Historic Preservation Commission
Regular MeetingWinnetka, IL · November 3, 2025
Minutes
Adopted on December 1, 2025
1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
2 NOVEMBER 3, 2025 MEETING MINUTES
3
4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman
5 Chris Enck
6 Patti Van Cleave
7 Paul Weaver
8 Anna Wisniewski
9
10 Members Absent: Beth Ann Papoutsis
11 Joseph Stuart
12
13 Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Myers
14
15 Junior Commissioner Present: Louis Zaranski
16
17 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner
18
19 Call to Order & Roll Call:
20 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members
21 present.
22
23 Public Comment:
24 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx also confirmed no public comments were received.
25
26 Approval of Minutes:
27 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the October 6,
28 2025, meeting minutes. A motion to approve the October 6, 2025, minutes was made by Ms. Van Cleave and
29 seconded by Ms. Wisniewski. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
30 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski
31 NAYS: None
32 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski
33
34 Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks:
35 a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 20 Fox Lane, a locally
36 designated landmark.
37 Mr. Marx noted the matter was moved to the November meeting from the October meeting at the applicant’s
38 request and summarized the proposed alterations. He stated the proposed addition, according to the applicant, to
39 the detached garage would result in a seamless appearance with the garage as well as creating additional storage
40 space which would not affect the historical and architectural character of the main home. Mr. Marx also noted a
41 setback variation was requested and would be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their November
42 meeting. He then referred to images of the existing home along with architectural plans for the proposed garage
43 addition. Mr. Marx noted the property obtained the status of a locally designated landmark in 2001 and asked if
44 there were any questions.
45
46 Mr. Enck asked what year the existing garage structure was built. Mr. Marx stated he would check but that
47 information was not immediately apparent. No additional questions were raised at this time.
48
49 Chairman Coladarci asked for the applicant’s presentation. Jeffrey Letzter, the project architect, stated he would
50 provide information with regard to the storage/garage addition to the home which included a variation request
51 due to the existing garage being located within the required side yard setback. He also noted the garage did not
52 run parallel to the home which resulted in a 50% setback variation request. Mr. Letzter identified the storage shed
November 3, 2025 Page 2
1 on the property and confirmed they do not know the exact age of when the garage was built. He stated the garage
2 details are accurate to the current home.
3
4 Mr. Weaver asked when the home was built which has a three car garage. Mr. Letzter responded the home was
5 built in 1924 and there is a two car garage and described the proposed garage extension which would match the
6 existing materials and roof height. He explained their consideration of the copper roof material. Mr. Marx provided
7 the Commission Members with information from the 2001 landmark designation and indicated the garage was
8 built after the landmark designation.
9
10 Mr. Enck referred to page 8 of the west front elevation and asked if the brick would continue straight across or if
11 the addition would have a new setback. Mr. Letzter responded it would be flush and described the installation in
12 detail. No additional questions were raised at this time. Mr. Weaver described the project as great.
13
14 Chairman Coladarci noted there is no public comment and called the matter in for discussion. Mr. Weaver
15 commented on the garage’s status and the attempt by the applicant to match it as originally built. Mr. Enck agreed
16 with Mr. Weaver’s comments and the fact that the garage is not original to the home.
17
18 Chairman Coladarci referred to page 9 and the Exterior Alterations of Designated Landmarks language and criteria
19 the Commission is to consider which he read into the record. He also referred to Part II with regard to design
20 guidelines, window and door proportion, window shape, scale, expression, architectural details and
21 appurtenances. Chairman Coladarci then read the following findings into the record: “The HPC shall determine
22 whether the proposed alterations will be appropriate or not appropriate to the preservation of the subject
23 property. Considering the alterations, does the HPC find that the subject property continues to meet the criteria
24 for designation as a locally designated landmark.” Mr. Marx suggested the Commission make a motion to state
25 that if there are no suggested amendments or revisions, to find that it continued to meet the criteria for a locally
26 designated landmark and the proposed alterations are appropriate to the preservation of the subject property.
