Design Review Board

Village of Winnetka Design Review Board/Sign Board of Appeals Regular Meeting October 16, 2025 at 7:00 PM Winnetka Village Hall Council Chambers 510 Green Bay Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments 3. Approval of Minutes a. September 18, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes 4. New Applications a. Case No. 25-20-DR: 986 Green Bay Road — Sit Still Kids Salon: A Sign Permit and Sign Code Variations to allow a new window, door, and illuminated wall sign at the storefront of the Subject Property. b. Case No. 25-21-DR: 520 Green Bay Road — BMO Bank: A Certificate of Appropriateness to allow replacement of landscaping with new plantings at the Subject Property. c. Case No. 25-22-DR: 914 Green Bay Road — Sante Integrated Health and Wellness: A Sign Permit and Sign Code Variations to allow six translucent decal signs at the 2nd-floor windows of their commercial space at the Subject Property. d. Case No. 25-23-DR: 714-16, 718-732, 736-740 Elm Street and 511 & 515 Lincoln Avenue — One Winnetka: A Certificate of Appropriateness to modify the exterior elevations of the approved One Winnetka PUD. 5. Other Business a. November 20, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check 6. Adjournment NOTICE Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter. The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041). Page 1 of 82  1 2 Winnetka Design Review Board/Sign Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes 3 September 18, 2025 4 5 Members Present: Katie Moor, Chairperson 6 Chris Baggett 7 Wesley Barker 8 Fritz Duda 9 Peter Evanich 10 Heather Niehoff 11 12 Members Absent: Colin Kennedy 13 14 Village Staff: Davorka Kirincic, Building and Code Enforcement Manager 15 16 Call to Order & Roll Call: 17 Chairperson Moor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Board Members present. 18 19 Public Comments: 20 No comments were made at this time. 21 22 Approval of Minutes: 23 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the July 17, 2025 24 meeting minutes. A motion to approve the July 17, 2025 meeting minutes was made by Mr. Barker and seconded 25 by Mr. Baggett. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 26 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff 27 NAYS: None 28 29 New Applications: 30 a. Case No. 25-13-DR: 933 Green Bay Road - Visual Comfort & Co.: Sign Permit to allow a new wall and 31 double-faced projecting signs, all of which will be on the new building’s Green Bay Road elevation of the Subject 32 Property. 33 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning 34 classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines the Board is to 35 consider. 36 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any questions. Ms. Niehoff referred to the backlit lighting and questioned 37 how it would operate. Frank Lambert, representing the applicant from the design sign company, responded that it 38 would be halo or reverse backlit lighting. Ms. Niehoff also asked for the reasoning for the 18-inch size. Ms. Kirincic 39 explained in terms of the design guideline recommendations. Mr. Lambert explained the limitations of how the 40 letters are fabricated and noted the lower-case lettering would be smaller, with only a few letters measuring 18 41 inches. Ms. Niehoff described it as massive. Mr. Lambert estimated the smaller letter height to be 14 inches and 42 stated that samples were previously provided to the Board for their review. He also described the LED wattage 43 that would be used. Ms. Kirincic provided the Board with additional information. 44 45 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any other questions. She indicated the letter size appeared to be a 46 manufacturing issue. Ms. Niehoff commented that the letter size did not seem appropriate and referred to its scale 47 in relation to neighboring buildings. Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the application as submitted 48 or for the applicant to conduct further investigation to determine whether the sign could be scaled to meet the 49 design guidelines, along with an alternative method of backlighting. A Board Member commented the sign is nice, 50 but the Board Members are wrestling with the width. Another Board Member agreed with the comments made 51 and added that it would embrace the Hubbard Woods business district. Another Board Member agreed with the 52 comments made and that the size should be reduced. 53 Page 2 of 82  Design Review Board September 16, 2025 Page 2 1 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request. A motion to approve the request was made by Mr. 2 Duda and seconded by Mr. Baggett. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5 to 1: 3 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor 4 NAYS: Niehoff 5 6 b. Case No. 25-14-DR: 191 Linden Street - Saints Faith Hope & Charity Parish: Certificate of 7 Appropriateness to allow the replacement of the existing roof on the south wing of the school at the Subject 8 Property. 9 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning 10 classification. She stated the applicant also provided site plans and referred to the Certificate of Appropriateness 11 Standards and Village Design Guidelines recommendations for the Board’s consideration. Chairperson Moor asked 12 Board members if there were any questions. No questions were raised at this time. 13 14 Chairperson Moor asked for the applicant’s presentation. Dennis Levin, the church’s general contractor, 15 introduced himself to the Board and explained the reasoning for not using clay tile for the roof replacement as 16 opposed to the metal roof used on other buildings in the surrounding area of the school campuses. Mr. Levin 17 explained the reasoning behind their selection, which included cost and the fact that the proposed roof would 18 match the other roof elements. Chairperson Moor asked if they had considered using different roofing materials. 19 Mr. Levin responded that they did and explained their choice, which included the length of time the roof would 20 last. 21 22 A Board Member asked if there is a history regarding other metal roofs. Ms. Kirincic explained that the special use 23 previously requested for the Parish Center included specifications for a metal sheet roof. Chairperson Moor 24 referred to a 2005 GIS image, which showed a metal roof for the church and gym buildings. Ms. Niehoff agreed 25 with Chairperson Moor that it would be better to use higher-quality materials, while acknowledging the complexity 26 and budget concerns. She then stated consistency would be provided on the campus. A Board Member asked if it 27 would be prefinished metal and for the warranty information. Mr. Levin confirmed that it is correct and that it 28 would have a 25-year warranty. 29 30 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request as presented. A motion to approve the request as 31 presented was made by Mr. Evanich and seconded by Ms. Niehoff. A vote was taken, and the motion was 32 unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 33 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff 34 NAYS: None 35 36 c. Case No. 25-15-DR: 520 Green Bay Road - BMO Bank: Certificate of Appropriateness to allow exterior 37 building and landscaping alterations on the Subject Property. 38 Chairperson Moor noted that the applicant asked to withdraw. Ms. Kirincic confirmed that the applicant had 39 withdrawn the application and provided a summary of the request to the Board. 40 41 No vote was taken at this time. 42 43 d. Case No. 25-16-DR: 847 Elm Street - Little Elm: Sign Permit to install window and projecting signs, and 44 Certificate of Appropriateness to allow storefront improvements and removal of the existing awning and awning 45 valance sign from the previous business on the Subject Property. 46 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning 47 classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines that the Board is to 48 consider. Additionally, Ms. Kirincic brought to the Board’s attention that the PowerPoint Applicant submitted to be 49 present at the meeting includes additional door window signage, decal updates regarding (including a change of 50 the color), and a different entrance door color than submitted initially with their applications 51 52 Chairperson Moor asked for the applicant’s presentation. Kittie Brandtner introduced herself to the Board and 53 stated that they planned to have one large windowpane instead of two aluminum windows. She also mentioned a Page 3 of 82  Design Review Board September 16, 2025 Page 3 1 side divert near the front door, where the logo decal would be placed, making it visible from the sidewalk. Ms. 2 Brandtner noted that there would be no logo on the main window to elevate the space and add charm. A Board 3 Member asked if the blade sign was fixed or on chains. Ms. Brandtner confirmed the blade sign is fixed. He then 4 referred to the design guidelines, which recommend against swinging signage. A Board Member questioned the 5 material to be used. Ms. Brandtner provided a sample to the Board for their review. She also referred to the 6 limestone, which would remain with the brick above. Ms. Brandtner then confirmed that the door would change, 7 along with the quartz on the bottom. 8 9 Ms. Niehoff commented that it looked great. Chairperson Moor agreed with Ms. Niehoff’s comments. Chairperson 10 Moor suggested that the Board approve the request, conditional upon the applicant resubmitting it with the decal 11 positioned on the side, featuring new text at the door window, and a different text and door color. 12 13 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request with a condition. A motion was made by Mr. Baggett, 14 conditional upon the applicant's submission of a revised rendering that includes the decal and updates the 15 proposed signage materials with new text colors and door window signage, as presented in the meeting's 16 PowerPoint. Mr. Duda seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion was unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 17 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff 18 NAYS: None 19 20 e. Case No. 25-17-DR: 555-557-559 Chestnut Street: Certificate of Appropriateness to enable the 21 sandblasting, tuckpointing, re-painting, and replacement of two existing windows on the alley elevation of the 22 Subject Property. 23 Chairperson Moor identified the property owner for the commercial building and stated the request is to allow 24 exterior repair and alterations to the existing structure and that the applicant is seeking approval to enable 25 sandblasting, tuckpointing, repainting, and replacement of two windows on the alley elevation. Ms. Kirincic 26 provided additional information to the Board. 27 28 Chairperson Moor stated that the two windows are shown on page 92. She then asked for a motion to approve the 29 request as presented. A motion to approve the request as presented was made by Mr. Baggett and seconded by 30 Mr. Barker. A vote was taken, and the motion was unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 31 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff 32 NAYS: None 33 34 f. Case No. 25-18-DR: 914 Green Bay Road - Sante Integrated Health and Wellness: Sign Permit to install 35 door window and projecting signs at the first-floor entrance of the Subject Property. 36 Chairperson Moor stated the applicant is requesting that the Board consider a sign application as the commercial 37 space lessee as well as a proposed door window and projecting sign at the entrance. 38 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning 39 classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines that the Board is to 40 consider. 41 42 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request as presented. A motion to approve the request as 43 presented was made by Ms. Niehoff and seconded by Mr. Barker. A vote was taken, and the motion was 44 unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 45 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff 46 NAYS: None 47 48 g. Case No. 25-19-DR: 560 Chestnut Street - Neapolitan: Certificate of Appropriateness requesting 49 approval to paint portions of the exterior storefront on the Subject Property. 50 Chairperson Moor stated the applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for recent storefront painting 51 changes. Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and 52 zoning classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines that the 53 Board is to consider. Page 4 of 82  Design Review Board September 16, 2025 Page 4 1 2 3 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any questions. Ms. Niehoff questioned the difference between the blush 4 and brighter pink colors. Ms. Kirincic explained to the Board and stated that the applicant was asked to provide 5 additional information. A Board Member noted that the rendering seemed to include more painted areas than the 6 current storefront photos, which reflect recent paint changes. Ms. Kirincic provided clarification to the Board. 7 8 Chairperson Moor asked for the applicant’s presentation. Kelly Golden, the owner, provided a paint sample to the 9 Board. She stated they intended to paint the metal, which she described as dark, along with the door entryway to 10 the pink color they use for their store branding. She referred to the attempts made regarding the paint having 11 different shades and asked if there were any questions. 