Muyni
← Back to Winnetka

General

Regular Meeting

Winnetka, IL · April 3, 2024

AgendaPacketMinutes

Minutes

Minutes adopted 05.22.2024 1 WINNETKA PLAN COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 2 APRIL 3, 2024 3 4 Members Present: Chris Foley, Acting Chairman 5 Jonathan Alt 6 Chris Enck 7 Liz Kunkle 8 Cyrus Subawalla 9 10 Members Absent: Matthew Bradley 11 Mamie Case 12 Layla Danley 13 14 Non-Voting Members Present: Tina Dalman 15 16 Village Staff: David Schoon, Director of Community Development 17 Ann Klaassen, Assistant Director of Community 18 Development 19 Chris Marx, Associate Planner 20 21 Call to Order & Roll Call: 22 The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Foley at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken of the 23 Commission Members present. 24 25 Approval of February 28, 2024, Meeting Minutes: 26 Chairman Foley asked if there were any comments or for a motion to approve the February 28, 2024, 27 meeting minutes. A motion was made by Mr. Alt and seconded by Mr. Subawalla to approve the February 28 28, 2024, meeting minutes. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 29 AYES: Alt, Enck, Foley, Kunkle, Subawalla 30 NAYS: None 31 NON-VOTING: Dalman 32 33 Public Comment: 34 No comments were made at this time. 35 36 Community Development Report: 37 Mr. Schoon stated the Village Council approved the Sacred Heart playground request as well as the Crow 38 Island School subdivision and addition. He also stated the Village Council approved the One Winnetka 39 planned development with the next steps being final plan submission to the Village Council for review and 40 building permit issuance with the earliest activity start being the end of the year or early next year. No 41 questions were raised at this time. 42 43 New Applications: 44 a. Case No. 24-02-SU: 1110 Chatfield Road - Hubbard Woods Elementary School: An application 45 seeking approval of an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit, which allowed an addition on the 46 southwest corner of the existing school building at 1110 Chatfield Road. The requested amendment 47 would allow improvements to existing playgrounds on the school property. The Village Council has final 48 jurisdiction on this request. April 3, 2024 Page 2 1 Ms. Klaassen stated the request is to amend an existing special use and identified the property’s location 2 and zoning classification. She stated the Comprehensive Plan designated the site as appropriate for 3 institutional uses with the applicant’s use being consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use 4 designation and zoning. Ms. Klaassen then described the three separate play areas along with the changes 5 to the surface materials, play equipment and equipment relocation. She also stated a new sandbox and 6 other play pieces are proposed for the upper play area by the school building and identified the existing 7 play equipment location. Ms. Klaassen identified the asphalt area to be removed and converted to lawn 8 area and play equipment installation in that area. She also identified the play area legal nonconformity 9 from Hamptondale with the proposed west play area complying with the west setback. Ms. Klaassen also 10 identified the extensive landscape improvements on the southwest lot line adjacent to the residential 11 neighbors and the mechanical equipment and refuse container enclosure landscape screening. She 12 informed the Commission that although not the purview of the Commission, two variations for the front 13 yard setback and impermeable lot coverage are being requested for the improvements. Ms. Klaassen then 14 stated the ZBA and DRB recommended approval of the request and no written comment was received 15 and that one neighbor spoke at the ZBA meeting and expressed strong support. Ms. Klaassen stated 16 following the applicant’s presentation and public comment, a Commission Member may wish to make a 17 motion to recommend approval or denial as indicated on page no. 15. She then asked if there were any 18 questions. 19 20 Mr. Alt asked with regard to impermeable surface if the wood chips would allow for water to be absorbed. 21 He also asked if with the asphalt surface reduction if there would be an offset in the numbers. Ms. Klaassen 22 provided the Commission the figures showing a net increase of 1,395 square feet of impermeable lot 23 coverage. Trustee Dalman referred to neighbors’ prior concerns relating to flooding and asked if there are 24 storm water improvements as part of the project. Ms. Klaassen informed the Commission storm water 25 detention was included as part of the addition project that is currently under construction with it being 26 constructed to accommodate the proposed playground improvements. She noted the Village Engineer 27 reviewed preliminary engineering plans for the improvements and is confident the final engineering plans 28 will be approved. Ms. Klaassen also confirmed notice of meetings was provided. No additional questions 29 were raised at this time. 30 31 Chairman Foley swore in those speaking to this matter. Katherine Talty, the landscape architect, 32 introduced herself to the Commission and offered to answer any Commission Member questions. 33 34 Mr. Subawalla asked if the new storm water detention allowed for the addition and the new impermeable 35 area. Ms. Talty confirmed that is correct and noted the proposed plan greatly reduced the asphalt to 36 balance the amount of impermeable surface added to the site. She then described how storm water 37 detention would be managed on the site and added there would be no issues with floating wood chips, 38 since all the wood chips would be removed as part of this project. Mr. Alt asked where the drains are 39 located and if they would be graded to run water away from neighboring properties. Ms. Talty confirmed 40 that is correct and explained how the drains would be graded toward the new lawn area. She also 41 explained how the new material replacing the wood chips is counted as being 100% impervious in 42 connection with the calculations although it has some impermeability to it. Ms. Talty informed the 43 Commission they met directly with the adjacent neighbors relating to the project. Trustee Dalman then 44 questioned if there would be a problem programmatically for the school in removing so much of the 45 asphalt. Adam Rappaport, with District 36, confirmed they spoke with the school administration, staff, 46 students, etc. and have worked with them to make sure the space would be adequate. Mr. Enck 47 questioned the durability of the grass in the new lawn area. Ms. Talty described how they planned to 48 manage the grass consistency in terms of its use. April 3, 2024 Page 3 1 Chairman Foley asked if there were any comments from the public. No public comments were made at 2 this time. He then called the matter in for discussion. 3 4 Ms. Kunkle described the project appeal as much more palatable and well designed. She also referred to 5 the neighbor’s comments in support of the request. Ms. Kunkle then referred to an illustration of the 6 amount of lawn area and asphalt and the fact drainage would be improved. She concluded she would be 7 in support. Trustee Dalman stated she would also be in support of the request. Ms. Kunkle added she 8 appreciated the project’s design improvement over the prior proposal in terms of its adjacency to the 9 west homeowners. Mr. Enck agreed thought was given to the landscaping improvements along the fence 10 line which would serve to soften the appearance. Mr. Alt agreed with the comments made and stated he 11 would be in support. Chairman Foley noted the nonconforming setback dated back to 1927 and referred 12 to the ZBA and DRB unanimous recommended approvals. He stated he also appreciated the applicant’s 13 working with the neighbors. 14 15 Chairman Foley then asked for a motion to recommend approval of the request as noted on page 11 of 16 the staff report. A motion to recommend approval was made by Mr. Alt who referred to the findings. Ms. 17 Kunkle seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 18 AYES: Alt, Enck, Foley, Kunkle, Subawalla 19 NAYS: None 20 NON-VOTING: Dalman 21 22 b. Case No. 24-04-SU: 847 Elm Street - Toned Yoga: An application seeking approval of a Special 23 Use Permit submitted by Toned Yoga 2 LLC, as the prospective lessee of the property located at 847 Elm 24 Street to allow a personal fitness facility in the C-2 General Retail Commercial Overlay District. The 25 property is currently owned by Helen James Family Limited Partnership, L.P. The Village Council has 26 final jurisdiction on this request. 27 Mr. Marx distributed written public correspondence regarding the application to the Commission for its 28 review of the special use permit application for a non-retail use in the retail overlay district. He identified 29 the applicant, and the property’s location and zoning classification, noting that the first 50 feet of the 30 property is located within the Commercia Overlay District. Mr. Marx also identified the previous tenant 31 and surrounding businesses. He described the proposed space’s measurements and the applicant’s 32 proposed use, along with some of their retail offerings, class sizes and employees. Mr. Marx explained the 33 applicant’s reasoning for choosing the proposed space and identified the hours of operation. 34 35 Mr. Marx stated with regard to parking, he identified one employee parking space at the rear of the 36 building and explained that parking needs were discussed with the applicant. He stated the applicant was 37 provided with the recent Chase Bank parking study that was completed for the proposed planned 38 development at Elm Street and Green Bay Road, which measured customer and employee parking in the 39 same area as the proposed business to determine whether the business’ use can be accommodated. Mr. 40 Marx explained to the Commission how parking would be accommodated for the employees and patrons. 41 He referred to the special use standards on page nos. 68 and 69 for the Commission to consider and stated 42 the Commission may make a motion to recommend approval or denial of the request. Mr. Marx stated 43 the applicant is present to answer questions and asked if there were any questions for the Village staff. 44 45 Chairman Foley also asked if there were any questions. Trustee Dalman asked how many parking spaces 46 are on Birch and referred to the surrounding parking spaces available. She noted concerns were raised 47 from West Elm business owners. Mr. Marx responded some of the Birch Street parking is limited in terms 48 of availability to customers, and Mr. Schoon further described the available public (customer) parking April 3, 2024 Page 4 1 spaces, including more than 20, 4-hour parking spaces on the east side of Birch between Elm and Spruce 2 and additional public parking for customers with limited hours during certain times. Mr. Marx referred to 3 the inventory of parking in the agenda packet with one employee space available at the rear of the 4 building. Trustee Dalman questioned whether the cleaners and nail salon received special use permits. 5 Mr. Schoon stated that special use approval was not needed at the time they occupied the spaces, but 6 would now, as the Overlay District special use classifications having been subsequently amended in 2019. 7 Trustee Dalman then referred to the Commission’s previous discussions regarding removing land uses at 8 the ends of the overlay district from the district. Mr. Enck referred to the Berkshire Hathaway vacancy. 9 Mr. Marx responded the space is vacant and available for leasing and an office use would need special 10 use approval to locate in that space. 11 12 Mr. Subawalla asked why there is opposition from surrounding business owners and reference made to 13 the March 29, 2024, letter. Chairman Foley stated the Commission would address the issue during their 14 discussion. No additional questions were raised at this time. 15 16 Chairman Foley asked for the applicant’s presentation and swore in those speaking to this matter. Jim 17 Nash of Farnsworth Hill introduced himself as the property manager and provided the Commission with 18 the history relating to the difficulty in leasing the narrow space. He then stated with regard to parking, 19 the rear parking space can fit two vehicles tandemly and he informed the Commission the Stephens family 20 owned most of the buildings on the north side of Elm Street between Chestnut and Birch Streets, and they 21 are very involved with the properties. Mr. Nash then read a letter from the property owner into the 22 record. He informed the Commission it appeared that the Berkshire Hathaway space is vacant, though 23 their lease has not expired, and the property owners were not aware of it being vacated but have been 24 actively marketing the space with a letter of intent recently received from a retail user. 25 26 Maddie and Rob Zonino introduced themselves as the founders/owners of Toned Yoga and described the 27 proposed business to the Commission. Mrs. Zonino stated they opened a studio in Lake Bluff last year and 28 have over 200 active members with some being Winnetka residents. Mrs. Zonino stated they have worked 29 with local Winnetka representatives to see if the proposed use would be a good fit and stated there is a 30 need in the community. She referred to the comments made from the local businesses and noted they 31 would have a large retail portion as part of the business and are very involved in partnering with the 32 community and businesses. 33 34 Chairman Foley asked if there were any questions. Trustee Dalman asked how long the space was vacant 35 prior to Ellen’s on Elm. Mr. Nash responded he did not specifically remember. Mr. Subawalla asked if there 36 is programming involving music and if so, he asked that sound attenuation be done to benefit the 37 neighbors. Mrs. Zonino agreed with Mr. Subawalla’s suggestion. Mr. Enck asked if the space would not 38 have a dedicated restroom. Mr. Nash described the shared restroom configuration and proposed change 39 to its access directly from the proposed space. Mr. Enck asked if there is a way to encourage patrons to 40 park in certain locations. Mrs. Zonino confirmed that is correct and it is being done at their other location. 