27
28 A motion as stated by Mr. Marx was made by Mr. Enck and seconded by Mr. Weaver. A vote was taken and the
29 motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
30 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski
31 NAYS: None
32 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski
33
34 The property owner, Colleen Carrol, provided information regarding the home to the Commission.
35
36 Other Business:
37 a. December 1, 2025 Meeting – Quorum Check.
38 Mr. Marx advised the Commission Members of the single agenda item for the December meeting. The Commission
39 Members discussed their availability.
40
41 b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update.
42 Mr. Marx provided the Commission Members with an update regarding a local plaque fabricator. Ms. Van Cleave
43 also provided information with regard to the fabricator who offered to create a prototype which would cost less
44 than $100. Mr. Marx estimated no more than five or six awards have been presented in a single year with an
45 average of two to three of them being done over the last couple of years. The Commission Members agreed to
46 move forward with the fabricator.
47
48 c. Monthly Communications for Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision.
49 Mr. Marx provided an update with regard to his discussion with the 615 Elm property owners as to whether they
50 would like to have an article included in the publication relating to the landmark nomination. He also referred to
51 Crow Island School. Ms. Van Cleave stated she needed to do more follow-up with the school district’s
52 communication director. Mr. Marx stated he would have to confirm with Josie with regard to the winter edition
53 deadline. The Commission Members discussed the farmer’s market timing. Mr. Marx asked the Commission
November 3, 2025 Page 3
1 Members if they had any items to prepare for the December edition and suggested an inquiry be made with regard
2 to the benches being offered to community members. Mr. Marx and Mr. Weaver stated they would share any
3 information they found. Mr. Zaranski also provided information relating to the individual chairs to be installed.
4
5 Adjournment:
6 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Weaver and seconded by
7 Ms. Van Cleave. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
8 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski
9 NAYS: None
10 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski
11 The meeting adjourned at 7:41 p.m.
12
13 Respectfully submitted,
14
15 Antionette Johnson
16 Recording Secretary
17
Agenda
Village of Winnetka
Historic Preservation Commission
Regular Meeting
November 3, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Village Hall - 510 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of October 6, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes
4. Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks
a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to
20 Fox Lane, a locally designated landmark.
5. Other Business
a. December 1, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update
c. Monthly Communications For Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion
and Content Decision
6. Adjournment
NOTICE
Village Council meetings are video recorded. All agenda materials are available at villageofwinnetka.org
(Governance > Agendas & Minutes); the Reference Desk at the Winnetka Library; or in the Manager’s
Office at Village Hall (2nd floor). The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act, requests that all persons with disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to
observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or
facilities, contact the Village ADA Coordinator, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, 847-716-
3543; T.D.D. 847-501-6041.
Packet
Village of Winnetka
Historic Preservation Commission
Regular Meeting
November 3, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Village Hall - 510 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of October 6, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes
4. Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks
a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to
20 Fox Lane, a locally designated landmark.
5. Other Business
a. December 1, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update
c. Monthly Communications For Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion
and Content Decision
6. Adjournment
NOTICE
Village Council meetings are video recorded. All agenda materials are available at villageofwinnetka.org
(Governance > Agendas & Minutes); the Reference Desk at the Winnetka Library; or in the Manager’s
Office at Village Hall (2nd floor). The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act, requests that all persons with disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to
observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or
facilities, contact the Village ADA Coordinator, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, 847-716-
3543; T.D.D. 847-501-6041.
Page 1 of 30
1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
2 OCTOBER 6, 2025 MEETING MINUTES
3
4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman
5 Beth Ann Papoutsis
6 Joseph Stuart
7 Patti Van Cleave
8 Anna Wisniewski
9
10 Members Absent: Chris Enck
11 Paul Weaver
12
13 Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Myers
14
15 Junior Commissioner Present: Louis Zaransky
16
17 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner
18
19 Call to Order & Roll Call:
20 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members
21 present.
22
23 Public Comment:
24 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx noted that no comments were received for items not on the
25 agenda.
26
27 Approval of Minutes:
28 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to approve the September 15, 2025 meeting minutes. Ms. Van Cleave
29 clarified her comment on page 2, line 14. Ms. Papoutsis clarified her comment on page 2, line 11. A motion to
30 approve the September 15, 2025 minutes, as amended, was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded by Ms.
