Village Council

Village of Winnetka Village Council Regular Meeting June 2, 2026 at 7:00 PM Village Hall 510 Green Bay Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Quorum a. June 9, 2026 Special Meeting b. June 16, 2026 Regular Meeting c. July 7, 2026 Regular Meeting 4. Presentations a. National Charity League Winnetka Community Beautification Project — Mural Preliminary Design (Council Direction) 5. Public Comments 6. Reports 7. Establishment of Consent Agenda 8. Approval of Consent Agenda a. Approval of Village Council Minutes i. May 5, 2026 Regular Meeting b. Approval of Warrant List Dated May 15, 2026 - May 28, 2026 c. Resolution No. R-47-2026: Approving a Contract with Maple Cable Construction Inc. for Directional Boring Services (Adoption) d. Resolution No. R-49-2026 Approving a Contract with Garland/DBS, Inc. for Yards Roof Replacement Project (Adoption) 9. Ordinances and Resolutions a. Ordinance No. MC-01-2026: Amending Section 8.16.140 of the Village Code Regarding the Location of Garbage and Refuse Receptacles (Introduction/Adoption) b. Ordinance No. M-09-2026: Granting a Variation from the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance to Allow the Construction of an Expanded Driveway Within the R-5 Single Family Residential District (1412 Scott Avenue) (Introduction/Adoption) NOTICE Village Council meetings are video recorded. All agenda materials are available at villageofwinnetka.org (Governance > Agendas & Minutes); the Reference Desk at the Winnetka Library; or in the Manager’s Office at Village Hall (2nd floor). The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that all persons with disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities, contact the Village ADA Coordinator, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, 847-716- 3543; T.D.D. 847-501-6041. Page 1 of 371  c. Ordinance No. M-10-2026: Granting an Amendment to a Special Use Permit to Allow a Childcare Center in the Winnetka Congregational Church in the R-2 Single Family Residential District (725 Pine) (Introduction/Adoption) 10. Old Business a. Village Hall Improvement Overview Presentation 11. New Business 12. Appointments 13. Closed Session 14. Adjournment Village of Winnetka Page 2 of 371 Village Council - June 2, 2026  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: National Charity League Winnetka Community Beautification Project — Mural Preliminary Design (Council Direction) PRESENTER: Hannah Lipman AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: No ITEM TYPE: Presentation ITEM HISTORY: January 20, 2026 - The National Charity League Winnetka presented a concept for a community beautification project for painting a mural on an overpass along the Green Bay Trail. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: National Charity League (NCL) Winnetka is a group of 215 mothers and daughters in grades 7th through 12th residing in the Village of Winnetka who have come together in a commitment to community service, leadership development and cultural experiences. The nearly 2-year-old chapter fosters the mother-daughter relationship by serving the Winnetka community, working with 25 philanthropy partners, ranging from local partners such as Friends of the Green Bay Trail, Winnetka Park District and New Trier Food Pantry, Chicagoland partners such as The Grace Network, Meals on Wheels, and Cradles to Crayons and national partners such as the Alzheimer's Association and the American Red Cross. During our 2024-2025 year, the chapter served the community for over 3,400 hours working with these philanthropy partners. NCL Winnetka is seeking an opportunity to partner with the Village of Winnetka on a community beautification project. Through their work with Friends of the Green Bay Trail, they believe that a mural project at an overpass along the trail presents a perfect opportunity to bring art to Winnetka. The NCL chapter will fund and paint the mural with the guidance of an artist. This project requires approval from Union Pacific, and approval of the Design Review Board and the Village Council. At the January 20, 2026 Village Council meeting, the Village Council provided direction to the NCL to proceed with the next steps in the mural concept, with the understanding that the final mural design would be presented to Council for initial feedback, submitted to the Design Review Board, and return to the Council for approval before the application for final approval is submitted to Union Pacific. Several of the student members will present the mural design concept to the Village Council and request that the Council provide feedback. The mural design concept will be considered by the Design Page 3 of 371 Review Board at a special meeting on June 4, 2026. Council will consider approval of the final mural design at its June 15, 2026 meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Council is asked to provide feedback about the National Charity League Winnetka community beautification project mural design. ATTACHMENTS: 1. NCL Winnetka Mural Presentation Page 4 of 371  June 2, 2026 NCL Winnetka Presents A Mural for Our Village Page 5 of 371  Mural Development Process Artist Input Design Rough Pencil Rough Color Selection Meeting Sketch RFP sent to 4 artists Determined Shayne provided 2 Combined elements 3 provided proposals expectations of detail design options of both designs Village Committee and design with Village Committee based on feedback selected Shayne Village Committee provided feedback Village Committee Taylor and Shayne and selected design approved color Agreed to Oak St Feedback session design location with NCL Winnetka FGBT provided NCL Winnetka voted native speciese list on design options Village Committee: Bob Dearborn - Winnetka Village President, Kirk Albinson - Winnetka Village Trustee, Maggie Meiners - local artist and former Design Review Board member, Katie Moor - Winnekta Design Review Board Chair, Steve Huels - Friends of the Green Bay Trail, Kristin Kazenas - Village Manager, Ann Klaassen - Village, Deirdre Campbell - NCL Winnetka President Page 6 of 371 Final Mural Design - East Wall Page 7 of 371 Final Mural Design - West Wall Page 8 of 371 Next Steps Approval Union Pacific Site Paint Submission Preparation Village Council Submit required Following Union Fall 2026 feedback on mural package to Union Pacific approval, NCL Winnetka design June 2, 2026 Pacific on June 16, professional Chapter to assist Design Review Board 2026 powerwashing Shayne Taylor in approval of mural Included letter of Primer applied painting mural design June 4, 2026 support from Village MuralGuard applied Village Council of Winnetka Ribbon cutting event approval of mural June 15, 2026 Fundraising continues until $45,000 goal is achieved Page 9 of 371 Volunteer Process Example of volunteer group painting process and finished product Page 10 of 371 Final product vs rendering Example of final product vs rendering to demonstrate the color accuracy Page 11 of 371 MuralGuard Outstanding Protection of Painted Murals and other Public Art projects Warranted to sustain repeated graffiti removals to 15 years Easy to Clean Graffiti Over 160 graffiti cleaning cycles without damage to this tough, 2 part coating Easiest graffiti removal is wiping with acetone solvent and no water rinse required UV Resistant Will Not Yellow Page 12 of 371 Thank You Page 13 of 371 Donate Give online: Scan the QR code to donate online. When prompted, write “Mural Project” in the Notes field to direct your gift to this project. Give through a Donor Advised Fund: Select National Charity League Winnetka IL Chapter (EIN 99-1371447) and include attention to “Mural Project.” Give by check: Checks may be made payable to National Charity League Winnetka IL and sent to 1001 Green Bay Rd # 189, Winnetka IL 60093- 1721, United States. Include “Mural Project” in the memo. 100% of your donation is tax-deductible and will support the Mural Project. For questions, please contact Deirdre Campbell at deirdrecampbell@gmail.com. Page 14 of 371  MINUTES WINNETKA VILLAGE COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING May 5, 2026 (Approved: xx) A record of a legally convened meeting of the Council of the Village of Winnetka, which was held at Council Chambers on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, at 7:00 PM. 1) Call to Order. President Dearborn called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Village Manager Kristin Kazenas called the roll. Present: Trustees Kirk Albinson, Rob Apatoff, Tina Dalman, Kim Handler, Scott Myers and Bridget Orsic. Absent: None. Also present: Deputy Village Manager Hannah Lipman, Deputy Village Clerk Berina Gradjan, Village Attorney Peter Friedman, Community Development Director Scott Mangum, and approximately 4 people in the audience. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. President Dearborn led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Village Clerk’s Report: Election Results Village Manager Kristin Kazenas reported the results of the March 17, 2026 Primary Election: Robert Apatoff, Kristina Dalman, and Kimberly Handler, were elected Village Trustees. 4) Village Clerk to Administer Oath of Office to Trustee Robert Apatoff, Trustee Kristina Dalman, and Trustee Kimberly Handler Village Manager Kazenas administered the Oath of Office to the newly elected Village officials. 5) Quorum. a) May 12, 2026 Special Study Session All of the Council members present said they expect to attend with the exception of Trustee Apatoff due to work obligations. b) May 19, 2026 Regular Meeting All of the Council members present said they expect to attend. c) June 2, 2026 Regular Meeting All of the Council members present said they expect to attend with the exception of President Dearborn. 6) Presentation a) Presentation by New Trier Township Supervisor Gail Eisenberg New Trier Township Supervisor Gail Eisebnberg addresses Council regarding the implementation of a new strategic plan, community services provided, various initiatives, policy updates, and fiscal transparency. 7) Public Comment: None. 8) Reports: a) Trustees. i. Trustee Myers advises Council regarding Signup Genius, a platform for Council to sign up for the Farmers’ Market in an effort to engage with the community. Page 15 of 371 Village Council Regular Meeting May 5, 2026 b) Village Attorney. No report. c) Village Manager. No report. d) Village President. i. President Dearborn attended the Cook County Forest Preserve environmental presentation, Northshore Counsel Mayors meetings, Chase Bank ribbon cutting event, and the spring town hall caucus meeting. Additionally, President Dearborn noted that an anonymous email was recently received criticizing the Village, leadership of the Council, and staff. President Dearborn refuted the contents of the email and assures members of the public that the Village Council works diligently and is committed to enhancing the Village through continued growth and success. 9) Establishment of the Consent Agenda Trustee Dalman, seconded by Trustee Handler, moved to approve the Establishment of the Consent Agenda. By voice vote, the motion carried. 10) Approval of the Consent Agenda a) Approval of Village Council Minutes i. April 7, 2026 Regular Meeting ii. April 14, 2026 Special Study Session b) Approval of Warrant List Dated April 17, 2026 – April 30, 2026 in the amount of $1,430,526.10. c) Ordinance No. M-06-2026: Waive Introduction and Adopt a Final Plat of Subdivision and Granting Variations from the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance (829 and 833 Foxdale Avenue) (Introduction/Adoption) d) Resolution No. R-42-2026: Approving Reimbursement to the Village of Kenilworth for Green Bay Road Streetscape Design Services for Phase I Engineering Study (Adoption) e) Resolution No. R-48-2026: Approving a License Agreement with Level 3 Communications, LLC for Installation of Fiber Optic Cable in Village Rights of Way (Adoption) Trustee Apatoff seconded by Trustee Orsic, moved to approve the foregoing items on the Consent Agenda by omnibus vote. By roll call vote, the motion carried. Ayes: Trustees Albinson, Apatoff, Dalman, Handler, Myers and Orsic. Nays: None. Absent: None. 11) Ordinances and Resolutions. a. Ordinance No. M-07-2026: Granting a Special Use Permit for the Operation of an Audiology Medical Office Within the C-2 Commercial Overlay District of the Village (730 Elm Street, Suite 120) (Introduction/Adoption) At the April 21st Council meeting, Council provided direction requesting that an ordinance approving the special use permit be prepared for an audiology clinic relocating from their existing Northfield location. Trustee Orsic, seconded by Trustee Dalman, moved to waive introduction of Ordinance Page 16 of 371 Village Council Regular Meeting May 5, 2026 No. M-07-2026. Trustee Albinson, seconded by Trustee Dalman, moved to adopt Ordinance No. M-07- 2026. By roll call vote, the motion carried. Ayes: Trustees Albinson, Apatoff, Dalman, Handler, Myers, and Orsic. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: None. b. Resolution No. R-46-2026: A Resolution of the Village of Winnetka in Support of the Illinois America250 Commemoration (Adoption) Deputy Village Manager Hannah Lipman advises Council that in partnership with the Park District, New Trier Township, Winnetka Northfield Public Library, Historical Society, New Trier District 36 and the Chamber of Commerce, community events have been planned throughout the summer that are America250 themed encouraging civic engagement. Additionally, Council is advised that on July 3rd, the Village will host the opening of the time capsule, however, details will be provided in the near future. Council welcomed the Village’s new Economic Development Manager, Lauren Parisi, who shared an overview of her experience and conveyed her enthusiasm for serving the community in her new role. Trustee Albinson, seconded by Trustee Myers, moved to adopt Resolution No. R-46-2026. By roll call vote, the motion carried. Ayes: Trustees Albinson, Apatoff, Dalman, Handler, Myers, and Orsic. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: None. 12) New Business. None. 13) Old Business. None. 14) Appointments: a) Approval of Council Organizational Assignments for 2026 – 2027. President Dearborn announces the Council Organizational Assignments for 2026 – 2027. Assignment 2026-2027 President Pro Tem Rob Apatoff Council Committees Warrants Scott Myers Chamber of Commerce Tina Dalman Committees by Code EFSC Kim Handler PC Bridget Orsic SWANCC (1) Bob Dearborn/Designee SWANCC (2) Kristin Kazenas/Designee Page 17 of 371 Village Council Regular Meeting May 5, 2026 Other Committees/Assignments NWMC (1) Bob Dearborn NWMC (2) Kristin Kazenas RED Center Scott Myers Stormwater Liaisons Bob Dearborn/Kristin Kazenas Hubbard Woods Liaisons Tina Dalman/Rob Apatoff HPC Liaison Scott Myers Post Office Liaisons Bob Dearborn/Kirk Albinson WPD Lakefront Liaisons Rob Apatoff/Bridget Orsic Community Outreach Liaison Scott Myers 15) Closed Session for the Purpose of Discussing Acquisition of Property Pursuant to 2(c)(5) of the Open Meetings Act. Trustee Orsic, seconded by Trustee Myers, moved to adjourn to Closed Session for the purpose of discussing acquisition of property pursuant to 2(c)(5) of the Open Meetings Act and to adjourn the Open Meeting automatically and immediately upon the conclusion of the Closed Session without the conduct of any further business or comments. By roll call vote, the motion carried. Ayes: Trustees Albinson, Apatoff, Dalman, Handler, Myers and Orsic. Nays: None. Absent: None. The Council adjourned into Closed Session at 7:40 p.m. 16) Adjournment. The Closed Session meeting ended at 8:26 p.m. _____________________________ Recording Secretary Page 18 of 371  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: Approval of Warrant List Dated May 15, 2026 - May 28, 2026 PRESENTER: Kristin Kazenas AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: Yes ITEM TYPE: Consent Agenda ITEM HISTORY: None. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Warrant List Dated May 15, 2026 - May 28, 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Consider Approving the Warrant List Dated May 15, 2026 - May 28, 2026 ATTACHMENTS: None Page 19 of 371  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: Resolution No. R-47-2026: Approving a Contract with Maple Cable Construction Inc. for Directional Boring Services (Adoption) PRESENTER: Nicholas Narhi AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: Yes ITEM TYPE: Consent Agenda ITEM HISTORY: Existing directional boring contract (Resolution No. R-51-2023) with Maple Cable Construction, Inc. expired on May 31, 2026. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Water & Electric Department issued Request for Bid No. 026-008 for directional boring services which includes the installation of conduit and equipment pads for electrical distribution system. Similar to prior contracts, the bid was structured with fixed prices for various units of work. The bid evaluation is based on estimated quantities of work for a one year period. The estimated quantities in the bid evaluation are an average of the last three years. The actual scope of work to be performed by the contractor is on an as-needed basis. As such, it is anticipated that the estimated quantities and actual quantities used will vary over the course of the year. Contractors were asked to provide fixed prices for units of work performed during the next three years; Year 1 (June 1, 2026 - May 31, 2027), Year 2 (June 1, 2027 - May 31, 2028) and Year 3 (June 1, 2028 - May 31, 2029). Acceptance of Year 2 and Year 3 pricing is at the Village's sole discretion. Bid notices were sent to fourteen firms and posted to the on-line bidding service Demand Star. Bids were opened on April 30, 2026, with three vendors submitting bids. The bid evaluation is shown below. Individual bids for the unit pricing have been included as Exhibit #1. Page 20 of 371  RFB #026-008 DIRECTIONAL BORING CONTRACT Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Maple Construction Inc. $969,00.23 $1,027,350.33 $1,131,300.43 $3,127,651.00 Archon Construciton $1,022,891.41 $1,074,754.92 $1,128,672.20 $3,226,318.53 Siebert & Sons LLC $1,610,374.10 $2,317,267.81 $3,623,320.07 $7,550,961.98 For a single-year contract award, Archon Construction had the lowest bid evaluation. If the bid evaluation is based on utilizing the same contractor over multiple years, the lowest responsible bidder over a three-year period is Maple Cable Construction, Inc. (doing business as Maple Construction, Inc.) with a bid evaluation of $3,127,651.00 for the life of the contract. The Village has experience with both contractors. Archon Construction has been awarded the contract in past years (pre-2011). Maple Construction is the incumbent contractor for directional boring work. The management and operating staff of Maple Construction (previously B-Max) have performed directional boring work for the electric utility since 2011. Staff is recommending an award to Maple Construction based on the multi-year evaluation, the contractor's satisfactory performance of prior directional boring work and the continuity of the work. Resolution No. R-47-2026, prepared by the Village Attorney, authorizes the Village President and Village Clerk to execute and attest, a contract with Maple Cable Construction, Inc. The 2026 Electric Fund Budget contains $1,288,585 for directional boring services. Of this funding, $272,000 (account #500.42.31-660) is allocated for system reinforcement and $1,015,709 (account 500.42.37-660) is allocated for new business projects initiated by customer requests. The Village Council has previously authorized $645,000 for directional boring work performed during the period from January 1 through May 31, 2026 (Reference Resolution No. R-75-2025; Approving Change Order No. 4 To The Contract With Maple Cable Construction Inc. For Electric Distribution System Work). Through the end of May 2026, staff will have expended $240,538.30 of the authorized funding. With the Council's consideration of a new contract award to Maple Cable Construction Inc. for work to be performed from June 1, 2026, through May 31, 2027, staff is requesting a funding authorization in the amount of $1,048,046 for the remainder of 2026 and $618,918 for the period of Jan 1, 2027 through May 31, 2027, for a total spend request of $1,666,964. The 2027 funding will be included in the FY2027 Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Consider adoption of Resolution No. R-47-2026, approving a contract with Maple Cable Construction Company, Inc. for directional boring work. Page 21 of 371 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment 1 - Resolution No. R-47-2026: Approving a Contract with Maple Cable Construction, Inc. for Directional Boring Services 2. Attachment 2 - Village of Winnetka Request for Contract Proposals and Contract RFB #026-008 3. Attachment 3 - RFB-026-008 - Directional Boring Page 22 of 371  ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. R-47-2026 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH MAPLE CABLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR DIRECTIONAL BORING SERVICES WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the Village of Winnetka (“Village”) to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2026, the Village issued Bid #026-008 (“Request for Bids”) for directional boring services, which includes the installation of conduit and equipment pads for the Village’s electrical distribution system (“Services”); and WHEREAS, the Village received three bids (“Bids”) to provide the Services; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 4.12 of the Village Code and the Village’s purchasing manual, the Village Council has determined that Maple Cable Construction, Inc., d/b/a Maple Construction, Inc. (“Contractor”), is the lowest responsible bidder to provide the Services; and WHEREAS, the Village Council desires to enter into a contract with Contractor for the provision of the Services from Contractor in an amount not to exceed $1,666,964 (“Contract”); and WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the Village and its residents to enter into the Contract with Contractor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the Village of Winnetka, Cook County, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The Village Council hereby adopts the foregoing recitals as its findings, as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT. The Village Council hereby approves the Contract in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A, and in a final form approved by the Village Attorney. SECTION 3: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE CONTRACT. The Village Council hereby authorizes and directs the Village President and the Village Clerk to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the Village, the final Contract after receipt by the Village Manager of two executed copies of the final Contract from Contractor; provided, however, that if the Village Manager does not receive two executed copies of the final Contract from Contractor within 60 days after the date of adoption of this Resolution, then this authority to execute and seal the final Contract will, at the option of the Village Council, be null and void. SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. June 2, 2026 R-47-2026 Page 23 of 371  ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 2026, pursuant to the following roll call vote: AYES: ____________________________________________________________ NAYS: ____________________________________________________________ ABSENT: ____________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: ____________________________________________________________ Signed ____________________________________ Village President Countersigned: _______________________________________ Village Clerk June 2, 2026 R-47-2026 Page 24 of 371  ATTACHMENT 2 Page 25 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 26 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 27 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 28 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 29 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 30 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 31 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 32 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 33 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 34 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 35 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 36 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 37 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 38 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 39 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 40 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 41 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 42 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 43 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 44 of 371  EXHIBIT A Page 45 of 371  ATTACHMENT 3 RFB-026-008 - Directional Boring UNIT UNIT UNIT Total Vendor PRICE A PRICE B PRICE C MAPLE $ 969,000.23 $ 1,027,350.33 $ 1,131,300.43 $ 3,127,651.00 ARCHON CONST. $ 1,022,891.41 $ 1,074,754.92 $ 1,128,672.20 $ 3,226,318.53 SIEBERT & SON $ 1,610,374.10 $ 2,317,267.81 $ 3,623,320.07 $ 7,550,961.98 Page 46 of 371  EXHIBIT 1 Maple Cable Construction YEAR 1 - UNIT PRICES Co Archon Siebert & Sons 3 YEAR UNIT WORK PROCESS Ext Price A UNIT PRICE "A" Ext Price A UNIT PRICE "A" Ext Price A AVERAGE PRICE "A" Start or End Pit: For 2” conduit 140 $ 475.00 $ 54,466.67 $ 960.00 $ 110,080.00 $ 300.00 $ 34,400.00 Start or End Pit: For 4” conduit 112 $ 500.00 $ 54,000.00 $ 980.00 $ 105,840.00 $ 300.00 $ 32,400.00 Start or End Pit: For 5” conduit 0 $ 525.00 $ 700.00 $ 100.00 $ 133.33 $ 400.00 $ 533.33 Start or End Pit: For 6” conduit 0 $ 575.00 $ - $ 1,018.00 $ - $ 500.00 $ - Test Holes In: Concrete 1 $ 525.00 $ 175.00 $ 2,125.00 $ 708.33 $ 450.00 $ 150.00 Test Holes In: Asphalt 10 $ 525.00 $ 1,925.00 $ 2,075.00 $ 7,608.33 $ 400.00 $ 1,466.67 Test Holes In: Parkway 226 $ 310.00 $ 61,690.00 $ 495.00 $ 98,505.00 $ 350.00 $ 69,650.00 Excavation for: Xfmr Pad 5’X5’X20” 1 $ 220.00 $ - $ 3,170.00 $ - $ 300.00 $ - Excavation for: Xfmr Pad 8’X8’X20” 0 $ 250.00 $ - $ 6,305.00 $ - $ 450.00 $ - Excavation for and Installation of: Xfmr Pad 4 $ 1,200.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 5,280.00 $ 21,120.00 $ 550.00 $ 2,200.00 5’X5’X20” Excavation for and Installation of: Xfmr Pad 2 $ 1,250.00 $ 3,750.00 $ 10,508.00 $ 31,524.00 $ 650.00 $ 1,950.00 8’X8’X20” Excavation for: Splice Box 28”X40”X30” 0 $ 220.00 $ - $ 1,270.00 $ - $ 650.00 $ - Excavation for: Splice Box 40”X50”X22” 1 $ 230.00 $ - $ 1,685.00 $ - $ 850.00 $ - Excavation for and Installation of: Splice Box 12 $ 550.00 $ 6,050.00 $ 3,167.00 $ 34,837.00 $ 950.00 $ 10,450.00 28”X40”X30” Excavation for and Installation of: Splice Box 6 $ 650.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 4,213.00 $ 16,852.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 5,000.00 40”X50”X22” Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 1 ¼” 9362 $ 10.00 $ 89,873.33 $ 0.78 $ 7,010.12 $ 25.50 $ 229,177.00 (Orange) w/ pull line Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 2” 5879 $ 20.00 $ 68,226.67 $ 1.37 $ 4,673.53 $ 35.50 $ 121,102.33 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 4” 6572 $ 35.00 $ 229,005.00 $ 4.38 $ 28,658.34 $ 45.50 $ 297,706.50 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 5” 0 $ 34.00 $ 2,380.00 $ 8.48 $ 593.60 $ 45.50 $ 3,185.00 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 6” 0 $ 42.00 $ - $ 11.96 $ - $ 55.50 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 3” 0 $ 12.00 $ - $ 19.79 $ - $ 45.00 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 4” 1644 $ 15.00 $ 49,100.00 $ 24.11 $ 78,920.07 $ 45.00 $ 147,300.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 6” 4157 $ 17.50 $ 61,710.83 $ 27.71 $ 97,714.70 $ 55.00 $ 193,948.33 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 8” 4036 $ 19.00 $ 24,149.00 $ 31.87 $ 40,506.77 $ 65.00 $ 82,615.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 10” 1135 $ 28.00 $ 30,501.33 $ 36.70 $ 39,978.53 $ 65.00 $ 70,806.67 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 12” 204 $ 30.00 $ 25,480.00 $ 42.22 $ 35,858.85 $ 85.00 $ 72,193.33 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 14” 116 $ 36.00 $ - $ 48.57 $ - $ 105.00 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 18” 93 $ 52.00 $ - $ 55.88 $ - $ 145.00 $ - Tie into Existing Manhole First Conduit 14 $ 1,900.00 $ 24,066.67 $ 4,212.00 $ 53,352.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 15,833.33 Tie into Existing Manhole Additional 14 $ 600.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 457.00 $ 4,417.67 $ 1,100.00 $ 10,633.33 Conduits Tie into Existing Splice Box First Conduit 26 $ 475.00 $ 11,400.00 $ 1,584.00 $ 38,016.00 $ 500.00 $ 12,000.00 Tie into Existing Splice Box Additional 0 $ 60.00 $ 20.00 $ 224.00 $ 74.67 $ 400.00 $ 133.33 Conduits E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 26 $ 16.00 $ 362.67 $ 7.23 $ 163.88 $ 7.50 $ 170.00 (Material and Labor): 1 1/4" E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 17 $ 20.00 $ 300.00 $ 13.47 $ 202.05 $ 11.00 $ 165.00 (Material and Labor): 2” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 64 $ 36.00 $ 2,244.00 $ 29.08 $ 1,812.65 $ 30.00 $ 1,870.00 (Material and Labor): 4” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 0 $ 38.00 $ 63.33 $ 52.49 $ 87.48 $ 45.00 $ 75.00 (Material and Labor): 5” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 0 $ 42.00 $ 28.00 $ 68.09 $ 45.39 $ 65.00 $ 43.33 (Material and Labor): 6” Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 2” 0 $ 275.00 $ - $ 546.22 $ - $ 16.00 $ - Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 4” 0 $ 325.00 $ 108.33 $ 841.23 $ 280.41 $ 40.00 $ 13.33 Page 47 of 371 Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 5” 0 $ 375.00 $ - $ 1,154.97 $ - $ 75.00 $ - Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 6” 0 $ 425.00 $ - $ 1,704.04 $ - $ 95.00 $ - 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 4 $ 65.00 $ 260.00 $ 170.26 $ 681.04 $ 129.00 $ 516.00 Steel) 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 3 $ 28.00 $ 37.33 $ 45.53 $ 60.71 $ 25.00 $ 33.33 PVC) 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 6 $ 30.00 $ 160.00 $ 395.85 $ 2,111.20 $ 50.00 $ 266.67 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 75.00 $ - $ 208.66 $ - $ 155.00 $ - Steel) 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 1 $ 35.00 $ 105.00 $ 51.32 $ 153.96 $ 23.00 $ 69.00 PVC) 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 2 $ 55.00 $ 128.33 $ 395.85 $ 923.65 $ 60.00 $ 140.00 2” 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 5 $ 170.00 $ 736.67 $ 148.09 $ 641.72 $ 135.00 $ 585.00 Only) 2” 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 5 $ 55.00 $ 220.00 $ 395.85 $ 1,583.40 $ 24.00 $ 96.00 Only) 2” 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 1 $ 45.00 $ 90.00 $ 16.64 $ 33.28 $ 15.00 $ 30.00 Only) 2” 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 1 $ 45.00 $ 75.00 $ 263.90 $ 439.83 $ 13.00 $ 21.67 Only) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 5 $ 190.00 $ 1,583.33 $ 527.37 $ 4,394.75 $ 340.00 $ 2,833.33 Steel) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 28 $ 60.00 $ 1,720.00 $ 57.08 $ 1,636.29 $ 70.00 $ 2,006.67 PVC) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 34 $ 55.00 $ 2,053.33 $ 395.85 $ 14,778.40 $ 25.00 $ 933.33 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 260.00 $ 86.67 $ 499.58 $ 166.53 $ 450.00 $ 150.00 Steel) 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 21 $ 75.00 $ 650.00 $ 136.21 $ 1,180.49 $ 40.00 $ 346.67 PVC) 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 21 $ 95.00 $ 823.33 $ 395.85 $ 3,430.70 $ 40.00 $ 346.67 4" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 12 $ 340.00 $ 2,833.33 $ 438.18 $ 3,651.50 $ 360.00 $ 3,000.00 Only) 4" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 12 $ 60.00 $ 500.00 $ 395.85 $ 3,298.75 $ 75.00 $ 625.00 Only) 4" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 23 $ 150.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 45.68 $ 822.24 $ 38.00 $ 684.00 Only) 4" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 23 $ 40.00 $ 693.33 $ 263.90 $ 4,574.27 $ 30.00 $ 520.00 Only) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 775.00 $ - $ 842.45 $ - $ 760.00 $ - Steel) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 180.00 $ - $ 194.49 $ - $ 135.00 $ - PVC) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 50.00 $ - $ 1,055.60 $ - $ 55.00 $ - 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 950.00 $ 316.67 $ 889.24 $ 296.41 $ 1,000.00 $ 333.33 Steel) 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 230.00 $ - $ 243.04 $ - $ 240.00 $ - PVC) 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 50.00 $ 16.67 $ 1,055.60 $ 351.87 $ 65.00 $ 21.67 5" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 550.00 $ - $ 823.37 $ - $ 740.00 $ - Only) 5" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 50.00 $ - $ 527.80 $ - $ 85.00 $ - Only) 5" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 170.00 $ - $ 34.35 $ - $ 170.00 $ - Only) 5" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 50.00 $ - $ 395.85 $ - $ 85.00 $ - Only) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 860.00 $ - $ 1,138.52 $ - $ 930.00 $ - Steel) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 280.00 $ - $ 264.97 $ - $ 70.00 $ - PVC) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 50.00 $ - $ 1,319.50 $ - $ 85.00 $ - 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 1,500.00 $ - $ 1,202.96 $ - $ 1,100.00 $ - Steel) Page 48 of 371 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 240.00 $ - $ 289.65 $ - $ 170.00 $ - PVC) 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 50.00 $ - $ 1,319.50 $ - $ 105.00 $ - 6" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 650.00 $ - $ 1,074.07 $ - $ 1,000.00 $ - Only) 6" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 50.00 $ - $ 1,319.50 $ - $ 115.00 $ - Only) 6" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 250.00 $ - $ 84.35 $ - $ 95.00 $ - Only) 6" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 50.00 $ - $ 461.83 $ - $ 105.00 $ - Only) 2” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 1.90 $ - $ 0.96 $ - $ 0.90 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) 4” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 324 $ 1.90 $ 2,532.07 $ 5.32 $ 7,089.79 $ 3.85 $ 5,130.77 striped conduits, cost per foot) 5” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 1.90 $ - $ 6.36 $ - $ 4.90 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) 6” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 1.90 $ - $ 12.04 $ - $ 7.50 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) Foreman Hourly Labor Rates: 187 $ 175.00 $ 30,012.50 $ 138.55 $ 23,761.33 $ 225.00 $ 38,587.50 Laborer Hourly Labor Rates: 547 $ 135.00 $ 72,697.50 $ 133.22 $ 71,738.97 $ 200.00 $ 107,700.00 Pickup Truck Hourly Equipment Rates: 350 $ 55.00 $ 19,543.33 $ 27.71 $ 9,846.29 $ 25.00 $ 8,883.33 Dump Truck Hourly Equipment Rates: 0 $ 85.00 $ 1,275.00 $ 31.97 $ 479.55 $ 45.00 $ 675.00 Mini Excavator w/trailer Hourly Equipment 172 $ 75.00 $ 12,175.00 $ 31.97 $ 5,189.80 $ 115.00 $ 18,668.33 Rates: Air Compressor Hourly Equipment Rates: 21 $ 45.00 $ - $ 58.62 $ - $ 120.00 $ - Install 4" steel pipe filled with concrete 0 $ 750.00 $ - $ 1,886.38 $ - $ 550.00 $ - Traffic Ballards $ 969,000.23 $ 1,022,891.41 $ 1,610,374.10 Page 49 of 371  EXHIBIT 2 Maple Cable Construction YEAR 2 - UNIT PRICES Co Archon Siebert & Sons 3 YEAR UNIT WORK PROCESS Ext Price A UNIT PRICE "A" Ext Price A UNIT PRICE "A" Ext Price A AVERAGE PRICE "A" Start or End Pit: For 2” conduit 140 $ 500.00 $ 57,333.33 $ 1,008.00 $ 115,584.00 $ 450.00 $ 51,600.00 Start or End Pit: For 4” conduit 112 $ 525.00 $ 56,700.00 $ 1,029.00 $ 111,132.00 $ 450.00 $ 48,600.00 Start or End Pit: For 5” conduit 0 $ 550.00 $ 733.33 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 600.00 $ 800.00 Start or End Pit: For 6” conduit 0 $ 600.00 $ - $ 1,070.00 $ - $ 750.00 $ - Test Holes In: Concrete 1 $ 550.00 $ 183.33 $ 2,232.00 $ 744.00 $ 675.00 $ 225.00 Test Holes In: Asphalt 10 $ 550.00 $ 2,016.67 $ 2,180.00 $ 7,993.33 $ 600.00 $ 2,200.00 Test Holes In: Parkway 226 $ 320.00 $ 63,680.00 $ 517.00 $ 102,883.00 $ 525.00 $ 104,475.00 Excavation for: Xfmr Pad 5’X5’X20” 1 $ 230.00 $ - $ 3,330.00 $ - $ 450.00 $ - Excavation for: Xfmr Pad 8’X8’X20” 0 $ 260.00 $ - $ 6,620.00 $ - $ 675.00 $ - Excavation for and Installation of: Xfmr Pad 4 $ 1,300.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 5,544.00 $ 22,176.00 $ 825.00 $ 3,300.00 5’X5’X20” Excavation for and Installation of: Xfmr Pad 2 $ 1,350.00 $ 4,050.00 $ 11,034.00 $ 33,102.00 $ 975.00 $ 2,925.00 8’X8’X20” Excavation for: Splice Box 28”X40”X30” 0 $ 230.00 $ - $ 1,333.00 $ - $ 975.00 $ - Excavation for: Splice Box 40”X50”X22” 1 $ 240.00 $ - $ 1,770.00 $ - $ 1,275.00 $ - Excavation for and Installation of: Splice Box 12 $ 600.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 3,325.00 $ 36,575.00 $ 1,425.00 $ 15,675.00 28”X40”X30” Excavation for and Installation of: Splice Box 6 $ 700.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 4,423.00 $ 17,692.00 $ 1,875.00 $ 7,500.00 40”X50”X22” Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 1 ¼” 9362 $ 11.00 $ 98,860.67 $ 0.82 $ 7,369.61 $ 38.25 $ 343,765.50 (Orange) w/ pull line Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 2” 5879 $ 22.00 $ 75,049.33 $ 1.44 $ 4,912.32 $ 53.25 $ 181,653.50 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 4” 6572 $ 40.00 $ 261,720.00 $ 4.60 $ 30,097.80 $ 68.25 $ 446,559.75 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 5” 0 $ 36.00 $ 2,520.00 $ 8.90 $ 623.00 $ 68.25 $ 4,777.50 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 6” 0 $ 48.00 $ - $ 12.55 $ - $ 83.25 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 3” 0 $ 13.00 $ - $ 20.78 $ - $ 37.50 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 4” 1644 $ 16.00 $ 52,373.33 $ 25.31 $ 82,848.07 $ 37.50 $ 122,750.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 6” 4157 $ 18.50 $ 65,237.17 $ 29.09 $ 102,581.04 $ 82.50 $ 290,922.50 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 8” 4036 $ 20.00 $ 25,420.00 $ 33.46 $ 42,527.66 $ 97.50 $ 123,922.50 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 10” 1135 $ 30.00 $ 32,680.00 $ 38.53 $ 41,972.01 $ 97.50 $ 106,210.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 12” 204 $ 32.00 $ 27,178.67 $ 44.34 $ 37,659.44 $ 127.50 $ 108,290.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 14” 116 $ 38.00 $ - $ 51.00 $ - $ 157.50 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 18” 93 $ 56.00 $ - $ 58.67 $ - $ 217.50 $ - Tie into Existing Manhole First Conduit 14 $ 200.00 $ 2,533.33 $ 4,423.00 $ 56,024.67 $ 1,875.00 $ 23,750.00 Tie into Existing Manhole Additional 14 $ 700.00 $ 6,766.67 $ 480.00 $ 4,640.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 15,950.00 Conduits Tie into Existing Splice Box First Conduit 26 $ 500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 1,663.00 $ 39,912.00 $ 750.00 $ 18,000.00 Tie into Existing Splice Box Additional 0 $ 70.00 $ 23.33 $ 235.00 $ 78.33 $ 600.00 $ 200.00 Conduits E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 26 $ 18.00 $ 408.00 $ 7.59 $ 172.04 $ 11.25 $ 255.00 (Material and Labor): 1 1/4" E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 17 $ 22.00 $ 330.00 $ 15.28 $ 229.20 $ 16.50 $ 247.50 (Material and Labor): 2” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 64 $ 38.00 $ 2,368.67 $ 30.53 $ 1,903.04 $ 45.00 $ 2,805.00 (Material and Labor): 4” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 0 $ 40.00 $ 66.67 $ 55.11 $ 91.85 $ 67.50 $ 112.50 (Material and Labor): 5” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 0 $ 44.00 $ 29.33 $ 71.49 $ 47.66 $ 97.50 $ 65.00 (Material and Labor): 6” Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 2” 0 $ 300.00 $ - $ 573.53 $ - $ 24.00 $ - Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 4” 0 $ 350.00 $ 116.67 $ 883.29 $ 294.43 $ 60.00 $ 20.00 Page 50 of 371 Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 5” 0 $ 400.00 $ - $ 1,212.72 $ - $ 112.50 $ - Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 6” 0 $ 450.00 $ - $ 1,729.60 $ - $ 142.50 $ - 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 4 $ 70.00 $ 280.00 $ 178.77 $ 715.08 $ 193.50 $ 774.00 Steel) 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 3 $ 30.00 $ 40.00 $ 47.81 $ 63.75 $ 37.50 $ 50.00 PVC) 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 6 $ 32.00 $ 170.67 $ 415.65 $ 2,216.80 $ 75.00 $ 400.00 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 80.00 $ - $ 219.09 $ - $ 232.50 $ - Steel) 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 1 $ 40.00 $ 120.00 $ 53.89 $ 161.67 $ 34.50 $ 103.50 PVC) 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 2 $ 60.00 $ 140.00 $ 415.64 $ 969.83 $ 90.00 $ 210.00 2” 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 5 $ 180.00 $ 780.00 $ 155.49 $ 673.79 $ 202.50 $ 877.50 Only) 2” 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 5 $ 60.00 $ 240.00 $ 415.64 $ 1,662.56 $ 36.00 $ 144.00 Only) 2” 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 1 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 17.47 $ 34.94 $ 22.50 $ 45.00 Only) 2” 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 1 $ 50.00 $ 83.33 $ 277.10 $ 461.83 $ 19.50 $ 32.50 Only) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 5 $ 200.00 $ 1,666.67 $ 553.74 $ 4,614.50 $ 510.00 $ 4,250.00 Steel) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 28 $ 65.00 $ 1,863.33 $ 59.93 $ 1,717.99 $ 105.00 $ 3,010.00 PVC) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 34 $ 60.00 $ 2,240.00 $ 415.64 $ 15,517.23 $ 37.50 $ 1,400.00 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 280.00 $ 93.33 $ 524.56 $ 174.85 $ 375.00 $ 125.00 Steel) 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 21 $ 80.00 $ 693.33 $ 143.02 $ 1,239.51 $ 60.00 $ 520.00 PVC) 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 21 $ 100.00 $ 866.67 $ 415.64 $ 3,602.21 $ 60.00 $ 520.00 4" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 12 $ 360.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 460.09 $ 3,834.08 $ 540.00 $ 4,500.00 Only) 4" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 12 $ 65.00 $ 541.67 $ 415.64 $ 3,463.67 $ 112.50 $ 937.50 Only) 4" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 23 $ 160.00 $ 2,880.00 $ 47.96 $ 863.28 $ 57.00 $ 1,026.00 Only) 4" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 23 $ 45.00 $ 780.00 $ 277.10 $ 4,803.07 $ 45.00 $ 780.00 Only) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 800.00 $ - $ 884.57 $ - $ 1,140.00 $ - Steel) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 190.00 $ - $ 204.21 $ - $ 202.50 $ - PVC) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 60.00 $ - $ 1,108.38 $ - $ 82.50 $ - 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 1,000.00 $ 333.33 $ 933.70 $ 311.23 $ 1,500.00 $ 500.00 Steel) 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 240.00 $ - $ 255.19 $ - $ 360.00 $ - PVC) 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 60.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,108.38 $ 369.46 $ 97.50 $ 32.50 5" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 575.00 $ - $ 864.54 $ - $ 1,110.00 $ - Only) 5" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 60.00 $ - $ 554.19 $ - $ 127.50 $ - Only) 5" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 180.00 $ - $ 37.57 $ - $ 255.00 $ - Only) 5" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 60.00 $ - $ 415.64 $ - $ 127.50 $ - Only) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 880.00 $ - $ 1,195.45 $ - $ 1,395.00 $ - Steel) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 300.00 $ - $ 278.22 $ - $ 105.00 $ - PVC) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 60.00 $ - $ 1,385.48 $ - $ 127.50 $ - 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 1,600.00 $ - $ 1,263.11 $ - $ 1,650.00 $ - Steel) Page 51 of 371 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 260.00 $ - $ 304.13 $ - $ 55.00 $ - PVC) 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 60.00 $ - $ 1,385.48 $ - $ 157.00 $ - 6" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 675.00 $ - $ 1,127.77 $ - $ 1,500.00 $ - Only) 6" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 60.00 $ - $ 1,385.48 $ - $ 172.50 $ - Only) 6" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 275.00 $ - $ 88.57 $ - $ 142.50 $ - Only) 6" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 60.00 $ - $ 484.92 $ - $ 157.50 $ - Only) 2” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 2.00 $ - $ 1.01 $ - $ 1.35 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) 4” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 324 $ 2.00 $ 2,665.33 $ 5.59 $ 7,449.61 $ 5.78 $ 7,702.81 striped conduits, cost per foot) 5” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 2.00 $ - $ 6.68 $ - $ 7.35 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) 6” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 2.00 $ - $ 12.64 $ - $ 11.25 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) Foreman Hourly Labor Rates: 187 $ 185.00 $ 31,727.50 $ 145.48 $ 24,949.82 $ 337.50 $ 57,881.25 Laborer Hourly Labor Rates: 547 $ 140.00 $ 75,390.00 $ 139.88 $ 75,325.38 $ 300.00 $ 161,550.00 Pickup Truck Hourly Equipment Rates: 350 $ 60.00 $ 21,320.00 $ 29.10 $ 10,340.20 $ 37.50 $ 13,325.00 Dump Truck Hourly Equipment Rates: 0 $ 90.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 33.57 $ 503.55 $ 67.50 $ 1,012.50 Mini Excavator w/trailer Hourly Equipment 172 $ 80.00 $ 12,986.67 $ 33.57 $ 5,449.53 $ 172.50 $ 28,002.50 Rates: Air Compressor Hourly Equipment Rates: 21 $ 50.00 $ - $ 61.55 $ - $ 180.00 $ - Install 4" steel pipe filled with concrete 0 $ 800.00 $ - $ 1,980.70 $ - $ 825.00 $ - Traffic Ballards $ 1,027,350.33 $ 1,074,754.92 $ 2,317,267.81 Page 52 of 371  EXHIBIT 3 Maple Cable Construction YEAR 3 - UNIT PRICES Co Archon Siebert & Sons 3 YEAR UNIT WORK PROCESS Ext Price A UNIT PRICE "A" Ext Price A UNIT PRICE "A" Ext Price A AVERAGE PRICE "A" Start or End Pit: For 2” conduit 140 $ 525.00 $ 60,200.00 $ 1,059.00 $ 121,432.00 $ 675.00 $ 77,400.00 Start or End Pit: For 4” conduit 112 $ 550.00 $ 59,400.00 $ 1,081.00 $ 116,748.00 $ 675.00 $ 72,900.00 Start or End Pit: For 5” conduit 0 $ 575.00 $ 766.67 $ 1,103.00 $ 1,470.67 $ 900.00 $ 1,200.00 Start or End Pit: For 6” conduit 0 $ 625.00 $ - $ 1,123.00 $ - $ 1,125.00 $ - Test Holes In: Concrete 1 $ 575.00 $ 191.67 $ 2,345.00 $ 781.67 $ 1,012.50 $ 337.50 Test Holes In: Asphalt 10 $ 575.00 $ 2,108.33 $ 2,290.00 $ 8,396.67 $ 900.00 $ 3,300.00 Test Holes In: Parkway 226 $ 330.00 $ 65,670.00 $ 543.00 $ 108,057.00 $ 787.50 $ 156,712.50 Excavation for: Xfmr Pad 5’X5’X20” 1 $ 240.00 $ - $ 3,495.00 $ - $ 675.00 $ - Excavation for: Xfmr Pad 8’X8’X20” 0 $ 270.00 $ - $ 6,952.00 $ - $ 1,012.50 $ - Excavation for and Installation of: Xfmr Pad 4 $ 1,400.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,822.00 $ 23,288.00 $ 1,237.50 $ 4,950.00 5’X5’X20” Excavation for and Installation of: Xfmr Pad 2 $ 1,450.00 $ 4,350.00 $ 11,585.00 $ 34,755.00 $ 1,462.00 $ 4,386.00 8’X8’X20” Excavation for: Splice Box 28”X40”X30” 0 $ 240.00 $ - $ 1,400.00 $ - $ 1,462.50 $ - Excavation for: Splice Box 40”X50”X22” 1 $ 250.00 $ - $ 1,858.00 $ - $ 1,912.50 $ - Excavation for and Installation of: Splice Box 12 $ 650.00 $ 7,150.00 $ 3,492.00 $ 38,412.00 $ 2,137.50 $ 23,512.50 28”X40”X30” Excavation for and Installation of: Splice Box 6 $ 750.