Muyni
← Back to Winnetka

Historic Preservation Commission

Regular Meeting

Winnetka, IL · November 3, 2025

AgendaPacketMinutes

Minutes

Adopted on December 1, 2025 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 NOVEMBER 3, 2025 MEETING MINUTES 3 4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman 5 Chris Enck 6 Patti Van Cleave 7 Paul Weaver 8 Anna Wisniewski 9 10 Members Absent: Beth Ann Papoutsis 11 Joseph Stuart 12 13 Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Myers 14 15 Junior Commissioner Present: Louis Zaranski 16 17 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner 18 19 Call to Order & Roll Call: 20 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members 21 present. 22 23 Public Comment: 24 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx also confirmed no public comments were received. 25 26 Approval of Minutes: 27 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the October 6, 28 2025, meeting minutes. A motion to approve the October 6, 2025, minutes was made by Ms. Van Cleave and 29 seconded by Ms. Wisniewski. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 30 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski 31 NAYS: None 32 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski 33 34 Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks: 35 a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 20 Fox Lane, a locally 36 designated landmark. 37 Mr. Marx noted the matter was moved to the November meeting from the October meeting at the applicant’s 38 request and summarized the proposed alterations. He stated the proposed addition, according to the applicant, to 39 the detached garage would result in a seamless appearance with the garage as well as creating additional storage 40 space which would not affect the historical and architectural character of the main home. Mr. Marx also noted a 41 setback variation was requested and would be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their November 42 meeting. He then referred to images of the existing home along with architectural plans for the proposed garage 43 addition. Mr. Marx noted the property obtained the status of a locally designated landmark in 2001 and asked if 44 there were any questions. 45 46 Mr. Enck asked what year the existing garage structure was built. Mr. Marx stated he would check but that 47 information was not immediately apparent. No additional questions were raised at this time. 48 49 Chairman Coladarci asked for the applicant’s presentation. Jeffrey Letzter, the project architect, stated he would 50 provide information with regard to the storage/garage addition to the home which included a variation request 51 due to the existing garage being located within the required side yard setback. He also noted the garage did not 52 run parallel to the home which resulted in a 50% setback variation request. Mr. Letzter identified the storage shed November 3, 2025 Page 2 1 on the property and confirmed they do not know the exact age of when the garage was built. He stated the garage 2 details are accurate to the current home. 3 4 Mr. Weaver asked when the home was built which has a three car garage. Mr. Letzter responded the home was 5 built in 1924 and there is a two car garage and described the proposed garage extension which would match the 6 existing materials and roof height. He explained their consideration of the copper roof material. Mr. Marx provided 7 the Commission Members with information from the 2001 landmark designation and indicated the garage was 8 built after the landmark designation. 9 10 Mr. Enck referred to page 8 of the west front elevation and asked if the brick would continue straight across or if 11 the addition would have a new setback. Mr. Letzter responded it would be flush and described the installation in 12 detail. No additional questions were raised at this time. Mr. Weaver described the project as great. 