single-Unit Residential District
C. Neighborhood Characteristics
The property is located in the Westmont Subdivision, which was recorded in 1921. This subdivision
includes an overwhelming majority of the lots in the southwest quadrant of the Village’s Downtown
area. A majority of the lots in this subdivision are around 9,000 square feet in area, except for the
lots in the western 1/3, which are around 8,400 square feet.
II. PETITIONER REQUEST:
The petitioners propose to construct a new larger deck approximately 226 square feet and a pool at
approximately 253 square feet. This construction would raise the property's lot coverage from 47%
to approximately 52.75%, which exceeds the 35% maximum allowed in the R-3 Single-Unit
Residential District for this property. Therefore, the petitioners are requesting a variance to a
maximum lot coverage of 52.75%, rounded up to 53%.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
A. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The Comprehensive Plan designates the current and future land use in this area as single-family
detached residential, with an appropriate zoning designation of R-3 Single-Unit Residential District.
This variance request does not directly conflict with either the land use plan or overall vision of the
Comprehensive Plan.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 009-2026 Page 2 of 5
Page 45 of 261
B. Entitlement Requests
The petitioners have provided project narratives and supporting documentation for the following
request, including the necessary responses to the Variance Standards. Any corresponding standards
for entitlement approval consideration can be referenced in item V(B).
● Zoning Ordinance Variance to the maximum lot coverage in the R-3 Single-Unit
Residential District for a deck.
Lot coverage is defined as the following per Chapter 95, Section 16.08:
Lot coverage: Lot coverage is measured as the percentage of a lot covered by
buildings, structures and permanent impervious surfaces.
Total lot coverage is calculated by taking the total combined footprint of these improvements, dividing
it by the total lot area, and then multiplying the result by 100 to express it as a percentage.
Chapter 95, Section 2.05 - Lot and Building Regulations
Maximum Lot Difference Difference
Existing Lot Proposed Lot
Coverage (Proposed - (Proposed -
Coverage Coverage
Permitted Existing) Permitted)
~ 53%
35%
~ 47% (rounded up from ~ 6% ~ 18%
52.75%)
3,500 ~ 4,233 ~ 4,747.74 ~ 514.59 ~ 1,247.74
Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet
The proposed deck and pool are shown to be located at the rear of the home. Due to the existing
location of the detached garage at the rear of the lot, a large portion of the backyard is covered by a
driveway that connects directly to South Washington Street rather than the unimproved alley to the
rear.
Chapter 95, Section 2.05 states that detached residences in the R-3 district have a 35% lot coverage
maximum. Additionally, if a proposed project results in lot coverage between 35% and 40%, it may
qualify for administrative approval rather than requiring a formal variance—so long as the property is
not located within a designated building moratorium area, a known drainage problem zone, or a
defined drainage sub-basin. This property is located within two sub-basins that contain low
depressional areas (LDA). The front yard of the subject property is within one LDA, while the back
half of the lot is within another larger LDA located betweenSouth Hudson Street and South Park
Street to the west. Therefore, the property is not permitted to exercise the administrative approval of
up to 40%.
The proposed deck complies with all zoning bulk and development regulations outlined in Chapter
95 - Zoning with the exception of the total lot coverage.
If the variance is approved, the Village's engineering consultant does not foresee any negative
impact on site drainage. This is because the proposed deck is classified as a pervious surface.
Additionally, the Village's Public Works Department is scheduled to improve the alleyway this year by
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 009-2026 Page 3 of 5
Page 46 of 261
adding storm sewers and pavement. These improvements will enhance drainage and are sufficient
to manage the increased impervious surfaces within this drainage sub-basin. Consequently, no
modifications to the plans have been recommended. The full engineering comments are attached to
this report.
C. Variance Standards
The Variance Standards, detailed below, must be applied to this request.
(H) Standards and Review Criteria: No variance may be approved or recommended for approval unless authorized
review and decision-making bodies have made findings of fact based upon the evidence provided by the
applicant the variance being sought satisfies each of the standards set forth in this section (Sec. 14.06(H)).
(1) Particular Hardship or Practical Difficulty: The applicant must demonstrate that requiring strict
compliance with the regulation for which a variance is sought would create a particular hardship or a
practical difficulty.
(2) Unique Physical Condition: The applicant must demonstrate that the subject property is exceptional as
compared to other lots subject to the same provision by reason of a unique physical condition, including
presence of an existing use, structure, or sign, whether conforming or nonconforming; irregular or
substandard shape or size; exceptional topographical features; or other extraordinary physical conditions
peculiar to and inherent in the subject property that amount to more than a mere inconvenience to the owner
and that relate to or arise out of the subject lot rather than the personal situation of the current owner of the
lot.
(3) Not Self-Created: The applicant must demonstrate that the unique physical condition is not the result of any
action or inaction of the owner, or of the owner's predecessors in title and known to the owner before
acquisition of the subject property, and existed at the time of the enactment of the provisions from which a
variance is sought or was created by natural forces or was the result of governmental action for which no
compensation was paid.
(4) Denied Substantial Rights: The applicant must demonstrate that requiring strict compliance with the
regulation for which a variance is sought would deprive the subject property owner of substantial rights
commonly enjoyed by owners of other lots subject to the same regulation.
(5) Not Merely Special Privilege: The applicant must demonstrate that the alleged particular hardship or
practical difficulty is not merely the inability of the owner or occupant to enjoy some special privilege or
additional right not available to owners or occupants of other lots subject to the same provision, nor merely
an inability to make more money from use of the subject property.
(6) Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan: The applicant must demonstrate that the variance would not
result in a use or development of the subject property that would not be in harmony with the general and
specific purposes of this zoning ordinance and the comprehensive plan.
(7) Essential Character of the Area: The applicant must demonstrate that the variance would not result in a
use or development of the subject property that:
(a) Would be materially detrimental to the public welfare or materially injurious to the enjoyment, use,
development, or value of property or improvements permitted in the vicinity;
(b) Would materially impair an adequate supply of light and air to the properties and improvements in
the vicinity;
(c) Would unduly increase the danger of flooding or fire;
(d) Would unduly tax public utilities, facilities, or services in the area; or
(e) Would endanger the public health or safety.
(8) No Other Remedy: The applicant must demonstrate that there is no means other than the requested
variance by which the alleged hardship or practical difficulty can be avoided or remedied to a degree
sufficient to permit a reasonable use of the subject property.
IV. SUMMARY
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 009-2026 Page 4 of 5
Page 47 of 261
The petitioners propose the construction of a new deck, expanding the size to approximately 226
square feet, and a pool of approximately 253 square feet. This proposed construction would
increase the property's lot coverage from approximately 47% to approximately 52.75%, which
exceeds the 35% maximum permitted within the R-3 Single-Unit Residential District for this property.
Consequently, the petitioners are seeking a variance to permit a maximum lot coverage of 52.75%,
rounded up to 53%.
V. LEGAL
A. Notification: A legal notice was published in Westmont Suburban Life on April 23, 2026.
B. Code References: Chapter 95, Sections 2.05 and 14.06.
C. Other Actions: The recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission will be referred to the
Village Board for a final decision, which is anticipated to be at the May 28, 2026 meeting.
VI. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Publication notice appearing in the April 23, 2026 Westmont Suburban Life.
2. Engineering PZC Review comments from EZA Engineering, dated April 28, 2026
3. Petitioner Attachments (Edited for PZC):
a. Planning and Zoning Development Application including responses to the Variance
Standards, received March 9, 2026.
b. Cover Letter
c. Site Plans
d. Pool specifications provided by Ohana.
e. Deck specification provided by Revamp.
f. Mortgage Release
g. Plat of Survey dated November 26, 2025.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 009-2026 Page 5 of 5
Page 48 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 017-2026
TITLE: Request from Hinsdale Mahjong Society, LLC, d/b/a HMS Mahjong Society (Petitioner), and
Westmont Downtown LLC (Owner) for the property at 10 West Burlington Avenue,
Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1. Special Use Permit to operate an Indoor Other Participant Entertainment business
(mahjong studio) in the B-1 Downtown Edge District.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Location: 10 West Burlington Avenue is located northwest of the intersection of Burlington Avenue
and North Cass Avenue. The subject property is about 0.33 acres in area, and is improved with a
two-story mixed-use building. The ground floor hosts a variety of commercial uses along Cass and
Burlington, with apartments on the upper story. The subject unit is located between Artistic Grooming
(dog groomer) and Escritorio Publico (office).
Aerial Map - 10 West Burlington Avenue (source: DuPage County Parcel Viewer)
Page 49 of 261
Zoning Map - 10 West Burlington Avenue
B. Zoning Designations:
SUBJECT PROPERTY B-1 Downtown Edge District
NORTH, EAST, & WEST B-1 Downtown Edge District
SOUTH R-5 General Residential District/Unzoned (Metra Station)
C. Neighborhood Characteristics
The lot is located in the A.T. McIntosh & Co.’s Fairmont Heights subdivision, which was recorded in 1920.
The lot is in the northwest corner of Cass and Burlington Avenues, at the heart of the Village’s downtown.
The subject property contains three buildings, with the subject unit being one of the westernmost units.
Most businesses facing Cass Avenue are restaurants, retail, and some office and service uses. Burlington
Avenue features many small commercial spaces, like the subject unit, typically occupied by offices or
service uses.
Street View - 10 West Burlington Avenue (source: Google Street View)
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 017-2026 Page 2 of 4
Page 50 of 261
II. PETITIONER REQUEST:
The petitioner has requested a Special Use Permit to operate HMS Mahjong Society, an indoor other
participant entertainment establishment (mahjong studio), in the B-1 Downtown Edge District.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
A. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The current zoning district of the property is B-1 Downtown Edge District, which is intended to
provide for a mix of supporting uses in the downtown area. The Comprehensive Plan designates the
future land use in this area as Downtown Mixed-Use, which should “...provide for an appropriate
variety of land uses.” The Plan further recommends that businesses near the Westmont Metra
Station should “...foster an active pedestrian oriented node.”
B. Entitlement Request
The petitioner has provided a project narrative and supporting documentation for the following
request, including the necessary responses to the Special Use Standards. Any corresponding
standards for entitlement approval consideration can be referenced in item V(B) below.
● Special Use Permit to operate an Indoor Other Participant Entertainment business in
the B-1 Downtown Edge District.
Chapter 95, Section 6.01 requires that all indoor other participant entertainment businesses obtain a
Special Use Permit in the B-1 District to assess impacts like traffic, activities, number of employees,
and operating hours.
The petitioner proposes to operate HMS Mahjong Society at 10 West Burlington Avenue. They
describe their business operations as a structured and reservation-based mahjong studio open to
players of all skill levels. The petitioner intends to lead instructional classes for beginners, multi-week
classes at various difficulty levels, and host open play events. Occasionally, the space may be
rented for small private events. Based on the floor plan submitted, the roughly 700 square foot space
can accommodate up to 20 players across five tables.
The petitioner will typically be the only employee on-site, but may occasionally have other instructors
join. The studio will host events primarily on weekday evenings from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., but will
also lead sessions on the weekend, and less classes during the weekday. Weekday sessions would
typically be held between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
In order to participate in game play events or one of the guided play sessions, one must register for
a slot ahead of time. The sessions are typically two hours long, where mahjong is played in a calm
and strategic manner. As opposed to other entertainment businesses like arcades or billiards halls,
the petitioner explains in their cover letter that the mahjong studio offers an alternative nightlife
activity that would not produce excessive noise, parking, or similar negative impacts.
Chapter 95, Section 9.04(B)(1) states that proposed uses in buildings zoned B-1 that existed before
December 17, 2020 are not required to provide off-street parking. There are multiple on-street
parking spaces available along Burlington Avenue, and the Lincoln Street public parking lot is just up
the alley from the subject property. The petitioner has provided a traffic impact statement, asserting
that the small group sizes should not overly-burden available public parking.
The use must be considered to the Special Use standards, which are listed below:
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 017-2026 Page 3 of 4
Page 51 of 261
Special Use Permit Review and Approval Criteria (Sec. 14.04(H)):
No special use may be recommended for approval or approved unless the respective review or
decision-making body determines that the proposed special use is consistent with and in substantial
compliance with all village ordinances and regulations and that the applicant has presented evidence
to support each of the following conclusions:
(1) That the proposed use or activity is expressly authorized in this zoning ordinance as a special
use;
(2) That the proposed use at the proposed location is necessary or desirable to provide a service
or a facility that is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general
welfare of the neighborhood or community;
(3) That the proposed use will not, in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be injurious to property values
or improvements in the vicinity;
(4) That approval of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;
(5) That the proposed special use will be served by adequate utilities, access roads, parking,
drainage and other important and necessary facilities, infrastructure and community services;
and
(6) That the proposed special use complies with all applicable regulations of this zoning
ordinance except as expressly approved in accordance with the procedures of this zoning
ordinance.
IV. SUMMARY
The petitioner has requested a Special Use Permit to operate HMS Mahjong Studio, an indoor other
participant entertainment business, in the B-1 Downtown Edge District. The request complies with
both the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the recommendations from the Comprehensive
Plan, and is subject to the standards of Special Use Permit approval.
V. LEGAL
A. Notification: A legal notice was published in Westmont Suburban Life on April 23, 2026.
B. Code References: Chapter 95, Sections 6.01; 14.04
C. Other Action: The recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be
referred to the Village Board for a final decision, which is anticipated to be on May 28, 2026.
VI. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Publication notice appearing in the April 23, 2026 Westmont Suburban Life.
2. Petitioner Attachments received April 9, 2026 (Edited for PZC):
a. Planning & Zoning Development Application, with responses to the Special Use Standards
b. Project Narrative
c. Proposed Floor Plan
d. Traffic Impact Statement
e. Signed Lease
f. ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 017-2026 Page 4 of 4
Page 52 of 261
Page 53 of 261
Page 54 of 261
Page 55 of 261
Page 56 of 261
Page 57 of 261
Page 58 of 261
Page 59 of 261
Page 60 of 261
Page 61 of 261
Page 62 of 261
Page 63 of 261
Page 64 of 261
Page 65 of 261
Page 66 of 261
Page 67 of 261
Page 68 of 261
Page 69 of 261
Page 70 of 261
Page 71 of 261
Page 72 of 261
Page 73 of 261
Page 74 of 261
Page 75 of 261
Page 76 of 261
Page 77 of 261
Page 78 of 261
Page 79 of 261
Page 80 of 261
Page 81 of 261
Page 82 of 261
Page 83 of 261
Page 84 of 261
Page 85 of 261
Page 86 of 261
Page 87 of 261
Page 88 of 261
Page 89 of 261
Page 90 of 261
Page 91 of 261
Page 92 of 261
Page 93 of 261
Page 94 of 261
Page 95 of 261
Page 96 of 261
Page 97 of 261
Page 98 of 261
Page 99 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 008-2026
TITLE: A request from Tesla, Inc. (Petitioner), and Ogden Avenue LLC (Owner) for the property at
50 West Ogden Avenue, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1. Special Use Permit amendment to allow modified operations and conditions for an
existing Vehicle Sales or Rentals business engaged in vehicle sales and minor vehicle
repair and maintenance in the B-2 General Business District.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Location: Situated between North Adams Street and North Lincoln Street, 50 West Ogden Avenue
covers approximately 2.85 acres and features a commercial building, a parking lot, and stormwater
management systems. The business on the property is owned and operated by Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”),
who received a special use permit in 2016 to operate an automobile dealership. This special use
permit allowed Tesla to sell new and used automobiles and to perform related automobile repair and
maintenance. Although Tesla initially operated an automobile dealership from the property that was
primarily engaged in the sale of Tesla vehicles, Tesla changed the scope of its operations in recent
years and converted it’s use of the property to a service and repair business. The property is
bordered by Ogden Lincoln of Westmont to the east and Americash Jewelry and Coin Buyers
(located in unincorporated DuPage County) to the west. Residential townhomes in the Village of
Westmont are adjacent to the north, while portions of the eastern border adjoin single-unit detached
residences within unincorporated DuPage County.
Aerial Map - 50 West Ogden Avenue (source: DuPage County Parcel Viewer)
Page 100 of 261
Zoning Map - 50 West Ogden Avenue
B. Zoning Designations:
SUBJECT PROPERTY B-2 General Business District
NORTH R-4 General Residential District
EAST Unincorporated DuPage County
WEST B-2 general Business District, R-3 Single Family Residential, and
Unincorporated DuPage County.
SOUTH B-2 General Business District
C. Neighborhood Characteristics
The lot is located in the Grant Street Resubdivision, which was recorded in 2016. The property has 2 points
for vehicular access on Ogden Avenue, and its rear yard abuts the North Grant Street Cul-de-sac. The
property includes one building, a parking lot, and a stormwater facility. Surrounding businesses in the
immediate area that front onto Ogden Avenue include a mix of restaurants, retail, office and service uses.