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 4,644.00 $ 18,576.00 $ 2,812.50 $ 11,250.00 40”X50”X22” Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 1 ¼” 9362 $ 12.00 $ 107,848.00 $ 0.86 $ 7,729.11 $ 57.38 $ 515,693.19 (Orange) w/ pull line Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 2” 5879 $ 24.00 $ 81,872.00 $ 1.51 $ 5,151.11 $ 79.88 $ 272,497.31 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 4” 6572 $ 45.00 $ 294,435.00 $ 4.83 $ 31,602.69 $ 102.38 $ 669,872.34 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 5” 0 $ 38.00 $ 2,660.00 $ 9.34 $ 653.80 $ 102.38 $ 7,166.60 Conduit/ft. (Material and Installation) 6” 0 $ 54.00 $ - $ 13.18 $ - $ 124.88 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 3” 0 $ 14.00 $ - $ 21.82 $ - $ 101.25 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 4” 1644 $ 17.00 $ 55,646.67 $ 26.58 $ 87,005.20 $ 101.25 $ 331,425.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 6” 4157 $ 19.50 $ 68,763.50 $ 30.55 $ 107,729.48 $ 123.75 $ 436,383.75 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 8” 4036 $ 21.00 $ 26,691.00 $ 35.14 $ 44,662.94 $ 146.25 $ 185,883.75 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 10” 1135 $ 32.00 $ 34,858.67 $ 40.45 $ 44,063.53 $ 146.25 $ 159,315.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 12” 204 $ 34.00 $ 28,877.33 $ 46.55 $ 39,536.47 $ 191.25 $ 162,435.00 Bore/Ream Size/ft. 14” 116 $ 40.00 $ - $ 53.55 $ - $ 236.25 $ - Bore/Ream Size/ft. 18” 93 $ 60.00 $ - $ 61.60 $ - $ 326.25 $ - Tie into Existing Manhole First Conduit 14 $ 2,100.00 $ 26,600.00 $ 4,644.00 $ 58,824.00 $ 2,812.50 $ 35,625.00 Tie into Existing Manhole Additional 14 $ 800.00 $ 7,733.33 $ 504.00 $ 4,872.00 $ 2,475.00 $ 23,925.00 Conduits Tie into Existing Splice Box First Conduit 26 $ 525.00 $ 12,600.00 $ 1,746.00 $ 41,904.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 27,000.00 Tie into Existing Splice Box Additional 0 $ 80.00 $ 26.67 $ 246.00 $ 82.00 $ 900.00 $ 300.00 Conduits E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 26 $ 20.00 $ 453.33 $ 7.97 $ 180.65 $ 16.88 $ 382.61 (Material and Labor): 1 1/4" E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 17 $ 24.00 $ 360.00 $ 16.04 $ 240.60 $ 24.75 $ 371.25 (Material and Labor): 2” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 64 $ 40.00 $ 2,493.33 $ 32.06 $ 1,998.41 $ 67.50 $ 4,207.50 (Material and Labor): 4” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 0 $ 42.00 $ 70.00 $ 57.87 $ 96.45 $ 101.25 $ 168.75 (Material and Labor): 5” E-Loc Couplings or Approved Equivalent 0 $ 46.00 $ 30.67 $ 75.06 $ 50.04 $ 146.25 $ 97.50 (Material and Labor): 6” Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 2” 0 $ 325.00 $ - $ 602.21 $ - $ 36.00 $ - Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 4” 0 $ 375.00 $ 125.00 $ 927.45 $ 309.15 $ 90.00 $ 30.00 Page 53 of 371 Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 5” 0 $ 425.00 $ - $ 1,273.36 $ - $ 168.75 $ - Fusion Butt Splice (Material and Labor): 6” 0 $ 475.00 $ - $ 1,816.08 $ - $ 213.75 $ - 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 4 $ 75.00 $ 300.00 $ 187.71 $ 750.84 $ 290.25 $ 1,161.00 Steel) 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 3 $ 32.00 $ 42.67 $ 50.20 $ 66.93 $ 56.25 $ 75.00 PVC) 2” – 18” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 6 $ 34.00 $ 181.33 $ 436.42 $ 2,327.57 $ 112.50 $ 600.00 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 85.00 $ - $ 230.04 $ - $ 348.75 $ - Steel) 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 1 $ 45.00 $ 135.00 $ 56.58 $ 169.74 $ 51.75 $ 155.25 PVC) 2” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 2 $ 65.00 $ 151.67 $ 436.42 $ 1,018.31 $ 135.00 $ 315.00 2” 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 5 $ 190.00 $ 823.33 $ 163.26 $ 707.46 $ 303.75 $ 1,316.25 Only) 2” 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 5 $ 65.00 $ 260.00 $ 436.42 $ 1,745.68 $ 54.00 $ 216.00 Only) 2” 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 1 $ 55.00 $ 110.00 $ 18.34 $ 36.68 $ 33.75 $ 67.50 Only) 2” 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 1 $ 55.00 $ 91.67 $ 290.85 $ 484.75 $ 29.25 $ 48.75 Only) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 5 $ 210.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 581.43 $ 4,845.25 $ 765.00 $ 6,375.00 Steel) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 28 $ 70.00 $ 2,006.67 $ 62.93 $ 1,803.99 $ 157.50 $ 4,515.00 PVC) 4” – 24” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 34 $ 65.00 $ 2,426.67 $ 436.42 $ 16,293.01 $ 53.25 $ 1,988.00 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 300.00 $ 100.00 $ 550.79 $ 183.60 $ 1,012.50 $ 337.50 Steel) 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 21 $ 85.00 $ 736.67 $ 150.17 $ 1,301.47 $ 90.00 $ 780.00 PVC) 4” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 21 $ 105.00 $ 910.00 $ 436.42 $ 3,782.31 $ 90.00 $ 780.00 4" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 12 $ 380.00 $ 3,166.67 $ 483.09 $ 4,025.75 $ 810.00 $ 6,750.00 Only) 4" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 12 $ 70.00 $ 583.33 $ 436.42 $ 3,636.83 $ 168.75 $ 1,406.25 Only) 4" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 23 $ 170.00 $ 3,060.00 $ 50.36 $ 906.48 $ 85.50 $ 1,539.00 Only) 4" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 23 $ 50.00 $ 866.67 $ 290.96 $ 5,043.31 $ 67.50 $ 1,170.00 Only) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 825.00 $ - $ 928.80 $ - $ 1,710.00 $ - Steel) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 200.00 $ - $ 214.42 $ - $ 303.75 $ - PVC) 5” – 36” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 70.00 $ - $ 1,163.80 $ - $ 213.75 $ - 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 1,050.00 $ 350.00 $ 980.39 $ 326.80 $ 2,250.00 $ 750.00 Steel) 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 250.00 $ - $ 267.95 $ - $ 540.00 $ - PVC) 5” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 70.00 $ 23.33 $ 1,163.80 $ 387.93 $ 146.25 $ 48.75 5" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 600.00 $ - $ 907.77 $ - $ 1,665.00 $ - Only) 5" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 70.00 $ - $ 581.90 $ - $ 191.25 $ - Only) 5" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 190.00 $ - $ 70.95 $ - $ 382.50 $ - Only) 5" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 70.00 $ - $ 436.42 $ - $ 191.25 $ - Only) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 900.00 $ - $ 1,255.22 $ - $ 2,092.50 $ - Steel) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 320.00 $ - $ 292.13 $ - $ 157.50 $ - PVC) 6” – 48” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 70.00 $ - $ 1,454.75 $ - $ 191.25 $ - 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 1,700.00 $ - $ 1,326.27 $ - $ 2,475.00 $ - Steel) Page 54 of 371 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Material Only, 0 $ 280.00 $ - $ 319.34 $ - $ 382.50 $ - PVC) 6” – 60” Sweep 90º Bends (Installation Only) 0 $ 70.00 $ - $ 1,454.75 $ - $ 236.25 $ - 6" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 700.00 $ - $ 1,184.16 $ - $ 2,250.00 $ - Only) 6" 10’ Steel Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 70.00 $ - $ 1,454.75 $ - $ 258.75 $ - Only) 6" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Material 0 $ 300.00 $ - $ 93.00 $ - $ 213.75 $ - Only) 6" 10’ PVC Conduit w/coupling (Installation 0 $ 70.00 $ - $ 509.17 $ - $ 236.25 $ - Only) 2” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 2.10 $ - $ 1.06 $ - $ 2.03 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) 4” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 324 $ 2.10 $ 2,798.60 $ 5.87 $ 7,822.75 $ 8.66 $ 11,540.89 striped conduits, cost per foot) 5” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 2.10 $ - $ 7.01 $ - $ 11.03 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) 6” Color Coded (Markup for red color or 0 $ 2.10 $ - $ 13.27 $ - $ 16.88 $ - striped conduits, cost per foot) Foreman Hourly Labor Rates: 187 $ 195.00 $ 33,442.50 $ 152.75 $ 26,196.63 $ 506.25 $ 86,821.88 Laborer Hourly Labor Rates: 547 $ 145.00 $ 78,082.50 $ 146.87 $ 79,089.50 $ 450.00 $ 242,325.00 Pickup Truck Hourly Equipment Rates: 350 $ 65.00 $ 23,096.67 $ 30.56 $ 10,858.99 $ 56.25 $ 19,987.50 Dump Truck Hourly Equipment Rates: 0 $ 95.00 $ 1,425.00 $ 35.25 $ 528.75 $ 101.25 $ 1,518.75 Mini Excavator w/trailer Hourly Equipment 172 $ 85.00 $ 13,798.33 $ 35.25 $ 5,722.25 $ 258.75 $ 42,003.75 Rates: Air Compressor Hourly Equipment Rates: 21 $ 55.00 $ - $ 64.63 $ - $ 270.00 $ - Install 4" steel pipe filled with concrete 0 $ 850.00 $ - $ 2,079.74 $ - $ 1,237.50 $ - Traffic Ballards $ 1,131,300.43 $ 1,128,672.20 $ 3,623,320.07 Page 55 of 371  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: Resolution No. R-49-2026 Approving a Contract with Garland/DBS, Inc. for Yards Roof Replacement Project (Adoption) PRESENTER: Tom Powers AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: Yes ITEM TYPE: Consent Agenda ITEM HISTORY: None. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As part of the upcoming solar project at the yards, a portion of the solar panels will need to be installed where we currently have EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer) roofs. The existing EPDM roofs are over 20 years old and out of warranty. While the roofs may have some residual life left in them, they are not appropriate for solar installations. Therefore, the Village evaluated the existing EPDM and determined they should be converted to standing seam metal roofs to support the solar project. Since the solar project is on an expedited timeline (solar panels have already been received) to ensure the receipt of tax credits, staff evaluated expedited project delivery options for the roof replacement. We were able to identify a Joint Purchasing contract under the Omnia Partners program to accelerate project delivery. The Omnia Program is compliant with the competitive procurement requirements of the Governmental Joint Purchasing Act 30 ILCS 525/0.01. Through the Omnia program, staff reached out to Garland DBS to get a quote for the roof replacement. Garland DBS obtained quotes from roof contractors to provide the labor to install the new standing seam metal roofs. They also provided a quote to seal the remaining existing roof to help ensure this portion of the roof lasts as long as the solar system. As part of the approved Omnia process, Garland administered an informal competitive process for obtaining quotes for the project. The scope was split into two main categories and the bid results for those categories were as follows: 1. Fluid Applied Restoration of the existing roofing to remain • Alloy Architectural $113,643 Page 56 of 371  • Riddiford Roofing $119,822 • Knickerbocker Roofing $140,803 2. Replacement of existing EPDM roofing with new metal standing seam • Alloy Architectural $850,210 • Riddiford Roofing $1,078,408 • Knickerbocker Roofing $1,321,012 The total project cost, including architectural drawings for permit, record and contingency allowance is $1,068,853.00. As with all contingency allowances, if it is not needed or used, the amount will be deducted from the final contract amount. Potential contingency items include: additional insulation, wet existing insulation, replacement of deteriorated wood nailers, among other items. These items are unknowable until the existing roof deck is opened up. This project was planned for the FY2027 Budget; however, the Village has the financial capacity to move forward this year. The updated timeline for the Willow Road project creates $1.3 million in General Fund budget capacity in 2026, and staff proposes to utilize a portion of that capacity to fund this project. RECOMMENDATION: Consider adopting Resolution No. R-49- 2026, awarding a contract to Garland/DBS, Inc. for the Yards Roof Replacement Project in the amount of $1,068,853.00 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment 1 - Resolution No. R-49-2026: Approving a Contract with Garland/DBS, Inc. for Yards Roof Replacement Project 2. Attachment 2 - Garland/DBS, Inc. Roofing Material and Services Proposal 3. Attachment 3 - Project Manual: 2026 Public Works - Roof Project Page 57 of 371  ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. R-49-2026 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH GARLAND/DBS, INC. FOR YARDS ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, 5 ILCS 220/1 et seq., authorize and encourage intergovernmental cooperation; and WHEREAS, the Village has identified the need to replace certain roofing at the Yards Solar Project to support the installation of solar equipment and preserve the Village’s eligibility for available tax-credit benefits (“Roof Replacement”); and WHEREAS, the Village is eligible to participate in Omnia Partners (“Omnia”) purchasing cooperative, which permits local governments to purchase and lease commodities and services according to contracts negotiated by Omnia, resulting in significant savings for the Village; and WHEREAS, Omnia sought bids for the award of contract for the Roof Replacement ("Contract"); and WHEREAS, Omnia identified Garland/DBS, Inc. ("Vendor"), as the low responsible bidder for the Contract; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have determined that it will serve and be in the best interest of the Village to approve the procurement of the Roof Replacement from the Vendor, in accordance with the Contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the Village of Winnetka, Cook County, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The Village Council adopts the foregoing recitals as its findings, as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT. The Village Council hereby approves the Contract between the Village and the Vendor in substantially the same form as attached as Exhibit A and in a final form approved by the Village Attorney. SECTION 3. EXECUTION OF CONTRACT. The Village Council authorizes and directs the Village President, the Village Manager, and the Village Clerk to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the Village, the final Contract approved by the Village Attorney in accordance with Section 2 of this Resolution. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] June 2, 2026 R- 49-2026 Page 58 of 371  ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 2026, pursuant to the following roll call vote: AYES: ____________________________________________________________ NAYS: ____________________________________________________________ ABSENT: ____________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: ____________________________________________________________ Signed ____________________________________ Village President Countersigned: _______________________________________ Village Clerk June 2, 2026 R- 49-2026 Page 59 of 371  EXHIBIT A CONTRACT June 2, 2026 R- 49-2026 Page 60 of 371 Page 61 of 371 Page 62 of 371 Page 63 of 371 Page 64 of 371 Page 65 of 371 Page 66 of 371 Page 67 of 371 Page 68 of 371 Page 69 of 371 Page 70 of 371 Page 71 of 371 Page 72 of 371 Page 73 of 371 Page 74 of 371 Page 75 of 371 Page 76 of 371 Page 77 of 371 Page 78 of 371 Page 79 of 371 Page 80 of 371 Page 81 of 371 Page 82 of 371 Page 83 of 371 Page 84 of 371 Page 85 of 371 Page 86 of 371 Page 87 of 371 Page 88 of 371 Page 89 of 371 Page 90 of 371 Page 91 of 371 Page 92 of 371 Page 93 of 371 Page 94 of 371 Page 95 of 371 Page 96 of 371  ATTACHMENT 2 Garland/DBS, Inc. 3800 East 91st Street Cleveland, OH 44105 Phone: (800) 762-8225 Fax: (216) 883-2055 ROOFING MATERIAL AND SERVICES PROPOSAL Village of Winnetka Public Works 1390 Willow Road Winnetka, IL 60093 Date Submitted: 4/27/2026 Proposal #: 25-IL-260379 MICPA # PW1925 Illinois General Contractor License #: 105.005715 Purchase orders to be made out to: Garland/DBS, Inc. Please Note: The following budget/estimate is being provided according to the pricing established under the Master Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing Agreement (MICPA) with Racine County, WI and OMNIA Partners, Public Sector (U.S. Communities). Garland/DBS, Inc. administered an informal competitive process for obtaining quotes for the project with the hopes of providing a lower market-adjusted price whenever possible. Scope of Work: Fluid Applied Restoration 1. Power wash entire roof section, including flashings and walls with Simple Green or TSP and thoroughly rinse. Be sure to rinse low areas and drains several times to ensure all cleaning residue is removed. Hot Steam washing is permitted. Ensure all moisture has been dried prior to applying any coating. 2. All necessary field and flashing repairs must be done according to good construction practices, including the removal of all wet insulation and defective materials as identified through a moisture detection survey such as an infrared scan and replacement with like- 3. All roof areas must promote positive drainage. Ensure roof is dry before prior to restoration application. 4. Apply base coat of Liquitec at a rate of 3 GAL/SQ on previously coated surfaces to cover entire roof. 5. Embed 40” wide Grip Polyester Firm into base coat by rolling over the fabric surface to fully saturate and encapsulate, ensuring no wrinkles, voids, or vertical fibers. 6. Allow base coat to cure but no longer than 72 hours. 7. Apply Liquitec top coat at an additional 2 gal/100 sq. ft. to cover entire roof. NOTE: Vertical flashings require multiple coats to obtain proper coverage. 8. Ensure Plumbing stacks are a minimum of 12” above roof height and wrapped in 4lb lead or Liquid Flashing (three course). 9. Paint drain baskets with Oil Based Enamel in Bright Red. Replace any drain rings and baskets that are plastic. Paint all gas lines with Oil Based Enamel in Safety Yellow. 10. Install new metal expansion joint cap at roof dividing expansion joints. Page 1 of 3 Page 97 of 371 Scope of Work: Standing Seam 1. Shop Drawings Required and manufacturer’s installation guidelines followed. 2. Remove existing EPDM Membrane. 3. Inspect existing insulation and replaced any wet or damaged panels in kind. 4. Install Rmer Seal, self adhered waterproofing membrane. 5. Install IRF retrofit framing system per engineered shop drawings. Seal fasteners with Tuff Stuff that area used to anchor the IRF 6. Install IMETCO's 16"”, 22 Gauge, Series 300 standing seam metal roof panels per the shop drawings. 7. Install S-5! Snow retention bars per shop drawings. 8. Install new vent piping above roof level. 9. Fabricate and install new gutters and downspouts. Fluid Applied Restoration Proposal Price Based Upon Market Experience: $ 113,643 Garland/DBS Price Based Upon Local Market Competition: Alloy Architectural $ 113,643 Riddiford Roofing $ 119,822 Knickerbocker Roofing $ 140,803 Standing Seam Proposal Price Based Upon Market Experience: $ 850,210 Garland/DBS Price Based Upon Local Market Competition: Alloy Architectural $ 850,210 Knickerbocker Roofing $ 1,078,408 Riddiford Roofing $ 1,321,012 Studio GC Architecture $ 55,000 Reccomended Owners Contingency $ 50,000 Alloy Architectural - Unforeseen Site Conditions: Additional Insulation Replacement Coating Option ONLY $ 6.96 per Sq. Ft. Page 2 of 3 Page 98 of 371 Potential issues that could arise during the construction phase of the project will be addressed via unit pricing for additional work beyond the scope of the specifications. This could range anywhere from wet insulation, to the replacement of deteriorated wood nailers. Please Note – The construction industry is experiencing unprecedented global pricing and availability pressures for many key building components. Specifically, the roofing industry is currently experiencing long lead times and significant price increases with roofing insulation and roofing fasteners. Therefore, this proposal can only be held for 30 days. DBS greatly values your business, and we are working diligently with our long-term suppliers to minimize price increases and project delays which could effect your project. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. Clarifications/Exclusions: 1. Sales and use taxes are excluded. 2. Permits are included. 3. Bonds are included. 4. Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical work is excluded. 5. Masonry work is included to which it obtains to the scope of work. 6. Interior Temporary protection is excluded. 7. Prevailing Wages are included. 8. Any work not exclusively described in the above proposal scope of work is excluded. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to call me at my number listed below. Respectfully Submitted, Nathan Parker Garland/DBS, Inc. (216) 302-3791 Page 3 of 3 Page 99 of 371  ATTACHMENT 3 Project Manual For: VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS - ROOF PROJECT 1390 WILLOW ROAD | WINNETKA, IL 60093 Page 100 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 007200 – General Conditions & Inst. to Bidders…..…...Page 3 Section 01010 – Summary of Work………………………….………Page 8 Section 014333.75 – Roofing Manufacturer’s Field Services....Page 12 Section 054100 – Metal Framing System……….……………......Page 17 Section 074113 –Metal Roof Panels….....……………….……......Page 22 Section 075630 – Fluid Applied Roof Restoration…………….. Page 31 Roof Measurement Report and Details…...………………………Page 44 2 Page 101 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 1 Instruction to Proposers In accordance with the Invitation to Proposal, the Proposal form must be submitted in accordance with the following: PROPOSAL DUE DATE: 04-02-2026 1. Proposals can be submit in one of the following two formats using the Proposal forms as provided herein: a. E-mail proposals to: DBSbids@garlandind.com 2. If you have any questions regarding the Proposal documents, please call Justin Reed at 312-550-5548. 3. Coordination with the Owner, as specified hereinafter, shall be made exclusively through the General Contractor’s Representative: Justin Reed at 312-550-5548 4. Proposal Bonds are not required for this project. Performance and Payment Bonds will not be required if awarded the project. Performance and payment bonds will be provided by Garland/DBS, Inc., herein referred to as “General Contractor” for the project. 5. Time is of the essence prior to contract signing, the number of consecutive working days necessary for the completion of the project shall be established by both parties. The Contractor agrees that failure to complete the scope of work within that stipulated period shall result in the assessment liquidated damages in the amount of $300 per day past a date to be agreed upon during the pre-construction conference. 6. It is the General Contractor’s intention to remit payment of approved invoice amounts within forty-five (45) days of General Contractor’s acceptance. Deductions may be made for unapproved amounts invoiced and/or any penalties or damages incurred by the Owner or General Contractor. 7. The final invoice for retention will be paid upon the General Contractor’s receipt of final payment by the Owner. 8. All Invoices must be submitted to General Contractor on AIA G702/G703 invoice forms or approved equal. 9. The contractor shall be prepared to submit a Certificate of Insurance with the Owner and General Contractor identified as the additional insured in accordance with the requirements as outlined in the Supplementary Conditions. 10. The Contractor shall be responsible for any building permits required by the Village of Glenview and must comply with all local, State, and Federal requirements. 11. Once the project is awarded the start date will be no later than May 2023 and the contractor must continue to work, full-time and with a sufficient workforce able to faithfully prosecute the Work until final completion is issued by the General Contractor. Roofing must 3 Page 102 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT be performed in logical sequence and in accordance with the specification documents as provided herein, deviations will only be allowed under direction of the General Contractor or Owner. 12. Unit costs must be provided for additional / optional repair items to be completed on various buildings. Any expected latent or c oncealed site conditions should be identified upfront with unit pricing. 13. Proposers are reminded that the General Contractor is purchasing the Garland roof system materials for this project. Proposers should adjust profit and overhead accordingly as they are not incurring the expense of the materials, but will still need to handle the materials and load the roof once the materials arrive to the site. 14. Proposers are reminded that the freight for the General Contractor supplied materials will be paid for by the General Contractor and will not be an expense to the Proposer. 15. Proposers are reminded that sales or use tax on the General Contractor supplied materials will be paid for by the General Contractor and will not be an expense to the Proposer. 16. Proposers are responsible for all materials not supplied by the General Contractor, as well as, the costs, freight, and sales or use taxes, if applicable. 4 Page 103 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 2 Proposal Forms 1. PROJECT CENTER – ONLINE PORTAL 2. E-mail Proposals to: DBSbids@garlandind.com Proposers should use best efforts to identify potential latent or concealed site conditions and provide unit costs for them in the appropriate section of the Proposal documents as to establish pricing for what may be unforeseen site conditions upfront. PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK YOUR PRICING TO BE AS COMPETITIVE AS POSSIBLE: 1. The General Contractor is purchasing the Garland roof system materials for this project. a. Adjust profit and overhead accordingly as you are not incurring the expense of the materials b. Account for the handling, storage and staging of the Garland materials in your price 2. The General Contractor is responsible for paying the freight associated with the Garland roof system materials. a. Remove any associated freight on Garland material from your price 3. The General Contractor is responsible for paying the sales or use tax on the Garland roof system materials. a. Do not include sales and use tax , if applicable, for the Garland Roof System Materials in your price b. Include all other materials not supplied by the General Contractor, as well as, the costs, freight, and sales or use taxes associated with them. 4. The General Contractor is providing Performance and Payment Bonds if the project is awarded. a. Do not include the costs of performance and payment bonds in your price. 5. COMPLETE ATTACHED EXCEL FORMAT PROPOSAL FORM AND EMAIL TO DBS. 5 Page 104 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3 Prevailing Wage Requirements This project requires the use of Cook County Prevailing Wages Rates as per the accordance with the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act (Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 820, par. 130-1 to 130- 12). To ascertain what the current prevailing rates are, please visit the Illinois Department of Labor website located at the following link: https://data.illinois.gov/dataset/8d883a59-ed92-46e7-b2ce-e270def7c179/resource/0c95f063-aed9- 4db7-adc3-c224acee8fc2/download/prevailing-wage-rates.csv 6 Page 105 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 4 Supplemental Conditions (Exhibits) Proposer is responsible for ensuring that their Proposal is in compliance with all of the requirements as listed in the supplemental conditions as provided in this section. Any deviations or exceptions taken to the contract terms must be noted in Proposal response before the Proposal closing. 7 Page 106 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 5 Specifications, Details, & Drawings SECTION 01010 - SUMMARY OF WORK PART 1 – GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Attached GENERAL CONDITIONS, BID FORM, forms a component part of this section. 1.2 SUMMARY OF WORK: FLUID APPLIED RESTORATION (YELLOW SECTION): 1. Power wash entire roof section, including flashings and walls with Simple Green or TSP and thoroughly rinse. Be sure to rinse low areas and drains several times to ensure all cleaning residue is removed. Hot Steam washing is permitted. Ensure all moisture has been dried prior to applying any coating. 2. All necessary field and flashing repairs must be done according to good construction practices, including the removal of all wet insulation and defective materials as identified through a moisture detection survey such as an infrared scan and replacement with like- materials. 8 Page 107 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3. All roof areas must promote positive drainage. Ensure roof is dry before prior to restoration application. 4. Apply base coat of Liquitec at a rate of 3 GAL/SQ on previously coated surfaces to cover entire roof. 5. Embed 40” wide Grip Polyester Firm into base coat by rolling over the fabric surface to fully saturate and encapsulate, ensuring no wrinkles, voids, or vertical fibers. 6. Allow base coat to cure but no longer than 72 hours. 7. Apply Liquitec top coat at an additional 2 gal/100 sq. ft. to cover entire roof. NOTE: Vertical flashings require multiple coats to obtain proper coverage. 8. Ensure Plumbing stacks are a minimum of 12” above roof height and wrapped in 4lb lead or Liquid Flashing (three course). 9. Paint drain baskets with Oil Based Enamel in Bright Red. Replace any drain rings and baskets that are plastic. Paint all gas lines with Oil Based Enamel in Safety Yellow. 10. Install new metal expansion joint cap at roof dividing expansion joints. STANDING SEAM METAL (RED SECTIONS): 1. Shop Drawings Required and manufacturer’s installation guidelines followed. 2. Remove existing EPDM Membrane. 3. Inspect existing insulation and replaced any wet or damaged panels in kind. 4. Install Rmer Seal, self adhered waterproofing membrane. 5. Install IRF retrofit framing system per engineered shop drawings. Seal fasteners with Tuff Stuff that area used to anchor the IRF 6. Install 18”, 22 Gauge, standing seam metal roof panels per the shop drawings. Clip spacing is 5’ in zones 1 & 2 and 4’4” in zone 3 per the wind up-lift calculations. 7. Install S-5! Snow retention bars per shop drawings. 8. Install new vent piping above roof level. 9. Fabricate and install new gutters and downspouts. 1.3 INTENT OF THE SPECIFICATIONS A. The intent of these specifications is to describe the material and methods of 9 Page 108 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT construction required for the performance of the work. In general, it is intended that the drawings shall delineate the detailed extent of the work. When there is a discrepancy between drawings, referenced specifications, and standards and this specification, this specification shall govern. 1.4 PROTECTION A. The contractor shall use every available precaution to provide for the safety of the property owner, visitors to the site, and all connected with the work under the Contract. B. All existing facilities both above and below ground shall be protected and maintained free of damage. Existing facilities shall remain operating during the period of construction unless otherwise permitted. All access roadways must remain open to traffic unless otherwise permitted. C. Barricades shall be erected to fence off all construction areas from operations personnel. D. Safety Requirements: 1. All application, material handling, and associated equipment shall conform to and be operated in conformance with OSHA safety requirements. 2. Comply with federal, state, and local and owner fire and safety requirements. 3. Advise owner whenever work is expected to be hazardous to owner employees and/or operations. 4. Maintain a crewman as a floor guard whenever roof decking is being repaired or replaced and whenever any roofing is being removed. 5. Maintain proper fire extinguisher within easy access whenever power tools, roofing kettles, and torches are being used. A MINIMUM OF A 2 HOUR FIRE WATCH SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO WHENEVER PROPANE TORCHES ARE IN USE. 6. ALL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING OWNER MUST BE FOLLOWED. NO EXCEPTIONS WILL BE PERMITTED. SAFETY ORIENTATION MEETING REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK. 1.5 HOUSEKEEPING A. Keep materials neat and orderly. B. Remove scrap, waste and debris from the project area. C. Maintenance of clean conditions while work is in progress and cleanup when work is completed shall be in strict accordance with the “General Conditions” of this contract. D. Fire protection during construction. 10 Page 109 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT E. Follow all requirements established by the building owner. F. All building measurements are the sole responsibility of the contractor. END OF SECTION 11 Page 110 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT SECTION 01 43 33.75 - ROOFING MANUFACTURER’S FIELD SERVICES PART 1 – GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including the Conditions of the Contract and Division 07 Specification Sections apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section includes Manufacturer’s field services for roofing assemblies. B. Related Work Specified Elsewhere: 1. Section 07 41 13 – Metal Roof Panels 2. Section 07 56 30- Fluid Applied Roofing Restoration 1.3 REFERENCES A. International building Code (current edition) or local authority building code. B. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. C. Factory Mutual Global (FMG): Roof Assembly Classifications. D. National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA): Roofing and Waterproofing Manual. E. American National Standards Institute and Single Ply Roofing Institute (ANSI/SPRI): ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Testing and Certification Listing of Shop Fabricated Edge Metal. 1.4 SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW A. Product Data: Provide manufacturer’s technical product data for each type of roofing product specified. Include data substantiating that materials comply with specified requirements. B. Specimen Warranty: Provide an unexecuted copy of the warranty specified for this Project, identifying the terms and conditions required of the Manufacturer and the Owner. C. Roofing System Manufacture’s Evaluation: Provide a comprehensive written assessment comparing available roofing solutions with validation of why the roofing system selection for the specific project is suitable and appropriate. 12 Page 111 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT D. Roofing System Manufacturer’s Report Form: Provide a copy of the report form utilized by the roofing system manufacturer for progress inspections to monitor installation and quality. E. Online Reporting Capabilities: Provide a sample of the roofing system manufacturer’s online roof inspection report as well as information about how long inspection reports are available to owner. 1.5 SUBMITTALS FOR INFORMATION A. Manufacturer’s Installation Instructions: Submit installation instructions and recommendations indicating special precautions required for installing the membrane. B. Manufacturer’s Certificate: Certify that roof system furnished is approved by Factory Mutual Global, Underwriters Laboratories, Warnock Hersey or approved third party testing facility in accordance with ASTM E108, Class A for external fire and meets local or nationally recognized building codes. C. Manufacturer’s Certificate: Certify that materials are manufactured in the United States and conform to requirements specified herein, are chemically and physically compatible with each other, and are suitable for inclusion within the total roof system specified herein. D. Manufacturer’s Certificate: Submit a certified copy of the roofing manufacturer’s ISO 9001 compliance certificate. E. Written certification from the roofing system manufacturer certifying the applicator is currently authorized for the installation of the specified roof system. F. Design Loads: Submit copy of manufacturer’s minimum design load calculations according to ASCE 7, Method 2 for Components and Cladding. In no case shall the design loads be taken to be less than those detailed in Design and Performance Criteria article of this specification. G. Qualification data for firms and individuals identified in Quality Assurance Article below. H. Substitutions: Products proposed as equal to the products specified for this project shall meet all of the requirements in the appropriate Division 7 specifications and shall be submitted for consideration at least 7 days prior to the date that bids must be submitted. 1. Proposals shall be accompanied by a copy of the manufacturer’s standard specification Section. That specification Section shall be signed and sealed by a professional engineer licensed in the state in which the installation is to take place. Substitution requests containing specifications without licensed engineer certification shall be rejected for non-conformance. 2. Manufacturer’s checklist will be accompanied with any substitution to verify equal performance characteristics to those specified in Division 7 specification. 13 Page 112 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3. The Owner’s decision regarding substitutions will be considered final. 1.6 MANUFACTURER’S INSPECTIONS A. When the Project is in progress, a full-time employee of the roofing system manufacturer must provide the following: 1. Report progress and quality of the work as observed. Progress reports must be published to an online system as referenced in Section 1.4. 2. Provide DAILY roofing installation inspections: Inspections must include; photographic documentation of work in-progress and written statements of compliance with details/shop drawings. 3. Report to the owner and owner’s rep. in writing any failure or refusal of the contractor to correct unacceptable practices called to the contractor’s attention. 4. Confirm after project completion that the manufacturer has observed no application procedures in conflict with the specifications other than those that may have been previously reported and corrected. 1.7 WARRANTY A. The roofing system manufacturer must have been in continuous business operation for a period of time at least as long as the length of the roof system warranty provided for this project. PART 2 – PRODUCTS (NOT USED) PART 3 – EXECUTION 3.1 EXECUTION, GENERAL A. Comply with requirements of related Division 07 Section. 3.2 GENERAL INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS A. Cooperate with manufacturer, inspection and test agencies engaged or required to perform services in connection with installing the roof system. B. Insurance/Code Compliance: Where required by code, install and test the roofing system to comply with governing regulation and specified insurance requirements. 3.3 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Roofing Manufacturer Representative shall perform field inspection as specified in Article titled: MANUFACTURER’S INSPECTIONS above. Inspections must include photographic documentation of installation progress, weather conditions, and personnel on the project at the time of inspection. 14 Page 113 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT B. Correct defects or irregularities discovered during field inspection. Issues deemed defective must be re-inspected and determined suitable by the roofing manufacturer. C. Require attendance of roofing materials manufacturers’ representatives at site during installation of the roofing system. A copy of the specification shall also be on site at all times. D. Frequent progress meetings shall be conducted during the performance of roof system installation and must be attended by the owner, architect or engineer, roofing system manufacturer’s full time employee, and other representatives directly concerned with performance of the work. 3.4 FINAL INSPECTION A. At the completion of the roofing installation and associated work, meet with contractor, installer of associated work, owner, roofing system manufacturer’s representative, and other representatives directly concerned with performance of roofing system. B. Walk roof surface areas of the building, inspect perimeter building edges as well as flashing of roof penetrations, walls, curbs and other equipment. List all items requiring correction or completion and furnish copy of list to each party in attendance. C. Notify the Owner’s Representative upon completion of corrections. D. The roofing system manufacturer reserves the right to request a thermographic scan of the roof during final inspection to determine if any damp or wet materials have been installed. The thermographic scan shall be provided by the roofing contractor. E. If core cuts verify the presence of damp or wet materials, the roofing contractor shall be required to replace the damaged areas at his own expense. F. Following the final inspection, provide written notice of acceptance of the installation from the roofing system manufacturer. G. Immediately correct roof leakage during construction. If the contractor does not respond within twenty four (24) hours, the owner may exercise right to correct the Work under the terms of the Conditions of the Contract. END OF SECTION SECTION 05 41 00 - METAL FRAMING SYSTEM PART 1 – GENERAL 15 Page 114 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. General 1. The retrofit roof framing system will support a new metal roofing system over the existing roof structure. It shall be engineered to meet specified code and design loads, transferring all loads to existing structural members. The system shall not be attached to or supported by the existing roof decking. It must correct inconsistencies in the roof’s topography and perimeter, establishing a new, uniform roof slope while minimizing potential oil-canning in the new metal roof system. 2. Provide all necessary labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services for the retrofit roof framing, as indicated in the Contract Documents. 3. Coordinate with other trades to ensure proper integration of the framing system. 4. Include all supplementary items and components necessary for a complete and secure installation, whether specifically indicated or not. 5. Refer to Division 1 for General Requirements. B. Related Work Specified Elsewhere 1. Metal Roof Panels – Section 074113 1.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Applicable Standards: All referenced publications shall be the most current edition as of the date of solicitation. 1. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC): o AISC Specification for Structural Steel for Buildings o AISC: "2001 North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Structural Members" 2. American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI): o AISI “Cold-Formed Steel Design Manual” 3. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): o ASCE-7 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures 4. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (as applicable): o ASTM A 36/A 36M – Structural Steel o ASTM A 653/A 653M – Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated by the Hot-Dip Method 5. International Building Code (IBC) 6. Light Gauge Structural Institute (LGSI) 7. American Society Of Heating, Refrigerating And Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE): o ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 90.1 – Energy Standard for Buildings B. Manufacturer Qualifications 1. Manufacturer must have a qualified PE (Physical Engineer) on staff for quality assurance in design and manufacturing. A compliance letter will be provided with product approval submittals. 2. Manufacturer must have a minimum of 10-years’ experience in design and specification of metal framing components. A compliance letter will be provided with product approval submittals. 16 Page 115 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3. The manufacturer shall also supply the metal roof and wall panel systems specified in Section 07610 and these components, including all accessories will be covered under a single-source warranty. C. Installation Contractor Qualifications 1. The contractor shall be a certified installer, approved by the manufacturer, with the following minimum requirements: o A minimum of $250,000 general liability insurance coverage. o Statutory worker’s compensation coverage. o No active claims for negligent acts or defective workmanship. o No bankruptcy filings under any state or federal insolvency codes. o A certified foreman, trained by the manufacturer, shall supervise installation at all times. 2. Pre-Installation Conference: o A meeting shall be held at the project site prior to installation to review framing details, anchorage methods, and phasing as necessary. 1.03 SUBMITTALS A. Provide complete shop drawings and details, including framing layout, component connections, and anchorage points, for approval by the architect and general contractor. B. Include engineering design calculations for the structural properties of the framing system and the metal roof panel system, sealed by a licensed Professional Engineer in the state of the project. C. Submittals shall also include a roof plan showing perimeter dimensions, equipment locations, and any relevant site conditions. 1.04 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS A. General Design the complete structural retrofit roof framing system in accordance with AISI, MBMA, ASCE, and local building codes. Any field revisions to framing members must be approved by the manufacturer. B. Building Code The system must meet the most current version of the applicable building code (IBC, UBC, BOCA, ASCE). C. Wind Load Design The framing assembly shall withstand wind pressures as specified in Section 07610. D. Live and Snow Load Design The system must meet local live and snow load requirements, with a deflection limit of L/180 for horizontal members and H/60 for vertical members. E. Dead Loads The framing must support the weight of the new roofing system and any additional collateral loads. 1.05 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Deliver materials properly packaged to prevent damage during transportation. B. Store materials off the ground and under waterproof cover to prevent damage. PART 2 – PRODUCTS 17 Page 116 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 2.01 MATERIALS A. Retrofit Roof Framing System Components 1. Base members shall be open-faced channels or zee shapes; vertical columns shall be cee shapes. Roof purlins shall be zee shapes with top flanges adjusted to match slopes of less than 4 inches per foot. For steeper slopes, an angle clip shall attach the purlin to the vertical column. 2. Eave members shall be cee shapes or angles with top flanges formed to match the roof slope. 3. Purlins shall conform to ASTM-A-1011, with a minimum yield strength of 50 ksi. Gauge and depth to be as per engineering calculations. 4. Vertical columns and base members shall have a minimum yield strength of 33 ksi for 18-gauge or lighter material, and 50 ksi for 16-gauge or heavier material, as specified by engineering. 5. Bracing angles shall conform to ASTM-A-792, 22-gauge 50 ksi minimum or 16-gauge 50 ksi minimum, as required. 6. Struts shall conform to ASTM A653/A1011, 18- or 16-gauge, per calculations. 7. All required hardware for installation shall be supplied per manufacturer’s instructions. B. Finishes 1. Red oxide primer shall meet FS-TTP-636 standards, with a dry film thickness of 0.6–1.0 mil. 2. Galvanized components shall conform to ASTM-A-653/653M G-90, G-60, or G-40. 3. Galvalume® components shall meet ASTM-A-792 AZ55 standards. C. Acceptable Manufacturer 1. IMETCO | 4648 South Old Peachtree Road | Norcross, GA | 30071 Phone: (800) 646-3826 | web: www.imetco.com 2. All products in this section must be supplied by the same manufacturer as Sections 07610 and 07620. 2.02 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS A. Fasteners and Anchors 1. Anchors for attaching the IntelliFrame RF retrofit framing to the existing structural support must meet required wind uplift values, have corrosion-resistant coatings, and securely attach to structural members. Minimum of two anchors for continuous base members and four for intermittent channels. 