31 Papoutsis. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
32 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski
33 NAYS: None
34 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky
35
36 Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks:
37 a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 20 Fox Lane, a locally
38 designated landmark.
39 Mr. Marx stated the applicant requested the item be continued to the November 2025 meeting so they can attend
40 the meeting.
41
42 b. Case No. 25-15-HPC - 1094 Fisher Crescent Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 1094 Fisher
43 Crescent Lane, a locally designated landmark.
44 Mr. Marx identified the property owner, summarized the proposal and summarized the proposed exterior
45 alterations in detail for the Commission. He referred to elevation renderings, photos and a cut-through on page
46 nos. 2-3 in the application materials as Attachment A. Mr. Marx stated the applicant described proposed
47 alterations as minor in scope and would serve to improve natural sunlight, improve ventilation and would have
48 minimal visual impact from the public right-of-way. He asked if there were any questions. No questions were
49 raised at this time.
50
51 David Szafarz of Downey Szafarz Architects described the three skylights on the flat roof as well as four in the rear
52 which open to the outside in a manner similar to a balcony window. He noted the roofline character would not
Page 2 of 30
October 6, 2025 Page 2
1 change or be visual from the street. Mr. Marx referred to Figure 1 on page 2 which is the property’s aerial view and
2 identified the topography which included a slope from Sheridan Road.
3
4 Ms. Papoutsis asked about the roof’s materials. Mr. Szafarz described the roof’s materials for the Commission.
5 Chairman Coladarci referred to page 35 and the factors the Commission is to consider, specifically items (g) and (h)
6 which he read into the record. He asked for the Commission’s comments or if there were any additional standards
7 to be discussed at length. Chairman Coladarci agreed the windows are not easily visible.
8
9 Mr. Stuart commented the alterations looked practical and asked if they could have done traditional dormers with
10 regard to the roof pitch. Mr. Szafarz responded there is a cut-in dormer which he identified and considered as an
11 alternative but it would have required zoning relief. No additional questions were raised at this time.
12
13 Chairman Coladarci then referred to several findings on page 35, item 2(a) which he read into the record and asked
14 if there were any comments. No comments were made at this time. He read the findings into the record and asked
15 for a motion to find that the Commission found that the proposed alterations are appropriate to the preservation
16 of the subject property and found that the subject property continued to meet the criteria as a locally designated
17 landmark. A motion as stated by Chairman Coladarci was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded by Ms.
18 Wisniewski. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
19 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski
20 NAYS: None
21 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky
22
23 Other Business:
24 a. November 3, 2025 Regular Meeting - Quorum Check.
25 The Commission Members discussed their availability.
26
27 b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update.
28 Mr. Marx summarized the status of seeking another plaque manufacturer and the proposed alternatives including
29 a matted framed photo and signed document which would be unique for each homeowner. He noted the prior
30 awarded plaques have not been located on the home’s exterior. Ms. Papoutsis commented on the effect of having
31 the plaques located outside. Chairman Coladarci referred to the amount of time it took to get the expensive
32 plaques done which would have to be redesigned. Mr. Marx described the plaque modification as very expensive
33 and took a significant amount of time to complete. He also provided the Commission with a summary of his search
34 for additional plaque fabricators. Ms. Papoutsis suggested that the plaques should still be suitable for bearing
35 outdoor weather and that local artists should be considered for design. The Commission Members also discussed
36 alternative suggestions for plaque manufacturers. Mr. Marx stated that they ideally would like to present the
37 awards in December and discussed the lead time for orders to be put together and asked the Commission
38 Members to contact him immediately with any potential manufacturer’s information. Chairman Coladarci
39 confirmed the item would be further discussed at the November meeting. Mr. Marx agreed to provide Ms. Van
40 Cleave with a sample plaque.
41
42 c. Monthly Communications for Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision.