Street View - 50 West Ogden Avenue (source: Google Street View)
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 008-2026 Page 2 of 7
Page 101 of 261
Street View - 50 West Ogden Avenue (source: Google Street View)
II. PETITIONER REQUEST:
The petitioner requests an amendment to its Year 2016 Special Use Permit to facilitate its modified
operations as a vehicle service use, and with new and amended conditions related to its now limited
vehicle sales use within the B-2 General Business District.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
A. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The current zoning district of the property is B-2 General Business, which is intended to provide for a
mix of supporting uses in the downtown area. The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land
use in this area as Corridor Commercial, which should “... provide for businesses to both serve the
daily needs of Westmont residents as well as a destination for the larger market.” The Plan further
recommends, “Development within the Corridor Commercial areas can consist of both standalone
buildings/sites such as big box retail and auto dealers or a multitenant building in a mall or plaza.
B. Entitlement Request
The petitioner has provided a project narrative and supporting documentation for the following
request, including the necessary responses to the Special Use Standards. Any corresponding
standards for entitlement approval consideration can be referenced in item V(B) below.
● Special Use Permit amendment to allow modified operations and conditions for an
existing Vehicle Sales or Rentals business engaged in vehicle sales and minor vehicle
repair and maintenance in the B-2 General Business District.
On May 26, 2016 the Village approved a special use permit which allowed Tesla Motors, Inc. (now
Tesla, Inc.) to operate a new automobile sales dealership on the property. During the public hearing
before the Planning and Zoning Commission and during the Village Board meeting to consider
Tesla’s special use request, Tesla represented that its principal business on the property would be an
automobile dealership that sold Tesla automobiles. Tesla further represented that it would list the
Village as the point of sales for sales tax purposes for all automobile sales. Notably, the Zoning
Ordinance in effect in 2016 required a different special use permit for a business that was primarily
engaged in vehicle service and repairs. Tesla did not apply for such a special use permit, and it did
not represent that its primary business would be vehicle service and repairs. The Village’s approval
of Tesla’s special use permit for an automobile dealership was subject to the following special
conditions per Or. No. 2016-085 (attached):
A. The landscaping and fencing shown on the approved Landscaping Plan shall be
maintained at all times by Applicant or its successor in interest;
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 008-2026 Page 3 of 7
Page 102 of 261
B. No loud speakers shall be used on the Subject Property;
C. No automobile racks or other forms of elevation shall be permitted to display automobiles
for sale;
D. No streamers, balloons or other promotional devices shall be permitted upon the Subject
Property, and any owner or operator shall restrain from painting or affixing oversized
letter or numbering (such as year or price information) on the vehicles for sale, other than
standards dealer-issued stickers and information;
E. No test driving of automobiles shall be permitted on residential streets.
F. Parking and display of automobiles shall be limited in number to the parking spaces
shown on the previously-approved Site Plan of the former Lamborghini dealership upon
the Subject Property, except that Applicant may double-stack vehicle inventory along the
rear (south) line of parking stalls only.
G. Applicant shall not perform or permit an automobile body work or painting to occur on the
Subject Property.
H. No employee parking on residential or public streets is allowed in or around the area of
the dealership.
I. The primary activity of the Applicant upon the Subject Property shall be the selling and
servicing of new and used vehicles. As a condition of receiving a certificate of occupancy
from the Village for this use, the Applicant must provide proof that it has obtained an
automobile dealer new car license from the State of Illinois for the Subject Property.
J. Upon a violation of any of these special conditions, the Village shall provide notice to the
Applicant with a reasonable time period to cure the violation. In the event that Applicant
fails to timely cure the violation, or in the event there are a total of three separate
incidences of violations by Applicant of these special conditions, the Village Board shall
hold a hearing upon notice to the Applicant and an opportunity for Applicant to be heard
to determine whether this special use permit should be revoked.
Beginning in 2024, the Village observed a noticeable decline in sales tax revenues paid to the
Village from the Tesla dealership. The sales tax revenues that were paid to the Village by Tesla in
2024 and thereafter originated almost entirely from the sales of vehicle parts related to Tesla’s
vehicle service activities rather than from vehicle sales.
The Village met with Tesla in March 2025 to discuss their vehicle sales activities on the property, and
Tesla informed the Village that its business operations had shifted to a vehicle service and repair
facility, and that it was only sporadically selling new Tesla vehicles. As a result of this information, on
May 22, 2025, the Village sent the First Notice of Violation of Special Use Ordinance to Tesla
asserting that Tesla had ceased operating as a new and used automobile dealership on the
property, as its principal use, in violation of Ord. No. 2016-085 and in violation of its representations
to the Village.. Instead, Tesla’s principal use of the Property was for vehicle maintenance and
repairs. This Notice threatened that the ultimate remedy available to the Village for this violation was
the revocation of Tesla’s special use permit.
On December 3, 2025, after further discussions with Tesla, the Village sent a follow-up letter to Tesla
Motors, Inc. that detailed the special use permit amendment that was needed to resolve the violation
and to not subject Tesla to a Second Notice of Violation. The petitioner has complied with the
request and submitted a zoning application seeking an amendment to its existing special use permit
to specifically allow it to operate a vehicle service use on the property and to resume vehicle sales
operations under specified conditions.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 008-2026 Page 4 of 7
Page 103 of 261
Consistent with the Village’s 12/03/25 letter to Tesla, Village Staff recommends including the
following special conditions as part of any PZC recommendation and as part of the ordinance
considered by the Village Board:
1. Tesla must continuously keep on the property an inventory of at least ten (10) new Tesla vehicles
that it offers for sale to customers.
2. For all sales of new Tesla vehicles from the inventory kept on the property, Tesla must finalize the
sales documentation/customer payment from the Property, and it must designate/list the Village of
Westmont as the point of sales for sales tax purposes for all such vehicles that are sold.
3. Tesla must allow this dealership to accept the delivery to the property of newly-purchased Tesla
vehicles when purchased on-line, where the customer designates the property as the pick-up
location, or when ordered from another Tesla location and delivered to Westmont, and Tesla must
allow customers to finalize the sale and pick-up of such Tesla vehicles from the property. In finalizing
such sales of delivered vehicles, Tesla must designate/list the Village of Westmont as the point of
sales for sales tax purposes.
4. Tesla must employ or retain at least one (1) vehicle salesperson who regularly operates from the
property and who is able to and does finalize the sales of Tesla vehicles from the property (including
both the sale of Tesla vehicles from the inventory kept on the property and the sale of Tesla vehicles
that are delivered to the property).
5. Tesla shall not allow the final sale of any new Tesla vehicle that is stored on or delivered to the
property to take place at any other Tesla dealership location or other off-site location.
6. Tesla shall modify its website, other means of advertising, and other internal operating systems to
designate and advertise the property as (a) a location where new Tesla vehicle inventory is
maintained and available for sale, and (b) a location where newly-purchased Tesla vehicles can be
delivered for final sale and pick-up by customers.
7. Tesla must adhere to its Parking Plan for the property that it submitted with its zoning application
showing the following:
(a)the location of the parking spaces where the minimum of 10 new Tesla vehicles will be
stored on the Property (note: we previously discussed designating 10 parking spaces along
the west property line of the Property);
(b) the location of the parking spaces where demo vehicles will be displayed and parked on
the Property;
(c) the location of the parking spaces where vehicles awaiting service/repairs and pick-up
following service/repairs will be parked on the Property;
(d) the location of the parking spaces where customers will park on the Property;
(e) the location of the parking spaces where Tesla employees will park on the Property; and
(f) the location of parking spaces that will be used for other purposes not identified above,
including a description of such other purpose/use.
8. Tesla shall comply with other standard conditions that are typically imposed by the Village in
conjunction with automobile dealerships, such as prohibiting the use of external loud speakers,
prohibiting the use of promotional sales balloons or inflatables, etc.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 008-2026 Page 5 of 7
Page 104 of 261
The petitioner has provided a marked-up version of the existing site plan that is to be included as an
exhibit to the amended special use and will need to be adjusted to accommodate the recommended
condition 7(a) above, if approved.
The marked-up site plan currently depicts the location and use of each parking space as follows:
● Demo Vehicles - 11 Spaces
● Customer Parking - 20 Spaces
● Vehicles Available for Purchase - 6 Spaces (recommended to be updated to 10 per
condition 7(a))
● Vehicles Awaiting Pick Up - 27 Spaces
● Vehicles Awaiting Service - 51 Spaces
● Employee Parking - 25 Spaces
● Charging - 15 Spaces
The request by Tesla must be analyzed using the Special Use standards, which are listed below:
Special Use Permit Review and Approval Criteria (Sec. 14.04(H)):
No special use may be recommended for approval or approved unless the respective review or
decision-making body determines that the proposed special use is consistent with and in substantial
compliance with all village ordinances and regulations and that the applicant has presented evidence
to support each of the following conclusions:
(1) That the proposed use or activity is expressly authorized in this zoning ordinance as a special
use;
(2) That the proposed use at the proposed location is necessary or desirable to provide a service
or a facility that is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general
welfare of the neighborhood or community;
(3) That the proposed use will not, in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be injurious to property values
or improvements in the vicinity;
(4) That approval of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;
(5) That the proposed special use will be served by adequate utilities, access roads, parking,
drainage and other important and necessary facilities, infrastructure and community services;
and
(6) That the proposed special use complies with all applicable regulations of this zoning
ordinance except as expressly approved in accordance with the procedures of this zoning
ordinance.
IV. SUMMARY
The petitioner requests a Special Use Permit amendment to facilitate modified operations and
updated conditions for the existing Vehicle Sales or Rentals establishment, which now specializes in
minor vehicle repair and maintenance services, along with accessory automotive sales within the
B-2 General Business District. To facilitate these modifications, Village Staff and the Village Attorney
have provided recommended special conditions to be placed on the amended special use permit,
and the petitioner has agreed to those conditions.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 008-2026 Page 6 of 7
Page 105 of 261
V. LEGAL
A. Notification: A legal notice was published in Westmont Suburban Life on April 23, 2026.
B. Code References: Chapter 95, Sections 6.01; 14.04
C. Other Action: The recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be
referred to the Village Board for a final decision, which is anticipated to be on May 28, 2026.
VI. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Publication notice appearing in the April 23, 2026 Westmont Suburban Life.
2. Ordinance No. 2016-085.
3. Petitioner Attachments received March 4, 2026 (Edited for PZC):
a. Planning & Zoning Development Application, with responses to the Special Use Standards
b. Project Narrative and Letter
c. Proposed Marked-Up Parking Plan
d. Signed Lease
e. Existing Site Plan
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 008-2026 Page 7 of 7
Page 106 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 013-2026
TITLE: Requests from the Village of Westmont for the following:
1. Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the Westmont Code of
Ordinances, Section 6.01, regarding the addition of Video Gaming, Accessory as a permitted use
in the B-1(A) Downtown Core and B-1 Downtown Edge Zoning Districts.
2. Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the Westmont Code of Ordinance,
Section 6.04, regarding the deletion of certain supplemental use regulations for Video Gaming,
Accessory.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Background:
Village staff began to re-examine the regulations regarding accessory video gaming in the downtown
area due to increased interest from potential new businesses. Currently, accessory video gaming is
not permitted in the B-1 and B-1(A) zoning districts per Section 6.04(F)(3)(a) of the zoning
ordinance. Similarly, Chapter 10 - Alcoholic Beverages of the municipal code prohibits the issuance
of new Class 23 liquor licenses (for video gaming) to businesses in the B-1 district.
The Village regulates accessory video gaming through two separate sets of regulations: Licensing
(Municipal Code Chapter 10 - Alcoholic Beverages) and the Zoning Ordinance.
At the April 2nd Administration and Finance Committee (“AFC”) meeting, staff was directed to
prepare text amendments to both codes. This staff report solely focuses on the Zoning regulations
as they relate to accessory video gaming. Municipal code amendments to Chapter 10 are solely
reviewed by the Village Board.
B. Previous Zoning Regulations on Accessory Video Gaming
Zoning regulations on video gaming have been amended a few times since initially being allowed in
2015. Below is a summary of the various amendments:
● Ord. 15-156 (October 2015): The first text amendment allowed for accessory video
gaming in the B-1, B-2, B-3, C-1, M, and O/R districts with a 500 foot distance separation
requirement.
● Ord. 16-036 (March 2016): Following a Community Development Committee discussion,
the 500 foot separation distance requirement was removed.
● Ord. 18-176 (December 2018): This amendment allowed for video gaming cafes to be a
principal use in the B-2 district, subject to Special Use Permit approval. Video gaming
cafes are when the principal use of the property is video gaming, whereas accessory
video gaming is an accessory use to a principal use, often a restaurant.
● Ord. 2022-166 (December 2022): This ordinance prohibited new video gaming cafes in
Page 107 of 261
the B-2 district and prohibited new accessory video gaming in the B-1 district. Specific
allowances were made for existing businesses affected by this amendment to continue
their operations.
● Ord. 2025-105 (August 2025): A part of the comprehensive zoning ordinance updates,
this amendment kept the regulations found in Ordinance 2022-166, and expanded on
them to clarify that video gaming is not allowed in the B-1(A) Downtown Core district.
C. Proposed Text Amendments
The following provides an overview of the proposed text amendments. The complete documentation,
which includes the precise language (with all additions and deletions), is attached for a detailed
review.
● Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the Westmont Code of
Ordinances, Section 6.01, regarding the addition of Video Gaming, Accessory as a
permitted use in the B-1(A) Downtown Core and B-1 Downtown Edge Zoning Districts.
Following the AFC’s direction, the first text amendment is to allow accessory video gaming as a
permitted accessory use in both the B-1(A) Downtown Core and B-1 Downtown Edge districts. Like
establishments in the B-2, B-3, C-1, O/R, and M districts, any business seeking to add accessory
video gaming must apply for the appropriate liquor license, which requires Village Board approval.
● Zoning Ordinance text amendments to Chapter 95 – Zoning, of the Westmont Code of
Ordinance, Section 6.04, regarding the deletion of certain supplemental use
regulations for Video Gaming, Accessory.
The second text amendment is to remove parts of the supplemental use regulations for accessory
video gaming from Sec. 6.04(F)(3)(a). These supplemental regulations were created to allow
businesses in the downtown that already offered accessory video gaming the ability to sell their
business with the gaming and make adjustments to the location and number of gaming terminals
within their business, while prohibiting new businesses from offering accessory gaming. These
regulations are applicable only to the B-1(A) and B-1 districts. For new businesses in the downtown
to offer accessory video gaming, these supplemental regulations must be removed.
The proposed text amendments do not alter any zoning regulations on video gaming cafes. New
cafes will continue to not be allowed, and existing cafes will remain subject to existing zoning
ordinance regulations.
II. SUMMARY
After being approached by a restaurant looking to open in the downtown area and offer accessory
video gaming, staff was directed by the Administration & Finance Committee to prepare text
amendments to the zoning ordinance. The proposed amendments allow for accessory video gaming
as a permitted accessory use in the B-1(A) Downtown Core and B-1 Downtown Edge districts.
A separate municipal code amendment to Chapter 10 - Alcoholic Beverages will be proposed by the
Administration Department to allow accessory video gaming liquor licenses to be available to
businesses in the B-1(A) and B-1 districts. Municipal code amendments are not reviewed by the
Planning & Zoning Commission, instead being reviewed solely by the Village Board.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 013-2026 Page 2 of 3
Page 108 of 261
III. LEGAL
A. Notification: A legal notice was published in Westmont Suburban Life on April 23, 2026.
B. Code References: Chapter 95 - Zoning, Sections 6.01, 6.04, and 14.02.
C. Other Actions: The recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission will be referred to
the Village Board for a final decision, which is anticipated to be at their regular meeting on May
28, 2026.
IV. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Legal notice was published in Westmont Suburban Life on April 23, 2026.
2. Proposed Text Amendment Additions & Strikethroughs
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 013-2026 Page 3 of 3
Page 109 of 261
Page 110 of 261
Proposed Language
Amendments are indicated by underlined and shaded text; deletions are indicated by strikeouts
Sec. 6.01 Allowed Uses
✳✳✳
Sec.
Video Gaming, Accessory – – – – – – – – P P P P P – P – P –
6.04(F)(3)(a)
Sec.
Video Gaming Cafe – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
6.04(F)(3)(b)
Sec. 6.04 Commercial Use Group
✳✳✳
(3) Supplemental Use Regulations
(a) Video Gaming, Accessory
Video gaming is allowed only as an accessory use to an allowed principal use Despite
any nonconformity provisions to the contrary contained in Article XIII or elsewhere in this
zoning ordinance: provided all other requirements of the Westmont Code of Ordinances
for video gaming are met.
i. A new owner of an existing establishment in a B-1(A) and B-1 zoning district
with video gaming as an accessory use may continue to operate that accessory
use if the new owner otherwise qualifies for and receives a village liquor license
for that accessory use and qualifies for and receives a state video gaming
license, and
ii. An existing establishment in a B-1(A) and B-1 zoning district with video gaming
as an accessory use may expand its structure, expand its interior area where
video gaming terminals are located, change the interior area where video gaming
terminals are located and/or expand the number of video gaming terminals on the
premises, provided that such actions comply with all other village ordinances and
regulations and comply with all state laws and regulations.