2. Fasteners shall be a minimum of ¼” diameter with 14 threads per inch and corrosion-resistant coating, as specified by the manufacturer. B. Anchor Penetration Sealant 1. Temporary sealant shall be used at anchor penetration points. The installer will select a sealant compatible with the existing roof membrane, ensuring a leak-free installation. PART 3 – EXECUTION 18 Page 117 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3.01 EXISTING ROOF SYSTEM SURVEY AND TESTING A. Before design work begins, the installation contractor must perform a rooftop survey to collect essential information on the existing roof and its support system. This information, provided to the retrofit system manufacturer, shall include: 1. Perimeter dimensions. 2. Dimensions of exterior and interior parapet walls (height, coping width, slope if applicable). 3. Dimensions of existing gravel stop or fascia (vertical face dimension for new perimeter flashing). 4. Dimensions of existing gutters (if they will remain). 5. Joist type, spacing, and span orientation. 6. Depth and type of decking, thickness of insulation. 7. Type of weatherproofing membrane. 8. Existing roof elevation changes and slope for drainage. 9. Wall construction at areas needing new counterflashing. 10. Location of HVAC equipment, with unit size and height. For units supported by IntelliFrame RF, provide weight and curb size. B. The contractor will conduct pullout testing on proposed anchors for attaching IntelliFrame RF to the existing structural system. Testing will be done across the roof using a calibrated pull-out tester. Anchors must penetrate the roof assembly and attach directly to structural members. The contractor will submit pull-out test results, anchorage design, and technical data for the anchors to the architect for review. C. The contractor will determine the compressive strength of the roof substrate and provide results to the retrofit system manufacturer. If values exceed the bearing capacity of standard IntelliFrame RF base members, the existing membrane and insulation will be removed at affected locations. D. The contractor will assess the roof substrate for moisture content and report any areas needing removal to the architect for remediation. 3.02 DEMOLITION OF EXISTING ROOF MATERIALS A. The contractor will remove any loose or semi-loose aggregate from the built-up roof asphalt at each framing attachment location to ensure a suitable bearing surface and enable temporary protective sealing at anchor points. B. If required, aggregate removal from the entire roof will be completed using a power broom, ensuring that drainage systems remain clear. All debris will be disposed of per local regulations. 19 Page 118 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3.03 FRAMING SYSTEM INSTALLATION A. General 1. The contractor shall install the IntelliFrame RF retrofit roof framing system per the manufacturer’s approved installation documents and drawings. 2. Retrofit purlins must be installed to prevent waves, warpage, or distortion. Extreme care should be taken to minimize oil canning in the metal roof panel system. 3. Field cutting of framing members shall be done with power tools, ensuring no damage to the existing roof or adjacent materials. Scrap should be minimized. 4. Continuous retrofit base members shall be shimmed to prevent rainwater damming during erection. Shims must be non-deteriorating with a minimum thickness of 3/8 inch. B. Erection Tolerances 1. Vertical members variation from plumb: 1/8 inch maximum. 2. Horizontal members variation from level: 1/8 inch maximum over the length. 3. Purlin variation from true roof plane: 1/4 inch in 20’-0” and 3/8 inch maximum in 40’-0”. 4. Purlin variation at ridge and panel end laps: 1/4 inch maximum in 20’-0”. 3.04 EXISTING ROOFTOP COMPONENTS AND EQUIPMENT A. If equipment locations conflict with IntelliFrame RF components, the contractor will provide additional framing to span over the equipment. All modifications must be approved by the manufacturer and architect. B. Electrical service extension: The contractor shall extend wiring as needed, using junction boxes at splices, per electrical code. C. Plumbing extension: Existing sanitary vents must be extended to new roof jacks, with piping material matching the existing. Penetrations must not interrupt roof panel side seams without manufacturer approval. D. Flue stacks for high-temperature equipment must be extended to the new roof plane and adequately protected. E. Ventilation equipment must be reinstalled on new curbs, with ductwork extended and sealed to ensure a leak-proof assembly. 20 Page 119 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3.05 EXISTING COMPONENTS REINSTALLATION A. All relocated equipment must be securely installed to ensure a watertight and stable assembly. 3.06 CLEAN UP A. The contractor will protect installed framing from damage and remove all debris, including unused anchors, fasteners, and sealant, from the site. END OF SECTION 21 Page 120 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT SECTION 07410 METAL ROOF PANELS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Standing seam metal roofing system. B. Standing seam metal roofing accessories. C. Metal roofing accessories. 1.2 REFERENCES A. ASTM A 792/A 792M - Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, 55% Aluminum-Zinc Alloy- Coated by the Hot-Dip Process. B. ASTM A 875 - Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-5 % Aluminum Alloy-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process C. ASTM D 1056 - Standard Specification for Flexible Cellular Materials - Sponge or Expanded Rubber. D. ASTM D 3575 - Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials made from Olefin Polymers. E. ASTM E 84 - Standard Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials. F. ASTM E 1592 - Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference. G. ASTM E 1646 - Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Metal Roof Panel Systems by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference. H. ASTM E 1680 - Standard Test Method for Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Metal Roof Panel Systems. I. ASTM E 2140 - Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Metal Roof Panel Systems by Static Water Pressure Head. J. ASCE 7 - Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. K. UL 263 - Fire Tests of Building Constructions and Materials. L. UL 790 - Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Roof Coverings. M. UL 1897 - Uplift Test for Roof Covering Systems. N. ICC-ES AC166 - Test Procedure for Wind Driven Rain Resistance of Metal Roof Coverings. O. SMACNA - Architectural Sheet Metal Manual. P. NRCA - The NRCA Roofing and Waterproofing Manual. 22 Page 121 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 1.3 DESIGN / PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Standing Seam Roofing System: R-Mer Span 1. Thermal Expansion and Contraction: a. Completed metal roofing and flashing system shall be capable of withstanding expansion and contraction of components caused by changes in temperature without buckling, producing excess stress on structure, anchors or fasteners, or reducing performance ability. b. Design temperature differential shall be not less then 200 degrees F. c. Interface between panel and clip shall provide for unlimited thermal movement in each direction along the longitudinal direction. d. Location of metal roofing rigid connector shall be at roof ridge unless otherwise approved by the Project Architect. Metal ridge connector may require design as per job conditions by specified manufacturer. 2. Uniform Wind Load Capacity: a. Installed roof system shall withstand negative (uplift) design wind loading pressures complying with the following criteria. 1) Design Code: ASCE 7, Method 2 for Components and Cladding. 2) Safety Factor: 1.67 after any load reduction or material stress increase. 3) Category __III_ Building with an Importance Factor of _1__. 4) Wind Speed: __120_ mph. 5) Ultimate Pullout Value: _779__ pounds per each of the two fasteners holding the panel anchor to the roof decking or framing system. b. ASTM E 1592: Capacity shall be determined using pleated airbag method in accordance with ASTM E 1592, testing of sheet metal roof panels. Allowable safe working loads shall be determined by dividing the ultimate test load by the safety factor specified above. c. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc., (UL), wind uplift resistance classification: Roof assembly shall be classified as Class 1-90, as defined by UL 580 d. FM 4471: Submit test report for negative wind uplift pressures no less than that specified. Roof system must have approval over the substrate specified. 3. Uniform Positive Load Capacity. a. Installed roof system shall be capable of resisting the following positive uniform roof loads: Roof Live Load of 20 psf; Roof Snow Load of __22_ psf. b. Dead Load: Loading of the roof structure, due to tear off of existing, and/or installation of new roofing materials shall not exceed the present loading due to weight of the existing roofing system. c. Installed roof system shall carry positive uniform design loads with a maximum system deflection of L/180 as measured at the rib (web) of the panel. 4. ASTM E 1680: Static pressure air infiltration (roof panels): a. Pressure Leakage Rate: 1) 1.57 PSF 0.0012 cfm/sq.ft. 2) 6.24 PSF 0.0001 cfm/sq.ft. 3) 20.0 PSF 0.0011 cfm/sq.ft. 5. ASTM E 1646: Static pressure water infiltration (roof panels): a. Pressure Result: 1) 5 Gal. /Hr. per S.F. and Static No Leakage 2) Pressure of 20.0 Psf for 15 minutes 6. Capacities for gauge, span or loading other than those tested may be determined by interpolation of test results within the range of test data. Extrapolations for conditions outside test range are not acceptable. 23 Page 122 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 7. Water penetration (dynamic pressure): No water penetration, other than condensation, when exposed to dynamic rain and 70 mph wind velocities for not less than five minutes duration, when tested in accord with principles of AAMA 501.1. 8. Wind and wind driven rain resistance: No water penetration or panel movement when exposed to 110 mph wind velocities when tested in accordance with TAS 100. 9. Installed roof system assembly shall show that it can resist the calculated roof pressure in accordance with the test results of TAS 125. 10. Water penetration in low slope applications: No water penetration or panel movement when subject to 6 inch head of water for 6 hours when tested in accordance with the ASTM E 2140 and when subject to 6 inch head of water for 7 days when tested in accordance with the TAS 114 appendix G. 11. Submit third party validation of environmental claims, prepared UL Environment, for all metal roof panels containing recycled content and/or bio based content. 1.4 SUBMITTALS AND SUBSTITUTIONS A. Product Data: Submit product data, test reports, and certifications in accordance with quality assurance and performance requirements specified herein. B. Design Loads: Submit manufacturer's minimum design load calculations according to ASCE 7, Method 2 for Components and Cladding. In no case shall the design loads be taken to be less than those specified herein. C. Dead Load Evaluation: Provide documentation from a licensed structural engineer of a structural evaluation of the roof structure and it's suitability for the new imposed roofing loads. D. Shop Drawings: Prepared specifically for this project; showing dimensions of metal roofing and accessories, fastening details and connections and interface with other products. E. LEED Submittals: Provide documentation of how the requirements of Credit will be met: 1. List of proposed materials with recycled content. Indicate post-consumer recycled content and pre-consumer recycled content for each product having recycled content. 2. Product data and certification letter indicating percentages by weight of post- consumer and pre-consumer recycled content for products having recycled content. F. Selection Samples: For each finish product specified, two complete sets of samples representing manufacturer's full range of available colors and textures. G. Verification Samples: For each finish product specified, two samples, minimum size 6 inches (150 mm) square, representing actual product, color, and textures. H. Manufacturer's Certificates: Certify products meet or exceed specified requirements. I. Closeout Submittals: 1. Provide manufacturer's maintenance instructions that include recommendations for periodic checking and maintenance of installed roof system. 2. Provide executed copy of manufacturer's warranty. J. Substitutions 1. The materials outlined herein are the type of materials that should be used in this project. When a particular make or trade name is specified, it shall be indicative of the minimum standard required. The bidder must disclose in his/her bid package the 24 Page 123 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT manufacturer that is intended to be used on this Project if other than the listed manufacturers. If no manufacturer is listed, the bidder’s bid is accepted only with the use of the Basis of Design manufacturer and the bidder must use the Basis of Design manufacturer. 2. Bidder will not be allowed to change materials after the bid opening date. 3. If an alternate material is bid, the material must be equal or exceed the specifications, and submitted by the bidding Roofing Contractor to the Architect for approval and include the following: a. Written application with explanation of why it should be considered b. Material product data sheets c. A certificate from an accredited testing laboratory comparing the physical and performance attributes of the proposed material with those materials denoted as pre-approved systems or the characteristics noted in the material specification section. d. A list of at least five (5) jobs where the proposed alternate material was used under similar conditions. These jobs shall be located within fifty (50) miles of this project. Each job must be at least five (5) years old, and each must be available for inspection by the Architect/Owner. e. The manufacturer must have a current ratio of 5:1 (current assets to current liabilities) and demonstrate such with an audited financial statement supported by an affidavit from a third party. Manufacturer must not have been in Chapter 11 bankruptcy during the last five (5) years or settled litigation or paid fines to a public agency in excess of $20 million dollars. The manufacturer must also have current ISO 9001:2000 certification for the manufacturing of the products to be utilized on this project. f. A sample warranty by the manufacturer of the standing seam metal roofing system. The manufacturer must be the organization that physically manufacturers and guarantees the standing seam metal roofing system. g. Bidding contractor, if making a request for substitution, represents that he/she personally investigated the proposed product or method and determined that it is equal or superior in all respects to that specified. He/she will provide the same guarantee for substitution as the products specified, waives all claims for additional cost related to substitution, and will reimburse the owner for all redesign cost by the architect for accommodation of the substitute. K. The Architect reserves the right to be the final authority on the acceptance or rejection of any or all bids, proposed alternate roofing systems or materials that has met ALL specified requirement criteria. L. Alternate material submissions shall be sent to the Architect by the bidding Roofing Contractor. Only substitutes approved in writing by the Architect will be considered. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Manufacturer Qualifications: 1. Manufacturer shall have in place a documented, standardized quality control program such as ISO-9001 approval. 2. Company specializing in manufacturing the products specified in this section with minimum 12 years documented experience. B. Installer Qualifications: Certified and approved installer of the sheet metal roofing manufacturer with a minimum of 5 years experience with said manufacturer. 25 Page 124 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT C. Installer’s Field Supervision: Maintain a full-time Supervisor/Foreman on job site during all phases of roofing work and at any time roofing work is in progress. Maintain proper supervision of workmen. Maintain a copy of the specifications in the possession of the Supervisor/Foremen and on the roof at all times. D. Source Limitations: Obtain all components of roof system from a single manufacturer. Secondary products that are required shall be recommended and approved in writing by the roofing system Manufacturer. E. Mock-Up: Provide a mock-up for evaluation of surface preparation techniques and application workmanship. 1. Finish areas designated by Architect. 2. Do not proceed with remaining work until workmanship, color, and sheen are approved by Architect. 3. Refinish mock-up area as required to produce acceptable work. 1.6 PRE-INSTALLATION CONFERENCE A. Convene a pre-roofing conference approximately two weeks before scheduled commencement of roofing system installation and associated work. B. Require attendance of installers of deck or substrate construction to receive roofing, installers of rooftop units and other work in and around roofing which must precede or follow roofing work including mechanical work, Architect, Owner, roofing system manufacturer's representative. C. Objectives include: 1. Review foreseeable methods and procedures related to roofing work, including set up and mobilization areas for stored material and work area. 2. Tour representative areas of roofing substrates, inspect and discuss condition of substrate, roof drains, curbs, penetrations and other preparatory work. 3. Review structural loading limitations of deck and inspect deck for loss of flatness and for required attachment. 4. Review roofing system requirements, Drawings, Specifications and other Contract Documents. 5. Review and finalize schedule related to roofing work and verify availability of materials, installer's personnel, equipment and facilities needed to make progress and avoid delays. 6. Review required inspection, testing, certifying procedures. 7. Review weather and forecasted weather conditions and procedures for coping with unfavorable conditions, including possibility of temporary roofing. 8. Record conference including decisions and agreements reached. Furnish a copy of records to each party attending. 1.7 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Deliver materials in manufacturer's original, unopened, undamaged containers with identification labels intact. B. Store materials protected from exposure to harmful environmental conditions and at temperature and humidity conditions recommended by the manufacturer. 1. Store materials above ground, on skids. 26 Page 125 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 2. Protect material with waterproof covering and allow sufficient ventilation to prevent condensation buildup or moisture entrapment on the materials. 1.8 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MANUFACTURER’S INSPECTIONS A. Maintain environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, and ventilation) within limits recommended by manufacturer for optimum results. Do not install products under environmental conditions outside manufacturer's absolute limits. B. When the project is in progress, the roofing system manufacturer will provide the following: 1. Keep the Architect informed as to the progress and quality of the work as observed. 2. Provide daily job site inspections a minimum of day (2) days a week with reports to the Architect. The reports will include pictures of the days progress made by the contractor and a detailed written report as to the work performed that day. 3. Roofing manufacturer’s inspector must have a minimum of 1 year experience with said roofing manufacturer and be an employee of the manufacturer warranting the roof system. A signed affidavit should be submitted as to the hire date of said employee of roofing manufacturer. 4. Report to the Architect in writing any failure or refusal of the Contractor to correct unacceptable practices called to the Contractor’s attention. 5. Confirm after completion that manufacturer has observed no application procedures in conflict with the specifications other than those that may have been previously reported and corrected. 1.9 WARRANTY A. Warranty: 1. 30 year, no dollar limit, warranty. 2. Provide installers 4 year warranty covering roofing system installation and water- tightness. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING A. R-Mer Span/Series 300: 1. Width of Standing T-Seam Panel: 1 inch T-seam. a. 18 inches. 2. Standing Seam: 2-3/8 inch tall mechanically seamed with factory installed hot melt sealant in-seam cap. Panel/Cap is configured with a total of 4 layers of metal surrounding anchor clip. 3. Panel Profile: Provided with minimum 1-1/2 inches wide elevated mesa's every 2 inches on center continuous throughout panel. a. Slope: Open Purlins or Solid Substrate down to 1/4:12. 4. Panel material: a. Galvanized Steel 22ga , G90, smooth as per ASTM A 653. 5. Flashing and flat stock material: Fabricate in profiles indicated on Drawings of same material, thickness, and finish as roof system, unless indicated otherwise. 6. Coated Finish: a. Exposed surfaces for coated panels: 1) Two coat coil applied, baked-on full-strength (70% resin) fluorocarbon coating system (polyvinylidene fluoride, PVF2), applied by 27 Page 126 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT manufacturer's approved applicator. b. Unexposed surfaces for coated panels shall be baked-on polyester coating with .20 to .30 dry film thickness (TDF). 7. Accessory Components: a. Anchor Clips: 1) Concealed Standard Anchor Clips: Clips 16 gauge galvanized steel, 1 piece clip with projecting legs for additional panel alignment and provision for unlimited thermal movement in each direction along the longitudinal dimension. b. Fasteners: 1) Concealed fasteners: Corrosion resistant steel fasteners (zinc plated, stainless steel or equal) designed to meet structural loading requirements. 2) Exposed fasteners: Series 410 stainless steel fasteners or 1/8 inch diameter stainless steel waterproof rivets. All exposed fasteners shall be factory painted to match the color of the standing seam panels. c. Closures: Factory precut closed cell foam meeting ASTM D 1056 or ASTM D 3575, enclosed in metal channel matching panels when used at hip, ridge, rake, and jamb. d. Provide all miscellaneous accessories for complete installation. 2.2 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING ACCESSORIES A. Sealant: 1. Concealed Applications: Non-Curing Butyl Sealant - Schnee-Morehead, Inc. SM5430 Acryl-R, or equal. 2. Exposed Applications: UV Resistant Tripolymer Sealant - Geocel Corporation, 2300 Tripolymer Sealant, or equal. 2.3 METAL ROOFING ACCESSORlES A. S-5! Snow Retention System: R-Mer Span metal panel systems. B. Underlayment: 40 mil minimum high temp self-adhered membrane, installed in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. C. Insulation: 1. Type: _Polyisocyanurate D. Framing Components: 1. Hat Sections: Galvanized steel furring hat sections, designed specific for project. 2. Retrofit Furring: Install galvanized or painted steel retrofit furring members over the existing standing seam roof panels. Provide with lower flange and web notched to match the profile of the existing standing seam roof panels. Designed specific for project. E. Bearing Plates: 1. Galvanized steel bearing plates 3 inches by 5 inches by 16 gauge, minimum. 2. Pre-punch with a hole pattern matching that of the panel anchor clips. Slotted holes are 28 Page 127 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT acceptable. F. Sealant: 1. Concealed Applications: Non-Curing Butyl Sealant - Schnee-Morehead, Inc. SM5430 Acryl-R, or equal. 2. Exposed Applications: UV Resistant Tripolymer Sealant - Geocel Corporation, 2300 Tripolymer Sealant, or equal. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Examine surfaces to receive metal roofing. Notify the Architect in writing of any defective B. Structural Deck Substrate: 1. Inspect roof deck to verify deck is clean and smooth, free of depressions, waves, or projections, and properly sloped. 2. Verify deck is dry and joints are solidly supported and fastened. 3. Verify wood nailers are installed and correctly located. Do not use pressure-treated wood containing salt-based preservatives or materials corrosive to steel. C. Structural Framing Substrate: 1. Verify primary and secondary framing members are installed and fastened, properly aligned and sloped. 2. Verify damaged shop coatings are repaired with touch up paint. D. Verify roof openings, curbs, pipes, sleeves, ducts, or vents through roof are solidly set, reglets are in place, and nailing strips located. E. Correct defective conditions before beginning work. 3.2 INSTALLATION A. Install in conformance with the NRCA Roofing and Waterproofing Manual and Manufacturers installation requirements. B. Form panel shape as indicated on Drawings, accurate in size, square, and free from distortion or defects. C. Install all panels continuous from ridge to eave. Transverse seams are not permitted. D. Panel lengths that exceed maximum shipping lengths shall be field rolled on equipment owned by the panel manufacturer. Seam sealant must be factory applied. E. Exposed fasteners, screws and/or roof mastic are unacceptable and will be rejected. System configuration only allows for exposed fasteners at panel overlap, if required, and at trim details in accordance with the Manufacturer's requirements. F. Where not otherwise indicated conform to SMACNA details including flashings and trim. G. Install sealants where indicated to clean dry surfaces only without skips or voids.. 29 Page 128 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT H. Install metal edge treatment in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and the approved shop drawings. I. Install metal roofing accessories in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and the approved shop drawings. 3.3 PROTECTION A. Protect installed products until completion of project. B. Touch-up, repair or replace damaged products before Substantial Completion. END OF SECTION 30 Page 129 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT SECTION 075630 - FLUID APPLIED ROOFING RESTORATION PART 1 GENERAL 1. RELATED DOCUMENTS a. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 2. SUMMARY a. All reinforced fluid applied membrane is being applied to extend existing roof warranties. b. Section Includes: 1) Smooth Surface Modified Bitumen Roof Membrane Restoration. a) Surface preparation: Remove membrane chalking, dust, dirt, and debris. b) Fascia Edges: Inspect and make repairs to membrane c) Parapets and Vertical Surfaces: Repair or replace flashing membrane as needed. d) Metal Flashings: Repair/Replace metal flashings as marked on drawings, pitch pockets, etc. e) Roof Repairs: Repair blisters, stressed, deteriorated or cracked membrane. f) Primer: Prime over new asphaltic or metal materials only. g) Install base coating and fabric reinforcement on flashings and entire roof surface. Let cure, and top coat flashings and entire roof surface. c. Related Requirements: 1) Division 06 Section “Rough Carpentry” for wood blocking, curbs, cants, and nailers. 2) Division 07 Section "Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim" for metal roof flashings and counterflashings. 3) Division 07 Section "Joint Sealants" for joint sealants, joint fillers, and joint preparation. 3. DEFINITIONS a. Roofing Terminology: Definitions in ASTM D1079 and glossary of NRCA's "The NRCA Roofing and Waterproofing Manual" apply to work of this Section. 31 Page 130 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 4. PREINSTALLATION MEETINGS a. Preinstallation Roofing Conference: Conduct conference at Project site. 1) Meet with Owner, Architect, roofing Installer, roofing system manufacturer's representative, and installers whose work interfaces with or affects roofing, including installers of roof accessories and roof-mounted equipment. 2) Review methods and procedures related to roofing installation, including manufacturer's written instructions. 3) Review and finalize construction schedule, and verify availability of materials, Installer's personnel, equipment, and facilities needed to make progress and avoid delays. 4) Examine deck substrate conditions and finishes for compliance with requirements, including flatness and fastening. 5) Review structural loading limitations of roof deck during and after roofing. 6) Review base flashings, special roofing details, roof drainage, roof penetrations, equipment curbs, and condition of other construction that affects roofing system. 7) Review governing regulations and requirements for insurance and certificates if applicable. 8) Review temporary protection requirements for roofing system during and after installation. 9) Review roof observation and repair procedures after roofing installation. b. Manufacturers Inspections: 1) The Roofing Systems Manufacturer shall provide Daily jobsite inspections with weekly written reports progress reports with photographs of work in progress. One manufacturer’s representative shall provide all inspections. 2) Confirm, whenever called upon by the Architect or Owner that no application procedures were in conflict with the published specifications other than those that may have been previously reported and corrected. 3) Inspections: performed only by a full-time employee of the Roofing System Manufacturer. The Representative: has been in the employ of Manufacturer a minimum of 5 years and live within 100-mile radius of the jobsite. 4) The Roofing System Manufacturer provide inspections of the roofing system, whenever called upon by the Architect or Owner, for the duration of the delivered warranty period 5. ACTION SUBMITTALS a. Product Data: For each type of product indicated. Include data substantiating that materials comply with requirements. 1) Descriptive product data including MSD sheets. 2) Certification of Class A roof system. 3) Sample copy of contractor’s workmanship warranty. 4) Sample copy of specified Manufacturer’s warranty. 5) Sample copy of Manufacturer’s Architectural indemnification Agreement. b. Shop Drawings: For roofing system. Include plans, elevations, sections, details, and attachments to other work, including: 1) Base flashings and membrane terminations. 2) Tapered insulation, including slopes. 32 Page 131 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3) Crickets, saddles, and tapered edge strips, including slopes. 4) Insulation fastening patterns for corner, perimeter, and field-of-roof locations. c. Samples for Verification: For the following products: 1) 12-by-12-inch (300-by-300-mm) dry sample of Fluid Applied System 2) 12-by-12-inch (300-by-300-mm) square of roofing insulation. 3) 6 insulation fasteners of each type, length, and finish. 6. INFORMATIONAL SUBMITALS a. Installer Certificates: Signed by roofing system manufacturer certifying that Installer is approved, authorized, or licensed by manufacturer to install roofing system and is eligible to receive the standard roofing manufacturer’s warranty. b. Manufacturer Certificates: Signed by roofing manufacturer certifying that roofing system complies with requirements specified in "Performance Requirements" Article. 1) Submit evidence of meeting performance requirements. c. Qualification Data: For firms and persons specified in the “Quality Assurance” Article to demonstrate their capabilities and experience. Include lists of completed projects with project names and addresses, names and addresses of Owners and Architects, and other information specified. d. Product Test Reports: Based on evaluation of comprehensive tests performed by manufacturer and witnessed by a qualified testing agency, indicate compliance of components of roofing system with requirements based on comprehensive testing of current product specification. e. Indicate compliance of bulk roofing asphalt materials delivered to Project with requirements. Include quantity and statistical and descriptive data for each product. Submit certificate with each load before it is used. f. Include continuous log showing time and temperature for each load of bulk bitumen, indicating date obtained from manufacturer, where held, and how transported before final heating and application in roof. g. Research/Evaluation Reports: Evidence of roofing system’s compliance with building code in effect for Project from a model code organization acceptable to authorities having jurisdiction. h. Warranties: Sample copy of standard roofing manufacturer’s warranty stating obligations, remedies, limitations, and exclusions of warranty. i. Wind Uplift Calculation: Roofing system manufacturer’s engineering department shall provide an ASCE 7-10 calculation per IBC, Chapter 15. Calculations shall be diagrammatically show fastening pattern for insulation attachment. j. Plumbing calculation: roofing system manufacturer’s engineering department shall provide a primary drain and overflow drain or overflow scupper calculation per IBC, Chapter 11. Calculations shall be stamped by an Illinois-licensed engineer. 33 Page 132 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 7. CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS a. Maintenance Data: For roofing system to include in maintenance manuals. b. Inspection Report: Copy of roofing system manufacturer's inspection report of completed roofing installation. 8. QUALITY ASSURANCE a. Manufacturer Qualifications: Company specializing in manufacturing products specified in this section with documented ISO 9001 certification. b. Installer Qualifications: Engage an experienced installer to perform Work of this Section who has specialized in installing roofing similar to that required for this Project; who is approved, authorized, or licensed by the roofing system manufacturer to install manufacturer’s product; and who is eligible to receive standard roofing manufacturer's warranty. All bidding roofing contractors must have full-time roofing installers on the payroll of the company and have an established certified and verifiable apprenticeship-training program for minimum 5 years. Brokers or jobbers that subcontract roofing work are not acceptable for certification to bid. All contractors must provide an AIA Qualification Form with their roofing bid to be considered as a responsible bidder. 9. DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING a. Deliver roofing materials to Project site in original containers with seals unbroken and labeled with manufacturer's name, product brand name and type, date of manufacture, approval or listing agency markings, and directions for storing and mixing with other components. b. Store liquid materials in their original undamaged containers in a clean, dry, protected location and within the temperature range required by roofing system manufacturer. Protect stored liquid material from direct sunlight. 1) Discard and legally dispose of liquid material that cannot be applied within its stated shelf life. c. Protect roof insulation materials from physical damage and from deterioration by sunlight, moisture, soiling, and other sources. Store in a dry location. Comply with insulation manufacturer's written instructions for handling, storing, and protecting during installation. d. Handle and store roofing materials, and place equipment in a manner to avoid permanent deflection of deck. e. Storage temperatures should be between 60 deg F to 80 deg F (15.6 deg to 26.7 deg C) and not exceed 110 deg F (43.3 deg C). Indoor ventilated storage is recommended Ensure jobsite storage is in a shaded and ventilated area. Do not store in direct sunlight. Keep materials away from open flame or welding sparks. 34 Page 133 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 10. FIELD CONDITIONS a. Weather Limitations: Proceed with installation only when existing and forecasted weather conditions permit roofing system to be installed according to manufacturer's written instructions and warranty requirements. b. When applying materials with spray equipment, take precautions to prevent over spray and/or solvents from damaging or defacing surrounding walls, building surfaces, vehicles or other property. Care should be taken to do the following: 1) Close air intakes into the building. 2) Have a dry chemical fire extinguisher available at the jobsite. 3) Post and enforce "No Smoking" signs. c. Avoid inhaling spray mist; take precautions to ensure adequate ventilation. d. Protect completed roof sections from foot traffic for a period of at least 48 hours at 75 degrees F (24 degrees C) and 50 percent relative humidity or until fully cured. e. Take precautions to ensure that materials do not freeze. f. Minimum temperature for application is 50 degrees F (10 degrees C) and rising 11. WARRANTY a. Manufacturer agrees to repair or replace components of roofing system that fail in materials or workmanship within specified warranty period. The manufacturer shall provide to the Owner, at the Manufacturer’s expense, with the labor and material necessary to return the defective area to a watertight condition. 1) Warranty Period: 20 years from date of Substantial Completion. b. Installer will submit a minimum four (4) year warranty to the membrane manufacturer with a copy directly to the Owner. PART 2 PRODUCTS 1. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS a. General Performance: Installed Reinforced, Fluid Applied Membrane shall withstand specified uplift pressures, thermally induced movement, and exposure to weather without failure due to defective manufacture, fabrication, installation, or other defects in construction. Roofing and base flashings shall remain watertight. 1) Accelerated Weathering: Roofing system shall withstand 2000 hours of exposure when tested according to ASTM G152, ASTM G154, or ASTM G155. 35 Page 134 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 2) Impact Resistance: Roofing system shall resist impact damage when tested according to ASTM D3746 or ASTM D4272. b. Material Compatibility: Roofing materials shall be compatible with one another and adjacent materials under conditions of service and application required, as demonstrated by roofing manufacturer based on testing and field experience. c. Exterior Fire-Test Exposure: ASTM E108 or UL 790, Class A; for application and roof slopes indicated; testing by a qualified testing agency. Identify products with appropriate markings of applicable testing agency. d. Fire-Resistance Ratings: Comply with fire-resistance-rated assembly designs indicated. Identify products with appropriate markings of applicable testing agency. 2. MANUFACTURERS a. Basis-of-Design Product: Subject to compliance with requirements, provide The Garland Co.; Liquitec,. b. Listing of specific manufactures is not an endorsement of compliance with the specifications. Each of the manufacturers must meet all of the performance requirements specified including but not limited to providing ASCE 7 engineering calculations, tensile/tear strengths, warranty requirements, manufacturer’s requirements and the required manufacturer’s inspections schedule. Proof of compliance must be received by the Architect 7 days prior to bid opening. Failure of the any roof system to meet all requirements of this specification will be determined to be an unresponsive bid. c. Source Limitations: Obtain components for roofing system from same manufacturer as membrane roofing or manufacturer approved by membrane roofing manufacturer. 3. FLUID APPLIED MEMBRANE MATERIALS a. Top Coat: LiquiTec: Multi-purpose, 100-percent solids, two-part, fast-cure, polyurea liquid waterproofing membrane having the following characteristics: 1) Elongation, ASTM D412: 433-percent. 2) Tensile Strength, ASTM D412: 2300 psi. 3) Tear Resistance, ASTM D624: 449 lb/inch. 4) Low Temperature Flexibility, ASTM D522: minus 60 deg F (minus 51.1 deg C). 5) Hardness, ASTM D2240 (Shore A): 80. 6) Dynamic Impact Resistance (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D5635, 37 joules. 7) Static Puncture Resistance (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D5602, 20 kg. 8) Tensile-Tear Resistance (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D4073, 274 lbf. 9) Tensile Load Strain (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D4073, 150 lbf/inch. 10) Toughness:193 ft-lbf/sq ft. 11) Dry Film Thickness (Fully Reinforced System), 88 mils. 12) Lap Shear Strength (MB Seam with coating): ASTM D7379, 231 lbf/inch. 13) Density at 77 deg F (25 deg C, ASTM D2939) 9.6 lb/gal (1.2 g/cu m). 14) Flash Point: ASTM D93, 110 deg F min. (43 deg C). 36 Page 135 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 15) VOC: 0 g/L. 16) Microbial Resistance: ASTM G21, No Microbial Growth. 17) Initial Reflectance: 0.84. 18) Initial Emittance: 0.88. 19) Initial SRI: 105. b. Base Coat: LiquiTec Base: Multi-purpose, 100% solids, two-part, fast-cure, polyurea liquid waterproofing membrane having the following characteristics: 1) Elongation, ASTM D412: 433 percent. 2) Tensile Strength, ASTM D412: 2300 psi. 3) Tear Resistance, ASTM D624: 449 lbs/inch. 4) Low Temperature Flexibility, ASTM D522: minus 60 deg F (minus 51.1 deg C) 5) Hardness, ASTM D2240 (Shore A): 80. 6) Dynamic Impact Resistance (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D5635, 37 joules. 7) Static Puncture Resistance (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D5602, 20 kg. 8) Tensile-Tear Resistance (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D4073, 274 lbf. 9) Tensile Load Strain (Fully Reinforced System): ASTM D4073,150 lbf/inch. 10) Toughness:193 ft-lbf/sq ft. 11) Dry Film Thickness (Fully Reinforced System), 88 mils. 12) Lap Shear Strength (MB Seam with coating): ASTM D7379, 231 lbf/inch. 13) Density at 77 deg F (25 deg C, ASTM D2939) 9.6 lb/gal (1.2 g/cu m). 14) Flash Point: ASTM D93, 110 deg F (43 deg C), minimum. 15) VOC: 0 g/L. 16) Microbial Resistance: ASTM G21, No Microbial Growth. c. Reinforcement: Grip Polyester Soft, strong, elastic, polyester reinforcing fabric. 4. ROOFING SHEET MATERIALS (FOR MODIFIED BITUMEN MEMBRANE REPAIRS) a. Base Sheet: ASTM D 6162, Grade S, 110 Mil SBS-modified asphalt sheet (reinforced with a combination of polyester fabric and glass fibers); smooth surfaced; suitable for torch application method specified. b. Granule-Surfaced Cap Sheet: ASTM D 6162, Grade G, SBS/SIS-modified asphalt sheet (reinforced with a combination of polyester fabric and glass fibers) – Torch Grade; granule surfaced; suitable for application method specified, and as follows: 1) Thickness: 195 mils. 2) Tensile Strength: 310 lbf/in.MD, 310lbf/in.CMD. 3) Elongation at Maximum Load: 3.5 percent at 73 deg F in each direction. 4) Tear Strength: 500 lbf/in.MD, 500lbf/in.CMD 5) Low-Temperature Flexibility: Pass at minus 30 deg F (minus 23 deg C). 6) Compound Stability: Not less than 250 deg F. 7) Mineral Color: White 37 Page 136 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 5. AUXILIARY ROOFING MATERIALS a. General: Auxiliary materials recommended by roofing system manufacturer for intended use and compatible with roofing. b. Roofing Mastic: Tuff Flash LO. c. Wood Nailer Strips: Furnish wood nailer strips complying with requirements of Division 06 Section "Rough Carpentry." d. Lead Flashings: 4 lb for roof drains and vent pipes. e. Mastic Sealant: Polyisobutylene; nonhardening, nonmigrating, nonskinning, and nondrying. f. Miscellaneous Accessories: Provide those recommended by roofing system manufacturer. 6. ROOF INSULATION (FOR SATURATED AREA REPAIR) a. General: Preformed roof insulation boards manufactured or approved by roofing manufacturer, selected from manufacturer's standard sizes suitable for application, of thicknesses indicated in drawings. b. Polyisocyanurate Board Insulation: ASTM C1289, Type II, Class 1, Grade 2, felt or glass-fiber mat facer on both major surfaces. 1) Manufacturers: Subject to compliance with requirements, provide products by one of the following: a) Viking Products Group b) Hunter Panels. c) Johns Manville. d) Rmax, Inc. c. Tapered Insulation: Provide factory-tapered insulation boards fabricated to slope of 1/4 inch per 12 inches unless otherwise indicated. d. Provide preformed saddles, crickets, tapered edge strips, and other insulation shapes where indicated for sloping to drain. Fabricate to slopes indicated. 7. INSULATION ACCESSORIES a. General: Roof insulation accessories recommended by insulation manufacturer for intended use and compatibility with roofing. b. Fasteners: Factory-coated steel fasteners and metal or plastic plates complying with corrosion- resistance provisions in FM Global 4470, designed for fastening roof insulation to substrate, and acceptable to roofing system manufacturer. 38 Page 137 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT c. Insulation Cant Strips: ASTM C208, Type II, Grade 1, cellulosic-fiber insulation board. PART 3 EXECUTION 1. EXAMINATION a. Examine substrates, areas, and conditions, with Installer present, for compliance with requirements and other conditions affecting performance of the Work: 1) Verify that roof openings and penetrations are in place, curbs are set and braced, and roof-drain bodies are securely clamped in place. 2) Verify that wood cants, blocking, curbs, and nailers are securely anchored to roof deck at penetrations and terminations and that nailers match thicknesses of insulation. 3) Verify that surface plane flatness and fastening of steel roof deck complies with insulation manufacturer's written requirements. 4) Verify that deck is securely fastened with no projecting fasteners and with no adjacent units in excess of 1/16 inch out of plane relative to adjoining deck. b. Proceed with installation only after unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. 2. PREPARATION a. Clean substrate of dust, debris, moisture, and other substances detrimental to roofing installation according to roofing system manufacturer's written instructions. Remove sharp projections. b. General: All necessary field and flashing repairs must be done according to good construction practices, including the removal of all wet insulation and defective materials as identified through a moisture detection survey such as an infrared scan and replacement with like-materials. 1) If wet, Remove existing roof flashings from curbs and parapet walls down to the surface of the roof. If wet, Remove existing flashings at roof drains and roof penetrations. 2) Remove all wet, deteriorated, blistered or delaminated roofing membrane or insulation and fill in any low spots occurring as a result of removal work to create a smooth, even surface for application of new roof membranes. 3) Install new wood nailers as necessary to accommodate insulation/recovery board or new nailing patterns. 4) When mechanically attached, the fastening pattern for the insulation/recovery board shall be as recommended by the specific product manufacturer. 5) Newly installed roof surfaces shall be primed as necessary and allowed to dry prior to installing the fluid-applied roofing system. c. Prevent materials from entering and clogging roof drains and conductors and from spilling or migrating onto surfaces of other construction. Remove roof-drain plugs when no work is taking place or when rain is forecast. d. Prepare surfaces using the methods recommended by the manufacturer for achieving the best result for the substrate under the project conditions. 