43 Ms. Van Cleave referred to the previous discussion with regard to the Crow Island addition and provided an
44 update. She suggested the matter beheld until they have access to Perkins & Will’s photos of the addition to
45 include in the article with the stewardship group to write the article. Mr. Marx identified the timeline to include it
46 in the quarterly report. He asked the Commission Members if they had any items to add to the list. Ms. Van Cleave
47 suggested featuring 615 Elm Street. Mr. Marx provided a summary of the work done and preservation tools the
48 homeowners used. He also mentioned Mr. Enck’s recognition from Landmarks Illinois appearing in the most recent
49 quarterly report. The Commission Members discussed contacting the 615 Elm property owners about doing a short
50 article as well as possible representation at the farmer’s market.
51
52 Adjournment:
Page 3 of 30
October 6, 2025 Page 3
1 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Van Cleave and
2 seconded by Mr. Stuart. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
3 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski
4 NAYS: None
5 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky
6 The meeting adjourned at 7:36 p.m.
7
8 Respectfully submitted,
9
10 Antionette Johnson
11 Recording Secretary
12
13
Page 4 of 30
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FROM: CHRISTOPHER MARX, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2025
SUBJECT: 20 FOX LANE - ALTERATIONS TO LOCAL LANDMARK
(CASE NO. 25-12-HPC)
INTRODUCTION
On November 3, 2025, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is scheduled to consider a request from
Aspect Design Architecture Inc. (the “Applicant”), as the architect representative of Chicago Land Trust
Company, As Trustee Under Trust #8002364810 (the “Owner”) of the property located at 20 Fox Lane (the
“Subject Property”), for an advisory review of exterior alterations to the Subject Property, a locally designated
landmark. The request was originally included on the October 6, 2025, meeting agenda but was continued to
the next available meeting date at the request of the Applicant.
PROPOSED PLAN
The Applicant has provided a written narrative, photos, architectural plans, and material specifications that
detail the proposed alteration to an accessory structure on the Subject Property. The existing detached
garage would receive modifications and improvements that include a one-story 286 square-foot addition on
its south end, bringing the accessory structure to a size of 814 square feet. The addition’s roof would match
the same pitch of the existing roof while the shingles on the entire roof surface would be replaced with a
one-inch standing seam copper roof material. The addition would have a matching face brick of 2¼” x 7 5/8”
x 4” bed depth with a smooth face and semi flush mortar and a warm white color identified as Sherwin
Williams Greek Villa. The addition would be accessible with a Morgan brand wood door painted in the same
shade of Greek Villa white. A Marvin Ultimate wood casement style window would be installed with
simulated divided light munitins in an arrangement of two panes in width and three panes in height while
also being painted in Greek Villa white, placed over a limestone sill. The Applicant states that the proposed
addition is designed to provide a seamless appearance in all aspects from the existing garage and its addition.
The Applicant states that the proposed addition would provide additional storage space while not disrupting
the character and architectural integrity of the main house. The Applicant has also applied for a zoning
variation that is scheduled to be reviewed at the November 10, 2025, meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals
meeting, as the proposed addition would not comply with zoning ordinance requirements for setbacks.
Page 5 of 30
Figure 1 – Subject Property – GIS aerial map
Figure 2 – Subject Property – Front (North) façade of house
Page 2
Page 6 of 30
Figure 3 – Subject Property – Front and side (North and East) façades of house
Figure 4 – Subject Property – Side (West) façade of house
Page 3
Page 7 of 30
Figure 5 – Subject Property – Detached garage and accessory shed
Location of
Proposed
Addition
Figure 6 – Subject Property – Proposed garage addition front (west) elevation rendering
Figure 7 – Subject Property – Proposed garage addition site plan
Page 4
Page 8 of 30
COMMISSION REVIEW
Exterior alterations of designated landmarks are subject to an advisory review by the HPC. The criteria to
consider when conducting an advisory review of alterations are as follows:
1. General Standards:
a. Conformance with the Zoning Ordinance;
b. Reasonable effort shall be made to use the building, structure, object or site for its originally
intended purpose or to provide a compatible use which requires minimal alteration,
relocation or demolition;
c. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, object or site should
not be destroyed. The alteration, relocation or demolition of any historic material or
distinctive architectural feature should be avoided except when necessary to assure an
economically viable use of the property;
d. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a
building, structure, object or site should usually be maintained and preserved;
e. Deteriorated architectural features should whenever possible be repaired rather than
replaced. If replacement is necessary, the new material should match as closely as
practicable the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other
visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features, where possible,
should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical or
pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different
architectural elements from other buildings, structures, objects or sites;
f. The surface cleaning of buildings, structures, objects or sites should be undertaken with the
gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods which will damage the
architectural or historic features and building material shall be discouraged.