12 13 Chairperson Moor described the color as very bright, and per the design guidelines, she read from the design 14 guidelines: “Colors shall be used with restraint. Excessive brightness should be avoided.” She commented that she 15 preferred the pale pink color, which would still complement the brand well. She noted that the elevation on the 16 rendering, which shows a pale/blush pink color, looks so beautiful and elegant. Ms. Niehoff asked if the color is 17 used throughout the store. Ms. Golden responded to the Board. She confirmed that the limestone and columns 18 would not be painted. Ms. Golden also stated that the color has been tested in terms of its appearance. The Board 19 Members then discussed the shade of pink colors and their intended uses in detail. They liked the pastel 20 pale/blush pink shade shown on the proposed renderings and directed the applicant to get as much of that shade 21 as they could on the storefront. Ms. Neihoff stated that with bright pink color and white limestone columns, the 22 overall appearance looks choppy. It was also concluded that board members would not mind all limestone 23 columns to be painted as shown on the rendering, as mentioned earlier, if the applicant can match that pale/blush 24 shade of pink. It would give a cohesive look to the storefront. 25 26 Ms. Niehoff suggested that if one bright shade of pink is vital to the applicant, it should only be done at the 27 entrance door and the recessed portion. She also stated it is essential to the building as a whole; a lighter 28 pale/blush pink color should be used in order to make it more contiguous. Chairperson Moor agreed with Ms. 29 Neihoff's suggestion and referred to several public comments she had received. Ms. Golden stated that she 30 appreciated the Board’s comments and is willing to return to the Board with a lighter pink color. The Chairperson 31 emphasized the importance of reviewing a paint sample before approval, noting that a photo of the paint does not 32 do justice. Mrs. Kirincic suggested that applicants can paint one smaller portion of the storefront to try to match 33 the preferred pastel pale/blush pink color and present it at the next DRB meeting for approval. The applicant 34 agreed to match the pale/blush pink color from the application material’s rendering as closely as possible. 35 However, she requested that the approval process be expedited to avoid a one-month delay in painting the 36 storefront. She is embarrassed by the storefront's current appearance and would like to paint it as soon as 37 possible. Members discussed how to expedite approval without waiting for next month's DRB meeting, while still 38 checking and approving a new shade of pale/blush pink that matches as closely as possible, as shown on the 39 application elevation rendering applied to the storefront. 40 41 It was decided that the Board will approve the application with the condition that a paint sample of the desired 42 pale/blush pink color be applied to a portion of the façade, in a couple of areas with different materials (limestone, 43 metal, fascia, and wood), to see how the paint takes to other materials. Also, it was concluded that staff will share 44 by e-mail a photo with a color paint sample applied on the storefront with Board members, get approval of the 45 color shade electronically (that way get back quickly to the Applicant and not postpone the project). After approval 46 of the specific color shade, the Applicant would be able to proceed with painting the whole storefront. 47 48 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request with a condition. Mr. Duda moved to approve the 49 Applicant application, conditioned on approval of the specific color by staff and committee, which will be 50 conducted electronically in some fashion. Mr. Barker seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion was 51 unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 52 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff 53 NAYS: None Page 5 of 82  Design Review Board September 16, 2025 Page 5 1 2 Other Business. 3 a. October 16, 2025, Meeting – Quorum Check. 4 The Board Members discussed their availability. 5 6 Adjournment: 7 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Niehoff and seconded by 8 Mr. Duda. A vote was taken, and the motion was unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 9 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff 10 NAYS: None 11 The meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m. 12 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Antionette Johnson 16 Recording Secretary Page 6 of 82  MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD/SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 9, 2025 SUBJECT: 986 GREEN BAY ROAD – SIT STILL KIDS SALON – NEW WINDOW, DOOR, AND ILLUMINATED WALL SIGN PERMIT AND SIGN CODE VARIATIONS (CASE NO. 25-20-DR) On October 16, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to consider a Sign Permit Application submitted by Sit Still Kids Salon (the “Applicant”), the current lessee of the commercial space located at 986 Green Bay Road (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant has submitted applications seeking the following approvals: 1. Sign Permit to allow installation of new back-lit illuminated wall, window, and door signs; and 2. Sign Code Variations to allow the following: a. Window signs that exceed 10% of their respective window area; b. Window decal signs that are not die-cut and are not limited to individual letters and logos, and c. The total sign area of signs on street exposure elevation exceeds the allowed 15 %. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located west of Green Bay Road between Scott Avenue and Merrill Street in the Hubbard Woods Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located within the Commercial Overlay District. Figures 1 and Figure 2 on the following page identify the Subject Property. Figure 3 identifies the proposed wall sign's location on the building's exterior façade on Green Bay Road. Page 7 of 82  Location of Subject Property Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map Location of Sit Still Kids Salon Figure 2 – Subject Property- View from Green Bay Road Page 8 of 82  Location of Proposed Back-lit Illuminated Wall Sign Figure 3 – Subject Property Sit Still Kids Salon – Storefront CURRENT REQUEST The Applicant seeks approval for new back-lit illuminated wall, window, and door signs to identify and promote their new business location at the Subject Property. The proposed signs will feature the business name and its branding, as illustrated below: Proposed Signage at Green Bay Road Storefront Page 9 of 82 Wall Sign • Three-dimensional, individually crafted letters in white • Back-lit (halo) illuminated channel letters 14 inches tall, fabricated in stainless steel, stating “sit still.”; • Non-illuminated flat cut acrylic letters ½ inch thick and 4.3 inches tall stating “KIDS SALON”; • Mounted with stud mounts, allowing the letters to stand off the wall slightly, added dimension; • Located on the Green Bay Road exterior wall on the sign band above the storefront side window and entrance door; • Approximately 10 square feet of sign area, and • 9.0 feet above grade. Back-Lit Illuminated Letters Non-Lit Acrylic Letters Wall Sign details Windows Signs A) Window Sign • Individual text die-cut decals in white color; • 11.79 inches tall text stating “We’re Hair” and “For You”; • 5.19 inches tall text stating “Hey There, North Shore!”; • Confetti Elements up to 21.69 inches tall and have a background in different colors; • Sign area of the text is 1.69 square feet; • Text and graphic elements located 2/3 of the window height; • 84.17 square feet of the sign area, and • Sign occupies 36% of the window area. B) Window Sign • Individual text die-cut decals in white and multi-color; • 4.72 inches tall text stating “A”, “MODERN”, “KIDS SALON; • Confetti Elements have a background in different colors; • Text located at the bottom of the window height; • Sign area of the text is 26.70 square feet, and • Sign occupies 9.0% of the window area. Page 10 of 82  Proposed Window Signs at Storefront Door Window Signs: D) Window • Individual text die-cut decals in white color • 1.41 inches tall text in white (Hours of Operation, Real Style, Real Fun, Franchising, Opportunities, and Available); • 1.41 Circle in orange; • Located in the lower and middle portion of the door window; and • Sign area is 2.37 square feet; and • Sign occupies 6.0% of the door glass area. E) Door Transom Sign • Individual text die-cut decals in white color • 1.41 inches tall text in white (stating “Style with us” and “Now hiring”); • Located in the lower portion of the Transom window; • Sign area is 3.01square feet, and • Sign occupies 8.0% of the transom glass area. Proposed Door Window & Transom Signs at Storefront Page 11 of 82  A copy of the Applicant’s application materials is included in Attachment A. SIGN CODE ANALYSIS Section 15.60.120 of the Village Sign Code establishes standards for door and window signs in commercial districts. Window and door signs that meet the following standards can be administratively approved by staff. When the proposed signs do not comply with these standards, they require review by the Design Review Board as well as approval of Sign Code Variations, and it is stated in bold text). • Limited to 10% or less of the single windowpane and 50% of the door glass pane; o Proposed signage in the left window covers up 36.87% of the respective window area (Sign Variation required for Window A); • Limited letters and logos no taller than 8”, except one logo, and the first letter of each word may be up to no taller than 24”, and except store hours and contact information shall be limited to 2” in height; o Several text lines and graphic elements of the proposed window signs are 11.79-21.69 inches in height. The subject elements are not a logo or first letter; they are higher than 8 inches and require Board approval. • The height of the sign should not exceed 1/3 of the height of the glass area and 90% of the glass width; • Decal window signs shall be die-cut and limited to individual letters and logos; o Several text lines and graphic elements of the proposed window signs are not die-cut, have a background, and need Board approval. (Sign Variation required) • Limited to two colors; o Proposed window signs have more than two colors and need Board approval. • Without reflective materials; • No window sign should be illuminated; • Located in the lower two-thirds of the window opening; • Shall not extend over or through architectural features/window muntin; • Comply with the following: for each street exposure, the total area of all wall signs, window signs, and awning signs other than exempt signs and permitted directional and incidental signs shall not exceed 15% of the street exposure. o The total sign area of signs on street exposure elevation exceeds the allowed 15% (Sign Variation required). Window Maximum Maximum Proposed Sign Area Proposed Proposed Sign /Door Allowed Sign Allowed (sf) Sign Area as Area Area Sign Area % of Window (sf) (% of Window (sf) Area Area) A) Window 84.17 10% 8.42 30.60 36.35% B) Window 26.70 10% 2.67 2.42 9.06% Door Window 12.36 50% 6.18 0.78 6.31% Door Transom 3.01 50% 4.53 0.24 8.00% As mentioned above, the proposed door window and window signs do not meet all the Sign Code standards for window and door signs. Page 12 of 82 Wall sign standards • Sign may only contain the business name, a three-word generic description of the types of products or services offered, and the occupant’s logo or trademark; • Sign may not exceed 70 square feet in area; • Shall be placed substantially parallel to the surface of the wall, and • Shall not be located above the second-floor windowsill level and shall not be higher than fourteen (14) feet above grade if there is no second-floor windowsill. The proposed wall sign meets all the above standards for wall signs. Signage Street Exposure Area Square Foot Percentage Green Bay Avenue Elevation Area 230.00 - Max Allowed per Sign Code 34.50 15.00% (15% of the Street Exposure) All Proposed Signs Counted Toward Street Exposure 44.04 19.50% The proposed signage does not comply with the maximum allowed sign area street exposure requirements and requires Variation approval. SIGN CODE VARIATION REQUEST 1. The Applicant has applied for a Sign Code Variation from Section 15.60.120 [Commercial Signs] to allow a. Window signs that exceed 10% of their respective window area; b. Window decal signs that are not die-cut and are not limited to individual letters and logos, and c. The total sign area of signs on street exposure elevation exceeds the allowed 15%. The Design Review Board (also sitting as the Sign Board of Appeals) may grant relief from the Sign Code if it determines that the following standards set out in Section 15.60.250 [Variations] are met: 1. The variations would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter; 2. Given the design elements of the building or site on which the sign is located, the design of the sign is as compatible, if not more compatible, with the character of the business district than the standard sign regulations would otherwise allow; 3. For window signs, the design of the sign would not significantly inhibit the viewing of store products, activities, or services; 4. The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality; 5. The design of the sign is contextually appropriate for the type of business; and 6. The design of the sign exhibits a high degree of artistic embellishment. DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS When reviewing the design of any signs, the Board is to consider the following standards and criteria of Section 15.60.150(F) of the Sign Code. Page 13 of 82  F. Standards and Criteria for Issuance. The following factors and characteristics relating to the safety and appearance of signage shall govern the Board’s evaluation of design submittals: 1. The sign area shall be in proportion and scale to the building or to other buildings or signs in the surrounding area; 2. A signage package for a business establishment that includes a number of signs and graphics shall have an overall plan that demonstrates the compatibility of the design and colors of all the signs that are part of that package; 3. The amount of text and graphics contained in or on any sign or group of signs shall be limited so that it results in a clear and readable design; 4. Signs and graphics shall have a harmonious relationship with nearby signs, buildings, and the neighborhood and shall be designed not to adversely affect adjacent structures. In this respect, the sign shall relate to its building, structure, and neighborhood in terms of size, shape, material, color, texture, lettering, location, arrangement, lighting, and the like; 5. Colors shall be used with restraint; excessive brightness shall be avoided; and 6. The additional provisions of this chapter, as specified in this chapter, shall be part of the criteria of the design review process. The Board should also consider the Village Design Guidelines for the proposed signage. See Attachment B. SUMMARY The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed signs appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines and approve the application as proposed, including the three aforementioned sign variations. Should the DRB find the proposed improvements acceptable, the Applicant would first need to obtain the approved sign permit for the illuminated sign from the Community Development Department before installing it. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Application Materials Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt Page 14 of 82  ATTACHMENT A Village of Winnetka SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EcE1ven SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION 0n AUG 2 8 2025 u Tenant/Lessee S � t rt<J u� - 910\ Name of Business Primary contact name Sit Still Kids Salon Chris Jordan Project Address 986 Green Bay Road City State Zip Code Email Winnetka IL 60093 chris.jordan@sitstillkids.com Sign Company Name of Sign Company Primary contact name Phone No. to be identified I Street Address Cit y l State Zip Code Email Property Owner Name of Company 986 Green Bay Road LLC Primary contact name Jenn Epstein I Phone No. 847.512.3191 Street Address: I 568 Lincoln Avenue City Winnetka I State IL Zip Code 60093 Email jepstein@hoff manncre.com Sign type(s): Ii] window graphics Ii) wall-mounted sign D ground-mounted sign (check all that apply) D projecting sign O other_______________ Additional description of sign type and materials Flat-cut acrylic letters atop the entrance. OFFICE USE ONLY SIGN FEE: $80 NON-ILLUMINATED PER SIGN TYPE $80 $195 ILLUMINATED SIGN STAFF REVIEW FEE: $70 WAIVE FEE□ TOTAL PERMIT FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ________________________ Page 4 of 4 Page 15 of 82  Village of Winnetka SIGN CODE VARIATION APPLICATION VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENf OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �ECEIVE� SIGN CODE VARIATION APPLICATION SEP 2 5 2025 Propertv Information Site Address: 986 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093 BY: ______ Name of Business: Sit Still Kids Salon -1_1_4_-0_1_1_-_ 1 0 Parcel Identification Number(s) (PIN): 0_5_-_1_7_ _ _27________________ Application is hereby made to the Village of Winnetka for a variation from Section{s) _________ of Chapter 15.60 Signs of the Village Code for the following work: _______________ Attach a separate written document that explains in detail how the requested variation complies with all of the following standards: 1. The requested variation is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Sign Code. 2. Given the design elements of the building or site on which the sign is located, the design is as compatible, if not more, with the character of the business district than the standard sign regulations allow. 3. For window signs, the design of the sign does not significantly inhibit the viewing of store products, activities, or services. 4. The design of the sign is contextually appropriate for the type of business. 5. The design of the sign exhibits a high degree of artistic embellishment. 6. The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Property Owner Information Applicant Information legal Name: 986 Green Bay Road LL C legal Name: McJordan LLC dba Sit Still Kids Salon Primary Contact: Jenn Epstein Primary Contact: Chris Jordan Address: 568 Lincoln Avenue Address: 2008 Bennett Avenue City, State, Zip : Winnetka, IL 6009 3 City, state, Zip: Evanston, IL 60201 Phone No. 847.512.3191 Phone No. Email: jepstein@hoffmsmncre.com Email: chris.jordan@sitstillkid Owner Signature: Applicant Signature: Page4 of4 Page 16 of 82 1) The requested variation is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Sign Code. a. This chapter is intended to reduce visual confusion; to restrict signs that overload the public’s capacity to receive information or that distract attention, obstruct vision or otherwise increase the risk of accidents, personal injury or property damage; to enable the public to locate goods, services and facilities in the Village without difficulty or confusion; to encourage a high quality of development and excellence in the design of signs throughout the Village; and to promote the use of signs that are appropriate to the type of activity to which they pertain as well as expressive of the identity of the proprietors of the premises on which they are located. Sit Still is a unique children’s salon; it is an upscale, minimalistic, brand that appeals to parents seeking a higher level of hair care with natural/organic hair care products for their children. This is evident in the signage and overall design elements of the brand. Sit Still has a simple, friendly, easy-to-read design. The customer is met with the words, “A Modern Kids Salon”, telling them very simply what the establishment is. And they are welcomed into the warm, playful, style of the brand when they see the words, “We’re Hair For You.” The customer is not inundated with anything more than this, save for a few pieces of confetti (meant to represent pieces of hair falling to the ground). Additionally, we will not have any street signs as part of our establishment. In this sense, there does not present risk of injury or distraction to the walker- or driver-by. 2) Given the design elements of the building or site on which the sign is located, the design is as compatible, if not more, with the character of the business district than the standard sign regulations allow. As a modern, upscale, salon, Sit Still fits in well with the Green Bay strip, and complements neighboring businesses. The wall sign above the door is minimalistic, and the landlord is supportive of such design in context of the building. 3) For window signs, the design of the sign does not significantly inhibit the viewing of store products, activities, or services. Page 17 of 82  The design of the window sign does not inhibit the viewing of store products and services. The text in the center part of the main window is not opaque but rather an outline-form, allowing the customer to view inside the store. Additionally, the colorful confetti exists on the bottom edge and corners of the windows per the Village guidelines. The design is consistent with the franchisor’s branding model, which has been purposefully derived and iterated upon so as to be both enticing for the passer-by but also not inhibiting for the viewer. 4) The design of the sign is contextually appropriate for the type of business. The design is specifically tailored to our business. It states this directly on the window pane: “A Modern Kids Salon.” In addition, the design is specific to a children’s establishment, in both the use of bright, primary, colors, but also in the use of the pieces of confetti (again, meant to represent pieces of hair) falling to the ground. 5) The design of the sign exhibits a high degree of artistic embellishment. The Sit Still brand is both modern, and minimalistic. Unlike many children’s salons, it is not a toy store first and a salon second; Sit Still is first and foremost an upscale, modern, salon with fewer, higher quality, hair care products for sale. This is evidenced in the window signage, which shows a playful demeanor with the text “We’re Hair For You”, coupled with the aesthetic of the confetti. 6) The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The wall sign and window signage fit in well with the Green Bay strip, and complements the children’s dentistry (City Kids Dental), right next door. And with Hubbard Woods Park across the street, and Graeter’s Ice Cream also nearby, Sit Still will enhance the kid-friendly character of the overall neighborhood. Page 18 of 82 sit still. KIDS SALON Page 19 of 82  Summary Sit Still Kids Salon ("SSK") is a modern kids hair salon geared towards children of all ages. Brit and Chris Jordan (SSK owners) are excited to bring this brand to Chicago, and believe 986 Green Bay will serve as a wonderful space to serve the Winnetka and M ERN greater North Shore communities. ■in,r s..- lR CJoLII u• LIH In speaking with our potential neighbors, they share in the excitement. .. The following slides depict the design, color, and overall image of the window signs, and wall signs, taking efforts to ensure conformance to the city's guidelines while also conforming to the brand's iconography. We will not require an awning, a projecting sign, or a mountedPage sign. 20 of 82 Front Dimensions 986 Green Bay measures 23' x 1 O'. For a total frontal surface area of 230 sq. ft. Page 21 of 82  Window Sign: Dimensions Window Dimensions: • (A) Main Window 89" H x 135" W = 83 sq. ft. • (B) Side Window 87'' H x 42.5" W = 26 sq. ft. • (C) Side Window 87'' H x 26.5" W = 16 sq. ft. • (D) Door 68" H x 27.5" W = 13 sq. ft. • (E) Above Door 16" H x 35" W HOFFMMN = 4 sq. ft. • Total surface area= 142 sq. ft. Page 22 of 82 Window Sign: Decals and Size conformance Total Coverage Area: • ~20% (see next slide for detail) • SSK guidelines call for ~40% of window coverage; modified layout here to better approximate city guidelines. Decal Positioning: • Middle/bottom Height of Lettering • Main window (A) Primary lettering - 1 O" Ancillary lettering - 5" • Side window (B) - 6" Page 23 of 82 Window Sign: Decals and Size conformance cont. TotalCoverage onWindowC 0.00 0.00 TotalSize ofWindowC 88.64 27.05 2397.54 16.65 C / ........,.. Circle 0.37 0.00 Hours of 1.41 9.43 13.34 0.09 Operation 1.41 11.32 16.01 0.11 RealStyle. Real Fun. 1.41 21.22 30.01 0.21 '\ \ Franchising 1.41 12.26 17.34 0.12 - \ ...... ........ Opportunities 1.41 15.56 22.01 0.15 ,,, Available 1.41 8.96 12.67 0.09 E N �- -- ..... .. TotalCoverage on Window D 111.75 0.78 TotalSize ofWindow D 65.07 27.35 1779.39 12.36 Icoverage/ Size Window D 6% 6% I Style with us 1.41 13.20 j 18.67 0.13 ,/ . Now hiring···············································}.. '.t.�..............1-.1-}:2-.....!........Y>.:�}.......... ..........9.:.1-1-........... ,/ Total Coverage onWindowE 34.68 0.24 ,,/ Inches TotalSize ofWindowE 15.09 28.76 433.95 3.01 ,,/ Height ,/ Width Area Area .coverage./ Size.Window .E.......................... ...................... ................................... ............... ...��..... . ..................... ... ...�.'l:'1i........... ..... . Hey There 5.19 60.35 '' I 313.02 2.17 ,, We're Hair ,, // 11.79 83.46 I' ' 983.73 6.83 ,, , ForYou 11.79 66.95 '' 789.21 5.48 'I Pink left 21.69 7.54 '' 163.62 1.14 A 4.72 4.72 22.23 0.15 Bottom left 19.80 7.54 I' ' 149.39 1.04 MODERN 4.72 31.59 148.95 1.03 Bottom right 'I' 986.06 6.85 KIDS 4.72 15.56 73.36 0.51 Green right ...... ' ' 1020.29 7.09 SALON 4.72 22.16 104.49 0.73 ....._ TotalCoverage onWindow A 4405.32 30.59 TotalCoverage onWindow B 349.03 2.42 TotalSize ofWindow A 88.64 136.74 12120.46 84.17 TotalSize ofWindow B 88.64 43.38 3845.11 26.70 I coverage I Size Window A 36% 36% Coverage I Size Window B Page 24 of 82 9% 9% Wall Sign Overview Construction Details • Channel letters. Three-dimensional, individually crafted letters. • Mounting: mounted with stud mounts, allowing the letters to stand off the wall slightly for added dimension. • Back (halo) lit • Color: White • Trimcap: Black Page 25 of 82 Wall Sign Conformance Street Frontage Dimensions: - 23' * 10'= 230 sq.ft. Wall Sign Area: - 5' * 2' = 10 sq.ft. -ff/' <70 sq.ft M ERN -ff/' Letters<=14" in height Total Wall Sign Coverage: - Sign Area / Street Frontage = - 10 sq.ft./ 230 sq.ft.= - 4% coverage -ff/' <=15% Wall+ Window Coverage: Wall Sign Area+ Window Sign Area<= 15% of Street Frontage -ff/' (10 sq.ft+ 34 sq.ft)/ 230 sq.ft.= -18% of Street Frontage Page 26 of 82  ATTACHMENT B G Building Signage Commercial signs should reflect the character of the building style, while expressing each store’s individuality. There are several prominent sign styles that are appropriateto Winnetka: surface mounted, pin-mounted, interior, decal and projecting blade signs. Sign materials are limited to painted wood, canvas, architectural glass and metal. Sign color must harmonize with the building upon which it is mounted and adjacent structures. Letteringcolor can be unique to the image of the retailer/user. Metal sign and plaque materialsuch as brushed bronze, antique bronze, aluminum, stainless steel and painted cast ironor similarly appearing materials are preferred. Highly reflective metallic signs are notallowed. Signs should be lit by marquee or spot lighting; neon lighting is not permitted.Spot lighting should be minimal and unobtrusive and, per the Village Code, the sourceof illumination shall not be visible from any street, sidewalk or dwelling. Simplifiedindustrial light fixtures are not permitted. Contextual solutions are recommended. Themajority of the signs will be mounted within the building’s sign band, defined as thewall area located above the ground floor storefront opening and below the second floorwindowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” above grade anda maximum of 15’-0”above grade. 