Historic Preservation Commission
Regular MeetingWinnetka, IL · December 1, 2025
Minutes
Adopted on January 5, 2025
1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
2 DECEMBER 1, 2025 MEETING MINUTES
3
4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman
5 Chris Enck
6 Beth Ann Papoutsis
7 Joseph Stuart
8 Patti Van Cleave
9 Anna Wisniewski
10
11 Members Absent: Paul Weaver
12
13 Non-Voting Members Absent: Scott Myers
14
15 Junior Commissioner Absent: Louis Zaransky
16
17 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner
18
19 Call to Order & Roll Call:
20 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members
21 present.
22
23 Public Comment:
24 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx confirmed no written public comments were received.
25
26 Approval of Minutes:
27 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to approve the November 3, 2025 meeting minutes. A motion to approve
28 the November 3, 2025 minutes was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded by Mr. Enck. A vote was taken and the
29 motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
30 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski
31 NAYS: None
32
33 Demolition Permit Applications:
34 a. Case No. 25-17-HPC - 43 Indian Hill Road: Review of the demolition permit application submitted for the
35 single-family residence at 43 Indian Hill Road.
36 Mr. Marx identified the applicants who are contract purchasers with the property ownership being a trust. He then
37 identified the property’s location, size and zoning classification with a construction date of approximately 1975 and
38 subsequent alterations which he summarized. He stated the property does not appear on the Illinois Historic
39 Structures Listing. Mr. Marx stated the Historical Society indicated that the property did not have architectural and
40 historical significance and noted a new building construction permit application has been submitted. He then
41 stated no public comments were received and asked if there were any questions.
42
43 Chairman Coladarci asked if the building permit had been filed with the County. Mr. Marx responded if it was, they
44 do not have those records and suggested the Commission take the Historical Society’s review into account as to
45 whether the original permit from the 1970’s is important. Mr. Enck informed the Commission the property is
46 adjacent to a property the Commission reviewed last month. Mr. Marx confirmed there are no other adjacent
47 homes under construction. No additional questions were raised at this time.
48
49 Chairman Coladarci asked for the applicant’s presentation. Milena Birov of Heritage Builders stated they have
50 drawings available for the new construction. Ms. Papoutsis asked what is the style of the new home. Ms. Birov
51 responded it would be a traditional home with a lot of windows. Chairman Coladarci asked what is the condition
52 of the existing home. Mrs. Birov responded the home was unsuccessfully listed on the market and is in need of
53 remodeling. She stated it would be more economical to build a new home as opposed to remodel the home in a
Page 2
1 desirable manner. Ms. Papoutsis asked if the new home would have a deep basement or sport court. Chairman
2 Coladarci asked if the home is in the flood plain. Ms. Birov confirmed it is not. No additional questions were raised
3 at this time.
4
5 Chairman Coladarci called the matter in for discussion and asked the Commission if they felt an HAIS would be
6 appropriate. Ms. Wisniewski asked if this home is one of the newer homes in Indian Hill. Chairman Coladarci
7 provided additional information with regard to the home being part of a group or development. The Commission
8 Members and Mr. Marx discussed to the Sanborn map. Mr. Marx indicated the area may have been incorporated
9 into the Village post war which may be the reason the Village’s records are not as thorough. The Commission
10 Members decided the home did not warrant an HAIS.
11
12 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to grant the demolition permit. A motion to approve the demolition permit
13 for 43 Indian Hill Road as presented was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded by Mr. Enck. A vote was taken and
14 the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
15 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski
16 NAYS: None
17
18 Other Business:
19 a. January 5, 2026 Meeting – Quorum Check.
20 The Commission Members discussed their availability. Mr. Marx advised the Commission Members of the January
21 agenda items.
22
23 b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update.
24 Mr. Marx provided the Commission Members with an update on the plaque status.
25
26 c. Monthly Communications For Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision.
27 Mr. Marx informed the Commission the deadline for the quarterly report is December 18, 2025 and noted there
28 was no information to review for this meeting. He suggested the next blast include information regarding next
29 year’s preservation awards and provided an update on the Village Hall renovation as well as the bench
30 replacement project. Mr. Marx asked the Commission Members for any information they would like to have
31 reviewed at the January meeting for the Commission’s review be sent to him.