g. New buildings and structures and the alterations and relocation of existing buildings or
structures shall not be discouraged when such work does not destroy significant historical or
architectural features and is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of
the property or neighborhood.
h. Alterations, relocations and demolitions which do not affect any significant exterior
architectural or historic features of the building, structure, object or site as viewed from a
private street, a courtyard open to the public or a public street, place or way should generally
be permitted;
i. Demolition of a designated landmark shall be discouraged if the building, structure or
property, as the case may be, is economically viable and can yield reasonable return in its
present condition or can be made economically viable and yield reasonable return after
completion of appropriate alteration, relocation, renovation or restoration work.
2. Design Guidelines:
a. Height. The height of any proposed alteration should be compatible with the architectural
style and character of the designated landmark.
b. Proportions of Windows and Doors. The proportions and relationships between doors and
windows should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the designated
landmark.
c. Roof Shape. The design of the roof should be compatible with the architectural style and
character of the designated landmark.
Page 5
Page 9 of 30
d. Scale. The scale of the structure should be compatible with the architectural style and
character of the designated landmark.
e. Directional Expression. The dominant horizontal or vertical expression of the facades should
be compatible with the original architectural style or character of the designated landmark.
f. Architectural Details. Materials, textures, colors and architectural details should be
compatible with the original architectural style or character of the designated landmark.
g. Appurtenances. Appurtenances including, but not limited to, signs, fences, accessory
buildings or structures, permeable and impermeable surfaces should be compatible with the
original architectural style or character of the designated landmark.
h. Other. In addition to the foregoing, the Commission may consider the Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings.
FINDINGS
The HPC shall determine whether the proposed alterations will be appropriate or not appropriate to the
preservation of the Subject Property. Considering the alterations, does the HPC find that the Subject Property
continues to meet the criteria for designation as a locally designated landmark?
If the HPC determines that the proposed alterations are inappropriate, it shall make recommendations to the
Applicant concerning changes, if any, in the proposed alterations which would cause the HPC to reconsider
its determination and shall confer with the Applicant.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Page 6
Page 10 of 30
ATTACHMENT A
Page 11 of 30
Page 12 of 30
From: jletzter aspectdesigninc.com
To: Christopher Marx; Ann Klaassen
Cc: Dean Botes
Subject: 20 Fox Lane / HPC meeting 10-6-25 and Zoning meeting 10-13-25 / ADI AD24227
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2025 6:12:47 PM
Attachments: Copper roof information 9-11-25.pdf
AD24227-CARROLL-09 11 25-REVISED.pdf
s3WKSX_978474_survey_r1.pdf
9-11-25 Signed application for Variation Carroll.pdf
09 11 25 Standards for Granting Variation Carroll.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Christopher & Ann,
Please find additional items requested for the HPC meeting and the zoning meeting.
HPC: Photos off home
Brick & Mortar will be painted Sherwin Williams SW7551 “Greek Villa” warm white. The brick
will match the common brick 2 ¼” x 7 5/8” x 4” bed depth which has a smooth face and lightly
tumbled edges, the mortar is semi flush and can cover some of the brick with semi-raked joints.
Window will be Marvin Brand Ultimate wood window casement style with 1 ¼” simulated true
divided lites, 2 Wide x 3 Tall with 3 ½” wood casing on the sides and head and wood sill painted in the
SW7551 color on a 3 ¼” tall x 5 ¼” deep limestone bull nose sill.
Service door will be a Morgan brand wood door and wood door frame with wood brick mould
and be painted in the SW7551 Color.
Roofing will be copper standing seam roofing 1” tall 20 oz thickness (see attached information).
Zoning & HPC: revised architectural plans
Updated Plat of Survey
Updated Standards for Granting a Zoning Variation
Current signed application form
After your review, please contact us with any additional items required.
Thank you,
Jeff
Jeffrey T. Letzter
President / Sales & Business Development
Aspect Design, Inc.