13 14 Chairman Coladarci noted there is no public comment and called the matter in for discussion. Mr. Weaver 15 commented on the garage’s status and the attempt by the applicant to match it as originally built. Mr. Enck agreed 16 with Mr. Weaver’s comments and the fact that the garage is not original to the home. 17 18 Chairman Coladarci referred to page 9 and the Exterior Alterations of Designated Landmarks language and criteria 19 the Commission is to consider which he read into the record. He also referred to Part II with regard to design 20 guidelines, window and door proportion, window shape, scale, expression, architectural details and 21 appurtenances. Chairman Coladarci then read the following findings into the record: “The HPC shall determine 22 whether the proposed alterations will be appropriate or not appropriate to the preservation of the subject 23 property. Considering the alterations, does the HPC find that the subject property continues to meet the criteria 24 for designation as a locally designated landmark.” Mr. Marx suggested the Commission make a motion to state 25 that if there are no suggested amendments or revisions, to find that it continued to meet the criteria for a locally 26 designated landmark and the proposed alterations are appropriate to the preservation of the subject property. 27 28 A motion as stated by Mr. Marx was made by Mr. Enck and seconded by Mr. Weaver. A vote was taken and the 29 motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 30 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski 31 NAYS: None 32 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski 33 34 The property owner, Colleen Carrol, provided information regarding the home to the Commission. 35 36 Other Business: 37 a. December 1, 2025 Meeting – Quorum Check. 38 Mr. Marx advised the Commission Members of the single agenda item for the December meeting. The Commission 39 Members discussed their availability. 40 41 b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update. 42 Mr. Marx provided the Commission Members with an update regarding a local plaque fabricator. Ms. Van Cleave 43 also provided information with regard to the fabricator who offered to create a prototype which would cost less 44 than $100. Mr. Marx estimated no more than five or six awards have been presented in a single year with an 45 average of two to three of them being done over the last couple of years. The Commission Members agreed to 46 move forward with the fabricator. 47 48 c. Monthly Communications for Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision. 49 Mr. Marx provided an update with regard to his discussion with the 615 Elm property owners as to whether they 50 would like to have an article included in the publication relating to the landmark nomination. He also referred to 51 Crow Island School. Ms. Van Cleave stated she needed to do more follow-up with the school district’s 52 communication director. Mr. Marx stated he would have to confirm with Josie with regard to the winter edition 53 deadline. The Commission Members discussed the farmer’s market timing. Mr. Marx asked the Commission November 3, 2025 Page 3 1 Members if they had any items to prepare for the December edition and suggested an inquiry be made with regard 2 to the benches being offered to community members. Mr. Marx and Mr. Weaver stated they would share any 3 information they found. Mr. Zaranski also provided information relating to the individual chairs to be installed. 4 5 Adjournment: 6 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Weaver and seconded by 7 Ms. Van Cleave. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 8 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski 9 NAYS: None 10 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski 11 The meeting adjourned at 7:41 p.m. 12 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Antionette Johnson 16 Recording Secretary 17

Agenda

Village of Winnetka Historic Preservation Commission Regular Meeting November 3, 2025 at 7:00 PM Winnetka Village Hall - 510 Green Bay Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments 3. Approval of Minutes a. Approval of October 6, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes 4. Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 20 Fox Lane, a locally designated landmark. 5. Other Business a. December 1, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update c. Monthly Communications For Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision 6. Adjournment NOTICE Village Council meetings are video recorded. All agenda materials are available at villageofwinnetka.org (Governance > Agendas & Minutes); the Reference Desk at the Winnetka Library; or in the Manager’s Office at Village Hall (2nd floor). The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that all persons with disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the Village ADA Coordinator, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, 847-716- 3543; T.D.D. 847-501-6041.