32
33 Mr. Enck asked what happened to the trolley tours. Mr. Marx responded they have not been done since Covid and
34 that he can ask if it would be resumed and would provide more information to the Commission. Mr. Enck
35 suggested it be brought back as a positive aspect with regard to the Commission’s duties. The Commission
36 Members discussed past trolley tours and tours done in other communities. Ms. Papoutsis suggested yard signs be
37 used for landmarked properties. Chairman Coladarci agreed that idea should be pursued. Mr. Enck offered to
38 research and provide additional to Mr. Marx prior to the next meeting.
39
40 Adjournment:
41 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Enck and seconded by
42 Ms. Papoutsis. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
43 AYES: Coladarci, Mr. Enck, Stuart, Van Cleave, Wisniewski
44 NAYS: None
45 The meeting adjourned at 7:42 p.m.
46
47 Respectfully submitted,
48
49 Antionette Johnson
50 Recording Secretary
51
Agenda
Village of Winnetka
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
December 1, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Police Department - Classroom
410 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of November 3, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes
4. Demolition Permit Applications
a. Case No. 25-17-HPC - 43 Indian Hill Road: Review of the demolition permit
application submitted for the single-family residence at 43 Indian Hill Road.
5. Other Business
a. January 5, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update
c. Monthly Communications For Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion
and Content Decision
6. Adjournment
NOTICE
Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments
prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or
by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All
agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter.
The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay
Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041).
Packet
Village of Winnetka
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
December 1, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Police Department - Classroom
410 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of November 3, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes
4. Demolition Permit Applications
a. Case No. 25-17-HPC - 43 Indian Hill Road: Review of the demolition permit
application submitted for the single-family residence at 43 Indian Hill Road.
5. Other Business
a. January 5, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update
c. Monthly Communications For Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion
and Content Decision
6. Adjournment
NOTICE
Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments
prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or
by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All
agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter.
The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay
Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041).
Page 1 of 34
1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
2 NOVEMBER 3, 2025 MEETING MINUTES
3
4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman
5 Chris Enck
6 Patti Van Cleave
7 Paul Weaver
8 Anna Wisniewski
9
10 Members Absent: Beth Ann Papoutsis
11 Joseph Stuart
12
13 Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Myers
14
15 Junior Commissioner Present: Louis Zaranski
16
17 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner
18
19 Call to Order & Roll Call:
20 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members
21 present.
22
23 Public Comment:
24 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx also confirmed no public comments were received.
25
26 Approval of Minutes:
27 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the October 6,
28 2025, meeting minutes. A motion to approve the October 6, 2025, minutes was made by Ms. Van Cleave and
29 seconded by Ms. Wisniewski. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
30 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski
31 NAYS: None
32 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski
33
34 Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks:
35 a. Case No. 25-12-HPC - 20 Fox Lane: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 20 Fox Lane, a locally
36 designated landmark.
37 Mr. Marx noted the matter was moved to the November meeting from the October meeting at the applicant’s
38 request and summarized the proposed alterations. He stated the proposed addition, according to the applicant, to
39 the detached garage would result in a seamless appearance with the garage as well as creating additional storage
40 space which would not affect the historical and architectural character of the main home. Mr. Marx also noted a
41 setback variation was requested and would be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their November
42 meeting. He then referred to images of the existing home along with architectural plans for the proposed garage
43 addition. Mr. Marx noted the property obtained the status of a locally designated landmark in 2001 and asked if
44 there were any questions.
45
46 Mr. Enck asked what year the existing garage structure was built. Mr. Marx stated he would check but that
47 information was not immediately apparent. No additional questions were raised at this time.
48
49 Chairman Coladarci asked for the applicant’s presentation. Jeffrey Letzter, the project architect, stated he would
50 provide information with regard to the storage/garage addition to the home which included a variation request
51 due to the existing garage being located within the required side yard setback. He also noted the garage did not
52 run parallel to the home which resulted in a 50% setback variation request. Mr. Letzter identified the storage shed
Page 2 of 34
November 3, 2025 Page 2
1 on the property and confirmed they do not know the exact age of when the garage was built. He stated the garage
2 details are accurate to the current home.
3
4 Mr. Weaver asked when the home was built which has a three car garage. Mr. Letzter responded the home was
5 built in 1924 and there is a two car garage and described the proposed garage extension which would match the
6 existing materials and roof height. He explained their consideration of the copper roof material. Mr. Marx provided
7 the Commission Members with information from the 2001 landmark designation and indicated the garage was
8 built after the landmark designation.