39 Page 138 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT e. Repair all defects such as deteriorated roof decks; replace saturated insulation board, replace loose or brittle membrane or membrane flashings. Verify that exiting conditions meet the following requirements: 1) Existing membrane is either fully adhered or that the membranes mechanical fasteners are secured and functional. 2) Application of roofing materials over a brittle roof membrane is not recommended. f. Remove all loose dirt and foreign debris from the roof surface. Do not damage roof membrane in cleaning process. g. Clean and seal all parapet walls, gutters and coping caps, and repair any damaged metal where necessary. Seal watertight all fasteners, pipes, drains, vents, joints and penetrations where water could enter the building envelope. h. Clean the entire roof surface by removing all dirt, algae, paint, oil, talc, rust or foreign substance. Use a Weathered Membrane Cleaner and warm water. Scrub heavily soiled areas with a brush. Rinse with fresh water to remove all solution. Allow roof to dry thoroughly before continuing. i. Repair existing roof membrane as necessary to provide a sound substrate for the fluid-applied membrane. All surface defects (loose Seams, blisters, tears) must be repaired with similar materials. EPDM REPAIRS: 1) Drains: Before the roof coating is installed, remove clamping rings and strainer and block pipe from seeping asphalt and debris. Grind existing drain bowl clean of all debris to bare metal. Apply Metal Primer. Apply Liquitec into drain bowl and embed Grip Polyester Soft. Reinstall clamping ring. Replace broken bolts, install new domes or strainers and clamping rings (included in bid) before coating and polyester is applied. Test and inspect all existing drains & repair as required to make drains function properly. Cracked or broken drain bowls shall be replaced per unit process. Ensure coating does not cover drain bolts so that bolts can be easily tightened if need for future maintenance. 2) Wet Areas Replacement: Should wet substrates be discovered, replace with new polyisocyanurate insulation to match existing thicknesses. Add any insulation necessary to match thickness of existing insulation and to ensure that replacement area does not pond water. All wet areas shall be confirmed by the Architect. Replace wet areas with one ply of 60 Mil EPDM to match existing. Replace in kind if saturated or deteriorated areas are found. j. Pre-Treatment of Known Growth General Surfaces: Once areas of moss, mold, algae and other fungal growths or vegetation have been removed and surfaces have also been thoroughly cleaned, apply a biocide wash at a maximum spread rate of 0.2 gallons/square (0.08 liters/m), to guard against subsequent infection. Allow to dry onto absorbent surfaces before continuing with the application. On non-absorbent surfaces, allow to react before thoroughly rinsing to remove all traces of the solution. 40 Page 139 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 3. INSTALLATION, GENERAL a. General Installation Requirements: 1) Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Apply to minimum coating thickness required by the manufacturer. 2) Cooperate with manufacturer, inspection and test agencies engaged or required to perform services in connection with installing the roof system. 3) Insurance/Code Compliance: Where required by code, install and test the roofing system to comply with governing regulation and specified insurance requirements. 4) Protect work from spillage of roofing materials and prevent materials from entering or clogging drains and conductors. Replace or restore work damaged by installation of the roofing system. 5) All primers must be top coated within 24 hours of application. Re-prime if more time passes after priming. 6) Keep roofing materials dry during application. 7) Coordinate counter flashing, cap flashings, expansion joints and similar work with work specified in other Sections under Related Work. 8) Coordinate roof accessories and miscellaneous sheet metal accessory items, including piping vents and other devices with work specified in other Sections under Related Work. 4. FLUID APPLIED SYSTEM INSTALLATION a. EPDM ROOF RESTORATION 1) Surface preparation: Remove dirt, and debris. 2) Fascia Edges: Strip in with new EPDM membrane prior to Coating if necessary. 3) Parapets and Vertical Surfaces: Replace damaged flashing membrane as required. 4) Metal Flashings: Repair/Replace metal flashings, pitch pockets, etc. as noted on drawings. 5) Metal Edge: Properly clean, prepare, and apply 6” Uni-Bond self adhered, polyester embedded membrane. 6) Roof Repairs: Repair blisters, stressed or cracked membrane, wrinkles and tenting. Cut back, patch with new membrane 7) Coating Mixing Procedure: a) Mix Part A liquid for one minute using an electric heavy duty power drill and Jiffy mixer blade. b) Slowly pour contents of Part B jug, located inside the Part A pail, into the Part A container and mix the two components together for two minutes moving the Jiffy blade from top to bottom and along the sides to ensure the product is thoroughly mixed. c) Always mix entire kit contents together as packaged. Do not break down into smaller quantities. 8) Application of LiquiTec Base or LiquiTec and Reinforcement: a) On field surfaces run fabric reinforcement parallel to the low edge using a shingling method up the slope with minimum 3 inch fabric laps. b) After positioning reinforcement to roll out, apply Base Coat about 40 inches wide to surface where reinforcement ply is to be applied at a rate of 3 gallons per 100 SF over modified bitumen. c) Use a notched squeegee to spread coating and roller apply with ¾” nap roller to obtain uniform coverage. 41 Page 140 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT d) Do not apply coating too far ahead of fabric so coating does not dry before fabric can be embedded. e) Immediately roll reinforcement into wet coating. f) Ensure roller is fully saturated with coating and backroll over the reinforcement surface to fully saturate. g) Use care to lay the fabric tight to the roof surface without air pockets, wrinkles, fishmouths, etc. h) Lap adjacent rolls of reinforcement 3 inches and end laps 6 inches. i) Allow to dry, but no more than 72 hours before applying top coat. 9) Application of Top Coat a) Apply top coat of LiquiTec at 2.0 gallons per 100 SF to clean and dry reinforced base coat application. 10) Liquid Flashings: a) All flashings are coated in the same manner as the field prior to field application. b) Vertical liquid flashings shall run a minimum of 4” onto the horizontal surface 11) Application of Non-Skid Surface for Walkways (if applicable) a) Apply LiquiTec or LiquiTec Base at a minimum of 1.0 gal./100 sq. ft. (0.41 l/m2) to dry top coat within 72 hours of its application. b) Broadcast dry roofing granules or 20-40 mesh silica sand into wet coating and immediately back-roll to set. 5. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL a. Daily Roof Inspections: Coordinate with roofing system manufacturer's technical personnel to inspect roofing installation on a daily basis until completion and submit report to Architect. A manufacturer’s representative must be onsite full time to start the project. b. Notify Architect and Owner 48 hours in advance of the date and time of Final inspection. 6. PROTECTING AND CLEANING a. Protect roofing system from damage and wear during remainder of construction period. When remaining construction does not affect or endanger roofing, inspect roofing for deterioration and damage, describing its nature and extent in a written report, with copies to Architect and Owner. b. Correct deficiencies in or remove roofing system that does not comply with requirements, repair substrates, and repair or reinstall roofing system to a condition free of damage and deterioration at time of Substantial Completion and according to warranty requirements. c. Clean overspray and spillage from adjacent construction using cleaning agents and procedures recommended by manufacturer of affected construction. END OF SECTION 075630 42 Page 141 of 371 VILLAGE OF WINNETKA 2026 PUBLIC WORKS ROOF PROJECT 43 Page 142 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT 1390 Willow Road, Winnetka, IL 60093 Report Contents Report Details Images ......................................1 Date: 03/29/2026 Length Diagram..........................4 Report: 70148524 Pitch Diagram.............................5 Building: 3 Area Diagram .............................6 Penetrations Diagram .................7 Roof Details Notes Diagram ...........................8 Total Area: 22,349 sq ft Property Info..............................9 Total Roof Facets: 8 Report Summary.......................10 Predominant Pitch: 4/12 Number of Stories: >1 Total Ridges/Hips: 175 ft Total Valleys: 93 ft Total Rakes: 264 ft Total Eaves: 867 ft Total Penetrations: 33 Total Penetrations Perimeter: 224 ft Total Penetrations Area: 104 sq ft Contact Us Contact: Justin Reed The Garland Company Inc. Company: Address: 3800 East 91st Cleveland OH 44105 Phone: 425-555-5555 Measurements provided by www.eagleview.com www.eagleview.com/Guarantee.aspx In this 3D model, facets appear as semi-transparent to reveal overhangs. xcxc © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. Page 143 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT IMAGES The following aerial images show different angles of this structure for your reference. EPDM AREAS ONLY Top View © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 1 Page 144 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT IMAGES North View East View © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 2 Page 145 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT IMAGES South View West View © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 3 Page 146 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT LENGTH DIAGRAM Total Line Lengths: Ridges = 92 ft Valleys = 93 ft Flashing = 229 ft Eaves = 867 ft Hips = 83 ft Rakes = 264 ft Step flashing = 98 ft Parapets = 0 ft 62 41 41 12 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 144 166 164 5 92 64 62 36 29 36 23 16 92 48 N 36 36 43 27 W E +69 S 92 Note: This diagram contains segment lengths (rounded to the nearest whole number) over 5 feet. In some cases, segment labels have been removed for readability. Plus signs preface some numbers to avoid confusion when rotated (e.g. +6 and +9). © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 4 Page 147 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT PITCH DIAGRAM Pitch values are shown in inches per foot, and arrows indicate slope direction. The predominant pitch on this roof is 4/12. 5 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 4 4 4 4 4 N 4 4 W E S Note: This diagram contains labeled pitches for facet areas larger than 20 square feet. In some cases, pitch labels have been removed for readability. Gray shading indicates flat, 1/12 or 2/12 pitches. If present, a value of "F" indicates a flat facet (no pitch). © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 5 Page 148 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT AREA DIAGRAM Total Area = 22,349 sq ft, with 8 facets. 834 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 3556 6719 3346 293 1999 N 2254 3346 W E S Note: This diagram shows the square feet of each roof facet (rounded to the nearest foot). The total area in square feet, at the top of this page, is based on the non-rounded values of each roof facet (rounded to the nearest square foot after being totaled). © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 6 Page 149 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT PENETRATIONS Penetrations Notes Diagram Penetrations are labeled from smallest to largest for easy reference. Total Penetrations: 33 Total Penetrations Area: 104 sq ft Total Penetrations Perimeter = 224 ft Total Roof Area Less Penetrations = 22,245 sq ft 31 30 29 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 26 28 27 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 22 10 8 18 20 23 19 32 24 11 17 33 N 16 21 W E 12 13 15 14 S Note: Any measured penetration smaller than 3x3 feet may need field verification. Accuracy is not guaranteed. The total penetration area is not subtracted from the total roof area. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 7 Page 150 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT NOTES DIAGRAM Roof facets are labeled from smallest to largest (A to Z) for easy reference. B ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. G H F A C N D E W E S © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 8 Page 151 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT Property Info Property Location Longitude = -87.7555925 Latitude = 42.0999646 Online map of property: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=g&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q= 1390+Willow+Road,Winnetka,IL,60093 Property Info Year Built: Effective Year Built: * *. Notes This was ordered as a commercial property. There were no changes to the structure in the past four years. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 9 Page 152 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT SUMMARY Below is a measurement summary using the values presented in this report. Lengths, Areas and Pitches Ridge....................................................92 ft (1 Ridges) Hips .........................................................83 ft (2 Hips) Valleys .................................................93 ft (2 Valleys) Rakes*.................................................264 ft (8 Rakes) ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Eaves/Starter** ..................................867 ft (11 Eaves) Drip Edge (Eaves + Rakes) ............1,131 ft (19 Lengths) Parapet Walls ........................................0 ft (0 Lengths) Flashing ............................................229 ft (3 Lengths) Step Flashing.......................................98 ft (7 Lengths) Total Area ..................................................22,349 sq ft N Total Penetrations Area....................................104 sq ft W E Total Roof Area Less Penetrations ................22,245 sq ft S Total Penetrations Perimeter.................................224 ft Predominant Pitch..................................................4/12 Total Roof Facets = 8 *Rakes are defined as roof edges that are sloped (not level). ** Eaves are defined as roof edges that are not sloped and level. Areas per Pitch Roof Pitches 4/12 5/12 Area (sq ft) 21514.2 834.5 % of Squares 96.3% 3.7% The table above lists each pitch on this roof and the total area and percent (both rounded) of the roof with that pitch. Waste Calculation Table Waste % 0% 10% 12% 15% 17% 20% 22% Area (sq ft) 22,349 24583.9 25030.9 25701.4 26148.3 26818.8 27265.8 Squares 223.5 245.8 250.3 257.0 261.5 268.2 272.7 This table shows the total roof area and squares (rounded up to the nearest decimal) based upon different waste percentages. The waste factor is subject to the complexity of the roof, individual roofing techniques and your experience. Please consider this when calculating appropriate waste percentages. Note that only roof area is included in these waste calculations. Additional materials needed for ridge, hip, valley, and starter lengths are not included. Penetration Table 1-26 27-31 32 33 Area (sq ft) 2.3 4 9 15 Perimeter (ft) 6 8 12 16 Any measured penetration smaller than 3x3 feet may need field verification. Accuracy is not guaranteed. The total penetration area is not subtracted from the total roof area. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 10 Page 153 of 371  Legal Notice and Disclaimer March 29, 2026 1390 Willow Road, Winnetka, IL 60093 Report: 70148524 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER Notice and Disclaimer No Warranty: The Copyrighted Materials are provided to you "as is," and you agree to use it at your own risk. EagleView Technologies makes no guarantees, representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, arising by law or otherwise, including but not limited to, content, quality, accuracy, completeness, effectiveness, reliability, fitness for a particular purpose, usefulness, use or results to be obtained from the Copyrighted Materials. Contractors agree to always conduct a preliminary site survey to verify Roof Report ordered. In the event of an error in a Report, your sole remedy will be a refund of the fees paid by you to obtain this Report. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749; 9,599,466. Other Patents Pending. Page 154 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT 1390 Willow Road, Winnetka, IL 60093 Report Contents Report Details Images ......................................1 Date: 03/29/2026 Length Diagram..........................4 Report: 70146006 Pitch Diagram.............................5 Building: 2 Area Diagram .............................6 Penetrations Diagram .................7 Roof Details Notes Diagram ...........................8 Total Area: 11,008 sq ft Property Info..............................9 Total Roof Facets: 8 Report Summary.......................10 Predominant Pitch: 4/12 Number of Stories: <=1 Total Ridges/Hips: 0 ft Total Valleys: 4 ft Total Rakes: 278 ft Total Eaves: 527 ft Total Penetrations: 13 Total Penetrations Perimeter: 94 ft Total Penetrations Area: 67 sq ft Contact Us Contact: Justin Reed The Garland Company Inc. Company: Address: 3800 East 91st Cleveland OH 44105 Phone: 425-555-5555 Measurements provided by www.eagleview.com www.eagleview.com/Guarantee.aspx In this 3D model, facets appear as semi-transparent to reveal overhangs. xcxc © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. Page 155 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT IMAGES The following aerial images show different angles of this structure for your reference. EPDM AREAS ONLY Top View © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 1 Page 156 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT IMAGES North View East View © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 2 Page 157 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT IMAGES South View West View © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 3 Page 158 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT LENGTH DIAGRAM Total Line Lengths: Ridges = 0 ft Valleys = 4 ft Flashing = 234 ft Eaves = 527 ft Hips = 0 ft Rakes = 278 ft Step flashing = 87 ft Parapets = 0 ft 21 8 22 48 48 47 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 57 33 20 27 25 7 13 7 +99 +99 +99 62 72 25 N 44 13 20 W E 12 12 S 13 Note: This diagram contains segment lengths (rounded to the nearest whole number) over 5 feet. In some cases, segment labels have been removed for readability. Plus signs preface some numbers to avoid confusion when rotated (e.g. +6 and +9). © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 4 Page 159 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT PITCH DIAGRAM Pitch values are shown in inches per foot, and arrows indicate slope direction. The predominant pitch on this roof is 4/12. 4 4 4 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. +9 4 4 1 N W E 2 S Note: This diagram contains labeled pitches for facet areas larger than 20 square feet. In some cases, pitch labels have been removed for readability. Gray shading indicates flat, 1/12 or 2/12 pitches. If present, a value of "F" indicates a flat facet (no pitch). © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 5 Page 160 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT AREA DIAGRAM Total Area = 11,008 sq ft, with 8 facets. 1003 1554 28 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 43 4691 1957 1571 N W E 160 S Note: This diagram shows the square feet of each roof facet (rounded to the nearest foot). The total area in square feet, at the top of this page, is based on the non-rounded values of each roof facet (rounded to the nearest square foot after being totaled). © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 6 Page 161 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT PENETRATIONS Penetrations Notes Diagram Penetrations are labeled from smallest to largest for easy reference. Total Penetrations: 13 Total Penetrations Area: 67 sq ft Total Penetrations Perimeter = 94 ft Total Roof Area Less Penetrations = 10,941 sq ft 5 ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 7 6 8 2 9 1 13 12 4 3 10 11 N W E S Note: Any measured penetration smaller than 3x3 feet may need field verification. Accuracy is not guaranteed. The total penetration area is not subtracted from the total roof area. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 7 Page 162 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT NOTES DIAGRAM Roof facets are labeled from smallest to largest (A to Z) for easy reference. D E A ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. B H G F N W E C S © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 8 Page 163 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT Property Info Property Location Longitude = -87.7560854 Latitude = 42.1002541 Online map of property: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=g&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q= 1390+Willow+Road,Winnetka,IL,60093 Property Info Year Built: Effective Year Built: * *. Notes This was ordered as a commercial property. There were no changes to the structure in the past four years. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 9 Page 164 of 371  ROOF MEASUREMENT REPORT REPORT SUMMARY Below is a measurement summary using the values presented in this report. Lengths, Areas and Pitches Ridge .....................................................0 ft (0 Ridges) Hips...........................................................0 ft (0 Hips) Valleys ...................................................4 ft (1 Valleys) Rakes* ...............................................278 ft (14 Rakes) ©2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Eaves/Starter** ..................................527 ft (11 Eaves) Drip Edge (Eaves + Rakes) ...............805 ft (25 Lengths) Parapet Walls ........................................0 ft (0 Lengths) Flashing ............................................234 ft (6 Lengths) Step Flashing.......................................87 ft (5 Lengths) Total Area ..................................................11,008 sq ft N Total Penetrations Area .....................................67 sq ft W E Total Roof Area Less Penetrations ................10,941 sq ft S Total Penetrations Perimeter ..................................94 ft Predominant Pitch..................................................4/12 Total Roof Facets = 8 *Rakes are defined as roof edges that are sloped (not level). ** Eaves are defined as roof edges that are not sloped and level. Areas per Pitch Roof Pitches 1/12 2/12 4/12 9/12 Area (sq ft) 1570.6 160.3 9233.6 43.1 % of Squares 14.3% 1.5% 83.9% 0.4% The table above lists each pitch on this roof and the total area and percent (both rounded) of the roof with that pitch. Waste Calculation Table Waste % 0% 10% 12% 15% 17% 20% 22% Area (sq ft) 11,008 12108.8 12329.0 12659.2 12879.4 13209.6 13429.8 Squares 110.1 121.1 123.3 126.6 128.8 132.1 134.3 This table shows the total roof area and squares (rounded up to the nearest decimal) based upon different waste percentages. The waste factor is subject to the complexity of the roof, individual roofing techniques and your experience. Please consider this when calculating appropriate waste percentages. Note that only roof area is included in these waste calculations. Additional materials needed for ridge, hip, valley, and starter lengths are not included. Penetration Table 1-5 6-11 12 13 Area (sq ft) 1 2.3 9 38.3 Perimeter (ft) 4 6 12 26 Any measured penetration smaller than 3x3 feet may need field verification. Accuracy is not guaranteed. The total penetration area is not subtracted from the total roof area. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749. Other Patents Pending. 10 Page 165 of 371  Legal Notice and Disclaimer March 29, 2026 1390 Willow Road, Winnetka, IL 60093 Report: 70146006 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER Notice and Disclaimer No Warranty: The Copyrighted Materials are provided to you "as is," and you agree to use it at your own risk. EagleView Technologies makes no guarantees, representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, arising by law or otherwise, including but not limited to, content, quality, accuracy, completeness, effectiveness, reliability, fitness for a particular purpose, usefulness, use or results to be obtained from the Copyrighted Materials. Contractors agree to always conduct a preliminary site survey to verify Roof Report ordered. In the event of an error in a Report, your sole remedy will be a refund of the fees paid by you to obtain this Report. © 2008-2026 Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry International Corp. – All Rights Reserved – Covered by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,078,436; 8,145,578; 8,170,840; 8,209,152; 8,515,125; 8,825,454; 9,135,737; 8,670,961; 9,514,568; 8,818,770; 8,542,880; 9,244,589; 9,329,749; 9,599,466. Other Patents Pending. Page 166 of 371  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: Ordinance No. MC-01-2026: Amending Section 8.16.140 of the Village Code Regarding the Location of Garbage and Refuse Receptacles (Introduction/Adoption) PRESENTER: Tom Powers AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: No ITEM TYPE: Ordinances and Resolutions ITEM HISTORY: August 2, 2022 - The Village Council adopted Ordinance No. MC-02-2022, updating the Village Code to reflect the implementation of a curbside refuse collection option. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Since curbside refuse collection was implemented in 2022, the Village staff has received various feedback from residents with concerns about the location of curbside refuse collection containers. Staff review of the Village's refuse ordinance revealed that there were some ambiguities in the existing ordinance which could lead to refuse containers being placed in inappropriate locations. In addition, the existing ordinance does not address special circumstances such as private streets or easements. As a result, staff worked with the Village Attorney to draft a revision to the ordinance to provide more consistency and clarity regarding the location of refuse containers. The revised ordinance provides code enforcement with a tool to help ensure refuse and recycling containers are located appropriately for service. The Village Manager has the authority to grant a waiver to the requirements, and is responsible for designating which frontage is appropriate for the placement of curbside refuse containers for lots with multiple frontages. RECOMMENDATION: Consider adopting Ordinance No. MC-01-2026, Amending Section 8.16.140 of the Village Code Regarding the Location of Garbage and Refuse Receptacles. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. MC-01-2026 Amending Section 8.16.140 of the Village Code Regarding the Location of Garbage and Refuse Receptacles Page 167 of 371  ORDINANCE NO. MC-01-2026 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.16.140 OF THE VILLAGE CODE REGARDING THE LOCATION OF GARBAGE AND REFUSE RECEPTACLES WHEREAS, the Village of Winnetka (“Village”) is a home rule municipality in accordance with Article VII, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and WHEREAS, the Village has the authority to adopt ordinances and to promulgate rules and regulations that pertain to its government and affairs; and WHEREAS, the Village regulates the storage, placement, collection, and disposal of garbage and refuse within the Village pursuant to Chapter 8.16 of the Winnetka Village Code, as amended (“Village Code”); and WHEREAS, the Village desires to amend Section 8.16.140 of the Village Code to prohibit the placement of receptacle containing garbage, ashes, household rubbish, yard waste, or recycling within certain areas; and WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined that amending the Village Code as set forth in this Ordinance and pursuant to the Village’s home rule authority is in the best interests of the Village; NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Village of Winnetka does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The recitals in this Ordinance are incorporated into this Section as the findings of the Village Council. SECTION 2: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8.16.140 OF THE VILLAGE CODE. Section 8.16.140, titled “Location of Receptacles,” of Chapter 8.16, titled “Garbage and Refuse,” of Title 8, titled “Health and Safety,” of the Village Code is amended to read as follows: “Section 8.16.140 Location of receptacles. A. Backdoor Service. Anyv owner or occupant who subscribes to backdoor refuse collection service shall place their refuse receptacles on collection days: (i) on the side of their residence or in front of the garage on their premises at ground level: (ii) outdoors: (iii) free from enclosures or structures: or (iv) at the edge of the pavement along the alley, if applicable. B. Curbside Service. Any owner or occupant who subscribes to curbside refuse collection service shall place their Village-issued refuse receptacle for collection on collection days: (i) at the curb or at the edge of the pavement of their property or within the right-of-way or access easement directly adjacent to the frontage of their property: or (ii) at the edge of the pavement along the alley directly adjacent to their property, if applicable. Receptacles must be oriented so Additions are bold and double-underlined; deletions are struck through 1 June 2, 2026 MC-01-2026 Page 168 of 371  the lid opens on the street or alley side with the handle facing the residence on the property. C. Recycling Service. All owners and occupants shall place their recycling receptacles at: (i) at the curb or at the edge of the pavement of their property or within the right-of-way or access easement directly adjacent to the frontage of their property: or (ii) at the edge of the pavement along the alley directly adjacent to their property, if applicable. Recycling receptacles must be oriented so the lid opens on the street side with the handle facing the residence on the property. D. Prohibited Location. No person shall place their Village-issued refuse or recycling receptacle within any access easement granted over property that is owned or occupied by another person or is in front, along the curb, or at the edge of the pavement of property owned or occupied by another person, without the express permission of the owner or lawful occupant. For locations where two adjacent properties front on the same access easement all receptacles shall be placed completely inside the owner or occupants’ property frontage at an easily serviceable location nearest to the access easement. E. Waiver. The Village Manager, in the Village Manager’s sole discretion, may grant a waiver of the requirements of this Section to allow all refuse or recycling receptacles to be placed in alternative or otherwise prohibited locations upon request of the property owner or lawful occupant. For lots with multiple frontages the Village Manager shall designate which frontage shall be applicable.” SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or part of this Ordinance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance will remain in full force and effect, and will be interpreted, applied, and enforced to achieve, as near as may be possible, the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to the greatest extent permitted by applicable law. SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] Additions are bold and double-underlined; deletions are struck through 2 June 2, 2026 MC-01-2026 Page 169 of 371 PASSED this 2nd day of June, 2026, pursuant to the following roll call vote: AYES: _________________________________________________________ NAYS: _________________________________________________________ ABSENT: _________________________________________________________ APPROVED this ___ day of ________________, 2026. Signed: __________________________________ Village President Countersigned: __________________________________ Village Clerk Published by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Winnetka, Illinois, this ____ day of _______, 2026. Introduced: ___________, 2026 Passed and Approved: _______________, 2026 Additions are bold and double-underlined; deletions are struck through 3 June 2, 2026 MC-01-2026 Page 170 of 371  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: Ordinance No. M-09-2026: Granting a Variation from the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance to Allow the Construction of an Expanded Driveway Within the R-5 Single Family Residential District (1412 Scott Avenue) (Introduction/Adoption) PRESENTER: Scott Mangum AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: No ITEM TYPE: Ordinances and Resolutions ITEM HISTORY: None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: INTRODUCTION On June 2, 2026, the Village Council is scheduled to consider Ordinance No. M-09-2026 in response to an application submitted by Adam and Jamie Rothschild (collectively, the “Applicant”), as the owners of the property located at 1412 Scott Avenue (the “Subject Property”). (Attachment 1) The Applicant requests approval of the following zoning variation to allow construction of an expanded driveway in the front yard of the Subject Property: 1. Front Yard Lot Coverage (FYLC) of 943.06 feet, whereas a maximum of 675 feet is permitted, a variation of 268.06 feet (39.71%) [Note: The existing improvements currently consist of 828.06 square feet of FYLC. The proposed driveway expansion would add 115 square feet of FYLC]. The variation is being requested in order to expand an existing driveway within the front yard of the Subject Property. The existing driveway would be expanded on both sides; 90 square feet on the east side and 25 square feet on the west side with an asphalt surface and bordering pavers intended to match the existing hardscape. The Subject Property also contains an existing four-foot-wide ingress-egress easement on the west side of the property which contains a portion of a paved driveway that serves the neighboring property at 1418 Scott Avenue. It is important to note that the portion of this driveway within the ingress-egress easement is included in the calculation of FYLC for the Subject Property and consists of approximately 153 square feet (16% of the total proposed FYLC and 22% of the permitted FYLC). Page 171 of 371 ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) considered the request on May 11, 2026. Attachment 2 includes the staff report and draft meeting minutes which summarize the request. After hearing from staff and the Applicant, and not receiving any written or verbal comments from the public, the ZBA discussed the request. Some members found there to be a safety concern and some also found the existence of the easement to be a hardship. One member noted that the residence was built with a three-car garage, which is not typical, and that the request does not meet the standards for granting a variation. In the end, by a vote of 5-1, the ZBA recommended approval of the request. RECOMMENDATION: The ZBA recommends approval (5-1), the Council may wish to (a) consider waiving introduction of Ordinance No. M-09-2026 and consider adoption of the Ordinance, or (b) consider only introduction of Ordinance No. M-09-2026. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment 1 - Ordinance No. M-09-2026, An Ordinance Granting a Variation to Allow the Construction of an Expanded Driveway (1412 Scott Avenue) 2. Attachment 2 - May 11, 2026, ZBA Meeting Staff Report and Meeting Minutes Excerpt Page 172 of 371  ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. M-09-2026 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE WINNETKA ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXPANDED DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE R-5 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1412 Scott Avenue) WHEREAS, Adam Rothschild and Jamie Rothschild (collectively, “Applicant”) are the record title owners of the parcel of real property commonly known as 1412 Scott Avenue in Winnetka, Illinois, and legally described in Exhibit A attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance (“Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is approximately 0.27 acres in area and located within the R-5 Single Family Residential District of the Village (“R-5 District”) and is improved with a single-family residence and attached garage (“Structures”); and WHEREAS, the Applicant desires to expand an existing driveway within the front yard of the Subject Property (“Proposed Improvement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.30.030 of the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance (“Zoning Ordinance”), the maximum front yard lot coverage allowed in the R-5 District is 30% of the minimum required front yard or 675 square feet; and WHEREAS, to construct the Proposed Improvement on the Subject Property, the Applicant filed an application for a variation from Section 17.30.030 to allow a front yard lot coverage of 943.06 feet (“Variation”); and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2026, after due notice thereof, the Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) conducted a public hearing on the Variation and, by a vote of 5 members in favor and 1 opposed, recommended that the Council of the Village of Winnetka (“Village Council”) approve the Variation; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.60.050 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Village Council has determined that: (i) the Variation is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and is in accordance with general or specific rules set forth in Chapter 17.60 of the Zoning Ordinance; and (ii) there are practical difficulties or particular hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provision or regulation of the Zoning Ordinance from which the Variation has been sought; and WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined that approval of the Variation for the Subject Property within the R-5 District is in the best interest of the Village and its residents; NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Village of Winnetka do ordain as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into this section as the findings of the Village Council, as if fully set forth herein. June 2, 2026 M-09-2026 Page 173 of 371  SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF VARIATION. Subject to, and contingent upon, the terms, conditions, restrictions, and provisions set forth in Section 3 of this Ordinance, the Variation from Section 17.30.030 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of the Proposed Improvement on the Subject Property is hereby granted, in accordance with and pursuant to Chapter 17.60 of the Zoning Ordinance and the home rule powers of the Village. SECTION 3: CONDITIONS. The Variation granted by Section 2 of this Ordinance is subject to, and contingent upon, compliance by the Applicant with the following conditions: A. Commencement of Construction. The Applicant must commence the construction of the Proposed Improvement no later than 12 months after the effective date of this Ordinance. B. Compliance with Regulations. Except to the extent specifically provided otherwise in this Ordinance, the development, use, and maintenance of the Proposed Improvement and Subject Property must comply at all times with all applicable Village codes and ordinances, as they have been or may be amended over time. C. Reimbursement of Village Costs. In addition to any other costs, payments, fees, charges, contributions, or dedications required under applicable Village codes, ordinances, resolutions, rules, or regulations, the Applicant must pay to the Village, promptly upon presentation of a written demand or demands therefor, all fees, costs, and expenses incurred or accrued in connection with the review, negotiation, preparation, consideration, and review of this Ordinance. Payment of all such fees, costs, and expenses for which demand has been made shall be made by a certified or cashier's check. Further, the Applicant must pay upon demand all costs incurred by the Village for publications and recordings required in connection with the aforesaid matters. D. Compliance with Plan. The development, use, and maintenance of the Proposed Improvement on the Subject Property must be in strict accordance with the plan prepared by the Applicant, consisting of one sheet, with a latest revision date of March 26, 2026, a copy of which is attached to, and by this reference, made part of this Ordinance as Exhibit B (“Plan”), except for minor changes and site work approved by the Director of Community Development or the Director of Engineering (within their respective permitting authority) in accordance with all applicable Village codes, ordinances, and standards. SECTION 4: RECORDATION; BINDING EFFECT. A copy of this Ordinance will be recorded with the Cook County Clerk Recording Division. This Ordinance and the privileges, obligations, and provisions contained herein inure solely to the benefit of, and are binding upon, the Applicant and each of its heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns. SECTION 5: FAILURE TO COMPLY. Upon the failure or refusal of the Applicant to comply with any or all of the conditions, restrictions, or provisions of this Ordinance, in addition to all other remedies available to the Village, the approval granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance June 2, 2026 M-09-2026 Page 174 of 371 will, at the sole discretion of the Village Council, by ordinance duly adopted, be revoked and become null and void; provided, however, that the Village Council may not so revoke the approval granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance unless it first provides the Applicant with two months advance written notice of the reasons for revocation and an opportunity to be heard at a regular meeting of the Village Council. In the event of revocation, the development and use of the Subject Property will be governed solely by the regulations of the applicable zoning district and the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, as the same may, from time to time, be amended. Further, in the event of such revocation, the Village Manager and Village Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to bring such zoning enforcement action as may be appropriate under the circumstances. SECTION 6: AMENDMENTS. Any amendment to this Ordinance may be granted only pursuant to the procedures, and subject to the standards and limitations, provided in the Zoning Ordinance for amending or granting variations. SECTION 7: SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or part thereof is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect, and shall be interpreted, applied, and enforced so as to achieve, as near as may be, the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to the greatest extent permitted by applicable law. SECTION 8: EFFECTIVE DATE. A. This Ordinance will be effective only upon the occurrence of all of the following events: 1. Passage by the Village Council in the manner required by law; 2. Publication in pamphlet form in the manner required by law; and 3. The filing by the Applicant with the Village Clerk of an Unconditional Agreement and Consent in the form of Exhibit C attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance to accept and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, and limitations set forth in this Ordinance and to indemnify the Village for any claims that may arise in connection with the approval of this Ordinance. B. In the event that the Applicant does not file with the Village Clerk a fully executed copy of the unconditional agreement and consent described in Section 8.A.3 of this Ordinance within 60 days after the date of passage of this Ordinance by the Village Council, the Village Council shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to declare this Ordinance null and void and of no force or effect. June 2, 2026 M-09-2026 Page 175 of 371  PASSED this 2nd day of June, 2026, pursuant to the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: APPROVED this 2nd day of June, 2026. Signed: Village President Countersigned: Village Clerk Published by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Winnetka, Illinois, this ___ day of _______, 2026. Introduced: ______________, 2026 Passed and Approved: ______________, 2026 June 2, 2026 M-09-2026 Page 176 of 371  EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY LOT 1 IN JOSEPH SUBDMSION OF THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 2 AND ALL OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 22 IN CHICAGO NORTH SHORE LAND CO'S SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 17 AND SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNLY, ILLINOIS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 1996 AS DOCUMENT 96781509. Commonly known as 1412 Scott Avenue, Winnetka, Illinois 60093. PIN: 05-18-217-023-0000 Page 177 of 371  EXHIBIT B PLAN Page 178 of 371  EXHIBIT C UNCONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND CONSENT TO: The Village of Winnetka, Illinois ("Village"): WHEREAS, Adam Rothschild and Jamie Rothschild (collectively, “Applicant”) are the record title owners of the parcel of real property commonly known as 1412 Scott Avenue in Winnetka, Illinois (“Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is approximately 0.27 acres in area and located within the R-5 Single Family Residential District of the Village (“R-5 District”) and is improved with a single-family residence and attached garage (“Structures”); and WHEREAS, the Applicant desires to expand an existing driveway within the front yard of the Subject Property (“Proposed Improvement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.30.030 of the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance (“Zoning Ordinance”), the maximum front yard lot coverage allowed in the R-5 District is 30% of the minimum required front yard or 675 square feet; and WHEREAS, to construct the Proposed Improvement on the Subject Property, the Applicant filed an application for a variation from Section 17.30.030 to allow a front yard lot coverage of 943.06 feet (“Variation”); and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. M-09-2026, adopted by the Village Council on June 2, 2026 (“Ordinance”), grants the Variation; and WHEREAS, Section 8 of the Ordinance provides, among other things, that the Ordinance will be of no force or effect unless and until the Applicant has filed, within 60 days following the passage of the Ordinance, its unconditional agreement and consent to accept and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, and limitations set forth in the Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, the Applicant does hereby agree and covenant as follows: 1. The Applicant hereby unconditionally agrees to accept, consent to, and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, limitations, restrictions, and provisions of the Ordinance. 2. The Applicant acknowledges that public notices and hearings have been properly given and held with respect to the adoption of the Ordinance, has considered the possibility of the revocation provided for in the Ordinance, and agrees not to challenge any such revocation on the grounds of any procedural infirmity or a denial of any procedural right. 