(b) Video Gaming Cafe Despite any nonconformity provisions to the contrary contained
in Article XIII or elsewhere in this zoning ordinance:
Page 111 of 261
i. A new owner of an existing video gaming cafe may continue to operate that use
if the new owner otherwise qualifies for and receives a village liquor license for
the use and qualifies for and receives a state video gaming license, and
ii. An existing video gaming cafe may expand its structure, expand its interior
area where video gaming terminals are located, change the interior area where
video gaming terminals are located, and/or expand the number of video gaming
terminals on the premises, provided that such actions comply with all other
village ordinances and regulations and comply with all state laws and regulations.
Page 112 of 261
Page 113 of 261
Page 114 of 261
Page 115 of 261
Page 116 of 261
MAJDI DARWISH
M I DARWISH ARCHITECT, LLC
18400 GREENLEAF CT
TINLEY OARK, IL 60487
Date: [Insert Date]
To: SCOTT WILLIAMS
Village of Westmont
Planning & Zoning Department
31 W. Quincy Street
Westmont, IL 60559
Subject: Proposal for Approval of 4-Unit Townhome Subdivision
Dear [Planning & Zoning Department],
On behalf of THE OWNER 5628 LLC, we respectfully submit this proposal for the development
of a 4-unit townhome subdivision at 5628 S CASS AVE. Each unit is approximately 1,800
square feet. The project has been designed to comply with the Village of Westmont’s zoning and
development standards, as summarized below: We are not seeking any variances, the design
meets all requirements under the current village of Westmont zoning ordinance
Site Data / Requirement Required Proposed / Actual
Zoning District R-4 R-4
Minimum Land Area 12,000 SF 19,200 SF
Minimum Lot Width 60' 104'
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.75 / 14,400 SF 8,892 SF
Number of Dwellings 3-BR units per 4,500 SF 4 units
Height 35' 29'-10½"
Lot Coverage No restriction N/A
Parking 2 per townhouse + 0.5 guest Compliant
Front Setback 30' Compliant
Rear Setback 30' Compliant
Side Setback 15' Compliant
The proposed development conforms to all applicable zoning regulations, lot coverage, height,
and setback requirements, while providing adequate parking. The project will provide high-
quality residential units and positively contribute to the neighborhood.
We respectfully request the Village’s review and approval of this 4-unit townhome subdivision.
We are happy to provide additional plans, renderings, or documentation to facilitate the approval
process.
Page 117 of 261
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
MAJDI DARWISH
M I DARWISHH ARCHITECT
Page 118 of 261
Page 119 of 261
pat o pat o pat o pat o
Page 120 of 261
Page 121 of 261
Page 122 of 261
Page 123 of 261
PAT O
PAT O PAT O
PAT O
Page 124 of 261
Page 125 of 261
Page 126 of 261
Page 127 of 261
Page 128 of 261
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS
FOR Cass Ave Village
This Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (“Declaration”) is made on
27 day of June 2026 by Cass LLC an Illinois LLC (“Declarant”), for the property located
at [PROPERTY ADDRESS/LEGAL DESCRIPTION], consisting of four (4) townhome
units, common areas, and related improvements (the “Property”).
ARTICLE I: DEFINITIONS
• Association: The [TOWNHOME COMMUNITY NAME] Homeowners’ Association,
a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of [STATE], or its successors.
• Common Areas: All portions of the Property not included within the boundaries of
a Lot, including the common green open area, concrete road, retention pond, and
any other shared facilities.
• Lot: Each individually owned townhome unit, including the dwelling, private patio,
and attached private garage, as described in the recorded plat or survey.
• Owner: The record owner of a Lot, whether one or more persons or entities.
• Property: The real property described above, including all Lots and Common
Areas.
ARTICLE II: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP
• Lots: The Property is divided into four (4) Lots, each containing a townhome unit
with a private patio and an attached private garage. Each Lot is individually
owned in fee simple.
• Common Areas: The common green open area, concrete road providing access
to the garages, and retention pond are owned collectively by all Owners as
tenants in common, with each Owner holding an undivided one-fourth (1/4)
interest.
• Easements:
o Access Easement: Each Owner is granted a non-exclusive easement over
the concrete road for ingress and egress to their garage.
o Utility Easement: A perpetual easement is granted to the Association and
utility providers for the installation, maintenance, and repair of utilities
serving the Property.
o Common Area Easement: Each Owner is granted a non-exclusive
easement for the use and enjoyment of the common green open area,
subject to Association rules.
ARTICLE III: HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION
• Formation: The Association is established to manage, maintain, and enforce
these covenants and to oversee the Common Areas.
Page 129 of 261
• Membership: Each Owner is automatically a member of the Association and is
entitled to one (1) vote per Lot on Association matters.
• Powers and Duties:
o Maintain, repair, and replace the Common Areas, including the concrete
road, common green open area, and retention pond.
o Enforce these covenants and adopt rules for the use of the Property.
o Levy assessments to cover maintenance, insurance, and other
Association expenses.
• Assessments:
o Regular Assessments: Each Owner shall pay an equal share (one-fourth)
of the annual budget for Common Area maintenance, insurance, and
Association operations.
o Special Assessments: The Association may levy special assessments for
capital improvements or unexpected expenses, subject to a majority vote
of Owners.
o Lien Rights: Unpaid assessments shall constitute a lien on the Owner’s
Lot, enforceable by the Association.
ARTICLE IV: USE RESTRICTIONS
• Residential Use: Lots shall be used exclusively for single-family residential
purposes. No commercial activities are permitted, except for home offices that do
not generate traffic or noise.
• Private Patios:
o Each Owner is responsible for maintaining their private patio in a clean
and attractive condition.
o Modifications to patios (e.g., adding structures or enclosures) require
Association approval.
• Private Garages:
o Garages shall be used primarily for vehicle parking and storage. No
commercial repairs or activities are permitted.
o Owners shall keep garage doors closed when not in use to maintain a
neat appearance.
• Common Areas:
o The common green open area is for recreational use by Owners and their
guests, subject to Association rules (e.g., no structures, no overnight
parking).
o The concrete road shall remain clear of obstructions to ensure access to
garages.
o The retention pond shall be maintained by the Association to comply with
stormwater regulations. No dumping or alterations are permitted.
• Exterior Maintenance:
o Each Owner shall maintain the exterior of their townhome, patio, and
garage in good repair and appearance, including painting, siding, and
landscaping.
Page 130 of 261
o The Association may perform maintenance and charge the Owner if they
fail to comply.
• Prohibited Activities:
o No noxious or offensive activities, excessive noise, or anything that may
become an annoyance or nuisance to other Owners.
o No signs, except one “For Sale” or “For Rent” sign per Lot, not exceeding
2 square feet.
o No exterior antennas or satellite dishes without Association approval,
unless permitted by law.
• Pets: Pets are permitted, subject to Association rules (e.g., leashing, waste
cleanup). No more than two (2) pets per Lot.
• Trash: Trash containers shall be stored out of sight, except on collection days.
• Leasing: Lots may be leased for terms of at least six (6) months. Owners are
responsible for their tenants’ compliance with these covenants.
ARTICLE V: MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
• Owner Responsibilities:
o Maintain and repair the interior and exterior of their townhome, private
patio, and private garage.
o Keep private landscaping (if any) neat and attractive.
• Association Responsibilities:
o Maintain, repair, and replace the common green open area, concrete road,
and retention pond.
o Ensure compliance with stormwater management requirements for the
retention pond.
o Procure insurance for the Common Areas, including liability and property
coverage.
• Shared Utilities: If utilities (e.g., water, sewer) are not separately metered, the
Association shall allocate costs equally among Owners.
ARTICLE VI: ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL
• Approval Required: No exterior modifications, additions, or alterations to a Lot
(e.g., painting, fencing, patio enclosures) may be made without prior written
approval from the Association.
• Review Process: Owners must submit plans and specifications to the
Association, which shall approve or deny within thirty (30) days based on
harmony with the community’s design and aesthetics.
ARTICLE VII: INSURANCE
• Association Insurance: The Association shall maintain liability and property
insurance for the Common Areas, paid through assessments.
Page 131 of 261
• Owner Insurance: Each Owner shall maintain homeowner’s insurance for their
Lot, including liability and property coverage for the townhome, patio, and
garage.
• Damage or Destruction:
o If a Lot is damaged, the Owner shall repair or rebuild within a reasonable
time.
o If Common Areas are damaged, the Association shall repair or rebuild,
funded by insurance proceeds or assessments.
ARTICLE VIII: ENFORCEMENT
• Compliance: All Owners, tenants, and guests shall comply with these covenants.
• Remedies: The Association or any Owner may enforce these covenants through
legal action, including injunctions or damages. Violators shall pay reasonable
attorney’s fees and costs.
• Fines: The Association may impose reasonable fines for violations, subject to
notice and an opportunity to be heard.
ARTICLE IX: AMENDMENT
• Amendment Process: These covenants may be amended by a vote of at least
three-fourths (3/4) of the Owners, recorded in the [COUNTY] public records.
• Declarant Rights: The Declarant reserves the right to amend these covenants
unilaterally until all Lots are sold, provided such amendments do not materially
adversely affect Owners.
ARTICLE X: GENERAL PROVISIONS
• Duration: These covenants shall run with the land and bind all Owners for a term
of thirty (30) years, automatically renewing for successive ten (10) year periods
unless terminated by unanimous vote of Owners.
• Severability: If any provision is found invalid, the remaining provisions shall
remain in effect.
• Governing Law: These covenants shall be governed by the laws of Illinois
• Notices: Notices shall be delivered in writing to an Owner’s Lot address or as
otherwise designated. HOA Formation: Form a legal HOA entity to manage
Common Areas and enforce covenants. File articles of incorporation and adopt
bylaws.
• Plat and Survey: Record a plat or survey clearly delineating Lots, Common
Areas, easements, and the retention pond. Include legal descriptions in the
CC&Rs.
• Stormwater Compliance: Verify that the retention pond complies with local
environmental and stormwater regulations. The Association may need to enter a
maintenance agreement with the local government.
Page 132 of 261
• Insurance: Consult an insurance agent to determine appropriate coverage for the
Common Areas and to advise Owners on their individual policies.
• Disclosure: Provide these covenants to prospective buyers as part of the
purchase process to ensure transparency.
• Initial Funding: Consider having the Declarant fund initial Association costs (e.g.,
landscaping, road maintenance) until all Lots are sold and assessments begin.
Costs to Address HOA annual fees to be determined
Page 133 of 261
Page 134 of 261
Page 135 of 261
Page 136 of 261
Page 137 of 261
Page 138 of 261
Page 139 of 261
Page 140 of 261
Page 141 of 261
Page 142 of 261
Page 143 of 261
Page 144 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 021-2025
TITLE: A request from 5628 SOUTH CASS LLC for the property at 5628 South Cass Avenue,
Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1. Major Site Plan Approval for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4) dwellings in the R-4
General Residential District.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Location: 5628 South Cass Avenue is located at the southwest corner of Cass Avenue and 56th
Place. The subject property is 104 feet wide by 185 feet deep, for an area of 19,240 square feet or
0.44 acres. Currently, the property is improved with a roughly 1,200 square foot detached home and
a detached garage.
Aerial Map - 5628 South Cass Avenue (source: DuPage County Parcel Viewer)
Page 145 of 261
Zoning Map - 5628 South Cass Avenue
B. Zoning Designations:
SUBJECT PROPERTY R-4 General Residential
NORTH R-4 General Residential & R-3 Single-Unit Residential
EAST R-4 General Residential & R-4 General Residential/Planned Development
WEST R-3 Single-Unit Residential
SOUTH R-4 General Residential
C. Neighborhood Characteristics
The lot is located in Nicholas’ Subdivision, which was recorded in 1921. Properties adjacent to Cass
Avenue from Dallas Street to 59th Street are almost completely zoned R-4 General Residential. Housing
types range in this corridor from detached homes to multi-unit residential buildings, which serves as a buffer
from Cass Avenue to the adjacent detached homes. Most multi-unit developments have around four to six
dwelling units, except for larger condominium developments southeast of the subject property.
Street View - 5628 South Cass Avenue (view from 56th Place)
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 021-2025 Page 2 of 5
Page 146 of 261
Street View - 5628 South Cass Avenue (view from Cass Avenue)
II. PETITIONER REQUEST:
The petitioner has requested approval of a major site plan for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4)
dwellings in the R-4 General Residential District.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
A. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The current zoning district of the property is R-4 General Residential District, which is intended to
create, maintain, and promote a variety of housing opportunities for individual households and to
maintain and promote the desired physical character of residential neighborhoods in accordance
with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use in this area
as Single Family Attached Residential, which should “...provide for single-family homes that share a
common wall such as duplexes, townhomes, and rowhomes.” The Plan further recommends in the
“Residential Land Use Policies” section that “...a range of quality housing types that serve residents
in all stages of life…” be provided.
B. Entitlement Request
The petitioner has provided a project narrative and supporting documentation for the following
request. Any corresponding standards for entitlement approval consideration can be referenced in
item V(B) below.
● Major Site Plan for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4) dwellings in the R-4
General Residential District.
Site Plan approval is mandated by Chapter 95, Section 14.05 when certain thresholds are met. This
specific application requires a major site plan review because the total gross floor area of the
building and outdoor area exceeds 10,000 square feet. Site plans involve the adoption of the site
plan, landscaping plan, and building elevations by the Village Board.
Final action to approve or deny a major site must be based on whether the new or modified
improvements shown on the site plan, as proposed, comply with the regulations of the zoning
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 021-2025 Page 3 of 5
Page 147 of 261
ordinance and all other applicable village ordinances and regulations. In reviewing and acting on
major site plans, review and decision-making bodies may also consider and be guided in the
reasonable exercise of their discretion by the following standards and criteria (Ch. 95, Sec.
14.05(G)(1)):
(a) Whether the proposed plans will protect the public health, safety, and welfare;
(b) Whether the proposed plans will avoid substantial injury to the value of other property in
the area;
(c) Whether the proposed plans will provide for protection of community appearance and the
function of the natural environment, including floodplains, soil and geologic characteristics,
and preservation of vegetation;
(d) Whether the proposed plans comply with all applicable village and county stormwater
regulations; and
(e) Whether the proposed plans comply with adopted building and site design guidelines
Principal Use:
The proposed Multi-Unit Residential building is a permitted use in the R-4 General Residential
District. The building type is considered Multi-Unit due to more than 3 dwelling units that share a
common wall. However, the more commonly acknowledged housing style is townhomes.
Building and Site:
The proposed building features a 5,267 square foot footprint and reaches a height of 29’ 10” at its
peak. The building consists of four 3-bedroom units with individual exterior entrances fronting onto
56th Street to the north.
The property boundaries are defined with the Cass Avenue frontage to the east serving as the front,
56th Street as the street side to the north, the rear to the west, and an interior side to the south.The
zoning ordinance defines the front lot line as the lot line having the shortest length abutting a street
line (Ch. 95, Sec. 17.05), regardless of which direction the building faces.
The proposed development complies with all applicable bulk standards, including setbacks and
height requirements. The building utilizes a mixed palette of materials, including red face brick,
vertical board cementitious siding, and insulated metal panels. Additional building elements feature
aluminum clad casement windows, and asphalt roof shingles, with additional architectural details
along street facing facades.
The proposed site plan also includes a rear patio that complies with the minimum setbacks for the
district. Additionally, the site plans include a 630 square foot drywell to satisfy DuPage County’s Post
Construction Best Management Practices (PCBMP) requirement in the front yard, along Cass
Avenue.
During rounds of staff review, the petitioner revised the building location, but did not provide a
revised photometric plan. All outdoor lighting must meet the Village's standards, and will be verified
when building permits are submitted.
Parking:
The site consists of a single vehicular access point on 56th Place and a shared drive aisle
connecting a parking area and individual garages. The single access point currently has a guyed
wires and a utility pole that may need to be relocated or buried to provide access driveway apron.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 021-2025 Page 4 of 5
Page 148 of 261
Minimum off-street parking requirements are calculated based on the number of bedrooms in the
unit. For a 3 bedroom unit, 2 parking spaces are required per dwelling unit. The proposed floor plans
indicate two parking spaces being provided in each garage and three additional “guest” parking
spaces for a total 11 parking spaces being provided when only 8 are required.
Landscaping:
The proposed landscape plan provides substantial screening to visible rights-of-way and the rear
property line providing a landscape buffer to the single family home to the west. The landscape plan
substantially complies with the minimum requirements.
The developer and owner will need to create a homeowners association and provide details related
to the declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions documents at the time of permitting. A
draft has been provided by the petitioner and is attached for reference, but is subject to change.