9
10 Mr. Enck referred to page 8 of the west front elevation and asked if the brick would continue straight across or if
11 the addition would have a new setback. Mr. Letzter responded it would be flush and described the installation in
12 detail. No additional questions were raised at this time. Mr. Weaver described the project as great.
13
14 Chairman Coladarci noted there is no public comment and called the matter in for discussion. Mr. Weaver
15 commented on the garage’s status and the attempt by the applicant to match it as originally built. Mr. Enck agreed
16 with Mr. Weaver’s comments and the fact that the garage is not original to the home.
17
18 Chairman Coladarci referred to page 9 and the Exterior Alterations of Designated Landmarks language and criteria
19 the Commission is to consider which he read into the record. He also referred to Part II with regard to design
20 guidelines, window and door proportion, window shape, scale, expression, architectural details and
21 appurtenances. Chairman Coladarci then read the following findings into the record: “The HPC shall determine
22 whether the proposed alterations will be appropriate or not appropriate to the preservation of the subject
23 property. Considering the alterations, does the HPC find that the subject property continues to meet the criteria
24 for designation as a locally designated landmark.” Mr. Marx suggested the Commission make a motion to state
25 that if there are no suggested amendments or revisions, to find that it continued to meet the criteria for a locally
26 designated landmark and the proposed alterations are appropriate to the preservation of the subject property.
27
28 A motion as stated by Mr. Marx was made by Mr. Enck and seconded by Mr. Weaver. A vote was taken and the
29 motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
30 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski
31 NAYS: None
32 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski
33
34 The property owner, Colleen Carrol, provided information regarding the home to the Commission.
35
36 Other Business:
37 a. December 1, 2025 Meeting – Quorum Check.
38 Mr. Marx advised the Commission Members of the single agenda item for the December meeting. The Commission
39 Members discussed their availability.
40
41 b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update.
42 Mr. Marx provided the Commission Members with an update regarding a local plaque fabricator. Ms. Van Cleave
43 also provided information with regard to the fabricator who offered to create a prototype which would cost less
44 than $100. Mr. Marx estimated no more than five or six awards have been presented in a single year with an
45 average of two to three of them being done over the last couple of years. The Commission Members agreed to
46 move forward with the fabricator.
47
48 c. Monthly Communications for Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision.
49 Mr. Marx provided an update with regard to his discussion with the 615 Elm property owners as to whether they
50 would like to have an article included in the publication relating to the landmark nomination. He also referred to
51 Crow Island School. Ms. Van Cleave stated she needed to do more follow-up with the school district’s
52 communication director. Mr. Marx stated he would have to confirm with Josie with regard to the winter edition
53 deadline. The Commission Members discussed the farmer’s market timing. Mr. Marx asked the Commission
Page 3 of 34
November 3, 2025 Page 3
1 Members if they had any items to prepare for the December edition and suggested an inquiry be made with regard
2 to the benches being offered to community members. Mr. Marx and Mr. Weaver stated they would share any
3 information they found. Mr. Zaranski also provided information relating to the individual chairs to be installed.
4
5 Adjournment:
6 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Weaver and seconded by
7 Ms. Van Cleave. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0:
8 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski
9 NAYS: None
10 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaranski
11 The meeting adjourned at 7:41 p.m.
12
13 Respectfully submitted,
14
15 Antionette Johnson
16 Recording Secretary
17
Page 4 of 34
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FROM: CHRISTOPHER, MARX, AICP, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 2025
SUBJECT: 43 INDIAN HILL ROAD - DEMOLITION PERMIT (CASE NO. 25-16-HPC)
INTRODUCTION
Meeting Date December 1, 2025
Commission Action Preliminary historic and architectural review to
determine if a Historic Architectural Impact Study (HAIS)
is necessary or if demolition may proceed without delay.