Packet

Village of Winnetka Historic Preservation Commission Regular Meeting November 3, 2025 at 7:00 PM Winnetka Village Hall - 510 Green Bay Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments 3. Approval of Minutes a. Approval of October 6, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes 4. Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 20 Fox Lane, a locally designated landmark. 5. Other Business a. December 1, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update c. Monthly Communications For Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision 6. Adjournment NOTICE Village Council meetings are video recorded. All agenda materials are available at villageofwinnetka.org (Governance > Agendas & Minutes); the Reference Desk at the Winnetka Library; or in the Manager’s Office at Village Hall (2nd floor). The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that all persons with disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the Village ADA Coordinator, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, 847-716- 3543; T.D.D. 847-501-6041. Page 1 of 30 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 OCTOBER 6, 2025 MEETING MINUTES 3 4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman 5 Beth Ann Papoutsis 6 Joseph Stuart 7 Patti Van Cleave 8 Anna Wisniewski 9 10 Members Absent: Chris Enck 11 Paul Weaver 12 13 Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Myers 14 15 Junior Commissioner Present: Louis Zaransky 16 17 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner 18 19 Call to Order & Roll Call: 20 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members 21 present. 22 23 Public Comment: 24 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx noted that no comments were received for items not on the 25 agenda. 26 27 Approval of Minutes: 28 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to approve the September 15, 2025 meeting minutes. Ms. Van Cleave 29 clarified her comment on page 2, line 14. Ms. Papoutsis clarified her comment on page 2, line 11. A motion to 30 approve the September 15, 2025 minutes, as amended, was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded by Ms. 31 Papoutsis. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 32 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski 33 NAYS: None 34 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 35 36 Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks: 37 a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 20 Fox Lane, a locally 38 designated landmark. 39 Mr. Marx stated the applicant requested the item be continued to the November 2025 meeting so they can attend 40 the meeting. 41 42 b. Case No. 25-15-HPC - 1094 Fisher Crescent Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 1094 Fisher 43 Crescent Lane, a locally designated landmark. 44 Mr. Marx identified the property owner, summarized the proposal and summarized the proposed exterior 45 alterations in detail for the Commission. He referred to elevation renderings, photos and a cut-through on page 46 nos. 2-3 in the application materials as Attachment A. Mr. Marx stated the applicant described proposed 47 alterations as minor in scope and would serve to improve natural sunlight, improve ventilation and would have 48 minimal visual impact from the public right-of-way. He asked if there were any questions. No questions were 49 raised at this time. 50 51 David Szafarz of Downey Szafarz Architects described the three skylights on the flat roof as well as four in the rear 52 which open to the outside in a manner similar to a balcony window. He noted the roofline character would not Page 2 of 30 October 6, 2025 Page 2 1 change or be visual from the street. Mr. Marx referred to Figure 1 on page 2 which is the property’s aerial view and 2 identified the topography which included a slope from Sheridan Road. 3 4 Ms. Papoutsis asked about the roof’s materials. Mr. Szafarz described the roof’s materials for the Commission. 