IV. SUMMARY
The petitioner has requested approval of a major site plan for a Multi-Unit Building containing four (4)
dwellings in the R-4 General Residential District. The proposed plans substantially complies with
both the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
V. LEGAL
A. Notification: No notification is required for this request.
B. Code References: Chapter 95, 14.05
C. Other Action: The recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be
referred to the Village Board for a final decision, which is anticipated to be on May 28, 2026.
VI. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Publication notice appearing in the April 23, 2026 Westmont Suburban Life.
2. Petitioner Attachments received April 9, 2026 (Edited for PZC):
a. Planning & Zoning Development Application
b. Project Narrative
c. Proposed Floor Plan
d. Traffic Impact Statement
e. Signed Lease
f. ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 021-2025 Page 5 of 5
Page 149 of 261
Page 150 of 261
Page 151 of 261
Page 152 of 261
Page 153 of 261
Page 154 of 261
Page 155 of 261
Page 156 of 261
Page 157 of 261
Page 158 of 261
Page 159 of 261
Page 160 of 261
Page 161 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 006-2026
TITLE: A request from Sonja Smilga for the property at 1351 South Ridge Road, Willowbrook,
Illinois, 60527, for the following:
1. Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to create one (1) lot in the R-1(A) Single-Unit Residential
District.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Location: 1351 South Ridge Road is located in the southwest corner of the Village, between 64th
and 65th Streets. The subject parcel measures 75 feet by 156 feet, for an area of 11,700 square
feet. The vacant parcel is surrounded by detached houses on all sides, many of which have been
subdivided and rezoned since annexing into the Village within the last 30 years. Though this property
has a Willowbrook zipcode, it is fully under the jurisdiction of the Village of Westmont, having been
annexed under Ordinance 02-113 in 2002.
Aerial Map - 1315 South Ridge Road (source: DuPage County Parcel Viewer)
Page 162 of 261
Zoning Map - 1351 South Ridge Road
B. Zoning Designations:
SUBJECT PROPERTY R-1(A) Single-Unit Residential
NORTH & EAST R-3 Single-Unit Residential
WEST R-1 Single-Unit Residential
SOUTH R-1(A) Single-Unit Residential
C. Neighborhood Characteristics
The parcel is located in the Resubdivision of Lots 1-8 & 36-43 of Highview Estates subdivision, which was
recorded in 1941. At the time of subdivision, all lots were at least 1.17 acres in size. Over the last 85 years,
these lots have been subdivided into two to four lots while under the jurisdiction of DuPage County or when
annexing into the Village of Westmont. More often than not, lots were subdivided and rezoned to the R-1(A)
or R-3 districts at the time of annexation, although larger lots to the southwest of the subject property
remained in the R-1 district.
Street View - 1351 South Ridge Road
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 021-2025 Page 2 of 4
Page 163 of 261
II. PETITIONER REQUEST:
The petitioner has requested a preliminary plan of subdivision to create one (1) lot in the R-1(A)
Single-Unit Residential District.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
A. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The current zoning district of the property is R-1(A) Single-Unit Residential District, which is intended
to provide larger “estate” lots than more traditional residential lots that occupy most of the Village.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use in this area as Single Family Detached
Residential, which should “... consist of one detached single household per lot, organized into
neighborhoods or subdivisions. The design and construction of new homes should take into
consideration the established character of surrounding single-family areas.”
B. Previous Approvals
In 2006, the Damjanoviches (owners at the time and the petitioner’s parents) requested approval to
subdivide 1351 South Ridge from one lot into two lots. At the time, only the preliminary plan was
approved by the Village Board (Ord. 06-123). The Damjanoviches originally requested a final plat of
subdivision in conjunction with the preliminary plan, but opted to delay final plat approval due to the
required engineering improvements. Since then, final plat approval has not been obtained. Per
Appendix B, Section 2.04(a), the applicant has one year after preliminary plan approval to obtain
final plat approval by the Village Board, which in this case never occurred. However, it appears that
the preliminary plan from 2006 was recorded with the DuPage County Recorder’s Office, creating
two separate PIN numbers for one lot. To rectify this issue and create a second lot, the petitioner
must request preliminary plan approval and final plat approval to record the subdivision with the
County.
C. Entitlement Request
The petitioner has provided a project narrative and supporting documentation for the following
request. Any corresponding standards for entitlement approval consideration can be referenced in
item V(B) below.
● Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to create one (1) lot in the R-1(A) Single-Unit
Residential District.
Appendix B requires preliminary plan approval prior to final plat approval by the Village Board. The
proposed preliminary plan provided by Landmark Engineering, LLC substantially complies with the
requirements of Appendix B, other than a fee-in-lieu of installation of right-of-way improvements
which the petitioner has indicated that they will request a waiver from. This waiver request is not
within the purview of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and will be forwarded to the Village
Board for consideration.
Additionally, the proposed subdivision meets all of the minimum requirements of the zoning
ordinance including lot width at 75 feet, a depth of 156 feet and an area of 11,700 square feet for the
R-1(A) Zoning District. The petitioner anticipates selling the vacant property to a prospective home
builder to develop a single-unit detached house, which is a permitted use in the R-1(A) Zoning
District.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 021-2025 Page 3 of 4
Page 164 of 261
Lot and Building Regulations R-1(A)
Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Lot Area (Square Feet)
Minimum Requirements 75 ft 125 ft 11,250 sqft
Proposed 75 ft 156 ft 11,700 sqft
IV. SUMMARY
The applicant is seeking a preliminary plan of subdivision to establish one (1) new lot within the
R-1(A) Single-Unit Residential District. Except for a waiver concerning right-of-way improvements,
the proposal substantially complies with the requirements of the Land Development and Zoning
Ordinance regulations. Furthermore, the application includes a formal request for a waiver
concerning right-of-way improvements and the associated fee-in-lieu; this specific waiver request will
be presented to the Village Board for consideration alongside the subdivision request.
V. LEGAL
A. Notification: No notification is required for this request.
B. Code References: Appendix B
C. Other Action: The recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be
referred to the Village Board for a final decision, which is anticipated to be on May 28, 2026.
VI. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Petitioner Attachments received February 18, 2026 (Edited for PZC):
a. Planning & Zoning Development Application
b. Project Narrative and Cover Letter
c. Proposed Preliminary Plan Prepared by Landmark Engineering, LLC dated March 18, 2026
d. Proposed Final Plat Prepared by Landmark Engineering, LLC undated
e. Deed
f. Legal Description
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 021-2025 Page 4 of 4
Page 165 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 010-2026
TITLE: A request from 814 CRE, LLC (Petitioner), and Encore CW, LLC (Owner), for the property at
6120 South Cass Avenue, Westmont, Illinois, 60559, for the following:
1. Major Site Plan Approval for a Day Care Center in the C-1 Commercial District.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Location: 6120 South Cass Avenue is located southwest of the intersection of Cass Avenue and 61st
Street. The subject property is about 201 feet wide by 437 feet deep, or 1.79 acres in area. The site
was formerly improved with a multi-tenant commercial building, but was torn down and subdivided in
2023 when Encore Car Wash redeveloped the property. Encore developed the northern lot with a car
wash, and left the southern lot vacant for future commercial development.
Aerial Map - 6120 South Cass Avenue (source: DuPage County Parcel Viewer)
Page 166 of 261
Zoning Map - 6120 South Cass Avenue
B. Zoning Designations:
SUBJECT PROPERTY C-1 Commercial
NORTH & EAST C-1 Commercial
WEST O/R Office/Research
SOUTH C-1 Commercial/Planned Development
C. Neighborhood Characteristics
The lot is located in the Encore Car Wash Subdivision, which was recorded in 2023. The subject property is
within the South Westmont Business District, just north of Market Centre. The South Westmont Business
District is home to a wide range of commercial businesses, including grocery stores, quick service
restaurants, and auto-oriented businesses, among many others.
Street View - 6120 South Cass Avenue (view from Cass Avenue)
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 010-2026 Page 2 of 6
Page 167 of 261
Street View - 6120 South Cass Avenue (view from 6100 South Cass Avenue)
II. PETITIONER REQUEST:
The petitioner has requested approval of a major site plan for the construction of a day care center in
the C-1 Commercial District.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
A. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The current zoning district of the property is C-1 Commercial, which is intended to encourage retail
and sales tax generating uses. The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use in this area
as Corridor Commercial, which should “...provide for businesses to both serve the daily needs of
Westmont residents as well as a destination for the larger market.” The subject property is located
within the 63rd & Cass subarea’s Commercial Redevelopment Area. In this part of the subarea, it is
recommended that building architecture be high quality to create a unique subarea within the context
of Westmont and surrounding communities.
Additionally, the property is within a Gateway & Corridor encompassing portion of South Cass
Avenue and 63rd Street. The Commercial Design Guidelines state that “Commercial development
along the Village’s primary corridors contribute significantly to the overall image and character of the
Village, and impacts the way residents and visitors perceive the community.” Commercial
development should abide by these guidelines.
B. Entitlement Request
The petitioner has provided a project narrative and supporting documentation for the following
request. Any corresponding standards for entitlement approval consideration can be referenced in
item V(B) below.
● Major Site Plan Approval for a Day Care Center in the C-1 Commercial District.
Site Plan approval is mandated by Chapter 95, Section 14.05 when certain thresholds are met. This
specific application requires a major site plan review because the total gross floor area of the
building and outdoor area exceeds 10,000 square feet. Site plans involve the adoption of the site
plan, landscaping plan, and building elevations by the Village Board.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 010-2026 Page 3 of 6
Page 168 of 261
Final action to approve or deny a major site must be based on whether the new or modified
improvements shown on the site plan, as proposed, comply with the regulations of the zoning
ordinance and all other applicable village ordinances and regulations. In reviewing and acting on
major site plans, review and decision-making bodies may also consider and be guided in the
reasonable exercise of their discretion by the following standards and criteria (Ch. 95, Sec.
14.05(G)(1)):
(a) Whether the proposed plans will protect the public health, safety, and welfare;
(b) Whether the proposed plans will avoid substantial injury to the value of other property in
the area;
(c) Whether the proposed plans will provide for protection of community appearance and the
function of the natural environment, including floodplains, soil and geologic characteristics,
and preservation of vegetation;
(d) Whether the proposed plans comply with all applicable village and county stormwater
regulations; and
(e) Whether the proposed plans comply with adopted building and site design guidelines
The petitioner is proposing a new daycare center that includes a new principal building, outdoor play
area, accessory parking facilities, and landscaping. Since daycare centers are a permitted use in the
C-1 Commercial District, the review and decision-making bodies should focus on the criteria listed
above when formulating a recommendation instead of the use itself.
The petitioner has provided exhibits that include architectural site plans including building elevations,
engineering plans, and a landscape plan. At staff's recommendation, the petitioner has provided two
sets of plans. The first is the petitioner's preferred clockwise parking lot flow, and the other is staff's
preferred counterclockwise flow.
Principal and Accessory Uses:
While the proposed daycare center is a permitted use in the C-1 District, the petitioner has submitted
a narrative detailing daily operations, including anticipated hours, staffing, and patron volume and is
summarized below.
Operating Monday through Friday from 6:00am to 6:30pm, the tenant, an early education provider
active in both the UK and the US, serves children from 6 weeks to 6 years of age, with a curriculum
focused on holistic development.
Maximum facility capacity is currently estimated at 173 students and 28 teachers, though final
enrollment will depend on local demand. To facilitate drop-offs and pick-ups, all parents and
guardians must park and personally escort children into the building. Peak traffic is expected during
the morning (6:00am to 9:00am) and evening (3:00pm to 6:30pm).
Building and Site:
The proposed principal building has a single floor at 13,661 square feet and reaches a peak height
of 20’ 9”. This facility connects to an outdoor play area measuring approximately 8,931 square feet,
which is enclosed by a 5-foot-high cedar picket fence. All applicable bulk standards, including
setbacks and height requirements have been met. Building materials consist of a mix of masonry
brick veneer, fiber cement siding, and expansive glass windows on the north and west facades
facing the primary drive aisle and Cass Avenue. Lap fiber cement siding is primarily used for the
southern and eastern elevations, which are less visible to the public. Furthermore, the submitted site
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 010-2026 Page 4 of 6
Page 169 of 261
plan indicates that the dumpster will be effectively screened by a gate and brick veneer walls,
situated at the parking lot's northwest corner which complies with the Village’s design standards.
In addition to the architectural plans, the petitioner submitted a photometric plan demonstrating
compliance with Village lighting standards. The design utilizes downcasted lighting to ensure minimal
light trespass onto adjacent properties.
Parking:
The petitioner submitted two distinct site plans that primarily differ in their impact on onsite traffic flow
and total parking capacity.
Petitioner's Preferred Plan (Clockwise Flow): This layout directs traffic to enter at the
northeast entrance and circle the building in a clockwise direction. This configuration
provides a total of 39 parking spaces, including ADA-compliant stalls.
Staff's Preferred Plan (Counterclockwise Flow): This alternative involves vehicles
entering through the northwest entrance, circling counterclockwise, and exiting at the
northeast corner. While this improves flow, it necessitates a reduction in onsite parking by
two stalls, resulting in 37 total spaces.
Minimum off-street parking requirements are calculated at a rate of 0.5 spaces per employee. Based
on the projected staff of 28, a minimum of 14 spaces is required. Regardless of the traffic flow, both
site plan options exceed the minimum regulatory standards.
Staff favors the counterclockwise pattern as it minimizes potential traffic conflicts at the Cass Avenue
"right-in only" entrance. Under the clockwise proposal, vehicles entering from Cass Avenue could try
to make an immediate left turn, creating a risk of congestion that could spill back onto the public
right-of-way. While the counterclockwise flow may still present internal conflicts at the northeast
entrance, it effectively moves any potential queuing away from Cass Avenue and into the site.
Regarding emergency access, neither plan currently satisfies the Fire Department's minimum turning
radius requirements due to constraints in the southern drive aisle. If approved, staff recommends a
condition allowing for minor modifications to the drive aisle or outdoor play area to ensure
compliance with fire safety standards.
Finally, a traffic impact statement from Veenstra and Kimm, Inc. was received; however, it was
submitted too late for a comprehensive staff review. This document is attached to the report with an
explanatory note.
Landscaping:
The proposed landscape plan provides substantial screening and aesthetic appeal to visible
rights-of-way and complies the minimum landscape requirements. The current placement of the
ground sign, however, fails to meet the minimum requirement of a five-foot landscaped area around
its base. Should the site plan be approved, Staff will mandate that this be corrected during the
permitting phase and recommends including this as a formal condition of approval.
Recommendation and Conditions:
If the Planning & Zoning Commission desires to recommend approval, staff recommends amending
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 010-2026 Page 5 of 6
Page 170 of 261
the motion to include the following conditions:
● That the ground sign shall comply with all regulations, including minimum landscaping
requirements, at the time of building permit issuance.
● That curbing on the south side of the property must be updated to accommodate the
fire truck turning radius, as required by the Fire Department, at the time of building
permit issuance and that staff is granted the authority to make minor adjustments to the
major site plan to accommodate said radius.
● That the site plan be revised to utilize the counterclockwise traffic flow pattern..
Should the Planning & Zoning Commission agree with the recommended conditions, the motion
should be amended to recommend approval of the major site plan request, subject to the
conditions listed in the staff report or modified conditions as deemed appropriate by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and/or Village Board.
IV. SUMMARY
The petitioner is requesting Major Site Plan approval to operate a daycare center that includes a
new principal building, outdoor play area, and parking facilities in the C-1 Commercial District. The
request largely complies with both the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the
recommendations from the Comprehensive Plan and Commercial Design Guidelines, if the
recommended conditions are accepted.
V. LEGAL
A. Notification: No notification is required for this request.
B. Code References: Chapter 95, 14.05
C. Other Action: The recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be
referred to the Village Board for a final decision, which is anticipated to be on May 28, 2026.
VI. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Petitioner Attachments received March 11, 2026 (Edited for PZC):
a. Planning & Zoning Development Application
b. Project Narrative
c. Signed Sale Agreement
d. Proposed Major Site Plan, including an alternative traffic flow option
e. Photometric Plan
f. Firetruck Turning Radius Exhibits, including an alternative traffic flow option
g. Traffic Impact Memorandum
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 010-2026 Page 6 of 6
Page 171 of 261
Page 172 of 261
Page 173 of 261
On behalf of 814 CRE LLC
Member
Page 174 of 261
Page 175 of 261
N. Family Narrative
814 Services LLC is under contract to purchase a +/-1.79 acre vacant parcel located at 6120 S Cass
Avenue (Property Identification Number 916406036) and is submitting for a Major Site Plan review.
This application is for a proposed approx.13,000 SF childcare facility including 8,998 SF of
playground and 38 parking stalls. In advance of this application a Pre-Application meeting was held
on October 29th, 2025 with Scott Williams. The subject property is zoned C-1 with day care centers
listed as a permitted as-of-right use.