3. The Applicant acknowledges and agrees that the Village is not and will not be, in any way, liable for any damages or injuries that may be sustained as a result of the Village’s grant of the Variation for the Subject Property or its adoption of the Ordinance, and that the Village’s approvals Page 179 of 371 do not, and will not, in any way, be deemed to insure the Applicant against damage or injury of any kind and at any time. 4. The Applicant hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Village, the Village’s corporate authorities, and all Village elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and attorneys, from any and all claims that may, at any time, be asserted against any of such parties in connection with the Village’s adoption of the Ordinance granting the Variation for the Subject Property. 5. The Applicant hereby agrees to pay all expenses incurred by the Village in defending itself with regard to any and all of the claims mentioned in this Unconditional Agreement and Consent. These expenses will include all out-of-pocket expenses, such as attorneys’ and experts’ fees, and will also include the reasonable value of any services rendered by any employees of the Village. Dated: , 2026 ATTEST: ADAM ROTHSCHILD By: By: Its: Its: ATTEST: JAMIE ROTHSCHILD By: By: Its: Its: Page 180 of 371  ATTACHMENT 2 MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: CHRISTOPHER MARX, ACIP – ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: MAY 7, 2026 SUBJECT: 1412 SCOTT AVENUE – VARIATION (CASE NO. 26-10-V2) INTRODUCTION On May 11, 2026, the Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) is scheduled to hold a public hearing on an application submitted by Adam and Jamie Rothschild (collectively, the “Applicant”), as the owners of the property located at 1412 Scott Avenue (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant requests approval of the following zoning variation to allow construction of an expanded driveway in the front yard of the Subject Property: 1. Front Yard Lot Coverage (FYLC) of 943.06 square feet, whereas a maximum of 675 square feet is permitted, a variation of 268.06 square feet (39.71%) [Section 17.30.030 – Intensity of Use of Lot] [Note: The existing improvements currently consist of 828.06 square feet. The proposed driveway expansion would add 115 square feet of FYLC]. A mail notice was sent to property owners within 250 feet of the Subject Property in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The hearing was properly noticed in the Winnetka Talk on April 23, 2026. As of the date of this memo, staff has not received any written comments from the public regarding this application. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request, as only the Council has the authority to grant a variation to exceed the maximum permitted front yard lot coverage. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property, which is approximately 0.27 acres in size, is located on the south side of Scott Avenue between Vernon Avenue and Greenwood Avenue and contains an existing two-story residence with an attached three-car garage (see Figure 1). The property is zoned R-5 Single Family Residential and is surrounded by the same (see Figure 2). The Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as appropriate for single-family residential development. The R-5 zoning of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation. The property also contains an existing four-foot-wide ingress-egress easement on the west side of the property which contains a portion of a paved driveway that serves the neighboring property at 1418 Scott Avenue. Page 1 Page 181 of 371  Scott Avenue Vernon Avenue Subject Property Greenwood Avenue Figure 1 – GIS Aerial Map Scott Avenue Subject Property Vernon Avenue Greenwood Avenue Figure 2 – Zoning Map PROPERTY HISTORY AND PREVIOUS ZONING APPLICATIONS The existing residence was constructed in 1997. There were subsequent building permits for a kitchen remodel in 2011, a roof replacement in 2022, and other minor permits in subsequent years. The Applicant acquired the property in 2024. There are no other previous zoning cases on file for the Subject Property. A building permit application for the proposed driveway expansion was submitted by the Applicant in 2025. The application was not approved because it did not comply with the front yard lot coverage regulation. Figures 3 and 4 on the following page are current photos of the Subject Property. Page 2 Page 182 of 371 Figure 3 – Subject Property (Front Elevation – Scott Avenue) Figure 4 – Subject Property – Front Yard Along Scott Avenue Page 3 Page 183 of 371 PROPOSED PLAN The variation is being requested in order to expand an existing driveway within the front yard of the Subject Property. The existing driveway would be expanded on both sides; 90 square feet on the east side and 25 square feet on the west side with an asphalt surface and bordering pavers intended to match the existing hardscaping. The width of the driveway where it intersects with the front lot line would remain unchanged. With the exception of the requested variation, the proposed improvement complies with the zoning regulations. An excerpt of the proposed site plan is provided on the following page as Figure 6. The complete set of plans is provided in the application materials (Attachment C). Figure 5 – Subject Property – 2024 Plat of Survey Showing Existing Conditions Page 4 Page 184 of 371  Location of Proposed Driveway Expansion Red Line Represents 30-Foot Setback From Front Property Line Figure 6 – Proposed Site Plan Given the ZBA often receives questions regarding the stormwater regulations applicable to a specific request being considered by the ZBA, attached is a Stormwater Matrix (Attachment B). Village Engineering staff approved the plans from the initial building permit submission in 2025, noting that detention would not be required while specifying that storm water would need to be managed on site. Figure 7 below represents the Subject Property’s proximity to the floodplain; the cyan represents the 100-year floodplain. Subject Property Figure 7 - GIS Floodplain Map Page 5 Page 185 of 371 REQUESTED ZONING RELIEF The attached Zoning Matrix highlights the existing lot and the proposed improvement’s compliance with the R-5 zoning district (Attachment A). One variation is being requested to exceed the maximum permitted front yard lot coverage (FYLC). The maximum permitted FYLC in the R-5 zoning district is 30% of the minimum required front yard setback, which means no more than 30% of the area measured within 30 feet from the front property line may be covered with impermeable surfaces or structures. The intent of this standard is twofold: (1) to limit the amount of hard surface area located within the required front yard and; (2) to discourage vehicle parking within the required front yard. The existing improvements within the front yard consist of 828.06 square feet, exceeding the maximum permitted FYLC by 153.06 square feet (22.67%). The increase in FYLC with the proposed expansion is 115 square feet, bringing the total FYLC to 943.06 square feet, whereas a maximum of 675 square feet is permitted, a variation of 268.06 square feet (39.71%). It is important to note that the driveway on the west side of the Subject Property within the ingress- egress easement, which provides driveway access for the neighboring property, is included in the calculation of FYLC for the Subject Property and consists of 153.06 square feet (16.23% of the total proposed FYLC and 22.67% of the permitted FYLC). FINDINGS Section 17.60.040 of the Zoning Ordinance lists eight variation standards that the Board must find a variation application meets. The Applicant has supplied as part of their application materials a narrative addressing how this proposal meets these standards. After hearing from the Applicant, and the public, the ZBA may decide to act on one of two options: 1. Continue the public hearing to a specific date to provide the Applicant and/or staff with additional time to address questions and comments from the ZBA; or 2. Consider a motion recommending approval or denial of the variation. If the ZBA is prepared to make a recommendation to the Village Council regarding the requested relief, a ZBA member may wish to make a motion recommending approval or recommending denial based upon the following: Move to recommend approval [denial] of the following variation granting: A. Front Yard Lot Coverage of 943.06 square feet, whereas a maximum of 675 square feet is permitted, a variation of 268.06 square feet (39.71%) [Section 17.30.030 – Intensity of Use of Lot]. The Zoning Board of Appeals finds, based on evidence in the record or a public document, that the variation requested is in harmony [not in harmony] with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and that each of the following eight standards on which evidence is required pursuant to Section 17.60.050 of this Code have been met [have not been met] in connection with this variation application [subject to the following conditions…] The eight standards to consider when granting a variation are as follows: 1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulations in that zone. Page 6 Page 186 of 371  2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. Such circumstances must be associated with the characteristics of the property in question, rather than being related to the occupants. 3. The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 4. An adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property will not be impaired. 5. The hazard from fire and other damages to the property will not be increased. 6. The taxable value of the land and buildings throughout the Village will not diminish. 7. The congestion in the public street will not increase. 8. The public health, safety, comfort, morals, and welfare of the inhabitants of the Village will not otherwise be impaired. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Zoning Matrix Attachment B: Stormwater Matrix Attachment C: Application Materials Page 7 Page 187 of 371  ATTACHMENT A ZONING MATRIX ADDRESS: 1412 Scott Avenue CASE NO: 26-10-V2 ZONING: R-5 MIN/MAX DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ITEM REQUIREMENT EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED & EXISTING ZONING CODE COMPLIANCE (3) Min. Lot Size 8,400 SF 11,936.25 SF N/A N/A OK Min. Average Lot Width 60 FT 75 FT N/A N/A OK Min. Lot Depth 120 FT 159.15 FT N/A N/A OK Max. Roofed Lot Coverage 2,984.06 SF (1) 2,533.03 SF 2,533.03 SF 0 SF OK Max. Gross Floor Area 3,963.53 SF (1) N/A N/A 0 SF EXISTING NONCONFORMING Max. Impermeable Lot Coverage 5,968.13 SF (1) 4,318.13 SF 4,433.13 SF 115 SF OK Max. Front Yard Lot Coverage 675 SF (2) 828.06 SF 943.06 SF 115 SF 268.06 SF (39.71%) VARIATION Min. Front Yard (North) 30 FT 32.43 FT 32.43 FT 0 FT OK Min. Side Yard (East) 7.5 FT 10.29 FT 10.29 FT 0 FT OK Min. Total Side Yard 18.75 FT 20.71 FT 20.71 FT 0 FT OK Min. Rear Yard (South) 23.87 FT 69.3 FT 69.3 FT 0 FT OK NOTES: (1) Based on lot area of 11,936.25 square feet. (2) Based on lot width of 75 feet and R-5 minimum front yard setback of 30 feet. (3) Variation amount is the difference between proposed and requirement. Page 188 of 371  ATTACHMENT B Stormwater Volume Requirements for Development Sites In addition to meeting the following storm water volume detention requirements, development sites must meet all other Village storm water management requirements such as drainage and grading, storm water release rates, storage system design requirements, etc. An exception is for lots along the lakefront that directly discharge into Lake Michigan; those lots are not required to provide stormwater volume detention on- site. They are required to meet all other Village stormwater system design requirements. Storm Water Detention Volume Applicable Requirement Requirements A. New Home Construction - The amount of additional required storm Previously Developed Lot water detention volume is based upon the difference between maximum impermeable lot coverage, per Zoning Code, and existing lot coverage, using the run-off coefficient for a 100-year storm event for both. B. New Home Construction - The amount of required storm water Previously Undeveloped Site detention volume is based upon the maximum impermeable lot coverage, using the run-off coefficient for 100-year storm event. C. Redevelopment of Site for The amount of required storm water Different Use detention volume is based upon the (e.g. single family to multi- maximum impermeable lot coverage, family, or commercial) using the run-off coefficient for 100-year storm event. D. Improvements to Existing The amount of additional required storm Applies to 1412 Scott Avenue. Home and/or Lot, causing an water detention volume is based upon Based upon review of increase in impermeable lot the difference between the proposed information to date, it appears coverage greater or equal to and existing impermeable lot coverage, that 1412 Scott Avenue would 25%. using the run-off coefficient for 100 year not have to provide additional storm event. (Note: If the increase in storm water detention volume. impermeable lot coverage is less than Village Engineering staff 25%, additional storm water detention approved the initial building volume is not required.) permit in 2025 with a note that additional detention wouldn't be required. E. Improvements to existing The amount of additional required storm lots, who currently exceed water detention volume is based upon: maximum impermeable lot a) The amount of the impermeable coverage (e.g., School sites, lot coverage (ILC) currently in single family and multi- excess of the maximum family sites) permitted amount of ILC allowed by zoning that will be removed and replaced, and/or b) The amount of ILC in addition to what currently exists on the lot. Page 189 of 371 Stormwater Volume Requirements for Development Sites The amount of required detention volume is then determined using the run- off coefficient for 100-year storm event. Page 190 of 371 ATTACHMENT C Page 191 of 371 Page 192 of 371 Page 193 of 371 Page 194 of 371 Page 195 of 371 Page 196 of 371 Page 197 of 371  1 WINNETKA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES EXCERPT 2 MAY 11, 2026 3 4 Zoning Board Members Present: Matt Bradley, Chairman 5 Mark Haller 6 Lynn Hanley 7 Kathryn Leister 8 Mike Nielsen 9 Todd Vender 10 11 Zoning Board Members Absent: Michael Ritter 12 13 Village Staff: Scott Mangum, Director of Community Development 14 Christopher Marx, Associate Planner 15 16 *** 17 18 New Cases: 19 a. Case No. 26-10-V2: 1412 Scott Avenue: An application seeking approval of a zoning variation 20 to allow expansion of the driveway at 1412 Scott Avenue. The requested variation would permit the 21 driveway to exceed the maximum permitted front yard lot coverage. The Village Council has final 22 jurisdiction on this request. 23 Mr. Marx summarized the application for the driveway expansion and variation for maximum front yard 24 lot coverage. He identified the property’s location, existing improvements, zoning classification as well 25 as site photos of the property. Mr. Marx noted the home was constructed in 1997 with a legally 26 nonconforming front-facing garage that would not be permitted under the current zoning code. He 27 summarized the front yard lot coverage variation being requested and the existing driveway easement 28 for the neighboring property in detail. 29 30 Mr. Marx stated no comments were received regarding the application and following the applicant’s 31 presentation, public comment and Board discussion, the Board may decide to either continue the 32 matter to a date certain to allow time to address questions or comments or make a motion to 33 recommend approval or denial of the requested variation with draft language included on page nos. 8 34 and 9. He asked if there were any questions. 35 36 Mr. Haller asked for the calculation covered by the easement for the west neighbor. Mr. Marx 37 responded it was measured to be 153.06 square feet. No additional questions were raised at this time. 38 39 Chairman Bradley swore in those speaking to this matter. Adam Rothschild, the applicant and 40 homeowner, stated that the home was purchased in July, 2024, after which time they realized there 41 were driveway issues. He described the three front facing garage doors and stated that due to the 42 driveway’s narrowness, it is difficult to maneuver into the outer garage bays which also created 43 landscaping issues. Mr. Rothschild stated the issue created major safety concerns for the motorist and 44 pedestrians which he described to the Board. He also described his background in terms of evaluating 45 property safety issues and referred to a 2007 photo from Google Maps Streetview which depicted a 46 larger driveway. Mr. Rothschild stated the request would serve to restore the previously existing 47 functionality of the driveway which is smaller than the previous condition. He added that the neighbors Page 198 of 371  May 11, 2026 Page 2 1 have no concerns with the request and asked the Board to recommend approval of the request. Mr. 2 Rothschild then provided photos to the Board for their review. 3 4 Ms. Hanley referred to the east side of the driveway and asked if consideration was given to installing 5 less pervious material to offset the amount of impervious being requested. Mr. Rothschild responded 6 that area related to the first 30 feet. Mr. Marx noted any surface material which would allow for walking 7 access or a vehicle to be driven over is counted toward impervious lot coverage and front yard lot 8 coverage, even if the material was capable of being pervious. Mr. Nielsen asked if the applicant had 9 three vehicles and Mr. Rothschild responded they have two vehicles. No additional questions were 10 raised at this time. 11 12 Chairman Bradley asked for public comment. No comments were made at this time. He then called the 13 matter in for discussion. 14 15 Ms. Hanley stated she had no problem with the request since it represented a safety issue as opposed to 16 an aesthetic issue. She also stated there is a hardship with regard to the west easement. Mr. Haller 17 stated after viewing the property and the amount of overage, he referred to the easement offset 18 compared to what is allowed. Mr. Haller then stated in considering the difficulty in terms of access, he 19 would recommend approval. Mr. Nielsen stated he is against the request and referred to the fact that 20 the house was constructed with a three-car garage. He also referred to the reasonable return standard 21 and described a three-car garage as a luxury item which did not meet that standard. Mr. Nielsen 22 concluded he would be against the request. Ms. Leister stated she leaned toward approval and viewed 23 the easement as a hardship. She agreed with the difficulty in maneuvering and stated the safety 24 concerns raised were a legitimate concern. Mr. Vender agreed with Mr. Nielsen with regard to the three 25 car garage concerns. He also referred to the safety concerns raised. Chairman Bradley agreed with the 26 safety concerns and stated easements did not make a property unique. He also described the existing 27 driveway as nonfunctional. Chairman Bradley stated the first two standards are difficult to meet and for 28 the easement and the ability to use the garage in the manner expected, he suggested the Board 29 recognize the opportunity to correct what was designed. He concluded the standards have largely been 30 met. 31 32 Chairman Bradley then asked for a motion to recommend approval as noted on page nos. 8 and 9. A 33 motion to recommend approval of the variation request was made by Ms. Hanley and seconded by Mr. 34 Haller. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5 to 1: 35 AYES: Bradley, Haller, Hanley, Leister, Vender 36 NAYS: Nielsen 37 38 *** 39 40 Respectfully submitted, 41 42 Antionette Johnson 43 Recording Secretary 44 Page 199 of 371  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: Ordinance No. M-10-2026: Granting an Amendment to a Special Use Permit to Allow a Childcare Center in the Winnetka Congregational Church in the R-2 Single Family Residential District (725 Pine) (Introduction/Adoption) PRESENTER: Scott Mangum AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: No ITEM TYPE: New Business ITEM HISTORY: None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: INTRODUCTION On June 2, 2026, the Village Council is scheduled to consider Ordinance M-10-2026 in response to an application submitted by Winnetka Congregational Church (the “Applicant”), as the owner of the property located at 725 Pine Street (the “Subject Property”) (Attachment 1). The Applicant is proposing operation of a childcare center within the existing church located on the Subject Property and requests approval of the following: 1. An amendment to an existing Special Use Permit that allowed expansion of the existing church building on the Subject Property in the R-2 Single-Family Residential Zoning District. The requested amendment would allow a childcare center as an accessory use to the existing church located on the Subject Property. The Applicant is proposing leasing space within the existing church building to Jumpstart Early Learning Services to operate a childcare center. The center would have 11 teachers, one director, and up to 64 students. The center would operate Monday through Friday, 7:00am until 6:00pm for children ages 6 weeks to 6 years old. The proposed plan does not include any expansion of the existing church building or parking lot, nor is a playground currently proposed on the Subject Property. The Applicant indicates that the existing multipurpose room in the church provides opportunity for physical activity, exercise, and play. If this request is approved by the Council and the Applicant proposes a playground in the future, the Applicant would need to receive approval of an amendment to the special use permit to allow a playground. Page 200 of 371 Childcare centers are licensed and regulated by the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (“DCFS”). The Applicant has indicated that they have received preliminary approval from DCFS for the use of the north wing of the church as a daycare facility. Therefore, the Applicant is moving forward with the formal application process with DCFS. Final DCFS approval is contingent upon completion of minor facility modifications, full build-out of the space, and receipt of Village approval. ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION REVIEW The Plan Commission (“PC”) considered the request on February 25, 2026. After hearing from staff, the Applicant and three members of the public, as well as receiving written correspondence from two neighbors (one in support and one in opposition to the request), the Commission discussed the request. The Commission recognized the need for childcare options for local families. Concerns expressed by members were centered around traffic generated by the drop-off/pick-up of students and the impact of the additional traffic to the immediate neighborhood. Ultimately, by a vote of 6-0, the Commission recommended approval with a condition that a traffic flow plan is prepared by the Applicant and approved by the Village Engineer and Police Department that will be included in the presentation of this request to the Village Council. The minutes of the PC meeting are provided in Attachment 3. The Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) considered the request on March 16, 2026. Attachment 2 contains the staff report and minutes of the ZBA meeting. After hearing from staff and the Applicant, the ZBA heard from two members of the public who expressed support of the request and also noted that they are members of the church. The ZBA then discussed the request. Discussion was primarily focused on traffic in the area during drop-off and pick-up. Piggybacking on the PC’s recommendation of approval with a condition that the Applicant submit a traffic flow plan for approval by the Village Engineer and Police Department prior to Council consideration of this request, by a vote of 5-0, the ZBA recommended approval with the same condition as the PC. On April 21, 2026, the Applicant submitted a parking and traffic flow plan, as well an illustrative drone video to demonstrate traffic flow in and out of the site. Attachment 4 contains the plan and video provided by the Applicant. The Village Engineer and the Chief of Police have reviewed the plan and video and recommend that a condition of approval is included in the ordinance approving the request for a look-back provision with the ability to reevaluate conditions. Ordinance M-10-2026 incorporates the following condition: “Traffic Flow Measures. Within 6 months of commencement of operation of the Childcare Center, the Village at the sole discretion of the Village Engineer or Chief of Police, reserves the right to require additional measures to manage traffic, including but not limited to signage limiting or prohibiting turning movements in and out of the driveway, establishment of an additional drop-off location, and operational or staffing changes during peak pick-up and drop-off times.” RECOMMENDATION: The Plan Commission recommends approval (6-0) and the ZBA recommends approval (5-0), the Council may wish to (a) consider waiving introduction of Ordinance No. M-10-2026 and consider adoption of the Ordinance, or (b) consider only introduction of Ordinance No. M-10-2026. Page 201 of 371 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment 1 - Ordinance No. M-10-2026: Granting an Amendment to a SUP to Allow a Childcare Center in the Winnetka Congregational Church - 725 Pine St 2. Attachment 2 - March 16, 2026, ZBA Meeting Staff Report and Meeting Minutes 3. Attachment 3 - February 25, 2026, PC Meeting Minutes 4. Attachment 4 - April 15, 2026, Parking and Traffic Flow Plan and Drone Video Submitted by Applicant Page 202 of 371  ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. M-10-2026 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CHILDCARE CENTER IN THE WINNETKA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH IN THE R-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (725 Pine Street) WHEREAS, Winnetka Congregational Church (“Applicant”) is the record title owner of the property commonly known as 725 Pine Street, Winnetka, Illinois, and legally described in Exhibit A attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance (“Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located within the R-2 Single-Family Residential District of the Village (“R-2 District”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is 2.36 acres and is improved with a church (“Church”) and parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Church has been operating on the Subject Property since 1936; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to lease existing space within the Church for the operation of a childcare center (“Childcare Center”); and WHEREAS, on March 19, 1996, the Village Council approved Ordinance No. M-450-96 (“Special Use Ordinance”) granting the Applicant a special use permit to allow for an expansion of the Church and parking lot of the Subject Property (“Special Use Permit”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.24.020 of the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance (“Zoning Ordinance”), the operation of a Childcare Center is permitted within the R-2 District as an accessory use to the Church; and WHEREAS, the Applicant filed an application for an amendment to the Special Use Permit pursuant to Sections 17.24.020 and Chapter 17.56 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the operation of the Childcare Center on the Subject Property within the R-2 District (“Special Use Permit Amendment”); and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2026, after due notice thereof, the Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) conducted a public hearing on the Special Use Permit Amendment and, by a vote of five in favor and none opposed, recommended that the Village Council approve the Special Use Permit Amendment subject to the conditions set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on February 25, 2026, after due notice thereof, the Plan Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Special Use Permit Amendment and, by a vote of six in favor and none opposed, recommended that the Village Council approve the Special Use Permit Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined that approval of the proposed Special Use Permit Amendment satisfies the standards for the approval of special use permits within the R-2 District set forth in Chapter 17.56 of the Zoning Ordinance; and June 2, 2026 M-10-2026 Page 203 of 371  WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined that approval of the Special Use Permit Amendment for the operation of the Childcare Center on the Subject Property within the R-2 District is in the best interest of the Village and its residents; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Village of Winnetka do ordain as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into this Section 1 as the findings of the Village Council of the Village of Winnetka, as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT. Subject to, and contingent upon, the terms and conditions set forth in Section 3 of this Ordinance, the Special Use Permit Amendment is hereby granted, pursuant to Chapter 17.56 and Section 17.24.020 of the Zoning Ordinance and the home rule powers of the Village, to allow the operation of the Childcare Center on the Subject Property within the R-2 District. SECTION 3: CONDITIONS. The approval granted by Sections 2 of this Ordinance is subject to, and contingent upon, compliance by the Applicant with the following conditions: A. Commencement of Operations. The Applicant must commence the operation of the Childcare Center no later than 12 months after the effective date of this Ordinance. B. Compliance with Regulations. Except to the extent specifically provided otherwise in this Ordinance and the Special Use Ordinance, the development, use, and maintenance of the Childcare Center and the Subject Property must comply at all times with all applicable Village codes and ordinances, as they have been or may be amended over time. C. Compliance with Plans. The development, use, and maintenance of the Childcare Center at the Subject Property must be in strict accordance with the Plans for the Childcare Center prepared by Weese Langley Weese Architects Ltd., consisting of three sheets, with a latest revision date of April 18, 2025, attached to and, by this reference made a part of this ordinance as Exhibit B (“Plans”), except for minor changes and site work approved by the Director of Community Development or the Director of Engineering (within their respective permitting authority) in accordance with all applicable Village codes, ordinances, and standards: D. Continued Effect of Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit and Special Use Ordinance, as amended by this Ordinance granting the Special Use Permit Amendment, remain in full force and effect; provided, however, that in the event of any conflict between the Special Use Ordinance and this Ordinance, the provisions of this Ordinance will control. E. Reimbursement of Village Costs. In addition to any other costs, payments, fees, charges, contributions, or dedications required under applicable Village codes, ordinances, resolutions, rules, or regulations, the Applicant must pay to the Village, promptly upon presentation of a written demand or demands therefor, of all fees, costs, and expenses incurred or accrued in connection with the review, negotiation, June 2, 2026 M-10-2026 Page 204 of 371  preparation, consideration, and review of this Ordinance. Payment of all such fees, costs, and expenses for which demand has been made shall be made by a certified or cashier's check. Further, the Applicant must pay upon demand all costs incurred by the Village for publications and recordings required in connection with the aforesaid matters. F. Operation of Childcare Center. The Childcare Center will have 11 teachers, one director, and up to 64 students, aged six weeks to six years old. The Childcare Center will operate Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. G. Traffic Flow Measures. Within 6 months of commencement of operation of the Childcare Center, the Village, at the sole discretion of the Village Engineer or Chief of Police, reserves the right to require additional measures to manage traffic, including but not limited to signage limiting or prohibiting turning movements in and out of the driveway, establishment of an additional drop-off location, and operational or staffing changes during peak pick-up and drop-off times. SECTION 4: RECORDATION; BINDING EFFECT. A copy of this Ordinance shall be recorded with the Recording Division of the Cook County Clerk. This Ordinance and the privileges, obligations, and provisions contained herein inure solely to the benefit of and are binding upon the Applicant and each of its heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns. SECTION 5: FAILURE TO COMPLY. Upon the failure or refusal of the Applicant to comply with any or all of the conditions, restrictions, or provisions of this Ordinance, in addition to all other remedies available to the Village, the approval granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance will, at the sole discretion of the Village Council, by ordinance duly adopted, be revoked and become null and void; provided, however, that the Village Council may not so revoke the approval granted in Sections 2 of this Ordinance unless it first provides the Applicant with two months advance written notice of the reasons for revocation and an opportunity to be heard at a regular meeting of the Village Council. In the event of revocation, the development and use of the Subject Property will be governed solely by the regulations of the applicable zoning district and the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, as the same may be amended from time to time. Further, in the event of such revocation, the Village Manager and Village Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to bring such zoning enforcement action as may be appropriate under the circumstances. SECTION 6: FUTURE AMENDMENT OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Any future amendments to the Special Use Permit Amendment granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance that may be requested by the Applicant after the effective date of this Ordinance may be granted only pursuant to the procedures, and subject to the standards and limitations, provided in the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 7: EFFECTIVE DATE. A. This Ordinance will be effective only upon the occurrence of all of the following events: 1. Passage by the Village Council in the manner required by law; June 2, 2026 M-10-2026 Page 205 of 371  2. Publication in pamphlet form in the manner required by law; and 3. The filing by the Applicant with the Village Clerk of an Unconditional Agreement and Consent in the form of Exhibit C attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance, to accept and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, and limitations set forth in this Ordinance and to indemnify the Village for any claims that may arise in connection with the approval of this Ordinance. B. In the event that the Applicant does not file with the Village Clerk a fully executed copy of the unconditional agreement and consent described in Section 7.A.3 of this Ordinance within 60 days after the date of passage of this Ordinance by the Village Council, the Village Council shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to declare this Ordinance null and void and of no force or effect. PASSED this ____ 2nd day of____, June 2026, pursuant to the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: APPROVED this ____ day of _________, 2026. Signed: Village President Countersigned: Village Clerk Published by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Winnetka, Illinois, this ___ day of _______, 2026. Introduced: ___________________, 2026 Passed and Approved: ______________, 2026 June 2, 2026 M-10-2026 Page 206 of 371  EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY LOT 1 IN THE WINNETKA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Commonly known as 725 Pine Street, Winnetka, Illinois. PIN: 05-16-103-019-0000 Page 207 of 371  EXHIBIT B PLANS (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) Page 208 of 371  EXHIBIT B Page 209 of 371 Page 210 of 371 Page 211 of 371  EXHIBIT C UNCONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND CONSENT TO: The Village of Winnetka, Illinois ("Village"): WHEREAS, Winnetka Congregational Church (“Applicant”) is the record title owner of the property commonly known as 725 Pine Street, Winnetka, Illinois (“Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located within the R-2 Single-Family Residential District of the Village (“R-2 District”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is 2.36 acres and is improved with a church (“Church”) and parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Church has been operating on the Subject Property since 1936; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to lease existing space within the Church for the operation of a childcare center (“Childcare Center”); and WHEREAS, on March 19, 1996, the Village Council approved Ordinance No. M-450-96 (“Special Use Ordinance”) granting the Applicant a special use permit to allow for an expansion of the Church and parking lot of the Subject Property (“Special Use Permit”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.24.020 of the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance (“Zoning Ordinance”), the operation of a Childcare Center is permitted within the R-2 District as an accessory use to the Church; and WHEREAS, the Applicant filed an application for an amendment to the Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.24.020 and Chapter 17.56 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the operation of the Childcare Center on the Subject Property within the R-2 District (“Special Use Permit Amendment”); and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. M-10-2026, adopted by the Village Council on ______, 2026 ("Ordinance"), grants to the Applicant the Special Use Permit Amendment; and WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Ordinance provides, among other things, that the Ordinance will be of no force or effect unless and until the Applicant has filed, within 60 days following the passage of the Ordinance, its unconditional agreement and consent to accept and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, and limitations set forth in the Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, the Applicant does hereby agree and covenant as follows: 1. The Applicant hereby unconditionally agrees to accept, consent to, and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, limitations, restrictions, and provisions of the Ordinance. 2. The Applicant acknowledges that public notices and hearings have been properly given and held with respect to the adoption of the Ordinance, has considered the possibility of the Page 212 of 371 revocation provided for in the Ordinance, and agrees not to challenge any such revocation on the grounds of any procedural infirmity or a denial of any procedural right. 3. The Applicant acknowledges and agrees that the Village is not and will not be, in any way, liable for any damages or injuries that may be sustained as a result of the Village’s grant of the Special Use Permit Amendment for the Subject Property or its adoption of the Ordinance, and that the Village’s approvals do not, and will not, in any way, be deemed to insure the Applicant against damage or injury of any kind and at any time. 4. The Applicant hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the Village, the Village’s corporate authorities, and all Village elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and attorneys, from any and all claims that may, at any time, be asserted against any of such parties in connection with the Village’s adoption of the Ordinance granting the Special Use Permit Amendment for the Subject Property. 5. The Applicant hereby agrees to pay all expenses incurred by the Village in defending itself with regard to any and all of the claims mentioned in this Unconditional Agreement and Consent. These expenses will include all out-of-pocket expenses, such as attorneys’ and experts’ fees, and will also include the reasonable value of any services rendered by any employees of the Village. Dated: , 2026 ATTEST: WINNETKA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH By: By: Its: Its: Page 213 of 371  ATTACHMENT 2 MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: ANN KLAASSEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 11, 2026 SUBJECT: WINNETKA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH – 725 PINE STREET SPECIAL USE PERMIT (CASE NO. 25-24-SU) INTRODUCTION On March 16, 2026, the Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) is scheduled to hold a public hearing on an application submitted by Winnetka Congregational Church (the “Applicant”), as owner of the property located at 725 Pine Street (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant is proposing operation of a childcare center within the existing church located on the Subject Property and requests approval of the following: 1. An amendment to an existing Special Use Permit that allowed expansion of the existing church building on the Subject Property in the R-2 Single-Family Residential Zoning District. The requested amendment would allow a childcare center as an accessory use to the existing church on the Subject Property. This item was originally scheduled for the March 9, 2026, ZBA meeting; however, due to the ZBA’s consideration of Case No. 25-28-SU, 225 Sheridan Road, Centennial Beach, the item was continued to a special ZBA meeting on March 16. A mail notice was sent to property owners within 250 feet of the Subject Property, in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, informing them of the public hearing on March 16. The original hearing date was also properly noticed in the Winnetka Talk on February 19, 2026. Additionally, a public notice sign was posted on the Subject Property informing the public of the March 16 ZBA meeting. As of the date of this memo, staff has received two written comments from the public regarding this application. The comments are provided in Attachment D. The Plan Commission (“PC”) considered this application at its February 25, 2026, meeting. By a vote of 6- 0, the Commission recommended approval with a condition that a traffic flow plan is prepared by the Applicant and approved by the Village Engineer and Police Department that will be included in the presentation of this request to the Village Council. Details regarding the PC’s consideration are provided later in this report. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request as only the Council has the authority to grant or amend a Special Use Permit. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property, which is approximately 2.36 acres (102,920.6 square feet) in size, is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Pine Street and Prospect Avenue and contains the Winnetka Congregational Church and a parking lot (Figure 1). Page 1 Page 214 of 371  Prospect Avenue Subject Property Community House Pine Street Lincoln Avenue Arbor Vitae Road Figure 1 – Location Map The Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as appropriate for “Institutional (Religious Institution, School, Governmental & Other Facilities” uses (Figure 2). The Subject Property is located in a residential area with single-family residences surrounding the site, and the Community House in close proximity. The Land Use Plan Map designates the surrounding properties as appropriate for “Single Family Residential” uses. The Comprehensive Plan also contains the following goals relevant to the proposed application: Goal 1.4: The Village will continue to ensure institutional uses, such a schools, religious institutions, and the Public Library are compatible with the residential neighborhoods in which they are located. Initiative 1.4.1: Study and consider establishing a specific zoning district for institutional uses or specific zoning standards for such uses within existing residential districts. This would allow more appropriate zoning standards for these uses. Goal 5.1: Recognizing that educational excellence is one of the primary reasons residents choose Winnetka, the Village will support the community’s public school districts, private schools, and other educational organizations by fostering a culture of student engagement and lifelong learning, as well as supporting the health and safety of students. Initiative 5.1.1: Consider amendments to the zoning ordinance to provide additional clarity regarding pre-kindergarten and daycare institutions to better support the establishment and operation of early childhood education in the Village. This could include changing special uses to permitted uses. Page 2 Page 215 of 371  Subject Property Figure 2 – Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map – Winnetka Futures 2040 Plan The property is zoned R-2 Single Family Residential and it is bordered by the same to the north and east, R-5 and R-4 Single Family Residential to the south, and R-3 Single Family Residential to the west (Figure 3). In addition to single-family residential uses, the R-2 District allows a limited range of additional uses by Special Use Permit. Allowed Special Uses in the R-2 District include (a) church or temple; (b) public school, elementary and high, or private school having a curriculum equivalent to a public elementary school, public high school or public institution of higher learning; and (c) library. The Applicant’s use of the Subject Property as a church is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the R-2 zoning district. Subject Property Figure 3 – Zoning Map Page 3 Page 216 of 371 PROPERTY HISTORY AND PREVIOUS ZONING APPLICATIONS According to Village records, construction of the church began in 1935. Subsequent building permits were issued in: 1. 1976 to construct a vestibule addition, enclose a portico, and remodel the church; and 2. 