5 Chairman Coladarci referred to page 35 and the factors the Commission is to consider, specifically items (g) and (h) 6 which he read into the record. He asked for the Commission’s comments or if there were any additional standards 7 to be discussed at length. Chairman Coladarci agreed the windows are not easily visible. 8 9 Mr. Stuart commented the alterations looked practical and asked if they could have done traditional dormers with 10 regard to the roof pitch. Mr. Szafarz responded there is a cut-in dormer which he identified and considered as an 11 alternative but it would have required zoning relief. No additional questions were raised at this time. 12 13 Chairman Coladarci then referred to several findings on page 35, item 2(a) which he read into the record and asked 14 if there were any comments. No comments were made at this time. He read the findings into the record and asked 15 for a motion to find that the Commission found that the proposed alterations are appropriate to the preservation 16 of the subject property and found that the subject property continued to meet the criteria as a locally designated 17 landmark. A motion as stated by Chairman Coladarci was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded by Ms. 18 Wisniewski. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 19 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski 20 NAYS: None 21 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 22 23 Other Business: 24 a. November 3, 2025 Regular Meeting - Quorum Check. 25 The Commission Members discussed their availability. 26 27 b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update. 28 Mr. Marx summarized the status of seeking another plaque manufacturer and the proposed alternatives including 29 a matted framed photo and signed document which would be unique for each homeowner. He noted the prior 30 awarded plaques have not been located on the home’s exterior. Ms. Papoutsis commented on the effect of having 31 the plaques located outside. Chairman Coladarci referred to the amount of time it took to get the expensive 32 plaques done which would have to be redesigned. Mr. Marx described the plaque modification as very expensive 33 and took a significant amount of time to complete. He also provided the Commission with a summary of his search 34 for additional plaque fabricators. Ms. Papoutsis suggested that the plaques should still be suitable for bearing 35 outdoor weather and that local artists should be considered for design. The Commission Members also discussed 36 alternative suggestions for plaque manufacturers. Mr. Marx stated that they ideally would like to present the 37 awards in December and discussed the lead time for orders to be put together and asked the Commission 38 Members to contact him immediately with any potential manufacturer’s information. Chairman Coladarci 39 confirmed the item would be further discussed at the November meeting. Mr. Marx agreed to provide Ms. Van 40 Cleave with a sample plaque. 41 42 c. Monthly Communications for Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision. 43 Ms. Van Cleave referred to the previous discussion with regard to the Crow Island addition and provided an 44 update. She suggested the matter beheld until they have access to Perkins & Will’s photos of the addition to 45 include in the article with the stewardship group to write the article. Mr. Marx identified the timeline to include it 46 in the quarterly report. He asked the Commission Members if they had any items to add to the list. Ms. Van Cleave 47 suggested featuring 615 Elm Street. Mr. Marx provided a summary of the work done and preservation tools the 48 homeowners used. He also mentioned Mr. Enck’s recognition from Landmarks Illinois appearing in the most recent 49 quarterly report. The Commission Members discussed contacting the 615 Elm property owners about doing a short 50 article as well as possible representation at the farmer’s market. 51 52 Adjournment: Page 3 of 30 October 6, 2025 Page 3 1 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Van Cleave and 2 seconded by Mr. Stuart. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 3 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski 4 NAYS: None 5 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 6 The meeting adjourned at 7:36 p.m. 7 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 10 Antionette Johnson 11 Recording Secretary 12 13 Page 4 of 30 MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FROM: CHRISTOPHER MARX, ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2025 SUBJECT: 20 FOX LANE - ALTERATIONS TO LOCAL LANDMARK (CASE NO. 25-12-HPC) INTRODUCTION On November 3, 2025, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is scheduled to consider a request from Aspect Design Architecture Inc. (the “Applicant”), as the architect representative of Chicago Land Trust Company, As Trustee Under Trust #8002364810 (the “Owner”) of the property located at 20 Fox Lane (the “Subject Property”), for an advisory review of exterior alterations to the Subject Property, a locally designated landmark. The request was originally included on the October 6, 2025, meeting agenda but was continued to the next available meeting date at the request of the Applicant. PROPOSED PLAN The Applicant has provided a written narrative, photos, architectural plans, and material specifications that detail the proposed alteration to an accessory structure on the Subject Property. The existing detached garage would receive modifications and improvements that include a one-story 286 square-foot addition on its south end, bringing the accessory structure to a size of 814 square feet. The addition’s roof would match the same pitch of the existing roof while the shingles on the entire roof surface would be replaced with a one-inch standing seam copper roof material. The addition would have a matching face brick of 2¼” x 7 5/8” x 4” bed depth with a smooth face and semi flush mortar and a warm white color identified as Sherwin Williams Greek Villa. The addition would be accessible with a Morgan brand wood door painted in the same shade of Greek Villa white. A Marvin Ultimate wood casement style window would be installed with simulated divided light munitins in an arrangement of two panes in width and three panes in height while also being painted in Greek Villa white, placed over a limestone sill. The Applicant states that the proposed addition is designed to provide a seamless appearance in all aspects from the existing garage and its addition. The Applicant states that the proposed addition would provide additional storage space while not disrupting the character and architectural integrity of the main house. The Applicant has also applied for a zoning variation that is scheduled to be reviewed at the November 10, 2025, meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting, as the proposed addition would not comply with zoning ordinance requirements for setbacks. Page 5 of 30 Figure 1 – Subject Property – GIS aerial map Figure 2 – Subject Property – Front (North) façade of house Page 2 Page 6 of 30 Figure 3 – Subject Property – Front and side (North and East) façades of house Figure 4 – Subject Property – Side (West) façade of house Page 3 Page 7 of 30 Figure 5 – Subject Property – Detached garage and accessory shed Location of Proposed Addition Figure 6 – Subject Property – Proposed garage addition front (west) elevation rendering Figure 7 – Subject Property – Proposed garage addition site plan Page 4 Page 8 of 30 COMMISSION REVIEW Exterior alterations of designated landmarks are subject to an advisory review by the HPC. The criteria to consider when conducting an advisory review of alterations are as follows: 1. General Standards: a. Conformance with the Zoning Ordinance; b. Reasonable effort shall be made to use the building, structure, object or site for its originally intended purpose or to provide a compatible use which requires minimal alteration, relocation or demolition; c. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, object or site should not be destroyed. The alteration, relocation or demolition of any historic material or distinctive architectural feature should be avoided except when necessary to assure an economically viable use of the property; d. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, object or site should usually be maintained and preserved; e. Deteriorated architectural features should whenever possible be repaired rather than replaced. If replacement is necessary, the new material should match as closely as practicable the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features, where possible, should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings, structures, objects or sites; f. The surface cleaning of buildings, structures, objects or sites should be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods which will damage the architectural or historic features and building material shall be discouraged. g. New buildings and structures and the alterations and relocation of existing buildings or structures shall not be discouraged when such work does not destroy significant historical or architectural features and is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property or neighborhood. h. Alterations, relocations and demolitions which do not affect any significant exterior architectural or historic features of the building, structure, object or site as viewed from a private street, a courtyard open to the public or a public street, place or way should generally be permitted; i. Demolition of a designated landmark shall be discouraged if the building, structure or property, as the case may be, is economically viable and can yield reasonable return in its present condition or can be made economically viable and yield reasonable return after completion of appropriate alteration, relocation, renovation or restoration work. 2. Design Guidelines: a. Height. The height of any proposed alteration should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the designated landmark. b. Proportions of Windows and Doors. The proportions and relationships between doors and windows should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the designated landmark. c. Roof Shape. The design of the roof should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the designated landmark. Page 5 Page 9 of 30 d. Scale. The scale of the structure should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the designated landmark. e. Directional Expression. The dominant horizontal or vertical expression of the facades should be compatible with the original architectural style or character of the designated landmark. f. Architectural Details. Materials, textures, colors and architectural details should be compatible with the original architectural style or character of the designated landmark. g. Appurtenances. Appurtenances including, but not limited to, signs, fences, accessory buildings or structures, permeable and impermeable surfaces should be compatible with the original architectural style or character of the designated landmark. h. Other. In addition to the foregoing, the Commission may consider the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. FINDINGS The HPC shall determine whether the proposed alterations will be appropriate or not appropriate to the preservation of the Subject Property. Considering the alterations, does the HPC find that the Subject Property continues to meet the criteria for designation as a locally designated landmark? If the HPC determines that the proposed alterations are inappropriate, it shall make recommendations to the Applicant concerning changes, if any, in the proposed alterations which would cause the HPC to reconsider its determination and shall confer with the Applicant. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Application Materials Page 6 Page 10 of 30 ATTACHMENT A Page 11 of 30 Page 12 of 30 From: jletzter aspectdesigninc.com To: Christopher Marx; Ann Klaassen Cc: Dean Botes Subject: 20 Fox Lane / HPC meeting 10-6-25 and Zoning meeting 10-13-25 / ADI AD24227 Date: Thursday, September 11, 2025 6:12:47 PM Attachments: Copper roof information 9-11-25.pdf AD24227-CARROLL-09 11 25-REVISED.pdf s3WKSX_978474_survey_r1.pdf 9-11-25 Signed application for Variation Carroll.pdf 09 11 25 Standards for Granting Variation Carroll.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Christopher & Ann, Please find additional items requested for the HPC meeting and the zoning meeting. HPC: Photos off home             Brick & Mortar will be painted Sherwin Williams SW7551 “Greek Villa” warm white. The brick will match the common brick 2 ¼” x 7 5/8” x 4” bed depth which has a smooth face and lightly tumbled edges, the mortar is semi flush and can cover some of the brick with semi-raked joints.               