The tenant is a provider of early education in the UK and now the US. The company offers its services
for children ages 6 weeks to 6 years old. The curriculum emphasizes child development through
holistic approaches focusing on
Tenant Curriculum
The provider offers full early education and care for children ageing from 6 weeks to 6 years. They
employ the company’s proprietary curriculum, which combines traditional, teacher-guided learning
with more child-initiated play. The curriculum also incorporates current research on child
development and emphasizes building character in students. Their learning philosophy consists of
four major components—theme-based learning, which uses topics of interest to children to place
concepts in context; an academic curriculum which focuses on school readiness in math, language,
and literacy; enrichment programs, which include music, arts, gardening, and foreign language,
among other activities; and character development. The N Family approach supports each students
development by preparing them for the modern world and focusing on holistic health, self-
expression, global responsibility, and encouraging inventive ideas.
The Company also places an emphasis on parent communication to foster the connection between
home and school, which creates continuity in the children’s educational experience. Schools provide
orientation sessions for parents of new students, a variety of parenting and educational resources
online, and regular communication with parents through newsletters, conferences, and school
events.
Page 176 of 261
General Tenant Operations
The tenant would operate Monday through Friday from 6:00am to 6:30pm. The approximate
13,480 SF building, with a play area approximately 3,420 SF. Each classroom is designed to
accommodate infants, toddlers, and pre-school children, with the appropriate required number of
staff for each classroom, per Illinois state day care licensing code. The total number of students in
the building will depend upon the local interest & enrollment numbers for this facility, however the
current assessment is that maximum capacity would allow for 173 students and 28 teachers.
Peak on-site traffic flow will occur during primary drop off/pick up times in the mornings and
evenings -between 6:00am and 9:00am, and between 3:00pm and 6:30pm, respectively. All
parents/guardians are required to park their vehicle and escort the child into the facility for “drop-
off” and “pick-up”.
Deliveries are conducted with small cargo cars and single rear axle trucks. No Loading zone is
required.
Playground areas are age-specific and playground equipment is disinfected before and after each use.
Page 177 of 261
19th
Page 178 of 261
Page 179 of 261
Page 180 of 261
Page 181 of 261
Page 182 of 261
Page 183 of 261
Petitioner Preferred: Clockwise Flow
Page 184 of 261
Petitioner Preferred: Clockwise Flow
Page 185 of 261
Petitioner Preferred: Clockwise Flow
Page 186 of 261
Petitioner Preferred: Clockwise Flow
Page 187 of 261
Staff Preferred: Counterclockwise Flow SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE THOSE OF THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
FOR WATER AND SEWER MAIN CONSTRUCTION IN ILLINOIS, EIGHTH
EDITION" (SSWSMC), ADOPTED, 2020 AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION" ADOPTED JANUARY 1, 2022.
12"
ADD "DO NOT BLOCK DRIVEWAY"
PLOTTED: Thursday, April 9, 2026 11:55:01 AM
SIGN TO EXISTING STOP SIGN
2"
18" POST
0' 20' 40'
2"
BIKE RACK, MINIMUM ST
6 SPACES ST "DO NOT ENTER"
SIGN, SEE DETAIL
THIS SHEET
EXISTING CONCRETE
DEPRESSED CURB AND GUTTER ACCESS ROAD CURB & GUTTER
ST
ST
ST 4.9' 0'
5.2'
ST 5' R1
6.2' 5' KEY NOTES:
6.2' 5' 5'
S
(SEE TYPICAL DETAILS ON SITE DETAIL SHEET)
S S
S
6 5' - 3" STANDARD ASPHALT PAVEMENT
6 NEW SIGN TO BE 1
3 5'
R1 PERMITTED BY OWNER
1 102.21 SF 2 - 5" STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
'
20
164.67 SF
Vestibule
Director
ADA RAMP Restroom Restroom
10.2' 3 - 8" HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
R8 R5 5' 839.50 SF
10 ' ' 279.32 SF
Lobby
- 4" PARKING STRIPE, WHITE
' Playroom #10 Playroom #11
N Studio
8 3"
4
Playroom #9
Restroom 7 5'
S 6' - CONC. CURB REVERSE GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12
DETENTION POND
5
38.7'
6 - 5" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
DUMPSTER LOCATION 5 Strg. Clst.
Corridor 9'
264.42 SF
Strg. Clst.
Corridor N Lab 7 7 - ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, MOUNTED TO BUILDING
9' 6' 4' - 2"
Restroom 9' 6
6
304.05 SF
Break Room
6 8 - ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING
EXISTING CONCRETE
Restroom
Restroom SIDEWALK
68.00 SF
Playroom #6 93.50 SF
Seat Strg. Nursing
330.06 SF 1
27.5' Kitchen
Restroom Playroom #7
Playroom #8
S
FILE PATH: ip01.kleinfelder.com\blbkshare\0700\0797-814_Services\0797-0001_Westmont_Cass_Ave_Childcare_SP_DS\CADD\_ProdDrawings\7971 Fire Truck Path.dwg
24' 18' 5'
18' Playroom #5
W D
3"
J/C / Storage Utilities/Riser
Restroom Restroom 4
Corridor
Restroom 19.8' 18'
1 R5-1 "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN
6' AS PER THE MANUAL ON
° 5
60 UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
Playroom #3 DEVICES
Playroom #4
S NEW FENCE, SEE ARCHITECTURAL 5
PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS
3"
CASS AVENUE
5'
Playroom #2
Playroom #1
' 2'
R5
6
R2
17.3'
0'
X-REFS: 7971 DESIGN & 7971 Topo & 7971 Boundary & N Family Floor Plan & 7971 DESIGN REVERSE TRAFFIC
6
JOB NO. 7971 VEENSTRA & KIMM, INC., DESIGN FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER 184.001939
1
2'
5 12' R70'
1
24' 14'
10'
X X
X X X
3"
X X
3"3"
3"
3"
3"
3" X 5'
3"3" X X ST
2" 3" X X
X X X 10' UTILITY EASEMENT
POTENTIAL FUTURE CROSS
DRIVE EASEMENT
| | | | | 3"
6" 3"
=O= =O= =O= =O= =O=
DATE REVISIONS SCALE AS NOTED SHEET NO.
DRAWN SKUPER 6120 S. CASS AVE., WESTMONT, IL - CHILD CARE FACILITY
CHECKED RDALTON
814 SERVICES, LLC
APPROVED ELEE GEOMETRIC SITE PLAN C-4
DATE 02/18/2026 552 W. Boughton Road ● Bolingbrook, IL 60440
ISSUED FOR REVIEW 319-466-1000 ● 1-800-241-8000 PROJECT 7971
Page 188 of 261
Page 189 of 261
Page 190 of 261
Page 191 of 261
Page 192 of 261
Page 193 of 261
Page 194 of 261
Page 195 of 261
Page 196 of 261
Page 197 of 261
Page 198 of 261
Page 199 of 261
Page 200 of 261
Page 201 of 261
Page 202 of 261
Page 203 of 261
Petitioner Preferred: Clockwise Flow
Page 204 of 261
40
Staff Preferred: Counterclockwise Flow
8 22
Pumper Fire Truck
PLOTTED: Friday, April 10, 2026 9:27:09 AM
2"
Overall Length 40.000ft
Overall Width 8.167ft 0' 20' 40'
Overall Body Height 7.745ft
Min Body Ground Clearance 0.656ft
Track Width 8.167ft
2" Lock-to-lock time 5.00s
Max Wheel Angle 45.00° ST
ST
ACCESS ROAD 2"
ST
ST
ST 4.9' 0'
5.2'
ST 5' R1
6.2' 5'
6.2' 5' 5'
S
S S
S
6 5'
6
5'
R1 102.21 SF
'
20
164.67 SF
Vestibule
Restroom Restroom Director
10.2'
R8 R5 5' 839.50 SF
10 ' ' 279.32 SF
N Studio Lobby
' Playroom #9
Playroom #10 Playroom #11 8 5' 3"
Restroom
S 6'
DETENTION POND
38.7'
Strg. Clst.
Corridor
264.42 SF
9'
Strg. Clst.
Corridor N Lab
9' 4' - 2"
6' Restroom 304.05 SF 9'
Break Room
EXISTING CONCRETE
Restroom
Restroom SIDEWALK
68.00 SF
Playroom #6 93.50 SF
Seat Strg. Nursing
330.06 SF
27.5' Kitchen
Restroom Playroom #7
Playroom #8
S
FILE PATH: ip01.kleinfelder.com\blbkshare\0700\0797-814_Services\0797-0001_Westmont_Cass_Ave_Childcare_SP_DS\CADD\_ProdDrawings\7971 Fire Truck Path.dwg
24' 18' 5'
18' Playroom #5
W D
3"
J/C / Storage Utilities/Riser
Restroom Restroom
Corridor
Restroom 19.8' 18'
6' °
60
Playroom #3
Playroom #4
S
3"
CASS AVENUE
5' 2"
Playroom #2
Playroom #1
'
R5
R2
17.3'
0'
X-REFS: 7971 DESIGN & 7971 Topo & 7971 Boundary & N Family Floor Plan & 7971 DESIGN REVERSE TRAFFIC JOB NO. 7971 VEENSTRA & KIMM, INC., DESIGN FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER 184.001939
2"
12' R70'
14'
10'
X X
X X X 2"
3" X X
3"3"
3"
3"
3"
3" X 5'
3"3" X X ST
2" 3" X X
X X X 10' UTILITY EASEMENT
| | | | | 3"
6" 3"
=O= =O= =O= =O= =O= 2"
DATE REVISIONS SCALE AS NOTED SHEET NO.
DRAWN SKUPER 6120 S. CASS AVE., WESTMONT, IL - CHILD CARE FACILITY
CHECKED RDALTON
814 SERVICES, LLC
APPROVED ELEE FIRE TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT 1
DATE 04/15/2026 552 W. Boughton Road ● Bolingbrook, IL 60440
ISSUED FOR REVIEW 319-466-1000 ● 1-800-241-8000 PROJECT 7971
Page 205 of 261
May 17, 2026
Village of Westmont
814 SERVICES – CHILD CARE FACILITY TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM
6102 S. CASS AVE, WESTMONT, IL
The purpose of this memorandum is to identify the impacts associated with the development of a day
care on Cass Avenue. The memo will provide information on the location, proposed land use, size of
development, trip generation, and trip distribution. The memo will utilize the Encore Car Wash Traffic
Impact Study completed by KLOA on October 19, 2022, to provide the baseline traffic information and
then add the day care trips to the study area. Detailed information is attached to this memo.
Location
The development is located at 6102 S. Cass Avenue just south of 61st Street and south Encore Car Wash.
The day care will share a full access to 61st Street to the north and a right-in-right-out access to the east.
The speed limit is 40 mph on Cass Ave and 25 mph on 61st Street.
Day Care
Figure 1 – Location Map
Development
The existing lot is empty. The proposed development is a 13,000-sf building with two entrances and
approximately 39 parking stalls. The facility is projected to care for 173 children and have 30 employees.
The west access is proposed to be two way and the east access is proposed to be one-way into the facility
and connect to the west access.
Page 206 of 261
Figure 2 – Site Plan
Internal Circulation
The primary drop-off location will be the east side of the building and there will be 10 parking stalls. Since
this is a day care facility of younger children, it is expected that parents will park and check in their
children. This access is one-way in and then drivers will continue around the building to exit the west
access. The west parking area will be primarily for employees but also allows for additional parking for
parents who drop off and pick up.
External Circulation
The directional distribution was taken from the Car Wash TIS and applied to the day care trips. The
access on 61st Street provides full access but the access to Cass Ave is only a right-in-right-out.
Northbound trips will need to utilize 61st Street and the southbound trips can use the right-in-right-out.
Trip Generation
The Trip Generation is based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, for a Day Care Center (565)
and is located in Appendix A. A gross floor area of 13,000-sf was used as the dependent variable.
Table 1 – Day Care Trips
TOTAL IN OUT
AM 141 53% 75 47% 66
PM 140 47% 66 53% 75
Page 207 of 261
Modeling
The AM & PM peak hours of the fully developed car wash was modeled as the existing conditions. The
same area as the car wash report was analyzed for the day care. This included 61st Street, the RIRO, the
development drive to the south, 63rd Street, which is signalized, and the access to 61st Street.
The same software, Trafficware Synchro, was used for the car wash TIA and this analysis but this analysis
used a newer version of the software. The intersection geometry, traffic signal timing, and traffic
volumes used for this analysis matched the car wash TIA, but slight differences were observed between
the two results.
The Traffic Impact Analysis feature of the software was used to distribute the new trips across the
network based on the distributions from the car wash TIA. The models were then simulated using the
software SimTraffic and reviewed for excessive queueing on the network.
Existing Conditions
Table 2 – Existing Level of Service 2026 (AM/PM)
MOVEMENT
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
INTERSECTION
BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND
L TH R L TH R L TH R L TH R
Access to 61st St - - A/A A/A A/A A/A
61st St E/F* B/B B/B A/A - -
RIRO B/B -
Commercial D/D - B/B A/A - -
63rd St (signalized) C/D D/D D/F D/F D/F C/C C/C D/D
*Queue length 1.6 vehicles
Developed Conditions
Table 3 – Developed Level of Service 2026 (AM/PM)
MOVEMENT
EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH
INTERSECTION
BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND
L TH R L TH R L TH R L TH R
st
Access to 61 St - - A/A A/A A/A A/A
st
61 St F/F* B/B B/B A/A - -
RIRO B/B -
Commercial D/D - B/B A/A - -
rd
63 St (signalized) C/D D/D D/F D/F D/F C/C C/C D/D
Optimized timing /E /D /E /D /E /D /C /E
*Queue length 2.5/4.2 vehicles
Page 208 of 261
Summary
The development of the day care has minimal impact on the surrounding road network. There is no
change in level of service (LOS) for all movements except for the AM eastbound left turn from 61st Street
to Cass Avenue. That movement drops from a LOS E to a LOS F. This results in the queue length
increasing from two vehicles to three vehicles. There is a small volume of traffic on 61st Street but the
traffic on Cass Avenue is high enough that eastbound left turning vehicles must wait to find gaps in the
traffic.
The existing traffic signal at Cass Avenue and 63rd Street has movements that currently fall to a LOS of F
during the peak hours. The signal timing can be optimized to provide more time to those movements and
bring them up to a LOS of E.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at 319-466-1000 or lbelding@kleinfelder.com.
VEENSTRA & KIMM, INC.
Leland Belding, PE, PTOE
Illinois License No. 062055533
License renewal date is November 30, 2027
Encl.