1996 to construct an addition to the church. Other minor permits have also been issued over the last several years. There are four previous zoning cases on file for the Subject Property: 1. In 1955, the Village Council granted a variation to allow the church to use the easterly 125 feet of the church property as a church yard permitting interment of ashes; 2. In 1975, the ZBA reversed the decision of the Village Superintendent of Public Works to issue a permit to construct a driveway and parking lot on an adjoining lot owned by the church. Subsequently, in 1976 the two adjoining lots owned by the Applicant (725 Pine Street and 651 Prospect Avenue) were consolidated into a single Lot of Record and construction of the parking lot was allowed to proceed; 3. In 1996, Ordinance M-450-96 was adopted by the Village Council granting variations and a special use permit to allow expansion of the church building and parking lot. The approved variations were for gross floor area for the building addition and the front yard setback from Prospect Avenue for expansion of the parking lot. The expansion of the church was to the north and provided new fellowship space and classrooms. A copy of Ordinance M-450-96 is provided in Attachment C; and 4. In 2000, an application was submitted by the Winnetka Park District requesting approval of an amendment to the church’s special use permit to allow use of the church’s north addition by the Park District for limited recreational facilities. After receiving recommendations of approval from both the ZBA and the PC, the Park District withdrew the application prior to the Village Council considering introduction of an ordinance approving the request. Figures 4 through 7 on the following pages are current photos of the Subject Property. Page 4 Page 217 of 371  Figure 4 – Subject Property – West Elevation (Pine Street) Figure 5 – Subject Property West Elevation of Parking Lot (Prospect Avenue) Page 5 Page 218 of 371 Figure 6 – Subject Property – South Elevation (Pine Street) Figure 7 – Subject Property – East Elevation (Pine Street) Page 6 Page 219 of 371 PROPOSED PLAN The Applicant is proposing leasing space within the existing church building to Jumpstart Early Learning Services (“Jumpstart”) to operate a childcare center. As described by the Applicant in the attached narrative included in Attachment A, the center would have 11 teachers, one director, and up to 64 students. The center would operate Monday through Friday, 7:00am until 6:00pm for children ages 6 weeks to 6 years old. The proposed plan does not include any expansion of the existing church building or parking lot, nor is a playground currently proposed on the Subject Property. The Applicant indicates that the existing multipurpose room in the church provides opportunity for physical activity, exercise, and play. If this request should ultimately be approved by the Village and the Applicant proposes a playground in the future, the Applicant would need to receive approval of an amendment to the special use permit to allow a playground. Childcare centers are licensed and regulated by the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (“DCFS”). The Applicant has indicated that they have received preliminary approval from DCFS for the use of the north wing of the church as a daycare facility. Therefore, the Applicant is moving forward with the formal application process with DCFS. Final DCFS approval is contingent upon completion of minor facility modifications, full build-out of the space, and receipt of Village approval. Parking and Traffic. The Applicant indicates that staff for the center will park in the existing on-site parking lot located on the Subject Property. There are currently three marked parking spaces in the circle driveway and 22 spaces in the lot itself, four of those are accessible spaces and one is occupied by the church’s rummage sale truck. In addition to responding to the standards used for evaluation of special uses, the Applicant has provided a traffic impact study prepared by Gewalt Hamilson Associates, Inc. (Attachment A). The analysis concluded: “The capacity analysis results indicated that the increase in project site-generated traffic has little to no effect upon Peak Hour operations or the area roadway network with the recommendations contained herein: • The location of the only full movement church access will be located approximately 125 feet northeast of the Prospect Avenue and Pine Street intersection. • Traffic operations will remain the same as existing for the intersections within this study. • To facilitate vehicles entering and exiting the church driveway, consider restricting parking on Prospect Avenue between the church driveway and Lincoln Avenue. • The church should plan for staff to assist with the drop-off and pick-up operations to help ensure orderly traffic flow on-site.” Director of Engineering/Village Engineer James Bernahl has reviewed the analysis and has the following recommendation based on the information provided by the Applicant: • The proposed Childcare Center can operate at this location with minimal overall impacts to the area. However, it may be necessary to perform ongoing evaluation and possible modifications based on drop-off and pick-up conditions. • Appropriate staffing will be critical in reducing the potential for on-street queuing of vehicles entering the site which would cause safety concerns at this curve on Prospect Avenue. • Parking for staff members on-site should be required to reduce any additional impacts to available Page 7 Page 220 of 371  on-street parking near the site. • Consideration should be given to overlapping of any other existing or future programs that are offered during the day. Previously attendants of church groups during the day would utilize the current on-site parking spaces for these activities. With the increase in additional staff members this could cause additional on-street parking issues. • The Church will need to consider its other current and future programming impacts as it relates to parking needs. Mr. Bernahl has prepared a memo with his conclusions and recommendation, which is included in Attachment B. Figure 8 – October 2,2025 - Plat of Survey of Subject Property Page 8 Page 221 of 371 General Location of Classrooms Figure 9 – Main Level Floor Plan Figure 10 – Upper Level Floor Plan Page 9 Page 222 of 371  Driveway Access to Existing On-Site Parking Pine Street Figure 11 – Aerial of Subject Property Figure 12 – Subject Property – Driveway Access to Parking and Entrance Page 10 Page 223 of 371 CONSIDERATION BY OTHER ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION On February 25, 2026, the Plan Commission (“PC”), held a public hearing on this request. After hearing from staff, the Applicant and three members of the public, as well as receiving written correspondence from two neighbors (one in support and one in opposition) (Attachment D), the PC discussed the request. The Commission recognized the need for childcare options for local families. Concerns expressed by members were centered around traffic generated by the drop-off/pick-up of students and the impact of the additional traffic to the immediate neighborhood. Ultimately, by a vote of 6-0, the Commission recommended approval with a condition that a traffic flow plan is prepared by the Applicant and approved by the Village Engineer and Police Department that will be included in the presentation of this request to the Village Council. The Applicant is currently working on preparing a traffic flow plan for review by the Village Engineer and the Police Department. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION The ZBA is charged with evaluating Special Uses for consistence with the six standards for granting special use permits. In the attached application materials submitted by the Applicant, the Applicant has provided a statement of justification regarding how the requested Special Use Permit meets the standards for granting the requested Special Use permit. After hearing from the Applicant and the public, the ZBA may decide to take action on one or two options: 1) Continue the public hearing to a specific date to provide the Applicant and/or staff with additional time to address questions and comments from the ZBA or the public; or 2) Consider a motion recommending approval or denial of the Special Use. If the ZBA is prepared to make a recommendation to the Village Council regarding the requested relief, a member may wish to make a motion recommending approval or recommending denial based upon the following: Move to recommend approval [denial] a Special Use Permit to allow an amendment to the existing special use granted by Ordinance M-450-96 to allow a childcare center to operate within the existing church building on the Subject Property, based on evidence in the record, or a public document, and upon the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use is consistent [is not consistent] with the Standards for the granting of Special Use Permits, as follows: a. That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals or general welfare; b. That the special use will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right in the district or districts of concern, nor substantially diminish or impair property values in the immediate vicinity; c. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity for uses permitted by right in the district or districts of concern; d. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress in a manner which minimizes pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in the public ways; Page 11 Page 224 of 371  e. That adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage and other facilities necessary to the operation of the special use exist or are to be provided; and f. That the special use in all other respects conforms to the applicable regulations of this and other Village ordinances and codes. [If the ZBA chooses to place conditions as part of its recommendation of approval, it will want to include the conditions here.] ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Application Materials Attachment B: Director of Engineering/Village Engineer Bernahl February 11, 2026, Memo Attachment C: Ordinance M-450-96, adopted by the Village Council on March 19, 1996 Attachment D: Public Correspondence Page 12 Page 225 of 371  ATTACHMENT A Page 226 of 371 Page 227 of 371 Community Benefits Statement Winnetka Congregational Church (WCC) – Proposed Childcare Center For nearly 150 years, Winnetka Congregational Church (WCC) has partnered with the Village of Winnetka to create and sustain community institutions and traditions. From helping to establish the public library and the Community House, to hosting the annual Fourth of July celebration, to raising millions of dollars for social service agencies through our Rummage Sale, WCC has continually worked to serve beyond its walls. Our proposal to lease space for a licensed childcare center, Jumpstart Early Learning Service to operate Monday-Friday 7:00am-6:00pm for children ages 6 weeks to 6 years old. Jumpstart will operate with 11 Teachers, 1 Director, and up to 64 children at full capacity. Why This Matters for Winnetka • Supports working families Convenient weekday care in the Village center strengthens Winnetka’s ability to attract and retain young families who want to live and work here. Research shows many other local childcare centers have waiting lists of up 30 children. Jumpstart’s reputation and this need have already started a quiet list of families hoping to enroll. • Activates the pedestrian environment Parents walking children to and from the center add daily vitality to the Village’s business district, consistent with the Winnetka Futures 2040 vision for a walkable, family- friendly community. • Protects neighborhood character The use adapts existing space within WCC’s historic building. No retail storefronts are lost; no new building is proposed. • Shares resources responsibly WCC’s parking lot, largely unused during weekdays, will meet the center’s needs without reducing parking available for nearby shops and restaurants. • Continues a tradition of service Just as WCC helped launch community institutions in the past, this project invests in today’s needs—supporting children, parents, and neighbors. Our Commitment • To operate in compliance with all Village codes and safety standards. • To collaborate with Village staff and neighbors on traffic, parking, and design details. Page 228 of 371 • To create a welcoming, high-quality environment that reflects Winnetka’s values. DCF Details for Teacher/Student Ratios: Based on DCFS guidelines the infant room must have a 1:4 ratio (1 teacher for every 4 children). We are anticipating approval for 16 infants. That would be 16 children and 4 teachers for our infant program. Toddler rooms are a 1:5. We are anticipating 15 children so that would be 3 teachers and 15 students in our toddler program. Two-year-old classes are 1:8. We are anticipating approval for 16 children so that would be 2 teachers and 16 children. Preschoolers are 1:10. We are anticipating an approval of 17 children. That would be 2 teachers and 17 children. 64 children and 11 teacher’s and 1 Director total. In short: This childcare center is not just about adapting space within WCC—it’s about continuing a 150-year partnership with the Village of Winnetka to ensure our community remains vibrant, family-friendly, and supportive of all who call it home. Page 229 of 371  V I L L A G E O F W I N N E T K A, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ILLINOIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS 1. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or general welfare; Jumpstart Early Learning Services (Jumpstart) will be fully licensed and regulated under the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) standards, ensuring compliance with all state-mandated health, safety, and operational requirements. These standards govern everything from staff qualifications and background checks to classroom ratios, emergency procedures, sanitation, and food service, guaranteeing that the center maintains the highest level of care and accountability. Based on DCFS staffing guidelines, Jumpstart’s program is structured to ensure appropriate supervision and high-quality care across all age groups. The infant room operates at a 1:4 ratio; with anticipated approval for 16 infants, the program will be staffed by four teachers. Toddler classrooms follow a 1:5 ratio, supporting 15 children with three teachers. Two-year-old classes maintain a 1:8 ratio, accommodating 16 children with two teachers. Preschool classrooms operate at a 1:10 ratio, with planned enrollment of 17 children supported by two teachers. In total, the program is designed to serve 64 children with a dedicated team of 11 teachers, and one Director, fully aligned with DCFS requirements. All classroom doors will be equipped with keyed entry and interior latch locks. All main entrance doors will feature secure keypad buzzer entry systems. The existing room numbering system will be retained to minimize confusion and ensure clear communication among WCC staff, Jumpstart staff, and emergency responders, including police and fire personnel. The Jumpstart staff will undergo all necessary training to ensure all processes and procedures are followed in case of emergency. (As a bonus the Executive Director of Operations at WCC was the Associate Dean of Budget and Administration at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago for many years and worked with CPD and CFD on shelter-in-place drills, and actual campus emergencies and threats. We have a solid team of experience on both sides of the building). An administrative office will be located at the building’s main entrance, along with a secure keypad-access door separating the church space from the childcare facility on the main floor. We expect the office will always be staffed when the center is open. A similar keypad-access entry will be installed on the second floor. WCC currently maintains lockdown doors as part of its Vanderbilt security system, and Jumpstart will explore implementing a system with comparable features and/or in-classroom panic Page 230 of 371 buttons. While the primary focus is education, creativity, motor skill development, and overall childhood growth, maintaining a safe and secure environment remains one of the highest priorities as well. In addition to meeting rigorous state standards, Jumpstart will serve as a valuable community asset by supporting the growing demand for quality early childhood care in the area. By providing a safe, nurturing, and educational environment, Jumpstart will allow parents and guardians to work or study with peace of mind, knowing their children are in capable hands. This service directly enhances the general welfare of the community by strengthening family stability, supporting local employment, and contributing to the family-friendly neighborhood fabric. 2. That the special use will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right in the district or districts of concern, nor substantially diminish or impair property values in the immediate vicinity; The proposed childcare center will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other properties in the immediate vicinity, nor will it diminish or impair property values. Operations will be limited to weekday daytime hours, aligning with typical neighborhood activity patterns and minimizing any potential disruption to adjacent properties. Outdoor playtime is not a requirement of DCFS and does not require a waiver; however, opportunities for fresh air and outdoor activity are always beneficial for children. The gymnasium within the building provides a substantial and well-equipped space to support fine and gross motor skill development, offering children ample opportunities for physical activity, exercise and play. While a dedicated playground would be ideal; it is not essential at this stage and may be considered in future phases subject to additional special use permits and a certificate of appropriateness. Jumpstart currently has two staff members who assist with pick-up and drop-off at their existing locations, and this arrangement has proven effective. They are prepared to adapt and adjust should backup or traffic flow issues or complications arise. Because the traffic study no longer requires a one-way entrance and exit, we do not anticipate significant queuing or overflow onto Prospect. Their team follows efficient, well- organized procedures to assist children and families safely and promptly when entering and exiting their vehicles. High-quality childcare centers such as Jumpstart are widely recognized as neighborhood assets that contribute to a community’s vitality and desirability. By offering a trusted, licensed service that meets the needs of local families, the proposed use will likely have a neutral to positive effect on nearby property values and enhance the overall appeal of the area as a family-oriented, well-supported neighborhood. Page 231 of 371  3. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity for uses permitted by right in the district or districts of concern; The proposed use will occupy existing building space, requiring only modest interior improvements and site adjustments that will not alter the physical character or development potential of surrounding parcels. Because the project does not introduce new large-scale structures, traffic-intensive operations, or environmental impacts, it will maintain compatibility with the existing mix of nearby residential, commercial, and institutional uses. Adjacent properties will retain full opportunity for continued improvement and redevelopment consistent with zoning allowances. Furthermore, by activating an existing space with a stable, community-serving tenant, the childcare center may encourage continued investment in the surrounding area. The presence of families and staff during weekday hours can increase neighborhood vitality, pedestrian activity, and local patronage of nearby businesses—all of which contribute positively to the district’s normal and orderly development. Recent research indicates a growing demand among families for high-quality childcare options such as Jumpstart Early Learning Services. Well-run childcare centers promote socialization, healthy development, consistency, and a strong sense of security for young children while providing dependable support for working families. Nearby childcare providers currently maintain waitlists exceeding 30 children, leaving many families feeling overwhelmed by the limited availability of care close to home. At the same time, our facility has remained largely vacant Monday through Friday for several years. Again, with only minor interior modifications, this underutilized space presents a valuable opportunity to deliver a much-needed service and meaningful resource to the surrounding community. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress in a manner which minimize pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in the public ways. A traffic management plan has been developed and submitted as part of this application, outlining clear procedures for drop-off and pick-up operations during peak times. The site’s design includes a single circular drive entry and exit point, allowing vehicles to move in a continuous flow without the need for backing or extended idling. Childcare center staff will be present during arrival and departure periods to assist with the safe loading and unloading of children, ensuring that vehicles move promptly and that pedestrians remain protected. Signage may be installed to ensure proper safety routes are followed. Page 232 of 371 The plan prioritizes safety and efficiency by separating vehicular circulation from pedestrian pathways, providing designated crosswalks, and maintaining clear sightlines for drivers. These coordinated measures will effectively minimize congestion in the public right-of-way, reduce potential traffic conflicts, and promote an orderly flow of vehicles throughout the day. 5. That adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage, and other facilities necessary to the operation of the special use exists or are to be provided; Twelve Jumpstart staff members will be on site during normal operations. Staff will park in the Winnetka Congregational Church parking lot, which has ample capacity and remains largely underutilized during weekday business hours. The WCC parking lot has 4 handicap spaces and 20 other parking spaces, including parking along Pine Street, which is sufficient for WCC staff, Jumpstart staff, visitors and vendors. Staff may also arrive by public transportation. In the event WCC needs use of the parking lot for concurrent programming, staff may be directed to park in nearby Village public parking lots, consistent with existing shared-parking practices in the East Elm district. Current occupancy levels, observed by the Village, indicated adequate capacity during daytime hours. Jumpstart catering deliveries will occur at 7:30am-11:30am by catering van. All essential utilities—including water, sewer, electricity, and internet—are already established and sufficient to meet the operational demands of the childcare facility. The building’s existing systems comply with current codes and will be reviewed as part of the DCFS licensing process to ensure continued safety and reliability. The site’s access roads and drainage infrastructure are also in place and in good condition. No new impervious surface or major site alteration is proposed, and stormwater will continue to be managed through the existing system without impact to surrounding properties. Collectively, these existing and planned measures ensure that all necessary operational facilities are adequate to support the proposed special use. 6. That the special use in all other respects conforms to the applicable regulations of this and other village ordinances and codes. The project will meet or exceed all requirements related to building, zoning, life safety, and accessibility, and will be reviewed by Village departments as part of the permitting process to ensure full compliance. Jumpstart Early Learning Services will also adhere to all Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) licensing standards, which govern health, safety, staffing, and facility operations. Page 233 of 371 By meeting every relevant local and state requirement, the project ensures that the special use will operate safely, responsibly, and in full harmony with surrounding uses and the broader goals of the Village’s zoning and development ordinances. Page 234 of 371 Page 235 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Part I. Introduction and Project Context Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. (GHA) has conducted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed daycare program to be operated from the existing Winnetka Congregational Church building at 725 Pine Street. The Winnetka Congregational Church is seeking a Special Use Permit from the Village of Winnetka. No changes to the site development are proposed as part of the requested Special Use. Existing, there is one full movement access to the church site on Prospect Avenue. The following summarizes our findings and provides various recommendations for your consideration. Appendices referenced are in the Technical Addendum at the end of this document. Part II. Background Information Site Location Map and Roadway Inventory Exhibit 1 provides a site location map. The existing traffic operations in the site area are illustrated on Exhibit 2. Appendix A provides a photo inventory of operations along the site frontage. Pertinent comments to the adjacent roadways include: Lincoln Avenue  Lincoln Avenue is a north-south local route under the jurisdiction of the Village of Winnetka.  Lincoln Ave provides one travel lane in each direction and terminates at Humboldt Ave to the north and Oak St to the south of the site.  Lincoln Ave is one-way southbound between Humboldt Ave and Pine St.  Lincoln Avenue is under stop-sign control at its “T” intersection with Prospect Avenue.  No speed limit is posted on Lincoln Avenue and no historical AADT volume is available. Prospect Avenue  Prospect Avenue is a curved east-west and north-south local route under the jurisdiction of the Village of Winnetka.  Prospect Ave provides one travel lane in each direction and terminates at Tower Road to the north and Lincoln Ave at the south end.  Prospect Ave is under stop-sign control at its “T” intersection with Pine Street.  Parking is prohibited by signage on the church side of the street. On the opposite side of the street, on-street parking is limited to 4 hours between 7AM and 5PM on weekdays.  No speed limit is posted on Prospect Avenue and no historical AADT volume is available. Pine Street  Pine Street is an east-west local route under the jurisdiction of the Village of Winnetka.  On-street parking is permitted on the church side of the street along Pine Street and prohibited by signage on the opposite side of the street.  No speed limit is posted on Pine Street and no historical AADT volume is available. Pedestrian Facilities  Sidewalk is provided on both sides of Lincoln Avenue, Prospect Avenue, and Pine Street within the site vicinity. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 1 Page 236 of 371 Page 237 of 371 Page 238 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Existing Traffic Exhibit 3 summarizes the existing weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes. Peak period traffic turning movement counts were conducted by GHA on Thursday December 4, 2025, from 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM and from 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM at the intersections of Lincoln Avenue and Prospect Ave and Prospect Avenue and Pine Street. The observed weekday morning and evening peak hours generally occurred from 8:00 to 9:00 AM, 3:30 to 4:30 PM, respectively. No unusual activities (e.g., roadway construction, or inclement weather) were observed during our counts that would be expected to impact traffic volumes or travel patterns in the vicinity. Summaries of the 2025 existing traffic counts and can be found in Appendix B. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 4 Page 239 of 371 Page 240 of 371 Page 241 of 371 Page 242 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Part III. Traffic Evaluation Future Site Characteristics Proposed Program Plan Winnetka Congregational Church is seeking to operate a daycare program in the existing church building at 725 Pine Street. No changes to the site development are proposed. There is an existing church full movement access along Prospect Avenue approximately 125 feet northeast of the intersection of Prospect Avenue and Pine Street. The daycare is expected to have operating hours of 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM and hold a maximum of 64 attendants. This dimension is also illustrated on Exhibit 5. Trip Generation Table 2 summarizes the traffic generation calculations for the proposed development. Trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the 12 th Edition of the Manual Trip Generation were used to determine the anticipated traffic generated by the proposed development. As can be seen in Table 2 the proposed daycare program is expected to generate approximately 51 trips (combined inbound and outbound) during each of the Peak Hours and approximately 244 trips (again inbound and outbound total) in a 24-hour period. Daycare facilities tend to have more spread out arrival and departure times than typical schools experience with drop-off and pick-up occurring generally within a two-hour window. By combining the anticipated trips with the observed Peak Hours, we have considered the maximum impacts of the proposed daycare program. See Appendix E for excerpts of the ITE manual. Table 2: Trip Generation Calculations Weekday Peak Hours Morning Evening Land Use ITE 8:00-9:00 AM 3:30-4:30 PM Daily Size Code In Out Sum In Out Sum In Out Sum Day Care Center 64 Attendants 565 27 24 51 24 27 51 122 122 244 New Trips 27 24 51 24 27 51 122 122 244 Sources:ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition - See Appendix E Trip Distribution Table 3 provides the anticipated distribution of site traffic. This was based on existing site travel patterns, proposed access, and the operational characteristics of the adjacent street system. The majority of daycare traffic is expected to be destined to and from the west along Lincoln Avenue and ultimately Green Bay Road further west. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 8 Page 243 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Table 3: Trip Distribution Percent Route Route & Direction To/From Site Lincoln Avenue North of Propsect Avenue 35% South of Propsect Avenue 35% Prospect Avenue East of Pine Street 10% Pine Street South of Propsect Avenue 20% Totals = 100% Traffic usage of the area roadway network is also illustrated on Exhibit 5 Site and Total Traffic Assignments Exhibit 5 illustrates the site traffic assignments for the development’s trips, which is based on the traffic characteristics summarized in Tables 2 and 3 (traffic generation and trip distribution) and assigned to the area roadways. As previously noted, the proposed daycare program is anticipated to open in 2026. Therefore, we have considered the total impacts of the complete development for the year 2031, or buildout plus five years. The site traffic (Exhibit 5) and 2031 No-Build traffic (Exhibit 4) were combined to produce the 2031 Total traffic, which is illustrated on Exhibit 6. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 9 Page 244 of 371 Page 245 of 371 Page 246 of 371 Page 247 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Table 5: Level-of-Service Summary Movement Group By Approach Intersection / Timeframe Roadway Conditions > = Shared Lane - = Non Critical or Not Allowed Movement Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 1. Lincoln Ave & Prospect Ave AWSC - NB/SB/WB Stop LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT • LOS - - - A - < - A < > A - • Delay - - - 7.7 - - - 7.6 - - 8.4 - A. Existing Traffic (See Exhibit 3) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 7.7 - - - 10.2 - - 17.9 - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (7.7) A (7.6) A (8.4) • LOS - - - A - < - A < > A - AM • Delay - - - 7.7 - - - 7.6 - - 8.4 - B. 2031 No-Build Traffic (See Exhibit 4) Peak • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 7.7 - - - 10.2 - - 20.5 - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (7.7) A (7.6) A (8.4) • LOS - - - A - < - A < > A - • Delay - - - 7.9 - - - 7.7 - - 8.6 - C. 2031 Total Traffic (See Exhibit 6) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 7.7 - - - 12.7 - - 20.5 - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (7.9) A (7.7) A (8.6) • LOS - - - A - < - A < > A - • Delay - - - 7.4 - - - 7.8 - - 8.3 - A. Existing Traffic (See Exhibit 3) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 5.0 - - - 15.1 - - 17.6 - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (7.4) A (7.8) A (8.3) • LOS - - - A - < - A < > A - PM • Delay - - - 7.4 - - - 7.8 - - 8.3 - B. 2031 No-Build Traffic (See Exhibit 4) Peak • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 5.0 - - - 15.1 - - 17.6 - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (7.4) A (7.8) A (8.3) • LOS - - - A - < - A < > A - • Delay - - - 7.6 - - - 7.9 - - 8.5 - C. 2031 Total Traffic (See Exhibit 6) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 7.6 - - - 15.1 - - 20.2 - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (7.6) A (7.9) A (8.5) Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 13 Page 248 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Table 5: Level-of-Service Summary (cont.) Movement Group By Approach Intersection / Timeframe Roadway Conditions > = Shared Lane - = Non Critical or Not Allowed Movement Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 2. Prospect Ave & Pine St TWSC - NB Stop LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - • Delay - - - 7.4 0.0 - 9.3 - - - - - A. Existing Traffic (See Exhibit 3) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 5 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (1.5) A (9.3) - • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - AM • Delay - - - 7.4 0.0 - 9.3 - - - - - B. 2031 No-Build Traffic (See Exhibit 4) Peak • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 5 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (1.5) A (9.3) - • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - • Delay - - - 7.5 0.1 - 9.6 - - - - - C. 2031 Total Traffic (See Exhibit 6) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 7.5 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (1.6) A (9.6) - • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - • Delay - - - 7.5 0.0 - 9.3 - - - - - A. Existing Traffic (See Exhibit 3) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 5.1 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (1.3) A (9.3) - • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - PM • Delay - - - 7.5 0.0 - 9.3 - - - - - B. 2031 No-Build Traffic (See Exhibit 4) Peak • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 5.1 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (1.3) A (9.3) - • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - • Delay - - - 7.5 0.1 - 9.6 - - - - - C. 2031 Total Traffic (See Exhibit 6) • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 5.1 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (1.6) A (9.6) - Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 14 Page 249 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Table 5: Level-of-Service Summary (cont.) Movement Group By Approach Intersection / Timeframe Roadway Conditions > = Shared Lane - = Non Critical or Not Allowed Movement Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 3. Prospect Ave & Church Full Access TWSC - NB Stop LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - AM • Delay - - - 7.5 0.0 - 9.3 - - - - - A. 2031 Total Traffic (See Exhibit 6) Peak • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 2.6 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (0.8) A (9.3) - • LOS - - - A A - A - < - - - PM • Delay - - - 7.4 0.0 - 9.2 - - - - - A. 2031 Total Traffic (See Exhibit 6) Peak • 95th Queue Length (ft) - - - 0 0 - 2.6 - - - - - • Approach LOS (Delay) - A (0.8) A (9.2) - Capacity analysis summary printouts are provided in Appendix F. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 15 Page 250 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Access Spacing  The only existing church full access is located approximately 125 feet northeast of Prospect Avenue & Pine Street. Recall, this dimension is illustrated on Exhibit 5. The following summarizes the findings of the Capacity Analyses. Lincoln Avenue & Prospect Avenue Currently, all movements operate at LOS A or better and are expected to remain at LOS A or better through buildout. Prospect Avenue & Pine Street Currently, all movements operate at LOS A or better and are expected to remain at LOS A or better through buildout. Prospect Avenue & Church Full Access After the daycare program is instituted the Church Full Access is expected to operate at LOS A or better for all movements. Parking Analysis Table 6 illustrates the required and projected parking based on the ITE Parking Generation Manual, 6 th Edition (See Appendix G). The Village of Winnetka Ordinance does not provide specific guidelines for off-street parking for a Daycare Center facility. Table 6: Parking Generation Calculations Parking Spaces ITE ITE Parking Muncipal Code Projected Use Code Size Unit Manual Code Required Demand Provided 0.25 Space Day Care Center 565 64 Attendants N/A N/A 16 25 per Attendant Total: N/A 16 25 Sources: ITE Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition - See Appendix G As shown in Table 6, the ITE projected demand for a Day Care Center of similar 64 attendants are 16 spaces. The site currently provides more than adequate parking spaces of 25. On street parking along Pine Street is also available for the daycare. It is estimated that the daycare program will have 10-15 full-time staff. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 16 Page 251 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois Part IV. Recommendations and Conclusions Analyses have been conducted under existing and future conditions to determine the impact from the proposed daycare program on the study area intersections. The capacity analysis results indicate that the increase in project site-generated traffic has little to no effect upon the Peak Hour operations of the area roadway network with the recommendations contained herein:  The location of the only full movement church access will be located approximately 125 feet northeast of the Prospect Avenue & Pine Street intersection.  Traffic operations will remain the same as existing for the intersections within this study.  To facilitate vehicles entering and exiting the church driveway, consider restricting parking on Prospect between the church driveway and Lincoln Avenue.  The church should plan for staff to assist with the drop-off and pick-up operations to help ensure orderly traffic flow on-site. Part V. Technical Addendum The following Appendices were previously referenced. They provide technical support for our observations, findings and recommendations discussed in the text. Appendices A. Photo Inventory B. 2025 Traffic Count Summaries C. Crash Summary Map D. CMAP Traffic Projections E. ITE Trip Generation Manual Excerpts F. Capacity Analysis Worksheets G. ITE Parking Generation Manual Excerpts 6213.900 WCC Day Care Traffic TIS 011226.docx Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 17 Page 252 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois TECHNICAL ADDENDUM Page 253 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDICES A. PHOTO INVENTORY B. 2025 TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARIES C. CRASH SUMMARY MAP D. CMAP 2050 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS E. ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL EXCERPTS F. CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS G. ITE PARKING GENERATION MANUAL EXCERPTS Page 254 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIX A Photo Inventory Page 255 of 371 Looking North along Lincoln Avenue approaching Prospect Avenue Looking South along Lincoln Avenue approaching Prospect Avenue Looking East across Lincoln Avenue at Prospect Avenue Looking West along Prospect Avenue approaching Lincoln Avenue Appendix A Photo Inventory Page | 1 Page 256 of 371 Looking North along Pine Street approaching Prospect Avenue Looking South across Prospect Avenue at Pine Street Looking East along Prospect Avenue approaching Pine Street Looking West along Prospect Avenue approaching Pine Street Appendix A Photo Inventory Page | 2 Page 257 of 371 Looking North along Church Full Access approaching Prospect Avenue Looking South across Prospect Avenue at Church Full Access Looking East along Prospect Avenue approaching Church Full Access On Street Parking along Pine Street Appendix A Photo Inventory Page | 3 Page 258 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIX B 2025 Traffic Count Summaries Page 259 of 371  Appendix B Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Lincoln Ave at Prospect Ave 625 Forest Edge Drive Count Name: Lincoln Ave at Prospect Ave 6213.900 WCC Day Care Traffic Site Code: 6 AM - 9 AM, 3 PM - 6 PM Vernon Hills, Illinois, United States 60061 Start Date: 12/04/2025 GHA Mio (847) 478-9700 poster@gha-engineers.com Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Prospect Ave Lincoln Ave Pine St Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total 6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 2 3 5 6:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 2 0 4 8 6:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 4 0 1 6 0 7 12 6:45 AM 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 3 0 4 2 0 6 10 Hourly Total 0 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 12 0 8 12 2 20 35 7:00 AM 0 1 4 0 5 0 2 2 0 4 0 6 6 1 12 21 7:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 4 0 9 0 7 4 1 11 21 7:30 AM 0 6 4 0 10 0 4 3 0 7 0 5 7 1 12 29 7:45 AM 0 7 10 1 17 0 6 5 0 11 0 9 8 0 17 45 Hourly Total 0 14 19 1 33 0 17 14 0 31 0 27 25 3 52 116 8:00 AM 0 10 5 1 15 1 10 11 4 22 0 17 15 0 32 69 8:15 AM 0 4 17 1 21 0 10 7 0 17 0 12 17 1 29 67 8:30 AM 0 8 6 0 14 0 15 8 0 23 0 24 24 0 48 85 8:45 AM 0 4 6 0 10 0 26 13 0 39 0 22 27 0 49 98 Hourly Total 0 26 34 2 60 1 61 39 4 101 0 75 83 1 158 319 *** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3:00 PM 0 4 7 0 11 0 14 7 2 21 0 15 15 2 30 62 3:15 PM 0 3 10 0 13 1 10 8 0 19 0 12 11 0 23 55 3:30 PM 0 2 10 0 12 0 15 9 4 24 0 20 13 1 33 69 3:45 PM 0 3 11 3 14 0 32 7 2 39 0 18 28 1 46 99 Hourly Total 0 12 38 3 50 1 71 31 8 103 0 65 67 4 132 285 4:00 PM 0 2 12 2 14 0 31 17 0 48 0 24 21 0 45 107 4:15 PM 0 4 11 0 15 0 14 10 0 24 0 14 15 0 29 68 4:30 PM 0 2 7 1 9 0 20 7 0 27 0 11 12 5 23 59 4:45 PM 0 3 11 0 14 0 21 7 3 28 0 12 22 2 34 76 Hourly Total 0 11 41 3 52 0 86 41 3 127 0 61 70 7 131 310 5:00 PM 0 4 6 2 10 1 48 14 0 63 0 17 23 0 40 113 5:15 PM 0 1 8 0 9 0 26 9 0 35 0 15 15 0 30 74 5:30 PM 0 3 11 0 14 0 20 5 0 25 0 8 20 0 28 67 5:45 PM 0 4 8 0 12 0 7 7 0 14 0 8 9 0 17 43 Hourly Total 0 12 33 2 45 1 101 35 0 137 0 48 67 0 115 297 Grand Total 0 76 167 12 243 3 344 164 16 511 0 284 324 17 608 1362 Approach % 0.0 31.3 68.7 - - 0.6 67.3 32.1 - - 0.0 46.7 53.3 - - - Total % 0.0 5.6 12.3 - 17.8 0.2 25.3 12.0 - 37.5 0.0 20.9 23.8 - 44.6 - Lights 0 75 166 - 241 3 342 163 - 508 0 280 322 - 602 1351 % Lights - 98.7 99.4 - 99.2 100.0 99.4 99.4 - 99.4 - 98.6 99.4 - 99.0 99.2 Mediums 0 1 1 - 2 0 2 1 - 3 0 4 2 - 6 11 % Mediums - 1.3 0.6 - 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 - 1.4 0.6 - 1.0 0.8 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 Page 260 of 371  Appendix B % Articulated Trucks - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 % Bicycles on Road - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 Pedestrians - - - 12 - - - - 16 - - - - 17 - - % Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - 2 Page 261 of 371  Appendix B Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc. Pine St at Prospect Ave 625 Forest Edge Drive Count Name: Pine St at Prospect Ave 6213.900 WCC Day Care Traffic Site Code: 6 AM - 9 AM, 3 PM - 6 PM Vernon Hills, Illinois, United States 60061 Start Date: 12/04/2025 GHA Mio (847) 478-9700 poster@gha-engineers.com Page No: 1 Turning Movement Data Prospect Ave Pine St Prospect Ave Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Peds App. Total U-Turn Left Right Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total 6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 6:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 6:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 4 6 6:45 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 4 6 Hourly Total 0 2 1 0 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 6 5 0 11 16 7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 4 0 6 2 0 8 14 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 7 4 0 11 14 7:30 AM 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 1 1 6 0 6 3 0 9 20 7:45 AM 0 0 6 0 6 0 7 1 0 8 0 3 8 0 11 25 Hourly Total 0 0 13 0 13 0 16 5 1 21 0 22 17 0 39 73 8:00 AM 0 4 9 0 13 0 10 4 1 14 0 9 17 0 26 53 8:15 AM 0 0 3 0 3 0 17 9 0 26 0 11 10 0 21 50 8:30 AM 0 1 4 0 5 0 10 3 1 13 0 22 12 0 34 52 8:45 AM 0 0 4 1 4 0 8 4 0 12 0 19 11 0 30 46 Hourly Total 0 5 20 1 25 0 45 20 2 65 0 61 50 0 111 201 *** BREAK *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3:00 PM 0 0 7 0 7 0 3 3 0 6 0 10 16 1 26 39 3:15 PM 1 1 8 0 10 0 6 5 0 11 0 8 10 0 18 39 3:30 PM 0 1 3 0 4 0 6 9 0 15 0 11 18 0 29 48 3:45 PM 0 0 5 0 5 0 10 4 0 14 0 14 12 0 26 45 Hourly Total 1 2 23 0 26 0 25 21 0 46 0 43 56 1 99 171 4:00 PM 0 2 2 0 4 0 9 1 1 10 1 24 16 0 41 55 4:15 PM 0 0 3 1 3 0 13 1 0 14 0 13 12 0 25 42 4:30 PM 0 1 2 2 3 0 7 0 5 7 0 11 9 0 20 30 4:45 PM 0 1 4 0 5 0 10 2 0 12 0 8 8 0 16 33 Hourly Total 0 4 11 3 15 0 39 4 6 43 1 56 45 0 102 160 5:00 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 0 5 1 11 22 0 34 41 5:15 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 7 4 0 11 0 12 10 0 22 35 5:30 PM 0 1 7 0 8 0 9 0 0 9 0 7 7 0 14 31 5:45 PM 0 1 3 0 4 0 10 2 0 12 0 8 8 0 16 32 Hourly Total 0 3 13 0 16 0 31 6 0 37 1 38 47 0 86 139 Grand Total 1 16 81 4 98 0 158 56 11 214 2 226 220 1 448 760 Approach % 1.0 16.3 82.7 - - 0.0 73.8 26.2 - - 0.4 50.4 49.1 - - - Total % 0.1 2.1 10.7 - 12.9 0.0 20.8 7.4 - 28.2 0.3 29.7 28.9 - 58.9 - Lights 1 16 81 - 98 0 157 54 - 211 2 224 215 - 441 750 % Lights 100.0 100.0 100.0 - 100.0 - 99.4 96.4 - 98.6 100.0 99.1 97.7 - 98.4 98.7 Mediums 0 0 0 - 0 0 1 2 - 3 0 2 4 - 6 9 % Mediums 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.6 3.6 - 1.4 0.0 0.9 1.8 - 1.3 1.2 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 3 Page 262 of 371  Appendix B % Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 - 1 1 % Bicycles on Road 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 - 0.2 0.1 Pedestrians - - - 4 - - - - 11 - - - - 1 - - % Pedestrians - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - - - 100.0 - - 4 Page 263 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIX C Crash Summary Map Page 264 of 371 Page 265 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIX D CMAP 2050 Projections Page 266 of 371 Page 267 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIX E ITE Trip Generation Manual Excerpts Page 268 of 371  Appendix E Land Use: 565 Day Care Center Description A day care center is a facility where care for preschool children is provided, normally during daytime hours. A day care facility generally includes classrooms, offices, eating areas, and playgrounds. A center may also provide after-school care for school-age children. Additional Data The sites were surveyed in the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in California, Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 335, 336, 337, 355, 418, 536, 550, 562, 583, 633, 734, 866, 869, 877, 878, 954, 959, 981, 1236 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799) 481 Page 269 of 371 1 Page 270 of 371 Page 271 of 371 Page 272 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIX F Capacity Analysis Worksheets Page 273 of 371 Page 274 of 371 Page 275 of 371 Page 276 of 371 Page 277 of 371 Page 278 of 371 Page 279 of 371 Page 280 of 371 Page 281 of 371 Page 282 of 371 Page 283 of 371 Page 284 of 371 Page 285 of 371 Page 286 of 371 Page 287 of 371  Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, Illinois APPENDIX G ITE Parking Generation Manual Excerpts Page 288 of 371 Page 289 of 371  Appendix G Land Use: 565 Day Care Center Description A day care center is a facility where care for pre-school age children is provided, normally during daytime hours. A day care facility generally includes classrooms, offices, eating areas, and playgrounds. A day care center may also provide after-school care for school-age children. Time-of-Day Distribution for Parking Demand The following table presents a time-of-day distribution of parking demand on a weekday at 17 study sites in a general urban/suburban setting. Hour Beginning Percent of Weekday Peak Parking Demand 12:00–4:00 a.m. — 5:00 a.m. — 6:00 a.m. 11 7:00 a.m. 45 8:00 a.m. 89 9:00 a.m. 93 10:00 a.m. 100 11:00 a.m. 100 12:00 p.m. 97 1:00 p.m. 93 2:00 p.m. 88 3:00 p.m. 82 4:00 p.m. 88 5:00 p.m. 96 6:00 p.m. 61 7:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. — 11:00 p.m. — 356 Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition 2 Page 290 of 371  Appendix G Additional Data For this land use, any child enrolled at a day care center is considered a student. The number of students refers to the total number of enrolled children, not just those present at the time the study is conducted. The average parking supply ratio for the 36 study sites with parking supply information and located in a general urban/suburban setting is 3.