41 No additional questions were raised at this time. 42 43 Chairman Foley asked for public comment. Max Weigandt, 887 Spruce Street, stated the classes are 44 busiest in the morning at the time when other businesses are not open. He then stated his wife Leslie is 45 very involved with yoga classes around the area and commented that the proposed use would be a good 46 fit for Winnetka. Mr. Weigandt stated the use would be a community builder and is the definition of foot 47 traffic and would support surrounding businesses. He concluded by stating they are in favor of the 48 request. April 3, 2024 Page 5 1 Chairman Foley called the matter in for discussion and asked for the Commission’s comments. Mr. Alt 2 described the proposal as a wonderful idea and a wonderful business for the community especially for 3 this space which is virtually unleasable. He then stated with regard to the neighboring business owners 4 who would benefit from the business, they should hear their comments in connection with parking and 5 noted Chase Bank would be taking up an additional 30 parking spaces. Mr. Alt then asked if a stipulation 6 should be included with an approval, he referred to the applicant’s willingness to ask patrons to park in 7 certain locations which would please everyone in the West Elm business district. 8 9 Ms. Kunkle stated she is also in favor of the request and since it is located at the end of the overlay district, 10 she is not as concerned. She referred to the very narrow space making it very difficult to lease and referred 11 to the public comments made. Ms. Kunkle also stated the hours of operation would benefit the 12 surrounding businesses as well as the fact that there would be a retail component. She concluded by 13 stating she is in favor. Trustee Dalman stated certain existing businesses are concerned with parking and 14 referred to previous high vacancy rates which led to more available parking but now with more 15 occupancies parking spaces seem more limited. She described the situation as difficult and referred to the 16 business as one that is desired by the community. Trustee Dalman referred to the parking survey 17 submitted to the Village Council which was done by those who signed the submitted letter and 18 commented an existing business does not have the right to block a new business from coming in. She 19 described the proposed use as fantastic which had local support with no conflict with the hours of 20 operation. Trustee Dalman noted for the record parking is an ongoing discussion at the Village Council 21 level. 22 23 Mr. Subawalla described the concerns relating to parking as overrated and identified sound attenuation 24 as his only concern. Mr. Enck stated for special use discussions, he referred to real estate offices and a 25 bank which serve customers coming in for a certain purpose and not patronizing other businesses. He 26 described the proposal as positive which would serve other businesses with its location at the west end 27 of the central business district making it walkable. Mr. Enck also referred to the applicant’s offer to ask 28 patrons to park in certain locations and described the request as a positive addition to an underutilized 29 retail overlay district area. Chairman Foley described parking and the retail overlay district as being issues 30 in connection with requests of this type. He then stated for the location at the edge of the overlay district, 31 it bore careful consideration and referred to the public comment for and against the request. Chairman 32 Foley referred to the applicant including retail as part of the business in the appropriate location inside 33 the building and agreed with the comments made relating to parking and questioned whether a parking 34 condition should be included as part of the approval. 35 36 Ms. Kunkle stated she did not feel a parking condition should be included. Mr. Enck suggested the 37 applicant speak with the Village staff and for any concerns that arise from other business owners, it could 38 be addressed informally. 39 40 Chairman Foley concluded the request is consistent with special use criteria nos. 1-12 and asked for a 41 motion to recommend approval as indicated on page 68. A motion was made by Ms. Kunkle to 42 recommend approval of the requested special use to allow Toned Yoga 2 LLC to operate a personal fitness 43 facility at 847 Elm Street within the C-2 Commercial Overlay District based on the findings of fact and 44 being subject to no conditions. Mr. Enck seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion 45 unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 46 AYES: Alt, Enck, Foley, Kunkle, Subawalla 47 NAYS: None 48 NON-VOTING: Dalman April 3, 2024 Page 6 1 New Business. 2 a. April 24, 2024 Meeting – Quorum check. 3 An update with regard to the post office site near Dwyer Park was provided by Mr. Schoon and Trustee 4 Dalman. Trustee Dalman also informed the Commission the Village Council continued to discuss parking 5 issues in the Village. Mr. Schoon confirmed there would not be an April 2024 meeting since none of the 6 items on the meeting agenda were continued. 7 8 Adjournment: 9 Chairman Foley asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Kunkle and seconded 10 by Mr. Alt. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 11 AYES: Alt, Enck, Foley, Kunkle, Subawalla 12 NAYS: None 13 NON-VOTING: Dalman 14 The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 Antionette Johnson 19 Recording Secretary

Agenda

Village of Winnetka Plan Commission Special Meeting April 3, 2024 at 7:00 PM Winnetka Village Hall Council Chambers 510 Green Bay Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes a. February 28, 2024, Regular Meeting Minutes 3. Public Comments 4. Community Development Report 5. New Applications a. Case No. 24-02-SU: 1110 Chatfield Road - Hubbard Woods Elementary School: An application seeking approval of an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit, which allowed an addition on the southwest corner of the existing school building at 1110 Chatfield Road. The requested amendment would allow improvements to existing playgrounds on the school property. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request. b. Case No. 24-04-SU: 847 Elm Street - Toned Yoga: An application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit submitted by Toned Yoga 2 LLC, as the prospective lessee of the property located at 847 Elm Street to allow a personal fitness facility in the C-2 General Retail Commercial Overlay District. The property is currently owned by Helen James Family Limited Partnership, L.P. The Village Council has final jurisdication on this request. 6. New Business a. April 24, 2024, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check 7. Adjournment NOTICE Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter. The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041).

Packet

Village of Winnetka Plan Commission Special Meeting April 3, 2024 at 7:00 PM Winnetka Village Hall Council Chambers 510 Green Bay Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes a. February 28, 2024, Regular Meeting Minutes 3. Public Comments 4. Community Development Report 5. New Applications a. Case No. 24-02-SU: 1110 Chatfield Road - Hubbard Woods Elementary School: An application seeking approval of an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit, which allowed an addition on the southwest corner of the existing school building at 1110 Chatfield Road. The requested amendment would allow improvements to existing playgrounds on the school property. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request. b. Case No. 24-04-SU: 847 Elm Street - Toned Yoga: An application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit submitted by Toned Yoga 2 LLC, as the prospective lessee of the property located at 847 Elm Street to allow a personal fitness facility in the C-2 General Retail Commercial Overlay District. The property is currently owned by Helen James Family Limited Partnership, L.P. The Village Council has final jurisdication on this request. 6. New Business a. April 24, 2024, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check 7. Adjournment NOTICE Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter. The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041). Page 1 of 100 1 WINNETKA PLAN COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 2 FEBRUARY 28, 2024 3 4 Members Present: Layla Danley, Chairperson 5 Jonathan Alt 6 Matthew Bradley 7 Chris Enck 8 Chris Foley 9 Liz Kunkle 10 11 Members Absent: Mamie Case 12 Cyrus Subawalla 13 14 Non-Voting Members Absent: Tina Dalman 15 16 Village Staff: David Schoon, Director of Community Development 17 Ann Klaassen, Assistant Director of Community 18 Development 19 20 Call to Order & Roll Call: 21 The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Danley at 7:04 p.m. Ms. Klaassen took roll call of the 22 Commission Members present. 23 24 Approval of January 24, 2024, Meeting Minutes: 25 Chairperson Danley asked for a motion to approve the January 24, 2024, meeting minutes. A motion to 26 approve the January 24, 2024, minutes was made by Mr. Bradley and seconded by Mr. Foley. A vote was 27 taken and the motion unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 28 AYES: Alt, Bradley Danley, Enck, Foley, Kunkle 29 NAYS: None 30 31 Public Comment: 32 No comments were made at this time. 33 34 Community Development Report: 35 Mr. Schoon provided an update on the Chase Bank special use permit application for the temporary retail 36 banking facility on Lincoln Avenue as well as the planned development application. 37 38 New Applications: 39 a. Case No. 24-01-SU: 1095 Gage Street - Sacred Heart School: An application seeking approval of 40 an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit, which allowed construction of an addition on the west 41 side of the existing school building at 1095 Gage Street. The requested amendment would allow 42 improvements to the existing playground located on the north side of the existing school building. The 43 Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request. 44 Mr. Bradley identified his affiliation with the applicant and stated he would not have a conflict of interest 45 considering the application. Ms. Klaassen identified the site’s location, zoning classification and limited 46 range of special uses allowed in the multi-family residential zoning district noting the applicant’s use is 47 consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. She then referred to the existing and proposed site condition 48 photos and outlined the proposed improvements in detail. Ms. Klaassen also identified the proposed 6 Page 2 of 100 February 28, 2024 Page 2 1 foot and 8 foot high proposed fencing on the site as well as renderings of proposed play equipment and 2 play surface materials. She noted that although not the purview of the Commission it was important to 3 note that four zoning variations are requested as part of the approval with the applicant intending to 4 provide the necessary infiltration system beneath the rubberized surface and artificial turf to receive a 5 25% impermeable lot coverage allowance. Ms. Klaassen stated the final design was not yet determined 6 and would result in an impermeable lot coverage decrease if the surfaces qualified for the allowance. She 7 stated the ZBA and DRB recommended approval of the request and proposed improvements with the one 8 public comment received included in the agenda materials. Ms. Klaassen stated following the applicant’s 9 presentation, public comment and Commission discussion, a Commission Member may wish to make a 10 motion as indicated beginning on page no. 15. She then asked if there were any questions. 11 12 Chairperson Danley also asked if there were any questions. No questions were raised at this time. 13 14 Chairperson Danley swore in those speaking to this matter. Matt Cronin, the project architect and Andrew 15 Heinen of Kimley-Horn introduced themselves to the Commission. Mr. Cronin informed the Commission 16 the school held open houses which resulted in positive feedback with the neighbors’ questions being 17 addressed. He stated with regard to the engineering design, they are required to have an infiltration 18 system and are working through the details. Mr. Cronin then asked if there were any questions. 19 20 Mr. Foley questioned the rationale for the 8 foot high fencing. Mr. Cronin stated that some neighbors 21 would like a 20-foot fence to prevent balls from going onto their property. He explained that they 22 relocated the basketball hoops to help alleviate that issue. Mr. Cronin explained that the fence height 23 would step down to 6 feet along portions of the side lot lines to be respectful of neighbors and the public 24 view. He also stated the proposed composite fencing would allow for better maintenance. No additional 25 questions were raised at this time. 26 27 Chairperson Danley asked for public comment. No comments were made at this time. She then called the 28 matter in for discussion. 29 30 Mr. Alt commented the project is good for the school and the change from blacktop to a portion being an 31 artificial field is also an improvement for the area at large. He commended the applicant for the project 32 and stated he is in support. Ms. Kunkle stated as an EFC member, she supported the project and with 33 regard to zero waste, she would not prefer vinyl artificial turf and the rubber play surface material but 34 would prefer to see natural options. She agreed there would be an overall benefit as a result of the project. 35 Mr. Foley identified the school as a Winnetka institution and stated he is in favor of the playground being 36 made better and safer. He also described the proposed surface as state of the art as well as fence material 37 improvement. He added the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the special use 38 standards. Mr. Foley stated he is also in favor of the request. Mr. Enck stated it is an overall improvement 39 and that he would hope to see the existing play equipment be repurposed, if possible, rather than going 40 to a landfill. Chairperson Danley agreed with the comments made and added the plan for tree 41 maintenance and the addition of trees is appreciated as well as the applicant working with the neighbors. 42 She stated she is also in favor of the request. 43 44 Chairperson Danley then asked for a motion. Mr. Foley moved to recommend approval of the amendment 45 to the existing special use as indicated on page nos. 15 and 16. Ms. Kunkle seconded the motion. A vote 46 was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 47 AYES: Alt, Danley, Enck, Foley, Kunkle 48 NAYS: None Page 3 of 100 February 28, 2024 Page 3 1 NON-VOTING: Bradley 2 3 New Business. 4 a. March 27, 2024, Meeting – Quorum check. 5 The Commission Members discussed their availability and alternate meeting dates. 6 7 Adjournment: 8 Chairperson Danley asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Kunkle. The 9 motion was seconded by Mr. Alt. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 10 AYES: Alt, Bradley Danley, Enck, Foley, Kunkle 11 NAYS: None 12 13 The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 14 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 17 Antionette Johnson 18 Recording Secretary Page 4 of 100 MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: PLAN COMMISSION FROM: ANN KLAASSEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 22, 2024 SUBJECT: HUBBARD WOODS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – 1110 CHATFIELD ROAD SPECIAL USE PERMIT (CASE NO. 24-02-SU) INTRODUCTION On April 3, 2024, the Plan Commission is scheduled to hold a public hearing on an application submitted by Winnetka Public School District 36 (the “Applicant”), as the owner of the property located at 1110 Chatfield Road (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant is proposing improvements to existing playgrounds located on the Subject Property and requests approval of the following relief: 1. Approval of an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit that allowed construction of an addition on the southwest corner of the existing school building on the Subject Property. The requested amendment would allow improvements to existing playgrounds on the Subject Property, which is located in the R-4 Single-Family Residential Zoning District. As will be discussed later in this report, the Applicant has also submitted a variation application for the following variations, to allow the proposed improvements: (a) impermeable lot coverage; and (b) front yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the special use permit and variation requests on March 11, 2024, and recommended by a vote of 6-0, approval of the requested relief for the proposed improvements. Additionally, the Applicant submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, which was considered by the Design Review Board (DRB) on March 20, 2024. By a vote of 5-0, the DRB recommended approval of the design of the proposed improvements. A sign has been posted on the Subject Property indicating the time and date of the Plan Commission public hearing. A mail notice has been sent to property owners within 250 feet of the Subject Property, in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The hearing was properly noticed in the Winnetka Talk on March 14, 2024. As of the date of this memo, staff has not received any written comment from the public regarding this application. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request as only the Council has the authority to grant or amend a Special Use Permit. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property, which is approximately 2.92 acres (127,273 square feet) in size, is located on the south side of Chatfield Road between Gordon Terrace and Burr Avenue and contains Hubbard Woods Elementary School (see Figure 1). The Subject Property has three front yards, with street frontage along Chatfield Road to the north, Burr and Laurel Avenues to the east, and Gordon Terrace and Hamptondale Avenue to the west. Page 1 Page 5 of 100 The Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as appropriate for “Institutional (Religious Institution, School, Governmental & Other Facilities” uses (see Figure 2). The property is zoned R-4 Single Family Residential, and it is bordered by R-4 Single Family Residential to the north, east, and west, and R-2 Single Family Residential to the southeast and southwest (see Figure 3). In addition to single-family residential uses, the R-4 District allows a limited range of additional uses by Special Use Permit. Allowed Special Uses in the R-4 District include (a) church or temple; (b) public school, elementary and high, or private school having a curriculum equivalent to a public elementary school, public high school or public institution of higher learning; and (c) library. The Applicant’s use of the Subject Property as a school is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the R-4 zoning district. Subject Property Figure 1 – Aerial Map Figure 2 - Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map – Winnetka Futures 2040 Page 2 Page 6 of 100 Subject Property Figure 3 – Zoning Map In addition to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, the Winnetka Futures 2040 Plan contains vision statements and goals that are relevant to the proposed application, including the following: Quality Livable Neighborhoods Vision Statement: A community of connected neighborhoods with safe, pedestrian-oriented streets, tree-lined parkways, and a variety of well-maintained housing offerings to meet the needs of all of its residents and create a unique and powerful sense of place. Goal 1.4: The Village will continue to ensure institutional uses, such as schools, religious institutions, and the Public Library, are compatible with the residential neighborhoods in which they are located. Educational Excellence Vision Statement: A community with a strong heritage rooted in education that acknowledges the whole student, fosters creativity and confidence, inspires lifelong learning, and develops civic responsibility. Goal 5.1: Recognizing that educational excellence is one of the primary reasons residents choose Winnetka, the Village will support the community’s public school districts, private schools, and other educational organizations by fostering a culture of student engagement and lifelong learning as well as supporting the health and safety of students. PROPERTY HISTORY AND PREVIOUS ZONING APPLICATIONS Hubbard Woods School was constructed circa 1911. There have been several additions and various other improvements to the school and Subject Property over the years. There are twelve (12) previous zoning cases on file for the Subject Property: 1. In 1927, ZBA Case No. 282 was approved for a front yard setback variation to allow an addition to the school; 2. In 1953, ZBA Case No. 788 was approved for a front yard setback variation to allow an addition to the school; 3. Ordinance M-287-90 was adopted in February 1990 by the Village Council, granting a special use permit and variations to allow construction of an addition on the south side of the existing school building. The approved variations were for (a) GFA; (b) roofed lot coverage; (c) impermeable lot coverage; and (d) front yard setback from Laurel and Burr Avenues; Page 3 Page 7 of 100 4. Ordinance M-472-96 was adopted in October 1996 by the Village Council, granting a special use permit and variations to allow a temporary mobile classroom structure and playground improvements. The approved variations were for GFA and roofed lot coverage; 5. Ordinance M-481-96 was adopted in January 1997 by the Village Council, granting a front yard setback variation to allow play equipment; 6. In 1997, ZBA Case No. 97-14-SU was a request to allow a temporary mobile classroom that would have exceeded the maximum permitted GFA. The application was withdrawn; 7. Ordinance M-528-98 was adopted in June 1998 by the Village Council, granting an amendment to a special use permit and variations to allow the construction of three one-story additions to the existing school building. The approved variations were for (a) GFA; (b) roofed lot coverage; and (c) impermeable lot coverage; 8. Ordinance M-578-99 was adopted in June 1999 by the Village Council, granting a front yard setback variation to allow play equipment within the minimum required front yard setback along Hamptondale Avenue; 9. Ordinance M-18-2006 was adopted in August 2006 by the Village Council, granting variations to allow playground improvements, a new storage shed, and an Outdoor Environmental Learning Area. The approved variations were for (a) GFA; (b) roofed lot coverage; and (c) impermeable lot coverage; 10. Ordinance M-5-2017 was adopted in May 2017 by the Village Council, granting a special use permit and a front yard setback variation to allow playground improvements within the minimum required front yard setback along Hamptondale Avenue; 11. Ordinance M-07-2022 was adopted on April 19, 2022, by the Village Council, granting an amendment to a special use permit, variations, and a certificate of appropriateness to allow improvements to an existing playground located on the north and west side of the Subject Property. The approved variations were for impermeable lot coverage and the side yard setback from the west property line. The playground improvements approved with the adoption of M- 07-2022 were never constructed; and 12. Ordinance M-07-2023 (Attachment C) was adopted on April 18, 2023, by the Village Council, granting an amendment to a special use permit, variations, and a certificate of appropriateness to allow construction of an addition to the existing school building and site improvements on the Subject Property. The approved variations were for (a) GFA; (b) roofed lot coverage; and (c) impermeable lot coverage (ILC). Prior to the Village Council’s consideration of M-07-2023, the Applicant rescinded its application for an amendment to a special use permit and variations for the playground improvements approved in 2022. Therefore, the ILC approved with the adoption of Ordinance M-07-2023 did not include the area of the rubberized play surface proposed in 2022. Figures 4 and 5 on the following page are current photos of the site where the improvements are proposed. Page 4 Page 8 of 100 Woodchip Play Surface to be Replaced with Rubberized Poured-in-Place Surface Figure 4 – Subject Property – Kindergarten Playground (Play equipment in foreground to remain) Existing Play Surfaces to be Replaced with Synthetic Turf Figure 5 – Upper Play Area Page 5 Page 9 of 100 Play Equipment to be Removed Figure 6 – Subject Property – Looking North (Photo taken in 2023, prior to commencement of current construction project) PROPOSED PLAN The Applicant is proposing improvements to three separate play areas on the Subject Property: (i) the kindergarten play area, which is the play area closest to Hamptondale Avenue, (ii) the west play area located along the southwesterly property line adjacent to single-family residences, and (iii) the upper play area, which is located next to the building (see Figure 6). The specific improvements for each play area are described below. Kindergarten Play Area: The existing woodchip play surface would be replaced with a poured-in place rubber play surface, measuring 2,600 square feet. The existing play equipment would remain the same and in its current location. The poured-in-place surface would be setback 4’-2” from the westerly property line along Hamptondale Avenue. West Play Area: Approximately 7,300 square feet of existing asphalt located towards the center of the Subject Property would be removed and converted into lawn area. The existing play equipment and woodchip play surface would be removed. New play equipment installed on a poured-in-place rubber play surface would be located in a new play area, south and east of the existing play area (see Figure 7). The proposed equipment would be in a palette of green and brown and supplied by NuToys Leisure Products, specifically from the manufacturer Landscape Structures. The tallest piece of play equipment would be 12 feet in height. This new play area would measure 4,340 square feet and be setback 30 feet from the southeasterly property line along Laurel Avenue and 23’-10” from the southwesterly property line. Page 6 Page 10 of 100 Upper Play Area: The existing synthetic turf would be replaced with new synthetic turf and slightly reconfigured, along with the concrete paths. The existing bridge would be relocated within the play area and the existing covered gazebo/pergola structures would remain. In addition to a new sand box, a few small pieces of play equipment are proposed. The proposed playground improvements represent a net increase in impermeable lot coverage of 1,395 square feet. The proposed site improvements also include extensive landscaping along the southwesterly property line, which is shared with the adjacent residential neighbors, as well as landscaping to screen the mechanical enclosure that was approved with the addition in 2023. Excerpts of the existing and proposed site plans, landscape plan, and renderings of the proposed equipment are provided below and on the next pages as Figures 7 through 12. The complete set of plans, including the specific plant list associated with the landscape plan, as well as photos of the three existing play areas are provided in the application materials, which are included in this report as Attachment B. Chatfield Road Existing Laurel Avenue Upper Play Area Existing Kindergarten Play Area Hamptondale Existing Avenue West Play Area Figure 7 – Existing Site Plan Page 7 Page 11 of 100 Upper Play Area Kindergarten Play Area Proposed West Play Area Figure 8 – Proposed Location Plan Figure 9 – Proposed Site Plan – West Campus Page 8 Page 12 of 100 Figure 10 – Proposed Landscape Plan Figure 11 – Rendering of Proposed Play Equipment – West Play Area Figure 12 – Proposed Play Equipment – Upper Play Area Page 9 Page 13 of 100 The Applicant has submitted preliminary engineering plans that have been reviewed by the Village Engineer. Based on these preliminary engineering plans and discussions between the Village Engineer and the Applicant’s engineering team, the Village Engineer is confident the final engineering plans will be approved for the proposed improvements. Final engineering plans are required with the submittal of the necessary permits to construct the proposed improvements. Figure 13 below represents the Subject Property’s proximity to the floodplain; the cyan represents the 100-year floodplain. Subject Property Figure 13 - GIS Floodplain Map ZONING RELIEF Although not part of the Commission’s consideration, it should be noted that two variations are being requested to allow the proposed playground improvements to (i) exceed the maximum permitted impermeable lot coverage (ILC); and (ii) provide less than the minimum required front yard setback from the northwesterly property line along Hamptondale Avenue. The existing improvements on the Subject Property are already nonconforming with respect to the maximum permitted ILC and the minimum required front yard setback. CONSIDERATION BY OTHER ADVISORY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS As noted earlier in this report, the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) considered the request on March 11, 2024. After hearing from the Applicant and one adjacent neighbor to the west of Subject Property who expressed strong support of the request, the Board discussed the item and recommended approval by a vote of 6-0. The Board was very complimentary of the Applicant for working with the neighbors to find a plan that addressed