Property Address 43 Indian Hill Road (See Attachment A – Aerial Map)
Property Owner Wintrust Private Trust Company NA as Trustee of the
Joseph H. Goldberg Trust; The Sheila R. Goldberg Trust
Application Submitted by Leo Birov, representing 43 Indian Hill LLC as the contract
buyer of the property
Mail Notice to Property Owners within 250 Completed
feet
Public Comments as of Date of Memo As of the date of this memo, staff has not received any
written comments from the public for this application.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Size 0.95 acres
Location North side of Indian Hill Road between Locust Road and
Fox Lane
Improvements Single-family residence with attached garage
Zoning R-1 Single Family Residential
Surrounding Zoning R-1 Single Family Residential
PROPERTY HISTORY See Attachment B, Preliminary Property History Study;
Attachment C, Winnetka Historical Society (WHS)
Research
Constructed 1975, according to WHS Research
Additional Construction Activity 1999 - Perform interior remodeling and enclose front
porch, 2013 – Construct three seasons room
Illinois Historic Structure Survey Listing No
Winnetka Historical Society (WHS) WHS research indicates that the property does not have
historic or architectural significance. (See Attachment C -
Historical Society Research)
Page 1
Page 5 of 34
ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
Other Permits for New Primary Structures None
on Same Block (either side of Cherry Street)
Director’s 60-Day Delay - Construction Delay is not necessary to prevent undue congestion and
Activity noise impacts in the neighborhood.
New Construction or Site Restoration Plans Building permit application for a new single-family home
Submitted has been submitted and is under review.
DEMOLITION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The Commission may order the issuance of a demolition delay of a historic or architecturally significant
structure for up to but not exceeding 270 days from the date the Commission determines that an HAIS
submission from the applicant is required for the structure that is applied to be demolished. Should the
HPC request an HAIS for the subject property at the December 1st meeting, and after reviewing the HAIS
at a future meeting, the HPC determines the structure is significant and issues a delay, the Commission
may issue a demolition delay up to but not exceeding 270 days from December 1st, 2025.
COMMISSION REVIEW
The Commission may consider the following motions: (1) Historical Architectural Impact Study Required
or (2) Building and/or Property is Not Historic or Architecturally Significant.
Historical Architectural Impact Study Required
The Commission finds that based upon (1) the preliminary property history study, (2) the Winnetka
Historical Society comments, and (3) other information, comments, or evidence received by the HPC
during its preliminary review that the building and/or property is of sufficient historic or architectural
merit to warrant conducting a Historical Architectural Impact Study (HAIS) prior to issuance of the
demolition permit. The Commission reached its conclusion based upon the property meeting the
following criteria: [The Commission must note which of the following criteria is met]
1. The property or structures have sufficient architectural or historical merit to warrant a full HAIS
prior to issuance of a demolition permit;
2. The property or structures have been designated a landmark pursuant to Chapter 15.64 of the
Village Code; (Subject Property is not a landmark)
3. The property or structures have been included in the most recent Illinois Historic Structure Survey
conducted under the auspices of the Illinois Department of Conservation; and (Subject Property is
not on the state survey)
4. The property or structures have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the Illinois
Register of Historic Places. (Subject Property is not listed on either register)
Building and/or Property Lacks Historic or Architectural Significance
The Commission has determined, in accordance with Section 15.52.040 of the Village Code, that the
building and/or property is not of sufficient historic or architectural merit to warrant a Historic
Architectural Impact Study, and the demolition of the structure may proceed without delay.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: GIS Aerial Map
Attachment B: Preliminary Property History Study
Attachment C: Historical Society Research
Attachment D: Application Materials
Page 6 of 34
ATTACHMENT A
0 100 200
ft
Disclaimer: The GIS Consortium and MGP Inc. are not liable for any use, misuse, modification or disclosure of any map provided under applicable law. This map is for general information purposes only. Although the
information is believed to be generally accurate, errors may exist and the user should independently confirm for accuracy. The map does not constitute a regulatory determination and is not a base for engineering
design. A Registered Land Surveyor should be consulted to determine precise location boundaries on the ground.
Page 7 of 34
ATTACHMENT B
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: WINNETKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
FROM: CHRISTOPHER MARX, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 25-16-HPC: 43 INDIAN HILL ROAD
INTRODUCTION
On December 1, 2025, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is scheduled to consider a request to
demolish the residence at 43 Indian Hill Road. Please return any available information regarding the
architectural and historical significance of the structure to Christopher Marx by the end of the day on
Tuesday, November 25, 2025. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at
cmarx@winnetka.org or (847) 716-3587.