Window will be Marvin Brand Ultimate wood window casement style with 1 ¼” simulated true divided lites, 2 Wide x 3 Tall with 3 ½” wood casing on the sides and head and wood sill painted in the SW7551 color on a 3 ¼” tall x 5 ¼” deep limestone bull nose sill.              Service door will be a Morgan brand wood door and wood door frame with wood brick mould and be painted in the SW7551 Color.         Roofing will be copper standing seam roofing 1” tall 20 oz thickness (see attached information). Zoning & HPC: revised architectural plans        Updated Plat of Survey Updated Standards for Granting a Zoning Variation     Current signed application form After your review, please contact us with any additional items required. Thank you, Jeff Jeffrey T. Letzter President / Sales & Business Development Aspect Design, Inc. 26575 Commerce Drive Suite 607 Volo, IL 60073 847-875-4372 Direct 847-457-2500 Office www.aspectdesigninc.com Page 13 of 30 3 ASP 2508.4428 4 5 ASP ASP PLAT OF SURVEY LOT 46 05-29-201-010 COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS 7 NE 1502 G RVL LA 0.5' OFF 6 0.4' OFF P.O.B. CP CP ASP 230.30' (R) 8 FO SIRC X G RVL 89 91 90 CLF S 89°31'28" E 230.30' (C) 79 88 78 77 174 87 C HLK C HLK C HLK 11 C HLK MF TONE C HLK MF WF 9 G RVL BRK SIRC L4 68 G RVL 69 G RVL PILLAR 81 85 G RVL SIRC L3 80 S. R/W LINE OF VACATED PORTER AVENUE 70 BRK PILLAR BRK PILLAR 74 BRK PILLAR 71 SIRC G RVL 73 72 G RVL G RVL G RVL G RVL IF 10 0.4' ON (8') W G RVL VE L D/ 84 PARCEL 1 GR A 82 83BRK PILLAR 42 BRK PILLAR 67.2' 67.2' BRK PILLAR 43 49 48 G RVL 50 13 G RVL G RVL GRAVEL G RVL 44 G RVL TP 81.3' 80.8' BRK G RVL 47 51 G RVL G RVL PILLAR 76 156 46 45 MF 3.9' ON TP (124.75') 52 G RVL G RVL G RVL 57 58 56 STN 59 61 STN 67 STN 53 STN 60 STN STN 38 BRK 39 36 37 BRK 3.8' ON G RVL 66 G RVL 62 63 CONC. ASP/BRK ASP/BRK STREET 35 54 37.7' 64 75 WF STN STN 25 34 8.4' W. G RVL 40 14 33 32 22.0' ASP/BRK 24.6' G RVL 41 BX BX MF ASP/BRK BRK GX PROPERTY ADDRESS: 65 55 BRICK ASP/BRK ASP/BRK ASP/BRK 05-29-201-016 G RVL STONE G RVL BRICK 14.3' 24.0' 24.0' 15 20 FOX LANE, WINNETKA, ILLINOIS 60093 ASPHALT 29.9' 86 GFF 28.8' 1.1' 10.0' 4.1' 10.0' 29.1' 0.7' GAR. 1.1' BX 11.8' 2.5' 6 SURVEY NUMBER: 2508.4428 WF 2.5' 22.0' 62 27. 6.7 1 625 62 .7 5.8 6.9' 137 0.7' 31 30 16 17 1.4' ON 12 19 20 18 21 13.2' 5.9' GX MF ASP/BRKASP/BRK GX 2 STORY BRICK WALL 12.0' TP TOPO TOPO BRICK WALL 8.8' 24 28 29 TOPO 23 22 TOPO 3.5' ON 158 C/S 9.2' BX 27 26 TOPO 136 135 TOPO 9.8' DATE SIGNED: 09/08/25 FIELD WORK DATE: 9/5/2025 ASP/BRK 62 BRICK IF 47.7' ASP/BRK BRK WALL/WF MF 7 9.4' MF FRAME MF WF 625.9 0.6' ON STONE RES. #20 FIRE PIT BRK GRILL 139 SHED 138 3.5' ON REVISION DATE(S): STONE BRK 149 BRK 94 37.9' 4.2' 6.2' 6.2' 97 95 92 BRK 96 STN 28.7' F IRE PIT F IRE PIT 3.5' STN (REV.0 9/8/2025) 8.3' 3 .6 3 .6 F IRE PIT ' ' 3 .6' ' 93 3 .6 150 15.0' S 3°50'47" W 283.42 N 0°11'54" E 249.50' (C) 140 146 147 STN 151 148 12.1' BRICK BRK 1.5' BRK BRK BRK BRK POINTS OF INTEREST BRK 141 152 155 STONE 1.5' 144 249.50' (R) 153 145 BRK BRK BRK B.R. (ASSUMED) 10.3' 5.6' 10.2' BRK 283.42' (R) BRK BRK 1. ADJACENT FENCE OVER PROPERTY LINE. ' (C) 5/8" FIR 98 MF 106 MF 109 STN 110 STN 105 104 MF 154 MF BRK 142 143 179 129 128 112 111 113 114 05-29-202-012 108 107 BRK BRK 5/8FIR WF WF STN STN STN STN MF MF WASHINGTON 161 160 C HLK C HLK 127 126 124 123 P OOL P OOL P OOL P OOL 125 P OOL ON LINE 157 TP 05-29-201-002 IF IN GROUND IF 162 CLF C HLK POOL 05-29-201-008 (124.75') VACATED 118 119 121 122 99 100 103 102 WF WF P OOL P OOL P OOL P OOL MF 120 C HLK MF C HLK CONC. TENNIS/ 115 P OOL 117 STN STN STONE BASKETBALL COURT PARCEL 2 116 STN PARCEL 3 101 IF C HLK CLF 163 C HLK 05-29-201-009 1.0' ON 05-29-201-035 (8') AREA= 72,077 SQ. FT. ± 0.7' OFF WF SIRC 0.3' ON 130 131 132 178 5/8" FIR WFWF 7.2' ON L2 WF 5/8FIR 1.0' ON L1 164 165 169 WF C HLK C HLK 159 LINE TABLE WF 133 0.9' ON TP 167 177 134 166 173 176 168 170 172 WF WF 171 5/8" FIP 5/8FIP WF WF WF N 89°29'57" W 212.15' (C) 5/8FIP CLF WF C HLK 0.8' ON WF LINE BEARING DISTANCE 5/8" FIP 1 C HLK 212.15' (R) 1.6' ON 0.5' ON SIRC 0.5' OFF L1 N 0°15'49" W 14.12' (C) 14.16' (R) 05-29-201-013 05-29-201-033 05-29-201-034 L2 N 89°29'15" W 38.00' (R&C) L3 S 89°29'15" E 38.00' (R&C) L4 N 0°11'54" E 19.18' (R&C) GRAPHIC SCALE (In Feet) 1 inch = 40' ft. SEE PAGE 2 OF 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 OF 2 - NOT VALID WITHOUT ALL PAGES Page 14 of 30 