26575 Commerce Drive Suite 607
Volo, IL 60073
847-875-4372 Direct
847-457-2500 Office
www.aspectdesigninc.com
Page 13 of 30
3
ASP
2508.4428
4
5
ASP
ASP
PLAT OF SURVEY LOT 46
05-29-201-010
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS 7 NE 1502
G RVL
LA
0.5' OFF
6
0.4' OFF
P.O.B.
CP
CP
ASP
230.30' (R) 8
FO
SIRC
X
G RVL
89
91
90
CLF S 89°31'28" E 230.30' (C) 79
88 78 77 174
87
C HLK
C HLK
C HLK 11
C HLK MF TONE
C HLK
MF
WF
9 G RVL
BRK
SIRC L4 68
G RVL
69
G RVL
PILLAR
81
85
G RVL
SIRC
L3
80
S. R/W LINE OF VACATED PORTER AVENUE
70
BRK PILLAR
BRK PILLAR
74 BRK PILLAR
71
SIRC
G RVL
73
72
G RVL
G RVL
G RVL
G RVL
IF 10
0.4' ON (8') W
G RVL
VE L D/ 84
PARCEL 1
GR A
82
83BRK PILLAR
42 BRK PILLAR
67.2' 67.2'
BRK PILLAR
43
49
48 G RVL
50
13
G RVL
G RVL
GRAVEL
G RVL 44
G RVL
TP
81.3' 80.8'
BRK
G RVL
47
51
G RVL
G RVL
PILLAR
76
156
46 45
MF
3.9' ON
TP
(124.75')
52
G RVL G RVL
G RVL
57
58
56
STN
59 61
STN
67
STN
53
STN
60
STN
STN
38
BRK
39 36
37
BRK
3.8' ON
G RVL
66
G RVL
62 63
CONC. ASP/BRK ASP/BRK
STREET
35
54
37.7'
64 75
WF
STN STN 25 34
8.4' W.
G RVL 40 14
33 32
22.0'
ASP/BRK
24.6'
G RVL 41
BX BX MF
ASP/BRK BRK GX
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
65 55
BRICK ASP/BRK
ASP/BRK ASP/BRK
05-29-201-016
G RVL
STONE G RVL
BRICK
14.3' 24.0' 24.0'
15
20 FOX LANE, WINNETKA, ILLINOIS 60093 ASPHALT
29.9'
86 GFF
28.8' 1.1' 10.0' 4.1' 10.0' 29.1' 0.7' GAR.
1.1'
BX
11.8'
2.5'
6
SURVEY NUMBER: 2508.4428 WF 2.5' 22.0' 62 27.
6.7 1
625
62 .7
5.8
6.9'
137
0.7'
31 30 16 17
1.4' ON
12 19 20
18 21
13.2' 5.9'
GX MF
ASP/BRKASP/BRK GX
2 STORY BRICK WALL 12.0'
TP TOPO TOPO
BRICK WALL 8.8' 24
28
29
TOPO
23
22
TOPO
3.5' ON
158
C/S 9.2' BX
27
26
TOPO
136
135 TOPO
9.8'
DATE SIGNED: 09/08/25 FIELD WORK DATE: 9/5/2025
ASP/BRK
62
BRICK IF
47.7'
ASP/BRK
BRK WALL/WF MF
7
9.4'
MF
FRAME MF
WF 625.9
0.6' ON STONE RES. #20
FIRE PIT BRK GRILL
139
SHED
138
3.5' ON
REVISION DATE(S):
STONE
BRK
149 BRK
94
37.9'
4.2' 6.2' 6.2'
97 95
92
BRK
96 STN
28.7'
F IRE PIT F IRE PIT
3.5'
STN
(REV.0 9/8/2025) 8.3' 3 .6 3 .6
F IRE PIT
' ' 3 .6' '
93
3 .6 150
15.0'
S 3°50'47" W 283.42
N 0°11'54" E 249.50' (C)
140 146 147
STN 151
148
12.1' BRICK
BRK
1.5' BRK
BRK
BRK BRK
POINTS OF INTEREST
BRK
141 152
155
STONE 1.5' 144
249.50' (R)
153 145
BRK BRK
BRK
B.R. (ASSUMED)
10.3' 5.6' 10.2' BRK
283.42' (R)