the neighbors’ concerns while also meeting the needs of the school. The Design Review Board (DRB) considered the Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed improvements on March 20, 2024. After hearing from the Applicant and no members of the public, the Board discussed the item and recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION The Plan Commission is charged with evaluating Special Uses for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, as well as the six standards for granting special use permits. As outlined earlier in this report, one of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is for the Village to “continue to ensure institutional uses, such as Page 10 Page 14 of 100 schools, religious institutions, and the Public Library, are compatible with the residential neighborhoods in which they are located.” The draft recommendation below lists another relevant goal from the Winnetka Futures 2040 Plan. Excerpts of the Comprehensive Plan are included in this report as Attachment A. The Plan Commission is to consider whether or not the requested amendment to the existing special use, granted by a previous ordinance, to allow improvements to existing playgrounds located at Hubbard Woods Elementary School is consistent with the Village’s Comprehensive Plan and with the Village’s special use permit standards. Following conclusion of public comment and Commission discussion, the Commission may choose to consider the following motion: The Plan Commission recommends approval [denial] of the requested amendment to the existing special use granted by Ordinance M-07-2023 to allow improvements to existing playgrounds on the Subject Property, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed playground improvements are [are not] consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Land Use Map designation of the Subject Property as appropriate for “Institutional (Religious Institution, School, Governmental & Other Facilities)” and is [is not] consistent with the following goals of Pillar 1: Quality Livable Neighborhoods and Pillar 5: Educational Excellence of the Winnetka Futures 2040 Comprehensive Plan: a. “The Village will continue to ensure institutional uses, such as schools, religious institutions, and the Public Library, are compatible with the residential neighborhoods in which they are located” (Goal 1.4); and b. “Recognizing that educational excellence is one of the primary reasons residents choose Winnetka, the Village will support the community’s public school districts, private schools, and other educational organizations by fostering a culture of student engagement and lifelong learning as well as supporting the health and safety of students” (Goal 5.1). 2. The proposed playground improvements are [are not] consistent with the Standards for granting of Special Use Permits, as follows: a. That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfare; b. That the special use will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right in the district or districts of concern, nor substantially diminish or impair property values in the immediate vicinity; c. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity for uses permitted by right in the district or districts of concern; d. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress in a manner which minimizes pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in the public ways; Page 11 Page 15 of 100 e. That adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage and other facilities necessary to the operation of the special use exist or are to be provided; and f. That the special use in all other respects conforms to the applicable regulations of this and other Village ordinances and codes. [The amendment to the special use for the playground improvements should only be approved subject to the following conditions…] ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Comprehensive Plan Excerpts (Pillars 1 and 5) Attachment B: Application Materials Attachment C: Ordinance M-07-2023, adopted April 18, 2023 Page 12 Page 16 of 100 ATTACHMENT A PILLAR 1: Quality Livable Neighborhoods Vision Statement: A community of connected neighborhoods with safe, pedestrian-oriented streets, tree-lined parkways, and a variety of well-maintained housing offerings to meet the needs of all of its residents and create a unique and powerful sense of place Goal 1.1: The Village will encourage renovation of existing homes and construction of new homes to be contextually consistent with existing single-family housing in its neighborhood. Goal 1.2: The Village will continue to explore housing diversity and address the housing gap to provide a supply that supports changing demographic needs and ensures a variety of product types, options, and costs available to seniors, empty nesters, families, and young residents. Goal 1.3: The Village will maintain and enhance the walkable and bicycle-friendly nature of the community’s neighborhoods. Goal 1.4: The Village will continue to ensure institutional uses, such as schools, religious institutions, and the Public Library, are compatible with the residential neighborhoods in which they are located. Goal 1.5: The Village will continue to support its policies and residents’ efforts that maintain and enhance inviting, neighborly, and sustainable outdoor spaces in our residential neighborhoods and the public parkways. Goal 1.6: The Village will encourage multi-family unit development in and near the downtown commercial districts. Goal 1.7: The Village will continue to ensure that open space uses, such as Park District parks, beaches, and facilities, are compatible with the residential neighborhoods in which they are located. Winnetka Futures 2040 Plan includes ten Community Pillars. The following section describes Winnetka’s vision for Pillar 1: Quality Livable Neighborhoods. A summary of the existing conditions analysis along with community input received over the course of the process are shared in the next few pages. Following that is a list of actionable initiatives for each of the goals listed above. Note that the order of goals and initiatives does not reflect their level of priority. 64 WINNETKA FUTURES: 2040 PL AN RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 17 of 100 PILLAR 5: Educational Excellence Vision Statement: A community with a strong heritage rooted in education that acknowledges the whole student, fosters creativity and confidence, inspires lifelong learning, and develops civic responsibility. Goal 5.1: Recognizing that educational excellence is one of the primary reasons residents choose Winnetka, the Village will support the community’s public school districts, private schools, and other educational organizations by fostering a culture of student engagement and lifelong learning, as well as supporting the health and safety of students. Goal 5.2: The Village will seek to collaborate with education-focused organizations to find synergies and efficiencies by sharing facilities, resources, and other assets. Goal 5.3: The Village will create a child-friendly environment that supports safety and independence. Winnetka Futures 2040 Plan includes ten Community Pillars. The following section describes Winnetka’s vision for Pillar 5: Educational Excellence. A summary of the existing conditions analysis along with community input received over the course of the process are shared in the next few pages. Following that is a list of actionable initiatives for each of the goals listed above. Note that the order of goals and initiatives does not reflect their level of priority. 144 WINNETKA FUTURES: 2040 PL AN RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 18 of 100 ATTACHMENT B Page 19 of 100 Hubbard Woods School Playground Enhancements Project narrative School District 36 respectfully submits this application for a zoning variance and special use permit to enhance existing outdoor recreational areas on its Hubbard Woods School campus. As part of this project, the District seeks to remove a portion of its asphalt play yard to increase the amount of lawn area, replace vintage play equipment that has aged past its useful life, replace the engineered fiber woodchips with poured-in-place rubber safety surfacing and renovate the upper play area space adjacent to the building. Currently, Hubbard Woods School has three separate play areas that will be affected by this enhancement, referred to as the Kindergarten, west and upper play area. All existing play equipment will be removed from the west play area and the space will be incorporated into a new lawn and landscaped border that runs the length of the west property line. The west play area will be relocated to the south and setback a substantial 30’ from both the side and front property lines. Both the west and Kindergarten play areas will have poured-in-place rubber play surfacing under the equipment in accordance with all safety requirements. The upper play area will be renovated with new synthetic turf surfacing, a small sandbox, a minimal amount of permanent play equipment and reconfigured concrete paths. The exiting pergola structures will be maintained. The principal of Hubbard Woods School gathered input from a group of teachers, students and parents representing all grade levels instructed at the school. Attention was focused on adding play pieces that allow the greatest opportunity for inclusive play, serving all the students at Hubbard Woods. Consideration of adjacent neighbors was a priority in determining the relocation of the west play area and layout of the new play equipment. Substantial landscaping has been added to the perimeter to further buffer the school’s outdoor activities. The District met with the adjacent neighbors to garner their feedback and the new plans were met favorably. A comprehensive grading and stormwater management plan prepared by Eriksson Engineering accompanies this application and will be submitted to the Village Engineering Department as part of the permit process. The District seeks approval to install this play equipment during the school’s summer break with a planned commencement of June 2024. Depending on the outcome of the competitive bid process and related budgetary constraints, the project my be installed in phases. Page 20 of 100 Special Use Standards Commentary – Hubbard Woods School 1. That the establishment, maintenance, and options of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or general welfare; Hubbard Woods School seeks approval of this Special Use to allow the reconfiguration of its campus outdoor space including: a) the removal of existing asphalt to establish more green space, b) renovation of the upper play area, adjacent to the building, c) replacement and relocation of aging play equipment and d) the installation of rubberized safety surface in their existing Kindergarten playground. The new surface will provide a more accessible route for students with mobility issues. The renovation of the existing play areas will provide a safe, inclusive play experience for all Hubbard Woods’ students. The project will be installed observing public health, safety, comfort, morals and general welfare. 2. That the Special Use will not substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right in the district or districts of concern, nor substantially diminish or impair property values in the immediate vicinity; The proposed, renovated Hubbard Woods School campus has been sensitively designed to respect the immediate neighbors. The relocation of the west play area and the introduction of additional green space was conceived to provide more of a buffer to the neighbors along the west property line. Equipment was placed at an increased side-yard setback with the intention to observe the privacy of adjacent backyards and additional landscaping has been included to provide a visual buffer. Having this lovely resource near homes in the area will only enhance the appeal to property owners in that the playground will be appropriately maintained and safety measures and guidelines will be followed throughout the installation process. The current plans meet all safety regulations and the structures themselves are attractive. 3. That the establishment of Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity for uses permitted by right in the district or districts of concern; The playground area and location on the property were consciously selected to preserve neighboring lots’ privacy and provide a visual buffer to the play activity. The design is in keeping with the type and rough dimensions of the existing equipment. The surrounding neighborhood will not be impacted negatively nor will the normal and orderly development be impeded. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress in a manner which minimize pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in the public ways; The proposed site improvements and installation of the new playground equipment will in no way impede the normal activities that occur around Hubbard Woods School. The pedestrian and vehicular traffic will remain unchanged by the replacement of the play equipment. Furthermore, the District will use good judgment and decision making as to when the equipment will be installed, ensuring, to the best of our ability, that traffic and sidewalks will not be obstructed for users. 5. The adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage, and other facilities necessary to the operation of the Special Use exits or are to be provided; 1 Page 21 of 100 The playground project does not require changes to existing parking, roads, drainage or facilities. The District will ensure that any disruption to the neighbors due to the installation of the new equipment will be minimal. We will provide information to the neighbors regarding the installation process. 6. That the Special Use in all other respects conforms to the applicable regulations of this and other village ordinances and code. The school district is obliged to follow the safety rules and regulations stated in school code, which ensures a safe playground for children to enjoy. The District will comply with all Village regulations, ordinances and codes in this process. 2 Page 22 of 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 EXISTING CONDITIONS SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 2 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL 02-23-24 WINNETKA, ILLINOIS Page 23 of 100 PROJECT AREA UPPER PLAY AREA 0 48 8 K.P.1 16 EXT. 16 16 72 10 48 40 32 24 16 8 WEST CAMPUS School\WNN17HUB1.dwg PROJECT LOCATION PLAN Xref ..\..