PRELIMINARY PROPERTY HISTORY STUDY/VILLAGE HALL RECORDS
Building Permits
Date Type Owner Architect
2-25-1999 Perform interior remodeling and Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Richard Preves
enclose front porch Goldberg
10-31-2013 Construct three seasons room Joe and Shiela Goldberg Randy Pruyn
addition
Page 8 of 34
Page 9 of 34
Page 10 of 34
Page 11 of 34
Page 12 of 34
Page 13 of 34
Page 14 of 34
ATTACHMENT C
PROPERTY RESEARCH
COVERSHEET
Address: 43 Indian Hill Road
Construction Details:
Original construction date: c. 1975
Construction type: Brick and wood siding
Style: unknown
OWNERSHIP HISTORY:
OWNER/RESIDENT DATES OCCUPIED INFORMATION SIGNIFICANCE
NAME ATTACHED
Joseph and Sheila Goldberg, By 1987 – present Building permit
Joseph and Sheila Goldberg applications, 1987
Trust directory, Cook
County Recorder
records, Chicago
Tribune obituary
ARCHITECTS:
ARCHITECT NAME DATE AND INFORMATION ATTACHED
DESCRIPTION OF
PROJECT
Richard Preves 1999 – perform interior Sovereigndevelopmentgroup.com,
remodeling and enclose Chicagobears.com
front porch
Randy Pruyn 2013 – construct three Pruyn Designs “Bio” webpage
seasons room addition
RESEARCH SOURCES USED: Winnetka Talk, Cook County Assessor records, Cook County
Recorder records, historic phone books, WHS property files, WHS digital files, Ancestry.com,
Chicago Tribune
Findings:
Our research does not indicate that this property maintains architectural or historical
significance. We were not able to determine who the original owners of the property were, or
who the original architect was. In addition, we were not able to determine whether the structure
is representative of a particular notable architectural style. Additionally, we were not able to
determine the original build date.
Page 15 of 34
Date of Research: 11/18/2025
Submitted by:
Meagan McChesney, PhD
Curator, Winnetka Historical Society
Mary Trieschmann, MS Ed
Executive Director, Winnetka Historical Society
Page 16 of 34
Page 17 of 34
Page 18 of 34
Page 19 of 34
Page 20 of 34
Page 21 of 34
Page 22 of 34
1987 directory
Cook County Recorder records
Page 23 of 34
Page 24 of 34
Share this obituary:
Joseph H. Goldberg OBITUARY
Joseph H. Goldberg, age 91, husband of Sheila R. Goldberg; father of Steven, Rick, Brett,
and Judd; grandfather of nine; great grandfather of one. The graveside service and shiva will
be private. The family would appreciate privacy during this time. Joe loved his golf game,
and anything related to his 84 years as a member of Twin Orchard Country Club. He was
also an active member of the Chicago Spring Manufacturers and the Spring Manufacturers
Institute (nationally). Joe was the owner of International Spring Company in Morton Grove
for over 52 years. He started college scholarships for young employees at Twin Orchard
County Club and spring manufacturers children in the United States. He also initiated a
special needs program at Temple Jeremiah. Joe will be in heaven creating a new Twin
Orchard Country Club for all his friends who will eventually arrive. He was a great guy and
will be dearly missed. Info: The Goldman Funeral Group (847) 478-1600.
Published in:
Chicago Tribune
from March 8, 2021 to March 10, 2021
Page 25 of 34
https://www.chicagobears.com/news/lead-architect-discusses-halas-hall-
expansion-project-
9656482#:~:text=Richard%20Preves%2C%20whose%20architectural%20firm,end%20
of%20the%20existing%20building.
Lead architect discusses Halas Hall expansion project
Mar 06, 2013 at 03:24 AM
Larry Mayer
Bears Senior Writer
Richard Preves, whose architectural firm is spearheading a massive expansion and
upgrade of the Bears' Halas Hall headquarters, recently spoke to ChicagoBears.com about
the project.
"For an architect, this a dream project for our firm," said Preves, the president of Richard
Preves and Associates. "We are putting in and designing a lot of new exciting functions that
Halas Hall has not seen before. It's enabled us to work with key members of the staff of the
Bears organization, envisioning and planning this project."
Richard Preves
The expansion, which is being done in conjunction with Mortenson Construction, will
enhance the Bears' football and business operations while providing new opportunities and
experiences for fans visiting the facility.
The weight room and training room will be expanded from 7,000 to 8,500 square feet and
feature new lighting. The locker room will be upgraded with additional and reconfigured
lockers and new carpeting. Existing and newly created meeting rooms will feature
enhanced technology.
A new event center will be built off the south end of the existing building. The state-of-the-
art addition will include a 4,000-square foot broadcast studio and conference center that
can host as many as 150 people for both events and original programming.
The two-level entryway to the event center will feature interactive digital displays, video
monitors and memorabilia, including some never before featured pieces of Bears history
Page 26 of 34
such as the 1963 NFL championship trophy. A new press conference room and a relocated
media courtyard will also be a part of the facility along with increased work space for media
members.