0&DPHQGHG Signs must comply with the general provisions of the Winnetka Sign Ordinance as well as design provisions contained within these Design Guidelines.  Surface mounted commercial signs are either fabricated from painted wood orcast metal plaques and are to be mounted within the sign band or within thestorefront transom. The height of the sign is restricted to 75% of the area of thesign band or 14 inches - whichever is less. The sign band of a building consists ofthe area located above the ground floor storefront opening and below the secondfloor windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” and a maximum of 15’-0”above grade. Refer to figures 28, 29, and 30 for location. Surface mounted orpin- mounted signs are not permitted on secondary elevations without a definedsign band. 2. Pin-mounted commercial signs consist of reverse channel, cast metal and flat cut metal letters mounted above the storefront in the masonry sign band or suspended in front of the storefront at the transom or recessed entry. The size of the lettering is restricted so that the height of the letters does not exceed 75% of the height of the sign band or 14 inches - whichever is less. The length of the lettering is to be Figure 38 contained within 75% of the length of the sign band. (See figure 38) 19 Building & Architecture Page 27 of 82 e. Awnings and Banners Awning scale and proportions are to be appropriate for the building on which they are mounted as well as the adjacent structures. It is highly recommended that awnings be uniform in size, shape (except for arched openings, see “Forms” below) and color in order to unify multiple storefronts within a single building. The length of the awning is to be restricted to the length of the storefront opening; awnings must not continue over masonry piers. The vertical and horizontal dimension should be proportional to the overall projection of the awning. (See figure 42) Figure 42 Awning projection is preferred at 36 inches, but awnings will be considered which range from a minimum of 24 inches to a maximum of 36 inches. Projection depth should match the existing adjacent awnings provided they comply with the acceptable minimum and maximum projection. Awnings should be placed at a minimum height of 8 feet above the sidewalk. If awnings are lit it should be from an outside source; no backlit awnings are allowed. Forms: Awning forms are to conform to the general shape of the opening. Arched openings are to receive ½-round domed awnings, whereas rectangular openings are to receive rectangular, gently sloping; planar forms with closed ends. Valances may be fixed or loose. Mounting: Awnings may be fixed or retractable. Retractable awnings must be kept either in the fully projected position or the fully closed position. Fixed awnings are to have concealed rigid metal frames. Retractable awnings should have a canopy cover and automatic retractable rollers mounted to the building. Underpanels are not desired. Frames should be painted to match or compliment the color of the awning cover material or its underside. Materials: The awning material should be taut, not relaxed. Awning materials may include matte finish painted army duck, vinyl-coated cotton, acrylic-coated polyester, and vinyl-coated polyester or cotton and solution-dyed acrylic. All materials should receive silkscreen, painted, cutout lettering, heat color-transfer, pressure sensitive vinyl films or sewn appliqué signs. Awning signs and logos are limited to a height of six inches, and may be placed on the valence only. 21 Building & Architecture Page 28 of 82 Village of Winnetka, Illinois Colors: Awning and banner colors must take into account the color selection of the surrounding materials, buildings, signs, awnings, and image of the retailer/user and district. All awnings located on the same building must be the same color. Colors should enhance and compliment the building and are restricted to earthtones and primary and secondary colors. Final color selection is contingent on approval by the Design Review Board and compliance with the Village awning ordinance. Banners should be considered as identification of commercial districts. Banners may be location, event, holiday or sponsor specific and can create a unifying thread between the independent districts. Banners are to be mounted on existing poles by fixed brackets and hardware. The Design Review Board must approve the final design. All new or replacement Awnings and Banners must comply with Village Ordinances and the Design Guidelines. f. ADA Compliance: Federal and State regulations require all public spaces to be accessible. Accessibility alterations shall allow access from either the primary or the secondary facade; additions of elevators or ramps should be designed as an integral element of the building. Entrances: Commercial and mixed-use facilities should provide first floor access from the primary or secondary facade. Elevators: Where possible, elevators should be incorporated into the existing building envelope. If physically impossible, the elevator and stair core can be located on the exterior of the building but should be located so as not visible from the main public way. Ramps: Where required, the slope of the ramp should be as gradual as possible to eliminate the need for handrails. Although a 1:12 slope is permitted, 1:20 is encouraged. A ramp should be an integral design element, reflecting the design of the building it serves and surrounding site. This can be accomplished by concealing the ramp behind a low screen wall. g. Mechanical Equipment 1. Location Mechanical Equipment must not be visible from pedestrian view. Roof top equipment should be located either in the center of the roof or in one corner away from the street elevation so as not to be visible from the primary or secondary approach. Design Guidelines 22 Page 29 of 82  Architectural Series of Asphalt Shingles (3 ply) (See figure 49) Wood Shingles (Fire treated) Slate (See figure 48) Real Copper (No other metal roofs are allowed) Figure 46 Institutional only Flat roofs must be hidden by parapet on primary / secondary facades. Commercial and Multiple- Family Flat roof must not be visible from street, pedestrian, or open spaces. d. Door and Window Materials: Commercial, Mixed Use, Institutional, Multiple- Family Residential: Entry doors should be wood or aluminum stile and rail with varying degrees of glass. Public entry doors should be Figure 47 fully glazed whereas private and semi- private entries should be primarily solid panel doors. Storefront window units should be either paneled aluminum or brass. Many original storefronts, some with transom windows, remain in the districts. Efforts should be taken to repair and renovate these systems Figure 48 where feasible. Window frames should be wood, steel or aluminum. Vinyl windows are not acceptable. Muntin divisions should be real divided glass or simulated with spacer bars. Snap-in muntins are not acceptable. Color selection should be sympathetic with the overall building color palette and take into account the adjacent building materials within the structure, immediately adjacent structures, structures within the same block and Figure 49 structures across the street. Entry door hardware is to be exterior grade with weather-resistant finish. Hardware design and finish is to be appropriate with facade articulation, color palette and district character. Glazing should be clear glass without tint or film. 25 Building & Architecture Page 30 of 82  Architectural Series of Asphalt Shingles (3 ply) (See figure 49) Wood Shingles (Fire treated) Slate (See figure 48) Real Copper (No other metal roofs are allowed) Figure 46 Institutional only Flat roofs must be hidden by parapet on primary / secondary facades. Commercial and Multiple- Family Flat roof must not be visible from street, pedestrian, or open spaces. d. Door and Window Materials: Commercial, Mixed Use, Institutional, Multiple- Family Residential: Entry doors should be wood or aluminum stile and rail with varying degrees of glass. Public entry doors should be Figure 47 fully glazed whereas private and semi- private entries should be primarily solid panel doors. Storefront window units should be either paneled aluminum or brass. Many original storefronts, some with transom windows, remain in the districts. Efforts should be taken to repair and renovate these systems Figure 48 where feasible. Window frames should be wood, steel or aluminum. Vinyl windows are not acceptable. Muntin divisions should be real divided glass or simulated with spacer bars. Snap-in muntins are not acceptable. Color selection should be sympathetic with the overall building color palette and take into account the adjacent building materials within the structure, immediately adjacent structures, structures within the same block and Figure 49 structures across the street. Entry door hardware is to be exterior grade with weather-resistant finish. Hardware design and finish is to be appropriate with facade articulation, color palette and district character. Glazing should be clear glass without tint or film. 25 Building & Architecture Page 31 of 82  MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD/SIGN BOARD OF APPELAS FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 9, 2025 SUBJECT: 520 GREEN BAY ROAD – BMO BANK – COA FOR LANDSCAPING ALTERATIONS (CASE NO. 2025-21-DR) INTRODUCTION On October 16, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to hold a public hearing on a Certificate of Appropriateness Application submitted by Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate (the “Applicant”) as the owner of the commercial building leased to BMO Bank, located at 520 Green Bay Road (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant is seeking approval to replace landscaping with new plantings on the Subject Property. The Subject Property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Green Bay Road and Elm Street in the Elm Street Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located in the Commercial Overlay District. The Subject Property is a traditional three-story commercial building that houses BMO Bank. Figure 1 below and Figure 2 on the following page identify the Subject Property. Subject Property Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map Page 32 of 82  Figure 2 – Subject Property – Building View/Green Bay Road and Elm Street Intersection PREVIOUS APPROVALS In 2018, the DRB approved existing building signage. In 2019, the DRB approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for exterior building lighting. In 2023, staff administratively approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for tuckpointing and repairing the landscaping retaining brick wall by the drive-thru at the Subject Property. CURRENT REQUEST As previously stated, the Applicant is seeking the replacement of the landscaping in the beds both along the sidewalk on Green Bay Road and along the drive-thru area at Subject Property, as proposed on the landscaping plan below. 2 Page 33 of 82 Proposed Landscaping Plan Proposed Plantings 3 Page 34 of 82  Proposed plantings A copy of the application materials is included in Attachment A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CONSIDERATIONS As established by the Village Code, the Design Review Board is to consider the following four (4) factors in determining whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: “(1) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are appropriate to and compatible with the character of the immediate neighborhood;” “(2) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are appropriate to and compatible with adopted Village plans for and improvements in the immediate neighborhood, and including both urban design and site arrangement considerations;” “(3) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are consistent with applicable Village design guidelines and such standards and criteria as may be adopted by the Board; and” “(4) the probable effect of the proposed external architectural features on the integrity of the immediate vicinity.” The Board will need to determine if the proposed landscaping replacement complies with the above standards. DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS Even though the Village’s Design Guidelines do not directly guide landscaping plantings on private commercial properties, staff reviewed proposed planting replacement and compared them with the recommendations of the Design Guidelines for pedestrian zone landscaping and noted that nine proposed varieties specified in the plans and photos match the recommendations of the design guidelines (Village Plant Palette, Appendix B). Of the nine varieties specified, two match the Village of Winnetka plant palette; five are not on the Village of Winnetka plant palette, but a different variety than that specified; two are 4 Page 35 of 82 not on the Village of Winnetka plant palette list. Details are provided below: Palette Match Koreanspice Viburnum Bloodgood Japanese Maple On Palette, but a Different Variety Bobo Hydrangea Bloomerang Lilac Green Velvet Boxwood Kit Kat Catmint Darts Blue Vinca Not on Palette Summer Beauty Allium Japanese Forest Grass SUMMARY The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed exterior building and landscaping alterations appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines and approve them as proposed. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Application Materials Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt 5 Page 36 of 82 Page 37 of 82 Page 38 of 82  Kit Kat Catmint Darts Blue Vinca Summer Beauty Allium Japanese Forest Grass Hoffman Commercial Real Estate | 520 Green Bay Road Groundcover & Perennial Images Page 39 of 82 Bobo Hydrangea Bloomerang Lilac Koreanspice Viburnum Green Velvet Boxwood Bloodgood Japanese Maple Hoffman Commercial Real Estate | 520 Green Bay Road Shrub & Tree Images Page 40 of 82  ATTACHMENT B APPENDIXB Village Plant Palette & Recommended Minimum Size Plant Material at Planting DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES/ STREET TREES minimum 4" caliper/ BB Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' FreemaniiMaple Acer nigrum Black Maple Acer platanoides 'Emerald Queen' Emerald Queen Norway Maple Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset'- Red Sunset Red Maple Acer saccharum Legacy Sugar Maple Columnar Sugar Maple (Columnar Acer saccharum 'Columnare' Shape) Celtis occidentalis Hackberry Celtis occidentalis 'Prairie Pride' Prairie Pride Hackberry Fraxinus americana 'Autumn Purple' Autumn Purple White Ash Fraxinus americana 'Rose Hill' Rose Hill White Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Marshall' Marshall Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' Patmore Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Summit' Summit Green Ash Fraxinus quadrangulata Blue Ash Ginko biloba Ginko (Male) Gleditsia triancanthos inermis 'Skyline' SkyJine Thomless Honeylocust Gymnocladus dioicus Kentucky coffeetree Pyrus calleryana 'Aristocrat' Aristocrat Pear Quercus bicolor White Oak Quercus muehlenbergii Chinkapin Oak Quercus rubra Red Oak Quercus robur English Oak Tilia americana American Linden Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' Little leaf Linden Tilia euchlora 'Redmond' Redmond Linden Tilia tomentosa Silver Linden Tilia tomentosa 'Sterling Silver' Sterling Silver Silver Linden Ulmus carpinifolia 'Regal' Regal Smooth leaf Elm Ulmus cultivars Elm (disease resistant cultivars) Zelkova serrata Greenvase Zelkova DECIDUOUS ORNAMENTAL TREES minimum 6'-10' height- clump form/ 21/2"-3" caliper-single stem/ BB Altus glutinosa Black Alder v'Acer palmatum 'Bloodgood' Japanese Bloodgood Maple ✓ Amelanchier canadensis Shadblow Serviceberry 79 Submission Requirements Page 41 of 82  Village of Winnetka, Illinois Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Apple Serviceberry Autumn Brilliance' Brilliance Betula nigra 'Heritage' Heritage River Birch Betula platyphylla '.japonica' Whitespire Birch Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam Cercis canadensis Red bud Cornus alternifolia Pagoda Dogwood Crataegus crusgalli 'Inermis' Thornless Cockspw- Hawthorn Malus floribunda Japanese Crabapple Malus 'Red Jewel' Red Jewel Crabapple Malus sargentii Sargent Crabapple Malus 'Snowdrift' White Crabapple Magnolia stellata Star Magnolia Magnolia x loebnerii 'Merill' Dr. Merill Magnolia Malus Zumi calocarpa Zumi Crabapple Pyrus calleryana 'Chanticleer' Chanticleer Pear Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk' Japanese Tree Lilac Viburnum prunifolium Blackhaw Viburnum EVERGREEN TREES minimum 6'-8' height/ BB Picea glauca 'Densata' Black Hills Spruce Pinus nigra Austrian Pine Picea pungens Green Colorado Spruce Picea pungens 'Glauca' Colorado Blue Spruce Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress DECIDUOUS SHRUBS minimum size range 18"-34"/ BB (species/location dependant) Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Acer ginnala Amur Maple Shrub Form Aronia melanocarpa Glossy Black Chokeberry Berberis thunbergii Crimson Pygmy Barberry Cotoneaster horizontalis Rockspray horizontalis Cotoneaster lucidus Peking Cotoneaster Clethra alnifolia Summer Sweet Clethra Cornus sericea 'Albo-Marginata' Variegated Dogwood Corylus colurna Turkish Filbert Cornus alba 'marginata' Variegated Tatarian Dogwood Cornus mas Comelian Cherry Dogwood Cornus altemifolia Pagoda Dogwood Cornus racemosa Gray Dogwood Alleman's Compact Redtwig Comus sericea 'Allemans' Dogwood Cornus sericea 'Isanti' Redtwig Dogwood Design Guidelines 80 Page 42 of 82  Euonymus alatas 'Compactus' Dwarf Winged Euonymus Euonymous fortunei 'Emerald Gaiety' Emerald Gaiety Euonymous Forsythia spp. Forsythia Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Annabelle Smooth Hydrangea Hydrangea paniculata 'Tardiva' Tardiva Hydrangea Hydrangea 'Nikko Blue' Nikko Blue Hydrangea Hamamelis virginiana Common Witch Hazel Ilex verticillata 'Jim Dandy/ Red Sprite' Winterberry (Male and Female 1 :5) Kerriajaponica Japanese Kerria Lonicera xylosteum 'Emerald Mound' Emerald Mound Honeysuckle Lonicera xylosteum 'Claveys Dwarf European Fly Honeysuckle Myrica pennsylvanica Bayberry Potentilla fruiticosa 'Abottswood' White Bush Cinquefoil Potentilla fruiticosa 'Golddrop' Gold Bush Cinquefoil Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low' Fragrant Sumac Ribes alpinum 'Greenmound' Greenmound Alpine Currant Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant Rosa 'Carefree Wonder' Carefree Wonder Rose Rosa 'Fairy Rose' The Fairy Rose Rhododendron 'Catawba' Catawba Rhododendron Rosa 'Sea Foam' Sea Foam Rose Rosa Meidland 'Scarlet' Scarlet Meidland Rose Spiraea x bumalda 'Froebelli' Froebe} Spirea Spiraea x bumalda 'Gold Flame' Gold Flame Spirea Spiraea japonica 'Little Princess' Japanese Spirea Syringa meyeri Meyer Lilac7 Syringa patula 'Ms. Kim' Ms. Kim LilacJ Spiraea x bumalda 'Roebels' Roebels Spirea ibumum carlesii Korean Spice Viburnum./ Viburnum dentatum Arrowwood Viburnum Viburnum x judii Judd Viburnum Hahs American Cranberrybush Viburnum trilobum 'Hahs' Viburnum Viburnum lentago 'Mohican' Nannyberry Viburnum 'Mohican' Viburnum prunifolium Blackhawk Viburnum Viburnum trilobum 'Wentworth' Wentworth American Cranberrybush EVERGREEN SHRUBS minimum size range 18"-24"/BB (species/ location dependentL Buxus microphyla 'Wintergreen' Ilex x meserveae 'China Boy/China Wintergreen Boxwood J Girl' China Boy/China Girl Holly Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' Sea Green Juniper Juniperus chinensis 'Kallays Compacta' Kallays Compact Juniper Pinus mugho Mugho Pine Taxus media 'Densiformis' Dense Yew 81 Submission Requirements Page 43 of 82  Village o(Winnetka. Illinois Taxus media 'Hicks" Hicks Yew Thuja occidentalis 'Mission' Mission Arborvitae PERENNIALS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES minimum size 1 gallon container Astilbe japonica 'Deutschland' Deutschland Astilbe Astilbe x arendsii 'Fanal' Fanal Astilbe Anemone japonica Japanese Anemone Amorpha canescens Lead Plant Andropogon scoparius Little Bluesteam Astilbe x arendsii 'Peach Blossom' Peach Blossom Astilbe Aster novae-angliae Purple Dome New England Aster Alchemilla mollis Lady's Mantle Bergenia rotblum Rotblum Bergenia Buddleia davidii 'Black Night' Black Night Davidii Calamogrostis acutifolia 'Stricta' Feather Reed Grass Chrysanthemum x superbum 'Alaska' Shasta Daisy Echinacea purpurea 'Magnus Pink' Coneflower Festuca 'Elijah Blue' Elijah Blue Fescue Dianthus 'Helen' Helen Dianthus Geranium sanguineum Bloody Red Cranesbill Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns' Happy Returns Daylily Hemerocallis 'Stella D'Oro' Yellow Daylily Heuchera micrantha 'Purple Palace' Purple Palace Coral Bells Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass Hosta sieboldiana 'Frances William' Frances William Hosta Hosta sieboldiana 'Elegans' Elegans Hosta Iris siberica 'Caesar's Brother' Caesar's Brother Iris Ligularia 'Rocket' Rocket Ligularia Liatris spicata 'Kobold' Gayfeather Liriope spicata Lilyturf Lysimachia clethroides' White Gooseneck' White Gooseneck Loosestrife Lavander mandeal Mandel Lavander Coreopsis vert ' Moonbeam' Moonbeam Coreopsis Miscanthus sinensis 'purpurescens' Maiden Grass Nepata x faassenii • Blue Wonder CatminQ Panicum virgatum cultivars Switch grass Pennisetum apelocuroides 'Hameln' Dwarf Fountain Grass Perovskia atriplicifolia 'Longin' Russian Sage Phlox divaricata Tall Phlox 'purple' Panicum virgatum cultivars Switch Grass Papaver Oriental Poppy Penisetum 'rubrum' Purple Fountain Grass Rudbeckia fulgida 'Goldstrum' Black-eyed Susan Sedum 'Autumn Joy' Autumn Joy Sedum Design Guidelines 82 Page 44 of 82  Sporobolus heterolepias Prairie Dropseed Veronica spicata Sunny Blue Veronica GROUNDCOVERS minimum size 3 "pot/ Quart container preferred Ajuga reptans Bugleweed Euonymus fortuneii 'Colorata' Purpleleaf Winter creeper Laminum Galeobdolon 'variegatum' Variegated Lamiastrum •Vinca Minor 'Bowles' Bowles Periwinkle Pachysandra terminalis Japanese Flowering Spurge Waldsteinia temata Barren Strawberry BULBS Topsize Daffodils spp. Ice Follies Daffodils Hyacinths spp. Grape Hyacinths Tulips spp. Mixed Colors Tulips ANNUALS 21/2" container/ 1 quart VINES minimum size 1 gallon container staked Campsis radicans Trumpet Creeper Clematis spp. Clematis Hydrangea anomala petiolans Climbing Hydrangea Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper Parthenocissus tricuspidata 'Robusta' Boston Ivy 83 Submission Requirements Page 45 of 82  Village of Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIXC SHADE TREE SETBACKS In order to protect trees and their root systems, new parkway trees should be located no closer than the following distances from the following structures in the parkway: Structure Distance (on center) Curbs 2'-0" Building exits 5'-0" Carriage walk 5'-0" Fire hydrants 5'-0" Manholes and catchbasins 5'-0" Wall hydrants, standpipes 5'-0" Siamese connections 5'-0" Buildings 8'-0" Fire escapes 10'-0" Street lights 12'-0" Trees (existing columnar forms) 20'-0" Pedestrian overpasses and tunnels 25'-0" Trees (existing spreading forms) 25'-0" Other structures 25'-0" Bus stop (near side of intersection) 40'-0" Railroads 50'-0" Viaducts 50'-0" Bus stop (far side of intersection) 75'-0" Areas devoted to outdoor dining or display should not exceed the width of the building, and should not be located within 1 O' of a fire hydrant, comer or bus stop, in accordance with the Village of Winnetka Zoning Ordinance. Design Guidelines 84 Page 46 of 82  BMO Landsca e Plan Review Comments Nine varieties are specified and the plans and photos match. Of the nine varieties specified, 2 match the VOW Plant Palette; 5 are on the VOW Plant Palette, but different variety than that specified; 2 are not on the VOW Plant Palette list. Details are provided below. Palette Match: Koreanspice Viburnum Bloodgood Japanese Maple On Palette. but Different Variety: Bobo Hydrangea Bloomerang Lilac Green Velvet Boxwood Kit Kat Catmint Darts Blue Vinca Not on Palette: Summer Beauty Allium Japanese Forest Grass Page 47 of 82 APPENDIXD Village of Winnetka Action Items As part of the Design Guidelines, specific recommendations have been proposed as part of the Streetscape/Pedestrian Zones as noted in the text. The Village may consider taking the next steps on these action items in its goal to implement these guidelines. Additionally, detailed planning and design will be required to implement these recommendations that may include: ■ Village Wayfinding/Signage Program: A coordinated sign system should be developed to assist in clearly defining and orienting residents to key Village entry points, business districts, area landmarks, and business district parking. ■ Decorative Lighting Plan: A decorative lighting plan should be implemented over a phased program for the Village's commercial districts and the Green Bay Road corridor. Pole/fixture locations, heights and light levels should be evaluated to their appropriateness and scale in any given district. ■ Streetscape Enhancement program: A new family of streetscape elements has been defined in these guidelines. A more detailed streetscape plan should be developed for each of the districts and the Green Bay Road Corridor that ide.ntifies phasing and implementation of these elements. ■ Green Bay Road Improvements: In its ongoing effort to enhance and beautify the Green Bay Road corridor, the Village should develop an overall corridor improvement plan that identifies desired pedestrian and vehicular landscaping, lighting and signage enhancements. This plan can be used to work with IDOT on any future planned road improvements through this corridor. 85 Submission Requirements Page 48 of 82  MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD/ SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 9, 2025 SUBJECT: 914 GREEN BAY ROAD – SANTE INTEGRATED HEALTH AND WELLNESS – SIGN PERMIT AND SIGN CODE VARIATIONS (CASE NO. 25-22-DR) INTRODUCTION On October 16, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to consider a Sign Permit application submitted by Sante Integrated Health and Wellness (the “Applicant”) as lessee of the 2nd floor commercial space at the property located at 914 Green Bay Road (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant has submitted applications seeking the following approvals: 1. Sign Permit to allow installation of six-window decal signs; and 2. Sign Code Variation to allow the following: a. Window signs that exceed 10% of their respective window area; and b. Window translucent decal signs that are not die-cut and are not limited to individual letters and logos. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located west of Green Bay Road between Gage Street and Tower Road in the Hubbard Woods Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located within the Commercial Overlay District. On the second floor of the commercial building, the Applicant operates its medical clinic. The first-floor commercial spaces are occupied by Lana and by Eversee Boutique Eyecare. Figure 1 identifies the location of the Subject Property, and Figure 2 on the next page shows the entire front façade of the building and the location of the Applicant’s business. Location of Subject Property Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map Page 49 of 82  Location of the Location of the recently Sante Integrated Health approved and Wellness on the projecting sign second floor Location of the recently approved door window sign Figure 2 – Subject Property View of the entire building at 914 Green Bay Road PREVIOUS APPROVALS The DRB approved the sign permit to install a wall sign for Lana Jewelry in March 2023, as well as storefront window signs, a door window sign, and a projecting sign. Additionally, approval was granted for the storefront gold vinyl border/ribbon to be installed around all windows at the subject building in February 2024. Just recently, at the September 18th meeting, the Board approved an entrance door window sign and a projecting sign for the Sante Integrated Health and Wellness. CURRENT REQUEST The Applicant is seeking additional signage in the form of window decals for promotion and identification of the existing grocery business. Six translucent, frosted vinyl decal window signs would be applied to the windows of the second floor along the building’s east façade on Green Bay Road. The proposed signs are as follows: • Left and Right window bays (three windows each) o The frosted vinyl decal will be applied to the lower portion of all second floor windows; o The left and right lower windows within each bay show the Sante Integrated Health and Wellness logo cutout in the frosted vinyl decal, 8” in height; and o The middle windows within each bay show the “SANTE” text cutout in the frosted vinyl decal, 6” in height; The signs described above are identified on the following page: Page 50 of 82 The Applicant has provided details of the proposed signs that are available in the application materials included in Attachment A. SIGN CODE ANALYSIS Section 15.60.120 of the Village Sign Code establishes commercial district window sign standards. Window signs that meet the following standards can be administratively approved by staff. Given the proposed signage covers 100 percent of the window, the signage does not meet many of the following standards. Thus, the window signage requires review by the Design Review Board as well as approval of Sign Code variations: • Limited to 10% or less of the single windowpane; o Existing signs in each window cover up 100% of the respective window area (Sign Variation required for each window); • Limited to 50% or less of a door-window or transom; Page 51 of 82  • Height of the sign to not exceed 1/3 of the height of the glass area and 90% of the glass width; • Limited letters and logos no taller than 8”, except one logo, and the first letter of each word may be up to no taller than 24”, and except store hours and contact information shall be limited to 2” in height; • No window sign should be illuminated; • Located in the lower two-thirds of the window opening; • Without reflective materials; • Limited to two colors; • Decal sign shall be die-cut and limited to individual letters and logos o The frosted vinyl, logo, and text decal signs are not die-cut and are not limited to individual letters and logos. (Sign Variation required for each window); • Shall not extend over or through architectural features/window muntin; and • Comply with the following: for each street exposure, the total area of all wall signs, window signs, and awning signs other than exempt signs and permitted directional and incidental signs shall not exceed 15% of the street exposure. Green Bay Road Signage Street Exposure Area Square Percentage Foot Green Bay Road Street Exposure 750 - Max Allowed per Sign Code 112.5 15% (15% of the Street Exposure) All Existing & Proposed Signs Counted Toward Street 41 5.4% Exposure The existing and proposed signs at the property comply with the maximum allowed sign area street exposure requirement. SIGN CODE VARIATION REQUEST 1. The Applicant has applied for a Sign Code Variation from Section 15.60.120 [Commercial Signs] to allow a. Window signs that exceed 10% of their respective window area; and b. Window translucent decal signs that are not die-cut and are not limited to individual letters and logos. The Design Review Board (also sitting as the Sign Board of Appeals) may grant relief from the Sign Code if it determines that the following standards set out in Section 15.60.250 [Variations] are met: 1. The variations would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter; 2. Given the design elements of the building or site on which the sign is located, the design of the sign is as compatible, if not more compatible, with the character of the business district than the standard sign regulations would otherwise allow; 3. For window signs, the design of the sign would not significantly inhibit the viewing of store products, activities, or services; 4. The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality; 5. The design of the sign is contextually appropriate for the type of business; and 6. The design of the sign exhibits a high degree of artistic embellishment. Page 52 of 82 DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS When reviewing the design of any signs, the Board is to consider the following standards and criteria of Section 15.60.150(F) of the Sign Code. F. Standards and Criteria for Issuance. The following factors and characteristics relating to the safety and appearance of signage shall govern the Board’s evaluation of design submittals: 1. The sign area shall be in proportion and scale to the building or to other buildings or signs in the surrounding area; 2. A signage package for a business establishment that includes a number of signs and graphics shall have an overall plan that demonstrates the compatibility of the design and colors of all the signs that are part of that package; 3. The amount of text and graphics contained in or on any sign or group of signs shall be limited so that it results in a clear and readable design; 4. Signs and graphics shall have a harmonious relationship with nearby signs, buildings, and the neighborhood and shall be designed not to adversely affect adjacent structures. In this respect, the sign shall relate to its building, structure, and neighborhood in terms of size, shape, material, color, texture, lettering, location, arrangement, lighting, and the like; 5. Colors shall be used with restraint; excessive brightness shall be avoided; and 6. The additional provisions of this chapter, as specified in this chapter, shall be part of the criteria of the design review process. The Board should also consider the Village Design Guidelines to approve the proposed signage. See Attachment B. SUMMARY The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed second-floor window signs as appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines and approve the Sign Permit and Sign Code Variation as submitted. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Application Materials Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt Page 53 of 82 ATTACHMENT A Page 54 of 82 914 Green Bay Road, Winnetka IL BETH EVELAND 2nd Floor DESIGN TRANSLUCENT FROSTED VINYL DECAL IN BOTTOM OF WINDOWS ARE BOTTOM OF EACH WINDOW, WITH DIE CUT LOGO FROSTED FOR PATIENT PRIVACY AND NAME IN ALTERNATING WINDOWS. IN MEDICAL OFFICE - CENTERED HORZ. + VERT. IN EACH WINDOW - LETTERS ARE 6”H, LOGO IS 8”H PLAIN FROSTING W/ NO NAME OR LOGO IN MIDDLE WINDOWS EXISTING SIGNAGE FOR ANOTHER TENANT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECTING SIGN 50’W FACADE SIGNS FABRICATED AND INSTALLED BY: Page 55 of 82 914 Green Bay Road, Winnetka IL BETH EVELAND 2nd Floor DESIGN 43” 43” 43” 80” 8” 6” 9” 28” VINYL WINDOW DECALS: TOTAL SIGN AREA: LOGOS: 8”W X 9”H. APPROX 0.5 SQ FT EACH VINYL WINDOW DECALS: 4.34 SQ. FT. TOTAL - 2% OF EACH WINDOW NAMES: 6”H X 28”W. APPROX 1.17 SQ FT EACH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SIGNAGE: 8.375 SQ FT - 4.8% OF EACH WINDOW (PROJECTING SIGN AND ENTRY DOOR DECAL) MATERIALS: TOTAL BUSINESS SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE: 12.715 SQ FT - FROSTED TRANSLUCENT VINYL ON CLEAR GLASS STREET FRONTAGE AREA: 1445 SQ. FT. WITH DIE CUT LOGOS AND LETTERS - SEE PAGE 1 FOR OVERALL STREET VIEW - INSTALLED ON INTERIOR FACE OF WINDOW TOTAL SIGN PERCENTAGE OF FRONTAGE = 0.9% - LOWER SECTION OF WINDOWS ARE FROSTED FOR PATIENT PRIVACY FROM STREET SIGNS FABRICATED AND INSTALLED BY: Page 56 of 82 914 Green Bay Road, Winnetka IL BETH EVELAND 2nd Floor DESIGN SIGNS FABRICATED AND INSTALLED BY: EXISTING BUILDING PHOTO Page 57 of 82  Village of Winnetka SIGN CODE VARIATION APPLICATION VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SIGN CODE VARIATION APPLICATIO CE-1 "e� l . St.? � \\ 101s Property Information Site Address: q \'1 b(e "' �\ �cr,..c\ 1 S\µ\(_ 2.c\ 6'1�=- � Name of Business: Sa,o\-c r�\\-e.�vtLW \.ko.. ,� C,\J'\c\ Wa.-\\ne<;.� Parcel ldentificationNumber(s) (PIN): _ ______________________ Application is hereby made to the Village of Winnetka for a variation from Section(s) _________ of Chapter 15.60 Signs of the Village Code for the following work: '$e_e a.\4a e-k.ed desc ;-,�bQI) Attach a separate written document that explains in detail how the requested variation complies with all of the following standards: 1. The requested variation is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Sign Code. 2. Given the design elements of the building or site on which the sign is located, the design is as compatible, if not more, with the character of the business district than the standard sign regulations allow. 3. For window signs, the design of the sign does not significantly inhibit the viewing of store products, activities, or services. 4. The design of the sign is contextually appropriate for the type of business. 5. The design of the sign exhibits a high degree of artistic embellishment. 6. The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Property Owner Information Applicant Information Legal Name: O'.\:::, 'CC N 0-z..n, c...\s, Legal Name: l==Q-Q,,, � ffi,><2..A:D Primary Contact:____________ Primary Contact: __________ Address: "'Jb \ Ye...(¼, th,U\vJL I Ne. 2..0(o Address: 9 \ L\ 0,e�.---. � <2.ca.J... 1 Sul� 20\ I City, State, Zip: 6\e(\c,_oe ,I IL b OQ2.-2 City, State, Zip: W:r-.f\e\-\...c.,. \ L- booli3 Phone No. 3\ J- • '7:) 3 J · <fS\.\ \i Phone No. __�_\_').._�_5_\_9_C/_q_2-__ Email: __ fY\Q_L=--'{_..C____...,. (; u.)�7---+-\=9,,�l/'\=j�C�£'-•�LA�CY\�_ -=-- Owner Signature:____________ Page 4 of 4 Page 58 of 82  SIGN CODE VARIATION APPLICATION Business: Sante Integrated Health and Wellness Address: 914 Green Bay Road, Suite 201 Statement of Need for Window Frosting: As a physician-led medical clinic, protecting patient privacy is a fundamental responsibility. The bottom windows of our second-floor medical office make it possible for pedestrians on the street or in the businesses across the street to see into areas where patients wait and receive care. We tested this ourselves and believed that there would be a privacy concern. Without protective treatment, this visibility risks exposing patients during sensitive health-related visits. We are proposing a frosted decal to address this concern by: 1. Safeguarding patient privacy. The frosted decal on the lower windows prevents pedestrians and street traffic from viewing patients inside. This ensures compliance with healthcare privacy expectations (HIPAA) and helps reinforce trust with our patients. 2. Provides dignity and comfort. A frosted lower window ensures that our patients feel secure, respected, and not on public display. 3. Maintaining natural light and esthetics. A frosted decal allows ample light to enter our clinic while creating a discreet professional appearance aligned with the Village of Winnetka's design standards. The logo and name will be integrated tastefully into the frosting, helping ensure that the signage is subtle, elegant, and consistent with the Village of Winnetka's character. I want to thank you for your consideration in this matter. This sign code variation application is not for decorative purposes but is essential for patient protection. The frosted lower windows represent the least intrusive and visually appealing solution to balance privacy and the welcoming appearance of our clinic. Page 59 of 82 Yours sincerely, Faris M Murad, MD, FASGE -fL_ Page 60 of 82  ATTACHMENT B d. Building Signage Commercial signs should reflect the character of the building style, while expressing each store’s individuality. There are several prominent sign styles that are appropriate to Winnetka: surface mounted, pin-mounted, interior, decal and projecting blade signs. Sign materials are limited to painted wood, canvas, architectural glass and metal. Sign color must harmonize with the building upon which it is mounted and adjacent structures. Lettering color can be unique to the image of the retailer/user. Metal sign and plaque material such as brushed bronze, antique bronze, aluminum, stainless steel and painted cast iron or similarly appearing materials are preferred. Highly reflective metallic signs are not allowed. Signs should be lit by marquee or spot lighting; neon lighting is not permitted. Spot lighting should be minimal and unobtrusive and, per the Village Code, the source of illumination shall not be visible from any street, sidewalk or dwelling. Simplified industrial light fixtures are not permitted. Contextual solutions are recommended. The majority of the signs will be mounted within the building’s sign band, defined as the wall area located above the ground floor storefront opening and below the second floor windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” above grade and a maximum of 15’-0” above grade. (MC-01-2023, amended, 01/17/2023) Signs must comply with the general provisions of the Winnetka Sign Ordinance as well as design provisions contained within these Design Guidelines. 