\17010 Hubbard Woods SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 3 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL 02-23-24 WINNETKA, ILLINOIS Page 24 of 100 UPPER PLAY AREA SURFACE AREA CALCULATIONS - UPPER PLAY AREA PLAY AREA TO BE REMOVED: - 3,932 SF (IMPERMEABLE) PROPOSED PLAY AREA: + 3,932 SF (IMPERMEABLE) TOTAL CHANGES TO IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0 ASPHALT TO REMAIN 0 48 EXISTING LAWN SURFACE AREA CALCULATIONS - WEST CAMPUS 8 K.P TO REMAIN .1 16 KINDERGARTEN ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED: - 7,304 SF PLAY AREA (IMPERMEABLE) EXT. 16 72 16 PLAY AREA TO BE REMOVED: 48 40 10 (PERMEABLE) 32 24 16 8 PROPOSED PLAY AREA PROPOSED ASPHALT: + 1,665 SF (IMPERMEABLE) PROPOSED RUBBERIZED PLAY SURFACE: + 7,034 SF (IMPERMEABLE) TOTAL CHANGES TO IMPERVIOUS AREA: +1,395 SF IMPERMEABLE CALCULATIONS SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 4 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL 02-23-24 WINNETKA, ILLINOIS Page 25 of 100 SITE PHOTOS EXISTING EQUIPMENT TO BE REPLACED SITE PHOTOS SITE PHOTOS EXISTING EQUIPMENT TO BE REMAIN SITE CONDITIONS 5 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL 02-23-24 WINNETKA, ILLINOIS Page 26 of 100 ASPHALT PLAY YARD FRONT YARD SETBACK (30') 8" 16'- 23'- 7" LAWN AREA BASKETBALL STANDARDS FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIRED 68'-8" 40'-0" 64'-10" 0 48 8 K.P .1 16 PROPOSED PLAY AREA PLAY EQUIPMENT MAX HEIGHT 4'-2" TO FENCE EXISTING ASPHALT TO NEW RUBBERIZED PLAY 12' TO TOP OF ROOF BE REMOVED SURFACE - 4,340 SF EXT. 16 16 72 EXISTING FENCE EX. TREE NEWLY ESTABLISHED TO REMAIN TO REMAIN 48 10 EXISTING KINDERGARTEN PLAY AREA LAWN AREA 40 32 WITH NEW RUBBERIZED PLAY SURFACE 24 PROPOSED PLAY EQUIPMENT 16 8 ~2,600 SF SEE NUTOYS FOR DETAILED LAYOUT 35'-0" TO FENCE EXISTING PLAY EQUIPMENT 28'-5" TO REMAIN VOLUNTARY TO FENCE SIDE YARD SETBACK (30') 43'-0" 30'-9" 23'-10" 43'-0" PROPERTY LINE REQUIRED TO PROP LINE TO PROP LINE TO PROP LINE TO PROP LINE SIDE YARD SETBACK (12') LANDSCAPE EXISTING LANDSCAPE SCREENING SCREENING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN EXISTING NEIGHBOR'S EXISTING FENCE WOOD FENCE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING NEIGHBOR'S TO REMAIN TO REMAIN WOOD FENCE SITE PLAN - WEST CAMPUS SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 0 10' 20' 6 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL 02-23-24 WINNETKA, ILLINOIS Page 27 of 100 &th [ii)·� HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL lk§)�� llllllllllll PIIODUCTS WINNETKA, IL CODE: WNN22HUB1 - OPTION 1 � HIIICHi21-S1D7 11/26/2021 DRAWN BY: DS ; SCALE: II FEET STRUCJURE DIMENSIONS: �,: ACTUAL SIZE: AREA REQUIRED: 111' Copylfoj,t: Land,capo Slrucbno, Inc REVISED 1/18/2022 REVISED 1/25/2022 REVISED 2/9/2022 REVISED 1/19/2024 1271153 PERii H!NDHIIU) PIIIEI. 115e1115 POD CllllER W/PERII H!NDHOUJ 1731181 OMNISPIN SPINNER NITMI' SUIFM:cNG ENDED FOR 2-5 N!f. GRlllP 7 Page 28 of 100 8 Page 29 of 100 9 Page 30 of 100 10 Page 31 of 100 5-HA 2-CA 3-TD 5-HA EXISTING ASPHALT LAWN AREA 0 48 8 K.P .1 16 EXT. 16 16 72 48 10 40 32 LAWN AREA 24 16 8 5-TOT 2-LIT 2-PSU 3-POM 1-QIM EX. TREE 6-VD 3-AC 3-PSU 3-POM 1-QIM EX. TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 0 10' 20' 11 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL WINNETKA, ILLINOIS 02-23-24 Page 32 of 100 SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY PAGODA DOGWOOD TULIP TREE SHINGLE OAK ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA DENSE YEW TECHNY ARBORVITAE DOUGLAS FIR SERBIAN SPRUCE 12 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL WINNETKA, ILLINOIS 02-23-24 Page 33 of 100 SITE PHOTOS SITE PHOTOS SITE PHOTOS EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (2) EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN EXISTING BRIDGE TO BE RELOCATED SITE PHOTOS EXISTING PLAY SURFACE TO BE REPLACED 13 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL WINNETKA, ILLINOIS 02-23-24 Page 34 of 100 TREE PROTECTION FENCING EXISTING PATIO EXISTING SCHOOL TREE PROTECTION EXISTING FENCING EXISTING BRIDGE BOULDER PLAY HOUSE TO REMOVE SYNTHETIC TREE TO BE TURF REMOVED SAND BOX 850 sf COVERED WOOD STRUCTURE COVERED WOOD EXISTING STRUCTURE BUTTERFLY GARDEN TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING UPPER PLAYGROUND SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 0 5' 10' 14 PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL WINNETKA, ILLINOIS 02-23-24 Page 35 of 100 EXISTING PATIO EXISTING SCHOOL EXISTING BRIDGE (RELOCATED) 12' x 12' SAND BOX PLAY KITCHEN LOG 8' PLAY 12' PLAY STEPPERS MOUND MOUND LOG TUNNEL CONCRETE 10' PLAY MOUND SYNTHETIC COVERED TURF WOOD ~1,700 sf STRUCTURE TABLES COVERED WOOD EXISTING STRUCTURE BUTTERFLY GARDEN 1-GBI SITE PLAN - UPPER PLAY AREA SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 0 5' 10' 15 UPPER PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL 02-23-24 WINNETKA, ILLINOIS Page 36 of 100 PROJECT TABLE SET COMMUNITY PLAYTHINGS ® OUTDOOR PLAY KITCHEN COMMUNITY PLAYTHINGS ® LOG TUNNEL LOG STEPPERS SANDBOX COVER LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES ® LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES ® PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT USA ® 16 UPPER PLAY AREA IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 36 - HUBBARD WOODS SCHOOL 02-23-24 WINNETKA, ILLINOIS Page 37 of 100 ATTACHMENT C Page 38 of 100 Page 39 of 100 Page 40 of 100 Page 41 of 100 Page 42 of 100 Page 43 of 100 Page 44 of 100 Page 45 of 100 Page 46 of 100 Page 47 of 100 Page 48 of 100 Page 49 of 100 Page 50 of 100 Page 51 of 100 Page 52 of 100 Page 53 of 100 Page 54 of 100 Page 55 of 100 Page 56 of 100 Page 57 of 100 Page 58 of 100 Page 59 of 100 Page 60 of 100 Page 61 of 100 Page 62 of 100 MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: PLAN COMMISSION FROM: CHRISTOPHER MARX, AICP – ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: MARCH 29, 2024 SUBJECT: 847 ELM STREET – TONED YOGA (CASE NO. 24-04-SU) INTRODUCTION On April 3, 2024, the Plan Commission is scheduled to hold a public hearing to consider an application submitted by Toned Yoga 2 LLC (the “Applicant”), as the prospective lessee of the property located at 847 Elm Street (the “Subject Property”), to allow a personal fitness facility to occupy the Subject Property. The property is currently vacant and is owned by Helen James Family Limited Partnership, L.P. The Applicant has filed an application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit in accordance with Chapter 17.56 [Special Uses] of the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance to permit a yoga studio in the C-2 General Retail Commercial Overlay District at the Subject Property. The Applicant is seeking the Special Use Permit to provide an additional location for their existing business. A sign has been posted on the Subject Property and a website notice has been posted on the Village website indicating the time and date of the Plan Commission public meeting. A mailed notice has been sent to property owners within 500 feet of the Subject Property. As of the date of this memo, staff has not received any written comments from the public regarding this application. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is in a space on the west end of a one-story commercial building at 847 Elm Street, which is located on the north side of Elm Street between Birch and Chestnut Streets in the West Elm Street business district. The vacant storefront is approximately 1600 square feet of commercial space with 15.75 feet of street frontage along Elm Street and previously housed Ellen’s on Elm gift shop. The overall building contains two other tenants including Crystal Cleaners and Botanic Nail & Spa. Figures 1 through 5 on the following pages identify the Subject Property and neighboring businesses. The Subject Property is located within the Village’s Commercial Overlay District, which allows non-retail uses, such as fitness and training studios; however, the Zoning Ordinance requires that they be evaluated by the Plan Commission and Village Council as a special use. Page 1 Page 63 of 100 Figure 1 – Subject Property – 847 Elm Street Proposed Location of Toned Yoga studio Figure 2 – Subject Property – 847 Elm Street Page 2 Page 64 of 100 Proposed Location of Toned Yoga studio Figure 3 – Subject Property – 847 Elm Street Proposed Location of Toned Yoga studio Figure 4 – Neighboring Businesses to East – Crystal Cleaners, Botanic Nail & Spa, and Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Chicago Figure 5 – Neighboring Use to West – Winnetka Bible Church Page 3 Page 65 of 100 COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT BACKGROUND The Overlay District was established in 1987 out of concern about the viability of the business districts as a whole if non-retail occupancies were allowed to proliferate and occupy significant areas within retail shopping districts. At the time of adoption there was a concern about the possible proliferation of real estate offices and financial institutions. The Village Zoning Ordinance describes the purpose of the Overlay District and its restrictions on non- retail uses as being: “to encourage retailing of comparison shopping goods and personal services compatible with such retailing on ground floor in order to encourage a clustering of such uses, to provide for a wide variety of retail shops and expose such shops to maximum foot traffic, while keeping such traffic in concentrated (yet well distinguished) channels throughout the district.” Since its adoption in 1987, the Overlay District has been revised on more than one occasion to alter district boundaries, or to modify the types of uses which are permitted within each district. The most recent amendment occurred on April 4, 2019, when the Village Council adopted MC-01-2019, amending the Zoning Ordinance regarding uses and regulations in the three commercial districts, including amendments to the Overlay District and the standards used to evaluate a special use. This request to allow a personal fitness studio would have required a special use permit under the former zoning regulations. ELM STREET BUSINESS DISTRICT OVERLAY BOUNDARIES A map depicting the zoning classifications of the Elm Street Business District is provided below as Figure 6. The Subject Property is highlighted with a black outline. Gray areas indicate the underlying C-2 General Retail Commercial zoning, which permits by right a relatively broad array of uses, including various retail uses, along with a number of non-retail uses such as professional offices, financial service firms, medical offices and the like. Red crosshatch areas represent those areas subject to the restrictions of the Commercial Overlay District. The boundaries of the Overlay District are established along certain public streets and extend for a depth of 50 feet from the front property line. Subject Property Figure 6 – Elm Street Business District Page 4 Page 66 of 100 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT REQUEST The Applicant is proposing to use a 1600 square foot space as a personal fitness facility for yoga classes. The studio would act as a second location to service Winnetka patrons that already attend their existing business in another community with 30 minutes sessions with class sizes of 19 people with 2 employees. Class times would generally be at 6:00 am, 7:30 am, 9:00 am, 5:30 pm, and 6:30 pm with occasional noon classes on Monday through Wednesday while being at 7:30 am, 9:00 am, 10:30 am, 4:00 pm, and occasional noon classes on Friday through Sunday. The Applicant states that the class start times are staggered to have no overlap between arriving and departing students. The storefront space would feature a main entrance area at the front that would also have retail offerings such as athletic apparel, fitness accessories, body lotions and sprays, and scented candles. A main studio space of 925 square feet for hot yoga classes would be located behind the retail area while a 257 square foot lounge for breaktime and refreshments would be located towards the rear. The Applicant has also provided an explanation of their expected parking impact, which they based off the information in the recent parking analysis done for the Chase Bank Building at 791 Elm Street. The analysis and parking study for reference can be found in Attachment A. The Applicant states that one off- street parking space behind the building will be available for an employee at any given time, while no more than 2-3 employees will be working in the studio at any given time. Based upon the parking analysis provided by the Applicant, which as previously noted was based upon a recent parking study submitted to the Village by the applicant for the new proposed Chase Bank building at 791 Elm Street, the Village Engineer has found that adequate public parking should be available to accommodate the employee and customer parking demand associated with the proposed Toned Yoga. The Applicant also states that there would be no changes to the exterior façade beyond any typical business signage that will be sought with permit applications reviewed by the Design Review Board (DRB). A full description of the proposed use can be found in the application materials of Attachment A. The Applicant has provided a floor plan representing the layout of the space below in Figure 7 which can also be found in Attachment A. Figure 7 – Excerpt of Proposed Floor Plan DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REVIEW The Applicant has not submitted any applications for to be reviewed by the DRB. Any installation of signage, awnings, or exterior alterations will require an application submission for review at a future meeting. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW / FINDINGS The “Purpose” section of Chapter 17.56, Special Uses, states the following regarding special uses: It is recognized that there are special types of uses which because of their specific characteristics in relationship to uses permitted by right in a particular district, or the services which they provide, cannot Page 5 Page 67 of 100 be properly permitted by right in a particular district without consideration, in each case, of the impact of such uses upon neighboring land, or of the public need for such uses at a particular location. A land use classified as a special use is an allowed land use as long as the Applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use in its proposed specific location meets the applicable standards for granting special use approval. Section 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance provides a series of twelve (12) standards for the evaluation of Special Use applications within the Commercial Overlay District, which provides a framework for evaluation by the Plan Commission. The Applicant has supplied as part of their application materials a narrative addressing how this proposal complies with the twelve (12) standards. (See Attachment A) Following conclusion of public comment and Commission discussion, a Commission member may choose to make the following motion: I make the motion that: The Plan Commission recommends approval [denial] of the requested special use to allow the Applicant, Toned Yoga 2 LLC, to operate a personal fitness facility at 847 Elm Street within the C- 2 Commercial Overlay District, based on the following findings of fact: “The yoga studio (the “Special Use”) is [is not] consistent with the Standards for granting of Special Use Permits in the Commercial Overlay District, which are as follows: 1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or general welfare; 2. The Special Use will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right in the district or districts of concern, nor substantially diminish or impair property values in the immediate vicinity; 3. The establishment of Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity for uses permitted by right in the district or districts of concern; 4. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress in a manner which minimize pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in the public ways; 5. Adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage, and other facilities necessary to the operation of the Special Use exists or are to be provided; 6. The Special Use in all other respects conforms to the applicable regulations of this and other village ordinances and codes; 7. The proposed special use at the proposed location will encourage, facilitate and enhance the continuity, concentration, and pedestrian nature of the area in a manner similar to that of retail uses; 8. The location of the proposed special use along a block frontage shall provide for a minimum interruption in the existing and potential continuity and concentration of the retail uses along the block’s frontage; 9. The proposed special use at the proposed location will provide for display windows, facades, signage and lighting similar in nature and compatible with that provided by retail uses; 10. If the proposed special use provides multi-use areas, such as retail merchandise areas, restaurant dining areas, general office space, private offices, reception areas, or employee work areas, any Page 6 Page 68 of 100 proposed retail merchandise area or restaurant dining area shall be concentrated and located immediately adjacent to the sidewalk and clearly visible from the street in such a fashion as to invite customers to browse or dine; 11. If a proposed new building contemplates a mix of retail, office and service type uses, the minimum frontage for each retail use adjacent to the sidewalk shall be 20 feet with a minimum gross floor area of 400 square feet. In addition, such retail space shall be devoted to active retail merchandising which maintain typical and customary hours of operation; and 12. The proposed location and operation of the proposed special use shall not significantly diminish the availability of parking for district clientele wishing to patronize existing retail businesses.” The Commission’s recommendation is subject to no conditions [the following conditions]: 1. [Insert conditions…] As noted above, the Commission may also wish to consider if there are any additional conditions it may want to place on the facility’s operation. This request is subject to final approval by the Village Council. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Application Materials Page 7 Page 69 of 100 ATTACHMENT A Page 70 of 100 SPECIAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS C-2 COMMERCIAL OVERLAY An application to establish a Special Use listed in Section 17.46.010 [Table of Uses] to be located on the ground floor in the C-2 Commercial Overlay District must establish in detail how the proposed occupancy and its operation will be in compliance with the following standards: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or general welfare At Toned Yoga, health and wellness is our utmost priority. Our mission statement is as follows: “Toned Yoga is a boutique fitness studio aimed to create a community of individuals who want to strengthen the connection of their mind, body, and soul.” At Toned Yoga, we want your fitness journey to be more than just a workout, but a lifestyle. We aim to create an environment in Winnetka that all ages, genders, and demographics can find a sense of community in. What makes Toned Yoga different from a gym, a franchise studio or another option for the Winnetka space? Community and connection. It’s all about the connection you will make with other students, community members, instructors - and that connection keeps growing in and out of the studio. When you invest in a boutique studio like Toned Yoga, you invest in your community. This idea of community and connection is essential when creating any type of business as we put the customer (in this case, the yoga student) as our priority. We have found in our Lake Bluff location that this idea of community was something that was missing prior to Toned Yoga - a place where anyone and everyone can come to and feel welcome. We are looking to replicate this amongst the Winnetka and surrounding suburb locations at this future location. Unlike other physical sports and workout classes, Toned Yoga has a variety of classes that are suitable and beneficial for people of all ages, genders, and demographics. Our instructors are tenured instructors who are masters in their field (with a combined over 10,000+ hours of experience in our Lake Bluff location alone). Every instructor and staff member is certified in their field, CPR certified and trained to handle any situation that happens in the studio. 2. That the special use will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right in the district or districts of concern, nor substantially diminish or impair property values in the immediate vicinity; The establishment of Toned Yoga in Winnetka will only help promote small businesses, retail, and more across Winnetka. Having grown up in the North Shore suburbs, we understand how important the aspect of community is. In Lake Page 71 of 100 Bluff, we partner with all local businesses (Hansa Coffee, Prairie Espresso & Wine Bar, LF Juice, etc.) to not only give our students access to local small businesses, but help grow those businesses as well! We have seen a large increase of sales amongst all of Lake Bluff retail/restaurants/etc. since Toned Yoga was established in June 2023. Not only sales, we have seen a large increase of net-new faces coming into these establishments, such as the surrounding communities, that then get familiar with the local shops of the town. Our plan in Winnetka, is to partner with the local coffee stores (Pete’s Coffee, Starbucks) as well as other storefronts/retail (True Juice/Hometown/Valentina, etc.) to help promote each other - forming this sense of community within the small business ownership. An example of how we will do this is offer discounts at local stores for students who attend a Toned Yoga class. In Lake Bluff, if you attend a Toned Yoga class, you get a certain percentage off at the coffee store next door. As mentioned in the letter from Hansa, we have seen a huge increase in sales before/after our classes with the foot traffic we have of people walking over to the coffee shop. In Winnetka, this is something we can replicate with Pete’s Coffee, Starbucks, True Juice, etc. Another example of this is with our local restaurants/bars, in Lake Bluff we have PM “Happy Hour” classes where students attend a night class and then walk over to get drink/appetizer deals at a local restaurant/bar. This has become increasingly popular and something we could do with local restaurants in downtown Winnetka. Furthermore, we have many Winnetka students and members who travel 25 minutes + to our Lake Bluff location because they feel this sense of community. We have been speaking with potential instructors, students and Winnetka community members who are wanting a more boutique-style studio nearby. While there are various other studios in the nearby Hubbard Woods/Winnetka premises (CorePower, AIR Aerial Fitness) they are not what we would call competition. What makes Toned Yoga different is Maddie and Rob as owners and the space and environment they have created. They are at the studio opening through closing ensuring that each one of their members are cared for, the studio is clean and the business is running well. The difference between a franchise or big-box gym compared to Toned Yoga is the care, the community, the passion that comes from being a community-based studio. This is something we have heard Winnetka needs and we are ready to bring to them! Overall, we are looking to grow the beauty of Winnetka with the local businesses around. We believe that we can help grow and promote each other by working together. Winnetka is already an incredible community, but we hope to continue to grow together and help promote small businesses in any capacity we can. Page 72 of 100 3. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity for uses permitted by right in the district or districts of concern; No, we are the end unit next to the dry cleaner. We will in no way impede the normal and orderly development of that property. If anything our members will likely want to drop off their dry cleaning before coming to a class. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress in a manner which minimize pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in the public ways; Because we are a yoga studio, our hours are very different from that of your retail business. Below is our set class schedule: to note, this varies depending on the season, but what we have found the most efficient: Monday-Thursday: 6AM, 7:30AM (varies days), 9AM, Noon (varies days), 5:30PM, 6:30PM Friday: 6AM, 7:30AM (varies days), 9AM, Noon (varies days), 4PM Saturday/Sunday: 7:30AM, 9AM, 10:30AM, 4PM We will typically have 2 employees at any given time. Total employees will range from 10 -15 What will the number of people be at any given class? Have you considered the possibility of any overlap between arriving and departing patrons, taking up studio space and parking at the same time? How much will that affect volume? If the studio does well we expect around 23 people (including 2 staff members) on average for our prime classes. We space the classes out by a minimum of 45 minutes so that there is no overlap. We have found our most popular class times fall into the times before 10am and after 5pm - as well as weekends. What’s important to note about this, is parking and foot traffic will not affect a business that has set business hours of 9-5pm. Another important factor is that when our class day is ending (roughly around 10am) that is prime time for the local retail/restaurants/shops I mentioned above. This is where the idea of partnership we mentioned above will come into play - as our foot traffic lowers after morning classes, there will be an influx of people who WANT to go get coffee, walk around, get their nails done (next door!) and have a bite to eat. Furthermore, the location we are looking to open at in Winnetka is located at the far end of the business strip and across from many available parking locations. This is a very strategic location for us as we will be in a corner lot with access to parking in the back (for employees), a large parking lot out front, and many additional parking spots on nearby streets. Page 73 of 100 The majority of our traffic will be away from the center of town and limited to the parking lot across the street as well as available street parking directly outside of the space. We have also found that a local yoga studio brings a lot of walking - in Lake Bluff, many people opt-out of driving and walk to the studio who live nearby. In the location we are looking at in Winnetka, there are many homes nearby with the option to walk where this would also help limit congestion. Overall, we are currently located in a much smaller town of Lake Bluff and parking has never been an issue or concern for local shops. We will ensure to keep this our top priority should it ever affect the business of those nearby. 5. That adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage, and other facilities necessary to the operation of the special use exists or are to be provided; We have provided a parking study and also can confirm that employees will have parking behind the studio. Please refer to our attached parking study for further information. 6. That the special use in all other respects conforms to the applicable regulations of this and other village ordinances and codes We have gone through extensive meetings, confirmations, etc. to confirm that Toned Yoga will not interfere with any village ordinances and codes. 7. The proposed special use at the proposed location will encourage, facilitate and enhance the continuity, concentration, and pedestrian nature of the area in a manner similar to that of retail uses; As we have mentioned in above questions, Toned Yoga will help promote all local businesses. We aim to act as a partner to businesses. Something Maddie (owner of Toned Yoga) focuses on is community and partnership growth. A lot of our time will be dedicated to seeing how Toned Yoga can help become more a part of the community. Ways we have seen success with this in Lake Bluff, is partnerships we have discussed above with businesses, as well as an active role in local schools (we participate at local schools preschool through highschool by offering yoga classes, private classes, sports team classes, recovery/rehabilitation, etc.), yoga and retail (we have worked with local retail businesses to create discounts or special occasions where students can attend a yoga class then go to a retail store for a shopping experience), yoga and nails, yoga and juice - the possibilities are truly endless. As we also mentioned, the times of our classes greatly benefit that of retail uses. Because the majority of our classes fall before 10am and after 5pm, that leaves a Page 74 of 100 large chunk of the day to do special events, classes, etc. with the local retail shops. The forward retail space will be able to accommodate 10-15 shoppers at a time. Some of the items that we will be selling include: Yoga/Fitness Apparel (Sweatshirts, Sweatpants, Tee-shirts, Shorts, Sports Bras, Leggings etc). We will include brands such as Alo Yoga, Splits59, and Made Activewear. We will also have a rotating section of influencer/ boutique brands. Furthermore we will sell yoga/fitness accessories such as stretching bands, yoga blocks, ankle weights, Theraguns etc. Lastly, we will sell a variety of products from scented candles to organic lotions/sprays. Overall, it is Maddie’s priority to help grow the Winnetka retail community - we have successfully done this in a short 8 months in Lake Bluff and are determined to replicate it in Winnetka! Furthermore, our studio also consists of a retail component that will benefit the local community as their currently isn’t any shops that offer athleisure/athletic wear 8. The location of the proposed special use along a block frontage shall provide for a minimum interruption in the existing and potential continuity and concentration of the retail uses along the block’s frontage; We agree to utilize the standard awning that is currently used by all the storefronts. We do not have anything that should cause interruption or hindrance along the block's frontage. This should not be a concern. 