"From an architectural standpoint, the best addition doesn't look like an addition," Preves
said. "When working on an iconic building like Halas Hall, we want to try to preserve the
original character of the building and seamlessly transition into the additions so that when
the project is complete, you're seeing a totality of a uniform-looking building."
The Bears will also be adding a practice viewing suite on the second level of Halas Hall. The
40-person suite will overlook the team's practice fields and feature many of the amenities
of game suites at Soldier Field.
A new kitchen and dining facility, including an outdoor patio, will be built with the ability to
hold up to 100 people. Additional conference room and staff offices will be added
throughout Halas Hall, which originally opened in March of 1997.
The Bears headquarters will also see a new entry into the main lobby and 105 additional
parking spaces. The architectural style will be consistent with that of the original building. A
main focal point will be the entry point to the main lobby, featuring the classic Bears "C" on
an impressive portico. The practice fields and the Walter Payton Center will not be
impacted.
The project, which will increase the current 100,000-square foot facility in excess of 30,000
square feet, is scheduled to be completed Aug. 1, before the Bears return from training
camp.
"The Bears stated from the very beginning they want this to be the finest facility in the NFL,"
Preves said, "and that's been our guiding goal through the whole process."
Page 27 of 34
http://sovereigndevelopmentgroup.com/currentprojects.html
Richard Preves & Associates
Architects and Land Planning
Richard Preves & Associates, established in 1980, is a full service professional organization
consisting of Architects and Designers based in Libertyville, IL. The company was founded
on the principle of providing innovative design and exceptional service to their
clients. Their group of designers is knowledgeable and proficient in all facets of
architectural services and has the planning and design expertise necessary to fulfill the
Palwaukee Municipal Airport Southeast Quadrant Redevelopment’s requirements. Their
history of proven expertise has been achieved by establishing rigid professional standards
and by closely monitoring the progress of each project. They are currently engaged in
various projects with total construction costs in excess of $25 million. They have also
prepared documents for over 5,000,000 square feet of interior building development. Their
experience encompasses programming through preparation of construction documents
and client occupancy.
Page 28 of 34
https://pruyndesigns.com/bio/
Randy B. Pruyn, NCARB, ALA
Architecture & Planning in the Greater Chicago Area
Phone: (630) 212-4408
BIO:
Randy graduated with honors from Kent State University School of Architecture in 1987,
earning his Bachelor of Architecture. While at Kent State, Randy participated in the School
of Architecture’s Florence, Italy Design Program in the Spring of 1985, under the tutelage of
Adolfo Natalini and Cristiano Toraldo di Francia founders of the world renown Superstudio.
From 1987-1992 Randy worked for the award-winning restaurant design firm Aumiller
Youngquist, P.C. (AY). His design for the Boudin Bakery Cafe at Woodfield Mall,
Schaumburg, Illinois was published in Food Retail Design & Display 2 by Martin Pegler. His
collaboration with Bill Aumiller on LaPaloma, a Mediterranean tapas restaurant in
Louisville, Kentucky, was cited by Esquire Magazine as one of their 25 Best New
Restaurants of 1991. Other major works with AY include the renovation of the historic
Ghirardelli Chocolate Manufactory and Gift Shop at Ghiradelli Square in San Francisco and
the prototype building design for the Max & Erma’s chain of restaurants.
In 1992, Randy left AY to design and oversee the construction of his first major commission
the Mid-America Reformed Seminary in Dyer, Indiana; an 18,000 square foot religious
school with a library, classrooms, and administrative offices. Randy continued to work with
his seminary engineering collaborator, R.W. Cooper & Associates, Inc., on several large-
scale manufacturing facilities, before forming the architectural design firm Cooper/Pruyn
Architecture, Ltd. which allowed Randy to get back into the restaurant design arena.
In 1997, Randy decided to go into solo practice, where he has continued to specialize in
restaurant and hospitality design. In his 30 years of architectural experience, Randy is also
well versed in retail, office, healthcare, and residential design and construction.
Credentials
Page 29 of 34
NCARB Certified (National Council of Architectural Registration Boards) Member
Association of Licensed Architect
Currently Licensed in the States of: Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, Missouri, Florida,
Michigan, and Ohio
Page 30 of 34
Page 31 of 34
ATTACHMENT D
Page 32 of 34
Page 33 of 34
Page 34 of 34