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA. The average peak parking occupancy at these 36 sites is 63 percent. For the single study site in a dense multiuse urban setting, the parking supply ratio is 1.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA and its peak parking occupancy is 86 percent. The sites were surveyed in the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in California, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 221, 223, 289, 291, 433, 555, 556, 557, 563, 603, 618, 622, 632, 633 3 Land Use Descriptions and Data Plots 357 Page 291 of 371 Page 292 of 371 Page 293 of 371 Page 294 of 371  TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION Phone: 312-814-8960 Fax: 312-814-3459 Email: SFM.Techservices@illinois.gov January 8, 2026 OSFM #25148 Victor Cuebas Jumpstart Early Learning Academy II 5644 West Diversey Avenue Chicago, IL 60639 Re: Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Day Care Center 725 Pine Street Winnetka, IL 60093 COOK COUNTY Dear Victor, Plans submitted for the above referenced day care center occupancy were reviewed on this date under the requirements of the 2015 edition of the NFPA 101-Life Safety Code and applicable references as adopted in Title 41 Illinois Administrative Code Parts 100, 109, and 251. This review pertains to: A NEW DAY CARE CENTER IN AN EXISTING TYPE III (211), PER NFPA 220, TWO-STORY BUILDING WITH BASEMENT AND NO OCCUPIED ATTIC. IT WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED BY FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS. Please note that OSFM’s plan reviews are strictly advisory in nature and that the local authority having jurisdiction retains the ultimate responsibility for compliance determinations. This advisory plan review is conducted based only on the information OSFM was provided. There may be information, details, or variables in existence but unknown to OSFM that would alter its technical analysis were those items made known to OSFM at the time of its advisory review. The drawings appear to conform with the applicable requirements with the following noted exceptions: 1. In accordance with Section 16.1.3.1, multiple occupancies shall be in accordance with 6.1.14. 555 W. Monroe Street 1035 Stevenson Drive 2309 W. Main Suite 1300-N Marion, IL 62959 Chicago, IL 60661 Springfield, IL 62703 (618) 993-7085 (312) 814-2693 (217) 785-0969 www.sfm.illinois.gov Page 295 of 371 Victor Cuebas 2 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 2. In accordance with Section 16.1.6.1, day-care occupancies, other than day-care homes, shall be limited to the locations, construction types, and sprinkler protection features specified in Table 16.1.6.1. based on the number of stories in height as defined in 4.6.3. (See 8.2.1.) 3. In accordance with Section 16.1.6.2, where day-care occupancies, other than day- care homes, with clients who are 24 months or less in age or who are incapable of self-preservation are located one or more stories above the level of exit discharge, or where day-care occupancies are located two or more stories above the level of exit discharge, smoke partitions shall be provided to divide such stories into not less than two compartments. The smoke barriers shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8.4 but shall not be required to have a fire resistance rating. 4. In accordance with Section 16.2.2.2.2, any door in a required means of egress from an area having an occupant load of 100 or more persons shall be permitted to be provided with a latch or lock only if the latch or lock is panic hardware or fire exit hardware complying with 7.2.1.7. 5. In accordance with Section 16.2.2.2.4, every door latch to closets, storage areas, kitchens, and other similar areas shall be such that clients can open the door from inside the space or area. 6. In accordance with Section 16.2.2.2.5, every bathroom door lock shall be designed to allow opening of the locked door from the outside in an emergency. The opening device shall be readily accessible to the staff. 7. In accordance with Section 16.2.4, the number of means of egress shall be in accordance with Section 7.4. Not less than two separate exits shall be in accordance with both of the following criteria: (1) They shall be provided on every story. (2) They shall be accessible from every part of every story and mezzanine, however, exit access travel shall be permitted to be common for the distance permitted as common path of travel by 16.2.5.3. 8. In accordance with Section 16.2.5.2, no dead-end corridor shall exceed 20 ft, other than in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, in which case dead-end corridors shall not exceed 50 ft. 9. In accordance with Section 16.2.5.3.1, common path of travel shall not exceed 100 ft in a building protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. Page 296 of 371 Victor Cuebas 3 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 10. In accordance with 16.2.5.3.2 common path of travel shall not exceed 75 ft. in a building not protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7 11. In accordance with Section 16.2.6.2, travel distance shall meet the following criteria, unless otherwise permitted by 16.2.6.3: (1) The travel distance between any room door intended as an exit access and an exit shall not exceed 100 ft. (2) The travel distance between any point in a room and an exit shall not exceed 150 ft. (3) The travel distance between any point in a sleeping room and an exit access door in that room shall not exceed 50 ft. 12. In accordance with 16.2.6.3, the travel distance in 16.2.6.2(1) and (2) shall be permitted to be increased by 50 ft in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. 13. In accordance with Section 16.2.8, means of egress shall be illuminated in accordance with Section 7.8. 14. In accordance with Section 16.2.9, emergency lighting shall be provided in accordance with Section 7.9 in the following areas: (1) Interior stairs and corridors (2) Assembly use spaces (3) Flexible and open plan buildings (4) Interior or windowless portions of buildings (5) Shops and laboratories 15. In accordance with Section 16.2.10, means of egress shall have signs in accordance with Section 7.10. 16. In accordance with Section 16.2.11.1, every room or space normally subject to client occupancy, other than bathrooms, shall have not less than one outside window for emergency rescue that complies with the following: (1) Such windows shall be openable from the inside without the use of tools and shall provide a clear opening of not less than 20 in. in width, 24 in. in height, and 5.7 ft2 in area. (2) The bottom of the opening shall be not more than 44 in. above the floor. (3) The clear opening shall allow a rectangular solid, with a width and height that provides not less than the required 5.7-ft2 opening and a depth of not less than 20 in., to pass fully through the opening. Page 297 of 371 Victor Cuebas 4 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 Exception No. 1: This requirement shall not apply to buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. Exception No. 2: This requirement shall not apply where the room or space has a door leading directly to the outside of the building. 17. In accordance with Section 16.3.1, any vertical opening, other than unprotected vertical openings in accordance with 8.6.9.1, shall be enclosed or protected in accordance with 8.6. 18. In accordance with Section 16.3.2.1, rooms or spaces for the storage, processing, or use of materials specified in 16.3.2.1(1) through (3) shall be protected in accordance with the following: (1) Separation from the remainder of the building by fire barriers having a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour or protection of such rooms by automatic extinguishing systems as specified in Section 8.7 in the following areas: a. Boiler and furnace rooms, unless such rooms enclose only air handling equipment b. Rooms or spaces used for the storage of combustible supplies in quantities deemed hazardous by the authority having jurisdiction c. Rooms or spaces used for the storage of hazardous materials or flammable or combustible liquids in quantities deemed hazardous by recognized standards d. Janitor closets (2) Separation from the remainder of the building by fire barriers having a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour and protection of such rooms by automatic extinguishing systems as specified in Section 8.7 in the following areas: a. Laundries (Note: It is not the intent to classify a room with a domestic-type clothes washer and a domestic-type clothes dryer as a laundry). b. Maintenance shops, including woodworking and painting areas c. Rooms or spaces used for processing or use of combustible supplies deemed hazardous by the authority having jurisdiction d. Rooms or spaces used for processing or use of hazardous materials or flammable or combustible liquids in quantities deemed hazardous by recognized standards (3) Where automatic extinguishing is used to meet the requirements of 16.3.2.1 (1) and (2), protection as permitted in accordance with 9.7.1.2 19. In accordance with Section 16.3.2.4, food preparation facilities protected in accordance with 9.2.3 shall not be required to have openings protected between food preparation areas and dining areas. (See OSFM policy for domestic cooking equipment that is used for food warming or limited cooking). Page 298 of 371 Victor Cuebas 5 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 20. In accordance with Section 16.3.3.2, interior wall and ceiling finish materials in accordance with 10.2. shall be Class A in stairways, corridors, and lobbies; in all other occupied areas, interior wall and ceiling finish shall be Class A or Class B. 21. In accordance with Section 16.3.3.3, interior floor finish materials in accordance with 10.2. shall be not less than Class II within corridors and exits if not separated by walls complying with 14.3.6. 22. In accordance with Section 16.3.4.1, day-care occupancies, other than day-care occupancies housed in one room, shall be provided with a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 9.6. The fire alarm system shall comply with the following: ➢ In accordance with Section 16.3.4.2, initiation of the required fire alarm system shall be by manual means and by operation of any required smoke detectors and required sprinkler systems. (See 16.3.4.5.) ➢ In accordance with Section 16.3.4.3.1, occupant notification shall be in accordance with 9.6.3. ➢ In accordance with Section 16.3.4.4, fire department notification shall be accomplished in accordance with 9.6.4. ➢ In accordance with Section 16.3.4.5, a smoke detection system in accordance with Section 9.6 shall be installed in day-care occupancies, other than those housed in one room. Detectors shall be installed on each story in front of the doors to the stairways and in the corridors of all floors occupied by the day-care occupancy. Detectors also shall be installed in lounges, recreation areas, and sleeping rooms in the day-care occupancy. ➢ In accordance with NFPA 72-National Fire Alarm Code, the acceptability of the location of the fire alarm control panel shall be confirmed by the local fire department having response jurisdiction to the occupancy. ➢ The installation of fire alarm systems is required to be performed by a licensed electrical and/or fire alarm installation company. Contact the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation for further information. 23. In accordance with Section 16.3.6, every interior corridor shall be constructed of walls having not less than a 1-hour fire resistance rating in accordance with 8.2.3. Exception No. 1: Corridor protection shall not be required where all spaces normally subject to client occupancy have not less than one door opening directly to the outside or to an exterior exit access balcony or corridor in accordance with 7.5.3. Exception No. 2: In buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, corridor walls shall not be required to be rated, provided that such walls form smoke partitions in accordance with 8.2.4. Page 299 of 371 Victor Cuebas 6 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 Exception No. 3: Where the corridor ceiling is an assembly having a 1-hour fire resistance rating where tested as a wall, the corridor walls shall be permitted to terminate at the corridor ceiling. Exception No. 4: Lavatories shall not be required to be separated from corridors, provided that they are separated from all other spaces by walls having not less than a 1-hour fire resistance rating in accordance with 8.2.3. 24. In accordance with Sections 16.5.1.1 and 16.5.2.1, utilities and HVAC equipment shall comply with the provisions of Sections 9.1 and 9.2 which require compliance with the following referenced codes and standards: NFPA 54 National Fuel Gas Code NFPA 70 National Electrical Code NFPA 110 Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems NFPA 111 Standard on Stored Electrical Energy Emergency and Standby Power Systems NFPA 90A Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems, NFPA 90B Standard for the Installation of Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Systems Additionally, in accordance with State statute (431 ILCS 75) every boiler and each pressure vessel over the minimum capacity must have a current inspection certificate issued by the Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal posted in the boiler room. Heating boilers (both steam and water), hot water supply boilers (hot water heaters) and other types of boilers are exempt from inspection and registration if the BTU output does not exceed 200,000. Contact the OSFM Division of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Safety for further information pertaining to boiler and pressure vessel registration. 25. In accordance with Section 16.5.1.2, special protective covers for all electrical receptacles shall be installed in all areas occupied by clients. 26. In accordance with Section 16.5.2.2, unvented fuel-fired room heaters, other than gas space heaters in compliance with NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code, shall not be permitted. 27. In accordance with Section 16.5.2.3, any heating equipment in spaces occupied by clients shall be provided with partitions, screens, or other means to protect clients from hot surfaces and open flames. If solid partitions are used to provide such protection, provisions shall be made to ensure adequate air for combustion and ventilation for the heating equipment. Page 300 of 371 Victor Cuebas 7 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 Concealed Spaces 28. In accordance with Section 8.2.7.1, in new Type III, Type IV, or Type V construction, any concealed space in which materials having a flame spread rating greater than Class A (as defined in Section 10.2) are exposed shall be effectively firestopped or draftstopped as follows: (1) Every exterior and interior wall and partition shall be fire-stopped at each floor level, at the top story ceiling level, and at the level of support for roofs. (2) Every unoccupied attic space shall be subdivided by draftstops into areas not to exceed 3000 ft2. (3) Any concealed space between the ceiling and the floor or roof above shall be draftstopped for the full depth of the space along the line of support for the floor or roof structural members and, if necessary, at other locations to form areas not to exceed 1000 ft2 for any space between the ceiling and floor and 3000 ft2 for any space between the ceiling and roof. Exception No. 1: This requirement shall not apply where the space is protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. Exception No. 2: This requirement shall not apply to concealed spaces serving as plenums. (See NFPA 90A, Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems.) Furnishings and Similar 29. In accordance with Section 16.7.4.1, draperies, curtains, and other similar furnishings and decorations in day-care occupancies shall be in accordance with the provisions of 10.3.1. OPERATING FEATURES (The following requirements should be shared with the facility administrator): 30. In accordance with Section 16.7.1, the facility shall have a comprehensive written fire emergency response plan. Copies of the plan shall be made available to all employees. All employees shall be periodically instructed and kept informed with respect to the duties of their position under the plan. 31. In accordance with Section 16.7.2.2, emergency egress and relocation drills shall be conducted as follows: (1) Not less than one emergency egress and relocation drill shall be conducted every month the facility is in session. Exception: In climates where the weather is severe, the monthly emergency egress and relocation drills shall be permitted to be deferred, provided that the Page 301 of 371 Victor Cuebas 8 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 required number of emergency egress and relocation drills is achieved and not less than four are conducted before the drills are deferred. (2) All occupants of the building shall participate in the drill. (3) One additional emergency egress and relocation drill, other than for day-care occupancies that are open on a year-round basis, shall be required within the first 30 days of operation. 32. In accordance with Section 16.7.3.1, fire prevention inspections shall be conducted monthly by a trained senior member of the staff. A copy of the latest inspection report shall be posted in a conspicuous place in the day-care facility. 33. In accordance with Section 16.7.3.2, it shall be the duty of site administrators and staff members to inspect all exit facilities daily to ensure that all stairways, doors, and other exits are in proper condition. 34. In accordance with Section 16.7.4.2, clothing and personal effects shall not be stored in corridors. Exception No. 1: This requirement shall not apply to corridors protected by an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. Exception No. 2: This requirement shall not apply to corridor areas protected by a smoke detection system in accordance with Section 9.6. Exception No. 3: This requirement shall not apply to storage in metal lockers, provided that the required egress width is maintained. 35. In accordance with Section 16.7.4.3, artwork and teaching materials shall be permitted to be attached directly to the walls and shall not exceed 20 percent of the wall area. 36. In accordance with Section 16.7.5, adequate adult staff shall be on duty, alert, awake, and in the facility at all times where clients are present. This review credited the presence of a complete automatic sprinkler system throughout the occupancy. The review did not however, consider specific information concerning the system water supply, pipe sizing, head placement, or hydraulic feasibility Compliance with these noted exceptions is mandatory. No guarantee is rendered as to the completeness of the plan review, and the responsibility for full compliance with both state and locally adopted codes, standards and regulations rests with the owner or his authorized agent or subcontractor. Subsequent discovery of errors or omissions shall not be construed as authority to violate, cancel or set aside any provision of any applicable codes. Page 302 of 371 Victor Cuebas 9 Jumpstart Early Learning Academy Jumpstart Early Learning Services Winnetka, Illinois January 8, 2026 OSFM Plan Review #25148 The rules of the Office of the State Fire Marshal are concurrently applicable with those of local authorities having jurisdiction. The Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal recommends contact with the local fire and/or building department to ensure compliance with local regulations in the event that they may have requirements that are more stringent. Day care center occupancies are licensed by the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, therefore, the OSFM will not conduct a final inspection of this occupancy until formally requested to so by DCFS. Please DO NOT NOTIFY the OSFM when this work has been completed, but rather contact the applicable DCFS licensing representative who will request an OSFM inspection. The returned plans shall be retained on-site and made available to the assigned Fire Prevention Inspector of the Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal for use in conducting an on-site inspection. Respectfully, Bernie Arends OSFM Technical Services c: OSFM Fire Prevention Portal OSFM Technical Services Plan Review File Fire Chief, Winnetka Fire Department Page 303 of 371  OSFM Plan Review # (To be completed by OSFM) OSFM PLAN SUBMITTAL FORM PROJECT INFORMATION Name of Project: Jumpstart Winnetka Address of Project: 725 Pine St. City: Winnetka 60093 ZIP Code ___________ County: Cook SUBMITTER INFORMATION Submitter’s Name: Victor Cuebas Jumpstart Early Learning Services Company Name: __________________________________ 7559 W. Addison St Address: _______________________________________ Chicago City: ____________________________ 60634 Zip: _____________ Telephone: 312.860.4205 jumpstartels@gmail.com Email: _____________________________ The plans are for: New construction An addition to an existing building Remodeling of an existing building: To serve the same occupancy classification as the most recent occupancy Changing the occupancy classification from that of the most recent occupancy. What was the previous occupancy classification? _______________________ Occupancy Classification as defined in NFPA 101 (2015) ____ Ambulatory Health Care ____ Detention & Correctional ____ Residential Board & Care ____ Assembly ____ Hotel ____ Storage ____ Apartment Building ____ Dormitory ____ ____ Business ____ Industrial ____ Day Care Center ____ Lodging or Rooming ____ Day Care Home ____ Mercantile Mixed Occupancy Classifications: Number of Stories One Two Three Four > Four “High rise” (> 75 ft) Is there a Basement or one or more levels below the level of exit discharge?: Yes No Page 304 of 371  Construction Classification per NFPA 220 _____ Type I(442) ____ Type II(222) _X_ Type III(211) ____ Type V(111) _____ Type I(332) ____ Type II(111) ____ Type III(200) ____ Type V(000) ____ Type II(000) ____ Type IV(2HH) Or provide construction classification per the International Building Code or BOCA Code: __IIIA_see email dated 12/16/25 Will the building be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system?: _____ No _____ Only partially in some areas or rooms. Please specify sprinklered areas: If yes, the standard to which the sprinkler system will be designed: NFPA 13 NFPA 13R NFPA 13D Will the building be protected by an automatic fire alarm system?: No Only partially in some areas or rooms: Please Specify: Yes Will kitchen cooking fire suppression systems be included in the building?: No Yes If yes, will the systems comply with NFPA 96? Yes No If food services are provided for occupants, is the cooking onsite or will food be catered? _______________________________________________________________________ Catered Are there any exceptions to the 2015 Life Safety Code included in this project? No Yes If yes, please explain: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 2 Page 305 of 371 Provide a description of the project to help us understand what you are proposing: ______________________________________________________________________ We are proposing a 2 story childcare center in existing classrooms. ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Plans are permitted to be submitted in PDF format via email (more than one email depending upon the size of the attachments) to SFM.Techservices@illinois.gov. OSFM is not permitted to use links to view stored plans in clouds or other similar types of storage. If hard copy submittal is preferred, please send an email to the address above to obtain an address for shipping. Victor Cuebas 12/12/25 Signature of Submitter Printed Name Date 3 Page 306 of 371  ATTACHMENT B Memorandum To: Zoning Board of Appeals and Plan Commission CC: Ann Klaassen From: James J. Bernahl, Director of Engineering/Village Engineer Date: February 11, 2026 Re: Special Use Permit Application – 725 Pine Street (Winnetka Congregational Church) – Childcare Center The Engineering Department has reviewed the Special Use permit application to allow for the implementation of a Childcare Center at the Winnetka Congregational Church, located at 725 Pine Street. The proposed location is located east of the intersection of Prospect Avenue and Pine Street. Based on responses provided from the applicant the Engineering Department is submitting this revised memo. The Engineering Department reviewed the information provided as part of this request which included a cover letter from the applicant, a copy of the Village of Winnetka Special Use Permit application, and a Traffic Impact Study; prepared by the Engineering firm Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. Among the conditions for being satisfied for a Special Use to be granted is the following: “That adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage, and other facilities necessary to the operation of the Special Use exists or are to be provided;” To demonstrate compliance with the above, the applicant affirmed that no proposed exterior modifications to the current structure, or exterior grading are proposed. Based on this statement the Engineering Department does not have concerns about any impact on the existing utility infrastructure or drainage concerns. Traffic Impact Study Overview The largest potential impact to the surrounding area is the inclusion of additional vehicles and pedestrian movements related specifically to the proposed Childcare Center. As noted above, the applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Study, the professional consultants’ conclusion are as follows: Page 307 of 371  February 11, 2026 “Analyses have been conducted under existing and future conditions to determine the impact from the proposed daycare program on the study area intersections. The capacity analysis results indicate that the increase in project site-generated traffic has little to no effect upon the Peak Hour operations of the area roadway network with the recommendations contained herein: • The location of the only full movement church access will be located approximately 125 feet northeast of the Prospect Avenue & Pine Street intersection. • Traffic operations will remain the same as existing for the intersections within this study. • To facilitate vehicles entering and exiting the church driveway, consider restricting parking on Prospect between the church driveway and Lincoln Avenue. • The church should plan for staff to assist with the drop-off and pick-up operations to help ensure orderly traffic flow on-site.” The Engineering Department has reviewed the technical information provided in the Traffic Study and offered comments to the consultant. Some of the information requested for additional clarification was as follows: • There was a discrepancy between the actual number of students being proposed and the number of students considered in the traffic study; 60 versus 64. Engineering is seeking a final clarification on the number of students to ensure the traffic study correctly reflects the impacts on traffic and pedestrian traffic. o This item has been addressed with a clarification that there will be 64 students. • The consultant indicated that, “The report references the “Village of Winnetka Traffic Count Map (Q1 2025).” The Engineering Department requested clarification on where this residential map comes from as it is not familiar with this document. o This item has been addressed and clarified. • Engineering stated that consideration should be given to the location of the existing church driveway entrance to this intersection. Parents wanting to head west will have site line issues for any queuing that would take place on Prospect. The narrow roadway, proximity to Lincoln, and the curve on Prospect would make it very difficult for vehicles to have a clear site line to the west. o The applicant has provided a response that the traffic study demonstrates that vehicles will be permitted to enter and leave the site from the north or south on Prospect without any impact. The 2 Page 308 of 371  February 11, 2026 Engineering Department believes that this will need to be evaluated on an ongoing basis based on actual traffic patterns for users entering and exiting the site. Should traffic issues arise from this additional coordination to address this issue will need to occur between the applicant, Engineering, and Police. • Engineering asked how many staff members are proposed to assist with vehicle drop off and pick up. This will be a big factor considering that it will drive any queuing efforts onto Prospect. o The applicant has provided a response that 2 staff members will be present. This will need to be evaluated on a long-term basis based on actual drop-off and pick-up operations. Additional personnel may be required based on the actual needs. • As noted above the Traffic Consultant recommended that, “To facilitate vehicles entering and exiting the church driveway, consider restricting parking on Prospect between the church driveway and Lincoln Avenue.” The Engineering Department has concerns about this recommendation as the removal of these temporary parking spaces where requested would reduce parking near the entrance, but it would push on street parking further north on Prospect Avenue. In the past the residents of Prospect have requested that this not be permitted as it reduced available parking in front of their homes. In addition, the bend of Prospect creates reduced visibility due to the bend. Engineering Department Recommendation: Based on the information provided by the applicant the Engineering Department believes that the proposed Childcare Center can operate at this location with minimal overall impacts to the area. However, as noted above it may be necessary to perform ongoing evaluation and possible modifications based on drop-off and pick-up conditions. Engineering believes that appropriate staffing will be critical in reducing the potential for on-street queuing of vehicles entering the site which could cause safety concerns at this curve on Prospect Avenue. In addition, parking for staff members on site should be required to reduce any additional impacts to available on Street parking near the site. Consideration should be given to any overlapping of any other existing or future programs that are offered during the day. Previously attendants of church groups during the day would utilize the current onsite parking spaces for these activities. With the increase in additional staff members this could cause additional on-street parking issues. The Church will need to consider its other current and future programming impacts as it relates to parking needs. 3 Page 309 of 371 ATTACHMENT C Page 310 of 371 Page 311 of 371 Page 312 of 371 Page 313 of 371 Page 314 of 371 Page 315 of 371 Page 316 of 371 Page 317 of 371 Page 318 of 371 Page 319 of 371 Page 320 of 371  ATTACHMENT D From: To: Planning Subject: Winnetka Congregational Childcare Center Date: Saturday, February 14, 2026 4:53:42 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Winnetka Plan Commission, We enthusiastically support making whatever Village zoning changes are necessary so a child care center can be operated at Winnetka Congregational Church. We have reviewed the plans and possible impact to the neighborhood. We feel the slight inconveniences are inconsequential trade-offs to have greatly needed additional childcare space here. We’ve been homeowners at Lincoln & Pine for over 40 years. We’re used to traffic ebbs & flows especially from both the Community House & Home Alone house tourists. Added traffic during childcare drop off & pickups won’t be an issue. Thanks, Nancy & Bill Yurek 647 Lincoln Ave Page 321 of 371 February 20, 2026 Via Electronic Mail planning@winnetka.org RE: Case No. 25-24-SU Dear Winnetka Plan Commission: The 542-619 Block of Lincoln Avenue, and the immediately surrounding blocks of Lincoln, Prospect and Pine, will be negatively impacted by the addition of a day care enterprise at the Winnetka Congregational Church (“WCC”) that will bring with it a twice-a-day, 80 to 100-car, drop- off and pick-up line and add an additional volume of street traffic and noise in this already busy residential area. We are raising two children here in Winnetka, and while we are sympathetic to the desire for additional childcare resources in the Village, we ask that the Village reject the request to modify WCC’s existing Special Use Permit to allow this use. While the WCC location in question is referenced as part of a “commercial overlay district” it is smack dab in the middle of a residential area – as shown in Winnetka’s zoning map – and must be evaluated through that lens. The purple dot reflects location of WCC surrounded by areas zoned as residential: The WCC suggests that the operation of a new childcare enterprise (the “Center”) on its property will not impact traffic in the area, but that suggestion is based on flawed data and unrealistic expectations. At the end of October 2025, in a letter sent to nearby neighbors announcing its proposal to lease space on its property for the Center, WCC provided neighbors with a copy of a Traffic and Parking Study (“Traffic Study”) that was prepared using “existing traffic data” along with “accepted…trip- generation methodologies” and “locally appropriate operating assumptions” (Traffic Study, p.1). However, a closer look reveals that none of these sources of data or assumptions likely reflect the true state of traffic volume and congestion in the area now or in the near future, and the plan would have additional negative effects for the area. Page 322 of 371 1. The Traffic Study Ignores Lincoln Avenue. The Traffic Study conveniently fails to consider traffic volumes on Lincoln Avenue, which along with Pine will obviously be a main route to the WCC for those accessing the proposed Center. The “Traffic Count Map” cited on page 2 of the Traffic Study references Q1 2025 traffic volumes on Prospect, Pine, and East Elm – but provides no data regarding Lincoln Avenue, an increasingly busy street that feeds traffic directly to Pine and Prospect from both north and south. The residents of the 580-619 end of the 542-619 Block of Lincoln Avenue already experience significant traffic from the East Elm and Lincoln retail and medical/dental businesses, as well as from the Winnetka Community House (“Community House”). The recent relocation of the Village’s post office branch to 586 Lincoln Avenue also means more cars and people coming to the area, and traffic from postal vehicles coming and going from the site. On this block of Lincoln, driving is already challenging, navigating from the East Elm side, bounded by the always-busy Hometown, through to the Community House and the end of the block. Parking is similarly a challenge, indicating the volume of cars that are coming to the area on a regular basis. By not including Lincoln Avenue, the Traffic Study also fails to consider the heavy traffic volumes in the 639-687 block of Lincoln Avenue – largely attributable to the “Home Alone” house at 671 Lincoln – which also affects surrounding blocks. The volume of traffic regularly seen in that immediate area is noteworthy throughout the year and is seemingly increasing each year. During the extended holiday season (roughly Halloween through January) the number of cars and people visiting and traversing Lincoln Avenue on weekdays and weekends increases even more. During that time, the Winnetka police must regularly direct traffic at the intersection of Lincoln and Pine at the turn onto Prospect, due to the massive influx of cars and people traveling to see the Home Alone house. In fact, this most recent holiday season, the Village temporarily converted the 639- 687 block of Lincoln Avenue to a southbound, one-way street in order to help manage the excessive traffic. Notably, when it operates as a one-way street, all of that block’s traffic must exit Lincoln going southbound, directly into the staggered intersection of Pine and Lincoln near the turn onto Prospect. Visitors also drive around Pine and Prospect as they circle and attempt to park to visit the Home Alone House. Adding 80-100 cars driving to, dropping off, and picking up children at the WCC around the corner from this area will make this intersection more difficult to navigate year-round. 2. Increased Traffic Volume Will Compromise Safety at an Already Busy Intersection. Adding additional traffic to and from the WCC will risk an increase in accidents and other safety events in this highly traveled area. The Community House hosts myriad events for children and families, including during weekdays and evenings, and children often travel across Pine and Lincoln to access the Community House. There are activities at the Children’s Chapel during the week, including a large rummage sale multiple times per year, that further impact traffic and parking around the staggered intersection of Pine, Lincoln, and Prospect. Of note, the proposed ingress and egress plan for the Center’s drop-off and pick-up, as described in the Traffic Study, relies on the travel of cars exclusively through that same staggered intersection. Further to that point, the Traffic Study’s assertion that cars dropping off and picking up at the Center will not regularly back up “queuing” onto Prospect or Pine is unrealistic. One needs only walk the immediate area surrounding the WCC to identify this – there will simply be nowhere else for this volume of cars (80-100 of them) to go during drop-off and pickup times. Those neighbors who live immediately next to and directly across from the WCC will be most acutely affected by this plan, but all residents in the surrounding area will be subject to the effects as this volume of cars attempts to navigate the area. Page 323 of 371 3. And What About One Winnetka? The Traffic Study relies on Q1 2025 data, and has not factored in the additional traffic that will be generated on East Elm, Lincoln, Prospect, Pine and Arbor Vitae in the very near future, once an additional 59 units of housing and additional retail and other businesses are in place at the One Winnetka site roughly one block away at the corner of Elm Street and Lincoln Avenue. Recent local news reports have expressed concerns about parking (which follows from increased traffic) in relation to the One Winnetka development. 4. The Plan Creates Other Significant Impacts. Beyond the impacts of additional vehicle traffic, congestion, and safety, all residences located within earshot of the WCC will experience additional daily noise disturbance from 80-100 cars, doors and trunks slamming, people coming and going, and of 80-100 children playing outside with all the typical noise that brings (however joyous in nature). This will significantly impinge on those residents’ reasonable use and enjoyment of their property. The residential area near the WCC already bears a significant burden of noise and disruption from frequent, loud, and poorly volume-regulated events at the Community House garden, weekday noise from the existing facilities for the Harkness House childcare and Winnetka Community Nursery School (i.e., facilities already provide child care one block away from the proposed Center), sound intrusion from WCC’s outdoor services, and the annual multi-day disruption that is the Winnetka Music Festival. It is already almost too much to bear in a small area, and WCC’s proposed modification to its Special Use permit to accommodate the Center will make the situation worse. For these reasons, we request that the Village reject the modification to WCC’s Special Use Permit. Respectfully, Sandra DiVarco and Derrick Kaleta 611 Lincoln Avenue Page 324 of 371  Minutes adopted 04.13.2026 1 WINNETKA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES EXCERPT 2 MARCH 16, 2026 3 4 Zoning Board Members Present: Matt Bradley, Chairman 5 Mark Haller 6 Kathryn Leister 7 Mike Nielsen 8 Michael Ritter 9 10 Zoning Board Members Absent: Lynn Hanley 11 Todd Vender 12 13 Village Staff: Scott Mangum, Director of Community Development 14 Ann Klaassen, Assistant Director of Community 15 Development 16 17 Village Attorney: Peter Friedman 18 19 *** 20 21 a. Case No. 25-24-SU: Winnetka Congregational Church - 725 Pine Street: An application seeking 22 approval of a Special Use Permit to allow a childcare center to operate in the existing church. The Village 23 Council has final jurisdiction on this request. 24 Ms. Klaassen stated the request is for an amendment to a special use permit to lease space in the existing 25 church to Jumpstart Early Learning Services to operate a childcare center. She noted the existing special 26 use permit was granted in 1998 which she described to the Board. Ms. Klaassen identified the property’s 27 location, zoning classification and existing improvements as well as a limited range of additional uses. She 28 then referred to existing site photos and employees and students which would occupy the space. Ms. 29 Klaassen noted the proposed plan did not include any building or parking lot expansion or playground 30 with an amendment needed to the special use if a playground is proposed in the future. She stated the 31 applicant received preliminary DCFS approval and DCFS required final approval by the Village and minor 32 facility modifications. Ms. Klaassen identified staff parking and noted a traffic impact study was prepared 33 by Gewalt Hamilton and provided in the application materials. She then read the recommendations 34 provided by the Village Engineer. 35 36 Ms. Klaassen summarized the PC’s consideration of the request with a recommendation of approval and 37 conditions. She also identified the six special use standards the Board is to consider and stated following 38 the applicant’s presentation, public comment and Board discussion, the Board may decide to continue 39 the matter to a date certain or provide a recommendation with draft language included on page nos. 216 40 and 217. Ms. Klaassen then asked if there were any questions. 41 42 Chairman Bradley also asked if there were any questions. No questions were raised at this time. 43 44 Chairman Bradley swore in those speaking to this matter. Amy Falkowski presented the request on behalf 45 of the applicant and clarified the special use application request is for a day care and not a pre-school. She 46 summarized the church’s history and how they have participated in the community. Ms. Falkowski stated 47 they discussed the proposed plan with the neighbors and had a traffic study performed. She added they Page 325 of 371  March 16, 2026 Page 2 1 are prepared in terms of traffic with regard to the proposed use. She then stated the request is in response 2 to the community’s needs and is in response to the Comprehensive Plan. 3 4 Ms. Falkowski stated in response to the questions raised, she explained the capacity in terms of children, 5 teachers and size of the space. She referred to an illustration and described the entrance, security systems 6 and traffic flow pattern. Ms. Falkowski also explained their hours of operation and noted a playground is 7 not a DCFS requirement. She also explained the parking spaces which would be occupied by the minimal 8 number of employees. Ms. Falkowski added the drop-off and pickup process is efficient and has been 9 successfully implemented in their other locations. She outlined the minor interior changes to be done to 10 accommodate the use. Ms. Falkowski stated the proposed use would bring neighborhood vitality, jobs 11 and increased business patronage. She also informed the Board that DCFS reviewed the building and 12 indicated once the minor modifications have been approved, they would provide their final approval. 13 14 Ms. Falkowski explained the traffic study conducted in the neighborhood which determined there would 15 be no significant impact during heavy traffic hours. She outlined how the circular driveway would be used 16 and that signage would be installed to direct traffic with directions also provided to parents. Ms. Falkowski 17 referred to the findings that there would be very little change in terms of traffic and provided additional 18 information in terms of staging and preparation in terms of pickup and drop-off. She stated there would 19 be no issues in terms of utility usage and confirmed there would be no changes outside. Ms. Falkowski 20 reiterated the need for daycare in the Village and asked if there were any questions. 21 22 Chairman Bradley also asked if there were any questions. Mr. Haller asked if they anticipated if at capacity 23 whether they would be able to transition vehicles without a queue. Ms. Falkowski confirmed that is 24 correct and explained how the queue would operate as well as the anticipated traffic pattern. Mr. Nielsen 25 questioned the increase in the number of children from 8 to 64. Ms. Falkowski confirmed the 64 figure 26 represented DCFS capacity. She also explained their response to Lincoln Avenue which was not addressed 27 in the traffic study as well as the traffic flow from Green Bay Road. Ms. Falkowski confirmed they would 28 address any issues that arise and confirmed there have been no complaints in terms of Sunday traffic. 29 30 Victor Cuebas explained the admission and application process to the Board and noted the application 31 included preferred drop-off and pickup times. Chairman Bradley referred to the first standard and 32 questioned the applicant’s background and verification process which Mr. Cuebas explained in detail to 33 the Board. Mr. Haller questioned the involvement of those higher in the organization than the applicant. 34 Mr. Cuebas explained they have a corporate office to which they report. No additional questions were 35 raised at this time. 36 37 Chairman Bradley asked for public comment and swore in those speaking to this matter. Dave Robertson 38 stated he is a church member and is familiar with the parking lot, the lots which were built and their usage. 39 He stated double parking may be the only issue with the main issue related to the existing parking lot off 40 Prospect. 41 42 Colleen Root stated she is also a church member and described her route to the church used several times 43 daily. She stated the traffic patterns can be managed and commented on her pleasure in terms of how 44 the special use application was handled. No additional comments were made at this time. 45 46 Chairman Bradley called the matter in for discussion. Mr. Ritter stated the primary impediment to him 47 with regard to the standards related to the traffic and parking issue and referred to the applicant’s 48 attempts to address the issues. He stated he had no problem with the request. Ms. Leister agreed with Page 326 of 371  March 16, 2026 Page 3 1 Mr. Ritter’s comments and stated her only concern related to traffic and parking. She stated the correct 2 analysis had been done and the situation would not be made worse than it is currently. Mr. Nielsen 3 referred to the standards related to parking, access roads and properties in the immediate vicinity and 4 the access off Prospect and Lincoln that he is fine with. He stated with regard to standard (d) relating to 5 parking and congestion, he referred to the Community House and nursery school and the number of 6 children and drop-off. Mr. Nielsen also referred to the existing amount of traffic from Pine off of Green 7 Bay Road and questioned the impact of both schools doing drop-offs at the same time. 8 9 Mr. Haller stated he is also familiar with the church and its activities. He referred to difficulties with the 10 circular driveway and the ability of users to navigate the circumstances. Mr. Haller stated he is minimally 11 concerned with the amount of traffic from Pine to Green Bay Road and the ability of the church to deal 12 with issues as they come up. He stated the use would definitely benefit the community and concluded he 13 would be in favor of the request. Chairman Bradley informed the Board of the PC’s discussion with regard 14 to the need for additional daycare solutions and collaboration. He stated he is also concerned with regard 15 to the traffic chokepoint and referred to traffic flow requirements being addressed prior to Village Council 16 approval in terms of how traffic flow and communication with parents would be navigated. Chairman 17 Bradley concluded that otherwise the standards have been met and asked for a motion to recommend 18 approval of the special use request as indicated on page 216. 