9. The proposed special use at the proposed location will provide for active display windows, facades, signage and lighting similar in nature and compatible with that provided by retail uses As mentioned above, we will utilize the standard awning that is currently used by all the storefronts. We are aligned with whatever the rules are for active display on windows, facades, etc. This should not be a concern. Furthermore, the entryway of our yoga studio will be retail-focused as we have mentioned above. We will have sections for clothing and accessories, which will be the front portion of the store. This is all shown in our mockup image of the studio. We believe that having this retail portion in the front will be inviting to those looking from outside in - they will be able to come into Toned Yoga and shop, while also learning more about the classes and studio offerings. Page 75 of 100 10. If the proposed special use provides multi-use areas, such as retail merchandise areas, restaurant dining areas, general office space, private offices, reception areas, or employee work areas, any proposed retail merchandise area or restaurant dining area shall be concentrated and located immediately adjacent to the sidewalk and clearly visible from the street in such a fashion as to invite customers to browse or dine Aligned. Because we are filing a Special Use for a yoga studio, the retail factor of our studio will include a smaller range of merchandise in the front of the storefront. We will ensure that everything we are offering is clearly visible and adjacent to the sidewalk. We have hired designers that have helped with our Lake Bluff location who we will also be utilizing for Winnetka. Aesthetics and design is very important to us and we will ensure that what we are displaying to the public is up to standards. 11. If a proposed new building contemplates a mix of retail, office and service type uses, the minimum frontage for each retail use adjacent to the sidewalk shall be 20 feet with a minimum gross floor area of 400 square feet. In addition, such retail space shall be devoted to active retail merchandising which maintains typical and customary hours of operation. As we have discussed with the Winnetka board members, this Special Use Permit will allow us to have both a studio and retail portion. With that said we will have 30 feet of frontage for retail totalling 427 sq feet of retail space. 12. The proposed location and operation of the proposed special use shall not significantly diminish the availability of parking for district clientele wishing to patronize existing retail businesses. We have conducted a parking study and can confirm that Toned Yoga’s hours of operation will not significantly affect local businesses. As mentioned in section 4, our main hours of operation fall before prime-time parking (before 10am) and after 5pm. As we also have touched on, the location of the spot we are looking at is very important - it is the last storefront on Elm Street and has a parking lot across the street, as well as several parking spots around the local streets. For more information, please refer to our attached parking study. Page 76 of 100 From: To: Christopher Marx Subject: Re: Toned Yoga SUP application Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 7:38:45 PM Attachments: 847 Elm Parking Study (1).pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hey Christopher, Thank you again for hopping on with me earlier this afternoon. Attached is an updated version of the parking study that includes class times and focuses more on public parking availability based on our class times. I have also included my responses in "red" below: Parking Plan: 1. The parking data is slightly inaccurate. Parking Zones A & C are available to downtown employees and residents with commuter parking passes, but not necessarily to the public at large after 8:00 am. Are you able to revise the findings and recommendations to better connect the available spots with the anticipated demand, throughout the hours of the day? For example, if you could indicate that the 5:00 hour will have ~X people with Y number of available parking spaces in these lots, the 6:00 hour will have ~A people with B number of available space, etc. That might give us a better idea of what will be available and when. Let me know if what I provided in the sheet suffices. The times that are on the sheet are our class times (give or take 30 min). Under each column you can see how many spaces are available in each lot based on the time. Then below I added a section where you can see the total number of available public parking spaces during each class as well as how many spaces we would likely use during a busy class. 2. Can you specify the allocation of parking spaces behind the building? As you’re probably aware, the building shares two other tenants and the rear off-street parking is rather limited. Can you specify how many employees will have access to how many spaces, at the times of business hours? On average we will typically have 2 employees in the studio at any given time (1 front desk staff that will handle retail / checking students in + 1 instructor for each yoga class). We were told by Jim that we would be allocated at least 1 spot behind the building (that is what he has communicated to us). We expect to have staff on-site between the hours of 5am - 1:30pm and then again from 4pm - 7:30pm. Depending on how the retail portion of our business is going we may also hire staff to cover the late afternoon gap. Page 77 of 100 Number of people: 1. How many employees will the studio have at any given time? What will the total amount of employees be? Typically 2 employees at any given time. Total employees will range from 10 -15 2. What will the number of people be at any given class? Have you considered the possibility of any overlap between arriving and departing patrons, taking up studio space and parking at the same time? How much will that affect volume? If the studio does well we expect around 23 people (including 2 staff members) on average for our prime classes. We space the classes out by a minimum of 45 minutes so that there is no overlap. Floorplan: 1. We will need a revised floor plan that doesn’t cut off the front. The front space of the building should have it’s street frontage dimensioned in terms of length. Please note that the frontage is not the 30 feet referenced in the application and is likely shorter. The frontage should measure just the space for Toned Yoga, not the other two tenants. I have reached out to our architect to update the floor plan to include the width of the front of the store which is 15'9". Is that what you are looking for? 2. Can you elaborate on the “Lounge Station located towards the back?” How many people can it accommodate? Will it have any food preparation or refreshment capacity? The lounge area will be a place for students to fill up their water bottles, grab supplies needed for class (bands, blocks etc). It will have a few seats for students in case they need a break from the hot studio. Lastly it will have soft floors in case students want to use the space after class to stretch. 3. How many people can the forward retail area accommodate? Can you specify what sort of merchandise will be in the front retail area? Will it be apparel? Will it include other yoga or fitness related accessories? The forward retail space will be able to accommodate 10-15 shoppers at a time. Some of the items that we will be selling include: Yoga/Fitness Apparel (Sweatshirts, Sweatpants, Tee-shirts, Shorts, Sports Bras, Leggings etc). We will include brands such as Alo Yoga, Splits59, and Made Activewear. We will also have a rotating section of influencer/ boutique brands. Furthermore we will sell yoga/fitness accessories such as stretching bands, yoga blocks, ankle weights, Theraguns etc. Lastly, we will sell a variety of products from scented candles to organic lotions/sprays. Page 78 of 100 Proposed 15.75 feet Page 79 of 100 Existing Page 80 of 100 Toned Yoga – 847 Elm Street Parking Demand and Available Parking Supply in West Elm Business District The following is our an�cipated class schedule and projected demand for parking. We will have no more than two to three employees on site at one �me, with the remaining individuals being clients. As part of the planned development applica�on for the proposed new Chase Bank building at 791 Elm Street, that applicant submited a parking study of the West Elm Business District. A copy of the study is atached (Chase Bank Parking Study, prepared by KLOA, dated January 20, 2024). Based upon the findings of that parking study and with the full occupancy of the new Chase Bank building and at peak parking demand periods: • There would be 42 parking spaces in the West Elm Business District available for other employees of the district to secure “A” parking permits. (See page 10 of Chase Bank parking study). We an�cipate needing no more than 2 of those 42 parking spaces for our employees. One off-street parking space will be available for one of our employees behind the studio on the subject property. • There would be 76 parking spaces for the public (customers and clients of the West Elm Business District). (See page 7 of the Chase Bank parking study - Inventory of 277 minus peak occupancy of 201 at 1:00 pm, leaves 76 parking spaces available.) The closest public parking lot available at all �mes for business customers and clients is the north por�on of the Post Office parking lot along Elm Street. As noted in the Chase Bank parking study, at the peak parking period (2:00 p.m.), there were 32 available parking spaces. (See page 7 of parking study - Inventory of 71 minus peak occupancy of 39 at 2:00 pm). There is ample parking for Toned Yoga members even during peak hours. With the primary set of classes happening before 9am and a�er 5:30pm, Toned Yoga will only have a very minor impact on public and employee permit parking. Lastly, the primary method for public parking ranges from 120 minutes to 4 hours which provides ample �me for members to not only atend class but shop at surrounding retailers before or a�er class. Page 81 of 100 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 | Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 | f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Spence Riverside Investment & Development FROM: Michael A. Werthmann, PE, PTOE Principal DATE: January 10, 2024 SUBJECT: Parking Study Redevelopment of Chase Bank Building Winnetka, Illinois This report summarizes the findings of a parking study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed redevelopment of the existing Chase Bank located in Winnetka, Illinois. The approximately 16,000 square-foot existing building is located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Green Bay Road with Elm Street. As proposed, the existing building will be replaced with a new approximately 41,200 square-foot building that will consist of approximately 6,800 square feet of retail bank space, 18,000 square feet of corporate office space, and 16,400 square feet of below-grade garage space. A total of 31 parking spaces are to be provided as part of the redeveloped bank building with seven surface parking spaces and 24 below-grade parking spaces. Existing Bank Building Current Parking Operations The bank building currently has a total of 20 surface parking spaces that are reserved for bank customers and wealth management clients. According to bank officials, a total of approximately 45 employees are assigned to the existing bank building. All of the employees that drive purchase permit parking from the Village and park in one of the Permit A parking spaces provided in several area parking lots and along Birch Street and Green Bay Road. Further, bank officials indicate that approximately 25 percent of the employees currently commute to work via public transportation or alternative modes of transportation. A copy of the existing bank building’s site plan is located in the Appendix. KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants Page 82 of 100 Redeveloped Bank Building Projected Parking Operations As proposed, the redeveloped bank building is to provide a total of 31 parking spaces with seven surface parking spaces and 24 parking spaces in a below-grade parking garage. The bank is proposing to assign/reserve the parking spaces as follows: • Surface Parking Spaces. Two surface parking spaces will be signed as ADA parking, one surface parking space will include an EV charging station that will be available to the public, and four surface parking spaces will be signed as 30-minute parking for bank customers only. • Below-Grade Parking Spaces. Five below-grade parking spaces will be signed for specific senior employees and 19 below-grade spaces will be reserved for the bank customers and wealth management clients. According to bank representatives, 70 to 75 employees will be assigned to the redeveloped bank building. Some of the employees will have the option to work from home on a hybrid or remote-work basis. Bank representatives anticipate that a maximum of approximately 75 to 80 percent of the employees will be working at the bank at any given time for a total of approximately 55 employees. Further, the bank anticipates that 25 percent of the employees will continue to commute to work via public transportation or alternative modes of transportation. A copy of the redeveloped bank building’s proposed site plan and below-grade parking garage plan are located in the Appendix. Redeveloped Bank Building Projected Parking Demand Bank Customers and Wealth Management Clients (Short-Term Parkers) The projected parking demand of the bank customers and wealth management clients was based on parking surveys performed at the existing bank building parking lot which is currently reserved for bank customers and wealth management clients. Table 1 shows the results of the parking surveys which were conducted every hour from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. on Wednesday, November 29, 2023. From Table 1 it can be seen that the existing bank had a peak parking demand of 16 bank customer/wealth management client vehicles. It should be noted that customers of other area businesses often park within the bank parking lot and, as such, the actual number of bank customers/wealth management clients parking in the bank lot may be less than that shown in Table 1. Nevertheless, the results of the parking surveys indicate that the existing 20 bank parking spaces, together with the available on-street parking spaces, are sufficient to meet the current parking demand of the bank customers and wealth management clients. 