Page 15 of 30 Page 16 of 30 Page 17 of 30 GENERAL NOTES ENERGY CODE FIREBLOCKING NOTES GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ST AT E OF I L L I NO IS ADDITION DEAN BOTES STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA LI 001-017326 EC T C EN T DESIGN LOADS I 20 FOX LANE SE D AR C H DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: WINNETKA, IL 60093 GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION SHEET INDEX 20 FOX LANE WINNETKA, IL. 60093 230.30' SITE WORK CONCRETE WORK METALS MASONRY 12/04/2024 12/23/2024 08/11/2025 09/09/2025 09/11/2025 DOORS AND WINDOWS THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION VACATED WASHINGTON REVIEW REVIEW FINAL REVISED REVISED CARPENTRY NOTES 26575 COMMERCE DR. WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM SUITE 607 VOLO, IL 60073 IL. LICENSE # 184-004354 STREET MAIN: 847-457-2500 283.42' S P E C T D E S I G N I N C. A R C H I T E C T S MECHANICAL PLUMBING 212.15' PROJECT # DRAWN BY: AD24227 DB / MB 20 FOX LANE TITLE SHEET & GEN. NOTES 1 SITE PLAN (R-1 ZONING) NORTH A 01 A 02 © COPYRIGHT MMXXV # 1 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS Page 18 of 30 A 02 2 STORAGE ROOM TYPICAL WALL SECTION A 02 1 Page 19 of 30 ENLARGED SITE PLAN © COPYRIGHT MMXXV REVIEW 12/04/2024 REVIEW 12/23/2024 DRAWN BY: PROJECT # 26575 COMMERCE DR. FINAL 08/11/2025 SUITE 607 20 FOX LANE REVISED 09/09/2025 VOLO, IL 60073 MAIN: 847-457-2500 REVISED 09/11/2025 S P E C T D E S I G N I N C. GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM A R C H I T E C T S # 2 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS A 02 IL. LICENSE # 184-004354 20 FOX LANE SITE PLAN & WALL SECTION DB / MB AD24227 WINNETKA, IL. 60093 GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION 20 FOX LANE 1 WEST ELEVATION (EXISTING) 2 SOUTH ELEVATION (EXISTING) WINNETKA, IL. 60093 A 03 A 03 EXISTING 2-CAR GARAGE N 4 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN 12/04/2024 12/23/2024 08/11/2025 3 WEST ELEVATION (PROPOSED) 4 SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED) 7 FLOOR PLAN (EXISTING) A 03 A 03 A 03 REVIEW REVIEW FINAL 26575 COMMERCE DR. WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM SUITE 607 VOLO, IL 60073 IL. LICENSE # 184-004354 EXISTING 2-CAR UNEXCAVATED GARAGE MAIN: 847-457-2500 UNEXCAVATED S P E C T D E S I G N I N C. A R C H I T E C T S UNEXCAVATED STORAGE ROOM N N 8 FOUNDATION PLAN (EXISTING) PROJECT # AD24227 10 PROPOSED FOUNDATION PLAN N DRAWN BY: DB 9 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN A 03 20 FOX LANE ELEVATIONS & PLANS 5 FOUNDATION PLAN (PROPOSED) 6 FLOOR PLAN (PROPOSED) A 03 # 3 OF 3 TOTAL SHEETS A 03 A 03 © COPYRIGHT MMXXV Page 20 of 30 GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION 20 FOX LANE WINNETKA, IL. 60093 UNEXCAVATED EXISTING 2-CAR GARAGE L-? L-? UNEXCAVATED L-? L-? STORAGE ROOM STORAGE ROOM 12/04/2024 12/23/2024 08/11/2025 09/09/2025 09/11/2025 6 FOUNDATION PLAN (PROPOSED) 4 ROOF PLAN (PROPOSED) 2 FLOOR PLAN (PROPOSED) A 03 A 03 A 03 REVIEW REVIEW FINAL REVISED REVISED 26575 COMMERCE DR. WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM SUITE 607 VOLO, IL 60073 IL. LICENSE # 184-004354 MAIN: 847-457-2500 S P E C T D E S I G N I N C. A R C H I T E C T S UNEXCAVATED EXISTING 2-CAR GARAGE PROJECT # AD24227 DRAWN BY: DB / MB 20 FOX LANE FLOOR PLANS 5 FOUNDATION PLAN (EXISTING) 3 ROOF PLAN (EXISTING) 1 FLOOR PLAN (EXISTING) A 03 A 03 A 03 A 03 © COPYRIGHT MMXXV # 3 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS Page 21 of 30 A 04 3 A 04 4 WEST ELEVATION (PROPOSED) WEST ELEVATION (EXISTING) Page 22 of 30 A 04 1 A 04 2 SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED) SOUTH ELEVATION (EXISTING) © COPYRIGHT MMXXV REVIEW 12/04/2024 REVIEW 12/23/2024 DRAWN BY: PROJECT # 26575 COMMERCE DR. FINAL 08/11/2025 20 FOX LANE SUITE 607 REVISED 09/09/2025 VOLO, IL 60073 MAIN: 847-457-2500 REVISED 09/11/2025 S P E C T D E S I G N I N C. GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM A R C H I T E C T S A 04 IL. LICENSE # 184-004354 20 FOX LANE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS # 4 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS DB / MB AD24227 WINNETKA, IL. 60093 Page 23 of 30 Page 24 of 30 Page 25 of 30 Page 26 of 30 Page 27 of 30 Page 28 of 30 Page 29 of 30 Page 30 of 30