A – Trip Generation
B – Car Wash Analysis (Baseline Existing Conditions)
C – Day Care Analysis
D – Site Plan
Page 209 of 261
APPENDIX – A
Trip Generation
Veenstra & Kimm, Inc. A
7971
Page 210 of 261
012ÿ41
9
56ÿ
4678
65
66ÿ5ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ8ÿ
!7ÿ1 "66#12$
%61#ÿ&'(5ÿ')ÿ*1678ÿ85668ÿ51))$
!76ÿ&'(5ÿ+68,667ÿ-ÿ17ÿ.ÿ1/
6887012'18'7 67651ÿ354171(4(5417
56789:ÿ<=ÿ>?6@A9BC DE
FGHIÿJKKKÿ>LIÿM?IÿNMFC
OA:9P?A<QRSÿOAB?:A86?A<QC TUÿ9Q?9:AQHVÿWDUÿ9XA?AQH
66ÿ5ÿ676518'7ÿ65ÿÿÿ8ÿ
FG9:RH9ÿYR?9 YRQH9ÿ<=ÿYR?9B >?RQ@R:@ÿO9GAR?A<Q
JKIEE JIDZÿ[ÿDIK\ I\D
0181ÿ%'8ÿ17ÿ(18'7
\KK
JK w
]ÿ^ÿ]:A_ÿ̀Q@B
JKK
K
KK JK v J \K
aÿ^ÿJKKKÿ>LIÿM?IÿNMF
8(2ÿ86 65106ÿb186
886ÿ4(56ÿ(18'7ÿc'8ÿ67 bdeÿffff
ghijÿlmnÿopnqprsJ\?tÿ̀@A?A<Q uQB?A?6?9ÿ<=ÿ]:RQB_<:?R?A<Qÿ̀QHAQ99:B
Page 211 of 261
012ÿ41
9
56ÿ
4678
65
66ÿ5ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ8ÿ
!7ÿ1 "66#12$
%61#ÿ&'(5ÿ')ÿ*1678ÿ85668ÿ51))$
!76ÿ&'(5ÿ+68,667ÿ-ÿ17ÿ.ÿ/
6887012'18'7 67651ÿ354171(4(5417
56789:ÿ<=ÿ>?6@A9BC DE
FGHIÿJKKKÿ>LIÿM?IÿNMFC O
PA:9Q?A<RSTÿPAB?:A86?A<RC ODUÿ9R?9:ARHVÿWUÿ9XA?ARH
66ÿ5ÿ676518'7ÿ65ÿÿÿ8ÿ
FG9:SH9ÿYS?9 YSRH9ÿ<=ÿYS?9B >?SR@S:@ÿP9GAS?A<R
JKID JI ÿZÿOKI[ IO
0181ÿ%'8ÿ17ÿ(18'7
sKK
JK
-
\ÿ]ÿ\:A^ÿ_R@B
JKK
K
KK JK v J sK
`ÿ]ÿJKKKÿ>LIÿM?IÿNMF
8(2ÿ86 65106ÿa186
886ÿ4(56ÿ(18'7ÿb'8ÿ67 acdÿeeee
fghiÿklmÿnompoqrJs?tÿ_@A?A<R uRB?A?6?9ÿ<=ÿ\:SRB^<:?S?A<Rÿ_RHAR99:B
Page 212 of 261
APPENDIX – B
Car Wash Developed Analysis
(Existing Conditions)
Veenstra & Kimm, Inc. B
7971
Page 213 of 261
Map - 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
AM PEAK
10 5 12 2
51 41 4
31 3
1 7
6
Page 214 of 261
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave AM PEAK
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 159 717 162 116 460 125 265 431 168 179 311 129
Future Volume (vph) 159 717 162 116 460 125 265 431 168 179 311 129
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3440 0 1770 3426 0 1770 3391 0 1770 3383 0
Flt Permitted 0.231 0.110 0.416 0.268
Satd. Flow (perm) 430 3440 0 205 3426 0 775 3391 0 499 3383 0
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 22 26 49 55
Lane Group Flow (vph) 177 977 0 129 650 0 294 666 0 199 489 0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Total Split (s) 21.0 49.0 14.0 42.0 13.0 52.0 15.0 54.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5
Act Effct Green (s) 57.9 43.0 51.3 39.3 57.3 45.8 60.7 47.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.33 0.39 0.30 0.44 0.35 0.47 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.85 0.66 0.62 0.72 0.54 0.59 0.38
Control Delay (s/veh) 28.1 47.8 41.5 40.8 35.4 33.1 27.5 27.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 28.1 47.8 41.5 40.8 35.4 33.1 27.5 27.8
LOS C D D D D C C C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 44.8 40.9 33.8 27.7
Approach LOS D D C C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 90 403 64 242 152 222 97 142
Queue Length 95th (ft) 142 493 #133 322 221 285 149 191
Internal Link Dist (ft) 483 369 316 757
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 205 210 200
Base Capacity (vph) 370 1153 201 1053 410 1225 341 1271
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.85 0.64 0.62 0.72 0.54 0.58 0.38
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 73 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 37.7 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.3% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø1 Ø2 (R) Ø3 Ø4
14 s 49 s 13 s 54 s
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø5 Ø6 (R) Ø7 Ø8
21 s 42 s 15 s 52 s Synchro 12 Report
Page 215 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
2: Cass Ave & 61th St AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 52 53 861 827 30
Future Vol, veh/h 25 52 53 861 827 30
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 27 55 56 916 880 32
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1466 456 912 0 - 0
Stage 1 896 - - - - -
Stage 2 571 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 119 552 743 - - -
Stage 1 359 - - - - -
Stage 2 529 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 107 552 743 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 107 - - - - -
Stage 1 322 - - - - -
Stage 2 529 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 24.39 1.47 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 209 - 107 552 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 - 0.249 0.1 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.2 0.9 49.6 12.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A E B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.9 0.3 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 216 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
3: Cass Ave AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 48 35 857 806 51
Future Vol, veh/h 38 48 35 857 806 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 40 51 37 912 857 54
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1415 456 912 0 - 0
Stage 1 885 - - - - -
Stage 2 530 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 128 552 743 - - -
Stage 1 364 - - - - -
Stage 2 554 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 120 552 743 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 120 - - - - -
Stage 1 339 - - - - -
Stage 2 554 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 34.11 1 0
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 141 - 213 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 - 0.43 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.1 0.6 34.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 2 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 217 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
4: Cass Ave & RIRO Access AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 914 877 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 914 877 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 5 0 962 923 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 463 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 546 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 546 - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.66 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 546 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.01 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 11.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 218 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
5: 61th St AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 1 3 73 1 3
Future Vol, veh/h 74 1 3 73 1 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 78 1 3 77 1 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 79 0 162 78
Stage 1 - - - - 78 -
Stage 2 - - - - 83 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1519 - 829 982
Stage 1 - - - - 945 -
Stage 2 - - - - 940 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1519 - 827 982
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 827 -
Stage 1 - - - - 943 -
Stage 2 - - - - 940 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.29 8.85
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 938 - - 71 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.002 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.9 - - 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 219 of 261
Map - 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
PM PEAK
10 5 12 2
51 41 4
31 3
1 7
6
8
Page 220 of 261
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave PM PEAK
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 167 469 281 278 838 152 283 466 193 174 613 169
Future Volume (vph) 167 469 281 278 838 152 283 466 193 174 613 169
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3341 0 1770 3458 0 1770 3383 0 1770 3426 0
Flt Permitted 0.094 0.182 0.185 0.231
Satd. Flow (perm) 175 3341 0 339 3458 0 345 3383 0 430 3426 0
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 102 16 53 30
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 833 0 309 1100 0 314 732 0 193 869 0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Total Split (s) 21.0 49.0 14.0 42.0 13.0 52.0 15.0 54.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5
Act Effct Green (s) 57.7 42.5 51.2 38.7 57.3 45.8 60.7 47.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.33 0.39 0.30 0.44 0.35 0.47 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.75 0.72 1.27 1.06 1.26 0.60 0.62 0.68
Control Delay (s/veh) 47.1 37.6 176.7 87.8 169.1 34.3 29.1 36.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 47.1 37.6 176.7 87.8 169.1 34.3 29.1 36.9
LOS D D F F F C C D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 39.3 107.3 74.8 35.5
Approach LOS D F E D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 99 291 ~234 ~540 ~229 251 93 318
Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 370 #443 #719 #424 318 144 394
Internal Link Dist (ft) 483 369 316 757
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 205 210 200
Base Capacity (vph) 288 1160 243 1040 250 1226 315 1270
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.72 1.27 1.06 1.26 0.60 0.61 0.68
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 73 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.27
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 67.7 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø1 Ø2 (R) Ø3 Ø4
14 s 49 s 13 s 54 s
#1 #1 #1 #1
Synchro 12 Report
Ø5 Ø6 (R) Ø7 Ø8
21 s 42 s 15 s 52 s
Page 221 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
2: Cass Ave & 61th St PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 65 70 878 1031 46
Future Vol, veh/h 26 65 70 878 1031 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 28 69 74 934 1097 49
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1737 573 1146 0 - 0
Stage 1 1121 - - - - -
Stage 2 616 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 78 463 606 - - -
Stage 1 273 - - - - -
Stage 2 501 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 65 463 606 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 65 - - - - -
Stage 1 228 - - - - -
Stage 2 501 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 37.43 2.43 0
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 266 - 65 463 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.123 - 0.423 0.149 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.8 1.7 95.6 14.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 1.6 0.5 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 222 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
3: Cass Ave PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 18 31 903 806 51
Future Vol, veh/h 18 18 31 903 806 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 19 19 33 961 857 54
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1431 456 912 0 - 0
Stage 1 885 - - - - -
Stage 2 546 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 125 552 743 - - -
Stage 1 364 - - - - -
Stage 2 544 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 118 552 743 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 118 - - - - -
Stage 1 342 - - - - -
Stage 2 544 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 28.06 0.89 0
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 119 - 194 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 - 0.197 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.1 0.6 28.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.7 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 223 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
4: Cass Ave & RIRO Access PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 13 0 948 1088 8
Future Vol, veh/h 0 13 0 948 1088 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 14 0 998 1145 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 577 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 460 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 460 - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.07 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 460 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.03 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 13.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 224 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
5: 61th St PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 4 7 89 4 10
Future Vol, veh/h 81 4 7 89 4 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 85 4 7 94 4 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 89 0 196 87
Stage 1 - - - - 87 -
Stage 2 - - - - 108 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1506 - 793 971
Stage 1 - - - - 936 -
Stage 2 - - - - 916 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1506 - 789 971
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 789 -
Stage 1 - - - - 931 -
Stage 2 - - - - 916 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.54 9.02
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 911 - - 131 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.005 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9 - - 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 225 of 261
APPENDIX – C
Day Care Developed Conditions
Veenstra & Kimm, Inc. C
7971
Page 226 of 261
Development Volumes 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
AM PEAK
10 5 12 2
51 41 4
31 3
1 7
6
Page 227 of 261
Total Volumes 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
AM PEAK
10 5 12 2
51 41 4
31 3
1 7
6
Page 228 of 261
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave AM PEAK
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 159 717 162 116 460 125 265 431 168 179 311 129
Future Volume (vph) 174 717 162 116 460 144 265 446 168 195 324 142
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3440 0 1770 3412 0 1770 3394 0 1770 3376 0
Flt Permitted 0.213 0.111 0.396 0.257
Satd. Flow (perm) 397 3440 0 207 3412 0 738 3394 0 479 3376 0
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 22 32 46 60
Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 977 0 129 671 0 294 683 0 217 518 0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Total Split (s) 21.0 49.0 14.0 42.0 13.0 52.0 15.0 54.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5
Act Effct Green (s) 58.3 43.0 50.6 38.7 57.2 45.7 60.8 47.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.33 0.39 0.30 0.44 0.35 0.47 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.85 0.66 0.65 0.74 0.56 0.65 0.41
Control Delay (s/veh) 29.9 47.8 41.6 41.7 37.3 33.7 30.4 28.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 29.9 47.8 41.6 41.7 37.3 33.7 30.4 28.1
LOS C D D D D C C C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 44.9 41.7 34.8 28.8
Approach LOS D D C C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 99 403 64 252 152 231 107 152
Queue Length 95th (ft) 154 493 #132 332 #225 295 163 203
Internal Link Dist (ft) 483 369 316 757
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 205 210 200
Base Capacity (vph) 359 1153 201 1037 396 1221 334 1271
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.85 0.64 0.65 0.74 0.56 0.65 0.41
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 73 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 38.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.3% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø1 Ø2 (R) Ø3 Ø4
14 s 49 s 13 s 54 s
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø5 Ø6 (R) Ø7 Ø8
21 s 42 s 15 s 52 s Synchro 12 Report
Page 229 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
2: Cass Ave & 61th St AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 52 53 861 827 30
Future Vol, veh/h 42 65 102 861 838 38
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 45 69 109 916 891 40
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1587 466 932 0 - 0
Stage 1 912 - - - - -
Stage 2 675 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 99 543 730 - - -
Stage 1 352 - - - - -
Stage 2 467 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 79 543 730 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 79 - - - - -
Stage 1 282 - - - - -
Stage 2 467 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 46.15 2.7 0
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 381 - 79 543 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 - 0.565 0.127 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.8 1.7 98.1 12.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - 2.5 0.4 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 230 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
3: Cass Ave AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 48 35 857 806 51
Future Vol, veh/h 38 48 35 906 848 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 40 51 37 964 902 54
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1486 478 956 0 - 0
Stage 1 929 - - - - -
Stage 2 556 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 115 533 715 - - -
Stage 1 345 - - - - -
Stage 2 538 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 107 533 715 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 107 - - - - -
Stage 1 320 - - - - -
Stage 2 538 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 39.31 1.04 0
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 134 - 193 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 - 0.473 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.3 0.7 39.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A E - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 2.3 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 231 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
4: Cass Ave & RIRO Access AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 914 877 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 38 0 963 886 17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 40 0 1014 933 18
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 475 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 536 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 536 - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.26 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 536 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.075 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 12.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 232 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
5: 61th St AM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 1 3 73 1 3
Future Vol, veh/h 78 5 60 73 8 29
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 82 5 63 77 8 31
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 87 0 288 85
Stage 1 - - - - 85 -
Stage 2 - - - - 203 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1509 - 703 974
Stage 1 - - - - 939 -
Stage 2 - - - - 831 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1509 - 672 974
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 672 -
Stage 1 - - - - 898 -
Stage 2 - - - - 831 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.38 9.24
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 888 - - 812 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 - - 0.042 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.2 - - 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 233 of 261
TIA Driveway Distribution Report 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
AM PEAK
Development: DAY CARE
Driveway: 1 Driveway 1 (Node 51)
To From
Origin # Route
Distribution % Trips Distribution % Trips
1 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 1 (Node 9) 10 8 25 17
2 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 2 (Node 10) 5 4 10 7
3 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 3 (Node 6) 20 15 5 3
4 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 4 (Node 8) 20 15 5 3
5 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 5 (Node 7) 25 19 5 3
Development: DAY CARE
Driveway: 2 Driveway 2 (Node 41)
To From
Origin # Route
Distribution % Trips Distribution % Trips
1 Origin 1 (Node 9) to Driveway 2 (Node 41) 15 11 0 0
2 Origin 2 (Node 10) to Driveway 2 (Node 41) 5 4 0 0
3 Driveway 2 (Node 41) to Origin 3 (Node 6) 0 0 15 10
4 Driveway 2 (Node 41) to Origin 4 (Node 8) 0 0 15 10
5 Driveway 2 (Node 41) to Origin 5 (Node 7) 0 0 20 13
Page 1
Page 234 of 261
Development Volumes 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
PM PEAK
10 5 12 2
51 41 4
31 3
1 7
6
8
Page 235 of 261
Total Volumes 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
PM PEAK
10 5 12 2
51 41 4
31 3
1 7
6
8
Page 236 of 261
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave PM PEAK
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 167 469 281 278 838 152 283 466 193 174 613 169
Future Volume (vph) 180 469 281 278 838 169 283 479 193 193 628 184
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3341 0 1770 3451 0 1770 3387 0 1770 3419 0
Flt Permitted 0.095 0.184 0.169 0.222
Satd. Flow (perm) 177 3341 0 343 3451 0 315 3387 0 414 3419 0
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 102 18 51 33
Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 833 0 309 1119 0 314 746 0 214 902 0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Total Split (s) 21.0 49.0 14.0 42.0 13.0 52.0 15.0 54.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5
Act Effct Green (s) 57.9 42.5 50.7 38.2 57.2 45.7 60.8 47.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.33 0.39 0.29 0.44 0.35 0.47 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.79 0.72 1.27 1.09 1.32 0.61 0.70 0.71
Control Delay (s/veh) 50.6 37.6 177.2 98.8 194.0 34.8 33.5 37.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 50.6 37.6 177.2 98.8 194.0 34.8 33.5 37.7
LOS D D F F F C C D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 40.1 115.8 82.0 36.9
Approach LOS D F F D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 111 291 ~237 ~572 ~237 258 105 334
Queue Length 95th (ft) #201 370 #441 #737 #433 327 160 413
Internal Link Dist (ft) 483 369 316 757
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 205 210 200
Base Capacity (vph) 288 1160 243 1025 238 1222 309 1270
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.72 1.27 1.09 1.32 0.61 0.69 0.71
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 73 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.32
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 72.2 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø1 Ø2 (R) Ø3 Ø4
14 s 49 s 13 s 54 s
#1 #1 #1 #1
Synchro 12 Report
Ø5 Ø6 (R) Ø7 Ø8
21 s 42 s 15 s 52 s
Page 237 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
2: Cass Ave & 61th St PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 65 70 878 1031 46
Future Vol, veh/h 45 80 113 878 1041 53
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 48 85 120 934 1107 56
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1843 582 1164 0 - 0
Stage 1 1136 - - - - -
Stage 2 707 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 67 456 596 - - -
Stage 1 268 - - - - -
Stage 2 450 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 48 456 596 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 48 - - - - -
Stage 1 195 - - - - -
Stage 2 450 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 102.58 3.84 0
HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 410 - 48 456 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.202 - 0.989 0.186 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.6 2.7 258.8 14.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 4.2 0.7 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 238 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
3: Cass Ave PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 18 31 903 806 51
Future Vol, veh/h 18 18 31 946 855 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 19 19 33 1006 910 54
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1506 482 964 0 - 0
Stage 1 937 - - - - -
Stage 2 569 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 112 530 710 - - -
Stage 1 342 - - - - -
Stage 2 530 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 105 530 710 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 105 - - - - -
Stage 1 320 - - - - -
Stage 2 530 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 31.3 0.93 0
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 114 - 175 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 - 0.219 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.3 0.6 31.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B A D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.8 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 239 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
4: Cass Ave & RIRO Access PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 13 0 948 1088 8
Future Vol, veh/h 0 50 0 991 1100 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 53 0 1043 1158 22
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 590 - 0 - 0
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 451 0 - - -
Stage 1 0 - 0 - - -
Stage 2 0 - 0 - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 451 - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.04 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 451 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.117 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - 14 - -
HCM Lane LOS - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 240 of 261
HCM 7th TWSC 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
5: 61th St PM PEAK
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 81 4 7 89 4 10
Future Vol, veh/h 84 7 57 89 11 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 88 7 60 94 12 43
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 96 0 306 92
Stage 1 - - - - 92 -
Stage 2 - - - - 214 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1498 - 686 965
Stage 1 - - - - 931 -
Stage 2 - - - - 822 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1498 - 657 965
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 657 -
Stage 1 - - - - 892 -
Stage 2 - - - - 822 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 2.93 9.37
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 878 - - 703 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 - - 0.04 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.4 - - 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.1 -
Synchro 12 Report
Page 241 of 261
TIA Driveway Distribution Report 2028 DAY CARE DEVELOPED
PM PEAK
Development: DAY CARE
Driveway: 1 Driveway 1 (Node 51)
To From
Origin # Route
Distribution % Trips Distribution % Trips
1 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 1 (Node 9) 10 7 25 19
2 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 2 (Node 10) 5 3 10 7
3 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 3 (Node 6) 20 13 5 4
4 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 4 (Node 8) 20 13 5 4
5 Driveway 1 (Node 51) to Origin 5 (Node 7) 25 17 5 4
Development: DAY CARE
Driveway: 2 Driveway 2 (Node 41)
To From
Origin # Route
Distribution % Trips Distribution % Trips
1 Origin 1 (Node 9) to Driveway 2 (Node 41) 15 10 0 0
2 Origin 2 (Node 10) to Driveway 2 (Node 41) 5 3 0 0
3 Driveway 2 (Node 41) to Origin 3 (Node 6) 0 0 15 11
4 Driveway 2 (Node 41) to Origin 4 (Node 8) 0 0 15 11
5 Driveway 2 (Node 41) to Origin 5 (Node 7) 0 0 20 15
Page 1
Page 242 of 261
Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2028 CAR WASH DEVELOPED
1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave PM PEAK - SIGNAL OPTIMIZED
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 167 469 281 278 838 152 283 466 193 174 613 169
Future Volume (vph) 167 469 281 278 838 152 283 466 193 174 613 169
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3341 0 1770 3458 0 1770 3383 0 1770 3426 0
Flt Permitted 0.111 0.103 0.106 0.246
Satd. Flow (perm) 207 3341 0 192 3458 0 197 3383 0 458 3426 0
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 94 17 49 26
Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 833 0 309 1100 0 314 732 0 193 869 0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Total Split (s) 15.1 42.0 24.0 50.9 24.0 44.6 19.4 40.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5 4.0 6.5
Act Effct Green (s) 49.6 36.0 62.0 44.4 60.0 40.2 49.6 33.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.28 0.48 0.34 0.46 0.31 0.38 0.26
v/c Ratio 0.88 0.84 0.94 0.92 0.95 0.68 0.62 0.96
Control Delay (s/veh) 67.9 48.1 71.5 53.9 74.7 40.6 31.4 67.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 67.9 48.1 71.5 53.9 74.7 40.6 31.4 67.1
LOS E D E D E D C E
Approach Delay (s/veh) 51.7 57.8 50.8 60.6
Approach LOS D E D E
Queue Length 50th (ft) 102 320 206 468 213 272 98 378
Queue Length 95th (ft) #245 405 #386 #605 #398 350 152 #517
Internal Link Dist (ft) 483 369 316 757
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 205 210 200
Base Capacity (vph) 212 992 334 1192 332 1079 337 909
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.88 0.84 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.68 0.57 0.96
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 73 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 55.5 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1: Cass Ave & 63rd Ave
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø1 Ø2 (R) Ø3 Ø4
24 s 42 s 24 s 40 s
#1 #1 #1 #1
Ø5 Ø6 (R) Ø7 Ø8
15.1 s 50.9 s 19.4 s 44.6 s Synchro 12 Report
Page 243 of 261
APPENDIX – D
Site Plan
Veenstra & Kimm, Inc. D
7971
Page 244 of 261
SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE THOSE OF THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
FOR WATER AND SEWER MAIN CONSTRUCTION IN ILLINOIS, EIGHTH
EDITION" (SSWSMC), ADOPTED, 2020 AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION" ADOPTED JANUARY 1, 2022.