19 20 A motion as stated by Chairman Bradley was made by Mr. Haller and seconded by Mr. Nielsen. A vote was 21 taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 22 AYES: Bradley, Haller, Leister, Nielsen, Ritter 23 NAYS: None 24 25 *** 26 27 Respectfully submitted, 28 Antionette Johnson 29 Recording Secretary Page 327 of 371  ATTACHMENT 3 Minutes adopted 3-25-2026 1 WINNETKA PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES EXCERPT 2 FEBRUARY 25, 2026 3 4 Members Present: Layla Danley, Chairperson 5 Matthew Bradley 6 Mamie Case 7 Chris Enck 8 King Poor 9 Cyrus Subawalla 10 Kate Van Vlack 11 12 Members Absent: Jonathan Alt 13 Christopher Blum 14 15 Non-Voting Members Present: Bridget Orsic 16 17 Village Staff: Scott Mangum, Community Development Director 18 Ann Klaassen, Assistant Director of Community 19 Development 20 21 Village Attorney: Peter Friedman 22 23 *** 24 25 New Applications: 26 a. Case No. 25-24-SU: Winnetka Congregational Church - 725 Pine Street: An application seeking 27 approval of a Special Use Permit to allow a childcare center to operate in the existing church. The Village 28 Council has final jurisdiction on this request. 29 Ms. Klaassen summarized the request to lease space in the existing church building to operate a childcare 30 center with the applicant seeking a recommendation of approval of an amendment to a special use permit 31 which she described to the Commission. She identified the property’s location, zoning classification and 32 the limited amount of additional uses allowed in addition to single family residential uses. Ms. Klaassen 33 stated the Comprehensive Plan designated the property as appropriate for uses she identified and that 34 the applicant’s use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation and R-2 zoning. She 35 then referred to site illustrations and outlined the number of employees and hours of operation and noted 36 there are no plans for expansion. Ms. Klaassen stated if in the future, the applicant decided to add a 37 playground, they would have to request special use approval. She stated the applicant received 38 preliminary approval from the DCFS in order to move forward which is contingent upon minor facility 39 modifications and Village approval. 40 41 Ms. Klaassen described plans for employee parking with the applicant having provided a traffic study and 42 noted the Village Engineer offered recommendations on the application which she described for the 43 Commission. She stated the ZBA would consider the request at a special meeting on March 16 and 44 referred to the standards they are to consider. Ms. Klaassen then stated following the applicant’s 45 presentation, public comment and Commission discussion, the Commission may decide to either continue 46 the matter to a date certain to allow time to address questions or comments or recommend approval or 47 denial with draft language for a motion provided in the packet. She noted additional correspondence was 48 received and provided to the Commission. Ms. Klaassen then asked if there were any questions. Page 328 of 371  February 25, 2026 Page 2 1 Chairperson Danley also asked if there were any questions. Ms. Van Vlack asked if the playground 2 discussion had been tabled. Ms. Klaassen responded the applicant is not currently proposing a playground. 3 Mr. Subawalla asked how many church members and employees there are. Ms. Klaassen responded the 4 applicant can answer that question. Ms. Van Vlack asked if the Commission is to consider timely drop-off 5 plans. Chairperson Danley responded that could be part of their consideration. 6 7 Chairperson Danley swore in those speaking to this matter. 8 9 Amy Falkowski, Winnetka Congregational Church Director of Operations, introduced Pastor Paulo Franca, 10 Julie McConnell, Chair of Congregation, Christie Sullenberger, committee member, Dan Brinkman of 11 Gewalt Hamilton Associates and Victor Cuebas of Jumpstart Early Learning Services. Ms. Falkowski 12 summarized the church’s history in the community and stated they discussed their proposed plans with 13 neighbors whose only concern related to traffic. She stated the traffic study resulted in little to no traffic 14 in the neighborhood. 15 16 Ms. Falkowski referred to the space which would be renovated and described their collaboration with 17 Jumpstart which would result in resolving the community’s need for additional childcare. She also 18 summarized the capacity which would increase incrementally. Ms. Falkowski then referred to illustrations 19 and identified drop-off and pickup locations. She stated with regard to the traffic study, since it would be 20 a daycare and not a school, she described the traffic pattern and their willingness to resolve any issues 21 that may arise. Ms. Falkowski referred to an illustration of the long driveway and described the process 22 as having a smooth transition. She informed the Commission they have coordinated their approval with 23 DCFS and confirmed there would be no footprint expansion. Ms. Falkowski concluded by describing how 24 the request would be beneficial for the community. 25 26 Chairperson Danley referred to Slide 16 which contained the parking lot outline and asked for the specific 27 family directive in terms of a specific traffic pattern. Ms. Falkowski described the entrance and exit 28 through the parking lot circle. Mr. Subawalla asked how many church employees would come to the 29 building during school days. Ms. Falkowski provided the staffing schedule for the Commission. Mr. 30 Subawalla asked if the property entrance is within 150 feet of Pine, Prospect and Lincoln. Ms. Falkowski 31 responded it is less than 150 feet. 32 33 Mr. Poor referred to the Village Engineer’s comments relating to the need for ongoing modifications or 34 monitoring how it would work and asked if they would be open to considering meeting with the Village 35 Engineer or neighbors after a few months of operation to determine its effectiveness. Ms. Falkowski 36 confirmed they would. Mr. Cuebas described their operations in terms of volume for their other two 37 locations which operate under a staggered start and release time. He also stated they do not have a 38 playground onsite and described how outdoor time is utilized. 39 40 Mr. Bradley asked if the capacity is set by code. Ms. Falkowski confirmed that is correct. Mr. Cuebas 41 informed the Commission the 64 figure for maximum capacity was derived by ratio and class size. He also 42 described the classroom makeup in terms of the children’s ages as well as the pickup times and staff 43 accommodation times for the rush periods. Mr. Cuebas then provided background check and liability 44 insurance information for their staff. Chairperson Danley asked if there is a structured curriculum. Mr. 45 Cuebas confirmed that is correct and described the curriculum to the Commission. Ms. Case asked how 46 infant drop-off is handled, which would impact traffic and parking. Mr. Cuebas described the drop-off 47 process, which varied on how families want it handled. 48 Page 329 of 371  February 25, 2026 Page 3 1 Mr. Enck referred to the Harkness House, which had limited daycare options and asked if they discussed 2 with them or the Winnetka Community Nursery School in terms of need. Ms. Falkowski confirmed they 3 have and stated they would relieve pressure for families on the waiting list. She stated the model would 4 be similar to Jumpstart’s other locations. Mr. Cuebas provided further information with regard to 5 electronic sign in and sign out. Ms. Van Vlack stated while she understood the concerns raised with regard 6 to traffic and the fact that there is an off-street area for parents to utilize, a lot of consideration was 7 provided in that regard. She also asked how many homes were included in the 150 foot area in terms of 8 impact. Ms. Falkowski estimated 60 homes with their having received a response from only one family 9 which attended the open house. Mr. Bradley asked if the facility would be ADA compliant. Ms. Falkowski 10 informed the Commission there is an elevator and ADA bathrooms. She added that section of the building 11 is fully ADA compliant. No additional questions were raised at this time. 12 13 Chairperson Danley asked for public comment. She swore in those speaking to this matter. 14 15 Bob Forbes, 684 Pine Street, stated he is a 27 year resident and described the parking and traffic situation 16 as well as the potential for accidents. He stated consideration needed to be given during peak times. Mr. 17 Forbes also referred to the Pine and Maple intersection and stated with the new commercial use, there 18 would be more traffic. He stated the One Winnetka development would also add more traffic in the area. 19 20 Beckley Maggio, a Winnetka resident and Harkness House president, stated they have had several 21 conversations with the church with regard to the child care need. She agreed there is no formal drop-off 22 with day care uses and stated she is concerned with regard to the student/teacher ratio and the possible 23 violation of DCFS regulations. Ms. Middleton stated the entire facility would need to be secure during its 24 hours of operation. She also questioned the time the traffic study was conducted and stated the parking 25 and traffic concerns should not be taken lightly. Ms. Middleton concluded by stating while there is a need 26 for additional child care options, she is concerned with regard to safety of students in connection with 27 parking and the lack of an outside playground facility. 28 29 Julie McConnell, Chair of Winnetka Congregational Church, described their visioning process which 30 included being a bigger part of the community and the need expressed for day care facilities by neighbors. 31 She stated there would be no footprint change and minimal interior changes. No additional comments 32 were made at this time. 33 34 Chairperson Danley closed public comment and asked the applicant if they would like to respond. 35 36 Ms. Falkowski stated in response to Harkness House comments, they have approval by DCFS and there 37 are no issues with regard to security and children/teacher ratios. She stated with regard to traffic and 38 parking; they are willing to work to make changes after they begin operations if issues arise and it is their 39 intent to not be a neighborhood nuisance. Mr. Bradley referred to the pickup and drop-off pattern and 40 asked if it would create concerns in connection with DCFS ratios. Mr. Cuebas confirmed that was part of 41 their approval process. Chairperson Danley referred to commercial truck traffic. Mr. Cuebas explained 42 how the food van caterer would drop off food early in the morning. Mr. Subawalla questioned the right- 43 of-way width at Pine and Prospect. Dan Brinkman stated he did not have that information and described 44 the process of how traffic counts were taken and observations and the traffic study being done on a 45 Thursday in December. Mr. Poor referred to the comments raised with regard to the effect of One 46 Winnetka on traffic. Mr. Brinkman explained the process which took into account growth and five year 47 projections. Mr. Poor questioned whether traffic signs would be utilized similar to those used in school 48 zones. Mr. Brinkman explained the difficulty of school zone signage utilization and stated he is not aware Page 330 of 371  February 25, 2026 Page 4 1 of the requirement for such a commercial use. Ms. Klaassen stated they could look into what would be 2 required to install such signage. Ms. Van Vlack commented on the safety issues and parking in the area. 3 No comments were made at this time. 4 5 Chairperson Danley called the matter in for discussion. Trustee Orsic stated with parking and traffic being 6 the biggest concern, she referred to a preschool in a church in the city which was able to work out issues. 7 She also stated neighborhood parents would walk and there would be varied hours with staggered 8 amounts of traffic. Trustee Orsic agreed with Mr. Poor’s suggestion to ensure any issues be discussed and 9 resolved. Mr. Poor commented the presentation was thoughtful and agreed there are traffic concerns 10 which he indicated are manageable. He stated the church is agreeable to manage any issues with 11 monitoring of the situation over the first several months which he would suggest as a condition. Mr. Poor 12 added signage and speed limits should also be investigated. He concluded he would vote to recommend 13 approval with the modifications he suggested. Mr. Subawalla stated the request would be good for the 14 community and traffic should be done in a multi-directional flow. He also suggested limiting parking on 15 the Prospect side of the street and that there would be numerous vehicles onsite at any given time. Mr. 16 Subawalla concluded the proposal would be very valid for the community. 17 18 Ms. Case agreed with the proposal and the need for additional childcare opportunities for the community. 19 She stated she is very concerned with regard to the pickup/drop-off situation and agreed with the one 20 way traffic suggestion. Ms. Case referred to the amount of activity in the area and agreed conditions 21 should be placed on the recommendation. Mr. Enck referred to the difficulty in finding childcare in the 22 area and stated the proposal would be in line with the Comprehensive Plan and would be a benefit to the 23 community. He stated the other concerns raised are resolvable and agreed there are ways in which to 24 resolve any issues. Mr. Enck also referred to the amount of traffic at Harkness House and suggested 25 working with the Village Engineer and the Police Department with regard to Pine Street. 26 27 Ms. Van Vlack agreed with the comments made and stated it would be important to establish rules in 28 terms of traffic for those using the facility. She also stated there are many preschools set within 29 neighborhoods and referred to the amount of traffic on Sundays which was not mentioned in the traffic 30 study. Ms. Van Vlack then stated with the cell phone alert suggestion, she would encourage a system 31 utilizing more of an advanced warning system rather than encouraging cell phone use while driving. She 32 also stated turning around in driveways should be prohibited. Ms. Van Vlack concluded there is a need for 33 child care options and agreed the proposal would represent a great use of the unused space. Trustee Orsic 34 agreed with Ms. Van Vlack’s comments with regard to cell phone use and referred to geo tracking, which 35 they would be using. Mr. Bradley referred to the roundabout as a unique solution that other day care 36 schools do not have to alleviate congestion and agreed with the conditions suggested which would be 37 difficult to enforce. He suggested exploring starting with a lower child count to ensure a smooth traffic 38 flow as opposed to having 64 children initially. Chairperson Danley agreed with the comments made and 39 agreed there is a community need with the main concern relating to traffic with specific issues she 40 identified. She then stated she did not agree that streets need to be turned into one way direction and 41 she would suggest the condition of having a defined traffic plan submitted with the application to direct 42 parents in terms of the pickup and drop-off function. 43 44 Chairperson Danley then asked for a motion and referred to page no. 407 with the condition as stated. 45 Mr. Poor moved to recommend approval of the request based on the Commission Members’ collective 46 comments. He stated a condition for approval should be a requirement of a traffic flow and parking plan 47 reviewed and approved by the Village Engineer and the Police Chief to be made to the Village Council. Mr. 48 Poor also stated a condition of approval would be the benefit of having a monitoring function of one, two Page 331 of 371  February 25, 2026 Page 5 1 or three months with the Village Engineer, Police Department and neighbors to ensure any issues are 2 resolved. He stated the issue of signage should be taken up with Public Works. Chairperson Danley asked 3 Mr. Friedman if there is a way to include the parking and traffic plan condition as a recommendation of 4 approval. Mr. Friedman confirmed it has been done before in terms of a specific review period with Village 5 monitoring being done to ensure compliance. 6 7 Mr. Poor moved to recommend approval of the request conditioned upon a traffic flow plan prepared by 8 the church, and approved by the Village Engineer and Police Department, that would be included in any 9 presentation made to the Village Council. Ms. Case seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion 10 unanimously passed, 6 to 0: 11 AYES: Case, Danley, Enck, Poor, Subawalla, Van Vlack 12 NAYS: None 13 NON-VOTING: Bradley, Orsic 14 15 *** 16 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 19 Antionette Johnson 20 Recording Secretary Page 332 of 371  ATTACHMENT 4 From: Amy Falkowski To: James Bernahl; Brian O"Connell; Scott Mangum Cc: Ann Klaassen Subject: Traffic Flow WCC & Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:47:20 PM Attachments: Outlook-ddjro4ua.png Parking and Traffic Flow WCC.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ​ Movie A.mov​ Illustrative Drone Video Provided by Applicant to Demonstrate traffic flow Dear James, Brian, Scott and Ann, Please see the attached Parking & Traffic Flow document we prepared in response to the Planning Council meeting on February 25th. The document includes some planned signs we intend to install and use, as well as our own facility usage throughout the week, and staff schedules. I've also attached a drone movie of traffic moving in/out of the driveway and around the circle to show how vehicles can flow around each other, even with obstacles in the way. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if you are unable to open any documents. Sincere thanks for your time and dedication to this project and request for a special-use- permit, Amy Amy Dane Falkowski Executive Director of Operations Winnetka Congregational Church 725 Pine Street Winnetka, IL 60093 amy@winnetkacongregationalchurch.org 847-999-9403 Page 333 of 371 April 15, 2026 Scott Magnum Jim Bernahl Brian O’Connell C: Ann Klassen RE: Case No. 25-24SU - Winnetka Congregational Church - 725 Pine Street Thank you for the opportunity to meet regarding Winnetka Congregational Church’s (WCC) application for a special-use-permit to lease space within our building to a childcare provider. This memorandum is intended to document our discussion and to provide a detailed traffic flow and parking plan responsive to the questions and concerns raised by Village leadership and staff. As you know, the application has been reviewed and approved by both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals, with a request that WCC provide a more detailed operational plan addressing traffic circulation, parking, and site management prior to consideration by the Village Council. This submission is intended to fulfill that request. As a baseline, the professionally completed Traffic Impact Study indicated the following: · Operation: Daycare facilities tend to have more spread out arrival and departure times than typical schools experience with drop-off and pick-up occurring generally within a two-hour window. · Parking: the ITE projected demand for a Daycare Center of similar 64 attendants are 16 spaces. The site currently provides more than adequate parking spaces of 25. On street parking along Pine Street is also available for the daycare. It is estimated that the daycare program will have 11 full-time staff. · Traffic capacity: The capacity analysis results indicate, with all Level of Service variables at the A level, that the increase in project site-generated traffic has little to no effect upon the Peak Hour operations of the area roadway network. The proposed daycare use will generate approximately 51 trips during peak hours and will not adversely impact the surrounding roadway network, with all studied intersections continuing to operate at Level of Service A. The study recommendations were: • The location of the only full movement church access will be located approximately 125 feet northeast of the Prospect Avenue & Pine Street intersection. • Traffic operations will remain the same as existing for the intersections within this study. Page 334 of 371  • To facilitate vehicles entering and exiting the church driveway, consider restricting parking on Prospect between the church driveway and Lincoln Avenue. • As proposed, the church should plan for daycare staff to assist with the drop-off and pick-up operations to help ensure orderly traffic flow on-site. The first recommendation, restricting parking on Prospect between the church driveway and Lincoln Avenue is a Village decision. The second recommendation, planning for staff to assist with drop-off and pick-up operations is already part of our potential lessee’s processes at two other facilities and would be replicated at WCC. The attached traffic flow and parking plan, based on the findings of a professional study, is intended to address the concerns you raised regarding the need for established procedures for daycare users as part of the SUP application process. The provider has incorporated your requests by outlining traffic flow and parking arrangements for the daycare center’s regular operations, as well as considerations for weather conditions and potential technology impacts. Currently, between the two centers JumpStart has in operation, 98/128 families (76%) use the geo tracking feature. The rest of the families utilize the scan QR code feature located on staff lanyards to check in/out their children. Both features are done curbside. About 29 percent of their families have one or more children enrolled (37/128). You asked about the families on the waiting list and where they might be coming from and we can report that there are six families on the provider’s waiting list, all from New Trier Township. We anticipate most, if not all, will come from the township as that is where there is so much need. In conclusion, the Traffic Impact Study demonstrates that the proposed daycare use will not materially impact roadway capacity or operations in the surrounding area. The detailed operational plan provided herein builds upon those findings by ensuring that all vehicle circulation, queuing, and parking activity is contained on-site and actively managed. With these procedures in place, we believe the proposed use will operate safely, efficiently, and in a manner consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. We respectfully request that Village staff endorse this Traffic Flow and Parking Plan so that the Special-Use-Permit application may proceed to the Village Council for their consideration. Kind regards, Jeanne Ebersole Christy Shellenbarger Amy Falkowski Space Committee Winnetka Congregational Church Page 335 of 371 Victor Cuevas JumpStart Early Learning Page 336 of 371 Case No. 25-24SU - Winnetka Congregational Church - 725 Pine Street 1. Traffic Flow and Parking Plan a. Regular Operations Hours of Operation The daycare will operate Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Peak Activity Windows ● Morning drop-off: 7:00 – 9:00 AM (peak approximately 8:00 – 9:00 AM) ● Afternoon pick-up: 3:30 – 5:30 PM (peak approximately 3:30 – 4:30 PM) On-Site Circulation Vehicles will enter and exit the site via the existing full-access driveway on Prospect Avenue. Internal circulation will function as a continuous loop, allowing vehicles to move in a forward direction through the site without reversing movements in active loading areas. This design minimizes conflict points and supports steady vehicle throughput. (See Movie A). Drop-Off and Pick-Up Operations ● A designated curbside loading zone will be established along the circular drive. (See Appendix A). ● The internal drive accommodates approximately 15 vehicles at one time, with an additional 5 short-term overflow spaces available adjacent to the building. (See Appendix A). ● This provides a total on-site stacking capacity of approximately 20 vehicles, ensuring that queuing remains internal to the site and does not extend onto Prospect Avenue. Staff Management Staff will be present outside during peak periods to: ● Direct vehicles through the circulation loop ● Assist children entering and exiting vehicles ● Maintain continuous vehicle movement This approach reflects established procedures successfully used by the operator at other locations and directly addresses recommendations in the Traffic Impact Study. Parking Allocation ● Total on-site parking: 24 spaces (20 standard, 4 ADA) Page 337 of 371  ● Designated weekday allocation: ○ Daycare staff: approximately 11 spaces ○ Church staff: approximately 7 spaces ○ ADA spaces: unchanged ○ Short-term drop-off/pick-up: 5 dedicated spaces during peak periods During peak drop-off and pick-up windows (7:00–10:00 AM and 3:00–6:00 PM), the 5 spaces nearest the entrance will be reserved exclusively for short-term family use. (See Appendix A). Use of Technology The daycare operator utilizes a geo-tracking application that alerts staff when families are approaching. This allows children to be prepared in advance and reduces dwell time at the curb, improving turnover and minimizing queuing. For families who are not comfortable allowing the app to geo-track them, staff assisting children will have a lanyard with a QR code to help support a timely hand-off. Overflow Management If short-term parking is needed, families may utilize the designated overflow spaces or briefly park with hazard lights activated for quick transitions. At no time will parking or queuing be permitted on Prospect Avenue. From an operations standpoint: ● Typical efficient drop-off time: ~1–3 minutes per vehicle ● With staff-assisted programs like ours this is often closer to ~60–90 seconds Childcare industry guidance consistently emphasizes brief and efficient drop-off transitions, typically lasting only a few minutes per vehicle, with best practices encouraging prompt handoff to staff to minimize separation anxiety and maintain flow. When combined with staff-assisted loading procedures, this results in an average vehicle dwell time of approximately 1–3 minutes, supporting continuous movement through the site and preventing queue accumulation. Drop-Off Duration and Vehicle Throughput Childcare industry guidance consistently emphasizes brief and efficient drop-off transitions, typically lasting only a few minutes per vehicle, with best practices encouraging prompt handoff to staff to support children and maintain traffic flow. When supported by staff-assisted loading procedures, as proposed for this site, average vehicle dwell times are typically in the range of approximately 1–3 minutes. This allows for continuous vehicle movement through the site and minimizes the potential for queue formation. In addition, daycare arrival patterns are inherently distributed over a broader window than traditional school uses. Industry norms indicate that arrivals occur over a 1–2-hour period, generally between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM, with peak clustering occurring within a narrower portion of that window. Page 338 of 371 Based on the Traffic Impact Study, the site is expected to experience approximately 51 vehicle trips during the peak hour. When distributed across a two-hour arrival window and combined with short dwell times and active staff management, the internal circulation system can accommodate this demand while maintaining continuous flow and preventing queueing onto Prospect Avenue. The available on-site stacking capacity of approximately 20 vehicles further supports this conclusion, ensuring that all vehicle activity can be contained within the site even under peak conditions. The circular driveway and parking lot are sufficiently large and wide to allow even the largest vehicles to pass one another safely as they enter and exit. This design helps prevent bottlenecks and reduces the potential for congestion within the driveway. b. Weather-Impacted Operations WCC maintains a formal snow and inclement weather management program: ● Snow removal is completed prior to morning operations and maintained throughout the day ● Walkways are cleared, salted, and kept accessible ● Snow storage is managed to ensure that the full width of the circulation drive and stacking lane remains available ● During snow events occurring throughout the day, the provider will work closely with WCC to follow established safety protocols. WCC closures align with those of New Trier Township, and the provider will coordinate with WCC to remain informed of all Township communications as conditions evolve. This ensures that traffic flow and pedestrian safety are maintained under all weather conditions. c. Technology Outage Procedures In the event of a temporary technology outage: ● Staff will revert to manual check-in/out procedures ● Additional staff (Executive Director, Owner) will be assigned to manage curbside operations ● Vehicles will continue to be processed through the loop in a controlled manner This redundancy ensures continuity of safe and efficient operations. Page 339 of 371 2. Additional Operational Considerations a. Shared Parking Plan WCC weekday programming will be intentionally structured to avoid overlap with daycare peak traffic periods: ● Regular weekday church programming occurs outside of drop-off and pick-up windows or has minimal attendance (Appendix B) ● Staff arrival times are generally staggered and limited in number (Appendix C) Importantly, the Thursday morning AA meeting will remain on-site; however, it occurs outside of peak daycare drop-off and pick-up periods and therefore does not create a traffic or parking conflict. Where necessary, church staff can utilize on-street parking along Pine Street, further reducing demand within the lot during peak daycare periods. b. Facility Access and Traffic Distribution Most of the site traffic is anticipated to approach from the west via Lincoln Avenue, consistent with the Traffic Impact Study findings. This distribution helps limit traffic impacts on residential streets and supports efficient ingress and egress from the site. Visitors, vendors, and deliveries are directed to use the Pine Street entrance during daytime hours, which reduces congestion at the Prospect Avenue driveway and separates service traffic from daycare operations. c. Deliveries and Service Vehicles Deliveries, including catering, are scheduled outside of peak drop-off and pick-up periods whenever possible and are directed to the Pine Street entrance. This ensures that service vehicles do not interfere with parent circulation patterns. d. Safety Measures The plan incorporates several safety-focused elements: ● Clearly defined pedestrian pathways from parking areas to building entrances ● Separation of pedestrian and vehicle movements where feasible ● Staff-assisted loading and unloading of children Page 340 of 371  ● Maintenance of clear sightlines throughout the circulation loop Crash data for the surrounding intersections indicates an extremely low incident history, with no pedestrian or bicycle crashes reported in the study area. e. Monitoring and Adjustment WCC and the daycare operator are committed to ongoing monitoring of traffic and parking operations as the program is implemented. Adjustments to staffing, circulation, or scheduling will be made as necessary to ensure continued safe and efficient operation. Page 341 of 371  Parent Traffic Flow/Parking Procedure Arrival/Dismissal: • Vehicles shall enter and exit the site via the driveway on Prospect Avenue. Pull as far forward as possible. Designated staff will assist in checking in and out your child curbside. Please remain in your care unless directed • We ask all parents/guardians to use the Procare geo-tracking feature on the app. https://www.procaresupport.com/procare-online/docs/sign-in-out-options • Check-in/out can also be done by scanning the QR code located on staff member’s lanyards. • Curbside Express services will take place from 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM and 3:30 PM - 5:30 PM • Designated parking spots will be available for parents/guardians who need to enter the center. • We kindly ask parents/guardians be respectful to our neighbors and NOT use their driveways to turn their vehicles around. Page 342 of 371 Page 343 of 371 Page 344 of 371 Page 345 of 371 Winnetka Congregational Church Weekly Programming (September–May) Door Usage, Weather Policies & Parking Lot Plan Sundays • 8:30–10:00 AM: Spiritual Enrichment • 10:00–11:00 AM: Worship Service • 11:00–11:30 AM: Fellowship • 11:00–11:30 AM: Happy Half Hour (Youth Programming) Impact on Daycare: None Mondays • 12:30–1:30 PM: Knitting Group (current; may not continue) o Entrance: Centennial Door (south of Sanctuary) o Attendance: 5–6 people Impact on Daycare: None- Drop-off/pickup would already be complete Tuesdays • 1:00–2:00 PM: Bell Choir o Entrance: Pine Street Door o Attendance: 8–10 people • 2:00–3:00 PM: Bible Study o Entrance: Centennial Door o Attendance: 8–10 people • 7:00–8:30 PM (monthly): Council Meeting o Entrance: Helms Door (parking lot) or Centennial Door o Attendance: ~17 people Impact on Daycare: None- Drop-off/pickup would already be complete Wednesdays • No scheduled programming- only internal staff meetings Impact on Daycare: None- Page 346 of 371 Thursdays • 9:00–10:00 AM: AA Meeting o Parking: Relocated offsite to avoid traffic conflicts o On-site parking limited to 1 space (group leader only) o Entrance: Pine Street Door (relocated from Helms Door) • 7:00–8:30 PM: Choir Rehearsal o Entrance: Helms Door o Attendance: Minimal Impact on Daycare: None - Drop-off/pickup would already be complete for Choir Rehearsal and Relocated for AA Fridays (3x per month) • 6:00–8:00 PM: First Friday / Spiritual Life Group / Men’s Fellowship o Attendance: 10–30 people o Entrances: § Centennial Door (First Friday & Spiritual Life Group) § Pine Street Door (Men’s Fellowship; relocated from Helms) Impact on Daycare: None- All end of the day events would be relocated to avoid the parking lot entrances other than handicap spaces. Building Access & Visitor Flow • Business Office, Pastoral Offices, and Reception are located at 725 Pine Street • Primary daytime entrance (9:00 AM–3:00 PM): Pine Street only • Helms (parking lot) door always remains locked • All visitors, vendors, and deliveries are directed to Pine Street • Vendors/maintenance typically arrive before 8:00 AM (often as early as 6:00 AM) Traffic Management Strategy: • Directing visitors to Pine Street reduces congestion at Prospect Avenue and the parking lot • Congregants are already accustomed to Pine Street access • Planned installation of a directional sign at driveway entrance reinforcing this flow Page 347 of 371 Inclement Weather & Snow Removal • WCC maintains a formal inclement weather policy (attached) • Contracted with Witt & Son Snow Removal o Snow cleared before business hours o Additional clearing performed throughout the day as needed o Walkways shoveled and salted o Snow relocated if it impacts parking capacity • Safety Record: Zero reported vehicle or pedestrian incidents due to weather conditions Parking Lot Allocation • Total Spaces: 24 o 20 Standard Spaces o 4 Handicap Spaces Reserved Parking: • 3 spaces: WCC o 2 Pastors o 1 Rummage Truck • 11 spaces: JumpStart Staff • 5 spaces: Guest / Drop-off / Pick-up Overflow (near Helms Door) • 4 spaces: Handicap (remaining unchanged) Drop-Off & Pick-Up Planning • 15 cars can fit within the circular drive at one time • 5 cars can fit into overflow spaces at one time • If 15 cars have 2 children each that would be 30 children being dropped off at one time, nearly half of full capacity and there wouldn’t even be backup traffic onto Prospect. • Based on evidence from JS1 &JS2, 29% families may include multiple children, resulting in 19 vehicles with more than one child at drop-off/pick-up reducing the number of vehicles from 64-45. • Peak Drop-Off Times: 8:00am-9:00am • Peak Pick-Up Times: 3:30pm-4:30pm • Geo-Tracking App Usage at other facilities: o 76% of families Page 348 of 371 Short-Term Parking for Families • 5 dedicated overflow spaces reserved during: o 7:00–10:00 AM (drop-off) o 3:00–6:00 PM (pick-up) • Located closest to building entry, adjacent to handicap spaces • No WCC staff parking permitted in these spaces during peak times Additional Flexibility: • Families may temporarily park with flashers if needed to enter briefly (there is enough passing space in the circle for cars to pull around). • WCC staff arrival times (8:30–9:00 AM) minimize overlap- most staff park on Pine Street • Maintenance staff do not utilize parking lot (public transit/bike year-round) Page 349 of 371 Winnetka Congregational Church Staff Schedule & Parking Sunday (End times may vary based on holidays or special programming) • Senior Pastor: 9:30 AM – 11:30 AM • Associate Pastor: 9:30 AM – 11:30 AM • Executive Director of Operations: 8:30 AM – 12:00 PM • Publisher: 8:00 AM – 12:00 PM • Director of Music: 8:00 AM – 11:30 AM • Director of Youth Ministries: 8:00 AM – 11:30 AM (September–May) • Organist: 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM (September–May) • Maintenance: 8:00 AM – 12:00 PM Monday (Pastors’ start times are flexible) • Senior Pastor: ~10:00 AM – 3:00 PM (Helms) • Associate Pastor: ~10:00 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Executive Director of Operations: 8:30 AM – 3:30 PM (Helms) Tuesday • Senior Pastor: ~10:00 AM – 3:00 PM (Helms) • Associate Pastor: ~10:00 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Executive Director of Operations: 8:30 AM – 3:30 PM (Helms) • Publisher: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Front Desk Staff: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Maintenance: 8:00 AM – 3:00 PM (N/A) Wednesday • Senior Pastor: ~10:00 AM – 3:00 PM (Helms) • Associate Pastor: ~10:00 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Executive Director of Operations: 8:30 AM – 3:30 PM (Helms) • Publisher: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Front Desk Staff: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Maintenance: 8:00 AM – 3:00 PM (N/A) • Director of Music: 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM (Pine) • Director of Youth Ministries: 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM (September–May) (Pine) Page 350 of 371 Thursday • Associate Pastor: ~10:00 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Executive Director of Operations: 8:30 AM – 3:30 PM (Helms) • Publisher: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Front Desk Staff: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Maintenance: 8:00 AM – 3:00 PM (N/A) • Director of Music: 6:30 PM – 8:30 PM (September–May )(Pine) • Organist: 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM (September–May) (Pine) Friday • Publisher: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Front Desk Staff: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM (Pine) • Maintenance: 8:00 AM – 3:00 PM (N/A) Saturday • Closed Page 351 of 371  Agenda Item Executive Summary TITLE: Village Hall Improvement Overview Presentation PRESENTER: Tom Powers AGENDA DATE: June 2, 2026 CONSENT: No ITEM TYPE: Old Business ITEM HISTORY: April 21, 2026 - Council approved a contract with Studio GC to prepare construction documents for improvements to Village Hall. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In 2024, the Village began a three-phase facility assessment of all Village-owned properties. The Village Hall portion of the assessment revealed critical improvements needed to the HVAC and fire alarm systems. Additionally, several regulatory and code compliance issues were identified with the ADA ramp, bathroom, and building's plumbing. In order to address the above, there would be significant operational impacts to the building. As such, there is value in performing proactive maintenance including concrete repair, floor repair, plumbing repairs, and interior space refurbishment while the building has areas closed off for construction. The Village subsequently budgeted to hire a design consultant and added a line item to the capital plan in the amount of $2,700,000 for FY27 construction if approved by Council.Staff and the Studio GC, the Village's consultant for the project, will present the project history, HVAC considerations, construction impacts, schematic budget and tax credit information. RECOMMENDATION: Council is asked to provide feedback on whether they concur with staff recommendation on the project scope for Village Hall HVAC transition, proactive maintenance, and ADA improvements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Village Hall HVAC Transition, Proactive Maintenance and ADA Improvements Page 352 of 371  0122345ÿ78ÿ91 5 3 ÿÿ  ÿÿ ÿ!ÿ "ÿ#ÿ$%&% '()*) +,-.ÿ'0ÿ')'( Page 353 of 371  /011234ÿ67ÿ80994:;2 6ÿ09 6ÿ86 8 0123ÿ 89ÿ78799ÿ687 8 6 6ÿ78ÿ67ÿ78878 !3 896 8ÿ79ÿ8ÿ67 89 "#$7 ÿ3 896 8ÿ%&ÿ '8(7)ÿ*86&ÿ57+ÿ369 ,#$ÿ-+ÿ#9 0123ÿ56789 8ÿ67ÿ78878ÿ78ÿ22ÿ689 . Page 354 of 371 1234567ÿ9 ÿ ÿ5675ÿ576ÿ   !"#"$ÿ&"'() [\]\ÿ RG0?:32S9D2G3ÿ I?3GY9D2G3ÿ 5Nb7ÿcU@D?Cÿ 930ÿI?@DG:9D2G3ÿ ^:GX?HDÿB20ÿ930ÿ 930ÿb0X9H?3Dÿ /0123ÿ56ÿ789:;ÿ I?CG0?823= T893ÿT:?T9:?0ÿ B20@ÿI?X?HD?0ÿ a9H282DUÿ I?T92:@ÿ <:2=2398ÿ>?@2=3 MUÿV9@ 0_?ÿDGÿB_0=?D b@@?@@C?3D 7G3@D:_HD2G3 *+A,ÿ *+JK ,PPQW,PP+ ,P**W,P*` ,P,A *+,-ÿ *+A- ,PPQÿ ,P*P ,P,KW,P,- ,P,Q B9@?C?3DEÿF2:@Dÿ I?CG0?823=ÿ930ÿ R9XG:ÿ N98_?ÿ 5Nb7cU@D?Cÿ F8GG:Eÿ@?HG30ÿ I?L9M282D9D2G3ÿ I?3GY9D2G3ÿ /3=23??:?0ÿ 930ÿb0X9H?3Dÿ F8GG: DGÿN2889=?ÿ598O >?@2=35ZI ^:GX?HDÿI?M20ÿ I?T92:@ÿ>?@2=3 930ÿ 7G3@D:_HD?0 deÿf!(ÿ"ghig('ÿ"f#!ÿf"("fj#ÿ &klmÿnoÿjÿp!"#"$ÿnoÿqÿ"ÿrstt 0 Page 355 of 371 1234567ÿ9 ÿ ÿ5675ÿ576ÿ  ÿ!"# $%&'( C4<T2I2BHÿFB;ÿ:4<T2I4ÿ 2::/4:ÿL4HFBÿ1>ÿ;4T40>3 ./012304ÿ6789ÿ:1/;24:ÿ CFBD>ÿI><3><F12>BÿFIK/2<4;ÿ Q4EÿOPPÿCFBD>ÿ7ORÿ6789ÿ RFI2021DÿF::4::?4B1ÿ 34<=><?4;@ÿ9A2004<ÿ:>0/12>Bÿ LDÿMFBF:>B2I :D:14?ÿ2B:1F04;ÿ <4I>??4B;:ÿ1A4ÿ 2;4B12=24; <430FI4?4B1ÿ>=ÿ1A4ÿ:D:14? )**- )*+* )*)* )*)U )**+,)**- )**J )*++,)*+) )*)S 6789ÿCD:14?ÿEF:ÿ4B;ÿ>=ÿ NM8ÿL4HFBÿ1>ÿ3AF:4ÿ>/1ÿ NM8ÿLFB:ÿ1A4ÿ:F04ÿ>=OPPÿ 720FH4ÿL/;H41:ÿ=><ÿ1A4ÿ 02=4ÿFB;ÿ14?34<F1/<4ÿG>B2BHÿ B4EÿOPPÿ:D:14?: 69R9ÿÿ<4=<2H4<FB1@ÿO4IDI04;ÿ 6789ÿ:D:14?ÿ<430FI4?4B1ÿ FB;ÿI>B1<>0ÿ2::/4:ÿE4<4ÿ /:4ÿF00>E4; ;4:2HB 2;4B12=24; #V''ÿW%%V%X Y ZZÿ'['$\']ÿ^]_`'$%ÿ%]a]$\ÿ$ÿ]ÿ%b'$c$\ÿ d]'c_ Y e](&ÿfV$gdÿ&ÿa&\'ÿ%Vgg&'hÿ^(ÿ̀]]%&$_ Y ga]dÿg]'%ÿ]'ÿV]i]$a]^a_ Y jb$$]%ÿk$bÿc&kah\ÿ&[ÿbe](&ÿ%(%dÿ]'ÿ']'_ Y l^%&aÿmV$ah$\ÿ"V&d]$&ÿe(%d_ 0 Page 356 of 371 0123ÿ56789 ÿ2 8ÿ9789 -./ÿ123ÿ43ÿ.3235 BCDEFGÿHIÿJ3CK1L3ÿMNEGNÿOJPÿ@Q,8(&ÿ99ÿ,,8"ÿ 67&%$8ÿ9+!ÿ &R:,+&ÿ(ÿ$!!9ÿ!ÿ+&&ÿ&Sÿ&T8&ÿ((U ,&%!:9;ÿ($&( 6<8!8ÿ+&$&ÿ BCDEFGÿVIÿW3FD.32X1KÿY$Z&%&ÿ:+$Z&(ÿ&&8;ÿ $!+,9&=;ÿ$&&ÿ &TT$&$;ÿ(ÿ9!8@&+ÿ$!ÿ%8ÿSZÿÿ[\]ÿ;&ÿ > ^!&T&9(ÿ9T&, 6ÿ?!8@&+ÿ &,9$&+&ÿ&8;ÿ BCDEFGÿ_Iÿ̀abEC3ÿP1GÿcFEKdÿYe&&TÿT!+ÿ+:9&!:ÿ ÿ&&(&( Z&8fÿ$!!98ÿ^:ÿ,&,&ÿT!ÿZ8Z&ÿ!:(ÿ9&%&9ÿ(ÿ $!+,9&=ÿ+&$&ÿ$!!9Uÿÿ8Z&ÿ&&8;ÿ!,&!9ÿ $!U gFD3IÿQ,8(&ÿ!ÿS&^@^&(ÿe7ÿ!ÿ&Z$&ÿ$!!9ÿ(ÿ +!!8ÿ!Tÿ99ÿÿ&9&+&ÿT!ÿ+,!%&(ÿ;&+ÿ +8&+&U ÿ!"ÿ#!$%&ÿ'&$&"ÿ(ÿ)ÿ*+,!%&+& A Page 357 of 371 0123ÿ56789 ÿ2 8ÿ9789 ./0 1234526789 :;<=>ÿ@A=> B CÿDÿE FG>H<;A<ÿIJ=>HKÿLA;=H @AMN;>;AMHNÿIOPQHÿIARMN S;THÿ@JQUH IR=>P;MPV;U;>J I;>Hÿ:;> SAMWÿXH<KÿY;=Z XA>PU= [\ []B ^_`aÿÿÿÿÿÿcdÿÿefgehijaÿiÿkelka`ÿminoa pÿÿqÿ*%&+&ÿrÿ&(ÿ$!(&! ÿ!"ÿ#!$%&ÿ'&$&"ÿ(ÿ)ÿ*+,!%&+& - Page 358 of 371 012345674812ÿ 743ÿ12ÿ1548123 ()*+ ,-. / 0 1,)*+ 23 4ÿ56 73 #556ÿ8ÿ"9 :3 ;6ÿ%& <3 =ÿ&>68ÿ & 5ÿ%& 3 >"ÿ3ÿ?955ÿ 59 @3 4ÿ A?5"ÿ5 >ÿ2ÿÿÿÿ>ÿ7ÿÿÿÿ>ÿ: ÿÿÿ! ÿ"ÿ#ÿ$%&%  ' Page 359 of 371 012345674812ÿ 743ÿ12ÿ1548123 #//-ÿ0ÿÿ*"& "ÿ&/1ÿ.23.4ÿ5 6 ()ÿ*ÿ&+%&ÿ " "ÿ,ÿ-"ÿ.& % ÿÿÿ! ÿ"ÿ#ÿ$%&%  ' Page 360 of 371 012345671ÿ9 6167ÿ36ÿ3353ÿ3ÿ5ÿ9376 4567 8 9: ;<=8567 >? ÿ*'#@%!1"&%'# A? B*'2,ÿ*'#@%!1"&%'# C? DEF%21,#&ÿ2!,G2F!*H"$,ÿ2"*I"J, K? )'&,#&%"LÿM'!,@%,L.2"*I"J, ÿ!"#$%&%'#(ÿ)!'"*&%+,ÿ-"%#&,#"#*,(ÿ"#.ÿ/ÿ012!'+,1,#&$ 3 Page 361 of 371 ÿ"#$$"ÿ"#"%&'%%(ÿ)"ÿ%&ÿ*%&&+ 8ÿ7 8ÿ ÿ./701283ÿ16ÿ4ÿ52ÿ76ÿ6 ÿ 3 4670ÿ9299ÿÿ06ÿ9/797870ÿ 868870ÿ78ÿ07ÿ78198 9:3817802ÿ6/9ÿ;0;ÿ99 89ÿ< =>?@AB0C6ÿ99 89ÿ478ÿ7ÿ379ÿ1/687D 9;676ÿ1182ÿ979ÿ8632ÿ?/99ÿ77 /ÿ @>B099ÿ8632ÿ788/7002ÿ4781990ÿ1/0ÿ1/687Eÿ 0 9ÿ7Fÿ78ÿ8ÿ4ÿ36ÿ/683ÿ0ÿ9879ÿ 6ÿ47ÿC79D 969ÿ8 6ÿ76ÿ./702ÿ?87/670ÿ379ÿ4783ÿ 9299ÿ602ÿ8ÿ 7/9 8ÿC44ÿ78ÿ6079ÿ 767 8ÿ 8 6ÿG3HIÿ78ÿ 46ÿ8 6ÿ76ÿ  00/789D 0123ÿ56789 8ÿ67ÿ78878ÿ78ÿ22ÿ689 ,- Page 362 of 371  012ÿ456789 86ÿ ÿ8ÿ5 QCRÿ9ÿS8ÿ56789 86ÿ ÿ8ÿ T9T 8U ÿ 98ÿ8ÿ ÿ56898ÿ 98ÿ8ÿÿ!"#$%ÿ&""$'()ÿ("ÿÿ$*"ÿ++,'()ÿ--&"$"% .*"ÿ!"#$ÿ#(%$/#$'(ÿ%$-$"0ÿ(ÿÿ1""ÿ2-(/-3ÿ45$*6ÿ4748 .*"ÿ(-&" +-$"ÿ#--#'$3ÿÿ$*"ÿ"(")3ÿ "$3ÿ'%ÿ968ÿ:;< .*"ÿ$$-+ÿ(%'$"ÿ+-1ÿ*/%ÿ#& +3ÿ,'$*ÿ#/"($ÿ=">-'+'()ÿ?-)"ÿ-(0ÿ@ "($'#"%*'ÿ "A/'"&"($% BÿCÿ:ÿC699ÿ8ÿÿ&""$'()ÿC 89ÿC686ÿ"A/'"&"($ @++ÿ%$/#$/-+ÿ%$""+ÿÿ'(ÿ/%"0ÿ&/%$ÿ1"ÿ0/#"0ÿ'(ÿD('$"0ÿE$-$"%Fÿ-(0 Gÿ!"#$%ÿ$*-$ÿ%$-$ÿ'(ÿ474HÿIH7Jÿÿ$*"ÿ&-(/-#$/"0ÿ#& ("($%ÿÿ$*"ÿ"(")3ÿ  "$3ÿ(""0ÿ$ÿ1"ÿ0/#"0ÿÿ&-(/-#$/"0ÿ0&"%$'#-++3 K$"ÿI$*"ÿ&-(/-#$/"0ÿ0&"%$'#ÿ#($"($ÿ"A/'"&"($%ÿ'(#"-%"ÿÿ!"#$%ÿ%$-$'()ÿ'(ÿ 474LÿIHLJ6ÿ474MÿIL7J6ÿ-(0ÿ474Nÿ-(0ÿ1"3(0ÿILLJ BÿCÿ:ÿC699ÿ8ÿÿ-ÿ!"#$ÿ+#-$"0ÿ'(ÿ-(ÿ868OPÿC 96P VÿXYXZÿ[\\][^_`abcdeÿf\\ÿg]`h_iÿgjijakjleÿmh]iÿdajij^_[_]b^ÿ]iÿnb^o]lj^_][\ÿ[^lÿdabda]j_[ap Page 363 of 371  012ÿ456789 86ÿ ÿ8ÿ5 88 ÿ66 ÿ568886868 5868!"8! # $%&'()*+&,-%./0$%&'1234/ # 5%66/01747,- # 8.&*9%'/0:;2,'7,-:%*+&,7/3/ # <&6=%/&,>$?>.;,7*1747,- # (6%*'.7*&657.7,-0@;,>27' # AB7'*+-%&.&,>1&,%6/ # @7.*27'/CAB7'*+%/ # :;,7';.7,-A;D'B&.%E@;,'.;6/F # G+%.3&6H,/26&'7;,D;.1.;I% # G2.I7,%/0J%,%.&';./ KÿMNMOÿPQQRPSTUVWXYZÿ[QQÿ\RU]T^ÿ\_^_V`_aZÿb]R^ÿYV_^_STPTRWSÿR^ÿcWSdRa_STRPQÿPSaÿYVWYVR_TPVe Page 364 of 371  )*1ÿ(+ÿ89987ÿ68 ' ÿ8ÿ(12342ÿ6789 ÿÿÿ  012342ÿ6789 ÿÿ77ÿ ÿÿ ÿ 7 0 ÿÿ7 ÿÿ 9899ÿ87ÿ7ÿÿ ÿÿÿ  0 !7ÿ899ÿ" 7ÿ ÿ 87ÿ#7 ÿ$ 0 ÿÿÿ 78ÿÿ77ÿ ÿÿ7 7ÿ  0 %897ÿ 78 7ÿÿ889ÿ  ÿ&7ÿ 068ÿÿÿ12342ÿ6789 0 ,9-7ÿÿ. ÿÿÿ7899/ÿ!7ÿ8 ÿ8  7ÿÿ" 7ÿÿ 87 0 0 7ÿ87ÿ%8& ÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿ &ÿÿÿ  0 8ÿ8ÿ9ÿÿÿ ÿÿ. 7ÿ1ÿ ÿÿÿÿ  ÿÿ8ÿ 9ÿ2 0 $ÿ 78 7ÿ1ÿ68ÿÿ89ÿ7ÿ8ÿ3ÿ ÿ3ÿ1ÿ  ÿ899ÿ 0 0 78 7ÿ7ÿ77 ÿ &ÿÿ 8. -7ÿÿ789ÿ88 89ÿÿÿ  ÿÿ3ÿ8777ÿ 99ÿ 8 4ÿ6768ÿ9::;9<=>?@ABCÿD::ÿE;>F=GÿEHGH?IHJCÿKF;GÿB?HGH<=9=;@<ÿ;GÿL@<M;JH<=;9:ÿ9<JÿB?@B?;H=9?N Page 365 of 371 01231245ÿ789ÿ013742ÿ7284878 &'()*+,ÿ.+(/*ÿ,(ÿ0*ÿ+(1.23*'*3ÿ34'215ÿ6789ÿ:';1.2,2(1< 9'2,2+;?ÿ&'2('2,@ÿA+(/* &'(;+,2W*X;21,*1;1+*ÿA+(/* BC"ÿ#$%$ BCYYÿ CDEÿ$% KC#ÿ%ÿ FCGHIJJÿ$ NCJVÿ%Jÿ%Zÿ#ÿ KCLÿJ$ÿM$ PCQJVÿMÿ!ÿ$ÿ%%V NCÿ% SCJOÿH CLÿ%ÿ!ÿ!HJO [CGHIJJÿUM PCQRÿJJ SCGTITMÿU%V! ÿÿÿ ÿ!ÿ"ÿ#$%$ => Page 366 of 371 01231245ÿ789ÿ013742ÿ7284878 ()*+,-)./ÿ12*/ ÿÿ ÿ!ÿ"ÿ#$%$ &' Page 367 of 371 012345671ÿ9 6167ÿ36 ,-./#ÿ'ÿ01%2#ÿÿ3,4-----ÿ ÿ56,4 7$18)8#ÿ!)#ÿ#(ÿ88ÿ 1%#ÿ%#"#8)(#ÿ%ÿ !ÿ!ÿ"/ÿ 29!8/ÿ9(ÿ!!#)ÿ 01%2# 7 ÿÿÿ!"#ÿ$#!#ÿ%ÿ&ÿ'()"#(# *+ Page 368 of 371 012345637ÿ93ÿ03 ()*+ , -./ 23 4%ÿ 0, )*1 53 67!89ÿ:ÿ!9ÿ8ÿ; ÿÿ ÿ!ÿ"ÿ#$%$ &' Page 369 of 371  '())*+,ÿ./ÿ0(11,23* 47ÿ587 8 6ÿ ÿÿÿ98ÿÿÿ 89ÿ8ÿ88ÿ 67ÿ 99 ÿ22ÿ689ÿ6ÿ776 ÿ78ÿ 978 9ÿ67ÿ78878ÿ9ÿ ÿ768ÿ ÿ !76ÿ3ÿÿ"ÿ 6# 8$ 0123ÿ56789 8ÿ67ÿ78878ÿ78ÿ22ÿ689 %& Page 370 of 371  "#$$%&'ÿ)*ÿ+#,,'-.% 999 8ÿ78ÿ3 8ÿ 6 8  9ÿ3 8ÿ86ÿ ÿ97ÿ 6 87 8ÿ8 6ÿ9ÿ6ÿ 17ÿ07ÿ0123ÿ56789 8ÿ67ÿ 78878ÿ78ÿ22ÿ689 0123ÿ56789 8ÿ67ÿ78878ÿ78ÿ22ÿ689 ! Page 371 of 371