BRK BRK
1. ADJACENT FENCE OVER PROPERTY LINE.
' (C)
5/8" FIR 98
MF
106
MF
109
STN
110
STN
105
104
MF
154
MF
BRK
142 143
179
129 128 112 111 113 114
05-29-202-012
108 107 BRK BRK
5/8FIR
WF WF STN STN STN STN
MF MF
WASHINGTON
161
160
C HLK
C HLK
127 126 124 123
P OOL P OOL P OOL P OOL
125
P OOL
ON LINE 157
TP
05-29-201-002
IF
IN GROUND IF 162
CLF
C HLK
POOL
05-29-201-008
(124.75')
VACATED
118 119 121 122
99
100
103
102
WF WF
P OOL P OOL P OOL P OOL
MF 120
C HLK
MF
C HLK
CONC. TENNIS/
115
P OOL
117
STN
STN
STONE BASKETBALL
COURT
PARCEL 2
116
STN
PARCEL 3 101
IF
C HLK
CLF
163
C HLK
05-29-201-009 1.0' ON 05-29-201-035
(8') AREA= 72,077 SQ. FT. ±
0.7' OFF WF SIRC
0.3' ON
130
131 132
178
5/8" FIR WFWF
7.2' ON
L2
WF
5/8FIR
1.0' ON
L1 164
165
169
WF
C HLK
C HLK
159
LINE TABLE
WF
133
0.9' ON
TP 167
177 134 166 173
176 168
170
172
WF
WF 171
5/8" FIP
5/8FIP WF WF WF
N 89°29'57" W 212.15' (C)
5/8FIP
CLF
WF
C HLK
0.8' ON
WF
LINE BEARING DISTANCE 5/8" FIP 1
C HLK
212.15' (R) 1.6' ON 0.5' ON
SIRC
0.5' OFF
L1 N 0°15'49" W 14.12' (C) 14.16' (R)
05-29-201-013 05-29-201-033 05-29-201-034
L2 N 89°29'15" W 38.00' (R&C)
L3 S 89°29'15" E 38.00' (R&C)
L4 N 0°11'54" E 19.18' (R&C)
GRAPHIC SCALE (In Feet)
1 inch = 40' ft.
SEE PAGE 2 OF 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PAGE 1 OF 2 - NOT VALID WITHOUT ALL PAGES
Page 14 of 30
Page 15 of 30
Page 16 of 30
Page 17 of 30
GENERAL NOTES ENERGY CODE FIREBLOCKING NOTES
GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ST
AT
E OF I L L
I
NO
IS
ADDITION
DEAN
BOTES
STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA LI
001-017326
EC
T
C EN T
DESIGN LOADS I
20 FOX LANE
SE
D AR C H
DATE:
EXPIRATION DATE:
WINNETKA, IL 60093
GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION
SHEET INDEX
20 FOX LANE
WINNETKA, IL. 60093
230.30'
SITE WORK
CONCRETE WORK
METALS
MASONRY
12/04/2024 12/23/2024 08/11/2025 09/09/2025 09/11/2025
DOORS AND WINDOWS
THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION
VACATED WASHINGTON
REVIEW REVIEW FINAL REVISED REVISED
CARPENTRY NOTES
26575 COMMERCE DR.
WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM
SUITE 607
VOLO, IL 60073
IL. LICENSE # 184-004354
STREET
MAIN: 847-457-2500
283.42'
S P E C T D E S I G N I N C.