12"
PLOTTED: Wednesday, April 15, 2026 2:36:43 PM
ADD "DO NOT BLOCK DRIVEWAY"
SIGN TO EXISTING STOP SIGN
2"
18" POST
0' 20' 40'
2"
BIKE RACK, MINIMUM ST
6 SPACES ST
EXISTING CONCRETE
DEPRESSED CURB AND GUTTER ACCESS ROAD CURB & GUTTER
ST
ST
ST 4.9' R1
5.2'
ST 5' 0'
6.2' 5' KEY NOTES:
6.2' 5' 5'
S
(SEE TYPICAL DETAILS ON SITE DETAIL SHEET)
S S
S
6 5' - 3" STANDARD ASPHALT PAVEMENT
6 6 NEW SIGN TO BE 1
3 5' R5
R1 ' PERMITTED BY OWNER
1 102.21 SF 2 - 5" STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
'
20
164.67 SF
Vestibule
Director
ADA RAMP Restroom Restroom 8'
10.2' 3 - 8" HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
R8 R5
' 5' 839.50 SF
10 ' 279.32 SF
Lobby 2 - 4" PARKING STRIPE, WHITE
' Playroom #9
Playroom #10 Playroom #11 N Studio
8 3"
4
S Restroom 7 6' 5' - CONC. CURB REVERSE GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12
DETENTION POND
6' 5
38.7'
6 - 5" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
Strg. Clst.
DUMPSTER LOCATION Corridor
264.42 SF
Strg. Clst.
Corridor N Lab 7 8' 7 - ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, MOUNTED TO BUILDING
9' 4' - 2"
Restroom
6
304.05 SF
Break Room
6 6 8 - ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING
EXISTING CONCRETE
Restroom
Restroom SIDEWALK
68.00 SF
Playroom #6 93.50 SF
Nursing 9'
FILE PATH: ip01.kleinfelder.com\blbkshare\0700\0797-814_Services\0797-0001_Westmont_Cass_Ave_Childcare_SP_DS\CADD\_ProdDrawings\7971 C-1 - C-6 Civil Drawings.dwg
Seat Strg.
330.06 SF 1
27.5' Kitchen
Restroom Playroom #7
Playroom #8
S
24' 18' 5'
18' Playroom #5
W D
3"
J/C / Storage Utilities/Riser
Restroom Restroom 4
Corridor
Restroom 19.8' 18'
5 R5-1 "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN
1 60
6' ° AS PER THE MANUAL ON
5
UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
Playroom #3 DEVICES
Playroom #4
S 5
3"
CASS AVENUE
NEW FENCE, SEE ARCHITECTURAL 5'
Playroom #2
Playroom #1
PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS
' 2'
R3
6
"DO NOT ENTER" R2
SIGN, SEE DETAIL 14.7' 0'
6
JOB NO. 7971 VEENSTRA & KIMM, INC., DESIGN FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER 184.001939
THIS SHEET
1
2'
1 5 12' R70'
24' 14'
10'
X X
X X X
3"
X X
3"3"
3"
3"
3" X 5'
3"3" X X ST
2" 3" X X
X X X 10' UTILITY EASEMENT
X-REFS: 7971 DESIGN & 7971 Topo & 7971 Boundary & N Family Floor Plan
POTENTIAL FUTURE CROSS
DRIVE EASEMENT
| | | | | 3"
6" 3"
=O= =O= =O= =O= =O=
DATE REVISIONS SCALE AS NOTED SHEET NO.
DRAWN SKUPER 6120 S. CASS AVE., WESTMONT, IL - CHILD CARE FACILITY
CHECKED RDALTON
814 SERVICES, LLC
APPROVED ELEE GEOMETRIC SITE PLAN C-4
DATE 04/15/2026 552 W. Boughton Road ● Bolingbrook, IL 60440
ISSUED FOR REVIEW 319-466-1000 ● 1-800-241-8000 PROJECT 7971
Page 245 of 261
Page 246 of 261
Page 247 of 261
Page 248 of 261
Page 249 of 261
Page 250 of 261
LOCATION MAP
PRELIMINARY PLAN - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN ITEM UNITS UNIT PRICE QUANTITY COST KAREN BAILEY MEYER TRUST
DAVID P. MEYER TRUST
SCALE: 1" = 10' DEMO EXISTING STRUCTURES L.S. $8000 1 $8000 123 HUDSON STREET
FOR EROSION CONTROL L.S. $5000 1 $5000 WESTMONT, IL 60559
GRADING L.S. $5000 1 $5000
Sanitary Sewer
300 WEST 60TH STREET SUBDIVISION TOPSOIL
SEEDING & BLANKET
S.Y.
S.Y.
$3
$2
1500
1500
$4500
$3000
Storm Sewer
300 60th ST. - WESTMONT, IL STREET SWEEPING L.S. $1000 1
Watermain
TOTAL COST $26500
310 60TH STREET: NOEL & MARK ALBIAN HOEKSTRA Contour Lines 704
290 60TH STREET: RADAVAN & DUSICA IVANOVIC 705.00
Spot Elevations
325 59TH STREET: GRANT & LAURA SMITH
LOT 15 IN BLOCK 2 IN FAIRVIEW ACRES, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 (ALSO 321 59TH STREET: LTC MDD06-018 Fence
SITE KNOWN AS LOT 6) OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, 301 59TH STREET: KRISTINE CURRIER
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL 9, 1936 AS DOCUMENT 368165, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. BENCHMARK INFORMATION Fire Hydrant
Manhole
DUPAGE COUNTY BENCHMARK #DGN17001: LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
SUBDIVISION AREA: 35640 S.F. ( 0.818 ACRES) OF THE INTERSECTION OF MAIN STREET AND 55TH STREET. STATION IS 26.5 FEET Light Pole
SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF 55TH STREET, 51.0 FEET WEST OF THE CENTERLINE ADDRESS: ZONING DISTRICT
OF MAIN STREET, AND 15.0 FEET EAST OF A POWER POLE "V0-75 SP 6 4 40". Power Pole
MONUMENT IS A BRONZE DISK IN THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF A CONCRETE TRAFFIC
300 60TH STREET: R-3 B-Box NEW
SIGNAL BASE.
ELEVATION = 756.72 (NAVD 88)
310 60TH STREET: R-3 B-BOX
290 60TH STREET: R-3 San. Cleanout SAN.
CLEANOUT
SITE BENCHMARK: STORM MANHOLE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 325 59TH STREET: R-3 Tree
SUBJECT PROPERTY. 321 59TH STREET: R-3
RIM ELEVATION = 738.87 (NAVD 88) 301 59TH STREET: R-3 Shrubs
Drainage Pattern
SITE PLAN PREPARED BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
Silt Fence S
PREPARED BY NEKOLA SURVEY, INC .
744.10 743.32
742.83 743.83
DRY WELL
CULVERT
INV.=742.30
CONCRETE
(ASPHALT PAVEMENT)
744 PAVEMENT 743.67
744.87 744.92
744.80
"S
74 744.79 744.67 12
4 744.27 744 0 739.80 9 RM
743.58 744.68 74 73 TO
744.37 310 60TH STREET 1
743.61 743 74
60TH ST.
743.84 OWNER:
744.11 737.69
NOEL & MARK ALBIAN HOEKSTRA 742 738.63
CULVERT
744
INV.=742.58 9
738.29 STORM MH 73
8"-W
48" 744.36 744.44 BRICK RET. WALL 743.89 743.72 742.28 738.94 RIM=738.87
740.42
743
T/W=743.39 T/W=744.95 T/W=744.46 T/W=743.96 739.93 INV.=734.97
742.61 743.60 743.48 743.27 743.49
743.14 743
742.72
742.39 742
8" 742.05 741.32 741 741.25 740.76
740 297.00' 739
739.22
744.12
12" 20" 739.00
14" 30" 12"
740.00 738.89
12
"S
TO
743.25 739.22 RM
743.38
10"
743.51
744.44 743.48
743.26
743.03
CULVERT
INV.=742.58
741.87
744 741.48 739
743.81
744 8" 10"
740.61 739.21
739.79
120.00'
743.75 745.15 74
743.89 744.87 745.63 3
744.87 743.80
744.07 16"
5
74 74
2
745
120.00'
12"
OVERHANG
746.25 74
1
743.25
8"-W
16"
300 74 12"
742.93 0
POND
T/F - 746.28
745.33 744.44
744.55 746.09
744.38 745.34 740.04
741.83
744.81 739.61
CULVERT 745 746.16 10"
INV.=743.28
745.70
745.53 745.84 4
CULVERT 744.87 74
CONC.
INV.=743.67 6
74
745.78 74
CONC. 745.58 5 20"
745.83 746.13 745.93
745.55
745.63 74
745.67 746 743.50 3
745.65 745.03
SANITARY SEWER
746.07 745.01
746.02 746.13
746.12 746.26
74 ASPHALT 46
CONC.
6 PAVEMENT 7 12" 14" 12" 14"
16" 16" 14"
GARAGE 12"
740.29
FLOOR=746.34 16"
746.02 745.99 746.30
28" 746.33 745.16
CULVERT 746.34 16"
746.35
INV.=744.22
(ASPHALT PAVEMENT)
745.83 744.48
746.58 746.23 746.39
CULVERT
INV.=744.61
746.35
297.00'
CULVERT
INV.=744.20 746.03
60TH ST.
8"-W
746 74
6
745 746 74
74
1
5 74
290 60TH STREET 2
743.11 741.50 740.90
747.50 7 745.05 4
7
747.30 OWNER: 74 74
746.67 74 RADAVAN & DUSICA IVANOVIC 3
74
746.64
745.07 SheetPage
1 /2512of 261
PRELIMINARY PLAN - GRADING & UTILITY PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 10'
FOR
0 10 20 30 40
300 60TH STREET SUBDIVISION
300 60TH ST. - WESTMONT, IL
743.21
CULVERT
INV.=742.44
743.76
744.10 743.32
742.83 743.83
DRY WELL
CULVERT
INV.=742.30
CONCRETE
(ASPHALT PAVEMENT)
744 PAVEMENT 743.67
744.87 744.92
744.80
"S
74 744.79 744.67 12
4 744.27 744 0 739.80 9 RM
743.58 744.68 74 73 TO
744.37 310 60TH STREET 1
743.61 743 74
60TH ST.
743.84 OWNER:
744.11 737.69
NOEL & MARK ALBIAN HOEKSTRA 742 738.63
CULVERT
744
INV.=742.58 NEW 5' WIDE CONC. 9
SIDEWALK (5" PCC &
738.29 STORM MH 73
8"-W
48" 744.36 744.44 BRICK RET. WALL 743.89 743.72 742.28 738.94
4" AGG. BASE, 6" PCC & RIM=738.87
740.42 CONNECT TO STORM SEWER
743
4" AGG. BASE AT DRIVEWAY) T/W=743.39 T/W=744.95 T/W=744.46 T/W=743.96 739.93 INV.=734.97
743.60 743.48 743.27 5.5 743.49 743.14 743
742.72
742.39 742
8" 742.05 741.32 741 741.25 740.76
740 297.00' (N00° 36' 41" W) 739
739.22
W/CORE & BOOT
INV.=735.5 +/-
744.12 742.61
743.3 743 740
12" 20" 6" PVC SDR26 @ 3.0%
30" 739.00
743
CONNECT TO
14" 743.3 5' P.U.E. TO BE GRANTED 741 12"
742 738.89
744 12" INLET 743
60.00' (S 89° 18' 21" W)
WATERMAIN
RIM=742.8 6"-18" TALL RETAINING
747.0 743.5
INV.=741.8 WALL 12
"S
60.00' (N89° 18' 21" E)
DRY WELL PER TO
745
739.22 RM
BMP REQUIREMENTS
NEW 74 0
B-BOX
NE 35.0 3 74
1.5"-W (TY W 1.5 10"
744.44 PE "W
10' P.U.E. TO BE GRANTED
K C AT
306
35' FRONT SETBACK LINE
OP ER
PE SER
R) VIC
E
GARAGE 74
CULVERT
6 FLOOR = 746.75 74 4
744
5
74
INV.=742.58 (AT GARAGE DOOR) 74
PROPOSED 1
STOOP=748.1
165.6
T/F = 747.50
739
743.2 1.5"-W
74
746
(PROVIDE BRICK LEDGE / DROP SIDING 2
744
746.6
744.8 SANITARY
CLEANOUT
AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN 6"-8"
FOUNDATION REVEAL) PAVER
LOT #1 739.21
CONNECT TO
PATIO
12" PVC SDR26 @ 1.0%
S A N.
S (250 S.F.)
745.07 SDR ERVICE 6
26-24 "
41 @ PVC
1.0 %
M IN.
SANITARY SEWER
24.0 5 6" P.C.C.