1. Surface mounted commercial signs are either fabricated from painted wood or cast metal plaques and are to be mounted within the sign band or within the storefront transom. The height of the sign is restricted to 75% of the area of the sign band or 14 inches - whichever is less. The sign band of a building consists of the area located above the ground floor storefront opening and below the second floor windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” and a maximum of 15’-0” above grade. Refer to figures 28, 29, and 30 for location. Surface mounted or pin- mounted signs are not permitted on secondary elevations without a defined sign band. 2. Pin-mounted commercial signs consist of reverse channel, cast metal and flat cut metal letters mounted above the storefront in the masonry sign band or suspended in front of the storefront at the transom or recessed entry. The size of the lettering is restricted so that the height of the letters does not exceed 75% of the height of the sign band or 14 inches - whichever is less. The length of the lettering is to be Figure 38 contained within 75% of the length of the sign band. (See figure 38) 19 Building & Architecture Page 61 of 82  MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD/SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2025 SUBJECT: 714-16, 718-732, 736 & 740 ELM STREET AND 511 & 515 LINCOLN AVENUE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO MODIFY THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF THE APPROVED ONE WINNETKA PUD (CASE NO. 25-23-DR) INTRODUCTION An application submitted by the MDG Winnetka One LP (the “Applicant”), as the property owner of 714-16 Elm Street, 718-732 Elm Street, 736 Elm Street, 740 Elm Street, 511 Lincoln Avenue, and 515 Lincoln Avenue (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant has filed a Certificate of Appropriateness Application seeking approval to modify the storefront windows and entries, as well as an alternative option to the metal screening panels of the new four-story mixed-use building at the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is generally located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Elm Street and Lincoln Avenue, is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial, and is located in the C-2 Commercial Overlay District. The Subject Property is currently under construction for a new four-story mixed-use building known as One Winnetka. Figure 1 below shows the location of the Subject Property. Figure 1- Location Map – Subject Property Page 62 of 82 CURRENT REQUEST The Applicant requests approval to modify the storefront windows and entries to better accommodate a future restaurant tenant, as well as an alternative option to the metal screening panels on the south and east elevations of the new four-story mixed-use building at the Subject Property. Storefront Windows and Entries Modifications • At Lincoln Avenue (West) ground floor elevation - Removing a double door that was placed initially in case this corner space was demised further, replacing it with a folding glass nana-wall, and adding a single swing door and revolving door further south on the elevation where a storefront was originally approved. • At Elm Street (North) ground floor Elevation - Removing a double door within a recessed entrance, replacing it with a storefront that is flush with the remaining storefront and installing a single exit door further east on the elevation of the subject commercial space. Subject Property - Floor Plan of the new four-story mixed-use building originally approved and proposed exterior elevation modifications Page 63 of 82 Subject Property – Marked Up Floor Plan showing originally approved and proposed modifications Page 64 of 82 Subject Property – Lincoln Avenue Elevations of the new four-story mixed-use building showing originally approved and proposed exterior ground floor elevation modifications Page 65 of 82 Subject Property – Elm Street Elevations of the new four-story mixed-use building showing originally approved and proposed exterior elevation modifications Page 66 of 82  Proposed Alternate Option for the Metal Screen Panels Due to the difficulty in sourcing the exact spec of the metal screening panels as originally approved, the Applicant is proposing an alternative option as shown below. Subject Property –Elevation showing the originally approved and proposed alternate option for the metal screens A copy of the Applicant’s application materials is included in Attachment A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CONSIDERATIONS As established by the Village Code, the Design Review Board is to consider the following four (4) factors in determining whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness: “(1) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are appropriate to and compatible with the character of the immediate neighborhood;” “(2) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are appropriate to and compatible with adopted Village plans for and improvements in the immediate neighborhood, and including both urban design and site arrangement considerations;” “(3) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are consistent with applicable Village design guidelines and such standards and criteria as may be adopted by the Board; and” “(4) the probable effect of the proposed external architectural features on the integrity of the immediate vicinity.” The Board must determine if the proposed exterior elevation modifications comply with the above standards and the following design guidelines. See Attachment B. DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS The Village’s Design Guidelines provide general guidance on the design and appearance of exterior façades on commercial buildings. They also provide guidance on commercial storefront doors and window material and color selection, recommending that the selection be sympathetic to the overall building color palette and consider the adjacent building materials within the structure, as well as the immediately adjacent structures, structures within the same block, and structures across the street. Page 67 of 82 The project adheres to the Village Design Guidelines, as the applicant will maintain the building's materials and colors approved initially during the PUD process. The form of the building will not be altered, as it is planned to use the existing window openings. SUMMARY The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed exterior elevations modification to be appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines and approve the Certificate of Appropriateness Application as submitted. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Application Materials Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt Page 68 of 82  ATTACHMENT A Village of Winnetka CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION Project Address: s11-s1suncoInAvenueand714-740ElmStreet '5\'5 L1r>C.u\{"") -Ave,_ Name of Business(es): One Winnetka Planned Development § Application is hereby made for the following work (please check all that apply): Sign Awning Si gn Permit Application attached? i Awning Pennit Application attached?!: Other (general description) Minor modifications to the storefront window and entries Please provide a detailed description of the proposed work (attach additional information such as material specifications, photographs, etc.): See attached plan and elevations. The proposed modifications are requested 10 better accommodate our restaurant tenant. I/We hereby certify that as Owner (Lessee/Owner) of the property located at 511-515 Lincoln Avenue & 714•740 Elm Street (address), I am/we are aut horized to submit plans for alterations of the subject W property. I/e agree to perform the subject work in accordance with the conditions of approval by the Winnetka Design Review Board as well as all other applicable codes, rules, and reg 1;1lations of the Village of Winnetka. SIGNED PRINTED NAME(S) John ADDRESS 227 W Monroe, Suite 5200 PHONE NO. EMA[L dclein@murphyres.com PRIMARY DESIGN FIRM ------------ OKW Arcllitects c_�-1\07 CONTACT NAME A nd_ers__A us_tin_________ __ ADDRESS 600 W Jackson Blvd # 250 Chicago, L 60661 PHONE NO. (513) 910-0851 EMAIL aruslin@okWarchttects.com Page4of 4 Page 69 of 82  ONE WINNETKA Page 70 of 82 FLOOR PLAN (AS APPROVED) __ _= ������ - -� ------,j L-- -1 w <( I- > 0:: 0 a:i 0:: <( ELM ST ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • ■ COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 12" WIOE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR 1--...,;. ..,,.. ING 12k\/ CABLES SER\IING 8,666 GSF 5,634 GSF 5,200 GSF EL. 650.75 El.648.35 El.646.50 TRANSFORMER -- L--- ■ • ■ ■ • ■ •sTAIR 648SF � • ■ ■ "a LOAD/BOH 8 <",i, -v�� 841 SF 6. • � EXISTlt:,lG_glJ6UC PARKING LOT COMMERCIAL PARKING 9 3�ACES 5 5 3 1s· - o· ■ SH • RESIDENTIAL 'LI' STANDPIPE CONNEC ION 4,618 SF El. 651.75 LOBBY ' � VEREO ENT '°".· �-� RAMP ON ____.. 9 FOC ;;; ::.� SLOPE: 18% GROUND LEVEL ASAPPROVED SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" OKJl'l EB N rMDG] ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 Chicago, IL 60661 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL 2 \ Architects SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project#: 21077 Page 71 of 82  ����s��� FLOOR PLAN '----I Ill:: � > (PROPOSED) =�-�---, 0 al Ill:: <( o ELM ST 4 � ��0��"-...........-,,. � oooo□ □ oooo 2:J,�(Jrl���iiiiiiipf��iiiiiiiiiii'=��=���f--li!!i��==--�iiiili!ii!□ iiiiiiiiiiiii���ffi . ---- � D D D D D TENANT COMMERCIAL 1,817 GSF COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 6,548 GSF El.649.4 1,816 GSF 5,204 GSF EL650.75 EL: 650.75 EL. 649.4 EL646.50 D D D D D 0 STAIR 183 SF D --- EXIST�LIC PARKING LOT COMMERCIAL PARKING 9 3�ACES = = 6 SF sI �5 I 3 I � I I � 18' - 0' D I � STANDP IPE CONN f T1N lJ LOBBY D □ FDC-___.,... � ¢:::J RAMP ON 9 :::;; � SLOPE: 18% GROUND LEVEL PROPOSED SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" OKJl'l rMDG] ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 Chicago, IL 60661 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL 3 \ Architects SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project#: 21077 Page 72 of 82 ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS ELM ST ELM ST (AS APPROVED) (PROPOSED) ·-----------( ------· 'V 102' ·--------------------· REWORKED STOREFRONT ■ ■ ■ I [l I- □ TENAN COMMERCIAL :6 COMMERCIAL OMMERCIAL 1 , 817 G EL. 649.! I C::: � 8,666 GSF :� 6,548 GSF 2,363 GSF (0 EL. 650.75 1 o EL. 650.75 EL: 650.75 I I- I Cf) ·� 1 0 ■ ■ ■ q•o� □ □ I L1.J I C::: □ I ■ ■ □ FIRE PUMP FIRE PUMP ROOM ROOM OKJl'l rMDG] ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 Chicago, IL 60661 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL 4 \ Architects SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project#: 21077 Page 73 of 82  MECHANICAL ROOF ACCESS STAIR, --­ CORRUGATED METAL MECH SCREEN, MTL-3 ELEVATIONS OPEN TO SKY; MTL•3 CORRUGATED METAL MECH SCREEN. OPEN TO SKY: MTL-3 �E BUILDING HEIGHT ELEVATOR OVERRUN FC-1 7" FC-1 (AS APPROVED) PARAPET HEIGHT PARAPET HEIG. 4 HT• RF-2 ' 04 704'·4" RF-1 7 FB-1 CS-1 0 � CS-1 1;s II 1,, CS-2 T/FINISHEO FLOOR NW LOWEST G�E_NW 650- • 9· 65CY- 7" LINCOLN AVE ELEVATION (WEST) (APPROVED) SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ODE BUILDING HEIGHT $ - 61'-0" CORRUGATED METAL MECH SCREEN, OPEN TO SKY; MTL-3 ODE BUILDING HEIGHT $i - 52'-7" FC-1, TRIM _,ra. _ g)QE BUILDING HEIGHT �7- PARAPET HEIGHT PARAPET HEIG.HT• 704'-4" 704' 4 LEVEL 04 690'• O" l- ... uJ :c <.!> LEVEL 03 z i5 678' • O' al ill "' II L�:.L.� . :0 i;) !::: T/FINISHEO FLOOR NW "T""...,_.�LO""'EST GRADE_N�W'.'L.___:�-....1-■ IV=,;:, -Mllilli.•lillllllllilllj�L,&..L.,.Llil..L..&..1�.lllla.-!l,�...l:..;:;.iiiiiiill.iliiiil,,,,i;;iiiiiiiiii�-.;:.==- 650'-9" 65CY- 7" l'ffll'!'I' 'eS!!"' - "'·ffl' - - CS-I FB-1 REWORKED STOREFRONT 0-;��L���� ��E ELEVATION (WEST) (PROPOSED) 2 OKJl'l rMDG] ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 Chicago, IL 60661 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL 5 \ Architects SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project#: 21077 Page 74 of 82  CODE BUILDING HEIGHT CORRUGATED MET AL MECH SCREEN, � ss·.o· - ROOF ACCESS STAIR (MTL-3) OPEN TO SKY; Mll-3 CODE BUILDING HE GHT WD-1 53'-7" � FC-1 "'� lEV8.04 ,_ 690'- o· w b :x: <!> z N z 5 LEVB.03 678'. o· ! CS-1 D b II � u., II a, � LEva02 666'- o· :,., '!? FB-1 TIFINISHED FLOOR NW" 650'- 9 LOWEST GRADE NW 650' • 7" ELM STREET ELEVATION (NORTH) (APPROV ED) SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" -------------------------------==cORRIJGl\TEO-UETALMECAliCR"Ril_______________________________ dt,�E BUILDING HEIGHT �E BUILDING HEIGHT �10' v ss- ·-=-o· ROOF ACCESS STAIR (MTL-3) OPEN TO SKY; Mll-3 / ,_ lEVa04 ,_ :x: 690'. o· :,:: I:! w :,:: w :,:: <!> <!> z z 9 95 5 a, lEVB.03 ID 0 678'. 0- D w w � D �w Q. 1;S II II � f;; REW ELM STREET ELEVATION (NORTH) (PROPOSED) SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" OKJl'l rMDG] ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 Chicago, IL 60661 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL 6 \ Architects SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project#: 21077 Page 75 of 82 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS (AS APPROVED) (PROPOSED) REWORKED STOREFRONT ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 7 OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL Chicago, IL 60661 SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project #: 21077 Page 76 of 82 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS (AS APPROVED) (PROPOSED) REWORKED STOREFRONT ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 8 OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL Chicago, IL 60661 SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project #: 21077 Page 77 of 82 THREE-DIMENSIONAL RENDERING VIEW AT CORNER OF ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE. (AS APPROVED) Renderings provided to illustrate overall design intent, refer to building elevation sheets for final façade design. ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 9 OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL Chicago, IL 60661 SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project #: 21077 Page 78 of 82 THREE-DIMENSIONAL RENDERING VIEW AT CORNER OF ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE. (PROPOSED) Renderings provided to illustrate overall design intent, refer to building elevation sheets for final façade design. ONE WINNETKA - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 10 OKW ARCHITECTS 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 ELM ST. & LINCOLN AVE., WINNETKA, IL Chicago, IL 60661 SEPTEMBER 25th, 2025 Project #: 21077 Page 79 of 82  . ...... . .. . .. .. . . . . ... . ... . . . . . ... 9 8 ........•..................................................................• 7 6 ·· ···· ··· 5 ··········· ·····························•······· ··········· · · 4 ···· ··· ·· ··········· · ·· ········ ·········· · · •· · · · · •· · · · ·· · · . . .. . . . 3 . .. . .... .. . . . . ...................... . . . .. ...... . . . . . . . 2 ... . ........... . .... . .. . . . . .. . .... .... . . .... ... ...... ............•........................... � ________ 0 GENERAL PLAN NOTES: D F OKWMARKUPS (0 cp 269'• 4" 1. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAr-.1S FOR ALL GRADES,SLAB ELEVA.TIONS, AND UTILITY CONNECTIONS. 2. DO �OT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TC VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO FRAMING. 10'-7" 5'-7" 24'-0' 5' -10' 15'-0" 9'-2" 11'-6" 18'-6" 10'-2' 19'-10" 30'-0' 30'-0" '-0' 23'-0" 3'-0' 28'-10" 1'·0" 14'•3' ALL DNS ARE TO ROUGH FRAMING. 2025-08-05 -5 1'-6 5'8"'���:r� �a�,�- "__11<4'c_- O"�- "_ '-c_l)O"'---+- ct---112·c_-_Q'Ot--- ft� --_11,.·_,,.oo-· __ ''90 EIEQ---''""-:_<or_· ---J'_:_· �-� c __11,.·_,,. OJ""__�·�,- �_-__112, _-_Q'O""___�r''"Q',r'4'fc·c6 c_11/IZ_2''� ;,:;�•-· 100'_11Z_""__ _�•_:c· 2,:· _ �-'•".·c'10o_1i,:/2c_" c ' '_:'- ·o,:_·-- -t'5', -:_t�r-- "-''_:_· ,;:� -----'" 'c_· •·,__cs,_,._.,o_· ,. -o · '-"'0 c>'_:_ '.,_,·+_,_ ._,_."-�- ,_ ·,.3'-c· r- _,r_,.,,�i--r--r---'1.._,·::-· o._· ___ '"'Q1"''-'"-''" -----"-"-'-"._o·_�fT --'1._3cc· 4 _1c . aa·._ ---r--· ·c-•· 3. REFER TO BUILDING ELEVA Tl(J\IS FOR 'NINDOW +--f"'-'""'";· ._EESCO'-,,- -----"" --i._E 'l:Q'!<-"'° �----t'1-4<:_ _' or_ ¼ -- ·· �f' 4 't 't 12 - 1 1 i � �� � :ti 7 TYPES/INFO AND FOR INDICATION FOR 1'-5 318" 111/2'c -t r 1,2'-5 114" ..:i 1 t t J' .L" Tt-:-;; r MASONRYCONTROL JOINTS. 4. ALL ANGLED PARTITIONS ARE 45 DEGREES U.N.O. I I 5, REFER TO SHEET P,-030FOR PARTITkJN TYPES. NEW EXIT DOOR I I --j-;7�- DOUBLE DOOR 6, TYPICAL EXTERkJR FF.AME WPJ...L DIMENSIONS TO BE 6"NOMINAL U.N.O. Al ------_L. / DECORATIVE METAL FENCE A251 7, PLUMBING WALLS TO BE 2X6AT 15' O.C. DR ------------- / WITH LATCHING GATE DOUBLED EXTERIOR WALLS WITI-l INSULATION / B3 J- AND THERMOPLYUNLESS WATER SUPPLIED , ,/ -7''' NJ ------ A:l'.15 I I THROUGH FLOOR. ' 8, AT ALL WET AREAS PROVIDE MOISTURE : -1:::--­ / ---+-- - -----rs,, '---' - -..i..SS ----t- - S14'r---! �� - -�� ' , RESISTANT WALL BOARD AND AT TILED AREAS PROVIDE CEMENT BOARD. n 815 9, INSULATE ALL CONCEALED SPACES AT --,,,,, -r �\ / EXTERIOR WALLS. ---r : ' ' . Ea . 10, CAULK SILL PLATES, JOINTS BETWEEN L.�----· L__ I' I' --�-J MULTIPLE STUDS,PIPE AND VENT PENETRATIONS, WINDOW AND DOOR OPENINGS. : 0 f 11, PROVIDE ALUMINUM FLASHING AT ALL I' ________ :__________ "' ROOF/VIALL INTERSECTIONS, ABOVE 648·-4" IMNOOW,'DOOR HEAOS, AND BAND BOARDS,AND : I' 1.",, I I CHIMNEY PENETRATIONS AT ROOF. r I' -0 12. FIRESTOP BETl/'\'EEN VERTICAL AND ELIMINATE RECESSED "A.6-1A HORIZONTAL CONCEALED SPACES SUCH AS SOFFITS, STAIR FRAMING,AND MECHANICAL r I DOOR AND REPLACE CHASES WITH SOLID 2X DI\ENSIONAL LUMBER : t- -r= OR 1/2"[R(lA'All.. DRAFTSTOP IN FIRESTOP AREAS 'NITH CAULK OR FOP.I'll SEALER. : j WITH STOREFRONT 13, CARPENTER . HVAC. PLUMBING. AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS TO COORDINATE : PLACEMENT OF ALL DUCTS. PIPES, AND WIRING PRIOR TO FRA�ING. ELECTR�L, AND MC:CHANICIIL EQUIPMENT AND METERS ARE : 4\ SUBJECT TO RELOCATION DUE TO FIELD El/\'-5, CONDITIONS. /cs ELMINATE DOOR AND 14. PROVIDE AND INSTALL SHELVING AT ALL : CLOSETS. b \ A200 ' REPLACE OPENING 15. ALL INTERIOR WALLS TO BE FINISHED WITH ''-- .J WITH NANA-WALL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL " Sia"DRYWALL, TYPE X,U.N.O . 16, PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER AT ALL CONDITIONED SLAB ON GRADE AREAS. : I 135 I I 140 I B.4C, P,B•2) I 1ao I 17, SLOPE AND CROSS SLOPES AT HANDICAP -+- PARKING SPACES, ACCESS AISLES, $ 65()-9' $ 650'-9' $ 54g.4• -$- 647'-10' MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS AND : ACCESSIBLE ROUTES NOT TO EXCEED 2%. ALTERNATE: PROVIDE RAISE[) ACCESS 18. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS TO BE FULLY : FLOORING WITHIN COMMERCIAL SPACE NORTH RECESSED. STAIR 19. FIRE ESTINGUISHERS LOCATED IN FOOD : I NS I PREPARATION AREAS TO BE CLASS K, ALL ADD SWING DOOR ------rl rttr-1- OTHER FIRE EXTINGUISHERS TO BE D_ASS ABC. 20, PROVIDE SAFETY STRIPING WITHIN PARKING GARAGE. AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. STRIPING TO BE 4·w1DE,TYPICAL AND REVOLVING 1 =· �==::o 21, PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARD OR RAIL PROTECTION • <� A CORRIDOR • E'v\'-6' 6 AROUND ALL PLUMalNG RISERS. FIRE DOOR 11501,; 1 HYDRANTS,GAS METERES,ELECTAL L EQUIPMENTS, METERS, 8. HARZARDOUS 651•• 10" I (. ;;;;:;, ��!JI NJ EQUPMENT,WHERE REQUIRED IN TEH FIRE [OKW 2025-08-06] CODE. WHICH MAY BE SUJECTED TO VrnlCULAR : DAMAGE PER 2021 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, 0 REMOVE DOOR, EGRESS PATH TO BE COORDINATED WITH-- EGRESS PATH TO BS COORDINATED WITH -----@ SECTION 312. 22, PER 410 ILCS 35/25,SECTION 25(c), ALL PUBLIC TENANT BUILDOUT SNGLE·OCCUPANCYRESTROOMS SHALL BE STOREFRONT TENANT BUILDOUT- -. IDENTIFIED AS ALL·GENOER AND DESIGNATED P "' FOR USE B'V NO MORE THAN ONE PERSON AT A ONLY TIME. EACH SINGLE -OCCUPANCY RESTROOM [f-----�IT7_1_1� �-- ,i,/.18' · 4" 1-,--T�'------71 6' -0" 9'-8· •0 SHALL BE OUTFITTED WITH EXTERIOR SIGNAGE : II I I I I I I ''' I I I I I II II I I I I I I THAT MARKS Tl-1E SINGLE-OCa.JPANCY I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I /P.B-1 II El/\'- 6 ' I I I I I I RESTROOM AS A RESTROOM AND DOES NOT 111 1CLEAR 1• • O" 1150B II I I I I I I I I I I INOICATE ANY SPECIFIC GENDER. EW-6 /- EW-5 �\ .1." I PLAN LEGEND: P.8-1 • : F5 GREEN ROOF F6 EB :. � v "' CONCRETE PAVER (2'x2.} ON // I � � ' � � ' EE ADJUSTABLE PAVER PEDESTAL LANDSCAPED AREA I [J 00 � � /� RAILING·01 J_ I -----@ PLAN KEYNOTES: : 2·.1:1 314''- . I 1 0'-8' (€J) PIPE BOLLARD. BOLLARD TO BE MOUNTED "' b : I ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S STANDARDS : <€9 FLOOR DRAIN. PITCH CONCRETE TOPPING 10 ! ' DRAIN (1/8' PER 1•-0• MIN.) : // / / / / -$- 651"-9" 7 <€t> LINEAR TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM (€,j>EV CHARGING STATION ,., I c0I �• ACCESSIBLE MOUNTED PARKING SPACE SIGN,POST A2� s, I <§> CONCRETE 'NHEEL STOP _ _ _ _ __ RAMP DN .._ PARKING EW-7 <f}) VERTICAL STORAGE BIKE RACK GARAGE I 120 I <c.1> CEILING MOUNTED EXHAUST FAN,ABOVE. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION �LIN:: OF BENTONITE BLINDSIDE // V1 -----@ WATERPROOFING AT FOUNDATION WALL � PLANTER BOX, REFER TO LANDSCAPE I ,.-1'-6" DRAWINGS FORADDIITIONAL INFORMATION 9· • O" 32·- O" �} REFLECTING POCt.. BASIN, REFER TO 1.ANIJSACAPE DRAWINGS � ) OUTDOOR GAS GRILL BUILT INTO 1\/ASONRY ---0 ENCLOSURE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE : DRAWINGS T �2'·0" WIDE BY 3'-0"TPJ...L PLANTER BOX ON I SLEEPERS AT RESIDENTIAL UNIT TERRACE. REFER TO L.\NDSCAPE OR.A.WINGS �1'.6" WIDE BY 3'-0"TPJ...L PLANTER BOX ON SLEEPERS AT RESIDENTIAL UNIT TERRACE. : I -----@ REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS � STANDPIPE WITH VALVE CABINET I '- F6 <� RECESSED CEILING MOUNTED DRAFT ,1, / . 23' -1 3/4" 18' -0' 3' -0"_ 18' o· 23' -0" 18'-o· L ,.,' 13P CONTROL DOOR.SAT EACH ELEVATOR ENTRANCE CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL. PITCH TOP : I ,., OF WALL TO DRAIN, REFER TO LANDSCAPE ELEV O S ---. -- ----@ DRAWINGS FOR WMJ... HEIGHT AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ELEV 14rl-t----- b:'r,o � 1;1)s·coNCRETE CURB ---; : "' <"> N -� 24"x24'. RECESSED FLOOR MOUNTED AREA r --1- DRAIN 8. WALL MOUNTED FALCET -� POST-MOUNTED RAILING AND LATCHING GATE i T i ELEVATOR AT RESIDENTIAL TERRACE, RAILING--0 1 : LOBBY I 10, I F6 '@ 12)SINGLE TIER METAL MESH STORAGE LOCKER l I SOUTH V1 � � DOUBLE TIER METAL MESH STORAGE LOCKER l CORRID R �FIRE DEPARTMEITT KEY BOX,RECESSED, 110 D ,-,;,,.t.. STAIR -----@ WALL MOUNTED. GC TO COORDINATE WITH □ / /..L • FIRE COOE OFFICI.AJ... FOR FINAL QUANTITY / // I ss I ; AND LOCATIONS OF KEY BOXES. � aF=r=lF -& 651'·9' I II I II I b ' : : : : uP>-++jC.-- ¢:1> MECHANICAL SHAFT -SINGLE STORY. WALL L : TYPE 'F.3·1'.REFER TO ES'G·,04 FOR 1 11 I II I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. // PIANO MEDIA /A 82 ,., "' <s> MECHANICAL SHAFT -MULTI-STORY. WALL A400 TYPE 'F.3·1'REFER TO E5/G104 FOR , ,, �-1,- LOUNGE I 101 I CLUB I I GOLF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. '' I 1n I I SIMULATOR i}MECHANICAL CHASE. WALL TYPE 'VIB.4'. Pi=Rr.tT REVISl'.lNS #? num:?o?!i ,_.__� \ I I I I 113A I � REFER TO E5JG104 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. : PERr.tT REVISIONS 9�¾ CONSTillJCTlON OQCllM�NTS 0&01,"2025 01111,'2�:?5 \ \ 7�% CONSTRUCTION OOCUMENTATlON 12/20,'2024 ;�� 1, 50¾ CONSTRUCTION 000JMENTAT10N 11126:202<1 FOUNDATION /DEMO PERMIT 11/04,"2024 IOOo/o DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 11)!'.lQ.'2024 PARKING SIGNAGE LEGEND NO.. ISSUED FOR: DATE : •EW·2B MAAK TYPE : "' OK� V VEHICULAR (RETROREFLECTIVE TEXT ONLY): R REGULATORY(RETROREFLECTIVE) p PEDESTRIAN PANEL PVC PVC CLEAR.A.NC: -----@ "'" : \ Architects PARKING SIGN KEY 8.0% : 16.0% � ' f Al OKW // � Architects "' MARK / 201 READER/INTERCOM AT TOP OF � 600 Wes1 Jackson Blvd PAAKING RAM? TIED TO ACCESS - - ---++- / Chicago, L 60661 ; CONTROL SYSTEM FOR LOWER -.,,,, _ FACE OF SIGN : T 312.798.7700 b LEVEL GARAGE DOOR (001) F 312.798.7777 / - RAIAP START POINT: / ---....., ,/ -� --- www.ok warchitects.com 19' • 8" , - o· 19' -8" 19'-8" 19'-8' PROPERTYLNE� cvv PARKING SIGNAGE SCHEDULE 93' -B '' 2'-83/4i- 2'-6 5/8" : MARK 1\/ESSAGE -,f--"-+-Y'- ONE WINNETKA MIXED-USE 107'• 8" DEVELOPMENT 30'. O' O" PVC1 X'-X"CLEAR/INCE 30'. O " 30-0" 29'-1 0" 14' •3' 5'-33/8" PVC2 =NO ENTRY= 2fJ. : V1 PAR'.{ V2 ONE WAY, NO ENTRY 515 LINCOLN AVENUE. V3 OUT WINNETKA, IL 60093 GROUND LEVEL PLAN : : : CIRAWN B'r': MS ,I 80 / SJ CHECKED: AR / 82 D7/D3/2025 CIATla; SHEET ftQ.: GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A101 A9 A101 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" : 21077 �ROJ. NO.: · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·· · · ·.. ........................................ ··•····················· ··········· ······ ··········· ······ � ····················· g ·•··········· ··········· ········································ 6 ······•································· ··········· ·················· 7 8 ·•················ ······ ··········································•········· 5 ······ ··········· ························· ···········•·· 4 ·················· ······ ··········· ······ ··········· ······;·· ·········································· ··········· · ······;······················· ············· ············ Page 80 of 82  cc CC] =cJ CCJCCJCCJ coco [D[O rn IT 1111111 U I ORIGINAL APPROVED AESTHETIC PROPOSED AESTHETIC SCREEN ELEV - ORIGINAL SCREEN ELEV - NEW 1 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 2 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" OKW ARCHITECTS ONE WINNETKA MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 600 W. Jackson, Suite 250 Chicago, IL 60661 SCALE: 1" = 10' 0 2.5' 5' 10' 515 LINCOLN AVENUE, WINNETKA, IL 60093 10/03/25 Project#: 21077 EX-01 Page 81 of 82  ATTACHMENT B Architectural Series of Asphalt Shingles (3 ply) (See figure 49) Wood Shingles (Fire treated) Slate (See figure 48) Real Copper (No other metal roofs are allowed) Figure 46 Institutional only Flat roofs must be hidden by parapet on primary / secondary facades. Commercial and Multiple- Family Flat roof must not be visible from street, pedestrian, or open spaces. d. Door and Window Materials: Commercial, Mixed Use, Institutional, Multiple- Family Residential: Entry doors should be wood or aluminum stile and rail with varying degrees of glass. Public entry doors should be Figure 47 fully glazed whereas private and semi- private entries should be primarily solid panel doors. Storefront window units should be either paneled aluminum or brass. Many original storefronts, some with transom windows, remain in the districts. Efforts should be taken to repair and renovate these systems Figure 48 where feasible. Window frames should be wood, steel or aluminum. Vinyl windows are not acceptable. Muntin divisions should be real divided glass or simulated with spacer bars. Snap-in muntins are not acceptable. Color selection should be sympathetic with the overall building color palette and take into account the adjacent building materials within the structure, immediately adjacent structures, structures within the same block and Figure 49 structures across the street. Entry door hardware is to be exterior grade with weather-resistant finish. Hardware design and finish is to be appropriate with facade articulation, color palette and district character. Glazing should be clear glass without tint or film. 25 Building & Architecture Page 82 of 82