A R C H I T E C T S
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
212.15' PROJECT #
DRAWN BY:
AD24227
DB / MB
20 FOX LANE
TITLE SHEET & GEN. NOTES
1 SITE PLAN (R-1 ZONING) NORTH
A 01
A 02 © COPYRIGHT MMXXV # 1 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS
Page 18 of 30
A 02 2
STORAGE
ROOM
TYPICAL WALL SECTION
A 02 1
Page 19 of 30
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
© COPYRIGHT MMXXV
REVIEW 12/04/2024
REVIEW 12/23/2024
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT # 26575 COMMERCE DR. FINAL 08/11/2025
SUITE 607
20 FOX LANE
REVISED 09/09/2025
VOLO, IL 60073
MAIN: 847-457-2500 REVISED 09/11/2025
S P E C T D E S I G N I N C. GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION
WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM
A R C H I T E C T S
# 2 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS
A 02 IL. LICENSE # 184-004354 20 FOX LANE
SITE PLAN & WALL SECTION DB / MB AD24227 WINNETKA, IL. 60093
GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION
20 FOX LANE
1 WEST ELEVATION (EXISTING) 2 SOUTH ELEVATION (EXISTING)
WINNETKA, IL. 60093
A 03 A 03
EXISTING 2-CAR
GARAGE
N
4 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN 12/04/2024 12/23/2024 08/11/2025
3 WEST ELEVATION (PROPOSED) 4 SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED) 7 FLOOR PLAN (EXISTING)
A 03 A 03 A 03
REVIEW REVIEW FINAL
26575 COMMERCE DR.
WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM
SUITE 607
VOLO, IL 60073
IL. LICENSE # 184-004354
EXISTING 2-CAR
UNEXCAVATED
GARAGE
MAIN: 847-457-2500
UNEXCAVATED
S P E C T D E S I G N I N C.
A R C H I T E C T S
UNEXCAVATED
STORAGE ROOM
N
N
8 FOUNDATION PLAN (EXISTING) PROJECT # AD24227
10 PROPOSED FOUNDATION PLAN N
DRAWN BY: DB
9 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN A 03 20 FOX LANE
ELEVATIONS & PLANS
5 FOUNDATION PLAN (PROPOSED) 6 FLOOR PLAN (PROPOSED) A 03
# 3 OF 3 TOTAL SHEETS
A 03 A 03
© COPYRIGHT MMXXV
Page 20 of 30
GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION
20 FOX LANE
WINNETKA, IL. 60093
UNEXCAVATED EXISTING 2-CAR
GARAGE
L-? L-?
UNEXCAVATED
L-? L-?
STORAGE ROOM STORAGE ROOM
12/04/2024 12/23/2024 08/11/2025 09/09/2025 09/11/2025
6 FOUNDATION PLAN (PROPOSED) 4 ROOF PLAN (PROPOSED) 2 FLOOR PLAN (PROPOSED)
A 03 A 03 A 03
REVIEW REVIEW FINAL REVISED REVISED
26575 COMMERCE DR.
WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM
SUITE 607
VOLO, IL 60073
IL. LICENSE # 184-004354
MAIN: 847-457-2500
S P E C T D E S I G N I N C.
A R C H I T E C T S
UNEXCAVATED
EXISTING 2-CAR
GARAGE
PROJECT # AD24227
DRAWN BY: DB / MB
20 FOX LANE
FLOOR PLANS
5 FOUNDATION PLAN (EXISTING) 3 ROOF PLAN (EXISTING) 1 FLOOR PLAN (EXISTING) A 03
A 03 A 03 A 03 © COPYRIGHT MMXXV # 3 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS
Page 21 of 30
A 04 3 A 04 4
WEST ELEVATION (PROPOSED) WEST ELEVATION (EXISTING)
Page 22 of 30
A 04 1
A 04 2
SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED)
SOUTH ELEVATION (EXISTING)
© COPYRIGHT MMXXV
REVIEW 12/04/2024
REVIEW 12/23/2024
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT # 26575 COMMERCE DR. FINAL 08/11/2025
20 FOX LANE
SUITE 607 REVISED 09/09/2025
VOLO, IL 60073
MAIN: 847-457-2500 REVISED 09/11/2025
S P E C T D E S I G N I N C. GARAGE STORAGE ROOM ADDITION
WWW. ASPECTDESIGNINC.COM
A R C H I T E C T S
A 04 IL. LICENSE # 184-004354 20 FOX LANE
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
# 4 OF 4 TOTAL SHEETS
DB / MB AD24227 WINNETKA, IL. 60093
Page 23 of 30
Page 24 of 30
Page 25 of 30
Page 26 of 30
Page 27 of 30
Page 28 of 30
Page 29 of 30
Page 30 of 30