SANITARY
744.87 74 18.0 4" CA-6 CLEANOUT
746.8 16"
2.5%
747.0
747.0
745.1 746.4
745 10.2 12"
745.3 746.5 5' P.U.E. TO BE GRANTED
746 297.00' (N00° 36' 41" W)
743
746
8"-W
CONNECT TO 16"
SANITARY SEWER
74 5' P.U.E. TO BE GRANTED
7.5 5 12"
REMOVE TREE 743.5 747.0
60.00' (N89° 18' 21" E)
744
SANITARY
744 745
SAN. SERVICE 6" PVC
CLEANOUT
SDR 26-2441 @ 1.0% MIN.
745.33 747.0
740
74
7 COVERED
CONNECT TO
743.7
PORCH=748.6
739.61
183.2
NEW
WATERMAIN
CULVERT B-BOX
NEW 1.5" WATER SERVICE DRY WELL PER 10"
INV.=743.28 745.7
1.5"-W (TYPE K COPPER)
1.5"-W
302 BMP REQUIREMENTS
741
10' P.U.E. TO BE GRANTED
745.53 745.63 55.0
(S 89° 18' 21" W)
74
12" PVC SDR26 @ 1.0%
745.3 7
35' FRONT SETBACK LINE
6 6" P.C.C. PROPOSED LOT #2
74 4" CA-6
T/F = 748.00
60.00'
24.0 18.0
742
20"
745.83 2.1% (PROVIDE BRICK LEDGE / DROP SIDING
747.5
GARAGE AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN 6"-8"
SANITARY SEWER
FLOOR = 747.25 FOUNDATION REVEAL)
745.7
(AT GARAGE DOOR) 747.3
PAVER
PATIO
6" FLARED END 746.0 746.07 (250 S.F.)
SECTION 74
6 746 12" 14" 12" 14"
INV.=744.5 16" 16" 14"
12"
747
747.5 740.29
743
744.0 16"
747.5
745 28"
74
5
CULVERT 746.34 16" 747
INV.=744.22 746.4
(ASPHALT PAVEMENT)
5.5 746.3
6" PVC SDR26 @ 0.5%
744.48 744 5' P.U.E. TO BE GRANTED
745.83 746
746.58 746.23 746.39
CULVERT
INV.=744.61
746.35
745.63
745.7
12" INLET
297.00' (S 00° 36' 41" E)
NEW 5' WIDE CONC.
RIM=746.0
746.03
SIDEWALK (5" PCC & INV.=745.0
60TH ST.
8"-W
4" AGG. BASE, 6" PCC &
4" AGG. BASE AT DRIVEWAY)
746 74
6
745 746 74
74
1
5 74
290 60TH STREET 2
743.11 741.50 740.90
747.50 7 745.05 4
7
747.30 OWNER: 74 74
746.67 74 RADAVAN & DUSICA IVANOVIC 3
74
745.07
746.64
746.49
This is to certify that I, Alecs C. Hur, a registered Professional
Engineer of Illinois hereby certify that these plans and specifications
PR
OF E S S ION A
L
have been prepared under my personal direction and supervision.
D
E ER
SE
GIN
L I C EN Dated this 10th day of March, 2026 at Elmhurst, Illinois.
ALECS C. HUR EN
062-054937
ST AT
IS
E O
IN
OF I LL
UPDATED 4/24/26 PER VILLAGE COMMENTS
UPDATED 5/06/26 PER VILLAGE COMMENTS
Illinois Professional Engineer Number 062-054937
My License Expires on November 30, 2027
Sheet 2 / 2
Page 252 of 261
Page 253 of 261
Page 254 of 261
Page 255 of 261
Page 256 of 261
PROPERTY ADDRESS: GENERAL SURVEYORS NOTES: SURVEYORS LEGEND:
300 60TH STREET, DOWNERS GROVE, ILLINOIS 60516
1. The Legal Description used to perform this survey was supplied by others. This survey does not determine ABBREVIATIONS FIP - Found Iron Pipe Surveyor
LINETYPES
SURVEY NUMBER: 2511.2020 nor imply ownership of the lands or any fences shown hereon. Unless the Title Commitment Number and (C) - Calculated FIPC - Found Iron Pipe & Cap PLT - Planter
Date is referenced on this survey, an examination of the abstract of title was NOT performed by the signing Boundary Line (D) - Deed FIR - Found Iron Rod POB - Point of Beginning
CERTIFIED TO:
VALBON & MEREME DERVISHI; LANDTRUST; CASH surveyor to determine which instruments, if any, are affecting this property. Center Line (F) - Field FIRC - Found Iron Rod & Cap POC - Point of
Chain Link or Wire (M) - Measured FN - Found Nail Commencement
2. The purpose of this survey is to establish the boundary of the lands described by the legal description
Fence (P) - Plat FN&D - Found Nail & Disc PRC - Point of Reverse
provided and to depict the visible improvements thereon for a pending financial transaction. Underground Curvature
footings, utilities, or other service lines, including roof eave overhangs were not located as part of this survey. Easement (R) - Record FRRSPK - Found Rail Road
Spike PRM - Permanent Reference
Unless specifically stated otherwise the purpose and intent of this survey is not for any construction activities Edge of Water (S) - Survey
Monument
or future planning. A/C - Air Conditioning GAR - Garage
Iron Fence PSM - Professional Surveyor &
AE - Access Easement GM - Gas Meter
DATE OF SURVEY: 11/14/25 3. If there is a septic tank or drain field shown on this survey, the location depicted hereon was either shown to Mapper
Overhead Lines ANE - Anchor Easement ID - Identification
the surveyor by a third party or it was estimated by visual above ground inspection. No excavation was PT - Point of Tangency
BUYER: Valbon & Mereme Dervishi ASBL - Accessory Setback Line IE/EE - Ingress/Egress
performed to determine its location. Structure PUE - Public Utility Easement
Easement
B/W - Bay/Box Window R - Radius or Radial
LENDER: CASH 4. This survey is exclusively for a pending financial transaction and only to be used by the parties to whom it is Survey Tie Line ILL - Illegible
BC - Block Corner R/W - Right of Way
certified. Vinyl Fence BFP - Backflow Preventer
INST - Instrument
TITLE COMPANY: LANDTRUST RES - Residential
INT - Intersection
5. Alterations to this survey map and report by other than the signing surveyor are prohibited. Wall or Party Wall BLDG - Building RGE - Range
IRRE - Irrigation Easement
COMMITMENT DATE: NOT REVIEWED CLIENT FILE NO: 6. Dimensions are in feet and decimals thereof. Wood Fence BLK - Block ROE - Roof Overhang
L - Length
BM - Benchmark Easement
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 7. Any FEMA flood zone data contained on this survey is for informational purposes only. Research to obtain SURFACE TYPES LAE - Limited Access Easement
BR - Bearing Reference RP - Radius Point
LOT 15 IN BLOCK 2 IN FAIRVIEW ACRES, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE said data was performed at www.fema.gov and may not reflect the most recent information. Asphalt BRL - Building Restriction Line
LB# - License No. (Business)
S/W - Sidewalk
NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 6) OF
LBE - Limited Buffer Easement
SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD 8. Unless otherwise noted “SIR” indicates a set iron rebar, 5/8 inch in diameter and twenty-four inches long. Brick or Tile BSMT - Basement SBL - Setback Line
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED LE - Landscape Easement
C - Curve SCL - Survey Closure Line
APRIL 9, 1936 AS DOCUMENT 368165, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 9. The symbols reflected in the legend and on this survey may have been enlarged or reduced for clarity. The Concrete LME - Lake/Landscape
symbols have been plotted at the approximate center of the field location and may not represent the actual C/L - Center Line SCR - Screen
Covered Area Maintenance Easement
shape or size of the feature. C/P - Covered Porch SEC - Section
LS# - License No. (Surveyor)
Water C/S - Concrete Slab SEP - Septic Tank
10. Points of Interest (POI’s) are select above-ground improvements, which may appear in conflict with MB - Map Book
Wood CATV - Cable TV Riser SEW - Sewer
boundary, building setback or easement lines, as defined by the parameters of this survey. These POI’s may ME - Maintenance Easement
CB - Concrete Block SIRC - Set Iron Rod & Cap
not represent all items of interest to the viewer. There may be additional POI’s which are not shown or called- SYMBOLS MES - Mitered End Section
CH - Chord Bearing SMWE - Storm Water
out as POI’s, or which are otherwise unknown to the surveyor. Benchmark MF - Metal Fence
Management Easement
CHIM - Chimney
MH - Manhole
11. Utilities shown on the subject property may or may not indicate the existence of recorded or unrecorded Center Line CLF - Chain Link Fence SN&D - Set Nail and Disc
MHWL - Mean High Water Line
utility easements. Central Angle or CME - Canal Maintenance SQFT - Square Feet
NR - Non-Radial
12. The information contained on this survey has been performed exclusively by and is the sole responsibility of Delta Easement STL - Survey Tie Line
NTS - Not to Scale
Exacta Land Surveyors, LLC. Additional logos or references to third party firms are for informational purposes Common Ownership CO - Clean Out STY - Story
NAVD88 - North American
only. CONC - Concrete SV - Sewer Valve
Control Point Vertical Datum 1988
COR - Corner SWE - Sidewalk Easement
13. Due to varying construction standards, building dimensions are approximate and are not intended to be NGVD29 - National Geodetic
Catch Basin CS/W - Concrete Sidewalk TBM - Temporary Bench Mark
used for new construction or planning. Vertical Datum 1929
Elevation CUE - Control Utility Easement OG - On Ground TEL - Telephone Facilities
14. Surveyor bearings are used for angular reference and are used to show angular relationships of lines only and CVG - Concrete Valley Gutter ORB - Official Records Book TOB - Top of Bank
Fire Hydrant
are not related or orientated to true or magnetic north. Bearings are shown as surveyor bearings, D/W - Driveway ORV - Official Record Volume TUE - Technological Utility
and when shown as matching those on the subdivision plats on which this survey is based, they are to Find or Set Easement
Monument DE - Drainage Easement O/A - Overall
be deemed no more accurate as the determination of a north orientation made on and for those original DF - Drain Field TWP - Township
Guywire or Anchor O/S - Offset
subdivision plats. North 00 degrees East is assumed and upon preparation of this plat, the resulting bearing DH - Drill Hole TX - Transformer
OFF - Outside Subject
between found points as shown on this survey is the basis of said surveyor bearings as defined and required Manhole DUE - Drainage & Utility Property TYP - Typical
to be noted by Illinois Administrative Code Title 68, Chapter VII, Sub-Chapter B, Part 1270, Section 1270.56, Easement UE - Utility Easement
Tree OH - Overhang
Paragraph B, Sub-Paragraph 6, Item k. ELEV - Elevation UG - Underground
Utility or Light Pole OHL - Overhead Utility Lines
15. THIS SURVEY IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE STATE EM - Electric Meter OHWL - Ordinary High Water UP - Utility Pole
OF ILLINOIS. NO IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF THIS PLAT ALONE. PLEASE REFER ALSO Well ENCL - Enclosure Line UR - Utility Riser
TO YOUR DEED, TITLE POLICY AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED BY THE ENT - Entrance ON - Inside Subject Property VF - Vinyl Fence
PARTIES TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. EOP - Edge of Pavement P/E - Pool Equipment W/C - Witness Corner
EOW - Edge of Water PB - Plat Book W/F - Water Filter
FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: ESMT - Easement PC - Point of Curvature WF - Wood Fence
EUB - Electric Utility Box PCC - Point of Compound WM - Water Meter/Valve Box
F/DH - Found Drill Hole Curvature WV - Water valve
FCM - Found Concrete PCP - Permanent Control Point
Monument PI - Point of Intersection
FF - Finished Floor PLS - Professional Land
JOB SPECIFIC SURVEYOR NOTES:
SEE PAGE 1 OF 2 FOR MAP OF PROPERTY
PAGE 2 OF 2 - NOT VALID WITHOUT ALL PAGES
Page 257 of 261
VILLAGE OF WESTMONT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2026 PZC 011-2026
TITLE: Request from the Karen Bailey Meyer Trust and the David P. Meyer Trust for the property at
300 West 60th Street, Downers Grove, Illinois, 60516, for the following:
1. Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to subdivide one (1) lot into two (2) lots in the R-3
Single-Unit Residential District.
I. BACKGROUND OF ITEM
A. Location: 300 West 60th Street is located on the northside of 60th Street between Fairview Avenue
and Cumnor Road. The subject property is currently improved with a detached house and separate
garage. If the subdivision request is approved, both buildings will be demolished to allow for two new
detached houses to be built. The lot is currently 120 feet wide by 297 feet deep, for an area of
35,640 square feet, or 0.82 acres. Though this property has a Downers Grove zipcode, it is fully
under the jurisdiction of the Village of Westmont, having been annexed under Ordinance 03-109 in
2003.
Aerial Map - 300 West 60th Street (source: DuPage County Parcel Viewer)
Page 258 of 261
Zoning Map - 300 West 60th Street
B. Zoning Designations:
SUBJECT PROPERTY R-3 Single-Unit Residential District
ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES R-3 Single-Unit Residential District
C. Neighborhood Characteristics
The lot is located in the Fairview Acres Subdivision, which was recorded in 1936. At the time of subdivision,
the prominent lot size in this subdivision is 120 feet wide by 297 feet deep, like the subject property. Over
the last 90 years, a majority of the properties to the south and east were subdivided into two 60 foot wide
lots. All adjacent properties are zoned R-3 and improved with detached houses, although there are
multi-unit residential complexes within a quarter-mile.
Street View - 300 West 60th Street
II. PETITIONER REQUEST:
The petitioner has requested a Preliminary Plan of Subdivision to subdivide one (1) lot into two (2)
lots in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential District.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 011-2026 Page 2 of 4
Page 259 of 261
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
A. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations
The current zoning district of the property is R-3 Single-Unit Residential District, which is intended to
create, maintain, and promote detached houses (f.k.a. single-family homes).
The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use in this area as Single Family Detached
Residential. Through this designation, the plan recommends that the design of new detached homes
“...consider the established character of surrounding single-family areas.” The plan also
recommends preserving and enhancing the Village’s housing stock through appropriately designed
and scaled new construction.
B. Entitlement Request
The petitioner has provided a project narrative and supporting documentation for the following
request. Any corresponding code sections for entitlement approval consideration can be referenced
in item V(B) below.
● Preliminary Plan to subdivide one (1) lots into two (2) lots in the R-3 Single-Unit
Residential District.
A preliminary plan of subdivision must be reviewed and approved prior to approval of the final plat of
subdivision. The submitted preliminary plan demonstrates substantial compliance with the applicable
requirements of Appendix B - Land Development. The table below lists the minimum lot width, depth,
and area requirements for lots in the R-3 district, and shows that the proposed preliminary plan
exceeds all minimums.
Chapter 95, Sec. 2.05: Lot and Building Regulations
R-3 Single-Unit Residential Minimum Required Proposed (both lots) Compliance
Lot Width 50 ft. 60 ft. Minimum met
Lot Depth 125 ft. 297 ft. Minimum met
Lot Area 7,800 sq. ft. 17,280 sq. ft. Minimum met
The preliminary plan contains draft designs of two detached homes, both of which largely meet the
applicable zoning setbacks and bulk regulations. The designs shown on the plan are not final, so the
homes built may be different.
When a property is subdivided, impact fees are collected for the new lot(s) and are paid to the
Westmont Park District, Westmont Library District, and the school districts serving the subject
property. In this case, only one new lot is created, so only one set of impact fees must be paid. Each
lot will pay ½ of the fee. The dollar amount is dependent on the bedroom count, and will be
determined when a building permit is applied for.
Although stormwater detention is not required for a subdivision of this size, Best Management
Practices (BMPs) will be required. To meet this requirement, the petitioner proposed to build a dry
well on each property. Further details on the dry well and BMPs will be worked out when an
engineering permit is submitted.
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 011-2026 Page 3 of 4
Page 260 of 261
The final plat of subdivision is attached to this report for reference, as it is not reviewed by the
Planning & Zoning Commission. The final plat is reviewed by the Village Board only.
IV. SUMMARY
The petitioner has requested a preliminary plan of subdivision to subdivide 300 West 60th Street
from one (1) lot into two (2) lots. The proposed plan meets the zoning and land development
requirements for lots in the R-3 Single-Unit Residential district, and is consistent with the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan.
V. LEGAL
A. Notification: No notification is required for subdivisions.
B. Code References: Appendix B
C. Other Action: The recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be
referred to the Village Board for a final decision. The final plat of subdivision will also be
reviewed by the Board at this meeting.
VI. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1. Petitioner Attachments received March 24, 2026 (Edited for PZC):
a. Planning & Zoning Development Application
b. Project Narrative
c. Preliminary Plan of Subdivision
d. Final Plat of Subdivision (for reference, not reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission)
e. Proof of Ownership
f. Plat of Survey
____________________________________________________________________________________
PZC 011-2026 Page 4 of 4
Page 261 of 261