2 Page 83 of 100 According to bank representatives, the number of bank customers/wealth management clients is conservatively (worst-case) projected to increase by 25 percent with the redeveloped bank building. Assuming that all of the observed parked vehicles in the bank parking lot are bank customers/wealth management clients, the redeveloped bank building is projected to have a peak bank customer/wealth management client parking demand of 20 vehicles. (Bank representatives estimate that of the total customers/clients, approximately 2/3 will be bank customers and 1/3 will be wealth management clients.) Further, the parking demand of the bank customers/clients is reduced due to the bank’s location in downtown Winnetka. A portion of the bank’s customers/clients are/will be captured from the existing population within the downtown area. As such, the total 23 reserved bank customer/wealth management client parking spaces to be provided by the redeveloped bank building will be sufficient to meet the peak parking of the bank customers/wealth management clients. It should be noted that some of the bank customers may continue to park on-street in the public parking spaces. Table 1 EXISTING BANK BUILDING PARKING SURVEYS WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2023 Time Parked Vehicles 9:00 A.M. 7 10:00 A.M. 14 11:00 A.M. 16 12:00 P.M. 10 1:00 P.M. 13 2:00 P.M. 10 3:00 P.M. 10 4:00 P.M. 10 5:00 P.M. 6 3 Page 84 of 100 Bank Employees (Long-Term Parkers) As previously indicated, 70 to 75 employees will be assigned to the redeveloped bank building. (Approximately 45 employees are currently assigned to the bank building). Some of the employees will have the option to work from home on a hybrid or remote-work basis. As discussed previously, a maximum of 50 to 55 employees will be working at the bank at any one time. Assuming a worst- case analysis that all 70 to 75 employees work at the office and that 25 percent of employees continue to commute to work via public transportation or alternative modes of transportation, the redeveloped bank building will have a peak employee parking demand of 50 to 55 vehicles. Except for the five spaces that will be reserved for specific senior employees in the below-grade parking garage, all the other employees that drive will be parking off-site via permit parking. It is important to note that currently 31 bank employees have purchased off-site permit parking. As such, assuming a worst-case scenario, approximately 14 to 19 additional employees will need to park off-site in one of the following permit parking lots with the increase in employees that will result from the redeveloped bank building: • The Post Office parking lot • The parking lot located in the southeast quadrant of Birch Street and Spruce Street • The parking lot located in the southeast quadrant of Birch Street and Pine Street Downtown Winnetka Existing Parking Surveys In order to determine the existing parking demand in downtown Winnetka, KLOA, Inc. performed parking inventory and occupancy surveys every hour from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. on Wednesday, November 29, 2023. The study area was generally bounded by Spruce Street on the north, Green Bay Road on the east, Oak Street on the south, and Birch Street on the west. Figure 1 illustrates the study area. It should be noted that according to the Village officials, only two first floor commercial spaces are currently vacant within the West Elm District. 4 Page 85 of 100 Study Area Figure 1 5 Page 86 of 100 Surveys of the Public Parking Spaces Table 2 summarizes the available on-street public parking for customers/patrons of the downtown businesses within one to two blocks of the bank building, which includes the following roads and parking lot: • Green Bay Road between Spruce Street and Oak Street, which has a total of 40 spaces restricted to two-hour parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. • Chestnut Street between Spruce Street and Oak Street, which has a total of 59 spaces restricted to two-hour parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and 5 spaces restricted to 15-minute parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. • Spruce Street between Green Bay Road and Birch Street, which has a total of 5 spaces restricted to one-hour parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and 6 spaces restricted to two-hour parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. • Elm Street between Green Bay Road and Birch Street, which has a total of 45 spaces restricted to two-hour parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and two spaces restricted to 15-minute parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. • Chestnut Court, which has a total of 14 spaces restricted to two-hour parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. • Oak Street between Green Bay Road and Birch Street, which has a total of 29 spaces restricted to two-hour parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and one space restricted to 15-minute parking from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. • The Post Office parking lot, which has a total of 71 public parking spaces with 62 spaces restricted to two-hour parking and 9 spaces restricted to four-hour parking. A total of 277 public on-street parking spaces is located within the above study area that includes nine spaces restricted to four-hour parking, 255 spaces restricted to two-hour parking, five spaces restricted to one-hour parking, and eight spaces restricted to 15-minute parking. From Table 2 it can be seen that the on-street public parking within the study area had a peak parking demand of 201 parked vehicles at 1:00 P.M. As such, a minimum of 76 public parking spaces were available within one to two blocks of the site, which is more than sufficient to accommodate the limited, if any, additional bank customers/wealth management clients that may park off-site with the redevelopment of the bank building. 6 Page 87 of 100 Table 2 DOWNTOWN WINNETKA PUBLIC PARKING SURVEYS WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2023 Green Bay Chestnut Spruce Chestnut Post Office Elm Street Oak Street Total Road Street Street Court Lot Inventory 40 64 11 47 14 30 71 277 9:00 AM 20 33 4 25 5 6 11 104 10:00 AM 28 51 7 34 12 10 19 161 11:00 AM 29 57 6 28 11 13 33 177 12:00 PM 28 62 11 35 13 15 36 200 1:00 PM 31 57 9 33 13 19 39 201 2:00 PM 27 50 10 34 8 12 39 180 3:00 PM 28 44 6 32 10 10 25 155 4:00 PM 24 47 10 31 9 16 33 170 5:00 PM 18 44 10 16 9 25 21 143 7 Page 88 of 100 Permit A (Employee) Parking Surveys Table 3 summarizes the available Permit A parking which provides long-term parking for employees of the downtown area business. The Permit A parking in the study area is located along sections of Birch Street and Green Bay Road and the following three parking lots: • The Post Office parking lot • The parking lot located in the southeast quadrant of Birch Street and Spruce Street • The parking lot located in the southeast quadrant of Birch Street and Pine Street From Table 3 it can be seen that a total of 215 Permit A parking spaces are located within the study area. The peak parking demand within the Permit A parking spaces occurred at 10:00 and 11:00 A.M. with a total of 154 parked vehicles. As such, a minimum of 61 Permit A parking spaces were available in the study area, which is more than sufficient to accommodate the approximately 14 to 19 (worst-case scenario) additional bank employees that may have to park off-site via permit parking with the redevelopment of the bank building. Table 3 DOWNTOWN WINNETKA PERMIT A PARKING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2023 Pine/Birch Spruce/Birch Post Green Birch Total Lot Lot Office Lot Bay Road Street Total Spaces 42 38 67 7 61 215 9:00 AM 23 19 61 7 25 135 10:00 AM 23 25 66 7 33 154 11:00 AM 23 26 66 7 32 154 12:00 PM 24 29 61 7 32 153 1:00 PM 22 28 56 7 32 145 2:00 PM 21 29 58 7 34 149 3:00 PM 13 27 60 5 28 133 4:00 PM 9 28 45 5 27 114 5:00 PM 5 26 39 1 26 97 8 Page 89 of 100 Conclusions The following summarizes the results of the parking study: • The results of the parking surveys show that a maximum of 16 vehicles were parked in the bank parking lot which is reserved for bank customers and wealth management clients. As such, the 20 bank parking spaces provided at the existing bank, together with the available on-street parking spaces, are sufficient to meet the current parking demand of the bank customers and wealth management clients. • The redeveloped bank building is to provide a total of 31 parking spaces with seven surface parking spaces and 24 parking spaces in a below-grade parking garage. The bank is proposing to assign/reserve the parking spaces as follows: o Surface Parking Spaces. Two surface parking spaces will be signed as ADA parking, one surface parking space will include an EV charging station that will be available to the public, and four surface parking spaces will be signed as 30-minute parking for bank customers only. o Below-Grade Parking Spaces. Five below-grade parking spaces will be signed for specific senior employees and 19 below-grade spaces will be reserved for the bank customers and wealth management clients. • Assuming a 25 percent increase in the number of bank customers/wealth management clients, the redeveloped bank building is projected to have a peak bank customer/wealth management client parking demand of 20 vehicles. As such, the total 23 reserved bank customer/wealth management client parking spaces to be provided by the redeveloped bank building will be sufficient to meet the peak parking of the bank customers/wealth management clients. • The results of the parking surveys showed that a minimum of 76 public parking spaces were available during the peak parking period within one to two blocks of the bank site, which is more than sufficient to accommodate any limited, if any, bank customers/wealth management clients that may park off-site. • Assuming a worst-case analysis that all 70 to 75 employees work at the office and that 25 percent of employees continue to commute to work via public transportation or alternative modes of transportation, the redeveloped bank building will have a peak employee parking demand of 50 to 55 vehicles. Except for the five spaces that will be reserved for specific senior employees in the below-grade parking garage, all the other employees that drive will be parking off-site via permit parking. It is important to note that currently 31 bank employees have purchased off-site permit parking. As such, assuming a worst-case scenario, approximately 14 to 19 additional employees will need to park in off-site permit parking lots with the increase in employees that will result from the redeveloped bank building. 9 Page 90 of 100 • The results of the parking surveys show that a minimum of 61 Permit A parking spaces were available during the peak parking period in the study area, which is more than sufficient to accommodate the approximately 14 to 19 additional bank employees that may have to park off-site via permit parking. 10 Page 91 of 100 Page 92 of 100 Toned Yoga All Hands Instructors + Front Desk 1/4/24 Page 93 of 100 Toned Yoga Overview At Toned Yoga, health and wellness is our utmost priority. Our mission statement is as follows: “Toned Yoga is a boutique fitness studio aimed to create a community of individuals who want to strengthen the connection of their mind, body, and soul.” What makes Toned Yoga different from a gym, a franchise studio or another option for the Winnetka space? Community and connection. It’s all about the connection you will make with other students, community members, instructors - and that connection keeps growing in and out of the studio. When you invest in a boutique studio like Toned Yoga, you invest in your community. Page 94 of 100 Inside Toned Yoga Lake Bluff Page 95 of 100 Inside Future Toned Yoga Winnetka Upon entering Toned Yoga Winnetka, you will walk into our reception area - a space both calming and inviting. Within this space we will feature various retail (activewear, yoga props, & more), as well as a relaxing waiting area to mingle with friends and prepare for class. Because Toned Yoga Winnetka will be larger than Lake Bluff, we are lucky enough to include a recovery room in the back of the studio. Think about having a place to stretch, mingle, meditate, relax, both before and after class What makes Toned Yoga different is the atmosphere, vibe, cleanliness, and overall ambiance. You WILL feel the difference! Page 96 of 100 Meet the Toned Yoga Community Page 97 of 100 Toned Yoga Partnerships Lake Bluff Partnerships: Hansa Coffee, Prairie, LF Juice, Forest Greens Juice Bar, Magdalena European Med Spa, Lake Bluff PTO, Lake Bluff 4th of July, Nonprofits, Schools & more! Potential Winnetka Opps: True Juice, Peet’s Coffee, Starbucks, local restaurant & bars, clothing stores, endless possibilities! Page 98 of 100 Formats & Class Times Infrared Heated & High-Intensity: Morning Class Times: TONE, STRENGTH, HIIT 6AM, 7:30AM, 9AM Infrared Heated & Mid-Intensity: Afternoon Class Times: FLOW, POWER FLOW, CANDLELIT Noon, 5:30PM, 6:30PM No Heat & Low-Intensity (Pre & Weekend Class Times: Postnatal Friendly): 7:30AM, 9AM, 10:30AM RESTORE, MEDITATION *classes vary by season and day, Pop-Up Formats: typically 5-6 classes on a weekday, 3-4 Kids Formats, Mommy & Me, Pre & classes on weekends* Postnatal, Athlete Recovery, Private Events/Workshops/Birthdays, etc. Page 99 of 100 Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: April 24, 2024, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check PRESENTER: AGENDA DATE: April 3, 2024 CONSENT: No ITEM TYPE: Reports ITEM HISTORY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: None Page 100 of 100